Instruct: Classify a review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: Extremely disappointing...

I plunked down $20 for this expecting a major upgrade. What I got instead:1. The quality in writing seems to have nose-dived. Rolling Stone seems to want to attract a younger audience so a lot of the reviews are just plain juvenile, written by what seems like high school kids. Compare the feature written on the Stones vs the one in the 1992 edition - no comparison. Note to the editors - good writing never goes out of style.2. Omissions galore! Some I've noticed:- Metallica (huh???)- Pete Townsend- Deep Purple- Queensryche- George Harrison- Scorpions (to be fair they weren't in the 92 edition)I'm sure there's more...either this was a monumental screw-up or they meant to leave these artists out. Either way, it doesn't bode well for the editors there!But that's ok, we got those bastions of rock, 98 degrees and Justin Timberlake!!! Whew!!!