since the first optical counterpart of gamma - ray burst ( grb ) was identified on 1997 february 28 , more and more grbs have been optically detected , especially after _ swift _ was launched successfully , which allows early follow - up observations with ground - based optical telescopes . however , about 40 per cent of _ swift _ grbs still failed to be identified with optical or infrared counterparts ( burrows et al .
2008 ) . for the nature of the dark burst ,
several models have been proposed : extinction from dusty opaque star - forming regions ( e.g. groot et al .
1998 ; reichart & price 2002 ) ; high redshift , which diminishes the grb optical luminosity ( lamb & reichart 2000 ) , as the ly@xmath6 forest is shifted into the observational energy range ; intrinsically dim bursts ( fynbo et al . 2001 ; rol et al . 2005 ) ; the observational effect , as a result of the late response to the bursts .
jakobsson et al .
( 2004 ) have proposed an operational definition of dark burst ( i.e. optical - to - x - ray spectral index @xmath7 ) , according to the fireball model .
however , grbs with an optical afterglow have been studied widely and in depth(e.g .
grb 060218 , grb 080319b ) . this has resulted in an increasing number of grbs with known redshift , which has allowed statistical studies to be carried out .
the optical luminosity distribution of grbs varies widely up to several magnitudes ( kann et al . 2006 ; 2008 ) . after being transformed into a common redshift ( e.g. , @xmath8 ) ,
the optical luminosity shows a bi - model phenomenon ( nardini et al .
2006 ; liang et al . 2006 ; kann et al . 2006 ; 2008 ) : optically luminous and optically dim .
the bi - model distribution is also found to exist in other energy bands ( gendre et al .
2008a , b ) .
liang & zhang ( 2006 ) found that the apparent bimodality can not be interpreted as a manifestation of the extinction effect , and they suggested that there might be two types of progenitors or two types of explosion mechanisms in operation . considering the dark burst is usually a type of grbs with a faint optical afterglow , optically dim bursts might be related to dark bursts ( nardini et al .
however , the number of well - studied optically dim bursts is very limited . thus , increasing the number of known optically dim bursts may help us to understand the origin of the bi - model distribution , the nature of optically dim bursts and dark bursts .
one such interesting case is grb 070518 .
it was detected by gamma - ray burst alert telescope ( bat ) onboard _ swift _ at 14:26:21 ( ut ) on 2007 may 18 .
the x - ray telescope ( xrt ) and ultraviolent / optical telescope ( uvot ) on board _ swift _ observed the counterpart beginning at 70 and 100 sec after the trigger , respectively .
t@xmath9 ( 15 - 350 kev ) is 5.5@xmath100.2 s , t@xmath11 is 2.9s ( sakamoto et al .
the values of duration mean the burst belongs to the short tail of the long group ( kouveliotou et al .
thus , it might be a classical long - duration grb or an intermediate - long grb ( horvath et al . 2008 ) .
the ratio of fluence between the 25 - 50 kev and 50 - 100 kev band ( sakamoto et al .
2008a ) is about 1.06 , which makes grb 070518 belong to an x - ray rich burst ( xrr ) , according to the criterion0.72 c - grb ; + 0.72@xmath12s(25 - 50kev)/s(50 - 100kev)@xmath131.31 xrr ; + s(25 - 50kev)/s(50 - 100kev)@xmath141.32 xrf . ] given by sakamoto et al .
( 2008b ) .
the first given magnitude and coordinates of the counterpart are about 18 mag in @xmath15 band reported by uvot and ra(j2000 ) = 16h 56 m 47.7s , dec(j2000 ) = 55d 17 m 42.3s ( radius , 90 pen cent containment ) , respectively ( guidorzi et al . 2007 ) .
the afterglow was also observed by other ground - based telescopes later . besides
, the redshift of grb 070518 was reported to be lower than 0.7 ( cucchiara et al . 2007 ) based on the photometry of the _ swift _ uvot .
no other report about redshift of grb 070518 has been presented in the literature up to now . in our analysis ,
the redshift of 0.7 are used to investigate the properties of grb 070518 .    in this paper
, we report on optical photometric follow - up observations of grb 070518 at xinglong observatory of national astronomical observatories , chinese academy of sciences .
afterglow observations and results are described in @xmath162 .
an anaysis and discussion are presented in @xmath163 , and a summary and conclusion are given in @xmath164 . in our calculations ,
a flat universe is assumed with matter density @xmath17 , cosmological constant @xmath18 , and hubble constant @xmath19 km s@xmath20 mpc@xmath20 .
the formula @xmath21@xmath22 is used for the afterglow decay analysis .
we carried out a follow - up observation programme of _ swift _ grbs with the 0.8-m tsinghua university - national astronomical observatory of china optical telescope ( tnt ) at xinglong observatory , under the framework of the east - asia follow - up observation network ( eafon ; urata et al .
