geometrical dynamics is a dynamics of elementary particles , generated by the space - time geometry . in the space - time of minkowski
the geometrical dynamics coincides with the conventional classical dynamics , and the geometrical dynamics may be considered to be a generalization of classical dynamics onto more general space - time geometries .
however , the geometric dynamics has more fundamental basis , and it may be defined in multivariant space - time geometries , where one can not introduce the conventional classical dynamics .
the fact is that , the classical dynamics has been introduced for the space - time geometry with unlimited divisibility , whereas the real space - time has a limited divisibility .
the limited divisibility of the space - time is of no importance for dynamics of macroscopic bodies .
however , when the size of moving bodies is of the order of the size of heterogeneity , one may not neglect the limited divisibility of the space - time geometry .
the geometric dynamics is developed in the framework of the program of the further physics geometrization , declared in @xcite .
the special relativity and the general relativity are steps in the development of this program .
necessity of the further development appeared in the thirtieth of the twentieth century , when diffraction of electrons has been discovered .
the motion of electrons , passing through the narrow slit , is multivariant .
as far as the free electron motion depends only on the properties of the space - time , one needed to change the space - time geometry , making it to be multivariant . in multivariant geometry
there are many vectors @xmath1 , @xmath2, ... at the point @xmath3 , which are equal to the vector @xmath4 , given at the point @xmath5 , but they are not equal between themselves , in general .
such a space - time geometry was not known in the beginning of the twentieth century .
it is impossible in the framework of the riemannian geometry . as a result
the multivariance was prescribed to dynamics . to take into account multivariance ,
dynamic variables were replaced by matrices and operators .
one obtains the quantum dynamics , which differs from the classical dynamics in its principles .
but the space - time conception remains to be newtonian ( nonrelativistic ) .
multivariant space - time geometry appeared only in the end of the twentieth century @xcite .
the further geometrization of physics became to be possible .
it should note that there were numerous attempts of further geometrization of physics .
they were based on the riemannian space - time geometry .
unfortunately , the true space - time geometry of microcosm does not belong to the class of riemannian geometries , and approximation of real space - time geometry by a riemannian geometry can not be completely successful . in particular , the riemannian geometry can not describe such a property of real space - time geometry as multivariance .
the multivariance of the space - time geometry was replaced by the multivariance of dynamics ( quantum theory ) .
understanding of nature of elementary particles is the aim of the further geometr - ization of physics .
this aim distinguishes from the aim of the conventional theory of elementary particles .
let us explain the difference of aims in the example of history the chemical elements investigation .
investigation of chemical elements reminds to some extent investigation of elementary particles .
chemical elements are investigated from two sides .
chemists systematized chemical elements , investigating their phenomenological properties .
the results of these investigations were formulated in the form of the periodical system of chemical elements in 1870 .
formulating this system , d.i.mendeleev conceived nothing about the atom construction
. nevertheless the periodical system appears to be very useful from the practical viewpoint .
physicists did not aim to explain the periodical system of chemical elements , they tried to understand simply the atom structure and the discrete character of atomic spectra .
after construction of the atomic theory it became clear , that the periodical system of chemical elements can be obtained and explained on the basis of the atomic theory . as a result
the `` physical '' approach to investigation of chemical elements appeared to be more fundamental , deep and promising , than the `` chemical '' one . on the other hand ,
the way of the `` physical '' approach to explanation of the periodical system is very long and difficult .
explanation of the periodical system was hardly possible at the `` physical '' approach , i.e. without the intermediate aim ( construction of atomic structure ) .
thus , using geometrization of physics , we try to approach only intermediate aim : explanation of multivariance of particle motion ( quantum motion ) and capacity of discrimination of particle masses .
discrete character of masses of elementary particles can be understood , only if we understand the reason of the elementary particle discrimination .
contemporary approach to the elementary particle theory is the `` chemical '' ( phenomenological ) approach .
it is useful from the practical viewpoint .
however , it admits hardly to understand nature of elementary particles , because the nature of the discrimination mechanism , leading to discrete characteristics of elementary particle , remains outside the consideration .
the most general geometry is a physical geometry , which is called also the tubular geometry ( t - geometry ) @xcite , because straights in t - geometry are hallow tubes , in general .
the t - geometry is determined completely by its world function @xmath6 , where @xmath7 is interval between the points @xmath8 and @xmath9 in space - time , described by the t - geometry .
all concepts of t - geometry are expressed in terms of the world function @xmath0 .
dynamics of particles ( geometric dynamics ) is also described in terms of the world function .
the elementary particle is considered as an elementary geometrical object ( ego ) in the space - time .
the elementary geometrical object @xmath10 is described by its skeleton @xmath11 and its envelope @xmath12 .
the envelope @xmath12 is defined as a set of zeros of the envelope function @xmath13@xmath14the envelope function @xmath13 is a real function of arguments @xmath15 .
any argument @xmath16 @xmath17 is a world function @xmath18 , @xmath19 .
it is supposed that ego with skeleton @xmath20 is placed at the point @xmath5 .    in t - geometry
the vector @xmath21 is an ordered set of two points @xmath22 .
the length @xmath23 of the vector @xmath4 is defined via the world function by means of the relation@xmath24    the scalar product @xmath25 of two vectors @xmath4 and @xmath1 is defined by the relation@xmath26equivalence @xmath4eqv@xmath1 of two vectors @xmath4 and @xmath1 is defined as follows .
two vectors @xmath4 and @xmath1 are equivalent ( equal ) , if@xmath27 in the developed form we have@xmath28    skeletons @xmath20 and @xmath29 are equivalent ( @xmath30eqv@xmath31 , if corresponding vectors of both skeletons are equivalent@xmath32    the skeleton @xmath20 of ego at the point @xmath5 may exist as a skeleton of a physical body , if it may exist at any point @xmath33 of the space - time @xmath34 .
it means that there is a solution for system of equations @xmath35for any point @xmath33 .
further for brevity we take , that an existence of a skeleton means an existence of corresponding geometrical object .    in the space - time of minkowski the problem of the skeleton existence is rather simple , because at given @xmath30 and @xmath3 the system ( [ c1.6 ] ) of @xmath36 algebraic equations has a unique solution , although the number of equations may distinguish from the number of variables to be determined .
indeed , in the four - dimensional space - time the number of coordinates of @xmath37 points @xmath38 is equal to @xmath39 ( the point @xmath3 is supposed to be given ) . if @xmath40 the number @xmath36 of equations is larger than the number ( @xmath39 ) of variables . in the case of an arbitrary space - time geometry ( arbitrary world function @xmath0 )
existence of solution of the system ( [ c1.6 ] ) is problematic , and the question of existence of the skeleton as a skeleton of a physical body is an essential problem . on the contrary ,
if @xmath41 , the number of coordinates to be determined is less , than the number of equations , and one may have many skeletons @xmath42placed at the point @xmath3 , which are equivalent to skeleton @xmath30 , but they are not equivalent between themselves .
this property is a property of multivariance of the space - time geometry .
this property is actual for simple skeletons , which contain less , than four points ( @xmath41 ) .
for instance , for the skeleton of two points @xmath43 , which is described by the vector @xmath4 , the problem of multivariance is actual . in the space - time of minkowski
the equivalence of two vectors ( @xmath44 ) is single - variant for the timelike vectors , however it is multivariant for spacelike vectors . in the general space - time
the equivalence relation @xmath44 is multivariant for both timelike and spacelike vectors .
the problem of multivariance is essential for both existence and dynamics of elementary geometrical objects ( elementary particles ) .
let us formulate dynamics of elementary particles in the coordinateless form .
dynamics of an elementary particle , having skeleton @xmath11 , is described by the world chain @xmath45direction of evolution in the space - time is described by the leading vector @xmath4 . if the motion of the elementary particle is free , the adjacent links @xmath46 and @xmath47 are equivalent in the sense that @xmath48    relations ( [ c1.7 ] ) - ( [ c1.9 ] ) realizes coordinateless description of the free elementary particle motion . in the simplest case ,
when the space - time is the space - time of minkowski , and the skeleton consists of two points @xmath49 with timelike leading vector @xmath4 , the coordinateless description by means of relations ( [ c1.7 ] ) - ( [ c1.9 ] ) coincides with the conventional description .
the conventional classical dynamics is well defined only in the riemannian space - time . the coordinateless dynamic description ( [ c1.7 ] ) - ( [ c1.9 ] ) of elementary particles is a generalization of the conventional classical dynamics onto the case of arbitrary space - time geometry .
any geometry is constructed as a modification of the proper euclidean geometry .
but not all representations of the proper euclidean geometry are convenient for modification .
there are three representation of the proper euclidean geometry @xcite .
they differ in the number of primary ( basic ) elements , forming the euclidean geometry .
the euclidean representation ( e - representation ) contains three basic elements ( point , segment , angle ) .
any geometrical object ( figure ) can be constructed of these basic elements .
properties of the basic elements and the method of their application are described by the euclidean axioms .
