relativistic heavy - ion collisions present an unique possibility to create nuclear matter at high densities and temperatures where the hadron properties become different and a phase transition to quark matter with signatures of the deconfinement and restoration of chiral symmetry is expected .
the change of the nucleon mass in the nuclear matter was implemented into the walecka model @xcite already in 1970 s in the framework of the effective hadron field theory . later on this effect
was put on the firmer grounds on the basis of a partial restoration of the chiral symmetry and finite - density qcd sum rules @xcite , the nambu - jona - lasinio model @xcite , and effective meson field theory @xcite .
dileptons ( @xmath17 @xmath18 ) are the most clear probes of the high density nuclear matter .
the reason is that the dileptons interact with the matter only by electromagnetic forces and can therefore leave the heavy - ion reaction zone essentially undistorted by final state interactions .
they provide valuable information on the in - medium properties of hadrons and , hence , on the state of matter .
the dilepton spectra from heavy - ion collisions have been measured at two different energy scales : by the ceres and helios-3 collaborations at sps @xcite ( a few hundreds gev per nucleon ) and by the dls collaboration at bevalac @xcite ( a few gev per nucleon ) . in the ceres and helios-3 experiments and in the bevalac experiment
the production of dileptons with invariant masses between @xmath19 mev is found to be enhanced as compared to estimates based on the theoretically known dilepton sources when in - medium modifications of hadron properties are neglected .
the data on the total photoabsorption cross section on heavy nuclei @xcite give an evidence for the broadening of nucleon resonances in the nuclear medium @xcite .
the physics behind is the same as in the collision broadening of the atomic spectral lines in hot and dense gases , discussed by weisskopf in the early 1930 s @xcite ( for the present status of this field , see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
this rather general effect which takes its origin from the atomic spectroscopy should also lead to a broadening of the @xmath20-mesons in heavy - ion collisions .
the low - energy dilepton excess can be explained by a reduction of the @xmath21-meson mass in a dense medium @xcite .
the in - medium modification of the @xmath21-meson spectral function @xcite leading to a broadening of the @xmath21-meson seems also to be sufficient to account for the ceres and helios-3 data @xcite .    in the dls experiment a different temperature and density regime
is probed .
the enhancement of the dilepton spectra due to the reduction of the @xmath20-meson mass and the @xmath20-meson broadening is not sufficient to bring theoretical estimates in coincidence with the available experimental data @xcite .
the in - medium @xmath20-meson scenarios that successfully explain the dilepton yield at sps energies fail for the dls data .
this phenomenon was called the
dls puzzle  .
it worthwhile to notice that the final data from the dls collaboration have changed by about a factor of @xmath22 as compared to the initially reported results .
the future hades experiment at gsi will study the dilepton spectra at the same energy range in greater details @xcite .    a possibility to clarify
the origin of the dls puzzle has appeared since data from elementary @xmath11 @xmath23 collisions at @xmath24 gev ( @xmath25 is the kinetic energy of the incident proton in the laboratory frame ) became available from the dls collaboration @xcite .
the elementary cross sections enter as an input into the transport simulations of heavy - ion collisions , so their better understanding is of great value .
the dilepton spectra in the @xmath11 collisions at @xmath26 gev have been calculated in refs.@xcite . in ref.@xcite
the agreement achieved with the dls  data is generally good at low energies where the subthreshold production of nucleon resonances is important .
when the energy increases and the inclusive production becomes dominant , the dilepton yield is underestimated at the same mass range @xmath27 mev as in the heavy - ion collisions .
a signature for this effect exists also in the calculations of refs.@xcite .
this can be interpreted to mean that the studies @xcite revealed , apparently , the reoccurrence of the dls puzzle on the elementary level of the nucleon collisions .
they leave , therefore , a doubt on the quality of the experimental data and/or the reliability of the accepted theoretical schemes .
this paper is devoted to a further going theoretical analysis of the elementary dilepton production cross sections .    in the next sect .
, the production mechanisms are critically revisited .
the subthreshold production cross sections for the vector mesons are treated such that no double counting appears with the inclusive processes .
the effect of multiple pion production on the experimental detection efficiency for the dilepton pairs is also studied .
we demonstrate that the detector efficiency is sensitive to the number of pions produced and propose a simple model to account for the multiple pion production effects .    in the dalitz decays of the nucleon resonances , @xmath28 , the vector meson dominance ( vmd ) model
is usually applied for the description of the resonance transition form factors . however , the naive vmd which takes the @xmath29 data as an input systematically overestimates the radiative decay branchings . in sect.3 ,
the vmd model is extended to ensure the correct asymptotic behavior of the transition form factors in agreement with the quark counting rules .
such a modification is found to be sufficient to achieve an unified description of both , @xmath30 radiative decays and @xmath14 meson decays .
our estimates of the subthreshold cross sections rely therefore on the two essentially different sets of the experimental data , @xmath13 and @xmath31 .
the numerical results are discussed in sect.4 .
we found that the above improvements do not eliminate the discrepancy with the dls  data at @xmath32 gev .
moreover , the results for the lowest energy , @xmath33 gev , also require an additional study from the experimental and/or theoretical side .
the dilepton production in nucleon collisions goes through the production of virtual photons which decay subsequently into @xmath35 pairs . according to the vmd model , the virtual photons
are coupled to vector mesons @xmath36 @xmath37 and @xmath38 the dilepton production can therefore be calculated using the inclusive vector meson production cross sections : @xmath39 here , @xmath40 is the square of the invariant mass of two colliding protons , @xmath41 the invariant mass of the dilepton pair , @xmath42 is the differential vector meson production cross section , and @xmath43 is the average number of additional vector mesons @xmath44 in the state @xmath45 . in the energy range of interest , @xmath26 gev , where @xmath25 is the kinetic energy of the proton in the laboratory system , @xmath46 .
the branching ratio @xmath47 corresponds to the direct @xmath48 decays , with @xmath49 being the total meson decay width .    in order to disentangle the various contributions ,
we decompose the cross section entering into eq.([v1 ] ) into pole and background parts : @xmath50 such a decomposition implies that interference effects between the different sources are neglected . the background sources like @xmath51 and @xmath52 do not interfere due to the kinematical reasons . these two reactions in turn do not interfere with the reaction @xmath53 , since the final states are different .
the reactions @xmath54 , @xmath55 going through the nucleon resonances @xmath56 with different quantum numbers do not interfere with each other either .
the sources like @xmath57 , @xmath58 and @xmath59 , @xmath60 do interfere , however .
the relative phases of the amplitudes describing the different reactions are unknown , so the neglection of the interference between all the reactions constitutes a reasonable first approximation .
the distribution over the meson mass @xmath41 in the pole part of the cross section has a breit - wigner form corrected to the available phase space for the final state @xmath61 . at moderate energies , the state @xmath45
is dominated by two nucleons and pions , so one can write @xmath62 where @xmath63 is the @xmath64-body phase space of the final state ( two nucleons with masses @xmath65 , one vector meson @xmath44 with mass @xmath66 and @xmath67 pions with masses @xmath68 ) . the value @xmath69 $ ] is the maximal number of pions allowed by energy conservation , @xmath70 $ ] denotes the integer value of @xmath71 , and the values @xmath72 are the probabilities for the production of @xmath67 pions , with @xmath73 the normalization factor @xmath74 is given by @xmath75 where @xmath76 is the physical threshold for vector meson decays ( @xmath77 for the @xmath20-meson ) .
notice that the cross section ( [ v2 ] ) vanishes at values @xmath78 @xmath76 .
however , the total width @xmath79 entering into the denominator of the branching ratio ( [ br ] ) at @xmath78 @xmath76 vanishes as well , so that the cross section ( [ v1 ] ) is actually finite everywhere above the two - electron threshold .    in the zero - width limit , @xmath80 eq.([v3 ] ) simplifies to give @xmath81 the finite - width effects are important for the @xmath20-meson and less important for @xmath4- and @xmath5-mesons .
as the background we consider states with @xmath82-mesons originating from the @xmath44-meson strong decays , that do not contribute to the pole part of the cross section of @xmath44-meson production .
we assume _
e.g. _ that the @xmath20-mesons from the reactions @xmath83
@xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 form a background , which should be added to the pole part of @xmath21-mesons production .
( in the last line only the @xmath21-mesons away from the resonance region correspond to background . )
the dilepton invariant mass in all these reactions can be lower than the two - pion threshold . clearly ,
all processes with @xmath87 are not accounted for by the pole part of the inclusive cross section .
their contributions should be added to the contribution of the pole part . with increasing invariant dilepton mass , somewhere in the region @xmath88 ,
we come to the double counting problem .
this part of the spectrum from the above reactions must be excluded as outlined below .
experimental data on the exclusive cross sections @xmath89 with @xmath90 at @xmath91 are not available . here
we assume that the probabilities @xmath72 are described by a binomial distribution @xmath92 to fix all probabilities it is sufficient to know the ratio between the exclusive vector meson production cross section @xmath93 and the inclusive cross section @xmath89 .
these two cross sections are experimentally known @xcite .
the value @xmath94 is defined as above by energy conservation while the value @xmath95 can be extracted from the relation @xmath96 the pion multiplicity equals @xmath97    in the case of the @xmath20-meson , the cross section @xmath89 determines the pole behavior of the total cross section @xmath98 in the vicinity of the @xmath20-meson peak .
like for vector mesons , eq.([v2 ] ) , the total cross section @xmath99 for the @xmath100 production can be decomposed into @xmath20-pole and background parts @xmath101 the background parts on the right hand sides of eq.([v5 ] ) and eq.([v2 ] ) do not coincide since the @xmath102 quantum numbers are not necessarily equal to the quantum numbers of the @xmath20-meson ( this is the case at the @xmath20-meson peak only and this is why with @xmath103 the first terms in eq.([v2 ] ) and eq.([v5 ] ) coincide ) .
thus the left hand sides of eq.([v5 ] ) and eq.([v2 ] ) do not coincide as well . since the @xmath20-meson is always detected via @xmath100 final states ( or via @xmath104 and @xmath105 final states for @xmath106- and @xmath5-mesons , respectively ) , the inclusive cross section for the production of vector mesons which enters into eq.([v1 ] ) can not be uniquely determined from the experimental data on inclusive production of @xmath102 .
instead , one needs a model for the calculation of the background part of the cross section in eq.([v2 ] ) .
a subtle problem of double counting in the total dilepton production cross section appears in this way .
we propose a quite natural phenomenological solution for it .
the background term @xmath107 at @xmath108can be saturated , at least partially , by considering the production of light mesons : @xmath109 @xmath110 , @xmath111 , etc .
, similarly for the @xmath112- and @xmath5-mesons .
the @xmath102 invariant masses are small here , so these processes contribute to the @xmath102 background .
eq.([v1 ] ) can now be rewritten as follows @xmath113 the first term is the same as in eq.([v1 ] ) , i.e. with the sum running over all vector mesons , however , keeping only the pole part of the cross section . in eq.([xsec ] ) the background is divided into contributions from direct decays of intermediate vector mesons , which are off - shell and typically below their physical thresholds ( @xmath114 ) and from decays of intermediate mesons , @xmath115 , to multi - particle final states ( @xmath116 ) . in the latter case , the cross section for the production of the intermediate meson has to be folded over its branching ratio to the final state under consideration :    @xmath117    the sum runs over the mesons @xmath118and@xmath119 here , @xmath120 is the average number of mesons @xmath115 in the state @xmath121 .
the value @xmath122 in the last equation describes the distribution over the off - shell masses of the mesons . for pseudo - scalar mesons , the cross sections due to their small widths are proportional to the delta - function @xmath123 ( cf .
eq.([zero - width ] ) ) and the expression reduces to a sum over the on - shell mesons decaying to the states @xmath124with @xmath125 @xmath126 . for vector mesons entering the sum of eq.([o ] ) one should use the cross sections ( [ v2 ] ) whose pole components are well defined .
the contribution to the background part of the cross section ( [ v1 ] ) with @xmath127can be calculated assuming that it results from subthreshold decays of baryon resonances @xmath128 produced in @xmath11 collisions , which decay into nucleons and vector mesons , @xmath129 @xcite . in terms of the branching ratios for
the dalitz decays of the baryon resonances , the cross section can be written as follows    @xmath130    here , @xmath122 is the running mass of the baryon resonance @xmath56 with the cross section @xmath131 , @xmath132 is the differential branching ratio for the dalitz decay @xmath133 through the vector meson @xmath44 .    with increasing energy , the vector mesons in eq.([1 ] ) can be produced at their physical masses .
in such a case , the processes ( [ 1 ] ) contribute to the pole part of the cross section @xmath134 .
the pole part of inclusive cross sections by definition accounts for all possible sources for the appearance of on - shell vector mesons , so that a naive extension of the subthreshold cross section to higher energies would result in a double counting . to avoid this double counting
we should skip the exclusive part of vector meson production in @xmath11 collision that enters to the total inclusive production of vector mesons as already taken into account in eq.([1 ] ) : @xmath135 the factor @xmath136 excludes the @xmath137 component of the inclusive cross section which is reproduced by the subthreshold mechanizm .
this prescription lies on the comparison of the experimental data to the exclusive vector meson production cross section , that goes through baryon resonances @xmath138 the cross sections reasonably agree ( see figs .
