the connection between core collapse supernovae and neutron stars @xcite has had a solid observational footing for almost forty years , due largely to the discovery of young radio pulsars in supernova remnants ( snrs ) like vela @xcite and in the crab nebula @xcite .
energetic young pulsars like these are strong radio and x - ray sources , and often power synchrotron nebulae called pulsar wind nebulae or pwne @xcite that are indirect markers of pulsars ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
the idea that young neutron stars resemble the crab pulsar came to dominate the search for the products of supernovae ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) .
recently , though , young neutron stars have been revealed in a wide variety of manifestations , from anomalous x - ray pulsars ( axps ) and soft @xmath2-ray repeaters ( sgrs ) , to nearby thermal and radio quiet neutron stars , to long period radio pulsars with high inferred magnetic fields . as exemplified by the identification of the central compact object ( cco ) in the snr @xcite ,
much of this diversity has come from x - ray observations .
while this diversity is clearly demonstrated observationally , theory and simulation can not yet constrain the fundamental birth properties of neutron stars ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
models still have difficulties achieving explosions , much less following the activity in the post - collapse object in any detail .
* hereafter ) have attempted to address our lack of understanding of stellar death and neutron star cooling by defining a volume - limited ( @xmath3  kpc ) sample of supernova remnants ( snrs ) , examining the neutron stars that they contain , and outlining a survey designed to detect or significantly constrain neutron stars in the remaining remnants .
the primary subsample discussed in is one where the snr diameter is @xmath4 , so that the _ chandra x - ray observatory _ can observe a significant fraction of the snr interior with its acis - i detector and hence cover the area where neutron stars would be with a reasonable range of velocities ( @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the velocity perpendicular to the line of sight ) . also discuss two other subsamples of snrs : one with diameters @xmath7 for which _ xmm - newton _  is suitable ( and which we will present in a forthcoming paper ) , and one with @xmath8 .
it is this subsample of the six largest snrs from that we consider here .
the organization of the paper is as follows . in   [
sec : snrs ] we give brief summaries of the six snrs discussed here . in
[ sec : bsc ] we describe our identification of candidate x - ray sources in and around the snrs . in
[ sec : cpt ] we detail the initial identification of optical / ir counterparts to the x - ray sources using available sky surveys : as discussed in , optical / ir observations are a powerful way to reject x - ray sources that are not neutron stars ( see also e.g. , @xcite ) . with the sky surveys we were able to identify most of the x - ray sources with high confidence : those for which we were not certain were selected for additional _ chandra _  observations and optical / ir observations (   [ sec : cxo ] ) .
finally , we give our discussion and conclusions in
[ sec : disc ] .
all coordinates are j2000.0 .
l l c c l c c & g65.2 + 5.7 & @xmath9 & 0.8 & optical velocity & 1.4 & 6.7 + & cygnus loop & @xmath10 & 0.44 & optical proper motion & 0.8 & 1.7 + & & 110 & 1.3 & nei fits & 3.5 & 29 + & hb9 & @xmath11 & @xmath12 & hi , optical velocity & 1 & @xmath13 + & monoceros & 220 & 1.2 & optical velocity & 0.8 & 13 + & lupus loop & 180 & 1.2 & nei fits & 0.5 & 12.0 +     +
we list the snrs for this paper , along with relevant parameters , in table  [ tab : snrs ] .
each snr has a distance determined from a more reliable method than the @xmath14-@xmath15 method ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , but they are not all of the same quality . in the best cases , the distances are from kinematic observations of optical or radio lines . in the worst cases , the distances are from fitting shock models to the x - ray data ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
these distances involve many uncertainties beyond the kinematic distances , including the assumption of a sedov - phase remnant , the state of equilibration in the system , the non - sphericity of the explosion , and the unknown total explosion energy . for kinematic distances ,
the uncertainties are probably @xmath16% , but for distances from x - ray fitting they could exceed 50% @xcite .
the ages tend to be derived from x - ray fits for all sources , although having an independently determined distance for some sources makes for better constraints .
below we discuss each snr in more detail .
snr  g65.3 + 5.7  ( also known as g65.2 + 5.7 ) was identified as a snr by @xcite by its filamentary line emission .
it has major axes of @xmath17 . according to @xcite ,
the age is 2025  kyr , and the distance is @xmath181.0  kpc ( a kinematic distance derived from the velocity of optical emission lines ; also see @xcite ) .
@xcite show data from pointed _
rosat_observations @xcite but do not discuss point sources ; the _ rosat _  data detect emission from much of the interior at @xmath19 , with @xmath20 pixels .
@xcite do mention an extended ( @xmath21 radius ) soft source at @xmath22 @xmath23 but come to no conclusion as to its identity .
the inner @xmath24 were searched for radio pulsars by @xcite at 1410  mhz down to a limit of 0.1  mjy , but given the size of snr  g65.3 + 5.7  a transverse velocity of only @xmath25 would have moved a neutron star outside the search region so the lack of detection was not very constraining ,    the 0.58-s radio pulsar lies @xmath26 from the center of the remnant .
however , with no estimate of the spin - down rate ( and hence no spin - down age ) , the period seems rather large to be associated with an snr ( it would require an unusual but not unheard of magnetic field of @xmath27  g ) , and no definite claim of an association can be made @xcite .
snr  g74.0@xmath288.5 , also known as the cygnus loop , is a @xmath29 radio and x - ray shell .
the distance , estimated from measurements of the shock velocity and proper motion is 0.44  kpc @xcite and the age is 8  kyr @xcite .
@xcite reported @xmath30 in the interior over the @xmath31 field of the sis for their _ asca _ observation , and used these data to conclude that snr  g74.0@xmath288.5  was likely the result of a type  ii supernova on the basis of elemental abundances .
@xcite searched snr  g74.0@xmath288.5  for promising x - ray point sources that might be compact objects , and identified two , one of which they later concluded was an active galactic nucleus ( agn ) on the basis of its long - term variability , x - ray spectrum , and radio counterpart @xcite , and the other of which they conclude may be a neutron star .
the inner @xmath32 were searched for radio pulsars by @xcite down to a 430  mhz flux limit of 0.3  mjy , but given the size of snr  g74.0@xmath288.5  the lack of detection was not very constraining ( @xmath33 ) .
the inner @xmath34 were also searched by @xcite for pulsars down to a 400-mhz flux of 3  mjy .
assuming an average radio spectrum for radio pulsars of @xmath35 , this translates to a 1400-mhz luminosity limit of @xmath36 , which is considerably fainter than the very low luminosity ( @xmath37 ; * ? ? ?
snr  g156.2 + 5.7  was discovered in the _ rosat _
all - sky survey by @xcite .
it has a faint @xmath38 shell in both x - rays and radio , and non - equilibrium fits to the x - ray data place it at a distance of @xmath39  kpc with an age of 15  kyr @xcite .
@xcite searched snr  g74.0@xmath288.5  for radio pulsars , tiling seven pointings of the 76-m lovell telescope at jodrell bank , each of which covered @xmath40 .
the search did not find any pulsars , down to a flux limit of @xmath41  mjy at 606  mhz , or a 1400-mhz luminosity limit of @xmath42 .
snr  g160.9 + 2.6 , also known as hb  9 , is a @xmath43 radio shell with bright x - rays in the interior .
@xcite use x - ray fitting to estimate a distance of 1.5  kpc and an age of 820  kyr .
this distance is consistent with the upper limit of 4  kpc derived from other measurements @xcite .
the inner @xmath34 were also searched by @xcite for pulsars down to a 610-mhz flux of 15  mjy .
@xcite discovered an old radio pulsar ( ) in the interior of the snr , although the association between the pulsar and the snr is generally considered to be false ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) based on the large spin - down age and low spin - down energy loss rate for the pulsar ( @xmath44  yr and @xmath45 , respectively ) .
snr  g205.5 + 0.5 , also known as the monoceros nebula , is a @xmath46 radio shell .
the systemic velocity of optical line emission puts the snr at a distance of 0.8  kpc @xcite , although distances up to 1.6  kpc are preferred by low - frequency radio data that show the snr within the mon  ob2 association @xcite .
the age is likely @xmath47  kyr , as inferred from fits to x - ray data @xcite .
snr  g330.0 + 15.0 , the lupus loop , is a low surface brightness radio shell approximately @xmath48 in diameter .
non - equilibrium fits to the x - ray data and comparison with the column density of the nearby remnant of sn  1006 suggest a distance of 1.01.2  kpc and an age of 50  kyr @xcite .
