the next linear collider ( nlc ) will explore @xmath1 processes in the tev energy regime , and probe the standard model of elementary particles to great accuracy .
electroweak processes which may reveal new physics , such as supersymmetry , are especially interesting .
therefore the accurate calculation of the scattering amplitudes of such high energy processes in the standard model is very important .
the main corrections to the born amplitudes at high energies , @xmath2 , are double logarithmic ( dl ) contributions of the form @xmath3 which arise from soft vector boson exchanges . here
we derive the dl asymptotics of scattering amplitudes , for a sequence of gauge theories leading up to the standard electroweak model .
the dl correction for qed processes dates back many years to the paper by sudakov @xcite . in section 2
we present the original sudakov form factor for qed in a form in which it can be generalized to non - abelian gauge theories , a subject to which we then turn .
we start with the processes where all the scalar products @xmath4 of the momenta of participating particles are of the same order . in section 3
we compute the dl corrections to processes governed by massless non - abelian gauge theories , and then , in section 4 , we turn to the interesting case of broken gauge symmetries , discussing , in particular , the dl effects for standard model electroweak processes .    in all these cases
the dl terms can be resummed in exponential forms which are generalizations of @xmath5 here @xmath6 is the probability of the emission of a soft and quasi - collinear gauge boson from an external particle @xmath7 , and the summation is over all @xmath8 external charged particles participating in the process .
the virtual particles are subject to an infrared cut - off @xmath9 on their transverse momenta .
we use an equation for the evolution of the scattering amplitudes as a function of the infrared cut - off @xmath9 of the transverse momenta of virtual particles .
our approach is based on a gauge invariant dispersive method which is a generalization of a powerful theorem on photon bremsstrahlung due to gribov @xcite .
his remarkable theorem , proved by dispersive methods , states that , due to gauge invariance , the region of applicability of well known formulas for accompanying photon bremsstrahlung is considerably extended at high energies . in these formulas the amplitude for a process with the emission of a soft photon is expressed , in a factorized form , in terms of the amplitude for the non - radiative process , with the particles taken _ on - mass - shell_. since the amplitude is taken on - shell , _ gauge invariance _ is guaranteed .
the evolution equation approach greatly simplifies the computation of dl effects for electroweak processes , which are mediated by broken symmetry with the photon having components in both the @xmath10(2 ) and @xmath11(1 ) gauge groups .
the evolution equations for the amplitude as a function of the infrared cut - off parameter @xmath12 are analogous to the renormalization group equations ( rge ) .
basically we start from the domain of very large @xmath12 , where the born amplitude applies , and evolve down to small @xmath12 , matching the solution at the mass thresholds bounding every new kinematic domain .
it is therefore not surprising that the structure of the exponentiation of the dl effects has a clear physical interpretation .
of course for observable processes it is necessary to consider the dl corrections to both the non - radiative and the radiative processes . for radiative processes we again have exponentiation of the sudakov dl corrections in a form similar to ( [ eq : a1 ] ) . the dependence on the infrared cut - off parameter @xmath9 is canceled in the measurable semi - inclusive process , and is replaced by a dependence on the experimental acceptance cuts on the soft boson emissions . in sections 3.1 , 4.1 and 4.2 we address these issues .    as well as
dl corrections of the sudakov type , there are dl contributions specific to forward or backward scattering , when a final particle is quasi - collinear to an initial particle and their energies are almost equal .
this is the domain of regge kinematics and is the subject of section 5 .
here we have the dl corrections related to the exchange of soft pairs of fermions or of bosons in the crossed channel .
the infrared evolution equations are now non - linear in the amplitude , and in the @xmath13-plane representation are of ricatti - type form . in simple cases
the latter forms can be reduced to a schrdinger - type equation with a harmonic potential .
this approach can also be applied to production processes in the multi - regge kinematics . in this case
the evolution equations are solved in a sequence of domains starting from the region where the born amplitude applies and evolving down in the cut - off @xmath9 to the region where soft particles are emitted .
the vector boson and fermion reggeization can be also easily verified in the dl approximation .
moreover , the infrared evolution equation allows the construction of scattering amplitudes with quasi - elastic unitarity .
the high energy asymptotics of electromagnetic processes was calculated many years ago within the framework of qed @xcite@xcite . in particular the amplitude for @xmath1 elastic scattering at a fixed angle ( @xmath14 a fictitious plays the role of the infrared cut - off . in physical cross sections the divergence in @xmath15 of the elastic amplitude is canceled with the analogous divergences in processes with soft photon emissions . ]
photon mass ) in the dl approximation has the form @xcite @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the born amplitude for @xmath1 scattering and @xmath18 is the sudakov form factor .
the dl approximation applies in the energy regime @xmath19 where the qed coupling @xmath20 .
thus each charged external particle effectively contributes @xmath21 to the total amplitude .
the sudakov form factor appears in the elastic scattering of an electron off an external field @xcite .
it is of the form : @xmath22 to specify @xmath23 it is convenient to use the sudakov parametrization of the momentum of the exchanged virtual photon : @xmath24 where @xmath25 and @xmath26 are the initial and final momenta of the scattered electron .
@xmath27 can then be written as the integral over @xmath28 and @xmath29 : @xmath30 where @xmath31 .
the first two factors in the integrand correspond to the propagators of the virtual fermions which occur in the one - loop triangle sudakov diagram .
the @xmath32 - function appears as a result of the integration of the propagator of the photon over its transverse momentum @xmath33 , noting that the main contribution comes from the region near the photon mass shell @xcite : @xmath34 to dl accuracy ( 6 ) gives for @xmath35 : @xmath36 where the result comes equally from two different kinematical regions , @xmath37 and @xmath38
. therefore one can write @xmath39 .
we can obtain physical insight by presenting the two equal contributions separately . in the first region , with @xmath40 ,
the virtual photon is emitted along @xmath25 and the parameter @xmath29 is given by the ratio of energies of the photon and the initial electron . here instead of @xmath28 , it is convenient to use eq .
( [ eq : kp ] ) to replace it by the square of the transverse momentum component of the photon .
then integrating over @xmath29 and @xmath41 gives @xmath42 in the dl approximation , which may be evaluated to give half of @xmath23 .
the quantity @xmath43 is proportional to the probability @xmath44 of the emission of a soft and almost collinear photon from an external particle with energy @xmath2 and mass @xmath45 , i.e. @xmath46 if several charged particles participate in a process , for example @xmath47 , then analogous contributions appear for each external line , provided all external invariants are large and of the same order .
this leads to the general result @xmath48 where @xmath8 is the number of external lines corresponding to charged particles . in summary
the soft emissions described by the sudakov form factor is a quasi - classical effect which does not depend on the hard dynamics of the process .
in particular there are no quantum mechanical interference effects in the dl sudakov corrections , for large scattering angles .
sudakov effects have been widely discussed for non - abelian gauge theories , such as @xmath49 and can be calculated in various ways ( see , for instance , @xcite ) .
we consider here the scattering amplitude in the simplest kinematics when all its invariants @xmath50 are large and of the same order @xmath51 .
a general method of finding the dl asymptotics ( not only of the sudakov type ) is based on the infrared evolution equations describing the dependence of the amplitudes on the infrared cutoff @xmath9 of the virtual particle transverse momenta @xcite .
this cutoff plays the same role as @xmath52 in qed , but , unlike @xmath52 , it is not necessary that it vanishes and it may take an arbitrary value .
it can be introduced in a gauge invariant way by working , for instance , in a finite phase space volume in the transverse direction with linear size @xmath53 . instead of calculating asymptotics of particular feynman diagrams and summing these asymptotics for a process with @xmath8 external lines it is convenient to extract the virtual particle with the smallest value of @xmath54 in such a way , that the transverse momenta @xmath55 of the other virtual particles are much bigger @xmath56 for the other particles @xmath57 plays the role of the initial infrared cut - off @xmath58 .    in particular , the sudakov dl corrections
are related to the exchange of soft gauge bosons , see fig .  1 .
for this case the integral over the momentum @xmath59 of the soft ( i.e. @xmath60 ) virtual boson with the smallest @xmath61 can be factored off , which leads to the following infrared evolution equation : @xmath62 where the amplitude @xmath63 on the right hand side is to be taken on the mass shell , but with the substituted infrared cutoff : @xmath64 .
the generator @xmath65 acts on the color indices of the particle with momentum @xmath66 .
the non - abelian gauge coupling is @xmath67 . in eq .
( [ eq : vem ] ) , and below , @xmath68 denotes the component of the gauge boson momentum @xmath69 transverse to the particle emitting this boson .
note that in sudakov dl corrections there are no interference effects , so that we can talk about the emission ( and absorption ) of a gauge boson by a definite ( external ) particle , namely by a particle with momentum almost collinear to @xmath69 .
it can be expressed in invariant form as @xmath70 for all @xmath71 .
the above factorization is related to a non - abelian generalization of the gribov theorem ) below , together with a description of its essential content . ] for the amplitude of the bremsstrahlung of a photon with small transverse momentum @xmath72 in high energy hadron scattering @xcite .
the form in which we present eq .
