an inflationary epoch of the early universe is widely accepted as the most efficient mechanism to solve the flatness and the horizon problem , while providing a nearly scale invariant spectrum of scalar perturbations , in agreement with observations .
however , the embedding of inflation driven by a single scalar field within string theory ( presently , the only known self - consistent theory of quantum gravity ) has proven to be challenging , since it requires an extremely flat potential .
in addition , the presence of many dynamic fields in string theory renders single field models less appealing because all but one degree of freedom need to be already stabilized at the onset of inflation .
though far from being simple or generic , a partially successful implementation is the kklmmt construction @xcite .    to ameliorate the problem of fine tuning the potential , liddle et .
al .  proposed assisted inflation in @xcite ( see also @xcite and follow ups ) , a certain type of multi - field inflation whereby the presence of many fields increases the hubble friction , allowing for steeper potentials to still drive slow roll inflation .
one shortcoming , however , is the need for fine tuned initial conditions for particular potentials , especially in the absence of an attractor solution ( for instance in n - flation @xcite ; see @xcite for a more general stability analysis of assisted inflation ) .
the presence of many degrees of freedom in string theory has , over the years , galvanized the emergence of a variety of models implementing assisted inflation ; these include inflation from multiple tachyons @xcite , from multiple m5-branes within m - theory @xcite or from axions @xcite among others , see e.g. @xcite for a small selection .
to make predictions in these models , it is common to introduce a single effective degree of freedom , visualized as the length of the trajectory in field space , see e.g. the review @xcite . utilizing this approach correctly recovers adiabatic perturbations , but not isocurvature / entropy modes .
the latter ones can be pictured as perturbations perpendicular to the trajectory and develop whenever several degrees of freedom are present @xcite .
although non - gaussianities may be produced ( see the review @xcite for details ) , it is possible to show that they are generically slow roll suppressed @xcite ( see however @xcite ) . with this in mind , is it then feasible to discriminate a given multi - field model from its single field analog ?    in this article , we investigate a , so far largely ignored ( see however @xcite ) , discriminating property of multi - field models , namely the possibility that fields decay during inflation . by `` decay '' we mean that individual fields suddenly become obsolete , while their energy is converted into other forms , such as radiation .
this is a widespread feature of models within string theory : consider , for instance , an association of inflatons with distances between branes that are located in some internal space .
if a brane annihilates during inflation , for example as a result of its dissolution into a boundary brane or a collision with an anti - brane , the distance to the just mentioned brane becomes meaningless .
of course , energy does not vanish , but is converted into a different type during the annihilation .
a further example is inflation driven by tachyons , which can condense during inflation in a staggered fashion .
the disappearance of fields causes an additional decrease of the potential energy during inflation , which can be even more important than the reduction of potential energy induced by slow roll .
hence , leading order corrections to observable parameters that are sensitive to the slow roll parameters , such as the scalar spectral index , are possible .
indeed , one can construct models of inflation entirely without a slow roll phase , similar to inflation without inflatons as proposed in @xcite .    in order to compute these effects
we assume a simple separable potential @xmath0 and promote the number of fields @xmath1 to a time dependent function .
we further smooth out @xmath1 so that we can introduce a continuous decay rate @xmath2 .
this approach is only justified if the number of fields and @xmath3 are large enough so that several fields disappear in any given hubble time .
further , any signal due to a rapid drop in the potential energy , such as a ringing in the power spectrum or additional non - gaussianities @xcite , can not be recovered by this approach . to guarantee energy - momentum conservation ( @xmath4 ) ,
we are forced to introduce an additional component of the total energy momentum tensor that takes over the energy of the disappearing fields .
the ratio of its energy density to the one in the remaining inflatons yields an additional small parameter @xmath5 appearing alongside the usual slow roll parameters . as a consequence , the equation of motion of the effective field is modified .
the resulting set - up is reminiscent of warm inflation @xcite , and might indeed be seen as a new , less problematic implementation of warm inflation within string theory .    at the perturbed level
, we consider adiabatic and entropy perturbations and show that the latter ones are suppressed in the models of interest .
focusing on the mukhanov variable , we derive the scalar spectral index and its running for general decay rates and number of fields .
we recover the usual slow roll result as well as @xcite ( a dynamically relaxing cosmological constant ) in the appropriate limits , but we also find leading order corrections to the slow roll result in general .
the running remains second order in small parameters and is , therefore , too small to be observed .    to exemplify the applicability of the formalism we make a detailed study of three concrete models ; firstly , as an instructive toy model , we consider assisted inflation with exponential potentials and a nonzero , constant decay rate , which we insert by hand .
@xmath6 provides a graceful exit to inflation at the cost of requiring somewhat flatter potentials or more fields so that the model remains consistent with observations .
if the decay rate is too big ( @xmath7 ) the scalar spectral index becomes unacceptably red , but all smaller rates work well .
secondly , we investigate inflation from multiple tachyons , as proposed in @xcite . here
, tachyons get displaced from the top of their potential by thermal or quantum mechanical fluctuations , causing them to condense during inflation .
we find that the best motivated and least fine tuned setup consists of a constant decay rate and tachyons close to the top of their potential so that their slow roll evolution yields negligible contributions to observable parameters .
the resulting spectral index is @xmath8 , where @xmath9 is the number efolds at which we evaluate @xmath10 .
this is in good agreement with the observations of the cmbr , @xmath11 @xcite .
lastly , we look at inflation from multiple m-5 branes within m - theroy @xcite . here , inflatons are associated with the inter - brane distance between m5-branes located within an orbifold @xmath12 .
whenever a brane comes close to a boundary brane it dissolves into the boundary via a small instanton transition . given the model s parameter ranges , which encompass , for instance , the concrete potential and the maximal number of branes , we show that inflation comes to an end within a few efolds after the first outermost brane disintegrates .
hence , only an initial narrow stacking of branes ( involves fine tuning ) permits a consistent scenario , and the usual slow roll expressions apply . based upon these findings ,
cascade inflation as investigated in @xcite is irrelevant for the cosmological scales that are observed in the cmbr , given the parameters put forward in @xcite .
it is evident that whether or not corrections due to @xmath6 are important is model - dependent , ranging from being the primary ingredient , as in the tachyon case , to being not pertinent , as in the m5-brane case .
thus , the many implementations of multi - field inflation within string theory should be thoroughly re - investigated .
the outline of this paper is as follows : in section [ sec : main ] , we derive the formalism to deal with dacaying fields , at the background level ( sec .
[ sec : background ] ) and the perturbed one ( sec .
