recently , there has been a great deal of activity aimed at studying the synchronization of coupled oscillators of diverse nature @xcite .
the theory of synchronization implies that even in uncoupled state the individual elementary units exhibit self - sustained oscillations
. however no less interesting are the systems where local coupling is essential for the very generation of oscillations and not only for their modulation or phase adjustment .    as far back as in early 1970s , smale @xcite constructed a counterintuitive mathematical example of a biological cell modeled by the chemical kinetics of four metabolites , @xmath0 , such that the reaction equations @xmath1 for the set of metabolites , @xmath2 , had a globally stable equilibrium .
the cell is `` dead '' , in that the concentrations of its metabolites always tend to the same fixed levels .
when two such cells are coupled by linear diffusion terms of the form @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is a diagonal matrix with the elements @xmath5 , however , the resulting equations are shown to have a globally stable limit cycle .
the concentrations of the metabolites begin to oscillate , and the system becomes `` alive '' . in smale s words :    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ there is a paradoxical aspect to the example .
one has two dead ( mathematically dead ) cells interacting by a diffusion process which has a tendency in itself to equalize the concentrations . yet in interaction , a state continues to pulse indefinitely .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _    the reaction equations involved in smale s model were too general to appeal to any specific process . since then , inspired by his pioneer work
, a number of models have been proposed containing biologically plausible mechanisms by which coupling of identical nonoscillating cells could generate synchronous oscillations . among them
are a model of electrically coupled cells , characterized by an excitable membrane and calcium dynamics @xcite , a model in which coupling a passive diffusive cytoplasmic bulk with an excitable membrane ( having an activator - inhibitor dynamics ) produces a self - sustained oscillatory behavior @xcite , an analog operational - amplifier implementation of neural cells connected by passive coupling ( where conductance of the resistive connection simulates the diffusion coefficient ) @xcite , etc .
the authors of the last model suggested a term awakening dynamics for the phenomenon .
the subject of the present paper is an emergence of collective oscillations in a system of coupled nonoscillatory consumer - resource ( cr ) pairs .
owing to simplicity , this model in a sense may be considered minimal .
our choice of coupled cr equations as a matter of enquiry is dictated primarily by the ubiquity and importance of cr interactions .
cr models are the fundamental building blocks used in mathematical description and simulation of ecosystems . depending on a specific nature of the involved cr interactions
, they can take the forms of predator - prey , plant - herbivore , parasite - host , and victim - exploiter systems @xcite .
however applications of the cr models extend far beyond the ecology and are found wherever one can speak of win - loss interactions . in its broad
meaning , resource is any substance which can lead to increased growth rate of the consumer as its availability in the environment is increased . as this takes place , the resource is certainly consumed .
consuming the resource means tending to reduce its availability .
when carefully examined , cr models are identified in the following fields : epidemiology ( susceptible and infected ( * ? ? ?
* ch . 10 ) ) , laser dynamics ( photons and electrons ( * ? ? ?
6 ) ) , labor economics ( share of labor and employment rate @xcite ) , theoretical immunology ( antigens and b lymphocytes @xcite ) , kinetics of chain chemical reactions ( lipid molecules and free radicals @xcite ) , and in numerous other studies from diverse disciplines .
we consider the situation when each of two consumer species exploits one respective resource only .
as explained in appendix , terms `` consumer '' and `` resource '' in our model may bear not only their literal ecological meaning , but the physical meaning of photon density and population inversion in a laser cavity as well . both resources
are being supplied with constant rates like in a chemostat and consumed according to a simple mass - action kinetics .
the resources are thought to be noninteractive . when uncoupled , self - inhibition of the individual consumer population is due to intraspecific interference .
the coupling is assumed to originate solely from the interspecific interference competition between the consumers and quantitatively expressed by a bilinear term combining the competitor densities .
the per individual loss rate of either consumer is proportional to the density of its counterpart .
representation of competition between species in terms of loss - coupling dates back to the classical model of lotka  volterra  gause ( lvg ) @xcite .
the lvg model operates with carrying capacities of the species , rather than referring explicitly to any essential resources . as shown by macarthur @xcite ,
lvg equations may be considered as a quasi - steady - state approximation to the cr equations accentuating resource - mediated nature of competition , under the assumption of relatively rapid dynamics of the involved resources .
thereafter trophic competition have developed into a major descriptor of competition in the ecological literature generally , and in conceptualizing ecosystems as systems of coupled cr oscillators specifically @xcite .
in contrast to the prevailing models of competition we consider the case of pure interspecific interference competition between the consumers with no consumption - induced contribution . actually , our model is nothing more nor less than lvg equations augmented with the rate equations for the resources .
another key assumption of the model is that the dynamics of the consumers is much faster than that of the resources .
from a physical perspective , by and large similar equations with the like time hierarchy ( fast consumer and slow resource ) have been in use for coupled longitudinal modes in a semiconductor laser with an intracavity - doubling crystal since the work of baer @xcite .
these equations have been treated mostly numerically .
the notable analytical result belongs to erneux and mandel @xcite who succeeded to show that the system admits antiphase periodic solutions by reducing it to the equations for quasi - conservative oscillator .
however this result has to do with the onset of low - amplitude quasi - harmonic oscillations . unlike their study , our approach deals with well - developed high - amplitude essentially nonlinear oscillations . besides , we propose the model to be valid not only for competing laser modes , but for loss - coupled lasers as well .
we analyze the model using geometric singular perturbation technique according to which the full system of equations is decomposed into fast and slow subsystems .
as we shall see below , the model reveals qualitatively different behavior at intense and weak competition between the consumer species . if coupling is strong , one of the consumers wins and completely dominates .
when coupling is weak , the model exhibits low - frequency antiphase relaxation oscillations with each species alternatively taking the dominant role .
the two - consumer , two - resource model we consider is the following nondimensional system of four ordinary differential equations :    [ coupled - uv ] @xmath6    here dots indicate differentiation with respect to the nondimensional time variable @xmath7 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( @xmath10 ) are quantities measuring the respective population sizes of @xmath11th resource and @xmath11th consumer , @xmath12 ( @xmath10 ) is the inflow rate of @xmath11th resource , @xmath13 is a parameter representing consumer self - limitation , @xmath14 ( @xmath15 and @xmath16 ) quantifies the inhibitory effect of @xmath17th consumer on the growth of @xmath11th consumer due to coupling , and @xmath18 is a singular perturbation parameter indicating that the dynamics of the consumers is much faster than that of the resources .
it should be mentioned that being proportional to its dimensional prototype , @xmath9 directly represents population density of consumer species and is always nonnegative .
quantity @xmath8 , however , is not a population size in the true sense of the word .
it is rather an affine transformation of a population size of the form @xmath19 , where @xmath20 and @xmath21 are scaling constants .
this is done for reasons of mathematical convenience . unlike a purely linear transformation
, an affine map does not preserve the zero point , so in @xmath22 corresponds to zero population size in reality .
nevertheless , from here on we shall apply the term `` resource '' to @xmath8 for brevity .    for more details and discussion on the derivation of the model from different perspectives the reader
is referred to appendix .
when @xmath23 , the communities are uncoupled and completely independent .
an isolated cr pair is governed by equations    [ isolated - uv ] @xmath24    there exist two nonnegative steady states :    [ steady - uv ] @xmath25    the linearization of takes the form @xmath26 where ( @xmath27 , @xmath28 ) is one of the above steady states .    at , one eigenvalue is negative and one is positive : @xmath29 , @xmath30 .
thus is a saddle point . at ,
@xmath31 and @xmath32 , so the steady state is a stable node / focus .
specifically , focus is the case for @xmath33 whence one obtains an asymptotic estimate @xmath34 fig .
