the chemical composition of a galaxy is one of its most fundamental characteristics .
here we focus on disk galaxies . because the chemical enrichment depends on various physical processes , such as the star formation history and the mass exchange between the galaxy and its environment , progress in our understanding of galaxy formation and evolution processes depends to a large extent on improving our knowledge of the detailed chemical properties of galaxies , such as the radial distribution of element abundances across galactic disks . establishing the macroscopic properties of spiral and irregular galaxies that likely govern
the distribution of heavy elements across their disks is very important in understanding the ( chemical ) evolution of galaxies .
accurate abundance determinations in a sample of galaxies are mandatory for such investigations .
the classical @xmath1 method , often referred to as the direct method , is generally considered to provide the most reliable oxygen and nitrogen abundances in hii regions . when this method can not be used ( due to the lack of measurements of the required weak auroral lines in the spectra of hii regions ) then combinations of the strong nebular line intensities in spectra of hii regions
can be used as indicators of their oxygen abundances , as was first suggested by @xcite and @xcite .
this approach is usually referred to as the `` strong - line method '' and has been widely adopted .
the establishment of calibrations ( i.e. , of relations between metallicity - sensitive emission - line combinations and metallicity ) was the subject of numerous studies ( * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * among many others ) .
a calibration is defined not only by the adopted indicators but also by the objects that serve as calibrating data points . a sample of hii regions with abundances derived through the @xmath2 method is used to construct an empirical calibration .
a set of photoionization models is used to construct a theoretical ( model ) calibration .
even if the same indicator is used in the empirical calibration and in the theoretical calibration and if the same spectral measurements in a given hii region are used , those calibrations can produce significantly different abundance estimations .
metallicities derived using theoretical calibrations tend to be systematically higher ( up to @xmath30.7 dex ) than those derived using the empirical calibrations ( see reviews by * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) . therefore , oxygen abundances in extragalactic hii regions obtained in different studies using different calibrations can be significantly different .
spectroscopic measurements of hii regions within and beyond optical radii of galaxies were carried out in many works ( see list of references below ) . in these studies , usually the hii regions in one or
several galaxies are measured and the radial distributions of the element abundances across the disks of those galaxies are estimated .
since often different methods for abundance determinations are used in different works , the resulting abundances from these studies are not homogeneous and can not be directly compared to each other .
therefore , the abundances in a sample of galaxies can be analyzed only after those abundances are homogenized , i.e. , all the abundances are redetermined in a uniform way .
this is the first step in our present investigation .
it should be noted that there have been several attempts to use uniform abundances for the determination of radial abundance gradients in a sample of galaxies ; e.g. , @xcite for a sample of 30 galaxies , @xcite for 39 galaxies , @xcite for 11 galaxies , @xcite for 54 galaxies , and @xcite for 21 galaxies .
however , those samples contain a relatively small number of galaxies ( whereas our present sample includes 130 galaxies ) .
so far , little attention has been paid to the radial distributions of nitrogen abundances in the disks of galaxies , despite the fact that this provides several advantages for the study of the chemical evolution of galaxies .
indeed , since at 12+log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 , secondary nitrogen becomes dominant and the nitrogen abundance increases at a faster rate than the oxygen abundance ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) , the change in nitrogen abundances with galactocentric distance should then show a larger amplitude in comparison to oxygen abundances and , as a consequence , should be easier to measure .
furthermore , there is a time delay in nitrogen production as compared to oxygen production @xcite .
thus the comparison between the radial distributions of oxygen and nitrogen abundances in the disks of galaxies can shed additional light on the chemical evolution of galaxies .
therefore we consider here not only the radial distributions of oxygen abundances but also those of nitrogen abundances .
our paper is organized in the following way .
we describe the method used for the oxygen and nitrogen abundance determinations in the hii regions of our galaxy sample in section 2 .
we describe the observational data that were used to determine the abundances in the hii regions in section 3 .
we discuss the abundance properties in the disks of nearby galaxies ( within the optical isophotal radii ) in section 4 .
we summarize our results in section 5 .    throughout this paper
, we will use the following standard notations for the line intensities : + @xmath5 = @xmath6 \lambda 3727 + \lambda 3729 } /i_{{\rm
h}\beta } $ ] , + @xmath7 = @xmath8 \lambda 6548 + \lambda 6584 } /i_{{\rm
h}\beta } $ ] , + @xmath9 = @xmath10 \lambda 6717 + \lambda 6731 } /i_{{\rm
h}\beta } $ ] , + @xmath11 = @xmath12 } \lambda 4959 + \lambda 5007 } /i_{{\rm
h}\beta } $ ] .
+ with these definitions , the excitation parameter @xmath13 can be expressed as : @xmath13 = @xmath11/(@xmath5+@xmath11 ) .
a new method ( called the `` @xmath14 method '' ) for oxygen and nitrogen abundance determinations has recently been suggested @xcite . the idea of the @xmath14 method is a very simple .
we have compared a several combinations of the strong - line intensities in the spectrum of a given hii region with those in the spectra of a sample of reference hii regions with known abundances in order to find the counterpart for the hii region under study .
it is assumed that the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in the studied hii region are the same as in its counterpart .
a counterpart can be selected by comparison of four combinations of strong - line intensities : @xmath13 = @xmath11/(@xmath5 + @xmath11 ) ( excitation parameter ) , log@xmath11 , log(@xmath7/@xmath5 ) , and log(@xmath9/@xmath5 )
.    however , there are recent measurements of spectra of many hii regions where the intensities of [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 or [ sii]@xmath156717 , [ sii]@xmath156731 ) lines are not available ( e.g. , in @xcite or in the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) ; see @xcite ) .
it has been argued that the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in hii regions can be estimated even if the [ sii]@xmath156717+@xmath156731 emission line is not measured @xcite or if the [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 emission line is not available @xcite .
the @xmath14 method can be adapted to such cases @xcite . to find the counterpart for the hii region under study
, one does not need to compare the four combinations of strong - line intensities , but can instead also use only three combinations : 1 ) log@xmath11 , @xmath13 , and log(@xmath7/@xmath5 ) , or 2 ) log@xmath11 , log@xmath7 , and log(@xmath7/@xmath9 ) .
when this first set of combinations of strong - line intensities is used to find the counterpart then the resulting oxygen and nitrogen abundances will be referred to as ( o / h)@xmath16 and ( n / h)@xmath16 .
when the second set of combinations of strong - line intensities is used to find the counterpart then the inferred oxygen and nitrogen abundances will be called ( o / h)@xmath17 and ( n / h)@xmath17 .
the data for reference hii regions with @xmath2-based abundances are compiled in @xcite .
the very recent spectroscopic observations of @xcite have been added to the compilation . using these combined data we select a sample of reference hii regions for which all the absolute differences for oxygen abundances ( o / h)@xmath16  ( o / h)@xmath18 and ( o / h)@xmath17  ( o / h)@xmath18 and for nitrogen abundances ( n / h)@xmath16  ( n / h)@xmath18 and ( n / h)@xmath17  ( n / h)@xmath18 are less than 0.1  dex .
this sample of reference hii regions contains 250 objects and will in the following be used for abundance determinations .
this sample will be referred to as @xmath19 sample ( etalon sample 2013 ) below .
furthermore , only blue spectra were observed for hii regions in a number of galaxies ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , i.e. , intensities of [ nii]@xmath156584 and [ sii]@xmath156717 , [ sii]@xmath156731 ) are not available in those cases .
the oxygen abundances in those hii regions can be estimated through the @xmath13 calibration where only the oxygen [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 and [ oiii]@xmath155007 lines are used @xcite .
we have constructed a new variant of the @xmath13 calibration .
the sample of reference hii regions , @xmath19 , has been used as calibration data points . to enlarge the number of calibration data points , we have added a number of hii regions with ( o / h)@xmath16 abundances that were chosen in the following way .
we determined the ( o / h)@xmath16 abundances in hii regions and obtained radial oxygen abundance gradients across the disks of galaxies ( see below ) .
the hii regions where the deviations of the ( o / h)@xmath16 abundances from the general radial abundance trend are less than 0.1  dex were added to the sample of reference hii regions .
it is well known that the relation between the oxygen abundance and the strong oxygen line intensities is double - valued , with two distinct parts traditionally known as the upper and lower branches of the r@xmath20  o / h diagram .
we have delimited the upper and lower branches and the transition zone , adopting 12+log(o / h ) = 8.3 as the boundary between the upper branch and the transition zone and 12+log(o / h ) = 8.0 as the boundary between the transition zone and the lower branch .
these boundaries are somewhat arbitrary , but were chosen so as to give the best calibrations with the existing data .
two distinct relations between the oxygen abundance and the strong oxygen line intensities will be established in the following , one for the upper branch ( the high - metallicity calibration ) and one for the lower branch ( the low - metallicity calibration ) .
the relation between the oxygen abundance @xmath21 @xmath22 12 + log ( o / h)@xmath23 and r@xmath24 and p can be fitted by a polynomial of the form @xcite @xmath25 where we have used the notation z @xmath22 12 + log ( o / h ) for brevity . to take into account the dependence on the excitation parameter @xmath13 , the coefficients of eq .
( [ equation : kr3 ] ) are chosen to have the form @xmath26 the coefficients @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , and @xmath32 can then be determined by looking for the best fit to our sample of hii regions .
we wish to derive a set of coefficients in eq .
( [ equation : kr3 ] ) which gives the minimum value of @xmath33 = @xmath34 .
here @xmath35 is equal to log(o / h)@xmath36  log(o / h)@xmath37 for each hii region in our sample .
the quantity @xmath33 is the average value of the differences between the oxygen abundances determined through the @xmath13 calibration and the original ones .
a few data points with large deviations , in excess of 0.15  dex , are rejected , and are not used in the determination of the final relation .
the obtained upper - branch @xmath13 calibration ( for 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 ) is @xmath38 the obtained lower - branch @xmath13 calibration ( for 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.0 ) is @xmath40 hence , here we use the empirical metallicity scale defined by the hii regions with abundances derived through the direct method ( @xmath2 method ) .
we have carried out a fairly comprehensive compilation of published spectra of hii regions in late - type galaxies . only those galaxies where
radial abundance gradients can be estimated were taken into consideration .
our final list includes 130 galaxies .
table [ table : sample ] lists the general characteristics of each galaxy .
the first column gives its name .
we have used the most widely used name for each galaxy .
the galaxies are listed in order of name category , with the following categories in descending order : + ngc  new general catalogue , + ic  index catalogue , + ugc
uppsala general catalog of galaxies , + pgc  catalogue of principal galaxies .
+ the morphological type of the galaxy and morphological type code @xmath41 from leda are reported in columns 2 and 3 . the right ascension ( r.a . ) and declination ( decl . )
( j2000.0 ) of each galaxy are given in columns 4 and 5 .
the right ascension and declination are taken from the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) .
the isophotal radius @xmath0 in arcmin of each galaxy is reported in column 6 .
unless otherwise stated , the @xmath0 values are taken from ( * ? ? ?