( [ eq : vem ] ) corresponds to a covariant gauge for the gluon with momentum @xmath59 .
formally this expression can be written in a gauge invariant way if we include in the sum the term with @xmath73 ( which does not give a dl contribution ) . indeed ,
in this case we can substitute @xmath74 by @xmath75 , where the polarization matrices of the boson @xmath76 in the various gauges differ by the terms proportional to @xmath77 or @xmath78 giving a vanishing contribution due to the conservation of the total color charge @xmath79 .
thus we have the possibility of choosing appropriate gauges for each kinematical region of quasi - collinearity of @xmath59 and @xmath80 .
we can , however , use ( [ eq : vem ] ) as well , noting that in this region for @xmath81 we have @xmath82 , where @xmath83 is the energy of the particle with momentum @xmath80 and @xmath84 the frequency of the emitted gauge boson , so that : @xmath85 where @xmath86 is the eigenvalue of the casimir operator @xmath87 ( @xmath88 for gauge bosons in the adjoint representation of the gauge group @xmath49 and @xmath89 for fermions in the fundamental representation ) .
the differential form of the infrared evolution equation follows immediately from ( [ eq : dgvem ] ) : @xmath90 where @xmath91 with @xmath92 as in the abelian case , @xmath93 is the probability to emit a soft and almost collinear gauge boson from the particle @xmath94 with mass @xmath95 , subject to the infrared cut - off @xmath9 on the transverse momentum .
note again that the cut - off @xmath9 is not taken to zero .
the function @xmath43 is determined by ( 9 ) for arbitrary values of the ratio @xmath96 . to logarithmic accuracy
, we obtain from ( [ eq : wl ] ) : @xmath97 the infrared evolution equation ( [ eq : ee ] ) should be solved with an appropriate initial condition . in the case of large scattering angles , if we choose the cut - off to be the large scale @xmath98 then clearly there are no sudakov corrections .
the initial condition is therefore @xmath99 and the solution of ( [ eq : ee ] ) is thus given by the product of the born amplitude and the sudakov form factors : @xmath100 therefore we obtain an exactly analogous sudakov exponentiation for the gauge group @xmath49 to that for the abelian case , see ( [ eq : a11 ] ) . theories with semi - simple gauge groups can be considered in a similar way .      since ultimately we are interested in measurable cross sections we have to consider the dl corrections to amplitudes of processes with soft emissions , as well as those without .
only in inclusive cross sections will the dependence on the infrared cut - off @xmath101 disappear , being replaced by parameters specifying the experimental acceptance . to put it in another way
, cross sections of the emission processes receive large ( dl ) contributions from regions where the emitted bosons are soft and the emission angles are small . therefore , to be consistent , we need to calculate cross sections of such processes as well .
this is easy to do for qed processes , where the single gauge boson ( the photon ) is neutral and does not possess self - interactions . therefore soft photons are emitted independently according to a poisson distribution . in non - abelian theories ,
gauge bosons are not neutral and interact with each other .
consequently , the soft emission does not follow a poisson distribution @xcite .
we again consider the simplest situation , when the additional soft gauge boson is emitted in the process with all invariants @xmath102 large .
of course , for the emission of a boson almost collinear to the particle the direction of the particle with momentum @xmath103 , the invariant @xmath104 is small in comparison with @xmath98 . in the case of
non - abelian gauge theories the corresponding amplitude for the emission of a soft gauge boson with small @xmath105 has , according to the gribov theorem , the following form : @xmath106 the possible corrections to this factorized expression are of the order of @xmath107 .
however , to dl accuracy , we can substitute @xmath58 in the arguments of the scattering amplitudes by its boundary value @xmath57 .
notice that the amplitude on the r.h.s . of ( [ eq : rem ] )
is taken on - the - mass shell , which guarantees its gauge invariance . the result ( [ eq : rem ] ) is highly non - trivial in the feynman diagram approach .
it means , that the region of applicability of the classical formulas for the bremsstrahlung amplitudes is significantly enlarged at high energies .
v.  gribov proved this result by using dispersion relations in the variables @xmath108 , and demonstrating that for small @xmath109 the pole terms in these invariants are much larger than the corresponding cut contributions due to the gauge invariance of the theory @xcite .
the region of applicability of ( [ eq : rem ] ) corresponds to the situation when the momentum of the emitted soft boson does not spoil the kinematics of the non - radiative process .
this implies that the frequency @xmath110 of the boson emitted off the particle with momentum @xmath80 should be much smaller than the energy @xmath83 , and that the emission angle latexmath:[$\vartheta _ { l}\simeq         the angle between @xmath80 and all other momenta @xmath112 ( otherwise one needs to include interference effects ) . for the physical coulomb gauge ( @xmath113 ) in the kinematical region where the gauge boson is emitted at a small angle @xmath114 with respect to the particle with momentum @xmath103 in ( [ eq : rem ] ) only the term with @xmath115 contributes .
the method based on the infrared evolution equation allows us to calculate , in the dl approximation , the amplitudes of the hard processes accompanied by the emission of any number of soft gauge bosons @xcite .
let us consider the amplitude for the emission of one soft gauge boson in the region of quasi - collinearity of its momentum with momentum @xmath103 ( i.e. , the emission of a soft boson by a particle with momentum @xmath103 ) .
when the transverse momentum @xmath109 of this boson is much less than the infrared cut - off @xmath9 , used for the virtual particles , the amplitude is given by the term with @xmath115 in the sum in ( [ eq : rem ] ) .
but we need to know the emission amplitude in the opposite case , @xmath116 .
it can be found from the evolution equation in this region using expression ( [ eq : rem ] ) at @xmath117 as the initial condition .
the kernel of the evolution equation in this region differs from the corresponding kernel in the region @xmath118 ( that is the kernel ( 16 ) of the evolution equation for the amplitude without emission ) by a term connected with the emission of a virtual boson from the real gauge boson with momentum @xmath59 : @xmath119 where @xmath120 is given by ( [ eq : wl ] ) with @xmath88 and @xmath121 , see fig .
it is clear , that this new term in the kernel for evolution from @xmath122 to @xmath58 leads to an additional term @xmath123 in the sudakov exponential .
thus , the amplitude for the emission of one gauge boson with small transverse momentum from the hard scattering process is of the form : @xmath124 @xmath125 we note again that here @xmath122 means the square of the component of the three - dimensional momentum transverse to the momentum of the emitting particle , say for example , @xmath80 .
we can write @xmath122 in the invariant form @xmath126 with @xmath81 , which does not depend on @xmath13 .
again we see that we have the exponentiation of the sudakov dl corrections .
note that in the abelian qed case we have @xmath127 and the exponent for the photon bremsstrahlung amplitude remains the same as that for the process without photon emission .
it is related to the poisson distribution for soft photon production .
the exponentiation of virtual dl corrections holds for multiple emission processes as well . in qed
it is trivial , since the soft photons are emitted independently . in non - abelian gauge theories it is not so simple .
the main complexity is connected with the nontrivial structure of the amplitudes for multiple emission of real soft gauge bosons , arising from their self - interaction .
but in the dl approximation these amplitudes can be calculated .
due to the coherence effect , the branching cascade develops only in the region of sequentially shrinking angular cones @xcite . in this region
the born amplitudes for multiple emission processes have a factorized form and the virtual corrections exponentiate @xcite .
it is proved by solving the infrared evolution equation in a series of regions where the infrared cut - off @xmath9 is bounded between a sequence of decreasing transverse momenta of the emitted gluons , using in each region the solution of the previous region as the initial condition .
the final result is    @xmath128 @xmath129 where @xmath130 are the momenta of the emitted gluons with strongly ordered energies and @xmath131 are their components transverse to the momenta of the emitting jets .
the same method , based on the infrared evolution equation , is also applicable to broken gauge theories .
let us consider for definiteness the standard electroweak theory , where the physical gauge bosons are a massless photon ( described by the field @xmath132 ) and massive @xmath133 and @xmath134 bosons ( described correspondingly by fields @xmath135 and @xmath136 ) .
to dl accuracy , all masses can be set equal : @xmath137 and the energy considered to be much larger , @xmath138 . in the unbroken phase the corresponding abelian and yang - mills fields
are denoted by @xmath139 and @xmath140 , with @xmath141 .
the physical fields are linear combinations of the fields in the unbroken theory with coefficients depending on the weinberg angle @xmath142 .
the left and right handed fermions are correspondingly doublets ( @xmath143 ) and singlets ( @xmath144 ) of the @xmath10(2 ) weak isospin group and have hypercharge @xmath145 related to the electric charge @xmath146 , measured in units of the proton charge , by the gell - mann - nishijima formula @xmath147 .    in the evolution equation in the dl
approximation the value of the infrared cutoff @xmath12 can be chosen in two different ranges : 1 ) @xmath148 and 2 ) @xmath149 .
the second case is universal in the sense that it does not depend on details of the electroweak theory .
it will be discussed below . in the first region
we can neglect spontaneous symmetry breaking effects , in particular gauge boson masses , and consider the evolution equation in the unbroken phase with effectively massless particles @xmath150 and @xmath151 .
of course one could calculate everything also in terms of the physical fields @xmath152 and @xmath153 . in the unbroken phase this is equivalent to the description in terms of the original fields @xmath154 and @xmath155 and leads to the same final result , but the intermediate steps will be more complicated because there are cancellations between non - exponentiating terms from diagrams with @xmath134 and @xmath156 exchanges .
the separation of these contributions is not gauge invariant and if we would consider the diagrams without virtual photons we would violate @xmath157 symmetry .
taking into account only such diagrams leads to nonexponentiating dl effects in an axial gauge @xcite .
3 illustrates this at the two loop level .
the loss of gauge invariance is related to the fact that the photon field contains the component @xmath158 of the non - abelian field @xmath159 , and so omitting the virtual photons would violate the conservation of the weak isospin current ( in the unbroken theory ) .
[ fig : zg ] +   +   +   +    in region 1 ) the infrared evolution equation , written in terms of the unbroken fields , is of a form analogous to ( [ eq : ee ] ) if we assume , for simplicity , that all the charged particles have masses @xmath160@xmath161 here @xmath162 is the total weak isospin of particle @xmath7 , @xmath163 is its weak hypercharge , and @xmath67 and @xmath164 are the couplings of the @xmath165 and @xmath166 gauge groups , respectively .
the sum in ( [ eq : ubee ] ) is to be performed over all @xmath8 external particles .
as before , the initial condition is given by the requirement that for the infrared cut - off @xmath167 we obtain the born amplitude .
the solution of ( [ eq : ubee ] ) is thus given by @xmath168 .
