string duality is a recently discovered symmetry of string theory .
string theory itself is over twenty - five years old , and has been under intensive development since 1984 as the leading candidate for a unified theory of particle physics and gravity .
the reason that some of its symmetry has been overlooked until now is simple , and important : string duality is not manifest in the weak - coupling perturbation expansion by which the theory is usually studied , but it is a property of the exact theory . as a result , string duality gives information about the behavior of string theory at strong coupling . in a period of a little over a year ,
we have gone from near - complete ignorance of the behavior of strongly - coupled strings to a rather detailed understanding of the intricate dynamics which occurs , at least in vacua having enough supersymmetry , and the subject continues to develop at a rapid pace .
the central idea of string duality is that the strongly coupled limit of any string theory is equivalent to the weakly coupled limit of some other theory .
all string theories are connected in this way , as well as something new and surprising : an eleven - dimensional theory known provisionally as ` m - theory . ' besides the ordinary vibrating strings which are the basic quanta of string theory , the multiplets of string duality include smooth classical objects ( solitons ) , singular classical objects ( black holes ) , and a new type of topological defect which is unique to string theory ( d - branes ) . with the improved understanding of string dynamics
it has become possible to address one of the long - standing problems of quantum gravity  to count the number of states of certain black holes in a controlled way , giving for the first time a statistical mechanical interpretation to the bekenstein - hawking entropy .    beyond these specific results ,
string duality has greatly changed the way string theorists think about the fundamental principles of the theory .
many ideas which once seemed to be central are now seen as technicalities , while other ideas which were neglected are now central . in this colloquium
i would like to try to explain these developments and to put them in the context of the search for the unified theory of particle physics and gravity .
i will use units in which @xmath0 .
the gravitational coupling @xmath1 is then a length - squared , @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the planck length , @xmath4 cm .
this is the natural length scale for the effects of quantum gravity to become important and so for the unification of gravity with the other interactions .
it is far shorter than the length scales which can be probed directly ; the corresponding energy scale is @xmath5 far beyond the reach of accelerators .
thus , to construct a unified theory one must rely heavily on theoretical reasoning such as the internal consistency of the theory , and any experimental tests will be indirect .    fortunately , consistency is a very restrictive guide .
general relativity is a nonrenormalizable field theory , meaning that its quantum mechanical perturbation theory has uncontrollable divergences . to see the significance of this ,
let us recall the four - fermi theory of the weak interaction .
the weak interaction was originally described as an interaction of four fermionic fields at a spacetime point as depicted in figure  1a .
the weak coupling constant @xmath6 also has units of length - squared , or inverse energy - squared . in a process with a characteristic energy @xmath7 the effective dimensionless coupling is then @xmath8 .
it follows that at sufficiently high energy the coupling becomes arbitrarily strong , and this also implies divergences in the perturbation theory .
a second order weak amplitude is dimensionally of the form @xmath9 where @xmath10 is the energy of the virtual state in the second order process , and this diverges at large energy . in position space
the divergence comes when the two weak interactions occur at the same spacetime point ( high energy = short distance ) .
the divergences become worse at each higher order of perturbation theory and so can not be controlled even with renormalization .
the natural interpretation of such divergences is that the theory one is working with is only valid up to some energy scale , beyond which new physics appears .
the new physics should have the effect of smearing out the interaction in spacetime and so soften the high energy behavior .
one might imagine that this could be done in many ways , but in fact the combined constraints of lorentz invariance and causality are very restrictive .
this is because lorentz invariance requires that if the interaction is spread out in space it is also spread out in time .
in fact , for the weak interaction there is only one known way to solve the short - distance problem .
this is depicted in figure  1b , where the four - fermi interaction is resolved into the exchange of a vector boson .
moreover , this vector boson must be of a very specific kind , coming from a spontaneously broken gauge invariance .
this is the only known solution , and in fact it is the one that nature chooses .    for gravity
the discussion is much the same .
the gravitational interaction is depicted in figure  2a .    as we have noted already ,
the gravitational coupling @xmath1 has units of length - squared and so the dimensionless coupling is @xmath11 .
this grows large at high energy and signifies a nonrenormalizable perturbation theory .
again the natural suspicion is that short - distance physics smears out the interaction , and again there is only one known way to do this , shown in figure  2b .
it involves a bigger step than in the case of the weak interaction : it requires that at the planck length the graviton and other particles turn out to be not points but one - dimensional objects , loops of ` string . '
it is certainly not obvious that this should be the right thing to do , but if one tries to make a consistent lorentz - invariant quantum theory of one - dimensional objects , one finds that it is possible but that the theory is highly constrained .
in particular , one of the states of the string is massless and has spin two .
consistency requires that such a particle be a graviton , that its long - wavelength interactions be described by general relativity , and indeed this is what is found from the sum - over - histories depicted in figure 2b  ( yoneya , 1974 ; scherk and schwarz , 1974 , 1975 ) . in a sense string theory predicts gravity , in that every consistent string theory includes general relativity , even though the theory initially seems to be formulated in flat space .
further , calculation of the quantum corrections to amplitudes shows that they are finite .
it is also not obvious why _ only _ this idea should work .
many others have been tried without success .
one natural question is , why one - dimensional objects and not two - dimensional or higher ? for this at least there is a simple answer .
extended objects have an infinite number of internal degrees of freedom ( the fourier modes describing their shape ) . spreading out point particles into extended objects
softens the spacetime divergences but introduces potential new divergences from the internal degrees of freedom .
the latter grow worse as the dimension of the object increases , and the one - dimensional case is the only one for which both the spacetime and internal behavior is under control
.    it could be that we suffer from a failure of imagination , and that there are other solutions .
however , we see from the example of the weak interaction that if we can find even one solution to a short - distance problem we should take it very seriously and see where it leads .
the result here is quite striking . besides the graviton , other states of the string with different internal oscillators excited behave as gauge bosons ( neveu and scherk , 1972 ) , and yet others are fermions ( ramond , 1971 ) .
in fact , string theory automatically incorporates ( and in some ways generalizes ) three earlier ideas for explaining the patterns in the standard model , namely grand unification , supersymmetry ( gliozzi , scherk and olive , 1977 ) , and kaluza - klein theory .
some of the simplest string theories , the calabi - yau models , closely resemble unified versions of the supersymmetric standard model .    as a particle physicist i usually emphasize these particle physics motivations for string theory , but
many of those educated in general relativity and in mathematics find string theory compelling for reasons that are not entirely the same . from newton s gravity to einstein s , from quantum mechanics to non - abelian gauge theory , new physical theories have often required new mathematics , or least mathematics that had not previously been used in physics . if one searches for higher symmetries or other more mathematical structures that might be useful in physics , one finds many connections to string theory .
one reason i emphasize this now is that in the recent work on string duality , all of these different points of view have had a role to play .
it is worthwhile to note that these three kinds of motivation  solving the divergence problem , the connection with geometry , and explaining the broad patterns in the standard model , were also present in the weak interaction .
weinberg ( 1980 ) emphasized the divergence problem as i have done .