* thereafter rc3 ) .
the position angle and inclination are listed in columns 7 and 8 , and the sources for these values are given in column 9 . the adopted distance and its reference
are reported in columns 10 and 11 .
the ned distances use flow corrections for virgo , the great attractor , and shapley supercluster infall . the isophotal radius in kpc , estimated from the data in columns 6 and 10 ,
is listed in column 12 .
we have carried out an extensive search of the literature and compiled a sample of measurements of hii regions in nearby late - type galaxies .
we have searched for spectra of hii regions with the requirement that they include the [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 , [ oiii]@xmath155007 , [ nii]@xmath156584 , and [ sii]@xmath156717+@xmath156731 lines .
while we have tried to include as many sources as possible , we do not claim our search to be exhaustive .
thus , for each listed spectrum , we record the measured values of [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 , [ oiii]@xmath155007 , [ nii]@xmath156584 , [ sii]@xmath156717 , and [ sii]@xmath156731 .
the intensities of all lines are normalised to the h@xmath42 line flux .
the predicted values of the flux ratio of oxygen [ oiii]@xmath155007/[oiii]@xmath154959 and nitrogen [ nii]@xmath156584/[nii]@xmath156548 lines are very close to three @xcite .
the measurements of the [ oiii]@xmath155007 and @xmath154959 lines in sdss spectra confirm this value of the flux ratio ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
therefore , the value of @xmath11 can be estimated without [ oiii]@xmath154959 line as @xmath43[oiii]@xmath155007 , and , similarly , the values of @xmath7 are estimated without the lines [ nii]@xmath156548 as @xmath7 = 1.33[nii]@xmath156584 .
we have taken the de - reddened line intensities as reported by the authors . in some papers only the measured fluxes are reported . in these cases ,
the measured emission - line fluxes were corrected for interstellar reddening using the theoretical h@xmath44 to h@xmath42 ratio ( i.e. , the standard value of h@xmath44/h@xmath42 = 2.86 ) and the analytical approximation to the whitford interstellar reddening law from @xcite .
the spectroscopic data so assembled form the basis of the present study .
our total list contains 3904 spectra including 162 spectra of hii regions beyond the isophotal radius @xmath0 . here
we will examine the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundance distributions within the isophotal radius in every galaxy .
the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundances beyond the isphotal radius will be discussed elsewere .
when measurements of the lines [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 , [ oiii]@xmath155007 , and [ nii]@xmath156584 were available then the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath16 and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath16 abundances in the hii regions were estimated and used in our study .
if the intensity of the line [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 was not measured but the measurements of the lines [ oiii]@xmath155007 , [ nii]@xmath156584 , [ sii]@xmath156717 , and [ sii]@xmath156731 ) were available then the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath17 and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath17 abundances of the hii regions were estimated and used .
if the measurements of only the oxygen lines [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 and [ oiii]@xmath155007 were available ( blue spectrum was observed only ) then the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath45 abundance of the hii regions was estimated and adopted .
the deprojected radii of the hii regions were computed using their coordinates ( or offsets from the nucleus ) as reported in the original papers , as were the position angle and inclination listed in table [ table : sample ] . in some publications , the positions of the observed hii regions ( or their identifications in catalogues )
were not reported , but the deprojected radii were listed instead . in these cases
these deprojected radii were used ( after correction for the galaxy distance adopted here , if necessary ) .
the fractional radii ( normalized to the optical isophotal radius @xmath0 ) were obtained with isophotal radii from table [ table : sample ] .
the radial oxygen abundance distribution within the isophotal radius in every galaxy was fitted by the following equation : @xmath46 where 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 is the oxygen abundance at @xmath48 = 0 , i.e. , the extrapolated central oxygen abundance , c@xmath49 , is the slope of the oxygen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex  @xmath50 , and @xmath51/@xmath52 is the fractional radius ( the galactocentric distance normalized to the disk s isophotal radius @xmath0 ) .
we also determined the oxygen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex  kpc@xmath53 .
if there were data points with large deviations , in excess of 0.2 dex , those points were rejected , and were not used in the determination of the final relation .
the derived parameters of the oxygen abundance distributions are presented in table  [ table : grad ] .
the name of the galaxy is listed in column 1 . the extrapolated central 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 oxygen abundance and the gradient ( the coefficient c@xmath49 in eq .
( [ equation : grado ] ) ) expressed in terms of dex  @xmath54 are listed in columns 2 and 3 .
the oxygen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex  kpc@xmath53 is listed in column 4 .
the scatter of oxygen abundances around the general radial oxygen abundance trend is reported in column 5 .    as in the case of the oxygen abundance ,
the radial nitrogen abundance distribution in every galaxy was fitted by the following equation : @xmath55 again , if there were data points with large deviations , in excess of 0.3  dex , those points were rejected , and were not used in the determination of the final relation .
these different rejection criteria for oxygen abundances , 0.2  dex , and nitrogen abundances , 0.3  dex , are used for the following reason .
there is no one - to - one correspondence between nitrogen and oxygen abundances , but instead there is a scatter in n / h at a given o / h .
therefore one can expect that the natural scatter in n / h at a given galactocentric distance can be larger than that in o / h assuming similar uncertainties in both abundance determinations .
the derived parameters of the nitrogen abundance distributions are presented in table  [ table : grad ] . the extrapolated central 12 + log(n / h)@xmath47 nitrogen abundance and the gradient ( the coefficient c@xmath56 in eq .
( [ equation : gradn ] ) ) expressed in terms of dex  @xmath50 are listed in columns 6 and 7 .
the nitrogen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex  kpc@xmath53 is listed in column 8 .
the scatter of nitrogen abundances around the general radial nitrogen abundance trend is reported in column 9 .
a list of references for the emission line flux measurements in the hii regions is given in table  [ table : reference ] .
in the case of ( o / h)@xmath23 abundances , there is the following problem .
the relationship between oxygen abundance and strong oxygen line intensities , the @xmath13 calibration , is double - valued with two distinct parts usually known as the `` lower '' and `` upper '' branches of the @xmath57  o / h relationship .
the expression for the oxygen abundance determination in high metallicity hii regions , eq .
( [ equation : ohph ] ) , is valid only for hii regions that belong to the upper branch , with 12+log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 .
thus , one has to know a priori on which of the two branches the hii region lies .
we can overcome this problem in the way suggested in @xcite .
it has been known for a long time @xcite that disks of spiral galaxies show radial oxygen abundance gradients , in the sense that the oxygen abundance is higher in the central part of the disk and decreases with galactocentric distance .
we thus start from the hii regions in the central part of disks and move outward until the radius @xmath58 where the oxygen abundance decreases to 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.3 .
it should be noted that it is difficult to establish the exact value of @xmath58 due to the scatter in oxygen abundance values at any fixed radius
. an unjustified use of eq .
( [ equation : ohph ] ) in the determination of the oxygen abundance in low - metallicity hii regions beyond @xmath58 would result in overestimated oxygen abundances , and would produce a false turnover in the slope of the abundance gradients @xcite . therefore , hii regions with galactocentric distances larger than @xmath58 , i.e. , those with 12+log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.3 were rejected .
the derived radial distributions of the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in 130 galaxies are presented in figure  [ figure : gs1 ] .
the oxygen abundances for individual hii regions are indicated by points .
all the data points ( including points with large deviations , which are rejected and are not used in determination of the final relation ) are shown .
the linear best fits ( derived via the least squares method ) to the points are represented by solid lines .
the galactocentric distances are normalized to the isophotal radius .
the nitrogen abundances for individual hii regions are shown by the plus signs .
the linear best fits to the points are indicated by dashed lines .
the values of the gradients in a number of galaxies ( e.g. , in ngc  12 , the first galaxy in our list ) are rather small and are comparable ( or even lower ) to the uncertainties of gradients . it can be assumed that there is no abundance gradient in such a galaxy , and its abundance can be specified by the mean of the central abundance and the abundance at the isophotal @xmath0 radius of the galaxy .
thus , the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundance distributions across the optical disk in every galaxy are individually fitted by a single relation .
it looks like a rather good approximation for the majority of galaxies .
however , a small change in slope in the abundance distribution can not be excluded in the disks of several galaxies ( e.g. , ngc  925 , ngc  3184 , ngc  5457 ) .
it is interesting to note the following .
@xcite studied the surface brightness profiles of a sample of late - type ( sb to sdm ) spiral galaxies using imaging data from the sdss survey .
they found that the surface brightness profiles can be divided into three classes .
a small fraction of galaxies ( around 10 % ) belong to type i , which comprises those galaxies that have a normal ( standard ) exponential disk down to the noise limit . the surface brightness distribution of the rest of the galaxies is better described as a broken exponential .
about 60 % of the galaxies belong to type ii , which means that they show a down - bending profile with steeper outer part .
about 30 % of the galaxies belong to type iii , implying that they show an up - bending profile with shallower outer part .
thus , the abundance distribution profile does not seem to follow strictly the slope of the surface brightness profile .
it should be noted , however , that the number of measured hii regions in many galaxies is too small to allow one to detect a small bend in the radial abundance distribution .
* ngc  1512 . *
the five hii regions that are located in the `` bridge '' between the interacting galaxies ngc  1512 and ngc  1510 @xcite were excluded from our analysis .
@xcite found that there is a significant discrepancy between the kinematically derived inclination of ngc  1512 and its photometric value ( @xmath59 = 65@xmath60 and @xmath61 = 35@xmath60 ) .
they noted that the explanation is quite clear : the photometric parameter is mainly representative of the bar which contributes a large part of the light resulting in more edge - on values .
however , the outer isophotes are much more face - on .
therefore , the kinematic value of the inclination is adopted here .
* ngc  2442 . *
the peculiar spiral galaxy ngc  2442 is tidally distorted
* and references therein ) .
* ngc  3227 . *
ngc  3227 is a nearby seyfert galaxy that is interacting with its gas - poor dwarf elliptical companion ngc  3226 .
@xcite discovered a cloud of hi close to , but physically and kinematically distinct from , the galactic disk of ngc  3227 .
they suggested that this cloud ( j1023 + 1952 ) might be a dwarf galaxy that is either preexisting and being accreted by ngc  3227 , or a newly created tidal dwarf galaxy @xcite .
however , the oxygen abundance of the cloud ( hii regions 24 and 25 from @xcite and of the hii region measured by @xcite ) follows the general trend of the radial abundance distribution in the disk of ngc  3227 .
the oxygen abundances of the hii region in the cloud estimated in different ways using the emission line measurements by @xcite are in satisfactory agreement to each other : 12+log(o / h)@xmath62 = 8.40 , 12+log(o / h)@xmath63 = 8.43 and 12+log(o / h)@xmath45 = 8.34 .
hii regions 10 and 12 from @xcite follow also the general trend of the radial abundance distribution in the disk of ngc  3227 although those hii regions may be associated with ngc  3226 .    * ngc  3239 . *
the irregular galaxy ngc  3239 is a candidate for a merging system @xcite .
the oxygen abundances determined in four hii regions from sdss spectra as well as the global abundance determined using the integrated spectra from @xcite are 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.0 @xmath64 8.1 , i.e. , those abundances correspond to the transition zone between the upper and lower branches of the o / h  @xmath65 diagram .
therefore , the ( o / h)@xmath45 abundances we derived from measurements by @xcite are not reliable and were not used .
* ngc  3310 . * ngc  3310 is believed to be an advanced merger and its unusual outer structure is probably the result of a recent merger with a smaller galaxy @xcite .
spectroscopic observations of six hii regions in ngc  3310 were presented by @xcite . the auroral line [ oiii]@xmath154363 is detected in four hii regions .
the @xmath2-based abundances in those hii regions are in the range from 12+log(o / h ) = 8.13 to 8.25 .
however , the coordinates of the hii regions are not published , which prevents us from using those hii regions in radial gradient determinations .
* ngc  3359 . *
the ngc  3359 is a giant , very strongly barred spiral galaxy . @xcite
estimated the radial gradient using the [ oiii]/h@xmath42 and [ nii]/[oiii ] indicators ( one - dimensional calibrations ) .
they found the radial abundance gradient break near the corotation radius .
@xcite carried out new measurements and determined abundances through the @xmath66 and @xmath67 calibrations following @xcite .
they concluded that , with a high degree of confidence , a model with a break fits the data significantly better than one without a break .
the @xmath14-based abundances show no gradient across the entire galaxy .
the @xmath2-based abundances in three hii regions in ngc  3359 are in agreement with no gradient .
* ngc  3718 .
* this galaxy is so peculiar that it is difficult to categorize it morphologically @xcite .
* ngc  4559 . *
the hii regions in ngc  4559 with galactocentric radii larger than 0.4@xmath0 measured by @xcite were excluded since they are in the transition zone .
* ngc  4625 .
* this is a magellanic spiral with @xmath0 @xmath3 3 kpc and an extended faint disk reaching four times the optical @xmath0 radius of the galaxy in the ultraviolet .
* ngc  5668 .
* @xcite have found that within @xmath68 of the nucleus the oxygen abundance o / h follows an exponential profile while the outer abundance trend flattens out to an approximately constant value and could even reverse .
* ngc 7518 .