_ chandra _  or _ xmm - newton _  imaging of the entire fields of the large - diameter snrs listed in table  [ tab : snrs ] is impractical because of their sizes . their proximities ( @xmath49  kpc ) ,
though , means that we do not need the high sensitivities of _ chandra _  or _ xmm - newton _  to achieve the same luminosity limit as in .
we therefore used the _ rosat _
all - sky survey bright source catalog ( hereafter bsc ; @xcite ) for our source selection .
this was a survey of the entire sky with the position - sensitive proportional counter ( pspc ) aboard _
rosat_.    the positional accuracy of the pspc does not approach that of _ chandra _  or even _ xmm - newton _  ( typical uncertainties are @xmath50 ) , and the observations are not as deep as the pointed _ chandra _  and _ xmm - newton_observations used for the other snrs . nonetheless , the bsc is useful .
as seen in table  [ tab : snrs ] , its limit of @xmath51 in the pspc is actually of roughly comparable depth to our _ chandra _  observations in  @xmath52  when the smaller distances and column densities of the snrs in this paper are taken into account . while the x - ray positions do not in all cases allow unambiguous optical identifications , the relative brightness and softness of the x - ray sources compared to those in means that very often stars from the digitized sky survey ( dss ) or 2mass @xcite can be identified as counterparts .
we selected the bsc sources within twice the nominal radii ( for elliptical sources , we took the semi - major axes ) of the snrs in table  [ tab : snrs ] ( as defined by their positions and sizes given by @xcite ) that had @xmath53 and were listed as unextended ( a value of 0 in the ` ext ` column of the bsc catalog ) . searching outside the remnants
allowed us to find neutron stars that have overtaken the snr shocks  not an uncommon occurrence @xcite in snrs of the ages considered here ( 1030  kyr ) .
this gave us all of the x - ray sources listed in table  [ tab : srcs ] .
for the sake of comparison between sources , we plot the distribution of hardness ratios in figure  [ fig : hard ] .      in our analysis
, we rejected those bsc sources that were identified as extended .
this was for several reasons : we eliminated peaks in diffuse background emission that may have been identified as discrete sources , and we eliminated large extended objects such as galaxy clusters .
practically , point sources offer much better astrometry and are better suited to counterpart identification .
however , in some sense our selection was less than ideal .
we would have eliminated any bright pwne , although these might have been identified by previous searches .
also , source confusion makes our resulting luminosity limits less constraining than they might otherwise be , as two nearby point - sources could have been identified as a single extended source and hence been rejected .
given the relatively low space density of bsc sources ( fig .
[ fig : dens ] ) this should not be a major effect , but it should still be noted .
in contrast , our _ chandra _  observations do not suffer from any confusion limitations .
one might ask if the diffuse emission from the snrs themselves will limit the depth of the bsc in the snr interiors . we have found in general that this is not the case .
figure  [ fig : dens ] shows the density of bsc sources ( both point - like and of all sizes ) within different radii from the snr centers . while the inner reaches of the snrs have few sources and therefore poor statistics , in no case is there a statistically significant deficit of point sources inside the snr .
there might be a slight deficit inside snr  g156.2 + 5.7  or snr  g160.9 + 2.6 , but these are also the smallest of the snrs and therefore have the fewest total sources .
similarly , in figure  [ fig : bg ] we show the average background count - rates determined when extracting the sources plotted in figure  [ fig : dens ] , with the same binning .
two of the snrs ( g65.3 + 5.7  and g74.0@xmath288.5 ) do show background increases in the interiors , two do not ( g205.5 + 0.5  and g330.0 + 15.0 ) , and two are uncertain due to few counts ( g156.2 + 5.7  and g160.9 + 2.6 ) , but even an increase of a factor of three above the mean background rate ( @xmath54 ) would give only @xmath55 within the 90% confidence radius of a pspc source ( for 0.3  kev ) which is a factor of 10 less than the minimum source count - rate for the bsc . therefore the diffuse snr emission should not have significantly affected the bsc source detection , and it is unlikely that there were any point sources that were missed .      besides the bsc , we took advantage of x - ray observations in the literature to identify additional sources for _ chandra _  followup .
these were : for snr  g74.0@xmath288.5 , ax  j2049.6 + 2939 ( from _ asca _ ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) ; and for snr  g205.5 + 0.5 : _ einstein _
sources 1 , 3 , and 6 from @xcite , known as 1e  0627.4 + 0537 , 1e  0630.9 + 0611 , and 1e  0636.8 + 0517 , respectively .
once we had assembled the list of x - ray sources , we then examined the publicly available surveys ( dss , 2mass , and nrao vla sky survey limit of the nvss . ]
[ nvss ; @xcite ] ) , as well as examination of simbad and the relevant literature . with these sources of information
, we were able to identify likely counterparts to 41 of the 50 sources in table  [ tab : srcs ] .
we list the relevant data ( x - ray and optical ) of the identifications in table  [ tab : srcs ] , with a summary of all identifications and additional notes in table  [ tab : id ] .
the separations between the nominal x - ray and optical positions were consistent with the predicted x - ray position uncertainties ( fig .
[ fig : offset ] ) .
there are a number of cases where there were multiple stars within the x - ray error circles , some of which were known to be physically associated with each other ( as noted in simbad ) . in these cases
we list multiple possible counterparts in table  [ tab : srcs ] .
the true source of the x - ray emission may be any one of the stars , or may in fact come from the interactions between them .
while the identifications were made only on the basis of positional coincidence with bright stars , in many cases we can be additionally confident .
this is because the stars are so bright ( @xmath56  mag ) that the chances of a false association are negligible or the stars are of types known to have x - ray emission ( e.g. , t tauri stars ) . to aid in the evaluation of our identifications ,
we plot the cumulative number density of 2mass sources for each snr in figure  [ fig : stars ] . for a typical position uncertainty of @xmath50
, we expect that all identifications with 2mass sources brighter than @xmath57  mag will be real ( chance probability @xmath0% ) , and even for sources brighter than @xmath58  mag the identifications will be probable ( chance rates @xmath59% ) .
we note , though , that while 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037  is consistent with having an association with one of the identified 2mass sources , the association is not secure .
chandra _  followup observation likely would have been definitive as it was for the majority of the ambiguous sources discussed in section  [ sec : cxo ] , but due to an oversight on our part this source was not selected for followup _ chandra _  observations .
we therefore discuss 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037  in extra detail in section  [ sec : rxsd ] .    given the uncertainties in spectrum and foreground column density , virtually all of the x - ray sources are consistent with being stars ( as opposed to active galaxies ; fig .
[ fig : fxk ] ) .
we show 2mass images of the x - ray sources with optical counterparts indicated in figures  [ fig : opt1][fig : opt12 ] .
the nine bsc sources that had no obvious optical counterparts ( excluding 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037 , as mentioned above ) , plus the four sources from   [ sec : addl ] , were selected for _ chandra _  followup observations . here , as in , we selected the exposure times ( 36  ksec ) based on the known column densities to the snrs ( tab .
[ tab : snrs ] ) and a blackbody spectrum with @xmath60  kev .
the positions are known to sufficient accuracy to allow use of the acis - s3 ccd @xcite .
depending on the source brightnesses , however , we were concerned about photon pileup for some of the sources , so we used the @xmath61- or @xmath62-subarray modes ( which also provides improved timing information ) , depending on the positional uncertainties .
a log of the observations is in table  [ tab : cxo ] .    in most of the cases ,
the _ chandra _  observations revealed nothing extraordinary . in the case of the bsc sources
, the _ chandra _  data typically showed that the bsc position was significantly off and/or the counterpart was faint ( figs .