2003;urata et al .
the tnt telescope is equipped with a pi 1300@xmath231340 ccd and filters in the standard johnson - bessel system .
the field of view of the tnt is 11.4@xmath2311.4 arcmin , yielding 0.5 arcsec of the pixel scale .
a custom - designed automation system has been developed for the grb follow - up observations ( zheng et al .
2008 ) .
the follow - up observations of grb 070518 were performed with the tnt from 512s after the initial _ swift _ trigger , and lasted for about 5.5 hours until the dawn time . a sequence of @xmath15 , @xmath5 , @xmath24 , and @xmath25 bands images was obtained .
after preliminary analysis , we first confirmed the counterpart of grb 070518 ( xin et al .
2007 ) after the report of _ swift _ uvot .
data reduction was carried out following standard routine in iraf package , including bias and flat - field corrections .
dark correction was not performed , as the temperature of our ccd was cooled down to @xmath26 .
point spread function ( psf ) photometry was applied via daophot task in iraf package to obtain the instrumental magnitudes . during the reduction ,
some frames were combined in order to increase signal - to - noise ( s / n ) ratio .
flux calibration was performed by re - observing the field of grb 070518 , together with landolt photometric standard stars with the tnt telescope on 2007 november 14 and december 12 .
considering that the @xmath15 band is not a standard band , we treated the @xmath15-band filter as a very broad filter .
when we calibrated the @xmath15 band data to @xmath5 band magnitude , no significant difference was found in the colour terms , and the response functions of the two filters were very similar with about 0.07 mag uncertainty . since the redshift of grb 070518 is no larger than 1 , the @xmath15 band data was calibrated to @xmath5 band magnitude , for simplicity .
the transformation uncertainty of 0.07 mag is added to the final results .
in addition , other optical photometries for grb 070518 are collected from the grb coordinate network ( gcn ) , in order to complete the optical light curves .
all of these optical data are presented in table 1 .
ccccccc t - t0 & exposure & band & mag & telescope + ( mid day ) & ( sec ) & & & or reference + 0.00636 & 2@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 19.03@xmath100.10 & tnt + 0.00699 & 2@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 19.23@xmath100.10 & tnt + 0.00804 & 3@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 19.37@xmath100.12 & tnt + 0.00883 & 3@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 19.27@xmath100.08 & tnt + 0.00961 & 3@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 19.68@xmath100.14 & tnt + 0.01053 & 4@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 19.56@xmath100.12 & tnt + 0.01157 & 4@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 19.74@xmath100.13 & tnt + 0.01275 & 5@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 20.08@xmath100.15 & tnt + 0.01406 & 5@xmath2320 & @xmath27 & 20.06@xmath100.18 & tnt + 0.02446 & 1@xmath23300 & @xmath5 & 20.20@xmath100.10 & tnt + 0.02814 & 1@xmath23300 & @xmath5 & 20.76@xmath100.16 & tnt + 0.03723 & 3@xmath23300 & @xmath5 & 20.48@xmath100.10 & tnt + 0.01237 & - & @xmath5 & 19.5 & gcn6443 + 0.23337 & - & @xmath5 & 22 & gcn6483 + 0.35948 & - & @xmath5 & 22.2 & gcn6418 + 0.37753 & - & @xmath28 & 22.3@xmath100.2 & gcn6458 + 0.71837 & - & @xmath5 & 23.03@xmath100.05 & gcn6462 + 1.45833 & - & @xmath5 & 23.3 & gcn6426 + 1.70837 & - & @xmath5 & 23.36@xmath100.05 & gcn6462 + 3.60837 & - & @xmath5 & 23.56@xmath100.05 & gcn6462 + 0.02065 & 1@xmath23300 & @xmath24 & 20.74@xmath100.15 & tnt + 0.06383 & 10@xmath23300 & @xmath25 & 20.47@xmath100.17 & tnt + 0.10197 & 10@xmath23300 & @xmath25 & 20.92@xmath100.13 & tnt + 0.15271 & 14@xmath23300 & @xmath25 & 21.37@xmath100.14 & tnt + 0.20660 & 15@xmath23300 & @xmath25 & 21.23@xmath100.24 & tnt +
the multiband light curves of grb 070518 are shown in fig .
galactic extinction ( schlegel et al . 1998 ) is corrected for all @xmath24,@xmath5 and @xmath25 bands data , which corresponds to a reddening of @xmath29 mag in the direction of the burst .
the @xmath5- band data could be corrected for the flux contamination of its host galaxy , whose magnitude is estimated to be @xmath30 mag ( garnavich et al . 2007b ) .
the contamination is also interpreted as a combination of its host galaxy and supernova bump ( dai et al . 2008 ) . as shown in fig .
