convection is a major process taking place in reg giant ( rg ) envelopes . in a previous letter ( @xcite , hereafter at97 ) ,
results of a study of this subject were reported briefly . in the present paper ,
more results of this study are presented .    throughout the paper ,
the reference one - dimensional ( 1d ) model of convection is the mixing length theory ( mlt , @xcite ) , according to the prescription of @xcite .
laboratory experiments , observations of the outer layers of the solar convective zone , and theoretical understanding have demonstrated that convection is much more complicated than mlt assumes .
analysis of experiments of convection in a box , in which a temperature gradient was established by using helium at about 5k and controlling the boundary conditions , have shown that convective flow is non - local with defined narrow streams going from the top down ( and vice versa ) , i.e. the existence of a downstream at a given depth at a given time depends upon the existence of a downstream in a higher point at previous time and not upon local parameters only .
this phenomenon is known as hard turbulence ( see @xcite ) .
observation of the outer layers of the sun have shown the existence of two dimensional cells of upstreams , in a variety of sizes and shapes , with the boundaries of these cells being the downstreams , i.e. the flow is not symmetric ( see @xcite ) .    during the years
, many studies were made in order to overcome the simplifications of mlt .
several non - local and non - instantaneous theories were proposed ( @xcite ) .
a common feature in these theories is using turbulence theory techniques in which the hydrodynamical quantities at each point are constructed of two components : a constant value and a varying value .
equations are formulated for each of the varying quantities which are then used to determine the convective velocity and flux .
these equations include creation and diffusion terms and thus constitute a set of coupled partial difference equations .
maybe because of this complexity , there is no wide usage of these theories .
xiong ( 1998a , b ) have used one of these theories to compute linear pulsation times of rr lyrae and long period variables . @xcite
are using a simplified 1d model of turbulent energy diffusion and convection with eight free parameters to describe cepheid and rr lyrae variables .
@xcite used turbulence models to construct an alternative model for mlt which includes a full spectrum of eddy sizes ( see also @xcite ) .
this model is still local and instantaneous , but is easy to include in astrophysical codes .
it was found that this model yields higher values of convective flux than mlt at efficient convection regimes , and lower values of convective flux at inefficient convection regimes .
this model was found to be preferable to mlt in many studies ( see @xcite ) .
these studies included red giant evolution ( @xcite ) , heliosesmology ( @xcite ) and calculations of uvby colors of a f and g stars ( @xcite ) .
the superiority of this model , for example in modeling red giant evolution , was the usage of a constant parameter for various masses , while when using mlt there was a need to change the mixing length parameter with mass .
however , @xcite have shown that a varying calibration is needed for this model too .
alternatives to the usual mixing length used in mlt ( which is a free parameter times the pressure scale height ) were suggested .
these included using the density scale height ( @xcite ) and the distance from the boundary of the convection zone as in @xcite .    for a correct modeling of red giant variables , the lack of time dependence and the locality of mlt
are major disadvantages .
the convection velocities , as predicted by mlt , and the radial velocities associated with pulsation are of the same order of magnitude ( of @xmath4 ) .
thus , interaction of the two phenomena is expected .
ad hoc prescriptions were made in order to take into account time dependence in dynamical calculations with mlt ( for example , pulsation calculation of miras , see @xcite ) . in these calculations , the convective flux at a given time is determined by using mlt and the flux at a previous time assuming a typical convective time scale estimated by convection velocity .
in other calculations , like evolution of massive stars , a non locality is presented to mlt in particular when treating penetration ( or overshoot ) of convection to stable neighboring zones .
a common assumption is that this overshoot region is proportional to the mixing length at the edge of the convection region .
these methods are obviously not rigorous and not intended to describe these processes precisely ( for example see @xcite .
being mainly a hydrodynamical phenomenon , an appealing method for modeling convection is by using numerical multidimensional simulations . in this approach , no explicit model of convection
is needed , and thus no mixing length parameter is assumed .
time dependence and non locality are naturally present . however , convection is multidimensional and the flow has many length scales and time scales , that might be smaller by far than other typical scales of the problem .
this is why such calculations are not suitable for all problems with convection .
numerical simulations of the hard turbulence experiments mentioned above where made ( werne 1993,1994 , @xcite ) .
these calculations reproduced the typical narrow streams of the experiments , and revealed that the origin of the flow was the thin boundary layers at the bottom and at the top of the experimental box .
many studies were made in order to understand general features of convective flow ( @xcite ) . typically , these studies assumed simplified physical assumptions , such as ideal gas equation of state , constant opacity and constant gravitation .
the systems were confined in a box with an initial unstable polytropic profile .
boundary conditions were periodic on the sides of the box , no flow was assumed in and out of the bottom and top of the box , a constant temperature gradient at the bottom and a constant temperature at the top .
some of the simulations assumed planar symmetry using 2d codes , while other used three - dimensional ( 3d ) codes .    summary of some the results of these studies is : there is an asymmetry in the flow with narrow rapid downstreams and wider upstreams and the 3d picture resembles the observations of the sun with cells of upstreams ; the flow in the wider upstreams is somewhat more turbulent ; the size of the cells increases with depth so downstreams merge .
this picture is revealed when using high resolution , while low resolution simulations show laminar flow with big convection cells .
the internal energy flux in the downstreams is relatively large , but a large kinetic energy flux with opposite sign almost cancels the net energy flux in the downstreams . near the outer boundary , convection might be supersonic .
other `` simulation in a box '' studies were dealing with invoking of p - modes in the convection zone ( @xcite ) , producing g - modes below ( and above ) the convection region ( @xcite ) and penetration of convection to neighboring layers ( @xcite singh 1994,1995 ) .
attempts have been made to simulate the outer layers of the solar convection region ( stein & nordlund 1989,1998 , @xcite ) .
since the computation box in these simulations included only a fraction of the convection region , penetrative boundary conditions were applied at the bottom of the computation box .
the outer layers which were included in the simulations and in which a superadiabatic gradient exist , are the most sensitive to the convection model .
these simulations reproduced the granulation pattern of convective streams of solar convection , as well as the heat flux and spectrum ( @xcite ) .
comparison of various measurements form the simulations ( such as maximal temperature gradient near the outer boundary ) enables calibration of the mlt parameter . @xcite and
@xcite have published such calibration for various models of solar - type stars .
they found that mlt parameter is 1.2 to 1.8 for starts with effective temperatures of 7100k to 4300k ( with dependency upon g - gravity and metallicity as well ) .
they also investigated the @xcite model and found it needs varying calibration as well .
simulations of convection in zz - ceti type white dwarfs were done by @xcite .
they found that different calibration models yield different mlt parameter values : 1.5 according to one measurement , and 4 according to another .    two - dimensional ( 2d ) calculations of rr - lyra were performed by deupree ( 1975,1977 , 1985 ) ; the ( very ) low resolution simulations of the narrow convection region in these variables stars have shown that convection has a damping effect upon pulsation , and vice versa . in these stars , there is little difference between a radiative model and a convective model , due to the narrow convection region .
thus , the relaxation time in the 2d simulations is relatively small , and might be calculated .
this is not true for rg in which the convection region is wide , and that is why simulating convection in rg s envelopes is much more difficult .
the above discussion , as well as the topic of this paper , concerns convective envelopes , in which the convection is not efficient enough to enforce an almost adiabatic profile throughout the convective region . multidimensional studies of other astrophysical cases have been published .
this includes core convection ( @xcite ) , shell burning ( @xcite , bazan & arnett 1994,1998 ) , nova bursts ( @xcite ) , core collapse ( see @xcite and ref . therein ) , and accretion disks ( for example @xcite ) . in these studies ,
some of the interesting questions are : the amount of mixing and penetration due to convective streams , nuclear energy sources and sinks in the convection region , the coupling of convection and rotation .
an interesting question in the context of multidimensional simulations of convection , is the validity of 2d calculations .
while it is obvious that 3d simulations are preferable , it is not clear what are the quantitative differences between 2d and 3d results . in many 2d studies of convection
, there are large convective cells ( eddies ) that occupy the whole convective region ( see for example @xcite ) , this phenomena is not seen in 3d simulations .
however , it does not mean that there are no small size eddies in 2d simulations , when increasing spatial resolution large eddies tend to brake up to small eddies ( see @xcite ) , and even low resolution 2d simulations have small eddies ( see @xcite and discussion in @xcite ) .
the qualitative features of convective flow , revealed by 3d simulations , are present in 2d simulations as well ( see @xcite and ref . therein ) .
there are few quantitative measurements of the differences between 2d and 3d simulations : in a study of convection in proto - neutron star , @xcite have shown that the importance of small scale features , and the kinetic energies are different when comparing 3d to 2d simulations ; @xcite have simulated novae in 3d and compared the results to their 2d simulations ( @xcite ) , they found the difference in the spectrum of eddy sizes to have an influence on the amount of overshoot and mixing , thus yielding a different answer to the question of the existence of thermonuclear runaway ; in a study of convection in solar type stars , which is more comparable to this paper , @xcite have results of first 3d calculations , these results indicate little difference between the calibrated mixing length parameter from 3d simulations , relative to the calibrated mixing length parameter from 2d simulations .
modeling the convection region of rg envelopes is necessary when studying phenomena related to these stars .
for example , consider the observational relation of the pulsation time to the luminosities of mirae : there is ambiguity concerning the pulsation mode ( is it the fundamental mode or the first mode ? ) .
the period in the first mode is about half of the period in the fundamental mode , however changing the mixing length parameter from 1 to 1.5 is enough to change the calculated period by a factor of 2 ( @xcite ) .