\label{eq : ubs }      \end{aligned}\ ] ] the expression in the brackets in the exponential can be written in terms of the parameters of the broken theory as follows : @xmath169 where the three terms on the r.h.s .
correspond to the contributions of the soft photon ( interacting with the electric charge @xmath170 ) , the @xmath133 and the @xmath134 bosons , respectively .
although we may rewrite solution ( [ eq : ubs ] ) in terms of the parameters of the broken theory in the form of a product of three exponents corresponding to the exchanges of photons , @xmath133 and @xmath134 bosons , it would be wrong to identify the contributions of the diagrams without virtual photons with this expression for the particular case @xmath171 .
this becomes evident when we note that if we were to omit photon lines then the result would depend on the choice of gauge , and therefore be unphysical . only for @xmath172 , where the photon coincides with the @xmath150 gauge boson ,
would the identification of the @xmath173 term with the contribution of the diagrams with photons be correct .
choosing the cutoff @xmath12 in the second region , @xmath149 , the infrared evolution equation takes the following form : @xmath174 evidently , only the photon contribution remains in this region .
now the appropriate initial condition is given by ( [ eq : ubs ] ) evaluated at the matching point @xmath175 .
the solution is thus @xmath176   \nonumber \\       & & \times \exp \left [ - \frac{1}{2 } \sum_{i=1}^{n } q^2_i \left ( w_i(s,\mu^2 )   - w_i(s , m^2 )
\right ) \right ] \nonumber \\   & = & { \cal m}_{\rm born}(p_{1}, ... ,p_{n } )       \nonumber \\       & & \times \exp \left [ -\frac{g^{2}}{2(4\pi ) ^{2}}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left ( \left\ {       t_{i}(t_{i}+1)+\tan ^{2}\theta _ { w}\left ( \frac{y_{i}}{2}\right )       ^{2}\right\ } \log ^{2}\frac{s}{m^{2}}\right ) \right ]   \nonumber \\       & & \times \exp \left [ -\sum_{i=1}^{n } \
! \left ( \frac{e_{i}^{2}}{(4\pi ) ^{2}}\ ! \left ( \log \frac{s}{m_{i}\,m}\log \frac{m^{2}}{m_{i}^{2}}+\log \frac{s}{m_{i}^{2}}\log \frac{m_{i}^{2}}{\mu ^{2 } } \ !
\right ) \ !
\right ) \ !
\right ] ,       \label{eq : ubsa }      \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the last equality holds for @xmath177 and @xmath178 from the respective expansions of @xmath179 in ( [ eq : a10 ] ) .
let us stress that ( [ eq : ubs ] ) and ( [ eq : ubsa ] ) are applicable for processes involving chiral fermions as well as gauge bosons , provided that all the invariants are large ( @xmath180 ) compared to @xmath181 .
note , that in the case , when quarks or gluons participate in the reaction , we should multiply these expressions by the sudakov factors corresponding to the virtual gluons emitted by these colored particles .
the infrared evolution equations ( [ eq : ubee ] ) and ( [ eq : ubeea ] ) have a clear physical meaning analogous to the renormalization group equations and therefore it is natural to expect that the next - to - leading corrections to the kernels can be calculated .    for physical observables
soft real photon emission must be taken into account in an inclusive way and effectively the parameter @xmath101 in ( [ eq : ubsa ] ) will be replaced by parameters depending on the experimental requirements .
the calculation of amplitudes for processes with the emission of a gauge boson in the kinematical region which gives dl contributions to the cross sections ( i.e. the region of soft quasi - collinear emission ) is similar to the analogous calculation for unbroken gauge theories , with complications of the type that we discussed above .
one is that we have to consider separately two regions of @xmath109 of the emitted boson : first @xmath182 and second @xmath183 . at high energies the cross sections of the emission processes receive dl contributions from both of these regions . of course
, @xmath133 and @xmath134 boson emissions contribute in the second region only
. therefore consideration of the first case is very simple .
for values of the infrared cut - off @xmath184 the amplitude for the emission of a soft photon by a particle with momenta @xmath80 ( i.e. emission within the cone along @xmath185 not containing the momenta of the other particles ) has , in the physical ( coulomb ) gauge , a factorized form @xmath186 according to the gribov theorem of ( [ eq : rem ] ) .
however , if @xmath187 , the kernel of the infrared evolution equation does not change when the cut - off @xmath58 changes from the domain @xmath188 to @xmath189 ( since the @xmath133 and @xmath134 bosons do not contribute in this first region ) . therefore , ( [ eq : g1 ] ) remains valid at arbitrary values of the cut - off @xmath9 .    in the second region , @xmath190 ,
the result is more involved .
we need to start from @xmath191 , where we can use a generalization of gribov s theorem .
consider again the case when a gauge boson is emitted by a particle with momentum @xmath80 .
we have @xmath192 where @xmath193 is given by ( [ eq : ubs ] ) and @xmath194 with @xmath195 .
then we have to solve the evolution equation in the region @xmath196 with the initial condition given by ( [ eq : g2 ] ) at the matching point @xmath197 .
in fact , it is more appropriate to work in terms of the fields @xmath140 and @xmath139 .
the kernel of the evolution equation remains unchanged for the emission of the @xmath150-particle due to its abelian nature . on the other hand the emission of the @xmath198 -particle leads to the same additional contribution as in the unbroken theory ( see ( [ eq : f1 ] ) ) .
therefore in the cut - off region @xmath199 , we obtain @xmath200 with the same amplitude @xmath193 as in ( [ eq : ubs ] ) and @xmath201 finally we study the region of the infrared cut - off @xmath202 . in this region the kernel of the evolution equation is determined by the electromagnetic interaction only ; therefore , the only contribution related to the emitted particles is that for @xmath133emission .
this contribution is given by @xmath203 where @xmath204 is defined by ( [ eq : a10 ] ) and ( 9 ) with @xmath205 .
consequently , for values of the infrared cut - off @xmath202 we obtain : @xmath206 where @xmath193 is given by ( [ eq : ubsa ] ) and @xmath207 the important point here is the difference of the dl exponent for a nonradiative process and the process with photon emission , which leads to a violation of the poisson distribution for photons in the dl approximation at high energies .
it is a direct consequence of the fact that the photon has a non - abelian component .
measurable cross sections have an inclusive nature ( at least with respect to photons , since only cross sections with an infinite number of emitted soft photons are observable ) .
let us consider the dl corrections to such cross sections .
it is clear that for the emission of real gauge bosons the same cut - off @xmath208 must be used as for virtual ones .
therefore , to calculate an experimentally measured cross section we have to take the cut - off @xmath58 less than the lower bound @xmath209 of @xmath210 of those photons emitted in processes which are not included in the cross section .
the calculation of the cross section is simple if the experimental conditions are such that only processes with emission of photons with @xmath211 are allowed . in this case
the non - abelian component of the photon is not essential , so that photon emissions obey a poisson distribution .
therefore for the cross section with an arbitrary number of emitted photons with momenta lying inside regions @xmath212 of the momentum space around the emitting particles with momenta @xmath103 , we obtain : @xmath213 where @xmath214 is the cross section of the non - radiative process and @xmath215 is the probability of the emission of photons with @xmath216 inside the allowed region @xmath217 since the upper bound on @xmath57 of the photons which are allowed to be radiated is less than @xmath218 , we must use the cut - off @xmath219 and , consequently , ( [ eq : ubsa ] ) for the matrix element of the non - radiative process .
therefore , we obtain @xmath220   \nonumber \\       & & \times \exp \left [ -\sum_{i=1}^{n}q_{i}^{2}\left ( w_{i}(s,\mu       ^{2})-w_{i}(s , m^{2})\right ) + w_{\exp}^{\gamma } \right ] \ , ,       \label{eq : h3 }      \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath221 is given by ( 10 ) and ( 9 ) . evidently , the dependence on @xmath9 in @xmath222 and @xmath215 cancels in the exponential .
if we include in the observed cross section the emission of gauge bosons with transverse momenta larger than @xmath223 , then the problem becomes much more complicated because of the non - poisson distribution of soft emission in non - abelian gauge theories @xcite .
let us consider here the simplest example of the cross section completely inclusive of photons emission in the two - loop approximation .
then the cross section can be written as @xmath224 where @xmath225 is the one - loop virtual correction , @xmath226 comes from one - photon emission taken in the born approximation and @xmath227 from the one - loop correction to one - photon emission .
due to exponentiation of the dl terms of the sudakov - type in virtual corrections , the term @xmath228 in ( [ eq : h4 ] ) gives the two - loop virtual correction .
the term @xmath229 gives the correction from two - photon emission in the born approximation , since in this approximation the two photons are emitted independently .    in the considered case of the cross section completely inclusive of photon emission
the cut - off parameter @xmath58 can be taken as large as @xmath218 ( but not greater , because the cross section does not include @xmath133 and @xmath134 emission ) .
each of the corrections considered above depends on @xmath230 , but their sum in ( [ eq : h4 ] ) does not ; therefore , we can take the most suitable value of the cut - off to calculate the cross section .
it is easy to see that the most convenient choice is @xmath231 . in this case from ( 26 ) we have : @xmath232 the correction due to one - photon emission taken in the born approximation is @xmath233 where @xmath234 is given by ( [ eq : h2 ] ) with @xmath231 , @xmath235 and the region @xmath212 defined by inequality @xmath236 .
it gives @xmath237 the one - loop contribution to this correction @xmath227 can be found with help of ( 26 ) , ( 31 ) , ( 32 ) and ( 33 ) : @xmath238\ ] ] @xmath239 \ , .
