Instruct: Classify a given review as either positive or negative.
Query: not a good stuff

although the purpose of the book is a good and extensive one, review the literature about supervenience in a cross field way (mind-body, ethics) and the different perspectives about the realism-anti-realism, most of the time what is achieved is a kind of impressionist and empty view of the debate where the main players are mentioned but not rightly debated. The chapter about ethics is especially weak and the model presented in the end of the first chapter seems more like a dream of what supervenience should be than what was proved to be.