disk galaxies exhibit many designs : bars , rings , and spiral structure .
the structure and placement of rings and bars are widely believed , on numerical and analytical grounds , to be governed by resonance .
a resonance is a rational relationship between two frequencies .
inner and outer rings form at radii that are resonant with the angular frequency of the bar pattern ( schwarz 1981 ; buta 1986 ; buta & crocker 1991 ) .
a strong bar ends near its corotation resonance ( contopoulos 1980 ) , referred to hereafter as `` cr '' .
many disk galaxies show spiral patterns , some of which are beautiful , two - armed spirals .
what effect do resonances have on the appearance of spiral patterns ? first consider barred spirals .
it was once widely believed that the bar was capable of `` driving '' spiral structure ( e.g. , van albada & roberts 1981 ) or of providing a source of disturbances that might be swing amplified into spiral structure ( toomre 1977 ) .
then the bar and the spiral patterns would be resonantly related .
but sellwood & sparke ( 1988 ) have suggested that spiral patterns need not be resonantly related to bars .
kinematic data for few galaxies have been analyzed to see if the resonant link exists between bars and spirals .
bar and spiral are part of the same pattern in both ngc1365 and ngc4321 , for example , but the transition from bar to spiral is at the cr in ngc1365 ( lindblad , lindblad , & athanassoula 1996 ) while it is at the inner 4:1 resonance in ngc4321 ( elmegreen , elmegreen , & montenegro 1992 ; sempere et al .
1995 ; canzian & allen 1997 ) .
apart from these two galaxies , there are differences between strongly and weakly barred spirals to consider , as well as differences between flat and exponential bars .
spiral patterns exist in disks without bars , too .
spiral density waves are constrained to exist between the inner and outer lindblad resonances , hereafter `` ilr '' and `` olr '' .
aside from this constraint , the role of resonances in shaping pure spiral morphology is uncertain .
many signatures of resonance structures have been suggested and used with varying success .
dust lanes may jump to the other sides of spiral arms across the cr ( roberts 1969 ) .
star formation may be less efficient within spiral arms near cr ( seen in ngc0628 and ngc3992 by cepa & beckman 1990 and in m51 by knapen et al .
1992 but not in ngc4321 by knapen et al .
enhanced star formation may occur in the interarm region at the cr , and at the inner 4:1 resonance there may be brightness minima in the arms and spurs should erupt in the interarm region ( elmegreen et al .
1989 , 1992 ) .
not all of the above prescriptions work in all cases .
tests of the above prescriptions can follow only when clear determinations of resonance locations have been made for many spirals .
confirmation of resonance locations requires kinematic data .
such data derive from emission line mapping , which is difficult and time consuming
. it would be more rewarding to study galaxies for which interesting resonance locations were known beforehand to be at easily studied radii in the bright disk .
the cr is one of the most interesting resonances to study .
this paper presents a test to identify galaxies whose cr is favorably placed for study ( within the bright disk ) .
the test requires only moderately deep imaging in typical seeing .
no rotation curve data are necessary .
the test is not completely determinate : galaxies with cr within the bright disk can be missed .
this is the price paid for operating in ignorance of the rotation curve shape and spiral pattern speed .
however , the test is reliable : when a suitable galaxy is identified , there is a good chance that its cr is , indeed , within the bright disk .
the basis of the test to identify galaxies with well - placed cr is presented in  [ sec_extensive ] .
the section also investigates how much effect the shape of the rotation curve and the spiral pattern speed have on the outcome of the test .
[ sec_observations ] outlines the observations .
the analysis of the imaging is described in  [ sec_analysis ] .
this includes not only a description of the measurements made but also some surface photometry to estimate how deep the imaging reaches .
the results are presented in
 [ sec_discussion ] , where promising galaxies are described and where the different characteristics of barred and pure spirals are discussed .
spiral structure is constrained to be between the ilr and olr of the spiral pattern .
the cr is between the ilr and olr .
it is not known how often spiral structure remains relatively bright , or even optically detectable , at radii approaching the olr .
spiral structure is probably detectable at the cr in most galaxies .
we seek galaxies for which the spiral structure is not merely detectable , but is genuinely bright , at the cr . by implication ,
the spiral structure would then stretch most of the way between the ilr and olr .    to test for placement of the cr within the bright disk , first measure the inner and outer extent of the spiral structure from deep imaging in typical seeing .
when the measured ratio of the outer to inner extent exceeds the `` typical '' ratio of cr to ilr radius ( described in  [ sec_flatrc ] ) , the spiral structure appears to have needed more space than is available just between the ilr and cr .
therefore , the cr is in the optically detectable part of the disk
. the larger the measured ratio , the deeper into the bright part of the disk the cr might be .
consider a flat rotation curve .
( more realistic shapes will be considered in  [ sec_shape ] . ) at the cr , disk material has an orbital frequency equal to the angular frequency of the spiral pattern : the stars and pattern corotate .
that is , @xmath0 at the cr , where @xmath1 is the pattern angular frequency , @xmath2 is the circular rotation speed , and @xmath3 is the corotation resonance radius . at the lindblad resonances , the material experiences the entire pattern exactly once each orbit . at the ilr
, the material sweeps through the pattern , while at the olr , the pattern catches up with and passes through the material . consider a two - armed spiral pattern . at the lindblad resonances , @xmath4 where @xmath5 is the epicyclic frequency , the @xmath6 sign refers to olr , the @xmath7 sign to ilr , and @xmath8 is the number of spiral arms .
( only two - armed spirals will be considered in this paper . )
figure  [ fig_flatfreq ] shows graphs of angular frequencies computed for a flat rotation curve .
@xmath9 is a decreasing function exterior to the ilr .
let @xmath10 be the innermost and let @xmath11 be the outermost measured radii of the spiral structure .
@xmath12 implies @xmath13 the epicyclic frequency is ( e.g. , binney & tremaine 1987 ) @xmath14^{1/2},\ ] ] and for a flat rotation curve , @xmath15 equations  [ eq_a ] and  [ eq_kappa ] lead to @xmath16 since @xmath17 , equation  [ eq_rilrr2 ] implies @xmath18 is the test of whether the observed spiral structure could fit between the ilr and cr . see
[ sec_shape ] for necessary modifications and interpretation of equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] when the rotation curve is not flat . the numerical coefficient in equation  [ eq_ilrcr ]
was referred to in  [ sec_extensive ] as the `` typical '' ratio .
what is the characteristic of spiral structure bounded between the ilr and olr ?
@xmath17 implies that @xmath19 equations  [ eq_r1rilr ] and  [ eq_kappa ] imply that @xmath20 since @xmath21 , @xmath22 then equations  [ eq_kappa ] and  [ eq_r2rolr ] imply @xmath23 combining equations  [ eq_r1rcr ] and  [ eq_r2rcr ] leads to the condition @xmath24
how does the shape of the rotation curve change the results of  [ sec_flatrc ] ?
four functional forms for rotation curves will be explored .
rotation curves that are not strictly flat lead to numerical coefficients somewhat different than , but still close to , those in equations  [ eq_ilrcr ] and  [ eq_ilrolr ] , so small violations of equations  [ eq_ilrcr ] or  [ eq_ilrolr ] are expected .    a rotation curve that is linearly rising or falling ( having functional form @xmath25 for @xmath26 and @xmath27 small ) will alter the values of the `` typical '' resonance ratios ( equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] or equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ) .
the changes are generally small and are independent of the value of @xmath28 .
figure  [ fig_4graph]_a _ shows the variation of the @xmath29 and @xmath30 ratios for @xmath31 .
the @xmath29 curve is asymptotic to @xmath32 and the @xmath33 curve is asymptotic to @xmath34 , diverging strongly only for very low pattern speeds .
consider the following family of rotation curves : @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the rotation speed as a function of radius @xmath37 and @xmath28 and @xmath27 are free parameters . for small @xmath37 , @xmath38 is approximately linear , and for large @xmath37 , @xmath39 is approximately constant , thus approximating the shapes of many real rotation curves .
graphs of the ratios @xmath29 and @xmath40 are shown in figure  [ fig_4graph]_b _ for the equation  [ eq_rcfamily ] family .
the ratios are independent of the asymptotic rotation speed and the slope of the inner part .
the ratios depend weakly on pattern speed until the pattern speed is a significant fraction ( over 50% ) of the value at the peak of the @xmath41 curve .
the curvature of the @xmath41 curve ( see figure  [ fig_freq ] ) pulls the ilr to a smaller radius than for a flat rotation curve .
the smaller inner radius , used as the divisor in equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] or equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] , will cause the computed value exceed unity . for the equation  [ eq_rcfamily ] rotation curves , the equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] value reaches 1.71 when the pattern speed is 75% of the angular frequency at the peak in @xmath41 .