the vector representation ( v - representation ) of the proper euclidean geometry contains two basic elements ( point , vector ) .
the angle is a derivative element , which is constructed of two vectors .
a use of the two basic elements at the construction of geometrical objects is determined by the special structure , known as the linear vector space with the scalar product , given on it ( euclidean space ) .
the scalar product of linear vector space describes interrelation of two basic elements ( vectors ) , whereas other properties of the linear vector space associate with the displacement of vectors .
the third representation ( @xmath0-representation ) of the proper euclidean geometry contains only one basic element ( point ) .
segment ( vector ) is a derivative element .
it is constructed of points .
the angle is also a derivative element .
it is constructed of two segments ( vectors ) .
the @xmath50-representation contains a special structure : world function @xmath0 , which describes interrelation of two basic elements ( points ) .
the world function @xmath51 , where @xmath52 is the distance between points @xmath5 and @xmath53 .
the concept of distance @xmath54 , as well as the world function @xmath0 , is used in all representations of the proper euclidean geometry . however , the world function forms a structure only in the @xmath0-representation , where the world function @xmath0 describes interrelation of two basic elements ( points ) .
besides , the world function satisfies a series of constraints , formulated in terms of @xmath0 and only in terms of @xmath0 .
these conditions ( the euclideaness conditions ) will be formulated below .
the euclideaness conditions are equivalent to a use of the vector linear space with the scalar product on it , but formally they do not mention the linear vector space , because all concepts of the linear vector space , as well as all concepts of the proper euclidean geometry are expressed directly via world function @xmath0 and only via it .
if we want to modify the proper euclidean geometry , then we should use the @xmath0-representation for its modification . in the @xmath0-representation the special geometric structure ( world function )
has the form of a function of two points . modifying the form of the world function , we modify automatically all concepts of the proper euclidean geometry , which are expressed via the world function .
it is very important , that the expression of geometrical concepts via the world function does not refer to the means of description ( dimension , coordinate system , concept of a curve ) .
the fact , that modifying the world function , one violates the euclideaness conditions , is of no importance , because one obtains non - euclidean geometry as a result of such a modification .
a change of the world function means a change of the distance , which is interpreted as a deformation of the proper euclidean geometry .
the generalized geometry , obtained by a deformation of the proper euclidean geometry is called the tubular geometry ( t - geometry ) , because in the generalized geometry straight lines are tubes ( surfaces ) , in general , but not one - dimensional lines .
another name of t - geometry is the physical geometry .
the physical geometry is the geometry , described completely by the world function .
any physical geometry may be used as a space - time geometry in the sense , that the set of all t - geometries is the set of all possible space - time geometries .
modification of the proper euclidean geometry in v - representation is very restricted , because in this representation there are two basic elements .
they are not independent , and one can not modify them independently .
formally it means , that the linear vector space is to be preserved as a geometrical structure .
it means , in particular , that the generalized geometry retains to be continuous , uniform and isotropic .
the dimension of the generalized geometry is to be fixed . besides
, the generalized geometry , obtained by such a way , can not be multivariant .
such a property of the space - time geometry as multivariance can be obtained only in @xmath0-representation .
as far as the @xmath0-representation of the proper euclidean geometry was not known in the twentieth century , the multivariance of geometry was also unknown concept .
transition from the v - representation to @xmath0-representation is carried out as follows .
all concepts of the linear vector space are expressed in terms of the world function @xmath0 . in reality ,
concepts of vector , scalar product of two vectors and linear dependence of @xmath37 vectors are expressed via the world function @xmath55 of the proper euclidean geometry .
such operations under vectors as equality of vectors , summation of vectors and multiplication of a vector by a real number are expressed by means of some formulae .
the characteristic properties of these operations , which are given in v - representation by means of axioms , are given now by special properties of the euclidean world function @xmath55 .
after expression of the linear vector space via the world function the linear vector space may be not mentioned , because all its properties are described by the world function .
we obtain the @xmath0-representation of the proper euclidean geometry , where some properties of the linear vector space are expressed in the form of formulae , whereas another part of properties is hidden in the specific form of the euclidean world function @xmath55 . modifying world function , we modify automatically the properties of the linear vector space ( which is not mentioned in fact ) . at such a modification
we are not to think about the way of modification of the linear vector space , which is the principal geometrical structure in the v - representation . in the @xmath0-representation the linear vector space is a derivative structure , which may be not mentioned at all .
thus , at transition to @xmath0-representation the concepts of the linear vector space ( primary concepts in v - representation ) become to be secondary concepts ( derivative concepts of the @xmath0-representation ) .    in @xmath0-representation
we have the following expressions for concepts of the proper euclidean geometry .
vector @xmath56 is an ordered set of two points @xmath8 and @xmath9 .
the length @xmath57 of the vector @xmath58 is defined by the relation@xmath59the scalar product @xmath25 of two vectors @xmath4 and @xmath1 is defined by the relation@xmath60where the world function @xmath0@xmath61is the world function @xmath55 of the euclidean geometry .    in the proper euclidean geometry
@xmath37 vectors @xmath62 , @xmath63 are linear dependent , if and only if the gram s determinant @xmath64 where the gram s determinant @xmath65 is defined by the relation @xmath66using expression ( [ a1.1 ] ) for the scalar product , the condition of the linear dependence of @xmath37 vectors @xmath62 , @xmath63 is written in the form@xmath67    definition ( [ a1.1 ] ) of the scalar product of two vectors coincides with the conventional scalar product of vectors in the proper euclidean space .
( one can verify this easily ) . the relations ( [ a1.1 ] ) , ( [ a1.7b ] ) do not contain a reference to the dimension of the euclidean space and to a coordinate system in it . hence , the relations ( [ a1.1 ] ) , ( [ a1.7b ] ) are general geometric relations , which may be considered as a definition of the scalar product of two vectors and that of the linear dependence of vectors .
equivalence ( equality ) of two vectors @xmath4 and @xmath1 is defined by the relations@xmath68where @xmath23 is the length ( [ a1.0 ] ) of the vector @xmath4@xmath69    in the developed form the condition ( [ a1.3 ] ) of equivalence of two vectors @xmath4 and @xmath1 has the form@xmath70    let the points @xmath49 , determining the vector @xmath4 , and the origin @xmath3 of the vector @xmath1 be given .
let @xmath4eqv@xmath1 .
we can determine the vector @xmath1 , solving two equations ( [ a1.5 ] ) , ( [ a1.6 ] ) with respect to the position of the point @xmath71 .
in the case of the proper euclidean space there is one and only one solution of equations ( [ a1.5 ] ) , ( [ a1.6 ] ) independently of the space dimension @xmath37 . in the case of arbitrary t - geometry
one can guarantee neither existence nor uniqueness of the solution of equations ( [ a1.5 ] ) , ( [ a1.6 ] ) for the point @xmath71 .
number of solutions depends on the form of the world function @xmath0 .
this fact means a multivariance of the property of two vectors equivalence in the arbitrary t - geometry . in other words ,
the single - variance of the vector equality in the proper euclidean space is a specific property of the proper euclidean geometry , and this property is conditioned by the form of the euclidean world function . in other t - geometries
this property does not take place , in general .
the multivariance is a general property of a physical geometry .
it is connected with a necessity of solution of algebraic equations , containing the world function . as far as the world function is different in different physical geometries
, the solution of these equations may be not unique , or it may not exist at all .    if in the @xmath37-dimensional euclidean space @xmath72 , the vectors @xmath62 , @xmath63 are linear independent .
we may construct rectilinear coordinate system with basic vectors @xmath62 , @xmath63 in the @xmath37-dimensional euclidean space .
covariant coordinates @xmath73 of the vector @xmath74 in this coordinate system have the form@xmath75    now we can formulate the euclideaness conditions .
these conditions are conditions of the fact , that the t - geometry , described by the world function @xmath0 , is @xmath37-dimensional proper euclidean geometry .
i. definition of the dimension and introduction of the rectilinear coordinate system : @xmath76where @xmath77  is the gram s determinant ( a1.7 ) .
vectors @xmath78 , @xmath79  are basic vectors of the rectilinear coordinate system @xmath80  with the origin at the point @xmath5 . in @xmath80
the covariant metric tensor @xmath81 ,  @xmath82  and the contravariant one @xmath83 ,  @xmath82  are defined by the relations @xmath84@xmath85    \ii .
linear structure of the euclidean space : @xmath86where coordinates @xmath87  @xmath88  of the point @xmath8  are covariant coordinates of the vector @xmath74 , defined by the relation ( [ a1.8 ] ) .
iii : the metric tensor matrix @xmath89  has only positive eigenvalues
@xmath90    \iv .
the continuity condition : the system of equations @xmath91considered to be equations for determination of the point @xmath8  as a function of coordinates @xmath92 ,  @xmath88  has always one and only one solution . _ _  _ _ all conditions i @xmath93 iv contain a reference to the dimension @xmath37  of the euclidean space .
