nonnuclear x - ray sources with luminosities higher than @xmath3  are classified as ultraluminous x - ray sources ( ulxs ) .
many of them are variable and most likely powered by accretion onto black holes . however , their luminosities , assuming isotropic emission , are higher than the maximum seen in galactic black hole binaries , suggesting the presence of intermediate mass black holes with masses of @xmath4  @xmath5 @xcite or super - eddington accretion onto stellar mass black holes of about 10  @xmath5 @xcite . discovery of intermediate mass black holes would be important because they can not be formed via core collapse of a single star with normal metallicity @xcite and may shed light onto the formation of supermassive black holes in the early universe @xcite .
dynamical measurement of the compact object mass for ulxs has been unfeasible to date @xcite . instead ,
indirect means such as x - ray spectroscopy may shed light on the black hole mass . at a fixed eddington ratio , the inner temperature of the accretion disk scales with black hole mass as @xmath6 @xcite .
application of this relation requires the black hole binary to be in the thermal state @xcite , in which the disk is believed to extend all the way to the last stable orbit around the black hole
. however , the thermal state is rarely found in ulxs , the only known occurrences are m82 x41.4 + 60 @xcite and m82 x37.8 + 54 @xcite during outburst .
x - ray sources with soft , @xmath7  kev , thermal spectra may be good candidates for intermediate , @xmath8 , mass black holes in the thermal state .
ngc 247 is a nearby spiral galaxy in the sculptor group , with a modest star formation rate estimated to be about 0.1  @xmath5  yr@xmath9 by counting bright main - sequence stars @xcite or based on h@xmath10 observations @xcite .
however , infrared and radio observations suggest a star formation rate 10 or 100 times lower @xcite .
the distance to ngc 247 has been measured independently by different groups using various means . among them , the recent result from @xcite using near - infrared observations of cepheids is claimed to be the most accurate .
we therefore adopt that distance of 3.4  mpc in this paper .
previously , ngc 247 has been observed in the x - ray band with einstein @xcite , rosat @xcite , and xmm - newton @xcite . a bright , off - nucleus x - ray source ( ngc 247 ulx = 1rxs  j004704.8@xmath11204743 ) was detected in all of these observations .
rosat observations revealed a very soft spectrum with @xmath12  kev @xcite .
later on , the source was observed to have brightened by a factor of 2 @xcite , suggestive of an accretion powered system . in 2001 , xmm - newton detected the source at the highest flux observed to date , with an unabsorbed luminosity of @xmath13  ( at 3.4  mpc ) in the 0.3 - 10 kev band , and the spectrum was still dominated by a soft thermal component with @xmath12  kev @xcite .
these results imply that the source is a good candidate to be an intermediate mass black hole in the thermal state .
unfortunately , the 2001 xmm - newton observation suffered strong background flares , resulting in little usable data and poor statistics in the extracted spectrum .
thus , we proposed a new xmm - newton observation of ngc 247 to obtain a better spectral measurement . in this paper
, we report results from the new observation about the ulx as well as other sources in ngc 247 .
the observation was performed on 2009 dec 27 ( pi : h.  feng ) , lasting about 35  ks , with the prime full window for the three cameras .
the thin filter was chosen for the pn and medium filter for the mos .
event lists were created from the observation data files using sas with recent calibrations . to minimize background contamination , we selected good time intervals ( gtis ) where the 10 - 15 kev count rate of the whole ccd was lower than the @xmath14 upper limit of the quiescent level .
this resulted in 22  ks of clean exposure for the pn and 30  ks for the mos .
images in two energy bands , 0.3 - 2  kev and 2 - 10  kev , were created for each ccd with a pixel size of 4.1  from events with flag = 0 and pattern @xmath15 4 for the pn or pattern @xmath15 12 for the mos .
the edetect_chain tool was used to detect point sources simultaneously on the six images . a total number of 75 sources with likelihood ( = @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is the chance probability ) over 10 were detected and are listed in table  [ tab : src ] and shown in figure  [ fig : img ]
. the astrometry was corrected by aligning the x - ray position of the known quasi - stellar object ( qso ) phl  6625 ( source 22 ) to its optical position quoted in the usno - b1.0 catalog .
+     the absorbed flux of each source was calculated from the net counts and an effective exposure with a response matrix created at the source position on the ccd assuming a power - law spectrum with galactic absorption ( @xmath18  @xmath19 ; * ? ? ?
* ) and a photon index of 1.7 .
we note that this is more accurate than using a single conversion factor in edetect_chain as the energy band is wide . in the calculation ,
either the pn or the averaged mos count rate was adopted depending on which likelihood was higher . for sources 38 , 60 , and 63 ,
only the mos2 data was adopted as they were not covered by the mos1 .
the hardness ratio was calculated using edetect_chain for each source as @xmath20 , where @xmath21 and @xmath22 are vignetting - corrected net count rates in the soft and hard bands , respectively .    for 15 sources , optical or infrared sources in the usno - b1.0 or two micron
all sky survey catalogs are found in a 2-radius circle around their corrected x - ray positions , and are indicated in table  [ tab : src ] .
most of the sources with optical / ir counterparts , 11 out of 15 , are outside of the d25 ellipse of ngc 247 .    for sources with 200 or more net counts
, we extracted the pn and the mos spectra and fitted them simultaneously with a power - law model subject to interstellar absorption . the lower limit of the absorption column density was set to the galactic value . for sources 4 and 67 , only the mos spectra were adopted as they lie on a gap or bad pixels on the pn . for phl  6625 , only the pn data were adopted for the same reason , and a redshifted power - law model with @xmath23 was used .
the best - fit spectral parameters are listed in table  [ tab : top ] , except for the ulx . among them , seven sources ( 4 , 16 , 19 , 22 , 39 , 61 , and 62 ) are coincident with an optical counterpart in usno - b1.0 , and source 67 has two possible counterparts .
we calculated their x - ray to optical flux ratios as @xmath24 , where @xmath25 is the observed flux in the 0.3 - 3.5 kev band in units of  and @xmath26 is the visual magnitude @xcite .
the average of the second red and blue magnitudes in usno - b1.0 , if available , was used to estimate the visual magnitude , otherwise , the red or blue magnitude is taken as an approximation to @xmath26 . the x - ray to optical flux ratios are 0.52 , 0.05 , 0.24 , 0.33 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , 0.04 , respectively for sources 4 , 16 , 19 , 22 ( phl  6625 ) , 39 , 61 , 62 .
for source 67 , the ratio is 0.20 or 0.54 depending on the counterpart .
these values are consistent with those found for active galactic nuclei ( agn ) and clusters of galaxies @xcite ; the ratios for sources 39 and 61 are also consistent with those of normal galaxies , and the ratios for source 4 and source 67 ( with the dimmer optical counterpart ) are also consistent with those of bl lac objects .    for other sources that are associated with an optical counterpart but do not have enough photons for spectral fitting
, we calculated their 0.3 - 3.5 kev fluxes from count rates and the x - ray to optical flux ratios were found in a range from @xmath29 to @xmath30 , which are consistent with those of agn or normal galaxies , but smaller than those of x - ray binaries .
two of them ( source 48 and source 57 with the brighter optical counterpart , both in d25 ) with ratios smaller than @xmath31 could also be foreground m or k dwarfs in the halo of the milky way .
thus , we conclude that sources associated with bright optical sources are unlikely to be members of ngc 247 , and more likely to be background or foreground objects .
the cumulative x - ray luminosity function ( xlf ) for sources inside the d25 ellipse of ngc 247 is plotted in figure  [ fig : lum ] . for sources with enough photons , those in table  [ tab : top ] and the ulx ,
the flux in the 0.3 - 10 kev band from spectral fitting is adopted , otherwise , the two fluxes in table  [ tab : src ] after correction for galactic absorption are summed and adopted . for comparison , two model xlfs are shown .
the shallower curve is the xlf expected for high mass x - ray binaries ( hmxbs ) : a power - law with a slope of @xmath32 as found for hmxbs in nearby starburst galaxies normalized to a star formation rate of 0.1  @xmath5  yr@xmath9 @xcite .
the steeper curve is the xlf for low mass x - ray binaries ( lmxbs ) , a power - law with a slope of @xmath33 @xcite , normalized to the observed number of sources at @xmath34  . comparing the curves with the data ,
it is clear that the x - ray binary population in ngc 247 is dominated by lmxbs .
normalized to the observed number at @xmath35  .
the shallower dotted line is the luminosity function for hxmbs with a slope of @xmath32 normalized to a star formation rate of 0.1  @xmath5  yr@xmath9 .
[ fig : lum ] ]    , brighter than a given observed flux in the 2 - 8 kev band , @xmath36 , for sources outside of the d25 ellipse of ngc 247 .
the dotted line is the distribution for agn with a slope of @xmath37 normalized to the observed solid angle of about 0.16  degree@xmath38 .
[ fig : logns ] ]    for sources outside of the d25 ellipse , we plotted @xmath39 versus @xmath40 , where @xmath36 is the observed flux in the 2 - 8 kev band and @xmath41 is the number of sources with flux greater than @xmath36 , see figure  [ fig : logns ] . for comparison ,
we show a power - law index of @xmath37 as expected for agn @xcite .
the power - law is normalized to a solid angle of 0.16  degree@xmath38 , equal to the sky area outside the d25 ellipse of ngc 247 and in the field of view of xmm - newton .
we examined short - term variability for each source using photons in the 0.3 - 10 kev band with the kolmogorov - smirnov test .
only the ulx shows evidence for variability with a chance probability lower than @xmath42 .      due to the soft spectrum of the ulx and the thin filter on the pn , the number of photons detected on the pn is about 3 - 4 times that on each mos .
thus , we used only the pn data for spectral analysis .
the energy spectrum was extracted from events in a 30-radius circular region around the source to avoid ccd gaps and with flag and pattern the same as those used in creating the image .
background was subtracted from events in a nearby circular region with a radius of 45  on the same ccd and off the readout column of the ulx . to avoid spurious spectral structure caused by over - sampling of the spectrum
, the energy channels were grouped with a bin size of 1/5th of the local spectral resolution ( in terms of full width at half maximum ) and to have at least 15 net counts per bin .
a single power - law subject to interstellar absorption is inadequate to fit the ulx spectrum , resulting in @xmath43 for 44 degrees of freedom ( dof ) .
an absorbed multicolor disk ( mcd ) model provides a better fit with @xmath44 , but is still inadequate , especially at energies above 1.4  kev where a hard excess is obvious , see the top panel in figure  [ fig : res ] .
therefore , we used a model with the sum of a power - law and a mcd , which significantly improved the fit with @xmath45 . to test the significance of the power - law tail , we simulated @xmath46 spectra based on the single mcd model .
in none of the simulated spectra did addition of a power - law reduce the @xmath47 by the amount seen in the real data .
this suggests a chance probability less than @xmath48 .
the f - test gives a consistent probability of @xmath49 despite caveats about its validity in such a case @xcite .     from fits to the spectrum of ngc 247 ulx with models wabs @xmath50 diskbb , wabs @xmath50 ( diskbb + powerlaw ) , wabs @xmath50 edge @xmath50 ( diskbb + powerlaw ) , respectively .
