inflation offers a simple solution to the shortcomings of the standard hot big bang model .
in addition , its predictions about the initial density perturbations , leading to the observed structure formation , are in a remarkable agreement with measurements of the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) temperature anisotropies . among the various inflationary models ,
one should select the ones which lead to a better agreement with data , with the additional requirement that such models should be naturally built within a fundamental theoretical framework . in spite of its enormous success
, inflation remains still a paradigm in search of a model .    despite the elegance of chaotic inflation  @xcite
, this simple model faces a fine tuning problem .
consistency , between predictions for the amplitude of cmb temperature anisotropies and measurements , requires a tiny coupling constant . to avoid this problem ,
linde  @xcite has proposed hybrid inflation , a model of inflation based on einstein gravity , but driven by a false vacuum . in this model ,
the inflaton field rolls while another scalar field remains trapped in a false vacuum state .
the false vacuum becomes unstable when the magnitude of the inflaton field falls below some critical value , leading to a phase transition to the true vacuum .
the energy density is dominated by the false vacuum energy density so that the phase transition signals the end of hybrid inflation .
the phase transition at the end of inflation leads to topological defect formation  @xcite .
theoretically motivated inflationary models can be built in a context of supersymmetry ( susy ) and supergravity ( sugra ) theories .
@xmath1 supersymmetric models contain complex scalar fields , which often have flat directions in their potential , thus offering natural candidates for inflationary models . in this framework , hybrid inflation ( driven by the f - terms or the d - terms ) are the most standard models .
such inflationary models lead generically to cosmic string formation at the end of the inflationary era .
cosmic strings in supersymmetric theories may have new properties , as compared to their non - supersymmetric counterparts ; we do not address this issue here .
a gauge symmetry can be broken spontaneously in @xmath1 globally supersymmetric theories , either by adding f - terms to the superpotential or , in the abelian case , by introducing fayet - iliopoulos ( fi ) d - terms .
the higgs mechanism leads generically  @xcite to abrikosov - nielsen - olesen ( ano ) strings . depending whether they were formed at the end of f- or d - term inflation
they are called f - term or d - term strings , respectively . f - term inflation is potentially plagued with the @xmath0-problem , while d - term inflation avoids it .
this problem arises from the presence of large corrections ( of the order of the hubble parameter during inflation ) to the inflaton mass , which spoil the required flatness of the inflaton potential .
d - term inflation can be successfully implemented in the framework of sugra , while in addition , it can be easily accommodated within string theory models .    in the simplest models of d - term inflation within sugra , in which the constant fi term gets compensated by a single complex scalar field at the end of the inflationary era , the d - term strings formed at the end of inflation are topologically stable , since @xmath2 , with @xmath3 the vacuum manifold of the broken u(1 ) symmetry .
our study concerns such models .
however , they have been proposed  @xcite models where d - term strings can become unstable . for example
, one can introduce additional matter multiplets so as to obtain a non - trivial global symmetry such as su(2 ) , leading to a simply connected vacuum manifold and the production of semi - local strings .
alternatively , it has been suggested  @xcite that the waterfall higgs fields are non - trivially charged under some other gauge symmetries @xmath4 , such that the vacuum manifold , @xmath5/ u(1)$ ] , is simply connected , leading to the formation of semi - local strings .
d - term inflation requires the existence of a non - zero constant fi term , which can be added to the lagrangian only in the presence of a u(1 ) gauge symmetry .
this extra u(1 ) symmetry can be of a different origin .
some models have been suggested for field - dependent fi terms , arising in the presence of a chiral superfield @xmath6 shifting under u(1 ) . the imaginary part of the scalar part of the chiral superfield plays the rle of an axion , and cancels the chiral anomaly by shifting under the u(1 ) symmetry .
such a u(1 ) symmetry is called _ anomalous _ , or _ pseudo - anomalous _ since the total anomaly vanishes . here
the fi term depends on the real part of the chiral superfield . in supersymmetry ,
models with anomalous fi terms have been developed  @xcite within heterotic string theory . in a cosmological setup
one has first to assume the stabilisation of the chiral superfield @xmath6 ; the rle of @xmath6 may be played by any modulus ( a dilaton or any volume modulus ) .
only if this assumption holds the dilaton - dependent d - term can be considered as a constant fi term . however , the issue of dilaton and moduli stabilisation in the heterotic string theory is far from being resolved .
it is still not clear how to derive constant fi terms from string or m - theory and only field - dependent d - terms have been identified .
as we will discuss , in absence of constant fi terms , local supersymmetry requires the superpotential to be invariant under the u(1)-gauged symmetry .    in the context of theories with large extra dimensions , brane
inflation occurs in a similar way as hybrid inflation within supergravity , leading to cosmic string - like objects . in string theories ,
d - brane @xmath7-anti - brane annihilation leads generically to the production of lower dimensional d - branes , with d3- and d1-branes , which are d - strings , being predominant  @xcite in iib string theories . to illustrate brane
inflation let us consider  @xcite a d@xmath8-@xmath9 system in iib string theory .
six of the spatial dimensions are compactified on a torus , while the branes move relatively to each other in some directions . as the two branes approach
, the open string modes between the branes develop a tachyon , thus an instability .
brane inflation  @xcite ends by a phase transition mediated by open string tachyons .
since the tachyonic vacuum has a non - trivial @xmath10 homotopy group , one concludes that there must exist stable tachyonic string solutions with @xmath11 co - dimensions ; they are stable bps ( bogomolnyi - prasad - sommerfield ) d@xmath12-branes .
since all dimensions are compact these daughter branes are seen as one - dimensional objects for a four - dimensional observer ; they are the d - strings .