one can show that conditions i @xmath93 iv are the necessary and sufficient conditions of the fact that the set @xmath34 together with the world function @xmath0 , given on @xmath94 , describes the @xmath37-dimensional euclidean space @xcite .
investigation of the dirac particle ( dynamic system , described by the dirac equation ) has shown , that the dirac particle is a composite particle r2004 , whose internal degrees of freedom are described nonrelativistically @xcite .
the composite structure of the dirac particle may be explained as a relativistic rotator , consisting of two ( or more ) particles , rotating around their inertia centre .
the relativistic rotator explains existence of the dirac particle spin , however , the problem of the rotating particles confinement appears . in this paper
we try to explain the problem of spin in the framework of the program of the physics geometrization , when dynamics of physical bodies is determined by the space - time geometry .
although the first stages of the physics geometrization ( the special relativity and the general relativity ) manifest themselves very well , the papers on further geometrization of physics , which ignore the quantum principles , are considered usually as dissident .
dynamics in the space - time , described by a physical geometry ( t - geometry ) , is presented in @xcite . here
we remind the statement of the problem of dynamics .
geometrical object @xmath95 is a subset of points in the point set @xmath34 . in the t - geometry
the geometric object @xmath10 is described by means of the skeleton - envelope method .
it means that any geometric object @xmath10 is considered to be a set of intersections and joins of elementary geometric objects ( ego ) .    the elementary geometrical object @xmath12 is described by its skeleton @xmath30 and envelope function @xmath13 .
the finite set @xmath96 of parameters of the envelope function @xmath13 is the skeleton of elementary geometric object ( ego ) @xmath97 .
the set @xmath97 of points forming ego is called the envelope of its skeleton @xmath30 .
the envelope function @xmath13@xmath98determining ego is a function of the running point @xmath99 and of parameters @xmath100 .
the envelope function @xmath13 is supposed to be an algebraic function of @xmath101 arguments @xmath15 , @xmath102 .
each of arguments @xmath103 is the world function @xmath0 of two points @xmath104 , either belonging to skeleton @xmath30 , or coinciding with the running point @xmath105 .
thus , any elementary geometric object @xmath12 is determined by its skeleton @xmath30 and its envelope function @xmath13 .
elementary geometric object @xmath12 is the set of zeros of the envelope function @xmath106__definition .
_ _ two egos @xmath107 and @xmath108 are equivalent , if their skeletons @xmath30 and @xmath109 are equivalent and their envelope functions @xmath13 and @xmath110 are equivalent .
equivalence ( @xmath30eqv@xmath109 ) of two skeletons @xmath111 and @xmath112 means that @xmath113equivalence of the envelope functions @xmath13 and @xmath110 means , that they have the same set of zeros .
it means that @xmath114where @xmath115 is an arbitrary function , having the property@xmath116    evolution of ego @xmath117 in the space - time is described as a world chain @xmath118 of equivalent connected egos .
the point @xmath5 of the skeleton @xmath11 is considered to be the origin of the geometrical object @xmath119 the ego @xmath117 is considered to be placed at its origin @xmath5 .
let us consider a set of equivalent skeletons @xmath120 @xmath121which are equivalent in pairs @xmath122the skeletons @xmath123 @xmath121are connected , and they form a chain in the direction of vector @xmath4 , if the point @xmath53 of one skeleton coincides with the origin @xmath5 of the adjacent skeleton @xmath124the chain @xmath118 describes evolution of the elementary geometrical object @xmath117 in the direction of the leading vector @xmath4 . the evolution of ego @xmath117 is a temporal evolution , if the vectors @xmath125 are timelike @xmath126 @xmath127 .
the evolution of ego @xmath117 is a spatial evolution , if the vectors @xmath125 are spacelike @xmath128 @xmath127 .
note , that all adjacent links ( egos ) of the chain are equivalent in pairs , although two links of the chain may be not equivalent , if they are not adjacent .
however , lengths of corresponding vectors are equal in all links of the chain @xmath129we shall refer to the vector @xmath125 , which determines the form of the evolution and the shape of the world chain , as the leading vector .
this vector determines the direction of 4-velocity of the physical body , associated with the link of the world chain .
if the relations@xmath130@xmath131are satisfied , the relations@xmath132are not satisfied , in general , because the relations ( [ a6.11 ] ) contain the scalar products @xmath133 .
these scalar products contain the world functions @xmath134 , which are not contained in relations ( [ a6.9 ] ) , ( [ a6.10 ] ) .
the world chain @xmath118 , consisting of equivalent links ( [ a6.1 ] ) , ( [ a6.2 ] ) , describes a free motion of a physical body ( particle ) , associated with the skeleton @xmath30 .
we assume that _ the motion of physical body is free , if all points of the body move free _ ( i.e. without acceleration ) . if the external forces are absent , the physical body as a whole moves without acceleration .
however , if the body rotates , one may not consider a motion of this body as a free motion , because not all points of this body move free ( without acceleration ) . in the rotating body
there are internal forces , which generate centripetal acceleration of some points of the body . as a result
some points of the body do not move free .
motion of the rotating body may be free only on the average , but not exactly free .
conception of non - free motion of a particle is rather indefinite , and we restrict ourselves with consideration of a free motion only
.    conventional conception of the motion of extensive ( non - pointlike ) particle , which is free on the average , contains a free displacement , described by the velocity 4-vector , and a spatial rotation , described by the angular velocity 3-pseudovector @xmath135 .
the velocity 4-vector is associated with the timelike leading vector @xmath4 . at the free on the average motion of a rotating body some of vectors @xmath136 ... of the skeleton @xmath30 are not in parallel with vectors @xmath137 , although at the free motion all vectors @xmath138 are to be in parallel with @xmath137 as follows from ( [ a6.1 ] ) .
it means that the world chain @xmath118 of a freely moving body can describe only translation of a physical body , but not its rotation .
if the leading vector @xmath4 is spacelike , the body , described by the skeleton @xmath30 , evolves in the spacelike direction .
it seems , that the spacelike evolution is prohibited .
but it is not so .
if the world chain forms a helix with the timelike axis , such a world chain may be considered as timelike on the average . in reality
such world chains are possible . for instance , the world chain of the classical dirac particle is a helix with timelike axis .
it is not quite clear , whether or not the links of this chain are spacelike , because internal degrees of freedom of the dirac particle , responsible for helicity of the world chain , are described nonrelativistically .
thus , consideration of a spatial evolution is not meaningless , especially if we take into account , that the spatial evolution may imitate rotation , which is absent at the free motion of a particle .
further we consider the problem of the spatial evolution .
dirac particle @xmath139 is the dynamic system , described by the dirac equation .
the free dirac particle @xmath139 is described by the free dirac equation @xmath140where @xmath141 is the four - component complex wave function , and @xmath142 , @xmath143 are @xmath144 complex matrices , satisfying the relations@xmath145@xmath146 is the @xmath144 unit matrix , @xmath147 is the metric tensor .
expressions of physical quantities : the 4-flux @xmath148 of particles and the energy - momentum tensor @xmath149 have the form@xmath150where @xmath151 , @xmath152 is the hermitian conjugate to @xmath141 .
the classical dirac particle is a dynamic system @xmath153 , which is obtained from the dynamic system @xmath139 in the classical limit .    to obtain the classical limit
, one may not set the quantum constant @xmath154 in the equation ( [ f1.2 ] ) , because in this case we do not obtain any reasonable description of the particle .
the dirac particle @xmath139 is a quantum particle in the sense , that it is described by a system of partial differential equations ( pde ) , which contain the quantum constant @xmath155 .
the classical dirac particle @xmath153 is described by a system of ordinary differential equations ( ode ) , which contain the quantum constant @xmath155 as a parameter .
may the system of ode carry out the classical description , if it contains the quantum constant @xmath155 ?
the answer depends on the viewpoint of investigator .
if the investigator believes that _ the quantum constant is an attribute of quantum principles and only of quantum principles _ , he supposes that , containing @xmath155 , the dynamic equations can not realize a classical description , where the quantum principles are not used .
however , if the investigator consider the classical description simply as method of investigation of the quantum dynamic equations , it is of no importance , whether or not the system of ode contains the quantum constant .
it is important only , that the system of pde is approximated by a system of ode .
the dynamic system , described by pde , contains infinite number of the freedom degrees .
the dynamic system , described by ode , contains several degrees of freedom .
it is simpler and can be investigated more effectively .    obtaining the classical approximation
, we use the procedure of dynamic disquantization @xcite .
this procedure transforms the system of pde into the system of ode .
the procedure of dynamic disquantization is a dynamical procedure , which has no relation to the process of quantization or disquantization in the sense , that it does not refer to the quantum principles .
the dynamic disquantization means that all derivatives @xmath156 in dynamic equations are replaced by the projection of vector @xmath157 onto the current vector @xmath148 @xmath158this dynamical operation is called the dynamic disquantization , because , applying it to the schrdinger equation , we obtain the dynamic equations for the statistical ensemble of classical nonrelativistic particles .