[ fig : res ] ]    although the mcd plus power - law model improves the fit considerably , it still does not provide an adequate fit .
as one can see from the middle panel of figure  [ fig : res ] , most residuals arise around 1  kev and appear like an absorption feature .
thus , we then tried two absorption components , both of which gave adequate fits .
an absorption edge at 1.02  kev gave @xmath51 and a gaussian absorption line with a centroid of 1.16  kev gave @xmath52 .
the residuals for both models are flat throughout the passband , see the bottom panel of figure  [ fig : res ] .
the absorption equivalent width is 0.13 to 0.19  kev , depending on the model .
similarly , we tested the significance of the absorption component using simulations , and an edge was detected as significant in only 1 out of @xmath46 trails , indicative of a chance probability of @xmath53 .
the spectral parameters are listed in table  [ tab : spe ] . due to the poor fit of the mcd plus power - law model , we fixed the absorption column density at the best value , @xmath54  @xmath19 , obtained from the best - fit model .
consistent parameters of the continuum components were obtained for all models . the unfolded spectrum from the mcd plus power - law model with absorption edge
is plotted in figure  [ fig : unf ] .
the mcd is the dominant component of the spectrum , with a contribution of 96% of the total unabsorbed flux in the 0.3 - 10 kev band .    ]
we also replaced the mcd with a blackbody and obtained similar results as shown in table  [ tab : spe ] .
we note that the use of a more sophisticated model for interstellar absorption , such as tbabs , leads to almost identical results as obtained with wabs due to the moderate resolution and statistics .
we tried to fit the spectrum with a mcd plus comptonization model , which is found to fit for ulx spectra with high statistics @xcite .
this model provides an equally good fit as the mcd plus power - law model and results in almost identical parameters for the disk component .
the disk temperature is @xmath55 kev and the inner disk radius is @xmath56 km assuming a face - on orientation .
a similar edge is required in the model at @xmath57 kev , with optical depth of @xmath58 .
the comptonization parameters are poorly constrained due to the low number of photons in the 2 - 10 kev band .
light curves of the ulx were created using the pn events in the same region as for spectral analysis with flag = # xmmea_ep and pattern @xmath59 4 .
continuous intervals with low background were selected from within the gtis .
the 0.3 - 2  kev light curve shown in figure  [ fig : pow ] has a bin size of 200  s.    , title="fig : " ] , title="fig : " ]    for each continuous interval , power spectra were calculated from a light curve with a bin size equal to the ccd frame time , @xmath6073  ms , using 8192-point fourier transforms .
a final power spectrum was created by averaging all the individual power spectra with frequency channels geometrically binned by a factor of 1.2 .
each point in the final spectrum is the mean of at least 33 individual data points , to assure validity in modeling the spectrum using minimal @xmath47 .
the final power spectrum in the 0.3 - 2 kev band normalized following @xcite is shown in figure  [ fig : pow ] .
a power - law plus a constant can adequately fit the power spectrum , with the constant describing the poisson noise level of @xmath61 and the power - law describing low - frequency noise with a slope of @xmath62 .
the source count rate is 0.10 counts  s@xmath9 in the 0.3 - 2 kev band and the background photon fraction is estimated to be 4.1% .
the fractional root - mean - square ( rms ) power of the source is estimated to be 0.52 by integrating the power - law component over 0.001 - 0.1  hz , or 0.31 extrapolating the power - law to the frequency range 0.1 - 10  hz .
the power spectrum in the 2 - 10 kev band is consistent with that of poisson noise , due to poor statistics .
we re - analyzed the xmm - newton observation of ngc 247 obtained in 2001 in a similar way . as the background is too high to find a quiescent level adaptively for the pn data , an additional requirement that the background count rate is less than 1.5  counts  s@xmath9 for the pn
is imposed to generate gtis .
the pn and the mos spectra are fitted simultaneously with a mcd plus power - law model , resulting in @xmath63 .
the mcd component contributes about 88% of the unabsorbed luminosity in the 0.3 - 10 kev band , which is @xmath64  , with a disk inner temperature of @xmath65  kev and a face - on inner radius of @xmath66  km .
the photon index of the power - law component is poorly constrained , with a 90% upper limit of 3.8 .
the interstellar absorption has a column density of @xmath67  @xmath19 .
the best - fit parameters are consistent with those reported in @xcite within errors .
the xmm - newton observation of ngc 247 obtained in december 2009 is , to date , the deepest x - ray observation of the galaxy and allows an x - ray source population study .
as shown in figure  [ fig : lum ] , sources inside the d25 ellipse of ngc 247 have a luminosity function well consistent with that of lmxbs .
a population of x - ray sources dominated by lmxbs is reasonable given the low star formation rate of the galaxy .    for sources outside of the d25 ellipse of the galaxy ,
the @xmath39 versus @xmath40 distribution is roughly consistent with that expected for agn @xcite ( figure  [ fig : logns ] ) at fluxes above @xmath68  .
below this flux , the distribution flattens significantly with decreasing flux .
this may be caused by the decrease of sensitivity due to vignetting at large off - axis angles .
some of these sources have bright optical counterparts with an x - ray to optical flux ratio consistent with that of agn .
therefore , we conclude that most sources outside of the d25 ellipse of ngc 247 are likely background objects .      the observed x - ray spectrum of the ulx is completely dominated by a cool , thermal emission component with a temperature around 0.1  kev ; a weak power - law tail with a photon index of about 2.5 is also evident but contributes only a small fraction of the flux .
this spectral shape is in contrast with that of many other ulxs whose high energy component contributes the majority of the flux ( more than 60% ) and can be explained by an optically - thick corona @xcite .
in fact , gladstone et al . (
2009 ) fits can predict an intrinsically soft - dominated spectrum , but this is a model - dependent result , while the observed spectral shapes of their sources are always dominated by the emission from a hard tail .
it is unlikely that the high energy component in ngc 247 ulx arises from an optically thick corona ; otherwise , such a corona must have a tiny covering factor since most disk photons are unscattered .
the spectrum , however , is consistent with that of black hole binaries in the thermal state @xcite , and may hint at a connection in nature .
an important observational characteristic of the thermal state is that the disk luminosity varies roughly with the 4th power of the disk inner temperature , equivalent to a constant disk inner radius .
this source has shown a consistent disk inner radius derived from two xmm - newton observations , though the constraint from the 2001 observation is loose . for a positive identification of the thermal state
, one also needs timing information .
this ulx displays red noise with a @xmath1 form above the white noise , which is consistent with that seen in the thermal state .
however , the integrated rms power is significantly higher than that seen in the thermal state . for galactic black holes , the total rms power in the 0.1 - 10
hz band is usually less than 0.075 in the thermal state , and only in the hard state is the rms power found to be greater than 0.15 @xcite .
however , the x - ray spectrum of the ulx is much too soft to be classified as in the hard state .
if the ulx is in the thermal state , then the source would be an interesting candidate to be an intermediate mass black hole .
the accretion disk in the thermal state is believed to extend all the way to the innermost stable circular orbit ( isco ) around the central black hole .
the isco radius depends only on the black hole mass and spin , as @xmath69 for a non - spinning black hole or 6 times smaller for an extremely spinning object , where @xmath70 is the gravitational constant , @xmath71 is the black hole mass , and @xmath72 is the light speed . assuming a hardening correction of 1.7 and that the maximum temperature occurs at 2.4 times the isco radius @xcite , the isco radius can be expressed as @xmath73 , where @xmath74 is the apparent inner radius derived directly from the normalization of the mcd component . adopting the parameters from the best - fitted model , mcd plus power - law with absorption edge , and assuming a face - on disk
, we have @xmath75  km in the 90% confidence region , corresponding to the isco radius of a @xmath76 schwarzschild black hole , or a more massive black hole if spinning or the disk is tilted .
the observed luminosity is about a few percent of the eddington limit of such a black hole , which is consistent with eddington ratios typically found in the thermal state .
similar results can be obtained with the gaussian absorption line .    due to the lack of a characteristic feature in the power spectrum
, we are unable to constrain the black hole mass via timing .
the rms - mass relation derived for agn @xcite may have issues in extrapolation to lower masses .
the faintness in the 2 - 10 kev band of the source prevents us from implementing the means proposed by @xcite to estimate the black hole mass .
a few other ulxs show a dominant soft , thermal emission component , and are classified as supersoft ulxs : m101 ulx-1 @xcite , antennae x-13 @xcite , m81 uls1 @xcite , and ngc 4631 x1 @xcite .
these sources also show extreme variability : the observed fluxes vary by up to a factor of a few tens , and the intrinsic luminosity changes may be as large as factors of @xmath77 @xcite .
short - term variability has been detected in almost all of these sources at timescales down to a few ks @xcite .
m101 ulx-1 also showed a power spectrum with a @xmath1 form at frequencies below @xmath42  hz @xcite during its outburst in 2000 march with variability more pronounced at high energies ( 0.8 - 2 kev ) than in the lower band ( 0.2 - 0.8 kev ) @xcite . for a direct comparison , we calculated the rms power of ngc 247 ulx in the same energy bands and found that the fractional rms is 0.80 in the 0.8 - 2 kev band and 0.44 in the 0.2 - 0.8 kev band .
similar to ngc 247 ulx , ngc 4631 x1 also exhibits an absorption edge at 1.01  kev with an optical depth of 2.0 in its high state @xcite .
these similarities suggest that ngc 247 ulx may be a new member of the supersoft , ultraluminous family .
the other soft ulxs seem to keep a constant temperature during huge changes in luminosity , indicative of a dramatic change of the emitting surface area of the same order .
@xcite has pointed out that this would lead to difficulty in interpreting the emission as due to accretion power release within a few schwarzschild radii of the black hole . for ngc 247 ulx , the four rosat and two xmm - newton observations
have detected a change by a factor of about 3 of the observed flux in 0.1 - 2 kev , which is significantly smaller than others .
therefore , the thermal state interpretation has not been ruled out for ngc 247 ulx ; new , multiple observations are the key to revealing its nature .    an alternative explanation of the soft , thermal emission is that it arises from a photosphere that has a radius of @xmath2  cm , inferred from the blackbody component .
the shortest timescale of variation above white noise is about @xmath0  s ( figure  [ fig : pow ] ) , which places a constraint that the emitting area must be smaller than @xmath78  cm , compatible with the size obtained from the blackbody parameters .
this photosphere is unlikely the surface of a white dwarf , as the observed luminosity and temperature are too high to be explained by steady nuclear burning on a white dwarf surface @xcite .
plus , presence of the power - law component with a 0.3 - 10 kev luminosity of @xmath79  is unexpected in such a case .
it has been suggested that supercritical accretion could drive massive outflows above the disk and form an optically - thick photosphere , with a temperature expected to be about 0.1 kev , which could shield the inner disk emission when viewed at a high inclination angle @xcite . in this picture , the supersoft ulxs and normal ulxs are the same objects with different viewing angles .
this interpretation may be in accord with the absorption feature observed at @xmath601  kev , which is likely due to l shell transitions of highly ionized iron . besides this ulx and ngc 4631 x1 ,
less similar absorption features near this energy have been detected in the ulx ngc 1365 x1 @xcite and in the quasar pds 456 @xcite , and are explained as a spectral signature of a massive outflow .
the absence of absorption from low - z elements like oxygen could be a consequence of high ionization .
we conclude that the x - ray properties of the ngc 247 ulx are unlike any popular emission state known in black hole binaries .
the source exhibits a spectrum like the thermal state , but shows variability much stronger than seen in the thermal state .
a possible strong absorption feature is detected .
this source and other supersoft ulxs may exhibit a new accretion state that is different from those seen in galactic black hole binaries and the majority of ulxs .
a variety of potential thermal emission components have been suggested to be present in the energy spectrum of ulxs , including the soft excess ( 0.1 - 0.4  kev ) found in the majority of ulxs @xcite , the high - temperature ( @xmath60kev ) ulxs @xcite , and supersoft ulxs .
the properties of these thermal components are summarized and compared in table  [ tab : comparsion ] , with ngc 247 ulx and m82 x41.4 + 60 in the thermal state highlighted . among them , a disk interpretation is best established for m82 x41.4 + 60 because its thermal state is consistent with those of stellar - mass x - ray binaries in terms of timing and spectral properties and spectral evolution @xcite . for the others , definitive evidence is lacking for positive determination of their nature , except that the disk explanation is ruled out for other supersoft ulxs other than ngc 247 ulx .
based on the timing information , it appears unlikely that the soft excess in normal ulxs and the soft ( dominant ) spectral component in supersoft ulxs have the same physical origin .
phl  6625 was identified as a radio - quiet background qso at @xmath23 based on a mg  ii emission line @xcite . a single power - law model with interstellar absorption provides an adequate fit to its x - ray spectrum .
the parameters listed in table  [ tab : top ] are obtained from fitting in the 0.3 - 10  kev energy range , and the hydrogen column density is very close to the galactic value at @xmath80  @xmath19 , indicative of negligible absorption within ngc 247 . however
, if we include data down to 0.2  kev , two more energy bins , then the best - fit absorption is @xmath81  @xmath19 .
this is caused by the low flux between 0.2 - 0.3  kev , and is consistent with the results obtained from rosat observations , in which a total absorption column density @xmath82  @xmath19 was derived from fitting in the 0.1 - 2  kev band , and the excess absorption mainly takes effect at energies below 0.3  kev @xcite .
those authors claimed a positive detection of absorbing materials in ngc 247 assuming a galactic @xmath83  @xmath19 based on 21  cm observations of neutral hydrogen .
here , we confirm this conclusion with tighter constraints , even assuming a higher galactic absorption .
therefore , with future high - resolution spectroscopic observations , this qso could be used to study the interstellar medium within ngc 247 .    for the 2009 data ,
the power - law photon index at the rest frame is @xmath84 .
we extracted spectra for this object from the 2001 xmm - newton observation and found a harder spectrum with @xmath85 at a flux level of @xmath86  in 0.3 - 10  kev similar to that in 2009 .
the fluxes observed with xmm - newton are about ten times lower than the rosat flux of @xmath87  in the 0.2 - 2.4 kev band @xcite .
no short - term x - ray variability has been detected for this object .
