Instruct: Classify a given Amazon review as either positive or negative.
Query: Waste of money

Reading this was the equivalent of reading a book report in high school - dull, overstuffed with adjectives, and rife with unfounded opinion.The contents of this self-published book were already posted on the author's blog during the trial. Dillon has interviewed no one actually connected to the case, except a sonar operator whose work was not even presented during the trial.She doesn't understand criminal law, and it's obvious in her writing that her 'legal review' is based only on a superficial reading of California criminal code. There are no informed insights here.The same goes for her armchair 'diagnosis' of Peterson's psychological pathology. Even worse, she manages to claim with a straight face that anyone who disagrees with her doesn't know what they're talking about.I really doubt that Catherine Crier, Nancy Grace, Rick Distaso, Jim Brazelton, and other major figures in the trial are all clueless just because Dillon says so.Verdict: Waste of money. Particularly at this price.