( when the equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] value is 1.71 , the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio is unity . )
the equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] ratio equals 2 when the pattern speed is at 86% of the angular frequency at the peak .
if the pattern speed exceeds the value at the peak , then there is no ilr , and spiral structure may ( in principle ) extend to the center of the disk
. then the @xmath29 and @xmath30 ratios can be arbitrarily large .
equations  [ eq_ilrcr ] and  [ eq_ilrolr ] will be called the `` canonical '' tests ; replacing the unit value of the inequality by 2 will be called the `` conservative '' tests .
when the conservative equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] test is applied , we are protecting ourselves against the case ( a `` false positive '' ) of a galaxy with a non - flat rotation curve giving a false indication that its cr is within its bright optical disk .
the power law is another family of rotation curve forms : @xmath42 many dwarf galaxies and a moderate fraction of low surface brightness disk galaxies have rotation curves that are well approximated by a power law out to the farthest observed radius ( de blok , mcgaugh , & van der hulst 1996 ; pickering et al .
current thinking on galaxy formation suggests that rotation curves that have an inner power - law form will flatten out at larger radius ( dalcanton , spergel , & summers 1997 ) .
but it is nonetheless worth while to derive the resonance ratio tests when the rotation curve is a power law , since it is possible that the ilr and olr are within the power law - like region of the rotation curve .
rising rotation curves are given by positive values of the exponent @xmath27 , with small values approximating a flat rotation curve ; slowly falling but nearly flat curves are given by negative values of the exponent @xmath27 .
for power law rotation curves , @xmath43^{1/(b-1)}.\label{eq_powlaw_ilrcr}\ ] ] and @xmath44^{1/(b-1)}.\label{eq_powlaw_ilrolr}\ ] ] graphs of the variation of these ratios with exponent @xmath27 are shown in figure  [ fig_4graph]_c_. although the ratios are a bit smaller than the canonical test values ( equations  [ eq_ilrcr ] and  [ eq_ilrolr ] ) for the smallest reasonable values of @xmath27 , the range between the canonical test value and the conservative test value includes most of the variation of the ratio graphs .
consider finally the hybrid form ( elmegreen & elmegreen 1990 ) : @xmath45.\label{eq_hybrid}\ ] ] some examples of rotation curves of this shape are shown in fig .  4 in elmegreen & elmegreen ( 1990 ) .
numerical solution for the resonance ratios led to the curves graphed in figure  [ fig_4graph]_d_. in this case , too , the range between the canonical test value and the conservative test value includes much of the variation in the resonance ratios shown in fig .
[ fig_4graph]_d_.    in all cases of realistic rotation curve shapes examined above , most of the variation in the resonance ratios falls within the range between the canonical and conservative tests derived for a flat rotation curve . for many rotation curves , the ratio is smaller than that for a flat rotation curve ( see , e.g. , fig .
[ fig_4graph]_d _ ) .
the consequence of small ratios is that some interesting candidates may not be noticed .
galaxies with such rotation curves might have only a modest extent of spiral structure as measured by the canonical test , yet the extent of spiral structure could be near the maximum allowed by the location of the lindblad resonances
. such a galaxy would be missed by the test proposed here .
although this circumstance decreases the efficiency of identifying promising galaxies , it also decreases the likelihood of incorrectly selecting a galaxy that does not , in fact , have its cr within its bright disk .      in a private discussion ,
a.  toomre noted potential problems that might result by assuming a unique pattern speed for the spiral structure , as was done in   [ sec_flatrc]-[sec_shape ] .
it is possible that the spiral structure is produced from spiral density waves with a range of pattern speeds about a well - defined characteristic pattern speed . there
would then be both a general broadening of the observed pattern and an apparent penetration of the lindblad resonances of the characteristic pattern .
this effect can be seen in fig .
8 of toomre ( 1981 ) , a classic illustration of a swing amplified spiral density wave , where the inner parts of the spiral become tightly wrapped and appear to penetrate the ilr .
the model was constructed from spiral density wave packets with a gaussian distribution of pattern speeds . to avoid the pitfalls of a spread of pattern speeds , only clearly defined spiral structure
was measured for this paper , letting the seeing blur any high frequency interior structure , which was ignored .
in contrast , spiral structure that is a mode of the disk may have a single pattern speed , as will spiral structure produced through swing amplification of a groove mode . in these cases , apparent extension of the spiral structure through lindblad resonance should not be apparent .
ccd frames have been obtained for 140 galaxies .
the observations span the period 1993 august 12 to 1997 september 7 .
all observations were made using the u.s .
naval observatory @xmath46 telescope with any of four ccd detectors : either of two texas instruments @xmath47-pixel ccd s ( the so - called `` banana '' and `` flat '' chips ) , a tektronix @xmath48-pixel ccd , or a tektronix @xmath49-pixel ccd .
the image scale was @xmath50 for the ti chips and @xmath51 for the tektronix chips .
all the observations reported here were during nights that were photometric or that had light cirrus at worst ; all frames reach comparable photometric depth . seeing
ranged from 1.4@xmath52 full width at half maximum .
total exposure times were 30 minutes for all regular two - armed spiral galaxies except for the following : ngc4321 ( 40 minutes ) , eso437-g044 ( 60 minutes , but very large zenith distance ) , ngc3054 ( 40 minutes ) , and ngc3433 ( 40 minutes ) . in cases where the nucleus was inordinately bright , two or more shorter exposures were stacked .
all exposures used a johnson @xmath2-band filter to attain large contrast in the spiral structure with reasonable exposure time .
two classes of galaxies make up the observing list : physically large spirals and grand design spirals . because rotation curves of spirals are usually flat , physically large spirals have a good chance of having spiral structure so extensive that the cr is within the bright disk . the enormous galaxy ugc02885 ( roelfsema & allen 1985 ; canzian , allen , & tilanus 1993 ) is the archetype of this class .
( if rotation curves were usually linearly rising , instead of flat , then the scale - free form of a logarithmic spiral would not favor any particular size of spiral galaxy for this investigation . ) data from the literature were processed to find physically large spiral galaxies . contributing to the list are observations by baiesi - pillastrini ( 1983 ) ; bicay & giovanelli ( 1986a , b , 1987 ) ; freudling , haynes , & giovanelli ( 1988 ) ; giovanelli & haynes ( 1985a , b , 1989 , 1993 ) ; giovanelli et al .
( 1986 ) ; gordon & gottesman ( 1981 ) ; haynes & giovanelli ( 1984 , 1986 , 1991 ) ; haynes et al .
( 1988 ) ; hewitt , haynes , & giovanelli ( 1983 ) ; huchtmeier & richter ( 1989 ) ; kyazumov ( 1984 ) ; lewis ( 1985 ) ; nilson ( 1973 ) ; romanishin ( 1983 ) ; sandage & tammann ( 1981 ) ; scaglia & sancisi ( 1988 ) ; schneider et al .
( 1986 ) ; scodeggio & gavazzi ( 1993 ) ; stavely - smith & davies ( 1988 ) ; de vaucouleurs , de vaucouleurs , & corwin ( 1976 ) ; wegner , haynes , & giovanelli ( 1993 ) . table  [ tab_large50inh ] lists the 50 largest spiral galaxies assembled from the above sources .
an index of physical size , the product of doppler velocity and angular size , was used to rank the galaxies . the same galaxy reported in several sources will appear several times in the list from which table  [ tab_large50inh ] was culled .
in most cases , the several entries for the same galaxy were not wildly separated in the ranked list .
table  [ tab_large50hom ] lists the 50 largest spiral galaxies in the rc3 ( de vaucouleurs et al .
1991 ) , a homogeneous catalog .
( in table  [ tab_large50hom ] , the velocity is with respect to the 3k background . )
tables  [ tab_large50inh ] and  [ tab_large50hom ] include only spirals with morphological type between sb and sc ( inclusive ) to help ensure enough @xmath53 for emission line mapping ( if desired ) and to avoid the ragged spiral structure of sd and later types .
