one of the most celebrated successes of string theory is the ads / cft correspondence @xcite .
this generates a powerful duality between asymptotically ads gravitational theories and conformal field theories on the ads boundary , which is the simplest and best - studied example of the more general notion of a ` gauge - gravity duality ' . as a strong - weak coupling duality
, the correspondence allows for the translation of non - perturbative field theory calculations into more tractable , perturbative calculations in gravity and vice - versa .
this has enabled the exploration of previously inaccessible regimes of theoretical physics . indeed , there are many examples of strongly coupled systems in condensed matter physics and it is hoped that gauge - gravity duality may allow for a better understanding of these .
significant progress has already been made in this direction , leading to the development of the ads / cmt correspondence ( see @xcite and references therein ) .
further recent progress has been to extend the correspondence to spacetimes which are not asymptotically - ads but rather exhibit hyperscaling violating and lifshitz ( hvlif ) behaviour @xcite , thus extending the dictionary between gravity and condensed matter systems living on the boundary .    the central idea in gauge / gravity duality is that each state in the bulk has a corresponding state in the dual field theory .
in particular , black objects are dual to thermal ensembles in the field theory with the same thermodynamic properties ( temperature , entropy , chemical potential , etc . ) as the bulk spacetime  @xcite .    a natural starting point for the correspondence
is to look at charged ( reissner - nordstrm or ` rn ' ) extremal black holes and black branes in ads @xcite .
however , like their asymptotically flat ` cousins ' they have a large non - zero entropy at zero temperature , thus violating the third law of thermodynamics , which states in its strictest version that the entropy of a system should vanish in the zero temperature limit @xcite .
while a non - vanishing entropy for certain classes of extremal black holes is consistent with microstate counting for the corresponding d - brane configuration in string theory @xcite , this still begs the question of whether one can find other gravitational systems which have a zero entropy or entropy density at zero temperature .
apart from being an interesting question about gravity , such systems are relevant for possible dualities between gravity and condensed matter systems .
we remark that although ` nernst law ' is in the following used synonymously with ` third law of thermodynamics ' , nernst s original formulation only requires that the difference in entropy between two equilibrium states related through a change in external parameters goes to zero at zero temperature .
this formulation is equivalent to the ` process version ' of the third law , which states that zero temperature can not be reached by any physical process in a finite number of steps .
a process version of the third law of black hole mechanics was already established in @xcite .
however , the nernst version or , equivalently , the process version of the third law does not imply by itself the slightly stronger version of the third law , due to planck , which states that the entropy itself goes to zero at zero temperature .
this stricter version corresponds to systems with a unique ground state , and thus is the generic situation in condensed matter , although there is an extended debate about possible exceptions in specific systems , see for example @xcite .
in the following we will be concerned with the explicit construction of families of gravitational solutions which have zero entropy ( or entropy density ) in the extremal limit . following conventions in the literature
, we will refer to the third law in its stricter , planckian , version as the nernst law .
extremal brane solutions with vanishing entropy density at zero temperature have recently been studied for a variety of bulk theories @xcite and could have important applications in extending the dictionary between condensed matter and gravity .
they have been dubbed ` nernst branes ' in @xcite , and it is believed that the corresponding non - extremal solutions exist and satisfy the nernst law , that is , these non - extremal solutions have a finite entropy which goes to zero when the temperature goes to zero while external parameters are kept fixed . finding such non - extremal solutions
is important , since extremal nernst branes are not completely regular solutions .
while all curvature invariants remain finite at the horizon , tidal forces become infinite and scalar fields take infinite values , which suggests a breakdown of the underlying effective field theory @xcite . a first step in addressing this issue
is to find non - extremal solutions , which can then be studied in the near extremal limit . in this context
it is clearly desirable to have completely explicit , analytical solutions .
however most results in the literature have to rely on a mixture of analytical and numerical methods .
of course tidal forces may still get very large at the horizon when one approaches the extremal limit @xcite , but analytical solutions will enable one to identify the region in parameter space where the solution can be trusted and possibly be mapped to condensed matter systems .
the second step in controlling the near horizon low temperature behaviour is to embed the theory under consideration into a uv - complete theory , for which string theory and its non - perturbative extension m - theory are arguably the best candidates . in the low - energy limit
the relevant stringy gravitational backgrounds can be described in terms of supergravity .
we will be working in a set - up which can be described by @xmath13 @xmath0 gauged supergravity with an arbitrary number of vector multiplets .
theories with @xmath13 supersymmetry are natural generalisations of the einstein - maxwell - scalar theories underlying dilatonic black hole and black brane solutions which have been studied extensively as potential duals of strongly coupled electron systems @xcite .
they have the advantage that one can often find exact , analytical answers , despite the fact that the couplings are not fixed by the matter content ( as is the case for @xmath14 supersymmetry ) , but depend on arbitrary functions of the scalar fields , which are subject to quantum and stringy corrections .
while we do not discuss the string theory or m - theory embedding explicitly , note that such theories arise through heterotic flux compactifications on @xmath15 and type - ii flux compactifications on calabi - yau three - folds .
we will not need to choose a specific model , and only assume that the vector multiplet couplings take the most general form that arises when working to leading order in the regge parameter @xmath16 , and within the validity of string perturbation theory .
in other words , we only assume that the prepotential , which encodes the vector multiplet couplings , is of the so - called very special type reviewed below .
by working in a gauged supergravity theory obtainable by flux compactification from string theory we will have the option to further address the issues related to singularities in the extremal limit at a later stage .
for bps black holes with vanishing entropy it is known that the inclusion of stringy higher curvature corrections in supergravity @xcite leads to regular solutions with finite entropy @xcite , and the entropy function formalism demonstrates that this mechanism is robust and does not depend on supersymmetry and details of the higher curvature corrections @xcite .
we refer to @xcite for a further discussion of the possible implications of quantum and string corrections to the zero temperature behaviour and the ` fate ' of the nernst law .    within the framework of four - dimensional @xmath13 @xmath0 gauged supergravity coupled to vector multiplets , extremal nernst branes
have previously been constructed in @xcite using a first - order rewriting of the equations of motion , and by considering a specific model : the so - called stu - model .
however a similar rewriting for their non - extremal counterparts has so far proven elusive , and the only known examples  @xcite have been constructed by deforming the metric of the corresponding five - dimensional extremal solution @xcite and imposing suitable consistency conditions . in this paper we are able to provide a systematic construction of non - extremal nernst branes by directly solving the second - order equations of motion . moreover
, our results will not only apply to a particular model , but to all models where the prepotential is of the very special type .
this gain in generality and systematics should help to expand the ads / cmt dictionary considerably in the future .
we now present a brief overview of the results in this paper .
we start with a theory of @xmath17 @xmath13 vector multiplets coupled to @xmath0 gauged supergravity , with prepotential @xmath18 where @xmath19 is homogeneous of degree three .
if @xmath19 is a homogeneous _ polynomial _ of degree three ( which is not required for our methods to apply ) , then the corresponding theory can be obtained by dimensional reduction from five dimensions . moreover ,
such prepotentials capture perturbative string effects to leading order in @xmath16 if the model can be embedded into heterotic or type - ii string theory .
in this case the supergravity lift to five dimensions becomes a lift from type - ii string theory to m - theory .    within these models
we restrict ourselves to static black brane solutions . apart from this
we will impose that the scalar fields take purely imaginary values , as for such ` axion - free ' field configurations there is a systematic simplification of the equations of motion .
since we impose stationarity in four dimensions , we can perform a time - like dimensional reduction to obtain an effective three - dimensional euclidean theory .
the degrees of freedom in three dimensions can then be repackaged using the real formulation of special geometry developed in @xcite , which has been used to construct solutions to both gauged @xcite and ungauged @xcite theories of supergravity coupled to vector multiplets .
since our ability to obtain explicit non - extremal solutions depends on using a specific formalism , let us briefly summarize the underlying principles without going into technical details .