\label{eq : h7}\ ] ]
the important point here is that the virtual correction to the one - photon emission does not coincide with the corresponding correction to the non - radiative process ( which means violation of the poisson distribution ) and depends on the momentum of the emitted photon .
it is a consequence of the fact that the photon has a non - abelian component .
one can check that using an arbitrary cut - off @xmath219 gives the same result , but the calculation is more complicated .
for two particle scattering in either the forward @xmath240 or the backward @xmath241 directions , corresponding to the regge regime , there are situations , where the amplitudes have dl contributions different from those of the sudakov type .
these logarithms appear from feynman diagrams in which the soft particles with the minimal transverse momenta are pairs of virtual fermions or bosons exchanged in the crossed @xmath242 or @xmath28 channels . for qed and qcd the infrared evolution equations for such regge processes
are known [ 4 , 5 , 7 ] .
the new features presented by the standard model of weak interactions are that the gauge group is semi - simple , @xmath243 , and that there is a large difference in the particle mass scales .
the general strategy of finding dl asymptotics in this case is to first solve the evolution equation in the region @xmath244 , where @xmath245 is the largest particle mass in the theory ; then to solve it in the region @xmath246 , where @xmath247 is the next largest particle mass , using the solution of the previous equation at @xmath248 as the initial condition , and to proceed with these steps until the intermediate particles are light quarks , electrons , neutrinos and photons .    for simplicity
we consider only the evolution equation in the region where the cut - off parameter @xmath9 is much larger than all particle masses . in this case
it is natural to calculate the amplitudes in terms of the massless particles of the unbroken theory , that is the leptons and quarks , the higgs , @xmath150 and @xmath198 bosons . by
solving the generalized infrared evolution equation in the dl approximation we sum up contributions of ladder - type diagrams in the crossed channel , with all possible insertions of the gauge bosons , leading to the sudakov double logarithms .
because the transverse momenta of the virtual particles are strongly ordered , the integral kernels in the ladder diagrams are given by the splitting kernels of the dglap evolution equ ation @xcite which describes all possible transitions among fermions and bosons in the standard model .
these splitting kernels can be simplified since the regge kinematic domain corresponds to a strong ordering of the bjorken variables @xmath249 along the ladder .
for definiteness we study the simple case of the backward lepton ( @xmath94 ) - antilepton ( @xmath250 ) scattering for @xmath251 . in the born approximation , the contribution of the feynman diagrams with the higgs , photon , @xmath150 and @xmath198 boson exchanges depend on the helicities @xmath252 ( with @xmath253 ) of the initial and final fermions , which have momenta @xmath254 we consider the scattering of the leptons @xmath255 and @xmath256 belonging to the first generation with the smallest masses .
because the coupling of the higgs particle to leptons is proportional to their mass , we can neglect the higgs contribution .
the dirac spinors describing the @xmath94 and @xmath257 states with the definite helicities @xmath52 are @xmath258 where @xmath259 with the use of these expressions we can calculate the matrix elements of the @xmath260-matrix structures which appear in the born approximation for backward lepton - antilepton scattering , @xmath261 , @xmath262 it is important , to note that both the helicity structures of @xmath263 and @xmath264 are proportional to @xmath265 , which means , that the helicities of the two fermions in the crossed @xmath28 channel are opposite in sign .
therefore the born diagram with a virtual @xmath198 boson gives a negligible contribution to the backward scattering . because the @xmath150 boson interacts with hypercharge @xmath145 ,
its contribution to the born amplitude is also zero for the right - handed neutrinos ( if they were to exist ) .
below we consider only the non - trivial case , when only @xmath266 , @xmath267 and @xmath268 can participate in the reaction .
because the hypercharge @xmath269 for left - handed fermions and @xmath270 for the right - handed electron , in this case the born amplitude is given by @xmath271 in the dl approximation we also obtain a significant simplification of the helicity structure of the scattering amplitude : @xmath272 where the functions @xmath273 describe contributions with positive and negative signature : @xmath274 the amplitudes @xmath275 are assumed to satisfy dispersion relations of the form @xmath276 where in the born approximation @xmath277 is different from zero only in the region where @xmath278 is of the order of unity . in particular , from the known behavior of the born contribution @xmath279 at large @xmath98 and its degeneracy in the signature we obtain @xmath280 the absence of degeneracy of the amplitude with respect to signature is a result of the presence of the non - planar diagrams which arise from the virtual soft @xmath150-bosons in the infrared evolution equations ( cf . the qcd case @xcite ) : @xmath281 @xmath282 @xmath283 @xmath284 where we introduced the notation    @xmath285    the linear terms in @xmath275 , on the right - hand side of the evolution equations , are the sudakov contributions which arise from soft @xmath198 and @xmath286 virtual bosons coupling to external lines with different momenta @xmath287 and @xmath288 .
the non - linear terms appear due to soft pairs of leptons exchanged in the crossed @xmath28 channel .
note that , in the above equations , the term related to the @xmath98-channel sudakov vertex with @xmath198 exchange is proportional to the casimir operator @xmath289 for the weak isospin group @xmath165 , and the total @xmath150 boson contribution from the four sudakov vertices having singularities in the @xmath98 and @xmath242 channels is proportional to @xmath290 .
the corresponding contribution of these vertices to the terms mixing the amplitudes with different signatures is proportional to @xmath291 for @xmath198 exchange and @xmath292 for @xmath150 exchange .
non - linear terms take into account the contribution of the ladder diagrams for two leptons interacting through @xmath150 exchanges .
the above equations can be simplified if we use the mellin representation for the amplitudes : @xmath293 where @xmath294 are the signature factors @xmath295 and where the integration contour @xmath296 is situated along the imaginary axes to the right of all singularities of the @xmath242-channel partial waves @xmath297 . in the @xmath13-representation , taking into account the degeneracy of the partial waves with different signatures in the born approximation , the evolution equations can be written in the form of ricatti equations [ 7 ] : @xmath298 if we take into account only the terms with effective dl variables @xmath299 and neglect other terms .
furthermore , using the following definition for the @xmath242-channel partial waves @xmath300 the equations can be written as follows @xmath301 both equations can be reduced to linear form after introducing new functions @xmath302 and @xmath303 according to the definitions @xmath304 they have the form of schrdinger equations @xmath305 the first is an equation for the harmonic oscillator . therefore taking into account the boundary condition
@xmath306 so as to match onto perturbation theory , we obtain the solution @xmath307 where @xmath308 is the parabolic cylinder function : @xmath309 therefore for the scattering amplitude with positive signature we have , to dl accuracy , @xmath310 with @xmath311 .
the equation for negative signatures can be easily solved for @xmath312 ( corresponding to complex values of the weinberg angle ) : @xmath313 where @xmath314 is the confluent hypergeometric function : @xmath315 therefore for @xmath312 , the amplitude with negative signature , in the dl approximation , is @xmath316 with @xmath311 . for general values of the parameter @xmath317 the solution can be obtained as a perturbation series in @xmath318 .
this perturbative expansion is convergent for all values of the dl parameter @xmath319 .
because the function @xmath308 does not have any singularities in the complex plane , the high energy asymptotics of the scattering amplitude with positive signature @xmath320 is determined by the position of its zeroes , @xmath321 , in the left - half plane , re@xmath322 .
the function @xmath323 has a singularity @xmath324 as @xmath325 , and therefore the scattering amplitude with negative signature behaves as @xmath326 at high energies .
such behavior of @xmath327 is valid also for other values of the parameter @xmath317 .
note , that similar dl asymptotics were obtained in qed for @xmath1 backward scattering amplitudes . for energies smaller than the masses of @xmath198 and @xmath134 bosons , only diagrams with virtual photons give rise to a dl contribution .
the photons interact with electric charge @xmath328 , which is the same for left- and right - handed electrons .
it is interesting , that at very large energies , the behavior of @xmath1 backward scattering amplitudes is different from the qed prediction even in the case of the abelian standard model with @xmath329    the dl asymptotics of lepton - antilepton forward scattering amplitudes , which is related to @xmath242-channel exchange of two fermions and an arbitrary number of @xmath198 and @xmath150 bosons , can be obtained in a similar way . in this case
one should take into account the diagram with a virtual @xmath198 boson even in the born approximation .
the reggeization of the fermions and @xmath198 boson can also be verified in the dl approximation with the use of the infrared evolution equation .
moreover , one can construct amplitudes with quasi - elastic unitarity @xcite , which is important for the theory of the bfkl pomeron @xcite .
some other applications of the dl asymptotics in qcd are given in @xcite , @xcite .
we have calculated the double logarithmic ( dl ) corrections to the amplitudes of a number of different high energy processes , in particular , of electroweak processes in the standard model .
these sudakov - type corrections , which are found to exponentiate , are crucial for the high precision studies planned at the next linear @xmath330 collider .
our approach is based on the use of an evolution equation in the infrared cut - off parameter @xmath9 , which in turn is based on a generalization of a gauge invariant dispersive method for photon bremsstrahlung originally due to gribov .
we have assumed that the energy of the process is much larger than all the masses in the theory .
however new physics could appear in the tev region and it will modify our dl asymptotic forms . because our approach is based on the infrared evolution equation ,
we need simply to change the initial conditions in this region to incorporate the new particles and/or new interactions of the existing particles .
the infrared evolution equation has the form of a renormalization group equation in the two - dimensional impact parameter subspace .
the usual bfkl equation can be also considered as a simplified version of the renormalization group equation but in two - dimensional longitudinal subspace . in this case , in the leading logarithmic approximation @xmath331 , instead of their dependence from the infrared cut - off @xmath12 , we have conformal invariance of the @xmath242-channel partial waves in impact parameter space .
however , in the next - to - leading approximation , the effect of the running coupling leads to violation of conformal invariance @xcite .
after the breaking of conformal invariance the equation takes the form of a quantized callan - symanzik equation @xcite .
therefore , even in the case of the bfkl equation , the renormalization group has its peculiarities .
it is related to the fact , that the equation determines not only the anomalous dimensions of the operators of different twists , but also their relative contributions .
the expressions for the dl asymptotics that we have obtained in the standard model can be used in perturbation theory to verify the first order , and to predict the higher order , expressions for scattering amplitudes , as has been done for the dl asymptotics in qcd @xcite , @xcite .
finally , we reiterate that the accurate calculation of scattering amplitudes is important because the effects of new physics can be rather small .
after this work was completed a paper by p. ciafaloni and d. comelli @xcite appeared , in which the electroweak dl corrections are considered in the particular case of massless @xmath332 production by a source which is a singlet with respect to the @xmath243 gauge group .
the results of this paper ( in particular , nonexponentiating dl corrections ) are not in agreement with our corresponding results .
the difference appears due to the fact that the method in @xcite consists of factorizing off the virtual gauge boson with the softest ( i.e. with smallest frequency ) momentum @xmath333 by computing external line insertions only , and in iterating this procedure by setting the virtual momentum @xmath334 in the left - over diagram .
we believe that this approach , which is in disagreement with the method based on the infrared evolution equation , is not valid .
we thank intas ( 95 - 0311 ) and the royal society for support .
we also thank ms .
sharon fairless for help in preparing the manuscript .
v. n. gribov , yad .
fiz . 5 ( 1967 ) 399 ( sov .
. phys . * 5 * ( 1967 ) 280 ) ; sov .
* 12 * ( 1971 ) 543 ; l. n. lipatov , nucl . phys . * b307 * ( 1988 ) 705 ; v. del duca , nucl . phys .
* b345 * ( 1990 ) 369 .
v. n. gribov , g. v. frolov , v. g. gorshkov and l. n. lipatov , phys . lett . * 22 * ( 1966 ) 671 ; yad . fiz .