[ fig01]c illustrates this focus - node bifurcation numerically .
damped oscillations is a well - known inherent feature of the photon - carrier dynamics in class - b lasers .
an isolated cr system admits therefore , only solution which tends asymptotically towards the unique steady state .
periodic solutions are excluded .
however the temporal dynamics of approaching this steady state essentially depends on the interplay between @xmath35 and @xmath36 , and is worth another look .
there are in fact three timescales , @xmath37 , @xmath38 and @xmath39 , involved in the cr system when it is overdamped , and two@xmath37 and @xmath38when underdamped .
system is singularly perturbed because the derivative of one of its state variables , @xmath40 , is multiplied by a small positive parameter @xmath35 .
singular perturbation cause two - time - scale behavior of the system characterized by the presence of slow and fast transients in the system s response to external stimuli .    replacing @xmath7 in with a fast time variable @xmath41 and setting @xmath42
we obtain the fast subsystem    [ isolated - fast ] @xmath43    where prime means differentiation with respect to @xmath44 . in the stretched timescale @xmath44 the slow resource variable @xmath45 , according to , is replaced by its initial value and reckoned as constant parameter .
equation is of a logistic type which has the solution @xmath46 valid for @xmath47 .    after a lapse of considerable time ( in the fast scale )
@xmath40 converges to either of two fixed points depending on a sign of @xmath45 : @xmath48 it means that every single trajectory starting within the positive quadrant of @xmath49 plane far enough from the stable steady state will run almost parallel to the vertical axis and hit the line @xmath50 practically in a finite time of order @xmath37 .
this is shown in fig .
[ fig01]a  b .
now set @xmath42 in to get the slow subsystem    [ isolated - slow ] @xmath51    the equation describes a slow manifold consisting of two lines in the @xmath49 plane : @xmath52 and @xmath53 . by ,
the former attracts all the trajectories in the first quadrant , while the latter  all those in the second .
inasmuch as the quasi - steady state of , @xmath54 , is an isolated root of and @xmath28 is a stable solution of for any @xmath55 , the assumptions of tikhonov s theorem @xcite are satisfied , and one may proceed to approximate @xmath45 and @xmath40 in terms of the solution of the reduced system in the slow timescale .
it means that after arriving at the slow manifold @xmath52 , the representing point of the full system will move along the manifold toward the equilibrium point with a characteristic velocity of order @xmath38 .    in the immediate proximity to equilibrium the behavior of the trajectory
is determined by the type of the fixed point , whether it is a node or a focus .
eventually this depends on the value of @xmath36 .
namely , close to a stable node , the system has two distinct real negative eigenvalues , one fast ( @xmath56 ) , and one slow ( @xmath57 ) : @xmath58 since @xmath59 , trajectories starting off the associated eigenvector 2 ( which is tangent to the slow manifold @xmath52 ) converge to that vector along lines almost parallel to eigenvector 1 ( which is parallel to the vertical axis @xmath40 ) .
as they approach vector 2 they become tangent to it and move along it up to the very nodal point ( fig .  [
fig01]a ) .
the characteristic time constant of this final stage is of order @xmath39 .    in the vicinity of a stable focus
the motion is qualitatively different : trajectories still keep converging to the equilibrium , but no longer follow the slow manifold @xmath52 ( fig .  [ fig01]b ) .
the reason is that for a focus eigenvectors are complex .
recalling that condition must be true for a focus , calculate the eigenvalues in a limit case of @xmath60 : @xmath61 loosely speaking , one may think that near a focal point separation of state variables into slow and fast ones ceases to have its conventional meaning .
there is no point to talk about motion along the slow manifold since there are no reduced one - dimensional systems corresponding to the neighborhood of a focus .
the perturbation parameter @xmath35 affects only the frequency of damped oscillation , but not the damping rate .
the radius of the focal spiral uniformly shrinks with a time constant of order @xmath38 .
to @xmath38 for small @xmath36 there is a way to recast the equations near the focal equilibrium @xmath62 in a convenient form where the perturbation parameter @xmath35 does not multiply any right hand side .
namely , performing the scaling @xmath63 , @xmath64 and @xmath65 , where @xmath66 , one obtains @xmath67 here dots stand for differentiation with respect to the time variable @xmath68 .
equations represent a weakly perturbed hamiltonian system . for @xmath69
the system is pure hamiltonian and admits the first integral @xmath70 which is a conserved quantity ( @xmath71 ) .
the periodic solutions of the hamiltonian system form a one - parameter family with the equilibrium @xmath72 as center point .
the condition @xmath73 makes equations quasi - conservative with phase trajectories slowly spiralling to the equilibrium ( fig .  [ fig02 ] ) .    system can be rewritten as a second order differential equation for @xmath74 only : @xmath75 this is the equation for a nonlinear quasi - conservative oscillator .
as is seen from , for @xmath76 and @xmath77 the oscillator is not only quasi - conservative , but also a quasi - linear with the frequency @xmath78 .
these conditions motivate introducing the new variable @xmath79 . as a result
one obtains @xmath80 this equation of quasi - conservative , quasi - linear oscillator will be used later on when analyzing the onset of synchronous periodicity .      in the following ,
we will distinguish two main types of coupling : strong , @xmath81 , and weak , @xmath82 .
physically feasible equilibria , or fixed points , @xmath83 , of are those for which @xmath84 . we denote the interior fixed point by @xmath85 , where the subscripts stand for the consumers .
lack of a certain index at a boundary fixed point means that the consumer concerned is not present ( extinct ) .
thus @xmath86 and @xmath87 designate either of one - consumer equilibria corresponding to dominance , while @xmath88 means both consumers having been washed out .    model has four feasible steady states . to @xmath38 for small @xmath36    [ ss ] @xmath89    where @xmath90 .
boundary equilibria @xmath91 , @xmath92 and @xmath93 always exist .