[ sec : spectralindex ] ) .
we compute the spectral index and the running in section [ sec : spectralindex ] and [ sec : running ] . along the way
, we draw comparisons to warm inflation in section [ sec : warm ] and comment on isocurvature modes as well as non - gaussianities in section [ sec : entropy ] .
we then shift gears and focus on applications , that is we investigate concrete models : assisted inflation ( sec .  [
sec : staggered ] ) , inflation from tachyons ( sec .
[ sec : acdmm ] ) and inflation from multiple m5-branes ( sec .
[ sec : bbk ] ) ; summaries of the conclusions for each model can be found at the end of their respective subsection .
we conclude in section [ sec : concl ] .
consider @xmath1 scalar fields with canonical kinetic terms and a separable potential @xmath0 , is not the susy superpotential . ]
so that the action reads @xmath13 for ease of notation , we set the reduced planck mass equal to one throughout @xmath14 .
assume that the fields all evolve according to the same potential @xmath15 and that they start out from an identical initial value , so that @xmath16 in this case , an effective single field model with @xmath17 and @xmath18 describes correctly the inflationary phase ( if @xmath19 is sufficiently flat ) as well as the production of adiabatic perturbations ( we comment on entropy perturbations in section [ sec : entropy ] ) .
to guarantee slow roll inflation , we demand @xmath20 where a prime on @xmath21 or @xmath22 denotes a derivative with respect to @xmath23 or @xmath24 respectively .
so far , this is merely a simple model of assisted inflation @xcite , see also @xcite and follow ups .    given this setup ,
we would like to investigate the consequences of individual fields @xmath23 dropping out of the model , more or less instantaneously . by dropping out we mean that a field decays while its energy is converted into a different form , for example radiation .
this may seem artificial at first glance , but it is actually quite generic in multi - field models of inflation within string theory .
for instance , in the model of @xcite ( see also @xcite ) the inflatons are related to the distances between adjacent m5-branes .
these branes are located along an orbifold @xmath25 and slowly separate from each other in the orbifold direction , corresponding to the inflationary phase in the effective four dimensional description .
since the orbifold is quasi - static during this regime , the outermost branes will collide with the orbifold - fixed planes at some point in time , dissolving into the boundaries through small instanton transitions .
thus , the degrees of freedom associated with the distances to these just dissolved branes become obsolete during inflation . of course
, the energy associated with the branes does not vanish , but gets converted to other degrees of freedom , such as radiation .
another example is inflation driven by multiple tachyons as proposed in @xcite ; here , tachyons roll slowly away from the top of their potential , but fluctuations may displace a given field far enough to condense suddenly , again making obsolete this degree of freedom during inflation .
we come back to these two concrete models later on , after developing the formalism to deal with decaying fields . for additional multi - field models see e.g. @xcite and @xcite for a review .
it is worth stressing at this point that the disappearance of a given field in the models considered in this paper is a sudden , but continuous process .
this means potential problems associated with first order phase transitions , as discussed in some detail in @xcite , are absent . to model the disappearance of individual fields we promote @xmath1 to a time dependent function .
we further smooth out , we will not be able to recover additional features in the power - spectrum that are directly related to sudden drops in the potential .
for instance , features could consist of a ringing or additional non - gaussianities @xcite .
however , such signals depend crucially on the detailed physics of the fields dissapearance , a rather badly understood and model dependent issue for the current generation of setups . as a consequence
, these features will be quite hard to estimate within an effective single field description and we will not address them further in this article . ]
@xmath26 so that we can introduce a continuous decay rate @xmath27 , which is to be determined from the underlying model . this smoothing is the key simplifying assumption in our approach , and it is only viable if the number of fields is large and the decay rate is such that within any given hubble time a few fields become obsolete . for the cases we are interested in
, this rate is small compared to the hubble parameter @xmath28 during inflation ( inflation ends quickly otherwise ) .
this means we can introduce the small parameter @xmath29    the time dependence of @xmath1 induces an additional decrease in the energy of the effective inflaton . to be concrete
, the continuity equation of @xmath24 needs to be modified to account for the energy loss in the inflaton sector due to decaying fields @xmath30 , so that @xmath31 here and throughout the subscript @xmath24 denotes the entire inflaton sector .
it is worthwhile mentioning that the individual @xmath23 evolve according to the standard slow roll equation of motion @xmath32 , as long as they are present . to retain @xmath33 ,
we must allow for an additional component @xmath34 within the energy budget , so that energy always flows from the inflaton field sector into @xmath35 . ] satisfying @xmath36 we use the subscript `` @xmath37 '' , since we have radiation in mind ( @xmath38 with @xmath39 ) ; this choice seems most natural to us , considering the models we are interested in , but to remain as general as possible we keep @xmath40 arbitrary throughout .
the condition @xmath41 implies that @xmath34 makes up only a small fraction of the total energy density during inflation .
thus , we may introduce the small parameter @xmath42 naturally , @xmath5 is not independent of @xmath43 , and one can show under mild assumptions that @xmath44 during inflation ( see below ) .
further , using slow roll of the individual fields @xmath23 , one can show that the total energy and pressure of the effective inflaton obey @xmath45 .
this , along with @xmath38 and the definitions above , leads to @xmath46 during slow roll ( the `` @xmath47 '' always denotes equality to first order in small parameters such as @xmath48 or @xmath5 ) . taking the derivative with respect to time of the friedmann equation @xmath49 and using ( [ cont1 ] ) as well as ( [ cont2 ] ) , yields the _ hubble slow roll parameter _ @xmath50 this explains the chosen pre - factors in ( [ defepsilonn ] ) and ( [ defbarepsilon ] ) , as well as our demand that all epsilons should be small .
we have carefully avoided the use of the klein gordon equation for @xmath24 , since it gets modified by the presence of @xmath6 . to derive this modification
, one can use @xmath51 in the continuity equation ( [ cont1 ] ) and make the usual slow roll approximations , or take the time derivative of @xmath52 directly with @xmath53 so that @xmath54 where we introduced the short hand notation @xmath55 as expected , the usual slow roll equation of motion is recovered from ( [ eomsrvarphi ] ) in the limit @xmath56 .
the limit @xmath57 , that is @xmath58 , corresponds to a dynamically relaxing cosmological constant , which is discussed in great detail in @xcite .    during inflation , @xmath28 , @xmath43 as well as
@xmath59 change very slowly , so that ( [ cont2 ] ) can be integrated to @xmath60 with @xmath61 .
this means that the additional component of the energy budget approaches a scaling solution @xmath62 for which @xmath63 and @xmath64 .
