Instruct: Classify the given review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: Mediocre!

This may be great for a psychologist that has his or her first bisexual client, after serving only monosexuals.Too many anthologies are catch-as-catch-can. You can tell how certain chapters go off topic that the editors were desperate for any contributions they could get. Here, however, clearly the editor had chapter ideas in mind and found writers that could follow through.Still, this book had competing flaws. At times, it states things obvious about bisexual concerns. Then other chapters were far too theoretically-high-falutin'. I wanted to send the chapter on bisexual, African-American men to some buddies, but it was all jargon and no beef. It may help the author get tenure somewhere, but it's otherwise useless.Books on bisexuality like "Closer to Home" and "Bisexual Politics" are excellent. This book just does not compete.