the d - strings ( d1-branes ) have been identified  @xcite in the low - energy supergravity with the d - term strings .
the justification for this conjecture is that only d - term strings remain bps states in @xmath13 supergravity . in supergravity
, f - term strings break all the supersymmetries , whereas the d - term strings preserve half of it .
an interesting and successful brane inflationary model is the d3/d7 one  @xcite , which has also an effective description as a d - term inflationary model .
the flat direction of the inflaton potential is associated with the shift symmetry , which protects the inflaton field from acquiring a large mass that would spoil the required flatness of the potential . in its original version
this model leads to the formation of topologically stable ano bps strings . in a later developed version  @xcite of the d3/d7 model , where in terms of an effective gauge theory the model has a local u(1 ) gauge symmetry and a global su(2 ) symmetry , semi - local strings are formed .
such strings can unwind without any cost of potential energy . in what follows we concentrate on inflationary models leading to the formation of topologically stable strings .
strings formed at the end of an inflationary era , contribute  @xcite in the spectrum of temperature anisotropies ; their contribution is heavily constrained from cmb data .
compatibility between cmb measurements and theoretical predictions constrain  @xcite the parameters space ( mass scales and couplings ) of the inflationary models .
these constraints have been obtained  @xcite for d - term inflation within minimal sugra . here
, we would like to investigate whether the constraints on the parameters space are a result of our choice of minimal supergravity , or whether they are a generic outcome of d - term hybrid inflation .
we will therefore examine d - term inflation originated by different choices of the khler potential .
the main motivation being that a minimal khler potential can be considered as a peculiar and unmotivated choice  @xcite .
we base our study in a formulation of supergravity constructed from superconformal theory , since the standard formulation may be insufficient in the presence of constant fayet - iliopoulos terms  @xcite .    to be able to constrain the parameters space of the models we should know the power spectrum of a cosmic strings network and the allowed upper limit on the cosmic string contribution to the measured temperature anisotropy spectrum .
the upper limit imposed on the cosmic string contribution to the cmb data depends on the numerical simulation employed in order to calculate the cosmic string power spectrum .
the upper limit found in the literature  @xcite is @xmath14 or @xmath15 , depending on the simulation , with @xmath16 confidence level .
there are some uncertainties in these results due to the cosmic string evolution codes they are based on was found using the results of ref .
@xcite , based on the velocity - dependent one - scale model for the string evolution .
this approach is certainly not the best .
the upper limit of @xmath15 was found using the results of ref .
@xcite ; however recently the authors have corrected  @xcite a mistake in their code , which has not been taken into account in ref .
note however that the corrected version of the code @xcite seems to give similar results .
we believe that the recent publication given in ref .
@xcite is the best , at present , approach .
] and therefore in our calculations we use an average value for the upper bound equal to @xmath17 .
note that none of the existing simulations take into account a non trivial microstructure of the cosmic strings formed : however they have been shown to be superconducting in supersymmetric abelian symmetry breaking through f- or d - terms  @xcite .
we plan the rest of the paper as follows : in section ii we address hybrid d - term inflation , first within the standard formulation of supergravity , and subsequently within the effective supergravity theory built upon superconformal field theory . in the rest of the paper we focus on the second approach .
we briefly review the effective supergravity formulation because of its consequences for d - term inflation , often not taken into consideration . in section iii we review d - term inflation in minimal supergravity . in section
iv we discuss inflation in a supergravity theory with shift symmetry . in section
v we consider d - term inflation in supergravity models with higher order terms , including all corrections up to order @xmath18 .
we round up our conclusions in section vi .
we first review hybrid d - term inflation model in its standard supergravity formulation .      following the standard formulation of supergravity  @xcite ,
the general sugra lagrangian for chiral superfields @xmath19 , and a vector superfield , depends on three generic functions : the khler potential @xmath20 , the superpotential @xmath21 , and the kinetic function @xmath22 for the vector multiplets .
it can be expressed as an integral over the grassmann variables @xmath23 and @xmath24 ( over superspace ) , as  @xcite : @xmath25\nonumber\\ & & + \int { \mathrm{d}}^2\theta [ f_{ab}(\phi_i)w_a^{\ \alpha } w_{\alpha b } + { \rm h.c.}]~ , \label{lagrsugra}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where _ h.c .
_ stands for hermitian conjugate .
it turns out that the effective lagrangian obtained from eq .
( [ lagrsugra ] ) depends only on one combination of the khler potential @xmath20 and the superpotential @xmath21 , the following : @xmath26 a priori , the only restriction for the choice of the khler potential @xmath27 and the superpotential @xmath28 is that @xmath27 must be a real function and @xmath28 must be a holomorphic function .
however , there exists a degeneracy in the choices of @xmath27 and @xmath28 , while the lagrangian is invariant under the _ khler transformation _
@xmath29 assuming that the lagrangian must be invariant also under a gauge symmetry , @xmath28 and @xmath27 must be invariant , at least up to a khler transformation .
the gauge kinetic function @xmath22 must be holomorphic and covariant under gauge symmetry .
choosing for example the _ minimal khler potential _
@xmath30 the kinetic terms for the scalar parts of the @xmath19 s are simply @xmath31 in minimal sugra , we also set the gauge kinetic function @xmath32 equal to @xmath33 .    within this framework of supergravity , and assuming that there is a gauge symmetry , the scalar potential @xmath34 for the scalar components @xmath35 of the superfields @xmath19 reads @xmath36 + \frac{1}{2}\left[{\rm re } f_{ab}(\phi_i)\right]^{-1}\sum_a g^2_a d^2_a~;\ ] ] the first term in the _ r.h.s _ of eq .