thus , we can use @xmath65 during inflation .      at this point
, we would like to comment on similarities to warm inflation @xcite , where the scalar field s interaction with other particles ( through which the scalar field transfers some of its energy into a thermal bath ) prevents the temperature from rapidly reaching zero .
within warm inflation , the motion of the scalar field is described by the modified klein - gordon equation ( assuming slow roll ) @xmath66 the extra friction term @xmath67 represents an additional energy loss of the scalar field @xmath24 stemming from particle creation .
this equation needs to be compared to our equation ( [ eomsrvarphi ] ) : in our case , an increase / decrease of the right hand side is present , depending on the sign of @xmath68 , while in ( [ eom_wi ] ) , the right hand side is always decreased by @xmath69 .    a more concrete realization of warm inflation based on thermal viscosity has been ( critically ) examined in @xcite . in this study ,
part of the inflaton s energy is converted into radiation through a viscosity term .
as a consequence , one can show that the energy density satisfies @xmath70 with @xmath71 . comparing ( [ energy_density_wi ] ) to our case ( [ energy_density ] ) we see a similar modification : an additional positive term , potentially counterbalancing the dilution of @xmath34 due to redshifting ; however , the origin of this term differs : in our case it is due to the transfer of potential energy , whereas that of ( [ energy_density_wi ] ) arises from infusing kinetic energy .
though the friction term in ( [ energy_density_wi ] ) could at first glance be large enough to allow for successful warm inflation , a more careful examination by yokoyama and linde revealed @xcite that warm inflation is not feasible in this framework , since @xmath24 changes significantly over the relaxation time of the relevant particles , violating an adiabaticity condition required for the validity of ( [ energy_density_wi ] ) .
nevertheless , albeit the presence of many problems like the one just mentioned , warm inflation remains an active field of research .
staggered multi - field inflation , as introduced in the present paper , might be seen as an independent ( less problematic ) realization of warm inflation , which can be embedded into string theory .      in order to compute the scalar spectral index we focus on adiabatic perturbations , that is , for the time being we neglect isocurvature perturbations
the latter ones arise due to the presence of the many scalar fields and @xmath34 , but one can show that they are suppressed during inflation .
the applicability of this approximation is discussed in section [ sec : entropy ] .
the canonical degree of freedom that diagonalizes the action of adiabatic scalar perturbations is the mukhanov variable @xmath72 @xcite .
it is related to the curvature perturbation on uniform density hyper - surfaces @xmath73 via @xmath74 where @xmath75 here , @xmath76 with @xmath77 and @xmath78 is the equation of state parameter , while @xmath79 is the adiabatic sound speed , which becomes @xmath80 on large scales . in terms of @xmath81 ,
the power spectrum is given by @xmath82 and the scalar spectral index is @xmath83 the mukhanov variable satisfies the simple equation of motion @xcite @xmath84 where a prime denotes a derivative with respect to conformal time @xmath85 , @xmath86 .
if the hubble slow roll parameter @xmath87 in ( [ defhatepsilon0 ] ) is evolving slowly , which is the case during inflation , we can approximate @xmath88 and solve ( [ eomvk ] ) analytically in terms of hankel functions ( see e.g. @xcite or @xcite ) . writing @xmath89 treating @xmath90 as a constant and imposing the bunch - davies vacuum at @xmath91 ( @xmath92 ) , we get @xmath93 where @xmath94 is an irrelevant phase factor , @xmath95 . hence , the curvature perturbation reads @xmath96 ) and taking the logarithmic derivative , one can read off the scalar spectral index to @xmath97    thus , we only have to compute @xmath98 and identify @xmath90 in order to get @xmath10 .
since @xmath99 is second order in small parameters , we need to focus on @xmath100 from ( [ deftheta ] ) only .
to leading order in @xmath101 and @xmath102 , the equation of state parameter reads    @xmath103    here , we used the equation of motion for @xmath24 in ( [ eomsrvarphi ] ) , @xmath104 from ( [ defgamma ] ) and @xmath105 from ( [ barepsilonandepsilonn ] ) . consequently @xmath106 in order to take the derivatives with respect to conformal time , we need @xmath107-\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}}\gamma\right]\ , , \label{dergam}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we introduced @xmath108 note that @xmath109 corresponds to @xmath110 , whereas @xmath111 corresponds to @xmath112 . deriving ( [ derep])-([dergam ] ) based on section [ sec : background ]
is straightforward , albeit somewhat tedious .
after some more algebra , we arrive at @xmath113-\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}}\gamma\right ] + \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}}(\varepsilon+\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}})(1-\delta ) \big)\bigg]\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] to leading order in small parameters ( we assume that @xmath114 is of the same order as @xmath43 ) . using @xmath115 from ( [ aoftau ] ) so that @xmath116 we can read off @xmath90 .
the resulting scalar spectral index is @xmath117.\label{finalns } % % % % % the below is my old checked expression , which we use in the maple codes .
do not erase ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
% % \nonumber n_s-1&\simeq&-2(\varepsilon+\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}})-\frac{2}{\varepsilon\gamma^2+\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n } } } % \bigg [ % \gamma^3\left(2\varepsilon^2-\varepsilon\eta\right)\\ % & & + \varepsilon\gamma\left[(\gamma-1)\left[(\varepsilon+\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}})(1-\delta)+\gamma(\eta-2\varepsilon)\right]-\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}}\gamma\right ] % + \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}}(\varepsilon+\varepsilon_{\mathcal{n}})(1-\delta ) % \bigg]\,.\label{finalns } % \end{aligned}\ ] ]
this is our first major result . in the limit @xmath118 , so that @xmath119 and @xmath120 , we recover the slow roll result @xmath121 . on the other hand , if @xmath110 ( that is @xmath109 ) and @xmath122 , we recover the case of a dynamically relaxing cosmological constant of @xcite @xmath123 .