* 6 * ( 1967 ) 129 , 361 ( sov . j. nucl
* 6 * ( 1967 ) 95 ) ; v. g. gorshkov , sov .
* 6 * ( 1968 ) 95 ; v. g. gorshkov , l. n. lipatov , m. m. nesterov , yad .
* 9 * ( 1969 ) 1221 ( sov .
* 9 * ( 1969 ) 714 ) .
l. n. lipatov , yad . fiz .
* 6 * ( 1967 ) 564 ( sov .
* 6 * ( 1967 ) 411 ) ; yad
* 14 * ( 1971 ) 160 , 396 ( sov .
* 14 * ( 1971 ) 90 , 223 ) ; v. g. gorshkov and l. n. lipatov , yad
* 9 * ( 1969 ) 818 ( sov .
* 9 * ( 1969 ) 480 ) .
j. j. carazzone , e. c. poggio and h. r. quinn , phys . rev .
* d11 * ( 1975 ) 2286 ; j. m. cornwall and g. tiktopolous , phys .
* 35 * ( 1975 ) 338 ; phys . rev .
* d13 * ( 1976 ) 3370 ; j. frenkel and j. c. taylor , nucl . phys .
* b116 * ( 1976 ) 185 ; v. v. belokurov and n. i. usyukina , phys . lett .
* b94 * ( 1980 ) 251 ; theor .
* 44 * ( 1980 ) 657 ; * 45 * ( 1980 ) 957 .
e. a. kuraev and v. s. fadin , yad . fiz .
* 27 * ( 1978 ) 1107 ( sov .
* 27 * ( 1978 ) 587 ) ; b. i. ermolaev and v. s. fadin , jetp lett . * 33 * ( 1981 ) 269 ; a. h. mueller , phys . lett .
* b108 * ( 1982 ) 355 ; b. i. ermolaev , l. n. lipatov and v. s. fadin , yad . fiz .
* 45 * ( 1987 ) 817 ( sov .
* 45 * ( 1987 ) 508 ) ; b. i.  ermolaev , l. n. lipatov , int . j. mod
. phys . * a4 * ( 1989 ) 3147 .      v. n. gribov and l. n. lipatov , sov .
15 * ( 1972 ) 438 , 675 ; l. n. lipatov , yad .
* 20 * ( 1974 ) 181 ( sov .
* 20 * ( 1974 ) 94 ) ; g. altarelli and g. parisi , nucl . phys .
* b126 * ( 1977 ) 298 ; yu . i. dokshitzer , sov .
jetp * 46 * ( 1977 ) 641 .
lipatov , sov .
* 23 * ( 1976 ) 642 ; v.s .
fadin , e.a .
kuraev and l.n .
lipatov , phys . lett .
* b60 * ( 1975 ) 50 ; v.s .
fadin , e.a .
kuraev and l.n .
lipatov , sov .
jetp * 45 * ( 1977 ) 199 ; ya.ya .
balitsky and l.n .
lipatov , sov .
* 28 * ( 1978 ) 822 .
r. kirschner and l. n. lipatov , nucl .
* b213 * ( 1983 ) 122 ; b. i. ermolaev , s. i. manaenkov and m. g. ryskin , z. phys . * c69 * ( 1996 ) 259 ; j. bartels , b. i. ermolaev and m. g. ryskin , z. phys .
* c70 * ( 1996 ) 273 ; z. phys . *
c72 * ( 1996 ) 627 ; s. i. manaenkov , z. phys . * c75 * ( 1997 ) 685 ; y. kiyo and j. kodaira , z. phys . * c74 * ( 1997 ) 631 ; b. badalek and j. kwiecinski , phys . lett . * b418 * ( 1998 ) 229 ; j. bartels , t. gehrmann and m. g. ryskin , desy 99 - 65 , hep - ph/9906204 ; b. i. ermolaev , m. greco and s. i. troyan , cern - th/99 - 155 .


the quantum mechanical spin degree of freedom is now widely exploited to control current transport in electronic devices .
for instance , the readout of magnetic hard disks is based on the spin - valve effect , i.e. the tunability of a conductance through the relative orientation of some ferromagnetic polarizations @xcite . however , realizing spin injection in mesoscopic conductors would allow to implement further functionalities , like e.g. a gate control of the spin valve effect @xcite .
importantly , electronic interaction effects can occur in mesoscopic structures , due to the electronic confinement .
this raises the fundamental question of the interplay between spin - dependent transport and electronic interactions .    upon scattering on the interface between a ferromagnet ( f ) and a non - magnetic material , electrons with spin
parallel or antiparallel to the magnetization of f can pick up different phase shifts , because they are affected by different scattering potentials .
this _ spin - dependence _ of interfacial phase shifts ( sdips ) can modify significantly the behavior of mesoscopic circuits .
first , when a mesoscopic conductor is connected to several f leads with non collinear polarizations , the sdips produces an interfacial precession of spins which can modify current transport in the device @xcite . secondly , in collinear configurations , precession effects are not relevant , but
the sdips can modify mesoscopic coherence effects .
for instance , in superconducting / ferromagnetic hybrid circuits , the sdips introduces a phase shift between electron and holes correlated by andreev reflection @xcite .
references and have identified signatures of this effect in the experiments of refs . and , respectively . in principle , normal systems in collinear configurations can also be affected by the sdips . indeed , from ref .
, the sdips should produce a spin - splitting of the resonant states in a ballistic interactionless wire contacted with collinearly polarized ferromagnetic leads .
however , this has not been confirmed experimentally yet @xcite .     and @xmath5 .
the magnetic polarizations @xmath6 and @xmath7 of leads @xmath8 and @xmath5 can be parallel ( configuration p ) or antiparallel ( configuration ap ) .
the element m is capacitively coupled to a gate voltage source @xmath1 . ]    recently , ref .
has reported current measurements in a single wall carbon nanotube ( swnt ) connected to two ferromagnetic leads with collinear polarizations .
the asymmetries observed in the magnetoresistance ( @xmath0 ) of the swnt versus gate voltage are strikingly similar to those predicted by ref . for an interactionless wire subject to the sdips@xcite . however ,
the swnt of ref . showed a quantum dot behavior with strong coulomb blockade effects , as demonstrated in a great number of experiments with non - magnetic leads ( see e.g. @xcite ) .
therefore , one important question is how interaction effects modify the scheme proposed by ref . .
the problem of the effects of interactions on the transport properties of a central region connected to ferromagnetic contacts has already been considered in various regimes , like e.g. the coulomb blockade regime@xcite , the kondo regime@xcite , the luttinger liquid regime@xcite and the marginal fermi liquid regime@xcite .
this article develops an approach suitable for the limit of ref . and studies , for the first time , the effect of the sdips on a quantum dot .
we consider a quantum dot coupled to metallic leads through spin - active interfaces . *
*  * * we use an anderson model to study the @xmath0 of the circuit above the kondo temperature , but beyond the sequential tunneling limit .
the sdips is taken into account through an effective spin - splitting of the dot energy levels .
this splitting makes easier negative @xmath0 effects .
when it is strong enough , it can even lead to a giant @xmath0 with a sign oscillating with the dot gate voltage @xmath1 , similarly to what has been found in the non - interacting case . in the non - interacting case , assuming that the properties of the contact are constant with energy and that the sdips is too weak to split the conductance peaks , one finds that the @xmath4 pattern is similar for all conductance peaks .
in contrast , the effect of the sdips depends on the occupation of the dot in the interacting case .
this is in apparent contradiction with the data of ref . because , in the @xmath3range presented in this ref .
, the @xmath4 oscillations are regular . using a two - orbitals model , which takes into account the @xmath9 orbital degeneracy
commonly observed for swnts ( see e.g. refs . ) , one can solve this discrepancy . in this framework
, we expect non - regular @xmath4 oscillations if the experiment is repeated on a larger @xmath3range .
this article is organized as follows : we start with summarizing the results found for the non - interacting case in section  [ sec : non - interacting ] . then we introduce a model for the interacting case in section  [ sec : interacting ] .
section  [ sec : single - level ] addresses the case of a one - orbital quantum dot circuit , and section  [ sec : two - level ] the case of a two - degenerate - orbitals quantum dot circuit . finally section  [ sec : conclusion ] concludes .
we consider a mesoscopic element m connected to ferromagnetic leads @xmath8 and @xmath5 ( fig .
[ figure1 ] ) . the chemical potential of m can be shifted by @xmath10 using the gate voltage @xmath1 , with @xmath11 the ratio between the gate capacitance and the total capacitance of @xmath12 .
the magnetic polarizations @xmath6 and @xmath7 of leads @xmath8 and @xmath5 can be parallel ( configuration @xmath13 ) or antiparallel ( configuration @xmath14 @xmath15 ) .      before introducing the interacting model investigated in this article ,
it is useful to reconsider the results obtained by ref . for the case in which m
is a non - interacting single - channel ballistic wire of length @xmath8 . in a scattering approach@xcite ,
the conductance of the circuit depends on the transmission probability @xmath16 for electrons with spin @xmath17 through contact @xmath18 , and on the reflection phase @xmath19 for electrons with spin @xmath20 coming from the wire towards contact @xmath21 .
the index @xmath22 $ ] denotes the parallel [ antiparallel ] leads configuration .
a spin dependence of @xmath19 can occur due to the magnetic properties of the contact materials used to engineer lead @xmath21 .
due to size quantization , the conductance @xmath23 of the circuit in configuration @xmath24 presents fabry - perot like resonances for @xmath25 , with @xmath26 a resonant energy ,  @xmath27 , @xmath28 the wire fermi energy , @xmath29 the density of orbitals states at the fermi level in the wire and @xmath30 the spin direction opposite to @xmath20 ( we have used @xmath31 ) . from this eq .
, in configuration @xmath24 , the sdips produces a spin - splitting @xmath32 of the resonant energies . when the effective field @xmath33 is strong enough to produce a spin - splitting of the conductance peaks
, the circuit can display a giant @xmath0 effect with a sign oscillating with @xmath1 , due to the strong shift of the conductance peaks from the @xmath34 to the @xmath15 configurations . in the opposite case
, @xmath0 remains smaller , but the sdips can still be detected through characteristic asymmetries in the oscillations of @xmath0 versus @xmath1 ( see fig .