@xmath94 exists if    [ existf12 ] @xmath95    in case the expression with `` @xmath96 '' in is realized , while in case the one with `` @xmath97 '' is feasible .
@xmath91 is always unstable , because two of the four associated eigenvalues are positive : @xmath98    correct to @xmath38 in @xmath35 , the eigenvalues for @xmath92 and @xmath93 are    [ lambdaf1f2 ] @xmath99    whence it follows that and are stable when    [ stabilityf1f2 ] @xmath100    respectively .    the necessary and sufficient conditions for all the eigenvalues of the jacobian matrix , @xmath101 evaluated at @xmath94 , to have negative real parts are , from the routh  hurwitz criterion ,    [ routh ] @xmath102    where @xmath103 , @xmath104 , @xmath105 and @xmath106 are the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial @xmath107 of : @xmath108    to analyze the validity of we put @xmath109 , where @xmath110 .
then for to be true , @xmath111 should be met , which is incompatible with strong coupling , yet possible for weak coupling .
conditions and are always valid .
as is known , guarantees a simple complex conjugate pair of eigenvalues corresponding to a linearization about steady state @xmath94 to have negative real part . for @xmath111 it boils down to @xmath112 whence it follows that @xmath113 with regard to a fairly small value of @xmath35 , may be thought to be broken under most physically meaningful conditions unless coupling is infinitesimally weak .
hence , normally , condition of the routh  hurwitz criterion is never fulfilled and the interior fixed point @xmath94if it exists  is always unstable by growing oscillations .
existence and stability conditions of possible nonnegative equilibrium points are summarized in table [ tab1 ] .
.existence and stability conditions of nonnegative equilibria of system .
[ cols="<,<,<",options="header " , ]     [ tab1 ]      strong coupling in makes possible bistability of boundary equilibria , as evident from table [ tab1 ] .
when both @xmath92 and @xmath93 are stable with an unstable coexistence steady state @xmath94 , the system being studied is able to exhibit a hysteresis effect . given the strong coupling , suppose , that the inflow of resource 2 is kept at some constant level , @xmath114 , while the inflow of resource 1 , @xmath115 , steadily increases from a value less than @xmath116 along the line @xmath114 in the @xmath117 parameter plane , as shown in fig .
[ fig03]a . referring to and
, one sees that initially @xmath92 is unstable , @xmath93 is stable and @xmath94 does not exist with the complete dominance of consumer 2 . within the interval @xmath118 steady state @xmath92 becomes stable yet empty and
@xmath94 becomes existent ( according to ) yet unstable , so the situation remains unchanged until point @xmath119 in fig .
[ fig03]a has been reached from the left . for a larger @xmath115
, state @xmath93 gives up its stability and the system jumps to @xmath92 .
consumer 2 gets washed out , while consumer 1 takes over .
if now we start reducing @xmath115 , the system remains in @xmath92 until @xmath115 drops to the lower critical value @xmath116 , beyond which @xmath92 is no longer stable and there is a reverse jump to @xmath93 . in other words , as @xmath115 progresses along @xmath114 there is a discontinuous switch from consumer 2 to consumer 1 at @xmath120 , while as @xmath115 retraces its steps , there is a discontinuous switch from consumer 1 to consumer 2 at @xmath116 .
[ fig03]b illustrates how the steady state level of consumer 1 responds to infinitesimally slow changes of the inflow rate of its own resource .
the hysteresis is made possible thanks to the concurrent stability of both boundary equilibria and instability of the interior fixed point for @xmath121 . in terms of electronics ,
such a situation would describe a flip - flop circuit
bistable multivibrator  having two stable conditions , each corresponding to one of two alternative input signals .
as seen from table [ tab1 ] , the very existence of interior equilibrium @xmath94 in a case of weak coupling ( condition ) implies instability of both boundary fixed points , @xmath92 and @xmath93 .
system happens to possess four nonnegative steady states , none of them being stable .
as we have found , @xmath94 is unstable through growing oscillations .
in such a case , the model would thus be expected to have a limit cycle in its four - dimensional phase space corresponding to self - sustained oscillations .
as is known , hopf bifurcations come in both super- and subcritical types . if a small , attracting limit cycle appears immediately after the fixed point goes unstable , and if its amplitude shrinks back to zero as the parameter is reversed , the bifurcation is supercritical ; otherwise , it s probably subcritical , in which case the nearest attractor might be far from the fixed point , and the system may exhibit hysteresis as the parameter is reversed .    to check whether the bifurcation is supercritical or subcritical
, we employ the averaging method @xcite . for negligible @xmath36
the problem reduces to weakly coupled quasi - conservative oscillators .
introduce the new time @xmath122 , where @xmath123 .
the new dynamic variables @xmath124 and @xmath125 are defined by formulas @xmath126 and @xmath127 . thus the variables @xmath124 and @xmath125 are the respective deviations of @xmath128 and @xmath129 from their standalone steady state values . with these new variables equations
become    [ hamilton4 ] @xmath130    where dots mean differentiation with respect to @xmath68 and @xmath131 are the scaled coupling strengths .    for brevity , we restrict our consideration to the case of identical cr pairs and symmetric coupling setting @xmath132 and @xmath133 . with these assumptions system can be transformed to two coupled second - order equations for quasi - conservative , quasi - linear oscillators .
this can be done as follows .
first , and are solved for @xmath134 and @xmath135 . secondly , and are differentiated with respect to time to get @xmath136 and @xmath137 .
thirdly , @xmath134 , @xmath135 , @xmath138 and @xmath139 are plugged into the equations for @xmath136 and @xmath137 . and finally , @xmath125 are replaced by the new variables @xmath140 : @xmath141 .    as a consequence ,
we arrive at the following coupled equations : @xmath142 where @xmath143    we seek the solution of in the quasi - harmonic form @xmath144 where @xmath145 and @xmath146 are slowly varying amplitudes and phases , and @xmath147 is the frequency of the synchronous oscillations . differentiating the assumed form of @xmath140 and equating the result to the assumed form of @xmath148 yields the first pair of relationships between @xmath145 and @xmath146 : @xmath149    then , differentiating @xmath148 and substituting the resulting expression for @xmath150 as well as the assumed forms for @xmath140 and @xmath148 into yields the second pair of equations relating @xmath145 and @xmath146 .
separating into equations for the rate of change of @xmath145 and @xmath146 one obtains @xmath151 where @xmath152    to this point no approximations have been made except of the expansion in powers of @xmath153 in .
averaging equations over the period @xmath154 and considering @xmath145 , @xmath146 , @xmath155 and @xmath156 to be constants while performing the averaging , one obtains the following equations describing the slow variations of @xmath145 and @xmath146 :    [ aver1 ] @xmath157    where @xmath158 .
