many astrophysical observations indicate the existence of dark matter ( dm ) . a good example of such observations is the measurement of rotation curves for stars and gas in spiral galaxies . on the other hand ,
the nature of dm remains to be unveiled . in this regard , many dm candidates have been proposed with the proposal of weak interacting massive particles ( wimps ) @xcite the most popular among all candidates .
the detections of dm shall test the idea of wimps .
the detections of dm can be categorized into direct and indirect approaches .
the former approach proceeds by observing the nucleus recoil as dm interacts with the target nuclei in the detector .
the latter approach relies on detecting final state particles resulting from dm annihilations or decays .
in this article , we focus on the indirect detection of dm through observing neutrinos produced by dm annihilations or decays in the galactic halo .
the search for neutrinos coming from dm annihilations in galactic halo has been performed by icecube @xcite .
data obtained from icecube 22-string configuration set the 90% c.l .
upper limit on dm annihilation cross section @xmath4@xmath5s@xmath6 for @xmath7 channel at @xmath8 tev  @xcite , while the preliminary result of icecube 40-string galactic - center analysis improves the above limit to @xmath9@xmath5s@xmath6  @xcite . based upon icecube 40-string data selection for searching diffuse flux of astrophysical muon neutrinos  @xcite , a comparable constraint on the cross section of @xmath7 annihilations , which could take place in the core of earth ,
is derived  @xcite for tev range dark - matter masses .
furthermore , upper limits on the annihilation cross sections of @xmath10 and @xmath11 channels are also obtained .
it is interesting to compare these upper limits with the required annihilation cross sections for the same channels for explaining the pamela data on positron fraction excess @xcite and fermi - lat @xmath12 fluxes measurement @xcite . as shown in ref .
@xcite , the icecube upper limit on @xmath11 annihilation cross section is comparable to the required @xmath11 annihilation cross section for explaining pamela and fermi - lat data . on the other hand ,
the icecube upper limit on @xmath10 annihilation cross section is still too high to test the idea of using this mode to account for pamela and fermi - lat data .
the icecube sensitivity on dm search is expected to improve with the data from all 86 strings analyzed .
the analysis of deepcore array data will further enhance the sensitivity .
the deepcore array @xcite is located in the deep center region of icecube detector .
this array consists of @xmath13 densely instrumented strings plus the nearest standard icecube strings .
the installation of deepcore array significantly improves the rejection of downward going atmospheric muons in icecube and lowers the threshold energy for detecting muon track or cascade events to about @xmath14 gev .
this muon rejection is crucial for icecube to observe dm induced neutrino signature from galactic halo .
in fact , it has been pointed out that the parameter range for @xmath10 channel preferred by pamela and fermi - lat data could be stringently constrained @xcite(see also discussions in ref .
@xcite ) by the data from icecube detector augmented with deepcore array . in this work
, we shall however focus on the low - mass dm instead of dm with its mass in the range preferred by pamela and fermi - lat .
we note that previous analyses on deepcore sensitivity @xcite have set the threshold energy at @xmath15 gev for both track and cascade events . however , to take the full advantage of deepcore array , it is desirable to include neutrino events in the energy range @xmath16 .
we have initiated such a study for track events  @xcite . in this work ,
we generalize the previous study to cascade events in icecube deepcore detector . since we are only interested in low - mass dm , we only consider channels @xmath0 , @xmath1 , and @xmath2 for annihilations and channels @xmath3 and @xmath1 , and @xmath2 for decays .
the neutrino fluxes generated through dm annihilations or decays into @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 final states are not included in this analysis .
this paper is organized as follows . in sec .
ii we describe neutrino fluxes from dm annihilation / decay at the galactic halo for different halo profiles . in sec .
iii we briefly describe our results on the background atmospheric neutrino fluxes taking into account neutrino oscillations . in sec .
iv we present our results on the projected five year sensitivity of deepcore array on cascade events induced by dm annihilations and decays .
in addition , we shall also compare our results with the up - to - date indirect detection limits from fermi - lat gamma ray data and cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) observations .
specifically , we shall compare the deepcore sensitivities on dm annihilation cross section @xmath20 and dm decay time with corresponding constraints obtained from gamma ray observations @xcite(see also analysis in ref .
