the abundance patterns of extremely metal - poor ( emp ) stars are useful in studying nucleosynthesis in massive supernovae ( sne ) .
population ( pop ) iii stars are usually considered to be massive stars .
some of them might become black holes without supernova explosions , but some should have exploded as supernovae to initiate the first metal enrichment in the early universe .
the stars born from the gas enriched by the pop iii sne are pop ii stars with low metallicity .
low - mass pop ii stars have long lifetimes and might be observed as extremely metal poor ( emp ) stars with [ fe / h ] @xmath0 .
( here , [ a / b ] = @xmath1(@xmath2/@xmath3 ) - @xmath1(@xmath2/@xmath3)@xmath4 , where the subscript `` @xmath5 '' refers the solar value and @xmath2 and @xmath3 are the abundances of elements a and b , respectively . ) therefore , a emp star may reflect the nucleosynthetic result of a pop iii sn and constrain properties of the pop iii sn
.    there have been attempts to actually fit the abundance patterns of emp stars with the supernova nucleosynthesis models .
for example , using the mixing - fallback model proposed by umeda @xmath6 nomoto ( 2002 ) ( hereafter un02 ) and umeda @xmath6 nomoto ( 2003 ) ( hereafter un03 ) mimicking aspherical explosion effects ( e.g. , tominaga 2009 ) , they showed that the abundance patterns of the elements from c to zn of carbon - normal emp stars and carbon - rich emp stars can be successfully reproduced by energetic core - collapse sn ( `` hypernova '' , hereafter hn ) , models and faint sn models , respectively ( un02 ; un05 ; tominaga et al .
2007 ) , while those of very metal poor ( vmp ) stars ( @xmath7 [ fe / h ] @xmath8 ) can be reproduced by normal core - collapse sn models or the imf - integration of hypernova and normal core - collapse sn models ( tominaga et al .
it is important to note that the observed emp stars are so far all explained by the pollutions by core - collapse sne with initial stellar masses 11@xmath9 and no evidence of pair instability sne with initial stellar masses 140@xmath10 ( un02 , see also chieffi @xmath6 limongi 2002 ; un03 ; umeda @xmath6 nomoto 2005 , hereafter un05 ; heger @xmath6 woosley 2002 , 2008 ) .
these previous sn models do not eject elements heavier than zn in a sizeable amount , and this is consistent with the abundance of some emp stars . however , there are also emp stars showing enhancements of neutron - capture elements .
some of them show abundance patterns almost identical to the solar system r - process pattern for sr and heavier elements ( e.g. , sneden et al . 2000 ; hill et al .
one example of such a star is cs22892 - 052 and called as a main `` r - process star '' ( sneden et al .
the process producing heavy neutron capture elements ( @xmath11ba - u ) is referred to as `` main '' r - process ( e.g. , truran et al . 2002 ; wanajo & ishimaru 2006 ) . on the other hand , there are other emp stars that require another neutron - capture process referred sometimes as `` lepp '' ( lighter element primary process ) or `` weak r - process '' ( travaglio et al . 2004 ; wanajo @xmath6 ishimaru 2006 ) .
travaglio et al . (
2004 ) reported emp stars with abundances of sr , y , and zr which can not be explained by the s - process or main r - process . in the weak r - process stars ,
the elements with intermediate mass ( 37@xmath12z@xmath1247 , i.e. , from rb to ag ) elements show moderate enhancements with respect to heavy ones ( z@xmath1356 , i.e. , heavier than ba ) .
more recently francois et al .
( 2007 ) showed several other examples of the weak r - process stars .
there are evidences of the existence of weak r - process but its origin is unknown .    several possible mechanisms to produce the weak r - process elements are proposed .
wanajo et al .
( 2001 ) presented calculations of r - process nucleosynthesis in neutrino - driven winds from a proto - neutron stars .
they showed that the abundance pattern of weak r - process is reproduced when the main r - process nucleosynthesis is failed .
the nucleosynthesis in neutrino - driven winds was also studied in hoffman et al .
( 1996 ) by taking the electron fraction @xmath14 of the wind matter as a free parameter .
they showed that weak r - process elements may be synthesized for low @xmath14 ( @xmath150.47 ) .
although the production of weak r - process elements in neutrino - driven winds was suggested , it is difficult to give a detailed yield because the physical conditions and ejected mass depend on unknown supernova explosion mechanisms .
explosive nucleosynthesis in low @xmath14 matter was also studied in the context of multi - dimensional explosion models ( janka et al .
2003 ; pruet et al .
they showed that small amounts of low @xmath14 ( @xmath160.46 ) matter as well as high @xmath14 ( @xmath170.56 ) matter are ejected from a hot bubble just outside a proto - neutron star .
the high @xmath14 ( @xmath170.56 ) matter is suggested to be ejected even in the one - dimensional cases ( e.g. , frlich et al .
2006 ) . on the other hand ,
the ejection of low @xmath14 matter is driven by the convection in the hot bubble , and thus essentially the multi - dimensional phenomenon .
janka et al .
( 2003 ) suggested that the low @xmath14 matter contains the weak r - process elements ( sr , y and zr ) to explain the galactic abundances , but a detailed nucleosynthesis calculation did not confirm the production of these elements ( pruet et al .
2005 ) .    in this paper
, we investigate the physical conditions to produce sufficient amounts of the weak r - process elements ( sr , y and zr ) and discuss whether core - collapse sne with a slight modification can be compatible with the observed abundances of the weak r - process elements in the emp stars . in order to do this ,
we assume that small amount of low @xmath14 matter is ejected by the multi - dimensional effects , which may be driven by the convection in a hot bubble ( janka et al .
2003 ) or jets in a jet - like explosion ( e.g. , maeda @xmath6 nomoto 2003 ) or a collapsar model ( e.g. , pruet et al . 2003 , 2004 ; popham , woosley @xmath6 fryer 1999 ) .
the entropy of the low @xmath14 matter flow may depend on the ejection mechanism .
we assume that the matter flow has the same entropy as the supernova shock wave .
jet - like explosion or collapsar models may describe hne .
however , they contain many unknown parameters , and the innermost @xmath14 of the ejecta depends on those parameters . on the other hand , the simulations of janka et al .
( 2003 ) contain less input parameters , so the obtained @xmath14 profile is more reliable , though their simulations are about normal sne .
we are interested in the emp stars , and their progenitor may be more massive and explode energetically , i.e. , may become hne .
therefore , we vary @xmath14 beyond the range given by the simulation in janka et al .
although we have multi - dimensional effects in mind , we only perform one - dimensional calculations in this paper , because it is often useful to make a large parametric search to disclose the essence of physics .    in @xmath18 2 ,
we show observational trends of [ sr , y , zr / fe ] . in @xmath18 3
, we describe our progenitor and explosion models . in @xmath18 4 ,
we present weak r - process nucleosynthesis and specify conditions mention our assumption applying to our models in order to reproduce reproducing the observational [ sr , y , zr / fe ] .
we also compare our yields with 4 emp stars which have peculiarly high [ sr , y , zr / fe ] . in @xmath18 5 ,
summaries and discussions are given .
since we are interested in the weak r - process elements in the emp stars , we select stars with [ fe / h ] @xmath19 from cayrel et al .
( 2004 ) and use their data from carbon to zinc . observations of [ sr , y , zr / fe ] are taken from honda et al .
( 2006 ) for hd122563 and francois et al .
( 2007 ) for the other stars .    taking the previous works on the weak r - process into consideration , we use two abundance ratios as a diagnostic to distinguish `` main r - process stars '' and `` weak r - process stars '' .
they are relative numbers of sr and ba , sr / ba , and y and eu , y / eu . we use @xmath20 from anders @xmath6 grevesse ( 1989 ) .
a main r - process star cs22892 - 052 has [ sr / ba ] = -0.57 and [ y / eu ] = -1.16 . therefore ,
if a emp star has [ sr / ba ] @xmath21 and [ y / eu ] @xmath22 , we consider the star as a weak r - process star , otherwise as a main r - process star ( see also aoki et al .
figure 1 shows [ sr / fe ] , [ y / fe ] , and [ zr / fe ] vs. [ fe / h ] of the weak r - process stars . among 21 selected stars ,
20 stars are with @xmath23 [ sr , y , zr / fe ] @xmath24 .
the calculation method and other assumptions are the same as described in umeda et al .
2000 ( hereafter unn00 ) , un02 , un05 and tominaga et al .