* instead of using the physical four - dimensional scalar fields @xmath20 , @xmath21 , we work on the ` big moduli space ' parametrized by scalar fields @xmath22 ,
the additional ( complex ) degree of freedom is compensated for by a local @xmath24 gauge symmetry .
working on the big moduli space has the advantage that the number of scalar fields and gauge fields matches .
* we use the real formulation of special khler geometry , which replaces the complex scalars @xmath22 by real scalars @xmath25 , @xmath26 and which replaces the holomorphic prepotential @xmath27 by a real hesse potential @xmath28 .
this leads to a simpler , and fully covariant , behaviour of all relevant quantities under electric - magnetic duality . * upon dimensional reduction , the kaluza - klein scalar @xmath29 is absorbed into the real scalars @xmath25 , which results in the ` radial ' direction of the big moduli space becoming a physical ( rather than gauge ) degree of freedom .
+ we postpone fixing the remaining @xmath30 gauge symmetry to preserve electric - magnetic duality .
the resulting three - dimensional theory depends on @xmath31 real scalars @xmath32 , subject to one local gauge symmetry , where @xmath33 are dual to the four - dimensional gauge fields and @xmath34 is dual to the kaluza - klein vector . while @xmath35 are vectors under electric - magnetic duality , @xmath34 is a scalar .
* we impose an ansatz which corresponds , from the four - dimensional point of view , to a static solution with purely imaginary scalar fields .
this determines @xmath34 and half of the fields @xmath35 in terms of the remaining fields , and also fixes the residual @xmath0 gauge symmetry . by abuse of notation
, we denote the remaining independent fields by @xmath35 ( with a restricted range of @xmath36 , depending on the precise version of the ansatz ) .
* when we now proceed to solve the time - reduced three - dimensional equations of motion , their particular structure allows us to obtain solutions in closed form .
we remark that while some of the above ingredients are well known to people working on @xmath13 supergravity , it is critical that these elements are put together into a systematic structure .
the key element that we use and preserve is electric - magnetic duality , which acts on the fields by symplectic transformations .
our choice of variables , which all transform as symplectic tensors , leads to the simplifications and systematics that we exploit .
we observe that this works despite the fact that the electric - magnetic duality group is broken to a discrete subgroup thereof by the presence of gauging ( a scalar potential ) , and despite the fact that our ansatz restricts us from the full symplectic group to a subgroup .
solving the three - dimensional equations of motion directly results in an instanton solution depending on a number of integration constants , which are _ a priori _ undetermined .
however , in order that this solution lifts to a _
regular _ black brane in four dimensions we have to impose suitable regularity conditions .
in particular , we require that the four - dimensional solution has a finite entropy density , which happens to simultaneously ensure that the scalar fields take finite values on the horizon . for
a given set of charges and fluxes , we are then left with a two - parameter family of black brane solutions parametrised by a temperature @xmath4 and chemical potential @xmath5 , which can both be freely varied . in the limit of zero temperature , we recover the extremal nernst branes of @xcite .
therefore we interpret our solutions as non - extremal ( or ` hot ' ) nernst branes . indeed
, it turns out that the entropy density goes to zero as @xmath37 for fixed charges / fluxes , in agreement with the nernst law .
our solutions interpolate between hyperscaling violating lifshitz geometries with @xmath6 at the horizon and @xmath7 at infinity , where @xmath38 is the dynamical critical exponent and where @xmath39 is the hyperscaling violating exponent . in the zero temperature limit
the near horizon geometry changes to @xmath8 .
this paper is organised as follows . in section  [ secrealform ]
we review the real formulation of special geometry as applied to @xmath13 @xmath0 gauged supergravity with both electric and magnetic fluxes , relegating the more technical details to the appendices .
we then reduce this theory over a time - like direction and determine the equations of motion of the three - dimensional theory for general static field configurations , before concentrating on the case of purely imaginary field configurations . in section  [ stusec ]
we solve the aforementioned equations of motion for the case where we have a single electric charge and some number of electric fluxes .
having found a solution to the three - dimensional equations of motion we then lift it back to a four - dimensional solution and determine the conditions imposed on the various integration constants by regularity , before carrying out an analysis of the properties of the solution . in section  [ secmagbrane ]
we apply our method to the case where we instead switch on a single magnetic charge and a single magnetic flux , whilst keeping @xmath40 of the electric fluxes .
section  [ secdiscussion ] contains our conclusions .
we also include a brief initial discussion of our results in the context of holography .
we begin with the well - known bosonic lagrangian of @xmath13 fayet - iliopoulos @xmath41 gauged supergravity coupled to @xmath17 vector multiplets .
our conventions follow those of  @xcite @xmath42 where @xmath43 are four - dimensional spacetime indices , and @xmath44 label the four - dimensional gauge fields : @xmath17 from the vector multiplets and one , the graviphoton , from the gravity multiplet . for later convenience
we use a formulation of the theory which contains @xmath45 complex scalar fields @xmath22 which are subject to local dilatations and @xmath0 transformations .
the @xmath17 physical scalars remaining after gauge fixing can be parametrised as @xmath46 , where @xmath47 . while the physical scalars @xmath20 parametrise a projective special khler ( psk ) manifold , the @xmath22 parametrise a conic affine special khler ( cask ) manifold , which is a complex cone over the psk manifold .
conversely , the psk manifold can be obtained as the khler quotient of the cask manifold with respect to the @xmath24-action generated by dilatations and @xmath0 transformations . in physical terms
this quotient amounts to gauge fixing the local @xmath24 action , as discussed below .
all terms in ( [ 4dlag ] ) except the scalar potential @xmath48 are completely determined by the holomorphic prepotential @xmath27 , which is homogeneous of degree 2 . prior to gauge fixing dilatations , the space - time ricci scalar , @xmath49 , is multiplied by the conformal compensator @xmath50 where derivatives of the prepotential are denoted @xmath51 , etc .