salam ( 1980 ) was more guided by the idea that non - abelian gauge theory was a beautiful structure that should be incorporated in physics .
experiment gave no direct indication that the weak interaction was anything but the pointlike interaction of figure  1a , and no direct clue as to the new physics that smears it out , just as today it gives no direct indication of what lies beyond the standard model .
but it did show certain broad patterns  universality and the @xmath12 structure , which were telltale signs of a gauge interaction .
it appears that nature is kind to us , in providing many trails to a correct theory .
the key question is , how do we go from explaining broad patterns to making precise predictions ? to understand the situation , it is useful to look again to history , to the state of quantum field theory in the early 60 s . at that time
there was a good technical control of the weak - coupling perturbation theory , the feynman graph expansion , but little else .
important dynamical ideas were missing , such as the higgs mechanism , dynamical symmetry breaking , and confinement .
these have largely to do with the fact that the vacuum , the ground state of quantum field theory , is generally a more interesting and less symmetric object than one might naively expect from the hamiltonian . without understanding these ideas
one can not make sense of the standard model : it would seem to predict fractionally charged particles and a long - ranged force coupled to isospin .    beyond these dynamical ideas
, it remained to discover the defining principle of the theory  that one should organize the physics not _
graph by graph _ but rather _ length scale by length scale _ with the shortest distances first .
this realization not only made it possible to define the theory beyond perturbation theory , but also provided a framework for understanding the dynamics , both analytically and numerically .
the situation is similar in string theory .
there has been a good technical control of the perturbation theory , but little else , at least up until the recent developments . the need
to understand the dynamics is even more acute than in the case of the standard model for two reasons .
the first is that because the planck energy is so large , there is no hope to explore a ` partonic ' regime where the stringy behavior is directly visible  rather , we see only the extreme low energy limit of string theory , filtered through all the dynamics at intervening scales .
the second reason has to do with one of the very attractive features of string theory , that it has no free dimensionless parameters at all .
instead it has , in perturbation theory , many degenerate ground states parameterized by the values of various scalar fields ( moduli ) .
the parameters of the standard model come ultimately from the values of these scalars , so it is necessary to understand the dynamics which selects one of the many ground states .
string theory contains quantum field theory as its low energy limit , so all of the familiar dynamics of the latter is still present , but because string theory has many more degrees of freedom it is likely to have interesting new dynamics of its own .    beyond this , the central defining principle of string theory is not known .
we are trying to answer the question ` what is string theory ? ' , just as wilson and others addressed the question ` what is field theory ? ' . the various properties that make string theory an attractive unifying idea also imply that the theory exists as something more than an asymptotic weak - coupling expansion .
so there is good reason to expect that we will find a central principle as powerful as that in field theory , which will again enable us to better understand the dynamics .    with this background
i can summarize what has been learned from string duality .
we have learned a number of new dynamical ideas though certainly not yet all we need .
we have not yet found the central principle but we have many new clues , some of which are surprising and have taken us in unexpected directions .
string duality involves an interplay of many different ideas from quantum field theory and string theory . in this part
i would like to explain some of the central principles .      here
are two ways to think about the meaning of the coupling constant @xmath13 of a quantum field theory .
the first is in terms of the weak - coupling perturbation expansion .
the amplitude @xmath14 for any process can be expanded @xmath15 where @xmath13 is the amplitude for a single interaction to occur . , or only odd , contribute to a given amplitude .
] the coefficient @xmath16 is given by the sum over feynman graphs with @xmath17 interaction vertices .
interpreted with sufficient care this is an asymptotic series , meaning that it gives an approximation of any desired accuracy by taking @xmath13 to be sufficiently small .
thus it is also a good qualitative guide to the small-@xmath13 physics . but
for @xmath13 of order @xmath18 or larger it is of limited usefulness and can miss important aspects of the physics .    another way to think about
the meaning of @xmath13 is in terms of the quantum fluctuation of the fields . for the purpose of this discussion
it is useful to keep explicit factors of @xmath19 ; we will return to @xmath20 units after section 3.2 .
when @xmath13 is small the fluctuations are small and their equations of motion can be approximated by linear equations  in other words , small @xmath13 is approximately free field theory . for larger @xmath13 the fluctuations of the fields , and the nonlinearities ,
become larger . and
the size of the quantum fluctuations is in terms of the path integral , the sum over field histories weighted by @xmath21 with @xmath22 the classical action .
the fields can be rescaled in such a way that @xmath13 appears in the action only as an overall factor @xmath23 , so @xmath13 and @xmath19 appear only in the combination @xmath24 .
it is then clear that small @xmath13 and small @xmath19 are equivalent with this scaling of the fields . to relate this to the familiar example of qed
, one must note that the electric charges of individual quanta are related to the charge in the classical field action by @xmath25 , so the familiar expansion parameter @xmath26 is indeed @xmath27 . ] in qcd , for example , the coupling is very strong at long distance , and correspondingly the color magnetic fields undergo large fluctuations in the vacuum  this is the source of confinement
.    weak / strong duality ( in field theory or string theory ) means that as the string coupling @xmath13 becomes large , one can find new ` dual ' fields whose fluctuations become _
small_they are characterized by a new coupling @xmath28 which is something like @xmath29 .
this is similar to a fourier transform , where a function which becomes spread out in position space can become very narrow in momentum space . here
though , the fourier transform is in a complicated nonlinear field space .
string theory includes gravity , and so one of the fields is the spacetime metric .
one might therefore have expected strongly coupled string theory to have new and very exotic physics , including large fluctuations of the spacetime geometry and all other fields .
this might correspond to some sort of confined phase of gravity .
one of the surprises of string duality is that this is not so . as @xmath30 , @xmath31 and
so the metric of the dual theory behaves more and more classically .
it is quite likely that in nature the string coupling is close to  1 rather than to  0 or  @xmath32 , so that string duality does not allow one to relate the theory directly to a weakly coupled theory in which one can calculate accurately . but
having an understanding of both limits , large and small coupling , constrains the kinds of qualitative physics that can occur at intermediate coupling .
even more important , duality gives a great deal of information about the exact theory and its symmetries , information that is not contained in the perturbation expansion , and so new clues to the answer to ` what is string theory ? ' .
another perspective on the meaning of duality starts with maxwell s equations , @xmath33 the symmetry between @xmath34 and @xmath35 in these equations is striking . if one ignores the sources , or adds magnetic sources , the equations are invariant under @xmath36 , @xmath37 .
this curious fact was made more interesting by dirac s study ( 1931 ) of the quantum mechanics of a charge moving in a magnetic monopole field .
he found that the wavefunction could be consistently defined only if the electric charge @xmath38 and magnetic charge @xmath39 satisfy a quantization condition @xmath40 note that if a monopole of some charge @xmath39 exists , then all electric charges must be multiples of the unit @xmath41 .
this would ` explain ' why the magnitudes of the electron and proton charges should be _ exactly _ equal , a fact known to hold to one part in @xmath42 .
the subject took another step forward when t hooft ( 1974 ) and polyakov ( 1974 ) showed that in any grand unified theory , magnetic monopoles actually do exist .