the running @xmath124 can be computed by applying , resulting in @xmath125 ; we use that @xmath28 is evolving slowly during inflation , that is @xmath126 . ]
@xmath127 to ( [ finalns ] ) . using again @xmath63 and @xmath128 where @xmath129 , as well as @xmath130 , @xmath131 and @xmath132 from ( [ derep])-([dergam ] ) the running reads @xmath133\\ & & + \nonumber(\varepsilon+\varepsilon_{\mathcal n})\left[(1-\delta)\left[(\gamma-1)(\varepsilon'\gamma+\varepsilon\gamma')+\varepsilon\gamma\gamma'+\frac{\varepsilon_{\mathcal n}'}{2}\right]-\delta'\left[\varepsilon\gamma(\gamma-1)+\frac{\varepsilon_{\mathcal n}}{2}\right]\right]\bigg]\\ & & -\nonumber\frac{2[\varepsilon'\gamma^2 + 2\varepsilon\gamma\gamma'+\varepsilon_{\mathcal n}']}{(\varepsilon\gamma^2+\varepsilon_{\mathcal n})^2}\left[\varepsilon\gamma^2(\eta+\varepsilon_{\mathcal n}-2\varepsilon)-(\varepsilon+\varepsilon_{\mathcal n})(1-\delta)\left[\varepsilon\gamma(\gamma-1)+\frac{\varepsilon_{\mathcal n}}{2}\right]\right]\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the limit @xmath56
, we recover the standard slow roll result @xmath134 . on the other hand , if @xmath135 , the running reduces to @xmath136 . in any event
, the running remains second order in small parameters , rendering it un - observably small .
so far we focused on adiabatic perturbations only , neglecting entropy perturbations entirely . to check
if entropy perturbations are indeed negligible , we follow @xcite ( see also @xcite ) .
the perturbation of the total pressure is in general @xmath137 where @xmath138 is the entropy density , @xmath139 ( we use cosmic time in this section in order to avoid confusion of this @xmath140 with conformal time ) and @xmath141 is the adiabatic sound speed , which reduces to @xmath142 on large scales .
the non - adiabatic pressure perturbation may thus be defined as @xmath143 in a multi - component fluid , there are two contributions to @xmath144 , a relative one @xmath145 between the fluid components and an intrinsic one within each fluid @xmath146 @xcite . in our case , we have two main components , the effective inflaton ( composed of @xmath1 fields ) with @xmath59 , and the additional component @xmath34 , for instance given by radiation , with a constant equation of state parameter @xmath147 .
let us first discuss @xmath148 , which can be written as @xcite @xmath149 where @xmath150 and the relative entropy perturbation is defined as @xmath151 we have already seen in the discussion before ( [ barepsilonandepsilonn ] ) that @xmath34 approaches a scaling solution @xmath62 during inflation for which @xmath152 is small ( @xmath64 ) .
since @xmath153 , the relative non - adiabatic pressure perturbation is heavily suppressed and can safely be ignored during inflation . remains small and finite in the limit of small @xmath152 , because the curvature perturbations @xmath154 and @xmath155 remain small ; see @xcite . ]    second , consider the intrinsic contributions @xmath156 since @xmath157 we have @xmath158 and @xmath159 .
therefore @xmath160 , that is the intrinsic non - adiabatic pressure @xmath161 vanishes identically .
however , for the effective inflaton the case is less clear , since its equation of state ( and thus the intrinsic sound speed ) changes and @xmath24 is actually composed of @xmath1 components .
we first note that the individual fields approach an equation of state @xmath162 during inflation , so that the equation of state parameter becomes nearly constant for each of the fields .
thus we have @xmath163 where @xmath164 .
therefore , the intrinsic non - adiabatic pressure within each inflaton field is @xmath165 .
second , the @xmath1 components relative non - adiabatic pressure perturbations contribute to @xmath166 .
but if we look at the relative non - adiabatic pressure contributions between the fields @xmath167 we conclude that @xmath168 since @xmath169 .
thus , the total non - adiabatic pressure is negligible during inflation and we are justified to focus on adiabatic perturbations . @xcite . ]
these are correctly recovered by focusing on the mukhanov variable @xmath72 , as we did in section [ sec : spectralindex ] .
one further comment might be in order : due to the suppression of entropy perturbations during inflation , we do not expect any large additional non - gaussianities ( ng ) caused by @xmath6 .
further , since multi - field inflationary models generically yield comparable ng to their single field analogs @xcite , and ng are suppressed during slow roll inflation ( see however @xcite ) , we do not expect any measurable ng within the setups discussed in this paper .
one caveat to this argument consists of the short intervals whenever one of the inflaton fields decays ( see e.g. @xcite for ng from steps in a potential in single field inflation ) .
we can not exclude the production of ng at these instances , but we do not anticipate them either , because the process is very similar to preheating and generically , preheating ( e.g. instant preheating ) does not cause large ng @xcite ( see however the possibility of larger ng in tachyonic preheating @xcite ) .
nevertheless , given a better microphysical understanding of how inflatons become obsolete , e.g. by investigating the brane annihilation in @xcite , one can and should check the validity of this expectation .
we would like to compute the scalar spectral index in ( [ finalns ] ) and the running in ( [ finalrunning ] ) within a couple of models .
first , we extend assisted inflation with exponential potentials @xcite by incorporating a non - zero @xmath3 , which provides a graceful exit of inflation ; this phenomenological model has the advantage of being instructive and simple .
next , we consider two concrete models @xcite which have the feature of decaying fields during inflation already build in , at the price of being more complicated to treat .
our approach consists of extracting the potential slow roll parameters @xmath101 , @xmath170 and @xmath171 , as well as @xmath172 with @xmath173 in order to apply ( [ finalns ] ) and ( [ finalrunning ] ) .
consider the original proposal of assisted inflation @xcite , where the @xmath1 scalar fields have identical exponential potentials @xmath174 so that the potential for the single effective field @xmath175 reads @xmath176 with @xmath177 ( we assume identical initial values for all @xmath23 ) .
power law inflation ( @xmath178 ) results for large enough @xmath179 , which can be achieved even with steep potentials if @xmath180 .
note that the single field solution is an attractor during inflation @xcite ( see @xcite for a general discussion of stability in multi - field inflation ) .
the slow roll parameters in the above model are @xmath181 so that the scalar spectral index is @xmath182 if @xmath118 ( see @xcite or equation ( [ finalns ] ) ) ; in addition , the running is zero since @xmath183 .
however , the above model has a graceful exit problem : inflation never ends because @xmath101 and @xmath170 are constant .
this problem can be alleviated by introducing a non - zero @xmath3 , so that the number of fields decreases during inflation .
let s for simplicity take a constant rate @xmath112 so that @xmath111
. consequently , inflation comes to an end when @xmath184 becomes of order one , at which point @xmath1 decreases rapidly during a hubble time so that the assistance effect diminishes .    since a shift in the individual fields @xmath185 can be absorbed into a redefinition of @xmath186 , we can set @xmath187 at @xmath188 efolds before the end of inflation , without loss of generality .
hence @xmath120 , and the scalar spectral index in ( [ finalns ] ) becomes since @xmath24 changes , and a shift in @xmath43 since @xmath186 changes ; however , an observable such as the scalar spectral index remains unaffected . ]
@xmath189 where we used @xmath190 and @xmath111 .