these dynamic equations are ode , which do not depend on the quantum constant @xmath155 .    applying the operation ( [ b3.1 ] ) , to the dirac equation ( [ f1.2 ] ) ,
we transform it to the form@xmath159the equation ( [ b3.2 ] ) is the dynamic equation for the dynamic system system @xmath160 .
the equation ( [ b3.2 ] ) contains only derivative @xmath161 in the direction of the current 4-vector @xmath148 . in terms of the wave function
@xmath141 the dynamic equation ( [ b3.2 ] ) for @xmath160 looks rather bulky . however , in the properly chosen variables the action for the dynamic system @xmath160 has the form @xcite @xmath162=\int \left\ { -\kappa _ { 0}m\sqrt{\dot{x}^{i}\dot{x}_{i}}+\hbar { \frac{(\dot{\mathbf{\xi } } \times \mathbf{\xi } ) \mathbf{z}}{2(1+\mathbf{\xi z})}}+\hbar \frac{(\dot{\mathbf{x}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{x}})\mathbf{\xi } } { 2\sqrt{\dot{x}^{s}\dot{x}_{s}}(\sqrt{\dot{x}^{s}\dot{x}_{s}}+\dot{x}^{0})}\right\ } d^{4}\tau   \label{a5.18}\]]where the dot means the total derivative @xmath163 .
the quantities @xmath164 , @xmath165 , @xmath166 , @xmath167 are considered to be functions of the lagrangian coordinates @xmath168 , @xmath169 .
the variables @xmath170 describe position of the dirac particle .
here and in what follows the symbol @xmath171 means the vector product of two 3-vectors .
the quantity@xmath172 is the constant unit 3-vector , @xmath173 is a dichotomic quantity @xmath174 , @xmath175 is the constant ( mass ) taken from the dirac equation ( [ f1.2 ] ) .
in fact , variables @xmath170 depend on @xmath176 as on parameters , because the action ( [ a5.18 ] ) does not contain derivatives with respect to @xmath177 ,  @xmath167 .
lagrangian density of the action ( [ a5.18 ] ) does not contain independent variables @xmath178 explicitly .
hence , it may be written in the form @xmath162=\int \mathcal{a}_{\mathrm{dcl}}[x,\mathbf{\xi } ] d\mathbf{\tau , \qquad } d\mathbf{\tau } = d\tau _ { 1}d\tau _ { 2}d\tau _ { 3 }   \label{b3.8}\]]where @xmath179=\int \left\ { -\kappa _ { 0}m\sqrt{\dot{x}^{i}\dot{x}_{i}}+\hbar { \frac{(\dot{\mathbf{\xi } } \times \mathbf{\xi } ) \mathbf{z}}{2(1+\mathbf{\xi z})}}+\hbar   \frac{(\dot{\mathbf{x}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{x}})\mathbf{\xi } } { 2\sqrt{\dot{x}^{s}\dot{x}_{s}}(\sqrt{\dot{x}^{s}\dot{x}_{s}}+\dot{x}^{0})}\right\ } d\tau _ { 0 }   \label{b3.9}\ ] ]    the action ( [ b3.8 ] ) is the action for the dynamic system @xmath160 , which is a set of similar independent dynamic systems @xmath153 . such a dynamic system is called a statistical ensemble . dynamic systems @xmath153 are elements ( constituents ) of the statistical ensemble @xmath160 .
dynamic equations for each @xmath153 form a system of ordinary differential equations .
it may be interpreted in the sense , that the dynamic system @xmath153 may be considered to be a classical one , although lagrangian of @xmath153 contains the quantum constant @xmath155 .
the dynamic system @xmath180 will be referred to as the classical dirac particle .    the dynamic system @xmath153 has ten degrees of freedom .
it describes a composite particle @xcite .
external degrees of freedom are described relativistically by variables @xmath170 .
internal degrees of freedom are described nonrelativistically @xcite by variables @xmath181 .
solution of dynamic equations , generated by the action ( [ b3.9 ] ) , gives the following result @xcite . in the coordinate system , where the canonical momentum four - vector @xmath182 has the form @xmath183the world line of the classical dirac particle is a helix , which is described by the relation @xmath184where the speed of the light @xmath185 , and @xmath186 is an arbitrary constant ( lorentz factor of the classical dirac particle ) .
the velocity @xmath187 of the classical dirac particle is expressed as follows @xmath188    helical world line of the classical dirac particle means a rotation of the particle around some point . on the one hand ,
such a rotation seems to be reasonable , because it explains freely the dirac particle spin and magnetic moment . on the other hand ,
the description of this rotation is nonrelativistic .
besides , it seems rather strange , that the world line of a free classical particle is a helix , but not a straight line .
attempt of consideration of the dirac particle as a rotator , consisting of two particles @xcite , meets the problem of confinement of the two particles .
although the pure dynamical methods of investigation are more general and effective , than the investigation methods , based on quantum principles , the purely dynamical methods of investigation meet incomprehension of most investigators , who believe , that the dirac particle must be investigated by quantum methods . the papers , devoted to investigation of the dirac equation by the dynamic methods , are considered as dissident .
they are rejected by the peer review journals ( see discussion in @xcite ) .
suddenly it is discovered that the helical world line , which is characteristic for the classical dirac particle , can be obtained as a result of a spatial evolution of geometric objects in the framework of properly chosen space - time geometry .
let us consider the flat homogeneous isotropic space - time @xmath189 , described by the world function @xmath190@xmath191@xmath192where @xmath193 is the world function of the @xmath194-dimensional space - time of minkowski .
@xmath195 is some elementary length .
in such a space - time geometry two connected equivalent timelike vectors @xmath4 and @xmath196 are described as follows @xcite @xmath197where @xmath198 is an arbitrary unit 3-vector .
the quantity @xmath199 is the length of the vector @xmath4 ( geometrical mass , associated with the particle , which is described by the vector @xmath4 ) .
we see that the spatial part of the vector @xmath196 is determined to within the arbitrary 3-vector of the length @xmath200 .
this multivariance generates wobbling of the links of the world chain , consisting of equivalent timelike vectors @xmath201 , @xmath196 , @xmath202 , ... statistical description of the chain with wobbling links coincides with the quantum description of the particle with the mass @xmath203 , if the elementary length @xmath204 , where @xmath205 is the speed of the light , @xmath155 is the quantum constant , and @xmath206 is some universal constant , whose exact value is not determined @xcite , because the statistical description does not contain the quantity @xmath206 .
thus , the characteristic wobbling length is of the order of @xmath195 .    to explain the quantum description of the particle motion as a statistical description of the multivariant classical motion , we should use the world function ( [ a4.1 ] )
however , the form of the world function ( [ a4.1 ] ) is determined by the coincidence of the two descriptions only for the value @xmath207 , where the constant @xmath208 is determined via the mass @xmath209 of the lightest massive particle ( electron ) by means of the relation @xmath210where @xmath211 is the geometrical mass of the lightest massive particle ( electron ) .
the geometrical mass @xmath212 of the same particle , considered in the space - time geometry of minkowski , has the form@xmath213as far as @xmath214 , and , hence , @xmath215 , we obtain the following estimation for the universal constant @xmath206@xmath216    intensity of wobbling may be described by the multivariance vector @xmath217 , which is defined as follows .
let @xmath196 , @xmath218 be two vectors which are equivalent to the vector @xmath219 .
let @xmath220let us consider the vector @xmath221which is a difference of vectors @xmath196 , @xmath218 .
we consider the length @xmath222 of the vector @xmath223 in the minkowski space - time .
we obtain@xmath224the length of the vector ( [ a4.3a ] ) is minimal at @xmath225 . at @xmath226
the length of the vector ( [ a4.3a ] ) is maximal , and it is equal to zero . by definition
the vector @xmath223 at @xmath225 is the multivariance 4-vector @xmath217 , which describes the intensity of the multivariance .
we have @xmath227where @xmath198 is an arbitrary unit 3-vector .
the multivariance vector @xmath217 is spacelike    in the case , when @xmath228 , the corresponding wobbling length @xmath229where @xmath230 is the electron compton wave length .
the relation ( [ a4.3 ] ) means that @xmath231for other values @xmath232 the form of the world function @xmath233 may distinguish from the relation ( [ a4.4 ] ) .
however , @xmath234 , if @xmath235 .
two equivalent connected spacelike vectors @xmath1 , @xmath236 have the form @xcite@xmath237where constants @xmath238 and @xmath239 are arbitrary . the result is obtained for the space - time geometry ( [ a4.0 ] ) .
arbitrariness of constants @xmath240 generates multivariance of the vector @xmath236 even in the space - time geometry of minkowski , where @xmath241 .
vectors @xmath236 , @xmath242 @xmath243are equivalent to the vector @xmath1 . the difference @xmath244 of two vectors @xmath236 , @xmath242 has the form@xmath245the vector @xmath244 may be spacelike and timelike
. its length has an extremum , if @xmath246 and @xmath247 . in this case the length @xmath248    however , the length@xmath249has neither maximum , nor minimum , and one can not introduce the multivariance vector of the type ( [ a4.3c ] ) .