they are classical solutions , with a nonsingular core whose size is set by the scale of spontaneous symmetry breaking .    at weak coupling ,
the electrically and magnetically charged objects look very different .
the electrically charged objects are weakly coupled and have pointlike interactions .
the magnetically charged objects are strongly coupled  by the dirac condition  ( [ dirac ] ) , the magnetic fine structure constant @xmath43 is roughly the reciprocal of the usual one  and as noted above they have cores of finite size .
montonen and olive ( 1977 ) were led by various evidence to conjecture that at strong coupling the situation would be reversed : the electrically charged objects would be strongly coupled and have nonsingular cores , while the magnetically charged objects would become weakly coupled and pointlike .
the strongly coupled theory would be equivalent to weakly coupled theory in which the basic quanta carried magnetic rather than electric charges . in subsequent work
this conjecture was refined ( witten and olive , 1978 ; osborn , 1979 ) .
it was argued to hold specifically in supersymmetric gauge theories , in particular @xmath44 theories ( @xmath45 is the number of conserved supersymmetries ) . relating this discussion to the previous section ,
the weakly coupled dual fields described there would be the fields corresponding to the magnetic quanta .
these conjectures were greeted with wide skepticism because the evidence for them was rather circumstantial , while attempts to construct the dual fields directly in terms of the original ones did not succeed .
this skepticism is now largely gone , not because the dual fields have been found ( they have not ) , but because of a substantial strengthening of the circumstantial evidence .
this evidence , based on supersymmetry , will be described in the next section .
the reader should notice that this whole section has been concerned with duality in field theory , not string theory .
the extension to string theory will be discussed in section  3.5 .      to test the duality conjectures
we need to be able to say something about the physics of the strongly coupled theories .
the methods available for this are very limited , but in supersymmetric theories it is possible .
supersymmetry is of interest for a number of reasons .
it is likely that it is associated with the breaking of the electroweak symmetry .
if so , it should be discovered by the lhc if not before , and it is the one piece of new physics associated with string theory that might be accessible at accelerators . beyond this , it is an appealing mathematical structure that extends general coordinate invariance and unifies fermions and bosons .
any consistent string theory must have supersymmetry , at least at the planck scale .
finally , supersymmetric field theories , and string theories with unbroken supersymmetry below the planck scale , have various nice properties that make them easier to study .
it is difficult to give an intuitive picture of supersymmetry .
one way to think about it is that in addition to the usual spacetime dimensions , whose coordinates are real numbers @xmath46 ( and so their multiplication commutes ) , there are additional ` fermionic ' coordinates @xmath47 which anticommute , @xmath48 .
these extra dimensions have no size ; the anticommuting property means that they are essentially infinitesimal .
one can make sensible field theories on this space .
in fact , they can be thought of as quantum field theories on ordinary spacetime but with fields that have both fermionic and bosonic components , with a symmetry relating the masses and charges of the particles with different statistics .    to see why supersymmetry is valuable in studying strong coupling we need the algebra of the quantum mechanical generators of the symmetry . for an ordinary internal symmetry , such as baryon number , the generator @xmath49 commutes with the hamiltonian @xmath50 , @xmath51 = 0.\ ] ]
this is the definition of a symmetry . for supersymmetry , with generator @xmath52
, there is an additional relation ( see , for example , haag , lopuszansky , and sohnius , 1975 ) @xmath53 = 0 \qquad \{q , q\ } = h + g. \label{susy}\ ] ] in the second , anticommutation , relation , both the hamiltonian and various internal generators appear on the right - hand side . for clarity we have omitted the indices which would distinguish the various supersymmetry and internal symmetry generators and various associated constants , so this anticommutation relation is schematic .
the anticommutation relation has the hamiltonian on the right - hand side , and as a result supersymmetry gives much more information about the dynamics than ordinary internal symmetries . to see one example of this ( witten and olive , 1978 ) , consider a one - particle state @xmath54 which has the special property that is invariant under part of the supersymmetry algebra ;
in other words , @xmath55 for some of the @xmath52 s . this is known as a _ bogomolnyi - prasad - sommerfeld ( bps ) state_. take the expectation value of the anticommutator in eq .
( [ susy ] ) , @xmath56 for those @xmath52 s which annihilate @xmath57 , the left hand side is zero .
the two terms on the right are just the mass of the particle and its @xmath49-charge .
thus , the mass of any bps particle is determined entirely by its charge .
this is a consequence of symmetry and does not depend on dynamics at all ; in particular it remains true even if the coupling is large .
further analysis puts strong constraints on the interactions and on the phase diagram .
for example , any bps state with zero charge has zero energy .
the anticommutation relations imply that no other state can have lower energy , so any such state will be the ground state .
a typical supersymmetric theory has many such states , which are characterized by the expectation values of some scalar fields .
all these states must be degenerate .
this is similar to spontaneous symmetry breaking , but with spontaneous symmetry breaking the degenerate vacua all have the same physics while here they are physically inequivalent  they are not related to one another directly by any symmetry , rather the degeneracy follows indirectly from the bps argument .
the scalar fields which label these vacua , known as moduli , must be massless for the same reason that goldstone bosons are massless .
the low energy physics , the phase structure , is determined by the physics of the moduli , which is strongly constrained by supersymmetry .    applying these methods to test the @xmath44 duality conjecture ,
one first finds that the bps mass formula is duality symmetric .
that is , electrically charged bps states at coupling @xmath13 have the same masses as magnetically charged states at coupling @xmath29 .
secondly , one can compare the degeneracies of bps states with different charges and spins .
the degeneracy of magnetic monopoles can be determined by semiclassical methods when @xmath13 is small . in @xmath44 theories there
can not be a phase transition as the coupling is varied and the supersymmetry algebra prevents the number of bps states from changing , so this also determines the degeneracy at strong coupling .
for @xmath44 theories it is the same as that of the electrically charged states in the dual theory . as another test
, the effective low energy physics of the moduli is duality invariant .
this evidence was widely regarded as unconvincing , an accidental consequence of supersymmetry , until seiberg ( 1994 ) and others began to apply these methods systematically to determine the phase structures of theories with less supersymmetry , @xmath58 and @xmath59 .
the arguments in these cases are more intricate , the physics is richer , and there are more consistency checks .
many more examples of duality were found ( reviewed in seiberg , 1995 , and intriligator and seiberg , 1995 ) , as well as convincing evidence for various associated phenomena such as composite gauge bosons .