* source 28*.  the source is hard , and its spectrum can be described by a power - law with @xmath88 , but the residuals vary systematically with energy . adding an mcd component improves the residuals and results in @xmath89 .
the disk has a temperature at the inner radius of @xmath90  kev with a bolometric luminosity of @xmath91  assuming a face - on geometry , and the power - law component has a photon index @xmath92 .
the disk component has a fractional luminosity of 11% in the 0.3 - 10 kev band .
if this source is a black hole binary , it is possibly in the hard state .
* source 34*.  the source sits at the north end of the ngc 247 disk , and was bright during the 2001 xmm - newton observation with @xmath93 , @xmath94  @xmath19 , and @xmath95  in the 0.3 - 10 kev band , or @xmath96  corrected for absorption .
however , it became faint in the 2009 xmm - newton observation , with a flux of @xmath97  in the 0.3 - 10 kev band , six times dimmer than in 2001 .
it is possibly source 3 in @xcite from einstein observations and source 1 in @xcite from rosat observations .
the rosat observations revealed a luminosity of @xmath98  corrected for galactic absorption only ( at 3.4  mpc ) in the 0.1 - 2 kev band , or @xmath99  corrected for all absorption .
the luminosity in the same band from the 2001 xmm - newton observation is about @xmath100  .
there is no bright optical counterpart found at the x - ray position .
however , the source is associated with a possible star forming region , seen in the ultraviolet image from the 2001 xmm - newton observation , with diffuse emission and star clusters nearby .
therefore , the source is likely an x - ray binary in ngc 247 , and is perhaps an accreting black hole .
* source 36*.  this source could be source 3 in @xcite .
the best - fitted column density is consistent with the galactic value .
its flux estimated from the 2001 xmm - newton observation is consistent with that in 2009 . in the x - ray image , the source seems to show extended features and may consists of multiple objects , which can only be resolved with future chandra observations .
* source 61*.  its x - ray spectrum can not be adequately fitted by a single power - law model , with @xmath101 ; adding a gaussian absorption line significantly improves the fit with @xmath102 .
the absorption line has a central energy of @xmath103  kev and a width of @xmath104  kev with an optical depth of @xmath105 .
the equivalent width is calculated to be around 0.30  kev .
its observed flux in 2001 was about twice of that in 2009 .
there is a bright optical source with @xmath106 and @xmath107 within 2  of the x - ray position , and the x - ray to optical flux ratio is estimated to be @xmath108 . as discussed above ,
this source is likely a background agn . due to the low absorption column density ,
the absorption line is likely produced intrinsic to the source .
similar absorption has been seen in agn @xcite .
* source 13*.  this is the hardest source detected with xmm - newton .
it is obvious in the hard band ( 2 - 10  kev ) but undetected in the soft band ( 0.3 - 2  kev ) , consistent with @xmath109  @xmath19 for a power - law spectrum with @xmath110 .
the source lies about 7  west of the nucleus of ngc 247 , and is likely a highly absorbed background agn .
* sources 41 , 50 , 59 , and 72*.  these four sources are the softest besides the ulx and are only detected in the soft band ( 0.3 - 2 kev ) with a hardness ratio around @xmath111 , which is consistent with a spectrum with a blackbody temperature @xmath112  kev or a power - law photon index @xmath113 , assuming galactic absorption .
sources 41 and 72 are outside of the d25 ellipse of ngc 247 , but sources 50 and 59 are inside .
their x - ray luminosities are about @xmath114
. these sources do not appear to have bright optical counterparts .
they could be canonical supersoft sources that are powered by nuclear burning on the surface of white dwarfs , or high redshift agn .
llccccccccc 1 & j004609.2@xmath11204504 & 00 46 09.29 & @xmath1120 45 04.9 & 2.21 & @xmath115 & @xmath116 & @xmath117 & 13.7 & no & + 2 & j004617.0@xmath11204151 & 00 46 17.00 & @xmath1120 41 51.8 & 1.44 & @xmath118 & @xmath119 & @xmath120 & 15.9 & no & + 3 & j004623.0@xmath11204740 & 00 46 23.02 & @xmath1120 47 40.3 & 1.02 & @xmath121 & @xmath122 & @xmath123 & 73.5 & no & + 4 & j004628.7@xmath11205005 & 00 46 28.73 & @xmath1120 50 05.2 & 0.78 & @xmath124 & @xmath125 & @xmath126 & 195.4 & no & o + 5 & j004631.1@xmath11203959 & 00 46 31.14 & @xmath1120 39 59.1 & 1.89 & @xmath127 & @xmath128 & @xmath129 & 17.2 & no & + 6 & j004632.1@xmath11205044 & 00 46 32.11 & @xmath1120 50 44.2 & 1.85 & @xmath130 & @xmath131 & @xmath132 & 18.6 & no & + 7 & j004633.1@xmath11205457 & 00 46 33.16 & @xmath1120 54 57.3 & 1.40 & @xmath133 & @xmath134 & @xmath135 & 20.1 & no & + 8 & j004634.1@xmath11205411 & 00 46 34.15 & @xmath1120 54 11.2 & 0.93 & @xmath136 & @xmath137 & @xmath138 & 51.1 & no & + 9 & j004635.1@xmath11203529 & 00 46 35.17 & @xmath1120 35 29.2 & 1.25 & @xmath139 & @xmath140 & @xmath141 & 42.3 & no & + 10 & j004635.2@xmath11203648 & 00 46 35.23 & @xmath1120 36 48.2 & 1.43 & @xmath142 & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 40.6 & no & + 11 & j004636.2@xmath11210018 & 00 46 36.29 & @xmath1121 00 18.7 & 1.00 & @xmath145 & @xmath146 & @xmath147 & 99.8 & no & o + 12 & j004638.0@xmath11203609 & 00 46 38.04 & @xmath1120 36 09.6 & 1.62 & @xmath148 & @xmath149 & @xmath150 & 32.5 & no & + 13 & j004639.6@xmath11204533 & 00 46 39.67 & @xmath1120 45 33.6 & 1.05 & @xmath151 & @xmath125 & @xmath152 & 40.4 & no & + 14 & j004642.6@xmath11204507 & 00 46 42.64 & @xmath1120 45 07.5 & 1.49 & @xmath153 & @xmath154 & @xmath155 & 19.4 & no & + 15 & j004645.8@xmath11210030 & 00 46 45.85 & @xmath1121 00 30.6 & 1.78 & @xmath156 & @xmath157 & @xmath141 & 21.7 & no & + 16 & j004646.3@xmath11204742 & 00 46 46.39 & @xmath1120 47 42.7 & 0.51 & @xmath158 & @xmath159 & @xmath160 & 327.2 & no & o + 17 & j004646.9@xmath11203658 & 00 46 46.92 & @xmath1120 36 58.0 & 1.56 & @xmath161 & @xmath162 & @xmath163 & 19.8 & no & + 18 & j004647.2@xmath11203628 & 00 46 47.23 & @xmath1120 36 28.1 & 1.78 & @xmath164 & @xmath165 & @xmath163 & 22.1 & no & + 19 & j004647.7@xmath11203837 & 00 46 47.72 & @xmath1120 38 37.3 & 0.65 & @xmath166 & @xmath167 & @xmath168 & 333.1 & no & o + 20 & j004648.8@xmath11205247 & 00 46 48.85 & @xmath1120 52 47.0 & 1.20 & @xmath169 & @xmath170 & @xmath171 & 60.6 & no & + 21 & j004650.4@xmath11203854 & 00 46 50.47 & @xmath1120 38 54.0 & 1.76 & @xmath172 & @xmath173 & @xmath174 & 17.4 & no & + 22 & j004651.8@xmath11204328 & 00 46 51.82 & @xmath1120 43 28.5 & 0.14 & @xmath175 & @xmath176 & @xmath177 & 14105.3 & no & qso + 23 & j004654.6@xmath11204129 & 00 46 54.63 & @xmath1120 41 29.4 & 0.78 & @xmath178 & @xmath179 & @xmath180 & 92.5 & yes & o + 24 & j004654.8@xmath11204100 & 00 46 54.87 & @xmath1120 41 00.9 & 0.56 & @xmath181 & @xmath182 & @xmath183 & 381.1 & yes & + 25 & j004655.7@xmath11203407 & 00 46 55.74 & @xmath1120 34 07.6 & 1.55 & @xmath184 & @xmath185 & @xmath117 & 19.5 & no & + 26 & j004655.9@xmath11205248 & 00 46 55.92 & @xmath1120 52 48.4 & 1.48 & @xmath186 & @xmath187 & @xmath188 & 18.1 & no & + 27 & j004656.4@xmath11205611 & 00 46 56.43 & @xmath1120 56 11.9 & 1.34 & @xmath189 & @xmath190 & @xmath191 & 35.7 & no & + 28 & j004659.3@xmath11204538 & 00 46 59.38 & @xmath1120 45 38.8 & 0.26 & @xmath192 & @xmath193 & @xmath194 & 1796.1 & yes & + 29 & j004659.7@xmath11204227 & 00 46 59.70 & @xmath1120 42 27.3 & 1.34 & @xmath195 & @xmath196 & @xmath197 & 38.7 & yes & + 30 & j004700.5@xmath11203359 & 00 47 00.55 & @xmath1120 33 59.7 & 3.09 & @xmath198 & @xmath199 & @xmath200 & 10.9 & no & + 31 & j004701.9@xmath11205450 & 00 47 01.98 & @xmath1120 54 50.8 & 1.62 & @xmath201 & @xmath202 & @xmath203 & 23.2 & no & + 32 & j004702.7@xmath11205302 & 00 47 02.79 & @xmath1120 53 02.9 & 1.97 & @xmath204 & @xmath205 & @xmath150 & 14.7 & yes & + 33 & j004703.2@xmath11204545 & 00 47 03.23 & @xmath1120 45 45.9 & 1.12 & @xmath136 & @xmath139 & @xmath206 & 56.2 & yes & + 34 & j004703.2@xmath11203657 & 00 47 03.28 & @xmath1120 36 57.9 & 1.64 & @xmath207 & @xmath208 & @xmath200 & 20.1 & yes & + 35 & j004703.4@xmath11204321 & 00 47 03.44 & @xmath1120 43 21.5 & 1.02 & @xmath209 & @xmath210 & @xmath211 & 42.7 & yes & + 36 & j004703.6@xmath11204015 & 00 47 03.68 & @xmath1120 40 15.6 & 0.42 & @xmath212 & @xmath213 & @xmath214 & 1184.2 & yes & + 37 & j004703.9@xmath11204743 & 00 47 03.90 & @xmath1120 47 43.8 & 0.16 & @xmath215 & @xmath216 & @xmath217 & 9827.5 & yes & ulx + 38 & j004704.5@xmath11205812 & 00 47 04.57 & @xmath1120 58 12.0 & 1.94 & @xmath218 & @xmath219 & @xmath220 & 17.8 & no & + 39 & j004705.9@xmath11205239 & 00 47 05.92 & @xmath1120 52 39.4 & 0.75 & @xmath221 & @xmath187 & @xmath222 & 152.1 & yes & o + 40 & j004705.9@xmath11204152 & 00 47 05.94 & @xmath1120 41 52.4 & 1.07 & @xmath223 & @xmath131 & @xmath224 & 69.9 & yes & + 41 & j004707.3@xmath11205749 & 00 47 07.38 & @xmath1120 57 49.3 & 1.30 & @xmath225 & @xmath226 & @xmath227 & 51.4 & no & + 42 & j004708.0@xmath11204346 & 00 47 08.01 & @xmath1120 43 46.8 & 1.57 & @xmath228 & @xmath216 & @xmath229 & 10.4 & yes & + 43 & j004709.0@xmath11205214 & 00 47 09.03 & @xmath1120 52 14.7 & 0.73 & @xmath230 & @xmath231 & @xmath232 & 172.1 & yes & + 44 & j004709.1@xmath11204622 & 00 47 09.16 & @xmath1120 46 22.8 & 1.10 & @xmath233 & @xmath234 & @xmath235 & 56.1 & yes & + 45 & j004710.0@xmath11204708 & 00 47 10.06 & @xmath1120 47 08.4 & 0.34 & @xmath236 & @xmath237 & @xmath238 & 1117.2 & yes & + 46 & j004710.3@xmath11204343 & 00 47 10.32 & @xmath1120 43 43.9 & 1.29 & @xmath239 & @xmath170 & @xmath163 & 24.8 & yes & + 47 & j004712.4@xmath11204219 & 00 47 12.48 & @xmath1120 42 19.1 & 1.45 & @xmath240 & @xmath241 & @xmath242 & 15.6 & yes & + 48 & j004712.7@xmath11203837 & 00 47 12.74 & @xmath1120 38 37.0 & 1.88 & @xmath243 & @xmath244 & @xmath132 & 14.0 & yes & o , i + 49 & j004713.7@xmath11205113 & 00 47 13.70 & @xmath1120 51 13.4 & 1.15 & @xmath245 & @xmath246 & @xmath247 & 45.1 & yes & + 50 & j004715.1@xmath11204717 & 00 47 15.17 & @xmath1120 47 17.3 & 0.96 & @xmath248 & @xmath249 & @xmath250 & 66.3 & yes & + 51 & j004715.9@xmath11205502 & 00 47 15.94 & @xmath1120 55 02.5 & 0.75 & @xmath251 & @xmath252 & @xmath253 & 235.8 & yes & + 52 & j004716.5@xmath11204814 & 00 47 16.59 & @xmath1120 48 14.4 & 0.85 & @xmath254 & @xmath241 & @xmath255 & 84.1 & yes & + 53 & j004716.6@xmath11203346 & 00 47 16.63 & @xmath1120 33 46.4 & 1.09 & @xmath256 & @xmath257 & @xmath258 & 11.1 & no & + 54 & j004717.9@xmath11205508 & 00 47 17.93 & @xmath1120 55 08.6 & 0.99 & @xmath259 & @xmath260 & @xmath261 & 97.5 & yes & + 55 & j004718.5@xmath11204739 & 00 47 18.56 & @xmath1120 47 39.8 & 0.90 & @xmath262 & @xmath139 & @xmath263 & 64.2 & yes & + 56 & j004719.7@xmath11205601 & 00 47 19.77 & @xmath1120 56 01.3 & 1.90 & @xmath130 & @xmath264 & @xmath163 & 11.8 & no & + 57 & j004720.3@xmath11205248 & 00 47 20.32 & @xmath1120 52 48.7 & 1.00 & @xmath265 & @xmath134 & @xmath266 & 110.1 & yes & o(@xmath267 ) , i + 58 & j004721.0@xmath11204932 & 00 47 21.05 & @xmath1120 49 32.3 & 1.32 & @xmath268 & @xmath216 & @xmath269 & 25.0 & yes & + 59 & j004721.4@xmath11205104 & 00 47 21.48 & @xmath1120 51 04.1 & 1.80 & @xmath270 & @xmath271 & @xmath272 & 14.8 & yes & + 60 & j004725.2@xmath11205442 & 00 47 25.23 & @xmath1120 54 42.4 & 1.28 & @xmath273 & @xmath162 & @xmath274 & 67.5 & no & + 61 & j004727.3@xmath11204721 & 00 47 27.36 & @xmath1120 47 21.6 & 0.28 & @xmath275 & @xmath276 & @xmath277 & 2204.7 & no & o + 62 & j004728.7@xmath11204301 & 00 47 28.76 & @xmath1120 43 01.7 & 0.72 & @xmath278 & @xmath122 & @xmath279 & 162.3 & no & o + 63 & j004730.6@xmath11205434 & 00 47 30.64 & @xmath1120 54 34.0 & 0.68 & @xmath280 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & 223.0 & no & + 64 & j004733.5@xmath11204557 & 00 47 33.57 & @xmath1120 45 57.5 & 1.16 & @xmath283 & @xmath284 & @xmath220 & 27.4 & no & + 65 & j004737.4@xmath11203648 & 00 47 37.49 & @xmath1120 36 48.3 & 1.50 & @xmath285 & @xmath286 & @xmath129 & 25.3 & no & o + 66 & j004740.7@xmath11204442 & 00 47 40.77 & @xmath1120 44 42.5 & 1.87 & @xmath287 & @xmath288 & @xmath132 & 15.9 & no & + 67 & j004741.8@xmath11205231 & 00 47 41.84 & @xmath1120 52 31.5 & 0.52 & @xmath289 & @xmath290 & @xmath291 & 485.8 & no & o(@xmath267 ) + 68 & j004743.4@xmath11204941 & 00 47 43.49 & @xmath1120 49 41.4 & 0.68 & @xmath292 & @xmath293 & @xmath294 & 230.5 & no & + 69 & j004744.5@xmath11205321 & 00 47 44.53 & @xmath1120 53 21.2 & 1.03 & @xmath295 & @xmath296 & @xmath297 & 65.2 & no & o + 70 & j004752.1@xmath11204053 & 00 47 52.19 & @xmath1120 40 53.9 & 1.78 & @xmath298 & @xmath185 & @xmath299 & 22.5 & no & o + 71 & j004753.5@xmath11205435 & 00 47 53.55 & @xmath1120 54 35.3 & 1.23 & @xmath300 & @xmath301 & @xmath117 & 39.8 & no & + 72 & j004759.1@xmath11205201 & 00 47 59.19 & @xmath1120 52 01.2 & 2.02 & @xmath302 & @xmath303 & @xmath304 & 11.7 & no & + 73 & j004808.3@xmath11204553 & 00 48 08.39 & @xmath1120 45 53.3 & 3.61 & @xmath305 & @xmath306 & @xmath200 & 13.7 & no & + 74 & j004810.7@xmath11204818 & 00 48 10.75 & @xmath1120 48 18.5 & 9.07 & @xmath307 & @xmath308 & @xmath309 & 11.2 & no & + 75 & j004812.3@xmath11204755 & 00 48 12.30 & @xmath1120 47 55.6 & 2.56 & @xmath310 & @xmath311 & @xmath309 & 12.4 & no & +    lllllll 4 & @xmath312 & @xmath313 & @xmath314 & @xmath315 & @xmath316 & 8.7/10 + 16 & @xmath317 & @xmath318 & @xmath319 & @xmath320 & @xmath321 & 20.8/17 + 19 & @xmath322 & @xmath323 & @xmath324 & @xmath325 & @xmath326 & 18.3/15 + 22 & @xmath327 & @xmath328 & @xmath329 & @xmath330 & @xmath331 & 99.2/99 + 24 & @xmath332 & @xmath333 & @xmath334 & @xmath335 & @xmath336 & 17.9/14 + 28 & @xmath337 & @xmath338 & @xmath339 & @xmath340 & @xmath341 & 57.2/56 + 36 & @xmath342 & @xmath343 & @xmath344 & @xmath345 & @xmath346 & 59.9/52 + 39 & @xmath312 & @xmath347 & @xmath348 & @xmath349 & @xmath350 & 7.3/8 + 43 & @xmath351 & @xmath352 & @xmath353 & @xmath354 & @xmath355 & 6.0/11 + 45 & @xmath356 & @xmath357 & @xmath313 & @xmath358 & @xmath359 & 46.8/46 + 51 & @xmath360 & @xmath361 & @xmath362 & @xmath363 & @xmath364 & 7.6/8 + 61 & @xmath365 & @xmath366 & @xmath367 & @xmath368 & @xmath369 & 80.9/60 + 62 & @xmath370 & @xmath371 & @xmath372 & @xmath373 & @xmath374 & 12.2/12 + 63 & @xmath375 & @xmath376 & @xmath377 & @xmath378 & @xmath379 & 7.2/13 + 67 & @xmath380 & @xmath381 & @xmath382 & @xmath383 & @xmath384 & 14.1/13 + 68 & @xmath312 & @xmath385 & @xmath386 & @xmath387 & @xmath388 & 19.3/14 +    llllcllcllllll @xmath389 & 3.2 & @xmath390 & @xmath391 & & @xmath392 & @xmath393 & & & & & @xmath394 & @xmath395 & 88.0/43 + @xmath396 & @xmath397 & @xmath398 & @xmath399 & & @xmath400 & @xmath401 & & @xmath57 & @xmath402 & & @xmath403 & @xmath404 & 36.8/40 + @xmath405 & @xmath406 & @xmath407 & @xmath408 & & @xmath409 & @xmath410 & & @xmath411 & @xmath412 & @xmath413 & @xmath414 & @xmath415 & 37.0/39 + @xmath416 & 2.7 & @xmath417 & @xmath418 & & @xmath392 & @xmath419 & & & & & @xmath420 & @xmath421 & 81.5/43 + @xmath422 & @xmath423 & @xmath424 & @xmath425 & & @xmath426 & @xmath427 & & @xmath428 & @xmath429 & & @xmath430 & @xmath431 & 39.0/40 + @xmath432 & @xmath433 & @xmath434 & @xmath435 & & @xmath436 & @xmath437 & & @xmath438 & @xmath439 & @xmath413 & @xmath414 & @xmath440 & 38.9/39    llccc ngc 247 ulx & low ( @xmath600.1 kev ) & major & high & unknown + other supersoft ulxs & low ( @xmath600.1 kev ) & major & high & no + m82 x41.4 + 60 during outburst & high ( @xmath601 kev ) & major & low & yes + other hot ulxs & high ( @xmath601 kev ) & major & unknown & maybe + soft excesses in ulxs & low ( 0.1 - 0.4 kev ) & minor & weak & rare +


in recent years , several studies have been carried out on the radio spectral properties of extra - galactic high - frequency selected radio sources .
sadler et al . ( 2006 ) presented the general properties of a sample of radio sources with flux densities above 100 mjy obtained as part of the pilot 20  ghz survey ( at20 g ) undertaken with the australia telescope compact array ( ricci et al .
2004 ) . with the use of a radio `` two - colour diagram '' , first used in the radio band by kesteven et al .
( 1977 ) , they characterized the spectral properties of the high - frequency radio sources and confirmed the diversity of the radio spectra and the difficulty of predicting high - frequency properties by extrapolating the results of surveys observed at lower frequencies ( see also tucci et al . 2008 and massardi et al .
2008 ) . considering the two classical radio source populations ( extended steep - spectrum and compact flat - spectrum sources ) , sadler et al .
( 2006 ) found that roughly 87 per cent of the high - frequency selected sources are flat - spectrum and 13 per cent are steep - spectrum .
tucci et al . ( 2008 ) performed a multifrequency spectral analysis of a sample of radio sources observed with the very small array ( vsa ) at 33 ghz exploiting existing data at different frequencies down to 1.4 ghz .
one of the most interesting results they found is that the majority of 33  ghz - selected sources show flatter spectra going to higher frequency ( about 50 per cent of the sample ) or become inverted ( about 19 per cent of the sample ) .
this contradicts the standard models for high - frequency source spectra , which predict a spectral steepening due to the ageing of high - energy electrons .
the result they found is completely consistent with the `` unified model '' for agn : the steep - spectrum component , which arises from extended radio lobes , rapidly decreases with frequency , while the compact emission starts to dominate at frequency @xmath2 1  ghz if the radio jet axis lies enough close to the line of sight .
the difficulty of predicting high - frequency flux densities from the extrapolation of lower frequency data is testified by the significant number of sources found at high frequency that were not predicted .
the percentage of these `` unexpected '' sources is observed to steadily increase with frequency : 10 per cent at 15  ghz ( taylor et al .