1 , the @xmath5 band light curve corrected for the flux contamination is labeled with `` after '' , while the @xmath5 band light curve without the correction is labeled with `` before '' . the tnt data before 10@xmath31 s are not affected by the contamination very much .
moreover , the `` after '' @xmath5 band light curve of whole data ( including tnt data and gcn data ) could be well fitted with a simple power law with a decay index of @xmath32 @xmath33 .
the result is consistent with the fitting index of @xmath00.81@xmath100.08 @xmath34 only for tnt data .
the general trends of light curves for the @xmath5 ( labeled `` before '' ) and @xmath25 bands are similar ; however , the fluctuations exist in both light curves , which might be a result of a low s / n ratio .
all @xmath5 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 band data have been corrected for the galactic extinction .
solid and open triangles present the @xmath5 band data before and after the correction of the flux contamination of the host galaxy , respectively .
the insert shows the flares in the x - ray light curve at the beginning .
, scaledwidth=50.0% ]    in order to investigate the decay properties between optical and x - ray light curves , we use the x - ray afterglow data downloaded from the website of the uk _ swift _ science data center(labeled as uss ) ( evans et al .
2007 ) , where some analysis results are given , including the spectral indices for each segments in the x - ray light curve .
these spectral indices are used directly for our later analysis .
the x - ray light curve is also plotted by squares in fig .
1 , showing several drastic flares from the beginning up to about 250s after the burst trigger . considering the sparse data between 2000 and @xmath35 sec , we fit the light curve after 250 sec by separating it into two parts .
one is between 250 sec and 2000 sec , and the other is from @xmath35 sec to over @xmath36 sec . the first part is well fitted by a single power law with an index of @xmath37 ( @xmath38 ) , while the second is well fitted by a single power law with a slope of @xmath39 ( @xmath40 ) . as shown in fig .
1 , the extrapolation of the first fitting is below the data detected after 1000 sec , suggesting that there is energy injection ( zhang et al . 2006 ) between the two segments , shown as a shallow decay . therefore , the x - ray light curve displays a `` steep - shallow - normal '' decays ( zhang et al .
2006 ) .      the first steep decay in the x - ray afterglow light curve is usually explained by the curvature effect ( e.g. kumar & panaitescu 2000 ; zhang et al .
according to their model , temporal index @xmath6 and spectral index @xmath41 have a tight relation @xmath42 . for grb 070518 ,
the first slope @xmath43 ( 1.78 ) of the x - ray light curve is definitely lower than the value ( 3.22 , from @xmath44 ) expected for high - latitude emission ( here , @xmath45 from uss ) .
however , the high - latitude effect only provides an upper limit to the decay slope , as it assumes that the shell emission stops abruptly after the initial pulse ( mangano et al .
the decline could be made in two cases : one is that residual emission from the shocked shells is still present , in which , the high - latitude emission would contribute only a small fraction of the overall radiation ; the other is that the x - ray band is below the cooling frequency , in which case , the expected decay slope of high - latitude radiation would naturally be shallower than 2 . for grb 070518 , the first possibility might be more reasonable , from the analysis for other segments of the x - ray light curve in the later sections .
the x - ray afterglow is analyzed by applying the closure relations given by zhang et al .
( 2006 ) to the x - ray spectral and temporal indices .
these relations help us to determine the location of the observed x - ray band relative to the synchrotron frequencies ( @xmath46,@xmath47,@xmath48 ) and the environment where the burst occurred .
the normal decay segment with @xmath49 and @xmath50 , agrees with the non - injected closure relations : @xmath51 and @xmath52 .
these relations are consistent with two cases : when @xmath53 in fast cooling phase or when @xmath54 in slow cooling phase .
also , the environment condition [ interstellar medium ( ism ) , wind ] could not be distinguished for the above cases .
the application of the closure relations to the x - ray temporal and spectral index in normal decay segment , combining the analysis in @xmath16 3.1 for the x - ray afterglow during 2000@xmath02@xmath55sec , suggests that there is energy injection before the start of the normal decay phase .
the x - ray light curve of grb 070518 shows drastic flares between 80 and 200s since the trigger , as shown in the insert in the fig . 1 .
several grbs were reported to have flares in x - ray afterglows ( e.g. bernardini et al . , 2009 ; krimm et al .
, 2007b ) . with the method of krimm et al .
( 2007b ) , the ratios of raise time duration and the middle time for two big flares ( peak times of about 106.9 s and 189 s , respectively ) are calculated .
@xmath56t / t for two flares was about 0.2 and 0.1 , respectively , and the @xmath56f / f was about 1 .
such steep and large amplitude rises in the observed flux , as in grb 070518 , could not be explained by a sudden increase in the external density ( nakar & granot 2007 ) .
another model , a patchy shell model , can produce the flare with @xmath56f / f of about 1 ( nakar & oren 2004 ) , athough it can not interpret the flares with @xmath56t / t @xmath57 0.1 .
for two big flares of grb 070518 , @xmath56t / t are about 0.2 and 0.1,respectively .
therefore , the model might be possible .
moreover , such dramatic flares are also related to refreshed shocks or the central engine activity ( e.g. zhang et al .
this is more reasonable for the case of grb 070518 , if we consider the above analysis that energy injection was still occurred after these flares .
chromatic decay could be seen in the case of grb 070518 , as shown in fig .
