active galactic nuclei ( agns ) are often believed to play a significant role in galaxy evolution .
as the observed scaling relations between black hole mass and global properties of their host galaxies seem to require self - regulation between black hole growth and galaxy evolution , theoretical models often include agn feedback as a core component of galaxy evolution ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
nonetheless , understanding how black holes and galaxies coevolve over hubble time is observationally limited due to the scarcity of direct measurements of scaling relations at high redshift @xcite , and the nature of agn feedback and the coupling of the agn energy output with the interstellar matter ( ism ) is a subject of active research in this field .
agn gas outflows are often observed over galaxy scales @xcite , hence , outflows may function as an effective channel of agn feedback . by connecting nuclear activity with the larger scale ism and star formation ( sf ) , agn outflows may push gas out of host galaxies and/or heat up the ism , leading to suppression of sf @xcite . on the other hand , outflows may trigger sf by compressing the ism @xcite .
currently , the evidence of negative agn feedback on sf is yet to be conclusive ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) , while detections of positive feedback on sf have been reported by several observational works based on individual objects ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
thus , it is of importance to investigate the true nature of agn feedback and understand the overall effect of agns through gas outflows .
the direct connection between agn activity and sf seems complex as various observations have been presented in the literature . for typical agns
, a positive correlation has been reported between agn luminosity , probed by either optical or x - ray , and sf luminosity ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , indicating an average scaling between agn activity and sfr .
in contrast , at high redshift in particular , x - ray agns seem to show enhanced sfr @xcite .
since the sfr of agn host galaxies is difficult to measure and there may be systematic differecne among various sfr indicators based on uv , optical , ir signatures ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , more detailed investigation is required to reveal the nature of agn and sf connection . in comparing with non - agn galaxies ,
a recent study by @xcite reported that x - ray and optical agns tend to have lower specific star formation rate ( ssfr ) compared to star - forming galaxies .
a similar work by @xcite showed that radio and optical agns have on average lower ssfr than star - forming galaxies , while mid - infrared selected agns show comparable or slightly higher ssfr than star - forming galaxies .
these results based on the present - day galaxies may suggest that agn feedback suppresses sf .
however , the physical mechanism for connecting agn and sf is yet to be clear , requiring further detailed studies of the link between outflows and sf .    to understand the role of agn gas outflows in galaxy evolution , it is important to investigate how common and strong these outflows are so that agns as a population , instead of individual objects , can be used for connecting outflows with agn energetics and galaxy evolution .
while the demography of ionized gas outflows in agns was limited to relatively small samples in the past , more robust results became available recently based on statistical samples of agns from large surveys .    to perform a statistical investigation of gas outflows and their connection to agn activity
, we are performing a series of studies using a large sample of type 2 agns from sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) .
in the first of this series , ( * ? ? ?
* here after , paper 1 ) presented a census of ionized gas outflows based on the [ ] @xmath05007 kinematics , by analyzing a sample of 39,000 present - day type 2 agns .
at least 50% of agns over the full luminosity range explored in that study , shows kinematic signatures of gas outflows .
this outflow fraction is considered as a lower limit for low - luminosity agns since their outflow indicator ( i.e. , a wing component of the [ ]  line ) is relatively weak and the gravitational potential of their host galaxy dominates in forming the emission line profile .
in fact , for high - luminosity agns , the outflow fraction is over 90% , indicating that the majority of energetic agns show outflows .
the steep increase of the outflow fraction with eddington ratio indicates a close link between outflow kinematics and agn accretion .
in contrast , we find no strong correlation between radio luminosity and ionized gas kinematics , indicating that the outflows are not directly connected to radio activity for most agns . in the second of this series , presented 3-d biconical outflow models combined with a thin dust plane , in order to constrain the intrinsic physical nature of gas outflows .
our models successfully reproduced the observed emission line profiles and the distribution of the velocity - velocity dispersion ( vvd ) diagram measured from the [ ]  line .
based on the monte carlo simulations of the vvd distribution , we constrained the physical parameters of the outflows , including launching velocity , opening angle , and dust extinction .    in this paper
, we mainly compare agns and sf galaxies in terms of the [ ]  kinematics and their link to sf , in order to investigate the role of gas outflows as agn feedback . throughout the paper ,
we use the cosmological parameters as @xmath3  km  s@xmath4  mpc@xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 .
110,000 galaxies at z@xmath20.3 , with well - defined emission - lines . ,
scaledwidth=38.0% ]    we extend our previous sample of agns in paper i to all emission line galaxies at z@xmath2@xmath10.3 , by including star - forming galaxies .
the initial sample of 235,922 emission line galaxies is selected from the sdss data release 7 @xcite , using the mpa - jhu catalogue , with signal - to - noise ratio ( s / n ) @xmath7 10 in the continuum , and s / n @xmath7 3 in the four emission lines , h@xmath8 , [ ] @xmath05007 , h@xmath9 , and [ ] @xmath06584 , which are used to classify each object in the diagnostic diagram ( see fig .
1 ) . using this initial sample , we applied a further constraint to select objects with well - defined emission line profiles with the amplitude - to - noise ( a / n ) ratio larger than 5 for the [ ]  and h@xmath9  lines . as a result
, we obtained a total of 112,726 emission line galaxies , which are classified into three groups : agns , composite objects , and star - forming galaxies as listed in table 1 , based on the classification scheme by @xcite . in the first paper of this series
, we presented the detailed analysis on the pure agn and composite samples ( paper i ) . in this work
, we mainly compare agns with sf galaxies in terms of [ ]  kinematics , and investigate how gas outflows are related to star - formation .
cccc redshift & agn & composite & s - f + ( 1)&(2)&(3)&(4 ) + 0.003 @xmath2z@xmath2 0.1 & 14923 ( 6733 ) & 14714 ( 4700 ) & 58928
( 23999 ) + 0.1 @xmath2z@xmath2 0.2 & 7382 ( 4495 ) & 5614 ( 1857 ) & 10019 ( 2967 ) + 0.2 @xmath2z@xmath2 0.3 & 447 ( 289 ) & 384 ( 147 ) & 315 ( 86 ) + 0.003 @xmath2z@xmath2 0.3 & 22752 ( 11517 ) & 20709 ( 6704 ) & 69265 ( 27052 ) +      we derive the properties of each galaxy in the sample in order to compare them with ionized gas kinematics , as we presented in detail for agns in paper 1 . here ,
we briefly summarize sample properties .
first , we adopt the stellar velocity dispersion and stellar mass from the mpa - jhu catalogue to investigate the host galaxy mass scale and gravitational potential . in the following analysis
, we include stellar velocity dispersion ( @xmath10 ) value down to 30 km s@xmath4 , which is slightly lower than the instrumental resolution of the sdss spectra while we exclude unreliably values ( @xmath10 @xmath11 420 km s@xmath4 ) as recommended by the sdss catalogue .