[ fig : cxoopt1 ] and [ fig : cxoopt2 ] ) .
the additional four sources from the literature were all coincident with stellar sources , once we had _
chandra _  positions . of the 13 sources with _
chandra _
followup , nine had point - like _ chandra _  sources with obvious ir counterparts (   [ sec : notescxo ] ) .
of the other four sources : two show extended x - ray emission with _ chandra _
, one has no obvious 2mass counterpart , and one source was not detected in the _ chandra _  observation .
we discuss these sources in more detail in section  [ sec : remain ] .      in the cases where
_ chandra _  point - sources were detected , the counterpart identifications are essentially secure .
this is due to the very small positional uncertainty of the _ chandra _  positions ( @xmath63 ) coupled with the brightnesses of the counterparts ( see fig .  [
fig : stars ] and ) . figures  [ fig : cxoopt1 ] and [ fig : cxoopt2 ] contain images of those sources with counterpart identifications . with these identifications we can eliminate these sources as candidate compact objects using the x - ray - to - optical flux ratio ( see fig .  [
fig : fxk ] and ) . here
we comment on all of the sources observed with _
chandra_.    1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301
: :    the _ chandra _  source is extended .
[ sec : rxsa ] .
1rxs  j193228.6 + 345318 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath64 ,    @xmath65 ( @xmath66 away    from the bsc position ) .
it is coincident with the    @xmath67  mag source 2mass  j19322722 + 3453148 , the    @xmath68  mag source usno  1248 - 0333432 , and with the nvss    source identified in table  [ tab : id ] .
it was identified as a flare star    by @xcite after our initial source selection .
1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643 : :    there is no _ chandra _
source in the followup observation .
[ sec : rxsb ] .
ax  j2049.6 + 2939 : :    this _ asca _ source was identified as a possible neutron star by    @xcite .
the _ chandra _
source is point - like , and is at    @xmath69 ,    @xmath70 .
it is coincident with the    @xmath71  mag source 2mass  j20493540 + 2938509 ( also    usno  1196@xmath280518650 ) , which is presumably the    @xmath72  mag g star discussed by @xcite . our observed    count - rate for this source ( @xmath73    in the 0.32.0  kev band ) is roughly comparable with that predicted    from the latest _
spectroscopy , although as noted in @xcite the    source appears to be variable .
given the variability of this source    and the extremely tight coincidence with a g star ( in this region ,    there are    @xmath74    stars with @xmath75  mag in 2mass , and to find one    @xmath76 away from the x - ray source has a chance rate    of @xmath77 ; see    fig .
[ fig : stars ] ) , the x - ray emission is very likely from an active    star .
@xcite had dismissed this possibility because of the high x - ray    intensity , but it is in fact consistent with the majority of the stars    that we detect here ( fig .  [
fig : fxk ] ; the x - ray flux is    @xmath78 ) .
1rxs  j045707.4 + 452751 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath79 ,    @xmath80 ( @xmath50 away    from the bsc position ) .
it is coincident with the    @xmath81  mag source 2mass  j04570832 + 4527499 .
1rxs  j050339.8 + 451715 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath82 ,    @xmath83 ( @xmath84 away    from the bsc position ) .
it is coincident with the    @xmath85  mag source 2mass  j05033958 + 4516594 and with the    nvss source identified in table  [ tab : id ] .
there is no usno    counterpart .
1rxs  j062740.3 + 073103 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath86 ,    @xmath87 ( @xmath88 from    the bsc position ) .
it is coincident with the    @xmath89  mag source +    2mass  j06274012 + 0731006 .
1e  0627.4 + 0537 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath90 ,    @xmath91 .
it is coincident with the    @xmath71  mag source 2mass  j06300529 + 0545407 .
1e  0630.9 + 0611 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath92 ,    @xmath93 .
it is coincident with the    @xmath94  mag source 2mass  j06333322 + 0608396 .
1e  0636.8 + 0517 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath95 ,    @xmath96 .
it is coincident with the    @xmath97  mag source 2mass  j06392566 + 0514301 .
1rxs  j150818.8@xmath28401730 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath98 ,    @xmath99 ( @xmath100 away    from the bsc position ) . it is coincident with the    @xmath101  mag source    2mass  j15081819@xmath284017261 .
1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 : :    the _ chandra _  source is extended . see
[ sec : rxsc ] .
1rxs  j151942.8@xmath28375255 : :    the _ chandra _  source is point - like , and is at    @xmath102 ,    @xmath103 ( @xmath88 away    from the bsc position ) .
there is no 2mass counterpart , but we do    identify a counterpart on our magellan magic optical and panic    infrared observations (   [ sec : oir ] and fig .
[ fig : mag ] ) .
the source has    @xmath104  mag and @xmath105  mag .
-band images of the source in snr  g156.2 + 5.7  from table  [ tab : srcs ] .
the images are @xmath106 , with north up and east to the left .
the x - ray position uncertainties are indicated by the circles , and the proposed optical counterparts are shown by the crosses.[fig : opt5],scaledwidth=50.0% ]                                             -band images of the sources in snr  g330.0 + 15.0  from table  [ tab : srcs ] ( cont . ) .
the images are @xmath106 , with north up and east to the left .
the x - ray position uncertainties are indicated by the circles , and the proposed optical counterparts are shown by the crosses.[fig : opt12],scaledwidth=50.0% ]      we obtained optical and infrared followup observations of three of the four sources where the _ chandra _  followup did not immediately identify a counterpart , namely 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , 1rxs  j151942.8@xmath28375255 , and 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 . for 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , we got a 300-s @xmath107-band exposure with the large format camera ( lfc ) on the palomar 200-inch telescope and 1200-s exposures in h@xmath108 and a narrowband filter located away from major emission lines with the ccd camera ( p60ccd ) on the palomar 60-inch telescope . for 1rxs  j151942.8@xmath28375255
, we obtained a 930-s @xmath109-band exposure with the raymond and beverly sackler magellan instant camera ( magic ) on the 6.5-m clay ( magellan ii ) telescope , and a 200-s @xmath110-band exposure with persson s auxiliary nasmyth infrared camera ( panic ; @xcite ) , also on the 6.5-m clay ( magellan ii ) telescope .
for 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 , we got a 160-s @xmath111-band exposure and a 60-s @xmath109-band exposure with magic .
the log of the observations is given in table  [ tab : optobs ] .
reduction and calibration followed standard procedures .
the magellan data were taken during the same observing runs as data presented in , and details can be found there .
for the reduction of the remaining data , we used standard ` iraf ` routines to subtract the bias , flat - field , and then combine separate exposures .
significant focal - plane distortion prevented simple addition of the lfc data , so we used the ` iraf ` ` mscred ` package to flatten each image with custom distortion maps prior to addition .
we then performed absolute astrometry , solving for plate - scale , rotation , and central position relative to stars the 2mass catalog , and getting residuals in each coordinate of @xmath112 ( 2100 stars ) and @xmath113 ( 4000 stars ) for p60ccd and lfc , respectively .
we find that after investigating 50 bsc sources plus four sources from the literature and obtaining _ chandra _  followup of 13 of these sources , there remain four x - ray sources that do not have very likely optical counterparts and are therefore worthy of extended discussion .
as noted in
[ sec : cpt ] and [ sec : notescxo ] , these sources are : 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643 , 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037 , and 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 . the first and fourth have extended x - ray emission , while the second has no apparent _ chandra _  counterpart .
the third has a probable but not definite association with optical / ir sources .
we now discuss all of these sources in more detail .
the bsc lists 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  as having @xmath114 in the pspc , with hardness ratios of @xmath115 and @xmath116 ( see @xcite for definitions of bands and hardness ratios ) .
the corresponding _ chandra _  source is clearly extended , as shown in figure  [ fig:1934 ] .
there are no other x - ray sources nearby , indicating that the _ chandra _  source is very likely 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  despite the @xmath117 distance between the two ( this is somewhat larger than the separations between the optical and x - ray sources in fig .