( the analysis of   [ sec_flatrc]-[sec_shape ] does not apply to multiple - armed or flocculent spirals . ) sometimes the literature source only specified that the object was a spiral ( morphological type `` s '' ) , usually because the object was too distant to show enough structure to determine a hubble subtype .
such cases were permitted in the observing list because the source material may have been poor and a much better ccd frame could reveal more structure .
in addition , the inclination of the galaxy was restricted to be in the range @xmath54 to @xmath55 , based on major and minor axis angular sizes , so that the spiral structure would be clear and later kinematic analysis would be possible .
many of the galaxies in tables  [ tab_large50inh ] and  [ tab_large50hom ] were observed as part of the observing program reported in this paper .
grand design spirals of all sizes were sought in addition to the physically large spirals .
objects from elmegreen et al .
( 1987 ) with arm class 12 ( `` grand design '' ) were chosen in addition to objects whose photos in atlases ( sandage & bedke 1988 ; sandage & tammann1981 ; wray 1988 ) showed clear two - armed grand design spiral structure .
table  [ tab_obslist ] shows the final list of objects observed with brief comments about their spiral structure .
two - armed grand design spirals ( called `` 2-arm g.d . '' in table  [ tab_obslist ] ) may have spurs or feathers that are not so prominent as to give the disk a multiple arm appearance .
spiral structure that is `` not regular '' may have arms with wildly varying pitch , there may be more than one pattern , or some other deviation from two - armed grand design structure .
galaxies marked `` faint '' lack enough signal in the exposure to categorize the spiral structure .
limited morphological information that is useful to the discussion in  [ sec_discussion ] is also reported in table  [ tab_obslist ] .
the presence of a bar is denoted by the symbol `` b '' ; an inner ring is denoted by `` r '' and an inner pseudoring by `` p '' ; an outer ring is denoted `` r '' and an outer pseudoring by `` p '' .
( i apologize to ron buta for this abbreviated classification scheme . )
if the galaxy is not barred , it is designated `` s '' . when the feature is not clear , the symbol is followed by a `` : '' .
deprojection ( which elongates round features ) may cause uncertainty about the presence of a bar .
the presence of a bar is also uncertain when the galaxy has an s - shape : then it is not clear if the nearly straight central segment is a bar or merely the convergence of two open spiral arms on the nucleus .
inner rings may be round or pointy ( that is , lozenge - shaped )
. pseudorings are ring - like features that appear to be formed by spiral arms , and may or may not be closed .
( see buta 1986 on the morphology of rings and pseudorings . )
inner pseudorings usually have a lozenge shape and are generally not closed .
the distinction between an inner pseudoring and a pointy inner ring is not clear .
for this paper , if the spiral arms followed continuously from the ring segments , or if the ring segments did not close , then the feature was called a pseudoring . if the ring segments were closed and the spiral arms were not obviously extensions of the segments , then the feature was called an inner ring .
outer pseudorings have a fat dumbbell or figure - eight shape .
a downhill simplex algorithm ( press et al . 1988 ) fitted ellipses to isophotes by minimizing the isophotal deviations around the ellipses .
the apparent shape of the disk was characterized by the outer isophotes , which then specified the deprojection of the image .
deprojection was done with iraf ( image reduction and analysis facility ) .
table  [ tab_obslist ] lists the position angles and inclinations ( to the nearest degree ) used for the deprojection .
indeterminate position angles result when the inclination is small .
the table lists formal errors on position angle and inclination that were computed from the fitting errors of ellipses that characterize the outer isophotes .
the fitting errors were empirically derived by varying the starting point in parameter space for the downhill simplex algorithm and compiling the deviations among the ending points .
the radial extent of spiral structure was measured on deprojected images of the galaxies .
the inner and outer extent of the spiral structure was marked conservatively , given the caveats in   [ sec_shape][sec_caveats ] .
( inner spiral structure had to be clear ; outer spiral structure had to have reasonable signal - to - noise , described below . ) the inner and outer radii of spiral structure for the two - armed grand design spirals are listed in table  [ tab_spextent ] .
some galaxies show two patterns : they have faint spiral structure in their outer disks that is of a different character than the bright inner arms ( see elmegreen & elmegreen 1995 on this topic ) . for galaxies with an inner and an outer pattern ,
separate computations were made for the end of the bright spiral pattern and the end of its faint extension .
the column in table  [ tab_spextent ] labeled `` s / n '' indicates the signal - to - noise ratio for the outer spiral structure detection .
signal was measured as a @xmath56-pixel ( @xmath57 , a typical spiral arm width for galaxies observed here ) average within the spiral arm at the furthest extent of the spiral structure .
local sky was determined from an average of four such @xmath56-pixel averages in nearby , almost emission - free areas .
the noise was determined as the average standard deviation from the mean in the four sky measurements .
surface photometry in the literature was used to calibrate the instrumental surface brightness profiles of some galaxies .
the effect of foreground stars on the measured profiles was reduced by ignoring the brightest 10% of the pixels in each radial zone .
ignoring bright pixels is admittedly not as accurate as fitting stellar profiles and subtracting stars from each frame .
the object of this exercise is not to derive accurate surface photometry , however , but rather to measure the photometric depth of the data frames .
the calibrated surface brightness profiles are shown in figure  [ fig_surphot ] .
there is excellent agreement in detail with most profiles from the literature .
small discrepancies in limited radial ranges can be attributed to the effects of foreground stars that were not uniformly treated in all published surface brightness studies .
surface brightness profiles are typically reliable to about @xmath58 . at this isophotal level ,
the signal - to - noise ratio ( s / n ) has dropped to 2.5 , counting signal within a typical seeing disk ( about @xmath59 ) .    the surface brightness at which the outer extent of spiral structure was determined was typically much brighter than @xmath58 . using the calibrated surface photometry shown in fig .
[ fig_surphot ] and outer spiral extents from table  [ tab_spextent ] , the mean surface brightness at the outer extent of the spiral structure was computed ( table  [ tab_spbright ] ) .
spiral arms are significantly brighter than the mean surface brightness , though . given that the gain of the tek1k chip ( the most frequently used detector for this study ) is @xmath60 , its read noise ( @xmath61 ) is insignificant compared to sky noise for 30-minute exposures , and that the mean sky brightness at the u.  s. naval observatory flagstaff station at @xmath2-band is @xmath62 , the s / n per pixel equals unity for the @xmath63 isophote .
probably the brightness of the spiral arm at the outer spiral extent reported in table  [ tab_spextent ] can be , at faintest , about @xmath63 at @xmath2-band .
note that the surface brightness at the outer extent of the spiral structure can be much brighter if , for instance , only the extent of the bright , inner arms is reported in table  [ tab_spextent ] ( e.g. , for ngc0521 ) .
given the generally large values of s / n at the outer spiral extent listed in table  [ tab_spextent ] and the fact that the data frames are rather deep ( as shown by the surface photometry in fig .
[ fig_surphot ] ) , nearly all the optically luminous spiral structure is recorded on the data frames and generally it is recorded comfortably above the noise threshold of the frames .    the results of checking for violations of equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] and adherence to equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] are shown in table  [ tab_spextent ] for the grand design spirals .
violations are assessed according to the `` conservative '' tests (  [ sec_shape ] ) .
a `` dot '' in the `` pass ? '' column indicates that the conservative test is passed with a measured value of the ratio less than 1.71 ; a `` @xmath64 '' in the `` pass ? '' column indicates a value of the ratio from 1.71 to 2.0 ; and if the measured ratio is over 2.0 , there is an `` n '' in the `` pass ? '' column , indicating a violation of the conservative ratio test .
the distribution of values of the equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] and equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratios is shown in figure  [ fig_histo ] .
only a single increment is shown for each galaxy in table  [ tab_spextent ] , except that ngc5248 and ngc6632 have two contributions because these galaxies have two distinct spiral patterns . in other cases where there are two entries for the same galaxy in table  [ tab_spextent ] , the entry that represented the most extensive , continuous , two - armed spiral structure was chosen .
ratios corresponding to the extent of extra or detached arms are not illustrated in fig .
[ fig_histo ] .
most of the galaxies have values of the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio that are less than unity .
this observation is consistent with spiral density wave theory ( spiral structure bounded by the lindblad resonances ) and the fact that most rotation curves are approximately flat .
effects due to the shape of the rotation curve (  [ sec_shape ] ) can explain the few ratios larger than unity .
surprisingly many grand design spirals have small values of the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio ( peaked around 0.3 in fig .
