Instruct: Classify a given review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: Interesting hypothesis, but falls short

This book is an interesting read, but there is ABSOLUTELY no evidence to support their conclusion. This book belongs to the category "if we can't solve the crime, the parents did it".In addition, the book is repetitive and touches on a very small fraction of the evidence, in a very superficial way.I came away with the conclusion that the authors had an original idea, but were extremely lazy in developing it. Because there is no evidence to support their theory, it is nothing more than slander...but, then, the dead can't sue.