similarly , the running in ( [ finalrunning ] ) reads @xmath191 where we also used @xmath192 and @xmath193 .
these predictions differ from the corresponding slow roll ones : the additional energy loss in the inflaton sector due to @xmath6 causes a redder spectrum with a running that is second order in the epsilons ( such a running is well below current observational limits , we will not comment on it further in section [ sec : acdmm ] and [ sec : bbk ] . ] ) .
the physical reason for the difference in the spectrum is the smooth graceful exit caused by a non - zero decay rate , resulting in @xmath194 .
note that for a sharp exit from inflation to the reheating era , which could be modeled by a step function @xmath195 with @xmath196 , we anticipate no corrections .     using
@xmath190 ( assisted inflation with exponential potentials ) we plot @xmath197 lines in the @xmath101-@xmath43 plane using ( [ assistedns ] ) , showing the @xmath198 interval of wmap5 @xcite @xmath11 ( solid and dotted lines ) .
thus , a non - zero @xmath43 requires a lower value of @xmath101 in order to remain consistent with observations . ]    in figure [ pic : assistedns ] , we plot @xmath197 lines in the @xmath101-@xmath43 plane , showing the @xmath198 interval of wmap5 @xcite @xmath11 . given @xmath199
, it is evident that in order to fit @xmath10 from observations in assisted inflation we need a smaller @xmath101 . to put it another way ,
the smooth graceful exit of inflation introduced by @xmath6 comes at the price of either requiring flatter potentials or more fields .
further , the spectral index lies outside the @xmath198 region if @xmath43 is too large ( @xmath200 ) , even if @xmath101 were identical to zero .
this means the half - time @xmath201 needs to be considerably larger than the hubble time @xmath202 during inflation , in order to be consistent with observations ( @xmath203 ) .    in the phenomenological model above
, we inserted a non - zero decay rate by hand . as we shall see in the next sections , more concrete models within string theory
actually force us to have @xmath6 , rendering the above model more natural .      in @xcite , @xmath1 brane anti - brane pairs ( @xmath204 ) where considered , giving rise to @xmath205 tachyons due to a @xmath206 gauge symmetry .
however , these tachyons are generically all coupled to each other , making them not well suited for assisted inflation . to alleviate this problem ,
davis and majumdar proposed to focus on the abelian part of @xmath206 , resulting in @xmath1 uncoupled tachyons @xmath23 , and time by @xmath140 . ]
@xmath207 ; admittedly , this choice is to some extent unphysical @xcite , but offers an instructive model . within this setup ,
the potential has the form @xcite @xmath208 which is valid in close proximity to @xmath209 . here , @xmath210 and @xmath211 @xcite , but the brane tension @xmath212 is model dependent . for large @xmath1 sufficient inflation can result if the tachyons are initially close to zero . for simplicity
, we assume that they all start out from the same initial value , in line with our assumptions in section [ sec : main ] .
whenever a tachyon gets displaced far enough from the origin ( be it due to its slow roll evolution or a dislocation caused by either thermal or quantum mechanical fluctuations @xcite ) the perturbative potential in ( [ potentialacd ] ) becomes unreliable , and the tachyon condenses quickly .
this condensation corresponds to the annihilation of a brane anti - brane pair .
inflation ends when all tachyons condense .
this condensation is also expected to be responsible for reheating , but a concrete study is lacking in the literature . giving the model the benefit of the doubt ,
we assume that whenever a brane anti - brane pair annihilates , its energy is indeed converted into some type of relativistic matter with @xmath213 ( from the four dimensional point of view ) .
thus , the model of @xcite is exactly of the type we examined in section [ sec : main ] .
next , we extract the slow roll parameters as well as specify the rate @xmath214 at which the tachyons condense in order to compute @xmath10 .
if all tachyons condense at the same time , we have @xmath118 during inflation and the standard slow roll expressions apply . however , given the sensitivity of condensation to thermal and quantum mechanical dislocations of the tachyons , a staggered fashion of condensation is expected .
in @xcite three types of such a staggered condensation were proposed :    1 .
the number of tachyons decreases exponentially so that @xmath112 ( @xmath215 in the notation of @xcite ) , similar to the model in section [ sec : staggered ] .
2 .   tachyons condense serially so that @xmath216 and @xmath217 ( @xmath218 in the notation of @xcite ) .
this is the case if tachyons condense at wildly different times .
3 .   tachyons condense in a staggered fashion , but a handful survive and drive an extended phase of slow roll inflation , rendering again @xmath118 during the cosmological relevant phase of inflation .
( we do not examine this case further . )    because the applicability of the potential ( and thus slow roll ) is questionable for large values of @xmath24 , we first examine cases one and two in a simplified setup with all tachyons sitting very close to the top of their potentials ( @xmath219 , @xmath220 ) . whenever a tachyon gets displaced by a fluctuation , it is assumed to condense immediately . in later sections ,
we incorporate slow roll .
* case 1 ) @xmath112 * + similar to section [ sec : staggered ] , we consider a constant condensation rate so that the number of tachyons decreases exponentially in time @xmath221 where we take @xmath222 at @xmath9 efolds before the end of inflation .
once the number of fields is depleted , that is once @xmath223 , inflation ends . to be concrete , we take @xmath224 . then , using @xmath225 and @xmath226 , the number of efolds becomes @xmath227 further , since @xmath228 we get from ( [ finalns ] ) @xmath229 which is within the @xmath198 error bars of wmap5 @xcite .
if we fine - tune the brane tension such that @xmath22 vanishes at the minimum , @xmath230 , we obtain @xmath231 thus , for @xmath232 , we need @xmath233 tachyons , which is somewhat large ; however , for @xmath234 we achieve the desired amount of inflation and a spectral index within observational bounds with a few hundred tachyons .
it should be noted that neglecting slow roll might actually be the best motivated case : we only trust the tachyon potential close to @xmath235 ; then the potential is indeed very flat so that @xmath101 can be neglected .
( just as in @xcite ) , and not by @xmath101 .
] as soon as an individual tachyon gets dislodged a bit , it should quickly condense and drop out of the model , leading to the above estimate for @xmath10 .