[ fig_histo ] ) .
can theories of the creation of grand design spiral structure explain this preponderance of low values ?
swing amplification ( see , e.g. , toomre 1981 ) of disturbances created by companions ( byrd & howard 1992 ) or a groove ( sellwood & kahn 1991 ) should create spirals that reach both their ilr and olr . if the swing - amplified spiral is a superposition of spiral density waves with a range of pattern speeds (  [ sec_caveats ] ) , then measurement of the extent of the spiral could lead to an equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio greater than unity , not less . but
under modal theory ( see , e.g. , bertin et al .
1989a , b ) , the innermost extent of the spiral would be the @xmath65-barrier , which is exterior to the ilr , thus decreasing the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio .    the best explanation for the low values of the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio involves the resonant interaction of spirals with bars and rings , as will be discussed below .
there is a peak in the distribution of values of equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] near 0.5 ( see fig .
[ fig_histo ] ) .
most of the galaxies contributing to the peak are barred and ringed galaxies .
the distributions of the values of the equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] ratio are graphed separately in figure  [ fig_type ] for three morphological classes : pure spirals with no sign of ring or bar , barred galaxies ( which may have a ring ) , and ringed galaxies ( which may also have a bar ) including galaxies with pseudorings .
galaxies showing signs of strong interaction , such as an anomalously long spiral arm and a probable companion , were omitted from all the distributions .
for example , galaxies resembling arp  82 or arp  248 , which have long and obvious tidal tails , were excluded from the distributions .
galaxies resembling m51 , which show a close interaction but no tidal tails , were excluded because the projection of a tidal tail nearly along the line of sight could masquerade as a spiral arm in such cases .
galaxies resembling m81 were included in the distributions .
although m81 has spiral structure that resulted from an interaction with a companion , its spiral structure is a spiral density wave in the disk and there is no sign of a tidal tail or other structure out of the plane of the disk .
the galaxies in table  [ tab_spextent ] that were excluded from the distributions are anon095814 , eso437g044 , ic0167 , ic1551 , ic2421 , ngc0280 , ngc2535 , ngc4321 , ngc7753 , ngc7769 , ugc04457 , ugc11453 , and ugc11695 .    as in fig .
[ fig_histo ] , when two ratio values are listed in table  [ tab_spextent ] , the entry corresponding to the main two - armed spiral structure is included in the fig .
[ fig_type ] histogram . in a few cases
where the uncertain morphology could move a galaxy from the barred or ringed class to the pure spiral class ( for instance `` b : '' might be `` b '' or `` s '' , and `` r : '' might be `` r '' or `` s '' ) , the galaxy is graphed on histograms for both possible classes as an unshaded box .
the values of the equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] ratio are much more evenly distributed for pure spirals than they are for the other morphological classes .
( pure spirals comprise less than one - third of the sample , making their statistics somewhat noisier than those for barred or ringed galaxies . ) the distributions of the equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] ratio for barred and ringed galaxies , in contrast to pure spirals , are decidedly peaked at small values ( around 0.5 to 0.7 ) .
the different appearance of the distributions in fig .
[ fig_type ] can be quantified by a kolmogorov - smirnov test ( cf .
press et al . ) .
the probability that the ratios for pure spirals are drawn from the same population as those for the barred spirals is less than 1% ; the probability is just over 1% for pure and ringed spirals .
in contrast , the ratios for barred and ringed spirals have a 97% probability of being drawn from the same population .
the last statistic is not surprising , since many galaxies have both bar and ring features .
( over half the barred galaxies in this study are also ringed . )
a correlation between limited spiral extent and the presence of a bar can be explained if , in many barred spirals , the bar and spiral are resonantly related .
modeling of barred spirals indicates that strong bars end at or just short of their cr ( contopoulos 1980 ; cf .
also elmegreen 1996 ) .
if the spiral patterns in strongly barred spirals had the same pattern speed as the bar , then spirals could extend only between their cr and olr .
for such a barred spiral , the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio would be @xmath66 .
all bars are not strong , though .
the relationship , if any , between the end of a weak bar and its resonances is not known .
furthermore , it is not established that bars and spirals are resonantly related when they appear together in the same galaxy .
so the rationale explaining why galaxies with bars tend to have less extensive spiral structure may be only a partial explanation
. the explanation may be true often enough , however , to explain why there is a peak around 0.50.7 in fig .
[ fig_type ] for barred spirals but no peak for pure spirals .
a correlation between limited spiral extent and the presence of an inner ring can also be explained if , as is fairly well established , inner rings are resonance phenomena .
inner rings and pseudorings seem to be located at the inner 4:1 resonance ( cf .
combes 1996 ) , which is exterior to the ilr .
limiting spiral structure to the range between inner 4:1 and olr also decreases the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio .
other aspects of rings are neutral to the discussion or are problematic .
the location of an outer ring at the olr ( buta & crocker 1991 ) does not place an extra limitation on spiral extent , and so does nothing to decrease the equation  [ eq_ilrolr ] ratio .
many barred spirals also have an inner ring circumscribing the bar .
it is not clear if it is possible to reconcile the presence of a strong bar ( ending inside its cr ) with a surrounding inner ring ( at the 4:1 resonance ) , although a weak bar and inner ring might be possible .
descriptions of the spiral structure of two - armed grand design spiral galaxies with the largest values of the resonance ratios follow below , where the relative merit of each galaxy for kinematic or resonance analysis is assessed . because the shape of the rotation curve is not known ,
the inclusion of a galaxy in this list is no guarantee that the cr for the two - arm spiral pattern is within the optical disk ( see  [ sec_shape ] ) .    _
_ this galaxy appears to be a member of a small group ( hcg73 : hickson , kindl , & auman 1989 ) .
one apparent member of the group shows signs of recent interaction ( tidal tail or one - armed spiral emerging from an off - center , nucleated , disturbed or irregular galaxy ) .
spiral structure reaches a very small radius , leading to a large equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] ratio .
there is some danger that the outer disk is distended or not planar owing to encounters within the group .    _
_ this galaxy may have a central oval , although the morphology of the spiral arms may contribute to the illusion of the oval . in the inner disk ,
spiral structure is bright and sharply defined , with regions of dust and star formation .
in the outer disk , spiral arms are faint , smooth , and broad . one spiral arm wraps through considerably more phase than the other .    _
spiral structure penetrates to very small radius in this galaxy .
the arms are somewhat faint and diffuse , although they are lightly dappled with regions of star formation .
_ ngc1042 .
_ much of the spiral structure of this galaxy is faint , diffuse , and punctuated by bright knots ( thus resembling ic0211 ) . the spiral structure in the inner disk consists of two short , bright arcs .
_ the inner disk has very regular , two - armed spiral structure .
there is a radial gap at the end of one bright inner arm , followed by a fainter , more diffuse , somewhat fragmentary outer arm .
the other bright inner arm shows similar behavior , except that the corresponding outer arm tracks the outer rim of the inner arm for about 30 degrees in azimuth before the inner arm fades .
it is possible that there are two resonantly related two - armed spiral patterns in this galaxy .
if so , then the ratio reported in table  [ tab_spextent ] is inappropriately large .    _
_ this galaxy may have a central oval , or else ( like ngc6907 ) the inner spiral arms mimic a lozenge shape .
one arm has a ragged and feathery appearance .    _
_ the spiral structure in the inner disk has a feathery appearance and it is somewhat difficult to trace the arms continuously into the outer disk .
the spiral arms in the outer disk are narrow and dotted by regions of star formation .
_ ngc7685 .
