many alternatives to the standard model ( sm ) of particle physics have been proposed over the last thirty years . among these , supersymmetry ( susy ) , and particularly its minimal version dubbed the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) @xcite , is one of the most popular sm extensions .
it consists in a symmetry linking fields with opposite statistics , matching thus a bosonic ( fermionic ) superpartner with each fermionic ( bosonic ) sm degree of freedom . as a consequence ,
it predicts the stabilization of the gap between the electroweak and the planck scale , gauge coupling unification at high energies , and a lightest supersymmetric particle , which is weakly interacting and stable and thus a good dark matter candidate .
since the superpartners of the sm particles have not yet been observed and in order to remain a viable solution to the hierarchy problem , susy must be softly broken at low energy , which makes the susy particles massive , with a mass lying in the tev range
. therefore , susy searches at present hadron colliders , such as the tevatron at fermilab or the lhc at cern , are important topics of the current experimental high - energy physics program .    within the standard model ,
flavour violation in the quark sector arises only through the rotation of the up- and down - type quark interaction eigenstates into the basis of physical mass eigenstates .
four bi - unitary matrices are required to diagonalize the quark yukawa matrices , which renders the charged - current interactions proportional to the unitary ckm matrix @xmath0 . in the super - ckm basis @xcite
, the squark interaction eigenstates undergo the same rotations as their quark counterparts , so that their charged - current interactions are also proportional to the ckm matrix .
however , in non - minimal flavour - violating supersymmetric theories , the quark and squark fields can be misaligned due to additional sources of flavour violation which are related to the breaking of supersymmetry . as a consequence ,
this leads to flavour - violating ( non - diagonal ) entries in the squark mass matrices .    in recent works
, we have analysed the cases where such soft terms appear in ( non - minimal ) supergravity and gauge - mediated susy breaking scenarios @xcite . in the first case
, supersymmetry is broken in a hidden sector and transmitted to the visible sector of squarks , sleptons , gauginos and gluinos through gravitational interactions .
soft masses for sfermions are induced by direct khler interactions , which can in general be flavour non - diagonal @xcite . in the second case ,
the breaking of supersymmetry is mediated to the visible sector via gauge interactions with messenger fields in a flavour - conserving fashion @xcite .
however , it has recently been shown that non - minimal versions of the gauge - mediated susy - breaking mechanism can yield important flavour - violation in the squark and slepton sectors @xcite .    when susy is broken in a hidden sector
, the soft masses also receive contributions from quantum effects due to the superconformal anomaly @xcite . in this work ,
we therefore consider this so - called anomaly - mediated susy - breaking ( amsb ) scenario , where those anomaly - mediated effects are large compared to all other sources of susy - breaking , which are subdominant .
we extend our previous work on flavour violation @xcite by investigating possible non - minimal flavour violation within the amsb context .
this paper is organized as follows : in sec .
[ sec : model ] , we define anomaly - mediated supersymmetry breaking scenarios and show how non - minimal flavour violation can appear . in sec .
[ sec : scan ] we impose current experimental constraints on the flavour - violating amsb scenario and perform scans of the parameter space .
in addition , experimentally allowed benchmark points are defined .
cross sections for the production of at least one gluino are analytically and numerically computed in sec .
[ sec : xsec ] .
we dedicate sec .
[ sec : cosmo ] to an analysis of the possible cosmological constraints related to the presence of cold dark matter in our universe .
our conclusions are presented in sec.[sec : conclusion ] .
in amsb scenarios , the soft terms are related to the anomalous dimensions of the different fields and have the feature to be renormalization - group invariant @xcite . as a consequence ,
they are fully determined by the known low - energy gauge and yukawa couplings and an overall mass scale @xmath1 , the vacuum expectation value of the scalar auxiliary field of the gravitation supermultiplet .
this scale is expected to be of the order of the gravitino mass @xmath2 , and we assume in the following , to simplify , @xmath3 . consequently , the model is highly predictive , with fixed mass ratios and distinctive signatures @xcite . among all the predictions ,
one finds , however , tachyonic sleptons .
this problem must be cured in order to have a phenomenologically viable model .
several solutions have been proposed @xcite , and we adopt here the phenomenological approach of assuming non - negligible contributions to the scalar soft masses , induced , _
e.g. _ , by supergravity , which makes their square positive at the weak scale
. however , in this case , solving the tachyonic sfermion mass problem can also introduce non - minimal flavour violation in the theory , through possible non - diagonal flavour - violating soft mass terms .
the squark mass matrices are written , in the super - ckm basis , as m_^2 = (    ccc|ccc m^2_l_q_1 & ^q_1 q_2_ll & ^q_1 q_3_ll & m_q_1 x_q_1 & ^q_1 q_2_lr & ^q_1 q_3_lr + ^q_1 q_2_ll & m^2_l_q_2 & ^q_2 q_3_ll & ^q_1 q_2_rl & m_q_2 x_q_2 & ^q_2 q_3_lr + ^q_1 q_3_ll & ^q_2 q_3_ll & m^2_l_q_3 & ^q_1 q_3_rl & ^q_2 q_3_rl & m_q_3 x_q_3 + m_q_1 x_q_1^ & ^q_1 q_2_rl & ^q_1 q_3_rl & m^2_r_q_1 & ^q_1 q_2_rr & ^q_1 q_3_rr + ^q_1 q_2_lr & m_q_2 x_q_2^ & ^q_2 q_3_rl & ^q_1 q_2_rr & m^2_r_q_2 & ^q_2 q_3_rr + ^q_1 q_3_lr & ^q_2 q_3_lr & m_q_3 x_q_3^ & ^q_1 q_3_rr & ^q_2 q_3_rr & m^2_r_q_3    )  , where the flavour - diagonal elements are given by m_l_q_i^2 = &  m_q_i^2 + m_q_i^2 + 2 ^ 2 ( t_q^3 - e_q s_w^2 )  , + m_r_q_i^2 = &  m_u_i^2 + m_q_i^2 + 2 ^ 2 e_q ^2  , + m_r_q_i^2 = &  m_d_i^2 + m_q_i^2 + 2 ^ 2 e_q ^2  , + x_q_i = &  a_q_i^- \
{    l  , +  .    .