1 . the x - ray afterglow shows a `` steep - shallow - normal '' decay
( zhang et al . 2005 ) , while optical afterglow is decaying with a constant index of 0.87 ( if the correct of the late contamination was right ) .
the decay index of the optical light curve ( @xmath58=0.87 ) is slightly smaller than that of the normal decay segment ( 0.99 ) of the x - ray afterglow .
the normal decay segment is usually explained the external shock model ( sari et al .
1998 ) , as expected for the optical afterglow .
however , the origin of the normal phase might also be related to the internal energy dissipation ( see as the discussion by urata et al .
thus , the classical external shock model will tested with the burst . according to the model
, the difference between the decay indices of the optical and x - ray afterglow should be between -0.25 for the uniform ism case and 0.25 for the wind medium case ( urata et al .
2007 ) . for grb 070518 , @xmath59 , ignoring the uncertainties of those values .
the case of grb 070518 agrees with the prediction of the classical external shock model . moreover , with the relation derived by urata et al .
( 2007 ) : @xmath60 , where s shows the condition of ambient matter density as a formate of @xmath61 , the value of s for grb 070518 could be deduced to be 0.84 .
this suggests that the surrounding matter of the burst is a mix of ism and wind - type medium .
the time - averaged spectrum of grb 070518 from t-1.8s to t+4.5s is best fitted by a simple power - law model with a photon index @xmath62 ( krimm et al .
2007a ; guidorzi et al . 2007 ) , corresponding to the energy spectral index of 1.11@xmath100.25 ( @xmath63 ) .
the fluence in the 15 - 150 kev band is 1.6@xmath100.2@xmath2310@xmath64 erg cm @xmath65 ( krimm et al .
2007a ) , which is lower than the average value of the _ swift _ burst ( sakamoto et al .
2008a ) .
2 shows the relation between @xmath66 in the rest frame and @xmath67 ( i.e. amati relation ; amati et al .
the data shown by open symbols and the best fitting parameters are obtained from amati et al .
( 2008 ) . for grb 070518
, spikes in the bat light curve reported by guidorzi et al .
( 2007 ) were only clearly seen under 50 kev , which implies that @xmath68 might be less than 50 kev .
besides , if @xmath68 is within the bat energy range , the photon index @xmath69 of a simple power - law fit and @xmath68 are well correlated with a relationship ( liang & zhang 2005 ) :    @xmath70 + sakamoto et al.(2009 ) also obtained a similar conclusion by combining the simulation : @xmath71 + with @xmath72 and the two relations above , @xmath73 and 30.8 are obtained , respectively .
the mean value of @xmath0 35 kev is taken from the above calculations as its peak energy in the observational frame .
thus @xmath74 kev in the rest frame . as a result ,
grb 070518 is consistent with amati relation within 3 @xmath75 uncertainties , as shown in fig .
2 .     and e@xmath76 ( the amati relation ) .
the solid triangle is shown for grb 070518 when @xmath77 and e@xmath78 kev .
e@xmath76 is calculated using the band function ( band et al .
1993 ) , assuming photon index @xmath79 of the simple power law is the higher photon index , and fixing @xmath80 as the lower photon index . the data shown as open symbols are taken from amati et al .
( 2008 ) . ,
scaledwidth=50.0% ]      ghirlanda , ghisellini & lazzati ( 2004 ) proposed a relation between peak energy @xmath66 in the rest frame and the collimation - corrected energy @xmath81 : @xmath82 kev , where @xmath83ergs and @xmath84 . in this relation ,
the jet angle @xmath85 is very important , which was given by sari , piran & halpern ( 1999 ) : + @xmath86 , + where z is the redshift , @xmath87 is the break time in days . for grb 070518
, the time of a possible jet break should be later than the last observation of x - ray afterglow , @xmath88 sec , according to the analysis of @xmath16 3.1 .
thus , the opening angle of jet @xmath85 should be larger than 25 degree , under an assumption of the typical values : @xmath89 @xmath90 and @xmath91 ( ghirlanda et al .
from the values of @xmath85 and e@xmath92 , @xmath81 is estimated to be larger than 6@xmath93 ergs .
however , @xmath66 has been estimated to be about 60 kev in the observation frame , as analyzed in @xmath163.2.1 .
the @xmath66 gives an @xmath81 of about 5.1@xmath93 , based on the ghirlanda relation .
this value is slightly less than that from the above analysis ( 6@xmath93 ergs ) , but the values are consistent with each other , considering all the assumptions we have made .
therefore , grb 070518 might agree with ghirlanda relation from above analysis .
nardini et al.(2006 ) found that grb optical luminosity at 12 hours ( at rest - frame ) after the trigger shows a bimodal distribution . with a redshift of 0.7 for grb 070518
, 12 h at the rest frame corresponds to 20.4 hours in the observer frame . following the method of nardini et al .