the tensor @xmath52 is the horizontal lift of the physical ( psk ) scalar metric to the cask manifold .
it has a two - dimensional kernel which reflects the fact that the @xmath22 only represent @xmath17 complex physical degrees of freedom .
the vector couplings are given by @xmath53 where @xmath54 .
we now turn to the @xmath24 gauge fixing .
dilatations are fixed by imposing the d - gauge @xmath55 which in particular brings the einstein - hilbert term in ( [ 4dlag ] ) to the standard form @xmath56 .
likewise @xmath0 transformations can be fixed by imposing any condition transverse to the @xmath0 action , such as @xmath57 . however , as discussed in more detail in  @xcite , it is often advantageous to postpone @xmath0 gauge fixing until reducing the theory and starting to solve the resulting equations of motion . in particular , upon imposing the d - gauge one has @xmath58 where @xmath59 is the positive definite ( psk ) metric of the physical scalars @xmath20 . working with the scalars
@xmath22 has the advantage that we retain covariance under symplectic transformations , and will result in a more convenient form of the equations of motion after reduction .
note that while the d - gauge removes one real degree of freedom from the @xmath22 , the second unphysical degree of freedom is taken care of by the remaining local @xmath0 symmetry , see @xcite for details .
geometrically , imposing the d - gauge while keeping the local @xmath0 symmetry corresponds to working on a @xmath0 principal bundle over the psk manifold .
the four - dimensional lagrangian also includes a scalar potential @xmath60 , which as in  @xcite is given as @xmath61 with a superpotential of the form @xmath62 where @xmath63 parametrize the @xmath0 gauging .
since superpotentials of the form ( [ superpot ] ) arise in flux compactifications , we refer to them as magnetic and electric fluxes , respectively .
note that we have included an explicit factor of @xmath64 in using dimensional analysis .
we will use this later to rewrite the potential in terms of real variables . for reference , we note that the @xmath22 have mass dimension @xmath65 while the flux parameters have dimension @xmath66 , so that @xmath67 has dimension @xmath68 . since @xmath69 and , hence , its inverse @xmath70 are homogeneous of degree 0 , they have dimension 0 , and @xmath71 has dimension @xmath72 , as required
. we also remark that for later convenience we have re - scaled the flux parameters by a factor of 2 relative to @xcite .
moreover , we have not factorized the flux parameters into a dimensionful coupling and dimensionless parameters , but kept them dimensionful .      imposing that the background is stationary , so that all of the fields are independent of time
, we can reduce the four - dimensional action over a time - like direction in order to obtain an effective three - dimensional euclidean action .
we decompose the four - dimensional metric as @xmath73 where @xmath29 and @xmath74 are the kaluza - klein scalar and vector respectively , and we have left the three - dimensional part of the metric undetermined for now . following the procedure for time - like dimensional reduction outlined in @xcite , and noting that the scalar potential remains unchanged throughout the reduction process , one obtains the three - dimensional lagrangian @xcite @xmath75 we have written all of the three - dimensional degrees of freedom using the conventions of the real formulation of special geometry developed in @xcite , and afterwards set @xmath76 for the remainder of the paper .
while we give a brief summary here , more details can be found in appendix  [ appendix : realspecial ] .
the three - dimensional action contains @xmath31 scalar fields @xmath77 which are subject to one local @xmath0 symmetry and hence has @xmath78 independent scalar degrees of freedom .
while the @xmath25 combine the four - dimensional scalars @xmath20 with the kaluza - klein scalar @xmath29 , the @xmath33 contain the degrees of freedom of the four - dimensional gauge fields , and @xmath34 is dual to the kaluza - klein vector .
the constant tensor @xmath79 is the symplectic form of the cask manifold expressed in real variables @xmath25 .
the tensor @xmath80 is given by @xmath81 where the hesse potential @xmath82 is related to the prepotential @xmath83 by the legendre transformation given in  .
as shown in the appendices , the scalar potential @xmath71 is given in terms of the real coordinates as @xmath84 \;,\ ] ] where the dual scalars @xmath85 are defined by @xmath86 .
substituting this expression into the three - dimensional lagrangian becomes @xmath87    in the following we will restrict ourselves to static solutions , i.e.  set @xmath88 in , for which the final term in vanishes @xcite .
the equations of motion for @xmath33 are then given by @xmath89 whilst those for @xmath25 read @xmath90 finally , the three - dimensional einstein equations are @xmath91      we concentrate in this paper on purely imaginary ( pi ) field configurations , which we define to be those for which the complex scalars are rescaled versions of the scalars @xmath22 . see for the definition . ] @xmath92 are purely imaginary @xcite .
moreover , we restrict ourselves to a class of prepotentials of the form @xmath93 where the function @xmath19 is homogeneous of degree three and real - valued when evaluated on real fields . for the case of ungauged @xmath13 supergravity ,
such models were considered in @xcite .
note that those models with @xmath19 a cubic polynomial are precisely the ` very special ' prepotentials for which the solutions can be uplifted to five dimensions .
since we choose to fix the @xmath0 gauge by taking @xmath94 , this is equivalent to setting @xmath95 to zero .
models obtainable from five dimensions are invariant under constant shifts @xmath96 , and , hence , pi configurations will be referred to as ` axion - free ' .    for
the class of models the scalar fields @xmath25 take the form @xcite @xmath97 and hence we see that @xmath98 .
following @xcite we extend the pi condition to the scalars @xmath33 by imposing @xmath99 which sets also @xmath100 . the quantities @xmath101 and @xmath102
encode the four - dimensional field strengths , see ( [ fieldstrengths ] ) .    in the same way
, we extend the pi condition to the fluxes @xmath103 by imposing @xmath104 which sets @xmath105 .
we then find that the equations of motion  and the three - dimensional einstein equations simplify to @xmath106 @xmath107 and @xmath108    it turns out to be useful to write the equations of motion in terms of the dual variables @xmath85 and @xmath109 defined in appendix [ appendix : realspecial ] . in terms of these , the equations  become @xmath110
@xmath111 and @xmath112    in the next section we will look for solutions of  which can be lifted to regular non - extremal black branes in four dimensions .
our aim in this section is to construct a family of non - extremal black branes in the @xmath13 gauged supergravity theory with prepotential . restricting our attention to the pi configurations described in section [ ssecpi ]
, it can be shown that the hesse potential takes the form@xcite @xmath113 for general functions @xmath19 , the form of the metric @xmath114 is fairly complicated @xcite . however , since the field @xmath115 decouples from the rest , we can compute @xmath116 and this will be sufficient to find solutions valid for any choice of @xmath19 .
we remark here upon a slight abuse of notation which we will make throughout the remainder of this paper .
specifically , we denote by @xmath117 with @xmath118 those scalar fields which are actually the @xmath119th components of the vector @xmath120 .
the same is true of the components @xmath121 of the metric , which should properly be the @xmath122 components of @xmath80 .