any stable fixed points of could mean that the phase difference between the coupled oscillators do not change in time ( @xmath159 ) , and the oscillations are periodic with constant amplitudes @xmath145 .
thus , finding the conditions when these fixed points are stable would mean finding the conditions at which the synchronization occurs .
equations show that the first approximation of the averaging method does not predict any nonzero steady - state amplitudes .
the reason for this seems to lie in the fact that the even terms in do not contribute to the value of integral . to take account of them we have to employ in what follows the second approximation of the averaging method . as to the phase difference , @xmath160
, we see that stable is only antiphase steady - state regime with @xmath161 .
let @xmath162 be the vector of the right - hand sides of
. also denote the operation of averaging by the angle brackets @xmath163 .
then @xmath164 will mean the right - hand sides of .
following the conventional procedure we retain only vibrational terms in @xmath162 , @xmath165 and integrate @xmath166 up to an arbitrary function of the amplitudes chosen for simplicity to be equal to zero : @xmath167 now , upon calculation of the jacobian matrix @xmath168 , we can write down the second approximation symbolically as @xmath169 ( the terms now neglected by averaging are of a higher order of magnitude with respect to the small parameters than the terms neglected in the first approximation . )    due to the symmetry of the case we may set @xmath170 enabling us to present the resulting equations of the second approximation as compact as possible :    [ aver2 ] @xmath171    the stable steady - state solution for the phase difference is @xmath161 . inserting this value into and putting @xmath172 we get three different steady - state solutions for @xmath20 ( including the trivial one ) , of which only one , @xmath173 being stable .
formula indicates a soft transition to sustained oscillations as the coupling parameter @xmath174 is progressively increased from a critical value .
thus we expect that the hopf bifurcation is supercritical .
[ fig04 ] plots @xmath175 phase planes for coupling strength below and above the hopf bifurcation . when @xmath176 ( consumers are decoupled ) the internal equilibrium is a stable focus ( fig .
[ fig04]a ) . for @xmath177 ( very weak coupling ; just below the bifurcation ) @xmath94 is still a stable focus , though a very gently winding one : the decay is slow ( fig .  [
fig04]b ) . for @xmath178 ( very weak coupling
; just above the bifurcation ) there is an unstable focus at @xmath94 and a stable oval limit cycle of small size representing low - amplitude quasi - harmonic oscillations ( fig .
[ fig04]c ) . on further increasing of coupling strength
the limit cycle continuously grows in size and takes an irregular shape indicating nonlinearity of the synchronous oscillations ( fig .
[ fig04]d  f ) .    as a practical matter ,
the range of very weak coupling not too far away from the hopf bifurcation , where oscillations are quasi - linear and quasi - harmonic , is of less concern to us than is the range of far more feasible not - too - weak coupling , corresponding to well - developed substantially nonlinear oscillations .
we are going to demonstrate that given conditions , system exhibits relaxation oscillatory behavior , with the two coupled cr pairs being antiphase locked .    by the assumption , @xmath179 , meaning that system is singularly perturbed .
the slow variables are resources , @xmath180 and @xmath181 , and the fast variables are consumers , @xmath182 and @xmath183 .
the standard practice of reducing such systems is the adiabatic elimination of the fast variables , when the left - hand side in the fast equation is replaced by zero , thus turning this differential equation into an algebraic equation .
it is assumed that the fast variables quickly relax to their momentary equilibrium , quasi - steady - state , values obtained from the algebraic equations , in which the slow variables are treated as parameters .
`` frozen '' slow variables do not move substantially in this short adaptation time of the fast variables .
quasi - steady - state values of the fast variables can then be expressed by values of the slow variables .
the fast variables hastily adapt to the motion of the slow variables .
the former are entrained by the latter .
the utility of quasi - steady - state approximation is that it allows us to reduce the dimension of the system by retaining only slow variables in the model .
one has to establish the validity of the adiabatic elimination in each specific case by using the recommendations of the singular perturbation theory @xcite .
in particular , tikhonov s theorem @xcite requires the quasi - steady state of the fast equations to be stable .    to decompose the full system into fast and slow subsystems , introduce fast time variable @xmath41 .
now rescale by replacing @xmath7 with @xmath184 and , after taking @xmath42 , it becomes    [ fast ] @xmath185    where prime means differentiation with respect to @xmath44 .
this is the fast subsystem , where @xmath180 and @xmath181 are replaced by their initial values and treated as parameters .
it yields inner solution , valid for @xmath47 .    setting @xmath42 in leads to the slow subsystem
[ slow ] @xmath186    which produces outer solution , valid for @xmath187 . in this singular limit as @xmath188 ,
the subsystem defines a slow flow on the surface ( slow manifold ) given by . outer solution is valid for those @xmath180 and @xmath181 , for which the quasi - steady states of the fast subsystem are stable .
we anticipate the dynamics of the full system in its four - dimensional phase space @xmath189 to consist of two typical motions : quickly approaching the slow manifold  , and slowly sliding over it until a leave point ( where the solution disappears ) is reached .
after that , the representing point may possibly jump to another local solution of .
thus , we ought to find all quasi - steady states of the fast subsystem , map the domains of their stability onto the slow phase plane @xmath190 , and then investigate the dynamics of the slow subsystem with piecewise continuous functions .
fast subsystem , which is nothing but the conventional lvg model , has four quasi - steady states
three boundary and one interior  denoted by @xmath191 (
the slow variables are deemed to be frozen ) :    [ qss ] @xmath192    existence and stability of these quasi - steady states is determined by @xmath190position of a representing point in the phase plane of the slow subsystem , shown in fig .
[ fig05]a .
@xmath191 , @xmath193 and @xmath194 always exist for all @xmath180 and @xmath181 from the positive quadrant of the slow phase plane . for not - too - weak coupling , such that @xmath195 , @xmath196 exists for all @xmath180 and @xmath181 satisfying the condition @xmath197 , i.e. within the opening of the angle formed by lines @xmath198 and @xmath199 in fig .
[ fig05]a .
the opening shrinks as the coupling strengths get weaker .
jacobian matrix of the fast subsystem , @xmath200 has the following sets of eigenvalues at :    [ eigqss ] @xmath201    based on one concludes that @xmath191 ( the origin ) is always an unstable node for all @xmath180 and @xmath181 from the positive quadrant of the slow phase plane .
@xmath193 is a stable node for @xmath202 , i.e. below the line @xmath203 in fig .
[ fig05]a , otherwise it is a saddle .
similarly , @xmath194 is a stable node for @xmath204 , i.e. above the line @xmath205 in the plane of slow variables , otherwise it is a saddle .
the interior quasi - steady state , @xmath196 , is always a saddle .
the performed typology of fixed points of the fast subsystem leads to three qualitatively different phase portraits depicted by fig .