2-right of ref . )
importantly , assuming that @xmath16 and @xmath19 are constant with @xmath1 , one has @xmath35)$ ] .
this implies that when @xmath33 is not strong enough to produce a spin - splitting of the conductance peaks , the @xmath4 pattern is similar for all the peaks displayed by @xmath36 .
we now assume the presence of strong coulomb interactions inside m , such that we have a quantum dot connected to ferromagnetic leads .
such a system can be realized for instance by using granular films@xcite , nanoparticles@xcite , carbon nanotubes@xcite , or @xmath37 molecules@xcite . in the non - interacting case of section  [
sec : non - interacting ] , we have considered that the spin - dependent confinement potential felt by electrons causes the sdips , which leads to the spin - splitting of the resonant states . in the interacting case ,
the scattering approach is not suitable anymore .
however , the energy of the quasi - bound single particle states in quantum dot m can depend on spin due to the spin - dependent confinement potential . on this ground
, we adopt the effective anderson hamiltonian @xmath38 with @xmath39 here , @xmath40 refers to the energy of the dot orbital state @xmath41 for spin @xmath20 , @xmath42 to the energy of lead state @xmath43 for spin @xmath20 and @xmath44 is an hoping matrix element ( we assume that the spin @xmath20 is preserved upon tunneling like in section  [ sec : non - interacting ] ) .
the index @xmath43 runs over the electronic states of lead @xmath8 and @xmath5 .
coulomb interactions are taken into account through the term in @xmath45 , with @xmath46 and @xmath47 the total capacitance of the quantum dot m. * *  * * by construction of the model ( see above ) , for @xmath48 , each orbital level @xmath40 corresponds to a resonant level @xmath49 of section  [ sec : non - interacting ] , with @xmath50 .
we can therefore regard the effective zeeman splitting @xmath33 in model  ( [ h ] ) as a generalization of the sdips concept to the interacting case@xcite .
the specificity of this effective field , with respect to an ordinary external field , is that it depends on the configuration @xmath24 of the ferromagnetic electrodes .
for instance , in the case of symmetric ferromagnetic contacts , symmetry considerations lead to @xmath51 and @xmath52 .    in the following ,
we calculate the zero - bias conductance of the circuit using  @xcite @xmath53\text { .}\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the above equation involves the retarded green s function @xmath54  with @xmath55 .
we also use the fermi distribution @xmath56)^{-1}$ ]  and the tunnel transition rates @xmath57 with @xmath58 . note that @xmath59 , @xmath40 and @xmath60 depend on the configuration @xmath61 considered but for simplicity we omit the index @xmath24 in those quantities .
we want to study current transport in the limit studied in ref .
, i.e. the width of conductance peaks displayed by the circuit is determined not only by temperature but also by the tunnel rates ( @xmath62 @xmath63 ) .
this requires to go beyond the sequential tunneling description , i.e. to take into account high - order quantum tunneling processes . for this purpose
, we will calculate @xmath59 using the equation of motion ( e.o.m . )
technique@xcite , which is valid for temperatures larger than the kondo temperature @xmath64 of the system@xcite .
for simplicity , we first take into account a single orbital level @xmath41 of the dot .
we follow the lines of ref .  .
the e.o.m .
technique leads to @xmath65 with @xmath66 \label{article::eq:1}%\ ] ] the average occupation of orbital @xmath41 by electrons with spin @xmath20 .
we define @xmath67^{-1}\ , , \label{article::eq:2}%\]]@xmath68^{-1}\ , , \label{article::eq:3}%\]]@xmath69 and , for @xmath70 , @xmath71 here , one has @xmath72 , @xmath73 and @xmath74 ( we anticipate on the next paragraphs by defining @xmath75 for @xmath76 and an arbitrary dot state @xmath77 , but only @xmath78 and @xmath79 are needed for the present one - orbital case ) .
we assume that the coupling to the leads is energy independent ( broad band approximation ) , which gives e.g. @xmath80 . the term @xmath81 , which is due to the tunneling of electrons with spin @xmath20 , already occurred in the non - interacting case@xcite .     in the parallel configuration ( red full lines ) and conductance @xmath82 in the antiparallel configuration ( black dotted lines ) as a function of the gate voltage @xmath1 , for the circuit shown in fig .
[ figure1 ] , with m a 1-orbital quantum dot .
we have used @xmath83 , @xmath84 , @xmath85 , @xmath86 and @xmath52 .
panels b , d , and f : magnetoresistance @xmath87 ( pink curves ) corresponding to the left conductance plots .
the results are shown for @xmath88 ( panels a and b ) , @xmath89 ( panels c and d ) and @xmath90 ( panels e and f ) . ]
( blue lines ) and @xmath91 ( black lines ) of level @xmath41 by spins @xmath92 and @xmath93  as a function of @xmath1 , for the 1-orbital quantum dot circuit of fig .
[ figure1 ] .
the results are shown for the same parameters as in fig .
[ figure2 ] and lead polarizations in the parallel configuration ( @xmath13 ) , with @xmath94 ( panel a ) , @xmath95 , ( panel b ) and @xmath96 ( panel c ) . for @xmath94 , @xmath97 and @xmath91
remain very close , simply showing two steps corresponding to the two conductances peaks visible in fig .
[ figure2]-a . in the case of a finite @xmath98 ,
@xmath99 rises more strongly than @xmath100 at the first conductance peak , revealing that current transport is due in majority to @xmath92 spins for this first peak .
then , @xmath97 and @xmath100 become closer when both @xmath101 and @xmath102 are below the fermi level . at
the second conductance peak @xmath91 rises more strongly than @xmath97 because current transport is now dominated by down spins .
the asymmetry between the behaviors of spins @xmath92 and @xmath93 increases with @xmath98 ( from left to right panels ) . ]    in the interacting case , @xmath103 also involves @xmath104 terms related to the tunneling of electrons with spin @xmath30 .
the average occupation @xmath105 can be calculated from eqs .
( [ gtot ] ) and ( [ article::eq:1 ] ) as @xmath106 with , for @xmath107 , @xmath108    figure [ figure2 ] shows the conductance @xmath109 in configuration @xmath61 ( panels a , c and e ) and the magnetoresistance @xmath87 ( panels b , d and f ) calculated for different values of @xmath33 , using @xmath110}% ^{l}=\gamma_{l}(1\pm p_{l})$ ] for @xmath18 .
we have used parameters consistent with ref .  ,
i.e. @xmath86 , and tunnel rates @xmath111 leading to the proper width and height for the conductance peaks .
we have also used relatively low values for @xmath112 because usual ferromagnetic contact materials are not fully polarized @xcite .
the conductance peak corresponding to level @xmath41 is split due to coulomb interactions ( see eq .
( [ gtot ] ) , figs .
[ figure2]-a , [ figure2]-c and [ figure2]-e ) . at low temperatures @xmath113 , kondo effect
is expected in the valley between the two resulting peaks .
we have checked that the hypothesis @xmath114 and hence the e.o.m .
technique are valid for the parameters of fig .
[ figure2 ] ( see refs . ) . for @xmath115
, we already note a strong qualitative difference with the non - interacting case : although the two conductance peaks displayed by @xmath36 are very similar , the @xmath0 variations corresponding to these two peaks have different shapes@xcite .
more precisely , for the low values of polarization considered here , @xmath4 is approximately mirror symmetric from one conductance peak to the other .
note that in fig .
[ figure2 ] , we have used specific parameters such that @xmath0 remains positive for any value of @xmath1 when there is no sdips .
nevertheless , it is possible to have @xmath116 for @xmath117 , for instance by increasing @xmath112 ( not shown ) .
we now address the effect of a finite effective field @xmath33 .
this field produces a shift of the conductance peaks from the @xmath34 to the @xmath15 configurations .
for instance , in fig .
2-c and fig . 2-e , plotted for @xmath51 and @xmath52 , the left [ right ] conductance peak
is shifted to the right [ left ] from @xmath34 to @xmath15 because it mainly comes from the transport of up [ down ] spins  in the @xmath34  case ( this can be seen from the average occupations of the levels versus @xmath1 in fig .
[ figure1n ] ) . as a consequence , in fig .
[ figure2 ] , @xmath0 becomes negative for certain values of gate voltage .
the effective field @xmath33 thus enhances negative @xmath0 effects .
if @xmath33 is strong enough , it can even produce a giant @xmath0 effect with its sign tunable with @xmath1 ( fig .
[ figure2]-f ) .
moreover , because of the opposite shifts of the two consecutive conductance peaks for @xmath13 with respect to those for @xmath118 , the positive - and - then - negative profile of mr corresponding to one conductance peak is generally followed by the negative - and - then - positive profile near the next conductance peak ( approximately mirror symmetric ) . note that a sign change @xmath119 will not modify this behavior for the low values of polarizations considered here , because the spin with lower[higher ] orbital energy will dominate in the left [ right ] peak of @xmath36 .
we now compare the results of this section with the experimental data of ref . .
like many coulomb blockade devices , the circuit studied in this experiment suffered from low frequency @xmath1-noise , which can be attributed to charge fluctuators located in the vicinity of the device .
a strong gate voltage offset jump occurred at @xmath120 , and the data before and after this jump do not necessarily correspond to the filling of consecutive levels .
therefore , we will focus on the data taken for @xmath121@xmath122 shown @xcite with black squares in fig .
[ figure4 ] .
these data display almost 2 regular @xmath4 oscillations , which can not be understood with the 1-orbital model .
indeed , as explained above , in this model , the two conductance peaks of @xmath123 are shifted in opposite directions by @xmath33 . as a consequence
, the @xmath4 variations corresponding to these two peaks can not be similar for parameters consistent with the experiment .
we have shown here curves for @xmath52 , but a finite @xmath124 would not modify this result . using values of @xmath112 larger than in fig .