* case 2 ) @xmath236 * + here , the number of fields is decreasing linearly @xmath237 so that inflation ends around @xmath238 .
analogous to ( [ efoldswsrconstgamma ] ) , the number of efolds becomes @xmath239 so that @xmath240 .
since @xmath241 we get from ( [ finalns ] ) @xmath242 smaller than in the @xmath112 case and close to the @xmath198 boundary of wmap5 @xcite .
tuning the brane tension again to @xmath230 , we obtain @xmath243 as a result , in order to achieve the desired @xmath188 efolds of inflation with a few hundred fields we need @xmath244 .      in case
all tachyons condense at once we have @xmath118 during inflation and the usual slow roll expressions apply . in order to provide a concrete example
we assume @xmath246 , tune the brane tension to @xmath247 and take @xmath248 even for @xmath249 , which is stretching the applicability of the potential .
corresponds to individual field values of order @xmath250 if @xmath251 . since @xmath252 in order for ( [ potsr ] ) to apply , we are reaching the limit of its applicability . ]
inflation ends when either @xmath101 or @xmath170 become of order one . for our potential , @xmath253 first at @xmath254 the value of @xmath24 at @xmath188 efolds before the end of inflation can then be computed numerically from @xmath255 given @xmath256 , the slow roll parameters and @xmath257 follow straightforwardly . since the only free parameter is the number of fields , we can fine - tune @xmath1 to yield the desired scalar spectral index . to be concrete , for @xmath258
we get @xmath259 and @xmath260 so that @xmath261 , @xmath262 resulting in @xmath263 , matching wmap5 @xcite .
if the full tachyon potential should become steeper before @xmath264 or the tachyons condense collectively at some smaller value @xmath265 , the corresponding @xmath256 shifts to lower values , causing @xmath101 and @xmath266 to decrease further . as a consequence , even less fields
@xmath267 are needed to match @xmath268 .
based on the last two sections , we expect the contributions to @xmath10 in ( [ finalns ] ) by the slow roll parameters and @xmath43 to be of comparable magnitude if the tachyons do not start out too close to the origin and we have @xmath269 as well as a decay rate of order @xmath270 ( or @xmath271 ) . for even smaller rates , @xmath43 becomes negligible and the usual slow roll results apply , whereas larger values cause a premature end of slow roll inflation .
on the other hand , if the tachyons start out very close to the origin , we can neglect the slow roll contribution altogether , just as in section [ sec : acdwithoutslowroll ] . to quantify these statements ,
we take the slow roll setup with @xmath247 as well as @xmath272 fields and slowly turn on @xmath3 in order to show its effect on @xmath10 .
* case 1 ) @xmath112 * + first , we determine the end of slow roll inflation , which occurs whenever @xmath101 , @xmath170 or @xmath43 becomes of order one ( or @xmath1 itself becomes of order one ) .
assuming @xmath180 is still valid at the end of inflation , one can show that @xmath253 before @xmath170 and @xmath43 if @xmath273 , where @xmath274 since @xmath275 for @xmath258 fields and we are primarily interested in small decay rates , we determine @xmath276 from @xmath253 . given @xmath264 , we can determine the time @xmath277 , and thus the field value @xmath278 from the requirement @xmath279 using @xmath280 and a numerical solution to the equation of motion for @xmath24 in ( [ eomsrvarphi ] ) . once @xmath256 is known , we can straightforwardly compute @xmath101 , @xmath170 and @xmath43 at @xmath188 efolds before the end of inflation . using these in ( [ finalns ] ) ,
we plot the resulting spectral index over @xmath3 in figure [ pic : nsm1overgamma ] .
as expected , the decay rate becomes important for @xmath281 , quickly driving the scalar spectral index outside the observationally favored region @xmath11 @xcite as @xmath3 increases further .     setting @xmath247 so that the potential in ( [ potentialacd ] ) vanishes at the minimum , we plot @xmath282 over @xmath283 , for @xmath112 ( solid line ) and @xmath236 ( dashed line ) .
we choose @xmath284 , so that @xmath285 ( the wmap5 value @xcite ) if @xmath286 ( or @xmath287 ) . as anticipated form section [ sec : acdwithoutslowroll ] , the decay rate becomes important for @xmath281 . ]    * case 2 ) @xmath236 * + we compute @xmath282 analogously to the previous section , but using @xmath288 instead of @xmath112 . since @xmath3 is time
dependent , we get a non - zero @xmath289 , leading to @xmath290 which also needs to be inserted into ( [ finalns ] ) .
the resulting scalar spectral index is plotted over @xmath291 in figure [ pic : nsm1overgamma ] .
@xmath10 is nearly indistinguishable from the @xmath112 case for the small @xmath292 under consideration .      allowing for @xmath6 yields the interesting possibility to drive inflation and generate observational viable values for the scalar spectral index with negligible contributions from slow roll .
one may start out with a few hundred tachyons very close to the top of their potential ( the potential is known in this regime ) .
as soon as a fluctuation , be it quantum mechanical or thermal , dislodges a field , it should condense quickly and drop out of the effective description , while contributing to @xmath34 .
this is the physical origin for @xmath6 . if the combination @xmath293 is chosen appropriately , for instance close to @xmath294 if @xmath112 , then @xmath188 efolds of inflation result with @xmath295 from ( [ ns3overn ] ) , in agreement with observations ( @xmath296 @xcite ) .
admittedly , there is still some tuning involved , but it does not seem overly contrived to us : a few hundred tachyons are certainly possible and @xmath270 does not seem far fetched either .    if the tachyons start to roll down the potential during inflation , the usual slow roll conditions must be satisfied too , so that @xmath282 in ( [ finalns ] ) remains small .
however , the applicability of the potential in ( [ potentialacd ] ) is questionable in the regime where @xmath101 and @xmath170 become of interest , since @xmath297 .
further , having both , @xmath101 and @xmath43 , of similar magnitude so that their contributions to @xmath10 are comparable constitutes an additional fine - tuning , which is not needed .
we conclude that with minimal fine - tuning of @xmath298 and using @xmath299 , the model of @xcite predicts @xmath300 , with a proportionality factor depending on the exact form of @xmath301 ( for instance @xmath302 if @xmath112 and @xmath303 if @xmath304 ) .
thus , a constant decay rate is in good agreement with observations .      in the model of @xcite inflation
is driven by an effective field @xmath24 , that evolves according to the exponential potential @xmath305 where @xmath306 with @xmath307 and @xmath308 ; here we used @xmath309 and @xmath310 , as in @xcite is denoted by @xmath311 . ]
( see also @xcite ) , but other combinations are possible @xcite .
@xmath1 is the number of m5-branes , which are ( equidistantly ) stacked somewhere within an orbifold @xmath25 of length @xmath312 .
its value is constraint to @xmath313 , justifying the use of @xmath180 above .