[ fig05]b  d .
suppose initially @xmath193 is stable and @xmath194 is not .
consumer 1 completely dominates .
this corresponds to slow variables @xmath180 and @xmath181 being somewhere below the line @xmath205 of fig .
[ fig05]a .
fast subsystem has phase portrait of a type shown in fig .
[ fig05]b .
while @xmath180 remains much greater than @xmath206 , the dynamics of the resources ( treated as bifurcation parameters in reference to the consumers ) is described by a system of two independent equations    [ slow - piecewise1 ] @xmath207    which is a piecewise version of the slow subsystem for @xmath208 and @xmath209 .
system has stable steady state @xmath210 where @xmath211 .
this equilibrium lies in the upper left corner of fig .
[ fig05]a .
while heading to , the trajectory crosses the line @xmath205 and enters the domain of bistability of both @xmath193 and @xmath194 .
fast subsystem takes new phase portrait of a type presented by fig .
[ fig05]c . however the dominance of consumer 1 persists .    upon introducing the deviations @xmath134 and @xmath212 from the respective steady states , the system becomes    [ slow - piecewise1-xi - eta ] @xmath213    whence one finds @xmath214    it follows from , that the dynamics of variable @xmath180 is faster than that of @xmath181 due to small @xmath36 . clearly , the representing point must have relaxed to the vertical line @xmath215 well before approaching the horizontal line @xmath216 .
further developments depend on whether the involved individual cr systems are overdamped or underdamped .
if @xmath36 is great enough to damp intrinsic oscillations in the constituent cr pairs , the representing point will slide along the nullcline @xmath217 ( slow manifold of the system ) , steadily tending to point ( fig .
[ fig06]a ) .
if @xmath36 is small in terms of the condition , then the individual cr pairs are underdamped . in the immediate vicinity of @xmath218
the division of variables on slow and fast ones loses its meaning and the reduced equation is no longer valid . instead of one should write down two equations :    [ constituent - u1v1 ] @xmath219    however this system is identical to equations for an uncoupled cr system and , in essence , describes convergence to a focal point via dying oscillations . in the plane of slow variables
@xmath190 these oscillations manifest themselves in damped transverse fluctuations superimposed on the independent vertical motion along the nullcline @xmath217 ( @xmath220 ) toward point ( fig .
[ fig06]b ) .    by virtue of the condition
, the trajectory has to cross the line @xmath199 on its way toward the neighborhood of steady state .
as soon as this has happened , node @xmath193 in the plane @xmath221 will be absorbed by saddle @xmath196 .
a new phase portrait of the fast subsystem takes on the appearance of fig .
[ fig05]d .
consumer 1 rapidly washes out , and the alternative boundary quasi - steady state @xmath194 becomes stable , with consumer 2 dominating .    in terms of the four - dimensional phase space of full system ,
the representing point is now in the other stable branch of the slow manifold .
the motion over this alternative branch obeys the piecewise subsystem    [ slow - piecewise2 ] @xmath222    with the initial conditions @xmath223 and @xmath224 .
the dynamics of is basically similar to that of analyzed above .
system has a stable steady state @xmath225 where @xmath226 .
this equilibrium lies in the lower right corner of fig .
[ fig05]a .
variable @xmath181 , being more rapid in comparison to @xmath180 , quickly enters the neighborhood of the nullcline @xmath227 given by @xmath228 , and then  depending on the value of @xmath36finally approaches the nullcline either monotonically ( fig .
[ fig06]a ) or via damped oscillations according to equations    [ constituent - u2v2 ] @xmath229    ( fig .  [ fig06]b ) .
system describes underdamped intrinsic oscillations of uncoupled consumer 2 for small @xmath36 .    at the same time
, @xmath180 steadily and independently tends to @xmath230 .
again , because point is located below the line @xmath231 ( on the strengths of the condition ) , the trajectory would certainly cross that line at a point @xmath232 , whereupon node @xmath194 would be absorbed by saddle @xmath196 .
the system returns to the first branch of the slow manifold , and thereby the oscillatory cycle gets closed .
fig .  [ fig07 ] shows the results of a numerical integration of system for the case of underdamped individual consumer - research pairs .
the two coupled communities execute self - sustained relaxation oscillations which are antiphase - locked .
the resources @xmath180 and @xmath181 demonstrate sawtooth periodic pulses .
the oscillation range for the resource levels remains finite and , what is important , it does not depend on the intrinsic second order loss @xmath36 ( measuring intraspecific interference ) .
the times of motion over either branch of the slow manifold and add up to give a predominant contribution to the period of oscillations , @xmath233 .
these times are determined mainly by the dynamics of the slow resource variables @xmath180 and @xmath181 and , to a zeroth approximation in @xmath35 and @xmath36 , can be found as solutions to the equations of motion and with respective boundary conditions @xmath234 and @xmath235 . in this way one obtains a quite simple estimate for the period : @xmath236 it is interesting that , according to , the period depends on the ratio of the two resource inflows , @xmath115 and @xmath237 , rather than on each of them individually , and does not depend completely on concrete value of @xmath36 .
the consumers @xmath182 and @xmath183 change periodically between extinction and respective constant levels @xmath115 and @xmath237 .
very brief transient from zero to flat nonzero level within each cycle is accompanied by a highly pronounced spiky overshoot .
the magnitude of the spike tends to infinity as @xmath60 , in view of and .
depending on the intensity of intraspecific interference , the overshoot may or may not be followed by a tail of fading high - frequency oscillations , when a consumer variable falls below its steady - state value and then bounce back above , taking some time to settle close to its steady - state value . in signal processing ,
such a kind of transient oscillations is known as `` ringing '' .
there is no ringing if the involved cr pair does not oscillate due to significant intraspecific interference .
ringing takes place if intraspecific interference is negligible and therefore the involved cr pair is characterized by underdamped intrinsic oscillations .
the `` pitch '' of ringing is just the frequency of these intrinsic oscillations .
one notices that when one consumer is very scanty , the coupled system behaves like an isolated cr pair .
another essential feature of the dynamics is the role of the resource variables in determining when the consumers emerge and wash out .
when @xmath180 , for example , rises above a threshold value ( determined by the amount of losses experienced by @xmath182 ) then @xmath182 comes into dominance causing @xmath183 in turn to disappear .
so except for their transient spiking and ringing , the consumer levels , either flat nonzero or essentially zero , are determined by the hysteretic cycling of the respective resources .
scrutinizing a cycle of consumer oscillations one may distinguish four parts within it :    @xmath182 is essentially zero , while @xmath183 is approximately equal to its uncoupled steady - state value , @xmath237 .