[ rho ] and [ omega ] ) .
= 13 cm    = 13 cm    [ omega ]    the meson multiplicities @xmath120 in eq.([o ] ) are set equal to zero except for the neutral pions .
for pions , we assume @xmath139 where @xmath140 is given by eq.([n_pi ] ) .
the factor @xmath141 appears statistically in the limit @xmath142 from charge conservation which implies that in every channel the total number of the neutral - pion pairs @xmath143 must be equal to the number of the charged - pion @xmath102 pairs .
there are no experimental data on the pion production inclusive cross section @xmath144 at @xmath26 gev .
there exist , however , experimental data on the two - pion production cross sections @xmath145 @xcite .
the parameter @xmath95 of the pion number distribution can therefore be estimated from equation @xmath146 it can further be used to find the total inclusive cross section @xmath147 using the same relation as in eq.([p ] ) .
the results for the pion multiplicities produced in reactions in accordance with different mesons @xmath115 are summarized in table 1 for those values of kinetic energies , @xmath148 at which the dilepton cross sections are measured by the dls  collaboration .
we give there also the cross sections obtained from the interpolation and/or extrapolation between the available experimental points .
the accuracy of these estimates is rarely better than @xmath149 . for the pion ,
we give an estimate for the inclusive cross section .
notice that it is in reasonable agreement with the prediction from the urqmd transport model @xcite .    for mesons @xmath150and@xmath151 estimates for the cross sections @xmath152 are given as derived from the distribution ( [ binom ] ) .
1.85 & 2.09 + @xmath153 & @xmath154 & @xmath154 & @xmath154 & @xmath155 & @xmath156 & @xmath154 + @xmath157 & @xmath158 & @xmath159 & @xmath159 & @xmath160 & @xmath161 & @xmath162 + @xmath163 & @xmath164 & @xmath165 & @xmath166 & @xmath167 & @xmath168 & @xmath169 + @xmath170[mb ] & @xmath171 & @xmath172 & @xmath173 & @xmath174 & @xmath175 & @xmath176 + @xmath177[mb ] & @xmath178 & @xmath179 & @xmath180 & @xmath181 & @xmath182 & @xmath183 + @xmath184[mb ] & @xmath185 & @xmath186 & @xmath187 & @xmath188 & @xmath189 & @xmath190 + @xmath191[gev ] & 2.09 & 4.88 & 4.88 & 4.88 & 4.88 & 4.88 + @xmath153 & @xmath156 & @xmath154 & @xmath156 & @xmath192 & @xmath193 & @xmath194 + @xmath195 & @xmath158 & @xmath196 & @xmath197 & @xmath198 & @xmath198 & @xmath160 + @xmath199 & @xmath200 & @xmath201 & @xmath202 & @xmath203 & @xmath204 & @xmath205 + @xmath170[mb ] & @xmath206 & @xmath207 & @xmath208 & @xmath209 & @xmath210 & @xmath211 + @xmath177[mb ] & @xmath212 & @xmath173 & @xmath212 & @xmath213 & @xmath165 & @xmath214 + @xmath184[mb ] & @xmath215 & @xmath216 & @xmath217 & @xmath218 & @xmath218 & @xmath219 +    also the estimates for the exclusive multi - pion production cross are in line with prediction from the fritiof string fragmentation model @xcite and the calculation of ref.@xcite .
to show this we make the following comparisons :    first , we compare our simple formulas explicitely to fritiof .
in refs.@xcite an attempt was made to extrapolate the fritiof model , originally proposed for high energies , to lower energies by a modification of the two - body mechanism for inelastic hadron - hadron reactions .
the authors claimed that they got finally a reasonable description of the basic characteristics of the hadron - hadron and nucleus - nucleus collisions , within the modified fritiof model .
@xmath220 + @xmath221&@xmath222&@xmath223 + @xmath224&@xmath225&@xmath226 + @xmath224&@xmath227&@xmath228 + @xmath229&@xmath230 & @xmath231 + @xmath224&@xmath232&@xmath233 + @xmath224&@xmath234 & @xmath235 + @xmath236 & @xmath237&@xmath238 + @xmath224&@xmath239&@xmath240 + @xmath224&@xmath241&@xmath242 + @xmath243&@xmath244&@xmath245 + @xmath224&@xmath246&@xmath247 + @xmath224 & @xmath248 & @xmath249 +    we compare our model with the modified fritiof model of refs.@xcite for the reaction @xmath250 at @xmath251 = 3.83 gev and 5.1 gev . in table 2
, we show 4 channels with @xmath252 .
the cross sections for the channels @xmath253 are not available .
we assume @xmath254 @xmath255 we use the experimental data from the first and the last lines of the table 2 to fit the parameter @xmath95 of the binomial distribution .
the results are shown in the table 2 ( third lines in the boxes ) , together with the experimental data ( first lines of the boxes , numbers with errors ) and predictions of the modified fritiof model ( second lines of the boxes , numbers in the brackets ) .
the experimental data are from ref .
is is seen that the description is reasonable .
notice that a @xmath256 accuracy occur for the modified fritiof predictions and similarly @xmath256 is also the accuracy of the binomial formula predictions .
second , the agreement with the work @xcite is reasonable .
for example as it can be seen from table 2 that our value for @xmath257 at 5.1 gev is close to their result of 2.85 mb at 5.5 gev .    in table 3 , we compare predictions from the binomial distribution for the reaction @xmath258 with the experimental data from ref.@xcite .
the uncertainty exists in these data also : the cross sections for @xmath259 , @xmath260 , @xmath261 , @xmath262 , @xmath263 , and @xmath264 are unknown . for a qualitative estimate
, we assume like before that the cross sections for the unknown channels are equal to the cross sections for the known channels , with the same number of the pions .
the parameter @xmath95 of the binomial formula is determined at each energy from the channels with one pion and with the maximum number of the pions in the final states .
the agreement is not unreasonable , especially in the view of the naive approximations like ( [ xx ] ) and ( [ yy ] ) .
the binomial formula does not contradict to the available data and we suppose that it can be used for estimates of the multiple pion production effects . notice that the pion contribution to the dilepton spectrum is quite far from the really interesting region about and just below the @xmath21-meson peak .
for the mesonic dilepton decays@xmath265of mesons @xmath266 experimental data exist in most cases .
the radiative decays @xmath267 can further be used to calculate the dilepton decays when the experimental data are not available . for details of the determination of the various branching ratios
see ref.@xcite .
the inclusive cross sections for the meson production and the branching ratios for the mesonic decays to dileptons can be combined to estimate the dilepton yield from eq.([xsec ] ) .
@xmath95 & @xmath268 $ ] & @xmath269 $ ] + @xmath270 & @xmath271 & @xmath272 & @xmath273 & @xmath274 + @xmath270 & @xmath275 & @xmath272 & @xmath276 & @xmath277 + @xmath270 & @xmath278 & @xmath272 & @xmath279 & @xmath280 + @xmath270 & @xmath281 & @xmath272 & @xmath282 & @xmath283 + @xmath270 & @xmath284 & @xmath272 & @xmath285 & @xmath286 + @xmath287 & @xmath271 & @xmath288 & @xmath289 & @xmath290 + @xmath287 & @xmath275 & @xmath288 & @xmath291 & @xmath292 + @xmath287 & @xmath278 & @xmath288 & @xmath293 & @xmath294 + @xmath295 & @xmath271 & @xmath296 & @xmath297 & @xmath298 + @xmath295 & @xmath275 & @xmath296 & @xmath299 & @xmath300 + @xmath295 & @xmath278 & @xmath296 & @xmath301 & @xmath302 + @xmath303 & @xmath271 & @xmath304 & @xmath305 & @xmath306 + @xmath303 & @xmath275 & @xmath304 & @xmath307 & @xmath308 + @xmath303 & @xmath278 & @xmath304 & @xmath309 & @xmath310 +    the differential decay branchings @xmath311are calculated in ref.@xcite in a non - relativistic approximation for the multipole decays with the emission of a massive vector particle .
we follow a similar approach here , but consider the relativistic case and modify the transition form factors for the nucleon resonances , @xmath56 , which is needed to bring their asymptotic behavior in the correspondence with the quark counting rules and to provide an unified description of the photo- and electroproduction data and vector meson decays @xmath14 @xcite .
the problem is adequately formulated in the non - relativistic approximation for radiative and vector meson decays of nucleon resonances .
we start with the discussion of this case , since it is much simpler .
the relativistic treatment , which will finally be implemented into the consideration , although is more complicated , is motivated by the same physical ideas .
the description of the resonance decays @xmath312 @xmath313 is usually based on the vmd model which provides transition form factors @xmath314 of a monopole form .
the pole corresponds to the masses of the @xmath20- and @xmath4-mesons .
this model should give , in principle , an unified description of the radiative @xmath314 and the mesonic @xmath315 decays .
however , a normalization to the radiative branchings ( @xmath316 ) strongly underestimates the mesonic branchings ( @xmath315 ) as we discuss below .
the resonance @xmath317 is a case for which both , the @xmath318 and @xmath319 widths are known with a relatively high precision : @xmath320 , @xmath321 @xmath322 ( @xmath323 mode)@xmath324 @xmath325 @xmath322 ( @xmath326 mode ) .
the branching ratios of the proton and neutron modes are equal within the experimental errors .
let us , for the moment , interpreete this by assumption that the radiative mode is dominated by the @xmath8-meson .
the same conclusion is reasonable for other @xmath327 resonances : @xmath328 @xmath322 ( @xmath323 mode)@xmath324 @xmath329 @xmath322 ( @xmath326 mode ) ; @xmath330 @xmath322 ( @xmath323 mode)@xmath324 @xmath331 @xmath322 ( @xmath326 mode ) , etc .
the @xmath332 decays proceed exclusively through the @xmath20-meson .
however , now the standard vmd model as it has been used in @xcite leads to a severe inconsistency : using the coupling constant @xmath333 extracted from the mesonic @xmath334 decay , the branching ratio for the radiative decay is found to be two to three times greater than the experimental value .
analogous overestimations are observed almost for all other @xmath335 and @xmath332 resonances for which the experimental @xmath336 and @xmath337 data are available .
table 4 summarizes the results .
.the coupling constants @xmath338 derived from the @xmath339 mesonic decays are compared to the coupling constants @xmath340 fixed from the radiative @xmath13 decays .
the numerical values @xmath338 are taken from ref .