, the duality holds at all energies . in many others
it is holds only in the low energy theory . ]
duality in supersymmetric gauge theory is now well - established .
it is important to note , though , that the dual fields still have not been constructed .
it is believed that to make duality manifest one may need a new formulation of these quantum field theories , something more intrinsically quantum - mechanical than the path integral over classical histories .
it is also suspected that an understanding of the dualities in field theory will ultimately come from string theory .
we will need one more idea in order to fully understand string duality .
this is that spacetime may have more than four dimensions .
the three spatial dimensions we see are expanding , and once were highly curved .
it is a logical possibility that there are other dimensions which did not expand but remain small and highly curved .
moreover , this is an attractive idea for a number of reasons .    a good model for physics in such
a spacetime is a waveguide , a cavity which has some finite cross section in the @xmath60-@xmath61 plane and is very long in the @xmath62 dimension .
seen from far away , or with low resolution , this looks one - dimensional .
an infinite number of different fields ( functions of @xmath62 and @xmath63 ) with different dispersion relations ( masses ) move along the waveguide . seen up close ,
the three - dimensional structure is evident and one sees that there is only one field , the electromagnetic field , and that the different dispersion relations come from modes with different @xmath60 , @xmath61 dependence .
physics is much the same in a spacetime with three large spatial dimensions and additional ones which are small and compact . in nature
, the additional dimensions would be quite small , close to the planck scale , so we would have seen only the very lowest modes .
one reason this is attractive is that it unifies gravitational and gauge interactions .
depending on whether its polarization is aligned along the long or compact directions , a higher - dimensional graviton can look like a graviton , photon , or scalar from the lower - dimensional point of view .
this is the kaluza - klein mechanism .
in addition , the dirac equation on such a space typically gives rise to multiple copies of the same set of quantum numbers ( that is , generations ) in the lower - dimensional spectrum .
consistent weakly - coupled string theories necessarily live in ten spacetime dimensions .
the origin of this condition is difficult to explain in simple terms , but it can be understood in various ways .
calculation of quantum effects shows that they spoil essential symmetries unless the dimension is ten . also , the properties of fermions depend in an essential way on the number of dimensions and ten is special here for a number of reasons related to supersymmetry . for example , ten is the highest dimension in which the number of states of a massless vector ( eight : the spacetime dimension minus the timelike and longitudinal polarizations ) can be equal to the number of states of a massless fermion  in higher dimensions the spinor representations are too large .
the field equations of ten - dimensional string theory are consistent with four - dimensional physics that looks very much like what we have .
some of the simplest solutions give rise to the same gauge groups and matter representations found in grand unification ( candelas , horowitz , strominger , and witten , 1985 ) .
it is notable that the four - dimensional gauge couplings can be chiral , meaning that the right- and left - handed fermions have different gauge interactions .
this was impossible for a number of previously considered unifying ideas including standard kaluza - klein theory ( witten , 1981 ) .    for future reference
it is useful to look at a simple example .
this is a massless scalar field in five spacetime dimensions , with one dimension periodic with period @xmath64 .
let @xmath46 with @xmath65 be the coordinates for the large dimensions , and @xmath66 be the periodic coordinate ; the index @xmath67 runs over all five values .
the wave equation is @xmath68 as in the waveguide , separate variables and expand the @xmath66 dependence in a complete set of modes , @xmath69 then the @xmath17th mode satisfies @xmath70 which is the klein - gordon equation for a scalar field of mass @xmath71 . at low energies
only the @xmath72 mode is detectable , but at energies above @xmath73 one sees a characteristic infinite tower of states . for this simple geometry
the states are spaced evenly in mass .
more complicated compact spaces would of course give a more complicated spectrum , but the average density of states depends only on the number of additional dimensions . from another point of view , consider how the spectrum behaves as @xmath74 : the infinite tower comes down in mass and forms the continuum characteristic of a noncompact dimension .
string theory includes gauge theory .
weak / strong duality in gauge theory is thus necessary if the same is to be true in string theory , but it is not sufficient . after the work of seiberg , it was still possible that duality was a property only of the low energy limit of string theory , not of the full massive spectrum .
there were a number of early duality conjectures in string theory .
a partial list includes the self - duality of @xmath58 heterotic string theories in four dimensions ( font , ibanez , lust , and quevedo , 1990 ) , self - duality of @xmath44 heterotic strings in four dimensions ( font , ibanez , lust , and quevedo , 1990 ; sen , 1994 ) , self - duality of the heterotic string in six dimensions ( duff,1995 ) , duality of certain string theories with theories of five - dimensional objects ( five - branes ) in ten dimensions ( duff , 1988 ; strominger , 1990 ) , and a relation  not specifically duality  of other string theories in ten dimensions to theories of membranes ( two - branes ) in eleven dimensions ( duff , howe , inami , and stelle , 1987 ) .
these conjectures did not attract broad attention , due to their rather scattered nature and the limited evidence for any of them .
the subject took a major step forward with the papers of hull and townsend ( 1995 ) , townsend ( 1995 ) , and witten ( 1995a ) .
these authors proposed a nearly complete set of duals for all known string theories with at least @xmath44 supersymmetry .
these new proposals elevated duality from a set of isolated conjectures to a general principle applying to any string theory in any dimension .
the structure is quite rigid  for each string theory the spectrum and symmetries determine a unique candidate for its dual , and the entire pattern fits together in an intricate way as dimensions are compactified and decompactified .
some of the earlier conjectures , such as the @xmath44 conjecture , were incorporated whole , while others were incorporated in a modified or limited form ; we will return to the membrane idea in section 4.2 .
these systematic conjectures made possible many new tests , and evidence for weak / strong duality in string theory accumulated rapidly .
this led also to the discovery of various new dynamical ideas , some of which will be described in part  4 .
there is now an integrated picture of the strongly coupled dynamics , at least for string theories with enough supersymmetry , and the methods are being extended to theories with less supersymmetry .
figure  3 is a schematic picture of the space of string vacua .
the parameters are the string coupling and the sizes and shapes of the compact dimensions ; in string theory these are not fixed but are determined by the expectation values of the moduli . over most of the space , the string coupling @xmath13 is of order 1 . in various limits
, there is an effective description in terms of one or another weakly coupled string theory .
the different string theories are characterized by the number and kind of supersymmetries and by the world - sheet topologies allowed ( oriented vs. unoriented and closed vs. open ) . in some limits new theories are encountered ; the most interesting of these , m - theory , will be described in section  4.1 .
figure  3 is actually an oversimplification , in that the different limits are characterized not only by different string theories but by different topologies for the compact dimensions .
it has been known for some time that even in weakly coupled string theory spacetime topology is not invariant ( aspinwall , greene , and morrison , 1993 ) , and string duality has provided many more examples ( greene , morrison , and strominger , 1995 ) .
also , a more accurate picture would have many pieces resembling figure  3 , touching one another at points or along curves .    in field theory
the duality multiplets included the elementary quanta plus smooth classical configurations ( magnetic monopoles ) .
the string duality multiplets include these ( though the elementary quanta are now loops rather than points ) , plus singular classical configurations ( black holes ) and also a new type of object unique to string theory , the d - brane .
d - branes are topological defects on which the ends of a string can be trapped , as shown in figure  4 .
they can be pointlike , one - dimensional , two - dimensional , and so on .
these were discovered in the study of perturbative dualities of string theories , dualities that relate different weakly coupled theories ( dai , leigh , and polchinski , 1989 ; polchinski , chaudhuri , and johnson , 1996 ) .
their relevance to weak / strong duality was noticed more recently ( polchinski , 1995 ) .
let me illustrate one of the methods by which the strongly coupled limits are determined .