@xmath180 increases due to its inflow until it overcomes losses for consumer 1 ;    with a sufficient resource stock , @xmath182 now emerges .
the population exhibits a spike due to the fast time scale of the consumer equations .
the sharp increase in population saturates the available resource level , so @xmath180 drops .
cross - losses cause @xmath183 to wash out ;    @xmath182 and @xmath180 relax to quasi - steady - state values , as if there were only one isolated cr pair .
@xmath183 is essentially zero .
@xmath181 is increasing , like @xmath180 did in part 1 ;    @xmath181 surpasses the losses , @xmath183 emerges and the subsequent cross - losses cause @xmath182 to wash out .
the spiking @xmath183 also causes a substantial decrease in the available stock of the associated resource .
the sequence begins again .    presenting
his famous model smale remarked that `` it is more difficult to reduce the number of chemicals to two or even three '' @xcite .
as distinct from smale s example , coupling in our case makes self - sustained synchronous oscillations possible for just two variables .
as we have seen , phase trajectory of the system constantly moves from the neighborhood of unstable boundary equilibrium @xmath92 where only consumer 1 is present , to the neighborhood of @xmath93 where consumer 2 completely dominates , back to @xmath92 , and so on in cyclic alternation .
this kind of trajectory was termed `` heteroclinic cycle '' by kirlinger @xcite .
a heteroclinic cycle occurs when the outflow ( unstable manifold ) from one saddle point is directly connected to the inflow ( stable manifold ) of another saddle point , and vice versa .
it is closely related to another notion of the nonlinear dynamics , a homoclinic cycle , which emerges when the unstable and the stable manifolds of the same saddle coincide and form a closed loop .
homo- and heteroclinic cycles are not robust structures in the sense that infinitesimally small change of system parameters destroy them .
however in the practical sense , any limit cycle passing in close proximity to saddle points will be indistinguishable from a heteroclinic cycle ( fig .
[ fig08 ] ) .
the only difference is strict periodicity , although the period of the limit cycle in a neighborhood of the heteroclinic cycle may be long .
besides , at the threshold of homo-/heteroclinic bifurcation the period is susceptible to external noise .    in the context of our model , as coupling becomes stronger , the stable limit cycle swells and passes closer and closer to boundary fixed points which are node - saddles or focus - saddles ( fig .
[ fig04]d  f ) .
depending on the interplay between the parameters , eventually it may bang into one or both of these equilibria creating either a homoclinic or heteroclinic cycle , respectively .
this corresponds to @xmath238 and @xmath239 . on further increasing the coupling , the saddle connection breaks and the loop
is destroyed .
it is worth noting that heteroclinic cycles were first found by may and leonard @xcite in a classical lvg system with competing three species .
however in their model the cycle is not truly periodic : as time goes on , the system tends to stay in the neighborhood of any one boundary equilibrium ever longer , so that the `` total time spent in completing one cycle is likewise proportional to the length of time the system has been running . '' moreover , may and leonard state that `` the phenomenon clearly requires at least three competitors , which is why it can not occur in models with two competitors . ''
this statement is echoed by vandermeer @xcite who extended their theory on higher dimensions : `` it appears to be the case that all cases of an odd number of species follow this basic pattern , whereas all cases of even number of species result in extinction of half of the components , leaving the other half living independently at their carrying capacities . '' in view of our results , the above conclusion is by far and away true providing one stays within the framework of classical lvg equations , which in fact imply a high rapidity of the resource dynamics . in our model of just two competitors
the slowness of the resource relative to the consumer is essential for the oscillations to occur , because it provides the necessary inertia to the system .
physically , our model is most likely feasible because it is based on the well - established rate equations for semiconductor lasers , and therefore should be considered as a model of anti - phase synchronization of two lasers via their loss - coupling .
ecologically , the feasibility of the model is tightly bound to justification of the adopted time hierarchy in system .
time scales are usually inverted in ecosystems , as opposed to lasers , the most common case being rapid consumption of food by species .
however it seems reasonable to propose that our model may describe the first level of an ecosystem , at which the consumers are autotrophs and the resources are mineral nutrients .
the ability to exploit different substrates leads to a possibility of stable coexistence of different organisms descending from the common ancestor .
divergent evolution is just the formation of new species : due to mutations two populations emerge with the same genetic code but having proteins able to process different substrates . providing the environmental conditions are quite stable on the evolutionary timescale ,
the inflows of inorganic substrates from the surroundings may be considered constant and the washout time of a substrate may occur much longer than the life expectancy of a species ( recall the definition of @xmath35 from ) .
we proposed a model of two cr pairs linked by interspecific interference competition .
when uncoupled , an individual cr pair has a unique stable steady state and does not admit periodic solutions . if intraspecific interference within the species is strong enough , the equilibrium is nonoscillatory ( stable node ) , otherwise the steadying occurs by decaying oscillations ( stable focus ) .
when coupled , the model behaves differently at strong and weak competitive interaction between the consumers . when coupling is strong , one of the consumers wins . which consumer wins or loses depends critically on the relative intensities of the resource inflows and coupling strengths . in the case of bistability ,
when the system acts like a bistable multivibrator ( flip - flop circuit ) , the winner may be determined by the initial conditions .
any static coexistence of competing consumers is not possible .
when coupling is moderately weak , the model reveals low - frequency antiphase relaxation oscillations represented by a continuous flow of rectangular pulses .
the system works as an astable multivibrator continually switching between its two states , neither of which is stable .
the consumers can not coexist even dynamically : in each of two alternating states one consumer completely dominates and the other is on the verge of extinction . the most intriguing feature of the model is that each of the participating cr pairs taken separately does not oscillate ; both communities are completely quiescent , however , in interaction , when coupled in a nonlinear way , the resulting system turns into a relaxation oscillator .    one way or the other
, it is believed that the proposed model for coupling - induced oscillations in nonoscillatory cr pairs can be considered as a minimal in that class of population - dynamical systems and its mechanism can be applied to networks with large numbers of nonoscillatory elements and complex architecture .
the author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper .
of all types of interactions between individuals of the same population ( intraspecific interactions ) or individuals of different populations ( interspecific interactions ) of the same trophic level competition is most commonly encountered . in a broad sense , competition takes place when each species ( individual ) has an inhibiting effect on the growth of the other species ( individual ) . an inhibiting effect
should be understood to mean either an increase in the death rate or a decrease in the birth rate .        here
dots indicate differentiation with respect to time @xmath7 , @xmath241 represents the total biomass of @xmath17th resource ( prey ) , @xmath242 stands for the total biomass of @xmath11th consumer ( predator ) species , the constant @xmath243 defines the growth rate of @xmath17th resource , @xmath244 is the carrying capacity of @xmath17th resource , @xmath245 is the rate of uptake of a unit of @xmath17th resource by each individual of @xmath11th consumer population , @xmath246 is the conversion efficiency parameter representing an amount of @xmath17th resource an individual of @xmath11th consumer population must consume in order to produce a single new individual of that species , @xmath247 is the loss rate of @xmath11th consumer due to either natural death or emigration .