@xcite , with exception of the @xmath341 resonance for which the theoretical value from @xcite is given and of the @xmath342 and @xmath343 resonances where the results of our calculations are given .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     the standard vmd predicts a @xmath344 asymptotic behavior for the transition form factors .
however , quark counting rules require a stronger suppression at high @xmath345 .
it is known from the nucleon form factors , the pion form factor , and the @xmath346 and @xmath347 transition form factors that the quark counting rules start to work experimentally at moderate @xmath348 gev@xmath349 one can assume that an appropriate modification of the standard vmd which takes the correct asymptotics of the @xmath316 transition form factors into account can provide a more accurate description of the radiative decays of the nucleon resonances .
we propose the following solution of the inconsistency between the @xmath315 and @xmath314 decay rates : let radial excitations of the @xmath20-meson , the @xmath350-meson and @xmath351-meson , for example , interfere with the @xmath20-meson in radiative processes .
however , we know neither the couplings of the @xmath352 and @xmath351 to the resonances @xmath353 @xmath354 ) nor the couplings of the @xmath355 and @xmath356 to a photon ( @xmath357 @xmath358 ) . thus in the sum @xmath359 where @xmath360with@xmath361 @xmath362 and @xmath363 , @xmath364 and @xmath363 refer to @xmath355- and @xmath351-mesons , respectively , the coefficients @xmath365 and @xmath366 are unknown . according to the quark counting rules @xcite , for large and negative @xmath367 the form factors of the @xmath368 amplitudes decrease like @xmath369 . on the phenomenological level
we can attribute such a behavior to a cancellation between the @xmath20-@xmath324 @xmath364-@xmath324 and @xmath363-mesons .
the constants @xmath370 and @xmath371 are then fixed and we obtain @xmath372 the last two factors in eq.([8 ] ) give the desired modification of the @xmath8-meson contribution to the radiative decays of the baryon resonances , as compared to the naive vmd  model : @xmath373 the mass - dependent correction factor is given by @xmath374 the same modification applies to the @xmath13 decays .
the reduction factor in the amplitude @xmath13 equals @xmath375 .
it is seen from table 4 that a reduction of about @xmath376 is just what one needs for a consistent description of both , the @xmath20-meson and the radiative decay of the @xmath317 . in all other cases
the reduction factor also improves the agreement . in the case of the @xmath377 resonance ,
the large difference between @xmath338 and @xmath340 can be attributed to a further suppression of the amplitude @xmath378 due to the quark counting rules which require a @xmath379 behavior of the @xmath368 vertex for the @xmath380 transition .
so , we have formulated the problem and outlined its possible solution .
note that interference between the different @xmath21-meson states does not change essentialy the dilepton contribution from the pion annihilation channel in heavy - ion collisions , since the @xmath21-meson form factor involved into that process falls off asymptotically like @xmath344 due to the quark counting rules , and so there should be no destructive interference between members of the @xmath21-meson family .
the vmd model by kroll , lee and zumino @xcite allows two independent couplings for the photons and vector mesons and can be used to resolve the discrepancy between the photon and @xmath21-meson branchings of the nucleon resonances @xcite .
it provides , however , the form factors asymptotics @xmath381 in disagreement with the quark counting rules .
the relativistic treatment of the @xmath382 decays is in details discussed in [ 37 ] . here , we sketch out the basic concept . for nucleon resonances with spin @xmath383 and arbitrary parity ,
there exist three independent transition form factors , while for spin-1/2 resonances , two independent form factors should be considered @xcite .
in terms of the electric ( e ) , magnetic ( m ) , and coulomb ( c ) form factors , the decay widths of nucleon resonances with spin @xmath384 into a virtual photon with mass @xmath41 has the form @xcite :    @xmath385    where @xmath386 refers to the nucleon resonance mass , @xmath387 is the nucleon mass , @xmath388 .
the signs @xmath389 refer to the natural parity ( @xmath390 ... ) and abnormal parity ( @xmath391 ... ) resonances .
@xmath392 means @xmath393 or @xmath394 .
the above equation is valid for @xmath395 . for @xmath396 ( @xmath397 ) ,
one gets    @xmath398    = 13 cm    [ figx ]    if the width @xmath399 is known , the factorization prescription can be used to find the dilepton decay rate :    @xmath400    where @xmath401 is the decay width of a virtual photon @xmath402 into the dilepton pair with invariant mass @xmath41 .
the couplings of the @xmath21- and @xmath403- mesons and of their radial exitations can be taken into account to describe radiative and electroproduction helicity amplitudes satisfying the quark counting rules .
the available data on the partial - wave analysis of the multichannel @xmath404-scattering can also be included into the framework of the extended vmd model . in ref.@xcite ,
the parameters of the model are fixed by fitting those data and by taking into account quark model predictions when the experimental data are not available . in this work ,
we use the model @xcite to calculate the dilepton production from the nucleon resonance decays .    in the relativistic case
, we can not write a compact expression for the suppression factor ( 23 )
. however , it is clear that the effect does exist .
the destructive interference is prescribed by the quark counting rules which are implemented into the relativistic model .
it means that the radiative decay should be less probable as compared to the naive vmd estimate from the ground - state @xmath21-meson .
the medium can destroy the destructive interference , in which case one can expect an enhancement of the dilepton production below the @xmath21-meson peak @xcite .
a detailed treatment of this effect will be given elsewhere @xcite .
the @xmath341 resonance is treated in the same way as the other resonances .
we take into acocunt @xmath405 resonances listed in table 4 .
the @xmath21- and @xmath403-meson channels are treated on the same footing .
the numerical results demonstrate that besides the @xmath317 and @xmath341 resonances , the @xmath343 and @xmath406 have considerable contributions .
it can be seen from fig .
3 where the resonance contributions are shown for proton kinetic energy @xmath407gev . at moderate invariant masses @xmath408gev of the dilepton pair , the resonance contributions are dominated by the @xmath409 . at larger masses
@xmath410gev , contributions from the heavier resonances become dominant .
the results for the dilepton spectra are shown in fig .
we show also inclusive and subthreshold cross sections separately . to compare with the experimental data , the acceptance of the dls  detector with respect to the @xmath35 pairs that have invariant mass @xmath41 , transverse momentum @xmath411 , and rapidity @xmath412
is taken into account .
for each process , the distribution over the @xmath413 and @xmath412 is determined by the available phase space of the process and then weighted with the filter function @xmath414 provided by the dls collaboration .
the details of this procedure are described in appendix b. finally , the finite mass resolution of the detector , @xmath415  mev , is taken into account by smearing the spectra with a gaussian distribution which corresponds to a standard error of @xmath416mev .    at the lowest initial kinetic energy of the proton , i.e. @xmath417gev
, the cross section is dominated by the @xmath6-dalitz decay below @xmath418mev and by the dalitz decays of the nucleon resonances , mainly the @xmath419-resonance , at @xmath420mev . compared to our calculation
there is an excess of detected @xmath35 pairs at @xmath421 mev .
earlier calculations @xcite obtained higher cross sections in this mass range .
this is due to the normalization to the @xmath422 branching ratios within the framework of the naive vmd which overestimates the radiative decay rates @xmath13 , as discussed in sect.3 .
= 12 cm    at higher initial proton energies , the agreement with the dls  data is generally very reasonable .
the contribution from the @xmath7-meson dalitz decay is dominant at @xmath423gev , while the dalitz decays of the baryon resonances dominate at @xmath424mev .    for the proton kinetic energy @xmath425gev ,
the inclusive and subthreshold productions of the @xmath20- and @xmath4-mesons become important at @xmath426mev .
the @xmath4-meson peak in the inclusive cross section is rather pronounced , whereas the subthreshold @xmath4-meson production cross section is large and smooth .
the total cross section , as a result , exceeds significantly the experimental data at @xmath427gev .
refs.@xcite agree quite well with the experimental data at the @xmath403-meson region . in ref.@xcite ,
the inclusive @xmath403-peak is not reproduced , apparently , due to a stronger _ ad hoc _ smearing with a mass - dependent parameter @xmath428 .
the smearing at the @xmath403-meson peak turns out to be factor of 3 greater than it should ( @xmath429 = 80 mev instead of 25 mev ) . in refs.@xcite , the @xmath403-chanels from the nucleon resonance decays are neglected .
this is the reason for the difference between our results and relults of refs.@xcite . in our calculations ,
the @xmath403-chanel contribution is large .
it can only be lowered by price of an _ ad hoc _ reduction of the decay probabilities of the nucleon resonances into the vector mesons , which has been calculated using the quark models @xcite .
the quark models reproduce , however , the @xmath21-meson decays of the nucleon resonances quite well , i.e. they are in good agreement with the partial - wave analysis of the @xmath404 inelastic scattering @xcite .
in this way the experimental underestimation of the dilepton yield at the @xmath403-peak at @xmath425gev seems to contradict the @xmath404 inelastic scattering data .
remarkably , the three highest experimental points at @xmath425gev lie above the kinematical limit @xmath430mev and the indicated experimental error @xmath415  mev is not sufficient to explain their occurrence .
we suppose that the experimental resolution is not good enough to resolve the kinematic threshold .    finally , at @xmath431gev , the contribution from the inclusive production of the @xmath7- , @xmath20- , and @xmath4-mesons becomes dominant at @xmath432mev . there is an underestimation of the dilepton yield in the region @xmath433mev .
a similar underestimation was found in @xcite both , at @xmath425gev and @xmath431gev .
as proposed in ref.@xcite , the existing gap might be filled by the subthreshold dilepton production via the baryon resonances .
however , we were not able to match the data using a consistent description of the photoproduction data and the @xmath29 meson decay branchings , with the proper application of the breit - wigner formula ( see details in appendix 1 ) , and removing possible sources for the double counting .
each of this three aspects leads to a reduction of the dilepton yield .
therefore , one can not exclude that the origin of the so called  dls puzzle  can be traced back to the elementary @xmath434 level and is not a specific feature of heavy - ion collisions .
new experimental measurements of the dilepton cross section , especially at @xmath25 = 1.04 , 2.09 , and 4.88 gev , would certainly help to clarify this point .    in this context one should be aware that the comparison to the experimental data is strongly influenced by the acceptance of the dls detector . in appendix 2
, we discuss the application of the corresponding filter program @xcite for the calculation of the experimentally measured cross sections . in fig.[fig4 ] the effective detector efficiency , smeared by a gaussian distribution with the standard deviation @xmath416mev , is shown as a function of the dilepton mass @xmath41 for decays @xmath435 @xmath436 and @xmath437 at the two highest proton energies @xmath425gev and @xmath431gev , where the effects of the multiple pion production are most important .
it can be seen that the effective acceptance decreases with increasing energy for a fixed number of pions in the final state . on the other hand , when the number of pions increases , the acceptance increases as well .
this can be interpreted to mean that a larger number of the pions reduces the available phase space for mesons decaying to the dilepton pairs , and the decays of such mesons can be detected with better efficiency .