( that is @xmath314 ) initially . ]    if @xmath315 , the scalar spectral index reads @xmath316 , just like in the case of assisted inflation in section [ sec : staggered ] . for @xmath317
we need @xmath318 m5-branes , a number which lies well within the allowed interval .
note that this prediction is only valid as long as branes are not dissolving into the boundary branes , that is as long as the distance between adjacent branes satisfies @xmath319 .
in @xcite it was also suggested that one could distribute the m5-branes uniformly over the interval in order to avoid the fine - tuning associated with the narrow stacking of branes .
the number of branes is bounded by the brane separation via @xmath320 , and whenever @xmath321 a brane dissoves into a boundary brane , decreasing @xmath1 by one . in terms of @xmath322 the effective field
is defined via @xmath323 where @xmath324 .
note that whenever @xmath1 decreases , @xmath24 makes a jump due to the decreased @xmath179 , whereas @xmath322 is continuous ( we do not perform any smoothing of @xmath26 in this section ) .
let us consider the following question in order to assess whether or not we need to consider effects caused by a decreasing number of m5-branes : if we have indeed a narrow stack of @xmath325 branes initially , how many efolds follow after the outermost m5-brane hits one of the boundary branes ?
if the number of efolds @xmath326 that follow up until @xmath327 ( at which point @xmath101 becomes of order one and slow roll inflation ends ) is small , the above fixed-@xmath1 result is applicable . on the other hand ,
if @xmath328 , one can not ignore the time dependence of @xmath1 and cascade - inflation @xcite results . to address this question ,
we assume that the stack of branes is located near the center of the orbifold , so that the branes are uniformly distributed over the whole orbifold when the first brane dissolves into a boundary brane . during slow roll ,
@xmath326 is easily computed from @xmath329 where @xmath330 and the integration boundaries follow from @xmath331 with @xmath332 , @xmath333 and @xmath334 ( which remains constant during each integration interval ) as @xmath335 since the integrand is constant during each interval , we get @xmath336\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath337 is the digamma function ( the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function ) . for large @xmath338 ,
this can be approximated by @xmath339 , that is @xmath340 for @xmath325 .
hence , inflation comes to an end shortly after the first m5-brane dissolves into the boundary brane and we are justified to use the fixed-@xmath1 result for @xmath10 .
further , since all branes dissolve within the last few efolds , we expect all of them to contribute to reheating .
one might wonder how many branes are needed to achieve @xmath188 if one starts out with a uniform distribution of m5-branes over the entire orbifold ( instead of a narrow stack of branes ) as mentioned in @xcite . solving @xmath341 for the number of branes
yields @xmath342 , which is unfortunately well outside the allowed interval for @xmath1 .
thus , such an initial uniform distribution is not feasible within the framework of @xcite , and the investigation of @xcite ( where @xmath343 and @xmath344 as well as @xmath345 are considered ) is strictly speaking not applicable either : any imprint onto fluctuations within the last few efolds of inflation does not correspond to the large scales observed in , e.g. the cmbr .
however , it should be noted that other values of @xmath346 and @xmath347 seem possible @xcite so that cascade - inflation might be important in different scenarios .
we leave this interesting possibility to future studies .
were within the allowed interval , one could not simply invoke the formalism of section [ sec : main ] , since the potential differs from the type we considered in that it is not a simple sum , for instance @xmath348 instead of @xmath349 .
therefore , one would have to adjust the formalism accordingly first . ]    to summarize , in the model of @xcite and adhering to the prefered parameter ranges , successful inflation can only be driven if the branes are stacked narrowly ( this involves fine - tuning ) ; then @xmath350 , so that about @xmath351 branes are needed in order to match observations .
as soon as the outermost m5-branes dissolve into the boundary branes , inflation comes to an end within a few efolds due to the rapidly decreasing number of branes . as a consequence , all branes should contribute to reheating .
in this study , we investigated the consequences of disappearing inflatons during multi - field inflation .
such a process occurs quite naturally in string theoretical models of multi - field inflation , for instance if the inflatons are associated with inter - brane distances and said branes start to annihilate during inflation , or if inflatons are identified with tachyons that condense in a staggered fashion .
focusing on inflationary models with separable potentials , we promoted the number of fields to a time dependent , continuous variable and derived the general formalism at the background and perturbed level to allow for a non - zero decay rate .
this approach is only valid if the number of fields is large and the decay rate is big enough so that at least a few fields drop out of the model in a given hubble time . to satisfy conservation of the energy momentum tensor , an additional component to the energy budget needs to be introduced , which takes over the energy of the decaying fields .
a non - zero decay rate can cause leading order corrections in observable quantities such as the scalar spectral index or the running , for which we derived general expressions .
we recovered standard slow roll results and the case of a dynamically relaxing cosmological constant of @xcite in the appropriate limits .
in addition , we showed that isocurvature modes are generically suppressed during inflation for the models of interest ; as a consequence , perturbations are adiabatic and nearly gaussian .
we also point out that staggered multi - field inflation might be seen as a new , less problematic type of warm inflation , which can be implemented within string theory .
based on our formalism , we investigated three concrete models : assisted inflation with exponential potentials @xcite , inflation from multiple tachyons @xcite , and inflation from multiple m5-branes @xcite .
for assisted inflation , the presence of a non - zero decay rate offers a graceful exit to inflation , while remaining observationally viable . for inflation from multiple tachyons ,
the use of our formalism offers a reliable method to compute the scalar spectral index ; we concluded that the setup with best computational control , minimal fine - tuning and good agreement with observations consists of a constant decay rate slightly below one , a few hundred tachyons and a negligible slow roll contribution . for inflation from multiple m5-branes , we showed that the dissolution of m5-branes into boundary branes is quite rapid within the allowed parameter ranges .
therefore , inflation comes to an end within a few efolds after the first m5-branes disappear .
hence , the only self consistent setup employs a ( fine - tuned ) narrow stack of branes , whose number is constant around the pivot scale for which the scalar spectral index is measured , and the standard slow roll result is applicable .
we did not investigate further the connection to warm inflation , since it would go beyond the scope of this article , but it is surely an avenue worth investigating more thoroughly .
further , our selection of models is not extensive , and had the primary purpose of exemplifying the applicability of the formalism in a few concrete , distinct scenarios . variations of the models discussed here ( and also entirely different ones ) are abundant in the literature and should be re - examined .
we thank paul steinhardt and scott watson for comments on the darft .
d.  b. would like to thank damtp and a.  c.  davis for support when this project was started , as well as princeton university for hospitality during the final stages of this work .
d.  b.  is supported by the eu fp6 marie curie research and training network `` universenet '' ( mrtn - ct-2006 - 035863 ) .