the weak isospin quantum numbers are @xmath4 for left - handed up - type and down - type ( s)quarks , their fractional electromagnetic charge is denoted by @xmath5 , and @xmath6 is the mass of the quark @xmath7 , @xmath8 being the flavour index , , @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath14 .
in addition , @xmath15 is the @xmath16-boson mass , and @xmath17 is the sine of the electroweak mixing angle .
the soft supersymmetry - breaking mass terms are @xmath18 and @xmath19 for the left - handed and right - handed squarks , while the quantities @xmath20 are the trilinear couplings between the higgs bosons and the scalar susy particles . in the higgs sector
, @xmath21 denotes the off - diagonal superpotential higgs mass parameter , and @xmath22 is the ratio of vacuum expectation values of the two higgs doublets . in our phenomenological approach ,
the off - diagonal parameters @xmath23 are arbitrary and can be normalized to the diagonal entries according to @xcite _ ab^q_i q_j = ^q_i q_j_ab m_q_i m_q_j  .
additional sources of quark flavour violation are then parameterized through the 21 dimensionless ( possibly complex ) new variables @xmath24 , since due to @xmath25 gauge invariance , the @xmath26 elements of the up- and down - type squark squared mass matrices are related to each other , [ eq : su2l ] m_,ll^2 = v_ckm m_,ll^2 v_ckm^  , as are the associated @xmath27-parameters .
this equation shows that both squark mass matrices can not be simultaneously diagonal ( without neglecting the ckm matrix ) .
the diagonalization of the mass matrices @xmath28 and @xmath29 requires the introduction of two @xmath30 matrices @xmath31 and @xmath32 , ( m_u_1 ^ 2 ,  ,
m_u_6 ^ 2 ) = r^u m_^2 r^u ( m_d_1 ^ 2 ,  , m_d_6 ^ 2 ) = r^d m_^2 r^d  , where by convention the masses are ordered increasingly , @xmath33 .
these mixing matrices relate the physical mass eigenbasis to the interaction eigenbasis through ( _ 1 , _ 2 , _ 3 , _ 4 , _ 5 , _ 6)^t = r^u ( _ l , _
r , _ r , _ r)^t ( _ 1 , _ 2 , _ 3 , _ 4 , _ 5 , _ 6)^t = r^d ( _ l , _
r , _ r , _
r)^t  .
recently , it has been shown that ( minimal ) amsb scenarios with an additional @xmath34 symmetry satisfy the requirements of the minimal flavour violation principles @xcite . in this case , the @xmath27-parameters are not free and directly dictated from the flavour structure of the ckm matrix . in our approach
, we are going beyond this scheme , keeping the flavour - violation parameters independent .
in this section , we discuss the most relevant experimental measurements that can be used to constrain the parameter space of the mssm . apart from direct searches for superpartners at collider experiments , and particularly the recent results of the atlas and cms experiments at the lhc @xcite
, numerous low - energy and electroweak precision measurements @xcite constrain masses and mixings of the superpartners .
they can often impose stronger limits on the flavour - violating entries introduced in sec .  [
sec : model ] .
extensive studies of the kaon sector , @xmath35- and @xmath36-meson oscillations , rare decays , and electric dipole moments suggest that only flavour mixing involving the second and third generations of squarks can be substantial , and this only in the left - left and right - right chiral sectors , which mix the superpartners of the left - handed and right - handed quarks @xcite .
for this reason , we restrict ourselves to the simpler scenario where only the flavour - mixing parameters related to the second and third generations and non mixing squark chiralities can be non - vanishing , _
l   _ ll^ct , _ u   _ rr^ct _ d   _ rr^sb  .
[ eq : lambda ] the parameter related to the mixing among second and third generation down - type squarks @xmath37 is not a free parameter of our simplified model , since it is connected to @xmath38 through eq .  .
the measurement of the rare @xmath39 decay represents one of the most stringent constraints on these squark mixings .
the inclusive branching ratio is determined to be ( bs ) = ( 3.55 0.26_exp 0.23_theo ) 10 ^ -4 [ eq : bsg ] from babar , belle , and cleo data @xcite . for the theoretical error estimate
, we refer to the discussion in refs .
squark diagrams contribute already at the one - loop level , as do the sm particles . as a consequence ,
this measurement can lead to strong constraints on the squark masses and couplings , especially on the @xmath40 parameter of the left - left chiral sector , since the lightest neutralinos and charginos appearing in the loops are mostly winos coupling to the left - handed components of the squark mass - eigenstates .
the same arguments apply to the @xmath41 branching fraction , experimentally measured as @xcite ( bs^+^- ) = ( 2.23 0.98_exp 0.11_theo ) 10 ^ -6  , the associated theoretical uncertainties being computed in ref.@xcite , or to the @xmath42-meson branching fractions to a muon pair , recently bounded from above by the cms and lhcb experiments @xcite , [ eq : bs0 ] br(b_s^0 ^+^- ) < 1.1 10 ^ -8  , at @xmath43 confidence level , which is , however , still about four or five times larger than the sm expectation .    also , the @xmath44 oscillations , which have been recently observed , directly probe the mixing between squarks of the second and third generations . since nmfv contributions arise at the same loop level as the sm ones , this observable can again be sensitive to non - vanishing @xmath27-parameters .
hence , the measured mass difference @xcite m_b_s^0 = ( 17.78 0.12_exp 3.3_theo )  ps^-1  , [ eq : dmbs ] where the theoretical uncertainty of 3.3  ps@xmath45 at the 95% confidence level has been derived in ref .