in addition to the fundamental strings , various string theories have in their spectra one - dimensional objects which are either smooth solitons or d - branes . at weak coupling
these are much heavier than the fundamental strings , but at strong coupling they are much lighter ( again this is guaranteed by the bps formula ) . in this limit
it is natural to reinterpret the theory with the soliton or d - brane being the fundamental string . which string theory one gets depends on the degrees of freedom of the object , which can be determined by a weak - coupling calculation .
this has been applied to determine , or confirm , the strongly coupled limits of various string theories ( sen , 1995a ; harvey and strominger , 1995 ; dabholkar , 1995 ; hull , 1995 ; schwarz , 1995 ; witten , 1996a ; polchinski and witten , 1996 ) .
i have described the principal methods and general results of string duality . in this final part
i would like to focus on some specific highlights , some of the discoveries that have most greatly changed our understanding .      as described in section  3.4 ,
weakly coupled string theory requires specifically ten dimensions .
one of the striking consequences of string duality is the existence of an eleventh dimension , not visible in weakly coupled string theory .
how does one discover a new dimension ?
the experimental signature was discussed in section  3.4 , a tower of new states above the energy @xmath73 .
the theoretical signature is the same . a certain string theory , the iia theory in ten dimensions , has zero - dimensional d - branes , d - particles .
these are heavy , with a mass @xmath75 at weak coupling ( @xmath76 is the string mass scale ) . for a pair of d - particles ,
the supersymmetric bound state problem can be solved and there is a single bound state with mass @xmath77 ( witten , 1996a ; sen , 1995b ) .
similarly , @xmath17 d - particles have a single bound state of mass @xmath78 .
this bound state spectrum was actually inferred from lower - dimensional duality symmetries before the explicit construction of the bound states . at strong coupling
all of these become light , and in the @xmath79 limit form a continuum .
we have seen just such a spectrum before , in section  3.4 .
it is the signature of a new , eleventh , dimension with @xmath80 ( townsend , 1995 , witten , 1995a ) .
this makes it clear why this dimension is invisible in string perturbation theory : the latter is an expansion in @xmath81 , so an expansion around the zero - radius limit .
eleven dimensions is an interesting number .
this is the maximum in which supersymmetry is possible  beyond eleven the massless multiplets would contain spins higher than two , something which seems to be impossible in a consistent theory .
eleven - dimensional supergravity is therefore the most symmetric theory based on supersymmetry ( cremmer , julia , and scherk , 1978 ) , and was considered as a possible unifying idea before string theory .
the principal problems were that it is nonrenormalizable and that it is not possible to obtain a chiral spectrum .
string theorists generally regarded eleven - dimensional supergravity as an irrelevant curiosity because of its difficulties and because strings seemed to live in ten , though some supergravity experts retained an interest in the theory because of its high degree of symmetry .
now it develops that strings have an eleven - dimensional limit whose low energy physics is determined by symmetry considerations to be eleven - dimensional supergravity and whose short distance physics is not understood .
this has been given the provisional name ` m - theory . '
the following exercise gives an interesting insight into m - theory .
consider a long iia string in ten dimensions , shown in figure  5a .
follow this state as the coupling is increased .
we now know that a new orthogonal dimension will appear , but there are two possibilities for the form of the resulting state : in eleven dimensions it could look like a string as in figure  5b , or it could turn out to be a membrane wrapped around the eleventh dimension as shown in figure  5c . the answer can be determined in various ways  from the conserved charges carries by the various objects , from the scaling of the string tension with coupling , from symmetry  and it is figure  5c , the wrapped membrane .    this is a puzzle .
it seems to say that string theory is really the quantum mechanics of membranes , but in section  2.1 we have said that theories of fundamental membranes do not seem to exist .
it is possible that the problems of quantizing membranes will be overcome and string theory will become membrane theory  this was one of the origins of the name m - theory .
it is likely , though , that the resolution lies in a different direction , that strings and membranes will turn out to be composites of something else .
this has long been suspected in the case of string theory .
some of the reasons for this are reviewed in polchinski ( 1994 ) .
they include the general lack of success of string field theory and the fact that string perturbation theory diverges more rapidly than in field theory ( shenker , 1991 ) .
string duality seems to give further support for this . in figure  3 ,
asymptotic _ behaviors in various limits are generated by different string theories , but there is no sign that the string descriptions do more than this .
sums over string or membrane world - sheets are directly analogous to the feynman graph expansion and so are intrinsically perturbative . as for duality in field theory , we need a more quantum - mechanical description , one in which @xmath19 is not a free parameter ( witten , 1996c ) .    incidentally , the membrane can also be oriented perpendicular to the eleventh dimension , so that in ten dimensions it still looks like a membrane . in string theory
it appears as a d - brane . from the eleven - dimensional point of view
one sees a symmetry in which a @xmath82 rotation takes the eleventh dimension into one of the others . from the string theory point of view
this is a nonperturbative symmetry , mixing radii and couplings and relating strings to d - branes .      in this section
i would like to explain how all this business of extra dimensions might enter into an important piece of physics , the unification of the couplings .
figure  6a shows the three gauge couplings and the dimensionless gravitational coupling @xmath83 as a function of energy .
the logarithmic running of the gauge couplings is familiar ( amaldi , de boer , and furstenau , 1991 ) , as is the fact that they meet within experimental errors in the minimal supersymmetric model .
it is also striking that the gravitational coupling nearly meets the other three , missing by a little over one order of magnitude out of fourteen.s and other factors reduces this to a factor of 20 ( kaplunovsky , 1988 ) .
] this is a near miss , less than ten percent in scale , but it is larger than the experimental error and so must be understood .
there are many ways that the four couplings might turn out to unify .
additional particles at an intermediate scale would change the running of the gauge couplings and can cause them to meet at a higher energy .
enough extra states near the unification scale can have the same effect . or
, the three gauge couplings may actually unify at the lower energy and a grand unified field theory with a single gauge coupling describe the physics from there until the string scale .
all of these ideas modify the behavior of the gauge couplings .
since the gauge couplings already meet , it would seem more economical to find instead a mechanism to change the running of the gravitational coupling .
but this seems impossible because the running of the gauge coupling is just dimensional , as @xmath84 ; gravity is still classical at these scales .
it is interesting to consider the effect of a new dimension below the unification scale .
this changes the dimensional analysis .
both the gauge and gravitational couplings grow more rapidly as shown in figure  6b , but they do not meet any sooner .    in the @xmath85 heterotic string , the strong coupling limit leads to a new dimension which is slightly different from that considered before . instead of being periodic , a circle , it is a segment ( horava and witten , 1996 ) .
the gauge fields and matter live at the endpoints only , while gravity propagates in the bulk .
suppose that a fifth dimension of this type exists below the unification scale .
that is , spacetime is a narrow five - dimensional layer bounded by four - dimensional walls .
since the gauge fields and matter live in the walls , the evolution of the gauge couplings is the same as in four dimensions , but since gravity propagates in the full five dimensions the gravitational coupling behaves as in figure  6b .
the result is shown in figure  6c : for a fifth dimension of appropriate size , the kink in the gravitational coupling makes it meet the others at the unification scale ( witten , 1996b ) .
