Instruct: Classify a review as either positive or negative.
Query: Questionable and likely fraudulent scientific work

I have read two thirds of this tomb and it's a bearable read, sometimes even an enjoyable read due to the biting and caustic sarcasm used to describe "oppositionals" which basically describes anybody who does not agree with the authors point of view. However I have deep reservations about the authors scientific merits...it casts a pall over the authors authenticity. However with that said, he does cover some interesting ground. The idea of call reluctance being a multifaceted problem I believe is original and stimulating. My only concern is that the author is a hack pretending to be a scientist. However even if he is his work is not without merit. I found the ideas advanced thought provoking.