@xcite , allows to constrain the magnitude of the above - mentioned flavour - violating parameters .
another important consequence of nmfv mixing in the squark sector is a large splitting between squark mass eigenvalues .
this influences the @xmath16- and @xmath46-boson self - energies at zero momentum , contributing hence to the electroweak @xmath47-parameter = - = ( m_z ) t = ( 2.36 8.65 ) 10 ^ -4   , the experimental value arising from combined fits of the @xmath16-boson mass , width , and pole asymmetry as well as of the masses of the @xmath46-boson and the top quark @xcite .
furthermore , recent measurements of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon @xmath48 indicate a discrepancy of about @xmath49 between the data and the standard model predictions @xcite , a_^exp - a_^sm = ( 25.5 7.98 ) 10 ^ -10 a _ ( g-2)_/2
. this gap could be explained by new physics . in the case of supersymmetric scenarios , the leading contributions , depending on the smuon , sneutrino , chargino and neutralino masses , have been found to be proportional to the sign of the @xmath21-parameter @xcite . since negative values
would then increase the discrepancy , we limit ourselves to positive values of @xmath21 . moreover , since squarks contribute only at the two - loop level , the dependence on flavour violation in the squark sector is expected to be considerably reduced . finally , from direct searches of the higgs boson , we ask for the mass of the lightest higgs - boson to fulfil 111  gev m_h 130  . [
eq : higgsmass ] the lower bound is based on the exclusion limit of @xmath50  gev from lep @xcite , after accounting for a theoretical uncertainty of about @xmath51 gev @xcite , whilst the upper bound corresponds to the non - observation of a higgs boson by the atlas and cms experiments @xcite . for a restricted set of universal scalar mass @xmath52 , introduced to solve the tachyonic slepton problem , smaller than a few tev , the upper bound is almost always satisfied . considering quantum corrections ,
the higgs mass @xmath53 depends on the squark masses , and thus on the flavour - violating entries in the associated mass matrices .      in order to study the phenomenology of amsb models including non - minimal flavour violation , we have scanned over the parameter space of the model , generalizing the squark mass matrices by including the three flavour - violation parameters presented in eq .  .
our procedure starts at a high - energy scale , where we define our input parameters as the gravitino mass @xmath2 , the universal scalar mass @xmath52 introduced to solve the tachyonic slepton problem , the ratio of the two neutral higgs field vacuum expectation values @xmath54 , and the sign of the higgs mixing parameter @xmath55 .
the soft supersymmetry - breaking terms at the electroweak scale are then obtained through renormalization group running using the spheno package version 3.0 @xcite , which solves the renormalization group equations numerically to two - loop order and extracts the particle spectrum and mixings at the electroweak scale at the one - loop level for the matter and gauge sectors and at the two - loop level for the higgs sector .
it also computes the electroweak precision and low - energy observables presented in sec.[sec : constraints ] .    for the numerical values of the standard model parameters , we fix the top quark pole mass to @xmath56 gev @xcite , the bottom quark mass to @xmath57 gev and the @xmath16-boson mass to @xmath58 gev .
the fermi constant has been taken as @xmath59 gev@xmath60 , and the strong and electromagnetic coupling constants at the @xmath16-pole as @xmath61 and @xmath62 . at this stage , the only source of flavour violation lies within the ckm - matrix , which is calculated using the wolfenstein parametrization .
the corresponding four free parameters are set to @xmath63 , @xmath64 , @xmath65 , and @xmath66 @xcite .     plane at fixed @xmath67 ( left panel ) , in the @xmath68 plane at fixed @xmath69 tev ( central panel ) and in the @xmath70 plane at fixed @xmath71 tev ( right panel ) .
we show regions where there is no physical solution to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , or which are excluded by the constraints related to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red ) .
the regions , where the agreement between theory and experiment for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is restored , are presented in beige . on the left panel ,
we also indicate the region where the mass of the lightest higgs boson is close to 125 gev ( green ) and the exclusion limit obtained ( crosses ) from the reinterpretation of the lhc results on supersymmetric particle searches in the context of amsb scenarios ( see ref .
@xcite).,title="fig : " ]   plane at fixed @xmath67 ( left panel ) , in the @xmath68 plane at fixed @xmath69 tev ( central panel ) and in the @xmath70 plane at fixed @xmath71 tev ( right panel ) .
we show regions where there is no physical solution to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , or which are excluded by the constraints related to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red ) .
the regions , where the agreement between theory and experiment for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is restored , are presented in beige . on the left panel ,
we also indicate the region where the mass of the lightest higgs boson is close to 125 gev ( green ) and the exclusion limit obtained ( crosses ) from the reinterpretation of the lhc results on supersymmetric particle searches in the context of amsb scenarios ( see ref .
@xcite).,title="fig : " ]   plane at fixed @xmath67 ( left panel ) , in the @xmath68 plane at fixed @xmath69 tev ( central panel ) and in the @xmath70 plane at fixed @xmath71 tev ( right panel ) .
we show regions where there is no physical solution to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , or which are excluded by the constraints related to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red ) .
the regions , where the agreement between theory and experiment for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is restored , are presented in beige . on the left panel
, we also indicate the region where the mass of the lightest higgs boson is close to 125 gev ( green ) and the exclusion limit obtained ( crosses ) from the reinterpretation of the lhc results on supersymmetric particle searches in the context of amsb scenarios ( see ref .
@xcite).,title="fig : " ]    in fig .
[ fig : mfv ] , we present typical scans of the _ minimal _ amsb parameter space , , when flavour - violation is induced by the ckm - matrix alone and all @xmath27-parameters vanish .
we show the examples of the @xmath72 plane at fixed @xmath67 ( left panel ) , the @xmath68 plane at fixed @xmath69 tev ( central panel ) as well as the @xmath70 plane at fixed @xmath71 tev ( right panel ) .
all experimental limits described in sec.[sec : constraints ] are imposed at the @xmath73-level .
we observe that the low - mass regions with a relatively small @xmath52 , attractive from a collider point of view , are strongly disfavoured by both the measurements of the @xmath39 branching ratio and the too low predicted mass for the lightest higgs boson .
the latter also excludes small values of @xmath74 for a large range of @xmath52 and @xmath2 masses .
in addition , a significant part of the regions where the predicted value for the @xmath75 branching ratio lies outside the @xmath76-range deduced from eq .   is also excluded by the constraints associated to the @xmath41 branching ratio .
therefore , these regions have not been shown on fig .