= 12 cm    the effect is particularly strong for the @xmath438 decay at @xmath32 gev .
while the average pion multiplicity @xmath140 is around @xmath439 the effective acceptance is extremely small below @xmath440 .
the acceptance is not reliable when it is much smaller than unity . in our case
this happens at @xmath441 .
while the statistical distribution gives here , as we expect , reasonable estimates , the calculation of the part of the cross section connected to the additional production of @xmath441 pions turns out to be unreliable . from the other side , at @xmath442 the filter
is well defined , but the binomial distribution gives exponentially small probabilities .
the highest part of the pion spectra corresponding to @xmath443 also can not be calculated accurately .
so , we consider the difference between our results for the pion contributions and those of refs.@xcite by about a factor of @xmath444 and those of ref.@xcite by about a factor of @xmath445 as a conservative estimate for uncertainties inherent in the theoretical calculations for both , the distribution over the pion multiplicities and the experimental filter acceptance in the region of small invariant masses .    at lower energies , these uncertainties practically disappear . in fig.[fig4 ] , we show a plot for the @xmath438 decay at @xmath446 gev
. it can be seen that now already for @xmath447 the effective acceptance is no more extremely small . for heavier mesons ,
the calculation of the acceptance is safer , which is again connected with less energy available for the produced mesons and , respectively , a better efficiency for the detection of the dileptons .    for the application of the filter we assumed an isotropic distribution of the particles in the final states in the c.m .
this is justified at small energies @xmath25 . with increasing kinetic energy ,
the distribution acquires a bias towards the beam direction .
this is an additional source of uncertainties in the calculations of the filter , which can be important at energy @xmath32 gev for the pion dalitz decays .    the many - body phase spaces entering into eq.(4 )
are known to be very sharp functions of the arguments .
the breit - wigner distribution over the dilepton mass , @xmath41 , gets therefore an enhancement towards small values of @xmath41 .
the greater the number of pions in the final state , the more important is this effect .
we found that rare processes with probabilities @xmath448 corresponding to large numbers of pions produced in association with the vector mesons , that should in principle give small contributions to the total cross sections , become very important at masses @xmath449 mev .
the spectral functions of the vector mesons are not known well far away from the vector meson peaks .
this effect is thus beyond the scope of the present model .
it should be analysed separately . in the present calculations ,
we apply a @xmath450 criterion to the multiple pion processes : the values @xmath72 are set equal to zero every time when @xmath451 this works for the inclusive vector meson production at @xmath452gev . at smaller energies pions
are not produced in association with vector mesons .
we have considered the dilepton production in @xmath11 collisions at bevalac energies .
the subthreshold production of vector mesons through the nucleon resonances is described within the extended vmd model which allows to bring the transition form factors in agreement with the quark counting rules and provides an unified description of the photo- and electroproduction data , @xmath453 the vector meson decays , @xmath454 , and the dilepton decays , @xmath455 .
the dilepton decay rates are described relativistically using kinematically complete phenomenological expressions and numerical results of ref .
@xcite . in this context , we discussed also the problem of double counting and proposed its possible solution .
the resulting dilepton spectra are reasonably well described at proton energies ranging from @xmath456gev . at @xmath33 gev
, there exists an overestimation of the dilepton yield , at @xmath446 gev , we see an underestimation in the vicinity of the @xmath403-meson peak . at @xmath431gev
we observe an underestimation in the region of dilepton masses below the @xmath20-peak ( @xmath433mev ) .
we hope that future experimental investigations will clarify these problems .
the authors are grateful to l.a .
kondratyuk and a. matschavariani for useful discussions of the field - theoretic aspects on the vector meson production , h. matis for providing the dls filter code and valuable comments , and u. mosel for correspondence on the breit - wigner formula .
two of us ( m.i.k . and b.v.m . )
are indebted to the institute for theoretical physics of university of tuebingen for kind hospitality .
the work was supported by gsi ( darmstadt ) under the contract tfst , by the plesler foundation , and by the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft under the contract no .
436rus113/367/0(r ) .
let us consider a process with a resonance in the intermediate state .
it can be produced either in a two - body collision or as a result of the decay of a particle or another resonance .
let the resonance further decay to some specific channel @xmath457 .
the amplitude for the total process , @xmath458 , i.e. the amplitude for resonance production , propagation , and subsequent decay to the channel @xmath457 is a product of the amplitude of its production @xmath459 , the resonance propagator , and the amplitude of the resonance decay @xmath460 : @xmath461 where @xmath95 is the momentum of the resonance , @xmath387 is its pole mass , @xmath462 is the resonance self energy .
the pole mass @xmath387 is defined such that @xmath463 . in general
, @xmath464 starts with terms of the order @xmath465 these terms are further neglected . the imaginary part of @xmath466 is equal to @xmath467 where @xmath468 is the phase space for the resonance decay into a channel @xmath457 .
we can therefore write either @xmath469 or @xmath470 both definitions of the total width , @xmath471and@xmath472 can be used in the relativistic breit - wigner formula , but the width should be multiplied by the proper resonance masses , @xmath473 ( running mass ) and @xmath387 ( pole mass ) , respectively .
( physical @xmath20-meson mass and @xmath474 without  @xmath475  ) has been substituted into the breit - wigner formula .
such a combination leads to an additional factor @xmath476 in the dilepton production cross section and , consequently , to an overestimation of the dilepton yield below the @xmath20-meson peak .
we have brought the attention of the authors of ref.@xcite to this circumstance .
recently , a new paper appeared , ref.@xcite , where that inconsistency has been removed . ]
the square of the amplitude @xmath477 , integrated over the phase space of the final particles with momenta , @xmath478 and @xmath479 and normalized by the corresponding factors for the initial particles , gives either a cross section ( two initial particles ) or a width ( one initial particle ) .
for the scattering problem , the cross section has the form @xmath480 where @xmath481 is the flux of the incoming particles .
further , we introduce two @xmath482-functions corresponding to momentum conservation in the processes of production and decay of the resonance and the running mass @xmath41 of the intermediate resonance @xmath483 and obtain @xmath484 where @xmath485 here , one should also use the partial widths @xmath486 @xmath487 with the proper masses @xmath488
@xmath489 the similar arguments apply in case of the decay problem .
a comparison to the dls data requires to take the experimental detector efficiency into account . for this purpose a filter function is provided by the dls collaboration . in particular at large @xmath25 ( e.g. @xmath431gev )
this filter function is not a small correction to the theoretical calculations but is crucial for the comparison to data .
thus , in this appendix we discuss the influence of the detector filter in our analysis .    in terms of the c.m .
frame momentum variables , the filter function can be rewritten as @xmath490 where @xmath491 is the transverse momentum of the dilepton pair , @xmath492 is the rapidity of the c.m .
frame @xmath493 with respect to the laboratory frame @xmath494 of the colliding nucleons , @xmath495 @xmath25 is the proton kinetic energy in the @xmath494 frame . the distribution of dileptons in the c.m .
frame @xmath493 is isotropic .
this is a universal feature which does not depend on the specific type of the reactions and is connected to the form of the cross section ( 4 ) only .
so , we work with the filter function averaged over the angles in the @xmath493 frame : @xmath496 where @xmath497 and @xmath498 the problem reduces to finding the dilepton distribution over the dilepton momentum @xmath499 in the c.m .
frame @xmath493 .
the probability distribution of the dilepton momentum in the @xmath493 frame for the direct decays @xmath48 is given by @xmath500 where @xmath501 the effective filter function can be calculated as follows @xmath502 the value of @xmath503 is integrated out within the limits @xmath504 @xmath505 the momentum of the dilepton pair @xmath506 is given by @xmath507 a @xmath508detector efficiency would yield @xmath509 and @xmath510 in virtue of eq.([sw=1 ] ) .
the values @xmath511 are plotted in fig.[fig4 ] for the @xmath512 decays for different values of @xmath67 at energies @xmath446 and @xmath513 gev .    for the dalitz
decays @xmath514 , the probability distribution for the dilepton energy @xmath515 in the c.m .
frame @xmath493 can be written as follows @xmath516 here , @xmath517 is the four momentum of the dilepton pair , @xmath518 is the mass of the meson @xmath115 in the reaction @xmath519with the subsequent decay @xmath520 in the @xmath493 frame , the vector @xmath7 is defined as @xmath521 the coefficients @xmath522 are defined as before .
now we should pass to the rest frame @xmath523 of the meson @xmath524 where @xmath525 the @xmath526-factor and the velocity @xmath527 of the meson @xmath115 in the @xmath493 frame are determined by equations @xmath528 the unit vector @xmath529 shows in the direction of the meson velocity in the @xmath493 frame . in the meson rest frame , @xmath523
, the dilepton pair has momentum @xmath530 where @xmath531 the function @xmath532 is defined earlier .
the unit vector @xmath533 shows in the direction of the dilepton pair momentum in the @xmath534 frame . in eq.([xxxx ] ) the value @xmath535 is the angle between the directions of the meson velocity in the @xmath493 frame and velocity of the dilepton pair in the @xmath523 frame , so that @xmath536 and therefore @xmath537 .    in eq.(40 )
the integral over the angle @xmath535 is evaluated explicitly , and we obtain @xmath538 where    @xmath539    the effective filter function can now be calculated to be @xmath540    the values @xmath511 are plotted in fig.[fig4 ] for the @xmath541 decays for different values of @xmath67 at energies @xmath446 and @xmath513 gev .
it is now sufficient to multiply the differential cross section ( [ v1 ] ) with the corresponding effective filter function @xmath542 in order to compare the calculations with the experiment . for the evaluation of the direct contributions one should use expression ( [ direct ] ) , while for the dalitz decays one should use expression ( [ dalitz ] ) . the function @xmath543 is given by a two - dimensional integral in eq.([direct ] ) and by a three - dimensional integral in eq.([dalitz ] ) .
0                                                          alexander g 1967 _ et al _ 1967 _ phys .
rev . _ * 154 * 1284 + bystricky j and lehar f 1981 _ nucleon - nucleon scattering data ; physics data _ , edited by h. behrens and g. ebel ( fachinformationszentrum , karlsruhe ) , nos .
11 - 2 and 11 - 3 + shimizu f _ et al _ 1982 _ nucl .
phys . _ * a386 * 571 + dakhno l g _ et al _ 1983 _ yad .
fiz . _ * 37 * 907 + baldini a , flaminio v , moorhead w g and morrison d r o 1988 _ total cross - sections for reactions of high energy particles ( including elastic , topological , inclusive and exclusive reactions ) _ , edited by h. schopper , _ landolt - bornstein _ , vol .
i/12 , springer , berlin .
ganhuyag b 1998 _ description of @xmath544-meson and proton characteristics in @xmath545-interactions at @xmath546 = 1.25 - 5.1 gev / c within the framework of fritiof model _ , preprint p2 - 98 - 26 , laboratory of high energies , jinr , dubna      baatar ts _
et al _ 1999 _ an analysis of characteristics for @xmath544- mesons and protons in inelastic ac - interactions at @xmath95 = 4.2 gev / c per nucleon in the framework of fritiof model _
preprint p1 - 99 - 45 , laboratory of high energies , jinr , dubna    ganhuyag b 1998 _ description of @xmath544-meson and proton characteristics in @xmath545-interactions at @xmath546 = 1.25 - 5.1 gev / c within the framework of fritiof model _
, preprint p2 - 98 - 26 , laboratory of high energies , jinr , dubna                          trueman t l 1969 _ phys .
rev . _ * 182 * 1469 + theis w r and hertel p 1970 _ nuovo .
cim . _ * 66 * 152 + close f e and cottingham w n 1975 _ nucl .
phys . _ * b99 * 61 + bardin w a and tung wu - ki 1968 _ phys
_ * 173 * 1423 + tarrach r 1975 _ nuovo cim . _
* a28 * 409    koniuk r 1982 _ nucl . phys . _ * b195 * 452 + capstick s and roberts s 1994 _ phys . rev . _
* d49 * 4570 + stassart p and stancu f 1990 _ phys .
* d42 * 1521 + stancu f and stassart p 1993 _ phys .
rev . _ * d47 * 2140


how does the environment of a galaxy influence its evolution ? finding an answer to this question requires extensive comparisons between galaxies in different environments , including those in the most isolated environments .
many studies have sought to compare the global star formation properties of galaxies in field and cluster environments ( see , for example , references in koopmann & kenney 2004a and a review by poggianti 2005 ) .
the selection of isolated comparison samples in these studies is as important as the selection of the primary objects of study . in the case of a study on environmental effects
, the comparison sample should ideally be made up of galaxies completely isolated from their surroundings .
however , the distribution of galaxies in space appears to be strongly clustered , with few , if any , objects outside gravitationally associated structures
. a truly isolated galaxy may not exist ( e.g. , vettolani _ et al . _
1986 , tully 1987b ) .
all is not lost , however . the main requirement for a galaxy to serve as a comparison object in a study of the environmental effects on bright cluster galaxies is that it have a low probability of interaction with another galaxy of similar mass or with a group environment over a hubble time .
such galaxies are not typical ( since 69% of galaxies are located in groups ; tully 1987b ) , but they do exist .
we undertook to observe a sample of isolated galaxies as part of a study to compare the star formation properties of nearly 100 bright isolated and virgo cluster spiral galaxies via broadband r and h@xmath0 images .
we sought the most isolated nearby galaxies for our comparison sample , using the environmental information in the nearby galaxies catalog ( tully 1987a , hereafter nbg ) . because we wished to compare virgo and isolated spirals as a function of hubble type classification , we selected our sample based on hubble type as well as local galaxy density , observing roughly equal numbers of different spiral types , with luminosities , distances , and inclinations as similar as possible to those of virgo spirals .
we use the term ` isolated ' for this sample rather than the more general term ` field ' .
the selection of field samples is generally not subject to the stringent requirements outlined here , and many field galaxy samples contain group members .    since our primary motivation was to find an isolated sample suitable for comparison to virgo cluster galaxies , our selection process was somewhat different from that of other studies which have sought to identify and characterize the most isolated galaxies .
studies such as karachentseva ( 1973 ) and pisano , wilcotts , & liu ( 2002 ) apply more stringent density limitations , but their samples contain relatively few early - type spiral galaxies and are on average further away .
we note that much larger samples of isolated galaxies are being compiled through studies such as allam _
et al . _  ( 2005 ) , who identify a sample of 2980 isolated galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ; york et al .