2001 ) , 18 per cent at 20  ghz ( sadler et al . 2006 ) and 32 per cent at 33 ghz ( tucci et al .
2008 ) .
the analysis of the radio spectral properties of 320 bright extragalactic radio sources with flux density @xmath3500  mjy at 20  ghz extracted from the at20 g was discussed in massardi et al .
in this sample , spectral steepening is a common feature that becomes more prominent at higher frequencies , even if flat and inverted spectrum objects still dominate the sample .    in a more recent paper , prandoni
et al ( 2010 ) studied the radio properties of a faint sample ( s @xmath30.6 mjy ) , selected at lower frequency ( 5  ghz ) and associated with early - type galaxies , finding strong spectral similarities with the massardi et al .
( 2008 ) sample and suggesting that faint radio galaxies are mostly counterparts of the brighter ones , with no significant influence introduced by different flux limits and frequency selection .
massardi et al .
( 2011a ) analysed the full sample release ( fsr , murphy et al .
2010 ) of the at20 g survey , which is 91 per cent complete above 100  mjy and 79 per cent complete above 50  mjy , and found that the high - frequency bright source sample is dominated by flat - spectrum sources , while the fraction of steep - spectrum sources increases with decreasing flux density .
these results have also been confirmed by procopio et al .
( 2011 ) , who observed 263 sources , selected at 23  ghz in the wmap maps , at 5 , 8 and 22  ghz almost simultaneously to the observations performed between 30 and 857  ghz by the european space agency planck satellite ( tauber et al .
the optical properties of the at20 g full sample presented in mahony et al .
( 2011 ) , who used supercosmos ( hambly et al . 2001 ) for optical identification and the 6df galaxy survey ( jones et al . 2009 ) or the literature for redshifts , showed that the sources which accrete cold gas have steeper radio spectral indices with respect to the sources that accrete hot gas .
this behaviour suggests that the radio emission in sources with cold - mode accretion is dominated by the jets .
interestingly , the fraction of flat- and steep - spectrum sources for the objects with no identification ( blank field ) is very different to that observed in the spectroscopic sample ; in fact the percentage of blank fields increases dramatically at steep spectral indices .
the authors suggested that this increase could indicate a population of high - z ultra - steep - spectrum sources .    in recent papers ,
massardi et al . ( 2011b ) and bonavera et al .
( 2011 ) presented the planck australia telescope compact array co - eval observations ( paco ) , which provided two complete samples of flux density - selected sources : a bright sample ( @xmath4 500 mjy ) and a faint sample ( @xmath4 200 mjy ) with extensive multi - frequency coverage ( 540  ghz ) .
the spectral analysis showed no significant differences between the two samples .
the steepening of the sources at high frequencies is confirmed .
the main difference is a larger fraction of steep - spectrum sources in the faint sample , mostly at the expense of peaked- and flat - spectrum sources . in a subsequent paper , bonaldi et al .
( 2013 ) presented a detailed analysis of a complete sample of 69 sources spectrally - selected from the at20 g sample as those having inverted or upturning spectra and observed in the framework of the paco project .
most of the source spectra ( 85 per cent ) are smooth and well described by a double power - law , while the remaining sources have complex spectra .
the majority of the radio sources are likely blazars probably caught during a bright phase at 20  ghz .
gawroski et al .
( 2010 ) also investigated the dependence of spectral index distribution on flux density for a sample of 57 sources detected at 30  ghz with the ocra prototype receiver at the 32-m toru radio telescope above a flux density limit of 5 mjy .
they found that the proportion of steep spectrum sources increases with decreasing flux density .
they found no evidence for an unexpected population of sources above their completeness limit of 10 mjy whose spectra rise towards higher frequencies .    peel et al .
( 2011 ) measured the 30  ghz flux densities of 605 radio sources from the combined radio all - sky target eight - ghz survey ( crates ) with the same instrumentation as gawroski et al .
they studied the radio spectra between 1.4 and 30  ghz and found that 75 per cent have steepened at @xmath5 compared with @xmath6 , 6 per cent of the sources show a ghz - peaked spectrum shape with a peak between 4.8 and 8.4  ghz , 10 per cent of the sources are flat or rising and another 10 per cent are inverted .
kurinsky et al .
( 2013 ) reported the multi - frequency observations ( 4.843.3 ghz ) of 89 sources with 37  ghz flux density @xmath3 1 jy carried out with the vla / jvla .
the sample contains a much higher fraction ( 42 per cent ) of flat - spectrum sources compared to 510 per cent of sources found in other samples selected at lower frequency .
this sample extends the radio spectral energy distribution of the radio sources in the 5857  ghz regime .    in this paper
we present the results of the multi - frequency follow - up observations of the k - band northern wide survey ( knows ) pilot project ( righini et al .
2012 , hereafter paper  i ) in a comprehensive way . in section
[ sez : bright ] a brief summary of the pilot survey is provided ; while in section  [ sez : lowfol ] the results of the 5/8  ghz follow - up observations are presented . in section  [ sez : ocra ]
we report on the 30  ghz follow - up observations and data reduction . in section  [ sez : spec ]
we show the radio spectra between 1.4 and 30  ghz and the optical identifications . in section  [ sez : res ]
we present the results of the analysis of radio spectra , and we compare them with the results from other high - frequency selected samples . in section  [ sez
: sum ] we summarize our conclusions . throughout this paper
we use the following cosmological parameters : @xmath771 km s@xmath8 mpc@xmath8 , @xmath90.27 and @xmath100.73 ( larson et al . 2011 ) .
during the years 20102011 , the medicina 32-m dish hosted the seven - feed 1826.5  ghz receiver built for the sardinia radio telescope , with the aim of performing its commissioning .
this opportunity was exploited to carry out a pilot survey at 20  ghz over the sky region north of @xmath11 .
this survey produced a catalogue of 73 confirmed sources down to a flux density limit of 115 mjy , which can be considered complete above 200 mjy .
the 73 confirmed sources come from a selected list of 151 candidates chosen from the brighter and more reliable targets for the 20  ghz follow - up .
for this reason the sample analysed in this paper is referred to as the knows 20  ghz bright sample .
a more detailed description is provided in paper  i.    precise 20  ghz flux densities and position measurements were derived for all sources through 20  ghz follow - up observations , carried out at the 32-m medicina telescope , in the framework of the multi - frequency ( 5 , 8 , 20 , 30  ghz ) study of the sample .
the medicina 20  ghz follow - up observations are described in detail in paper  i. here we focus on the 5/8  ghz medicina observations and on the 30  ghz observations carried out at the toru telescope .
follow - up observations of the knows bright sample were performed with the 32-m medicina telescope on dec 11@xmath12 , 12@xmath12 and 13@xmath12 2010 in the frequency ranges 55.15  ghz and 8.188.33  ghz .
the target list of 73 sources was scheduled to be observed at 5 and 8  ghz in blocks of pointings based on ra range .
a list of flux density calibrators ( 3c286 , 3c295 , 3c48 , 3c123 and ngc7027 ) were observed twice a day interspersed with blocks of target sources .
both calibrators and target sources were observed in multiple ra and dec cross - scans centred on the positions obtained from the knows 20  ghz bright sample .
the cross - scans were 6@xmath13hpbw wide ( where the half power beam width is 7.5 arcmin at 5  ghz and 4.8 arcmin at 8.3  ghz ) at the scanning speed of 3@xmath14/min and 2@xmath14/min at 5 and 8  ghz respectively .
for comparison , the angular resolution at 20  ghz is 1.7 arcmin .
data were recorded into fits files .
they were then flagged in order to discard scans clearly affected by radio frequency interference and/or severe atmospheric disturbances .
the data were flux - calibrated according to the absolute flux density scale by ott et al .
the ra and dec cross - scans were then stacked for each target source in order to improve the s / n ratio of the detections by decreasing the rms noise .
the stacked cross - scan was gaussian - fitted in order to obtain flux density and positional offsets in ra and dec .
the positional offsets were then used to correct the flux density for the signal attenuation caused by the primary beam profile . a thorough description of the aforementioned calibration and fitting procedures ( performed with the data reduction package oscar , procopio et al . 2011 ) , together with the error analysis for the flux density measurements are provided in paper  i.    of the 73 sources , 60 ( 82 per cent ) and 57 ( 78 per cent ) were detected at 5 and 8  ghz respectively .
non - detections at 5/8  ghz were mainly due to the limited sensitivity of the receivers , which were not properly cooled down at the time of observations .
the @xmath15 flux density limit was 63 mjy / beam at 5 ghz and 85 mjy / beam at 8 ghz .
the 5/8  ghz flux densities of the sources are listed in table  [ tab : flux ] .
the 30  ghz follow - up observations were carried out with the ocra - p receiver at the toru 32-m telescope ( poland ) .
ocra - p is the prototype of the ocra - f ( one centimeter radio array - faraday ) multi - feed 30  ghz receiver developed in the framework of the ocra program ( browne et al .
the nominal sensitivity of the receiver considering an overall system temperature of 40  k and a bandwidth of 6  ghz , is 6 mjy s@xmath16 .
the fwhm of the antenna beam is 72 arcsec at 30  ghz .
the 30 ghz observations were carried out on september 9@xmath17 , november 15@xmath17 and december 3@xmath18 2010 .
the targets were observed using cross - scans or on / off measurements depending on the source flux density ( lowe et al .
2007 ; gawroski et al .
the planetary nebula ngc  7027 was used as primary flux density calibrator .
ngc  7027 was observed 610 times for each observing session .
hafez et al . ( 2008 ) report a flux density of 5.39@xmath190.04  jy at 33  ghz at an epoch of 2003.0 with a secular decrease of @xmath20 per cent per year ( ott et al .
1994 ) . by extrapolating the flux density to 2010.0 a value of 5.32@xmath190.04  jy was obtained , which was then scaled to 30 ghz using the ngc  7027 spectral index of @xmath21 .
the 30  ghz flux density of ngc  7027 thus obtained is 5.38@xmath190.04 jy . secondary flux density calibration was performed using the signal generated from a noise diode after each source observation .
the flux density of ngc  7027 was measured at different elevations in order to obtain elevation - dependent gain corrections .
the correction for atmospheric absorption was obtained by calculating the opacity from the system temperature measurements at zenith and at 30@xmath14 of elevation .
the data reduction was performed using a custom software package described in peel et al .
( 2011 ) and in greater detail in peel ( 2009 ) . in total 295 measurements were obtained on the full list of 73 sources .
data affected by poor weather conditions were discarded , as well as cross - scans in which the peak amplitude measured by the ocra - p beams was offset by more than 20 per cent .
52 targets were detected at 30  ghz corresponding to 71 per cent of the total .
the 30  ghz flux densities of the detected sources are listed in table  [ tab : flux ] .
[ fig : ocra ] shows the scatter plot between the 30  ghz planck early release compact source catalogue ( ercsc ; planck collaboration 2011 ) flux densities and the 30  ghz ocra flux densities of the 16 targets present in both data sets .
planck and ocra flux densities are in reasonable agreement especially at the bright end , indicating that our flux densities are not affected by significant systematic effects . source variability might account for a scatter that is larger than the flux density error bars for the fainter objects .
it might also be useful to compare in terms of variability the planck - ocra scatter plot with the one in figure 6 of gawroski et al .
( 2010 ) where 42 ocra - p 30  ghz flux densities are matched with those from the very small array source subtractor at 33  ghz .
10 out of the 42 sources show variations greater than 2@xmath22 ( combined error ) .
the radio spectra of the knows sources are shown in fig .
[ fig : sed ] . integrated flux densities at 1.4  ghz were added from the nrao - vla sky survey ( nvss , condon et al .