2007 , except for the size of the nuclear reaction networks . in this paper , we adopt the pop iii progenitors as in un05 and apply the model with @xmath25 = 13 @xmath26 and @xmath27 = 1.5 ( hereafter model-1301 ) , the one with @xmath25 = 25 @xmath26 and @xmath27 = 1 ( hereafter model-2501 ) , and the one with @xmath25 = 25 @xmath26 and @xmath27 = 20 ( hereafter model-2520 ) .
model-1301 and model-2501 are normal sn models , and model-2520 is a hn model .
detailed nucleosynthesis is calculated as a postprocessing after the hydrodynamical calculation with a simple @xmath28-network .
the isotopes included in the post process calculations are 809 species up to @xmath29pd ( see table 1 ) .
we note that a neutrino process during explosive burning ( yoshida et al . 2008 ; woosley @xmath6 weaver 1995 ) is not taken into account .
the abundance distributions after the sn explosion for model-1301 , model-2501 and model-2520 are shown in figure 2 .
we obtain the final yields by setting the inner boundary of the ejected matter , a mass - cut ( @xmath30 ) as we describe in the next section .      in this section
we summarize the abundance pattern of sn ejecta when a `` conventional '' mass - cut is adopted .
the `` conventional '' means that the mass - cut is chosen to eject a reasonable amount of @xmath31ni .
although previously the mass - cut is often chosen to eject 0.07 @xmath26 of @xmath31ni reproducing the brightness of normal sne as sn1987a ( e.g. , nomoto et al .
2003b ) , we set @xmath30 = 1.59 @xmath26 for model-1301 , 1.76 @xmath26 for model-2501 and 2.31 @xmath26 for model-2520 to yield [ si / fe ] @xmath32 [ si/@xmath31ni ] @xmath11 0.4 . as a result ,
13@xmath26 model eject a similar amount of @xmath31ni to sn  1987a ( @xmath11 0.07 @xmath26 ) , but 25@xmath26 models eject large amounts of @xmath31ni ( @xmath11 0.5 @xmath26)ni mass is smaller than this value .
see e.g. , table 3 and section 4.4 below . ] . in figure 3 ,
the abundance patterns from si to ru are compared with those of emp stars .
this figure shows that the adopted @xmath30s yield a rather good agreement between the predicted and the observed abundance ratios for most of the elements above si . on the contrary , [ sr ,
y , zr / fe ] in the models are much lower than those observed in the `` weak r - process stars '' .
as mentioned in @xmath18 3 , the models with the `` conventional '' mass - cut do not reproduce @xmath33 [ sr , y , zr / fe ] @xmath34 . in this section , we study the conditions to produce weak r - process elements .
we take into account of the uncertainty of @xmath14 and assume some ejection of matter from regions below @xmath30 .
recent theoretical multi - d hydrodynamical simulations of core collapse supernova have shown that the presupernova value of @xmath14 can be modified during the explosion , even significantly , in the innermost zones of the exploding envelope . in figure 4
we schematically depict the value of @xmath14 before and after the explosion .
the presupernova value shown is for the model when the central density is @xmath11 @xmath35 g @xmath36 .
after that time , the electron capture significantly reduces @xmath14 ( @xmath170.4 ) in the inner part , but the very neutron - rich matter is rarely ejected .
recent simulations have shown that not only neutron - rich(@xmath14 @xmath15 0.5 ) but also proton - rich(@xmath14 @xmath37 0.5 ) regions appear after explosion(e.g . ,
fr@xmath38lich et al .
the @xmath14 distributions based on an actual 2d - simulations is , for example , given in figure 4 of pruet et al .
figure 4 shows the assumed @xmath14 profile mimicking the results of such simulations .
those simulations have shown that a density just above a proto - neutron star surface rapidly decreases after the supernova shockwave passes through a fe - core .
this region is often called a hot bubble , in which @xmath14 is set by a competition between different lepton capture processes on free nucleons . at the beginning of the explosion ,
an excess of electron neutrinos over antineutrinos makes the matter tend to be proton - rich ( qian and woosley 1996 ) .
recent detailed one- and two - dimensional simulations have shown that some of these proton - rich matter is actually ejected . in the later stages ,
the fluxes and spectral change of neutrinos make @xmath14 less than 0.5 .
2d simulations by janka et al .
( 2003 ) have shown that not only the proton - rich matter but also some neutron - rich matter ( @xmath14@xmath390.46 - 0.47 ) is ejected .
this is because the hot bubble is convective and some of the inner matter can be dragged outside .
although these previous calculations are for less massive normal supernovae , the similar mechanism may work for more massive supernova .
even if the explosion mechanism is completely different , the inner matter may be carried outside along the jets in a jet - like explosions .
therefore , in the following we calculate nucleosynthesis in a deep region of supernovae to estimate the total yield when the same amount of matter below the conventional mass cut , with @xmath14 arbitrarily changed with respect to the presupernova value , is ejected .    in order to perform nucleosynthesis calculations , we need histories of temperature and density for a given mass element . strictly speaking ,
the histories depend on explosion models and how the matter is carried outside and can not be represented by a one - dimensional model . to avoid complication ,
however , we carry out the same calculations with section 3 but in the region below @xmath30 and arbitrarily changing the @xmath14 in the progenitor model according to figure 4 .
this approach helps simplifying the complicated problems and clarifying the essence of physics . with this assumption ,
the entropy of the low @xmath14 flow is @xmath40@xmath113 for sne and @xmath1115 for hne , which is similar value as the matter just above @xmath30 .
it has been long discussed that if a normal sn produces main r - process elements .
this is because the sn has to eject quite high - entropy neutrino driven wind . as for the weak r - process , wanajo et al .
( 2001 ) , for example , showed that if the entropy of the neutrino driven wind is not high enough for the main r - process , a weak r - process - like pattern is obtained .
however , whether a sn can eject such kind of mater is unpredictable because explosion simulations have not been succeeded .
therefore , we consider an extreme case that no neutrino - driven high - entropy matter but the supernova - shocked matter is ejected .
the ejection of high entropy matter are discussed in the last part of section 5 briefly and will be discussed in detail elsewhere .      in this subsection
, we show parameter dependences of the products of the complete - si burning .
the complete si - burning takes place in the shocked matter attaining the maximum temperature of @xmath41 @xmath379.5 and thus no unburned si is left after the complete si - burning .
since we are mainly interested in the ejection of low @xmath14 matter from the beneath of a conventional mass - cut , @xmath30 , we change @xmath14 in the region from 0.40 to 0.50 .
although janka et al .
( 2003 ) showed the small amount of ejection of matter with @xmath14 @xmath110.56 - 0.46 from the hot bubble region , we consider @xmath14 as low as 0.40 because the explosion mechanism is quite uncertain especially for hypernovae . in this paper
we do not consider @xmath14 @xmath370.5 matter .
its effect is briefly discussed in section 5 .
we use the temperature and density trajectories of the models 1301 , 2501 and 2520 as  3 .
the difference from  3 is that we consider the deep region below @xmath30 .
we denote the mass coordinate of the inner and outer boundaries of the region by @xmath42 and @xmath43 , respectively , and take mass average in the region .
@xmath43 is defined by the location where @xmath44(@xmath45si)@xmath1110@xmath46 .
@xmath42 is chosen at a point near fe core surface .
we note that the result is not sensitive to @xmath42 because density and temperature trajectories during nucleosynthesis is almost the same around @xmath42 .
the specific values taken are ( @xmath42,@xmath43)=(1.41@xmath26,1.64@xmath26),(1.52@xmath26,1.92@xmath26 ) and ( 1.61@xmath26,2.69@xmath26 ) for model-1301 , model-2501 , and model-2520 , respectively .
figure 5 illustrates the @xmath14 profile for the three models we have assumed .
nucleosynthesis of this region basically proceeds as @xmath28-rich freezeout .
when the shock wave reaches the region , temperature rises rapidly and heavy elements are decomposed mainly into @xmath28-particles . as the star expands and the temperature drops , @xmath28-rich freezeout takes place with roughly constant @xmath14 .
the mass fraction of @xmath28 at the maximum temperature and later stages depends on the entropy , i.e. , temperature and density .
more @xmath28 is produced and heavier elements are synthesized for higher entropy explosions ( e.g. , un02 ) .      in figures 6 - 8 , abundance ratios , [ x / fe ] , of the complete si - burning products integrated over @xmath42 and @xmath43 are shown .
the abundance ratios of heavy elements as a function of @xmath14 show non - monotonic behavior in figure 6 - 8 .
this behavior depends not only on the abundance of x , but also on that of fe .
for example , in figure 6 and 7 , fe to heavy elements ratios , such as sr / fe , appear to be minimum for @xmath14 @xmath110.45 .
this is because for @xmath14 @xmath110.45 the most abundant isotope which becomes fe is @xmath31fe and not @xmath31ni .