( [ formpotenscal ] ) is called _ f - term _ and the second one _ d - term_. while the f - term has in general positive and negative contributions , the d - term is positive definite .
@xmath37 is given by @xmath38 where the fayet - iliopoulos term , @xmath39 , is non - zero only if the gauge symmetry is abelian ; @xmath40 is the gauge coupling of the symmetry generated by @xmath41 .
assuming a constant fi term , d - term potential may lead to de sitter type of solutions , which is particularly interested for building an inflationary model within supergravity .
the standard d - term hybrid inflation model is based on the superpotential  @xcite @xmath42 where @xmath43 are three chiral superfields and @xmath44 is the superpotential coupling .
this model assumes an invariance under an abelian gauge group @xmath45 , under which the three superfields , @xmath43 , have charges @xmath46 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 , respectively .
this model also assumes the existence of a constant fi term .    however , the above summarised supergravity formulation (
called hereafter _ standard _ ) is inappropriate to describe d - term inflation  @xcite .
indeed , in d - term inflation the superpotential vanishes at the unstable de sitter vacuum , as it also vanishes in the absolute minkowski vacuum ; anywhere else the superpotential is non - zero .
thus , the standard formulation of supergravity , where the lagrangian depends on @xmath27 and @xmath28 only through the combination given in eq .
( [ kwcomb ] ) is inappropriate , since the theory is ill defined at @xmath49 . in conclusion , d - term inflation in supergravity must be described with a non - singular formulation of sugra when the superpotential vanishes .
various formulations of effective supergravity can be constructed from the superconformal field theory ( see , ref .
@xcite for a recent review ) .
the main idea is , in a first stage , to build a lagrangian with full superconformal theory . in a second stage , the gauge symmetries that are absent in poincar supergravity ( e.g. , local dilatations , local chiral u(1)-symmetry and local s - supersymmetry ) are gauge fixed . starting from this framework in order to derive the effective supergravity theory
, one can construct a non - singular theory at @xmath49 , where the action depends on all three functions , @xmath50 and @xmath32 .    the superconformal field theory ( scft )
is based on the @xmath51 symmetry .
the superconformal lagrangian contains three parts , each of them being separately conformally invariant . for @xmath52 chiral multiplets @xmath53 ( with @xmath54 and some vector multiplets @xmath55 superconformally
coupled to supergravity , the superconformal lagrangian reads  @xcite @xmath56_d + \left[{\mathcal{w}}(x ) \right]_f + \left[f_{\alpha\beta}(x ) \bar{\lambda}^\alpha \lambda^\beta\right]_f~.\ ] ] the homogeneous function @xmath57 and the holomorphic functions @xmath58 , @xmath59 encode the khler potential , the superpotential and gauge kinetic function , respectively , once the extra gauge symmetries have been gauge - fixed .    after constructing the lagrangian , we fix the extra symmetries . fixing local dilatation ,
the number of chiral scalars is decreased by one : there will be only @xmath60 physical scalar fields in supergravity .
fixing s - supersymmetry makes a free fermion field to be removed .
one thus makes a transformation from the @xmath52 variables @xmath53 to the _ conformon _ scalar @xmath61 and @xmath60 physical scalars @xmath62 , the @xmath60 chiral superfields of standard supergravity . more precisely , @xmath63 where @xmath64 are a set of holomorphic functions .
the khler potential @xmath65 is related to the function @xmath57 , appearing in the superconformal lagrangian , and the conformon superfield @xmath61 through @xmath66 chiral and dilatation symmetry imply that the holomorphic function @xmath67 is @xmath68    apart the local @xmath51 symmetry , the lagrangian may also have some yang - mills gauge symmetries , which commute with local superconformal symmetries .
the superconformal functions @xmath69 are invariant , while the superconformal function @xmath32 is covariant under the yang - mills gauge symmetries .
the yang - mills transformations of all chiral superfields in the superconformal action are @xmath70 @xmath71 and @xmath72 are @xmath52 holomorphic functions for every symmetry .
note that the splitting given in eq .
( [ splitting]a ) is not unique ; the action invariance under khler transformation , eq .
( [ defkahltransf ] ) , has its origin exactly in this remark .
the meaning of the value of @xmath73 is the transformation of the conformon field @xmath61 .
the invariance of @xmath74 leads to  @xcite @xmath75\right\}~,\ ] ] implying that @xmath71 describes the non - invariance of the khler potential @xmath76 given by @xmath77 .
note that derivatives @xmath78 ( and @xmath79 ) stand for derivatives w.r.t .
@xmath62 ( and @xmath80 , respectively ) . assuming that the transformation of the conformon superfield @xmath61 is given by imaginary constants ,
then @xmath81 @xmath82 is the gauge coupling constant .
if @xmath83 , the conformon superfield @xmath61 transforms under a @xmath84 .
only if @xmath85 the symmetry is preserved without corrections of the superconformal u(1 ) .
equation ( [ transfofi]a ) shows the superconformal origin of fi terms via the gauge transformations of the conformon field .
equation ( [ ralpha ] ) implies that the khler potential is invariant  @xcite @xmath86 the function @xmath67 should be invariant under yang - mills transformations , @xmath87 implying @xmath88 since the _ r.h.s .
_ of the above equation , eq .
( [ noninv ] ) , is non - zero when fi terms are present , one concludes that the superpotential @xmath28 can not be gauge invariant , if the conformon multiplet @xmath61 transforms under gauge transformations . assuming that @xmath73 is given by eq .