this notation is convenient since @xmath123 are the remaining non - trivial @xmath25-fields within our ansatz .    for simplicity we will concentrate on solutions which are supported by a single electric charge @xmath124 and electric fluxes @xmath125 in this section
however , as we will see in section [ secmagbrane ] , the methods introduced in the following can be easily extended to deal also with solutions with a single magnetic charge switched on and sourced by both electric and magnetic fluxes .
the systematic investigation of dyonic black branes will be carried out in a future publication @xcite .
we make a brane - like ansatz for the three - dimensional metric : @xmath126 where @xmath127 is some function to be determined .
this form of the metric can always be obtained from the more commonly used form @xmath128 by a suitable redefinition @xmath129 .
we also impose that all fields @xmath85 and @xmath109 depend only on @xmath130 .
the coordinate @xmath130 has been chosen such that it is an affine parameter for geodesic curves on the scalar target space parametrized by @xmath25 and @xmath33 .
equivalently , the @xmath130-dependent part of the three - dimensional laplace operator is given by @xmath131 .
the non - zero components of the ricci tensor are given by @xmath132 where the dot denotes differentiation with respect to @xmath130 . with this choice
the three - dimensional einstein equations become @xmath133 for @xmath134 and @xmath135 for @xmath136 , where we have used .
equation is the hamiltonian constraint which needs to be imposed on solutions @xmath137 of the second order scalar field equations .
we remark that since we have consistently reduced the full field equations , we do not need to impose this constraint by hand , but have retained it as a field equation following from an action principle .
we now turn to the equations of motion for the fields @xmath85 and @xmath109 .
we start with the @xmath109 equations of motion , which read simply @xmath138 and can be integrated once to find @xmath139 for some constants @xmath140 , which are proportional to the electric and magnetic charges of the solution , @xmath141 @xcite .
the explicit relations between the @xmath109 and the field strengths can be found in appendix  [ appendix : realspecial ] .
for the case at hand we only have a single electric charge @xmath124 , and so the only non - zero component of @xmath142 is @xmath143 .
we turn now to the @xmath85 equations of motion , which become @xmath144    for the models without magnetic flux , @xmath145 , on which we concentrate in this section , the @xmath115 equation of motion decouples from the others . indeed , using with @xmath146
the @xmath115 equation of motion becomes @xmath147 this takes precisely the same form as in the ungauged case @xcite and can be solved with @xmath148 for some constants @xmath149 and @xmath150 .
since the solution is invariant under @xmath151 , we can take @xmath152 without loss of generality .
it will turn out that @xmath149 acts as a non - extremality parameter for the full solution . furthermore , as we will see later explicitly , @xmath130 naturally takes values @xmath153 . thus in order that @xmath154 for @xmath155 we will have to require @xmath156 .
the @xmath117 equations of motion , for @xmath118 , become @xmath157 multiplying by @xmath158 and summing over @xmath159 gives @xmath160 where we have made use of the homogeneity properties of the metric @xmath80 , viz .
@xmath161 and @xmath162 .
one can now compare this equation to , which for the model at hand becomes @xmath163 substituting from this into the last two terms of we obtain @xmath164 the left - hand side of this equation can be rewritten as a total derivative @xmath165 and so we can integrate to find @xmath166 for some integration constant @xmath167 , where we have chosen the factor for later convenience . now , using the identity @xmath168 @xcite one can show furthermore that @xmath169 substituting this expression into and further integrating gives @xmath170 where we have used the definition of @xmath171 given in , and have chosen the definition of the integration constant @xmath172 for later convenience . substituting the explicit expression for the hesse potential we therefore find @xmath173    let us now return to the hamiltonian constraint which , upon substituting the expression , becomes @xmath174    so far we have the following picture : the equations of motion for the @xmath117 are given by the set of coupled equations .
the solutions @xmath175 of should then satisfy the two constraints and .
we proceed by imposing that the @xmath117 are all proportional , which will in turn mean that all of the physical scalar fields @xmath20 are proportional to one another . specifically , we set @xmath176 for some constants @xmath177 . in terms of this ansatz ,
the constraints and ( the derivative of ) become @xmath178 we have made use here of the homogeneity properties of @xmath19 and the metric @xmath114 , as well as the identity @xmath179 @xcite which implies , for the models at hand , that @xmath180    the two equations can be combined into a second - order non - linear differential equation for @xmath181 : @xmath182 introducing the variable @xmath183 this becomes @xmath184 for @xmath185 and hence can be solved by @xmath186 where @xmath187 and @xmath188 are integration constants , and we have taken @xmath189 to be the positive root without loss of generality .
note that the right hand side should be non - negative for all @xmath190 , and hence we should pick @xmath191 and @xmath192 .
the solution now determines the function @xmath181 appearing in the metric ansatz in terms of some integration constants , which we will fix in section  [ ssecphysicality ]
.    we can now use to find an expression for @xmath193 . indeed , differentiating with respect to @xmath130 and substituting into the second equation in we obtain @xmath194 this can be integrated up to find @xmath195 where @xmath196 is an integration constant . since we have set all of the @xmath117 proportional to each other , we can therefore write @xmath197 for some constants @xmath198 . substituting this into we find that @xmath199 , and that the @xmath117 equation of motion is satisfied provided the integration constants @xmath200 are related to the electric fluxes @xmath201 via @xmath202    returning to then determines the constant @xmath172 in terms of @xmath187 and the fluxes @xmath201 as @xmath203 finally , the kaluza - klein scalar @xmath29 appearing in the metric ansatz is determined in terms of the @xmath85 via the @xmath204-gauge condition and the explicit form of the hesse potential .    to summarise , we find that the scalars @xmath85 are given by @xmath205 whilst the metric degrees of freedom are given by @xmath206 the @xmath207 signs in  should be chosen such that the function @xmath208 is well - defined .      in this section
we want to look at the conditions on the various integration constants which give rise to regular black brane solutions in four dimensions .
in particular , we impose that our solution has finite entropy density , which is the relevant regularity condition for solutions with non - compact horizon .
let us recall the form of the four - dimensional metric in the @xmath130 coordinates : @xmath209    we will see below that for a suitable choice of integration constants @xmath210 is an event horizon , while @xmath211 is the asymptotic regime at infinite distance .
the regularity of the solution within the bulk between horizon and infinity depends on the detailed properties of the function @xmath19 . in particular , when evaluating @xmath19 on the solution , we require that it has neither zeroes ( so that there are in particular no changes of sign of @xmath208 ) nor poles .
given the experience with similar issues for black hole solutions and domain walls , one expects that such solutions exist for any prepotential arising in string theory upon suitable restriction of the integration constants @xcite . in any case
, such questions can only be investigated explicitly on a case - by - case basis , while we restrict ourselves to questions that can be answered irrespective of the choice of @xmath19 .
the position of the event horizon can be found by looking at the value of @xmath130 for which the norm of the killing vector field @xmath212 vanishes . since @xmath213 as @xmath214
, we can identify the horizon with the limiting value @xmath214 provided @xmath215 .