1998 ) to extend the frequency baseline .
the nvss flux densities were extracted from the nvss online catalogue from a cross - match with the knows 20  ghz follow - up positions within a search radius of 50  arcsec . in order to assess the reliability of these cross - matches , all the 1.4  ghz nvss images were retrieved from the nvss online postage - stamp server and visually inspected .
all 73 sources in our sample appear to have nvss counterparts , with three sources ( knows  080817 + 731514 , knows  144830 + 760137 , knows  184218 + 794540 ) showing two nvss components and three sources ( knows  160731 + 850159 , knows  211402 + 820437 , knows  220549 + 743632 ) showing three nvss components in the nvss images .
for these six sources the nvss components were summed to provide the integrated 1.4  ghz flux densities reported in table  [ tab : flux ] .
when available , the 30  ghz , 44  ghz and 70  ghz planck ercsc ( planck collaboration 2011 ) flux densities were also added to the radio spectra .
however such measurements are not included in table  [ tab : flux ] due to the sparsity of this information .
we note that flux density measurements used to derive the radio spectra are not coeval . in particular the high - frequency ones ( @xmath23 5  ghz ) were taken within a time range of 1.5 years : between august 2009 and june 2010 for the planck flux density measurements ; in november 2010 for the ocra - p 30  ghz knows follow - up ; in december 2010 for the 5/8  ghz follow - up and in april 2011 for the knows 20  ghz follow - up measurements .
the 1.4 ghz nvss observations were done between september 1993 and october 1996 with additional patching observations carried out during the fourth quarter of 1997 .
this means that our radio spectra might be affected by variability .
massardi et al .
( 2010 ) found a 56 per cent median variability on a 6 months timescale in the range 518 ghz , and up to a @xmath24 per cent variability over 9 months , so we do not expect variability to significantly affect the spectral analysis discussed in the following sections .
the long time lag between the 1.4 ghz observations and the higher frequency ones ( 17 years ) is not troublesome because at lower frequencies most of the emission comes from radio lobes which are more stable than radio cores .    in this paper
we are interested only to the statistical behaviour of spectral indices in the sample . in this case
positive and negative variations caused by short - term variability tend to cancel out .
however , it must be born in mind , when using our data to interpret individual source spectra , that some sources may experience large variability also in relatively short periods .
some long - term flux density monitoring projects carried out at high frequencies at ovro , metsahovi and umrao ( richards et al .
2011 , ciaramella et al .
2004 , pyatunina et al .
2005 , hovatta et al .
2007 ) show plenty of such examples .
the nasa extragalactic database ( ned ; _ http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/_ ) was then used to identify the radio source optical counterparts , to find redshifts and to obtain optical types within a search radius of 1 arcmin to the 20  ghz knows follow - up positions . in cases of multiple counterparts we chose the one which matched the nvss flux density and position information .
we also extracted the information on the optical class , b@xmath25 and r@xmath26 magnitude from the supercosmos sky surveys database ( sss ; _ http://www-wfau.roe.ac.uk/sss/index.html_ ) .
we again allowed for a 1-arcmin wide search box and in cases of multiple counterparts we chose the entry with the minimum distance from the follow - up 20  ghz radio position .
the optical and redshift information of the knows sample is summarized in table  [ tab : optid ] .    according to ned we have 36 qsos ( 49 per cent ) , 17 galaxies ( 23 per cent ) and one planetary nebula , while 19 objects ( 36 per cent ) have no optical types . in supercosmos , 18 objects ( 25 per cent ) show galaxy appearance ( class 1 ) , 51 ( 70 per cent ) a stellar appearance ( class 2 ) , one ( the planetary nebula ) is noisy ( class=4 ) and 3 objects ( 4 per cent ) have no supercosmos identification .
for the 19 sources that have no optical type in ned we use the supercosmos classification , when available .
putting together the ned and supercosmos classifications , sources in the knows bright sample can be divided as follows : 20 ( 27 per cent ) are galaxies or with galaxy appearance and 50 ( 68 per cent ) are qsos or with stellar appearance , in agreement with the results of previous works ( see e.g. sadler et al . 2006 ) .
two have no optical classification and one is a planetary nebula .
42 out of the 72 ( 58 per cent ) extragalactic objects ( we exclude here the planetary nebula ) in the knows bright sample have a redshift measurement .
30 of them are qsos and 12 are radiogalaxies according to the combined ned / supercosmos optical classification . for 34 objects ( 24 qsos and 10 radiogalaxies )
we computed the radio and optical luminosities using the scheme described in mahony et al .
( 2011 ) . to compute luminosities across a wide range of redshifts
it is essential to shift the observed frequencies into the rest frame using a @xmath27correction . as qsos and
galaxies have very different seds in the optical regime each optical class needs to be @xmath27corrected in a different manner .
the @xmath27correction formula by de propris et al .
( 2004 ) , making use of the b@xmath28r@xmath26 colour , was applied to the radiogalaxies .
for qsos a power law was instead used with a spectral index @xmath29 .
the redshift and luminosity statistics for the qsos and radiogalaxies in the knows sample are summarized in table  [ tab : lumz ] . as expected , qsos are found on average at higher redshifts than radiogalaxies and are intrinsically brighter both in the radio and the optical band .
lrrrrrrrrrr     +   + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) + name & s30 & @xmath30 & s20 & @xmath31 & s8 & @xmath32 & s5 & @xmath33 & s1.4 & @xmath34 + & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) +     + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) + name & s30 & @xmath30 & s20 & @xmath31 & s8 & @xmath32 & s5 & @xmath33 & s1.4 & @xmath34 + & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) +    knows 001302@xmath35723123 & 167 & 5 & 325 & 18 &  &  & 559 & 14 & 509.1 & 11.2 + knows 001312@xmath35774854 &  &  & 208 & 19 & 548 & 11 & 718 & 16 & 2101.3 & 63.0 + knows 001633@xmath35791641 &  &  & 247 & 12 & 738 & 31 & 1123 & 14 & 3651.0 & 88.6 + knows 001716@xmath35813441 & 480 & 20 & 745 & 38 & 1362 & 19 & 1471 & 16 & 692.8 & 20.8 + knows 001948@xmath35732725 & 870 & 31 & 1283 & 64 & 1068 & 25 & 858 & 14 & 1251.8 & 37.6 + knows 020313@xmath35810622 & 546 & 17 & 174 & 9 & 277 & 12 & 172 & 3 & 211.0 & 6.3 + knows 020336@xmath35723253 & 420 & 22 & 594 & 34 & 549 & 21 &  &  & 229.9 & 6.9 + knows 020649@xmath35841102 & 189 & 14 & 120 & 12 &  &  & 244 & 9 & 100.0 & 3.0 + knows 020954@xmath35722920 & 488 & 21 & 488 & 42 & 454 & 14 & 398 & 8 & 669.9 & 20.1 + knows 021733@xmath35734923 & 2739 & 96 & 2894 & 145 & 3760 & 32 & 3829 & 22 & 2271.6 & 68.1 + knows 022459@xmath35765544 &  &  & 130 & 11 & 330 & 9 & 554 & 12 & 1927.2 & 57.8 + knows 035447@xmath35800918 & 313 & 13 & 294 & 21 &  &  & 406 & 11 & 643.7 & 19.3 + knows 041050@xmath35765649 & 962 & 36 & 1342 & 67 & 2122 & 38 & 2984 & 19 & 5620.1 & 168.6 + knows 041318@xmath35745107 & 152 & 11 & 297 & 25 & 900 & 22 & 1094 & 18 & 2847.6 & 80.0 + knows 042132@xmath35835837 & 188 & 16 & 205 & 10 &  &  &  &  & 5.2 & 0.6 + knows 050844@xmath35843202 & 140 & 12 & 301 & 15 & 315 & 13 & 359 & 19 & 294.8 & 8.9 + knows 061048@xmath35724843 & 228 & 16 & 360 & 25 & 484 & 12 & 683 & 18 & 1041.6 & 31.3 + knows 062555@xmath35820228 & 528 & 19 & 628 & 45 & 755 & 17 & 1016 & 14 & 681.0 & 20.4 + knows 063921@xmath35732454 & 1254 & 48 & 1467 & 73 & 1026 & 22 &  &  & 903.6 & 27.1 + knows 064132@xmath35881200 &  &  & 204 & 14 &  &  & 235 & 5 & 126.2 & 3.8 + knows 072608@xmath35791135 & 405 & 17 & 498 & 25 & 836 & 18 & 914 & 14 & 501.0 & 15.0 + knows 074713@xmath35763918 & 373 & 17 & 498 & 25 & 688 & 17 & 657 & 11 & 133.1 & 4.0 + knows 074922@xmath35742038 & 231 & 19 & 416 & 21 & 461 & 19 & 563 & 11 & 510.3 & 15.3 + knows 075039@xmath35790914 & 339 & 16 & 240 & 12 & 268 & 12 & 361 & 6 & 181.5 & 5.5 + knows 075052@xmath35824200 & 336 & 26 & 475 & 24 & 644 & 16 & 846 & 11 & 1845.1 & 55.4 + knows 080817@xmath35731514 & 74 & 3 & 320 & 16 & 378 & 13 & 431 & 12 & 376.8 & 9.3 + knows 092934@xmath35861236 &  &  & 187 & 9 & 255 & 11 & 483 & 10 & 142.7 & 4.3 + knows 093056@xmath35742017 &  &  & 240 & 15 & 400 & 11 & 369 & 10 & 211.0 & 6.3 + knows 101009@xmath35825020 & 283 & 13 & 353 & 18 & 420 & 13 &  &  & 503.7 & 15.1 + knows 104421@xmath35805447 & 577 & 30 & 1188 & 56 & 706 & 17 & 658 & 7 & 828.3 & 24.9 + knows 105359@xmath35863004 &  &  & 126 & 9 &  &  & 265 & 4 & 230.6 & 6.9 + knows 105812@xmath35811438 & 756 & 27 & 795 & 44 & 756 & 17 & 764 & 13 & 240.3 & 7.2 + knows 110149@xmath35722544 & 904 & 31 & 912 & 46 & 980 & 20 & 954 & 12 & 1245.6 & 37.4 + knows 110410@xmath35765859 & 189 & 9 & 278 & 14 & 545 & 13 & 773 & 15 & 2340.6 & 58.8 + knows 115311@xmath35805837 & 689 & 28 & 880 & 44 & 1215 & 23 & 1429 & 14 & 1343.4 & 40.3 + knows 120019@xmath35730054 & 507 & 23 & 750 & 38 & 1666 & 30 & 2572 & 14 & 5564.7 & 166.9 + knows 122340@xmath35804016 & 429 & 18 & 479 & 24 & 508 & 19 & 847 & 11 & 705.1 & 21.2 + knows 132143@xmath35831623 & 96 & 3 & 395 & 28 & 417 & 17 & 318 & 18 & 565.4 & 17.0 + knows 132351@xmath35794258 &  &  & 378 & 19 & 453 & 22 &  &  & 599.4 & 18.0 + knows 135324@xmath35753307 & 387 & 16 & 341 & 17 & 524 & 17 &  &  & 132.6 & 4.0 + knows 135756@xmath35764330 & 441 & 23 & 458 & 23 & 551 & 14 &  &  & 647.2 & 19.4 + knows 140638@xmath35782816 &  &  & 115 & 6 & 199 & 10 &  &  & 396.8 & 11.1 + knows 144830@xmath35760137 & 639 & 28 & 1225 & 61 & 747 & 17 & 507 & 13 & 280.8 & 6.2 + knows 152107@xmath35785837 &  &  & 178 & 9 &  &  &  &  & 124.9 & 3.8 + knows 155608@xmath35742107 &  &  & 190 & 11 &  &  &  &  & 179.9 & 5.4 + knows 160731@xmath35850159 &  &  & 265 & 13 &  &  & 320 & 8 & 819.8 & 18.0 + knows 160922@xmath35794023 &  &  & 287 & 22 & 408 & 12 & 522 & 15 & 1238.9 & 37.2 + knows 163235@xmath35823228 & 908 & 40 & 798 & 40 & 928 & 15 & 1109 & 13 & 801.8 & 14.8 + knows 172404@xmath35765328 & 621 & 29 & 730 & 37 &  &  &  &  & 424.0 & 12.7 + knows 180044@xmath35782812 & 2376 & 81 & 2660 & 133 & 2482 & 44 & 2180 & 15 & 2223.5 & 66.7 + knows 182316@xmath35793856 & 56 & 2 & 279 & 14 & 556 & 9 & 611 & 11 & 296.9 & 8.4 + knows 183659@xmath35750741 & 85 & 3 & 257 & 14 & 299 & 6 & 244 & 5 & 133.9 & 4.0 + knows 184218@xmath35794540 & 607 & 34 & 941 & 47 & 2773 & 48 & 3927 & 18 & 11555.9 & 280.6 + knows 185458@xmath35735129 & 266 & 13 & 263 & 14 & 331 & 13 & 419 & 13 & 465.1 & 11.7 + knows 192754@xmath35735816 & 4347 & 160 & 5165 & 258 & 4133 & 51 & 3289 & 23 & 3950.9 & 118.5 + knows 193526@xmath35813022 &  &  & 193 & 10 & 423 & 13 & 452 & 12 & 278.1 & 8.4 + knows 193706@xmath35744102 &  &  & 420 & 21 & 242 & 10 & 156 & 6 & 205.5 & 6.2 + knows 200422@xmath35735505 &  &  & 308 & 15 & 230 & 9 & 209 & 8 & 108.0 & 3.1 + knows 200539@xmath35775252 & 662 & 28 & 809 & 60 & 1128 & 23 & 993 & 20 & 1060.7 & 29.8 + knows 200955@xmath35722920 & 597 & 22 & 737 & 37 & 752 & 16 & 855 & 12 & 953.6 & 28.6 + knows 201716@xmath35744059 & 369 & 18 & 464 & 34 & 455 & 18 & 386 & 7 & 473.7 & 14.2 + knows 202242@xmath35761131 & 784 & 29 & 1471 & 101 & 942 & 19 & 898 & 17 & 428.9 & 12.9 + knows 204240@xmath35750802 &  &  & 229 & 12 &  &  & 424 & 9 & 208.3 & 5.8 + knows 211402@xmath35820437 & 157 & 19 & 235 & 12 & 287 & 12 & 347 & 13 & 474.9 & 11.2 + knows 213345@xmath35823904 & 167 & 17 & 302 & 15 &  &  & 479 & 17 & 915.1 & 27.5 + knows 220039@xmath35805844 &  &  & 166 & 12 &  &  & 145 & 9 & 176.3 & 5.3 + knows 220549@xmath35743632 &  &  & 201 & 10 &  &  & 363 & 9 & 430.5 & 8.9 + knows 230524@xmath35824232 & 107 & 4 & 243 & 17 &  &  &  &  & 116.7 & 3.5 + knows 231226@xmath35724055 & 143 & 3 & 310 & 23 & 225 & 12 & 229 & 6 & 270.6 & 8.1 + knows 231556@xmath35863130 &  &  & 280 & 19 & 344 & 13 & 299 & 8 & 170.5 & 4.7 + knows 232713@xmath35801236 & 176 & 13 & 213 & 16 &  &  &  &  & 138.4 & 4.2 + knows 234405@xmath35822638 &  &  & 309 & 15 & 755 & 16 & 1251 & 16 & 3777.4 & 113.3 + knows 235626@xmath35815255 & 715 & 35 & 664 & 34 & 652 & 17 & 531 & 9 & 520.9 & 15.6 +    llllllcl     +   + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) + name & radio spectrum & ned i d & z & b@xmath36 & r@xmath37 & class & alt . name +     + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) + name & radio spectrum & ned i d & z & b@xmath36 & r@xmath37 & class & alt . name +    knows 001302@xmath35723123 & flat & pn & ... & 12.744 & 12.741 & 4 & ngc0040 + knows 001312@xmath35774854 & steep & gal & 0.326 & 22.351 &  & 1 & nvssj001311@xmath35774846 + knows 001633@xmath35791641 & steep & gal & 0.8404 & 21.707 & 19.731 & 2 & 3c 006.1 + knows 001716@xmath35813441 & peaked & qso & 3.366 & 19.013 & 17.432 & 2 & 0014@xmath35813 + knows 001948@xmath35732725 & flat & qso & 1.718 & 19.284 & 18.364 & 2 & 0016@xmath35731 + knows 020313@xmath35810622 & steep & no & ... & 19.952 & 18.621 & 2 & nvssj020307@xmath35810612 + knows 020336@xmath35723253 & inverted & qso & ... & 20.185 & 19.528 & 1 & nvssj020333@xmath35723254 + knows 020649@xmath35841102 & peaked & no & ... & 21.837 &  & 1 & nvssj020713@xmath35841119 + knows 020954@xmath35722920 & flat & gal & 0.895 & 19.557 & 18.085 & 2 & s5 0205@xmath3572 + knows 021733@xmath35734923 & flat & qso & 2.367 & 17.090 & 15.298 & 2 & 0212@xmath35735 + knows 022459@xmath35765544 & steep & gal & ... & 20.534 & 19.086 & 2 & 4c@xmath3576.01 + knows 035447@xmath35800918 & flat & no & ... & 19.831 &  & 2 & 0345@xmath357958 + knows 041050@xmath35765649 & steep & gal & 0.5985 & 21.678 &  & 2 & 4c@xmath3576.03 + knows 041318@xmath35745107 & steep & gal & 0.373 & 20.811 & 18.782 & 1 & 4c@xmath3574.08 + knows 042132@xmath35835837 &  & no & ... & 21.580 & 19.171 & 2 & nvssj042140@xmath35835842 + knows 050844@xmath35843202 & flat & qso & 1.340 & 20.134 & 19.116 & 2 & 0454@xmath35844 + knows 061048@xmath35724843 & flat & qso & 3.53 & 22.337 &  & 2 & 4c@xmath3572.10 + knows 062555@xmath35820228 & flat & qso & 0.710 & 21.368 & 18.946 & 1 & 0615@xmath35820 + knows 063921@xmath35732454 & flat & qso & 1.85 & 18.592 & 18.172 & 2 & nvssj063921@xmath35732458 + knows 064132@xmath35881200 & flat & no & ... & 20.291 &  & 1 & nvssj064206@xmath35881154 + knows 072608@xmath35791135 & peaked & no & ... & 21.908 &  & 2 & s5 0718@xmath3579 + knows 074713@xmath35763918 & peaked & no & ... & 12.224 & 10.830 & 2 & s5 0740@xmath3576 + knows 074922@xmath35742038 & flat & qso & 1.629 & 19.282 & 18.990 & 2 & s5 0743@xmath3574 + knows 075039@xmath35790914 & peaked & no & ... & 21.917 &  & 2 & nvssj075043@xmath35790917 + knows 075052@xmath35824200 & steep & qso & 1.991 &  &  & - & 0740@xmath358249 + knows 080817@xmath35731514 & flat & qso & 0.496 & 21.208 & 19.286 & 2 & s5 0802@xmath3573 + knows 092934@xmath35861236 & peaked & qso & ... & 21.563 &  & 1 & s5 0916@xmath3586 + knows 093056@xmath35742017 & peaked & no & ... & 21.792 &  & 2 & s5 0925@xmath3574 + knows 101009@xmath35825020 & flat & gal & 0.322 & 20.792 & 19.672 & 1 & s5 1003@xmath3583 + knows 104421@xmath35805447 & upturn & qso & 1.26 & 18.685 & 17.978 & 2 & 1039@xmath35811 + knows 105359@xmath35863004 & peaked & gal & ... & 21.253 &  & 1 & nvssj105421@xmath35862936 + knows 105812@xmath35811438 & inverted & gal & 0.706 & 19.470 & 19.036 & 2 & s5 1053@xmath3581 + knows 110149@xmath35722544 & flat & qso & 1.46 & 17.612 & 17.122 & 2 & 1058@xmath35726 + knows 110410@xmath35765859 & steep & qso & 0.3115 & 15.330 & 14.978 & 2 & pg1100@xmath35772 + knows 115311@xmath35805837 & flat & qso & 1.25 & 18.787 & 18.173 & 2 & 1150@xmath35812 + knows 120019@xmath35730054 & steep & gal & 0.97 & 20.133 & 18.369 & 1 & 3c268.1 + knows 122340@xmath35804016 & flat & qso & ... & 21.975 &  & 2 & s5 1221@xmath3580 + knows 132143@xmath35831623 & flat & no & 1.024 & 20.508 &
18.712 & 2 & nvssj132145@xmath35831614 + knows 132351@xmath35794258 & flat & qso & 1.970 & 21.501 &  & 1 & s5 1323@xmath3579
+ knows 135324@xmath35753307 & peaked & qso & 1.619 & 18.386 & 17.995 & 2 &
nvssj135323@xmath35753258 + knows 135756@xmath35764330 & flat & qso & ... & 22.535 &  & 2 & s5 1357@xmath3576 + knows 140638@xmath35782816 & steep & gal & ... & 20.338 & 18.655 & 2 & nvss j140636@xmath35782810 + knows 144830@xmath35760137 & inverted & qso & 0.899 & 21.996 &  & 1 & s5 1448@xmath3576 + knows 152107@xmath35785837 &  & no & ... & 18.996 & 18.382 & 2 & nvss j152102@xmath35785830 + knows 155608@xmath35742107 &  & qso & 1.667 & 20.435 & 19.641 & 2 & nvss j155603@xmath35742057 + knows 160731@xmath35850159 & steep & gal & 0.183 & 18.072 & 16.660 & 1 & s5 1616@xmath3585 + knows 160922@xmath35794023 & steep & no & ... &  &  & - & 4c@xmath3579.15 + knows 163235@xmath35823228 & flat & gal & 0.02471 & 14.531 & 7.384 & 1 & ngc6251 + knows 172404@xmath35765328 &  & qso & 0.680 & 18.901 & 18.428 & 2 & 1725@xmath357655 + knows 180044@xmath35782812 & flat & qso & 0.68 & 18.186 & 16.632 & 2 & 1803@xmath35784 + knows 182316@xmath35793856 & peaked & qso & 0.224 & 19.269 & 17.415 & 1 & s5 1826@xmath3579 + knows 183659@xmath35750741 & flat & no & ... & 19.798 & 20.297 & 2 &
1838@xmath357504 + knows 184218@xmath35794540 & steep & gal & 0.0561 & 12.582 & 11.015 & 2 & 3c390.3 + knows 185458@xmath35735129 & flat & qso & 0.461 & 16.521 & 16.411 & 2 & s5 1856@xmath3573 + knows 192754@xmath35735816 & flat & qso & 0.3021 & 7.445 & 16.557 & 2 & 4c @xmath3573.18 + knows 193526@xmath35813022 & peaked & gal & ... & 19.060 & 17.912 & 2 & s5 1939@xmath3581 + knows 193706@xmath35744102 & upturn & no & ... & 22.221 &  & 1 & nvss j193702@xmath35744054
+ knows 200422@xmath35735505 & inverted & no & ... &  &  & - & nvss j200417@xmath35735505 + knows 200539@xmath35775252 & flat & qso & 0.342 &
14.039 & 13.372 & 2 & 2007@xmath35777 + knows 200955@xmath35722920 & flat & qso & ... & 20.623 & 19.475 & 2 & 4c@xmath3572.28 + knows 201716@xmath35744059 & flat & qso & 2.187 & 18.464 & 18.165 & 2 & 4c@xmath3574.25 + knows 202242@xmath35761131 & inverted & qso & ... & 20.265 & 19.087 & 2 & s5 2023@xmath3576 + knows 204240@xmath35750802 & peaked & qso & 0.104 & 17.132 & 16.152 & 1 & 4c@xmath3574.26 + knows 211402@xmath35820437 & flat & gal & 0.084 & 17.137 & 15.832 & 1 & s5 2116@xmath3581 + knows 213345@xmath35823904 & steep & qso & 2.357 & 21.414 & 19.450 & 2 & s5 2136@xmath3582 + knows 220039@xmath35805844 & flat & no & ... & 21.534 & 20.664 & 2 & 2201@xmath358043 + knows 220549@xmath35743632 & flat & gal & ... & 21.532 & 20.585 & 2 & s5 2205@xmath3574 + knows 230524@xmath35824232 &  & qso & ... & 18.390 & 17.336 & 2 & s5
2304@xmath3582 + knows 231226@xmath35724055 & flat & no & ... & 18.827 & 17.855 & 2 & nvssj231219@xmath35724127 + knows 231556@xmath35863130 & flat & no & ... & 20.992 & 18.721 & 2 & nvssj231549@xmath35863143 + knows 232713@xmath35801236 &  & no & ... & 22.170 & 20.618 & 2 & nvssj232706@xmath35801259 + knows 234405@xmath35822638 & steep & qso & 0.735 & 21.769 & 20.233 & 2 & 2342@xmath35821 + knows 235626@xmath35815255 & flat & qso & 1.344 & 21.155 & 18.584 & 2 & s5 2353@xmath3581 +    .redshift and luminosity statistics for the knows sources with redshift information .