( 2006 ) , and assuming @xmath94 , @xmath95 erg s@xmath20 is obtained based on the redshift of 0.7 , and @xmath96 .
the low value of @xmath97 of grb 070518 means that the burst is one of the optically dimmest grb afterglows so far ( nardini et al .
2008 ) .
we have also noted that the result might be affected by the subtraction of its contamination at late phase . in order to investigate this
, we just calculate the optical luminosity at the rest frame with the data without correction of the contamination of its possible host galaxy . in this case , @xmath98 erg s@xmath20 is obtained with the assumptions as above , indicating that the burst is really an optically dim burst .
moreover , if the real redshift of the burst was lower than 0.7 , its luminosity would become much lower than the value given above .
another method to investigate the optically dim luminosity of grb 070518 is to compare its light curve with other long bursts directly .
kann et al .
( 2007 ) have collected grbs in the pre-_swift _ and _ swift _ era to compare the luminosity of grbs in the common redshift of 1 . in this sample , grb 050416a , grb 060512 and
grb 070419a are at the lower edge of the distribution of optical light curves ( seen in the figure 1 of kann et al .
2008 ) . in order to make the comparison , we have collected @xmath5 band data of the above three dim bursts from gcn circular and other literature .
these data are transformed into a common redshift @xmath8 , with @xmath99 for grb 050416a ( soderberg et al .
2007 ) and fixed @xmath100 for other bursts , grb 070518 , grb 060512 and grb 070419a . in the transformation , all magnitudes are corrected for the galactic extinction , and without considering the extinction from their host galaxies .
in addition , for grb 070518 , flux contribution of host galaxy is corrected . as shown in fig.3 ,
the luminosity of grb 070518 is close to that of the three bursts , based on the redshift of 0.7 .
therefore , grb 070518 should belong to optically dim bursts , like the other three bursts ( e.g. grb 050416a , grb 060512 and grb 070419a ) .
band luminosity of grb 070518 with three other long bursts after transformation into the same redshift of @xmath8 .
the comparison long bursts are grb 050416a , grb 060512a and grb 070419a , as labeled in the plot .
grb 070518 was shown as a solid line based on the redshift of @xmath77 .
the reference for data are as follows : grb 050416a ( soderberg et al .
2007 ) ; grb 060512a ( mundell et al .
gcn5118 ; malesani et al .
gcn5122 ; cenko gcn5125 ; milne gcn5127 ) ; grb 070419a ( cenko et al . gcn6306 ; williams et al .
gcn6328 ; milne et al .
gcn6341 ; nishiura et al .
gcn6308 ; updike et al .
gcn6317 ; lizuka et al .
gcn6316 ; fu et al.gcn6311;pozanenko et al .
gcn6407 ; garnavich et al.gcn6406 ; hill et al .
gcn6486).,scaledwidth=50.0% ]      one of the interpretations for the optically dim luminosity is the extinction and absorption from circumburst medium in its host galaxy . here
, we try to estimate the extinction along the line - of - sight to the burst . the observed neutral hydrogen column density along this line - of - sight to grb 070518 determined by xrt onboard _
swift _ is about @xmath101 cm@xmath65 ( guidorzi et al .
2007 ) , larger than the previously measured galactic value ( @xmath103 ; dickey & lockman , 1990 ) .
the excess value is about @xmath104 cm@xmath65 .
if the excess value is from a previously unobserved over - density located within or close to our galaxy , then the excess extinction @xmath105 would be obtained with the excess value of neutral hydrogen , based on the relation found by predehl & schmitt ( 1995 ) : @xmath106 + 0.23 $ ] mag .
if this is the case , extinction should not be a prominent cause for the optically dim luminosity .
it is likely that the excess column density is located within the host galaxy of grb 070518 . as in the discussion for grb 051022 ( nysewander et al .
2006 ) , the rest frame @xmath107 is given by the observed @xmath108 .
the source frame is about @xmath109 with z=0.7 . from the relation of host extinction @xmath110 mag ( nysewander et al .
2006 ) , @xmath111 mag would be given in the rest frame based on a redshift of 0.7 .
clearly , under these conditions , high extinction would be a dominate cause of the optically dim luminosity of grb 070518 .
however , all above estimates are made with an assumption of the milky way - type extinction .
the optical extinction from the measured @xmath107 absorption should depend on the assumed dust - to - gas ratio .
some evidence shows that the extinction law in the grb host galaxy is likely to be a small magellanic clouds ( smc ) type . using the small dust - to - gas ratio of the smc ( pei 1992 ) , the host extinction @xmath112 would be 0.3 mag when @xmath77 .
the difference of the extinction value estimated above is very large , about a factor of 10 .
actually , the real extinction law in the grb host galaxy is uncertain in most cases , like grb 050401 , for example , the extinction @xmath2 is estimated to be @xmath113 by fitting the optical spectrum , which is lower than the value @xmath114 inferred from the x - ray column density ( watson et al .
one reason for the case of grb 050401 was that high energy release of gamma - ray and hard x - ray photons might destroy the circumburst dust in the grb host galaxy ( watson et al .
the reason might also be the case of grb 070518 .      as shown in fig.3 , three _
swift _ optically dim bursts grb 050416 , grb 060512a and grb 070419a are labeled to compare with grb 070518 . in order to investigate the reason for the dim luminosity of grb 070518
, we try to compare them in different aspects .
table 2 presented the main parameters for the three bursts along with those of grb 070518 .
there are several similar properties , as follows .