the value of the mixing length parameter affects the calculated age of globular clusters ( see @xcite and ref . therein ) .    due to the importance of modeling convection in studying rg s , and the lack of previous hydrodynamical calculations of this phenomena , i focused on 2d simulation of rg s envelope convection . in
2 i describe the code used for the simulations .
summary of the results published in at97 is presented in  3 and more results of the at97 simulations are summarized in  4 .
a survey of the importance of the various parameters of the simulation techniques is presented in  5 and  6 . a short summary of this research
is given in  7 .
as was described in at97 , the hydrodynamical code vulcan ( @xcite ) was used for this study , after utilizing several modifications to the code .
this version of the code solves the hydrodynamic equations and radiative diffusion equations by splitting each time step into hydrodynamic time step followed by a radiative diffusion time step .
both steps are solved implicitly to have an accurate and stable solution .
the code uses an arbitrary lagrangian eulerian ( ale ) scheme in which each lagrangian step is followed by a relaxation of the numerical grid . in this relaxation stage ,
the grid is modified to eliminate distortion and to allow calculation of flow with vorticity .
a quasi 1d lagrangian relaxation was used , in which each radial row of cells kept its mass .
this was done for each row of cells by calculating an average outer radius , so that the sum of the mass fluxes through it would be zero . using this method ,
one was able to follow the average radial expansion or shrinking of the envelope .
the mass , momentum and energy fluxes in the relaxation stage were calculated by a second order donor scheme , in which the gradiants of these variables were used to estimate the fluxes at the boundaries of the cells ( according to @xcite ) . .
like other numerical studies of convection ( @xcite ) , i implemented subscale viscosity and diffusion terms using the @xcite model .
the inclusion of these terms in the equations solved by the code should compensate for the use of a finite number of cells which is much less than needed when simulating turbulent flow if one wishes to simulate the effects of all scales up to the scale of physical dissipation . in the simple smagorinsky model these terms are the usual viscosity terms with a coefficient which depends upon derivatives of the velocities and a typical length scale of the numerical grid .
when there is a scalar field that is characteristic of the fluid , one should add a diffusion term of this scalar field with a coefficient which is proportional to the viscosity coefficient .
in convective flow , this scalar is the entropy ( @xcite , ludwig 1994 , @xcite ) and thus entropy diffusion was added to the code .
the two parameters in these large eddies simulation ( les ) terms were the smagorinsky coefficient ( which multiplies the viscosity coefficient ) and the prandtl number ( which is the ratio of the viscosity coefficient to the diffusion coefficient ) .
both the viscosity and the entropy diffusion were added as explicit terms since they were relatively small .
the inner boundary in the simulations was located deeper than the convection zone to minimize the effects of not including the entire envelope . however , in preliminary simulations , hydrodynamical waves were invoked below the convection zone , and there was a convective flux near the inner boundary . by comparing simulations in which the inner boundary was placed at different depths , it was found that this convective flux was not physical because it was always located near the inner boundary .
realizing this was due to an improper boundary condition ( in which only the radial velocities were set to zero for points on the inner boundary ) , i changed the condition and set both components of the velocities at the inner boundary to zero and allowed only radial velocities at the lowest three rows of points . with this new boundary condition ,
the flux disappeared .
the inner boundary condition for the radiative diffusion was of a constant entering flux equal to the luminosity of the static model ( i.e. equivalent to @xmath2 ) .    for the hydrodynamic step a constant ( usually zero ) outer pressure
was used , without limiting the direction of the velocities at the outer boundary . however , at the mesh relaxation stage , an average radius was calculated for the outer boundary so that the mass flux through the boundary was zero . the remapping fluxes ( i.e. the fluxes at the mesh relaxation stage ) , through this boundary were calculated using the values of the bundary cells ( i.e. , using an acceptor scheme for the incoming flow ) . for the radiative diffusion
, an outgoing flux was calculated using @xmath5 where t is the temperature of the boundary cell and @xmath6 is the stefan constant ( i.e. , assuming it to be at optical depth of about two thirds ) .    for the sides of the computational sector either reflective boundary conditions , or periodic boundary conditions were used . when using the reflective boundary conditions , all fluxes through these boundaries
were set to be zero , and thus only downstreams or upstreams existed on the boundaries .
this was different when using periodic boundary condition , for which each boundary cell has an artificial neighbor at the other side of the sector ( though , since i assumed cylindrical symmetry , there is no direct physical meaning to periodic boundary conditions ) .    in order to analyze the results of the simulations i used printouts of time averaged energy fluxes for each radial layer .
the fluxes included radiative flux as was calculated by the radiative diffusion step , remapping fluxes of internal energy and kinetic energy calculated by the grid relaxation stage , and hydrodynamical fluxes that can be calculated using @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the total energy density , @xmath9 is the pressure , @xmath10 is the velocity vector and @xmath11 is the mass density .
the convective flux is the sum of the remapping and the hydrodynamical fluxes .
both the radiative and the remapping fluxes were calculated explicitly in the simulations and had only to be time averaged . however , the hydrodynamical fluxes were intrinsic and thus had to be estimated .
i used two methods : a. explicitly using the above formula , and b. by energy balance of each radial layer in the hydrodynamical step ( i.e. the flux from one layer to the next in each time step is equal to the change in total energy of the layer during the time step minus the flux from the previous layer ) .
both methods had inconsistencies : the first uses a formula which is not one of the formulae that control the simulation and the second is correct only if full conservation of energy exists in the simulation .
additional discussion of this issue appears in  4 , where a flux plot is presented .    as a test case for the simulation techniques i reproduced the results of a `` convection in a box '' study ( published by @xcite ) .
the configuration for these simulations was of two stable layers with an unstable layer in between . the velocity field and the averaged fluxes in the simulations were similar to the published existing results .
in addition to the 2d hydrodynamic code , two 1d codes were used : a static code ( see @xcite for description ) , and a hydrodynamic code ( @xcite ) .
the static code was used to integrate initial models of the envelope , and the dynamic code was used to follow the hydrodynamic evolution of the models for comparison with the 2d results ( as explained in the following sections ) .
both codes use @xcite prescription of mlt to calculate convective flux .
the equation of state and opacities used by these 1d codes are identical to those used by the 2d code .
the equation of state is based on tabular form and includes sum of components for electrons , ions , molecules of hydrogen and helium and radiation ( see @xcite for details ) .
opacities are calculated according to @xcite with water molecules contribution according to @xcite ( taken from @xcite ) .
the study was focused on models of an envelope of a red giant with total mass of @xmath0 core mass of @xmath1 , luminosity of @xmath2 and metallicity of @xmath3 .
the models were integrated using the mixing length theory with the mixing length proportional to the pressure scale height .
five models were integrated using different values of the proportion coefficient ( -mixing length parameter ) @xmath12 : @xmath13 ( i.e. no convection ) , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , and @xmath17 .
these five models had different total energy as well as different energetic structure as an outcome of different energy transport efficiency , as was dictated by the value of the mixing length parameter .
the aim of the study was to find which of these five models was more consistent with the results of 2d dynamical simulations .
the final configuration reached by the end of 2d dynamical simulations of each of these five models should be the same , since they all correspond to the same physical envelope ( the same mass , luminosity and structure below the convection zone ) .
the difference in the simulations is in the relaxation time needed for the different models to adjust their total energy and structure and to reach thermal equilibrium . due to the long thermal time scale of these envelopes , and to computational limitations
, this relaxation phase could not be fully simulated , however , as was demonstrated in figure 1 , there was enough data in the beginning of the simulations to reach conclusions about the preferred model .    in this figure
the luminosity as a function of time for each of the five simulations was presented .
the most obvious result in this figure is that in the simulations that started from models with @xmath18 the envelope lost energy while for simulations started from models with @xmath19 the envelope gained energy . that was the main reason for the conclusion that the 1d model integrated with @xmath20 was the most consistent with the 2d simulations .
a consistency check of this result was done by using 1d dynamic simulation with @xmath20 mlt starting from the above different initial models .
it was found out that the 1d simulations mimic the 2d simulations , i.e. the luminosity ( and radius ) as a function of time for the different initial models looked similar . a more precise analysis of the results revealed that the final configuration of the _ dynamical _ simulations ( both one and 2d ) had slightly less total energy than the _ static _ 1d model of @xmath20 .
a typical velocity field in the simulations is presented in figure 2 .
one can identify narrow downstreams and wider upstreams in the flow .
the length scale of the streams increased with depth ( as well as the pressure scale height ) .
the existence of hydrodynamical waves below the convection zone is apparent .    as mentioned before , by comparison of the five simulations
a conclusion could be made that the @xmath20 model was the most consistent with the final 2d configuration , however from figure 3 it is clear that this model was not in a full thermal equilibrium . in this figure ,
the ( time ) averaged fluxes in the 2d simulation of this model are presented , including the radiative flux and the total flux ( the sum of radiative and convective fluxes ) . for comparison , the 1d ( static ) radiative flux is presented , too .
the radiative flux in the 2d simulation resembled the static model , though a modest widening of the convective zone is clear , and an increase in the radiative flux above the constant luminosity is apparent near the bottom of the convective zone ( see @xcite ) .
the value of the total flux is indicative of the thermal equilibrium of the model .
the total flux was slightly less than @xmath21 below the convective zone , and reached a maximum of about @xmath22 near the upper boundary and then it declined to the surface luminosity of about @xmath23 . while it is clear that this is a result of a yet non equilibrium configuration , one should nt forget that due to the lack of algebric energy conservation , this plot is influenced by the uncertainty in the value of the hydrodynamical flux ( as was described in  2 ) : the energy conservation in each time step was of the order of @xmath24 of the energy .
this seems to be small , but when one divides it by the time step ( about 80 seconds ) , one gets @xmath25 .