_ the spiral structure is somewhat feathery and is complicated by the emergence of a short arm from the interarm region between the two main spiral arms .
the following galaxies marginally pass the conservative test ( indicated by a `` @xmath64 '' in table  [ tab_spextent ] ) .    _
_ the spiral structure is very regular and winds through a turn and a half .
the arms make an abrupt transition from bright to faint after about a full turn .
the spiral arms in the outer disk are still rather narrow and are not diffuse , in contrast to other galaxies with different arm brightnesses in the inner and outer disk .    _
_ the spiral arms are exceptionally thin .
there is some irregularity in the emergence of the two - armed spiral .
it appears that there is a single spiral arm in the inner disk that leads continuously , except for a kink or cusp , to one of the two main outer arms .
the second main arm emerges in a manner symmetrical to the first , but without obvious connection to the inner disk . a short arm or arc emerges from the interarm region interior to the main arm with the kink .
the short arm is initially bright but quickly dims and broadens .
both of the main arms make a transition from narrow and bright to fainter and more diffuse in the outer disk .    _
_ the spiral arms are narrow and emerge from nearby the nucleus .
the otherwise regular morphology is complicated by one arm forking in the outer disk .
the inner tine of the forked arm winds a half turn into the outer disk as a broader , faint arm .
the outer tine of the forked arm is initially the brighter tine but it fades after a quarter turn .    _
this galaxy has two bright arms in the inner disk that abruptly and symmetrically transition to broader , faint arms in the outer disk .
one of the main arms is considerably longer than the other . a very faint , third arm that winds half a turn in the outer disk emerges from an interarm region between the two main inner arms .    _
_ the spiral structure is very regular and winds inward to a rather small radius .
there is an abrupt change from bright , narrow arms in the inner disk to broad , faint arms in the outer disk , suggesting a resonance crossing .
this galaxy is an exemplary case for kinematic and resonance analysis .
the author has obtained vla @xmath67 data with which to map its velocity field .
this paper describes an observational project that examined 140 spiral galaxies , measuring the visual extent of their spiral structure .
the purpose of the project was to find galaxies for which the corotation resonance of the two - armed grand design spiral structure was likely to be within the bright optical disk .
the likelihood that the corotation resonance is within the optical disk can be assessed by comparing the measured ratio of outer to inner spiral extent with the value of the canonical ratio ( equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] ) .    the test using the canonical ratio is not conclusive because of variations due to rotation curve shape .
it is also possible that there is no inner lindblad resonance . to counter our ignorance of the rotation curve ,
a test with a more conservative value of the ratio than equation  [ eq_ilrcr ] should be used ( here , an extra factor of two ) .
a few galaxies were found that have large spiral extent and whose corotation resonance radius is very likely to be within the bright optical disk . among the best candidates for kinematic study are ngc5829 , ngc6907 , ic0211 , ngc1042 , and ngc0132 .
it was incidentally found that barred and ringed spirals statistically have more limited spiral extent than pure spirals .
this observation can be explained if many bars end at their inner 4:1 or corotation resonance and if the bar and spiral are part of the same pattern .
the location of inner rings at the inner 4:1 resonance also limits spiral extent , but the location of outer rings at the outer lindblad resonance places no extra constraint on spiral extent .
this research was supported in part by the director s research fund at the space telescope science institute .
i thank otto richter for an electronic copy of his table of @xmath53 observations and riccardo giovanelli for electronic copies of several tables summarizing @xmath67 observations .
i have benefited from conversations with ken freeman , piet van der kruit , and alar toomre .
arne henden kindly observed and provided processed ccd frames of six of the galaxies for this project .
thanks to the referee , bruce elmegreen , for his comments and criticisms that led to improvements of this paper .
provisional images of some galaxies were obtained during a preliminary phase of this research using the guide stars selection system astrometric support program developed at the space telescope science institute ( stsci is operated by the association of universities for research in astronomy , inc . for nasa ) .
this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) , which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , caltech , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration .
electronic copies of several tables of galaxy and redshift information were obtained from the national space science data center and the astronomical data center .
van albada , g. d. , & roberts , w. w. , jr .
1981 , , 246 , 740 baiesi - pillastrini , g. c. 1983 , , 53 , 373 bertin , g. , lin , c. c. , lowe , s. a. , & thurstans , r. p. 1989a
, , 338 , 78 bertin , g. , lin , c. c. , lowe , s. a. , & thurstans , r. p. 1989b
, , 338 , 104 bicay , m. d. , & giovanelli , r. 1986a , , 91 , 705 bicay , m. d. , & giovanelli , r. 1986b , , 91 , 732 bicay , m. d. , & giovanelli , r. 1987 , , 93 , 1326 binney , j. , & tremaine , s. 1987 , galactic dynamics ( princeton : princeton university press ) de blok , w. j. g. , mcgaugh , s. s. , & van der hulst , j. m. 1996 , , 283 , 18 buta , r. 1986 , , 61 , 609 buta , r. , & crocker , d. a. 1991 , , 102 , 1715 byrd , g. g. , & howard , s. 1992 , , 103 , 1089 canzian , b. , allen , r. j. , & tilanus , r. p. j. 1993 , , 406 , 457 canzian , b. , & allen , r. j. 1997 , , 479 , 723 cepa , j. , & beckman , j. e. 1990 , , 349 , 497 combes , f. 1996 , in _ barred galaxies _ , ed .
r. buta , d. a. crocker , & b. g. elmegreen ( asp conf .
ser . vol .
91 ) , 286 contopoulos , g. 1980 , , 81 , 198 dalcanton , j. j. , spergel , d. n. , & summers , f. j. 1997 , , 482 , 659 elmegreen , b. g. 1996 , in _ barred galaxies _ , ed .
r. buta , d. a. crocker , & b. g. elmegreen ( asp conf . ser .
91 ) , 197 elmegreen , b. g. , & elmegreen , d. m. 1990 , , 355 , 52 elmegreen , b. g. , elmegreen , d. m. , & montenegro , l. 1992 , , 79 , 37 elmegreen , b. g. , elmegreen , d.m . , & seiden , p. e. 1989 , , 343 , 602 elmegreen , d. m. , & elmegreen , b. g. 1987 , , 314 , 3 elmegreen , d. m. , & elmegreen , b. g. 1995 , , 445 , 591 freudling , w. , haynes , m. p. , & giovanelli , r. 1988 , 96
, 1791 giovanelli , r. , & haynes , m. p. 1985a
, , 90 , 2445 giovanelli , r. , & haynes , m. p. 1985b
, , 292 , 404 giovanelli , r. , & haynes , m. p. 1989
, , 97 , 633 giovanelli , r. , & haynes , m. p. 1993
, , 105 , 1271 giovanelli , r. , haynes , m. p. , myers , s. t. , & roth , j. 1986 , , 92 , 250 gordon , d. , & gottesman , s. t. 1981 , , 86 , 161 haynes , m. p. , & giovanelli , r. 1984 , , 89 , 758 haynes , m. p. , & giovanelli , r. 1986 , , 306 , 466 haynes , m. p. , & giovanelli , r. 1991 , , 102 , 841 haynes , m. p. , giovanelli , r. , starosta , b. m. , & magri , c. 1988 , , 95 , 607 hewitt , j. n. , haynes , m. p. , & giovanelli , r. 1983 , , 88 , 272 hickson , p. , kindl , e. , & auman , j. r. 1989 , , 70 , 687 huchtmeier , w. k. , & richter , o .- g .
1989 , a general catalog of hi observations of galaxies ( new york : springer - verlag ) knapen , j. h. , beckman , j. e. , cepa , j. , van der hulst , j. m. , & rand , r. j. 1992 , , 385 , l37 knapen , j. h. , beckman , j. e. , cepa , j. , & nakai , n. 1996 ,  , 308 , 27 kyazumov , g. a. 1984 , sov . astron .
, 28 , 496 lewis , b. m. 1985 , , 292 , 451 lindblad , p. a. b. , lindblad , p. o. , & athanassoula , e. 1996 ,  , 313 , 65 nilson , p. 1973
, uppsala general catalogue of galaxies ( uppsala : uppsala offset center ab ) pickering , t. e. , impey , c. d. , van gorkom , j. h. , & bothun , g. d. 1997 , , 114 , 1858 press , w. h. , flannery , b. p. , teukolsky , s. a. , & vetterling , w. t. 1988 , numerical recipes ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) roberts , w. w. 1969 , , 158 , 123 roelfsema , p. r. , & allen , r. j. 1985 , , 146 , 213 romanishin , w. 1983 , , 204 , 909 sandage , a. , & bedke , j. 1988 , atlas of galaxies useful for measuring the cosmological distance scale ( nasa sp-496 ) ( washington , d.c . : u.s . government printing office ) sandage , a. , & tammann , g. a. 1981 , a revised shapley - ames catalog of bright galaxies ( washington , d.c .