[ fig : offset ] , but given the extended nature of the x - ray source that is not that surprising ) .
the peak of the _ chandra_emission is at @xmath118 , @xmath119 , and has an extent of @xmath120 .
the overall source is larger and asymmetric , with a maximum visible distance of @xmath121 from the peak to the north - east and a minimum distance of @xmath122 from the peak to the south - west , although there is some diffuse emission that extends further .
averaged over azimuth , the half - power radius is @xmath123 , and 95% of the power is within @xmath124 .
fitting the spatial profile to a @xmath125-model ( surface brightness @xmath126 , typical for galaxy clusters ) in ` sherpa ` was successful , with core radius @xmath127 , @xmath128 , an amplitude of @xmath129 , and @xmath130 for 12 degrees of freedom .
we extracted photon events from a @xmath131 region and created source and background response files using the ` ciao ` task ` acisspec ` .
we used versions of 3.0.2 of ` ciao ` and 2.26 ` caldb ` that compensate for low - energy degradation of the acis detector .
we then fit the data in ` sherpa ` .
the events were binned so that each bin had @xmath132  counts .    while there are not very many counts ( 601 source counts before background subtraction , with 77.2 background counts ) , the data are well fit ( fig .  [ fig:1934spec ] ) by an absorbed power - law model , with @xmath133 , @xmath134 , and an amplitude of @xmath135 at 1  kev ( giving @xmath136 for 16 degrees of freedom ; all uncertainties are 1-@xmath137 ) .
the observed flux from this model is @xmath138 ( 0.38.0  kev ) , while the unabsorbed flux is @xmath139 ( 0.38.0  kev ) .
@xcite plasma models do not fit , giving @xmath140/16 .
the extended morphology and the hard spectrum of the source suggest several models : ( 1 ) a very hot nebula of galactic origin , ( 2 ) a very hot nebula but of extra - galactic origin ( gas from a cluster or an early - type galaxy ; @xcite ) , ( 3 ) the superposition of many bright lmxbs ( with power - law spectra ) in an early - type galaxy @xcite , or ( 4 ) a pulsar wind nebula radiating via synchrotron emission . here
we discuss each interpretation in some detail .
galactic nebula : :    this would require a very bright central source ( i.e.  an ob star ) to    heat the nebula , which would also be visible as an extended optical / ir    source and should show h@xmath108 emission . while the    northern 2mass source ( 2mass  j19345557 + 3353136 ) in figure  [ fig:1934 ha ]    is moderately bright ( with about a 5% chance of a star this bright    occurring randomly within @xmath141 of a position ) , it    does not appear to be an ob star .
the colors are fairly common for the    field , they are more consistent with a star of type    @xmath142g0 , and the extinction that would be required of    an ob star is higher than expected for this line of sight    ( @xmath143  mag , compared to a maximum of    @xmath144 as determined by @xcite and    w3colden ) . the    southern 2mass source ( 2mass  j19345569 + 3353063 ) is fainter and    redder  consistent with being a late - type star  but its position near    the peak of the x - ray emission ( chance probability of    @xmath0% ) suggests that there might be an actual association    between it and the x - ray emission . since there is no diffuse broadband    optical , broadband ir , or h@xmath108 emission , we do not    believe that the extended x - ray emission is powered by any of the    stars , although it may be related to one or both of the 2mass sources .
extragalactic nebula : :    the x - ray emission is much more compact than is typical for galaxy    groups or clusters ( even clusters at @xmath1451 have    @xmath146 ; @xcite ) , and the spectrum    is wrong ( thermal plasma models do not fit ) . early - type galaxy : :    the size is similar to what is often seen for early - type ( e and s0 )    galaxies . in those galaxies the x - ray emission comes from a    combination of hot gas ( plasma with @xmath1471.0  kev ; @xcite ) and the superposition of many hard    x - ray point sources ( whose spectra are power - laws with    @xmath148 )  reasonably compatible with the    observed spectrum of 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 .    +    for these galaxies , the hard x - ray luminosity scales reasonably well    with the integrated @xmath111 or @xmath149 band    luminosities as @xmath150    or @xmath151 , where the x - ray luminosity is in the    0.38.0  kev band and all luminosities are corrected for extinction    @xcite ; the scatter in this ( from a sample of 14 galaxies ) is a    factor of 23 ( there is more scatter in @xcite , but their work    concerns the soft emission more than the hard emission , and the    scatter is still only a factor of @xmath152 ) .
we can    convert the relations from @xcite into relations for fluxes and    magnitudes ( i.e.  observables ) , giving @xmath153 where @xmath154 is the    absorption - corrected x - ray flux in the 0.38.0  kev band in units of    @xmath155 , @xmath156    ( @xmath157 ) is the observed @xmath111-band    ( @xmath149-band ) magnitude , @xmath158 is the galactic column density along the line of sight in    units of @xmath159 , and    @xmath160  mag    ( @xmath161  mag ) is the @xmath111-band    ( @xmath149-band ) absolute magnitude of the sun ( we have assumed    @xmath162 following @xcite ) .
+    the relation in equation  [ eqn : flux ] implies that for    @xmath163 and    @xmath164 , @xmath165  mag and    @xmath166  mag ( this indeed matches what is seen for    sources in @xcite ) . therefore , such sources should be readily visible    on even shallow images . examining 2mass and palomar    ( fig .
[ fig:1934 ha ] ) images of 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  we see that there    are two optical / ir sources near the peak of the x - ray emission : the    northern source appears stellar ( fwhm@xmath167 ) ,    while the southern source may have some extended    emission  mag ) m star @xmath168 to the    south . ] to the north - east ( although this could be a superposition of    point sources ) .
however , neither of these sources is a great candidate    for the origin of the x - ray emission , as they are too faint by several    orders of magnitude ( @xmath169  mag and    @xmath170  mag for the northern and southern sources ,    respectively ) and not extended enough .
therefore , while it is not    impossible that 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  is an early - type galaxy , we    consider it unlikely .
deeper x - ray observations should be conclusive :    if 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  is a galaxy , it should resolve into discrete    point sources .
optical spectroscopy would also be useful in    determining the natures of the optical / ir sources .
+    there are some early - type galaxies with significant excesses of x - ray    emission @xcite , largely due to increases in the amounts of hot gas    that give roughly the same x - ray - to - optical ratio as would be    necessary here . however , the optical / ir sources in fig .
[ fig:1934 ha ]    do not look like bright galaxies ( unlike the galaxies from @xcite    which are typically @xmath171 in the optical ) and the    spectrum of 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  is wrong : again , thermal plasma    models do not fit .
pwn : :    a pulsar wind nebula ( i.e. , a nebula excited by a pulsar or pwn ; for a    review , see @xcite ) is consistent with the size and spectrum of    1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , although the source is slightly softer toward    the center ( fig .  [ fig : radprof ] ) , contrary to what is expected for    pwne .
there is no obvious h@xmath108 emission from    1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  in figure  [ fig:1934 ha ] as there can be near pwne    ( associated either with sn ejecta or with the passage of the pulsar    through the interstellar medium ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , but this could be    because the conditions are not favorable .
+    1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  is outside snr  g65.3 + 5.7 .
if it were a bow - shock    nebula that originated in the interior of the snr and then moved    outside the shell ( and not a static pwn inflated by the wind of its    central pulsar ) , one would expect h@xmath108 emission and    for the x - ray nebula to trail away from the direction of motion / toward    the snr center ( e.g. , @xcite , although this is not always the case ) .    since the x - ray emission trails _ away _ from the snr center ( suggesting    motion toward the snr instead of out of it ) , we see no    h@xmath108 , the fitted value of @xmath172 is    just about at the maximum predicted for this line of sight by w3colden    and is somewhat higher than the nominal value for    snr  g65.3 + 5.7  ( suggesting that the x - ray source may be more distant    and highly absorbed than snr  g65.3 + 5.7 ) , we believe that an    association between the two is unlikely . however , this is not entirely    unexpected , as there are a number of young , newly - discovered pwne that    have no definitively associated snrs ( similar to the the crab nebula ;    @xcite ) .
the bsc lists 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  as having @xmath173 in the pspc , with hardness ratios of @xmath174 and @xmath175 .
the _ chandra _  observation of 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  had a total exposure time of 3.7  ksec , and which should give @xmath176 acis - s counts depending on the source spectrum . however , as shown in figure  [ fig : rxsb ] there are no point sources detected anywhere within three times the nominal position uncertainty ( a conservative limit , as seen in fig .  [ fig : offset ] ) : the only significant source detected ( using ` wavdetect ` on scales from 132  pixels ; see for the detection method ) in the data - set is at @xmath177 , @xmath178 ( with @xmath179 counts ) , which is @xmath180 or 6-@xmath137 away from 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643 .