* this is a hydrogen - deficient galaxy in the pegasus cluster .
following @xcite , oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra ( 360  nm
 560  nm ) have been used in the abundance determinations .
* ngc  7529 .
* this galaxy of the pegasus cluster has a normal hi content .
there is no determination of the position angle , but the inclination is small .
again following @xcite , oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra have been used in the abundance determinations .
* ngc  7591 .
* this galaxy of the pegasus cluster has a normal hi content .
as before , following @xcite , oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra have been used in the abundance determinations .    * ic  10 . * due to uncertainties in the position angle and in the inclination of ic  10 , the galactocentric distances of hii regions have been computed without any de - projection ( following * ? ? ?
* ic  5309 . * a hydrogen - deficient galaxy of the pegasus cluster . following @xcite ,
oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra have been used in the abundance determinations .
* ugc  9562 = ii zw 71 . *
the blue compact dwarf galaxy ugc  9562 is a probable polar - ring galaxy , and there are a several luminous hii regions along its major axis .
the oxygen abundances in four hii regions are around 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.2 , i.e. , those abundances correspond to the transition zone between the upper and lower branches of the o / h  @xmath65 diagram .
therefore , the ( o / h)@xmath45 abundances obtained with measurements from @xcite were not used .
the global oxygen abundances determined from the integrated spectra from @xcite are 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.3 .
* pgc  029167 . * the dwarf galaxy `` garland '' or pgc  029167 ( a tidal dwarf candidate ; * ? ? ?
* ) lies within the tidal bridges of neutral hydrogen connecting m  81 , m  82 and ngc  3077 .
this alignment has led to the suggestion that this dwarf formed recently , as a result of tidal interactions within the group .
hii regions in and near garland exhibit enhanced metallicities compared to other galaxies at similar luminosities .
notably , the oxygen abundances are similar to abundances measured in m  81 and ngc  3077 ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) .        figure  [ figure : ohnh ] shows the nitrogen abundance as a function of oxygen abundance in our sample of galaxies .
the plus signs are the nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath47 and oxygen abundances ( o / h)@xmath47 at @xmath48 = 0 , i.e. , the central nitrogen and oxygen abundances .
the points show the nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath69 and oxygen ( o / h)@xmath69 abundances at the @xmath0 radius of the galaxies .
our data show a well - defined sequence in the o / h  n / h plot .
this sequence exhibits the well - known turnover in the sense that the slope at low metallicity is shallower than that at high metallicity .
the commonly accepted explanation of this change of slope is that nitrogen can be interpreted as having both primary and secondary components .
nitrogen production is primary at low metallicity , but for 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 , secondary nitrogen becomes prominent , and nitrogen increases at a faster rate than oxygen @xcite .
figure  [ figure : ohnh ] shows that at high metallicity , 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.2 , the relation between the logarithms of nitrogen and oxygen abundances can be approximated by a linear expression . for ( n / h)@xmath47 and ( o / h)@xmath47 abundances , we found the following relation through the least squares method : @xmath70 a similar relation @xmath71 was obtained for the ( n / h)@xmath69 and ( o / h)@xmath69 abundances . a comparison between eq .
( [ equation : nhro ] ) and eq .
( [ equation : nhrg ] ) shows that the relations n / h = @xmath72(o / h ) for the ( n / h)@xmath47 and ( o / h)@xmath47 abundances and for the ( n / h)@xmath69 and ( o / h)@xmath69 abundances agree with each other within the errors .
the n / h = @xmath72(o / h ) relation given by eq .
( [ equation : nhro ] ) is presented in figure  [ figure : ohnh ] by the solid line .
the dashed lines indicate shifts along the y - axis by @xmath730.15 dex . at low metallicity ,
12 + log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.0 , the single relation @xmath74 was found using both central abundances and abundances at the @xmath0 radii of the galaxies .
this relation is presented in figure  [ figure : ohnh ] by the dotted line .
figure  [ figure : ohnh ] shows that there is an appreciable spread in n / h at a given o / h .
the variation in n / h is around a factor of 2 for a given o / h .
the scatter can be partially attributed to the errors in the abundance determinations but part of it seems to be true abundance scatter .
two major mechanisms have been proposed for generating a spread .
one mechanism invokes a time delay between ejections of the freshly manufactured oxygen and nitrogen into the interstellar medium by a given stellar generation .
the n / o ratios may be an indicator of the age of a galactic system , indicating the time that has passed since the bulk of star formation activity @xcite .
thus , the n / o ratio in a galaxy would then depend on its star formation history .
the second mechanism for causing n / h variations at a given o / h is a variation in the efficiency of enriched galactic winds @xcite or / and in the inflow of gas into the galaxy @xcite .
it is believed that galactic winds do not play a significant role in the chemical evolution of large spiral galaxies @xcite .
the enhanced n / o ratio in individual hii regions can be caused by the local pollution in nitrogen by wolf - rayet stars ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) .
since we consider `` average ''
n and o abundances based on the abundances of different hii regions this origin of the scatter in our diagrams seems to be unlikely .
it has been known for a long time that galaxies of different morphological types have different star formation histories , i.e. , spiral galaxies with early morphological types have a larger fraction of old stars @xcite .
one can then expect that n / h at a given o / h may depend on the morphological type of galaxy expressed in terms of @xmath41 type @xcite . on the other hand
, the star formation history of a galaxy also strongly depends on its mass ( or luminosity ) as is epitomized in the galaxy downsizing effect , where the star formation acitvity shifts from high - mass galaxies at early cosmic times to lower - mass galaxies at later epochs @xcite .
again , one can expect then that the n / h ratio at a given o / h will depend on the galaxy mass @xcite .
there is a relatively tight linear correlation between the absolute magnitudes and the logarithms of the linear diameters of nearby galaxies @xcite .
therefore , the linear diameter of a galaxy can be used as indicator of its luminosity ( and mass ) .
thus , if the spread in n / h at a given o / h is caused by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in different galaxies then the n / h at a given o / h should correlate with morphological @xmath41 type or / and with linear radius of the galaxy .
figure  [ figure : residual ] shows the residual of eqs .
( [ equation : nhro]),([equation : nhrg ] ) as a function of the morphological @xmath41 type and linear radius of the galaxy @xmath0 .
figure  [ figure : residual ] indicates that there may exist some correlation between the n / h at a given o / h and morphological type or / and linear radius of the galaxy . to verify this
, we found a relation between n / h and o / h for spiral galaxies ( with @xmath41 @xmath75 7.5 ) where @xmath41 and log@xmath0 are `` secondary parameters '' , n / h = @xmath72(o / h,@xmath41,log@xmath0 ) .
it should be noted that @xmath41 and log@xmath0 are not a perfectly independent parameters since there is some correlation between them .
the relation obtained for central abundances is @xmath76 the values of the coefficients in the terms containing @xmath41 and log@xmath0 are similar .
however , the @xmath41 value is a more important second parameter than the log@xmath0 value since the variation in @xmath41 values ( from 1 to 7.5 ) is much larger than the variation of log@xmath0 values ( from @xmath30.6 to @xmath31.5 ) .
therefore , the variation in n / h due to variation in the morphological type is larger than that due to variation in the linear radii of galaxies .
for example , the sab galaxies ( @xmath41 = 2 ) have nitrogen abundances larger than on average 0.1 dex ( i.e. , by around 30% ) than sd ( @xmath41 = 7 ) galaxies with the same oxygen abundances .
the relation n / h = @xmath72(o / h,@xmath41,log@xmath0 ) obtained for abundances at the optical @xmath0 radii of the galaxies is @xmath77 in this case the log@xmath0 value is the more important second parameter than the @xmath41 value . although the morphological type is the more important second parameter in the relation for central abundances while log@xmath0 is the more important second parameter in the relation for abundances at the optical @xmath0 radii of the galaxies , it is difficult to draw a solid conclusion whether this is physically meaningful since there is a correlation between @xmath41 and log@xmath0 . that the relation between n / h and o / h depends on the additional parameter(s ) @xmath41 and/or log@xmath0 suggests that the scatter in n / h at a given o / h can be caused , at least partly , by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in different galaxies .
the upper left panel of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central oxygen ( o / h)@xmath47 abundance in a galaxy as a function of its morphological @xmath41 type ( data from table [ table : sample ] and table  [ table : grad ] ) .
the ( o / h)@xmath47  @xmath41 diagram shows that there is a trend in central oxygen abundance with morphological type for galaxies later than sc ( @xmath41 @xmath4 5 ) such that the central oxygen abundances are lower in galaxies of later types .
this trend disappears for early - type spiral galaxies ( @xmath41 @xmath39 5 ) .
the upper right panel of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central oxygen abundance in a galaxy as a function of its isophotal radius @xmath0 .
since there is a relatively tight linear correlation between the absolute magnitudes and the logarithms of the linear diameters of nearby galaxies @xcite , this diagram can be considered as some kind of analog of the standard `` luminosity  metallicity '' diagram .
the ( o / h)@xmath47  @xmath0 diagram shows that there is a weak correlation between the central oxygen abundance and optical radius for small galaxies ( @xmath0 @xmath39 10 kpc ) in the sense that the smaller galaxies have on average lower oxygen abundances .
this correlation disappears for large galaxies ( @xmath0 @xmath4 10 kpc ) , i.e. , the most oxygen - rich galaxies of different radii have similar central oxygen abundances .
different versions of the luminosity  metallicity diagram have been constructed in earlier studies .
@xmath78-band luminosity
characteristic oxygen abundance diagrams were considered in @xcite , where the characteristic oxygen abundance is defined as the abundance at @xmath51 = 0.4@xmath0 . @xcite
have used the global abundances ( in the sense that their abundances do not correspond to the abundances at a fixed galactocentric distance , but instead are some kind of mean abundance for a fraction of a galaxy within the fiber aperture ) estimated from sdss spectra in constructing the luminosity  metallicity diagram . the luminosity  central metallicity diagram was examined in @xcite .
the flattening of the luminosity  metallicity relation at high luminosities ( essentially a plateau ) can be seen in all versions of the diagram .
thus the plateau in our ( o / h)@xmath47  @xmath0 diagram at large radii is consistent with previous results .
it has been advocated that the constant maximum value of the observed central oxygen abundance in the most oxygen - rich galaxies suggests that the observed oxygen abundance in the centers of those galaxies represents the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance @xcite .
the upper - row panels of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] show that the observed central oxygen abundance in the most oxygen - rich galaxies in our sample is 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.85 .
the dashed lines in the upper row of panels of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] show this value of oxygen abundance , which seems to correspond to the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance in galaxies .
the observed central oxygen abundance in the most oxygen - rich galaxies from our sample is a factor @xmath32 higher than the gas - phase oxygen abundance in the solar neighbourhood , 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.5 ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
the maximum attainable value of the oxygen abundance in galaxies obtained here is in agreement with the value from @xcite . because some fraction of the oxygen ( about 0.1 dex ) is expected to be locked in dust grains ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) , the maximum value of the true ( gas + dust ) oxygen abundances in hii regions of spiral galaxies is 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.95 .
the lower left panel of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath47 abundance in a galaxy disk as a function of its morphological @xmath41 type .
the comparison of the panels in the left column of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] shows that the changes in the central oxygen and nitrogen abundances with morphological type of a galaxy are rather similar .
the lower right panel of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central nitrogen abundance in a galaxy disk as a function of its optical isophotal radius @xmath0 .
again , the comparison between the right column panels of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] indicates that the general behaviour of the central nitrogen abundances as a function of optical radius is similar to that for oxygen .    according to the relation between nitrogen and oxygen abundances given in eq .