@xmath31fe is produced relatively a lot for @xmath14 @xmath110.45 .
therefore , the reason for this non - monotonic behavior is not simple .
these figures also show that for @xmath14 @xmath39 0.49 , elements heavier than zn are not efficiently produced compared to fe .
we provide some explanations of the result paying attention to the abundance of x in the following paragraphs .
absolute amounts of the synthesized weak r - process elements are easily seen in figure 9 , which shows the mass fractions of sr , y and zr in the region .
this figure shows that the abundances of these elements are relatively large for @xmath14@xmath170.48 and have a peak around @xmath14@xmath110.43 - 0.46 . for @xmath14@xmath110.42 - 0.43 , most abundant isotopes that become sr ,
y and zr are @xmath47kr , and @xmath48kr and @xmath49kr , respectively . for @xmath14@xmath110.45 - 0.46 , these are @xmath47sr , @xmath48y and @xmath49zr , respectively . since these isotopes are all neutron - rich having @xmath14@xmath50z / a@xmath110.41 - 0.45 , the weak r - process elements are tend to be produced most efficiently for this range of @xmath14 .
we note that the exact processes complicatedly depend on entropy , @xmath14 , the properties of nuclear states , and the mass fraction of @xmath28 particles during @xmath28-rich freezeout .
the abundance peaks seem to locate at @xmath14@xmath110.43 for the normal energy models ( 1301 and 2501 ) , and @xmath14@xmath110.45 - 0.46 for model-2520 .
it is interesting that the peak is located at a larger value of @xmath14 for the higher energy model .
the reason for this is not simple because the yields depend on the complicated properties of nuclear structures .
for example , in the @xmath14=0.40 case in figure 8 ( model-2520 ) , the synthesized amounts of the weak r - process elements are small , but lighter elements , ge to kr , are quite abundant . for this specific case @xmath51ge , with @xmath14@xmath50z / a=0.390 ,
is quite abundant after the explosive synthesis .
this decays into @xmath51se and the synthesis of heavier weak r - process elements are suppressed .      since the density and temperature trajectories of the complete si - burning region are not so different for model-1301 and model-2501 , the abundance of weak r - process elements in model-1301 and model-2501 are similar ( figure 6 , 7 and 9 ) .
as seen in figure 7 , 8 and 9 , high @xmath52 enhances the weak r - elements especially from @xmath14 = 0.45 to 0.47 .
temperature of the complete si - burning region in model-2520 is much higher than that in the model-2501 .
therefore , an entropy of model-2520 is much higher than that of model-2501 , and much more @xmath28-particles can be obtained in model-2520 than in model-2501 .
this is why more sr , y and zr are produced in model-2520 than in model-2501 .
the abundances of sr , y and zr are almost same in model-2501 and model-2520 when @xmath14=0.49 and 0.50 .
when @xmath14 is 0.49 and 0.50 , the elements produced also have @xmath530.5 .
since heavy nucleus with @xmath530.5 are less bound than those with neutron - rich ( hoffman et al .
1996 ) , when @xmath54 0.5 , heavier elements than zn are not produced even though @xmath52 is high .
nucleosynthesis pattern in the complete si - burning region with constant @xmath14 is shown in the previous subsection . in this subsection , assuming various @xmath14 distributions in region below @xmath30 , we present abundance patterns of whole ejecta with mass ejection below @xmath30 . for the matter below @xmath30 ,
the yields are averaged for the @xmath14 values ranged from @xmath55 to @xmath56 .
for example , the y@xmath57 distribution y@xmath57 = 0.45 - 0.50 means that the yields are the average of the six models with y@xmath57 = 0.45 , 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 , 0.49 and 0.50 .
in this subsection again we do not consider the matter with @xmath14@xmath370.5 .
the main parameters of our models are @xmath58 and @xmath55 .
@xmath58 is the mass of the ejected matter from the region below @xmath30 , and @xmath55 is the lowest @xmath14 of the ejected matter .
@xmath58 of the matter below @xmath30 is added to the matter above @xmath30 , and they are assumed to be ejected to the outer space all together .
small amounts of matter with low @xmath14 could be ejected in two - dimensional or jet - like explosion models ( e.g. , janka et al .
as shown in the previous subsection , large amounts of sr , y and zr are obtained when @xmath14 = 0.43 in model-1301 and model-2501 , and when @xmath14 = 0.45 in model-2520 .
therefore , we take @xmath56 = 0.5 , and @xmath55 = 0.42 and 0.43 for model-1301 and model-2501 , and various values from @xmath55 = 0.45 to 0.49 for model-2520 . here
, @xmath58 is selected to obtain 0 @xmath17 [ zn / fe ] @xmath17 0.5 .
the abundance patterns of the ejected matter for model-1301 , model-2501 and model-2520 are shown in figure 10 , 11 and 12 - 13 , respectively .
@xmath55 and @xmath58 and some related numbers for models ( a ) are summarized in table 2 . in the models ( a ) , @xmath59 is set to obtain [ zn / fe]@xmath320.5 for @xmath55@xmath170.46 . for @xmath600.47 ( model-2520 ) , the same value of @xmath58 with the @xmath55@xmath170.46 models
is adopted because [ zn / fe ] is lower than 0.5 even if all the matter below @xmath30 is ejected .
for the models ( b ) and ( c ) , @xmath58 of the model ( a ) is divided by 3 and 10 , respectively .    as shown in figure 10 and 11 , [ sr , y , zr / fe ]
are not improved to fit the observation in model-1301 and model-2501 . on the contrary , [ sr ,
y , zr / fe ] in model-2520 are high enough to be ranged in @xmath61 [ sr , y , zr / fe ] @xmath15 1 when @xmath55 is from 0.45 to 0.46 ( fig .
note that the abundance patterns of [ sr , y , zr / fe ] are different depending on @xmath55 .
when @xmath55 @xmath620.45 , those ratios have the relation of [ sr / fe]@xmath11[zr / fe]@xmath37[y / fe ] .
when @xmath55 @xmath620.452 , [ sr / fe ] @xmath63 [ y / fe ] @xmath15 [ zr / fe ] .
when @xmath55 @xmath64 , [ sr / fe ] @xmath15 [ y / fe ] @xmath15 [ zr / fe ] .      in this subsection
we compare our yields of model-2520 with abundance patterns of emp stars . among the 22 weak r - process stars mentioned in @xmath18 1 , 15 stars have [ sr / ba]@xmath37 1 and [ y / eu ] @xmath37 1 . we select sr - rich stars with [ sr / ba ] @xmath37 1 , [ y / eu ] @xmath37 1 and [ sr / fe ] @xmath37 0 : bs16477 - 003 ( [ fe / h]=-3.36 ) , cs22873 - 166 ( [ fe / h]=-2.97 ) , cs22897 - 008 ( [ fe / h]=-3.41 ) and cs29518 - 051 ( [ fe / h]=-2.78 ) .
the observational data from he to zn and beyond zn are taken from cayrel et al .
( 2004 ) and francois et al .
( 2007 ) , respectively .
@xmath14 distribution and @xmath58 have been chosen in order to obtain the best fit to the observed abundances of sr , y and zr . in order to adjust light to heavy element ratios , such as o / fe , we also assume the following mixing - fallback process to take place in hn model-2520 ( see e.g. , tominaga et al .
2007 for detail ) : + 1 .
burned material below @xmath65(out ) is uniformly mixed .
afterward only a fraction ( @xmath66 ) of the mixed material is ejected with the matter above @xmath65(out ) .
+ we set @xmath65(out ) = 3.60@xmath26 for the c - poor stars with [ c / mg]@xmath150 , such as cs22873 - 166 and cs29518 - 051 , and 5.76@xmath26 for c - normal stars with [ c / mg]@xmath110 , such as bs16477 - 003 and cs22897 - 008 .
@xmath67 = 3.60@xmath26 is a point above which x(ca)@xmath15x(mg ) , and @xmath67 = 5.76@xmath26 is a point in the o - rich layer . @xmath55 ,
@xmath58 , @xmath66 , @xmath65(out ) and the other values for each comparison are summarized in table 3 .
figure 14 shows comparisons between the yields of our mixing - fallback models and the abundance patterns of emp stars .
in addition to the abundance ratios of the elements heavier than si , [ c / fe ] , [ mg / fe ] and [ al / fe ] show reasonable agreements with the observations . the nucleosynthesis yields in the ejecta for selected isotopes at the time around 150 seconds after the explosion are also given in tables 4 to 7 .
to obtain these tables , the isotopes with their half - lives less than 30 days except @xmath31ni are radioactively decayed .
in this paper we assume uncertainty of @xmath14 in the deep regions below @xmath30 and mass ejection from the regions for three models model-1301 , model-2501 and model-2520 . among those models ,
we obtain high [ sr , y , zr / fe ] ( ranged from -1 to 1 ) only in the model-2520 .
the `` hypernova '' model-2520 can reproduce the observational data of sr , y and zr in addition to the elements from c to zn .
we also find that the weak r - process elements are not contained in the `` normal '' supernova models 1301 @xmath6 2501 , even though low @xmath14 ( @xmath390.40 ) matter is ejected . in the normal supernova models , however ,
intermediate mass elements from ga to rb may be abundantly ejected ( figure 10 and 11 ) .
it is interesting to note that there have been no observational evidences that ga - rb - rich stars exist in emp stars .
it is possible that normal sne do not eject sufficient amounts of low @xmath14 matter or that we have observationally overlooked such ga - rb - rich stars .    in comparisons with 4 emp stars in figure 14 , the ratios of some elements , i.e.