( [ transfofi]a ) , which corresponds to a constant fi term in supergravity , one gets  @xcite @xmath89    to construct a formulation of supergravity with constant fi terms from superconformal theory , one finds  @xcite that under u(1 ) gauge transformations in the directions in which there are constant fi terms @xmath90 , the superpotential @xmath28 must transform as in eq .
( [ transfow ] ) . as a consequence
, we can not keep any longer the charge assignment described in the case of standard supergravity .      as it was explicitly shown in ref .
@xcite , the gauge fixing of the local dilatational invariance introduces the mass scale @xmath91 , which we set @xmath92 , and fixes the value of the conformon superfield in terms of the khler potential @xmath76 , which depends only on the physical scalars @xmath93 and @xmath94 , namely @xmath95 the value @xmath96 being fixed , we then fix the phase of @xmath61 .
the superconformal lagrangian , eq .
( [ lagrangsuperconf ] ) , is invariant under the redefinition @xmath97 for an arbitrary holomorphic function @xmath98 , since this redefinition can be absorbed in a redefinition of @xmath62 .
we can check that the effect of this redefinition on @xmath65 and @xmath28 is precisely the khler transformation introduced in eq .
( [ defkahltransf ] ) .
two choices have been proposed  @xcite in order to fix the phase of @xmath61 .
either @xmath99 leading to the standard formulation of sugra , described previously , or alternatively @xmath100 the first choice , eq .
( [ choice1 ] ) , makes sense only for @xmath101 , while the second one , eq .  ( [ choice2 ] ) , is appropriate for cases where @xmath67 can become zero .
since in what follows we focus on d - term inflation , where the superpotential vanishes during inflation as well as at the end of the inflationary era , we adopt the second choice of gauge fixing . in this case , the form of the lagrangian is explicitly given in refs .
we give below several quantities which are of interest for the purpose of our study .
to switch to dimensional khler potential and fields , we redefine @xmath62 and @xmath65 , as  @xcite @xmath102 @xmath103 is regular at @xmath104 .
we denote the scalar part of the superfield @xmath19 by @xmath35 . from now on derivatives @xmath78 stand for derivatives w.r.t .
@xmath35 ; we thus use the fields @xmath35 and their complex conjugates @xmath105 to indicate scalar fields .
the previous choice of conformon transformation , eq .  ( [ transfofi ] ) , now reads @xmath106 .
the supergravity lagrangian depends on @xmath107 and @xmath108 .
constant fi terms can be introduced for some of the u(1 ) gauge groups .
we write below the bosonic and fermionic parts of the lagrangian for the scalar fields @xmath35 , which are relevant for d - term inflation in the context of supergravity formulated using superconformal theory .
the part of the bosonic sector which interests us , is @xmath109 with @xmath110\nonumber\\ v_d&=&\frac{1}{2}\left[({\rm re}f)^{-1}\right]^{\alpha\beta } { \mathcal{p}}_\alpha { \mathcal{p}}_\beta~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath111~,\ ] ] and @xmath112    the fermionic mass terms for fermions @xmath113 of chiral supermultiplets @xmath35 are given by the fermionic sector of the lagrangian , namely  @xcite @xmath114 -m^{ij}\bar{\chi}_i\chi_j - m_{ij}\bar{\chi}^i\chi^j + e^{-1}{\mathcal{l}}_{\rm mix}~,\ ] ] where @xmath115 and @xmath116 and where the khler metric and khler connection are defined by @xmath117 in addition to the standard mass terms proportional to @xmath118 , some mixing mass terms between the chiral fermions @xmath113 and the gaugino or the gravitino are contained in @xmath119 .
they can potentially contribute to the fermionic mass matrix  @xcite : @xmath120~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath121\nonumber\\ v_l^1&=&\frac{1}{2}i{\mathcal{p}}_\alpha\lambda_l^\alpha+m^i\chi_i~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the case of non vanishing @xmath119 , the masses of are obtained by diagonalising the fermionic mass matrix .
let us investigate the consequences of a formulation of supergravity constructed from superconformal theory for d - term inflation .
first , the transformation of the sugra superpotential given by the eq .
( [ transfow ] ) imposes a modification of the charge assignment of section  [ sec : stdsugraformul ] .
this charge assignment holds for the global supersymmetric limit .
since the charge of the superpotential is given by the sum of the charges of the fields @xmath122 , @xmath123 , we must impose  @xcite @xmath124 note that as a consequence , we can relate the fi amplitude to the anomaly of the symmetry u(1 ) @xmath125 similarly to the generation of fi terms with anomalous u(1 ) symmetry within weakly coupled string theories .    in ref .
@xcite the authors suggest a way to solve the anomalous u(1 ) symmetry .
more precisely , the authors introduce new matter superfields , which are not involved in inflation , with appropriate charge assignments so that the anomaly gets cancelled four - dimensional supergravity with fayet - iliopoulos couplings has been recently addressed in refs .
@xcite . ] . in order to avoid an @xmath126problem we set @xmath127 .
this modification of the charge assignment induces a modification of the d - terms of the scalar potential .
since the function @xmath27 is real and @xmath28 is holomorphic , we can check that the expression of the f - terms , eq .
( [ potenfterms ] ) , is identical to the standard formulation of supergravity .
concerning the radiative corrections , the modification of the charges induces a modification of the mass terms for the scalar components of the chiral superfields , since part of their mass terms comes from the d - terms .
the fermionic lagrangian , eq .
( [ lagrangfermio ] ) , is identical to the expression obtained in the context of standard supergravity given in  @xcite .
note that in the case of interest , there are no additional contributions to the chiral fermion mass terms from @xmath119 given in eq .
( [ lagrangfermiomix ] ) .
the last consequence of the superconformal origin of supergravity concerns the form of the superpotential .
we first remark that the transformation of the superpotential , eq .
