Instruct: Classify the given Amazon review into positive or negative sentiment.
Query: History as Argument Without End

I BELIEVE "BARDOLATORS" SHOULD NOT CLOSE THEIR MINDS TO THE CONTINUING AUTHORSHIP QUESTION. THERE SEEMS TO BE AT LEAST ONE BOOK EACH YEAR WITH SERIOUS SCHOLARSHIP QUESTIONNING THE MAN FROM STRATFORD AS THE TRUE AUTHOR. FOR EXAMPLE, SEE "SHAKESPEARE BY ANOTHER NAME", BY MARK ANDERSON (2005); SHAKESPEARE'S UNORTHODOX BIOGRAPHY" BY DIANA PRICE (2001); AND "PLAYERS" BY BERTRAM FIELDS (2005) TO NAME SOME. THE LEADING CANDIDATE FOR NEARLY 100 YEARS HAS BEEN THE 17TH EARL OF OXFORD. MARK ANDERSON'S BIO OF THE EARL AS THE TRUE AUTHOR IS NIGH IRREFUTABLE. SEE ALSO MARK TWAIN'S ESSAY "IS SHAKESPEARE DEAD?" TWAIN, NO FOOL, WAS AN EARLY DOUBTER. I FIND TOO MANY OF THE ORTHODOX BIOS TO BE MORE ABOUT ELIZABETHAN SOCIETY THAN ABOUT VALIDATING THE TRUE AUTHOR. SEE E.G. STEPHEN GREENBLATT'S BIO.