Instruct: Classify the given Amazon review as either positive or negative.
Query: Worthless.

I am a research entomologist, specializing in urban pests, particularly cockroaches and termites. I ordered this title, thinking that it might be a reference that I had overlooked. I shouldn't have bothered. This looks like the barely formatted output from a literature search from one of the scientific databases with some primitive indexing on authors and key words. It includes 138 references published from 1991-1995, a small fraction of the relevant literature published during that period. Abstracts are not included. The indexes cover pages 21-106, the actual references pages 107-157. The only "text" has nothing to do with the alleged subject. The whole thing appears to be photocopied, single-sided, and mounted in a cheap plastic report binder. The length of this item is grossly inflated since it was printed in large type with wide margins.I would actually argue that this is not a book in the sense that most people would understand the term. Don't waste your time.