since stellar velocity dispersions are more uncertain for lower mass galaxies due to the spectral resolution limit as well as the lower s / n , we will also use the stellar mass ( m@xmath12 ) estimates as a tracer of the host galaxy gravitational potential . as shown in fig 2 ,
the sample galaxies follow the correlation between stellar mass and stellar velocity dispersion as expected from fiber - jackson relation although the scatter becomes larger for lower mass galaxies due to measurement uncertainties .
note that three groups have different mass ranges . while the stellar mass of the most agn host galaxies ranges from 10@xmath13 to 10@xmath14 m@xmath15 , that of sf galaxies lies between @xmath110@xmath16 to 10@xmath17 m@xmath15 .
thus , when we compare agns with sf galaxies , we will use stellar mass fixed subsamples , to account for the difference of their gravitational potential .
in addition to the host galaxy properties , we also determine the properties of black holes . for black hole mass estimates
, we use the updated scaling relations , e.g. , black hole mass - stellar velocity dispersion ( m@xmath18-@xmath19 ) relation based on the reverberation - mapped agns from @xcite ( see also * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) and black hole mass - stellar mass relation .
as we pointed out in paper i , the range of black hole mass significantly changes depending on the adopted scaling relation .
we adopted the black hole mass estimates based on the black hole mass - stellar mass relation to be consistent with paper 1 , while the choice of the black hole mass estimates do not change the main results presented in this paper .
x= 0.04 dex and @xmath20y=0.01 dex .
, scaledwidth=48.0% ]          we used the strong [ ]  line at 5007  line as a tracer of the ionized gas outflows , by measuring the velocity shift from the systemic velocity and the velocity dispersion compared to the stellar velocity dispersion , as we discussed in paper i. here we briefly summarize the procedure for completeness . using the sdss spectra , we first fitted stellar absorption lines with a series of stellar population models , which were constructed with the penalized pixel - fitting code @xcite based on simple stellar population models with solar metallicity and various ages ( 60 myrs to 12.6 gyrs ) @xcite . based on the stellar absorption fit
, we determined the systemic velocity , which will be used for calculating the velocity shift of [ ] .    by subtracting the best - fit stellar population model
, we generated pure emission line spectra , on which we fitted the [ ]  line with one or two gaussian components using the mpfit code ( markwardt 2009 ) .
only if the [ ]  line profile shows a prominent wing component , i.e. , the peak of the second component is a factor of three larger than the noise level ( i.e. , a / n ratio @xmath11 3 ) , we adopted the 2nd gaussian component , in order to avoid unreliable detection of wing features .
once we obtained the best fit model for [ ] , we calculated the first and second moments of the line profile using the best - fit model as @xmath21 @xmath22}}]^2   = { \int \lambda^2 f_\lambda d\lambda \over \int f_\lambda d\lambda } - \lambda_0 ^ 2 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath23 is the flux at each wavelength .
then , we calculated the velocity shift ( v@xmath24 ) of the first moment of [ ]  with respect to the systemic velocity , which is determined from stellar absorption lines , and the velocity dispersion ( @xmath25 ) of [ ]  from the second moment .
we determined the uncertainty of v@xmath24  and @xmath25  by performing monte carlo simulations , which generate the distribution of measurements based on the 100 mock spectra generated by randomizing flux with flux error at each wavelength .
we adopted the 1 @xmath26 dispersion of the distribution as the measurement uncertainty , respectively for v@xmath24  and @xmath25 .
when we examined the fractional error of @xmath27}}$ ] of the sample , the distribution shows a gaussian distribution with a mean value of @xmath28 in log scale ( -0.89@xmath290.44 for agns , -0.74@xmath290.39 for composite objects , and -0.79@xmath290.54 for sf galaxies ) , which corresponds to @xmath116% uncertainty . to avoid uncertain measurements
, we excluded 7902 objects , that have a large uncertainty ( i.e. fractional error @xmath11 1 ) , from the sample ( 7.0% ) when we used the measurements of the [ ]  kinematics in the analysis . in the case of v@xmath24 , the mean uncertainty is @xmath30 km s@xmath4  for agns , @xmath31 km s@xmath4  for composite objects , and @xmath32 km s@xmath4  for sf galaxies , indicating that very weak velocity shifts ( i.e. , @xmath2 30 km s@xmath4 ) are difficult to detect .
note that the quoted errors are the r.m.s from the distribution of errors of individual objects .
the measured [ ]  velocity dispersions were corrected for the wavelength - dependent instrumental resolution of the sdss spectroscopy , which is close to 55 - 60 km s@xmath4  at the observed wavelength of [ ] .
a number of objects has relatively narrow [ ] , for which the measured @xmath27}}$ ] is smaller than the instrumental resolution .
we excluded 1872 objects with very low velocity dispersion ( i.e. , @xmath27}}$ ] @xmath2 30 km s@xmath4 ) or unresolved [ ] . in total we excluded 8.7% of the sample , which have either very small velocity dispersion ( i.e. , @xmath27}}$ ] @xmath2 30 km s@xmath4 ) or large fractional errors ( @xmath111 ) . note that including these objects does not change our conclusions in the following analysis .
-to - stellar velocity dispersions as a function of [ ]  luminosity ( top ) , respectively for agns ( red ) , composite objects ( green ) , and sf galaxies ( blue ) .
we divide the sample into two groups : [ ]  fitted with single gaussian ( left ) and double gaussian ( right ) .
the ratio of the agn sample is systematically higher than that of sf galaxies , indicating that the non - gravitational component , i.e. , outflows is dominant in agns , particularly at high luminosity regime .
the bottom panels show the mean ratio of [ ]  divided by stellar mass ( in units of km s@xmath4  m@xmath33 ) as a function of [ ]  luminosity . , title="fig : " ] +    velocity dispersion with [ ]  luminosity , respectively for agns ( left ) , composite objects ( middle ) , and sf galaxies ( right ) , using the entire sample ( top ) and for the stellar mass - limited sample ( bottom ) .
the color represent the number density in each bin with @xmath20x= 0.03 dex and @xmath20y=0.01 dex.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]      to investigate the signature of gas outflows , we compare gas and stellar kinematics using [ ]  velocity dispersion ( @xmath25 ) and stellar velocity dispersion ( @xmath10 ) in figure 3 .
we find a clear difference between agn sample and sf galaxies .
agns with larger @xmath25  have larger @xmath10 , indicating that the host galaxy gravitational potential plays a role in broadening the gas emission lines . however , the relation is not linear as @xmath25  is larger than @xmath10  particularly for high luminosity agns .
as we discussed in paper i , we interpret the ratio of @xmath25  to @xmath10  larger than unity as an indication of non - gravitational kinematic components , i.e. outflows .
in contrast , sf galaxies show almost one - to - one relationship between @xmath25  and @xmath10 , suggesting that the broadening of gas emission line can be entirely accounted by the virial motion due to the galaxy gravitational potential .