[ fig : mfv ] , for clarity .
predictions for the other considered @xmath35-physics observables , @xmath77 and the branching ratio @xmath78 , are mostly compatible with data and hence absent from the figure , as is the computed value for the @xmath79 parameter .
this quantity only restricts the parameter space at very heavy masses , which lie outside the mass range presented in the figures .    on the left panel of fig .
[ fig : mfv ] , we also show the exclusion limits on the parameter space of amsb scenarios obtained from a reinterpretation of the results of the direct searches for superparticles at the lhc in the amsb context @xcite , as well as the region where the mass of the lightest higgs boson is close to 125 gev , a value favoured by the recent observations of the atlas and cms experiments @xcite .
however , in the absence of a confirmed signal for a higgs boson in that mass range , we do not consider this last limit for our analysis in the sequel .
the size of the regions , where the gap between the data and the predictions for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon @xmath80 is closed , is relatively small .
moreover , a significant fraction of it is excluded by the @xmath81 constraint , as it has also been found in refs .
hence , a possible explanation of the discrepancy between theory and data for this observable by contributions related to amsb scenarios is rather difficult .
however , the dominant supersymmetric contributions to @xmath80 highly depend on the slepton masses , entering into the theoretical calculation already at the one - loop level . since in the context of amsb scenarios ,
any prediction associated to the slepton sector is tightly linked to the employed solution to solve the tachyonic slepton problem , we choose to relax the constraint associated to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon .
this is also motivated by the fact that non - minimal flavour violation in the squark sector , , the scope of this paper , contributes subdominantly , at the two - loop level , to @xmath80 , so that it becomes almost independent of the @xmath27-parameters as it was already noticed in the discussions of refs.@xcite .
we now turn to non - minimal flavour violation in amsb scenarios , where non - vanishing @xmath27-parameters can arise , , from non - trivial khler interactions as in supergravity . in our phenomenological approach ,
we introduce non - minimal flavour violation at the weak scale , generalizing the squark mass matrices by introducing the three parameters defined in eq .  .
we use again the spheno 3.0 program to diagonalize the squark sector and compute the flavour and weak observables presented in sec .
[ sec : constraints ] . in figs.[fig : tb10 ] and [ fig : m60 ] , we depict the impact of the considered nmfv parameters on these observables , showing the associated constraints on the non - minimal amsb parameter space .
we impose the above - mentioned limit for the higgs - boson mass , , @xmath82 gev ( see the discussion in section [ sec : constraints ] ) , as well as all the other constraints at the 2@xmath83 confidence level .
we present different typical amsb planes for different values of the flavour - violating @xmath27-parameters , keeping only the most constraining observables for clarity and neglecting the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon for the reasons mentioned above .
plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ] +   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ] +   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath67 .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameters @xmath40 ( upper panels ) , @xmath84 ( central panels ) and @xmath85 ( lower panels ) .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) and the higgs mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]    typical scans in the @xmath86 planes of the amsb parameter space are shown in fig .
[ fig : tb10 ] .
we use a fixed value of @xmath67 and choose a positive sign for the @xmath21-parameter . comparing with the corresponding minimal amsb results ( left panel of fig .
[ fig : mfv ] ) , we find that the most sensitive observable is the @xmath39 branching ratio , which directly probes squark mixing in the left - left chiral sector , , the @xmath38-parameter .
this strong dependence is due to squark and neutralino - chargino loops , involving @xmath87 interactions between squarks , quarks and neutralinos or charginos , proportional to the squark mixing matrices @xmath31 and @xmath32 ( see eq .   below ) .
this also explains the less pronounced sensitivity to nmfv mixing in the right - right chiral sectors ( @xmath84 and @xmath85 ) , where the results do not show any strong dependence on the @xmath27-parameters . at intermediate values of @xmath88 ,
the interplay between squark masses and mixings is such that almost all the parameter space accessible by renormalization group running remains allowed by the @xmath89 branching ratio compared to the minimal results of fig.[fig : mfv ] .
similar conclusions hold for the @xmath90 branching ratio , not presented on the figures for clarity .
the other considered observables , , the constraint on the lightest higgs boson mass , are barely sensitive to non - minimal flavour violation , as the dependence on the squark sector is subdominant
.     plane with a fixed value of @xmath69 tev ( upper panels ) and in the @xmath91 plane with a fixed value of @xmath71 tev ( lower panels ) .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameter @xmath38 .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) , the @xmath42-meson branching to a muon pair @xmath92 ( green ) and the lightest higgs - boson mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath69 tev ( upper panels ) and in the @xmath91 plane with a fixed value of @xmath71 tev ( lower panels ) .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameter @xmath38 .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) , the @xmath42-meson branching to a muon pair @xmath92 ( green ) and the lightest higgs - boson mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath69 tev ( upper panels ) and in the @xmath91 plane with a fixed value of @xmath71 tev ( lower panels ) .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameter @xmath38 .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) , the @xmath42-meson branching to a muon pair @xmath92 ( green ) and the lightest higgs - boson mass ( red).,title="fig : " ] +   plane with a fixed value of @xmath69 tev ( upper panels ) and in the @xmath91 plane with a fixed value of @xmath71 tev ( lower panels ) .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameter @xmath38 .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) , the @xmath42-meson branching to a muon pair @xmath92 ( green ) and the lightest higgs - boson mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath69 tev ( upper panels ) and in the @xmath91 plane with a fixed value of @xmath71 tev ( lower panels ) .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameter @xmath38 .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) , the @xmath42-meson branching to a muon pair @xmath92 ( green ) and the lightest higgs - boson mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]   plane with a fixed value of @xmath69 tev ( upper panels ) and in the @xmath91 plane with a fixed value of @xmath71 tev ( lower panels ) .
the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is chosen positive and we present the results for different values of the nmfv - parameter @xmath38 .
we show regions excluded due to the absence of physical solutions to the renormalization group equations ( grey ) , by the constraints associated to the @xmath39 branching ratio ( blue ) , the @xmath42-meson branching to a muon pair @xmath92 ( green ) and the lightest higgs - boson mass ( red).,title="fig : " ]    in fig .  [ fig : m60 ] , we investigate the dependence of the predictions for weak and flavour observables on @xmath74 .
we first fix the universal scalar mass @xmath52 to 1 tev and scan over the @xmath93 plane .
secondly , we fix the gravitino mass @xmath2 to 60 tev and scan over the @xmath91 plane . in both cases , the sign of the @xmath21-parameter is again chosen to be positive .
as for the analysis in fig .