( [ equation : nhro ] ) , the value of 12 + log(n / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.42 corresponds to the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance in galaxies with 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.85 .
this value of nitrogen abundance is indicated in the lower row of panels of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] by the dashed lines .
one can see that the value of 12 + log(n / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.42 can be adopted as the maximum value of the observed central nitrogen abundance in the most nitrogen - rich galaxies at the present - day epoch . however , in contrast to the case of oxygen , it is not necessary that this value corresponds to the the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance in galaxies because of the time - delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment of the interstellar medium .
the panels in the left column of figure  [ figure : xhrgf ] show the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath69 ( upper panel ) and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath69 ( lower panel ) abundances measured at the isophotal radius , @xmath0 , as a function of morphological @xmath41 type . a comparison between the panels in the left column of figure  [ figure : xhrof ] and figure  [ figure : xhrgf ] shows that the changes in the central oxygen ( nitrogen ) abundances and in the abundances at the optical edge of the disk along the hubble sequence ( or morphological type ) are more or less similar ( at least qualitatively ) . however , the oxygen and nitrogen abundances at the @xmath0 radius in four of the late - type galaxies ( ngc  4625 , ic  10 , ugc  223 , and pgc  29167 ) are high and those galaxies show a large deviation from the general trends .
ngc  4625 is a magellanic spiral with @xmath0 @xmath3 3  kpc and a very extended faint disk ( see below ) .
the dwarf irregular galaxy ic  10 has a very small optical radius , @xmath0 = 0.6 kpc , and a positive radial abundance gradient .
one may suggest though that any radial gradient in such small galaxies is hard to define based on hii regions .
it remains a mystery why the oxygen abundance changes by a factor of about two on the scale of 0.6 kpc in this galaxy .
ic  10 is one of several dwarf galaxies in which evidence for localized , inhomogeneous enrichment has been found @xcite  perhaps this is a common mode of enrichment in these small objects .
in contrast , the irregular galaxy ugc  223 is rather large with @xmath0 = 9.3 kpc .
the peculiar dwarf galaxy pgc  29167 ( or `` garland '' ) is commonly considered a tidal dwarf galaxy ( see comment on this galaxy in section  4.2 ) .
the panels in the right column of figure  [ figure : xhrgf ] show the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath69 ( upper panel ) and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath69 ( lower panel ) abundances at the optical edge of the disk as defined by the @xmath0 radius as a function of isophotal radius @xmath0 .
the positions of the galaxies in the ( o / h)@xmath69  @xmath0 and ( n / h)@xmath69  @xmath0 diagrams do not show any obvious trends . in particular , the ( o / h)@xmath69 and ( n / h)@xmath69 abundances do not show any appreciable correlation with isophotal radius @xmath0 .
however , one feature in these diagrams should be noted : the ( o / h)@xmath69 and ( n / h)@xmath69 abundances have a maximum value in galaxies with an isophotal radius @xmath0 @xmath3 10 kpc and decrease when moving from this value both towards smaller or larger optical radii .
figure  [ figure : gradf ] shows the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundance gradients in units of dex  kpc@xmath53 as a function of morphological @xmath41 type ( left panels ) and of isophotal radius @xmath0 of a galaxy ( right panels ) . inspection of the left column panels of figure  [ figure : xhrgf ] shows that the values of the abundance gradients in units of dex  kpc@xmath53 do not correlate with the morphological type of a galaxy . according to @xcite
, the lack of a correlation between gradients in units of dex  kpc@xmath53 and the macroscopic properties of late - type galaxies may suggest that the relationship between these parameters is more complex than a simple correlation .
indeed , @xcite have concluded that a correlation for non - barred galaxies is seen .
the panels in the right column of figure  [ figure : xhrgf ] show that shallow gradients can be found both in small and large galaxies while steep gradients are seen only in small galaxies in the sense that the smaller a galaxy the steeper its gradient .
we compiled published spectra of hii regions in 130 nearby galaxies .
our list contains 3904 spectra including 162 spectra of hii regions beyond the isophotal radius @xmath0 .
the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in hii regions were determined on the metallicity scale defined by hii regions with @xmath2-based abundances .
the radial gradients of oxygen and nitrogen abundances across the disks of the galaxies were estimated .    at the centers of metal - rich galaxies ( i.e. , ( 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.2 ) , we found the relation between n and o abundances to be ( n / h)@xmath79 @xmath80 ( o / h)@xmath81 . the ( n / h)@xmath69 = @xmath72(o / h)@xmath69 relation between n and o abundances at the @xmath0 isophotal radii of high metallicity galaxies is similar to that for the abundances at their centers .
the variation in ( n / h ) at a given ( o / h ) is around 0.3 dex . to test whether the scatter in n / h at a given o / h can be explained by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in galaxies of different morphological types and dimensions ( masses ) , we derived a more complex relation between n and o abundances ( n / h ) = @xmath72((o / h),@xmath41,@xmath0 ) .
we found that the morphological type , @xmath41 , is a more important `` second parameter '' in the relation for central abundances , while the log@xmath0 is a more important second parameter in the relation for abundances at the @xmath0 radii of our galaxies . since there is a correlation between @xmath41 and log@xmath0 it is as yet unclear whether this difference is meaningful
the fact that the relation between n / h and o / h depends on additional parameter(s ) , namely @xmath41 and/or log@xmath0 suggests that the scatter in n / h at a given o / h can be caused , at least partly , by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in different galaxies .
the best fit to n / h as a function of o / h is close to a linear relation at low metallicity ( 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.0 ) .
the central oxygen abundances ( o / h)@xmath79 show a trend along the hubble sequence of galaxies of late morphological types ( @xmath41 @xmath4 5 ) such that the oxygen abundances are lower in galaxies of later types .
this trend disappears for early morphological types .
the central oxygen abundance also correlates with optical galaxy radius for small galaxies , @xmath0 @xmath39 10 kpc , being lower in galaxies of smaller radii .
the trend disappears for galaxies with large radii .
the maximum gas - phase oxygen abundance in large ( 10 kpc @xmath39 r@xmath82 @xmath39 30 kpc ) galaxies ( or in galaxies of early ( 1 @xmath39 @xmath41 @xmath39 5 ) morphological types ) is constant , 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.85 .
this implies that the observed central oxygen abundance of the most oxygen - rich galaxies in our sample is a factor of @xmath32 higher than the gas - phase oxygen abundance in the solar neighbourhood .
the central nitrogen abundances ( n / h)@xmath47 show a similar behaviour .
the observed central nitrogen abundance in the most nitrogen - rich galaxies of our sample is 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.42 .
the radial o and n abundance gradients ( in units of dex  kpc@xmath53 ) within the optical radius do not show any significant correlation with the morphological type and optical radius .
however , the spread in the gradients increases with decreasing galaxy radius in the sense that shallow gradients are seen both in small and large galaxies while steep gradients occur only in a small galaxies .
the smaller a galaxy the steeper is the gradient that it may show .
the abundance data set presented in this paper serves as the foundation for other investigations we are carrying out . in a forthcoming paper @xcite , we examine relations between the radial abundance distribution across the disk and the disk surface brightness profiles in the optical @xmath78 and infrared @xmath83 bands for a sample of nearby galaxies .
we are grateful to the referee for his or her constructive comments .
l.s.p .  and e.k.g .
acknowledge support within the framework of sonderforschungsbereich ( sfb 881 ) on `` the milky way system '' ( especially subproject a5 ) , which is funded by the german research foundation ( dfg ) .
thanks the astronomisches rechen - institut at heidelberg university where this investigation was carried out for the hospitality . a.y.k .  acknowledges the support from the national research foundation ( nrf ) of south africa .
+ we thank h.j .
zahid and f.  bresolin for supporting us with some unpublished details of their observations of hii regions in ngc  3359 .
+ the authors acknowledge the work of the sdss collaboration .
funding for sdss - iii has been provided by the alfred p.  sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , and the u.s .
department of energy office of science .
the sdss - iii web site is http://www.sdss3.org/. sdss - iii is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions of the sdss - iii collaboration including the university of arizona , the brazilian participation group , brookhaven national laboratory , university of cambridge , carnegie mellon university , university of florida , the french participation group , the german participation group , harvard university , the instituto de astrofisica de canarias , the michigan state / notre dame / jina participation group , johns hopkins university , lawrence berkeley national laboratory , max planck institute for astrophysics , max planck institute for extraterrestrial physics , new mexico state university , new york university , ohio state university , pennsylvania state university , university of portsmouth , princeton university , the spanish participation group , university of tokyo , university of utah , vanderbilt university , university of virginia , university of washington , and yale university .
+ we acknowledge the usage of the hyperleda database ( http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr ) .
llcrrrrccrcr ngc 0012 & sc & 4.9 & 2.486458 & 4.612528 & 0.85 & 125 & 27 & 1 & 53.20 & 2 & 13.14 + ngc 0055 & sbm & 8.8 & 3.723333 & -39.196639 & 16.18 & 110 & 79 & 3 & 1.91 & 4 & 8.99 + ngc 0099 & sc & 5.9 & 5.997470 & 15.770428 & 0.71 & 0 & 24 & 1 & 77.00 & 5 & 15.82 + ngc 0224 & sb & 3.0 & 10.684792 & 41.269065 & 95.27 & 35 & 77 & 6 & 0.74 & 7 & 20.51 + ngc 0234 & sabc & 5.3 & 10.884977 & 14.342564 & 0.81 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 59.60 & 2 & 14.06 + ngc 0253 & sabc & 5.1 & 11.888000 & -25.288219 & 13.77 & 50 & 76 & 8 & 3.46 & 9 & 13.86 + ngc 0300 & scd & 6.9 & 13.722833 & -37.684389 & 10.94 & 106 & 42 & 10 & 1.94 & 4 & 6.17 + ngc 0428 & sabm & 8.6 & 18.232125 & 0.981557 & 2.04 & 120 & 41 & 1 & 14.80 & 11 & 8.77 + ngc 0450 & sabc & 5.8 & 18.876840 & -0.860974 & 1.54 & 72 & 41 & 1 & 18.70 & 11 & 8.40 + ngc 0493 & sc & 5.9 & 20.537458 & 0.945362 & 1.69 & 58 & 72 & 1 & 23.20 & 11 & 11.43 + ngc 0575 & sc & 5.3 & 22.694333 & 21.440417 & 0.85 & 0 & 21 & 1 & 41.80 & 2 & 10.32 + ngc 0598 & sc & 5.9 & 23.462042 & 30.660222 & 35.40 & 23 & 56 & 12 & 0.76 & 4 & 7.83 + ngc 0628 & sc & 5.2 & 24.173946 & 15.783661 & 5.24 & 25 & 6 & 13 & 9.91 & 14 & 15.09 + ngc 0753 & sabc & 4.9 & 29.425833 & 35.916125 & 1.26 & 128 & 50 & 15 & 67.10 & 16 & 24.52 + ngc 0783 & sc & 5.3 & 30.277542 & 31.882472 & 0.79 & 35 & 27 & 1 & 69.30 & 2 & 15.98 + ngc 0925 & scd & 7.0 & 36.820333 & 33.579167 & 5.24 & 101 & 58 & 17 & 9.29 & 18 & 14.15 + ngc 1055 & sbb & 3.1 & 40.438458 & 0.443168 & 3.79 & 105 & 69 & 1 & 14.40 & 11 & 15.89 + ngc 1058 & sc & 5.1 & 40.874988 &