note that the non - linear relation between @xmath25  and @xmath10  for the agn sample is mainly due to the wing component in the [ ]  line profile , which is not well constrained when fwhm is used to represent the velocity of [ ]  line ( see paper i for detailed discussion ) . in the case of composite objects , @xmath25  and @xmath10
are linearly correlated each other .
although agn outflows may be present in composite objects , the outflow velocity is relatively low due to the average low luminosity ( see the lack of high [ ]  velocity agns in figure 3 ) , hence the non - gravitational kinematic component can be easily diluted by the dominant virial component .    in figure 4
, we investigate the ratio between @xmath25  and @xmath10   as a function of [ ]  luminosity . here
we separate the emission line galaxies , depending on the presence of a wing component in [ ]  ( i.e. , single gaussian vs. double gaussian ) . regardless of agn activity ,
most objects without a wing component show the @xmath25 /@xmath10
ratio close to unity except for the agns in the highest luminosity bin , indicating that [ ]  gas kinematics of these objects are mostly due to the host galaxy gravitational potential .
in contrast , among the objects with a wing component in [ ]  ( right panels in figure 4 ) , there is a systemic difference of the @xmath25 /@xmath10  ratio between agns and sf galaxies . for agns ,
@xmath25  is much larger than @xmath10  ( by 0.13 dex on average ) , indicating the presence of non - virial kinematics , while for sf galaxies , @xmath25  is comparable to @xmath10  except for the highest luminosity bin ( the average ratio log ( @xmath25 /@xmath10 ) = 0.01 ) .
note that we detect a wing component in [ ] , which is fitted by the second gaussian component , for @xmath139% of sf galaxies .
however , the @xmath25  values are similar to stellar velocity dispersions .    instead of @xmath10 , we can use stellar mass to normalize gas outflow kinematics by the host galaxy gravitational potential ( bottom panels of figure 4 ) .
we find qualitatively same trends that the broadening of [ ]  in agns can not be entirely accounted by the gravitational potential while the broadening of [ ]  in sf galaxies are mainly due to the host galaxy potential .
the average difference between agns and sf galaxies is 0.16 dex .
note that even among the objects with single gaussian [ ] , we clearly detect the systematic difference of the ratio between agns and sf galaxies ( the average difference is 0.11 dex ) .
we investigate how the [ ]  kinematics are related to [ ]  luminosity for agns and sf galaxies in figure 5 .
there is an increasing trend of @xmath25  with increasing luminosity in agns although the trend is very broad .
the increasing trend is also present among composite objects while the the luminosity range of [ ]  is an order of magnitude narrower .
these trends show that gas outflows are stronger in agns with higher luminosity , indicating agn energetics are responsible for the outflow kinematics .
in contrast , we find no clear increasing trend among sf galaxies . on average
the @xmath25  is lower in sf galaxies while the range of @xmath25  is as broad as that of agns .
since the average stellar mass of agns and sf galaxies is very different as we pointed out in s.2.2 , we plot the same comparison after limiting stellar mass between 10@xmath34 and 10@xmath35 ( bottom panels in fig . 5 ) .
again , we find that agns and sf galaxies show different trends , suggesting that these different trends are not due to the difference in mass scales between agn and sf galaxy samples .      in figure 6 , we combine the velocity and velocity dispersion of [ ]  to investigate the difference of gas kinematics between agns and sf galaxies .
we find a dramatic contrast between agns and sf galaxies in terms of the range of gas velocities .
while sf galaxies are concentrated at the lower center with a limited range of velocity shift ( @xmath36v@xmath24@xmath36 @xmath2 100 km s@xmath4 ) and velocity dispersion ( @xmath25  @xmath2 @xmath1150 km s@xmath4 ) , agns show a much larger distribution , including agns with extreme kinematics ( i.e. , @xmath36v@xmath24@xmath36 @xmath11 200 km s@xmath4  and @xmath25 @xmath37400 km s@xmath4 ) .
the average @xmath25  is @xmath38 , @xmath39 , and @xmath40 km s@xmath4 , respectively for agns , composite objects , and sf galaxies , indicating that agns have more than a factor of 2 broader [ ]  than sf galaxies . also , the dispersion of the @xmath25  distribution is significantly different with a factor of @xmath13 broader distribution in agns .
note that the @xmath25  distribution is skewed toward high values , indicating the presence of extreme kinematics in the agn sample . in the case of v@xmath24 ,
the average value is @xmath41 , @xmath42 , and @xmath43 km s@xmath4 , respectively for agns , composite objects , and sf galaxies , indicating that the average v@xmath24  is similar among 3 groups .
this is mainly due to the fact that the majority of objects have relatively low velocity shift , which can not be well constrained for given v@xmath24  uncertainties ( see s.2.3 ) .
however , we clearly detect that the distribution of v@xmath24  of agns is a factor of @xmath13 broader than that of sf galaxies , suggesting the influence of gas outflows in agns .
considering the fact that galaxy bulge gravitational potential can also broaden the emission line , of which velocity dispersion is expected to correlate with stellar mass , we plot subsamples of agns and sf galaxies in the same stellar mass range , 10 @xmath2 log m@xmath12 @xmath2 10.5 ( bottom panels in figure 6 ) . in this case , the range of velocity and velocity dispersion decrease , however the strong difference in the vvd distributions still remains .
the mean @xmath25  is @xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 , respectively for agns , composite objects , and sf galaxies , showing a factor of @xmath12 difference in terms of the mean value and dispersion of the distribution between agns and sf galaxies .
the distribution of v@xmath24  is similar to that of the total sample , with the mean v@xmath24  = @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 , respectively for agns , composite objects , and sf galaxies .
+    in figure 7 we present the vvd diagram as a function of [ ]  luminosity , respectively for agns ( top ) , composite objects ( middle ) , and sf galaxies ( bottom ) . in agns
we find the vvd diagram dramatically expands toward higher values with increasing [ ]  luminosity , indicating the gas outflows are driven by agn energetics .
composite objects in general follow the same trend although at the highest luminosity bin , the number of objects is relatively small .
in contrast , sf galaxies do not show any significant change of the vvd diagram as a function of [ ]  luminosity , suggesting that photoionization mechanism of the [ ]  line is not directly responsible for the [ ]  kinematics .
as we already showed in figure 4 , the gas kinematics are mainly governed by the gravitational potential of the host galaxy .