the multivariance of the spacelike vectors equality is not introduced by the distortion @xmath250 , defined by ( [ a4.0a ] ) .
it takes place already in the space - time of minkowski . in the conventional approach to the geometry of minkowski one
does not accept the multivariance of spacelike vectors equivalence .
furthermore , the concept of multivariance of two vectors parallelism ( and equality ) is absent at all in the conventional approach to the geometry .
for instance , when in the riemannian geometry the multivariance of parallelism of remote vectors appears , the mathematicians prefer to deny at all the fernparallelism ( parallelism of two remote vectors ) , but not to introduce the concept of multivariance .
this circumstance is connected with the fact , that the multivariance may not appear , if the geometry is constructed on the basis of a system of axioms .
the world chain , consisting of timelike equivalent vectors , imitates a world line of a free particle .
this fact seems to be rather reasonable .
considering the vectors @xmath1 and @xmath236 in ( [ a6.50 ] ) from the viewpoint of the geometry of minkowski , we see that the vector @xmath236 is obtained from the vector @xmath1 as a result of spatial rotation and of an addition of some temporal component .
one should expect , that the world chain , consisting of spacelike equivalent vectors , imitates a world line of a free particle , moving with a superluminal velocity .
the motion with the superluminal velocity seems to be unobservable .
such a motion is considered to be impossible . however , if the spacelike world line has a shape of a helix with timelike axis , such a situation may be considered as a free rotating particle .
the fact , that the particle rotates with the superluminal velocity is not so important , if the helix axis is timelike .
the world line of a classical dirac particle is a helix .
it is not very important , whether the rotation velocity is tardyon or not .
especially , if we take into account that the dirac equation describes the internal degrees of freedom ( rotation ) nonrelativistically , ( i.e. the description of internal degrees of the classical dirac particle is incorrect from the viewpoint of the relativity theory ) .
we investigate now , whether a world chain of equivalent spacelike vectors may form a helix with timelike axis .
if it is possible , then we try to investigate , under which world function such a situation is possible .
we consider the world function @xmath233 of the form @xmath251where the function @xmath252 should be determined from the condition , that the world chain , consisting of spacelike links , forms a helix with timelike axis .
to estimate the form of @xmath233 as a function of @xmath193 at @xmath232 , we consider the chain , consisting of equivalent spacelike vectors ... @xmath4 , @xmath196 , @xmath253 ... we suppose that the chain is a helix with timelike axis in the space - time .
let the points @xmath254 . have the coordinates@xmath255all points ( [ a4.6 ] ) lie on a helix with timelike axis .
in the space - time of minkowski the step of helix is equal to @xmath256 , and @xmath105 is the radius of the helix .
the constants @xmath257 and @xmath258 are parameters of the helix .
all vectors @xmath259 have the same length .
introducing designations [ 02beg]@xmath260we obtain coordinates of vectors @xmath259 in the form @xmath261where @xmath262 are parameters of the helix .
let us investigate , under which conditions the relation @xmath263eqv@xmath259 takes place .
we suppose that all vectors of the helix are spacelike @xmath264 .
it is evident , that it is sufficient to investigate the situation for the case @xmath265 , when @xmath4eqv@xmath196 .
let coordinates of vectors @xmath4 , @xmath196 be @xmath266 in this case the coordinates of the points @xmath267 may be chosen in the form@xmath268and the vector @xmath219 has coordinates @xmath269we choose the world function ( [ a4.5 ] ) in the form@xmath270and introduce the quantity @xmath271    thus , we have @xmath272the space - time geometry ( [ a4.15 ] ) is a special case of the space - time geometry ( [ a4.4 ] ) .
we do not pretend to the claim , that ( [ a4.15 ] ) is the world function of true space - time geometry .
we shall show only that in the space - time geometry ( [ a4.15 ] ) the spacelike vectors ( [ a4.9 ] ) may be equivalent at some proper choice of parameters @xmath273 , @xmath274 and @xmath257 .    in our calculations we shall use two geometries : the geometry @xmath275 of minkowski and the space - time geometry @xmath276 , described by the world function @xmath233 , determined by ( [ a4.15 ] ) .
then expressions of the geometry @xmath276 may be reduced to expressions of the geometry @xmath275 by means of relations@xmath277@xmath278@xmath279the geometrical relations in @xmath276 are expressed via the same relations , written in @xmath275 with additional terms , containing the distortion @xmath250 .
this additional terms in dynamic relations are interpreted as additional metric interactions , acting on a particle , when the real space - time geometry @xmath276 is considered to be the geometry @xmath275 .
appearance of additional interactions reminds appearance of inertial forces at a use of accelerated coordinate systems instead of inertial ones .
condition @xmath4eqv@xmath196 of equivalence of vectors @xmath4 , @xmath196 is written in the form of two equations@xmath280@xmath281where index m means , that the corresponding quantities are calculated in @xmath275 .
the function @xmath250 is determined by the relation ( [ a4.15 ] ) , and the quantity @xmath282 is determined by the relation @xmath283which follows from the definition of the scalar product ( [ a4.15c ] ) . using the conventional relations for the scalar product in @xmath275 , we can rewrite the relations ( [ a4.16 ] ) , ( [ a4.17 ] ) in the form @xmath284@xmath285where@xmath286    to obtain the relation ( [ a4.21 ] ) from ( [ a4.18 ] ) , we use the relations@xmath287@xmath288the equation ( [ a4.20 ] ) is the identity .
let us introduce pure quantities
@xmath289 , @xmath290 , defining them by relations@xmath291@xmath292then the equation ( [ a4.19 ] ) takes the form@xmath293where the function @xmath294 is defined by the relation ( [ a4.15])@xmath295and the constant @xmath296 is defined by the relation ( [ a4.14a ] ) .
let us note , that in the case , when @xmath297 is a linear function @xmath298 , for @xmath299 $ ] , the equation ( [ a4.25a ] ) has the unique solution @xmath300 .
the solution with @xmath301 describes a straight but not a helix .
considering solutions of equation ( [ a4.25a ] ) with respect to @xmath302 , we are interested in positive values of @xmath290 , because the quantity @xmath290 is nonnegative by definition ( [ a4.25 ] ) . at @xmath303 numerical solutions of equation ( [ a4.25a ] ) with respect to @xmath290
are presented in the form@xmath304    according to ( [ a4.7 ] ) , ( [ a4.24 ] ) and ( [ a4.25 ] ) we have the following relations for the helix radius @xmath105 @xmath305we obtain the helix step @xmath306 in the form@xmath307    negative values of @xmath289 correspond to helix with timelike vectors @xmath263 .
positive solutions of equation ( [ a4.25a ] ) take place only for @xmath308 ( spacelike vectors ) and @xmath309 ( timelike vectors ) .
the values of parameter @xmath310 belong to intervals    @xmath311 , \qquad a\in \left ( 0,3\right )   \label{a4.38}\ ] ]    for spacelike and timelike vectors correspondingly .
thus , we see that in the space - time geometry with the world function ( a4.15 ) the spatial evolution , determined by the spacelike vectors @xmath259 , may lead to a helical world chain with timelike axis .
however , equivalence of spacelike vectors @xmath259 is multivariant even in the space - time of minkowski .
it is valid for the space - time geometry ( [ a4.15 ] ) also . as a result
the wobbling of the spacelike vectors appears .
it may lead to destruction of the helix .    in reality the conditions @xmath312 determines vector @xmath313to within the vector @xmath314 , and we have instead of equations ( [ a4.9 ] ) @xmath315where @xmath316 , @xmath317 , @xmath318 are 4-vectors with coordinates@xmath319    instead of equations ( [ a4.19 ] )  ( [ a4.21 ] ) we have the following equations@xmath320@xmath321where @xmath322 and @xmath323 mean scalar products of vectors @xmath324 in the space - time of minkowski . the relation ( [ a4.25a ] ) is the necessary condition of the fact , that @xmath325 is a solution of equations ( [ a4.41 ] ) , ( [ a4.42 ] ) .
we obtain from ( [ a4.41 ] ) @xmath326where @xmath327 means the scalar product of 3-vectors @xmath328 and @xmath329 .
taking into account the relation ( [ a4.25a ] ) , we obtain from relation ( [ a4.42 ] ) @xmath330supposing , that @xmath322 is a small quantity we obtain from ( [ a4.44 ] ) by means of ( [ a4.43])@xmath331    the relation ( [ a4.45 ] ) may be transformed to the equation@xmath332where@xmath333as far as @xmath334 , we obtain , that @xmath335 , and the surface ( [ a4.46 ] ) is a hyperboloid in the 3-space of quantities @xmath336 .
it means that solutions of the equations ( [ a4.43 ] ) , ( [ a4.44 ] ) may deflect arbitrarily far from the helix solution ( [ a4.9 ] ) .