37.341339 & 1.51 & 145 & 15 & 19 & 10.60 & 20 & 4.66 + ngc 1068 & sb & 3.0 & 40.669629 & -0.013281 & 3.54 & 70 & 32 & 1 & 10.10 & 11 & 10.40 + ngc 1090 & sbc & 3.8 & 41.641401 & -0.247158 & 1.99 & 102 & 64 & 1 & 35.90 & 16 & 20.79 + ngc 1097 & sbb & 3.3 & 41.579375 & -30.274889 & 4.67 & 134 & 46 & 21 & 16.50 & 2 & 22.40 + ngc 1232 & sabc & 5.0 & 47.439625 & -20.579306 & 3.71 & 90 & 30 & 22 & 21.00 & 2 & 22.64 + ngc 1313 & sbcd & 7.0 & 49.566875 & -66.498250 & 4.56 & 4 & 38 & 23 & 4.39 & 24 & 5.82 + ngc 1365 & sb & 3.2 & 53.401546 & -36.140403 & 5.61 & 42 & 46 & 25 & 19.60 & 18 & 32.00 + ngc 1512 & sa & 1.1 & 60.976167 & -43.348861 & 4.46 & 80 & 35 & 26 & 9.50 & 27 & 12.32 + ngc 1598 & sbc & 4.9 & 67.140292 & -47.782556 & 0.72 & 123 & 55 & 1 & 55.80 & 16 & 11.73 + ngc 1637 & sc & 5.0 & 70.367408 & -2.857961 & 1.99 & 31 & 40 & 19 & 12.00 & 18 & 6.95 + ngc 1642 & sc & 5.2 & 70.728792 & 0.618583 & 0.91 & 175 & 29 & 1 & 62.10 & 2 & 16.43 + ngc 1672 & sb & 3.3 & 71.427125 & -59.247278 & 3.30 & 170 & 34 & 1 & 16.70 & 2 & 16.05 + ngc 2336 & sbc & 4.0 & 111.766875 & 80.178083 & 2.51@xmath84 & 175 & 55 & 28 & 34.20 & 2 & 24.95 + ngc 2403 & sabc & 6.0 & 114.214167 & 65.602556 & 10.94 & 126 & 58 & 29 & 3.06 & 18 & 9.74 + ngc 2441 & sabb & 3.3 & 117.978083 & 73.015694 & 1.00 & 0 & 29 & 1 & 50.90 & 2 & 14.77 + ngc 2442 & sbc & 3.7 & 114.099333 & -69.530833 & 2.75 & 27 & 29 & 30 & 17.10 & 31 & 13.67 + ngc 2541 & sabc & 6.0 & 123.667148 & 49.061709 & 3.16 & 165 & 60 & 1 & 12.60 & 18 & 11.56 + ngc 2805 & sabc & 6.9 & 140.085042 & 64.102778 & 3.16 & 125 & 41 & 1 & 28.00 & 31 & 25.70 + ngc 2835 & sc & 5.0 & 139.470458 & -22.354667 & 3.30 & 160 & 45 & 32 & 10.10 & 16 & 9.71 + ngc 2841 & sb & 3.0 & 140.510975 & 50.976519 & 4.06 & 150 & 66 & 33 & 14.10 & 18 & 16.67 + ngc 2903 & sabb & 4.0 & 143.042125 & 21.500833 & 6.30 & 22 & 65 & 34 & 8.90 & 35 & 16.30 + ngc 2997 & sabc & 5.1 & 146.411625 & -31.191083 & 4.46 & 107 & 32 & 36 & 12.20 & 36 & 15.82 + ngc 3020 & sc & 5.9 & 147.527500 &
12.813639 & 1.58 & 105 & 60 & 1 & 21.90 & 11 & 10.07 + ngc 3023 & sabc & 5.5 & 147.469112 & 0.618167 & 1.44 & 70 & 60 & 1 & 29.40 & 2 & 12.33 + ngc 3031 & sab & 2.4 & 148.888221 & 69.065295 & 13.46 & 150 & 59 & 37 & 3.63 & 18 &
14.21 + ngc 3184 & sabc & 5.9 & 154.570258 &
41.424053 & 3.71 & 135 & 21 & 1 & 12.60 & 14 & 13.59 + ngc 3198 & sc & 5.2 & 154.978966 &
45.549623 & 4.26 & 35 & 67 & 1 & 14.50 & 18 & 17.95 + ngc 3227 & saba & 1.5 & 155.877412 &
19.865050 & 2.68 & 155 & 47 & 1 & 20.60 & 31 & 16.09 + ngc 3239 & ib & 9.8 & 156.270375 & 17.163583 & 2.51 & 80 & 49 & 38 & 8.10 & 31 & 5.90 + ngc 3310 & sabb & 4.0 & 159.691083 & 53.503383 & 1.54 & 163 & 39 & 39 & 19.20 & 2 & 8.63 + ngc 3319 & sbc & 6.0 & 159.789414 & 41.686675 & 3.08 & 37 & 57 & 1 & 14.10 & 18 & 12.64 + ngc 3344 & sbc & 4.0 & 160.879792 & 24.922222 & 3.54 & 156 & 25 & 40 & 6.10 & 31 & 6.28 + ngc 3351 & sb & 3.1 & 160.990417 & 11.703806 & 3.71 & 13 & 42 & 26 & 10.50 & 18 & 11.32 + ngc 3359 & sc & 5.2 & 161.653596 & 63.224236 & 3.62 & 172 & 51 & 41 & 14.40 & 42 & 15.17 + ngc 3486 & sc & 5.2 & 165.099452 & 28.975137 & 3.54 & 80 & 42 & 1 & 9.16 & 2 & 9.43 + ngc 3521 & sabb & 4.0 & 166.452421 & -0.035864 & 5.48 & 160 & 73 & 37 & 10.70 & 43 & 17.06 + ngc 3621 & sbcd & 6.9 & 169.568792 & -32.814056 & 4.89@xmath85 & 165 & 65 & 37 & 7.24 & 18 & 10.29 + ngc 3631 & sc & 5.2 & 170.261976 & 53.169569 & 2.51 & 152 & 20 & 86 & 22.2 & 2 & 16.18 + ngc 3718 & sa & 1.1 & 173.145221 & 53.067922 & 3.77@xmath86 & 15 & 65 & 44 & 17.00 & 31 & 18.63 + ngc 3820 & sbc & 3.6 & 175.520442 & 10.384253 & 0.33 & 26 & 42 & 45 & 91.30 & 2 & 8.77 + ngc 3893 & sabc & 5.2 & 177.159125 &
48.710833 & 2.23 & 165 & 52 & 1 & 18.20 & 11 & 11.82 + ngc 3938 & sc & 5.2 & 178.206042 & 44.120722 & 2.68 & 15 & 24 & 1 & 17.90 & 46 & 13.98 + ngc 4030 & sbc & 4.0 & 180.098445 & -1.100095 & 2.08 & 27 & 44 & 1 & 27.20 & 11 & 16.49 + ngc 4088 & sabc & 4.7 & 181.392458 & 50.539028 & 2.88 & 43 & 67 & 1 & 14.30 & 11 & 11.97 + ngc 4109 & sa & 1.1 & 181.713008 & 42.995642 & 0.50 & 147 & 44 & 45 & 102.80 & 2 & 14.95 + ngc 4254 & sc & 5.2 & 184.706683 & 14.416508 & 2.68 & 59 & 29 & 19 & 14.30 & 16 & 11.17 + ngc 4258 & sabb & 4.0 & 184.739600 & 47.303972 & 9.31 & 150 & 72 & 47 & 7.20 & 48 & 19.50 + ngc 4303 & sbc & 4.0 & 185.478729 &
4.473647 & 3.23 & 137 & 27 & 19 & 13.60 & 2 & 12.77 + ngc 4321 & sabb & 4.1 & 185.728462 & 15.821817 & 3.71 & 30 & 32 & 1 & 17.20 & 18 & 18.55 + ngc 4395 & sm & 8.9 & 186.453592 & 33.546928 & 6.59 & 147 & 46 & 49 & 4.30 & 50 & 8.24 + ngc 4490 & sbcd & 7.0 & 187.650996 & 41.643898 & 3.16 & 125 & 61 & 1 & 7.80 & 31 & 7.16 + ngc 4501 & sb & 3.3 & 187.996503 & 14.420387 & 3.46 & 141 & 63 & 51 & 14.10 & 52 & 14.19 + ngc 4535 & sc & 5.0 & 188.584625 & 8.197750 & 3.54 & 0 & 45 & 1 & 17.80 & 18 & 18.33 + ngc 4559 & sc & 6.0 & 188.990195 & 27.959992 & 5.36 & 143 & 67 & 53 & 7.87 & 16 & 12.27 + ngc 4625 & sabm & 8.8 & 190.469671 & 41.273964 & 1.09 & 130 & 27 & 54 & 9.20 & 18 & 2.93 + ngc 4631 & sbcd & 6.6 & 190.533375 & 32.541500 & 7.74 & 86 & 80 & 1 & 7.62 & 55 & 17.17 + ngc 4651 & sc & 5.2 & 190.927625 &
16.393389 & 1.99 & 78 & 48 & 19 & 23.60 & 56 & 13.67 + ngc 4654 & sc & 5.9 & 190.985750 & 13.126681 & 2.45 & 122 & 57 & 19 & 16.10 & 16 & 11.47 + ngc 4656 & sbm & 9.0 & 190.990531 & 32.168150 & 7.57 & 33 & 79 & 1 & 8.20 & 2 & 18.05 + ngc 4713 & scd & 6.8 & 192.491139 & 5.311405 & 1.35 & 50 & 35 & 57 & 14.90 & 11 & 5.83 + ngc 4725 & saba & 2.2 & 192.610755 & 25.500805 & 5.36 & 35 & 45 & 1 & 13.50 & 18 & 21.04 + ngc 4736 & sab & 2.4 & 192.721088 & 41.120458 & 5.61 & 116 & 37 & 58 & 4.66 & 24 & 7.60 + ngc 4861 & sm & 8.9 & 194.759754 & 34.859444 & 1.99 & 23 & 69 & 59 & 7.59 & 11 & 4.40 + ngc 5033 & sc & 5.1 & 198.364441 & 36.569936 & 5.36 & 170 & 62 & 1 & 18.70 & 16 & 29.14 + ngc 5055 & sbc & 4.0 & 198.955542 & 42.029278 & 6.30 & 101 & 64 & 33 & 7.94 & 11 & 14.54 + ngc 5068 & sc & 6.0 & 199.728375 & -21.039111 & 3.62 & 110 & 29 & 1 & 5.40 & 60 & 5.69 + ngc 5194 & sbc & 4.0 & 202.469629 & 47.195172 & 5.61 & 163 & 52 & 1 & 8.90 & 61 & 14.52 + ngc 5236 & sc & 5.0 & 204.253958 & -29.865417 & 6.44 & 46 & 24 & 58 & 4.61 & 18 & 8.64 + ngc 5248 & sabb & 4.0 & 204.383433 & 8.885178 & 3.08 & 110 & 44 & 1 & 22.90 & 2 & 20.54 + ngc 5457 & sabc & 6.0 & 210.802267 & 54.348950 & 14.42 & 37 & 18 & 62 & 6.85 & 18 & 28.73 + ngc 5474 & sc & 6.1 & 211.256708 & 53.662222 & 2.39 & 159 & 21 & 63 & 6.80 & 35 & 4.73 + ngc 5668 & scd & 6.9 & 218.351408 &
4.450458 & 1.66 & 164 & 21 & 64 & 26.90 & 31 & 12.96 + ngc 6384 & sabb & 3.6 & 263.101250 & 7.060278 & 3.08 & 32 & 48 & 19 & 25.90 & 11 & 23.23 + ngc 6691 & sbc & 3.6 & 279.801042 & 55.641806 & 0.79 & 0 & 21 & 1 & 85.10 & 2 & 19.62 + ngc 6744 & sbc & 4.0 & 287.442125 & -63.857528 & 9.98 & 20 & 50 & 65 & 9.40 & 16 & 27.28 + ngc 6946 & sabc & 5.9 & 308.718012 & 60.153914 & 5.74 & 62 & 38 & 66 & 6.00 & 67 & 10.02 + ngc 7331 & sbc & 3.9 & 339.266725 & 34.415519 & 5.24 & 169 & 75 & 28 & 15.10 & 68 & 23.00 + ngc 7495 & sabc & 5.3 & 347.238250 & 12.048028 & 0.91 & 5 & 24 & 1 & 70.00 & 69 & 18.53 + ngc 7518 & saba & 1.1 & 348.303042 &
6.321667 & 0.71 & 109 & 42 & 70 & 50.50 & 70 & 10.38 + ngc 7529 & sbc & 4.4 & 348.513292 & 8.992500 & 0.43 & 0 & 17 & 1 & 62.10 & 2 & 7.69 + ngc 7570 & sa & 1.1 & 349.186134 & 13.483011 & 0.77 & 30 & 54 & 1 & 17.70 & 16 & 3.99 + ngc 7591 & sbbc & 3.6 & 349.567833 & 6.585806 & 0.98 & 148 & 68 & 71 & 60.20 & 16 & 17.07 + ngc 7678 & sc & 4.9 & 352.116250 & 22.421194 & 1.17 & 5 & 45 & 1 & 48.90 & 2 & 16.67 + ngc 7793 & scd & 7.4 & 359.457625 & -32.591028 & 4.67 & 99 & 54 & 10 & 3.40 & 72 & 4.62 + ic 0010 & ib & 9.9 & 5.072250 & 59.303778 & 3.16 & 125 & 27 & 45 & 0.66 & 73 & 0.61 + ic 0193 & sc & 5.3 & 30.629083 & 11.093083 & 0.93 & 154 & 32 & 1 & 61.60 & 2 & 16.68 + ic 0208 & sbc & 3.6 & 32.115583 & 6.394917 & 0.91 & 0 & 12 & 1 & 38.30 & 16 & 10.14 + ic 0342 & sabc & 6.0 & 56.702096 & 68.096367 & 10.69 & 37 & 31 & 74 & 3.30 & 68 & 10.26 + ic 1132 & sc & 5.4 & 235.028171 & 20.680606 & 0.59 & 50 & 18 & 75 & 70.60 & 2 & 12.06 + ic 2204 & sab & 2.5 & 115.325435 & 34.232169 & 0.52 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 66.20 & 76 & 10.08 + ic 5201 & sc & 6.1 & 335.239333 & -46.035861 & 4.26 & 33 & 63 & 1 & 12.80 & 2 & 15.85 + ic 5309 & sb & 3.1 & 349.798542 & 8.109306 & 0.67 & 20 & 63 & 77 & 50.00 & 16 & 9.81 + ugc 00223 & i & 9.9 & 6.177915 & 14.824582 & 0.46 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 70.80 & 2 & 9.39 + ugc 01087 & sc & 5.3 & 22.860833 & 14.277500 & 0.74 & 0 & 21 & 1 & 59.60 & 2 & 12.82 + ugc 01862 & sabc & 6.4 & 36.103375 & -2.162361 & 0.83 & 10 & 39 & 1 & 20.10 & 16 & 4.85 + ugc 02023 & i & 9.7 & 37.572417 & 33.491111 & 0.83 & 59 & 26 & 78 & 10.30 & 79 & 2.49 + ugc 02216 & i & 9.9 & 41.087913 & 0.675381 & 0.64 & 15 & 72 & 1 & 36.50 & 2 & 6.84 + ugc 02345 & sm & 8.8 & 42.969583 & -1.172222 & 1.73 & 160 & 30 & 1 & 20.00 & 2 & 10.09 + ugc 03701 & sc & 6.0 & 107.927833 & 72.169306 & 0.91 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 43.20 & 2 & 11.43 + ugc 04107 & sc & 5.3 & 119.257792 & 49.567361 & 0.71 & 0 & 12 & 1 & 51.50 & 2 & 10.58 + ugc 04305 & i & 9.9 & 124.770750 & 70.720027 & 3.97 & 177 & 40 & 80 & 3.38 & 9 & 3.90 + ugc 05100 & sbb & 3.0 & 143.661008 & 5.841439 & 0.60 & 30 & 53 & 1 & 80.60 & 2 & 14.09 + ugc 06410 & sabc & 5.3 & 171.024500 &
45.811072 & 0.55 & 5 & 39 & 1 & 82.50 & 2 & 13.16 + ugc 08091 & i & 9.8 & 194.668512 & 14.217511 & 0.54 & 170 & 20 & 81 & 2.08 & 9 & 0.32 + ugc 09562 & sd & 8.0 & 222.810048 & 35.542269 & 0.48 & 30 & 27 & 1 & 23.80 & 31 & 3.31 + ugc 09837 & sabc & 5.3 & 230.965311 & 58.052941 & 0.91 & 21 & 18 & 82 & 42.00 & 82 & 11.12 + ugc 10445 & sc & 6.0 & 248.448417 & 28.984778 & 1.38 & 142 & 46 & 83 & 20.00 & 2 & 8.01 + ugc 12709 & sabm & 8.7 & 354.350001 & 0.391670 & 1.51 & 145 & 47 & 1 & 37.00 & 2 & 16.25 + pgc 29167 & i & 10.0 & 150.965417 & 68.690278 & 2.70@xmath87 & 0 & 0 & & 3.82 & 84 & 3.00 + pgc 41318 & s ? & 4.3 & 187.589848 & 56.791542 & 0.29 & 0 & 21 & 45 & 70.10 & 2 & 6.00 + pgc 44772 & s ? & 1.9 & 195.138542 & 10.129969 & 0.40 & 128 & 32 & 45 & 107.80 & 2 & 12.39 + pgc 45195 & sd & 7.7 & 196.129979 & -3.572419 & 1.77 & 63 & 44 & 1 & 24.10 & 2 & 12.44 + pgc 46182 & sc & 4.9 & 199.061225 & 41.494460 & 0.54@xmath88 & 34 & 52 & 85 & 89.40 & 76 & 14.15 + ;    lccrrrrcc ngc 0012 & 8.56 @xmath73 0.02 & 0.015 @xmath73 0.042 & 0.0011 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.033 & 7.74 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.008 @xmath73 0.087 & -0.0006 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.068 + ngc 0055 & 8.04 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.053 @xmath73 0.094 & -0.0059 @xmath73 0.0104 & 0.075 & 6.50 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.037 @xmath73 0.131 & -0.0042 @xmath73 0.0145 & 0.091 + ngc 0099 & 8.55 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.319 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0202 @xmath73 0.0045 & 0.055 & 7.70 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.666 @xmath73 0.137 & -0.0422 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.105 + ngc 0224 & 8.72 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.352 @xmath73 0.039 & -0.0172 @xmath73 0.0019 & 0.077 & 8.17 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.996 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0486
