Instruct: Classify a given review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: Good blend of scope and detail

I was impressed by how much detail is known to science about the deep phylogenies Dawkins explains, and how well support it all is. I think working backwards as this presentation is structured is valid and unusually clear. The limits on the most distant relationships pale in comparison with the insights genetic and molecular methods have provided in tracing homologies and deep structures far into the past. Dawkins manages to include a great deal of information, in detail, into an entertaining read.My main complaint is the the sheer massive nonstep density of misspellings in the book made focusing on the narrative difficult, like being slapped in the face every few seconds. The book could have been significantly more readable with even minimal editing.