, [ na / fe ] , [ k / fe ] , [ sc / fe ] , [ mn / fe ] and [ co / fe ] show deficiencies from the observation as our previous finding ( see e.g. , un05 ; tominaga et al .
2007 ) . in tominaga
et al . ( 2007 ) , possible solutions are discussed as follows : na is mostly synthesized in the c - shell burning , and the produced amount of na depends on the overshooting at the edge of the convective c - burning shell ( iwamoto et al .
since no overshooting is included in the present presupernova evolution models , the inclusion of the overshooting could enhance the na abundance .
[ k / fe ] is slightly enhanced by the `` low - density '' modification ( un05 ; tominaga et al .
2007 ) and iwamoto et al .
( 2006 ) suggests that the matter with large @xmath14 ( @xmath370.5 ) can produce enough k. [ sc / fe ] and [ ti / fe ] can be enhanced by nucleosynthesis in high - entropy environments ( a low - density modification , un05 ; tominaga et al .
2007 ) or in a jet - like explosion ( nagataki et al . 2003 ; maeda @xmath6 nomoto 2003 ; tominaga 2009 ) , and further an enhancement of [ sc / fe ] can be realized if @xmath14 ( @xmath370.5 ) ( pruet et al .
2004a , 2005 ; frhlich et al .
2006b ; iwamoto et al .
[ co / fe ] and [ mn / fe ] can be improved by the @xmath14 modification in the si - burning region ( un05 ; tominaga et al .
2007 ) and [ mn / fe ] can also be enhanced by a neutrino process ( woosley @xmath6 weaver 1995 ; yoshida et al .
2008 ) .
many of the solutions discussed above include the the ejection of proton - rich ( @xmath14@xmath370.5 ) `` complete si - burning '' matter .
this does not contradict with our assumption that the neutron - rich ( @xmath14@xmath150.5 ) `` complete si - burning '' matter is ejected .
this is because both @xmath14@xmath370.5 matter and @xmath14@xmath150.5 matter could be ejected simultaneously from the `` hot - bubble region '' in the multi - dimensional simulations ( e.g. , janka et al . 2003 ; pruet et al .
although we do not include the proton - rich matter , the inclusion of the matter does not change the present results because the contributions from the proton - rich matter can merely be added to the present results .
the nucleosynthesis in the proton - rich matter as well as the neutrino process will be considered elsewhere .    there also remains a possible problem in elements mo , ru and rh .
the observational data of those elements is obtained in only two emp stars hd122563 and hd88609 ( see honda et al .
the abundance patterns of them show continuously decreasing trends compared with the main r - process as a function of atomic number , from sr to yb ( z=38@xmath6870 ) .
our models have [ mo / fe]@xmath695 , [ ru / fe]@xmath692 and [ rh / fe]@xmath693 , while hd122563 has [ mo / fe]=@xmath680.02 , [ ru / fe]=0.07 and [ rh / fe]@xmath150.45 , and hd88609 has [ mo / fe]=0.15 , [ ru / fe]=0.32 and [ rh / fe]@xmath150.70 .
further observation will be needed to investigate whether high ratios of mo , ru and rh are typical in the weak r - process stars .
since there two stars are relatively metal rich , [ fe / h ] @xmath70 ( hd88609 ) and [ fe / h ] @xmath71 ( hd122563 ) , their abundance patterns may be contaminated by several sne , r - process and s - process .
there may be a solution in a high - entropy matter ejection .
pruet et al .
( 2006 ) investigated the contribution of the proton - rich high - entropy winds using the two - dimensional 15@xmath26 core collapse model of janka et al .
the origin of the so - called p - process nuclei from a=92 to 126 is an unsolved riddles of nuclear astrophysics , but they found synthesis of p - rich nuclei up to @xmath72pd in the proton - rich wind , although their calculations do not show an efficient production of @xmath73mo .
@xmath14 of proton - rich neutrino wind in pruet et al .
( 2006 ) is ranged from 0.539 to 0.558 , and entropy ( @xmath74/@xmath75 ) is from 54.8 to 76.9 .
the entropy in the supernova shock model ( @xmath74/@xmath75@xmath1715 ) is much smaller . since the properties of the neutrino driven wind is uncertain , the nucleosynthesis in the proton - rich wind is certainly interesting , especially if there are no other possibilities .
the @xmath14 below the mass cut is very sensitive to the rates for the neutrino and positron captures on neutrons and for the inverse captures on protons .
unfortunately the actual amount of neutrino flux depends on the unknown explosion mechanisms .
therefore , the @xmath14 of ejecta for a specific model needs to be calculated in the future works .    in figure 15
we show [ sr / fe ] vs. [ zn / fe ] because [ zn / fe ] is a rough barometer of the sn explosion energy ( e.g. , un02 , un05 ) .
the implications obtained from this figure are as follows .
we have shown that the weak r - process elements can be produced without introducing extra higher - entropy matter in high @xmath52 sn models .
previous work ( un02 ) suggests that the abundance of emp stars with high [ zn / fe ] are reproduced by high @xmath52 sn models . the apparent no - correlation between [ sr / fe ] and [ zn / fe ] means that , if our interpretation is correct , only a portion of hne eject a large amount of sr but the rest of hne eject a small amount of sr . in other words
high @xmath52 is just a necessary condition to eject the weak r - process elements and other factors determine the ejected mass of the weak r - process elements .
our results show that normal @xmath52 models do not produce large amount of sr , y , and zr .
however we should note that this is not the case if a normal sn ejects somehow higher - entropy matter than the supernova shock .
figure 15 does not deny such a possibility because [ zn / fe]@xmath110 stars may be reproduced by a normal sne or the mixture of several sne ( tominaga et al .
this figure show that all [ zn / fe]@xmath110 stars show high [ sr / fe ] .
a possible interpretation is that the actual normal sne can produce [ sr / fe]@xmath11 0 . if this is the case , our results imply that a normal sn can be ejecting a higher entropy matter than the supernova shock , that is likely the neutrino driven wind .
this fact may be used to constrain the neutrino driven wind of a normal sn , though we have to handle the @xmath760.5 matter before qualitatively constraining the model , because the high - entropy proton - rich matter may also produce the weak r - process elements as shown in pruet et al .
( 2006 ) .
we would like to thank t. yoshida , w. aoki and s. wanajo for useful comments and discussions . this work has been supported in part by the grants - in - aid for scientific research ( 19840010 ) from the mext of japan .
nomoto , k. , maeda , k. , umeda , h. , ohkubo , t. , deng , j. , & mazzali , p.a .
2003a , in iau symp 212 , a massive star odyssey , from main sequence to supernova , eds .