2000 ) data release 1 .
the galaxies identified in this survey are on average at much greater distance than virgo , but the sample contains a significant number of early - type galaxies .
a dilemma in selecting isolated galaxies for comparison was deciding whether or not to select only galaxies which had previous measurements at other wavelengths .
for example , it would be useful to have a comparison sample of galaxies also mapped in hi and co. however ,
we decided that such a selection criterion might bias the sample , since galaxies with mapped hi and co were often selected because of their peculiarities .
our final sample contains rather obscure galaxies , but we hope that this will be changed in the future by further observations of these galaxies .    in this paper , we present images and radial profiles in h@xmath0 and r for 29 isolated spiral galaxies .
there are several other papers in this series .
r and h@xmath0 images and selection details of the virgo cluster sample are presented in koopmann , kenney , & young ( 2001 ) .
comparisons between the r and h@xmath0 radial profiles of virgo cluster and isolated spirals are presented in koopmann & kenney ( 1998 ; 2004a , 2004b ) .
this paper is organized as follows .
the selection of the isolated galaxies is described in section  [ select ] .
section  [ observe ] describes the observations and reduction procedures .
section  [ atlas ] presents the atlas of isolated galaxies , including images and surface photometry .
lll|ll s0-s0/a &  50% ( 4/8 ) & 100% ( 1/1 ) & 36% ( 4/11 ) & 50% ( 1/2 ) + sa - sab &   44% ( 4/9 ) &  -  ( 0/0 ) & 60% ( 9/15 ) &  0% ( 0/1 ) +
sb - sbc & 27% ( 6/22 ) & 33% ( 1/3 ) & 19% ( 5/26 ) & 13% ( 1/8 ) + sc - scd & 21% ( 7/34 ) & 22% ( 2/9 ) & 15% ( 6/41 ) & 18% ( 2/11 ) + total ( all ) &   29% ( 21/73 ) & 11% ( 4/13 ) & 26% ( 24/93 ) & 18% ( 4/22 ) + total ( sa - scd ) &  26% ( 17/65 ) & 18% ( 3/12 ) & 24% ( 20/82 ) & 15% ( 3/20 ) + total ( all mags ) & 29% ( 25/86 ) & - & 24% ( 28/115 ) & - + total ( sa - scd ) &  26% ( 20/77 ) & - & 23% ( 23/102 ) & - [ tabisocomp ]
[ select ] an isolated comparison sample of galaxies should resemble the cluster sample as much as possible in distance and absolute magnitude , but be located in the lowest density regions possible .
the selection of isolated galaxies was based on the environmental information contained in the nbg , supplemented by group listings from the work of gourgoulhon _ et al . _  ( 1992 ) .
the nbg lists 2367 galaxies with recessional velocities @xmath2 3000 km s@xmath3 .
the catalog is essentially complete for galaxies with recessional velocities @xmath2 1500 km s@xmath3 .
the galaxies in the catalog are assigned memberships within hierarchical structures ranging from large - scale ` clouds ' to associations and groups .
associated galaxies must meet a critical density requirement to be considered a bound group with a crossing time shorter than a hubble time .
unbound ` associations ' of galaxies meet a density requirement one order of magnitude lower than the group requirement .
our first step towards finding the most isolated galaxies was to eliminate all group members , which amounts to approximately 69% of the nbg ( tully 1987b ) .
the remaining galaxies were either in associations ( 20% ) or ` at - large ' within a cloud , i.e. , apparently unassociated with other cloud members ( 10% ) .
selection of our sample from these galaxies was based on the hubble type , local density , distances , recessional velocities , inclinations , and luminosities provided in the catalog ( described in detail by tully 1988 ) .
we selected only spiral galaxies with hubble types s0-scd , and sought to observe sufficient galaxies of each spiral type to provide a comparison sample for virgo cluster galaxies .
thus the observed galaxies do not represent the actual number distribution in terms of hubble type . only galaxies with inclinations of @xmath4
were selected .
the luminosity cutoff was set to the same as that of the virgo cluster sample : m@xmath1 -18 .
the local density , distance , and recessional velocity limits were determined by experimentation to obtain sufficient numbers of early - type spirals , which are less common in field environments . to select galaxies with distances comparable to virgo , a cutoff in velocity of 2500 km s@xmath3 and a cutoff in distance of 33 mpc ( as listed by nbg ) were applied .
66% ( @xmath5 ) of the galaxies have v@xmath6 @xmath2 1500 km s@xmath3 and 86% ( @xmath7 ) @xmath2 2000 km s@xmath3 .
galaxies with v@xmath6 @xmath8 1500 km s@xmath3 are mostly early - type spirals .
the distances of the galaxies , originally extracted from the nbg , were reevaluated using the heliocentric velocity and the multiattractor model for the velocity fields within the local supercluster ( tonry _ et al . _  2000
; masters , k. l. , private communication ) , with an assumed hubble constant of 70 km s@xmath3 mpc@xmath3 .
37% of the galaxies are within 20 mpc , while 62% are within 25 mpc .
our absolute density cutoff was set at 0.3 gal mpc@xmath9 .
the local density of a particular galaxy is based on the contributions of all galaxies with absolute magnitudes brighter than -16 , including the galaxy itself .
local densities range from 0.06 gal mpc@xmath9 for an isolated galaxy to 4.2 gal mpc@xmath9 in the central regions of the virgo cluster . for comparison , the density of the local group is 0.52 gal mpc@xmath9 .
the local density is at least 0.1 gal mpc@xmath9 for 90% of the galaxies of all classes , meaning that almost all galaxies have companions within @xmath10 1 mpc .
( it should be emphasized that the nearby galaxies catalog is not able to identify galaxies with small companions , i.e. , companions with m@xmath11 @xmath8 -16 .
however , our objective is to select galaxies which are the least likely to have experienced similar mass interactions . ) in the observed sample , 69% of the 29 galaxies selected from the nearby galaxies catalog have local densities @xmath12 0.2 gal mpc@xmath9 and 34% @xmath12 0.1 gal mpc@xmath9 .
67% of the sample galaxies appear to belong to a specific cloud , but are at - large in the cloud , and 33% belong to associations within clouds .
a total of 115 isolated galaxies matching our selection criteria were found in the nbg .
we provide in table  [ tabisocomp ] a summary of the percentages of galaxies observed , according to the classifications given by the two main catalogs : ( i ) _ revised shapley ames catalog ( sandage & tammann 1987 ; hereafter rsa ) or the _ carnegie atlas ( sandage & bedke 1994 ; hereafter ca ) and ( ii ) _ third reference catalog ( devaucouleurs _ et al . _
1991 ; hereafter rc3 ) .
( note that only 86/115 of the nbg galaxies appeared in the rsa / ca . ) _ _ _    additional targets were identified from a list of 86 isolated galaxies derived from analyses described in gourgoulhon _
et al . _  ( 1992 ) and fouqu _ et al . _  ( 1992 ) and kindly provided to us by p. fouqu .
the list is derived from a sample of 4143 galaxies with blue isophotal diameters , d@xmath13 , larger than 100@xmath14 and recessional velocities @xmath2 6000 km s@xmath3 , with completeness of 84% .
group and association members were identified in a manner similiar to the nbg , but with a somewhat different approach to determination of critical density and corrections for faint galaxies .
the final percentage of group members ( @xmath10 65% ) is similar to the nbg .
six of the observed galaxies appeared in both lists .
one galaxy which appeared only in the fouqu list ( ngc  2640 ) was also observed , but not included in the final analysis due to reduction problems .
the final selection of galaxies was also dependent on the time of year allocated for observing .
the properties of the galaxies presented are listed in table  [ tabsample ] .
the columns of table  [ tabsample ] contain the following information : ( 1 ) name of galaxy , ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) galaxy coordinates , ( 4 ) rsa / ca hubble type , ( 5 ) rc3 hubble type ( 6 ) the total , face - on blue magnitude from devaucouleurs _
et al . _  ( 1991 ) , ( 7 ) the heliocentric radial velocity , ( 8) the distance of the galaxy in mpc , based on the heliocentric velocity and the multiattractor model for the velocity fields within the local supercluster ( tonry _ et al . _  2000 ; masters , k. l. , private communication ) , with an assumed hubble constant of 70 km s@xmath3 mpc@xmath3 , ( 9 ) a@xmath15 , scaled from a@xmath11 values listed in devaucouleurs _
_  ( 1991 ) using values given in riefe & lebofsky ( 1985 ) , ( 10 ) the hi deficiency parameter , as defined by solanes _
et al . _  ( 1996 ; see also giovanelli & haynes 1983 ) , ( 11 ) the local galaxy density in units of galaxies mpc@xmath9 , given in the nbg , and ( 12 ) the affiliation of a galaxy with respect to associations , as defined by the nbg : at - large means the galaxy is unassociated with other galaxies within the large scale cloud , association means that the galaxy is associated with other galaxies within the cloud .
the hi fluxes used to extract the hi deficiencies in column ( 10 ) were extracted from the cornell university extragalactic group private digital hi archive , and are corrected for effects such as beam dilution ( springob _ et al . _  2005
; see also haynes & giovanelli 1984 ) , while optical diameters were obtained from the arecibo general catalog , a private database maintained at cornell university by martha haynes and riccardo giovanelli .
both the rc3 and rsa classes are listed in table  [ tabsample ] .