this is no more predictive than the idea of a unified theory : it adds one new parameter , the size of the fifth dimension .
nevertheless it is an economical solution to the problem of the unification of all couplings , as likely to be true as any other . with only the data of the four couplings ,
there is not enough to distinguish among the possibilities . if supersymmetry is found and the masses of the superpartners measured with precision , many new renormalization group analyses become possible and it may be possible to determine the physics at the unification scale .      local symmetries  gauge invariance and coordinate invariance
are a key ingredient in physics , appearing in the strong , weak , electromagnetic , and gravitational interactions .
yet as has often been noted , these are not really symmetries in the usual sense .
rather , they are _ redundancies _ : different vector potentials or coordinate systems describe the same physical state .
why redundancy should be so important is puzzling , but it seems to be , and most attempts to unify are based on embedding the local symmetries at low energy into larger groups such as @xmath86 . in
weakly coupled four dimensional theories , the size of the gauge group can only get larger at higher energies .
there have been various arguments made that at strong coupling the reverse could be true , but convincing examples have only come with the understanding of strongly coupled dynamics in supersymmetric gauge and string theories .
there are now many examples of composite gauge fields in the low energy theory , gauge fields not among the original short - distance fields ( intriligator and seiberg , 1995 ) .
the interpretation of gauge symmetry is reversed : gauge symmetry is ubiquitous not because it is present in the underlying ultraviolet theory , but because it is infrared stable .
that is , it is one of the few kinds of interesting long - distance dynamics which is _ natural _ , which does nt disappear when small changes are made in the short - distance parameters .      in the early 1970 s
it was found that classical black holes obey laws directly analogous to the laws of thermodynamics .
this analogy was made sharper by hawking s discovery ( 1975 ) that black holes radiate as black bodies at the corresponding temperature . under this analogy ,
the entropy of a black hole ( the bekenstein - hawking entropy ) is the area of its horizon divided by @xmath87 .
it has long been a goal to find a statistical mechanical theory associated with this thermodynamics , and in particular to associate the entropy with the density of states of the black hole .
many arguments ( too many to review here ) have been put forward in this direction . while it may develop that some of the principles behind these are correct , until recently there was no example where the states of a black hole could be counted in a controlled way .
the idea is to count supersymmetric ( bps ) black hole states .
such black holes always carry gauge charges and have the maximum allowed charge to mass ratio
they are extremal . as discussed in section  2.2 , the number of bps states can not change as we vary the string coupling constant . as the coupling is reduced and so the gravitational interaction weakened
, certain black holes will at sufficiently weak coupling no longer look like black holes .
rather , they look like a collection of d - particles as depicted in figure  7 ; this has the same charge - to - mass ratio as the black hole .
the d - particles are a weakly coupled quantum system whose spectrum is explicitly known from d - brane methods .
the density of bps states is just that given by the bekenstein - hawking entropy ( strominger and vafa , 1996 , and much subsequent work ; for a review see horowitz , 1996 ) .
closely associated with all this is the black hole information paradox . a black hole of given mass and charge can be formed in a very large number of ways .
it will then evaporate , and the final state is black body radiation that does not depend on how the black hole formed .
thus , many initial states evolve to a single final state .
this violates the usual laws of quantum mechanics .
there are various schools of thought here ( reviewed in page , 1993 ) .
the proposal of hawking ( 1976 ) is that this is just the way things are : the laws of quantum mechanics need to be changed .
there is also strong opposition to this view .
the problem is not that theorists believe that the laws of quantum mechanics are in their final form  they may be , though most of us would like to see a less mysterious structure . rather , it is that the specific modification required here , the replacement of wavefunctions with density matrices , seems ugly and very possibly inconsistent .
the principal alternative , that the initial state is encoded in subtle correlations in the hawking radiation , sounds plausible but in fact is even more radical .
the problem is that hawking radiation emerges from the region of the horizon , where the geometry is smooth and so ordinary low energy field theory should be valid .
one can follow the hawking radiation and see correlations develop between the fields inside and outside the black hole ; the superposition principle then forbids the necessary correlations to exist strictly among the fields outside . to evade this requires that the locality principle in quantum field theory break down in some long - ranged but subtle way .
there is a proposal for how this might occur in string theory ( susskind , 1993 , 1995 ; lowe , polchinski , susskind , thorlacius , and uglum , 1995 ) , but it is controversial .
the recent progress in string duality suggests that black holes do obey the ordinary rules of quantum mechanics .
the multiplets include black holes along with various nonsingular states , and in figure  7 we have continuously deformed a black hole into a system which obeys ordinary quantum mechanics , at least to high accuracy .
this is certainly not decisive , however .
the problem is that dynamical properties are not like the counting of bps states ; they are not invariant under changes in parameters
. it could be that as the coupling constant is increased , a critical coupling is reached where the d - particles collapse into a black hole . at this coupling
there could be a discontinuous change ( or a smooth crossover ) from ordinary quantum behavior to information loss .
it is an open question whether d - branes will give insight into the dynamical behavior of black holes ; there are hints that it may be so .
so when will string theory make sharp predictions ? probably not until the vacuum is understood , as we discussed in section  2.3 .
an important problem remains in our understanding of the vacuum , when we try to calculate the vacuum energy density , the cosmological constant .
the vacuum is a complicated place , and there are many different contributions to the energy density  the zero point energies of the quantum fields , the potential energy of the higgs field , the energy of the strongly fluctuating qcd fields .
the total of the separate densities is at least @xmath88 gev@xmath89 , and there is no reason known that they should cancel to any degree of accuracy . yet the experimental bound on the cosmological constant is 55 orders of magnitude smaller than this ( see weinberg , 1989 , for a review ) .
this is just as much problem in quantum field theory as in string theory but field theory can still make precise predictions because it is less ambitious .
one can ignore gravity , or add a free parameter and adjust it to cancel the other contributions to the cosmological constant .
in string theory , neither of these is possible .
does string duality help here ? possibly .
it is an interesting fact that in supersymmetric theories the energy density can cancel naturally .
for example the zero point energies of bosons and their fermionic partners are equal and opposite .
one can see this in the discussion of bps states : a supersymmetric vacuum has zero energy ( though the inclusion of supergravity makes things a bit more subtle ) . in nature ,
though , supersymmetry must be spontaneously broken  there is no charged boson degenerate with the electron  and spontaneous breaking spoils the cancellation of the cosmological constant .
we need some new phase of supersymmetric theories , in which the boson / fermion degeneracy is removed while the vacuum energy remains zero .
witten ( 1995b ) has suggested how such a phase might appear in strongly coupled string theory .    from another point of view
, the cosmological constant and black hole information problems both seem to require subtle nonlocalities in spacetime . for the information problem we have discussed this ; for the cosmological constant ,
the point is that the low energy value of this constant must somehow feed back into the short - distance physics that determines it .
for example , it was argued that spacetime wormholes could accomplish this ( coleman , 1988 ) .
this proposal was the subject of intense and skeptical scrutiny , but the subject ground to a halt because a nonperturbative formulation of quantum gravity was lacking .