if @xmath216 then the position of the horizon will change depending on the relative magnitudes of @xmath217 and @xmath149 , and so we will take @xmath215 in what follows .
the area of the horizon is given by @xmath218 which is divergent since the @xmath219 and @xmath220 coordinates are non - compact .
however , we can still define a finite entropy density @xmath221 provided the factor @xmath222 remains finite . from the expressions
one can show that in this limit we have @xmath223 in order that this be finite and non - zero at the horizon we therefore require @xmath224 which turns out to be equivalent to fixing @xmath225 .
note that in this case we likewise have @xmath226 .    we still at this stage have four integration constants @xmath227 which are _ a priori _ yet to be determined .
however , note that we can always absorb @xmath188 into a shift of @xmath130 and a redefinition of the constants @xmath187 and @xmath150 .
indeed , it will be useful to set @xmath228 at this stage so that the asymptotic region of the solution is at @xmath229 .
moreover , we see that in the extremal @xmath230 limit , the expression becomes @xmath231 . hence , we can scale @xmath130 to set @xmath232 , matching the conventions of the extremal nernst brane of @xcite .
we are therefore left with a two - parameter family of solutions to the three - dimensional equations of motion , parametrised by @xmath149 and @xmath150 , which we will interpret in terms of thermodynamic quantities in section [ ssecproperties ] .    before moving on to study properties of the solution ,
we summarise the results so far : the scalars @xmath85 and @xmath109 are given by @xmath233 whilst the metric degrees of freedom are given by @xmath234 the physical scalar fields @xmath92 can be determined from the expressions @xmath235 which were obtained in  @xcite , see appendix [ appendix : realspecial ] .
we find @xmath236 note that for @xmath237 , @xmath115 and @xmath117 all behave as @xmath238 when @xmath239 .
we will show in the following section that this implies that the physical scalar fields take finite values on the horizon for @xmath237 .
we now turn to an analysis of various properties of the solution obtained in section  [ ssecphysicality ] , postponing a fuller discussion to section  [ secdiscussion ] .
it is convenient to introduce the radial coordinate @xmath240 via @xmath241 with this definition , the asymptotic region is situated at @xmath242 , while the horizon is at @xmath243 . in terms of @xmath240 , we find the expressions @xmath244 where we have introduced the function - model . ]
@xmath245 .\ ] ] the physical scalar fields @xmath246 then take the form @xmath247 hence , for @xmath248 we find the asymptotic behaviour @xmath249 , whilst for @xmath250 we find @xmath251 .
the four - dimensional line element becomes @xmath252 where we have found it convenient to define @xmath253 from this form of the metric , it is clear that the limit @xmath230 can be achieved simply by setting @xmath254 and @xmath255 in this case we reproduce the extremal nernst brane solutions of @xcite , albeit in different coordinates .
this identifies @xmath149 as a parameter encoding the non - extremality of the solution .    for @xmath250 ,
the harmonic function for both the extremal and non - extremal solutions becomes @xmath256 .
the line element then becomes @xmath257 where we have defined @xmath258 with the sign chosen such that @xmath259 is positive .
the corresponding extremal solution can be obtained by setting the ` blackening factor ' @xmath254 in .      to investigate the near - horizon behaviour of the line element ,
we define @xmath260 and zoom in on the region @xmath261 .
we then find that for @xmath237 the near - horizon metric looks like @xmath262 which is the product of a two - dimensional rindler spacetime with two - dimensional flat space .
we also include , for comparison , the near - horizon behaviour of the extremal solution which , after putting @xmath263 , becomes @xmath264 .\ ] ]    by wick rotating to euclidean time @xmath265 in and enforcing regularity of the @xmath266 circle we can read off the temperature @xmath267 we can also read off from the entropy density of the solution , which is given by @xmath268 note that from and we can eliminate the integration constant @xmath149 in terms of the thermodynamic quantities @xmath221 and @xmath269 via .
we now turn to a consideration of the asymptotic @xmath242 properties of the line element , which for @xmath248 becomes @xmath271.\ ] ] note that this is the same for both the extremal and non - extremal solutions . making
the coordinate change @xmath272 then brings this to the form @xmath273 , \ ] ] which is conformally @xmath274 with boundary at @xmath275 .    for the case
@xmath250 , the asymptotic limit corresponds simply to @xmath276 in , from which we find the asymptotic line element , after a suitable coordinate redefinition .
the gauge field strength @xmath277 is determined from the scalar field @xmath278 via : @xmath279 substituting in the expression and integrating with respect to @xmath130 gives @xmath280,\ ] ] where we have chosen the integration constant such that @xmath281 , i.e.  that the gauge fields vanish on the horizon .
the chemical potential @xmath5 is then given by the asymptotic value of @xmath282 , @xmath283 , \ ] ] which diverges as @xmath284 .
note that in the extremal limit @xmath230 with @xmath248 we get @xmath285 .
we are now in a position to relate the integration constants @xmath149 and @xmath150 appearing in our solution to the thermodynamic quantities @xmath221 , @xmath269 and @xmath5 . in particular , we can rearrange to find @xmath286 where we have used .
returning to we then find an equation determining the entropy density as a function of the electric charge @xmath124 , fluxes @xmath287 , temperature @xmath269 and chemical potential @xmath5 of the black brane : @xmath288 one consequence of is that , if we keep @xmath259 , @xmath124 and @xmath5 fixed and send @xmath289 , we see that @xmath290 , which is precisely the strict ( planckian ) formulation of the third law of thermodynamics @xcite .
this identifies the solution constructed in section [ ssecphysicality ] as a non - extremal ( ` hot ' ) nernst brane .
we can further analyse by looking at the dimensionless ratio @xmath291 .
when @xmath291 is small , the second term in becomes negligible , and we find that the entropy density behaves as @xmath292 . on the other hand ,
when @xmath291 becomes large , the second term in dominates , and we find the behaviour @xmath293 .    in figure [ stdiagram ]
we plot equation for various values of @xmath5 , keeping @xmath124 and @xmath259 fixed .
this shows a ) the nernst law behaviour @xmath290 as @xmath289 , and b ) the crossover from the behaviour @xmath292 to @xmath293 .
varies with temperature @xmath269 for various values of the chemical potential @xmath5 , and with @xmath124 and @xmath259 fixed . ]
we now turn our attention to a simple reformulation of the procedure in section  [ stusec ] which for a certain class of prepotentials allows us to construct non - extremal black branes carrying magnetic charge . we will here simply present the supergravity solution , and leave a fuller discussion of the thermodynamics of magnetically - charged black branes for future work .
in particular , we are interested in prepotentials for which one of the fields @xmath294 decouples from the others . without loss of generality , we can assume that @xmath295 decouples , and consider prepotentials of the form @xmath296 where the function @xmath297 is homogeneous of degree 2 .
