Instruct: Classify a review as either positive or negative.
Query: More about what could have been than about what it was

The book is long and boring. It deals more with JFK style theories of what could have been, rather than what it really was. In the end, it falls short of its goal of debunking the resurrection accounts.I wish the editors would challenge William Lane Craig and Gary Habermas to an extended (3-day or more) debate on this subject. Until then, these theories are only that, plausible? yes, most of them. True? Not likely, given the evidence to the contrary.