it may then be that it will return , possibly in some transmuted form , when we know what string theory is .    in closing , let me say that there is a sense among those working in string theory that we are dealing with a unique and remarkable structure , one which has many points of contact with the physics we know and with earlier attempts to unify it
quantum mechanics , gravity , gauge symmetry , chirality , grand unification , supersymmetry , and kaluza - klein theory .
there is also a sense that we are discovering this structure , not inventing it .
the distinction is illustrated , for example , by the question of the nature of spacetime .
there have been many previous attempts to modify spacetime in a way that would look the same at long distance but would solve the problems of quantum gravity .
this approach has often been sterile
it is not a problem that seems to yield to direct effort .
string theory , on the other hand , starts with a flat spacetime .
one discovers first that the spacetime is dynamical , that the theory contains gravity .
later one finds , as mentioned in section  3.5 , that spacetime topology is not a physical invariant but can change in specific and controlled ways .
there is still more to be learned . in perturbation
theory it seems that the shortest sensible distance is the string length scale , the typical radius of zero point vibrations of the string ( gross and mende , 1987 ; amati , ciafaloni , and veneziano , 1989 ; reviewed in witten , 1996c ) .
this works out to be the planck length divided by a power of the string coupling .
there is evidence for a somewhat shorter scale in the exact theory ( shenker , 1995 ) , and that d - branes may probe it ( bachas , 1995 ; danielsson , ferretti and sundborg , 1995 ; kabat and pouliot , 1995 ) . moreover , there is a sense in which the spacetime coordinates for d - branes are elevated from numbers to matrices ( witten , 1996a ) ; only at low energy the matrices are diagonal and an ordinary spacetime picture holds
. it may turn that this is a curiosity , or it may signal a new uncertainty principle relating to a minimum distance . exploring
the connection between d - branes and black holes is a likely way to learn which . in effect
, string theory is smarter than we are .
it knows what spacetime is , and we do nt , and we have to figure out how to ask it .
we are very fortunate that this remarkable structure exists and that it seems to be within our power to understand it .
i would like to thank gary horowitz , clifford johnson , and andy strominger for their suggestions on the manuscript .
this work is supported by nsf grants phy91 - 16964 and phy94 - 07194 .
u. amaldi , w. de boer , and h. furstenau , 1991 , `` comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at lep , '' phys . lett .
* b260 , * 447 .
+ d. amati , m. ciafaloni , and g. veneziano , 1989 , `` can spacetime be probed below the string scale ? ''
phys . lett .
* b216 , * 41 .
+ p. s. aspinwall , b. r. greene , and d. r. morrison , 1993 , `` multiple mirror manifolds and topology change in string theory , '' phys . lett .
* b303 , * 249 , e - print hep - th/9301043 .
+ c. bachas , 1996 , `` d - brane dynamics , '' phys .
* b374 , * 37 , e - print hep - th/9511043 .
+ e. bergshoeff , e. sezgin , and p.k .
townsend , 1987 , `` supermembranes and eleven dimensional supergravity , '' phys .
lett . * b189 , * 75 .
+ p. candelas , g. horowitz , a. strominger , and e. witten , 1985 , `` vacuum configurations for superstrings , '' nucl . phys .
* b258 , * 46 .
+ b. carter , 1979 , `` the general theory of the mechanical , electromagnetic , and thermodynamic properties of black holes , '' in _ general relativity .
an einstein centennial survey , _ ed .
s. w. hawking and w. israel ( cambridge , cambridge ) .
+ s. coleman , 1988 , `` why there is nothing rather than something : a theory of the cosmological constant , '' nucl . phys .
* b310 , * 643 .
+ e. d. commins and p. h. bucksbaum , 1983 , _ weak interactions of leptons and quarks _ ( cambridge , new york ) .
+ e. cremmer , b. julia , and j. scherk , 1978 , `` supergravity theory in eleven dimensions , '' phys . lett .
* 76b , * 409 .
+ a. dabholkar , 1995 , `` ten - dimensional heterotic string as a soliton , '' phys .
* b357 , * 307 , e - print hep - th/9506160 .
+ j. dai , r. g. leigh , and j. polchinski , 1989 , `` new connections between string theories , '' mod .
. lett . * a4 , * 2073 .
+ u. h. danielsson , g. ferretti , and b. sundborg , 1996 , `` d - particle dynamics and bound states , '' preprint usitp-96 - 03 , e - print hep - th/9603081 .
+ p. a. m. dirac , 1931 , `` quantized singularities in the electromagnetic field , '' proc .
* a133 , * 60 .
+ m. j. duff , p.s .
howe , t. inami , and k.s .
stelle , 1987 , `` superstrings in @xmath90 from supermembranes in @xmath91 , '' phys
* 191b , * 70 .
+ m. j. duff , 1988 , `` supermembranes : the first fifteen weeks , '' class .
* 5 , * 189 .
+ m. j. duff , 1995 , `` strong / weak duality from the dual string , '' nucl .
* b442 , * 47 , e - print hep - th/9506057 .
+ a. font , l. ibanez , d. lust , and f. quevedo , 1990 , `` strong - weak coupling duality and nonperturbative effects in string theory , '' phys .
* b249 , * 35 .
+ f. gliozzi , j. scherk , and d. olive , 1977 , `` supersymmetry , supergravity theories , and the dual spinor model , '' nucl . phys .
* b122 , * 253 ; reprinted in schwarz , 1985 , vol . 1 , 300 . + m. b. green and j. h. schwarz , 1984 , `` anomaly cancellations in supersymmetric @xmath90 gauge theory and superstring theory , '' phys . lett .
* 136b , * 367 ; reprinted in schwarz , 1985 , vol . 2 , 1007 .
+ m. b. green , j. h. schwarz , and e. witten , 1987 , _ superstring theory , vols . 1 and 2 _ ( cambridge , cambridge ) .
+ b. r. greene , d. r. morrison , and a. strominger , 1995 , `` black hole condensation and the unification of string vacua , '' nucl .
* b451 , * 109 , e - print hep - th/9504145 .
+ d. j. gross , j. a. harvey , e. martinec , and r. rohm , 1985 , `` heterotic string , '' phys .
* 54 , * 502 .
+ r. haag , j. t. lopuszanski , and m sohnius , 1975 , `` all possible generators of supersymmetries of the s matrix , '' nucl . phys .
* b88 , * 257 .
+ j. a. harvey and a. strominger , 1995 , `` the heterotic string is a soliton , '' nucl .
* b449 , * 535 , ( e ) * b458 , * 456 , e - print hep - th/9504047 . + j. a. harvey , 1996 , `` magnetic monopoles , duality , and supersymmetry , '' chicago preprint efi-96 - 06 , e - print hep - th/9603086
. + s. w. hawking , 1975 , `` particle creation by black holes , '' comm .
* 43 , * 199 .
+ s. w. hawking , 1976 , `` breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse , '' phys . rev .
* d14 , * 2460 .
+ p. horava and e. witten , 1996 , `` heterotic and type i string dynamics from eleven dimensions , '' nucl .
* b460 , * 506 , e - print hep - th/9510209 .