+    if we investigate the vvd diagram as a function of stellar mass , instead of the [ ]  luminosity , we find no dramatic expansion of the diagram .
the vvd distribution is already broad even at low mass regime .
other than the increase of the sample size , agns , composite objects and sf galaxies show similar distributions , suggesting that stellar mass is not directly related to the expansion of the vvd diagram .            in this section
we investigate how the outflow kinematics are related to star formation in the host galaxies . since the star formation rate ( sfr ) of agn host galaxies is difficult to directly measure due to the contamination of agn emission to sfr indicators , i.e. , the h@xmath9 line , uv continuum , etc ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) , we use the sfr based on ir luminosity by adopting the catalogue of @xcite , which provides the ir luminosity of @xmath1330,000 sdss galaxies and the estimated sfr converted from ir luminosity based on the conversion equation by @xcite , @xmath50 in their work @xcite determined ir luminosity from artificial neural network techniques , which were tested and trained based on the herschel - sdss strip 82 matched sample of 1136 galaxies .
as recommended by @xcite , we used reliable estimates of sfr using @xmath51 @xmath2 0.1 ( see also * ? ? ?
* ) . in this case
, a total of 30,352 objects ( 26.9% ) is excluded from our agn+composite+sf sample in table 1 . more specifically ,
10,316 objects from pure agns ( 45.3% ) , 4,710 objects from composite objects ( 22.7% ) , and 15,326 objects from sf galaxies ( 22.1% ) were removed due to the @xmath51 @xmath2 0.1 criterion .
since we loose a large fraction of agns , we tried to use a less conservative criterion , i.e. , @xmath51 @xmath2 0.3 , in order to include more objects with less secure sfr estimates . in this case , 12,042 objects ( 10.7% of the total sample ) were excluded ( 3,375 , 1,781 , and 6,886 objects respectively from pure agns , composite objects , and sf galaxies ) .
the results based on the sample with @xmath51 @xmath2 0.3 remained qualitatively the same .
note that the ir - based sfr represents the average sfr over @xmath110@xmath16 years as the ir emission is reradiated by cold dust around ob stars .
in addition to ir - based sfr , we also used the d@xmath52 provided by the sdss catalogue for a consistency check ( see section 4.3 ) .      in figure 8 , we present the specific star formation rate ( ssfr ) , by dividing the estimated sfr by stellar mass , as a function of the outflow velocities . to account for the difference of stellar mass range between agn and sf galaxies , we present the comparison in each stellar mass bin . here , the outflow velocities as expressed as @xmath53}'$ ] , are calculated by adding the velocity and velocity dispersion of [ ]  in quadrature , which can be understood as the corrected velocity dispersion of [ ]  accounting for the projection effect .
then , the outflow velocities are normalized by stellar velocity dispersion in order to show the non - gravitational ( i.e. , outflow ) kinematics .    in the case of sf galaxies ,
the ssfr does not change along the stellar mass bin , showing that non - agn galaxies form a star forming sequence with a constant ssfr within a factor of @xmath12 scatter ( see table 2 ) . in each stellar mass bin ,
the distribution of log ssfr is centered at the mean value of @xmath54 yrs@xmath4 , which is averaged over all sf galaxies .
with respect to the normalized gas kinematics , we find no correlation , indicating that the kinematics of ionized gas are not related to sf .
as expected , sfr is not affected by gas kinematics in sf galaxies since gas kinematics are mainly due to the galaxy gravitational potential rather than agn outflows .
note that at lower stellar mass bin , stellar velocity dispersion is on average more uncertain , broadening the distribution of gas - to - stellar velocity dispersion ratio .
in contrast , we find that agns and composite objects have on average lower ssfr than sf galaxies .
the mean log ssfr is @xmath55 and @xmath56 , respectively for pure agns and composite objects , showing a factor of 4 and 3 lower sfr than non - agn galaxies at fixed stellar mass .
moreover , we find that the ssfr of agn sample tend to increase with increasing outflow velocities . in the 10.5@xmath2 log
m@xmath15/m@xmath15 @xmath2 11 bin , for example , there is a clear increasing trend of ssfr with increasing outflow velocities in agns , while the distribution is almost round in sf galaxies .
this trend implies a close connection between agn outflows and star formation in the host galaxies .
interestingly , agns with higher outflow velocities have on average higher ssfr than agns with lower outflow velocities , implying that outflows do not instantly suppress sf , although the time scale of sf quenching has to be carefully investigated .
since agns with strong outflows show higher sfr than agns with weak outflows , this may indicate a close link between outflows and sf .
we find no evidence of enhanced sf in agns .
even for the agns with extreme outflow velocities , ssfr is not very high and rather it is comparable to that of sf galaxies ( dashed line ) , suggesting that host galaxies of extreme agn outflows have regular sfr compared to sf galaxies .
in contrast , ssfr decreases with decreasing outflow velocities .
for example , agns with no or weak outflows ( i.e. , when @xmath57 ) , ssfr is almost an order of magnitude lower than sf galaxies or agns with strong outflows .
in other words , agns with strong outflows have similar sfr compared to sf galaxies , while agns with weak / no outflows have much lower sfr than non - agn galaxies .
thus , the 0.6 dex mean difference of ssfr between agn and sf galaxy samples is mainly due to the population of agns with weak [ ]  outflows .
the stellar velocity dispersion measured from sdss spectra may not be the best parameter to represent the virial motion caused by the gravitational potential of the host galaxies , particularly for lower mass galaxies , since the spectral resolution of the sdss spectroscopy is limited , and the effect of the rotational broadening and the projection due to the random inclination of the stellar disk to the line - of - sight can be significant for rotation - dominant galaxies .
considering these effects , we use stellar mass , instead of @xmath10 , to normalize the gas kinematics . assuming the fiber - jackson relation , we use stellar mass to the 1/4 power ( m@xmath58 ) as a proxy for stellar velocity dispersion representing the virial motion ( bottom panel in fig . 9 ) .
we see qualitatively similar distribution of ssfr with the normalized outflow kinematics . except for the agns with lowest ssfr
, there is a general trend that agns with higher outflow velocities have higher ssfr , while the ssfr of agns with no outflows have much lower ssfr .
/@xmath10@xmath11 0.3 ; top ) , weak outflows ( 0 @xmath2 log @xmath59/@xmath10@xmath2 0.3 ; middle ) , and no outflows ( log @xmath59/@xmath10@xmath2 0 ; bottom ) . in the left panels , agns and sf galaxies in a fixed stellar mass bin ( 10.5 @xmath2 log m@xmath15 @xmath2 11 )
are presented .
the relative ssfr is calculated with respect to the mean ssfr of all sf galaxies .
, title="fig : " ] /@xmath10@xmath11 0.3 ; top ) , weak outflows ( 0 @xmath2 log @xmath59/@xmath10@xmath2 0.3 ; middle ) , and no outflows ( log @xmath59/@xmath10@xmath2 0 ; bottom ) . in the left panels , agns and sf galaxies in a fixed stellar mass bin ( 10.5 @xmath2 log m@xmath15 @xmath2 11 )
are presented .
the relative ssfr is calculated with respect to the mean ssfr of all sf galaxies .