t.  b.  would like to thank kari enquist and the helsinki institute of physics for hospitality .
t.  b.  is supported by the council on science and technology at princeton university .
this work is supported in part by pparc grant pp / d507366/1 and the stfc at damtp .
s.  kachru , r.  kallosh , a.  linde , j.  m.  maldacena , l.  p.  mcallister and s.  p.  trivedi , `` towards inflation in string theory , '' jcap * 0310 * , 013 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0308055 ] .
a.  r.  liddle , a.  mazumdar and f.  e.  schunck , `` assisted inflation , '' phys .
d * 58 * , 061301 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9804177 ] .
k.  a.  malik and d.  wands , `` dynamics of assisted inflation , '' phys .
d * 59 * , 123501 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9812204 ] .
p.  kanti and k.  a.  olive , `` on the realization of assisted inflation , '' phys .
d * 60 * , 043502 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9903524 ] .
s.  dimopoulos , s.  kachru , j.  mcgreevy and j.  g.  wacker , `` n - flation , '' arxiv : hep - th/0507205 . g.  calcagni and a.  r.  liddle , `` stability of multi - field cosmological solutions , '' phys .
d * 77 * , 023522 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0711.3360 [ astro - ph ] ] .
m.  majumdar and a.  c.  davis , `` inflation from tachyon condensation , large n effects , '' phys .
d * 69 * , 103504 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0304226 ] .
k.  becker , m.  becker and a.  krause , `` m - theory inflation from multi m5-brane dynamics , '' nucl .
b * 715 * , 349 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0501130 ] .
j.  ward , `` dbi n - flation , '' jhep * 0712 * , 045 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv:0711.0760 [ hep - th ] ] .
t.  w.  grimm , `` axion inflation in type ii string theory , '' arxiv:0710.3883 [ hep - th ] .
k.  l.  panigrahi and h.  singh , `` assisted inflation from geometric tachyon , '' jhep * 0711 * , 017 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv:0708.1679 [ hep - th ] ] .
y.  s.  piao , r.  g.  cai , x.  m.  zhang and y.  z.  zhang , `` assisted tachyonic inflation , '' phys .  rev .
d * 66 * , 121301 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0207143 ] .
a.  mazumdar , s.  panda and a.  perez - lorenzana , `` assisted inflation via tachyon condensation , '' nucl .
b * 614 * , 101 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0107058 ] .
j.  m.  cline and h.  stoica , `` multibrane inflation and dynamical flattening of the inflaton potential , '' phys .
d * 72 * , 126004 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0508029 ] .
d.  wands , `` multiple field inflation , '' lect .  notes phys .   *
738 * , 275 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0702187 ] . c.  gordon , d.  wands , b.  a.  bassett and r.  maartens , `` adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation , '' phys .
d * 63 * , 023506 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0009131 ] .
t.  battefeld and r.  easther , `` non - gaussianities in multi - field inflation , '' jcap * 0703 * , 020 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0610296 ] .
d.  battefeld and t.  battefeld , `` non - gaussianities in n - flation , '' jcap * 0705 * , 012 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0703012 ] .
c.  t.  byrnes , k.  y.  choi and l.  m.  h.  hall , `` conditions for large non - gaussianity in two - field slow - roll inflation , '' arxiv:0807.1101 [ astro - ph ] .
a.  ashoorioon and a.  krause , `` power spectrum and signatures for cascade inflation , '' arxiv : hep - th/0607001 . s.  watson , m.  j.  perry , g.  l.  kane and f.  c.  adams , `` inflation without inflaton(s ) , '' jcap * 0711 * , 017 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0610054 ] .
x.  chen , r.  easther and e.  a.  lim , `` large non - gaussianities in single field inflation , '' jcap * 0706 * , 023 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0611645 ] .
l.  covi , j.  hamann , a.  melchiorri , a.  slosar and i.  sorbera , `` inflation and wmap three year data : features have a future ! , '' phys .
d * 74 * , 083509 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0606452 ] .
a.  berera , `` warm inflation , '' phys .
lett .   * 75 * , 3218 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9509049 ] .
e.  komatsu _ et al .
_ , `` five - year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe ( wmap ) observations : cosmological interpretation , '' arxiv:0803.0547 [ astro - ph ] .
d.  chialva and u.  h.  danielsson , `` chain inflation revisited , '' arxiv:0804.2846 [ hep - th ] .
a.  krause , `` large gravitational waves and lyth bound in multi brane inflation , '' arxiv:0708.4414 [ hep - th ] .
j.  yokoyama and a.  d.  linde , `` is warm inflation possible ?
, '' phys .
d * 60 * , 083509 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9809409 ] .
v.  f.  mukhanov , h.  a.  feldman and r.  h.  brandenberger , `` theory of cosmological perturbations .
classical perturbations .
quantum theory of perturbations .
extensions , '' phys .  rept .
* 215 * , 203 ( 1992 ) .
d.  h.  lyth and a.  riotto , `` particle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation , '' phys .
* 314 * , 1 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9807278 ] .
a.  r.  liddle and d.  h.  lyth , `` cosmological inflation and large - scale structure , '' _ cambridge , uk : univ .
pr . ( 2000 ) 400 p _    a.  kosowsky and m.  s.  turner , `` cbr anisotropy and the running of the scalar spectral index , '' phys .  rev .
d * 52 * , 1739 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9504071 ] .
k.  a.  malik , d.  wands and c.  ungarelli , `` large - scale curvature and entropy perturbations for multiple interacting fluids , '' phys .
d * 67 * , 063516 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0211602 ] .
h.  kodama and m.  sasaki , `` cosmological perturbation theory , '' prog .
* 78 * , 1 ( 1984 ) .
a. ashoorioon , private discussion at cosmo 2008 .
k.  enqvist , a.  jokinen , a.  mazumdar , t.  multamaki and a.  vaihkonen , `` non - gaussianity from instant and tachyonic preheating , '' jcap * 0503 * , 010 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0501076 ] . n.  barnaby and j.  m.  cline , `` nongaussian and nonscale - invariant perturbations from tachyonic preheating in hybrid inflation , '' phys .
d * 73 * , 106012 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0601481 ] .
n.  barnaby and j.  m.  cline , `` nongaussianity from tachyonic preheating in hybrid inflation , '' phys .
d * 75 * , 086004 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0611750 ] .
k.  ohmori , `` a review on tachyon condensation in open string field theories , '' arxiv : hep - th/0102085 .
m.  becker , g.  curio and a.  krause , `` de sitter vacua from heterotic m - theory , '' nucl .
b * 693 * , 223 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0403027 ] .