i think it is important to note that this has little effect upon the simulation itself , which i confirmed by adding artificial non - energy - conserving term to the _
1d _ dynamic code and comparing the results of several simulations where i changed the value of this term .
the different values of the luminosity in the simulations ( figure 1 ) were dominated by the values of of the outer radii ( compare this figure with figure 3 in at97 ) . in the initial configurations
there was a relatively large difference in the effective temperatures : 3675k for @xmath26 , 4600k for @xmath27 and 5110k for @xmath28 .
however , in the dynamical simulations , very quickly ( less than a month ) the difference shrank dramatically , and the effective temperature became : 4520k , 4600k , and 4650k ( for the same models as above ) with time fluctuations of about 100k .
in other words , using the dynamical simulations , one gets almost immediately , an effective temperature which is very close to the effective temperature of the @xmath20 model .
this gives more confidence in the above conclusion that the @xmath20 is the preferred model .
the 1d consistency simulations featured the same phenomenon .
the five ( 2d ) simulations used similar numerical parameters .
the grid consisted of 36 angular cells in each row , with 53 to 72 rows ( for the simulations of models with @xmath19 , i included deeper regions of the envelope - down to eight @xmath29 - because of the deeper convection zone ) .
the angular sector was @xmath30 near the equatorial plane .
the fluxes in the relaxation stage were calculated using a second order donor scheme , and the energy flux consisted of both internal and kinetic energies .
i used reflective boundary conditions on the sides of the computational domain .
les viscosity was used , with smagorinsky coefficient of 0.5 and without entropy diffusion .
i made many tests of the dynamical simulation of the model that started with the @xmath20 profile .
i changed the numerical scheme , the number of cells and the angular width of the computational domain and the parameters of the les terms .
the changes in numerical scheme included : calculating the remapping fluxes using full donor ( i.e. without taking the gradients of the hydrodynamical variables into account ) , using internal energy fluxes in the grid relaxation stage ( without adding the kinetic energy ) and the use of periodic boundary conditions at the sides .
i found that the full donor simulation yielded a rapid expansion of the envelope - implying it is necessary to include gradients in the calculation of the fluxes .
the use of the internal energy ( only ) for the remapping energy fluxes caused a small constant loss of kinetic energy and thus a modest shrinking of the envelope without changing the luminosity .
the velocity field of the simulation with periodic boundary conditions is presented in figure 4 .
the non radial velocities at the sides are expected , but no other significant change can be seen , compared to the velocity field of reflecting boundary conditions ( figure 2 ) , i.e. the size of the eddies and the changes in the velocities with depth look similar .
the luminosity and outer radius as a function of time look the same as well , as can be seen in figure 5 .
changes in the angular width or number of cells had small effects . increasing both the angular width to @xmath31 and the number of cells in each row to 54 yielded similar results as the nominal simulation , as presented in the velocity field - figure 6 , and in the luminosity and outer radius - figure 7 .
when i decreased the angular width to @xmath32 i got a larger variability in the luminosity and outer radius ( see figure 8) and a small increase in the average luminosity , as well .
a small increase in the average luminosity was seen in a simulation with larger number of cells ( = 54 ) in each row ( with the nominal angular width of @xmath30 ) , as presented in figure 9 . increasing the number of rows to 81 , had no significant effect .
the variations in the les terms included changing the numerical coefficient and adding an entropy diffusion term .
when i had zero or small ( smagorinsky coefficient of 0.01 ) les viscosity i got somewhat larger variability in the luminosity and outer radius , but without changes of the average values . however , including an entropy diffusion term ( with prandtl number of one ) increased the average luminosity by a small amount ( see figure 10 ) . when i had this term , a further increase in the luminosity was evident when the smagorinsky coefficient was increased to one
a summary of these tests reveals that there was a tendency to increase the luminosity in two cases : when i increased the angular resolution , and when i added an entropy diffusion term in the les scheme .
these two cases have one physical meaning : an increase in the efficiency of convection by adding smaller scale turbulent fluxes . since there was a very small luminosity increase in the above simulations , i performed yet another simulation where i increased the resolution by a ( relatively ) large factor .
i started with a profile of the nominal simulation ( of @xmath33 cells ) and increased the number of cells almost by an order of magnitude ( @xmath34 cells ) , without the entropy diffusion term .
this simulation , being much more cpu demanding , was followed for a small physical time but nevertheless a clear conclusion can be made , as can be seen in figure 11 .
the luminosity increased quite significantly from about @xmath23 in the nominal simulation to about @xmath35 .
an increase in luminosity means that the envelope loses more energy , and from the five simulation with different initial models , this means that the 1d model which is consistent with the 2d simulations should have a larger value of @xmath12 , i.e. @xmath19 . to test this conclusion i performed high resolution simulation starting with the initial model based upon @xmath28 .
again , i started with a profile of the nominal simulation ( with @xmath36 cells ) and increased the resolution to @xmath37 cells .
this yielded an increase in the luminosity from about @xmath38 to about @xmath39 , as expected .
in order to check systematically the dependence of the luminosity in the spatial resolution and in the les terms , i performed the following simulations , which started with the same initial profile .
the initial profile was a 2d profile with an already developed convective flow based on the initial 1d model with @xmath20 . from this profile
i interpolated four equivalent profiles with different spatial resolution : @xmath40 cells , @xmath41 cells , @xmath42 cells and @xmath43 cells , thus having factor of about 64 between the number of cells in the finer grid and in the coarser grid . from the above discussion
it is clear that the significant term in the les scheme is the entropy diffusion term , so i used the nominal 0.5 value of the smagorinsky coefficient , and changed the importance of the entropy diffusion term by changing the prandtl number , using the values : @xmath44 ( i.e. the last value corresponds to increasing the diffusion term by a factor of five compared to the first value ) .
i used these values of the prandtl number for each of the four resolutions , and thus having sixteen simulations .
the flow in four of these sixteen simulations is presented in figure 12 , for different resolutions .
the flow is presented by contours of the vorticity and indeed increasing the resolution yielded more small scale eddies ( and higher values of vorticity ) .
the luminosities of these simulations are summarized in figure 13 , and in table 1 i present the average luminosities . from these results
one can conclude that the best estimate of the luminosity is @xmath45 , and that the better the resolution is , the less important the value of prandtl number is . in a perfect les scheme one should get the converged result for each resolution for given set of numerical parameters ( i.e. prandtl number in our case ) .
however , the value of about @xmath46 was obtained in each resolution with a different value of prandtl number , this value seems to increase when decreasing the resolution .    for two of these 16 simulations
i checked the importance of the les entropy diffusion term comparing to the les viscosity terms .
i performed simulations where i changed both smagorinsky coefficient and prandtl number so that the amplitude of the diffusion term would be the same , while changing the amplitude of the viscosity terms .
i performed a @xmath42 cell simulation with smagorinsky coefficient of 1.5 and prandtl number of 1 and got an average luminosity of @xmath47 ( equivalent to a prandtl number @xmath48 simulation ) , and a @xmath49 cell simulation with smagorinsky coefficient of 1 . and prandtl number of 1 where i got an average luminosity of @xmath46 ( equivalent to a prandtl number @xmath14 simulation ) .
the summary of these results is that the 2d simulations of an initial model calculated with @xmath20 mlt , yields an energy - losing envelope with an average luminosity of @xmath46 . to find
what value of @xmath12 can reproduce this i performed several 1d dynamic simulations . in each of these simulations ,
i started with the same @xmath20 profile , and assuming different values for the @xmath12 in the dynamical model i got different luminosities . for the following values of @xmath12
: 1.2 , 1.3 , 1.4 and 1.5 i got average luminosities of about : 230 , 240 , 250 and 270 ( @xmath50 ) . from this
i conclude that the consistent value of @xmath12 is 1.4 .
as was presented in at97 the convective envelope of a red giant ( of mass @xmath0 , core mass of @xmath1 , luminosity of @xmath2 , and metallicity @xmath3 ) was studied by comparing 2d simulations of five different initial models .
while a full convergence of these simulations to a balanced final configuration was not possible , due to the large thermal time scale of this envelope , it was found that an initial model calculated with mlt using @xmath20 , was almost energetically balanced , and thus was the best estimate of the final configuration .      after a comprehensive survey of the importance of the various parameters used in the simulation technique , a sensitivity to the spatial resolution and to the les entropy diffusion term was found .
this sensitivity was tested by using four resolutions and four values of the les term , and it was concluded that the preferred value of @xmath12 is 1.4 , for the envelope tested in this study . it was found that , at least for this code and for these kind of simulations , one needs to calibrate the les terms .    the conclusion for the value of @xmath12 , to be used in modeling the ged giant envelope studied in this research , being larger than one is consistent with the results of @xcite where they calculated evolutionary sequences and compared them to observation .
this value of 1.4 is also consistent with _
extrapolation _ of the results of @xcite and @xcite where numerical simulations were applied to the outer convective zone of solar like stars .
this conclusion is important for studies in which an accurate modeling of red giants is necessary , like obtaining pulsation times of miras ( @xcite ) or calculating isochrones of globular clusters(@xcite ) .
an obvious limitation of this study is the use of 2d simulations ( and not 3d simulations ) .
the spectrum of eddy sizes is probably different in 3d , but the influence of this upon the calibrated mixing length parameter is not known .
however , @xcite have first estimation of the change in the calibrated mixing length parameter for their study of solar type convection , due to the difference between 2d and 3d simulations .
they conclude that the calibrated mixing length parameter for the sun from 3d simulation is higher by 0.07 than from 2d simulation .
i am grateful to yitzchak tuchman for his encouraging cooperation and to eli livne for his code .
i thank ami glasner , yossi stein and zalman barkat for many fruitful discussions , and dave arnett and the referee for useful suggestions to the manuscript .
abbett , w.p . ,
beaner , m. , davids , b. , georgobiani , d. , rathbun , p. , & stein r.f .