, title="fig : " ]    /l@xmath60 @xmath11 - 2 ; top ) , intermediate eddington ratio ( -3 @xmath2 log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 - 2 ; middle ) , and low eddington ratio ( -3.5@xmath2 log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 - 3 ; bottom ) . in the left panels , agns and sf galaxies in a fixed stellar mass bin ( 10.5 @xmath2 log m@xmath15 @xmath2 11 ) are presented .
the relative ssfr is calculated with respect to the mean ssfr of all sf galaxies .
note that the eddington ratio estimates based on the [ ]  luminosity may have systematic uncertainties due to the contribution from the sf region to the observed [ ]  luminosity .
, title="fig : " ] /l@xmath60 @xmath11 - 2 ; top ) , intermediate eddington ratio ( -3 @xmath2 log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 - 2 ; middle ) , and low eddington ratio ( -3.5@xmath2 log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 - 3 ; bottom ) . in the left panels , agns and sf galaxies in a fixed stellar mass bin ( 10.5 @xmath2 log m@xmath15 @xmath2 11 ) are presented .
the relative ssfr is calculated with respect to the mean ssfr of all sf galaxies .
note that the eddington ratio estimates based on the [ ]  luminosity may have systematic uncertainties due to the contribution from the sf region to the observed [ ]  luminosity .
, title="fig : " ]    to further investigate the difference of ssfr between agns and sf galaxies , we compare the distribution of ssfr between agns ( pure agn + composite objects ; red ) , and sf galaxies ( blue ) in figure 9 . here
we divide the sample into 3 groups : strong ( i.e. , log @xmath53}'$]/@xmath10@xmath11 0.3 ; top panel ) , intermediate ( i.e. , 0@xmath2 log @xmath53}'$]/@xmath10@xmath2 0.3 ; middle panel ) , and weak outflows ( i.e. , log @xmath53}'$]/@xmath10@xmath20 ; bottom panel ) . while the distribution of ssfr is broad , agns with intermediate and weak outflows have lower ssfr by @xmath62 and @xmath63 dex , respectively , compared to the mean ssfr of sf galaxies .
in contrast , agns with strong outflows have similar ssfr compared to sf galaxies ( see table 2 for details ) . considering the stellar mass difference between agns and sf galaxy sample , we compare the ssfr distribution at fixed stellar bass bin , e.g. , at @xmath64 log m@xmath12 @xmath65 ( right panel in figure 9 ) .
we find a similar trend of decreasing mean ssfr with decreasing outflow velocities .
since the distribution of ssfr is very broad ( @xmath11 dex in fwhm ) , large ranges of agn outflow velocities and sfr are present in the sample .
however , it is clear that there is strong trend of decreasing ssfr for agns with no outflows .
although it is previously found that optical and x - ray agns have on average lower ssfr than sf galaxies ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , a physical mechanism for explaining the trend was not clearly identified .
we try to interpret these results by connecting agn outflows with sf in the following scenario .
when gas is supplied , both agn and sf are triggered as we typically observe the correlation between x - ray and ir luminosities ( e.g. * ? ? ?
however , it would take the order of a dynamical time for outflows to impact on the ism over galactic scales .
once the outflows start playing a role in impacting on the ism , we may observe the decrease of both sfr and agn activity .
after that , as the agn activity decreases , the outflow kinematics become weaker and finally disappear . in this scenario , we link agns with strong outflows hosted by galaxies with regular sfr and agns with no outflows hosted by galaxies with lower sfr as a evolutionary sequence . perhaps , we are seeing for the first time , the physical link between agn outflows and the delayed suppression of sf .
we further investigate whether ssfr is related with agn energetics since outflow velocities and agn luminosity show a broad correlation , albeit with a large scatter . in figure 10
, we present the distribution of ssfr , after dividing agns into three eddington ratio bins . note that since we can not detect a very weak [ ]  line , the eddington ratio of the agn sample ranges from 10@xmath66 to 1 while most agns are located within 10@xmath67 @xmath2 log l / l@xmath60 @xmath2 -0.5 ( see figure 5 in paper 1 ) .
we find a similar trend that low eddington agns have clearly lower ssfr than sf galaxies , while high eddington agns have comparable ssfr with respect to sf galaxies . while the difference of ssfr distribution is negligible between high eddington agns and sf galaxies with a small negative offset of @xmath68 , low eddington agns clearly show much lower ssfr by @xmath69 dex , indicating that sfr is much lower in the host galaxies of low eddington agns .
the same trend is detected when we limit the sample within the stellar mass bin 10.5@xmath2 log m@xmath12/m@xmath15 @xmath2 11 ( right panel in figure 10 ) .    combing the trend of ssfr with outflow velocities and eddington ratios
, it seems that more energetic agns with strong outflows and high eddington accretion tend to be hosted by typical sf galaxies , while low - eddington agns with weak / no outflows have relatively quiescent host galaxies .        in figure 11 , we investigate how host galaxy properties are related with agn outflows and ssfr .
first , we adopt the galaxy morphology information from galaxy zoo ( 1st col . in figure 11 ; * ? ? ?
* ) . since each galaxy is classified as elliptical , spiral , or uncertain object , we only present ellipticals and spirals by excluding uncertain objects . in agn
sample spiral galaxies generally follow the broad trend between ssfr and outflow velocities while elliptical galaxies are located separately at a much lower ssfr region .
these elliptical galaxies would not be included in our emission line galaxy sample if agn was not present since they have no or weak emission lines from star forming region .
however , by excluding these elliptical galaxies , we still see that the ssfr of agns ranges down to much lower level compared to that of sf galaxies . considering the potential contamination of elliptical host galaxies in the agn sample
, we investigated the ssfr distribution using only spiral galaxies .
we find that the difference of mean ssfr between agns and sf galaxies and the decreasing ssfr with decreasing outflow velocities and eddington ratios remain the same , indicating that the contamination of elliptical galaxies is not mainly responsible for the much lower ssfr of agns with no outflows .
second , we color - code agns based on the 4000 - break strength d@xmath52 as a sfr indicator @xcite , which is adopted from the mpa - jhu catalogue ( 2nd col . in figure 11 ) .
as expected ssfr correlates with d@xmath52 in agns , while sf galaxies have overall lower values of d@xmath52 .
the decreasing trend of d@xmath52 with increasing outflow velocities confirms a consistency between ir - based sfr and d@xmath52-based sfr .
third , we also utilize the uv - to - optical color as a sfr indicator . by matching our sdss sample with galex general release 6/7 including ais and mis data @xcite
, we obtained nuv - r color for 38,105 objects .
as shown in figure 11 ( 3rd col . ) , we find qualitatively the same trend although the size of the matched sample is relatively small . finally , we present eddington ratios in the 4th col . in figure 11 , showing a clear increasing trend with both ssfr and outflow velocities , albeit with considerable scatter .
these findings indicate that a clear trend , although not bimodal , is present between high eddington , strong outflow agns in sf galaxies and low eddington , no outflow agns in weakly star - forming galaxies .