: carnegie institute of washington publication 635 ) scaglia , r. p. , & sancisi , r. 1988 , , 203 , 28 schneider , s. e. , helou , g. , salpeter , e. e. , & terzian , y. 1986 , , 92 , 742 schwarz , m. p. 1981
, , 247 , 77 scodeggio , m. , & gavazzi , g. 1993 , , 409 , 110 sellwood , j. a. , & kahn , f. d. 1991 , , 250 , 278 sellwood , j. a. , & sparke , l. s. 1988 , , 231 , 25p sempere , m. j. , garcia - burillo , s. , combes , f. , & knapen , j. h. 1995 ,  , 296 , 45 stavely - smith , l. , & davies , r. d. 1988 , , 231 , 833 toomre , a. 1977 , , 15 , 437 toomre , a. 1981 , in the structure and evolution of normal galaxies , ed .
s. m. fall & d. lynden - bell ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , 111 de vaucouleurs , g. , de vaucouleurs , a. , & corwin , h. g. , jr .
1976 , second reference catalogue of bright galaxies ( austin : university of texas press ) de vaucouleurs , g. , de vaucouleurs , a. , corwin , h. g. , jr . ,
buta , r. j. , paturel , g. , & fouque , p. 1991
, third reference catalogue of bright galaxies ( new york : springer - verlag ) wegner , p. , haynes , m. p. , & giovanelli , r. 1993 , , 105 , 1251 wray , j. d. 1988 , the color atlas of galaxies ( new york : cambridge university press )    rllrrc 61875&malin1&&2.50&24750&(1)40709&ugc02885&&7.02&5799&(1)36210&ugc08058&anon1254 + 57&1.7&21300&(2)34330&ic1551&ugc00268&2.6&13204&(3)31292&ic0983&ugc09061&5.75&5442&(1)30697&ugc11473&&6.60&4651&(1)29476&ugc10104&anon1555 + 30&2.95&9992&(4)26472&ugc02339&&1.60&16545&(12)25571&ngc3883&ugc06754&3.64&7025&(1)25341&ngc5174&ugc08475&3.70&6849&(1)25254&ngc5688&&9.00&2806&(1)25056&ic0226&ugc01922&2.30&10894&(1)24488&ngc2206&ugca123&3.90&6279&(1)23870&ugc05813&ugc05813&1.8&13261&(3)22631&ugc01886&&4.50&5029&(11)22523&ngc2713&ugc04691&5.75&3917&(1)22464&ugc09515&&1.6&14040&(5)22198&ngc1241&&5.50&4036&(1)22128&ugc02151&&2.0&11064&(8)21755&ugc12128&&1.1&19777&(10)21725&ngc0772&ugc01466&8.86&2452&(1)21577&ngc1961&ugc03334&5.50&3923&(1)21122&ic1142&ugc10055&1.5&14081&(5)21040&ngc1085&ugc02241&3.1&6787&(6)20619&ngc5981&ugc09948&4.10&5029&(1)20544&ngc2446&ugc04027&2.10&9783&(1)20504&ic4381&ugc09073&2.20&9320&(1)20477&ugc00520&&1.00&20477&(12)20222&ngc4939&&6.50&3111&(1)20122&ngc5619&ugc09255&2.4&8384&(7)20075&ngc0497&ugc00915&2.5&8030&(2)19958&ugc12084&&1.6&12474&(9)19839&ugc09025&&1.10&18035&(1)19497&anon2233 + 34&&2.95&6609&(1)19345&ngc6007&ugc11079&1.82&10629&(4)19180&ngc1530&ugc03013&7.80&2459&(1)19166&ngc2336&ugc03809&8.70&2203&(1)19164&ic0213&ugc01719&2.30&8332&(12)19089&ic1173&ugc10180&1.83&10431&(1)18985&ngc1169&ugc02503&7.95&2388&(1)18946&ngc5172&ugc08477&4.70&4031&(1)18921&ngc7753&ugc12780&3.5&5406&(8)18795&ugc04457&anon0829 + 19a&1.70&11056&(4)18717&ugc10405&&1.7&11010&(3)18634&ngc5905&ugc09797&5.50&3388&(1)18600&ngc0858&&1.51&12318&(4)18591&ugc01212&&1.70&10936&(11)18522&ngc3968&ugc06895&2.90&6387&(1)18403&ngc0536&ugc01013&3.55&5184&(1)18389&ugc09107&&1.2&15324&(5 )    rllrr 32641&ic1551&ugc00268&2.57&1269930509&ic0983&ugc09061&5.37&568128442&ugc02885&&5.01&567527559&ugc04219&&2.19&1259726732&ugc10104&anon1555 + 30&2.69&993223874&ic0226&ugc01922&2.24&1066423306&ugc03139&&3.72&627321677&ngc3883&ugc06754&2.95&734521156&ugc09234&&1.91&1110320745&ugc04457&anon0829 + 19a&1.82&1140020550&ugc09515&&1.45&1421720300&ngc1085&ugc02241&3.09&656920084&ugc12128&&1.05&1918019614&ugc03531&&1.62&1209419601&ngc1961&ugc03334&5.01&391119300&ngc4939&&5.62&343219054&ugc02151&&1.78&1071518854&ngc5619&ugc09255&2.19&861818588&ugc03374&&3.02&615518392&ngc4501&ugc07675&7.08&259818285&ugc09025&&1.00&1828518148&ugc10250&&0.93&1944618117&ngc3968&ugc06895&2.69&673118114&ugc01886&&3.89&465618113&ngc6007&ugc10079&1.70&1066618078&ngc3314b&&3.80&475517738&ugc09107&&1.15&1544917481&ngc1365&&11.22&155817156&anon0958@xmath714&&1.82&942816912&ngc0309&&3.16&534816847&pgc07941&&2.63&640516804&ugc01810&anon0218 + 39a&2.29&733516772&ngc7753&ugc12780&3.47&483716740&ugc03252&&2.75&607816620&ugca228&anon1108@xmath709&2.04&814016598&ngc0772&ugc01466&7.59&218816546&ngc5514&ugc09102&2.19&756316395&ic3165&ugc07384&1.91&860416279&ngc2336&ugc03809&7.41&219616273&ngc6744&&20.42&79716191&ngc4535&ugc07727&7.08&228716084&ugc02351&&1.95&824916020&ugc08510&&1.10&1461015884&ugc04207&&1.66&957115865&ngc6177&ugc10428&1.70&934215783&ngc5652&ugc09334&2.04&773015760&ngc6632&ugc11226&3.39&465115692&ic1222&ugc10461&1.70&924015599&ngc5230&ugc08573&2.19&713015445&ngc6674&ugc11308&4.68&3302    llrrrrllc anon0958@xmath714&&  &  &  &
&2-arm g.d.&bp&(1)eso437@xmath7g044&am1039@xmath7283&  &  &0&