( [ transfow ] ) , combined with the requirement that the inflaton field should remain uncharged in order to avoid the @xmath0-problem , protect the form of the superpotential @xmath128 all non - renormalisable terms of the form @xmath129 are forbidden . secondly ,
if we assume in addition that the superfields and the superpotential transform under an r - symmetry as @xmath130 then all terms proportional to @xmath131 , with @xmath132 , and all terms of the form @xmath133 or @xmath134 are forbidden .
we end up with a d - term inflation that is precisely described by the minimal superpotential , eq .
( [ superpot ] ) , even if in supergravity non - renormalisable terms can be present .
this motivates our choice to consider in this work , the standard form of superpotential .
the minimal supergravity description is based on the minimal khler potential @xmath135 and the minimal structure for @xmath22 , namely @xmath136 .
the tree level scalar potential reads  @xcite @xmath137\nonumber \\ & & + \frac{g^2}{2}\left(q_+|\phi_+|^2+q_-|\phi_-|^2+\xi\right)^2~.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    the next step is the calculation of the masses of the components of the superfields @xmath123 .
the scalar mass squared can be read directly from the scalar potential  @xcite , namely @xmath138 strictly speaking , one must use the charge assignment given by eq .
( [ chargassign ] ) , for example , @xmath139 hereafter we assume @xmath140 and therefore the expression for the scalar masses , eq .
( [ scalmass ] ) , can be approximated as @xmath141 in the inflationary valley , where @xmath142 , the associated dirac fermions have a mass squared @xmath143 unchanged compared to the case of standard minimal supergravity  @xcite .    using the coleman - weinberg formula
, we can then compute the effective inflationary potential , taking into account the tree - level and the one - loop radiative corrections due to the mass splitting between components of the chiral superfields @xmath123 .
the effective potential reads  @xcite @xmath144 \right\ } ~,\ ] ] where @xmath145 and @xmath146    d - term inflation leads to cosmic strings formation at the end of the inflationary era .
consistency between cmb measurements and theoretical predictions constrain the parameters space .
the constrains are imposed on the couplings and mass scales .
they are shown in fig .
[ fig : dtermstandard ] and can be summarised as  @xcite @xmath147 the above constraints , eq .
( [ constrdmin ] ) , can be expressed  @xcite as a single constraint on the fayet - iliopoulos term @xmath148 , namely , @xmath149 we can therefore see that our assumption that @xmath150 in eq .
( [ approxmass ] ) is justified  @xcite , which implies that for the purpose of our study and for minimal d - term inflation , we can neglect the corrections introduced by the superconformal origin of supergravity . moreover , since the tree level potential is given by @xmath151 , the limit @xmath152 should hold since otherwise the energy density would become transplankian and the quantum gravity corrections , which have been so far neglected  @xcite , would become important  @xcite . +    , as a function of the superpotential coupling constant @xmath44 . ]    in what follows we address whether the restrictions found in the framework of minimal sugra , are still qualitatively valid for a non - minimal sugra theory .
we will thus study d - term hybrid inflation with a superpotential @xmath28 defined by eq .
( [ superpoteninflad ] ) and different choices for the form of the khler potential .
we first study hybrid inflation in the context of supergravity , with a khler potential obeying a shift symmetry .
this symmetry can be used for model building in the framework of supergravity , while it is also motivated from string theory  @xcite .
more precisely , the shift symmetry , @xmath153 with @xmath154 a real constant , has been used in order to obtain flat potentials from f - terms in sugra , so that the @xmath0-problem is cured , or to make compatible chaotic inflation , which requires an inflaton field larger than the planck scale , and supergravity  @xcite .
thus , we consider the following form for the khler potential @xmath155 and minimal structure for the kinetic function .
we note that compared to the minimal khler potential , eq .
( [ kmin ] ) , @xmath156 has two additional terms , , @xmath157 and @xmath158 , which do not affect the kinetic terms .
comparing with the scalar potential obtained in minimal sugra , we can identify two differences .
the first one is that there are several new terms proportional to @xmath164 .
these terms will not affect the effective mass terms of the @xmath123 fields , thus they will not affect the inflationary potential , even when one - loop radiative corrections have been taken into account .
the second one is that the exponential factor @xmath165 in minimal sugra , has been here replaced by @xmath166 .
writing @xmath167 , we get @xmath168 .
if we identify the inflaton field with the real part of @xmath122 , then we obtain exactly the same potential as in the minimal case .
however , with the present choice for the khler potential , @xmath156 , it would be more logical to identify the inflaton field with the imaginary part of @xmath122 , namely @xmath169 .
the reason being that with this choice the exponential term is constant during inflation , thus it can not spoil the slow roll conditions
. then we can check that the inflationary potential we get is identical to the usual d - term inflation within the global susy framework .
this model has been studied in ref .
the result obtained in ref .
@xcite is reminded in fig .
[ dtermsusy ] .    , in the case of the d - term inflation model in the framework of global susy .
figure taken from ref .
@xcite . ]    clearly , in such a model the cosmic string contribution to the cmb anisotropies is dominant , in contradiction with the cmb measurements , unless the superpotential coupling is constrained to be @xmath170 concluding , we state that simply imposing a shift symmetry to the khler potential is not enough to _ escape _ the _ cosmic string problem _ of d - term inflation .
in this section , we consider another choice of khler potential that contains non renormalisable terms .
more precisely , we consider the following form @xmath171 where @xmath172 are arbitrary functions of @xmath173 .
contrary to the previous section , this new form should modify the kinetic terms .
the motivation for this choice is that it contains the next - to - minimal khler potential , with all terms up to order @xmath174 .
we consider in a first place a reduced version of this potential and then we proceed with the full expression .
we remind to the reader that our primary goal is not to build a new model for d - term inflation in the context of supergravity , but to study the robustness of our prediction that there is a dominant contribution of cosmic strings to the cmb temperature anisotropies , unless we fine tune the superpotential coupling constant @xmath44 .
we first consider the case of the previous khler potential , eq .
