Instruct: Classify an Amazon review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: This book is in error, and not worth the price

It is rare for a book of such ambition to be exposed as mistaken, and in the very moment of its publication, but clearly Terrence Deacon (The Symbolic Species) has a much clearer understanding of how the mind works. I enjoyed Pinker's first book (The Language Instinct), but this time around he bit off much more than he could chew. I believe Deacon has exposed Chomsky, Minsky and Pinker as terribly mistaken people. In particular, Deacon's detailed and comprehensive refutation of Chomsky's LAD seems unanswerable to me -- Deacon points out that there is no way that evolution could have produced any generalized LAD, and Chomsky has always refused to discuss the topic. Throughout this book, Pinker makes fun of people with "antiquated ideas," and seems not to realize that his own dumb idea of "the brain as a computer" is now getting to be about fifty years old.