this deflection is a manifestation of the multivariance of the space - time geometry .
suppression of multivariance and stabilization of the world chain , consisting of spacelike vectors , can be achieved , if we consider the world chain with composed links , whose skeleton consists of three points @xmath337 , @xmath338 ( see figure 1 ) .
let @xmath259 be a spacelike vector , whereas the vector @xmath339 be a timelike vector in @xmath275 . to investigate the effect of stabilization , it is sufficient to consider the points @xmath340 , having coordinates@xmath341the following vectors
are associated with these points of the skeletons@xmath342where the quantities @xmath343 are the given 4-vectors , whereas the quantities @xmath344 are 4-vectors , which are to be determined from the condition @xmath345    expressions for 4-vectors @xmath317 and @xmath54 are chosen in such a way , that vectors @xmath196 and @xmath346 ( at @xmath347 ) were a result of rotation of vectors @xmath4 and @xmath348 in the plane @xmath349 by the angle @xmath350 .
the quantities @xmath351are supposed to be given . the 4-vectors @xmath352are to be determined from the relations ( [ a5.3a ] ) .    the 4-vectors @xmath316 and @xmath317 coincide with vectors ( [ a4.9 ] ) .
we are interested in the following question , whether the stabilizing vector @xmath353 can be chosen in such a way , that equations ( [ a5.3a ] ) have the unique solution @xmath347 .
if such a stabilizing vector @xmath354exists , the world chain will have a shape of a helix without wobbling .
it may be , that the complete stabilization is impossible .
then , maybe , a partial stabilization is possible , when the quantities @xmath318 , @xmath355 are small , although they do not vanish . in any case
the problem of the stabilizing vector existence is a pure mathematical problem .    solving this problem
, we shall use relations ( [ a4.15a ] ) , ( [ a4.15b ] ) to reduce all geometrical relations to the geometrical relations in the space - time of minkowski .
working in the space - time of minkowski , we shall use the conventional covariant formalism , where the expressions of the type @xmath356 and @xmath357 mean@xmath358index " will be omitted for brevity .
it follows from the condition @xmath4eqv@xmath196@xmath359where@xmath360after transformations we obtain@xmath361@xmath362these equations coincide with ( [ a4.41 ] ) , ( [ a4.42 ] ) . if @xmath363 the equations ( [ b5.11 ] ) , ( [ b5.12 ] ) coincide with ( [ a4.20 ] ) , ( a4.25a ) respectively .
we obtain from the condition @xmath348eqv@xmath346@xmath364@xmath365where@xmath366    the equations ( [ b5.14 ] ) and ( [ b5.15 ] ) are transformed to the form@xmath367@xmath368@xmath369    let us suppose that the stabilizing vector @xmath101 is long in the sense that @xmath370then in ( [ b5.17 ] ) the functions @xmath250 , which contains @xmath101 in its argument will be equal to @xmath371 and all terms , containing @xmath101 compensate each other .
the necessary condition of the fact , that @xmath372 is a solution of equations ( [ b5.16 ] ) , ( [ b5.17 ] ) , has the form@xmath373@xmath374the equation ( [ b5.18 ] ) is satisfied identically by the choice ( b5.4a ) , ( [ b5.4b ] ) of vectors @xmath101 and @xmath54 .
we obtain from the condition @xmath375eqv@xmath376@xmath377@xmath378@xmath379@xmath380    the necessary conditions of the fact , that @xmath381 is a solution of equations ( [ b5.23 ] ) , ( [ b5.24 ] ) , have the form@xmath382@xmath383    the equation ( [ b5.27 ] ) is satisfied identically by the relations ( b5.4a ) , ( [ b5.4b ] ) .
the difference of equations ( [ b5.19 ] ) and ( b5.28 ) leads to the equation    @xmath384    let us substitute expressions for @xmath385 , determined by the relations ( [ b5.4a ] ) , ( [ b5.4b ] ) , in ( [ b5.29 ] ) .
after transformations we obtain the connection between the quantities @xmath386 and @xmath387 in the form@xmath388    the equation ( [ b5.19 ] ) by means of ( [ b5.30 ] ) is reduced to the form@xmath389where according to ( [ a4.15 ] ) the function @xmath390 is substituted by @xmath391 .    setting @xmath392and using designations ( [ a4.24 ] ) , ( [ a4.25 ] ) , we transform the equation ( [ b5.31 ] ) to the form @xmath393    the equations ( [ a4.25a ] ) and ( [ b5.33 ] ) form a system of two necessary conditions , imposed on parmeters of the helical world chain .
each link of the chain consists of two vectors : leading vector @xmath394 and stabilizing vector @xmath395 .
parameter @xmath396 is determined by the space - time geometry .
the quantity @xmath397 describes the length of the spacelike leading vector @xmath394 .
parameter @xmath398 describes the length of the projection of the leading vector @xmath394 on the plane of rotation .
finally , @xmath399 describes the angle @xmath350 of rotation of the leading vector in the plane of rotation .
numerical solutions of equations ( [ a4.25a ] ) and ( [ b5.33 ] ) are presented for the parameter @xmath303
solutions of equations , which describe the necessary conditions of the fact , that the world chain may be a helix , are not unique
. there may be solutions of ( [ a5.3a ] ) , described by nonvanishing @xmath318 and @xmath355 , which generate wobbling and violate the helical character of world chain .
we write six equation ( [ a5.3a ] ) as equation for @xmath401 with parameters @xmath343 , satisfying the necessary conditions ( [ a4.25a ] ) and ( b5.33 ) .
we obtain instead of equations ( [ b5.11 ] ) , ( [ b5.12 ] ) the following two equations@xmath402@xmath403where the quantities @xmath404 satisfy the necessary conditions ( [ b5.33 ] ) ( [ a4.25a ] ) , and @xmath405 is a derivative of the function ( [ a4.26 ] ) , which is always nonnegative
. then it follows from ( [ b6.2 ] ) @xmath406    equations ( [ b6.1 ] ) , ( [ b6.3 ] ) contain only the variable @xmath318 ( but not @xmath355 ) and coincide with the equations ( [ a4.41 ] ) , ( a4.42 ) . however , there are additional constraints , containing @xmath318 . as a result the constraints on @xmath318 distinguish from the relation ( a4.46 ) , describing values of @xmath318 without the stabilizing vector @xmath395 .    in the developed
form the relations ( [ b5.16 ] ) , ( [ b5.17 ] ) have the form @xmath407@xmath408they contain only the variable @xmath355 ( but not @xmath318 )    finally the relations ( [ b5.23 ] ) , ( [ b5.24 ] ) in the developed form can be written as follows@xmath409@xmath410the relation ( [ b6.7 ] ) is a linear combination of equations ( [ b5.17 ] ) and ( [ b5.24 ] ) , which does not contain the function @xmath294 . relations ( b6.6 ) and ( [ b6.7 ] ) contain both quantities @xmath401 and @xmath411 . the constraints ( [ b6.6 ] ) and ( [ b6.7 ] )
modify the constraints ( [ a4.46 ] ) , transforming the hyperboloid into ellipsoid .
we suppose for simplicity , that the vector @xmath395 is very long ( @xmath412 ) .
we suppose , that @xmath413 . in this case
we obtain from the relation ( [ b6.5 ] ) , that @xmath414 .
it follows from ( [ b6.7 ] ) , that @xmath415 .
besides , it follows from ( [ b6.3 ] ) , that @xmath416 .
thus , solutions of the equations ( [ b6.5 ] ) , ( [ b6.7 ] ) and ( [ b6.3 ] ) have the form @xmath417    at the constraints ( [ b6.8 ] ) three other equations ( [ b6.1 ] ) , ( b6.4 ) and ( [ b6.6 ] ) take the form @xmath418@xmath419@xmath420solution of equation ( [ b6.9 ] ) has the form @xmath421where @xmath422 is an arbitrary angle .
solution of equation ( [ b6.10 ] ) has the form@xmath423where the quantities @xmath424 @xmath425 are arbitrary . and the quantity @xmath426 is determined by the relation ( [ b5.30 ] ) .    substituting ( [ b6.12 ] ) - ( [ b6.14c ] ) in ( [ b6.11 ] ) , one obtains a constraint on the quantities @xmath427 @xmath424 @xmath425 .
independently of this constraint the 3-vector @xmath428has the same 3-length @xmath274 , as the length of 3-vector @xmath429 .
the angle between the 3-vectors @xmath430 and @xmath431is equal to @xmath350 . if @xmath432 , then @xmath325 , and vectors @xmath394 and @xmath433 are elements of the same helix .    we see that the stabilizing vector @xmath395 reduces wobbling of vector @xmath394 . in the case of equation ( [ a4.46 ] )
the spatial component @xmath329 of the 4-vector @xmath318 may be infinite . in the case of the equation ( [ b6.9 ] )
the length @xmath434 of the spatial component @xmath329 of the 4-vector @xmath318 is less , than @xmath435 thus , the stabilizing vector @xmath395 reduces the wobbling of the world chain .