( [ gen ] ) , setting @xmath175 , implying
latexmath:[\[k_3=|s|^2+|\phi_+|^2+|\phi_-|^2+f_+\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg)|\phi_+|^2+f_-\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg )    arbitrary functions of @xmath173 , while the superpotential is given in eq .
( [ superpoteninflad ] ) .
one can argue that the khler potential given in eq .
( [ kahlerseto1 ] ) is quite general , since during inflation the higgs fields are small .
however , one can also criticise this choice for the following reason : even though @xmath177-terms are indeed negligible as compared to the @xmath178-ones ( the @xmath179-terms are small during the inflationary era ) there is no reason for neglecting @xmath180-terms .
they will be taken into account in next section .
note that the expression for the effective scalar potential is identical to that of minimal supergravity , except for the expression of @xmath93 .
the first derivative of the potential is equal to @xmath194 where @xmath195 @xmath196 ~;\ ] ] @xmath197 denote the first derivative of @xmath172 with respect to @xmath198 .
a choice which we will later consider for @xmath199 is @xmath200 in the large @xmath201-limit the effective potential and its first derivative with respect to @xmath201 reduce to @xmath202 \label{limitz1}\ ] ] and @xmath203 respectively .    at this point
, we would like to note that d - term inflation can be realised with the last 60 e - folds being very close to the critical value @xmath204 , implying that the above reduced formulae , eqs .
( [ limitz1 ] ) , ( [ limitz2 ] ) , _ can not _ be used to compute the predictions of the model regarding the cmb temperature anisotropies .
therefore , we disagree with the approach of ref .
@xcite , where the authors have used the reduced formulae for the effective potential and its first derivative , to compute the inflaton contribution to the cmb temperature anisotropies .    to illustrate the above remark
, we represent in fig .
[ fig : error ] the error made by this assumption .
the cosmic string contribution is drawn as a function of the superpotential coupling constant @xmath44 , considering either the partial or the full scalar potential .
one can realise that the error on the cosmic string contribution can reach @xmath205 , leading to a considerable error in the induced constraints on the parameters space .     with partial ( dashed line ) or full ( continuous line ) scalar potential .
]    the number of e - foldings of inflation between the initial and final value of the inflaton field is @xmath206 f_{v'}(z)}~,\ ] ] where we note that the index @xmath207 denotes the scale responsible for the quadrupole anisotropy in the cmb . for the integral appearing in the above expression for @xmath208 to be correctly defined
, one must assume that the function @xmath209 can be inverted .
since it is a monotonic and increasing function , one can verify , at least numerically , that the function @xmath210 can be inverted .
we denote the inverted function by @xmath211 .    the above expression for @xmath208 , eq .
( [ efoldings ] ) , will enable us to write a relation between @xmath148 and @xmath212 .
setting @xmath213 , we can fix the value of the inflaton field @xmath214 , responsible for the quadrupole anisotropy of the cmb .
d - term inflation leads generically to cosmic strings formation , which also contribute to the cmb temperature anisotropies .
the total contribution , from the inflaton field as well as from the cosmic strings , has to be normalised to the value measured by the cobe - dmr experiment .
this normalisation will fix the mass scale @xmath215 as a function of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 and the gauge coupling @xmath82 , which are considered here as parameters .
thus , we have to calculate both , the cosmic strings contribution and the inflaton field one , and normalise their _ sum _ to cobe - dmr .
here we emphasise that different approaches can be found in the literature where the authors do not normalise the sum of the two contributions to the data .
clearly not to normalise the sum to the data is a simplification , which may lead to an important error for the result . normalising only the inflationary contribution to the quadrupole absolute value
can be considered as an assumption where the cosmic string contribution is neglected .
this assumption could be _ allowed _ only if one wants to argue that the cosmic strings are sub - dominant . however , since we already know that cosmic strings are indeed sub - dominant and our aim is to constrain the parameters space and calculate exactly how sub - dominant the strings are , this simplification in the normalisation implies important errors in the calculated cosmic string contribution .    from the scalar potential given in eq .
( [ dpotensugranonmin ] ) , one can see that the spontaneous symmetry breaking is generated when @xmath216 takes a vacuum expectation value @xmath215 .
thus , the quadrupole contribution to the cmb temperature anisotropies from the cosmic strings formed at the end of hybrid inflation , which is @xmath217 where @xmath218 is the vacuum expectation value of the higgs field responsible for the formation of cosmic strings ,
is approximately equal to @xmath219    for the contribution from the inflaton field , we evaluate the sachs - wolfe term splitted into the scalar and tensor parts , using @xmath220 and @xmath221 from eqs .
( [ treelevelsc ] ) , ( [ veff ] ) , ( [ inflsc ] ) and ( [ inflsctens ] ) we get @xmath222 and @xmath223 we note that the ratio of the tensor part of the inflaton field contribution to the cosmic strings one is constant , and that the tensor part contribution can be neglected .
the tensor over scalar ratio , @xmath224 , is less straightforward and it is given by @xmath225    we then proceed with the cosmic string contribution to the quadruple cmb temperature anisotropy .
this contribution in computed as a function of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 , for various values of @xmath82 and @xmath226 , which are considered as parameters .
the results are plotted in fig .