this class is particularly interesting from the perspective of embedding the model into string theory as it contains the tree - level heterotic prepotentials , which are linear in the heterotic dilaton @xmath298 .
we consider black brane solutions which are supported by a single magnetic charge @xmath299 , a magnetic flux @xmath300 , and electric fluxes @xmath301 .    in this case
we see that the equations of motion can be solved in precisely the same way as in section [ stusec ] , with the field @xmath302 and magnetic charge @xmath299 playing the role of @xmath115 and @xmath124 in the preceding section . in particular , we have @xmath303 whilst @xmath115 and @xmath304 take the same form as after replacing @xmath305 with @xmath300 in the obvious place . moreover , the function @xmath306 remains unchanged and , since @xmath307 is symmetric in @xmath115 and @xmath302 , we find that the line element takes the same form as in section [ stusec ] .
looking at the near - horizon behaviour we again find that regularity of the solution imposes the same relation between the integration constants , @xmath225 , as before .
the entropy density is therefore @xmath308 whilst the temperature of the solution is given by @xmath309
in this paper we have provided a new technique for the construction of non - extremal black brane solutions to large classes of @xmath13 @xmath0 gauged supergravity models , utilising the techniques of time - like dimensional reduction followed by a rewriting of the effective three - dimensional degrees of freedom through the real formulation of special geometry . in section  [ stusec ]
we explicitly constructed a family of non - extremal black branes supported by a single electric charge and an arbitrary number of electric fluxes .
this family of branes has an entropy density behaving as @xmath2 for @xmath37 , which therefore vanishes at @xmath310 , where we recover the extremal nernst brane solutions of @xcite .
we anticipate that such non - extremal nernst branes will have interesting applications in the context of holography , where they could prove useful in describing dual field theory configurations at finite temperature and chemical potential which satisfy the nernst law .
one issue with regards to a holographic interpretation is that our solutions do not fit naturally into the framework of ads / cmt , since they do not asymptote to @xmath274 , but rather conformal @xmath274 , as seen in .
hence , the stress tensor of the dual field theory in the uv would not be scale invariant .
however , in recent years much progress has been made in understanding the holographic description of such ` hyperscaling violating ' theories , as well as the more general class of hyperscaling violating lifshitz ( hvlif ) theories  @xcite , which we now review .
consider spacetime geometries of the form ( we use the conventions of  @xcite ) @xmath311 where @xmath312 label the spatial directions on the boundary , @xmath38 is the ` dynamical critical ' ( lifshitz ) exponent , and @xmath39 is the ` hyperscaling violating ' exponent . note that for @xmath313 , @xmath314 one recovers the metric on @xmath315 .    by looking at the near - horizon and boundary behaviour of our solutions
, we see that the nernst brane interpolates between two hvlif geometries with @xmath316 .
there are four cases of interest , corresponding to whether @xmath150 and @xmath149 are zero or non - zero :    * @xmath250 , @xmath317 : the solution becomes globally hvlif with @xmath8 .
it has zero temperature and infinite chemical potential .
* @xmath250 , @xmath237 : the solution has finite temperature and infinite chemical potential , and interpolates between a near - horizon rindler geometry , with @xmath6 , and an asymptotic hvlif geometry with @xmath8 . * @xmath248 , @xmath317 : the solution has zero temperature and a finite chemical potential .
it interpolates between a hvlif geometry with @xmath8 at the horizon , and the conformal @xmath274 geometry   with @xmath7 at infinity .
this is the nernst brane solution of @xcite .
* @xmath248 , @xmath237 : the solution has finite temperature and chemical potential , and interpolates between a near - horizon rindler geometry with @xmath6 and the conformal @xmath274 geometry with @xmath7 at infinity .
note that all of these values are consistent with the constraints imposed by the null energy condition  @xcite .
we have therefore found , _ analytically _ , a family of solutions which interpolate between two hvlif geometries .
this family is parametrised by the two integration constants @xmath149 and @xmath150 , or equivalently by the temperature @xmath4 and chemical potential @xmath5 of the solution , both of which can be freely varied .
both parameters have a distinct effect on the near horizon and asymptotic forms of the solution : while the extremal or zero temperature limit @xmath318 changes the near horizon solution from @xmath6 to @xmath8 , the infinite chemical potential limit @xmath284 changes the geometry at infinity from @xmath7 to @xmath8 .
if both limits are performed we obtain a global hvlif solution with @xmath8 which we interpret as the ground state of the given charge sector . note that like any lifshitz solution different from ads it is not geodesically complete , and that the scalars are non - constant and run off to zero or infinity in the asymptotic regions .
however , a similar behaviour can occur for domain wall solutions in gauged supergravity which , for lack of more symmetric solutions , are interpreted as ground states .
sometimes this interpretation can be further justified by an embedding into string theory or m - theory , see for example @xcite .
while we leave studying the string theory embedding of our solutions for future work , we remark that the interpretation is consistent with a limit where the temperature is zero and the chemical potential infinite .
since so far solutions interpolating between hvlif geometries have only been found by relying on a mixture of analytical and numerical methods , we have made a significant step forward , and expect that the techniques used and described in this paper will be useful in making further progress . while we leave searching for a concrete holographic dual of the bulk geometries presented in this paper to future work , we can already make some interesting observations which shed some light on the properties which such a putative dual theory might possess .
let us first consider the extremal ( @xmath317 ) solution with @xmath250 . since this is the gravitational ground state solution with @xmath8 , zero temperature and infinite chemical potential , we expect it to be dual to the ground state of a @xmath319-dimensional qft with hyperscaling exponent @xmath320 and lifshitz exponent @xmath321 .
we remark that the specific value @xmath320 for a qft in @xmath316 space dimensions seems to be required for the description of states with hidden fermi surfaces , although a three - loop calculation gives @xmath322 rather than @xmath321 @xcite .
now consider turning on some finite temperature @xmath323 on the field theory side . by a simple scaling argument
, one can argue @xcite that the entropy density of the thermal state is related to the temperature as @xmath324 .
we therefore expect that the non - extremal nernst brane with @xmath250 in provides us with the relevant gravity dual to the @xmath319-dimensional qft with @xmath320 and @xmath321 at finite temperature . indeed , taking @xmath325 in the relation we see that the entropy density of the brane solution is related to the temperature as @xmath2 which is the expected behaviour from the field theory arguments , and therefore consistent with our tentative interpretation .
we now move on to consider what happens at finite chemical potential @xmath326 , which corresponds to @xmath248 . in this case
, the extremal nernst brane interpolates between a hvlif geometry with @xmath8 at the horizon , and a hvlif with @xmath7 at infinity , which is conformal to @xmath274 .