[ figure2 ] would not help either .    for simplicity ,
we have considered in this section the one - orbital case . in reality , there are more than one orbital levels on a quantum dot .
as long as these levels are sufficiently well separated from each other ( roughly , by an orbital energy difference larger than the hund - rule exchange energy ) , the two conductance peaks associated to a given level will occur consecutively in @xmath23 and will thus be described qualitatively like above@xcite .
in particular , the two peaks will be shifted in opposite directions by @xmath125 ; the first peak to lower values of @xmath1 and the second peak to higher values .
therefore , this limit should not allow to obtain two consecutive conductance peaks with analogue @xmath126  patterns .
on the contrary , if two ( or more ) levels are nearly degenerate , it is possible that the orbital levels of the quantum dot are not filled one by one while increasing @xmath1 .
therefore , consecutive conductance peaks may exhibit a qualitatively different behavior compared with the one - orbital case . to examine this effect
, we will consider in next section the extreme case of a quantum dot with a twofold orbital degeneracy .
we will see that the discrepancy between the theory and the data can be resolved by using this model .    before concluding this section
, we make a remark on another possible contribution to the spin splitting of the conductance peaks .
even though so far we have mainly considered the contribution from the sdips , in principle , virtual particle exchange processes with the spin - polarized leads can also renormalize the energy levels through the @xmath127 terms of eq .
( [ b ] ) @xcite .
indeed , the @xmath104 terms are not negligible in general . for example , in fig .
[ figure2]-a , they globally shift the position of the conductance peaks in @xmath36 by about @xmath128  of @xmath129 .
nevertheless ,  for the low values of polarizations @xmath112  and the temperatures used here , the level spin - splitting produced by the @xmath104 terms is much weaker than this global shift and can not compete with the finite values of @xmath33 considered in this article .
in order to improve the understanding of ref . , we  now take into account the @xmath130-@xmath131 orbital degeneracy commonly observed@xcite in swnts , by considering a two - orbitals model i.e. hamiltonian ( [ h ] ) with @xmath132 and @xmath133 .
interestingly , su(4 ) kondo effect involving the orbital and spin degrees of freedom was observed in swnts with the @xmath130-@xmath131 degeneracy @xcite .
this suggests that , in this system , the orbital quantum number is conserved during higher order tunnel events , probably because the electrons of the nanotube quantum dot are coupled to the nanotube section underneath the contacts , where they dwell for some time before moving into the metal . for simplicity
, we will also assume such a situation here and disregard high - order quantum processes which couple the @xmath130 and @xmath131 orbitals  @xcite . in order to calculate the conductance of the system from eq .
( [ cond ] ) , one needs to calculate the retarded green s function @xmath134  for @xmath135 . for this purpose
, we again use the eom technique .
since it is not possible to obtain a simple analytical expression for @xmath134  in the two - orbitals case , we show below the system of equations of motion calculated by neglecting electronic correlations between the dot and the leads ( @xmath114 ) . using @xmath136 , @xmath137 , @xmath138  and @xmath139  to denote four different dot states in the ensemble @xmath140
, we obtain     in the parallel configuration ( red full lines ) and conductance @xmath82 in the antiparallel configuration ( black dotted lines ) , for the circuit of fig .
[ figure1 ] , with m a two - orbitals quantum dot .
we have used identical tunnel rates to the two orbitals , i.e. @xmath141 , @xmath142 , and @xmath143 .
we have also used @xmath86 and @xmath52 .
panels b , d and f : magnetoresistance @xmath0 ( pink full lines ) corresponding to the left conductance plots .
the results are shown for @xmath88 ( panels a and b ) , @xmath144 ( panels c and d ) and @xmath145 ( panels e and f ) . ]
@xmath146    @xmath147    @xmath148    @xmath149    due to interaction @xmath150 , the green s function @xmath151  is coupled to other green s functions @xmath152  with @xmath153  and @xmath154  for @xmath155 .
this means that the dynamics of electrons in state @xmath136  is modified by the presence of other electrons on the dot [ in the one orbital case , @xmath156  was coupled to @xmath157  only , which lead to simple expression ( [ gtot ] ) ] .
the term @xmath158  is the tunneling self energy for a non - interacting quantum dot , already introduced in previous section .
the equations of motion also involve terms @xmath104 , which are defined by eq.([b ] ) , and terms defined by @xmath159 these terms take into account the tunneling of electrons between the leads and a dot state @xmath160  different from @xmath161 .
the average level occupations occuring in eqs .
( [ a1])([a4 ] ) are given by @xmath162 $ ] .
the green s functions and the level occupations can be calculated numerically from the above equations . up to now ,
the e.o.m .
technique for multilevel systems had been implemented only by neglecting @xmath104 and @xmath163 terms @xcite . like in the one - orbital case , these terms are not negligible in the context of our study .
( blue lines ) and @xmath164 ( black lines ) of levels @xmath130 and @xmath165 by spins @xmath92 and @xmath93  as a function of @xmath1 , for a two - orbitals quantum dot circuit with the same parameters as in fig .
[ figure3 ] .
the results are shown for lead polarizations in the parallel configuration ( @xmath13 ) , with @xmath94 ( panel a ) , @xmath144 ( panel b ) , and @xmath166 ( panel c ) . for @xmath94 , @xmath167 and @xmath168
remains very close , showing four steps corresponding to the four conductances peaks visible in fig .
[ figure3]-a . in the case of a finite @xmath98
, @xmath167 rises more strongly than @xmath169 for the two first conductance peaks , which shows that current transport is due in majority to up spins for these two peaks .
the opposite situation occurs for the two last conductance peaks .
the asymmetry between the behaviors of spins @xmath92 and @xmath93 increases with @xmath98 ( from left to right panels ) . ]
figure  [ figure3 ] shows the conductance ( panels a , c and e ) and @xmath0 curves ( panels b , d and f ) calculated from eqs .
( [ cond ] ) and ( [ a1]-[a4 ] ) , for different values of @xmath33 . for simplicity , we have assumed that the coupling to the leads is identical for the two orbitals , i.e. @xmath170}^{l}=\gamma_{k^{^{\prime}% } \uparrow\lbrack\downarrow]}^{l}=\gamma_{l}(1\pm p_{l})$ ] for @xmath18 .
we have again used parameters consistent with ref .
i.e. @xmath86 , relatively low polarizations @xmath171 and values of @xmath111 leading to the proper width and height for the conductance peaks .
we have checked that these parameters are compatible with the hypothesis @xmath114 , with @xmath64 the kondo temperature associated to the su(4 ) kondo effect expected in this system @xcite . in most cases ,
the curves @xmath23 show 4 resonances , the first two associated with a single occupation of @xmath130 and @xmath165 , and the other two to double occupation ( see e.g. fig . [ figure3]-a ) . for @xmath172 and the parameters used here , @xmath0 remains positive for any value of @xmath1 ( fig .
[ figure3]-b ) .
like in the 1-orbital case , a finite @xmath33 makes easier negative @xmath0 effects and can even lead to a giant @xmath0 effect with a sign tunable with @xmath1 ( figs 4-d and 4-f ) .
importantly , the effect of @xmath33 depends on the occupation of the dot .
for instance , in fig .
[ figure3]-e plotted for @xmath173 larger than the linewidth of the conductance peaks , the first two conductance peaks of @xmath174 ( peaks 1 and 2 ) are strongly shifted to the left by @xmath98 because they are due in majority to up spins , as can be seen from the average occupation of the levels in fig .
[ figure2n]-c .
this allows to get a @xmath0 pattern approximately similar for these two peaks , i.e. a transition from positive to negative values of @xmath175 ( fig .
[ figure3]-f ) . on the contrary
, peak 4 corresponds to a transition from negative to positive values of @xmath0 because the associated conductance peak is due in majority to down spins . in fig .
[ figure3]-e , the shape of the @xmath4 pattern associated to peak 3 is more particular ( positive / negative / positive ) because , for the values of parameters considered here , coulomb blockade does not entirely suppress the up spins contribution in peak 3 , which is therefore spin - split @xcite .
remarkably , this allows to obtain , at the left of fig .
[ figure3]-f , three positive @xmath0 maxima which differ in amplitude but have rather similar shapes . in the case of @xmath176 finite but smaller than the linewidth of the conductance peaks ( fig .
[ figure3]-c ) , the amplitude of the @xmath0 signal is much smaller than in the previous case but its shape remains comparable .     in the parallel configuration ( top panel ) and the corresponding magnetoresistance @xmath177 ( bottom panel ) .
the theory is shown for parameters consistent with the experiment i.e. @xmath178 , @xmath86 and @xmath179 .
we also use relatively low values of polarization @xmath143 because usual ferromagnetic contact materials are not fully polarized @xcite . assuming identical tunnel couplings for the two orbitals , the values of tunnels rates @xmath180 and @xmath181
are imposed by the width and height of the conductance peaks .
then , @xmath182}$ ] are the only free fitting parameters which remain for interpreting the @xmath0 curve .
we have assumed @xmath183  for all the theoretical curves shown in this figure .
we have plot the @xmath184  curves of bottom panel for @xmath52  ( pink curve , corresponding to fig . [ figure3]-d ) , @xmath185  ( green dashed curve ) and @xmath186  ( blue dot - dashed curve ) . note that in this figure , we show @xmath187  instead of @xmath188  @xmath189  in order to be consistent with ref .   .
a strong gate voltage offset jump occurred at @xmath120v , therefore , we show the data at the left / right of this jump with grey / black symbols . ]
we now reconsider the experimental data of ref .  .
even the two - orbital model can not not provide a reasonable fit to the data if we assume @xmath94 and @xmath52 .
in contrast , the two - orbital model exhibits a good agreement with the experimental data for @xmath190 , @xmath52 , @xmath191 , @xmath192 , @xmath193 , and parameters @xmath194 , @xmath195 , and @xmath179 given by the experiment ( see fig .
[ figure4 ] , red and pink full curves ) .
we now discuss the value of @xmath196 found for the above fit .
this corresponds to a magnetic field of about @xmath197 , which is too strong to be attributed to stray fields from the ferromagnetic electrodes ( see e.g. ref . ) .
this is in favor of generalizing the sdips concept to swnts quantum dots circuits , i.e. considering that the energy levels of the dot are spin - split because the confinement potential created by the ferromagnetic electrodes is spin - dependent . for comparison ,
we have estimated @xmath98 in the non - interacting theory@xcite , using realistic parameters i.e leads with a fermi energy @xmath198   and a density of states polarized by @xmath199 , and a nanotube with fermi wavevector @xmath200  @xmath201 , fermi velocity@xcite @xmath202  @xmath203 , length @xmath204   like in ref . , and density of states @xmath205 .
we have modeled the interfaces between the nanotube and the leads with dirac potential barriers@xcite , with a height which is spin - polarized by @xmath199 and an average value which corresponds to@xcite @xmath206 @xmath207  @xmath208(for comparison the fitting parameters used in fig .