one can not be sure , that this wobbling does not destroy the helical character of the world chain .
however , the main question is , whether or not the evolution of the world chain in the spacelike direction lead to the world chain , which is timelike on the average .
any next point @xmath436 of the world chain jumps along the timelike direction at the distance @xmath273 and in the 3-space , which is orthogonal to this direction , the point jumps at the distance @xmath437 .
direction of the jump in the 3-space is described by the vector @xmath430 , which is given by the relation ( [ c5.17 ] ) .
the length of @xmath430 is @xmath274 . if the direction of jump is completely random , the displacement @xmath438 for @xmath37 steps ( @xmath439 is proportional to @xmath440 , whereas displacement in the temporal direction is @xmath441 .
it means that the mean velocity @xmath442tends to zero for @xmath443 , although @xmath444 . in the case , if @xmath363 and the 3-vector @xmath430 * *  * * determined by ( [ c5.17 ] ) is not random , the world chain form a helix with timelike axis . in this case
the mean velocity tends to zero also .
it should expect that in the case , when the vector ( [ c5.17 ] ) is stochastic , but its stochasticity is restricted by the relation ( [ c5.17 ] ) ( the angle @xmath422 is completely random ) , the mean world chain will be also timelike on the average .
we can not prove this fact strictly now , but this result seems to be very probable .
the obtained classical helical world chain ( [ a4.6 ] ) associates with the classical dirac particle , which has alike world line ( [ e6.33 ] ) , ( e6.34 ) .
the direction of the mean momentum distinguishes from the direction of the 4-velocity .
this fact is characteristic for both particles ( the dirac particle , and the particle , described by the world chain ( a4.6 ) ) .
both particles have angular moment . for the dirac particle the mass @xmath175 , which enters in the dirac equation , distinguishes from the mass @xmath445 of the particle moving along the world line ( [ e6.33 ] ) , ( [ e6.34 ] ) @xcite . as to the mass of the particle , described by the world chain ( [ a4.6 ] ) , it is not yet determined . for determination of the mass , one needs to consider the world chain ( [ a4.6 ] ) of charged particle with the skeleton @xmath446 in the distorted space - time of klein - kaluza , containing electromagnetic field .
existence of helical world chain with timelike axis seems to be rather unexpected , because leading vectors @xmath259 of the chain are spacelike , and it corresponds to superluminal motion of a particle .
superluminal motion seems to be incompatible with the relativity principle , which admits only motion with the speed less , than the speed of the light .
however , this constraint is valid only for continuous space - time geometry , which admits unlimited divisibility . in a discrete geometry
there are no distances less , than some elementary length , and it is difficult to formulate the relativity principle statement on impossibility of superluminal motion .
one needs another more adequate formulation of the relativity principle .    is the space - time geometry ( [ a4.14 ] ) discrete ? at @xmath447 the space - time geometry ( [ a4.14 ] ) turns to the space - time geometry@xmath448which is certainly discrete , because in the space - time there no timelike intervals @xmath57 , which are less , than @xmath195 , and there are no spacelike intervals @xmath449 , which are less , than @xmath195 . in such a space - time geometry
there are no particles , whose geometrical mass @xmath199 is less than @xmath195 .
however , if @xmath214 , is the space - time geometry discrete ? to answer this question , we introduce the parameter of discreteness : the relative density of points in the space - time with respect to the point density in the space - time of minkowski .
let us define the quantity @xmath450 by means of the relation @xmath451 in the case ( [ a4.14 ] ) we have for @xmath452 $ ] @xmath453resolving ( [ a7.3 ] ) with respect to @xmath193 , we obtain @xmath454where@xmath455    taking into account ( [ a7.4 ] ) we obtain the world function @xmath193 as a function of @xmath233@xmath456the relative density of points in the space - time geometry @xmath276 with respect to the standard geometry @xmath275 of minkowski is given by the relation ( [ a7.2 ] ) .
the expression for @xmath457 is given by the relation@xmath458where @xmath459 is given by the relation @xmath460if @xmath461 and @xmath462 , we have approximately@xmath463 in the limit @xmath461 , when the world function ( [ a4.14 ] ) turns into the world function ( [ a7.1 ] ) of the completely discrete geometry , we obtain for the relative density@xmath464    thus , @xmath465 for @xmath466 , and this fact correspond to the space - time geometry ( [ a7.1 ] ) , where close points , for which @xmath467 , are absent . the relative density @xmath450 of points may serve as quantity , describing the discreteness of the space - time geometry and the character of this discreteness .
the discreteness may be complete , when the density @xmath468vanishes in some region as in the case ( [ a7.10 ] ) .
but the discreteness may be incomplete , as in the case ( [ a7.7 ] ) . in this case for @xmath469
we have @xmath470{g_{1}\left ( \sigma _ { \mathrm{d}}\right ) } + \frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{g_{1}\left ( \sigma _ { \mathrm{d}}\right ) } } \right ) , \qquad \sigma _ { \mathrm{d}}\in \left ( -2\lambda _ { 0}^{2},2\lambda _ { 0}^{2}\right )   \label{a7.11}\]]where@xmath471the expression ( [ a7.11 ] ) is a symmetric function of @xmath472 , as one can see from ( [ a7.3 ] ) .
it is symmetric , indeed , although it does not look formally as a symmetric function of @xmath233 .
numerical values of @xmath473 @xmath474 are presented in the table @xmath475the relative density @xmath450 is less , than unity .
it may be interpreted in the sense , that the space - time geometry is discrete only partly .
nevertheless the incompletely discrete space - time geometry discriminates most of world chains with spatial leading vector , remaining only some of them .
multivariance of particle motion and discrimination of some states of motion play the crucial role in structure of elementary particles , as well as in the structure of atoms .
let us explain this circumstance in the example of the hydrogen atom . according to laws of the classical mechanics the electron of the hydrogen atom is to fall onto the nucleus due to the coulomb attraction .
two reasons prevent from this falling : ( 1 ) multivariant ( stochastic ) motion of the electron , and ( 1 ) rotation of electron around the nucleus .    the multivariant motion of the electron leads to escape of the electron from the nuclear surface .
this process has the same nature , as an escape of dust from the earth surface . moving multivariantly ( as brownian particles ) , the flecks of dust form a stationary distribution in the gravitational field of the earth .
if multivariance of their motion is cut out , the flecks of the dust fall onto the surface of the earth .
statistical description of the electron distribution and the dust distribution are different , because the multivariant electron motion is conceptually relativistic , whereas the brownian particles motion is nonrelativistic .
one may describe brownian particles by means of probabilistic statistical description , whereas one may use only dynamical conception of statistical description for statistical description of multivariant motion of relativistic particles .
rotation of the electron around the nucleus creates the field of centrifugal force , which is added to the coulomb force . as a result
additional distributions of the electrons appear .
if the obtained distribution of electrons is nonstationary , the electrons emanate the electromagnetic radiation until the electron distribution becomes to be stationary .
thus , the electromagnetic radiation carries out discrimination of nonstationary states ( electron distributions ) .
the multivariance of the electron motion and mechanism of discrimination of non - stationary states generates the structure of the hydrogen atom and discrete character of the radiation spectra . from the mathematical viewpoint
the discrete character of the electron states is conditioned by procedure of the eigenstates determination .
only eigenstates of the hamilton operator appear to be stationary and stable .
the multivariance of the particle motion and some mechanism of discrimination play also the crucial role in the understanding of the structure of elementary particles .
however , in the case of the elementary particle structure the discrimination mechanism is conditioned by some metric ( geometric ) forces , which appear , when we use space - time geometry of minkowski instead of the real multivariant space - time geometry .
formally these forces have the form of additional terms of the type ( [ a4.18 ] ) in dynamic equations .
these additional terms are expressed via the space - time distortion @xmath250 .
they describe both multivariance of motion and the discrimination mechanism .
the multivariance of motion is associated with the multivariance of the vector equivalence definition ( [ a1.3 ] ) , whereas the discrimination mechanism is associated with the zero - variance of the same definition ( [ a1.3 ] ) for some vectors .
besides , as we have seen , the zero - variance ( discrimination ) is associated with the discreteness ( or partial discreteness ) of the space - time geometry .
it is very important , that consideration of multivariant space - time geometry _ is not a hypothesis _ , which needs an experimental test .
consideration of the multivariant space - time geometry is a corollary of correction of our imperfect conception of geometry .
conception of geometry , based on supposition that any space - time geometry may be axiomatized ( i.e. may be concluded from some system of axioms ) , is imperfect , because it does not admit one to construct multivariant geometry conceptually .
however , the motion of electrons and other elementary particles is multivariant .
multivariance of this motion is an experimental fact , which can not be ignored .
as far as the imperfect conception of geometry did not admit one to construct multivariant space - time geometry , investigators were forced to ascribe multivariance to dynamics , introducing quantum principles with all their attributes .
the quantum principles look enigmatic and artificial , because multivariance is ascribed to dynamics , whereas it should be ascribed to the space - time geometry .