ccccc & agn+composite & agns & composite & s - f + & & all mass + ( 1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5 ) + 0.3 @xmath2 log @xmath25/@xmath10 & @xmath70 & @xmath71 & @xmath72 & @xmath73 + 0 @xmath2 log @xmath25/@xmath10@xmath2 0.3 & @xmath74 & @xmath75 & @xmath76 & @xmath77 + log @xmath25/@xmath10@xmath2 0 & @xmath78 & @xmath79 & @xmath80 & @xmath81 + -2 @xmath2log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 & @xmath82 & @xmath83 & @xmath84 & + -3 @xmath2 log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 -2 & @xmath85 & @xmath86 & @xmath87 & @xmath88 + log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 -3 & @xmath89 & @xmath90 & @xmath91 & +    & & 10.5 @xmath2 log m@xmath15 @xmath2 11 + 0.3 @xmath2 log @xmath25/@xmath10 & @xmath92 & @xmath93 & @xmath94 & @xmath95 + 0 @xmath2 log @xmath25/@xmath10@xmath2 0.3 & @xmath96 & @xmath97 & @xmath98 & @xmath99 + log @xmath25/@xmath10@xmath2 0 & @xmath100 & @xmath101 & @xmath102 & @xmath103 + -2 @xmath2log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 & @xmath104 & @xmath105 & @xmath106 & + -3 @xmath2 log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 -2 & @xmath107 & @xmath86 & @xmath108 & @xmath109 + log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 -3 & @xmath110 & @xmath111 & @xmath91 & + & & 10 @xmath2 log m@xmath15 @xmath2 10.5 + 0.3 @xmath2 log @xmath25/@xmath10 & @xmath112 & @xmath113 & @xmath114 & @xmath115 + 0 @xmath2 log @xmath25/@xmath10@xmath2 0.3 & @xmath116 & @xmath117 & @xmath118 & @xmath119 + log @xmath25/@xmath10@xmath2 0 & @xmath120 & @xmath121 & @xmath122 & @xmath123 + -2 @xmath2log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 & @xmath124 & @xmath125 & @xmath126 & + -3 @xmath2 log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 -2 & @xmath127 & @xmath128 & @xmath129 & @xmath130 + log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 @xmath2 -3 & @xmath131 & @xmath132 & @xmath133 & +
we reported that optical type 2 agns have on average lower ssfr compared to sf galaxies as previously found by @xcite and @xcite based on x - ray , optical , and radio agns .
however , there is a large range of ssfr among agns , and we discovered a link between agn outflows and ssfr . while agns with powerful outflows have comparable ssfr with respect to sf galaxies , agns with weak or no outflows tend to have much lower ssfr . moreover , there is a clear trend that the mean ssfr decreases with decreasing eddington ratios . combining these two trends ,
we see a distribution from agns with strong outflow , high eddington accretion , and regular sfr to agns with no outflow , low eddington accretion , and much lower sfr .
the trend between eddington ratio and ssfr naturally explains the observed agn - star formation luminosity relation in the local universe @xcite .
we may interpret these trends as a evolutionary sequence i.e. , when there is gas supply , both agn and sf are triggered .
agns with high - eddington accretion develop strong outflows while sf is on - going as in regular sf galaxies .
when the outflows start impacting on the ism after the order of a dynamical time , the effect of agn feedback is observable as the sfr decreases while agn becomes weaker and no strong outflows are visible .
note that the sfr based on ir luminosity traces the reradiation by cold dust around ob stars and averaged over @xmath110@xmath16 yrs .
also , the eddington ratio was calculated based on [ ]  luminosity , which does not reflect the short time scale flickering of accretion disk activity . rather , [ ]  luminosity is averaged over longer time scale . if the outflow can effectively push the gas supply and/or prevent the cooling of the ism , it is naturally expected that both sfr and agn accretion will decrease .
the distribution of agns from strong outflow , high eddington , and regular sfr to no outflow , low eddington , and low sfr may be understood as the evolutionary sequence caused by delayed agn feedback .
alternatively , the same evolutionary sequence can be interpreted as the consequence of depletion of gas supply .
when gas is supplied , both agn and sf are triggered .
however , once gas is depleted , both agn activity and sf decreases . thus , we naturally expect that agns with strong outflow , high eddington , and regular sfr become agns with no outflow , low eddington , and low sfr . in this case , no agn feedback is invoked and simply gas depletion causes the transition .    instead of evolutionary sequence , it is also possible that intrinsic gas content varies among galaxies at given stellar mass . if the amount of gas is intrinsically large , agns may tend to be high - eddington with strong outflows and host galaxies show regular sfr as in sf galaxies . on the other hand ,
if gas content is intrinsically lower , sfr is lower than that of galaxies in star - forming sequence , and agns have relatively low eddington and weak outflows .    for given our data set ,
it is not clear which scenario best explains the observed trend .
in particular , in the evolutionary sequence scenario , it is very difficult to confirm whether agn feedback causes the transition or the transition is natural outcome of gas depletion . in the case of the 3rd scenario
, we may be able to investigate the difference of intrinsic gas content based on co observations by selecting agns with strong and no outflow for given stellar mass and morphology .
the decreasing trend of ssfr with decreasing eddington ratio down to 10@xmath67 shown in figure 10 can be interpreted in two different ways : selection bias and intrinsic nature .
we first examine whether the lower ssfr of low eddington agns is due to the selection bias .
since we classify agns based on the emission line flux ratios in the bpt diagram , if agns produce weak emission lines , which can be over - shined by the emission produced by strong star formation , the combined observed emission lines are likely to be classified as sf galaxies rather than agns .
thus , it is possible that we may miss very weak black hole activity present in strongly sf galaxies due to the limitation of the optical bpt classification .
note that we do not consider very weak black hole activity with extremely low eddington ratios ( @xmath13410@xmath66 ) ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) since these very weak activities are not generally considered as agn population and the feedback energy from these objects is expected to be negligible in the context of galaxy evolution .
if we focus on low eddington ratio agns between 10@xmath66 and 10@xmath135 , it is not clear why we should expect these agns are dominantly hosted by highly sf galaxies , while we expect that very weak black hole activity is present in most galaxies . by selecting sf galaxies , @xcite reported that the mean sf luminosity correlates with the mean agn x - ray luminosity down to eddington ratio @xmath136 ( see also * ? ? ?
* ) , although it is extremely difficult to investigate the distribution of eddington ratios below @xmath136 ( see e.g. * ? ? ?