1997 , , 480 , 395 arnett , w.d .
1994 , , 427 , 932 asida , s.m . , & tuchman , y. 1997 , , 491 , l47 basu , s. & antia , h. m. 1994 , journal of astrophysics and astronomy , 15 , 143 bazan , g. , & arnett , w.d .
1994 , , 433 , l41 bazan , g. , & arnett , w.d .
1998 , , 496 , 316 bogdan , t.j . ,
cattaneo , f. , & malagoni , a. , 1993 , , 407 , 316 bohm - vitense e. , 1958 , z. astrophys .
46 , 108 buchler , j.r . , yecko , p. , koll@xmath51th , z. , & goupil , m .- j . 1999 ,
astro - ph/9905025 canuto , v.m . , 1996 , , 467 , 385 canuto , v.m . , 1997 , , 482 , 827 canuto , v.m . , & christensen - dalsgaard , j. , 1998 , annu
fluid mech . , 30 , 167 canuto , v.m . , & dubovikov , m. , 1998 , , 493 , 834 canuto , v.m . ,
goldman , i. , & mazzitelli , i. , 1996 , , 473 , 550 canuto , v.m .
, & mazzitelli , i. , 1991 , , 370 , 295 castaing , b. , gunaratne , g. , & heslot , f. , 1989 , j. fluid mech . , 204 , 1 cattaneo , f. , brummell , n.h . , toomre , j. , malagoni , a. , & hurlburt , n.e .
1991 , , 370 , 282 cattaneo , f. , hurlburt , n.e . , &
toomre , j. 1990 , 349 , l63 chan , k.l .
, & gigas , d. 1992 , , 389 , l87 chan , k.l . , & sofia , s. 1986 , , 307 , 222 chan , k.l . , sofia , s. , & wolff , c.l .
1982 , , 263 , 935 cox , a.n . , &
stewart , j.n .
1970 , , 19 , 243 cox , j.p . , & giuli , r.t . 1968 , principles of stellar structure ( new york : gordon & breach ) demarque .
p. , guenther , d.b .
, & kim , y .- c .
1997 , , 474 , 790 deupree , r.g . 1975 , 201 , 183 deupree , r.g .
1977 , 211 , 509 deupree , r.g . 1985 , 296 , 160 deupree , r.g .
1998 , 499 , 340 freytag , b. , ludwig , h .- g . , & steffen , m. 1999 , in proceedings contribution to the workshop on stellar structure : `` theory and tests of convective energy transport '' granada , spain , 1998 , eds .
a.  gimenez , e.  guinan , b.  montesinos freytag , b. & salaris , m. 1999 , , 513 , l49 gehmeyr , m. & winkler , k. -h .
a. 1992 , , 253 , 92 glasner , s.a . , & livne , e. 1995 , , 445 , l149 glasner , s.a . , & livne , e. , & truran , j.w .
1997 , , 475 , 754 grossman , s. a. 1996 , , 279 , 305 grossman , s.a . ,
narayan , r. 1993 , , 89 , 361 grossman , s.a . ,
narayan , r. , & arnett , d. 1993 , , 407 , 284 helsot , f. , castaing , b. , & libchaber , a. 1987 , , 36 , 5870 hossain , m. , & mullan , d.j .
1991 , , 380 , 631 hurlburt , n. e. , toomre , j. , & massaguer , j. m. 1984 , , 282 , 557 hurlburt , n. e. , toomre , j. , & massaguer , j. m. 1986 , , 311 , 563 hurlburt , n. e. , toomre , j. , massaguer , j. m. , & zahn , j. -p .
1994 , , 421 , 245 kercek , a. , hillebrant , w. , & truran , j.w .
1998 , , 337 , 379 kercek , a. , hillebrant , w. , & truran , j.w .
1998 , , 345 , 831 kerr , r.m .
1996 , j. fluid mech . ,
310 , 139 kim , y. -c . , fox , p. a. , sofia , s. , & demarque , p. 1995
, , 442 , 422 kim , y. -c . , fox , p. a. , demarque , p. , & sofia , s. 1996 , , 461 , 499 livne , e. 1993 , , 412 , 634 ludwig , h .-
g . , freytag , b. , & steffen , m. 1999 , , 346 , 111 ludwig , h. -g . , jordan , s. & steffen , m. 1994 , , 284 , 105 maeder , a. , & conti , p.s .
1994 , , 32 , 227 malagoni , a. , cattaneo , f. , & brummell , n.h .
1990 , , 361 , l33 mezzacappa , a. , calder , a. c. , bruenn , s. w. , blondin , j. m. , guidry , m. w. , strayer , m. r. & umar , a. s. 1998 , , 495 , 911 m@xmath52ller , e. , & janka h .-
1997 , , 317 , 140 nordlund , a. , & stein , r.f .
1995 , stellar evolution : what can be done , 32@xmath53 liege int .
nordlund , a. , stein , r.f . , & brandenburg , a. 1996 , bull astron .
india , 24 paczinski , b. 1969 , acta astr .
19 , 1 porter , d.h . , &
woodward , p.r .
1994 , , 93 , 309 rast , m.p .
, & toomre , j. 1993 , , 419 , 224 schwarzchild , m. 1961 , , 134 , 1 singh , h. p. , & chan , k. l. 1993 , , 279 , 107 singh , h. p. , roxburgh , i. w. , & chan , k. l. 1994 , , 281 , l73 singh , h. p. , roxburgh , i. w. , & chan , k. l. 1995 , , 295 , 703 smagorinsky , j. 1963 , mon .
weather rev . , 91(3 ) , 99 smalley , b. , & kupka , f. 1997 , , 328 , 349 spiegel , e.a .
1963 , , 138 , 216 spruit , h.c . ,
nordlund , a. , & title , a.m. 1990 , , 28 , 263 stein r.f .
, & nordlund , a. 1989 , 342 , l95 stein r.f .
, & nordlund , a. 1998 , 499 , 914 stellingwerf , r.f .
1982 , , 262 , 330 stone , j. m. , & balbus , s. a. 1996 , , 464 , 364 stothers , r. b. , & chin , c. -w .
1995 , , 440 , 297 stothers , r. b. , & chin , c. -w .
1997 , , 478 , l103 tligner , a. , belmonte , a. , & libchaber , a. 1993 , , 47 , r2253 tuchman , y. 1980 , `` dynamical phenomena in red giant envelopes '' , phd .
thesis tuchman , y. , sack , n. , & barkat , z. 1978 , , 219 , 183 tuchman , y. , sack , n. , & barkat , z. 1979 , , 234 , 217 ulrich , r.k .
1970 , ap .
space sci .
, 7 , 71 ulrich , r.k .
1976 , , 207 , 564 van leer b. 1979 , j. comput .
phys . , 32 , 101 werne , j. 1993 , , 48 , 1020 werne , j. 1994 , , 49 , 4072 wu , x .- z . , & libchaber , a. 1992 , , 45 , 842 xie , x. , & toomre , j. 1993 , , 405 , 747 xiong , d. r. , cheng , q. l. , & deng , l. 1997 , , 108 , 529 xiong , d. r. , deng , l. , & cheng , q. l. 1998 , , 499 , 355 xiong , d. r. , cheng , q. l. , & deng , l. 1998 , , 500 , 449 yaari , a. , & tuchman , y. 1998 , private communication zahn , j. -p .
1991 , , 252 , 179


particles with resonant short - range interactions display the efimov effect @xcite and related universal phenomena associated with a discrete scaling symmetry @xcite . in particular , efimov showed that three identical bosons form infinitely many trimer bound states with an accumulation point at the scattering threshold when the @xmath3-wave scattering length @xmath4 is tuned to the unitary limit @xmath5 : @xmath6 where @xmath0 is the mass of the particles , @xmath7 is a transcendental number , and @xmath8 is the binding wavenumber of the efimov state labeled by @xmath9 .
the geometric spectrum in ( [ kappa - star ] ) is the signature of a discrete scaling symmetry with scaling factor @xmath10 . for a finite scattering length larger than the range of the interaction ,
the universal properties persist but there is only a finite number of efimov states . the full structure of the trimer spectrum as a function of the inverse scattering length @xmath11 is conveniently summarized in the so - called efimov plot illustrated in fig .
[ fig:3body ] .
this plot shows the scattering length dependence of the bound states in the    @xmath12 plane for the 3-body problem .
scattering thresholds are indicated by the cross - hatching while the universal window is given by the circle of radius @xmath13 .
a few of the infinitely many branches of efimov states are shown by the solid lines.,width=302 ]    @xmath14@xmath12 plane , where @xmath15 is a momentum variable that corresponds to the binding momentum for bound states with @xmath16 .
the threshold for scattering states is indicated by the hatched area .
the efimov trimers are represented by the solid lines below the threshold .
there are infinitely many branches of efimov trimers , but only a few are shown . in the unitary limit @xmath17 , infinitely many trimer states accumulate at threshold .
when the radial variable @xmath18 is of the order of the inverse interaction range @xmath13 or larger , universality breaks down and the states become sensitive to the details of the interaction at short distances .
ultracold atoms are an ideal tool to study such phenomena since the scattering length can be tuned experimentally to be large compared to the range of the interaction using feshbach resonances .
efimov trimers can be observed in ultracold atomic gases via their signature in three - body recombination rates @xcite . using this method , kraemer _ et al . _
provided the first evidence for efimov trimers in an ultracold gas of @xmath19cs atoms by observing the resonant enhancement of atom losses through three - body recombination caused by the trimers @xcite .
efimov states have been observed in a variety of other atomic species since then @xcite .
the scaling factor @xmath20 can be significantly reduced in heteronuclear systems with different mass particles which makes it easier to observe multiple states . in this paper , we focus on heteronuclear systems with two species of atoms where only the interspecies scattering length is large . for comparable masses
the scaling factor is quite large in this case ( @xmath21 for equal masses ) as we now have only two resonant interactions out of three .
however , in the case of two heavy bosonic atoms of mass @xmath1 ( denoted @xmath22 ) and one light atom of mass @xmath23 ( denoted @xmath24 ) , this factor can become significantly smaller than the value 22.7 for identical bosons  @xcite .
relaxation and recombination losses near an interspecies resonance have recently been investigated in mixtures of cesium and lithium atoms and three consecutive cs - cs - li efimov resonances were observed in agreement with the predicted scaling relations @xcite .
the effect of the cs - cs scattering length on the efimov resonances was investigated in refs .