[ figure4 ] correspond to @xmath209  @xmath208 and @xmath210  @xmath211 ) .
we obtain @xmath212 , which is consistent with the above analysis .    in the above discussion ,
we have assumed @xmath52 for simplicity .
the height of the conductance peaks in the data imposes to use a strong assymetry @xmath213  between the left and right tunnel rates .
thus , the two tunnel barriers are not symmetric , and there is no fundamental reason to assume @xmath52 .
figure  [ figure4 ] shows examples of @xmath184  curves plotted for a finite @xmath124 . using @xmath186  ( green dashed curve ) enhances the fit of the @xmath184  at peak 2 whereas @xmath185  ( blue dot - dashed curve ) enhances the fit of the @xmath184  at peak 3 .
interestingly , with the non - interacting model , assuming the most simple situation in which @xmath214  has the same sign for the two leads , one finds @xmath215 ,  which is in agreement with the values used here .
the fact that the best fit for the @xmath184  patterns at peaks 2 and 3 correspond to different values of @xmath216  might be due to a gate dependence of the sdips .
this is indeed possible since the potential profile of the interfaces between the wire and the leads can vary with @xmath1 .
we now comment briefly on the data taken for @xmath217v .
it is not sure that the data shown before and after @xmath120v correspond to the filling of consecutive levels because of the gate voltage jump which occured at this value of @xmath1 .
nevertheless , the shape of the mr curve corresponding to @xmath217v is rather consistent with the theory shown in fig .
this suggests that these data really correspond to peak 1 . at this stage
, it is important to point out that other orbital levels not taken into account in our calculation should slightly modify the conductance peaks 1 and 4 .
the discrepancy between the theory and the data for @xmath217v could be explained by the effect of the other orbitals . for the data at @xmath218v ,
our fit is more quantitative since we have used peaks 2 and 3 of the theory .    in principle
, the modelisation of the orbital levels in swnts can be refined by taking into account an exchange energy @xmath219  which favors spin alignment , an excess coulomb energy @xmath220  related to the double occupation of the same orbital , and a subband mismatch @xmath221  ( see ref . ) .
in practice , @xmath220  is rather small but @xmath219  and @xmath222  can be of the same order as @xmath150 .
two different regimes of parameters can occur in practice . if @xmath223 , two electrons with opposite spins will fill consecutively the same energy level while @xmath1 increases ( see refs . ) , and the behavior of the device should thus be analogue to the non - degenerate multi - orbital case evoked at the end of section [ sec : single - level ] .
nevertheless , if @xmath224 , peaks 1 and 2 [ 3 and 4 ] will correspond in majority to the same spin direction , as observed experimentally by . in this case , the effect of @xmath225  should be qualitatively the same as described in the present section .
we expect that the weights of k and k in peaks 1 and 2 differ due to @xmath226 ,  but this should not change the way in which @xmath33  shifts the conductance peaks from @xmath34  to @xmath15 .    in future experiments
, it would be interesting to obtain continuous data on a larger @xmath1-range , in order to check that the shape of the @xmath126 pattern depends on the occupation of the dot .
this would also allow to study the gate voltage dependence of @xmath33 .
it would also be interesting to engineer contacts with ferromagnetic insulators or highly polarized ferromagnets in order to observe the sdips - induced giant @xmath184 effect .
note that although we have considered here the limit @xmath227 , a strong enough sdips should also affect the behavior of the quantum dot in the sequential tunneling limit @xmath228 , through an analogous mechanism .
using an anderson model , we have studied the behavior of a quantum dot connected to ferromagnetic leads through spin - active interfaces .
the spin activity of the interfaces makes easier negative magnetoresistance ( @xmath0 ) effects and can even lead to a giant @xmath0 with a sign oscillating with the gate voltage of the dot . due to coulomb blockade
, the @xmath0 versus gate voltage pattern can not be identical for all conductance peaks .
it is nevertheless possible to account for the @xmath0 data measured by ref . in single - wall carbon nanotubes by taking into account the @xmath9 orbital degeneracy commonly observed in those systems .
a.c . acknowledges discussions with b.  douot , t.  kontos , g.  montambaux and i.  safi . this work was supported by grants from rgion ile - de - france , the src / erc program ( r11 - 2000 - 071 ) , the krf grant ( krf-2005 - 070-c00055 ) , and the sk fund .
a. brataas , y.v .
nazarov , and g. e. w. bauer , phys .
lett . * 84 * , 2481 ( 2000 ) ; d.h .
hernando , y.v .
nazarov , a. brataas , and g.e.w .
bauer , phys .
b * 62 * , 5700 ( 2000 ) ; a. brataas , y.v .
nazarov and g.e.w .
bauer , eur .
j. b * 22 * , 99 ( 2001 ) .
a. millis , d. rainer , and j. a. sauls , phys .
b * 38 * , 4504 ( 1988 ) ; m. fogelstrm , _ ibid . _ * 62 * , 11812 ( 2000 ) ; j.c . cuevas and m. fogelstrm , _ ibid . _ * 64 * , 104502 ( 2001 ) ; n.m .
chtchelkatchev , w. belzig , y.v .
nazarov , and c. bruder , jetp lett . * 74 * , 323 ( 2001 ) ; d. huertas - hernando , y.v .
nazarov , and w. belzig , phys .
lett . * 88 * , 047003 ( 2002 ) ; j. kopu , m. eschrig , j. c. cuevas , and m. fogelstrm , phys . rev .
b * 69 * , 094501 ( 2004 ) ; e. zhao , t. lfwander , and j. a. sauls , _ ibid . _ * 70 * , 134510 ( 2004 ) .              very recently ,
et al_.  @xcite have reported a spin - dependent transport experiment through a swnt connected to collinearly - polarized ferromagnetic leads in the resonant tunneling regime .
the data of this ref . are interpreted following the lines in ref .  .
in this particular experiment , the sdips has been found to be vanishing .
this is probably due to the fact that , considering the strong values of @xmath229 in this experiment , the effects of sdips on the @xmath4 curves are too weak to be resolved in the actual experiment .
j. barnas and a. fert , phys .
lett . * 80 * , 1058 ( 1998 ) ; a. braatas , yu . v. nazarov , j. inoue and g. e. w. bauer , phys .
b * 59 * , 93 ( 1999 ) ; h. imamura , s. takahashi and s. maekawa , phys . rev .
b * 59 * , 6017 ( 1999 ) ; b. r. bulka , phys . rev .
b * 62 * , 1186 ( 2000 ) ; a. cottet , w. belzig and c. bruder , phys . rev . lett . *
92 * , 206801 ( 2004 ) , phys . rev .
b * 70 * , 115315 ( 2004 ) ; h .- f .
mu , g. su , and q .- r .
zheng , phys .
b * 73 * , 054414 ( 2006 ) .
n. sergueev , q .- f .
sun , h. guo , b. g. wang , and j. wang , phys .
b * 65 * , 165303 ( 2002 ) ; j. martinek , m. sindel , l. borda , j. barnas , j. knig , g. schn , and j. von delft , phys . rev . lett .
* 91 * , 247202 ( 2003 ) ; m .- s .
choi , d. sanchez and r. lopez , phys .
lett . * 92 * , 056601 ( 2004 ) ; y. utsumi , j. martinek , g. schn , h. imamura and s. maekawa , phys .
b * 71 * , 245116 ( 2005 ) ; j. martinek , m. sindel , l. borda , j. barnas , r. bulla , j. knig , g. schn , s. maekawa and j. von delft , phys . rev .
b * 72 * , 121302(r ) ( 2005 ) ; r. swirkowicz , m. wilczynski , m. wawrzyniak and j. barnas , phys . rev .
b * 73 * , 193312 ( 2006 ) .
l. f. schelp , a. fert , f. fettar , p. holody , s. f. lee , j. l. maurice , f. petroff , and a. vaures , phys .
b * 56 * , r5747 ( 1997 ) ; k. yakushiji , s. mitani , k.takanashi , s. takahashi , s. maekawa , h. imamura , and h. fujimori appl . phys . lett.*78 * , 515 ( 2001 ) ; l. zhang , c. wang , y. wei , x. liu , and d. davidovic , phys . rev.b * 72 * , 155445 ( 2005 ) .
note that ref .
has also introduced an effective exchange field to take into account the sdips in an interacting single electron transistor connected to ferromagnetic leads .
these authors have studied precession effects produced by the sdips  in non - collinear configurations .
they did not consider spin - dependent resonance effects because this is not relevant in the diffusive limit considered in this ref .        note that in the limit considered in this article , the spin accumulation concept of ref
. simply corresponds to having a finite average spin on the quantum dot .
this feature is intrinsically taken into account in our treatment .    for @xmath48 , the conductance given by eqs .
( [ cond ] ) and ( [ gtot ] ) can be perfectly mapped onto the interactionless conductance found in ref . for @xmath230 and a level @xmath231 close to resonance , using @xmath232 and @xmath233 .
we point out that this splitting effect is unrelated to @xmath33 .
this is particularly clear in the limit of no tunneling @xmath237 , in which the renormalization of the levels by the @xmath104 terms vanishes whereas @xmath33 persists .
the function @xmath103 is resonant at @xmath238 $ ] and @xmath239 $ ] .
interestingly , for @xmath240 , @xmath241 , @xmath242 and @xmath243 , a simplified expression of the resonance spin - splitting caused by the @xmath127 terms can be obtained by evaluating @xmath244 $ ] at @xmath245 and @xmath246 $ ] at @xmath247 .
this leads to @xmath248 $ ] where the prime represents cauchy s principal value .
interestingly , this expression perfectly matches with eq .
( 3.9 ) of ref . .
studies the precession effect produced by @xmath249 in a quantum dot with ferromagnetic leads polarized in non - collinear directions , in the limit  @xmath250 .
the system is described with eqs . which neglect @xmath249 in the collinear case .
note that it is possible to decrease the up spins contribution in peak 3 and to have a @xmath126 pattern similar for peaks 3 and 4 by using values of @xmath112 much smaller than in fig.[figure3 ] ( e.g. @xmath251 ) .