Instruct: Classify a given Amazon review as either positive or negative.
Query: Lazy and unfounded basis

Appreciating an interesting but light read, I came to the following on page 40: "So boundaries - and the physical structures that constituted them... - were crucial. First, they held the animal's substance in, and the rest of the world out. Second, ... they formed a frontier... at which the outside world impacted the animal" This is a philosophical ethnocentrism, placing ones beliefs into an interpretation of what is viewed while presenting the material as if an objective viewpoint. He sneakily inserts the separate animal, an animal separate to us as we view and interpret it, but an animal that probably does not think at all, and just exists within its environment, not separate from it. The author separates the substance of the animal from the rest of the world - it is a viewpoint. The feebleness of this segment kept me from going further. What could follow from such an unfounded basis so lightly considered?