hucht , a. herrero and c. esteban(san francisco : asp ) , 395(astro - ph/0209064 )                                                llcc n & 1 & v & 44 - 60 h & 1 - 3 & cr & 46 - 63 he & 3 - 4 & mn & 48 - 65 li & 6 - 7 & fe & 50 - 68 be & 7 - 9 & co & 51 - 71 b & 8 - 13 & ni & 54 - 73 c & 11 - 15 & cu & 56 - 76 n & 13 - 18 & zn & 59 - 78 o & 14 - 21 & ga & 60 - 81 f & 17 - 23 & ge & 59 - 84 ne & 18 - 26 & as & 64 - 86 na & 21 - 28 & se & 65 - 89 mg & 22 - 31 & br & 68 - 92 al & 25 - 34 & kr & 66 - 94 si & 26 - 36 & rb & 72 - 97p & 27 - 39 & sr & 69 - 100s & 30 - 42 & y & 76 - 102 cl & 32 - 44 & zr & 74 - 105ar & 34 - 47 & nb & 80 - 107 k & 36 - 50 & mo & 79 - 110ca & 38 - 52 & tc & 85 - 113sc & 40 - 55 & ru & 84 - 115ti & 42 - 57 & rh & 89 - 118 & & pd & 89 - 121    rlcccccccc 1301(a ) & 0.42 & 1.65e-03 & -2.38 & -3.38 & -3.20 & 1.02e-08 & 2.10e-10 & 8.02e-10 & 5.93e-021301(a ) & 0.43 & 1.65e-03 & -2.37 & -3.47 & -3.25 & 1.05e-08 & 1.69e-10 & 7.16e-10 & 5.93e-022501(a ) & 0.42 & 2.02e-02 & -1.99 & -3.18 & -3.12 & 9.12e-08 & 1.21e-09 & 3.55e-09 & 2.19e-012501(a ) & 0.43 & 2.02e-02 & -1.99 & -3.33 & -3.20 & 9.26e-08 & 8.62e-10 & 2.92e-09 & 2.19e-012520(a ) & 0.45 & 1.08e-02 & 0.54 & 0.22 & 0.43 & 6.56e-05 & 6.40e-06 & 2.59e-05 & 4.60e-012520(a ) & 0.452 & 1.08e-02 & 0.38 & 0.36 & 0.52 & 4.51e-05 & 8.70e-06 & 3.20e-05 & 4.60e-012520(a ) & 0.454&1.08e-02 & 0.15 & 0.35 & 0.60 & 2.65e-05 & 8.53e-06 & 3.68e-05 & 4.60e-012520(a ) & 0.456 & 1.08e-02 & -0.11 & 0.26 & 0.65 & 1.47e-05 & 7.00e-06 & 4.28e-05 & 4.60e-012520(a ) & 0.458 & 1.08e-02 & -0.33 & 0.15 & 0.66 & 8.73e-06 & 5.47e-06 & 4.44e-05 & 4.60e-012520(a ) & 0.46 & 1.08e-02 & -0.72 & -0.17 & 0.46 & 3.57e-06 & 2.61e-06 & 2.77e-05 & 4.61e-012520(a ) & 0.47&1.08e-02 & -2.24 & -2.32 & -0.51 & 1.07e-07 & 1.84e-08 & 2.98e-06 & 4.61e-012520(a ) & 0.48&1.08e-02 & -3.41 & -4.13 & -3.37 & 7.32e-09 & 2.84e-10 & 4.09e-09 & 4.62e-012520(a ) & 0.49&1.08e-02 & -3.67 & -4.51 & -3.67 & 4.01e-09 & 1.20e-10 & 2.07e-09 & 4.64e-01    llccccccccc 2520 - 1 & 0.452 & 2.70e-04 & 0.05 & 5.76 & 1.13e-06 & 2.17e-07 & 8.00e-07&2.30e-02 & bs16477 - 0032520 - 2 & 0.45 & 5.90e-04 & 0.05 & 5.76 & 3.61e-06 & 3.52e-07 & 1.43e-06 & 2.30e-02 & cs22897 - 0082520 - 3 & 0.45 & 1.08e-03 & 0.20 & 3.60&6.56e-06 & 6.40e-07 & 2.60e-06 & 9.19e-02 & cs22873 - 1662520 - 4 & 0.45 & 1.35e-03 & 0.25 & 3.60 & 8.19e-06&8.00e-07&3.24e-06 & 1.15e-01 & cs29518 - 051    llccccccccc @xmath77c & 1.755e-01 & @xmath78sc & 4.216e-13 & @xmath79ge & 3.551e-10 & @xmath80mo & 4.850e-09 @xmath81c & 5.045e-08 & @xmath82ti & 1.502e-05 & @xmath83ge & 8.559e-09 & @xmath84mo & 9.053e-11 @xmath85c & 1.369e-10 & @xmath78ti & 2.482e-07 & @xmath86ge & 2.588e-12 & @xmath87mo & 2.144e-10 @xmath85n & 6.300e-04 & @xmath88ti & 9.284e-07 & @xmath79as & 4.569e-09 & @xmath89mo & 5.496e-13 @xmath90n & 4.046e-07 & @xmath91ti & 4.214e-05 & @xmath92as & 3.377e-09 & @xmath93mo & 9.662e-13 @xmath94o & 4.086e-01 & @xmath95ti & 3.174e-10 & @xmath83se & 3.920e-08 & @xmath96mo & 2.373e-13 @xmath97o & 1.478e-06 & @xmath98ti & 2.678e-07 & @xmath92se & 1.748e-09 & @xmath99mo & 9.873e-14 @xmath100o & 5.506e-07 & @xmath95v & 4.535e-07 & @xmath86se & 1.596e-07 & @xmath101mo & 6.059e-15 @xmath102f & 8.379e-08 & @xmath98v & 1.184e-11 & @xmath103se & 1.744e-09 & @xmath89tc & 8.480e-11 @xmath104ne & 6.517e-02 & @xmath105v & 2.164e-06 & @xmath106se & 4.886e-08 & @xmath96tc & 5.534e-11 @xmath107ne & 1.754e-06 & @xmath98cr & 4.088e-07 & @xmath108se & 7.851e-11 & @xmath99tc & 1.019e-13 @xmath109ne & 7.150e-07 & @xmath110cr & 4.455e-04 & @xmath111se & 6.644e-10 & @xmath112tc & 7.414e-14 @xmath109na & 1.287e-06 & @xmath113cr & 9.406e-08 & @xmath114se & 2.263e-13 & @xmath93ru & 2.458e-10 @xmath115na & 1.496e-05 & @xmath116cr & 1.555e-06 & @xmath108br & 4.948e-09 & @xmath99ru & 1.099e-10 @xmath117 mg & 3.295e-02 & @xmath113mn & 1.134e-05 & @xmath118br & 2.286e-09 & @xmath112ru & 5.395e-11 @xmath119 mg & 8.304e-05 & @xmath116mn & 1.981e-09 & @xmath106kr & 9.330e-09 & @xmath101ru & 3.006e-10 @xmath120 mg & 5.831e-06 & @xmath121mn & 3.709e-07 & @xmath111kr & 2.412e-08 & @xmath122ru & 9.298e-14 @xmath120al & 2.346e-06 & @xmath116fe & 4.782e-06 & @xmath118kr & 5.302e-10 & @xmath72ru & 5.723e-14 @xmath123al & 2.605e-04 & @xmath121fe & 5.501e-06 & @xmath114kr & 3.516e-08 & @xmath124ru & 1.393e-13 @xmath125si & 4.050e-02 & @xmath126fe & 5.754e-06 & @xmath127kr & 5.357e-10 & @xmath128ru & 2.455e-14 @xmath129si & 9.614e-05 & @xmath130fe & 2.071e-07 & @xmath131kr & 1.470e-08 & @xmath132ru & 1.458e-15 @xmath133si & 3.956e-05 & @xmath134fe & 5.094e-06 & @xmath135kr & 3.664e-11 & @xmath122rh & 4.509e-11 @xmath136si & 2.587e-13 & @xmath137fe & 8.189e-10 & @xmath138kr & 2.902e-10 & @xmath72rh & 2.008e-14 @xmath139p & 1.844e-05 & @xmath140fe & 7.672e-10 & @xmath127rb & 1.383e-09 & @xmath124rh & 9.428e-12 @xmath136s & 1.471e-02 & @xmath126co & 4.064e-08 & @xmath131rb & 1.082e-10 @xmath141s & 1.725e-05 & @xmath130co & 3.451e-04 & @xmath135rb & 3.471e-09 @xmath142s & 3.206e-06 & @xmath134co & 2.239e-09 & @xmath143rb & 8.623e-09 @xmath144s & 4.812e-11 & @xmath137co & 1.883e-07 & @xmath131sr & 1.239e-09 @xmath145s & 3.057e-12 & @xmath140co & 1.308e-09 & @xmath135sr & 1.931e-10 @xmath144cl & 1.906e-06 & @xmath126ni & 2.297e-02 & @xmath138sr & 3.750e-09 @xmath145cl & 1.244e-09 & @xmath134ni & 1.897e-04 & @xmath143sr & 1.490e-09 @xmath146cl & 1.131e-09 & @xmath137ni & 5.428e-05 & @xmath147sr & 1.121e-06 @xmath145ar & 2.644e-03 & @xmath140ni & 5.189e-04 & @xmath148sr & 3.053e-11 @xmath146ar & 1.193e-06 & @xmath149ni & 9.478e-06 & @xmath150sr & 9.241e-14 @xmath151ar & 6.251e-07 & @xmath152ni & 4.693e-05 & @xmath147y & 7.221e-11 @xmath153ar & 1.520e-12 & @xmath154ni & 2.101e-08 & @xmath148y & 2.174e-07 @xmath155ar & 7.346e-13 & @xmath156ni & 2.509e-07 & @xmath157y & 3.240e-13 @xmath158ar & 3.761e-17 & @xmath154cu & 2.266e-06 & @xmath147zr & 