@xcite ) and those obtained from cmb anisotropy  @xcite based on one or both of the recent wmap 7-year  @xcite and act 2008  @xcite data . discussions and conclusions are given in sec .
the differential neutrino flux from the galactic dark matter halo for neutrino flavor @xmath21 can be written as  @xcite @xmath22 for the case of annihilating dm , and @xmath23 for the case of decaying dm , where @xmath24 is the distance from the galactic center ( gc ) to the solar system , @xmath25 is the dm density in the solar neighborhood , @xmath26 is the dm mass , @xmath27 is the dm decay time and @xmath28 is the neutrino spectrum per annihilation or decay for a given annihilation or decay channel @xmath29 with a corresponding branching fraction @xmath30 . for @xmath31 channel ,
we assume that two neutrinos are produced per annihilated dm pair and all neutrino flavors are equally populated .
thus the neutrino spectrum per flavor is a monochromatic line with @xmath32 . on the other hand ,
the neutrino spectrum per flavor for @xmath33 channel is @xmath34 .
the neutrino spectra @xmath28 for other channels are summarized in refs  @xcite .
the quantity @xmath20 is the thermally averaged annihilation cross section , which can be written as @xmath35 with a boost factor @xmath36 @xcite .
we set @xmath37 , which is the typical annihilation cross section for the present dark matter abundance under the standard thermal relic scenario @xcite .
we treat the boost factor @xmath36 as a phenomenological parameter .
the dimensionless quantity @xmath38 is the dm distribution integrated over the line - of - sight ( l.o.s ) and averaged over a solid angle @xmath39 , i.e. , @xmath40 + where @xmath41 is the dm density at a specific location described by the coordinate @xmath42 with @xmath43 the distance from the earth to dm and @xmath44 the direction of dm viewed from the earth with @xmath45 corresponding to the direction of gc .
the distance @xmath46 is the distance from gc to dm .
we note that the above definition of @xmath47 include the constant factors @xmath48 , @xmath49 and @xmath50 in the denominator .
this definition differs from that adopted in papers by icecube and fermi - lat collaborations ( see , for example , refs .
@xcite and @xcite ) where the above - mentioned constant factors are not included .
we computed the values of @xmath38 with darksusy @xcite . for the galactic dm distribution ,
we consider navarro - frenk - white ( nfw )  @xcite , einasto  @xcite and isothermal profiles  @xcite .
the functional forms of these profiles are given by @xmath51 @xmath52\right\ } , \,\alpha = 0.17,\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath53 with values of @xmath54 and @xmath55 given in table i. in all cases we impose the normalization @xmath25 , which is at @xmath56 kpc .
ccc dm halo model & @xmath57 in kpc & @xmath58 in @xmath59 +   + nfw & 20.0 & 0.260 + einasto & 21.5 & 0.0538 + isothermal & 3.50 & 2.07 +    the comparison of different dm halo models is shown in fig .  1 .
neutrinos are significantly mixed through oscillations when they travel a vast distance across the galaxy .
the observed flavor ratio of dm induced neutrinos is related to the flavor ratio at the source through the probability matrix @xmath60  @xcite . in particular , the exact form of @xmath61 in terms of mixing angles @xmath62 and cp phase @xmath63 is given in ref .
the mixing angles @xmath64 and @xmath65 has been well measured while newest results for @xmath66 from accelerator  @xcite and reactor experiments  @xcite are also available .
we take @xmath67 , @xmath68 , @xmath69 and @xmath70 , which are best fit values of neutrino mixing parameters from a recent global fitting  @xcite in the case of normal mass hierarchy .
therefore , @xmath71 where @xmath72 and @xmath73 are neutrino fluxes at the source and on the earth respectively .
while the best fit neutrino mixing parameters differ slightly in the case of inverted mass hierarchy , they do not produce noticeable change in the above relation .
we follow the approaches in  @xcite to compute the intrinsic atmospheric neutrino background fluxes . the @xmath74 flux arising from @xmath75
decays reads @xmath76 where @xmath77 is the neutrino energy , @xmath78 is the slant depth in units of g/@xmath79 , @xmath80 is the zenith angle in the direction of incident cosmic - ray nucleons , @xmath81 , @xmath82 is the pion decay length in units of g/@xmath79 , @xmath83 is the nucleon interaction length while @xmath84 is the corresponding nucleon attenuation length , and @xmath85 is the primary cosmic - ray spectrum .
we have @xmath86 with @xmath87 the atomic number of each nucleus .
the spectrum of each cosmic - ray component is parametrized by @xcite @xmath88)^{- \alpha},\end{aligned}\ ] ] in units of m@xmath89s@xmath6sr@xmath6gev@xmath6 .
the fitting parameters @xmath90 depend on the type of nucleus .
they are tabulated in ref .
the function @xmath91 is the probability that a charged pion produced at the slant depth @xmath92 survives to the depth @xmath78 ( @xmath93 )  @xcite .
