Instruct: Classify a review as either positive or negative.
Query: There are so many better books on type out there. . . .

This book is the worst: poorly designed, poor selection of work, poor reproductions. And it's not even about "big type". The intro says: "<em>Big Type</em> is not what it might seem. This book is a collection of design work in which the typographic elements assume primary importance." So the editors knew the title was misleading? Then why not change the title? Yuck.