all parameters in are nonnegative .
macarthur assumed population dynamics of the resources to be much faster than that of the consumers which enabled him to approximate @xmath241 in by its quasi - steady - state value derived by setting the right - hand side of to zero . as a result
, he succeeded to reduce slow - scale equation to the well - known lvg model @xcite      more recently , such an asymptotic reduction has also been carried out for a model of competition where species ( with continuous trait ) consume the common resource that is constantly supplied , under the assumption of a very fast dynamics for the supply of the resource and a fast dynamics for death and uptake rates @xcite .
cr model assumes that competition within and between consumer species is purely exploitative : individuals and populations interact through utilizing ( or occupying ) common resource that is in short supply .
quite on the contrary , lvg model describes competition strictly phenomenologically , as direct interference where consumers experience harm attributed to their mutual presence in a habitat ( e.g. through aggressive behavior ) .
however we have to stress that neither macarthur s reduction claims that interference competition entirely results from `` more fundamental '' trophic competition , nor it urges us to hastily consider direct competition as some derived concept .
what it actually states is that at slow - time scale associated with dynamics of the consumers , the effects of exploitation competition are indistinguishable from those of interference competition .
and at slow - time scale , coefficients @xmath249 of merely add to interference coefficients @xmath250 which are to be present primordially in .
most mathematical models dealing with coupled cr pairs or multilevel trophic chains ignore contributions of intraspecific and interspecific interference . indeed
, the empirical data like @xcite do indicate that @xmath251 may be negligible in comparison with @xmath249 .
still , works advocating the explicit account for direct interference show that incorporation of self - limitation and cross - limitation terms in the equations at the consumers level can provide for the stable coexistence of many species on few resources @xcite , @xcite .          instead of the logistic mode of resource supply ,
as is the case in macarthur s model , our model is based on so - called `` equable '' mode of resource exploitation @xcite , by which the quantities of available resources are held constant by a continuous - flow system . according to and , a constant concentration of @xmath17th resource ( @xmath15 ) flows into a defined volume with the rate @xmath253 while unused resource flows out with the per capita rate @xmath254 , in much the same manner as in a chemostat @xcite .    in more exact terms , the true chemostat model for one substrate and one species looks as follows : @xmath255 where the rate of substrate uptake is expressed by the monod formula @xmath256 , @xmath257 is a saturation constant numerically equal to the substrate concentration at which the uptake rate is half the maximum , @xmath258 is the dilution rate defined as the rate of flow of medium over the volume of the bioreactor , and @xmath259 is an input concentration of the substrate .        besides , in and intraspecific competition strength @xmath265 ( @xmath10 ) measures direct interference of individuals within @xmath11th consumer population with each other resulting in an additional per capita loss rate @xmath266 ; interspecific competition strength @xmath267 ( @xmath268 ; @xmath269 ) quantifies direct interference effect from @xmath68th consumer on @xmath11th consumer resulting in an additional per capita loss rate , @xmath270 , of the latter .
equations contain two important assumptions .
first , they assume that the resources are noninteractive . on higher trophic levels , however , resources may interact and the possibility of competition among the resources was originally pointed out by lynch @xcite .
since then , a whole series of theoretical papers have been published on two - predator , two - prey systems with interference competition between two self - reproducting prey species based on the lotka  volterra equations .
specifically , kirlinger @xcite describes the model in which each predator specializes on one prey only , while xiang and song @xcite treat a similar model in which each predator is allowed to feed on both prey .
a second assumption of our equations is that the consumers interact only directly , through interference competition , and can not compete through their use of resources , as each consumer specializes on one resource only .
the theory of pure trophic competition in equable models has been developed in the works @xcite .
intraspecific interference competition is allowed within the consumers as well . even though the available amount of any resource happened to be of a constant level , the population size of the associated consumer would remain finite due to self - limitation caused by direct intraspecific interference .
the novelty of model is that it considers time hierarchy of macarthur s cr equations to be reversed by assuming dynamics of the consumers to be much faster than that of the involved resources and articulates the importance of direct competition mechanisms within the framework of this assumption .          the parameters @xmath274 , @xmath275 and @xmath276 reflect the rapidity of the dynamics of @xmath181 , @xmath182 and @xmath183 with reference to that of @xmath180
it is assumed that @xmath277 and @xmath278 .    in studying the effect of coupling ,
the parameters of interest are obviously the coupling strengths , @xmath279 and @xmath280 .
the parameters of interest are also those which characterize the difference between the states of the uncoupled systems .
the resource income rates @xmath115 and @xmath237 are used as the control parameters that distinguish the relative base states of the two systems .
laser rate equations originally proposed by statz and demars @xcite are differential equations that relate two quantities : injected carrier density ( @xmath284 ) and photon density ( @xmath285 ) . for a single - mode semiconductor laser
, these equations take the form ( * ? ? ?
6 )      where dots mean differentiation with respect to time @xmath7 , @xmath287 is the injection current density ( pump parameter ) , @xmath288 is the magnitude of the electron charge , @xmath289 is the active - layer thickness , @xmath290 is the confinement factor accounting for the fraction of the light power contained in the active region , @xmath291 is the group velocity of light that can be expressed through the speed of light in vacuum ( @xmath292 ) and the group refractive index of the dispersive semiconductor material ( @xmath293 ) as @xmath294 , @xmath20 is the gain coefficient , @xmath295 is the carrier density at transparency corresponding to the onset of population inversion , @xmath296 is the lifetime of the electrons in the conduction band before being lost by escape from the active region , @xmath297 is the lifetime of photons inside the cavity before going out of the cavity or being absorbed inside the cavity . in the contribution of spontaneous emission is neglected .
typical parameter values for a semiconductor laser ( mostly borrowed from @xcite ) are given in table [ taba1 ] .
these numerical values are used in the calculations throughout the present paper , unless otherwise noted .
lll + ( r)1 - 2 notation & meaning & value + @xmath287  ( @xmath298 ) & pump current density & @xmath299  ( 1.19375 ) + @xmath289 & active layer thickness & @xmath300 + @xmath290 & confinement factor & @xmath301 + @xmath293 & group refraction index & @xmath302 + @xmath20 & differential gain coefficient & @xmath303 + @xmath295 & carrier density at transparency & @xmath304 + @xmath296 & carrier lifetime & @xmath305 + @xmath297 & photon loss time & @xmath306 + @xmath35 & @xmath307 & @xmath308 + @xmath258  ( @xmath36 ) & intrinsic second order loss & @xmath309  ( 0.01 ) +      consider two ( not necessarily identical ) lasers of type and introduce additional intensity - dependent losses such that each laser , @xmath11 , of the two has a total loss represented by the sum of the constant loss , @xmath310 , plus the loss proportional to its own intensity , @xmath311 , plus the loss proportional to the intensity of the other laser , @xmath312 :      where @xmath314 ( @xmath10 ) is the second order loss constant of the isolated @xmath11th laser and @xmath315 is the coupling strength measuring the cross - loss effect of @xmath11th laser on @xmath17th laser .