@xmath94 is the normalized inclusive cross section for @xmath95 , and is given in ref .
the kaon contribution to the atmospheric @xmath74 flux has the same form as eq .
( [ atm - nu ] ) with an inclusion of the branching ratio @xmath96 and appropriate replacements in kinematic factors as well as in the normalized inclusive cross section .
the three - body muon decay contribution to the atmospheric @xmath74 flux is also included .
the details are discussed in ref .
@xcite . after summing the two - body and three - body decay contributions
, we obtain the total intrinsic atmospheric muon neutrino flux . from the fig .  1 of ref .
@xcite , we note that angle - averaged atmospheric muon neutrino flux obtained by our calculation and that obtained by honda et al . @xcite both agree well with amanda - ii results @xcite .
, as a function of distance from the galactic center as described by the nfw , einasto and isothermal halo models.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    the intrinsic atmospheric @xmath97 flux due to @xmath98 decays can be obtained by solving cascade equations  @xcite .
one obtains @xmath99 where @xmath100 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 are the z moments defined in our previous work  @xcite . finally , the atmospheric @xmath74 flux taking into account the neutrino oscillation effect is given by @xmath103,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath104 is the @xmath105 oscillation probability .
sub - leading contributions to atmospheric @xmath74 flux arising from @xmath106 and @xmath107 oscillations are not included in the above equation .
we can write down the atmospheric @xmath97 flux in the similar way .
in icecube deepcore , the track event rate for contained muons is given by @xmath108 while the cascade event rate is given by @xmath109 where @xmath110 is the density of ice , @xmath111 is avogadro s number , @xmath112 is the effective volume of icecube deepcore array for muon track events  @xcite and @xmath113 is that for cascade events @xcite , @xmath114 is the neutrino flux arrived at icecube , which is the sum of dm induced flux and the background atmospheric neutrino flux , @xmath115 is taken as @xmath26 for annihilation and @xmath116 for decay , @xmath117 and @xmath118 are the threshold energies for track events and cascade events respectively , @xmath119 is the differential cross section of neutrino - nucleon charged - current scattering , and @xmath120 is the differential cross section for showers produced by neutrino - nucleon charged - current and neutral - current scatterings . in this work ,
we use differential cross sections @xmath121 and @xmath120 given by ref .
@xcite with cteq6 parton distribution functions .
the atmospheric part of @xmath122 is taken from ref .
we also set @xmath123 gev .
it should be noted that the value for @xmath124 is an average effective volume based on the energy dependent @xmath124 discussed in ref .
@xcite , while the value for @xmath125 is just the instrumental volume of the deepcore detector .
the updated effective volumes of deepcore detector for track and cascade events are available in ref .
while we adopt constant effective volumes for evaluating deepcore sensitivities , we shall also estimate how much the updated effective volumes affect our results .
, @xmath126 , @xmath127 , and @xmath128 channels , respectively .
we adopt nfw profile for obtaining the results in this figure and those in the subsequent figures except fig .  4 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    as mentioned earlier , we consider neutrino fluxes generated through the annihilation channels @xmath129 , @xmath1 and @xmath130 , and the decay channels @xmath131 , @xmath1 and @xmath130 .
by computing the cascade event rates , we present in fig .
2 the required dm annihilation cross section as a function of @xmath26 such that the neutrino signature from dm annihilations can be detected at the @xmath132 significance in five years .
the @xmath132 statistical significance is defined as @xmath133 where @xmath134 and @xmath135 are numbers of signal and background events , respectively . in fig .  2 , we take nfw profile for dm density distribution in the galactic halo , the shower threshold energy @xmath136 and the cone half - angle @xmath137 .
non - detection of dm neutrino signature would then exclude the parameter region above the curve at the @xmath132 level .
we have presented results corresponding to different annihilation channels .
it is seen that the required annihilation cross section for @xmath132 detection significance is smallest for @xmath138 channel and largest for the channel @xmath139 .    at this juncture , it is desirable to estimate effects of the updated effective volume on our sensitivity calculations .
the energy dependent effective volume @xmath140 as given in ref .