@xmath73 0.0035 & 0.136 + ngc 0234 & 8.65 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.154 @xmath73 0.022 & -0.0109 @xmath73 0.0015 & 0.027 & 7.91 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.329 @xmath73 0.046 & -0.0234 @xmath73 0.0033 & 0.058 + ngc 0253 & 8.55 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.125 @xmath73 0.164 & -0.0090 @xmath73 0.0119 & 0.055 & 7.60 @xmath73 0.35 & -0.241 @xmath73 0.441 & -0.0174 @xmath73 0.0319 & 0.149 + ngc 0300 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.519 @xmath73 0.040 & -0.0842 @xmath73 0.0065 & 0.069 & 7.47 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.955 @xmath73 0.080 & -0.1548 @xmath73 0.0129 & 0.130 + ngc 0428 & 8.20 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.035 @xmath73 0.109 & -0.0040 @xmath73 0.0124 & 0.059 & 6.95 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.118 @xmath73 0.184 & -0.0135 @xmath73 0.0210 & 0.099 + ngc 0450 & 8.35 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.285
@xmath73 0.057 & -0.0340 @xmath73 0.0067 & 0.046 & 7.24 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.589 @xmath73 0.112 & -0.0702 @xmath73 0.0133 & 0.092 + ngc 0493 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.450
@xmath73 0.070 & -0.0393 @xmath73 0.0061 & 0.053 & 7.53 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.893 @xmath73 0.124 & -0.0780
@xmath73 0.0109 & 0.093 + ngc 0575 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.195 @xmath73 0.026 & -0.0189 @xmath73 0.0025 & 0.026 & 7.82 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.530 @xmath73 0.061 & -0.0514 @xmath73 0.0059 & 0.060 + ngc 0598 & 8.48 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.359 @xmath73 0.041 & -0.0459 @xmath73 0.0053 & 0.073 & 7.47 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.691 @xmath73 0.084 & -0.0883 @xmath73 0.0107 &
0.145 + ngc 0628 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.572 @xmath73 0.027 & -0.0379 @xmath73 0.0018 & 0.060 & 8.17 @xmath73 0.03 & -1.292 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0856 @xmath73 0.0042 & 0.137 + ngc 0753 & 8.67 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.212 @xmath73 0.106 & -0.0087 @xmath73 0.0043 & 0.065 & 8.01 @xmath73 0.20 & -0.399 @xmath73 0.290 & -0.0163 @xmath73 0.0118 & 0.177 + ngc 0783 & 8.68 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.189 @xmath73 0.104 & -0.0118 @xmath73 0.0056 & 0.031 & 7.91 @xmath73 0.30 & -0.274 @xmath73 0.434 & -0.0171 @xmath73 0.0272 & 0.130 + ngc 0925 & 8.48 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.473 @xmath73 0.037 & -0.0334 @xmath73 0.0026 & 0.067 & 7.45 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.941 @xmath73 0.071 & -0.0665
@xmath73 0.0050 & 0.128 + ngc 1055 & 8.62 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.140 @xmath73 0.100 & -0.0088 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.059 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.414 @xmath73 0.118 & -0.0261 @xmath73 0.0074 & 0.070 + ngc 1058 & 8.62 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.352 @xmath73 0.027 & -0.0757 @xmath73 0.0058 & 0.055 & 7.72 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.751 @xmath73 0.069 & -0.1613 @xmath73 0.0149 & 0.137 + ngc 1068 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.121 @xmath73 0.051 & -0.0116 @xmath73 0.0049 & 0.070 & 7.94 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.141 @xmath73 0.100 & -0.0136 @xmath73 0.0096 & 0.126 + ngc 1090 & 8.61 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.284 @xmath73 0.103 & -0.0137 @xmath73 0.0050 & 0.026 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.775 @xmath73 0.131 & -0.0373 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.033 + ngc 1097 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.357 @xmath73 0.054 & -0.0159 @xmath73 0.0024 & 0.030 & 8.25 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.997 @xmath73 0.209 & -0.0445 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.114 + ngc 1232 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.573 @xmath73 0.068 & -0.0253 @xmath73 0.0030 & 0.040 & 8.12 @xmath73 0.10 & -1.166 @xmath73 0.172 & -0.0515 @xmath73 0.0076 & 0.103 + ngc 1313 & 8.21 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.159 @xmath73 0.051 & -0.0273 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.071 & 6.84 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.269 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0462 @xmath73 0.0165 & 0.132 + ngc 1365 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.253 @xmath73 0.033 & -0.0079 @xmath73 0.0010 & 0.064 & 7.91 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.622 @xmath73 0.080 & -0.0193 @xmath73 0.0024 & 0.137 + ngc 1512 & 8.79 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.461 @xmath73 0.048 & -0.0374 @xmath73 0.0039 & 0.066 & 8.42 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.410 @xmath73 0.083 & -0.1144 @xmath73 0.0067 & 0.115 + ngc 1598 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.402 @xmath73 0.062 & -0.0343 @xmath73 0.0053 & 0.042 & 8.20 @xmath73 0.09 & -1.014 @xmath73 0.178 & -0.0865 @xmath73 0.0152 & 0.122 + ngc 1637 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.115 @xmath73 0.023 & -0.0165 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.062 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.170 @xmath73 0.067 & -0.0236 @xmath73 0.0096 & 0.160 + ngc 1642 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.154 @xmath73 0.024 & -0.0094 @xmath73 0.0015 & 0.030 & 7.86 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.244 @xmath73 0.050 & -0.0148 @xmath73 0.0031 & 0.062 + ngc 1672 & 8.67 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.216 @xmath73 0.070 & -0.0135 @xmath73 0.0044 & 0.055 & 8.00 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.464 @xmath73 0.158 & -0.0290 @xmath73 0.0098 & 0.119 + ngc 2336 & 8.80 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.390 @xmath73 0.056 & -0.0156 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.041 & 8.14 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.725 @xmath73 0.121 & -0.0290 @xmath73 0.0049 & 0.088 + ngc 2403 & 8.48 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.524 @xmath73 0.043 & -0.0538 @xmath73
0.0044 & 0.079 & 7.47 @xmath73 0.03 & -1.005 @xmath73 0.069 & -0.1032 @xmath73 0.0071 & 0.128 + ngc 2441 & 8.54 @xmath73 0.01 & 0.017 @xmath73 0.040 & 0.0011 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.036 & 7.67 @xmath73 0.03 & 0.100 @xmath73 0.080 & 0.0068 @xmath73 0.0054 & 0.072 + ngc 2442 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.079 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0058 @xmath73 0.0052 & 0.030 & 7.87 @xmath73 0.14 & -0.119 @xmath73 0.204 & -0.0087
@xmath73 0.0150 & 0.087 + ngc 2541 & 8.45 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.608 @xmath73 0.053 & -0.0526 @xmath73 0.0046 & 0.030 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 2805 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.432 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0168 @xmath73 0.0017 & 0.040 & 7.53 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.869 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0338 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.087 + ngc 2835 & 8.50 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.314 @xmath73 0.060 & -0.0324 @xmath73 0.0062 & 0.057 & 7.51 @xmath73 0.10 & -0.633 @xmath73 0.149 & -0.0652 @xmath73 0.0154 & 0.142 + ngc 2841 & 8.99 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.607 @xmath73 0.172 & -0.0363 @xmath73 0.0103 & 0.022 & 8.81 @xmath73 0.20 & -1.488 @xmath73 0.450 & -0.0890 @xmath73 0.0269 & 0.052 + ngc 2903 & 8.82 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.523 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0321 @xmath73 0.0044 & 0.061 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.06 & -1.588 @xmath73 0.152 & -0.0975 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.121 + ngc 2997 & 8.80 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.502 @xmath73 0.121 & -0.0318 @xmath73 0.0076 & 0.060 & 8.44 @xmath73 0.13 & -1.503 @xmath73 0.274 & -0.0950 @xmath73 0.0173 & 0.129 + ngc 3020 & 8.39 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.558 @xmath73 0.041 & -0.0554 @xmath73 0.0041 & 0.011 & 7.27 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.053 @xmath73 0.167 & -0.1045
@xmath73 0.0167 & 0.045 + ngc 3023 & 8.34 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.444 @xmath73 0.201 & -0.0361 @xmath73 0.0163 & 0.054 & 7.20 @xmath73 0.14 & -0.889 @xmath73 0.372 & -0.0722 @xmath73 0.0302 & 0.100 + ngc 3031 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.156 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0110 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.043 & 7.84 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.464 @xmath73 0.116 & -0.0327 @xmath73 0.0081 & 0.110 + ngc 3184 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.176 @xmath73 0.037 & -0.0130 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.066 & 7.86 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.338 @xmath73 0.086 & -0.0249 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.137 + ngc 3198 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.425 @xmath73 0.076 & -0.0237 @xmath73 0.0042 & 0.063 & 7.94 @xmath73 0.11 & -1.145 @xmath73 0.317 & -0.0638 @xmath73 0.0176 & 0.091 + ngc 3227 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.254 @xmath73 0.077 & -0.0158 @xmath73 0.0048 & 0.056 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3239 & 8.12 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.153 @xmath73 0.012 & -0.0260 @xmath73 0.0021 & 0.005 & 6.78 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.275 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0467 @xmath73 0.0108 & 0.026 + ngc 3310 & 8.37 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.101 @xmath73 0.023 & -0.0117 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.040 & 7.27 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.254 @xmath73 0.060 & -0.0295 @xmath73 0.0070 &
0.104 + ngc 3319 & 8.50 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.516 @xmath73 0.043 & -0.0408 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.024 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3344 & 8.72 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.618 @xmath73 0.039 & -0.0984 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.029 & 8.08 @xmath73 0.17 & -1.413 @xmath73 0.252 & -0.2254 @xmath73 0.0407 & 0.044 + ngc 3351 & 8.82 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.210 @xmath73 0.031 & -0.0186 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.038 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.678