[ csdelambda ] .     from the top to the bottom , respectively .
this is for @xmath227 . ]    to show the dependence of the cosmic string contribution on the gauge coupling @xmath82 , we draw in fig .
[ csdelambdag1 ] the cosmic string contribution for @xmath228 and @xmath229 . clearly , this case ( @xmath228 ) is excluded since the cosmic string contribution is above the allowed one .
we note that we do not take @xmath230 higher than 5 , since positivity condition @xmath231 requires @xmath232  @xcite .     from the top to the bottom , respectively .
this is for @xmath228 . ]
we quantify below the constraints on the parameters space imposed from the three - year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe ( wmap )  @xcite measurements .
we want to set precise constraints on the free parameters since this can be of importance for concluding of whether d - term inflation remains in agreement with cmb data once we also include constraints imposed from the allowed value of the spectral index  @xcite .    for @xmath233 , there is no parameters space in agreement with measurements . in the range
@xmath234 $ ] , the parameters space is extremely small , around @xmath235 ; the presence of @xmath230 enlarges slightly the allowed window . for @xmath227 , the @xmath17 upper limit on the allowed cosmic string contribution to the cmb imposes , at @xmath236 of confidence level , the following constraints : @xmath237 or , equivalently , @xmath238 clearly the new degree of freedom , namely @xmath226 , allows a slightly higher upper bound on the coupling , which is however at best higher by only a factor of 2 , thus concluding that fine tuning is still required .
all constraints are equivalent to a single constraint on @xmath239 , or @xmath240 , as already stated in refs .
therefore , there is a bijection between the cosmic string contribution and the mass scale of inflation , which nevertheless does not mean that one can normalise only the inflaton contribution to the cmb data . clearly , the error made by this assumption is big when cosmic strings have an important weight , while it is small if the cosmic string contribution is small , of the order the one found here . with the current upper limit of @xmath17 on the allowed cosmic string contribution to the temperature anisotropies , the relative error made on the string contribution , by not normalising the sum ,
is of the order of @xmath241 .
as one can see from figs .
[ csdelambda ] , [ csdelambdag1 ] the curve which showing the cosmic string contribution becomes singular at its minimum , for large values of @xmath242 .
the reason for this behaviour is that the function @xmath243 , denoting the sum of the cosmic strings and inflaton contributions as a function of @xmath148 becomes non - bijective for certain values of @xmath44 .
this implies that there are more than one solutions for the function @xmath244 normalised to the cobe data , for a tiny window of the parameter @xmath44 around the value @xmath245 .
we illustrate this in fig .
[ multval ] .    .
in terms of the cosmic string contributions these solutions correspond to @xmath246 and @xmath247 from left to right , equivalently . ]
we have checked that this _ degeneracy _ does not influence the validity of our results since the different solutions for the normalisation to cobe are of the same order of magnitude and this behaviour is observed for a tiny parameters space .    as a final remark , we would like to note that there is also another point where we disagree with ref .  @xcite . in their model specified by the choice of the khler potential and with the simplifications made for the scalar potential ,
the authors obtain  @xcite a value for @xmath239 , required to generate the appropriate magnitude of density perturbations .
the authors argue that this value is consistent with the upper limit imposed on @xmath148 so that the cosmic string contribution is within the allowed window , following the results of ref .
@xcite . however , the analysis of ref .
@xcite was done employing the curvaton mechanism ; a contribution which the authors of ref .
@xcite have not considered at all .
we proceed with the general case , namely we include all terms of the next to leading order latexmath:[\[k_2=|s|^2+|\phi_+|^2+|\phi_-|^2+f_+\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg)|\phi_+|^2+f_-\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg )    @xmath172 is just @xmath249    the motivation for such a choice is that beyond the minimal supergravity part of the khler potential , the leading order is @xmath174 , implying that one should consider all corrections up to this order . during inflation , the charged fields @xmath123 vanish , meaning that terms of the form @xmath250 or @xmath251 can be neglected compared to @xmath252-terms , which are in @xmath253 . thus , the next - to - minimal d - term inflationary model should be constructed with khler potential @xmath254 .
we again consider the superpotential @xmath255 involving the superfields @xmath122 and @xmath123 with charges @xmath46 and @xmath256 , respectively , under the @xmath45 symmetry of the lagrangian .
the charges @xmath256 must satisfy the constraint induced by the superconformal origin of the fi term , as discussed in section  [ csqforsugra ] . the d - term part of the scalar potential is thus unchanged as compared the previous section and given by eq .
( [ vdnonmin ] ) .
equation ( [ fnew ] ) implies that during inflation @xmath182 is minimised for @xmath267 , thus @xmath268 and inflation is driven by the d - term .
the total scalar potential @xmath34 is constant at tree level and equal to @xmath269 . having the scalar potential we calculate the masses of the canonically normalised scalar components of the superfields @xmath123 : @xmath270 whereas from eq .
( [ lagrangfermio ] ) we get the mass squared for their fermionic partners : @xmath271 following the same procedure as in the previous sections , we obtain the effective potential @xmath190 \right\ } ~,\ ] ] where @xmath272 is the same as in section  [ secpotenseto ] , eq .
( [ deffv ] ) ; the only difference is the expression for @xmath93 , namely here @xmath273 the first derivative of the scalar potential with respect to @xmath201 reads @xmath274 where @xmath275 is the same as in section  [ secpotenseto ] , eq .
( [ deffv ] ) , but @xmath276 is in this case given by @xmath277~. \label{newfz}\ ] ] the number of e - folds and the inflationary contribution to the cmb quadrupole anisotropy are still calculated using eqs .