* ) .    for investigating whether our optical agn sample misses low eddington agns hosted by strongly sf galaxies ,
x - ray agn sample is very useful since optical bpt - based classification can be avoided .
in fact , @xcite reported that their swift - bat agn sample shows on average lower ssfr compared to sf galaxies , indicating the same trend as we found in our sample .
we independently investigate this issue by selecting x - ray agns from swift - bat 70 month catalogue @xcite after matching with our sdss sample .
although the number of x - ray agns , for which we can determine stellar mass and eddington ratio , is relatively small , these 59 x - ray agns show a consistent trend that agns with low eddington ratio tend to show lower ssfr than agns with high eddington ratio .
for example , since the eddington ratio ( log l@xmath61/l@xmath60 ) of this matched sample ranges from -3 to 0 , we divide them into 3 groups . we find that the d@xmath52-based ssfr of high eddington agns ( log l@xmath137/l@xmath138 @xmath11 -1 ) is higher by 0.13 and 0.83 dex , respectively , than that of intermediate ( -2@xmath2 log l@xmath137/l@xmath138 @xmath2 - 1 ) and low eddington agns ( log l@xmath137/l@xmath138 @xmath2 -2 ) , although the distribution of ssfr in each group is very large with rms of 0.7 to 0.8 dex due to presumably small number statistics . note that we were not able to use ir - based sfr since ir luminosity taken from @xcite is available only for 20 out of 59 objects .
although we see a consistent trend between eddington ratios and ssfr based on the x - ray sample , we can not firmly conclude whether the lack of low - eddington agns in sf galaxies in our optical sample is due to selection effect or intrinsic nature since the size of the matched sample is very small and the x - ray flux limit of the swift - bat sample is still shallow ( down to l@xmath137/l@xmath138 @xmath2@xmath1 - 3 ) .    in investigating the trend between ssfr and eddington ratio ,
it is important to reliably estimate agn bolometric luminosity . in the case of optically - identified type 2 agns , the [ ]  luminosity
is typically used for calculating eddington ratios as in our study ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
however , the bolometric correction of [ ]  is difficult to determine due to various effects , including dust extinction and the dependency on the ionization parameter @xcite .
also , star forming region can contribute to the [ ]  flux observed through an aperture larger than the size of the narrow - line region .
therefore , it is important to decompose the agn and sf fraction in the observed [ ]  luminosity ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) . by simply assuming the maximum agn fraction in the [ ] luminosity of sf galaxies as 1% , 10% , and 50% , we simulate the distribution of ssfr as in figure 10 in order to test the effect of the contribution of non - detected agns in sf galaxies
we find that the case of 1% and 10% agn luminosity does not change the decreasing trend of the ssfr as a function of eddington ratios down to 10@xmath139 .
when we assume 50% of [ ]  in sf galaxies is originated from agns , we still see the same trend while the difference of ssfr between high and low eddington agns becomes smaller .    due to the aforementioned issues and uncertainty of eddington ratio ,
it is clear that more detailed investigations are required to confirm the trend of the decreasing ssfr with decreasing eddington ratios .
in particular , a detailed comparison between x - ray and optical agns , for example , using the optical follow - up survey of the swift - bat agns @xcite , will be very useful to constrain the nature of host galaxies of low eddington agns , which is beyond the scope of this paper .      since we have adopted the estimated sfr based on ir from @xcite , it is important to discuss whether the main results of this paper is affected by the uncertainty of ir - based sfr . as shown in figure 11 , other sfr indicators , i.e. , d@xmath52 and uv - to - optical color show consistent results . while sf galaxies have overall lower values of d@xmath1404000
, there is a clear spread of d@xmath52 among agns , which broadly correlates with outflow velocities .
also , the uv - to - optical color shows a similar trend with agn outflow velocities .
these results suggest that although the ir - based sfr is not the best sf indicator , there is a clear trend of ssfr with agn outflow velocities , while sf galaxies do not show such a trend .
using a large sample of @xmath1110,000 type 2 agns out to z@xmath10.3 , we investigated the kinematics of the ionized gas outflows , demography of outflows in agns and sf galaxies , and the connection between outflows and sf .
we summarize the main results as follows .
@xmath141 gas and stellar velocity dispersions are comparable to each other in sf galaxies , indicating that he gravitational potential of host galaxies determines are mainly responsible for gas and stellar kinematics .
@xmath141 in contrast , agns show much larger [ ]  velocity dispersion than stellar velocity dispersion , indicating that strong non - gravitational kinematics , i.e. , outflows , are present .
the kinematic component of outflows is comparable to or stronger than the virial motion caused by the gravitational potential .
@xmath141 the fraction of agns with outflows steeply increases with agn luminosity and eddington ratio .
in particular , the majority of luminous agns presents strong non - gravitational kinematics in the [ ]  profile .
@xmath141 we find a dramatic difference of the outflow signatures between agns and star - forming galaxies .
the distribution in the [ ]  velocity - velocity dispersion diagram dramatically expands toward large values with increasing agn luminosity , implying that the outflows are agn - driven , while that of sf galaxies show no significant change as a function of [ ]  luminosity .
@xmath141 the ssfr of non - outflow agns is much lower than that of strong outflow agns , while the ssfr of strong outflow agns is comparable to that of sf galaxies .
we interpret this trend as a result of delayed agn feedback as it takes the order of a dynamical time for the outflows to suppress star formation . alternatively
, gas depletion or intrinsic difference of gas content may cause the trend .
we thank the anonymous referee for the suggestions , which were useful to clarify the results and interpretation .
we thank sara ellison for her helpful comments on the ir - based sfr .
support for this work was provided by the national research foundation of korea grant funded by the korea government ( no .
2016r1a2b3011457 ) .      baumgartner , w.  h. , tueller , j. , markwardt , c.  b. , et al .
2013 , , 207 , 19 bennert , v.  n. , auger , m.  w. , treu , t. , woo , j .- h . , & malkan , m.  a.  2011 , , 726 , 59 barbosa , f.  k.  b. , storchi - bergmann , t. , cid fernandes , r. , winge , c. , & schmitt , h.  2009 , , 396 , 2 baldwin , j. a. , phillips , m. m. , & terlevich , r. 1981 , pasp , 93 , 5 boroson , t. 2005 , , 130 , 381 brinchmann , j. , charlot , s. , white , s.  d.  m. , et al .
2004 , , 351 , 1151 cappellari , m. , & emsellem , e. 2004 , pasp , 116 , 138 carniani , s. , marconi , a. , maiolino , r. , et al .
2016 , , 591 , a28 chen , c .- t .
j. , hickox , r.  c. , alberts , s. , et al .
2013 , , 773 , 3    choi , y .- y . , woo , j .- h . , &
park , c.  2009 , , 699 , 1679 ciotti , l. , & ostriker , j.  p.  2007 , , 665 , 1038 crenshaw , d. m. , kraemer , s. b. 2000 , , 532 , l101 crenshaw , d.  m. , kraemer , s.  b. , hutchings , j.  b. , et al .
2000 , , 120 , 1731 crenshaw , d. m. , kraemer , s. b. , & george , i. m. 2003 , , 41 , 117 crenshaw , d. m. , schmitt , h. r. , kraemer , s. b. , mushotzky , r. f. , & dunn , j. p. 2010
, , 708 , 419      croton , d. j. , et al .
2006 , , 365 , 11 das , v. , et al .