@xcite is roughly 3 times smaller than the value @xmath141 adopted in our calculation for @xmath142 gev . on the other hand
, @xmath140 increases monotonically with energy with @xmath140 greater than @xmath141 for @xmath143 gev . for the annihilation process @xmath7
, one has @xmath144 .
hence the deepcore sensitivity to this process should be better than that presented in fig .  2 , which starts from @xmath145 gev .
for @xmath10 mode , @xmath146 gev corresponds to @xmath147 gev . at this energy ,
the value @xmath148 overestimates the effective volume by about a factor of 2 , thus the deepcore sensitivity to @xmath149 should be corrected by a factor of @xmath150 .
the correction factor gradually reduces to @xmath151 as @xmath26 approaches to about @xmath152 gev , which corresponds to @xmath153 gev . for @xmath154 gev ,
the deepcore sensitivity calculated with @xmath140 is better than that presented in fig .  2 .
the correction factor for @xmath11 is similar to that for @xmath10 . the hadronic mode @xmath155 requires different correction factor for the same @xmath26 .
however we shall not address such a correction here since deepcore detector is relatively insensitive to @xmath155 .     as a function of @xmath26 such that the cascade events induced by neutrinos from dm annihilations can be detected at the @xmath132 significance in five years .
results corresponding to different @xmath156 are presented . for comparison
, we also show the result with @xmath157 gev and @xmath158 @xcite .
, title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    next , we show how the deepcore sensitivity on dm annihilation cross section varies with the chosen cone half - angle and threshold energy for nfw dm density profile . here
we take @xmath10 channel for illustration .
3 shows the required dm annihilation cross section @xmath149 for a @xmath132 detection in five years for different cone half - angle @xmath159 .
it is seen that the sensitivity is improved as @xmath159 increases from @xmath160 to @xmath161 while it turns weaker as @xmath159 increases further . in the latter case ,
the signal increases slower than the background does .
we should point out that the choice of @xmath159 depends on the angular resolution of the experiment .
the current angular resolution in icecube for cascade events is @xmath162 .
however , an improvement on such a resolution is expected  @xcite .
in fact , new reconstruction method which can achieve a @xmath163 angular resolution for cascade events in large - scale neutrino telescopes has been proposed  @xcite . hence results shown in fig .
3 with @xmath164 can be realized in the near future . in this figure
, we also show the result for a higher threshold energy @xmath165 with a cone half - angle @xmath158 for comparison .
this result is taken from ref .
@xcite where @xmath158 is identified as the most optimal cone half - angle for constraining dm annihilation cross section at that threshold energy . for
large @xmath26 , lowering @xmath166 from @xmath167 gev to @xmath168 gev does not affect much the signal rate while increases significantly the atmospheric background event rate .
hence , the sensitivity on dm annihilation cross section becomes worse by choosing @xmath136 .
one expects the situation turns opposite for @xmath26 approaching to the threshold energy .
in fact , for @xmath169 gev , one can see that the sensitivity on dm annihilation cross section obtained with @xmath136 is always better than that obtained with @xmath170 .
we note that the deepcore sensitivities on other annihilation channels have similar cone half - angle and threshold energy dependencies . from the above discussions , we observe that , in contrast to the main concern of this article , raising the shower threshold energy gains sensitivity for probing heavier dm . in fact , as the threshold energy approaches to @xmath171 gev , one enters into the operative energy range of the full icecube array such that the effective volume of the detector increases more rapidly with the threshold energy than the case with deepcore detector alone  @xcite .
the same situation holds for probing dm annihilation with track events .     for einasto
@xcite , isothermal  @xciteand nfw  @xcite dm density profiles.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    after discussing how the deepcore sensitivities on dm annihilation cross section vary with the chosen cone half - angle and threshold energy for nfw profile , we study the variation of deepcore sensitivities on @xmath10 with @xmath159 for different dm density profiles .
first , we present in fig .  4 our expected deepcore sensitivities corresponding to different @xmath159 for einasto dm density profile .
similar to nfw profile , einasto dm density distribution also has a cusp in the central dm region .
we refer to this class of dm density profiles as the cusped profile .
therefore the deepcore sensitivity on @xmath149 with einasto profile becomes poorer as @xmath159 increases .
in addition , we can see from fig .  1 that the dm density of einasto profile is higher than that of nfw profile between 0.1 kpc and 5 kpc from the gc , and both density profiles are almost identical beyond this range of distances .
hence the deepcore sensitivity on @xmath149 with einasto profile is better than that with nfw profile for @xmath137 .
next , we also present in fig .