( note that the agreement between classifiers is far better for this isolated sample of galaxies than for galaxies listed in the virgo cluster sample of koopmann _ et al . _
the observations of the isolated galaxies were made on the kpno 0.9-m and the ctio 0.9-m and 1.5-m telescopes on photometric nights between august 1993 and february 1996 .
exposures ranged from 3 - 15 min in a standard harris ( kron - cousins ) r filter , and 1 - 2 hrs in an h@xmath0 filter of width 60 - 80  , centered either near 6573   or near 6600   ( for galaxies with v @xmath8 1000 km / s ) .
an observing log is presented in table  [ tabobslog ] .
galaxies are listed in order by right ascension , with two to three lines describing the r and h@xmath0 observations .
the columns list the following information : ( 1 ) name of the galaxy , ( 2 ) the date of the observation , ( 3 ) the telescope and chip in column 3 ( where chip characteristics are given in table  [ chip ] ) , ( 4 ) filter ( where filter codes and characteristics are given in table  [ filter ] ) , ( 5 ) exposure time in seconds , ( 6 ) airmass of the observation , ( 7 ) the full width half maximum ( fwhm ) in arcseconds , ( 8) the sky background sigma , ( 9 ) and the estimated uncertainty in the sky level .
the units of columns ( 8) and ( 9 ) are erg @xmath16s@xmath3arcsec@xmath17 .
the values for the r observations may be converted to magnitudes using a zeropoint of 13.945 .
the absolute flux calibration was based on observations of the spectrophotometric standard stars from the lists of massey _ et al . _  ( 1988 ) and hamuy _ et al . _  ( 1992 ) .
landolt ( 1992 ) standards were observed to derive the extinction coefficient and/or monitor the photometricity , and in some cases , to calibrate the observations .
reduction procedures were identical to those described in koopmann
_ et al . _  ( 2001 ) .
multiple exposures were registered and combined .
images were flux calibrated to the massey _ et al . _  ( 1988 ) and hamuy _ et al . _  ( 1992 ) spectrophotometric standards .
the sky background was subtracted from the r and h@xmath0 images before continuum subtraction .
uncertainties in the sky levels were typically 0.5 - 1% for r and 1 - 2% for h@xmath0 , as listed in column ( 9 ) of table  [ tabobslog ] .
the continuum light was subtracted from the h@xmath0 image using a scaled r image .
a full discussion of the uncertainties in the continuum subtraction is provided in koopmann _
et al . _  ( 2001 ) .    as in previous papers in the series
, no correction was made for contamination by the 2 [ nii ] lines ( @xmath18 @xmath18=6548.1 , 6583.8  ) that also lie within the h@xmath0 filter bandpass .
the ratio of [ nii ] to h@xmath0 flux in hii regions has been estimated by kennicutt ( 1992 ) to be 0.53 in the median .
it appears to be dependent upon galaxy luminosity ( e.g. , jansen _
et al . _   2000
) such that fainter galaxies have a smaller [ nii ] contamination .
see also james _ et al . _  ( 2005 ) for a complete literature review .
james _ et al . _  ( 2005 ) probe the radial dependence of the [ nii]/h@xmath0 correction factor using narrow - band h@xmath0 and [ nii ] imaging of 7 spiral galaxies .
they find lower values for the global [ n ii]/h@xmath0 ratio than previous studies and show that the value has a strong dependence on radius .
the value and the radial dependence vary widely in their small sample .
one sc galaxy , for example , has no detectable [ nii ] emission .
the value and radial dependence of [ nii]/h@xmath0 are sources of uncertainty in our fluxes and surface photometry . if the james _ et al . _
galaxies are typical , the contribution from [ nii ] is most significant in nuclear regions , meaning that our profiles tend to be too bright at inner radii .
however , without detailed knowledge of the value of n ii]/h@xmath0 as a function of radius , we do not attempt a correction .
hereafter we will abbreviate h@xmath0+[nii ] as h@xmath0 .
the h@xmath0 fluxes were not corrected for the presence of the h@xmath0 emission line in the r continuum image , in order to be consistent with fluxes given in koopmann _
et al . _  ( 2001 ) and young _ et al . _
this correction amounts to a factor of 4 - 5% depending on the h@xmath0 filter used .
these isolated sample galaxies are located at many different galactic latitudes and it was necessary to apply a correction for galactic extinction .
absorption values in the b filter listed in the rc3 were scaled to r and h@xmath0 using the values given in rieke & lebofsky ( 1985 ) .
a@xmath19 values are listed in column ( 9 ) of table  [ tabsample ] .
r and h@xmath0 images and surface photometry of the 29 isolated galaxies are presented in figure  [ isoim ] .
galaxies are ordered by right ascension , with morphological information and size scales indicated on the plots . in the lefthand column ,
the images are displayed on a log scale , with north up and east to the left . in the righthand column ,
r ( solid ) and h@xmath0 ( dotted ) surface photometry profiles are plotted as a function of radius in arc seconds .
the h@xmath0 profiles are displaced from the r profiles using an arbitrary zeropoint of 18.945 .
the h@xmath0 profile is plotted out to the radius containing the outermost resolved hii region .
radial parameters derived from the surface photometry ( as described in section  [ sp ] ) are indicated in the plots , as explained in the figure caption .
surface brightness profiles were obtained from the images using a surface photometry program written in the idl programming language .
the full procedure is described in koopmann _
_  ( 2001 ) ; this section presents a brief summary of the approach .
the center of the galaxy was derived using centroiding via the _ center task in iraf .
the axial ratio and position angle were derived from fitting to the outer isophotes .
the center , axial ratio , and position angle were held fixed in the determination of the profile .
_    the r radial profiles were calculated until the error in the sky background exceeded the signal .
the h@xmath0 surface photometry was halted just outside the radius of the outermost hii region .
for galaxies with faint outer disk star formation or galaxies with scattered background light or poor flat fields , this radius was beyond the point in the profile where sky uncertainty errors overwhelmed the azimuthally averaged signal .
we indicate this radius in the plots of radial profiles given in figure  [ isoim ] , but plot the h@xmath0 radial profile to the outermost hii region to emphasize the extent of star formation .
all profiles were corrected to face on assuming complete transparency in the disk ( see discussion in koopmann _
et al . _
profiles of individual galaxies are plotted in the right - hand columns of figure  [ isoim ] .
the h@xmath0 profiles were arbitrarily scaled to the r profile using a zeropoint of 18.945 .
the morphological type of each galaxy is indicated .
the main contributor of noise in the radial profile is the uncertainty in the sky level .
there are several other systematic errors which have not been included in the error bars .
the error in the flux calibration contributes @xmath10 5% . in h@xmath0 ,
systematic errors due to the continuum subraction and contribution of [ n ii ] are typically 20 - 30%
. see figure 7 of koopmann _ et al .
_  ( 2001 ) for a graphical example of the uncertainty in the h@xmath0 surface photometry .
table  [ isorpara ] presents quantities derived from the r surface photometry .
the columns provide : ( 1 ) name of galaxy , ( 2 ) axial ratio and , in parentheses , inclination calculated using the hubble ( 1926 ) conversion ( see koopmann _ et al . _  2001 ) , ( 3 ) position angle , ( 4 ) r@xmath20 , the radius in units of arcsecs at the 24 r mag / arcsec@xmath21 isophote , ( 5 ) the magnitude within r@xmath20 , ( 6 ) r@xmath13 , the radius in units of arcsecs at the 25 r mag / arcsec@xmath21 isophote , ( 7 ) the magnitude within r@xmath13 , ( 8) the central r light concentration parameter , ( 9 ) the disk scalelength , and ( 10 ) the uncertainty in the disk scalelength.including axial ratios , position angles , isophotal radii and magnitudes , and disk scalelengths . the central r light concentration parameter given in column ( 8) is defined analogously to abraham _ et al . _  ( 1994 ) , as @xmath22 where f@xmath15(r@xmath20 ) is the flux in r measured within the r@xmath20 isophote and f@xmath15(0.3r@xmath20 ) is the flux within the 0.3r@xmath20 isophote .    , title="fig : " ] , title="fig : " ]    table  [ hapar ] presents quantities derived from the h@xmath0 surface photometry . the information listed in the columns is : ( 1 ) name of galaxy , ( 2 ) log of the total h@xmath0 flux in units of 10@xmath23 erg @xmath16 s@xmath3 , with uncertainty based on the background sky error combined in quadrature with an estimated 3 $ error in the continuum subtraction factor , ( 3 ) h@xmath0 equivalent width in  , as defined below , with uncertainty , ( 4 ) semimajor radius in arcseconds of the outermost hii region , ( 5 ) radius in arcseconds which contains 95% of the total h@xmath0 flux , ( 6 ) radius in arcseconds at which the surface brightness falls to 17 x 10@xmath23 erg @xmath16 s@xmath3 arcsec@xmath3 , ( 7 ) log of the h@xmath0 flux within r@xmath24 in units of 1 x 10@xmath23 erg @xmath16 s@xmath3 , and ( 8) the h@xmath0 concentration , as defined below .    the h@xmath0 equivalent width given in column ( 3 )
was derived from the h@xmath0 and r photometry via the formula    @xmath25    where @xmath26 is the r flux , @xmath27 is the scaling factor used in the continuum subtraction ( typically 0.04 - 0.05 ) , and @xmath28 is the width of the h@xmath0 filter in  .
a linear fit to the h@xmath0 equivalent width and the nmsfr parameter produces : @xmath29    column ( 8) of table  [ hapar ] provides the h@xmath0 light concentration parameter , defined as    @xmath30    where f@xmath31 is the total h@xmath0 flux and f@xmath31(0.3r@xmath20 ) is the flux within the 0.3r@xmath20 isophote .
a ch@xmath0 of 1 indicates that all of the h@xmath0 emission is located within 0.3r@xmath20 .
few previous photometric measurements at red wavelengths exist for this set of spirals .
lauberts & valentijn ( 1989 ) contains isophotal magnitudes for 11 galaxies in common .
these magnitudes are correlated with our magnitudes , as shown in figure  [ photcomp]a .
the solid line indicates a one - to - one matching .
the scatter in a least - squares fit is 15% .
20 of our galaxies have v magnitudes listed in the rc3 , and these magnitudes are correlated with our isophotal r magnitudes with a scatter of about 12% .
eleven of our sample galaxies have been observed in i - band by haynes _
et al . _
( private communication ) .
we find a 12% scatter between the r and i photometry .
all the sample galaxies have been observed by 2mass .
total and isophotal j magnitudes were extracted from the 2mass archive using the large galaxy atlas ( jarrett _ et al . _
2003 ) where possible .
figure  [ photcomp]b shows the correlation between our r magnitudes and the total j magnitude from 2mass .
the scatter in the best - fit line is 10% .
( a similar scatter is seen in comparisons of the eso catalog r and 2mass j photometry . )
the correlation is similar to that obtained using our virgo cluster sample galaxies ( koopmann _ et al . _
2001 ) , although the virgo cluster spirals show somewhat less scatter ( 7% ) .
results are similar when isophotal j magnitudes are used in place of the total j magnitudes .
while the scatter in the least - square fits are similar for all 4 comparison bands , we see few galaxies with consistently bright or faint values .
three galaxies show trends in at least 3 bands : our photometry of ic 5273 falls consistently below the trend line compared to other bands , while ngc 3705 and ngc 986 fall consistently above .
h@xmath0 fluxes have been measured previously for 10 galaxies , as compiled by kennicutt & akiyama ( in prep . ) and generously provided to us in advance of publication .
kennicutt & akiyama have placed the h@xmath0 fluxes of approximately 2600 galaxies in the literature on the same scale , correcting for systematic factors such as broad- vs narrow - band continuum filters and [ n ii ] contamination , and finding average fluxes for galaxies with multiple measurements . the comparison between the scaled literature fluxes and our fluxes is shown in figure  [ haphotcomp ] .
references for the literature values can be found in kennicutt & akiyama . to place our fluxes on the same scale as kennicutt & akiyama ,
the galactic extinction correction factor was removed and a 5% correction factor was added to account for the presence of the h@xmath0 line emission in the r filter . in the plot , galaxies with one literature measurement
are represented by cross symbols , while galaxies with two literature measurements are represented by solid circles ( ngc 7098 ) and asterisks ( ugc 3580 ) .
there is general agreement in the fluxes , although our fluxes may be systematically smaller . on the other hand , h@xmath0 fluxes from different sources can differ by far more than the internal errors , as seen for the two galaxies with two literature measurements .
photometry given in this paper compared with literature sources as compiled by kennicutt & akiyama ( in prep ) .
our h@xmath0 fluxes were placed on the same scale as kennicutt & akiyama , by removing the galactic extinction correction factor and adding an estimated 5% correction factor to account for the presence of the h@xmath0 line emission in the r filter .
the solid line shows a one - to - one correlation .
error bars on the h@xmath0 photometry in this paper are derived from the sky error combined in quadrature with an estimate of a 3% error in the continuum subtraction factor .
even a 3% error in the continuum subtraction factor can result in a large error in the h@xmath0 flux for galaxies with relatively weak h@xmath0 emission , as seen for two galaxies ( from left to right , ngc 5273 and ic 356 ) .
kennicutt & akiyama estimate a typical error in literature values of 5 - 15% ; the error bars shown in the plot are at the 10% level .
cross symbols show those galaxies with one literature measurement .
differences between authors can be much larger than estimated errors , as seen for two galaxies with two measurements in the literature : ngc 7098 ( solid circles ) and ugc 3580 ( asterisks ) . [ haphotcomp ] ]
broadband  r and h@xmath0 images , surface photometry , and quantitative parameters describing central concentrations and star formation rates have been obtained for a sample of 29 isolated s0-scd spiral galaxies .