@xcite .
connected to the efimov states are universal bound states in the four- and higher - body sector .
although there is no accumulation of bound states at threshold , there are universal four- and higher - body states attached to each efimov trimer .
the binding energies of these higher - body states are uniquely determined by @xmath4 and @xmath8 and no higher - body parameters are required @xcite . in experiments with ultracold cesium atoms universal states up to @xmath25
have been observed @xcite . for identical bosons ,
exactly two tetramer states are attached to each trimer state @xcite .
this pattern appears to hold also for the higher - body states and has been calculated explicitly up to @xmath26 @xcite .
the ground states have been calculated up to @xmath27 @xcite .
it would be very interesting to demonstrate the existence of the higher - body universal states in experiments with mixtures .
focusing on four - body states , the @xmath28 states are most promising due to the favorable scaling factor .
however , the relation of the higher - body energies to the trimer energies is not governed by the same universal numbers and even the number of higher - body states attached to the trimers will very likely depend on the mass ratio .
the signatures of efimov physics in heteronuclear four - body systems were first investigated in ref .
a detailed study of the four - body states in a mixture of cesium and lithium atoms in the vicinity of the unitary limit and the three - atom threshold was recently performed by blume and yan @xcite . for large enough mass ratios ( @xmath29 they found two universal four - body states in the unitary limit .
they also found an excited four - body state for negative values of the scattering length for all mass ratios they investigated ( @xmath30 ) . for the mass ratio @xmath31
they showed that the excited tetramer becomes unbound at a certain positive value of the scattering length , leading them to the conjecture that the scattering length at which the excited tetramer becomes unbound depends on the mass ratio .    in this paper
, we build upon the investigation by blume and yan and extend it in several ways .
we extend their calculation to positive scattering lengths further away from the unitary limit .
in particular , we investigate the mass dependence of the spectrum and discuss the number of universal tetramer states as function of the mass ratio .
one of our key findings is that the structure of the spectrum changes as the mass ratio @xmath2 decreases . in particular ,
the distance between the thresholds for trimer and tetramer states gets smaller until they almost coincide for @xmath32 .
preliminary studies of this aspect were presented in ref .
moreover , we summarize our insights in a multi - dimensional efimov plot which shows @xmath12 as a function of @xmath11 and the ratio of the heavy and light masses @xmath2 .    a particularly interesting aspect of the @xmath28 system is the prospect of observing effective efimov states of a @xmath33 dimer and two heavy atoms @xmath22 which are denoted @xmath34 in the following .
such an effective efimov effect must exist close to the crossing point of the @xmath35 trimer and the @xmath33 dimer threshold .
this requires precise studies of the bound state spectrum near the @xmath33 dimer threshold . assuming that only the @xmath33 dimer and the two @xmath22 atoms interact
, one would expect a scaling factor that is larger than 1986 , which is the limiting value for @xmath36  @xcite . for a cesium - lithium mixture
, one would expect a scaling factor of about 2500 .    using the born - oppenheimer approximation , wang and collaborators
@xcite found evidence for the existence of two such states for the mass ratio @xmath37 with a scaling factor of approximately 20 .
they explain the small scaling factor with an effective interaction between the @xmath22 particles that is induced by the exchange of the @xmath24 particle . in this paper
, we will address this puzzle by investigating the effective @xmath34 efimov states for different mass ratios @xmath2 using explicit four - body calculations as well as using an effective field theory for heteronuclear three - body mixtures @xcite .
to obtain the energies of the @xmath38 trimer and @xmath28 tetramer systems , we employ the gaussian expansion method ( gem ) @xcite . the method was successfully applied to various types of three- , four- and five - body hypernuclear systems @xcite and trimer and tetramer systems of @xmath39he @xcite .
we use jacobian coordinate sets for trimer and tetramer systems as shown in fig .
[ fig : three - atom ] .
the hamiltonians for the three and four - body systems are described as @xmath40 respectively , where @xmath41 is the kinetic - energy operator , the @xmath42 and @xmath43 are two - body potentials and @xmath44 and @xmath45 are three - body potentials , which are the same as in ref .
the details are given below .
here it should be noted that we switch off the two - body interaction between the heavy bosonic atoms .
the energies are obtained by solving the trimer and tetramer schrdinger equations given by @xmath46    at ( 0,0.99 )   and @xmath47 are heavy bosonic atoms and @xmath48 is a light atom . in ( b ) @xmath49 , @xmath47 , and @xmath48 are heavy bosonic atoms and @xmath50 is a light atom .
the two bosonic atoms in the trimer and the three bosonic atoms in the tetramer are symmetrized.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] ; at ( 8,0 )   and @xmath47 are heavy bosonic atoms and @xmath48 is a light atom . in ( b )
@xmath49 , @xmath47 , and @xmath48 are heavy bosonic atoms and @xmath50 is a light atom . the two bosonic atoms in the trimer and the three bosonic atoms in the tetramer are symmetrized.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=50.0% ] ; at ( -2.55,0.5 ) @xmath51 ; at ( -0.63,0.85 ) @xmath52 ; at ( 5.5,2.2 ) @xmath51 ; at ( 6.7,2 . )
@xmath53 ; at ( 7.7,2.35 ) @xmath54 ; at ( 8.6,-1.88 ) @xmath55 ; at ( 6.7,-2.2 ) @xmath56 ; at ( 7.2,-1.3 ) @xmath57 ;    the wave functions of three - body and four - body systems are described as a sum of amplitudes for the rearrangement channels ( @xmath58 for the trimer , @xmath59 for the tetramer ) illustrated in fig .  [ fig : three - atom ] as follows : @xmath60_{jm } \\
\psi^{\rm tetramer}_{jm } & =   \sum^4_{c=1 } \sum_{n_c , n_c,\nu_c}\sum_{\ell_c , l_c,\lambda_c }    c^{(c)}_{n_c \ell_c   n_c l_c \nu_c \lambda_c } \\   & \quad \times [ [ \phi^{(c)}_{n_c \ell_c}({\bf r}_c )
\psi^{(c)}_{n_c l_c}({\bf r}_c)]_i \xi_{\nu_c \lambda_c}^{(c ) } ( \mbox{\boldmath $ \rho$}_c)]_{jm}.   \end{split}\ ] ]    here , the two ( three ) bosonic atoms in the trimer ( tetramer ) must be symmetrized . for this purpose , we take the angular momenta @xmath61 to be even numbers in the corresponding rearrangement channels . we take the functional form of @xmath62 , @xmath63 , and @xmath64 as @xmath65 where @xmath66 , @xmath67 , @xmath68 denote the normalization constants .
the gaussian range parameters are chosen according to geometrical progression : @xmath69    the gaussian ranges are very suitable for accurately describing both the short - range correlations and the long - range tail in the asymptotic region of few - body wave functions .
the gaussian shape of basis functions makes the calculation of matrix elements simple even between basis functions of different channels .
rrrrrrrrrrrrr + @xmath70 & @xmath71 & @xmath72 & @xmath73 & @xmath74 & @xmath75 & @xmath76 & @xmath77 & @xmath78 + 1 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0.028 & 15 & 20 & 0.038 & 65 + 1 & 2 & 2 & 21 & 0.180 & 27 & 19 & 0.228 & 20 + 2 & 0 & 0 & 19 & 0.110 & 26 & 21 & 0.085 & 29 +   +   +    the eigenenergies @xmath79 in eq .
( [ hamil ] ) and the coefficients @xmath80 in eq .
( [ wave ] ) are then determined by the raleigh - ritz variational method .    in tables [
table : parameters ] and [ table : parameters2 ] , typical parameters of the basis functions for the trimer and tetramer are listed .
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr + @xmath70 & @xmath71 & @xmath72 & @xmath73 & @xmath74 & @xmath75 & @xmath76 & @xmath77 & @xmath78 & @xmath81 & @xmath82 & @xmath83 + 1 & 0 & 0 & 11 & 0.073 & 13 & 13 & 0.059 & 8 & 11 & 0.055 & 14 + 2 & 0 & 0 & 15 & 0.043 & 9 & 15 & 0.044 & 7 & 15 & 0.075 & 33 + 3 & 0 & 0 & 17 & 0.038 & 6 & 16 & 0.044 & 13 & 17 & 0.055 & 25 + 3 & 1 & 1 & 13 & 0.057 & 7 & 13 & 0.052 & 6 & 14 & 0.094 & 25 + 4 & 0 & 0 & 14 & 0.139 & 15 & 12 & 0.033 & 5 & 14 & 0.127 & 12
+   +   +    the potential and kinetic energy terms are expanded in the truncated basis as shown in eq .