[ cols="<,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     to better characterize the flat - spectrum source population , massardi et al .
( 2011a ) divided the sources of the at20 g fsr with flux densities measured at 5 , 8 and 20 ghz into five classes based on the place they occupy in a @xmath38 vs @xmath39 colour - colour plot , according to the following scheme :    * flat : @xmath40 and @xmath41 * inverted : @xmath42 and @xmath43 minus flat region * peaked : @xmath42 and @xmath44 minus flat region * upturn : @xmath45 and @xmath43 minus flat region * steep : @xmath45 and @xmath44 minus flat region    in fig .
[ fig:3flux ] we show the colour - colour plot divided according to this five - population scheme for the 50 sources in our sample with flux density measurements at 5 , 8 and 20 ghz .     vs @xmath39 ) with the five - population scheme described in the paper .
the spectral index error bars have the size of the symbols .
the central square confines the region of flat - spectrum sources and the diagonal dotted line corresponds to sources with single power - law radio spectra .
qsos are indicated by crosses , radiogalaxies by stars and sources without classification by diamonds.,height=302 ]    in table  [ tab : at20 g ] we show the comparison between the statistics of our sample and the ones in the at20 g fsr catalog ( massardi et al .
2011a ) and the paco bright sample ( massardi et al .
2011b ) for which the same scheme was adopted .
it is apparent that the flat - spectrum and steep - spectrum sources are the most represented in both our sample and the at20 g sample with the full sample ( s@xmath46 mjy ) providing the best match with our statistics .
the comparison with the paco bright sample ( massardi et al .
2011b ) , estimated with the source selection applied here to the spectral indices calculated on their best epoch fit of the sed between 4.5 and 40 ghz , clearly shows the higher fraction of flat spectrum sources dominating the population of sources selected above 200 mjy , while at our flux density limit the steep spectrum objects become more significant .
the fractions in the remaining sub - populations are comparable .
it is also worth noticing that all the remaining sources in the up - turn quadrant are classified as flat in table  [ tab : at20 g ] .
in this paper we presented the results of the multi - frequency follow - up observations of the k - band northern wide survey ( knows ) pilot project .
73 objects were observed at 5 , 8 and 20 ghz with the 32-m medicina radio telescope and 30 ghz with the toru radio telescope .
16 objects have a counterpart in the 30 ghz planck ercsc .
planck and toru 30 ghz flux densities are in reasonable agreement , indicating that our flux densities are not systematically biased .
the objects were identified through ned and supercosmos as radiogalaxies ( 27 per cent ) and qsos ( 68 per cent ) in agreement with previous works ( e.g. sadler et al .
two objects have no optical i d and one is a planetary nebula .    42 ( 58 per cent ) out of the 72 extragalactic objects have a redshift measurement : 30 are qsos and 12 are radiogalaxies . for 34 objects ( 24 qsos and 10 radiogalaxies )
we computed the optical and radio luminosity .
as expected , qsos are found on average at higher redshift than radiogalaxies and are intrinsically brighter both in the radio and the optical band .
four spectral indices in four contiguous frequency ranges were calculated : @xmath47 ; @xmath39 ; @xmath38 and @xmath48 . a clear steepening trend is visible both in the mean and median of the spectral indices when moving from lower to higher frequency ranges , a behaviour that is in agreement with what was found by massardi et al .
( 2011a ) for the at20 g full sample release .
we used radio colour - colour plots to compare the radio spectral properties of radio sources of different populations with the ones found in other high - frequency selected catalogues .
radiogalaxies mostly appear in the two lower quadrants ( corresponding to the steep - spectrum and gps - like classes ) while qsos are more scattered around the centre of the diagram indicating a prevalent flat radio spectrum : qsos are therefore more easily singled out in high frequency selected surveys .
our sample appears to be in substantial agreement with the at20 g fsr source population statistics when the latter sample is cut to the same flux density limit ( 100 mjy ) .
conversely , both our sample and the at20 g fsr statistics differ from the one of the sadler et al .
( 2006 ) sample for the up - turn , peaked and inverted spectral types even if all the samples have the same flux density threshold .
this work is based on observations performed with the medicina telescope , operated by inaf
istituto di radioastronomia .
we gratefully thank the staff of the medicina radio telescope for the valuable support provided .
rv used a grant of the estrela ( early - stage training site for european long - wavelength astronomy ) network during her phd .
rv thanks the staff of the toru observatory ( poland ) for their kind help with the 30  ghz follow - up observations and data reduction .
we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the royal society paul instrument fund which allowed us to construct the 30 ghz ocra - p receiver .
we are also grateful to the polish ministry of science and higher education ( grant number n n203 390434 ) .
we acknowledge the fundamental support provided by the european community through the framework program fp5 ( faraday ) and the contribution of radionet in the technological development of the italian k - band multifeed receiver . this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration .
this research has made use of data obtained from the supercosmos science archive , prepared and hosted by the wide field astronomy unit , institute for astronomy , university of edinburgh , which is funded by the uk science and technology facilities council .
the authors thank the referee merja tornikoski for the useful comments .
bonaldi a. , bonavera l. , massardi m. , de zotti g. , 2013 , mnras , 428 , 1845 bonavera l. , massardi m. , bonaldi a. , gonzlez - nuevo j. , de zotti g. ; ekers r.d . , 2011 , mnras , 416 , 559 browne i.w . , mao s. , wilkinson p.n .
, kus a.j . ,
marecki , a. , birkinshaw m. , 2000 , in `` _ ocra : a one - centimeter receiver array _ '' , proc .
spie , 4015 , 299 chhetri r. , ekers r.d .
, mahony e.k .
, jones p.a . , massardi m. , ricci r. , sadler e.m . , 2012 , mnras , 422 , 2274 ciaramella a. , bongardo c. , aller h.d . ,
aller m.f .
, de zotti g. , lhteenmaki a. , longo g. , milano l. , et al .
, 2004 , a&a , 419 , 485 condon j.j . , cotton w.d . ,
greisen e.w . ,
yin q.f . , perley r.a . , taylor g.b
. , broderick j.j . , 1998 , aj , 115 , 1693 de propris r. , colless m. , peacock j.a . ,
couch w.j . , driver s.p . , balogh m.l .
, baldry i.k . , baugh c.m . , et al . , 2004 , mnras , 351 , 125 gawronski m.p . , peel m.w . , lancaster k. , battye r.a . , birkinshaw m. , browne i.w.a . , davies m.l .
, davis r.j . , et al . , 2010 , mnras , 406 , 1853 hambly n.c . , macgillivray h.t .
, read m.a . ,
tritton s.b .
, thomson e.b . , kelly b.d . ,
morgan d.h . ,
smith r.e . , et al .
, 2001 , mnras , 326 , 1279 hafez y.a .
, davies r.d . , davis r.j . ,
dickinson c. , battistelli e.s . , blanco f. , cleary k. , franzen t. , et al . , 2008 , mnras , 388 , 1775 hovatta t. , tornikoski m. , lainela m. , lehto h. j. , valtaoja e. , torniainen i. , aller m.f . , aller h.d . , 2007 , a&a , 469 , 899 jones , d.h .
, read m.a . , saunders w. , colless m. , jarrett t. , parker q.a . , fairall a.p .
, mauch t. , et al .
, 2009 , mnras , 399 , 683 kesteven m.j .
, bridle a.h .
, brandie g.w .
, 1977 , aj , 82 , 541 kurinsky n. , sajina a. , partridge b. , myers s. , chen x. , lpez - caniego m. , 2013 , a&a , 549a , 133 larson d. , dunkley j. , hinshaw g. , komatsu e. , nolta m.r .
, bennett c.l . , gold b. , halpern m. , et al . , 2011 ,
apjs , 192 , 16 lowe s.r . ,
gawroski m.p . ,
wilkinson p.n . ,
, browne i.w.a . ,
pazderski e. , feiler r. , kettle d. , 2007 , a&a , 474 , 1093 mahony e.k .
, sadler e.m . , croom s.m . , ekers r.d . , bannister k.w . ,
chhetri r. , hancock p.j .
, johnston h.m . , et al . , 2011 , mnras , 417 , 2651 massardi m. , ekers r.d . , murphy t. , ricci r. , sadler e.m . , burke s. , de zotti g. , edwards p.g . , et al . , 2008 , mnras , 384 , 775 massardi m. , bonaldi a. , negrello m. , ricciardi s. , roccanelli a. , de zotti g. , 2010 , mnras , 404 , 532 massardi m. , ekers r.d . , murphy t. , mahony e.k . , hancock p.j . , chhetri r. , de zotti g. , sadler e.m .
, 2011a , mnras , 412 , 318 massardi m. , bonaldi a. , bonavera l. , lpez - caniego m. , de zotti g. , ekers r.d . , 2011b , mnras , 415 , 1597 murphy t. , sadler e.m . , ekers r.d . , massardi m. , hancock p.j . ,
mahony e.k . , ricci r. , burke - spolaor s. , et al . , 2010 , mnras , 402 , 2403 jorstad s.g . ,
aller m.f .
, aller h.d . , terasranta h. , 2005 , asp conf .
, 340 , 113 odea , c.p . , 1998 , pasp , 110 , 493 ott m. , witzel a. , quirrenbach a. , krichbaum t.p .
, standke k.j .
, schalinski c.j . ,
hummel c.a . ,
1994 , a&a , 284 , 331 peel m.w . , 2009 , phd thesis , university of manchester ( _ http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2760 _ ) peel m.w .
, gawronski m.p . ,
battye r.a . , birkinshaw m. , browne i.w.a . ,
davis r.j .
, feiler r. , kus a.j .
, et al . 2011 ,
mnras , 410 , 2960 planck collaboration , 2011 , a&a , 536 , 7 prandoni , i. , de ruiter h.r . , ricci r. , parma p. , gregorini l. , ekers r.d . , 2010 ,
a&a , 510 , a42 procopio p. , massardi m. , righini s. , zanichelli a. , ricciardi s. , libardi p. , burigana c. , cuttaia f. , et al . , 2011 , mnras , 417 , 1123 pyatunina t.b .
, kudryatseva d.c . ,
gabuzda d.c . , ricci r. , sadler e.m . , ekers r.d . , staveley - smith l. , wilson w.e .
, kesteven m.j .
, subrahmanyan r. , walker m.a .
et al . , 2004 ,
mnras , 354 , 305 richards j.l . , max - moerbeck w. , pavlidu v. , pearson t.j . , readhead a.c.s . , stevenson m.a
. , healey s.e .
, romani r.w .
et al . , 2011 , apjs , 194 , 29 righini s. , carretti e. , ricci r. , zanichelli a. , mack k .- h . , massardi m. , prandoni i. , procopio p. , et al . , 2012 , mnras , 426 , 210 sadler e.m .
, ricci r. , ekers r.d . , ekers j.a . ,
hancock p.j . ,
jackson c.a .
, kesteven m.j . , murphy t. , et al . , 2006 , mnras , 371 , 898 tauber j.a .
, mandolesi n. , puget j .-
, banos t. , bersanelli m. , bouchet f.r . , butler r.c .
, charra j. , et al . , 2010 , a&a , 520 , 1 taylor a.c . , grainge k. , jones m.e . ,
pooley g.g . , saunders r.d.e . ,
waldram e.m . , 2001 ,
mnras , 327 , l1 tucci m. , rubio - martin j.a . , rebolo r. , genova - santos r. , watson r.a .
, battye r.a . ,
cleary k.a . , davies r.d .
, et al . , 2008 , mnras , 386 , 1729