+ g. t. horowitz , 1996 , `` the origin of black hole entropy in string theory , '' ucsb preprint ucsbth-96 - 07 , e - print gr - qc/9604051 .
+ c. m. hull and p. k. townsend , 1995 , `` unity of superstring dualities , '' nucl .
* b438 , * 109 , e - print hep - th/9410167 .
+ c. m. hull , 1995 , `` string - string duality in ten - dimensions , '' phys .
* b357 , * 545 , e - print hep - th/9506194 .
+ k. intriligator and n. seiberg , 1995 , `` lectures on supersymmetric gauge theories and electric - magnetic duality , '' presented at tasi 95 , boulder , colo . , trieste summer school , trieste , italy , and cargese summer school , cargese , france , rutgers preprint ru-95 - 48 , e - print hep - th/9509066 .
+ d. kabat and p. pouliot , `` a comment on zero - brane quantum mechanics , '' rutgers preprint ru-96 - 17 , e - print hep - th/9603127 .
+ v. s. kaplunovsky , 1988 , `` one loop effects in string unification , '' nucl . phys .
* b307 , * 145 , ( e ) * b382 , * 436 ( 1992 ) , e - print hep - th/9205070
. + d. a. lowe , j. polchinski , l. susskind , l. thorlacius , and j. uglum , 1995 , `` black hole complementarity versus locality , '' phys . rev .
* d52 , * 6997 , e - print hep - th/9506138 .
+ c. montonen and d. olive , 1977 , `` magnetic monopoles as gauge particles ? '' phys .
* 72b , * 117 .
+ a. neveu and j. scherk , 1972 , `` connection between yang - mills fields and dual models , '' nucl . phys .
* b36 , * 155 .
+ h. osborn , 1979 , `` topological charges for @xmath44 supersymmetric gauge theories and monopoles of spin 1 , '' phys .
* 83b , * 321 .
+ d. n. page , 1993 , `` black hole information , '' canadian gen .
rel . * 1993 , * 1 , e - print hep - th/9305040 .
+ j. polchinski , 1994 , `` what is string theory ? ''
les houches summer school , session 62 : fluctuating geometries in statistical mechanics and field theory , 1994 , e - print hep - th/9411028 + j. polchinski , 1995 , `` dirichlet - branes and ramond - ramond charges , '' phys .
* 75 , * 4724 , e - print hep - th/9510017 .
+ j. polchinski and e. witten , 1996 , `` evidence for heterotic - type i string duality , '' nucl . phys .
* b460 , * 525 , e - print hep - th/9510169 .
+ j. polchinski , s. chaudhuri , and c. v. johnson , 1996 , `` notes on d - branes , '' itp preprint nsf - itp-96 - 003 , e - print hep - th/9602052 .
+ p. ramond , 1971 , `` dual theory for free fermions , '' phys .
* d3 , * 2415 ; reprinted in schwarz , 1985 , vol . 1 , 53 . + a. salam , 1980 , `` grand unification of fundamental forces , '' rev .
* 52 , * 525 .
+ j. scherk and j. h. schwarz , 1974 , `` dual models for non - hadrons , '' nucl .
* b81 , * 118 ; reprinted in schwarz , 1985 , vol . 1 , 191 . + j. scherk and j. h. schwarz , 1975 , `` dual model approach to a renormalizable theory of gravitation , '' caltech preprint calt-58 - 488 ; reprinted in schwarz , 1985 , vol . 1 , 218 . + j. h. schwarz , 1985 , _ superstrings .
the first 15 years of superstring theory , vols . 1 and 2 _ ( world scientific , singapore ) .
+ j. h. schwarz , 1995 , `` an @xmath92 multiplet of type iib superstrings , '' phys .
* b360 , * 13 , ( e ) * b364 , * 252 , e - print hep - th/9508143 .
+ n. seiberg , 1994 , `` exact results on the space of vacua of four - dimensional susy gauge theories , '' phys
* d49 , * 6857 , e - print hep - th/9402044 .
+ n. seiberg , 1995 , `` the power of duality : exact results in 4-d susy field theory , '' rutgers preprint ru-95 - 37 , e - print hep - th/9506077 .
+ a. sen , 1994 , `` strong - weak coupling duality in four - dimensional string theory , '' int .
* a9 , * 3707 , e - print hep - th/9402002 .
+ a. sen , 1995a , `` string string duality conjecture in six - dimensions and charged solitonic strings , '' nucl .
* b450 , * 103 , e - print hep - th/9504027 .
+ a. sen , 1995b , `` a note on marginally stable bound states in type ii string theory , '' mehta preprint mri - phy-23 - 95 , e - print hep - th/9510229 .
+ s. h. shenker , 1991 , `` the strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory , '' in _
random surfaces and quantum gravity _ , eds . o. alvarez , e. marinari , and p. windey ( plenum , 1991 ) .
+ s. h. shenker , 1995 , `` another length scale in string theory ? '' rutgers preprint ru-95 - 53 , e - print hep - th/9509132 .
+ a. strominger , 1990 , `` heterotic solitons , '' nucl .
* b343 , * 167 , ( e ) * b353 , * 565 .
+ a. strominger and c. vafa , 1996 , `` microscopic origin of the bekenstein - hawking entropy , '' preprint hutp-96-a002 , e - print hep - th/9601029 .
+ l. susskind , 1993 , `` string theory and the principles of black hole complementarity , '' phys .
* 71 , * 2367 , e - print hep - th/9307168 + l. susskind , 1995 , `` the world as a hologram , '' j. math . phys .
* 36 , * 6377 , e - print hep - th/9409089 .
+ p. k. townsend , 1995 , `` the eleven - dimensional supermembrane revisited , '' phys .
* b350 , * 184 , e - print hep - th/9501068 .
+ s. weinberg , 1980 , `` conceptual foundations of the unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions , '' rev .
* 52 , * 515 .
+ s. weinberg , 1989 , `` the cosmological constant problem , '' rev .
* 61 , * 1 . + k. wilson , 1983 , `` the renormalization group and critical phenomena , '' rev . mod .
* 55 , * 515 .
+ e. witten and d. olive , 1978 , `` supersymmetry algebras that include topological charges , '' phys .
lett . * 78b , * 97 .
+ e. witten , 1981 , `` search for a realistic kaluza - klein theory , '' nucl .
* b186 , * 412 .
+ e. witten , 1995a , `` string theory dynamics in various dimensions , '' nucl .
* b443 , * 85 , e - print hep - th/9503124 .
+ e. witten , 1995b , `` strong coupling and the cosmological constant , '' mod .
* a10 , * 2153 , e - print hep - th/9506101 .
+ e. witten , 1996a , `` bound states of strings and @xmath93-branes , '' nucl .
* b460 , * 335 , e - print hep - th/9510135 .
+ e. witten , 1996b , `` strong - coupling expansion of calabi - yau compactification , '' ias preprint iassns - hep-96 - 08 , e - print hep - th/9602070 .
+ e. witten , 1996c , `` reflections on the fate of spacetime , '' phys . today * 49 , * 4 , 5 .