( [ wave ] ) . because the states are not orthogonal this transforms the schrdinger equation @xmath84_{jm } { \vphantom{\def{&}{}h -    e c^{(c)}_{n_cl_cn_cl_c}[\phi^{(c)}_{n_c \ell_c}({\bf r}_c ) \psi^{(c)}_{n_c
l_c}({\bf r}_c)]_{jm } } } \right| h -    e \left|   c^{(c)}_{n_cl_cn_cl_c}[\phi^{(c)}_{n_c \ell_c}({\bf r}_c ) \psi^{(c)}_{n_c
l_c}({\bf r}_c)]_{jm }   { \vphantom{\def{&}{}[\phi^{(c')}_{n_{c ' } \ell_{c'}}({\bf r}_{c ' } ) \psi^{(c')}_{n_{c ' } l_{c'}}({\bf r}_{c'})]_{jm}h -    e } } \right > } = 0\ ] ] into a general eigenvalue problem @xmath85 where @xmath86 is a normalization matrix and @xmath87 is a shorthand notation for all the indices that are summed over , i.e. @xmath88 in the three - body case .
the matrix elements can be calculated analytically for some potentials and the equation can be solved using standard linear algebra methods .
since we want to study universal effects , i.e. effects that are independent of the exact shape of the potential and only depend on the long - range behavior of the potential , it is beneficial to use simple potentials .
we have chosen gaussian potentials , because their matrix elements can be calculated analytically in the gaussian expansion method ( gem ) .
there are many prior calculations with gaussian potentials @xcite , so we can easily validate our method .
we use the same potentials as in ref .
the two - body potential is given by @xmath89 and the three - body potential is @xmath90 where @xmath91 , and @xmath92 is the position of atom @xmath93 .
the interaction takes place only between different atoms , where the @xmath94th atom is the special one ( type @xmath24 ) , and all other atoms are identical bosons ( type @xmath22 ) . the interaction between identical bosons
is neglected , because it is assumed to be very weak compared to the resonant @xmath33 interaction .
this is reflected in the summation in eq .
( [ eq : pot ] ) .
gaussian potentials that are tuned to the universal regime can be understood as regularized contact terms in an eft expansion @xcite , so our results are valid only in the energy regime of this implicit eft expansion .
this requires that all calculated energies are small compared to the natural energy scale set by the window of universality shown in fig .
[ fig:3body ] . the natural energy scale connected to the potential ( [ eq:2bpot ] , [ eq:3bpot ] ) is @xmath95 the reduced mass of the interacting dimer ( @xmath33 ) .
the two - body potential ( [ eq:2bpot ] ) is attractive , whereas the three - body potential ( [ eq:3bpot ] ) is chosen to be repulsive such that the calculated binding energies are in the window of universality , i.e. @xmath96 . the three - body force parameter , @xmath97 , is kept constant throughout the calculations presented here , except where noted otherwise .
the units are chosen so that the calculations are numerically well - behaved , and the results are presented in terms of @xmath98 and @xmath4 , the @xmath33 s - wave scattering length .
we vary @xmath99 to reproduce different scattering lengths @xmath4 as @xmath99 is roughly linearly proportional to @xmath11 .
the length scale @xmath100 is then essentially a free parameter that sets the scale for @xmath4 .
its numerical value is set to @xmath101 throughout our calculations .
.comparison of our benchmarking results with @xcite for the mass ratio @xmath31 .
the numbers are taken from fig . 2 of the supplement and
were provided to us by d. blume @xcite .
the first column gives the strength of the three - body force in units of the natural energy scale @xmath98 as defined in eq .  .
the following columns give the ratios of the trimer ground state and @xmath98 and the ratio of the lowest two trimer states , respectively . [ cols= " < , < ,
< , < , < " , ]     in order to benchmark our method , we calculate the trimer and tetramer energies in the vicinity of the unitary limit and compare with the results for the mass ratio @xmath31 obtained by blume and yan @xcite .
our calculations are carried out very close to the unitary limit at @xmath102 .
the corresponding results for the trimer energies are given in table  [ tab : trimere ] , while the corresponding tetramer energies are given in table  [ tab : tetramere ] .
for the different strengths of the three - body force @xmath97 , we find agreement with ref .
@xcite to three digits or better , which gives us confidence in our method .
however , the time spent optimizing the basis function parameters for the actual calculations discussed in sec .
[ 4and3closetothresh ] was about @xmath103 times longer than for the benchmark calculations discussed above .
moreover , the basis size used for the actual calculations was about twice as large as for the benchmark calculations .
this ensures that our results in sec .
[ 4and3closetothresh ] are converged to about 8 digits corresponding to a precision of @xmath104 .
the energies are less sensitive to non - universal aspects of the finite - range model potentials for larger values of @xmath97  @xcite . as a consequence , we use @xmath105 in our calculations of the @xmath35 and @xmath28 systems below .
this ensures absolute energies are small enough that range effects do not play a role and the results are close to the universal limit of zero - range interactions . in practice
, we have ensured that all calculated energies satisfy @xmath106 .    since the gaussian expansion method as employed here uses a truncated sum over rearrangement channels and relative angular momenta to represent the wave function ( cf .
( [ wave ] ) ) , contributions from higher relative angular momenta are neglected .
we included as many configurations as possible without encountering numerical instabilities .
in addition , the states are extremely shallow in the region where very high precision is required , such that higher relative angular momenta are strongly suppressed .
the highest angular momentum quantum numbers that are included in our four - body calculations are @xmath107 . including the corresponding @xmath107 basis functions of the rearrangement channel @xmath108 ( cf .
[ fig : three - atom ] ) , which contributes the most , leads to a correction of only @xmath109 near the threshold .
this gives us confidence that including even higher relative angular momenta would not lead to significant contributions .
in this work , we focus on three - body systems of one light particle @xmath24 of mass @xmath0 and two heavy bosons @xmath22 of mass @xmath1 and four - body systems of three heavy bosons @xmath22 and one light particle @xmath24 . in order to establish the qualitative behavior of trimer and tetramer states as a function of the mass ratio @xmath2
, we have calculated the tetramer and trimer energies for the cases @xmath110 , @xmath111 , and @xmath112 , which correspond to possible mixtures of ultracold atoms , as a function of @xmath113 where @xmath100 is the interaction range of the effective potentials considered ( cf .
( [ eq:2bpot ] , [ eq:3bpot ] ) ) . thus the scale @xmath98 defined in eq .   is the natural energy scale of the problem , and all energies are quoted in units of @xmath98 . to embed our findings in a larger context
, we show in fig .
[ fig : overview ] an efimov plot for @xmath35 trimer and @xmath28 tetramer states for the mass ratios @xmath31 and @xmath114 .
all states shown are well within the universal window indicated by the shaded area in fig .
[ fig:3body ] .
the results for @xmath115 are not plotted because they would overlap with the results for @xmath31 . to increase visibility of the features of the plot
, the axes are rescaled by taking the fourth root .
the variables @xmath22 and @xmath116 are introduced as @xmath117 and @xmath118 ( cf .  ref .
to @xmath119 small deviations from the linearity of the dimer threshold are strongly magnified .
therefore we plot the energy differences to the @xmath33-@xmath22-@xmath22 dimer - atom - atom threshold on the right half plane and include an idealized dimer - atom - atom threshold .
] we only show the lowest trimer because we focus on the tetramer states attached to each trimer for two different mass ratios .
we could confirm that , as already noted by blume at al .
@xcite , the excited tetramer does exist in the unitary limit for @xmath31 and does not for @xmath114 .
they reported that for mass ratios less than 16 , namely 12 and 8 , they could only find an excited tetramer away from the unitary limit on the negative scattering length side .
for @xmath114 we did not find any excited tetramer , not even on the negative scattering length side .
this indicates that the value of @xmath11 where the excited tetramer crosses into the trimer threshold recedes from a point on the positive scattering length side of the efimov plot for large mass ratios to points on the negative scattering length side for smaller mass ratios until it ceases to exist altogether .
however , to prove this hypothesis , more data points are necessary .    comparing the curves for the two mass ratios
, one can see that the @xmath114 mixture has much shallower bound states , approaching the dimer threshold with an extremely small slope .
this holds true even when the three - body potential strength is adjusted such that the trimer vanishes at the same value for @xmath113 for both mixtures .
in addition , in both cases the tetramer and the trimer seem to vanish at the same point . in the next section
, we show our results for this point with much higher resolution and discuss it in more detail .
trimers and @xmath28 tetramers in a @xmath19cs-@xmath120li mixture ( lower group of lines ) and a @xmath121li-@xmath122li mixture ( upper group of lines ) .
the blue dotted line marks the @xmath33 dimer + two @xmath22 atom threshold , the red solid lines the @xmath35 trimer + @xmath22 atom threshold , the dashed green lines the @xmath28 tetramer ground states , and the dot - dashed black line the excited state of the tetramer . to increase visibility of the features of the plot
, the axes are rescaled by taking the fourth root . to this end ,
@xmath22 and @xmath116 are introduced as @xmath117 and @xmath118 ( cf .
@xcite ) . , width=453 ]
dimer threshold ( dotted line ) .
@xmath123 is the @xmath33 dimer energy and @xmath98 is the natural energy scale defined in eq .  .
the inset shows a larger region of @xmath113 .
we included our estimate ( solid black line ) of where the next excited efimov state should appear if the scaling factor were 20 ( see discussion in sec .
[ resolutionestimate ] ) .
we did not find evidence for such a state.,width=411 ]    next we focus on the tetramer spectrum close to the atom - dimer threshold in the region where the trimer disappears .
this region has not been studied in a full four - body approach for heteronuclear systems .
the corresponding results are shown in figs .
