Instruct: Classify a given Amazon review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: Starts out well, then crashes

There is indeed some impressive scholarship in this book, except where the author attempts to make sense of figures he has failed to study in depth, such as Aquinas, where the errors are numerous and elementary. Behind the project, of course, is an agenda, a familiar anti-Western polemic dressed up in good historical research and extremely clumsy philosophy.I notice that the publishers quote David Burrell's review in Nova et Vetera--funny, since that review was anything but positive in its final conclusions regarding this book.Bradshaw is a bad philosopher, but he gives his audience what they want. He will be praised extravagantly.