&2-arm g.d.&sic0167&ugc01313&86&3&49&2&2-arm g.d.&b&(1,3)ic0211&ugc01678&39&3&46&2&2-arm g.d.&bpic0267&ugc02368&14&7&37&3&2-arm g.d.&bic0421&ugca111&  &  &0&  &mixed&bpic0983&ugc09061&  &  &0&  &multiple arms&bpic1142&ugc10055&148&10&32&7&multiple arms&bpic1237&ugc10621&20&1&71&1&2-arm g.d.&b : p:&(4)ic1302&&43&3&59&2&2-arm g.d.&sic1516&ugc12852&45&17&11&6&multiple arms&sric1525&ugc12883&26&5&30&6&2-arm g.d.&bpic1551&ugc00268&  &  &  &  &two tidal arms&s&(2)ic2421&ugc04658&61&31&22&12&2-arm g.d.&s&(3)ic2627&ugca227&134&15&34&4&2-arm g.d.&sic4381&ugc09073&126&6&50&5&2-arm g.d.&s&(3)ngc0036&ugc00106&9&1&61&2&2-arm g.d.&bpngc0132&ugc00301&46&3&39&2&2-arm g.d.&b : ngc0173&ugc00369&94&5&37&5&2-arm g.d.&sngc0180&ugc00380&158&4&32&3&mixed&bpngc0266&ugc00508&118&8&17&5&2-arm g.d.&bp : ngc0280&ugc00534&104&5&51&4&2-arm g.d.&sngc0497&ugc00915&131&4&58&2&multiple arms&bpngc0521&ugc00962&  &  &0&  &mixed&bp : ngc0536&ugc01013&63&2&70&2&2-arm g.d.&brngc0562&ugc01049&6&26&18&10&2-arm g.d.&sngc0606&ugc01126&109&6&30&9&3-arm g.d.&bpngc0753&ugc01437&121&7&46&0&multiple arms&sngc0772&ugc01466&120&4&47&1&not regular&sngc0841&ugc01676&131&1&61&1&2-arm g.d.&p : srngc1042&&182&11&20&8&2-arm g.d.&sngc1169&ugc02503&34&4&46&2&multiple arms&brngc1376&&  &
&0&1&multiple arms&sngc1417&&6&2&62&1&2-arm g.d.&b : pngc1784&&111&6&35&5&multiple arms&brngc2206&ugca123&134&3&54&2&2-arm g.d.&srngc2280&ugca131&158&4&65&2&2-arm g.d.&s&(1,4)ngc2336&ugc03809&182&2&52&1&multiple arms&spngc2460&ugc04097&17&3&45&3&mixed&sngc2535&ugc04264&  &  &  &
&2-arm g.d.&sp&(2)ngc2543&ugc04273&42&4&51&2&2-arm g.d.&bngc2595&ugc04422&41&7&42&1&2-arm g.d.&bpngc2608&ugc04484&43&3&38&1&multiple arms&bp : ngc2713&ugc04691&107&2&66&1&2-arm g.d.&brngc2718&ugc04707&88&21&19&16&2-arm g.d.&brngc2935&ugca169&167&3&31&3&2-arm g.d.&bngc3038&&121&2&56&2&mixed&sngc3054&ugca187&120&3&49&2&2-arm g.d.&bngc3183&ugc05582&155&7&40&10&2-arm g.d.&bngc3319&ugc05789&39&2&55&2&2-arm g.d.&bngc3347&&175&3&64&3&2-arm g.d.&bp&(3)ngc3381&ugc05909&75&20&17&16&2-arm g.d.&bngc3433&ugc05981&46&8&37&2&2-arm g.d.&sngc3478&ugc06069&131&2&60&2&multiple arms&bngc3513&ugca224&92&5&36&6&2-arm g.d.&bpngc3577&ugc06257&  &
&2&2&2-arm g.d.&bpngc3583&ugc06263&124&4&38&1&2-arm g.d.&bngc3642&ugc06385&35&35&5&5&2-arm g.d.&sngc3883&ugc06754&160&12&34&4&mixed&bngc3897&ugc06784&92&2&35&4&2-arm g.d.&spngc3963&ugc06884&  &  &0&
 &2-arm g.d.&bngc3968&ugc06895&7&3&48&3&multiple arms&bngc3992&ugc06937&69&1&53&1&multiple arms&bpngc4079&ugc07067&127&2&46&4&2-arm g.d.&sngc4321&ugc07450&27&8&33&1&2-arm g.d.&bngc4662&ugc07917&137&10&13&7&multiple arms&bpngc5172&ugc08477&95&1&50&1&one - armed&sngc5230&ugc08573&  &
&2&2&multiple arms&brngc5248&ugc08616&99&3&36&2&2-arm g.d.&sngc5409&ugc08938&41&3&46&5&2-arm g.d.&srngc5619&ugc09255&6&1&62&3&2-arm g.d.&bpngc5829&ugc09673&55&6&32&5&2-arm g.d.&sngc5905&ugc09797&128&5&34&3&2-arm g.d.&bpngc6177&ugc10428&23&3&43&3&2-arm g.d.&bprngc6181&ugc10439&2&1&61&2&2-arm g.d.&bngc6412&ugc10897&49&28&7&7&2-arm g.d.&bngc6632&ugc11226&150&2&59&1&two patterns?&spngc6674&ugc11308&137&3&50&1&multiple arms&brngc6907&ugca418&97&35&17&15&2-arm g.d.&b : ngc6951&ugc11604&150&6&31&3&2-arm g.d.&bpngc6956&ugc11619&122&32&16&8&2-arm g.d.&brngc6962&ugc11628&77&1&38&2&2-arm g.d.&bngc7042&ugc11702&128&3&35&2&2-arm g.d.&sngc7309&&138&66&12&12&3-arm g.d.&sngc7407&ugc12230&151&1&61&2&2-arm g.d.&sngc7685&ugc12638&176&14&40&5&2-arm g.d.&srngc7738&ugc12757&70&7&52&2&2-arm g.d.&bpngc7743&ugc12759&114&9&29&4&2-arm g.d.&bpngc7753&ugc12780&33&3&47&3&2-arm g.d.&bngc7769&ugc12808&25&7&25&11&mixed&sngc7782&ugc12834&178&2&54&2&faint&sngc7819&ugc00026&105&3&43&4&2-arm g.d.&bugc00250&&125&1&48&3&multiple arms&brugc00520&&138&1&60&1&2-arm g.d.&sugc00850&&65&4&58&2&2-arm g.d.&b : r&(3)ugc01919&&35&10&33&4&2-arm g.d.&brugc02151&&109&1&59&1&three arms&sugc02507&&5&2&55&1&2-arm g.d.&bugc02582&&10&9&22&14&multiple arms&sugc02885&&44&1&65&1&multiple arms&b : ugc03120&&115&2&41&2&2- or 3-arm g.d.&sugc03252&&40&3&41&2&mixed&sugc03294&&125&2&61&5&multiple arms&brugc03325&&34&6&32&0&2-arm g.d.&b : ugc03374&&33&24&16&14&2-arm g.d.&brugc03375&&49&1&61&1&multiple arms&b : pugc03531&&139&2&48&3&2-arm g.d.&brugc03593&&46&1&58&2&2-arm g.d.&sugc04207&&21&6&56&2&2-arm g.d.&srugc04219&&122&3&42&4&2-arm g.d.&sugc04457&anon0829 + 19a&171&9&52&3&2-arm g.d.&sugc04643&&94&5&36&4&2-arm g.d.&sugc04706&&130&10&33&9&2-arm
g.d.&bugc04884&&41&4&47&3&2-arm g.d.&sugc05813&&40&3&52&3&multiple arms&brugc06093&&  &  &1&1&2-arm g.d.&br&(1)ugc07065&&144&1&35&2&2-arm g.d.&bpr&(1,3)ugc08058&anon1254 + 57&  &  &  &  &2-arm g.d.&s&(2)ugc08510&&  &
&9&9&multiple arms&sugc09025&&64&3&53&3&multiple arms&b : ugc09107&&150&6&45&4&2-arm g.d.&sr&(3)ugc09808&&  &  &0&