thus according to , two lasers happen to be cross - coupled through their resonators , so that each of them can modulate the cavity loss of the other .
technically , intensity - dependent intrinsic and cross - losses may be implemented , for example , using an intracavity electro - optic modulator fed by a current proportional to the output power @xcite .
we will consider the pump currents @xmath316 and @xmath317 , and the coupling strengths @xmath318 and @xmath319 , as free parameters of the model .
for the present , we can not judge with any confidence the numerical value of @xmath320 , however , as it is demonstrated in the main body of the paper , the exact value of the intrinsic second order loss is not all that critical and does not affect principal results of our analysis , providing that this parameter is small in a sense .
for the purposes of model calculations , we adopt @xmath320 to be somewhat less than @xmath321 .    presumably , hofelich - abate and hofelich @xcite were first to introduce ( in general form ) an intensity - dependent self - limitation term in the photon - density rate equation .
later , that has been done in an explicit form of the second order loss @xcite .
those and subsequent studies @xcite showed efficient damping of relaxation oscillations in the presence of intensity - dependent losses .
as to the formal analysis of laser coupling via intensity - loss cross - modulation , very few attempts have been done so far to consider such a mechanism  e.g .
@xcite and @xcite . the former work , however , does not treat intrinsic second order losses .
the works which address loss - coupled modes of a single laser rather than loss - coupled single - mode lasers are much more plentiful and varied , and we refer the reader for the reviews in ( * ? ? ?
* ch . 8) and
12 ) . in his seminal paper @xcite , baer studied multimode regime of nd : yag ( neodymium - doped yttrium aluminum garnet ) laser with the intracavity - doubling ktp ( potassium titynal phosphate ) crystal both experimentally and numerically , and proposed the following rate equations for two coupled longitudinal modes :      where @xmath323 and @xmath324 ( @xmath10 ) are the respective gain and intensity of @xmath11th mode , @xmath325 is the fluorescence lifetime , @xmath326 is the small - signal gain ( pump parameter ) for @xmath11th mode , @xmath327 is the saturation parameter which determines how strongly the intensity depletes the available gain , @xmath328 is the cross - saturation parameter for modes 1 and 2 , @xmath296 is the cavity round - trip time , @xmath329 is the loss of @xmath11th mode , @xmath35 is the nonlinear coupling coefficient , which models the intracavity - doubling crystal as an intensity - dependent loss in the laser resonator .    the last two terms in and represent second order losses that are due to intracavity second - harmonic generation and sum - frequency generation , respectively .
numerical calculations revealed antiphase synchronous oscillations in . in antiphase state , either mode has precisely the same time profile being shifted by @xmath330 of a period from its counterpart .
this type of dynamics was later observed in a multimode @xmath331:yag laser with intracavity doubling crystal @xcite . for @xmath284 antiphase oscillators ,
the phase shift between any nearest neighbors is @xmath332 of a period .
the scaling @xmath334 turns into nondimensional form .
since the lasers are made of the same material , we can put @xmath335 , @xmath336 , @xmath337 , @xmath338 , @xmath339 , @xmath340 , @xmath341 , and @xmath342 , whence @xmath281 , @xmath282 and @xmath283 , and we arrive , dropping the prime at @xmath7 , at the set of equations .
s.  smale , `` a mathematical model of two cells via turing s equation , '' in _ some mathematical questions in biology v _
( j.  d. cowan , ed . ) , vol .  6 of _ lectures on mathematics in the life sciences _ , pp .  1526 , providence , ri : american mathematical society , 1974 .
y.  loewenstein , y.  yarom , and h.  sompolinsky , `` the generation of oscillations in networks of electrically coupled cells , '' _ proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america _ , vol .
98 , no .
14 , pp .  80958100 , 2001 .
i.  szatmri and l.  o. chua , `` awakening dynamics via passive coupling and synchronization mechanism in oscillatory cellular neural / nonlinear networks , '' _ international journal of circuit theory and applications _ , vol .
36 , no .  5 - 6 , pp .
525553 , 2008 .
d.  s. chernavskii , e.  k. palamarchuk , a.  a. polezhaev , g.  i. solyanik , and e.  b. burlakova , `` a mathematical model of periodic processes in membranes ( with application to cell cycle regulation ) , '' _
biosystems _ , vol .  9 , no .  4 , pp .
187193 , 1977 .
t.  baer , `` large - amplitude fluctuations due to longitudinal mode coupling in diode - pumped intracavity - doubled nd : yag lasers , '' _ journal of the optical society of america b : optical physics _ , vol .  3 , no .  9 , pp .
11751180 , 1986 .
m.  devetter and j.  sed , `` the relative role of interference competition in regulation of a rotifer community during spring development in a eutrophic reservoir , '' _ international review of hydrobiology _ , vol .
93 , no .  1 ,
pp .  3143 , 2008 .
f.  m. stewart and b.  r. levin , `` partitioning of resources and the outcome of interspecific competition : a model and some general considerations , '' _ american naturalist _
107 , no .
954 , pp .  171198 , 1973 .
a.  ghosh , b.  k. goswami , and r.  vijaya , `` nonlinear resonance phenomena of a doped fibre laser under cavity - loss modulation : experimental demonstrations , '' _ pramana - journal of physics _ , vol .  75 , no .  5 , pp .
915921 , 2010 .
j.  tian , y.  yao , j.  j. xiao , x.  yu , and d.  chen , `` tunable multiwavelength erbium - doped fiber laser based on intensity - dependent loss and intra - cavity loss modulation , '' _ optics communications _ ,
285 , no .  9 , pp .  24262429 , 2012 .
a.  kellou , k.  at - ameur , and f.  sanchez , `` suppression of undamped oscillations in erbium - doped fibre lasers with intensity - dependent losses , '' _ journal of modern optics _ ,
45 , no .  9 , pp .  19511956 , 1998 .
f.  li , j.  n. kutz , and p.  k.  a. wai , `` characterizing bifurcations and chaos in multiwavelength lasers with intensity - dependent loss and saturable homogeneous gain , '' _ optics communications _ , vol .
285 , no .  8 , pp .  21442153 , 2012 .
a.  el amili , g.  kervella , and m.  alouini , `` experimental evidence and theoretical modeling of two - photon absorption dynamics in the reduction of intensity noise of solid - state er : yb lasers , '' _ optics express _ , vol .
21 , no .  7 , pp .
87738780 , 2013 .