2.081e-10 @xmath153k & 6.151e-07 & @xmath159cu & 1.583e-07 & @xmath150zr & 7.952e-07 @xmath155k & 3.358e-11 & @xmath156zn & 6.511e-05 & @xmath157zr & 9.083e-10 @xmath160k & 1.288e-11 & @xmath159zn & 2.625e-07 & @xmath80zr & 4.393e-11 @xmath155ca & 2.605e-03 & @xmath161zn & 1.272e-05 & @xmath84zr & 4.954e-14 @xmath160ca & 2.355e-07 & @xmath162zn & 7.894e-08 & @xmath87zr & 2.988e-14 @xmath158ca & 1.772e-08 & @xmath163zn & 3.639e-07 & @xmath89zr & 7.698e-14 @xmath164ca & 1.459e-08 & @xmath165zn & 4.206e-11 & @xmath93zr & 1.295e-14 @xmath82ca & 3.043e-11 & @xmath166ga & 5.433e-08 & @xmath157nb & 3.611e-09 @xmath167ca & 3.966e-14 & @xmath168ga & 4.531e-09 & @xmath80nb & 1.732e-11 @xmath78ca & 3.965e-12 & @xmath163ge & 1.131e-06 & @xmath84nb & 2.300e-12 @xmath91ca & 2.440e-12 & @xmath165ge & 1.089e-06 & @xmath87nb & 6.665e-14 @xmath167sc & 1.662e-08 & @xmath169ge & 4.058e-07 & @xmath89nb & 2.658e-13    llccccccccc @xmath77c & 1.755e-01 & @xmath78sc & 9.068e-13 & @xmath79ge & 1.385e-09 & @xmath80mo & 1.046e-08 @xmath81c & 5.045e-08 & @xmath82ti & 1.508e-05 & @xmath83ge & 6.408e-08 & @xmath84mo & 1.500e-10 @xmath85c & 1.369e-10 & @xmath78ti & 2.600e-07 & @xmath86ge & 9.684e-11 & @xmath87mo & 2.518e-10 @xmath85n & 6.300e-04 & @xmath88ti & 9.410e-07 & @xmath79as & 8.465e-09 & @xmath89mo & 6.159e-13 @xmath90n & 4.046e-07 & @xmath91ti & 4.224e-05 & @xmath92as & 1.002e-08 & @xmath93mo & 9.878e-13 @xmath94o & 4.086e-01 & @xmath95ti & 1.117e-09 & @xmath83se & 8.518e-08 & @xmath96mo & 2.383e-13 @xmath97o & 1.478e-06 & @xmath98ti & 1.168e-06 & @xmath92se & 3.689e-09 & @xmath99mo & 9.912e-14 @xmath100o & 5.506e-07 & @xmath95v & 4.614e-07 & @xmath86se & 2.947e-07 & @xmath101mo & 6.227e-15 @xmath102f & 8.379e-08 & @xmath98v & 2.573e-11 & @xmath103se & 4.212e-09 & @xmath89tc & 8.516e-11 @xmath104ne & 6.517e-02 & @xmath105v & 2.287e-06 & @xmath106se & 1.252e-07 & @xmath96tc & 5.567e-11 @xmath107ne & 1.754e-06 & @xmath98cr & 4.174e-07 & @xmath108se & 4.423e-10 & @xmath99tc & 1.022e-13 @xmath109ne & 7.150e-07 & @xmath110cr & 4.468e-04 & @xmath111se & 7.106e-09 & @xmath112tc & 7.460e-14 @xmath109na & 1.287e-06 & @xmath113cr & 2.320e-07 & @xmath114se & 1.243e-11 & @xmath93ru & 2.472e-10 @xmath115na & 1.496e-05 & @xmath116cr & 5.295e-06 & @xmath108br & 8.292e-09 & @xmath99ru & 1.105e-10 @xmath117 mg & 3.295e-02 & @xmath113mn & 1.135e-05 & @xmath118br & 8.530e-09 & @xmath112ru & 5.432e-11 @xmath119 mg & 8.304e-05 & @xmath116mn & 3.734e-09 & @xmath106kr & 1.820e-08 & @xmath101ru & 3.021e-10 @xmath120 mg & 5.831e-06 & @xmath121mn & 8.530e-07 & @xmath111kr & 5.220e-08 & @xmath122ru & 9.375e-14 @xmath120al & 2.347e-06 & @xmath116fe & 4.860e-06 & @xmath118kr & 1.098e-09 & @xmath72ru & 5.789e-14 @xmath123al & 2.605e-04 & @xmath121fe & 5.526e-06 & @xmath114kr & 6.539e-08 & @xmath124ru & 1.403e-13 @xmath125si & 4.050e-02 & @xmath126fe & 1.081e-05 & @xmath127kr & 2.574e-09 & @xmath128ru & 2.507e-14 @xmath129si & 9.614e-05 & @xmath130fe & 4.053e-07 & @xmath131kr & 4.073e-08 & @xmath132ru & 2.162e-15 @xmath133si & 3.956e-05 & @xmath134fe & 1.482e-05 & @xmath135kr & 2.244e-10 & @xmath122rh & 4.534e-11 @xmath136si & 2.758e-13 & @xmath137fe & 4.922e-09 & @xmath138kr & 3.441e-09 & @xmath72rh & 2.011e-14 @xmath139p & 1.844e-05 & @xmath140fe & 8.019e-09 & @xmath127rb & 2.995e-09 & @xmath124rh & 9.514e-12 @xmath136s & 1.471e-02 & @xmath126co & 4.292e-08 & @xmath131rb & 2.291e-10 @xmath141s & 1.725e-05 & @xmath130co & 3.476e-04 & @xmath135rb & 6.494e-09 @xmath142s & 3.210e-06 & @xmath134co & 4.357e-09 & @xmath143rb & 2.652e-08 @xmath144s & 4.816e-11 & @xmath137co & 3.613e-07 & @xmath131sr & 2.651e-09 @xmath145s & 6.989e-12 & @xmath140co & 4.607e-09 & @xmath135sr & 4.205e-10 @xmath144cl & 1.913e-06 & @xmath126ni & 2.302e-02 & @xmath138sr & 6.693e-09 @xmath145cl & 1.246e-09 & @xmath134ni & 2.436e-04 & @xmath143sr & 2.464e-09 @xmath146cl & 1.132e-09 & @xmath137ni & 5.601e-05 & @xmath147sr & 3.593e-06 @xmath145ar & 2.644e-03 & @xmath140ni & 5.788e-04 & @xmath148sr & 2.271e-10 @xmath146ar & 1.194e-06 & @xmath149ni & 1.067e-05 & @xmath150sr & 1.103e-12 @xmath151ar & 6.295e-07 & @xmath152ni & 9.771e-05 & @xmath147y & 1.393e-10 @xmath153ar & 2.135e-12 & @xmath154ni & 1.066e-07 & @xmath148y & 3.515e-07 @xmath155ar & 1.633e-12 & @xmath156ni & 2.265e-06 & @xmath157y & 1.904e-12 @xmath158ar & 1.188e-16 & @xmath154cu & 3.344e-06 & @xmath147zr & 3.741e-10 @xmath153k & 6.229e-07 & @xmath159cu & 5.006e-07 & @xmath150zr & 1.418e-06 @xmath155k & 3.891e-11 & @xmath156zn & 8.389e-05 & @xmath157zr & 1.582e-09 @xmath160k & 2.182e-11 & @xmath159zn & 4.592e-07 & @xmath80zr & 1.178e-10 @xmath155ca & 2.605e-03 & @xmath161zn & 2.364e-05 & @xmath84zr & 1.000e-13 @xmath160ca & 2.359e-07 & @xmath162zn & 1.572e-07 & @xmath87zr & 3.159e-14 @xmath158ca & 2.588e-08 & @xmath163zn & 1.622e-06 & @xmath89zr & 7.723e-14 @xmath164ca & 1.619e-08 & @xmath165zn & 9.605e-10 & @xmath93zr & 1.357e-14 @xmath82ca & 6.262e-11 & @xmath166ga & 1.067e-07 & @xmath157nb & 7.695e-09 @xmath167ca & 1.711e-13 & @xmath168ga & 1.207e-08 & @xmath80nb & 3.452e-11 @xmath78ca & 2.337e-11 & @xmath163ge & 1.900e-06 & @xmath84nb & 3.862e-12 @xmath91ca & 1.134e-11 & @xmath165ge & 2.229e-06 & @xmath87nb & 6.996e-14 @xmath167sc & 1.798e-08 & @xmath169ge & 8.084e-07 & @xmath89nb & 2.675e-13    llccccccccc @xmath77c & 2.417e-01 & @xmath78sc & 1.775e-12 & @xmath79ge & 2.519e-09 & @xmath80mo & 1.938e-08 @xmath81c & 7.670e-08 & @xmath82ti & 6.014e-05 & @xmath83ge & 1.165e-07 & @xmath84mo & 3.594e-10 @xmath85c & 3.219e-10 & @xmath78ti & 1.028e-06 & @xmath86ge & 1.761e-10 & @xmath87mo & 8.444e-10 @xmath85n & 6.309e-04 & @xmath88ti & 3.714e-06 & @xmath79as & 1.631e-08 & @xmath89mo & 2.131e-12 @xmath90n & 5.305e-07 & @xmath91ti & 1.686e-04 & @xmath92as & 1.821e-08 & @xmath93mo & 3.853e-12 @xmath94o & 2.043e+00 & @xmath95ti & 2.032e-09 & @xmath83se & 1.557e-07 & @xmath96mo & 9.491e-13 @xmath97o & 1.487e-06 & @xmath98ti & 2.123e-06 & @xmath92se & 6.738e-09 & @xmath99mo & 3.949e-13 @xmath100o & 5.541e-07 & @xmath95v & 1.819e-06 & @xmath86se & 5.390e-07 & @xmath101mo & 2.424e-14 @xmath102f & 8.399e-08 & @xmath98v & 4.735e-11 & @xmath103se & 7.826e-09 & @xmath89tc & 3.392e-10 @xmath104ne & 1.646e-01 & @xmath105v & 8.739e-06 & @xmath106se & 2.277e-07 & @xmath96tc & 2.213e-10 @xmath107ne & 8.490e-06 & @xmath98cr & 1.732e-06 & @xmath108se & 8.043e-10 & @xmath99tc & 4.076e-13 @xmath109ne & 1.462e-06 & @xmath110cr & 1.782e-03 & @xmath111se & 1.292e-08 & @xmath112tc & 2.966e-13 @xmath109na & 5.343e-06 & @xmath113cr & 4.218e-07 & @xmath114se & 2.261e-11 & @xmath93ru & 9.833e-10 @xmath115na & 2.018e-04 & @xmath116cr & 9.627e-06 & @xmath108br & 1.520e-08 & @xmath99ru & 4.396e-10 @xmath117 mg & 1.477e-01 & @xmath113mn & 4.536e-05 & @xmath118br & 1.551e-08 & @xmath112ru & 2.158e-10 @xmath119 mg & 1.102e-04 & @xmath116mn & 6.796e-09 & @xmath106kr & 3.737e-08 & @xmath101ru & 1.202e-09 @xmath120 mg & 2.944e-05 & @xmath121mn & 1.551e-06 & @xmath111kr & 9.522e-08 & @xmath122ru & 3.719e-13 @xmath120al & 3.404e-06 & @xmath116fe & 1.958e-05 & @xmath118kr & 2.033e-09 & @xmath72ru & 2.289e-13 @xmath123al & 1.036e-03 & @xmath121fe & 2.202e-05 & @xmath114kr & 1.194e-07 & @xmath124ru & 5.570e-13 @xmath125si & 2.094e-01 & @xmath126fe & 1.968e-05 & @xmath127kr & 4.680e-09 & @xmath128ru & 9.821e-14 @xmath129si & 5.847e-04 & @xmath130fe & 7.369e-07 & @xmath131kr & 7.406e-08 & @xmath132ru & 5.831e-15 @xmath133si & 9.516e-05 & @xmath134fe & 2.695e-05 & @xmath135kr & 4.080e-10 & @xmath122rh & 1.804e-10 @xmath136si & 3.666e-13 & @xmath137fe & 8.949e-09 & @xmath138kr & 6.256e-09 & @xmath72rh & 8.031e-14 @xmath139p & 6.653e-05 & @xmath140fe & 1.458e-08 & @xmath127rb & 5.462e-09 & @xmath124rh & 3.771e-11 @xmath136s & 7.671e-02 & @xmath126co & 1.632e-07 & @xmath131rb & 4.166e-10 @xmath141s & 1.964e-04 & @xmath130co & 1.380e-03 & @xmath135rb & 1.181e-08 @xmath142s & 2.550e-05 & @xmath134co & 7.945e-09 & @xmath143rb & 4.823e-08 @xmath144s & 5.278e-10 & @xmath137co & 6.570e-07 & @xmath131sr & 4.984e-09 @xmath145s & 5.323e-11 & @xmath140co & 8.377e-09 & @xmath135sr & 7.702e-10 @xmath144cl & 1.503e-05 & @xmath126ni & 9.188e-02 & @xmath138sr & 1.225e-08 @xmath145cl & 2.379e-08 & @xmath134ni & 7.591e-04 & @xmath143sr & 4.552e-09 @xmath146cl & 2.221e-08 & @xmath137ni & 2.171e-04 & @xmath147sr & 6.533e-06 @xmath145ar & 1.234e-02 & @xmath140ni & 2.070e-03 & @xmath148sr & 4.130e-10 @xmath146ar & 1.576e-05 & @xmath149ni & 3.764e-05 & @xmath150sr & 2.066e-12 @xmath151ar & 7.734e-06 & @xmath152ni & 1.880e-04 & @xmath147y & 2.534e-10 @xmath153ar & 2.101e-11 & @xmath154ni & 1.939e-07 & @xmath148y & 6.392e-07 @xmath155ar & 3.820e-12 & @xmath156ni & 4.118e-06 & @xmath157y & 3.541e-12 @xmath158ar & 5.836e-16 & @xmath154cu & 8.746e-06 & @xmath147zr & 8.341e-10 @xmath153k & 4.466e-06 & @xmath159cu & 9.101e-07 & @xmath150zr & 2.578e-06 @xmath155k & 5.160e-10 & @xmath156zn & 2.602e-04 & @xmath157zr & 2.876e-09 @xmath160k & 1.293e-10 & @xmath159zn & 1.016e-06 & @xmath80zr & 2.143e-10 @xmath155ca & 1.075e-02 & @xmath161zn & 4.431e-05 & @xmath84zr & 2.681e-13 @xmath160ca & 1.993e-06 & @xmath162zn & 3.278e-07 & @xmath87zr & 1.224e-13 @xmath158ca & 1.826e-07 & @xmath163zn & 2.972e-06 & @xmath89zr & 3.079e-13 @xmath164ca & 5.851e-08 & @xmath165zn & 1.747e-09 & @xmath93zr & 5.192e-14 @xmath82ca & 1.883e-10 & @xmath166ga & 1.988e-07 & @xmath157nb & 1.415e-08 @xmath167ca & 3.175e-13 & @xmath168ga & 2.199e-08 & @xmath80nb & 6.286e-11 @xmath78ca & 4.255e-11 & @xmath163ge & 4.524e-06 & @xmath84nb & 7.268e-12 @xmath91ca & 2.025e-11 & @xmath165ge & 4.055e-06 & @xmath87nb & 2.663e-13 @xmath167sc & 7.514e-08 & @xmath169ge & 1.481e-06 & @xmath89nb & 1.064e-12    llccccccccc @xmath77c & 2.417e-01 & @xmath78sc & 2.184e-12 & @xmath79ge & 3.149e-09 & @xmath80mo & 2.423e-08 @xmath81c & 7.670e-08 & @xmath82ti & 7.515e-05 & @xmath83ge & 1.456e-07 & @xmath84mo & 4.492e-10 @xmath85c & 3.219e-10 & @xmath78ti & 1.274e-06 & @xmath86ge & 2.201e-10 & @xmath87mo & 1.056e-09 @xmath85n & 6.309e-04 & @xmath88ti & 4.642e-06 & @xmath79as & 2.039e-08 & @xmath89mo & 2.664e-12 @xmath90n & 5.306e-07 & @xmath91ti & 2.107e-04 & @xmath92as & 2.277e-08 & @xmath93mo & 4.817e-12 @xmath94o & 2.046e+00 & @xmath95ti & 2.540e-09 & @xmath83se & 1.946e-07 & @xmath96mo & 1.186e-12 @xmath97o & 1.487e-06 & @xmath98ti & 2.654e-06 & @xmath92se & 8.422e-09 & @xmath99mo & 4.936e-13 @xmath100o & 5.541e-07 & @xmath95v & 2.272e-06 & @xmath86se & 6.737e-07 & @xmath101mo & 3.030e-14 @xmath102f & 8.399e-08 & @xmath98v & 5.902e-11 & @xmath103se & 9.783e-09 & @xmath89tc & 4.240e-10 @xmath104ne & 1.646e-01 & @xmath105v & 1.092e-05 & @xmath106se & 2.846e-07 & @xmath96tc & 2.767e-10 @xmath107ne & 8.490e-06 & @xmath98cr & 2.135e-06 & @xmath108se & 1.005e-09 & @xmath99tc & 5.095e-13 @xmath109ne & 1.462e-06 & @xmath110cr & 2.227e-03 & @xmath111se & 1.615e-08 & @xmath112tc & 3.707e-13 @xmath109na & 5.343e-06 & @xmath113cr & 5.273e-07 & @xmath114se & 2.826e-11 & @xmath93ru & 1.229e-09 @xmath115na & 2.018e-04 & @xmath116cr & 1.203e-05 & @xmath108br & 1.901e-08 & @xmath99ru & 5.495e-10 @xmath117 mg & 1.477e-01 & @xmath113mn & 5.670e-05 & @xmath118br & 1.939e-08 & @xmath112ru & 2.697e-10 @xmath119 mg & 1.102e-04 & @xmath116mn & 8.493e-09 & @xmath106kr & 4.669e-08 & @xmath101ru & 1.503e-09 @xmath120 mg & 2.944e-05 & @xmath121mn & 1.939e-06 & @xmath111kr & 1.190e-07 & @xmath122ru & 4.649e-13 @xmath120al & 3.417e-06 & @xmath116fe & 2.434e-05 & @xmath118kr & 2.541e-09 & @xmath72ru & 2.861e-13 @xmath123al & 1.036e-03 & @xmath121fe & 2.752e-05 & @xmath114kr & 1.493e-07 & @xmath124ru & 6.963e-13 @xmath125si & 2.261e-01 & @xmath126fe & 2.459e-05 & @xmath127kr & 5.850e-09 & @xmath128ru & 1.228e-13 @xmath129si & 5.859e-04 & @xmath130fe & 9.211e-07 & @xmath131kr & 