[ fig : tb10 ] , the most sensitive observables to non - minimal flavour violation are the @xmath39 and @xmath94 branching ratios .
since the constraints related to the second decay are weaker and overlapping with those of the first , they are again omitted from the figures .
the regions of the parameter space excluded by the constraints associated to the @xmath75 branching ratio increase with the values of the flavour - violating parameter @xmath95 . for small values , squark mixings and mass effects compensate , which leaves again almost all the parameter space open .
in fact , the exclusion contours related to the @xmath75 branching ratio even vanish , when @xmath40 increases slightly .
such contours reappear only at much larger @xmath40 values . as a consequence , for @xmath96 , possible flavour violating entries in the squark mass matrices are reduced to be rather modest , , @xmath97 . on the other hand , very low values of @xmath74
are excluded by the bounds on the lightest higgs boson mass for all values of @xmath40 .
it is also interesting to remark that the predictions for the @xmath98 observable lie above the current experimental bounds of eq . in the rather large @xmath74 region , for moderate values of the mixing parameter of the left - left chiral sector ( @xmath99 $ ] ) and for relatively light gravitino and universal scalar masses .
let us finally note that the results for non - minimal flavour violation in the right - right chiral sector are unchanged with respect to the minimal case shown in fig .
[ fig : mfv ] , and we subsequently do not present the corresponding figures .      inspecting the various amsb planes presented in sec .
[ sec : planes ] , we select three benchmark scenarios allowed by the present low - energy and electroweak precision constraints , which permit a sizeable mixing between second and third generation squarks and which are collider - friendly in the sense that one or several superpartners could be produced with a large rate at the lhc .
this means that at least some of the superpartners should not be too heavy .
the chosen benchmark points are presented in tab .
[ tab : points ] , together with the sps9 benchmark point @xcite which is shown as a reference . as a generic feature for all the four points
, the gravitino mass is taken as @xmath71 tev and the sign of the off - diagonal higgs mixing parameter is positive , for the reasons discussed in sec.[sec : constraints ] .
due to the renormalization group running invariance of the gaugino mass parameters @xmath100 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 , the dependence of the masses of the gluino , the two lightest neutralinos and the lightest chargino , all mainly gaugino - like , on @xmath52 and @xmath74 is reduced and subdominant .
therefore , they are roughly identical for all scenarios , with @xmath103  gev , @xmath104  gev , and @xmath105  gev . in contrast
, the scalar spectrum is quite different .
.three amsb benchmark scenarios allowing for sizeable flavour - violating entries in the squark mass matrices with respect to the second and third generation mixing in the left - left and/or the right - right chiral squark sectors .
the sps9 scenario is also presented for comparison .
we indicate the susy - breaking parameters at the high scale and the resulting masses at low energy ( after renormalization group running ) for the gluino , the lightest squarks and sleptons , the two lightest neutralinos , the lightest chargino , and the lightest higgs - boson .
the values are presented assuming constrained minimal flavour - violation , , when @xmath106 .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ]     for gluino pair production as well as for the associated production of a chargino or a neutralino with a gluino , only the @xmath107- and @xmath108-channel diagrams depend on the flavour - violating parameters in the squark sector since they contain a squark propagator ( see the feynman diagrams shown in figs .
[ fig:01 ] and [ fig:03 ] ) .
however , all squark eigenstates contribute to the total cross section and the corresponding diagrams must be summed over , leading subsequently to production cross sections insensitive to non - minimal flavour - violation .
we present these results , therefore independent of the @xmath27-parameters , in tab .  [
tab : xsec ] , both for our scenarios i , ii and iii as well as for the sps 9 benchmark point as a reference .
strong gluino pair production is clearly dominant , and the luminosity required to observe possible signal events is not so high .
in contrast , the cross sections related to the semi - weak production of a gluino and a chargino / neutralino vary from @xmath109 fb for the lightest chargino and neutralino case to the barely visible level of @xmath110 fb for the heavier superpartners .    , @xmath84 , and @xmath85 for the reference scenario i of tab .
[ tab : points].,title="fig : " ] , @xmath84 , and @xmath85 for the reference scenario i of tab .
[ tab : points].,title="fig : " ] + , @xmath84 , and @xmath85 for the reference scenario i of tab .
[ tab : points].,title="fig : " ] , @xmath84 , and @xmath85 for the reference scenario i of tab .
[ tab : points].,title="fig : " ]     for reference scenario ii.,title="fig : " ]   for reference scenario ii.,title="fig : " ] +   for reference scenario ii.,title="fig : " ]   for reference scenario ii.,title="fig : " ]     for reference scenario iii.,title="fig : " ]   for reference scenario iii.,title="fig : " ] +   for reference scenario iii.,title="fig : " ]   for reference scenario iii.,title="fig : " ]    contrary to the previous cases , associated squark and gluino production shows an interesting dependence on the non - minimal flavour - violation @xmath27-parameters , as illustrated in figs .
[ fig : xsec1 ] , [ fig : xsec2 ] and [ fig : xsec3 ] for our scenarios i , ii and iii , respectively .
moreover , the cross sections are fairly high , reaching the level of several hundereds of fb for many channels , which makes them nice candidates to study non - minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry at the lhc . analyzing the dependence of the cross section on the @xmath27-parameters , sharp and smooth transitions can be observed , the first ones being related to the presence of an avoided crossing and the second ones to a smooth change in the flavour content of the relevant eigenstate ( see section [ sec : benchmark ] ) .
indeed , at the point where the mass of two eigenstates should cross , , at @xmath111 on the top - left panel of fig .