@xmath73 0.094 & -0.0599 @xmath73 0.0083 & 0.116 + ngc 3359 & 8.40 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.271 @xmath73 0.108 & -0.0179 @xmath73 0.0071 & 0.099 & 7.43 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.688 @xmath73 0.154 & -0.0453 @xmath73 0.0102 & 0.130 + ngc 3486 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.421 @xmath73 0.043 & -0.0447 @xmath73 0.0046 & 0.018 & 7.80 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.928 @xmath73 0.088 & -0.0985 @xmath73 0.0094 & 0.036 + ngc 3521 & 8.83 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.666 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0390 @xmath73 0.0056 & 0.048 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3621 & 8.68 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.460 @xmath73 0.035 & -0.0446 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.050 & 8.05 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.298 @xmath73 0.095 & -0.1260 @xmath73 0.0092 & 0.133 + ngc 3631 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.414 @xmath73 0.077 & -0.0256 @xmath73 0.0048 & 0.024 & 7.94 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.719 @xmath73 0.145 & -0.0445 @xmath73 0.0090 & 0.046 + ngc 3718 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.19 & -0.221 @xmath73 0.253 & -0.0119 @xmath73 0.0136 & 0.066 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3820 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.102 @xmath73 0.019 & -0.0116 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.019 & 7.92 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.342 @xmath73 0.093 & -0.0389 @xmath73 0.0105 &
0.092 + ngc 3893 & 8.73 @xmath73 0.16 & -0.437 @xmath73 0.254 & -0.0371 @xmath73 0.0215 & 0.028 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3938 & 8.79 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.577 @xmath73 0.092 & -0.0413 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.031 & 8.15 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.204 @xmath73 0.141 & -0.0861 @xmath73 0.0101 & 0.048 + ngc 4030 & 8.77 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.258 @xmath73 0.036 & -0.0156 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.010 & 8.05 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.344 @xmath73 0.177 & -0.0208 @xmath73 0.0107 & 0.052 + ngc 4088 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.366 @xmath73 0.093 & -0.0305
@xmath73 0.0078 & 0.025 & 7.97 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.698 @xmath73 0.116 & -0.0582 @xmath73 0.0097 & 0.032 + ngc 4109 & 8.63 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.402 @xmath73 0.099 & -0.0269 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.056 & 7.87 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.152 @xmath73 0.154 & -0.0770
@xmath73 0.0103 & 0.081 + ngc 4254 & 8.77 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.353 @xmath73 0.034 & -0.0316 @xmath73 0.0031 & 0.036 & 8.09 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.716 @xmath73 0.100 & -0.0641 @xmath73 0.0090 & 0.106 + ngc 4258 & 8.54 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.161 @xmath73 0.073 & -0.0083 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.031 & 7.59 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.232 @xmath73 0.282 & -0.0119 @xmath73 0.0144 & 0.120 + ngc 4303 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.577 @xmath73 0.073 & -0.0452 @xmath73 0.0057 & 0.062 & 8.24 @xmath73 0.08 & -1.370 @xmath73 0.189 & -0.1073 @xmath73 0.0148 & 0.156 + ngc 4321 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.219 @xmath73 0.048 & -0.0118 @xmath73 0.0026 & 0.038 & 8.04 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.355 @xmath73 0.104 & -0.0192 @xmath73 0.0056 & 0.083 + ngc 4395 & 8.19 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.164 @xmath73 0.082 & -0.0200 @xmath73 0.0100 & 0.079 & 6.89 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.346 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.0420 @xmath73 0.0174 & 0.136 + ngc 4490 & 8.29 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.318 @xmath73 0.254 & -0.0444 @xmath73 0.0355 & 0.058 & 7.09 @xmath73 0.15 & -0.560 @xmath73 0.449 & -0.0781 @xmath73 0.0629 &
0.102 + ngc 4501 & 8.92 @xmath73 0.12 & -0.424 @xmath73 0.242 & -0.0299 @xmath73 0.0171 & 0.054 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4535 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.299 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0163 @xmath73 0.0035 & 0.025 & 7.97 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.594 @xmath73 0.055 & -0.0324 @xmath73 0.0030 & 0.022 + ngc 4559 & 8.53 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.573 @xmath73 0.056 & -0.0467 @xmath73 0.0046 & 0.047 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4625 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.130 @xmath73 0.044 & -0.0443 @xmath73 0.0151 & 0.042 & 7.84 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.680 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.2318 @xmath73 0.0488 & 0.127 + ngc 4631 & 8.39 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.333 @xmath73 0.125 & -0.0194 @xmath73 0.0073 & 0.077 & 7.18 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.480 @xmath73 0.169 & -0.0280 @xmath73 0.0098 & 0.093 + ngc 4651 & 8.68 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.469 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0343 @xmath73 0.0070 & 0.049 & 8.02 @xmath73 0.10 & -1.133 @xmath73 0.233 & -0.0829 @xmath73 0.0170 & 0.119 + ngc 4654 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.364 @xmath73 0.083 & -0.0318 @xmath73 0.0073 & 0.044 & 7.90 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.797 @xmath73 0.229 & -0.0695 @xmath73 0.0200 & 0.120 + ngc 4656 & 8.06 @xmath73 0.16 & -0.551 @xmath73 0.280 & -0.0305 @xmath73 0.0155 & 0.084 & 6.62 @xmath73 0.24 & -0.634 @xmath73 0.409 & -0.0351 @xmath73 0.0227 & 0.123 + ngc 4713 & 8.53 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.771 @xmath73 0.250 & -0.1325 @xmath73 0.0428 & 0.095 & 7.60 @xmath73 0.14 & -1.548 @xmath73 0.397 & -0.2662 @xmath73 0.0679 & 0.150 + ngc 4725 & 8.83 @xmath73 0.37 & -0.472 @xmath73 0.853 & -0.0223 @xmath73 0.0404 & 0.070 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4736 & 8.57 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.066 @xmath73 0.170 & -0.0086 @xmath73 0.0224 & 0.065 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4861 & 8.00 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.013 @xmath73 0.092 & -0.0030 @xmath73 0.0210 & 0.090 & 6.54 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.058 @xmath73 0.200 & -0.0132 @xmath73 0.0454 & 0.193 + ngc 5033 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.278 @xmath73 0.094 & -0.0095 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.090 & 8.00 @xmath73 0.10 & -0.599 @xmath73 0.130 & -0.0206
@xmath73 0.0045 & 0.072 + ngc 5055 & 8.87 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.490 @xmath73 0.031 & -0.0337 @xmath73 0.0021 & 0.007 & 8.42 @xmath73 0.10 & -1.259 @xmath73 0.186 & -0.0867 @xmath73 0.0129 & 0.044 + ngc 5068 & 8.57 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.355 @xmath73 0.098 & -0.0626 @xmath73 0.0173 & 0.050 & 7.53 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.451 @xmath73 0.263 & -0.0794 @xmath73 0.0463 & 0.134 + ngc 5194 & 8.88 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.324 @xmath73 0.053 & -0.0223 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.062 & 8.52 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.704 @xmath73 0.102 & -0.0484 @xmath73 0.0070 &
0.117 + ngc 5236 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.221 @xmath73 0.028 & -0.0256 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.050 & 8.34 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.649 @xmath73 0.058 & -0.0752 @xmath73 0.0068 & 0.104 + ngc 5248 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.142 @xmath73 0.076 & -0.0069 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.072 & 7.74 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.132 @xmath73 0.155 & -0.0064
@xmath73 0.0075 & 0.146 + ngc 5457 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.840 @xmath73 0.029 & -0.0293 @xmath73 0.0010 & 0.076 & 8.01 @xmath73 0.03 & -1.760 @xmath73 0.056 & -0.0613 @xmath73 0.0020 & 0.142 + ngc 5474 & 8.19 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.008 @xmath73 0.086 & -0.0019 @xmath73 0.0182 & 0.100 & 6.82 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.261 @xmath73 0.144 & -0.0553 @xmath73 0.0303 & 0.156 + ngc 5668 & 8.52 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.471 @xmath73 0.061 & -0.0364 @xmath73 0.0047 & 0.075 & 7.48 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.032 @xmath73 0.127 & -0.0796 @xmath73 0.0098 & 0.147 + ngc 6384 & 8.87 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.531 @xmath73 0.068 & -0.0228 @xmath73 0.0029 & 0.029 & 8.41 @xmath73 0.12 & -1.172 @xmath73 0.197 & -0.0504 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.083 + ngc 6691 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.152 @xmath73 0.052 & -0.0077 @xmath73 0.0026 & 0.050 & 7.98 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.414 @xmath73 0.157 & -0.0211
@xmath73 0.0080 & 0.142 + ngc 6744 & 8.88 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.726 @xmath73 0.060 & -0.0266 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.034 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.996 @xmath73 0.157 & -0.0731 @xmath73 0.0057 & 0.087 + ngc 6946 & 8.72 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.337 @xmath73 0.099 & -0.0337 @xmath73 0.0099 & 0.061 & 8.05 @xmath73 0.15 & -0.751 @xmath73 0.237 & -0.0751 @xmath73 0.0237 & 0.148 + ngc 7331 & 8.67 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.222 @xmath73 0.193 & -0.0097 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.044 & 7.75 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.056 @xmath73 0.213 & -0.0024 @xmath73 0.0092 & 0.048 + ngc 7495 & 8.61 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.260 @xmath73 0.027 & -0.0140 @xmath73 0.0015 & 0.028 & 7.83 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.616 @xmath73 0.062 & -0.0333 @xmath73 0.0033 & 0.064 + ngc 7518 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.127 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0122 @xmath73 0.0043 & 0.034 & 8.30 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.514 @xmath73 0.136 & -0.0496 @xmath73 0.0131 & 0.104 + ngc 7529 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.232 @xmath73 0.067 & -0.0303 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.040 & 7.97 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.752 @xmath73 0.223 & -0.0979 @xmath73 0.0290 & 0.133 + ngc 7570 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.086 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0217 @xmath73 0.0114 & 0.029 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.219 @xmath73 0.106 & -0.0549 @xmath73 0.0265 & 0.068 + ngc 7591 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.146 @xmath73 0.029 & -0.0085 @xmath73 0.0017 & 0.024 & 8.13 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.400 @xmath73 0.114 & -0.0234 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.093 + ngc 7678 & 8.55 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.079 @xmath73 0.078 & -0.0048 @xmath73 0.0047 & 0.030 & 7.64 @xmath73 0.14 & -0.081 @xmath73 0.248 & -0.0049 @xmath73 0.0149 & 0.094 + ngc 7793 & 8.50 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.305 @xmath73 0.048 & -0.0662 @xmath73 0.0104 & 0.071 & 7.52 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.752 @xmath73 0.095 & -0.1631 @xmath73 0.0207 & 0.135 + ic 0010 & 8.14 @xmath73 0.08 & 0.252 @xmath73 0.185 & 0.4294 @xmath73 0.3025 & 0.094 & 6.90 @xmath73 0.15 & 0.355 @xmath73 0.338 & 0.6035 @xmath73 0.5534 & 0.165 + ic 0193 & 8.59 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.139 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0083 @xmath73 0.0039 & 0.039 & 7.80 @xmath73 0.05 &