9.257e-08 & @xmath132ru & 7.289e-15 @xmath133si & 9.565e-05 & @xmath134fe & 3.369e-05 & @xmath135kr & 5.100e-10 & @xmath122rh & 2.255e-10 @xmath136si & 3.753e-13 & @xmath137fe & 1.119e-08 & @xmath138kr & 7.820e-09 & @xmath72rh & 1.004e-13 @xmath139p & 6.763e-05 & @xmath140fe & 1.823e-08 & @xmath127rb & 6.827e-09 & @xmath124rh & 4.714e-11 @xmath136s & 8.853e-02 & @xmath126co & 2.038e-07 & @xmath131rb & 5.207e-10 @xmath141s & 1.983e-04 & @xmath130co & 1.725e-03 & @xmath135rb & 1.477e-08 @xmath142s & 2.648e-05 & @xmath134co & 9.927e-09 & @xmath143rb & 6.028e-08 @xmath144s & 5.279e-10 & @xmath137co & 8.212e-07 & @xmath131sr & 6.221e-09 @xmath145s & 5.534e-11 & @xmath140co & 1.047e-08 & @xmath135sr & 9.622e-10 @xmath144cl & 1.610e-05 & @xmath126ni & 1.149e-01 & @xmath138sr & 1.531e-08 @xmath145cl & 2.384e-08 & @xmath134ni & 9.488e-04 & @xmath143sr & 5.690e-09 @xmath146cl & 2.223e-08 & @xmath137ni & 2.714e-04 & @xmath147sr & 8.166e-06 @xmath145ar & 1.486e-02 & @xmath140ni & 2.587e-03 & @xmath148sr & 5.163e-10 @xmath146ar & 1.626e-05 & @xmath149ni & 4.706e-05 & @xmath150sr & 2.583e-12 @xmath151ar & 8.030e-06 & @xmath152ni & 2.350e-04 & @xmath147y & 3.168e-10 @xmath153ar & 2.157e-11 & @xmath154ni & 2.424e-07 & @xmath148y & 7.990e-07 @xmath155ar & 4.532e-12 & @xmath156ni & 5.147e-06 & @xmath157y & 4.427e-12 @xmath158ar & 6.299e-16 & @xmath154cu & 1.093e-05 & @xmath147zr & 1.042e-09 @xmath153k & 4.955e-06 & @xmath159cu & 1.138e-06 & @xmath150zr & 3.222e-06 @xmath155k & 5.257e-10 & @xmath156zn & 3.253e-04 & @xmath157zr & 3.594e-09 @xmath160k & 1.372e-10 & @xmath159zn & 1.271e-06 & @xmath80zr & 2.679e-10 @xmath155ca & 1.334e-02 & @xmath161zn & 5.539e-05 & @xmath84zr & 3.352e-13 @xmath160ca & 2.163e-06 & @xmath162zn & 4.097e-07 & @xmath87zr & 1.527e-13 @xmath158ca & 1.934e-07 & @xmath163zn & 3.715e-06 & @xmath89zr & 3.849e-13 @xmath164ca & 7.309e-08 & @xmath165zn & 2.183e-09 & @xmath93zr & 6.485e-14 @xmath82ca & 2.157e-10 & @xmath166ga & 2.485e-07 & @xmath157nb & 1.768e-08 @xmath167ca & 3.950e-13 & @xmath168ga & 2.748e-08 & @xmath80nb & 7.857e-11 @xmath78ca & 5.316e-11 & @xmath163ge & 5.655e-06 & @xmath84nb & 9.085e-12 @xmath91ca & 2.474e-11 & @xmath165ge & 5.068e-06 & @xmath87nb & 3.329e-13 @xmath167sc & 9.122e-08 & @xmath169ge & 1.851e-06 & @xmath89nb & 1.329e-12    = 1.59@xmath26 , 1.76@xmath26 and 2.31@xmath26 for model-1301 , model-2501 and model-2520 , respectively .
bs16477 - 003 is the weak r - process star with the highest abundance of sr , y and zr , and cs22172 - 002 is the weak r - process star with the lowest abundance of these elements.,title="fig:",width=302 ] = 1.59@xmath26 , 1.76@xmath26 and 2.31@xmath26 for model-1301 , model-2501 and model-2520 , respectively .
bs16477 - 003 is the weak r - process star with the highest abundance of sr , y and zr , and cs22172 - 002 is the weak r - process star with the lowest abundance of these elements.,title="fig:",width=302 ] = 1.59@xmath26 , 1.76@xmath26 and 2.31@xmath26 for model-1301 , model-2501 and model-2520 , respectively .
bs16477 - 003 is the weak r - process star with the highest abundance of sr , y and zr , and cs22172 - 002 is the weak r - process star with the lowest abundance of these elements.,title="fig:",width=302 ]        , @xmath43 , and @xmath14 in section 4.2 .
panels ( a ) , ( b ) and ( c ) are model-1301 , model-2501 and model-2520 , respectively . @xmath42 and @xmath43 are the inner and outer boundaries of the calculated region , i.e. , the complete si - burning region , respectively .
we carry out the nucleosynthesis calculation in the region @xmath42@xmath15@xmath25@xmath15@xmath43 with constant @xmath14 from 0.40 to 0.50 as shown in solid lines.,width=302 ]    .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . ,
title="fig:",width=302 ] .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . ,
title="fig:",width=302 ] .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . , title="fig:",width=302 ] . the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . ,
title="fig:",width=302 ]    .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . ,
title="fig:",width=302 ] .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . ,
title="fig:",width=302 ] .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . ,
title="fig:",width=302 ] .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 and @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 ( from the top ) .
the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.46 , 0.47 , 0.48 and @xmath170 = 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top ) . ,
title="fig:",width=302 ]       .
the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 , @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 and @xmath170 = 0.452 , 0.454 , 0.456 ( from the top ) . the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.458 , 0.46 , 0.47 and @xmath170 = 0.48 , 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top).,title="fig:",width=302 ] . the left panels : @xmath170 = 0.40 , 0.41 , 0.42 , @xmath170 = 0.43 , 0.44 , 0.45 and @xmath170 = 0.452 , 0.454 , 0.456 ( from the top ) . the right panels : @xmath170 = 0.458 , 0.46 , 0.47 and @xmath170 = 0.48 , 0.49 , 0.50 ( from the top).,title="fig:",width=302 ]             distribution and @xmath58 . here , the abundance below @xmath30 is averaged for @xmath14 = @xmath171 0.50 . the parameters and some related numbers for models ( a ) are shown in table 2 .
for the models ( b ) and ( c ) , @xmath58 of model ( a ) is divided by 3 and 10 , respectively .
, title="fig:",width=302 ]   distribution and @xmath58 . here
, the abundance below @xmath30 is averaged for @xmath14 = @xmath171 0.50 .
the parameters and some related numbers for models ( a ) are shown in table 2 .
for the models ( b ) and ( c ) , @xmath58 of model ( a ) is divided by 3 and 10 , respectively .
, title="fig:",width=302 ]