further analyses of the spacial distribution of star formation in these galaxies are provided in several papers .
the properties of these galaxies are quantitatively compared to those of virgo cluster galaxies in koopmann & kenney ( 1998 ; 2004a ; 2004b ) .
scale lengths are presented and compared to virgo cluster and other field galaxies in koopmann , haynes , & catinella ( 2005 ) .
the funding for the research on the virgo cluster and isolated spiral galaxies was provided by nsf grant ast-9322779 .
we thank r.b .
tully for providing us with the online version of the nearby galaxies catalog and software to access it , p. fouqu for providing us with a list of isolated galaxies , and r. pogge for excellent advice on obtaining the best continuum subtractions .
we are grateful to sydney barnes , shardha jogee , jerry orosz , sally cersosimo , and charles bailyn for obtaining many of the images in this paper during yale service observing runs .
this work was substantially aided by observing support from the kitt peak and cerro tololo staffs .
martha haynes , christopher springob , karen masters , and the cornell extragalactic group are gratefully acknowledged for their aid in derivation of updated distances and hi deficiencies .
this publication makes use of data products from the two micron all sky survey , which is a joint project of the university of massachusetts and the infrared processing and analysis center / california institute of technology , funded by the national aeronautics and space administration and the national science foundation .
this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration .
the authors and maintainers of the iraf and stsdas software packages and instruction manuals are also gratefully acknowledged .
abraham , r. g. , valdes , f. , yee , h. k. c. , & van den bergh , s. 1994 , apj , 432 , 75 allam , s. s. , tucker , d. l. , lee , b. c. , & smith , j. a. 2005 , , 129 , 2062 devaucouleurs , g. , devaucouleurs , a. , corwin , h. g. , buta , r. j. , paturel , g. , & fouqu , p. 1991
, third reference catalog of bright galaxies ( new york : springer - verlag ) ( rc3 ) fouqu , p. , gourgoulhon , e. , chamaraux , p. , & paturel , g. 1992 , , 93 , 211 giovanelli , r. & haynes , m. p. 1983
, , 88 , 881 gourgoulhon , e. , chamaraux , p. , & fouqu ,
, , 255,69 hamuy , m , walker , a. r. , suntzeff , n. b. , gigoux , p. , heathcote , s. r. , & phillips , m. m. 1992 , , 104 , 533 haynes , m. p. & giovanelli , r. 1984 , , 89 , 758 james , p. a. , shane , n. s. , knapen , j. h. , etherton , j. , & percival , s. m. 2005 , , 429 , 851 jansen , r. a. , fabricant , d. , franx , m. , & caldwell , n. 2000 , apjs , 126 , 331 jarrett , t. h.,chester , t. cutri , r. , scheider , s. e. , & huchra , j. p. 2003
, , 125 , 525 karachentseva , v. e. 1973 , soobshch
, 8 , 3 kennicutt , r. c. 1992 , , 388 , 310 koopmann , r. a. , haynes , m. p. , & catinella , b. 2005 , , submitted koopmann , r. a. & kenney , j.d.p .
1998 , , 497 , l75 koopmann , r. a. & kenney , j.d.p .
2004a , , 613 , 851 koopmann , r. a. & kenney , j.d.p .
2004b , , 613 , 866 koopmann , r. a. , kenney , j. d. p. , young , j. 2001 , , 135 , 125 landolt , a. u. 1992 , , 104 , 340 ( pi ) lauberts , a. & valentijn , e. a. 1989 , the surface photometry catalogue of the eso - uppsala galaxies ( garching : eso ) massey , p. , strobel , k. , barnes , j. v. , & anderson , e. 1988 , , 328 , 315 pisano , d. j. , wilcots , e. m. , & liu , c. t. 2002 , , 142 , 161 poggianti , b. 2005 , in baryons in dark matter halos , r.j .
dettmar , u. klein , p. salucci ( ed ) , astro - ph/0503218 rieke , g. h. & lebofsky , m. j. 1985 , , 288 , 618 sandage , a. , & bedke , j. 1994 , the carnegie atlas of galaxies ( washington : carnegie ) sandage , a. , & tammann , g. a. 1987 , a revised shapley - ames catalog of bright galaxies ( washington , dc : carnegie institution ) solanes , j. m. , giovanelli , r. , & haynes , m. p. 1996
, , 461 , 609 solanes , j. m. , manrique , a. , garcia - gomez , c. , gonzalez - casado , g. , giovanelli , r. , & haynes , m. p. 2001
, , 548 , 97 springob , c. m. , haynes , m. p. , giovanelli , r. , & kent , b. r. 2005 , , in press tonry , j. l. , blakeslee , j. p. , ajhar , e. a. , & dressler , a. 2000 , , 530 , 625 tully , r. b. 1987a , nearby galaxies catalog , ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) tully , r. b. 1987b , , 321 , 280 tully , r. b. 1988 , , 96 , 73 vettolani , g. , de souza , r. , & chincarini , g. 1986 , , 154 , 343 york , d. g. , et al . 2000 , , 120 ,
1579    llrcclrcrrcl ngc 578 & 01 30 29.1 & -22 40 03 & sc(s)ii & sab(rs)c & 11.17 & 1630 & 26.2 & .02&.17&0.07 & at - large + ngc 613 & 01 34 17.4 & -29 24 58 & sbb(rs)ii&sb(rs)bc&10.53 & 1475 & 23.9 & .02 & .40 & 0.07 & at - large + ngc 986 & 02 33 34.2 & -39 02 40 & sbb(rs)i - ii&sb(rs)ab & 11.45 & 2005 & 32.2 & .03&.58 & 0.06 & at - large + ngc 1249 & 03 10 06.4 & -53 20 17 & sbc & sb(s)cd & 11.64 & 1072 & 17.4 & 0&.03 & 0.27 & at - large + ic 356 & 04 07 46.5 & + 69 48 45 & -&sa(s)ab pec & 10.17 & 895 & 14.6 & 1.2&-.17 & 0.08 & association + ngc 2090 & 05 47 02.3 & -34 15 05 & sc(s)ii & sa(rs)c & 11.45 & 931 & 15.6 & 0&-.15 & 0.14 & association + ngc 2196 & 06 12 09.5 & -21 48 23 & sab(s)i & sa(s)ab & 11.38 & 2321 & 26.8 & .45&.31&0.10 & association + ugc 3580 & 06 55 31.0 & + 69 33 49&-&sa(s)a pec : & 12.20 & 1201 & 18.7 & .19&.10&0.08 & at - large + ngc 2525 & 08 05 37.9 & -11 25 40 & sbc(s)ii&sb(s)c & 11.55 & 1581 & 25.5 & .40&.45&0.06 & at - large + ngc 2712 & 08 59 30.6 & + 44 54 51 & sbb(s)i - ii & sb(r)b : & 12.19 & 1815 & 26.4 & .04&.14 & 0.17 & at - large + ngc 2787 & 9 19 18.5 & + 69 12 12 & sb0/a&sb0(r)+ & 11.61 & 696 & 12.0 & .17&0.50 & 0.06 & at - large + ngc 2950 & 9 42 35.1 & + 58 51 05 & rsb0@xmath32&(r)sb(r)0 & 11.80 & 1337 & 20.1 & .03&@xmath81 & 0.22 & at - large + ngc 3329 & 10 44 39.5 & + 76 48 34 & sab & ( r)sa(r)b : & 12.57 & 1812 & 27.2 & .03&- & 0.20 & association + ngc 3359 & 10 46 36.5 & + 63 13 24 & sbc(s)i.8 pec&sb(rs)c & 10.68 & 1013 & 16.0 & 0&-.13 & 0.21 & at - large + ngc 3414 & 10 51 16.2 & + 27 58 30 & s0@xmath33(0)/a&s0pec & 11.86 & 1414 & 21.4 & 0&1.1 & 0.28 & association + ngc 3673 & 11 25 12.7 & -26 44 11 & sbb(rs)i - ii & sb(rs)b & 11.81 & 1938 & 31.6 & .27&.46&.15 & association + ngc 3705 & 11 30 07.6 & + 09 16 36 & sb(r)i - ii & sab(r)ab & 11.25 & 1017 & 16.5 & .12&.67 & 0.27 & association + ngc 3887 & 11 47 04.8 & -16 51 16&sbbc(s)ii - iii&sb(r)bc&11.19 & 1209 & 20.2 & .05&.03&0.08 & at - large + ngc 3941 & 11 52 55.3 & + 36 59 11 & sb0@xmath33/a&sb(s)0 & 11.25 & 928 & 14.6 & 0&.40 & 0.29 & association + ngc 4597 & 12 40 12.8 & -05 47 59 & sbc(r)iii : & sb(rs)m & 12.21 & 1043 & 17.4 & .03&-.08&0.19 & at - large + ngc 4800 & 12 54 37.7 & + 46 31 51 & sb(rs)ii - iii & sa(rs)b & 12.13 & 891 & 14.1 & 0&.28 & 0.17 & at - large + ngc 4984 & 13 08 57.2 & -15 30 59 & sa(s ) & ( r)sab(rs)0 + & 12.03 & 1206 & 20.1 & .07&1.1 & 0.26 & at - large + ngc 5273 & 13 42 08.3 & + 35 39 15 & s0/a & sa(s)0 & 12.38 & 1054 & 16.3 & 0&@xmath81 & 0.15 & association + ngc 5334 & 13 52 54.4 & -01 06 52&sbc(rs)ii&sb(rs)c : & 11.62 & 1383 & 22.2 & 0.15&.40&0.16 & at - large + ngc 5669 & 14 32 43.8 & + 09 53 29 & sbc(s)ii & sab(rs)cd & 11.79 & 1371 & 21.6 & .02&.17&0.29 & at - large + ngc 7098 & 21 44 15.4 & -75 06 44 & - & ( r)sab(rs)a & 11.63 & 2357 & 37.5 & .40&.29 & 0.07 & at - large + ngc 7141 & 21 52 14.1 & -55 34 10 & - & sab(rs)bc & 12.21 & 2978 & 47.7 & 0&-&0.18 & at - large + ic 5240 & 22 41 52.3 & -44 46 04 & sba(r ) & sb(r)a & 12.29 & 1777 & 29.8 & 0&.48&0.18 & at - large + ic 5273 & 22 59 26.5 & -37 42 12 & sbc(s)ii - iii & sb(rs)cd : & 11.55 & 1301 & 22.3 & .04&.08 & 0.21 & at - large + [ tabsample ]    lllccrrcccrrrr ngc 578 & 1994 aug 18 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.01&1.01 & 1.8&530&63&188&2 + ngc 613 & 1992 aug 18 & ct9/tek1k & r &  & 300 &  & 1.11&  &1.7&1420&  &438 &  + & 1992 aug 17 & ct9/tek1k &  & h@xmath06 &  & 3 x 2400 &  & 1.04&1.7&  &138&  &4 + ngc 986 & 1994 aug 14 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.11 & 1.05 & 1.5 & 313 & 50 & 188&4 + ngc 1249 & 1992 aug 20 & ct9/tek1k & r&h@xmath06 & 600 & 5 x 1200 & 1.17 & 1.14 & 1.1 & 640 & 56 & 188&4 + ic 356 & 1995 feb 06 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 3 x 300 & 3 x 1500 & 1.27 & 1.29 & 1.4 & 410 & 43 & 432&2 + ngc 2090 & 1993 mar 01 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath05 & 900 & 3 x 2400 & 1.33 & 1.05 & 1.6 & 525 & 30 & 188&4 + ngc 2196 & 1995 mar 03&ct15/tek1k & r&h@xmath06 & 4 x 90 & 4 x 600 & 1.30 & 1.17 & 1.6 & 380 & 27 & 135&3 + ugc 3580 & 1995 feb 02 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 1800 & 1.29 & 1.27 & 1.4 & 162 & 50 & 65&2 + ngc 2525 & 1994 feb 24 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 3 x 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.07 & 1.06 & 1.6 &