this x - ray source is almost certainly not related to 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643 .
we can then set a limit of @xmath181  counts to any point source .
there are no obvious extended sources , but such limits are more difficult to quantify : overall , there are 1047 counts in the 0.35.0  kev energy range over the whole @xmath182 image , so the average background rate is @xmath183 .
then , in a region @xmath184 in area , the 3-@xmath137 limits will be @xmath185  counts .
there are no regions in the event list with such concentrations , so no extended sources are present .
one obvious explanation of the disappearance of 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  is variability .
this is not atypical among the most common class of soft x - ray sources in the galactic plane : active stars .
flares and other chromospheric / magnetospheric events often lead to dramatic changes in the fluxes of these sources .
while other sources , such as x - ray binaries , active galaxies , and some anomalous x - ray pulsars , do exhibit variability , these sources have hard x - ray spectra generally inconsistent with the bsc emission .
we therefore think it likely that 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  is an active star , but of course this can not be confirmed without additional data .
it is also possible that the source is extended , and therefore too diffuse to have been detected by _
the softness of the bsc emission make this unlikely , though , as most known types of extended sources are relatively hard ( e.g. , 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  and 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 ) .
it is possible , but unlikely , that 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  is a neutron star .
as discussed above , most of the neutron stars considered in have stable x - ray emission : only some of the axps vary significantly . however , the spectrum of 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  is unlike those of axps ( typically a power - law with @xmath186 ) .
the bsc lists 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037  as having @xmath187 in the pspc , with hardness ratios of @xmath188 and @xmath189 .
this is moderately hard compared to the other sources in fig .
[ fig : hard ] , but is not too extreme .
unlike the rest of the sources without _ chandra _  followup , the counterpart(s ) shown in figure  [ fig : opt4 ] are not entirely secure . within @xmath32 of 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037 ,
there are 1627 2mass sources , for an average density of @xmath190 . to find a source within @xmath191 ( as in the case of 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037 ) has a chance probability of 37% , and
the chance probability for two sources is 13% .
these are not small enough for a definite association .
1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037is similar , in both hardness ratio and optical brightness , to other sources like 1rxs  j193228.6 + 345318 , 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643 , 1rxs  j045707.4 + 452751 , or 1rxs  j151942.8@xmath28375255 .
these sources did not have certain associations based on _ rosat _  alone , but the _ chandra _  data are unambiguous .
these sources may represent a population of x - ray sources that are somewhat fainter than the majority of the sources in table  [ tab : srcs ] .
this faintness , together with the hardness of the x - ray spectrum , likely reflects extragalactic origins of the sources ( i.e.  they are active galaxies ) : in figure  [ fig : fxk ] these sources are largely those with the highest x - ray - to - ir flux ratios most similar to the extragalactic sample .
overall , 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037  is consistent with having an association with one of the identified 2mass sources .
chandra _
followup observation would have made the case secure , but it was not selected for _ chandra _  due to an oversight . as with 1rxs  j205042.9
+ 284643 , we do not believe that 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037  is a neutron star , but we can not rule out this possibility .   +      the bsc lists 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  as having @xmath192 in the pspc , with hardness ratios of @xmath193 and @xmath194 .
the _ chandra _
source is fainter than that of 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , but nonetheless it appears extended , as shown in figure  [ fig:1501 ] . since this source is more diffuse than 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , the spatial measurements are not as precise , but the center is at approximately @xmath195 , @xmath196 .
the total extent of the source is @xmath197 in radius . as with 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , while there is some offset between the _ rosat _  and _ chandra_positions , this does not appear inconsistent with the position uncertainties for such extended sources .
again , we can be quite confident that the _ chandra _  source is 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 , since there are no other sources nearby .    similar to our analysis of 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  (   [ sec : rxsa ] ) , we extracted photon events from a @xmath198 region and created source and background response files using the ` ciao ` task ` acisspec ` .
we then fit the data in ` sherpa ` , where the events were binned so that each bin had @xmath132  counts .
there are 1305 source counts and 478.5 background counts .
the data are well fit ( fig .  [ fig:1501spec ] ) by an absorbed power - law model , with @xmath199 , @xmath200 , and an amplitude of @xmath201 at 1  kev ( giving @xmath202 for 32 degrees of freedom ; all uncertainties are 1-@xmath137 ) .
the observed flux from this model is @xmath203 ( 0.38.0  kev ) , and the unabsorbed flux is @xmath204 ( 0.38.0  kev ) .
the column density is higher than but consistent ( given the uncertainties ) with both the column density of snr  g330.0 + 15.0  and the total expected along this line of sight ( @xmath205 ) .    as with 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301
, we considered different models for 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 .
figure  [ fig:15012mass ] does not identify a single hot source , so a thermal galactic nebula is unlikely .
our first idea was that 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  is a pwn .
the size is about right and the spectrum is typical for pwne .
however , as with 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  there is a problem : 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815is outside of snr  g156.2 + 5.7 , and the largely symmetric morphology rules out an association between 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  and snr  g330.0 + 15.0  ( i.e.  1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  can not be a bow - shock nebula ) .
1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  could instead be a pressure - confined bubble pwn related to another supernova ; we searched the sydney university molongolo sky survey ( summs ; @xcite ) for evidence of radio emission from or another supernova shell surrounding 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 , but there is no extended or point - like emission present at the position of 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  nor is there any sign of a new snr around it .
sumss is particularly sensitive to extended emission , and would almost certainly have identified any snr around 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 . like 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301
, the lack of a clear snr shell does not mean that 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  is not a pwn .
we then examined possible extragalactic classifications for 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 .
this source is larger than 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , and is more compatible with the sizes of typical galaxy clusters ( @xmath206 ) : a fit to a @xmath125 model has @xmath207 and @xmath208 .
the spectral data are reasonably well fit by a @xcite plasma model , having @xmath209 , @xmath210  kev , and a normalization , where @xmath211 is the angular - size distance ( in cm ) , @xmath212 is the electron density ( in @xmath213 ) , and @xmath214 is the hydrogen density ( in @xmath213 ) . ] of @xmath215 ( giving @xmath216 for 32 degrees of freedom ) , such as what one would expect for a cluster @xcite . with this model
the observed flux is @xmath217 ( 0.38.0  kev ) , and the unabsorbed flux is @xmath218 .    examining the 2mass image we see an extended elliptical source , 2masx  j15014110@xmath284038093 , near the center of the x - ray emission ( fig .
[ fig:15012mass ] ) .
this source has a radius of @xmath219 ( @xmath220 isophotal radius ) , a @xmath110 magnitude of @xmath221  mag within that radius , and @xmath222  mag .
higher - resolution optical images of 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  ( fig .
[ fig:15012mass ] ) show that + 2masx  j15014110@xmath284038093 is partially decomposed into two sources : an extended source labeled a that is at the exact position of 2masx  j15014110@xmath284038093 ( within uncertainties ) , and a source labeled b @xmath223 to the east .
there is also another extended source labeled c @xmath224 to the north - east , but this is a separate 2mass source ( 2mass  j15014145@xmath284038068 ) .
we performed a rough photometric calibration using 80 stars from the usno - b1.0 catalog and then ran ` sextractor ` @xcite on the images : the results for sources a
c are given in table  [ tab : rxscopt ] .
source a is very clearly extended , although it is not as large as 2masx  j15014110@xmath284038093 ( the fwhm of the ir emission is @xmath225 ) .
source b is very likely unresolved ( within uncertainties ) , and source c is extended .
source a is very red ( @xmath226  mag ) , consistent with the 2mass data .
we believe that the 2mass source is primarily due to source a , given the position coincidence and the extreme redness of a compared to b or c. if this is the case , though , then a has the relatively blue color of @xmath227  mag , but this could be partly due to the difficulties of measuring an extended source from images with drastically different seeing ( 2mass versus magic @xmath109-band ) .
the ir colors of 2masx  j15014110@xmath284038093 are similar to the brighter galaxies in known clusters ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
therefore , 2masx  j15014110@xmath284038093 could be the central galaxy of an unknown cluster .
the x - ray temperature is reasonably high , implying a high luminosity ( @xmath228 ; @xcite ) , so this source can not be part of a nearby , low-@xmath229 group
. however , the value of @xmath125 is lower than those of most known clusters @xcite , and is more similar to those of low-@xmath229 systems @xcite .    while 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  is compatible with the sizes and spectra of early - type galaxies , and there is an extended optical / ir source near the peak of the x - ray emission , the scenario is not entirely consistent .
the optical / ir source is , like those in 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301 , about 7 magnitudes fainter than expected ( the predicted magnitude following eqn .