one possible interpretation is as an rg flow between two qfts : one with hyperscaling exponent @xmath327 in the uv ; and one with hyperscaling exponent @xmath320 and lifshitz exponent @xmath321 in the ir . as the gravity solution is smooth , and we do not seem to have a natural candidate for an order parameter identifying a phase transition , we think that the more likely interpretation is that the uv ` phase ' and the ir ` phase ' are related by smooth crossover . for the ir theory
we expect that the entropy scales like @xmath328 , which agrees with the behaviour of the nernst brane solution for low temperature @xmath329 . adding temperature changes the near horizon geometry , but leaves the asymptotic geometry at infinity unchanged , which is consistent with interpreting these configurations as thermal states .
we therefore expect that the ir behaviour is correctly described by the nernst brane solution , which in turn predicts a scaling @xmath330 of the entropy for high temperatures , @xmath331 .
this however does not agree with the expected scaling of our tentative uv theory with @xmath7 , which predicts @xmath332 .
we also note that the asymptotic uv geometry , while conformal to @xmath274 , can not be interpreted as an alternative ground state of our supergravity theory , because it is not , when taken as a global geometry , part of our family of solutions . moreover
, the physical scalar fields @xmath333 run off to infinity in the uv region , which indicates strong coupling or decompactification .
taken together this suggests that the description in terms of our four - dimensional gauged supergravity theory is incomplete in the uv , and that further degrees of freedom become relevant .
if we accept that the uv geometry correctly captures the thermodynamic behaviour then the corresponding uv theory should have a scaling behaviour @xmath334 ( @xmath335 ) .
the resulting tentative phase diagram is shown in figure  [ phasediagram ] .
the above mentioned analogy with domain walls together with the runaway behaviour of the scalars suggests to interpret the uv behaviour as a decompactification limit and to embed the four - dimensional supergravity theory into a higher dimensional theory . since the class of prepotentials that we have considered in this paper includes those ` very special ' prepotentials for which the theory can be uplifted to five dimensions , the most obvious embedding is into five - dimensional supergravity .
there are grounds to believe  @xcite that the dimensional reduction of theories admitting @xmath336 vacua would admit vacua with some nontrivial hvlif behaviour .
therefore we expect that by lifting our solutions to five dimensions we will obtain new asymptotically @xmath337 finite temperature solutions in @xmath13 gauged supergravity which still satisfy the nernst law hot nernst solutions were constructed in  @xcite , their solutions do not reduce to the finite temperature solutions presented here . ]
. we will expand on this point in @xcite , and remark that an asymptotic @xmath337 leads to a scaling of the entropy @xmath338 , ( @xmath339 ) , which is consistent with our proposed uv theory .
we should also point out that there are issues with the interpretation of our solutions if the temperature is strictly zero , since the nernst brane solution has infinite tidal forces and run - away behaviour of the scalars at the horizon in the extremal limit .
this again indicates a breakdown of the effective description , and strictly speaking the supergravity solution should only be trusted at low but finite temperature .
thus , as in the similar case of the holographic interpretation of hyperscaling violating solutions of einstein - maxwell - dilaton theories @xcite , the nernst brane solution is not a valid description of its ( tentative ) dual over the full range of the energy ( radial coordinate ) from the uv ( infinity ) to the ir ( horizon ) , but only over a finite interval outside the horizon .
we leave it to future work to characterize the range of validity more quantitatively , and to identify the necessary completions in the uv and ir using a string theory embedding .
one possible strategy to further investigate the zero temperature limit is to adapt formalisms that allow to include higher derivative terms . in @xmath1 supergravity a certain class of higher derivative terms ( those encoded in the so - called weyl multiplet ) , which are related to the topological string , lead to a generalization of the framework of special geometry , on which we relied in the article @xcite .
one could also try to adapt the entropy function formalism @xcite , which employs universal properties of near horizon geometries and does not depend on supersymmetry .
finally we comment on further possible future directions on the gravity side . here
it would be interesting to find solutions where other and possibly more charges and fluxes have been turned on .
we expect that our formalism is particularly suited to finding dyonic solutions , due to its built - in electric - magnetic covariance @xcite . for work in this direction
it is encouraging that work on static bps solutions in @xmath0 gauged supergravity solutions with symmetric scalar target spaces has led to the construction of the general dyonic solution @xcite .
we think that the systematic methods and explicit analytical solutions interpolating between hvlif geometries that we have presented in this paper will help to make progress towards a classification of solutions in gauged supergravity , and of the hvlif landscape , and to extend and deepen our understanding of the field theory / gravity dictionary .
we would like to thank g.  lopes  cardoso for drawing our attention to the problem of constructing non - extremal versions of nernst branes in gauged supergravity , and for many further useful discussions .
we also thank p.  athanasopoulos , m.  haack , s.  gentle , p.  rakow and o.  vaughan for useful discussions .
the work of pd is supported by stfc grant st / j50113x/1 and national research foundation of korea grants 2005 - 0093843 , 2010 - 220-c00003 and 2012k2a1a9055280 .
the work of de is supported by stfc studentship st / k502145/1 .
the work of tm is partially supported by the stfc consolidated grants st / g00062x/1 and st / l000431/1 .
in this appendix we review the real formulation of special geometry introduced in @xcite , based on the work of  @xcite , and extend it to include scalar potentials of the form ( [ scalpot ] ) , which result from a flux superpotential ( [ superpot ] ) .
starting from the holomorphic formulation , where the complex scalars @xmath22 parametrise a conic affine special khler ( cask ) manifold , and where all vector multiplet couplings are encoded in a holomorphic prepotential @xmath27 , which is homogeneous of degree two , one introduces special real coordinates @xmath340 , where @xmath341 note that @xmath51 is homogeneous of degree one . in the real formulation
all vector multiplet couplings are encoded in a hesse potential @xmath28 , which is homogeneous of degree two , and which is obtained from the imaginary part of the holomorphic prepotential by a legendre transformation , which replaces @xmath342 by @xmath343 as an independent variable : @xmath344 the special real coordinates @xmath25 are darboux coordinates , and the khler form on the cask manifold is simply @xmath345    it is useful to note that the first derivatives @xmath346 of the hesse potential are related to the imaginary parts of @xmath22 and @xmath347 by @xmath348 and provide an alternative , ` dual ' coordinate system on the cask manifold .    to obtain the associated projective special khler ( psk ) manifold , one imposes the d - gauge @xmath349 , together with a condition which fixes a @xmath0 gauge .
if one wants to preserve symplectic covariance , one postpones fixing a @xmath0 gauge and retains a local @xmath0 gauge invariance .
geometrically this corresponds to working on the total space of a @xmath0 principal bundle over the psk manifold .    in @xcite
it was shown how to express all couplings appearing in the bosonic part of the vector multiplet lagrangian in terms of real coordinates .