593&143 & 310&4 + ngc 2712 & 1995 feb 03 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath04 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 1200 & 1.15 & 1.10 & 1.5 & 164 & 50 & 65&3 + ngc 2787 & 1995 feb 03 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 4 x 150 & 3 x 1500 & 1.66 & 1.56 & 1.6 & 302 & 26 & 108&3 + ngc 2950 & 1995 feb 04 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 5 x 72 & 3 x 900 & 1.29 & 1.24 & 1.6 & 260 & 30 & 65&4 + ngc 3329 & 1995 feb 02 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath04 & 2 x 300 & 3 x 1800 & 1.51 & 1.47 & 1.5 & 260 & 21 & 65&2 + ngc 3359 & 1995
feb 05 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 1200 & 1.51 & 1.43 & 1.4 & 310 & 10 & 65&2 + ngc 3414 & 1995 feb 06 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath04 & 5 x 120 & 3 x 900 & 1.37 & 1.25 & 1.6 & 260 & 20 & 108&3 + ngc 3673 & 1995 mar 29&ct15/tek1k & r&h@xmath06 & 4 x 90 & 4 x 600 & 1.11 & 1.09 & 1.5 & 350 & 27 & 81&3 + ngc
3705 & 1995 feb 03 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 4 x 70 & 4 x 900 & 1.44 & 1.44 & 1.4 & 390 & 32 & 43&1 + ngc 3887 & 1994 feb 25 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.16 & 1.09 & 2.6 & 535 & 90 & 128&4 + ngc 3941 & 1995 feb 04 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 5 x 75 & 4 x 750 & 1.43 & 1.32 & 1.4 & 280 & 26 & 130&4 + ngc 4597 & 1993 mar 02 & ct9/tek1k & r&h@xmath06 & 900 & 3 x 2400 & 1.18 & 1.13 & 1.7 & 421 & 45 & 64&2 + ngc 4800 & 1995 feb 06 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 3 x 240 & 4 x 900 & 1.05 & 1.03 & 1.2 & 151 & 22 & 65&2 + ngc
4984 & 1993 mar 01 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.13 & 1.04 & 2.0 & 287 & 38 & 128&4 + ngc 5273 & 1995 feb 04 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 3 x 300 & 3 x 1200 & 1.01 & 1.00 & 1.4 & 91 & 20 & 43&3 + ngc 5334 & 1995 mar 29&ct15/tek1k & r&h@xmath06 & 4 x 90 & 4 x 600 & 1.67 & 1.57 & 1.1 & 310 & 22 & 216&3 + ngc
5669 & 1995 feb 05 & kp9/t2ka & r&h@xmath03 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 1200 & 1.14 & 1.11 & 1.2&182 & 24 & 65&2 + ngc 7098 & 1994 aug 15 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.43 & 1.44 & 2.2 & 216 & 51 & 255&5 + ngc 7141 & 1994 aug 13 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.26 & 1.35 & 1.7 & 264 & 64 & 319&5 + ic 5240 & 1994 aug 12 & ct9/tek2k & r&h@xmath06 & 2 x 450 & 3 x 2400 & 1.10 & 1.18 & 1.7 & 160 & 51 & 160&5 + ic 5273 & 1992 aug 18 & ct9/tek1k & r&h@xmath06 & 300 & 3 x 2400 & 1.40 & 1.07 & 2.0&1500&115 & 574&5 + [ tabobslog ]        crrrrrrrrr ngc 578 & 0.574 ( 57 ) & 110 & 117 & 10.8 & 146 & 10.7 & 0.36 & 35 & 3 + ngc 613 & 0.799 ( 38 ) & 120 & 207 & 9.3 & 0 & 0.0 & 0.44 & 63 & 3 + ngc 986 & 0.743 ( 43 ) & 150 & 119 & 10.7 & 144 & 10.6 & 0.49 & 38 & 3 + ngc 1249 & 0.500 ( 62 ) & 85 & 94 & 11.6 & 121 & 11.5 & 0.32 & 40 & 3 + ic 356 & 0.719 ( 45 ) & 105 & 252 & 9.0 & 0 & 0.0 & 0.52 & 81 & 10 + ngc 2090 & 0.484 ( 63 ) & 13 & 99 & 10.5 & 173 & 10.4 & 0.50 & - & - + ngc 2196 & 0.682 ( 48 ) & 53 & 102 & 10.6 & 140 & 10.5 & 0.54 & 31 & 5 + ugc 3580 & 0.469 ( 64 ) & 5 & 60 & 12.3 & 90 & 12.1 & 0.49 & 28 & 3 + ngc 2525 & 0.643 ( 51 ) & 75 & 100 & 10.7 & 118 & 10.7 & 0.30 & 30 & 5 + ngc 2712 & 0.500 ( 62 ) & 0 & 64 & 11.7 & 86 & 11.7 & 0.37 & 19 & 2 + ngc 2787 & 0.574 ( 57 ) & 130 & 104 & 10.1 & 129 & 10.0 & 0.61 & 25 & 3 + ngc 2950 & 0.656 ( 50 ) & 127 & 93 & 10.5 & 113 & 10.5 & 0.73 & 26 & 2 + ngc 3329 & 0.559 ( 58 ) & 133 & 55 & 11.8 & 77 & 11.8 & 0.58 & 20 & 3 + ngc 3359 & 0.643 ( 51 ) & 175 & 142 & 10.5 & 184 & 10.4 & 0.37 & 43 & 2 + ngc 3414 & 0.839 ( 34 ) & 30 & 104 & 10.5 & 149 & 10.5 & 0.61 & - & - + ngc 3673 & 0.500 ( 62 ) & 75 & 109 & 11.0 & 139 & 11.0 & 0.41 & 33 & 3 + ngc 3705 & 0.423 ( 68 ) & 119 & 112 & 10.7 & 146 & 10.6 & 0.35 & 32 & 2 + ngc 3887 & 0.766 ( 41 ) & 19 & 109 & 10.5 & 130 & 10.4 & 0.40 & 27 & 3 + ngc 3941 & 0.731 ( 44 ) & 10 & 98 & 9.9 & 119 & 9.9 & 0.65 & 22 & 2 + ngc 4597 & 0.423 ( 68 ) & 49 & 93 & 12.0 & 120 & 11.8 & 0.21 & 40 & 6 + ngc 4800 & 0.766 ( 41 ) & 25 & 60 & 11.0 & 78 & 11.0 & 0.56 & 19 & 5 + ngc 4984 & 0.755 ( 42 ) & 15 & 115 & 10.4 & 159 & 10.3 & 0.65 & 40 & 4 + ngc 5273 & 0.866 ( 31 ) & 10 & 68 & 11.8 & 84 & 11.7 & 0.42 & 20 & 3 + ngc 5334 & 0.719 ( 45 ) & 15 & 101 & 11.4 & 126 & 11.3 & 0.27 & 40 & 4 + ngc 5669 & 0.707 ( 46 ) & 50 & 90 & 11.7 & 117 & 11.5 & 0.34 & 31 & 4 + ngc 7098 & 0.574 ( 57 ) & 70 & 135 & 10.5 & 162 & 10.5 & 0.57 & 42 & 4 + ngc 7141 & 0.707 ( 46 ) & 0 & 77 & 11.7 & 124 & 11.5 & 0.39 & 32 & 4 + ic 5240 & 0.643 ( 51 ) & 100 & 80 & 11.3 & 99 & 11.3 & 0.49 & 24 & 3 + ic 5273 & 0.602 ( 55 ) & 56 & 102 & 10.8 & 0 & 0.0 & 0.35 & 31 & 2 + [ isorpara ]    lcrrrccc ngc 578 & -11.52 @xmath34 0.03 & 36 @xmath34 2 & 135 & 104 & 102 & -11.54 & 0.25 + ngc 613 & -11.34 @xmath34 0.09 & 14 @xmath34 2 & 164 & 101 & 113 & -11.34 & 0.60 + ngc 986 & -11.63 @xmath34 0.04 & 23 @xmath34 2 & 108 & 82 & 91 & -11.63 & 0.49 + ngc 1249 & -11.76 @xmath34 0.03 & 39 @xmath34 3 & 179 & 137 & 80 & -11.85 & 0.25 + ic 356 & -11.66 @xmath34 0.17 &  5 @xmath34 2 & 245 & 184 & 150 & -11.73 & 0.29 + ngc 2090 & -11.58 @xmath34 0.04 & 31 @xmath34 2 & 287 & 203 & 122 & -11.73 & 0.32 + ngc 2196 & -11.74 @xmath34 0.06 & 16 @xmath34 2 & 123 & 112 & 99 & -11.80 & 0.18 + ugc 3580 & -12.27 @xmath34 0.04 & 25 @xmath34 2 & 130 & 100 & 35 & -12.40 & 0.63 + ngc 2525 & -11.49 @xmath34 0.03 & 35 @xmath34 3 & 88 & 69 & 79 & -11.49 & 0.20 + ngc 2712 & -12.12 @xmath34 0.04 & 23 @xmath34 2 & 98 & 69 & 59 & -12.17 & 0.27 + ngc 2787 & -13.14 @xmath34 0.7  & 0.5 @xmath34 2 & 31 & 27 & 13 & -13.31 & 1.00 + ngc 2950 & -12.59 @xmath34 0.5  & 3 @xmath34 2 & 49 & 44 & 31 & -12.69 & 0.76 + ngc 3329 & -12.33 @xmath34 0.06 & 13 @xmath34 2 & 63 & 53 & 34 & -12.42 & 0.43 + ngc 3359 & -11.40 @xmath34 0.02 & 12 @xmath34 2 & 235 & 176 & 141 & -11.46 & 0.24 + ngc 3414 & -12.89 @xmath34 0.4  &  1 @xmath34 2 & 33 & 28 & 19 & -13.00 & 0.99 + ngc 3673 & -12.09 @xmath34 0.09 & 11 @xmath34 2 & 139 & 124 & 73 & -12.29 & 0.13 + ngc 3705 & -11.69 @xmath34 0.04 & 24 @xmath34 2 & 196 & 141 & 96 & -11.77 & 0.23 + ngc 3887 & -11.36 @xmath34 0.03 & 39 @xmath34 3 & 125 & 100 & 108 & -11.38 & 0.17 + ngc 3941 & -12.50 @xmath34 0.3  &  2@xmath34 2 & 94 & 87 & 17 & -13.07 & 0.31 + ngc 4597 & -11.82 @xmath34 0.02 & 48 @xmath34 3 & 149 & 123 & 106 & -11.87 & 0.07 + ngc 4800 & -11.89 @xmath34 0.04 & 20 @xmath34 2 & 58 & 40 & 45 & -11.90 & 0.54 + ngc 4984 & -11.99 @xmath34 0.11 &  8 @xmath34 2 & 50 & 35 & 41 & -12.00 & 0.94 + ngc 5273 & -12.82 @xmath34 0.4  &  3 @xmath34 2 & 10 & 3 & 6 & -12.82 & 0.45 + ngc 5334 & -11.82 @xmath34 0.04 & 27 @xmath34 2 & 131 & 115 & 102 & -11.89 & 0.16 + ngc 5669 & -11.82 @xmath34 0.02 & 42 @xmath34 2 & 138 & 115 & 113 & -11.84 & 0.23 + ngc 7098 & -12.14 @xmath34 0.14 &  7@xmath34 2 & 137 & 126 & 66 & -12.41 & 0.25 + ngc 7141 & -12.28
@xmath34 0.08 & 13 @xmath34 2 & 126 & 114 & 64 & -12.43 & 0.35 + ic 5240 & -12.33 @xmath34 0.14 &  7 @xmath34 2 & 88 & 79 & 60 & -12.47 & 0.10 + ic 5273 & -11.77 @xmath34 0.06 &  7 @xmath34 2 & 89 & 60 & 70 & -11.77 & 0.38 + [ hapar ]