[ eqn : flux ] is @xmath230  mag ) .
this is far greater than the variation seen among galaxies .
we do not believe that the difference can be due to an excess of soft emission in 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  or 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  ( eqn .
[ eqn : flux ] refers only to the contribution of hard point sources ) , as the spectra of 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  and 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  are hard and similar to the prototypical sources assumed in @xcite and when one fits primarily for the soft emission ( as in @xcite ) one finds a similar relation to that of @xcite .
it is possible that 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  is an over - luminous elliptical galaxy , such as those discussed in @xcite , as the size , optical / x - ray flux ratio , and luminosity are similar to these sources ( @xmath231 ; @xmath232 assuming @xmath233 ) , but again there are difficulties : the temperature of 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  is considerably higher than those of @xcite , and the value of @xmath125 is too low .
we see that no scenario is entirely consistent for 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 .
pwne , isolated elliptical galaxies , and galaxy clusters all have problems .
we believe it likely that 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  does have an extragalactic origin , as 2masx  j15014110@xmath284038093 looks like an elliptical galaxy and it is probably associated with the x - ray emission : there are 39 extended 2mass sources within @xmath234 of 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 , giving a false - association rate of 0.005% for a source within @xmath235 . however , it is not clear exactly what 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  is . as with 1rxs
j193458.1 + 335301 , deeper x - ray observations and optical spectroscopy should be conclusive for 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815 .
we have fully investigated the population of _ rosat _  bsc point sources in six large - diameter snrs .
our identifications of counterparts to 50 of the 54 sources are quite secure : in most cases the positional coincidence between the x - ray and optical / ir sources has been augmented by identification of an abnormal stellar type ( variable , t tau , binary , etc . ) , by the extreme brightness ( and hence rarity ) of the optical source , or by a previous classification in the literature .
this conclusion echoes that of @xcite , who searched for older neutron stars using _ rosat _  and found only previously identified neutron stars , along with 17 sources that are definitely not neutron stars and 13 that are probably not .
the remaining sources , as discussed in section  [ sec : remain ] , are more intriguing .
however , none of them is likely to be a neutron star associated with one of the snrs in table  [ tab : snrs ] . to begin with , all are outside their snrs . while this is not impossible for older sources and high velocity neutron stars ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) , it lessens the chance of association .    for 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  and 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  the x - ray morphologies rule out associations , since any pwne outside the snrs would likely have elongated bow - shock appearances , in contrast to what we see ( of course , 1rxs  j193458.1 + 335301  and/or 1rxs  j150139.6@xmath28403815  could be extragalactic ) .
1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  and 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037 , neither of which has a _
chandra _
detection , are more uncertain .
1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643  is likely a flare star .
1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037  does not have a provisional classification but is probably extragalactic in origin .
since we have ruled out ( to some degree of certainty ) neutron stars in all six snrs considered here , we can then follow and draw the x - ray luminosity limits on a cooling diagram .
this is shown in figure  [ fig : cool ] . to account for the uncertainties of 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643and 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037 , both in snr  g74.0@xmath288.5
, we have adjusted the luminosity of that snr from table  [ tab : snrs ] to correspond to @xmath236  above the count - rates of both of the uncertain sources and therefore a more secure limit .
further x - ray observations of 1rxs  j205812.8 + 292037  would very likely detect counterparts ( for 1rxs  j205042.9 + 284643 , it might have only been included in the bsc due to a flare , and therefore significantly deeper x - ray observations may be necessary ) . with secure counterparts ,
the limit for snr  g74.0@xmath288.5  would decrease by a factor of 3 .
the limits in figure  [ fig : cool ] are not as uniform or as constraining as those from .
the lack of uniformity is due to the sample construction : the different distances and column densities of the snrs make the bsc limit of @xmath237 translate into different luminosities .
so , snrs g74.0@xmath288.5 , g330.0 + 15.0 , and g65.3 + 5.7  all have reasonably tight limits ( and those of snr  g74.0@xmath288.5could get better ) .
snrs g160.9 + 2.6  and g205.5 + 0.5  have loose limits primarily due to uncertain distances : we have used the upper limit of 4  kpc for snr  g160.9 + 2.6  and the full range of 0.81.6  kpc for snr  g205.5 + 0.5  in figure  [ fig : cool ] .
finally , snr  g156.2 + 5.7  is more highly absorbed than the other snrs .    while all of the limits are below the luminosities of central sources in cas  a , , and ( and are therefore in concordance with our original survey design from ) , some are further below than others .
the utility of these limits is somewhat lessened , though , as the snrs are all reasonably large and are older ( 1030  kyr ) than the sources in ( 310  kyr ) . therefore the cooling curves have descended , and there are other snrs that have similar or even lower neutron star luminosities ( , , for the snrs with tighter limits , and , snrs  , , and for the remaining snrs ) , although 5/7 of these sources have x - ray pwne that increase their luminosities by a factor of @xmath152 .    in one sense ,
though , the limits here are tighter than those of . by using the bsc to go to twice the snr radii , we have virtually eliminated the possibility that there are high - velocity neutron stars in these snrs ( as discussed in   [ sec : ext ] confusion is most likely not a limiting factor in detecting x - ray sources ) , while in we only searched a portion of the snr interiors .
it is of course possible that the sn explosions were type  ia or produced black holes , but as discussed in these alternate scenarios are not very likely for an ensemble .
therefore , while not as tight as those of ( or e.g. , @xcite ; @xcite ) , our limits are still useful .
they are not below all detected neutron stars , so do not require appeals to exotic physics or cooling processes , but they conclusively demonstrate that there is a significant range in the observed luminosities of neutron stars , even including experimental uncertainties .
it is clear that the neutron stars of a single age must be able to produce a luminosities differing by a factor of @xmath238 .
whether the unknown parameter that controls the luminosity is one of the usual culprits ( mass , rotation , composition , magnetic field ) or something entirely different is not known .
it is also clear that there is a significant number of objects that do not show non - thermal emission and would therefore not go on to evolve as traditional radio pulsars .
we thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments .
d.  l.  k.  was partially supported by a fellowship from the fannie and john hertz foundation .
b.  m.  g.  and p.  o.  s.  acknowledge support from nasa contract nas8 - 39073 and grant g02 - 3090 .
b.  m.  g.  is supported by nasa ltsa grant nag5 - 13032 .
s.  r.  k.  is supported by grants from nsf and nasa .
support for this work was provided by the national aeronautics and space administration through chandra award go3 - 4088x issued by the _ chandra x - ray observatory _
center , which is operated by the smithsonian astrophysical observatory for and on behalf of nasa under contract nas8 - 39073 .
the nrao is a facility of the national science foundation operated under cooperative agreement by associated universities , inc .
the digitized sky surveys were produced at the space telescope science institute under u.s .
government grant nag w-2166 .
we have made extensive use of the simbad database , and we are grateful to the astronomers at the centre de donnes astronomiques de strasbourg for maintaining this database .
we would like to thank e.  persson and c.  rakowski for assistance with the panic observing , and d.  fox for assistance with the p60 observing .