4 the expected deepcore sensitivities for different @xmath159 with isothermal dm density profile .
because there is a core in the central dm density distribution of isothermal profile , we refer to this class of profile as the cored profile .
we note that the sensitivity to dm annihilation cross section with isothermal profile improves as @xmath159 increases from @xmath160 to @xmath162 while the sensitivity with einasto profile behaves oppositely .
this is because that the dm density distribution of isothermal profile maintains flat for a much longer distance from the gc as compared to the cusped profile .
however , as @xmath159 increases further , the deepcore sensitivity to dm annihilation cross section becomes poorer even for isothermal profile since the factor @xmath172 is proportional to the square of dm density . finally
, deepcore sensitivities to dm annihilation cross section with isothermal profile are poorer than those with cusped profiles for the same @xmath159 .
this results from the fact that dm densities of cusped profiles around gc are much larger than that of isothermal profile in the same region .     as a function of @xmath26 such that the neutrino signature from dm annihilations can be detected at the @xmath132 significance in five years for track and cascade events.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    having discussed the effect of dm density profiles on the derived deepcore sensitivities , we present in fig .  5 the comparison of deepcore sensitivities to @xmath149 obtained by measuring cascade events and track events , respectively .
we note that nfw profile is adopted for results in this figure as well as results presented in the remaining figures of this article .
we point out that @xmath74 is the dominant flavor of atmospheric neutrinos above few tens of gev and the neutrino - nucleon cross section are almost the same for all flavors .
therefore , comparing with the result of track events , the signal to background ratio is enhanced in cascade events because @xmath74 only produces the cascade events through the neutral - current interaction , which is lower in cross section than that of charged - current interaction .
hence cascade events in general provide better sensitivities to dm annihilation cross section than those provided by track events .
we like to point out that the comparison between cascade and track events in fig .
5 is based upon the current angular resolution of icecube detector .
if the angular resolution for cascade events is improved in the future , the advantage of measuring cascade events would be even more significant as one can see from fig .
the dot - dashed line is the @xmath173 upper bound on annihilation cross section for low - mass wimp  @xcite obtained by wmap7 data .
the dot - dot - dashed line is the cmb constraint obtained by using wmap7 + act data at @xmath174 c.l .
the dashed line is the dsphs constraint at @xmath174 c.l .
the dotted line is the constraint due to fermi - lat observations on the region @xmath175 plus a @xmath176 square region centered at gc , assuming the nfw profile  @xcite .
the thick and thin solid lines are the expected @xmath132 sensitivities of deepcore detector with @xmath177 and @xmath178 , respectively.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    it is interesting and essential to compare our results with constraints obtained from gamma - ray astronomy and cosmology .
fermi large area telescope ( fermi - lat )  @xcite is a pair - conversion telescope that explores the gamma - ray sky in the 20 mev to 300 gev range with unprecedented sensitivity . in a recent work ,
fermi - lat collaboration derive constraints on wimp annihilation or decay into various final states which produce a continuous photon spectrum  @xcite .
these constraints are based upon the measured inclusive photon intensity spectrum from 4.8 gev to 264 gev obtained from two years of fermi - lat data over the region @xmath175 plus a @xmath176 square region centered at gc with point sources removed . in fig .
6 , the dotted line is cross section upper limit on dm annihilation channel @xmath10 from the diffuse gamma - ray spectrum with nfw profile .
it is taken from ref .