+ ( 1 ) for all the bursts , t@xmath9 is lower than 10s , except for grb 070419a .
this means that they belong to the shortest part of the `` long grb '' ( paciesas et al .
1999 ) , or intermediate long grb ( horvath et al . 2008 ) classification . + ( 2 )
the photon indices of these bursts are larger than 2 , which implies that the spectra are so soft that these bursts belong to xrrs and xrfs .
+ ( 3 ) the redshifts of all these bursts are lower than 1 .
lcccccl grb & @xmath4 & @xmath69 & f & z & @xmath2 & xrr + name & ( s ) & & & & & or xrf + 070518 & 5.5 & 2.11 & 6.02 & 0.7@xmath01 &  & yes + 050416a@xmath115 & 2.4 & 3.4 & 3.5 & 0.6535 & 0.2(0.32 ) & yes + 060512@xmath116 & 8.6 & 2.49 & 2.3 & 0.4428(2.1 ) &  & yes + 070419a@xmath117 & 116 & 2.35 & 5.6 & 0.97 &  & yes +    @xmath115
the references for grb 050416a are sakamoto et al.(2005,2006 ) , holland et al .
( 2007 ) and kann et al .
+ @xmath116 the references for grb 060512 are cummings et al .
( 2006 ) , starling r. et al .
( 2006 ) , bloom et al .
( 2006 ) and kann et al.(2007 ) .
+ @xmath117 the references for grb 070419a are cenko et al .
( 2007 ) and stamatikos et al .
+    another aspect concerns the absorption and extinction of the grb host galaxy . of the bursts mentioned above
, only grb 050416a has been studied extensively ( e.g. sakamoto et al .
2006 ; mangano et al . 2007 ;
soderberg et al .
2007 ) , and the extinction from its host galaxy has been estimated to be @xmath118 ( holland et al .
2007 ) , or @xmath119 ( kann et al . 2007 ) .
the two values are similar to the average value ( @xmath120=0.2 ) of grbs based on the study of kann et al .
( 2007 , 2008 ) .
however , they are significantly smaller than the extinction ( a@xmath121 ) expected from the hydrogen column density inferred from x - ray observations of xrf 050416a , assuming a dust - to - gas ratio similar to that found for the milky way ( holland et al .
the low value of extinction from host galaxy of grb 050416a implies that the extinction of host galaxy of grb 070518 might be not large , only about @xmath122 , as analyzed in @xmath163.4 .
optically dim bursts might be related to dark bursts ( nardini et al .
considering that grb 070518 is an optically dim burst , we wonder whether the burst is a dark burst or not .    the index of optical to x - ray spectrum @xmath123 ( @xmath124 ) at 11 h after the burst trigger is used to define dark bursts ( jakobsson et al .
cenko et al .
( 2009 ) argued that the x - ray flux at about 11 hours might be contaminated by the shallow decay for some bursts . as a result
, the x - ray flux would be larger than the real x - ray flux radiated along with optical afterglow , which would make some normal bursts `` dark '' bursts .
they calculated @xmath123 for the bursts in their catalogue at 1000s after the trigger time .
however , it is too early for most of the _ swift _ bursts to carry out the calculation at 1000s after the trigger , because the x - ray light curves in some _ swift _ grbs might be at the steep or shallow decay segment about this time .
for grb 070518 , @xmath123 at 1000s , 11 hours and @xmath125s after the burst are calculated by interpolation , as shown in fig.4 .
@xmath123 for grb 070518 is 0.666 , 0.606 and 0.543 at the above three epochs , respectively .
it seems that the burst is not a dark burst , for all of @xmath123 are slightly larger than 0.5 . however , spectral index @xmath1 depends on the energy distribution @xmath126 of electrons ( jakobsson et al .
2004 ) , for grb 070518 , @xmath126 should be 2.22@xmath127 , as @xmath128 ( from analysis of uss ) and @xmath129 . in this case , the criterion for dark bursts should become @xmath130 . consequently , grb 070518 might be a dark burst ( jakobsson et al .
2004 ) or a gray burst ( zheng et al .
2009 ) .     band , shown as open hexagonal .
the x - ray data at 3 kev is shown as solid squares .
the spectral indices are calculated at different times ( 1000s , 11 hours and @xmath125s ) by the interpolation of their light curves .
the optical to x - ray spectral indices @xmath1 are also shown .