[ fig : xsec1 ] or at @xmath112 on the lower - right panel of fig .
[ fig : xsec2 ] , the flavour content of both squarks is exchanged and the same sharp transition is observed at the level of the cross section .
smooth increases and decreases in the cross section with the values of the @xmath27-parameters have two sources .
first , second and third generation squark mixing induces larger mass splitting , as illustrated in figs .
[ fig : squarks1 ] , [ fig : squarks2 ] and [ fig : squarks3 ] .
this renders certain channels phase - space favoured and other channels phase - space suppressed .
secondly , the magnitude of the cross section is connected to the flavour content of the squark produced in association with the gluino , since producing a given flavour of squark requires an initial quark of the same flavour , as shown in the feynman diagrams of fig .
[ fig : gosq ] . as an example , the lightest down - type squark mass eigenstate is a pure sbottom state for small values of @xmath113 , whilst it becomes a mixed state for @xmath114 , with a larger and larger strange squark component with increasing values of @xmath85 , as it can be seen from the upper - right panel of fig.[fig : squarks1 ] .
consequently , as presented in lower - right panel of fig .
[ fig : xsec1 ] , the cross section related to the process @xmath115 is small and constant for @xmath113 ( @xmath116 fb ) and gets larger and larger for increasing @xmath85 , even reaching a couple of hundreds of fb for @xmath117 .
the opposite effects can be observed for the process @xmath118 in the context of the scenario iii , as shown in the lower - left panel of fig.[fig : xsec3 ] .
among the most compelling evidences for physics beyond the standard model is the presence of cold dark matter ( cdm ) in our universe .
its relic density is today constrained to be _
cdmh^2  =   0.1123 0.0035 [ eq : omh2 ] from recent wmap data combined with measurements related to supernov  and baryonic acoustic oscillations @xcite . here
, @xmath119 is the present hubble expansion rate in units of @xmath120 .
new physics models should therefore include a viable dark matter candidate that can account for the above amount of dark matter .    in amsb models ,
the lightest of the four neutralinos is the lightest superpartner and therefore the dark matter candidate , if r - parity is assumed to be conserved .
after the renormalization group evolution from the high - scale parameters to the weak scale , the wino mass parameter @xmath101 turns out to be smaller than the bino and gluino masses @xmath100 and @xmath102 . in consequence , in amsb scenarios
the lightest neutralino is wino - like .
this is in contrast to , e.g. , models based on minimal supergravity where usually @xmath121 leading to a bino - like lsp . since also the chargino mass is governed by @xmath101 , the mass difference between the lightest neutralino and the lightest chargino is rather small . for our reference scenarios ,
the mass difference is less than a gev , as can be seen in tab .
[ tab : points ] . due to the larger pair annihilation cross section
as compared to the bino and due to efficient co - annihilations with the chargino , the resulting relic density of the thermally produced neutralino is usually one or two orders of magnitude below the range given in eq.([eq : omh2 ] ) @xcite . using the public programme darksusy @xcite
, we obtain the values @xmath122 , and @xmath123 for the scenarios of tab .
[ tab : points ] , respectively .    however , thermal production of neutralinos is not the only mechanism to be considered .
possible non - thermal production modes include the decay of heavy fields such as moduli or gravitinos in the early universe @xcite .
moreover , axions and axinos can contribute to the dark matter relic abundance @xcite .
the contribution to the neutralino relic density from moduli decay can be estimated as @xcite _ ^0_1h^2   0.1 ( ) ( ) ^1/4 ( ) ( ) ^3/2 .
it depends on the neutralino mass @xmath124 , the mass of the moduli fields @xmath125 , the effective number of degrees of freedom @xmath126 , and the thermally averaged annihilation cross - section @xmath127 . in fig .
[ fig : cosmo ] , we depict isolines of the neutralino relic density in the @xmath124@xmath125 plane , assuming @xmath128 @xcite and different values of the annihilation cross - section @xmath127 .
our typical scenarios lead to a neutralino relic density of about @xmath129 , which is consistent with a neutralino annihilation cross - section of @xmath130 . for such cross - sections , a neutralino mass of @xmath131 gev and moduli masses comparable with the gravitino mass , @xmath132 tev , which is consistent with gravity and anomaly mediation @xcite ,
this yields nearly the measured abundance of eq .
( [ eq : omh2 ] ) .     in the @xmath125@xmath124 planes for different values of @xmath133 .
the dotted lines correspond to @xmath134 gev and @xmath135 tev .
right : the neutralino relic density @xmath136 from gravitino decay as a function of the reheating temperature @xmath137 for a typical amsb scenarios with @xmath138 gev , @xmath71 tev , as it is the case for the scenarios of tab .  [ tab : points ] .
the solid line includes a contribution of @xmath139 from thermal neutralinos , while the dashed line indicates the contribution from gravitino decay only.,title="fig : " ]   in the @xmath125@xmath124 planes for different values of @xmath133 .
the dotted lines correspond to @xmath134 gev and @xmath135 tev .
right : the neutralino relic density @xmath136 from gravitino decay as a function of the reheating temperature @xmath137 for a typical amsb scenarios with @xmath138 gev , @xmath71 tev , as it is the case for the scenarios of tab .
[ tab : points ] .
the solid line includes a contribution of @xmath139 from thermal neutralinos , while the dashed line indicates the contribution from gravitino decay only.,title="fig : " ]    the neutralino relic abundance from gravitino decay is directly related to the thermal abundance @xmath140 , that the gravitino would have if it did not decay .
the latter is obtained from computing the thermal production of gravitinos in the early universe .
more precisely , the resulting neutralino relic density can then be evaluated according to @xcite _ ^0_1h^2  =   _ 3/2h^2   ( ) ( ) _ i=1 ^ 3 _ i g_i^2 ( 1 + ) , [ eq : omh2grav ] where the ratio of neutralino and gravitino mass expresses the fact that each gravitino decays into one stable neutralino . the thermal gravitino production depends linearly on the gravitino mass @xmath2 and the reheating temperature @xmath137 of the universe after inflation .
the sum runs over the three gauge groups @xmath34 , @xmath25 , and @xmath141 , @xmath142 are the coupling constants of the three gauge groups , and @xmath143 the mass parameters of the associated gauginos .
note that in eq .
