Instruct: Classify a given Amazon review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: Preposterous Generalizations and Overstatements

Nice stories, good observations, simplistic exposés and bold statements... but dubious generalizations.This book fails to satisfy the very basic rules of logic. One can propose a generalization of a phenomenon based on unique observations and, depending upon which school of epistemology you belong to, either treat it as a hypothesis that must yet be proven, or adopt it as theory until it is proven wrong (i.e., falsified). But in either case, the existence of a counterexample will shatter the claim. If you are willing to read Rapaille's book from a critical thinking perspective, you will find a counterexample to his theories on almost every page.I totally endorse Publishers Weekly's review: "preposterous generalizations and overstatements".This does not discount the book's value as fantasy novel and "feel-good" reading.