, scaledwidth=50.0% ]
we have presented optical afterglow observations of grb 070518 from the tnt and an analysis of the optical and x - ray light curves .
the optical afterglow shows a constant power law decay @xmath00.87 , while the x - ray shows a `` steep - shallow - normal '' decay behavior .
based on the upper limit of redshift of 0.7 , the optical luminosity at 12 hours in the rest frame was estimated to be @xmath131 erg s@xmath20 , which means that the burst is an optically dim burst .
the conclusion is also supported by comparing with three other optically dim bursts : grb 050416a , grb 060512 and grb 070419a .
the spectral indices of @xmath123 at 1000 s , 12 hours,10@xmath132 are calculated .
all @xmath123 were slightly larger than 0.5 , indicating that grb 070518 might be a dark burst or a gray burst , according to the definition of jakobsson et al .
the optical extinction in its host galaxy inferred from x - ray hydrogen column density is 3.2 with galactic extinction law , and 0.3 with smc extinction law .
afterglow model has been applied to the light curves .
energy injection is found to occurr for the x - ray afterglow before the start of the normal decay segment .
the behavior of the normal segment of the x - ray afterglow and the optical afterglow is consistent with the prediction of the classical external shock model ( urata et al .
2007 ) , indicating that they come from the same origin . as an xrr burst ,
grb 070518 agrees with amati relation .
moreover , it fills the gape of high - luminosity and low - luminosity bursts in the amati relation , similar to grb 050416a ( sakamoto et al .
it is also found that grb 070518 agrees with the ghalanda relation within reasonable assumptions .
moreover , a comparison with three optically dim bursts ( grb 050416a , grb 060512 and grb 070419a and grb 070518 ) reveals that several similar properties were shared : burst duration t@xmath9@xmath1210s ( expect for grb 070419a , @xmath133 ) , soft spectrum at bat band @xmath69@xmath134 , low redshift @xmath1351 , etc .
we are very grateful to the anonymous referee , who provided excellent advice and comments , and many suggestions for improving the paper .
we wish to thank dr.xinyu dai for the discussion about the dark burst and the redshift of the burst .
thanks go to dr.yufeng mao , xuhui han , huali li for their kindly help in correcting and improving the writing .
this work made use of data supplied by the uk _ swift _ science data center at the university of leicester .
this study has been supported by national basic research program of china-973 program 2009cb824800 and by the national natural science foundation of china - grant no.10673014 and 10803008 .
199 amati l. et al . , 2002 , a&a , 390 , 81 amati l. , guidorzi c. , frontera f. , della valle m. , finelli f. , landi r. , montanari e. , 2008 , mnras , 391 , 577 band l. et al . , 1993 ,
apj , 413,281 bernardini m. g. , dainotti m.g . , bianco c. l. , caito l. , guida r. , ruffini r. , 2009 , aipc , 1111 , 383 bloom j. , foley r. j. , koceveki d. , perley d. , 2006 , gcn circ .
, 5217 burrows d. n. et al . , 2008 , preprint ( arxiv:0803.1844 ) cenko s. b. , 2006 , gcn circ . , 5125 cenko s. b. , fox d. b. , 2007 , gcn circ . , 6306 cenko s. b. , gezari s. , small t. , fox d.b . , chornock r. , 2007 , gcn circ . , 6322 cenko s. b. et al . ,
apj , 693 , 1484 covino s. , tagliaferri g. , chincarini g. , antonelli l. a. , israel g. l. , andreuzzi g. , garcia de gurtubai escudero a. , 2007 , gcn circ . , 6426 cucchiara a. , marshall f. e. , guidorzi c. , 2007 , gcn circ . , 6419 cummings j. et al .
, 2006,gcn circ .
, 5124 dai x. et al . , 2008 , apj , 682 , l77 dickey j. m. , & lockman , f. j. , 1990 , ara&a , 28 , 215 evans p. a. et al . , 2007 , a&a , 469,379 fu k.j . , lee y. h. , huang k. y. , urata y. , 2007 , gcn circ . , 6311 fynbo j.u .
et al . , 2001 , a&a , 373 , 796 garnavich p. et al .
, 2007a , gcn circ . , 6406 garnavich p.
et al . , 2007b , gcn circ .
, 6462 gendre b. , pelisson s. , boer m. , basa s. , mazure a. , 2008a , a&a , 492 , l1 gendre b. , galli a. , boer m. , 2008b , apj , 683 , 620 ghirlanda g. , ghisellini g. , lazzati d. , apj , 616 , 331 groot p. et al . , 1998 , apj , 493 , l27 guidorzi c. et al . , 2007 , gcn circ .
, 6415 hill j. et al .
2007,gcn circ . , 6486 holland s. t. et al . , 2007 , aj , 133 , 122 horvath i. , balazs l. g. , bagoly z. , veres p. , 2008
, a&a , 489 , l1 jakobsson p. , hjorth j. , fynbo j. p. u. , watson d. , pedersen k. , bjornsson g. , gorosabel j. , 2004 , apj , 617 , l21 jelinek m. , castro - tirado a. j. , casanova v. , gorosabel j. , de ugarte postigo a. , vitek s. , cunniffe r. , kubanek p. , 2007
, gcn circ . , 6418 kann d. a. , klose s. , zeh a. , 2006 , apj , 641 , 993 kann d. a. et al . , 2007 , apj , preprint ( arxiv:0712.2186 )
kann d. a. et al .