in particular the cask metric @xmath350 is replaced by the hessian metric @xmath351    for the purpose of this paper we need to rewrite the scalar potential @xmath48 of ( [ scalpot ] ) , and the associated flux superpotential @xmath352 of ( [ superpot ] ) , in terms of real coordinates . using that @xmath353 by homogeneity , and using the formulae given above ,
it is straightforward to obtain @xmath354 where we have defined @xmath355 .    in order to obtain the potential @xmath71 as given in  , we must compute the derivatives @xmath356 since this derivative involves the real coordinates @xmath357 rather than @xmath358 , we apply the chain rule to @xmath359 and compute @xmath360 after decomposing the second derivatives of the prepotential @xmath83 into real and imaginary parts ( including a conventional factor of 2 ) by @xmath361 , one can apply the chain rule to show that @xmath362 and read from  @xcite that @xmath363 combining this , we find @xmath364 finally , we can put all of this together to obtain @xmath365 where @xmath366 , @xmath367 is the inverse hessian metric on the cask manifold ( see  @xcite ) , and @xmath368 is the inverse of @xmath369 .    using  , we have that @xmath370 this can be substituted into  , which after simplification becomes @xmath371 where we have used the identity @xmath372 @xcite .
the final expression for the scalar potential given purely in terms of real coordinates then comes from   using   and   as follows : @xmath373 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used homogeneity @xmath374 .
lastly , we substitute the @xmath204-gauge condition @xmath375 into to obtain @xmath376.\ ] ] note that the expression within the square brackets is homogeneous of degree zero .
this is useful in order to rewrite @xmath71 in terms of rescaled variables after dimensional reduction .
we shall now define the various terms appearing in the three - dimensional lagrangian  , which uses a modified version of the real formulation of special geometry that is adapted to dimensional reduction .
we follow the conventions of  @xcite , to which we refer the reader for further details .
firstly , the complex scalar fields , @xmath22 , appearing in the four - dimensional lagrangian  , are replaced by rescaled scalars @xmath377 where @xmath29 is the kaluza klein scalar . in the four - dimensional theory parametrised by the @xmath22
the radial direction of the cask manifold , which is generated by the vector field @xmath378 is a gauge degree of freedom .
the above rescaling promotes it to a physical degree of freedom , which is equivalent to the kaluza - klein scalar .
it turns out that this rescaling leads to a convenient parametrization of the reduced three - dimensional theory . rewriting the d - gauge condition ( [ dgaugex ] ) in terms of @xmath379
, we obtain @xmath380 which determines @xmath29 in terms of the scalar fields @xmath379 .    due to the homogeneity properties of the prepotential and hesse potential ,
we can obtain a real parametrization which is based on the rescaled complex scalars @xmath379 .
the associated real coordinates are defined by the decomposition @xmath381 as @xmath382    furthermore , after reducing to three dimensions it is possible to write the gauge degrees of freedom using scalar fields as well . in particular , we define @xmath383 where @xmath384 are the components of the four - dimensional gauge fields @xmath385 along the reduction direction , and @xmath386 are the hodge - duals of the three - dimensional vector parts . specifically , these scalars descend from the four - dimensional field strengths as follows : @xmath387 where @xmath388 are defined as @xmath389 we can make further use of hodge duality to encode the kaluza - klein vector degree of freedom using the scalar field @xmath34 @xcite , although we will not need this here since we deal only with static configurations .    in terms of rescaled complex scalars
@xmath379 and rescaled real variables @xmath25 , the relation between prepotential @xmath390 and hesse potential @xmath28 is @xmath391 we also note that the d - gauge , when expressed in terms of rescaled real scalars , reads @xmath392    in the lagrangian  , we also use the tensor field @xmath393 this tensor can be interpreted as a metric on the cask manifold , which is related to @xmath394 by flipping the signature along the radial direction generated by the field @xmath395 , combined with a conformal transformation which changes the scale transformation @xmath396 , where @xmath397 , from being a homothety to being an isometry .
this follows from the obvious fact that while @xmath398 is homogeneous of degree @xmath399 , @xmath400 is homogeneous of degree @xmath401 . note that the metric coefficients @xmath394 and @xmath80 are homogeneous of degrees 0 and @xmath66 , respectively .
both tensors are related by @xmath402    it will be convenient for us to introduce a set of dual coordinates with respect to the metric @xmath80 defined by @xmath403 one can show that @xmath404 where we have used that @xmath405 is homogeneous of degree @xmath65 for the first identity and the chain rule for the second .      finally , we re - express the scalar potential in terms of variables adapted to dimensional reduction .
since , as we remarked , the expression in the square brackets of ( [ v ] ) is homogeneous of degree zero , it remains invariant if we rescale the real coordinates @xmath25 by @xmath408 . to express @xmath71 in terms of the tensor @xmath80 we use the relation to write @xmath409.\ ] ] finally
, we use   to re - write @xmath71 in terms of the dual coordinates @xmath85 , and take into account that upon dimensional reduction the term @xmath410 in the lagrangian gets multiplet by @xmath411 and obtain @xmath412.\ ] ] [ 2]#2            x.  dong , s.  harrison , s.  kachru , g.  torroba , and h.  wang , _ aspects of holography for theories with hyperscaling violation _
, _ jhep _ * 1206 * ( 2012 ) 041 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1201.1905 [ arxiv:1201.1905 ] ] .
a.  chamblin , r.  emparan , c.  v. johnson , and r.  c. myers , _ charged ads black holes and catastrophic holography _ , _ phys.rev .
_ * d60 * ( 1999 ) 064018 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9902170 [ hep - th/9902170 ] ] .
g.  lopes  cardoso , b.  de  wit , and t.  mohaupt , _ corrections to macroscopic supersymmetric black hole entropy _ , _ phys.lett .
_ * b451 * ( 1999 ) 309316 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9812082 [ hep - th/9812082 ] ] .
g.  lopes  cardoso , b.  de  wit , j.  kappeli , and t.  mohaupt , _ stationary bps solutions in n = 2 supergravity with @xmath414 interactions _ , _ jhep _ * 12 * ( 2000 ) 019 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0009234 [ hep - th/0009234 ] ] .
s.  barisch - dick , g.  lopes  cardoso , m.  haack , and s.  nampuri , _ extremal black brane solutions in five - dimensional gauged supergravity _ , _ jhep _ * 1302 * ( 2013 ) 103 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1211.0832 [ arxiv:1211.0832 ] ] .
d.  klemm and o.  vaughan , _ nonextremal black holes in gauged supergravity and the real formulation of special geometry ii _ , _ class.quant.grav .
_ * 30 * ( 2013 ) 065003 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1211.1618 [ arxiv:1211.1618 ] ] .
g.  l. cardoso , b.  de  wit , and s.  mahapatra , _ non - holomorphic deformations of special geometry and their applications _ , _
springer proc.phys._ * 144 * ( 2013 ) 158 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1206.0577 [ arxiv:1206.0577 ] ] .
p.  bueno , w.  chemissany , p.  meessen , t.  ortin , and c.  shahbazi , _ lifshitz - like solutions with hyperscaling violation in ungauged supergravity _ , _ jhep _ * 1301 * ( 2013 ) 189 , [ http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1209.4047[arxiv:1209.4047 ] ] .