multivariance and zero - variance as properties of the space - time geometry look as quite natural properties of the definition ( [ a1.3 ] ) .
indeed , it does not follow from anywhere , that equations ( [ a1.3 ] ) are to have unique solution for arbitrary world function , which determines the form of these equations
. absence of any hypotheses is a very important property of the geometrical approach to the structure of elementary particles . besides
, the geometrical dynamics is very general and simple .
dynamic equations of the geometric dynamics do not use even differential equations .
formulation of dynamic equations does not contain a reference to the coordinate system . on the other hand , when the geometric dynamics in the real space - time is described in terms of the space - time of minkowski , one obtains additional metric forces , which look rather exotic .
they can be obtained hardly in the framework of the conventional approach .
the conventional approach to the theory of elementary particles contains a lot of secondary concepts and properties .
one may not see any discrimination mechanism in wave functions , field equations , branes , symmetries and other remote corollaries of the unknown structure of elementary particles .
but it is impossible to obtain and to understand the discrete properties of elementary particles without a reliable mechanism of discrimination .
even if investigating and systematizing these remote corollaries , one succeeds to obtain a perfect systematization of elementary particles , one can obtain structure of elementary particles from the perfect systematization with the same success , as one can obtain the atomic structure from the periodical system of chemical elements .
consideration of t - geometry as a space - time geometry admits one to obtain dynamics of a particle as corollary of its geometrical structure .
evolution of the geometrical object in the space - time is determined by the skeleton @xmath476 of the geometrical object and by fixing of the leading vector @xmath4 .
the skeleton and the leading vector determine the world chain , which describes the evolution completely .
the world chain may wobble , it is manifestation of the space - time geometry multivariance .
quantum effects are only one of manifestation of the multivariance .
it is remarkable , that for determination of the world chain one does not need differential equations , which may be used only on the space - time manifold .
one does not need space - time continuity ( continual geometry ) .
of course , one may introduce the continual coordinate system and write dynamic differential equation there .
one may , but it is not necessary . in general , the geometrical dynamics ( i.e. dynamics generated by the space - time geometry ) is a discrete dynamics , where step of evolution is determined by the length of the leading vector .
it is possible , that one will need a development of special mathematical technique for the geometrical dynamics .
the real space - time geometry contains the quantum constant @xmath155 as a parameter . as a result
the geometric dynamics explains freely quantum effects , but not only them .
the particle mass is geometrized ( the particle mass is simply a length of some vector ) . as a result
the problem of mass of elementary particles is simply a geometrical problem .
it is a problem of the structure of elementary geometrical object and its evolution .
one needs simply to investigate different forms of skeletons of simplest geometrical objects .
in general , not all skeletons are possible , because at the spatial evolution the world chain is observable ( helical ) only for several skeletons .
additional points of skeleton lead to additional ( sometimes unexpected ) properties of corresponding elementary geometrical objects ( elementary particles ) .
note that the geometric dynamics does not contain a rotational motion .
it contains only a shift .
all vectors of the skeleton @xmath477 of the link @xmath478 are equivalent to vectors of the skeleton @xmath479 of the adjacent link @xmath480 .
such a situation is quite reasonable , because the geometrical dynamics describes evolution of free particles . the rotating particle can not be completely free , because in the rotating particle there is centripetal acceleration .
however , acceleration of all parts of the body has to be absent for completely free motion . on the other hand ,
the geometric dynamics contains the spatial evolution , which absent in the conventional dynamics . from the geometrical viewpoint
we may not discriminate spatial evolution on the basis , that the leading vector @xmath4 is spacelike and its length is imaginary .
in fact the spatial evolution discriminates itself , by the fact , that the corresponding world chain is unobservable , in general .
it appears to be observable only for some complex skeletons , consisting of more , than two points .
the world chain , describing the spatial evolution is observable only in the case , when it may be localized near the world chain of the observer .
it takes place , when the world chain has a shape of a helix with timelike axis , or some other shape , which may be localized near the world chain of the observer . as a result
not all skeletons appear to be observable .
although the geometric dynamics does not contain a rotation , but the corollaries of the rotation ( angular momentum , magnetic momentum ) may be obtained as a result of the spatial evolution , when the world chain is a helix .
apparently , the fact , that such a `` particle rotation '' is a corollary of the spatial evolution , leads to the spin discreteness of the dirac particle .
of course , such statements are to be tested by exact mathematical investigations of different types of skeletons and of different space - time geometries .
however , such a statement of the problem is quite concrete and realizable .
note , that the geometric dynamics in the real ( non - minkowskian ) space - time contains additional terms with respect to dynamics in the space - time of minkowski . from viewpoint of the space - time of minkowski
these additional terms may be interpreted as some ( metric ) interactions , which take place inside the elementary particles . from the conventional viewpoint
these interactions look very exotic and strange .
it is impossible ( or very difficult ) to guess at them , starting from conventional conception of the space - time and dynamics . in the geometric dynamics
there are no additional interactions , if we use the true space - time geometry . however , additional interactions appear , if we use inadequate geometry ( for instance , geometry of minkowski , or riemannian geometry ) . in other words , it is possible to compensate false space - time geometry by introduction of additional interactions .
it is well known from the general relativity , that the motion of free body in the curved space - time looks as a motion in the gravitational field , if one interprets this motion as a motion in the space - time of minkowski .
description of conceptually new unknown phenomena by means of a change of the space - time geometry is simpler , than an introduction of additional interactions , because the space - time geometry is described by the world function , which is a function of two points .
the form of the world function for large distances is determined by the necessity of obtaining the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics .
restrictions , imposed on the world function at small distances , are determined by the condition , that the spatial evolution may describe the dirac particle .
( very many elementary particles are the dirac particles ) .
besides , the condition of localization of the world chain ( helical world chain ) imposes restrictions on parameters of the particle .
not all parameters of particles appear to be possible .
this condition is a condition of `` peculiar quantization '' of the particle parameters , which include the particle mass .
let us note that the contemporary theory of elementary particles returns to geometrical considerations ( strings , branes ) .
however , these considerations are restricted by the framework of the riemannian geometries and geometries close to the riemannian geometry .
for instance , the quantum geometry , which uses operators instead of the point coordinates . this is some way of introduction of multivariance in the geometry .
however , this geometry is developed on the basis of the linear vector space , which is a restriction on the space - time geometry . in any case
the conventional approach to the space - time geometry considers only a part of all possible space - time geometries .
one can not be sure , that the class of considered geometries contains true space - time geometry .
of course , if one uses a false space - time geometry , there is a possibility to correct the false space - time geometry by means of additional interaction , generated by difference with the true space - time geometry .
but such a correction is difficult , especially if the true geometry is discrete or close to the discrete geometry .
note , that the geometry ( [ a4.0 ] ) is discrete , although it is given on the continuous manifold of minkowski .
it is discrete , because the module of distance between any two points is more , than @xmath195 .
it is very unexpected , because it is a common practice to consider any geometry on the manifold as a continuous geometry , although in reality the geometry is determined by the world function and only by the world function .
a discrete geometry is associated with a grid .
of course , a geometry , given on a grid , can not be continuous .
however , a geometry , given on the continuous set of points ( manifold ) , may be discrete .    why the microcosm physics of the twentieth century did leave the successful program of the physics geometrization and choose the alternative program of quantum theory ?
discovery of the electron diffraction need of multivariance of the microcosm physics .
multivariance may be taken into account either on the level of the space - time geometry , or on the level of dynamics .
the multivariant space - time geometry was not known in the thirtieth , when the electron diffraction was discovered .
the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics had been constructed already , and it was applied successfully for explanation of the electron diffraction .    the space - time geometry is a basis of dynamics . introducing multivariance in dynamics , one can describe not only nonrelativistic phenomena of microcosm .
one can describe also relativistic phenomena and that part of the microcosm physics , which is known as the theory of elementary particles .
the principles of quantum mechanics , which introduce multivariance in the microcosm physics , were invented for the newtonian conception of the space - time , and their extrapolation to the relativistic phenomena appeared to be problematic .
of course , some properties of the true space - time geometry may be taken into account by introduction of additional interactions .
however , it is very difficult to invent and introduce additional interactions without understanding of these innovations .
capacities of the geometrical approach are very large , especially if one takes into account all possible space - time geometries .
the theory of elementary particles returns to the geometrical description , but this description is burthened by such concepts as wave function , string , brane , which have very abstracted relation to the structure of elementary particles and microcosm physics .
a. rylov , tubular geometry construction as a reason for new revision of the space - time conception . in _
what is geometry ?
_ polimetrica publisher , italy , pp.201 - 235 http://www.polimetrica.com/polimetrica/406/              yu .
a. rylov , author s comments to referee s reports on the paper by y. a. rylov `` dynamical methods of investigation in application to the dirac particle '' , submitted to a scientific journal .
( available at _ http://rsfq1.physics.sunysb . edu / rylov /comm1e . pdf _ )