@xcite with a rescaling factor @xmath179 applied since we have adopted a local density of @xmath25 while fermi - lat analysis uses @xmath180 .
our expected @xmath132 sensitivities on @xmath10 annihilation cross section by the deepcore detector with @xmath137 and @xmath158 are plotted for comparison .
we can see that our expected @xmath132 sensitivity with @xmath137 is slightly stronger than this fermi - lat constraint , even if we calculate the sensitivity with @xmath140 given by ref .
furthermore , the expected @xmath132 sensitivity with @xmath158 in the deepcore detector is almost an order of magnitude stronger than this fermi - lat constraint for small @xmath26 .    .
the dashed line is the dsphs constraint at @xmath174 c.l .
the dotted line is the constraint due to fermi - lat observations for the region @xmath175 plus a @xmath176 square region centered at the gc , assuming the nfw profile  @xcite .
the solid line is the expected @xmath132 sensitivity by deepcore detector with @xmath181 and @xmath158 , which is weaker than both fermi - lat constraints .
the deepcore sensitivity with @xmath137 is not shown since it is even less competitive.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    constraints on dm annihilation cross section were also obtained from cosmology and gamma - ray observations on dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies ( dsphs ) of the milky way .
energy injection from dm annihilation at redshift @xmath182 affects the cmb anisotropy .
this is because the injected energy can ionize the thermal gas and modify the standard recombination history of the universe .
the updated cmb constraints on dm annihilation cross sections are derived in refs .
@xcite and @xcite , where the former work is based on the recent wmap 7-year data  @xcite while the latter one combines wmap 7-year and act 2008  @xcite data .
we present the above two cmb constraints on @xmath10 annihilation cross section in fig .
one can see that the thick solid line is higher than the dot - dot - dashed line ( @xmath174 c.l . ) by roughly a factor of 2 .
thus the expected sensitivity of icecube deepcore detector with @xmath137 is slightly weaker than the cmb constraint .
however , the deepcore sensitivity is comparable to the cmb constraint with @xmath158 .
it should be noted that the dm annihilation cross section could be velocity dependent .
hence , a model dependent extrapolation on dm annihilation cross section might be required to compare the constraint on @xmath183 at redshift @xmath182 to that at the present day universe @xcite .    , @xmath184 , @xmath185 , and @xmath186 , respectively.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm     as a function of @xmath26 such that the neutrino signature from dm decays
can be detected at the @xmath132 significance in five years for cascade events .
results corresponding to different @xmath156 are presented . for comparison
, we also show the result with @xmath157 gev and @xmath137 @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies of the milky way are dm - dominated systems which do not have active star formation or detected gas content  @xcite .
satellite galaxies are among the best targets to search for dm signals in gamma rays because of small background from astrophysical sources and a favorable signal to noise ratio . in ref .
@xcite , fermi - lat collaboration derive upper limits on dm annihilation cross sections by applying a joint likelihood analysis to 24 months of data from 10 satellite galaxies with uncertainties on the dark matter distributions in the satellite galaxies taken into account .
we present the dsphs constraint on @xmath10 annihilation cross section at @xmath174 c.l . in fig .
6 . for @xmath187 ,
the expected deepcore sensitivity curves are below that set by dsphs constraint for both @xmath137 and @xmath158 . for @xmath188
gev , the dsphs constraint is comparable to the expected deepcore sensitivity with @xmath158 .
thus it is stronger than the expected deepcore sensitivity with @xmath137 in this dm mass range .     as a function of @xmath26 such that the neutrino signature from dm decays
can be detected at the @xmath132 significance in five years for track and cascade events.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    we also present fermi - lat s dsphs constraint and galactic gamma ray constraint on @xmath155 annihilation cross section in fig .
7 . by comparing figs .  6 and 7
, we note that fermi - lat data gives more stringent constraint on @xmath155 mode than its constraint on @xmath10 mode .
this is in contrast to the deepcore case as one can see from fig .  2 .
while the neutrino spectrum through @xmath10 is harder than that through @xmath155 , the gamma ray spectra through the above annihilations behave differently .
the gamma ray spectrum from @xmath155 dominates over that from @xmath10 for most of the range of @xmath189  @xcite . the expected @xmath132 sensitivity on @xmath155 channel by the deepcore detector with @xmath158
is also shown in fig .
one can see that the expected deepcore sensitivity on this channel is weaker than all existing constraints presented here .     and @xmath190 channels due to fermi observations for the region @xmath175 plus a @xmath176 at gc , assuming the nfw profile  @xcite .
the solid line and dotted line are our expected @xmath132 sensitivities for @xmath191 and @xmath190 channels with @xmath181 and @xmath137 .