( [ eq : omh2grav ] ) , @xmath142 and @xmath143 are evaluated at the reheating scale @xmath137 .
the constants @xmath144 and @xmath145 are given by @xmath146 and @xmath147 for @xmath148 , respectively @xcite .
the right panel of fig .
[ fig : cosmo ] shows the resulting neutralino relic density as a function of the reheating temperature for the situation corresponding to the scenarios of tab .
[ tab : points ] . for low values of @xmath137 ,
the thermal neutralino production dominates , leading to the value of @xmath149 already mentioned above . for @xmath150  gev ,
the contribution from gravitino decay becomes dominant and @xmath151 grows linearly with @xmath137 . as can be seen , the observed relic density of @xmath152 is obtained for a reheating temperature of @xmath153  gev , which is well compatible with thermal leptogenesis @xcite .
the relic abundance of the neutralino may also depend on flavour violating entries of the squark ( or slepton ) mass matrices . in ref .
@xcite this has been studied for the case of minimal supergravity scenarios , where flavour violating couplings can modify the annihilation and coannihilation modes that enter the boltzmann equation in the typical scenario with thermal production of neutralinos .
similar conclusions have been found for flavour non - diagonal entries in the leptonic soft matrices @xcite .
flavour - violating effects are , of course , also present in the discussed cases of moduli or gravitino decay .
a full study of their impact within this context is , however , clearly beyond the scope of this work .
in this paper , we have studied the consequences of non - minimal flavour violation in minimal anomaly - mediated supersymmetry breaking models , where tachyonic sleptons are avoided by introducing a common scalar mass similar to the one introduced in minimal supergravity . in these scenarios , new sources of flavour violation
are in general introduced at high scales , leading to different flavour mixings for sm particles and their superpartners at the weak scale .
using the conventional parameterization of squark mixing at the weak scale , we analyzed the viable amsb parameter space in the light of the latest limits on low - energy observables and of the latest results from direct searches for higgs and susy particles at the lhc .
we found that intermediate values of @xmath154 and relatively large scalar masses of @xmath155 tev , increasing with @xmath74 , were preferred and allowed for sizeable flavour violation in the left - left and essentially unconstrained flavour violation in the right - right squark sectors .
we completed our analytical calculations of flavour - violating supersymmetric particle production at hadron colliders with those related to gluino pair production and to the associated production of gluinos with charginos and neutralinos as well as with squarks .
the corresponding cross sections were expected to be large due to the strong coupling of gluinos to the initial quarks and gluons .
flavour violation effects were expected to be only significant for the associated production of gluinos and squarks , since the other processes involved ( almost ) complete sums over internal squark exchanges .
this was confirmed in our numerical analysis for the high - energy phase of the lhc , where phenomena such as avoided crossings or smooth flavour dependences known from our previous studies could again be observed . for the experimental analysis of the ensuing cascade decays ,
leading to final states with second and third generation quarks and missing transverse energy , we referred the reader to previously published dedicated studies performed , , in supergravity models .
the corresponding analysis in amsb models was beyond the scope of this paper and is left for future work .
finally , we briefly addressed the related cosmological aspects , showing that the well - known problem of dark matter underabundance in minimal amsb models could be solved with moduli or gravitino decays also in the presence of flavour violation .
the authors would like to thank w.  porod for helpful discussions .
this work has been supported by the theory - lhc france - initiative of the cnrs / in2p3 and by the `` helmholtz alliance for astroparticle phyics hap '' funded by the initiative and networking fund of the helmholtz association .
g.  bozzi , b.  fuks , b.  herrmann and m.  klasen , nucl .
b * 787 * ( 2007 ) 1 .
b.  fuks , b.  herrmann and m.  klasen , nucl .
b * 810 * ( 2009 ) 266 .
a.  h.  chamseddine , r.  l.  arnowitt , p.  nath , phys .
* 49 * ( 1982 ) 970 .
m.  dine and a.  e.  nelson , phys .
d * 48 * ( 1993 ) 1277 ; + m.  dine , a.  e.  nelson and y.  shirman , phys .
d * 51 * ( 1995 ) 1362 ; + m.  dine , a.  e.  nelson , y.  nir and y.  shirman , phys .
d * 53 * ( 1996 ) 2658 .
l.  randall , r.  sundrum , nucl .  phys .
* b557 * ( 1999 ) 79 - 118 .
g.  f.  giudice , m.  a.  luty , h.  murayama _ et al .
_ , jhep * 9812 * ( 1998 ) 027 . t.  gherghetta , g.  f.  giudice , j.  d.  wells , nucl .  phys
.   * b559 * ( 1999 ) 27 - 47 .
a.  pomarol , r.  rattazzi , jhep * 9905 * ( 1999 ) 013
. i.  jack , d.  r.  t.  jones , phys .
lett .   *
b465 * ( 1999 ) 148 - 154 . n.  arkani - hamed , d.  e.  kaplan , h.  murayama _ et al .
_ , jhep * 0102 * ( 2001 ) 041
. j.  l.  feng , t.  moroi , l.  randall _ et al .
_ , phys .  rev
.  lett .
* 83 * ( 1999 )
1731 - 1734 . j.  l.  feng , t.  moroi , phys .
rev .   * d61 * ( 2000 ) 095004 .
r.  rattazzi , a.  strumia , j.  d.  wells , nucl .
phys .   * b576 * ( 2000 ) 3 - 28 . a.  j.  barr , c.  g.  lester , m.  a.  parker _ et al . _ , jhep * 0303 * ( 2003 ) 045 .
z.  chacko , m.  a.  luty , i.  maksymyk _ et al .
_ , jhep * 0004 * ( 2000 ) 001 . e.  katz , y.  shadmi , y.  shirman , jhep * 9908 * ( 1999 ) 015 .
i.  jack , d.  r.  t.  jones , phys .
lett .   *
b482 * ( 2000 ) 167 - 173 .
i.  jack , d.  r.  t.  jones , nucl .