-0.306 @xmath73 0.151 & -0.0183 @xmath73 0.0090 & 0.092 + ic 0208 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.168 @xmath73 0.035 & -0.0165 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.036 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.422 @xmath73 0.083 & -0.0416 @xmath73 0.0082 & 0.086 + ic 0342 & 8.83 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.513 @xmath73 0.087 & -0.0500 @xmath73 0.0085 & 0.045 & 8.46 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.465 @xmath73 0.131 & -0.1426 @xmath73 0.0128 & 0.068 + ic 1132 & 8.65 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.390 @xmath73 0.059 & -0.0323 @xmath73 0.0049 & 0.077 & 7.69 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.598 @xmath73 0.106 & -0.0495 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.128 + ic 2204 & 8.62 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.160 @xmath73 0.033 & -0.0159 @xmath73 0.0033 & 0.024 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.387 @xmath73 0.086 & -0.0384 @xmath73 0.0086 & 0.064 + ic 5201 & 8.35 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.501 @xmath73 0.147 & -0.0316 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.074 & 7.19 @xmath73 0.12 & -0.908 @xmath73 0.242 & -0.0573 @xmath73 0.0153 & 0.122 + ic 5309 & 8.70 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.058 @xmath73 0.066 & -0.0059 @xmath73 0.0067 & 0.059 & 8.08 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.211 @xmath73 0.206 & -0.0215 @xmath73 0.0210 & 0.170 + ugc 00223 & 8.53 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.099 @xmath73 0.053 & -0.0105 @xmath73 0.0057 & 0.029 & 7.72 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.295 @xmath73 0.152 & -0.0313 @xmath73 0.0162 & 0.084 + ugc 01087 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.01 &
-0.246 @xmath73 0.023 & -0.0192 @xmath73 0.0018 & 0.026 & 7.83 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.609 @xmath73 0.058 & -0.0475 @xmath73 0.0045 & 0.066 + ugc 01862 & 8.43 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.094 @xmath73 0.039 & -0.0194 @xmath73 0.0081 & 0.040 & 7.42 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.316 @xmath73 0.090 & -0.0651 @xmath73 0.0186 & 0.092 + ugc 02023 & 8.13 @xmath73 0.19 & -0.088 @xmath73 0.280 & -0.0358 @xmath73 0.1128 & 0.075 & 6.84 @xmath73 0.29 & -0.197 @xmath73 0.434 & -0.0800 @xmath73 0.1752 & 0.115 + ugc 02216 & 8.08 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.068 @xmath73 0.052 & -0.0099 @xmath73 0.0077 & 0.024 & 6.72 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.124 @xmath73 0.094 & -0.0181 @xmath73 0.0137 & 0.041 + ugc 02345 & 8.04 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.893 @xmath73 0.085 & -0.0885 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.041 & 6.63 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.846 @xmath73 0.255 & -0.0838 @xmath73 0.0253 & 0.131 + ugc 03701 & 8.41 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.087 @xmath73 0.046 & -0.0076 @xmath73 0.0040 & 0.042 & 7.41 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.329 @xmath73 0.102 & -0.0288 @xmath73 0.0089 & 0.092 + ugc 04107 & 8.56 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.231 @xmath73 0.041 & -0.0219 @xmath73 0.0039 & 0.045 & 7.72 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.498 @xmath73 0.087 & -0.0470 @xmath73 0.0083 & 0.096 + ugc 04305 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.225 @xmath73 0.137 & -0.0573 @xmath73 0.0352 & 0.075 & 6.41 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.307 @xmath73 0.246 & -0.0784 @xmath73 0.0629 & 0.139 + ugc 05100 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.078 @xmath73 0.075 & -0.0056 @xmath73 0.0053 & 0.047 & 7.90 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.220 @xmath73 0.204 & -0.0156 @xmath73 0.0145 & 0.119 + ugc 06410 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.148 @xmath73 0.040 & -0.0113 @xmath73 0.0031 & 0.057 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.454 @xmath73 0.093 & -0.0345 @xmath73 0.0071 & 0.123 + ugc 08091 & 7.58 @xmath73 0.04 & 0.177 @xmath73 0.067 & 0.5487 @xmath73 0.2003 & 0.055 & 6.03 @xmath73 0.08 & 0.255 @xmath73 0.129 & 0.7891 @xmath73 0.3905 & 0.108 + ugc 09562 & 8.22 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.193 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.0585 @xmath73 0.0433 & 0.080 & 6.80 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.206 @xmath73 0.144 & -0.0626 @xmath73 0.0437 & 0.068 + ugc 09837 & 8.45 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.412 @xmath73 0.076 & -0.0370 @xmath73 0.0068 & 0.078 & 7.32 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.820 @xmath73 0.140 & -0.0738 @xmath73 0.0126 & 0.141 + ugc 10445 & 8.27 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.082 @xmath73 0.077 & -0.0103 @xmath73 0.0096 & 0.050 & 7.03 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.197 @xmath73 0.141 & -0.0246 @xmath73 0.0176 & 0.091 + ugc 12709 & 8.47 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.706 @xmath73 0.218 & -0.0434 @xmath73 0.0134 & 0.082 & 7.30 @xmath73 0.15 & -1.089 @xmath73 0.418 & -0.0669 @xmath73 0.0257 & 0.157 + pgc 29167 & 8.34 @xmath73 0.10 & 0.152 @xmath73 0.169 & 0.0507 @xmath73 0.0565 & 0.040 & 7.25 @xmath73 0.01 & 0.005 @xmath73 0.020 & 0.0017 @xmath73 0.0065 & 0.005 + pgc 41318 & 8.45 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.168 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.0281 @xmath73 0.0239 & 0.033 & 7.28 @xmath73 0.17 & -0.563 @xmath73 0.568 & -0.0941 @xmath73 0.0945 & 0.130 + pgc 44772 & 8.59 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.268 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0216 @xmath73 0.0036 & 0.043 & 7.79 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.705 @xmath73 0.115 & -0.0569 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.109 + pgc 45195 & 8.14 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.152 @xmath73 0.059 & -0.0122 @xmath73 0.0047 & 0.035 & 6.81 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.277 @xmath73 0.104 & -0.0223 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.061 + pgc 46182 & 8.59 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.126 @xmath73 0.078 & -0.0089 @xmath73 0.0055 & 0.035 & 7.92 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.462 @xmath73 0.313 & -0.0327
@xmath73 0.0221 & 0.141 +    ll ngc 0012 & @xcite + ngc 0055 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0099 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 0224 ( m  31 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0234 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 0253 & @xcite + ngc 0300 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0428 & sdss + ngc 0450 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 0493 & sdss + ngc 0575 & @xcite + ngc 0598 ( m  33 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0628 ( m  74 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0753 & @xcite + ngc 0783 & @xcite + ngc 0925 & @xcite + ngc 1055 & sdss + ngc 1058 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1068 ( m  77 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 1090 & sdss + ngc 1097 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1232 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1313 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1365 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1512 & @xcite + ngc 1598 & @xcite + ngc 1637 & @xcite ,
@xcite + ngc 1642 & @xcite + ngc 1672 & @xcite + ngc 2336 & @xcite + ngc 2403 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 2441 & @xcite + ngc 2442 & @xcite + ngc 2541 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 2805 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 2835 & @xcite + ngc 2841 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 2903 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 2997 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3020 & sdss + ngc 3023 & sdss + ngc 3031 ( m  81 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3184 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 3198 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3227 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3239 & sdss + ngc 3310 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3319 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3344 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 3351 ( m  95 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 3359 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3486 & sdss + ngc 3521 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3621 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3631 & sdss + ngc 3718 & @xcite + ngc 3820 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3893 & @xcite + ngc 3938 & sdss + ngc 4030 & sdss + ngc 4088 & sdss + ngc 4109 & @xcite + ngc 4254 ( m  99 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4258 ( m  106 ) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4303 ( m  61 ) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4321 ( m  100 ) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4395 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4490 & sdss + ngc 4501 & @xcite + ngc 4535 & sdss + ngc 4559 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4625 & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4631 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4651 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4654 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4656 & sdss + ngc 4713 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4725 & @xcite + ngc 4736 ( m  94 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 4861 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 5033 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 5055 ( m  63 ) & @xcite + ngc 5068 & @xcite + ngc 5194 ( m  51 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss , + & @xcite + ngc 5236 ( m  83 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 5248 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 5457 ( m  101 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , sdss , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 5474 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 5668 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 6384 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 6691 & @xcite + ngc 6744 & @xcite + ngc 6946 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 7331 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 7495 & @xcite + ngc 7518 & @xcite + ngc 7529 & @xcite + ngc 7570 & @xcite + ngc 7591 & @xcite + ngc 7678 & @xcite + ngc 7793 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ic 0010 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ic 0193 & @xcite + ic 0208 & @xcite + ic 0342 & @xcite + ic 1132 & @xcite + ic 2204 & @xcite , sdss + ic 5201 & @xcite + ic 5309 & @xcite + ugc 00223 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 01087 & @xcite + ugc 01862 & @xcite + ugc 02023 & @xcite + ugc 02216 & sdss + ugc 02345 & sdss + ugc 03701 & @xcite + ugc 04107 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 04305 & @xcite + ugc 05100 & @xcite + ugc 06410 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 08091 ( gr  8) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ugc 09562 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 09837 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 10445 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 12709 & sdss + pgc 029167 & @xcite + pgc 041318 & @xcite + pgc 044772 & @xcite + pgc 045195 & sdss + pgc 046182 & sdss , @xcite +