( [ efoldings ] ) and ( [ dtsurt ] ) , respectively , with @xmath276 given by eq .
( [ newfz ] ) above .
the cosmic strings contribution to the cmb temperature anisotropies is the same as in the minimal d - term sugra case .
the contribution of cosmic strings to the cmb anisotropies in the whole parameters space is represented in figs .
[ csdelambdanonminextc0g2 ] , [ csdelambdanonminextc0b1 ] , [ csdelambdanonminextb1c1 ] .    , in the next - to - minimal d - term inflationary model .
the value of the gauge coupling constant is fixed and equal to @xmath227 ; there are no cross terms between @xmath122 and @xmath123 , i.e. , @xmath278 .
the minimal sugra for @xmath175 is represented by the dashed line , while the different plain lines are calculated for @xmath279 , going from the bottom to the top .
a fine tuning of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is still required , in order to avoid a dominant contribution of cosmic strings .
]    , in the next - to - minimal d - term inflation model .
the parameter @xmath280 is set equal to @xmath281 ; there are no cross terms between @xmath122 and @xmath123 , ie @xmath278 .
the different plain lines are calculated for @xmath282 , going from the bottom to the top .
a fine tuning of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is still is required to avoid a dominant contribution of cosmic strings . ]    , in the next - to - minimal d - term inflation model .
the parameter @xmath280 is set equal to @xmath281 ; there are no cross terms between @xmath122 and @xmath123 , i.e. , @xmath278 .
the different plain lines are calculated for @xmath282 , going from the bottom to the top .
a fine tuning of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is still required , in order to avoid a dominant contribution of cosmic strings . ]
studying the above figures one easily concludes that considering a more general form for the khler potential does not solve the fine tuning problem of d - term inflation .
the new term in the khler potential , whose weight is given by the parameter @xmath280 , induces an enhancement of the cosmic string contribution at low @xmath44 .
we still observe a dominant contribution of cosmic strings if the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is close to unity .
therefore , the constraints on @xmath44 found on the previous section remain unchanged as given in eq .
( [ contraintelambdanonmin ] ) .
d - term hybrid inflation is a successful and interesting model . in the context of supergravity
, d - term inflation avoids the _ hubble - induced mass _ problem , which plagues f - term hybrid inflation , while it can easily be implemented in string theory . in a standard formulation of d - term inflation , where the constant fi term gets compensated by a single complex scalar field , we do not add an additional discrete symmetry , and do not consider non - renormalisable terms in the potential , d - term strings are formed at the end of the phase transitions which signals the end of inflation .
these strings are analogous to the d - strings formed at the end of brane inflation , which is the result of brane collisions .
d - term inflation can not be studied in the standard formulation of supergravity , which is ill - defined whenever the superpotential vanishes and there are present constant fayet iliopoulos terms . following an effective supergravity formulation based on superconformal theory , the superpotential transforms under the u(1 ) symmetry along the directions where the fi terms are constant .
this transformation defines the charge assignments of the superfields .
d - term inflation has to be studied within this new formulation of supergravity , which is well defined when the superpotential vanishes .
cosmic strings contribute to the cosmic microwave background temperature anisotropies .
all current measurements put severe constraints on the allowed cosmic string contribution . to achieve a compatibility between measurements and theoretical predictions one
should fine tune the couplings .
this was already found in the case of minimal supergravity .
it was therefore natural to ask the question of whether this result still holds in non - minimal supergravity .
it was previously claimed in the literature that higher order khler potentials suppress the cosmic strings contribution . studying a case of non - minimal supergravity , where we include higher order corrections in the khler potential , as well as supergravity with shift symmetry
we conclude that cosmic string contribution will be dominant unless the couplings are fine - tuned .
we also find that , as in the minimal case  @xcite , the @xmath17 constraint on the cosmic string contribution is equivalent to the constraint @xmath283 we would also like to emphasise that if @xmath215 is higher by a factor of 2 , the cosmic string contributison is of the order of @xmath284 , as show in fig .  7 of ref
.  @xcite .    in conclusion
, we definitely disagree with the statement that non - minimal khler potentials avoid the cosmic strings problem , which should imply that fine tuning is not necessary .
even though we have not studied a large number of khler potentials , our current findings indicate that the problem of fine tuning is unavoidable unless one considers a more complicated model , for example where strings become topologically unstable , namely semi - local strings .
we have not yet studied  @xcite the spectral index in our models to check the consistency with the limits imposed by the recent three - year wmap data , which however have been given only for purely adiabatic models .
if the spectral index is higher than the one preferred from the measurements and since , in addition , the requirement for very small couplings seems more difficult to be satisfied in string theory , one should then look for mechanisms to suppress the rle of strings , for example by making them unstable , along the lines of refs .
@xcite , by adding new terms in the superpotential  @xcite , or by considering the curvaton mechanism  @xcite .
as we were completing this work , ref .
@xcite came to our attention . in that study , the authors find , in the context of minimal supergravity , slightly higher upper bounds for the parameters @xmath44 and @xmath82 , whereas the obtain the same with us upper bound on the fi term .
this small discrepancy originates from the different analysis followed in ref .
@xcite ; the authors perform a full markov - chain - monte - carlo analysis and consider one more parameter , namely the spectral index .
it is a pleasure to thank n.  chatillon , r.  kallosh , p.  greene , j.  gray , j.  martin , a.  van proeyen and j.  yokoyama for stimulating discussions .
jr acknowledges support by the national science foundation under grant no .
phy-0455649 and by the university of texas at san antonio , texas 78249 , usa .
10 a.  linde , phys .
b * 129 * , 177 ( 1983 ) .