[ fig:133 - 6 ] and [ fig:87 - 7 ] , respectively .
in all three cases ( @xmath124 ) , ( @xmath125 ) , and ( @xmath126 ) , the tetramer disappears through the dimer threshold after the trimer has already disappeared .
however , the points in @xmath113 where the trimer and tetramer disappear approach each other as the mass ratio @xmath2 is decreased and the two states almost disappear at the same point in the ( @xmath126 ) case .
this is a qualitatively new behavior that is not seen in systems with identical bosons .
it might suggest that for equal masses @xmath127 , the two states disappear at the same value of @xmath113 .
we have further investigated this below .
if the mass ratio @xmath2 is even further decreased , we enter the regime of an inverted mass ratio where the scaling factor grows rapidly . in the current study
we have not investigated this region .    to quantify the behavior of the threshold crossings
, we have extracted the difference @xmath128 between the points @xmath129 , denoting the value of @xmath113 where the @xmath28 tetramer vanishes into the @xmath33+@xmath22+@xmath22-threshold , and @xmath130 , the point where the @xmath35 trimer vanishes into the @xmath33+@xmath22-threshold , from figs .
[ fig:133 - 6 ] and [ fig:87 - 7 ] .
we show this coefficient as a function of the mass ratio @xmath2 in fig .
[ fig : thresh ] .     as a function of the mass ratio @xmath131 ( circle , square , triangle ) .
the dashed ( solid ) line shows effective field theory calculations for an effective three - body system of an @xmath33 dimer and two heavy bosons @xmath22 of mass @xmath1 fitted to reproduce the point @xmath132 ( @xmath133 ) .
, width=453 ]    our results for the mass ratios @xmath131 are shown by the circle , square , and triangle , respectively .
the errors in the extracted values are relatively large , but our calculations indicate that the relation is not linear .    in order to understand this pattern ,
we have performed effective field theory calculations for effective three - body systems of an @xmath33 dimer of mass @xmath134 and two @xmath22 bosons of mass @xmath1 , where only the dimer and the bosons interact .
using the effective field theory formalism for unequal mass particles with resonant interaction discussed in ref .
@xcite , we can calculate the coefficient @xmath135 up to one free parameter , namely the effective three - body parameter of the @xmath33-@xmath22-@xmath22 system .
( see appendix [ app : eft ] for a brief discussion of this framework . )
therefore we can fit the effective three - body parameter either to the point @xmath132 ( dashed line ) or @xmath133 ( solid line ) . in each case
the point @xmath136 is reproduced within error bands .
a fit that reproduces all three points is not possible .
this shows the limitations of the effective three - body calculation which is strictly valid only near @xmath137 .
the effective three - body calculation shows that @xmath135 vanishes for @xmath138 , and is very small but finite at @xmath127 .
we emphasize that this effective three - body approach is not exact and should only be valid near the point where the trimer vanishes through the @xmath33 dimer threshold .
an estimate of the @xmath33-@xmath22 scattering length indicates that its value is at least two orders of magnitude larger for the case @xmath136 compared to the other two mass ratios .
thus we expect the effective three - body picture to work best for this case .
the tension between effective three - body and the gem calculations could be due to two potential problems .
first , the gem calculations could be not as accurate as we estimate , possibly due to neglected higher partial wave contributions or hard to detect numerical pathologies .
second , some essential aspect of the system might not be present in the effective three - body description , which might also explain why different approximation schemes yield different results as discussed in the next section .
to discuss the effective efimov states that were already mentioned in the introduction , three aspects are important . to begin with , the region where they can occur has to be established . for discussions on whether or not they can be seen in numerical calculations or even in experiments , an important issue is the predicted scaling factor .
we will briefly present two competing approximation schemes that lead to very different predictions . to conclude
, we will comment on the current state of the evidence for the effective efimov states .      near the dimer threshold ,
both trimer and tetramer become very weakly bound in comparison to the dimer . for this reason
it is expected that at a certain point the system can be treated as an effective three - body problem . at the point were the trimer becomes unbound , the dimer - atom interaction is resonant , leading to the occurrence of the efimov effect in the effective three - body system .
therefore , the effective efimov effect is expected to arise in a small region around the point where the trimer crosses the dimer threshold .
this region is bounded by the tetramer ground state from below . as we have shown in the previous section , this region
( the size of which can be expressed by @xmath139 ) proved to be extremely small in our calculations .
the effective efimov effect has already been studied in systems of four identical bosons by deltuva @xcite and in heteronuclear systems by wang et al .
@xcite .    for four identical bosons , deltuva found @xmath140 , which compares well to our value for @xmath141li/@xmath120li , @xmath142 . for equal masses ,
our effective three - body calculations yielded values between @xmath143 and @xmath144 , depending on the three - body parameter ( compare fig .  [
fig : thresh ] and the discussion in the previous section ) .
assuming that the system is away from the unitary limit and close to the dimer threshold the dimer - atom scattering length is much larger than the scattering length between identical bosons , which means that the system studied in @xcite is comparable to our calculations .
deltuva also did effective three - body dimer - atom - atom calculations and showed that very close to the dimer - atom - atom threshold this approximation is valid .
his estimated scaling factor for the effective efimov states is @xmath145 , which agrees with @xcite and our discussion in the next section .    in a paper from 2012 ,
wang et al .
@xcite used the born - oppenheimer approximation in heteronuclear systems with very high mass ratios ( @xmath146 and @xmath147 ) to calculate recombination features .
they calculated trimer ( @xmath38 ) , tetramer ( @xmath148 ) and also @xmath34 states as effective two- and three - body problems .
they also used correlated gaussian results to check their calculations where possible .
moreover , they provide a qualitative sketch of the heteronuclear efimov spectrum .
we note , however , that this sketch is somewhat misleading concerning the window where dimer - atom - atom efimov states could form , as its size is exaggerated in light of our results . comparing their results to ours , several differences can be noted .    from fig .  2 in  @xcite we extracted their @xmath139 for @xmath149 , which is roughly @xmath150 , an order of magnitude larger than for our calculations ( extrapolations via the effective three - body calculations to @xmath146 suggest something of order @xmath151 ) .
@xcite , separable potentials of yamaguchi type between the @xmath33 pairs were used @xcite .
so there are three obvious possible reasons for the discrepancy , a ) @xmath139 is not universal and in fact depends on the @xmath33 potential , b ) the bo approximation is problematic in this region , as may be suggested by the fact that the scaling factor between consecutive efimov states is 5.5 in their calculations , while the universal value is 3.96  @xcite , and c ) the effective three - body calculations we used are not valid for higher mass ratios because of the larger @xmath139 value , and therefore the extrapolation to @xmath149 is not sound .    to rule out a )
, one would have to use a different potential and redo the calculations .
moreover , it is unclear whether the calculations of wang et al .
@xcite are conducted closer to the unitary limit than ours , but since they state that @xmath152 is not well satisfied in their calculations , we suppose @xmath153 is of comparable size for both their calculations and ours ( we have @xmath154 for the ( @xmath155 ) and ( @xmath156 ) systems , and @xmath157 for the ( @xmath158 ) system ) .
in addition , because @xmath139 is very similar for the excited and ground state trimer in their calculation , and of roughly the same order of magnitude for different values of @xmath153 in our calculations , a strong dependence on @xmath153 is not likely .    following the argument b ) , one might also add that our effective three - body calculation did not agree too well with our full four - body calculation , as shown in the previous section .
( note that the order of magnitude of @xmath139 is a fit parameter in our stm treatment , so it agrees by construction . ) this might indicate that approximations that reduce the problem to an effective three - body system are generally insufficient to accurately describe the behavior near the dimer threshold .
aspect c ) should not play a huge role because the atom - dimer scattering length @xmath159 is estimated to be larger than @xmath160 for @xmath161 and does not change much between @xmath162 and @xmath163 , so extrapolating to @xmath146 should yield reasonable accuracy .
the dimer - atom - atom efimov effect is conjectured to arise when the four - body system of @xmath148 can be treated as an effective three - body system that has an effective resonant interaction .
this is expected to be the case in the vicinity where the @xmath38 three - body state vanishes into the dimer threshold . there ,
braaten and hammer @xcite argued , we can regard the @xmath33 dimer as much more strongly bound than the trimer , allowing us to treat the trimer as an effective two - body system @xmath164 with an effective @xmath165 scattering length @xmath159 which can be estimated by the inverse square root of the binding energy of the @xmath38 trimer .
then the @xmath148 tetramer can be treated as an effective three - body system @xmath34 which is also governed by the dimer - atom scattering length @xmath159 . for large @xmath159
this leads to the emergence of the efimov effect .
the scaling factor expected in this case is roughly 2000 , because there are only two interacting pairs @xmath165 , and there are two `` light '' particles @xmath22 and one that is slightly heavier @xmath166 .
the scenario with the smallest scaling factor is @xmath167 , in which case it is 1986.1 @xcite .
this is the picture we have been using in our stm calculations shown in fig .
[ fig : thresh ] . because of the huge scaling factor , we did not expect to be able to find these efimov states with the accuracy we have reached .
however , in the born - oppenheimer approximation picture that wang et al .
@xcite used , the light atom @xmath24 is seen as mediating the interaction between the heavy bosons @xmath22 , leading to an effective three - body problem of three @xmath22 s , with an effective scattering length @xmath168 .
this effective scattering length diverges for the values of @xmath169 where an efimov trimer becomes unbound , so it shows the same behavior as @xmath159 .
but , since in this picture the @xmath24 is absorbed in the effective interaction , a symmetric system of three resonantly interacting @xmath22 s emerges .
the efimov effect for this system , which is the well known three identical boson case , yields a much smaller scaling factor of @xmath170 @xcite .    using the born - oppenheimer approximation , wang et al .
@xcite find somewhat tenuous evidence for an excited tetramer separated from the lower tetramer by a scaling factor of @xmath171 on the positive @xmath168 side and @xmath172 on the negative side .
this is in disagreement with the expectation from the eft approach outlined above .
the main difference between the two approaches lies in the way the separation of scales is conducted . in the first approach
, it is assumed that the @xmath33 dimer is much more deeply bound than the @xmath38 and @xmath148 states , allowing a separation of energy scales and associated length scales .
this assumption is found to be valid , because @xmath173 for the whole region shown in figs .