green , d.  a. 2000 , a catalogue of galactic supernova remnants ( 2000 august version ) , mullard radio astronomy observatory , cavendish laboratory , cambridge , uk ( available on the world - wide - web at http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys/snrs/ )                                                      , r.  f. 2004 , in clusters of galaxies : probes of cosmological structure and galaxy evolution , ed . j.  s. mulchaey , a.  dressler , & a.  oemler ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , 123 , ( astro - ph/0311105 )                                                    r c c r r c c l c r c r + 1 & & 0.066 & 45.1 & 11 & @xmath239 & @xmath240 & & 19344524 + 3030590 & 5.0 & 10.41 & 8.108 + 2 & & 0.083 & 82.7 & 9 & @xmath241 & @xmath242 & & 19384012 + 3030284 & 7.1 & 12.6 & 11.150 + 3 & & 0.054 & 101.8 & 12 & @xmath243 & @xmath244 & & 19392261 + 3009119 & 9.9 & 4.685 & 2.499 + 4 & & 0.256 & 155.8 & 8 & @xmath245 & @xmath246 & & 19433674 + 3225206 & 5.6 & 9.9 & 8.082 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath247 & @xmath248 & & 19433790 + 3225124 & 13.6 & 10.7 & 7.179 + 5 & & 0.051 & 165.0 & 14 & @xmath249 & @xmath250 & & & & & + 6 & & 0.110 & 194.4 & 15 & @xmath251 & @xmath252 & usno 1181@xmath280406270 & 19272197 + 2809452 & 9.8 & 11.620 & 8.426 + 7 & & 0.138 & 202.7 & 8 & @xmath253 & @xmath254 & & 19440138 + 2845099 & 14.0 & & 8.691 + 8 & & 0.357 & 219.9 & 7 & @xmath255 & @xmath256 & & 19490298 + 2952582 & 1.2 & 8.32 & 5.734 + 9 & & 0.091 & 223.4 & 9 & @xmath257 & @xmath258 & & & & & + 10 & & 0.057 & 237.0 & 14 & @xmath259 & @xmath260 & & 19145022 + 3151371 & 16.5 & 6.618 & 4.312 + 11 & & 0.290 & 255.7 & 8 & @xmath261 & @xmath262 & & 19385576 + 3514132 & 8.0 & 8.29 & 6.858 + 12 & & 0.074 & 285.6 & 8 & @xmath263 & @xmath264 & & 19393666 + 2637169 & 3.0 & 11.1 & 7.345 + 13 & & 0.153 & 298.4 & 7 & @xmath265 & @xmath266 & & 19311257 + 3607300 & 13.1 & & 8.839 + 14 & & 0.052 & 305.3 & 11 & @xmath267 & @xmath268 & usno 1188@xmath280330651 & 19115080 + 2850075 & 5.7 & 12.510 & 8.898 +   + 1 & & 0.111 & 113.3 & 12 & @xmath269 & @xmath270 & & & & & + 2 & & 0.104 & 114.4 & 10 & @xmath271 & @xmath272 & & 20445809 + 2916211 & 11.9 & 10.8 & 8.746 + 3 & & 0.129 & 122.3 & 8 & @xmath273 & @xmath274 & usno
1193@xmath280519643 & 20581282 + 2920282 & 8.9 & 15.980 & 14.258 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath275 & @xmath276 & & 20581257 + 2920454 & 8.5 & & 13.405 + 4 & & 0.225 & 214.7 & 8 & @xmath277 & @xmath278 & & 20520768 + 2705491 & 11.4 & 4.576 & 2.722 +   + 1 & & 0.051 & 75.3 & 20 & @xmath279 & @xmath280 & & 05064067 + 5135519 & 20.8 & 4.980 & 4.124 +   + 1 & & 0.061 & 82.5 & 9 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & & & & & + 2 & & 0.061 & 87.2 & 11 & @xmath283 & @xmath284 & & & & & + 3 & & 0.052 & 99.0 & 10 & @xmath285 & @xmath286 & & 04522151 + 4556236 & 8.6 & 6.695 & 5.407 +   + 1 & & 0.086 & 74.3 & 11 & @xmath287 & @xmath288 & usno 0155@xmath2801104@xmath281 & 06410807 + 0522522 & 4.0 & 10.780 & 8.905 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath289 & @xmath290 & & 06410796 + 0522438 & 8.0 & & 12.121 + 2 & & 0.054 & 100.1 & 11 & @xmath291 & @xmath292 & & 06413601 + 0802055 & 13.0 & 10.3 & 8.712 + 3 & & 0.076 & 107.4 & 17 & @xmath293 & @xmath294 & usno 0947@xmath280100759 & 06410953 + 0447354 & 5.4 & 17.650 & 15.084 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath295 & @xmath296 & usno 0947@xmath280100763 & 06410988 + 0447350 & 8.1 & 15.840 & 14.636 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath297 & @xmath298 & & 06410900 + 0447239 & 10.1 & & 12.182 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath299 & @xmath300 & usno 0155@xmath2802167@xmath281 & 06410924 + 0447187 & 14.3 & 11.100 & 8.688 + 4 & & 0.092 & 160.1 & 10 & @xmath301 & @xmath302 & & 06464073 + 0821471 & 7.6 & 7.5 & 6.080 + 5 & & 0.082 & 179.5 & 8 & @xmath303 & @xmath304 & & & & & + 6 & & 0.088 & 183.9 & 9 & @xmath305 & @xmath306 & & 06293689 + 0829327 & 5.1 & 7.62 & 6.306 + 7 & & 0.109 & 191.7 & 10 & @xmath307 & @xmath308 & usno 0150@xmath2800332@xmath281 & 06371522 + 0320081 & 7.6 & 10.640 & 9.323 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath309 & @xmath310 & & 06371585 + 0320043 & 2.5 & & 14.508 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath311 & @xmath312 & & 06371555 + 0320026 & 3.7 & & 11.813 + 8 & & 0.106 & 196.7 & 11 & @xmath313 & @xmath314 & usno 0145@xmath2801717@xmath281 & 06255524 + 0655386 & 7.8 & 9.660 & 8.019 +   + 1 & & 0.077 & 26.1 & 10 & @xmath315 & @xmath316 & & & & & + 2 & & 0.082 & 35.0 & 12 & @xmath317 & @xmath318 & usno 0505@xmath280350285 & 15105908@xmath283926590 & 7.2 & & 15.066 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath319 & @xmath320 & usno 7826@xmath2800179@xmath281 & 15105821@xmath283926499 & 16.4 & 10.600 & 8.374 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath321 & @xmath322 & usno 0505@xmath280350290 & & 2.4 & & + 3 & & 0.069 & 40.3 & 16 & @xmath323 & @xmath324 & & 15081213@xmath284035022 & 27.1 & 5.762 & 5.934 + 4 & & 0.051 & 72.7 & 11 & @xmath325 & @xmath326 & & 15042865@xmath283924261 & 3.9 & 10.7 & 8.293 + 5 & & 0.073 & 81.8 & 8 & @xmath327 & @xmath328 & & 15052586@xmath283857031 & 9.4 & 12.55 & 9.124 + 6 & & 0.125 & 103.2 & 14 & @xmath329 & @xmath330 & & & & & + 7 & & 0.107 & 113.6 & 17 & @xmath331 & @xmath332 & & 15185282@xmath284050528 & 38.4 & 11.01 & 8.547 + 8 & & 0.085 & 117.1 & 11 & @xmath333 & @xmath334 & & 14595244@xmath284011594 & 8.6 & 9.90 & 8.401 + 9 & & 0.065 & 123.0 & 16 & @xmath335 & @xmath336 & & 15165935@xmath283826514 & 3.4 & 6.876 & 5.789 + 10 & & 0.074 & 135.1 & 10 & @xmath337 & @xmath338 & & 15204697@xmath284053526 & 15.1 & 7.83 & 6.518 + 11 & & 0.084 & 138.2 & 10 & @xmath339 & @xmath340 & usno 0507@xmath280344267 & 14583744@xmath283915033 & 4.9 & 11.850 & 8.648 + 12 & & 0.080 & 140.1 & 11 & @xmath341 & @xmath342 & & 15221162@xmath283959509 & 