, 2008 , apj , preprint ( arxiv:0804.1959 ) kouveliotou c. , meegan c. a. , fishman g. j. , bhat n. p. , briggs m.s .
, koshut t. m. , paciesas w. s. , pendleton g. n. , 1993 , apj , 413 , l101 krimm h. a. et al . , 2007a , gcn circ . ,
6417 krimm h. a. et al .
, 2007b , apj,665,554 kumar p. , panaitescu a. , 2000 , apj , 541 , l9 lamb d. q. , reichart d. , 2000 , apj , 536 , 1 liang e. w. , zhang b. , 2005 , apj , 633 , 611 liang e. w. , zhang b. , 2006 , apj , 638 , l67 malesani d. , piranomonte s. , covino s. , masetti n. , maiorano e. , magazzu a. , mainella g. , 2006 , gcn circ .
, 5122 mangano v. et al . , 2007 , aj , 133 , 122 milne p. a. , 2006 , gcn circ . , 5127 milne p.
a. , williams g. g. , 2007 , gcn circ .
, 6341 mundell c. g. , steele i. a. , cummings j. r. , 2006 , gcn circ .
, 5118 nakar e. , & oren y. , 2004 , apj , 602 , l97 nakar e. , & granot j. , 2007a , mnras , 380 , 1744 nardini m. , ghisellini g. , ghirlanda , g.,tavecchio f. , firmani c. , lazzati d. , 2006 , a&a , 451 , 821 nardini m. , ghisellini , g. , ghirlanda g. , 2008 , mnras , 386 , l87 nishiura s.,tornita h. , urata y. , huang k.y . , 2007,gcn circ . ,
6308 nysewander m. c. , 2006 , ( phdt.2n ) publication number : aat 3239245 , isbn : 9780542940439 paciesas w. s. et al .
, 1999 , apjs , 122 , 465 panaitescu a. , kumar p. , 2001a
, apj , 554 , 667 panaitescu a. , kumar p. , 2001b
, apj , 571,779 pei y. c. , 1992 , apj , 395 , 130 reichart d. , price p. , 2002
, apj , 565 , 174 pozanenko a. , shulga a. , volnova a. , hafizov b. , asfandiyarov i. , ibrabimov m. , 2007,gcn circ . , 6407 predehl p. , schmitt , j.h.m.m . , 1995 , a&a , 293 , 889 price p. a. minezaki t. , 2007 , gcn circ . , 6443 rol e. , wijers r.a.m .
j. , kouveliotou c. , kaper l. , kaneko y. , 2005 , apj , 624 , 868 rumyantsev v. , biryukov v. , pozanenko a. , 2007 gcn circ .
, 6483 sakamoto t. et al . , 2005 , gcn circ . , 3273 sakamoto t. et al
. , 2006 , apj , 636 , l73 sakamoto t et al .
, 2008a , apjs , 175 , 179 sakamoto t. et al . , 2008b , apj , 679 , 570 sakamoto t. et al . , 2009 , apj , 693 , 922 sari r. , piran t. , narayan r. , 1998 , apj , 497 , 17s sari r. , piran t. , halpern j. p. , 1999
, apj , 519,l17 schlegel e. m. , finkbeiner d. p. , davis m. , 1998 , apj , 500 , 525 soderberg a.m. et al . , 2007 , apj,661,982 stamatikos m. , parsons a. , perri m.
, landsman w. , barthelmy s. d. , burrows d. n. , roming p. , gehrels n. , 2007 , gcn report , 47 starling r. et al .
, 2006,gcn circ . , 5149 terra f. et al .
, 2007,gcn circ . ,
6458 updike a. c. , hartmann d. h. , rumstay k. , 2007 , gcn circ .
, 6317 urata y. et al . , 2003 , apj , 595 , l21 urata y. et al . , 2005 , nuovo cimento c , 28 , 775 urata y. et al . , 2007 , apj , 668,95 watson d. et al . , 2006 ,
apj , 652 , 1011 williams g. g. , milne p. a. , 2007,gcn circ . , 6328 xin l. p. , zhai m. , qiu y. l. , wei j.y . , hu j. y. , deng j.s . , urata y. , zheng w.k . , 2007 , gcn circ .
, 6416 zhang b. , fan y. z. , dyks j. , kobayashi s. , meszaros p. , burrows d. n. , nousek j. a. , gehrels n. , 2006 , apj , 642 , 354 zhang b. b. , zhang b. , liang e - w . , wang x - y . , 2009 , apj , 690 , l10 zheng w. k. et al.,2008 , chjaa , 8 , 693 zheng w. k. , deng j - s . , wang j. , 2009 , ra&a , 9 , 1103