Instruct: Classify the given Amazon review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: this is not [w]holistic

The statement, "a must for people who love their cat", is a bit passive aggressive. There are narrow defitions of "holistic" and there are true ones. This falls into the homeopath[et]ic former: ideological. Unless i buy "remedies" (which have never worked on me) then the book has little use. Hey, don't get me wrong. If you define the "whole" in "holistic" as "partialistic", as in doubl;ethink, then this is a "whole" approach.There are few herbal, ionic mineralistic, enzymatic, vitaministic, food combinationalistic, et. al. modalities in this "whole", reminding me of the redefinition of "health" in ObamaScare as toxic "pharmaceuticalization".