[ fig:133 - 6 ]  and [ fig:87 - 7 ] .
on the other hand , in the bo approximation it is assumed that the time scale of the motion of the light atom is much shorter than that of the heavy atoms , allowing us to solve the dynamics of the light atom for fixed heavy atoms and then solving the heavy atoms system independently .
this assumes that the light atom interacts with all the heavy atoms while they are fixed at some points , thus generating an effective interaction .
if however the light atom is very tightly bound to one heavy atom , as is the case here , its motion around the heavy atom might be on a shorter timescale than the motion of the heavy atom , but its motion towards the other heavy atoms is coupled to the motion of the heavy atom , which means it is on the same timescale and therefore not separable . by using the bo approximation one implies in the calculation that the dimer is not very deeply bound .
this means that in our understanding , both effective treatments are mutually exclusive and have to be applied to different systems . if we regard the two approximations as two ends of a spectrum , the bo approximation would apply to the case where the dimer and the trimer are both very weakly bound , and the eft approximation would apply to the case where the dimer is infinitely strongly bound . between these two points , we conjecture there is a transition between the three identical boson case with its relatively small scaling factor which then becomes larger and larger until it reaches the limit of two light bosons with one heavy boson . for the case we are studying here
, this could mean that the scaling factor is slightly smaller than we would expect from our stm calculation .
this however can only be explored using a full four - body calculation that is accurate enough to resolve these effective efimov states .      to estimate whether it would be possible to see the effective efimov states in our calculations , we made some further assumptions . first , we assumed that the universal tetramer can be interpreted at the same time as the lowest state of the effective efimov states .
we do not expect this state to be fully universal , so the scaling factor between this state and the next may be smaller or larger , but we expect it to be of the same order of magnitude .
this assumption was apparently also made by wang et al .
@xcite , although they did not mention it explicitly .
the second assumption is that the shape of the first excited effective efimov state would resemble the shape of the universal tetramer near the threshold .
then we could scale the tetramer in figs .
[ fig:133 - 6 ] and [ fig:87 - 7 ] using different scaling factors to assess whether this state could be found with our accuracy .
an example for a scaling factor of 20 is shown in fig .
[ fig:133 - 6 ] .
our four - body calculations presented here are by far not accurate enough to find effective efimov states with a scaling factor of 2000 .
but our accuracy might just be sufficient to detect effective efimov states if the scaling factor was indeed approximately 20 as suggested by wang et al .
we did not find any states , but since they would be just at the limit of our resolution , this is no conclusive evidence of their non - existence .
in this paper , we have presented a detailed study of the bound state spectrum of heteronuclear four - body systems of three heavy bosons @xmath22 and a light atom @xmath24 with resonant interspecies interaction in the region of positive scattering lengths .
the interaction between the heavy bosons was assumed to be negligible . to obtain the energies of the @xmath38 trimer and @xmath28 tetramer systems , we employed the gaussian expansion method ( gem ) @xcite .
the general structure of the spectrum for different mass ratios was summarized in the efimov plot of fig .
[ fig : overview ] , a notable feature being that there is no excited efimov tetramer at all for the mass ratio @xmath114 . as the mass ratio increases ,
the excited state tetramer appears on the negative scattering length side of the efimov plot .
for @xmath31 it exists also in the unitary limit and disappears through the trimer - atom threshold on the positive scattering length side of the efimov plot .
our results confirm and extend the findings of blume and yan  @xcite , who conducted calculations down to @xmath174 .
next we focused on the dimer - atom(-atom ) threshold region .
we found that the value of the scattering length where the trimer vanishes into the threshold and the point where the tetramer does the same are extremely close to each other .
we have investigated the dependence of the distance between these points , @xmath135 , on the mass ratio @xmath2 and presented a detailed discussion of the sources of error in our calculation , such as a possible dependence of the results on the potential shape and missing higher partial wave contributions .
we have estimated the size of errors from the latter to not be larger than @xmath104 near the dimer - atom - atom threshold .
the correlation between @xmath135 and @xmath2 does not appear to be linear , and the results from the four - body calculation could be reconciled only partly with effective three - body results in the framework of a stm - like equation derived from effective field theory  @xcite .
we conclude that either an important aspect of the four - body system is missing in the effective three - body calculation close to the dimer - atom - atom threshold , or the errors of our four - body results are underestimated .
the resolution of this question requires further work , such as repeating the calculations for different potential shapes , to test the influence on @xmath135 and the general shape of the tetramer near the threshold . in order to rule out finite range effects a study of higher excited trimers and the tetramer resonances
belonging to them would be useful .
in the last part , we discussed in depth the possibility of finding effective dimer - atom - atom efimov states near the dimer - atom - atom threshold .
we did not observe such states and estimated it is unlikely to find them without a major improvement of the accuracy in our calculation .
wang and collaborators  @xcite have previously found such states , albeit only in effective three - body calculations within the born - oppenheimer approximation .
we have compared our results to the results of  @xcite and highlighted some important differences between the two approaches .
the key question in reconciling the results involves the scaling factor for the effective efimov states .
we expect a large scaling factor of order 2000 since only the @xmath33 dimer and the @xmath22 atoms of the effective three - body system are interacting resonantly .
we estimated that for this scaling factor an observation of the effective efimov states in our calculation is very unlikely . in the born - oppenheimer picture , however , the light @xmath24 atom mediates an interaction between all three @xmath22 atoms such that there are effectively three resonant pair interactions and the scaling factor should be much smaller and close to 22.7 . as we discussed in detail , it is not obvious that the born - oppenheimer picture is still applicable near the dimer - atom - atom threshold . settling the question of the effective dimer - atom - atom efimov states in heteronuclear systems requires a significant increase in the accuracy of our four - body calculations and a coordinated study of the problem in both approaches .
we acknowledge useful discussions with doerte blume on heteronuclear few - body systems and practical units , and with artem volosniev on the limitations of the born - oppenheimer approximation .
we also thank doerte blume for providing data from her figures from @xcite .
this research was supported in part by the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft through sfb 1245 and by the german federal ministry of education and research under contract 05p15rdfn1 .
thanks riken for support under the ipa program and the studienstiftung des deutschen volkes for support under the riken program .
some of the calculations were carried out at supercomputing facilities of the yitp ( kyoto university ) and of nagoya university .
an effective field theory for heteronuclear three - body systems consisting of an atom of mass @xmath175 and two identical bosonic atoms of mass @xmath176 was developed by helfrich et al .  @xcite .
this effective field theory leads to an analog of the skorniakov - ter - martirosian ( stm ) equation  @xcite for the unequal mass case .
similar equations also arise in the effective field theory description of two - neutron halo nuclei in nuclear physics  @xcite . here
we focus on the case of zero - range interactions between the unlike atoms characterized by a scattering length @xmath177 and no interaction between the like atoms ( @xmath178 ) .
the trimer binding energies @xmath179 in this framework are given by the non - trivial solutions of the integral equation : @xmath180 where @xmath181 and @xmath182 are the reduced masses of the @xmath183 and @xmath184 systems .
the cutoff @xmath185 plays the role of the three - body parameter and can be used to fix the energy @xmath179 of any three - body state in the system . ) , the log - periodicity of the three - body force term in the effective field theory was used to move the dependence on the three - body parameter to the upper limit of the integral ( see ref .
@xcite for more details ) . ] all other three - body energies can then be predicted .
alternatively , the energies can be predicted in units of @xmath186 .
the wave function of the trimers can be obtained from the function @xmath187 but will not be required here .
e.  braaten and h .- w .
hammer , phys .
rept .   * 428 * , 259 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : cond - mat/0410417 ] .
l.  platter , few body syst .   *
46 * , 139 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0904.2227 ] .
p.  naidon and s.  endo , arxiv:1610.09805 [ quant - ph ] .
e.  nielsen and j.h .
macek , phys .
lett .  * 83 * , 1566 ( 1999 ) .
j.  ulmanis , s.  hfner , r.  pires , e.  d.  kuhnle , y.  wang , c.  h.  greene and m.  weidemller , phys .
* 117 * , 153201 ( 2016 ) [ arxiv:1608.01477 [ cond-mat.quant-gas ] ] .
s. hfner , j. ulmanis , e. d. kuhnle , y. wang , c. h. greene , m. weidemller , arxiv:1701.08007 [ cond-mat.quant-gas ] .
l.  platter , h .- w .
hammer and u.  g.  meiner , phys .
a * 70 * , 052101 ( 2004 ) [ cond - mat/0404313 ] .
a. zenesini , b. huang , m. berninger , s. besler , h .- c .
ngerl , f. ferlaino , r. grimm , c. h. greene , and j. von stecher , new  journal  of  physics * 15 * , 043040 ( 2013 ) [ arxiv:1205.1921 ]          m.  gattobigio , a.  kievsky and m.  viviani , phys .  rev .
a * 86 * , 042513 ( 2012 ) [ arxiv:1206.0854 [ physics.atm-clus ] ] .
a.  n.  nicholson , phys .
lett .   * 109 * , 073003 ( 2012 ) [ arxiv:1202.4402 [ cond-mat.quant-gas ] ] .
a.  kievsky , n.  k.  timofeyuk and m.  gattobigio , phys .
a * 90 * , 032504 ( 2014 ) [ arxiv:1405.2371 [ cond-mat.quant-gas ] ] .
d. blume and y. yan , phys .
a * 92 * , 0333626 ( 2015 ) [ arxiv:1508.00081 [ cond-mat.quant-gas ] ] .