8.4 & 12.02 & 9.100 + 13 & & 0.099 & 145.9 & 9 & @xmath343 & @xmath344 & & 14572207@xmath284013586 & 4.2 & & 13.333 + 14 & & 0.115 & 148.5 & 12 & @xmath345 & @xmath346 & & 15180715@xmath283804238 & 5.3 & & 10.600 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath347 & @xmath348 & usno 7822@xmath2800433@xmath281 & 15180762@xmath283804237 & 10.7 & 10.650 & 7.999 + 15 & & 0.054 & 150.7 & 13 & @xmath349 & @xmath350 & & 15144748@xmath284220149 & 14.2 & & 9.011 + 16 & & 0.153 & 152.8 & 8 & @xmath351 & @xmath352 & & 15201253@xmath283821579 & 4.2 & & 8.454 + 17 & & 0.061 & 169.1 & 10 & @xmath353 & @xmath354 & & & & & + 18 & & 0.105 & 170.4 & 11 & @xmath355 & @xmath356 & & 15244501@xmath283942367 & 4.7 & 5.367 & 5.495 + 19 & & 0.176 & 172.5 & 8 & @xmath357 & @xmath358 & & 14561404@xmath283851200 & 5.2 & 9.15 & 7.323 + 20 & & 0.051 & 173.7 & 15 & @xmath359 & @xmath360 & usno 0483@xmath280366208 & 14574495@xmath284141394 & 6.9 & 11.790 & 9.351 +  &  &  &  &  & @xmath361 & @xmath362 & & 14574414@xmath284141408 & 1.8 & & 14.698 +    l c p1.25 in c c p2.5 in + & 1 & & [ fig : opt1 ] & n & planetary nebula , associated with 235.2  mjy nvss source at @xmath363 @xmath364 @xcite + & 2 & & [ fig : opt1 ] & n & dwarf nova ; x - ray emission reported by @xcite and @xcite + & 3 & & [ fig : opt1 ] & n & spectroscopic binary ; type g8iii + & 4 & / & [ fig : opt1 ] & n & binary system , late - type + & 5&&[fig : opt1],[fig:1934 ha ] & y & extended _ chandra _  source ; see   [ sec : rxsa ] + & 6 & usno 1181@xmath280406270 & [ fig : opt1 ] & n & + & 7 & & [ fig : opt2 ] & n & late - type + & 8 & & [ fig : opt2 ] & n & pulsating variable star of type k2ii - iii + & 9&2mass  j19322722 + 3453148&[fig : opt2],[fig : cxoopt1 ] & y & 35.4  mjy nvss counterpart at @xmath365 , @xmath366 ; flare star @xcite + & 10 & & [ fig : opt2 ] & n & late - type + & 11 & & [ fig : opt2 ] & n & double star system ; late - type + & 12 & & [ fig : opt2 ] & n & late - type + & 13 & & [ fig : opt3 ] & n + & 14 & usno  1188@xmath280330651 & [ fig : opt3 ] & n +   + & 1 & & [ fig : opt4 ] & y & flare star ? see   [ sec : rxsb ] + & 2 & & [ fig : opt4 ] & n & late - type + & 3 & usno  1193@xmath280519643/ 2mass  j20581257 + 2920454&[fig : opt4 ] & n & association may be somewhat questionable ; see   [ sec : rxsd ] + & 4 & & [ fig : opt4 ] & n & variable type g7iii star + & & 2mass  j20493540 + 2938509 & [ fig : cxoopt1 ] & y & late - type +   + & 1 & & [ fig : opt5 ] & n & variable star of the @xmath2-dor type +   + & 1 & 2mass  j04570832 + 4527499 & [ fig : opt6],[fig : cxoopt1 ] & y + & 2 & 2mass  j05033958 + 4516594 & [ fig : opt6],[fig : cxoopt1 ] & y & associated with the 34.3  mjy nvss source at @xmath82 , @xmath367 ; flare star ? + & 3 & & [ fig : opt6 ] & n & late - type +   + & 1 & usno 0155@xmath2801104@xmath281/ 2mass  j06410796 + 0522438 & [ fig : opt7 ] &
n & binary system ? + & 2 & & [ fig : opt7 ] & n & late - type + & 3 & usno  0947@xmath280100759/ usno  0947@xmath280100763/ 2mass  j06410900 + 0447239/ usno  0155@xmath2802167@xmath281 & [ fig : opt7 ] & n & multiple - star system + & 4 & & [ fig : opt7 ] & n & variable star of the @xmath2-dor type + & 5 & 2mass  j06274012 + 0731006&[fig : opt7],[fig : cxoopt1 ] & y & + & 6 & & [ fig : opt7 ] & n & late - type + & 7 & usno  0150@xmath2800332@xmath281/ 2mass  j06371585 + 0320043/ 2mass
j06371555 + 0320026&[fig : opt8 ] & n & multiple - star system ?
+ & 8 & usno  0145@xmath2801717@xmath281&[fig : opt8 ] & n + 1e  0627.4 + 0537 & & 2mass  j06300529 + 0545407 & [ fig : cxoopt1 ] & y & + 1e  0630.9 + 0611 & & 2mass  j06333322 + 0608396 & [ fig : cxoopt2 ] & y & + 1e  0636.8 + 0517 & & 2mass  j06392566 + 0514301 & [ fig : cxoopt2 ] & y & +   + & 1 & 2mass  j15081819@xmath284017261 & [ fig : opt9],[fig : cxoopt2 ] & y & also 1axg  j150818@xmath284016 @xcite + & 2 & usno  0505@xmath280350285/ usno  7826@xmath2800179@xmath281/ usno  0505@xmath280350290 & [ fig : opt9 ] & n & multiple - star system ?
+ & 3 & & [ fig : opt9 ] & n & variable star of the @xmath368-cvn type ; has late - type companion @xcite + & 4 & & [ fig : opt9 ] & n + & 5 & & [ fig : opt9 ] & n & t tauri star + & 6 & & [ fig : opt9],[fig:15012mass ] & y & extended _ chandra _  source ; see   [ sec : rxsc ] + & 7 & & [ fig : opt10 ] & n & t tauri star + & 8 & & [ fig : opt10 ] & n & late - type + & 9 & & [ fig : opt10 ] & n & late - type + & 10 & & [ fig : opt10 ] & n & late - type + & 11 & usno  0507@xmath280344267 & [ fig : opt10 ] & n + & 12 & & [ fig : opt10 ] & n & t tauri star + & 13 & 2mass  j14572207@xmath284013586 & [ fig : opt11 ] & n & extended on the dss/2mass images ( 2masx  j14572207@xmath284013588 ) ; likely a galaxy + & 14 & usno  7822@xmath2800433@xmath281/ 2mass  j15180762@xmath283804237&[fig : opt11 ] & n & multiple - star system ?
+ & 15 & & [ fig : opt11 ] & n + & 16 & & [ fig : opt11 ] & n & multiple - star system ?
+ & 17 & & [ fig : mag ] & y & star detected in magellan data + & 18 & & [ fig : opt11 ] & n & double star ; type a0sp@xmath369 + & 19 & & [ fig : opt12 ] & n & late - type + & 20 & usno  0483@xmath280366208/ 2mass  j14574414@xmath284141408 & [ fig : opt12 ] & n & multiple - star system ? +    l c c c + & & 3.7 & 1/4 + & & 3.5 & 1/4 +   + & & 3.2 & 1/2 + & & 3.9 & 1/4 +   + & & 5.2 & 1/4 +   + & & 5.4 & 1/4 + & & 3.4 & 1/4 + 1e  0627.4 + 0537  & & 3.5 & 1/2 + 1e  0630.9 + 0611  & & 3.6 & 1/2 + 1e  0636.8 + 0517  & & 3.8 & 1/2 +   + & & 2.9 & 1/4 + & & 3.7 & 1/4 + & & 2.9 & 1/4 +    l l l l c r 1rxs j193458.1 + 335301 & 2003-jul-03 & p200 & lfc & @xmath370 & 300 + 1rxs j193458.1 + 335301 & 2003-jul-24 & p60 & p60ccd & h@xmath108/offband & 1200 + 1rxs j151942.8@xmath28375255 & 2003-apr-04 & magellan ii / clay & magic & @xmath109 & 930 + & 2003-apr-18 & magellan ii / clay & panic & @xmath110 & 200 + 1rxs j150139.6@xmath28403815 & 2004-feb-16 & magellan ii / clay & magic & @xmath109 & 60 + & & & & @xmath111 & 160 +