* b662 * ( 2003 ) 63 - 88 .
b.  murakami , j.  d.  wells , phys .
* d68 * ( 2003 ) 035006 .
r.  kitano , g.  d.  kribs , h.  murayama , phys .
* d70 * ( 2004 ) 035001 .
m.  ibe , r.  kitano , h.  murayama , phys .
* d71 * ( 2005 ) 075003 .
r.  hodgson , i.  jack , d.  r.  t.  jones _ et al .
_ , nucl .
* b728 * ( 2005 ) 192 - 206 .
d.  r.  t.  jones , g.  g.  ross , phys .
lett .   *
b642 * ( 2006 ) 540 - 545 .
r.  hodgson , i.  jack , d.  r.  t.  jones , jhep * 0710 * ( 2007 ) 070 .
f.  gabbiani , e.  gabrielli , a.  masiero and l.  silvestrini , nucl .
b * 477 * ( 1996 ) 321 .
b.  c.  allanach , g.  hiller , d.  r.  t.  jones _ et al .
_ , jhep * 0904 * ( 2009 ) 088 .
k.  nakamura _ et al .
_ [ particle data group ] , j.  phys .
g * 37 * ( 2010 ) 075021 .
d.  asner _
[ heavy flavor averaging group ] , arxiv:1010.1589 [ hep - ex ] .
j.  s.  hagelin , s.  kelley and t.  tanaka , nucl .
b * 415 * ( 1994 ) 293 .
p.  brax and c.  a.  savoy , nucl .
b * 447 * ( 1995 ) 227 .
m.  ciuchini , e.  franco , d.  guadagnoli , v.  lubicz , m.  pierini , v.  porretti and l.  silvestrini , phys .
b * 655 * ( 2007 ) 162 .
t.  hurth , e.  lunghi and w.  porod , nucl .
b * 704 * ( 2005 ) 56 .
m.  misiak _ et al .
_ , phys .
* 98 * ( 2007 ) 022002 .
t.  huber , t.  hurth and e.  lunghi , nucl .
b * 802 * ( 2008 ) 40 .
cms - pas - bph-11 - 019 .
p.  ball and r.  fleischer , eur .
j.   c * 48 * ( 2006 ) 413 .
t.  moroi , phys .
d * 53 * ( 1996 ) 6565 [ erratum - ibid .
d * 56 * ( 1997 ) 4424 ] .
w.  porod , comput .
commun .
* 153 * ( 2003 ) 275 .
atlas - conf-2011 - 163 .
m.  lancaster [ tevatron electroweak working group and for the cdf and d0 collaborations ] , arxiv:1107.5255 [ hep - ex ] . b.  c.  allanach , t.  j.  khoo and k.  sakurai , arxiv:1110.1119 [ hep - ph ] .
s.  p.  martin , j.  d.  wells , phys .
* d64 * ( 2001 ) 035003 .
b.  c.  allanach _ et al .
_ , eur .
j.   c * 25 * ( 2002 ) 113 .
t.  hurth and w.  porod , jhep * 0908 * ( 2009 ) 087 .
a.  bartl , k.  hidaka , k.  hohenwarter - sodek , t.  kernreiter , w.  majerotto and w.  porod , phys .
b * 679 * ( 2009 ) 260 .
a.  bartl , h.  eberl , b.  herrmann , k.  hidaka , w.  majerotto and w.  porod , phys .
b * 698 * ( 2011 ) 380 [ erratum - ibid .
b * 700 * ( 2011 ) 390 ] m.  bruhnke , b.  herrmann and w.  porod , jhep * 1009 * ( 2010 ) 006 .
a.  bartl , h.  eberl , e.  ginina , b.  herrmann , k.  hidaka , w.  majerotto and w.  porod , arxiv:1107.2775 [ hep - ph ] .
c.  gross and g.  hiller , phys .
d  * 83 * ( 2011 ) 095015 .
w.  beenakker , r.  hopker , m.  spira and p.  m.  zerwas , nucl .
b * 492 * ( 1997 ) 51 .
t.  gehrmann , d.  maitre and d.  wyler , nucl .
b * 703 * ( 2004 ) 147 .
j.  pumplin , d.  r.  stump , j.  huston , h.  l.  lai , p.  nadolsky and w.  k.  tung , jhep * 0207 * ( 2002 ) 012 .
e.  komatsu _ et al .
_ [ wmap collaboration ] , astrophys .  j.  suppl .
* 192 * ( 2011 ) 18 . c.  h.  chen , m.  drees and j.  f.  gunion , phys
.  rev .
d * 55 * ( 1997 ) 330 [ erratum - ibid .
d * 60 * ( 1999 ) 039901 ] .
t.  moroi and l.  randall , nucl .  phys .
b * 570 * ( 2000 ) 455 .
p.  gondolo , j.  edsj , p.  ullio , l.  bergstrom , m.  schelke and e.  a.  baltz , jcap * 0407 * ( 2004 ) 008 ; p. gondolo , j. edsj , p. ullio , l. bergstrm , m. schelke , e.a .
baltz , t. bringmann and g. duda , http://www.darksusy.org .
s.  rajagopalan , arxiv:1010.3384 [ hep - ph ] .
l.  covi , j.  e.  kim and l.  roszkowski , phys .
* 82 * ( 1999 ) 4180 .
l.  covi , h.  b.  kim , j.  e.  kim and l.  roszkowski , jhep * 0105 * ( 2001 ) 033 .
b.  s.  acharya , g.  kane , s.  watson and p.  kumar , phys .
d * 80 * ( 2009 ) 083529 .
j.  pradler and f.  d.  steffen , phys .
d * 75 * ( 2007 ) 023509 .
w.  buchmuller , p.  di bari and m.  plumacher , annals phys .
* 315 * ( 2005 ) 305 .
b.  herrmann , m.  klasen and q.  le boulch , phys .
d  * 84 * ( 2011 ) 095007 .
d.  choudhury , r.  garani and s.  k.  vempati , arxiv:1104.4467 [ hep - ph ] .