&2-arm g.d.&sugc10104&anon1555 + 30&19&36&9&9&2-arm g.d.&sugc10405&&40&9&37&3&multiple arms&bugc10837&&151&1&59&2&2-arm g.d.&bp : ugc11406&&7&3&53&4&2-arm g.d.&bugc11453&anon1930 + 54&79&1&40&1&2-arm g.d.&sugc11473&&128&4&62&2&not regular&sugc11585&&82&2&48&3&2-arm g.d.&brugc11695&anon210901&107&4&56&4&2-arm g.d.&sugc11809&&31&1&61&0&not regular&bugc11919&anon2206 + 40&23&6&44&4&2-arm g.d.&sugc12084&&96&14&30&7&2-arm g.d.&brugc12128&&130&1&61&0&2-arm g.d.&sugc12164&&121&3&52&2&2-arm g.d.&sugc12199&&95&4&55&1&2-arm g.d.&brugc12646&&48&1&23&7&2-arm g.d.&bprugc12776&&95&12&37&4&2-arm g.d.&brugc12792&&56&10&42&2&2-arm g.d.&brugca228&anon1108@xmath709&10&51&8&8&multiple arms&bp    llrrllccrl anon0958@xmath714&&7&51&2.06&n&1.21&.&3.0&(1)eso437@xmath7g044&am1039@xmath7283&25&112&1.31&.&0.77&.&1.6&(1)ic0167&ugc01313&13&104&2.41&n&1.36&.&6.8&(10)ic0211&ugc01678&7&65&2.78&n&1.57&.&14.0&ic0267&ugc02368&56&83&0.43&.&0.24&.&5.8&ic0421&ugca111&21&73&1.02&.&0.57&.&9.3&(7,8)ic1237&ugc10621&13&69&1.55&.&0.87&.&10.9&(4)ic1302&&9&28&0.94&.&0.53&.&11.6&ic1525&ugc12883&14&51&1.05&.&0.59&.&14.0&ic1551&ugc00268&16&77&1.39&.&0.81&.&3.0&(1,10)ic2421&ugc04658&22&63&0.84&.&0.49&.&3.0&(10)ic2627&ugca227&14&85&1.79&@xmath64&1.05&.&5.5&(4)&&14&105&2.21&n&1.30&.&3.0&(3,12)ic4381&ugc09073&12&61&1.47&.&0.86&.&2.4&(4,5)ngc0036&ugc00369&18&85&1.37&.&0.80&.&4.0&(2)ngc0132&ugc00301&8&56&2.19&n&1.28&.&2.8&(14)ngc0173&ugc00369&15&110&2.18&n&1.23&.&3.1&ngc0180&ugc00380&15&30&0.59&.&0.33&.&39.7&(7,8)ngc0266&ugc00508&34&108&0.94&.&0.55&.&5.3&ngc0280&ugc00534&11&42&1.09&.&0.64&.&23.9&ngc0521&ugc00962&19&44&0.68&.&0.40&.&14.9&(2,7,8)ngc0536&ugc01013&63&100&0.47&.&0.27&.&11.1&ngc0562&ugc01049&6&33&1.68&.&0.95&.&16.9&(4)ngc0841&ugc01676&25&45&0.52&.&0.30&.&5.5&ngc1042&&12&94&2.38&n&1.39&.&8.1&ngc1417&&15&73&1.46&.&0.85&.&8.3&ngc2206&ugca123&20&67&0.99&.&0.58&.&12.3&ngc2280&ugca131&22&72&0.99&.&0.58&.&66.9&(2,8)&&22&243&3.31&n&1.94&@xmath64&4.4&(3,7)ngc2460&ugc04097&82&160&0.57&.&0.34&.&4.7&(5,9)ngc2535&ugc04264&20&160&2.41&n&1.41&.&4.2&(1)ngc2543&ugc04273&23&90&1.15&.&0.65&.&3.5&(3)ngc2595&ugc04422&33&88&0.77&.&0.45&.&4.8&ngc2713&ugc04691&45&74&0.49&.&0.28&.&24.7&ngc2718&ugc04707&32&48&0.44&.&0.26&.&11.6&ngc2935&ugca169&43&130&0.89&.&0.50&.&8.9&(2)&&43&155&1.06&.&0.60&.&1.2&(3)ngc3038&&34&78&0.67&.&0.38&.&14.0&(9,16)ngc3054&ugca187&19&63&0.99&.&0.58&.&23.5&(7,8)&&19&98&1.54&.&0.90&.&8.3&(3,12)ngc3183&ugc05582&27&61&0.67&.&0.39&.&18.6&ngc3319&ugc05789&56&170&0.89&.&0.52&.&12.8&ngc3347&&74&131&0.52&.&0.30&.&67.5&ngc3381&ugc05909&14&43&0.90&.&0.53&.&15.3&ngc3433&ugc05981&21&49&0.68&.&0.40&.&31.8&(7,8)ngc3513&ugca224&22&93&1.25&.&0.70&.&13.3&ngc3577&ugc06257&12&52&1.29&.&0.72&.&1.2&ngc3583&ugc06263&27&68&0.75&.&0.42&.&32.6&ngc3642&ugc06385&28&128&1.35&.&0.76&.&11.3&(3)ngc3883&ugc06754&18&40&0.63&.&0.37&.&8.2&(7,8)ngc3897&ugc06784&12&71&1.82&@xmath64&1.06&.&3.1&ngc3963&ugc06884&18&66&1.08&.&0.61&.&12.8&ngc4079&ugc07067&12&75&1.76&@xmath64&1.03&.&5.0&ngc4321&ugc07450&60&155&0.76&.&0.44&.&39.7&ngc5248&ugc08616&28&100&1.06&.&0.62&.&103.9&(8)&&100&219&0.64&.&0.38&.&3.8&(5)ngc5409&ugc08938&21&41&0.58&.&0.34&.&10.1&ngc5619&ugc09255&27&59&0.64&.&0.38&.&21.2&ngc5829&ugc09673&5&52&3.10&n&1.75&@xmath64&14.4&ngc5905&ugc09797&27&105&1.14&.&0.67&.&5.4&(2)&&27&128&1.40&.&0.82&.&4.7&(3,12)ngc6177&ugc10428&23&44&0.56&.&0.33&.&14.1&ngc6181&ugc10439&22&59&0.79&.&0.44&.&10.4&(4)ngc6412&ugc10897&10&53&1.52&.&0.85&.&27.2&ngc6632&ugc11226&27&42&0.46&.&0.27&.&33.1&(8)&&55&88&0.47&.&0.27&.&16.4&(5)ngc6907&ugca418&11&107&2.85&n&1.67&.&5.1&ngc6951&ugc11604&54&107&0.59&.&0.34&.&3.7&ngc6956&ugc11619&20&46&0.68&.&0.40&.&15.1&ngc6962&ugc11628&42&73&0.51&.&0.30&.&15.1&ngc7042&ugc11702&10&49&1.40&.&0.82&.&25.1&ngc7407&ugc12230&10&30&0.88&.&0.52&.&21.2&(2)ngc7685&ugc12638&10&67&2.05&n&1.16&.&5.2&(4)ngc7738&ugc12757&42&65&0.46&.&0.27&.&3.3&ngc7743&ugc12759&39&55&0.42&.&0.24&.&20.9&ngc7753&ugc12780&23&101&1.31&.&0.77&.&8.0&ngc7769&ugc12808&28&94&1.00&.&0.58&.&4.2&(9,10,16)ngc7819&ugc00026&21&52&0.74&.&0.43&.&7.6&ugc00520&&10&17&0.50&.&0.29&.&7.3&ugc00850&&7&31&1.30&.&0.76&.&12.9&ugc01919&&19&35&0.54&.&0.32&.&5.9&ugc02507&&14&27&0.56&.&0.33&.&9.0&(2)&&14&32&0.66&.&0.39&.&4.3&(3,11)ugc03252&&13&27&0.63&.&0.37&.&68.7&(7,8)ugc03325&&9&38&1.19&.&0.70&.&4.9&ugc03374&&41&71&0.50&.&0.28&.&4.0&(4)ugc03531&&15&45&0.88&.&0.52&.&5.5&ugc03593&&11&34&0.91&.&0.51&.&25.5&ugc04207&&13&48&1.05&.&0.59&.&5.3&(2)ugc04219&&13&64&1.49&.&0.87&.&1.6&ugc04457&&7&66&2.80&n&1.64&.&3.5&(10)ugc04643&&10&63&1.89&@xmath64&1.07&.&5.2&ugc04706&&23&40&0.52&.&0.30&.&4.6&ugc04884&&23&30&0.38&.&0.21&.&8.2&ugc06093&&8&36&1.32&.&0.77&.&2.7&ugc07065&&26&54&0.61&.&0.34&.&6.6&ugc09107&&17&42&0.74&.&0.43&.&4.8&ugc09808&&7&45&1.87&@xmath64&1.05&.&6.2&(4)ugc10104&anon1555 + 30&10&75&2.20&n&1.24&.&5.0&ugc10837&&25&54&0.65&.&0.38&.&5.1&ugc11406&anon1906 + 42&46&71&0.45&.&0.25&.&19.7&ugc11453&anon1930 + 54&23&57&0.73&.&0.41&.&19.4&(10)ugc11585&&15&34&0.66&.&0.39&.&15.2&ugc11695&anon210901&10&28&0.84&.&0.49&.&5.8&(4,13)&&10&56&1.70&.&1.00&.&2.4&(10,14)ugc11919&anon2206 + 40&10&37&1.04&.&0.61&.&13.8&ugc12084&&19&35&0.54&.&0.32&.&4.4&ugc12128&&20&28&0.42&.&0.24&.&3.1&ugc12164&&17&58&1.02&.&0.60&.&6.1&ugc12199&&35&49&0.42&.&0.23&.&11.2&ugc12646&&31&44&0.42&.&0.25&.&6.3&ugc12776&&47&121&0.76&.&0.43&.&3.3&ugc12792&&11&22&0.61&.&0.35&.&11.7 &    llc ic0167&ugc01313&26.0ic0267&ugc02368&26.5ngc0266&ugc00508&25.6ngc0521&ugc00962&22.5ngc2543&ugc04273&25.2ngc2595&ugc04422&25.1ngc3883&ugc06754&23.6ngc5905&ugc09797&25.7ngc6181&ugc10439&23.3ngc6951&ugc11604&23.8ngc6962&ugc11628&23.2ngc7685&ugc12638&25.9ngc7743&ugc12759&22.6ngc7769&ugc12808&25.5