2005 , , 130 , 945 diamond - stanic , a.  m. , & rieke , g.  h.  2012 , , 746 , 168 di matteo , t. , springel , v. , & hernquist , l.  2005 , , 433 , 604 degraf , c. , di matteo , t. , treu , t. , et al .
2015 , , 454 , 913 dubois , y. , gavazzi , r. , reirani , s , & silk , j. 2013 , , 433 , 3297 dubois , y. , peirani , s. , pichon , c. , et al .
2016 , , 463 , 3948 ellison , s.  l. , teimoorinia , h. , rosario , d.  j. , & mendel , j.  t.  2016 , , 455 , 370 ellison , s.  l. , teimoorinia , h. , rosario , d.  j. , & mendel , j.  t.  2016 , , 458 , l34 faber , s.  m. , & jackson , r.  e.  1976 , , 204 , 668 fabian , a. 2012 , ara&a , 50 , 455 fischer , t. c. , crenshaw , d. m. , kraemer , s. b. , schmitt , h. r. , & trippe , m. l. 2010 , , 140 , 577 fischer , t. c. , crenshaw , d. m. , kraemer , s. b. , & schmitt , h. r. 2013 , , 209 , 1 gallo , e. , treu , t. , jacob , j. , et al .  2008 , , 680 , 154 - 168 greene , j.  e. , & ho , l.  c.  2005 , , 627 , 721      , d. , & mathur , s. 2004 , , 606 , l41 harrison , c.  m. , alexander , d.  m. , mullaney , j.  r. , & swinbank , a.  m.  2014 , , 441 , 3306 heckman , t.  m. , miley , g.  k. , & green , r.  f.  1984 , , 281 , 525 heckman , t. m. 2004 , , 613 , 109 hopkins , p.  f. , hernquist , l. , cox , t.  j. , & kere , d.  2008 , , 175 , 356 hopkins , p.  f. , torrey , p. , faucher - gigure , c .- a . ,
quataert , e. , & murray , n.  2016 , , 458 , 816 husemann , b. , jahnke , k. , snchez , s.  f. , et al .
2014 , , 443 , 755 husemann , b. , scharwchter , j. , bennert , v.  n. , et al .
2016 , , 594 , a44            kennicutt , r.  c. , jr .
1998 , , 36 , 189 kewley , l. j. , groves , b. , kauffmann , g. , & heckman , t. 2006 , , 372 , 961 komossa , s. , & xu , d.  2007 , , 667 , l33 komossa , s. , xu , d. , zhou , h. , storchi - bergmann , t. , & binette , l. 2008 , , 680 , 926 kormendy , j. , & ho , l.  c.  2013 , ara&a , 51 , 511 koss , m. , et al .
, submitted    lamassa , s.  m. , heckman , t.  m. , ptak , a. , & urry , c.  m.  2013 , , 765 , l33 lintott , c. et al .
2011 , , 410 , 166 liu , g. , zakamska , n.  l. , greene , j.  e. , nesvadba , n.  p.  h. , & liu , x.  2013 , , 436 , 2576 markwardt , c. b. 2009 , aspc , 411 , 251 marconi , a. , & hunt , l.  k.  2003 , , 589 , l21 matsuoka , k. , & woo , j .- h .  2015 , , 807 , 28 mauch , t. , & sadler , e.  m.  2007 , , 375 , 931 miller , b.  p. , gallo , e. , greene , j.  e. , et al .
2015 , , 799 , 98 morrissey , p.
2007 , apjs , 173 , 682 mullaney , j.  r. , alexander , d.  m. , aird , j. , et al .
2015 , , 453 , l83 mullaney , j.  r. , alexander , d.  m. , fine , s. , et al .
2013 , , 433 , 622 mullaney , j.  r. , pannella , m. , daddi , e. , et al .
2012 , , 419 , 95 nelson , c.  h. , & whittle , m.  1995 , , 99 , 67 nelson , c.  h. , & whittle , m.  1996 , , 465 , 96 nesvadba , n.  p.  h. , lehnert , m.  d. , eisenhauer , f. , et al .
2006 , , 650 , 693 netzer , h. 2009 , mnras , 399 , 1907 park , d. , kelly , b. c. , woo , j .- h . , & treu , t. 2012 , , 203 , 6 park , d. , woo , j .- h .
, bennert , v.  n. , et al .
2015 , , 799 , 164 peng , c.  y.  2007 , , 671 , 1098 rafferty , d.  a. , brandt , w.  n. , alexander , d.  m. , et al .
2011 , , 742 , 3 reeves , j.  n. , obrien , p.  t. , & ward , m.  j.  2003 , , 593 , l65 rosario , d.  j. , santini , p. , lutz , d. , et al .
2012 , , 545 , a45      ruiz , j. , et al .
2001 , , 122 , 2961 ruiz , j.  r. , crenshaw , d.  m. , kraemer , s.  b. , et al .
2005 , , 129 , 73 salviander , s. , & shields , g.  a.  2013 , , 764 , 80 santini , p. , rosario , d.  j. , shao , l. , et al .
2012 , , 540 , a109 snchez - blzquez , p. , et al .
2006 , , 371 , 703 shankar , f. , weinberg , d. h. , & miralda - escud , j. 2013 , , 428 , 421 shimizu , t.  t. , mushotzky , r.  f. , melndez , m. , koss , m. , & rosario , d.  j.  2015 , , 452 , 1841 silk , j. , & rees , m.  j.  1998 , , 331 , l1    treu , t. , woo , j .- h . ,
malkan , m.  a. , & blandford , r.  d.  2007 , , 667 , 117 veilleux s. , & osterbrock d. e. , 1987 , , 63 , 295 villar - martn , m. , humphrey , a. , delgado , r.  g. , colina , l. , & arribas , s.  2011 , , 418 , 2032 villar - martn , m. , arribas , s. , emonts , b. , et al .
2016 , , 460 , 130 wang , j. , mao , y. f. , & wei , j. y. 2011 , , 741 , 50 white , r. l. , becker , r. h. , helfand , d. j. , & gregg , m. d. 1997 , , 475 , 479 woo , j .- h . ,
treu , t. , malkan , m.  a. , & blandford , r.  d.  2006 , , 645 , 900 woo , j .- h . ,
treu , t. , malkan , m.  a. , & blandford , r.  d.  2008 , , 681 , 925 woo , j .- h . , treu , t. , barth , a.  j. , et al .
2010 , , 716 , 269 woo , j .- h . , kim , j. h. , imanishi , m. , & park , d. 2012 , , 143 , 49 woo , j .- h . , et al .
2015 , , 801 , 38 woo , j .- h . ,
bae , h .- j . , son , d. , & karouzos , m.  2016 , , 817 , 108 , t. , barth , a.  j. , greene , j.  e. , et  al .
2011 , , 739 , 28 zhang , k. , dong , x .- b . ,
wang , t .-
g . , & gaskell , c. m. 2011 , 737 , 71