, title="fig:",scaledwidth=85.0% ] 0.5 cm    in addition to studying deepcore sensitivities on dm annihilation channels , we also study sensitivities on dm decay time for @xmath3 , @xmath1 and @xmath130 channels .
figure  8 shows the required dm decay time for reaching @xmath132 detection significance in five years on cascade events from each channel with the threshold energy @xmath181 and a cone half - angle @xmath137 .
non - detection of such a signature would then exclude the parameter region below the curve at the @xmath132 level .
we shall see later that the deepcore sensitivity to dm decay time is not improved by considering @xmath159 smaller than @xmath162 . comparing various dm decay modes , one can see that @xmath186 channel requires the lowest decay rate ( longest decay time ) to avoid a @xmath132 detection significance in five years of deepcore data taking .
we note that the energy - dependent effective volume @xmath140  @xcite downgrades the sensitivity to @xmath192 decay time by roughly a factor of 1.5 at @xmath193 gev , which corresponds to @xmath194 gev .
however , the sensitivity to @xmath192 obtained with @xmath140 is better than that presented in fig .  8 for @xmath195 gev , which corresponds to @xmath196 gev . for @xmath191 mode ,
the sensitivity at @xmath193 gev is lower by a factor of @xmath197 by applying @xmath140 , since such a @xmath26 corresponds to lowest possible neutrino energy @xmath142 gev .
however , @xmath140 shall enhance the sensitivity for @xmath198 gev , which corresponds to @xmath199 gev , assuming @xmath200 .
the correction factor for @xmath201 is similar to that for @xmath191 , while the hadronic mode @xmath190 requires different correction factor for the same @xmath26 .
once more , we do not address such a correction as the deepcore detector is relatively insensitive to @xmath190 .
next , we show how the deepcore sensitivity on dm decay time varies with the chosen cone half - angle and threshold energy .
we use @xmath191 channel to illustrate these effects . in fig .  9 , we present the required dm decay time @xmath202 as a function of @xmath26 for reaching @xmath132 detection significance in five years for different cone half - angle @xmath159 .
the sensitivity curve rises as @xmath159 increases from @xmath160 to @xmath162 . as @xmath159 increases in this cone half - angle range , the dm event rate increases faster than that of atmospheric background .
however , the sensitivity is not further improved by increasing @xmath159 from @xmath162 to @xmath203 .
we also show the required dm decay time for a @xmath132 detection significance in five years with @xmath204 and @xmath205 for comparison .
it has been pointed out in ref .
@xcite that @xmath205 gives rise to the highest sensitivity on dm decay time for @xmath170 .
we note that the sensitivity on dm decay time is improved by lowering @xmath166 from @xmath167 gev to @xmath168 gev for @xmath206 gev .
it is of interest to compare sensitivities on dm decay time given by cascade events and track events . in fig .
10 , one can see that cascade events provide better sensitivity on dm decay time than that given by track events for the same threshold energy @xmath207 and @xmath159 . in the same figure
we also show the sensitivity given by track events for @xmath208 .
such a @xmath209 renders the best sensitivity for track events .
however this sensitivity is still poorer than those given by cascade events .    in fig .  11 , we present decay time lower limits for @xmath191 and @xmath190 channels obtained from the diffuse gamma - ray spectrum for the region @xmath175 plus a @xmath176 square region centered at gc , assuming the nfw profile .
they are taken from ref .
@xcite , with a rescaling factor @xmath210 applied since we have adopted a local density of @xmath25 while fermi - lat analysis uses @xmath180 . in the same figure , we also show the expected @xmath132 sensitivities to @xmath191 and @xmath190 decay time by the deepcore detector with @xmath137 for comparisons . for the deepcore detector ,
the sensitivity to the @xmath191 decay time is better than that to the @xmath190 decay time , since the neutrino spectrum in the former channel is harder than the one in the latter channel . on the other hand , the fermi - lat data in general gives more stringent constraint on @xmath190 decay time than its constraint on the decay time of @xmath191 .
this is because that the gamma ray spectrum from the former channel dominates over the one from the latter channel for most of the range of @xmath189 , as the dm annihilation case .
if dm decays predominantly into @xmath1 , one can see that the decay time sensitivity expected at deepcore is comparable to the constraint given by fermi - lat data .
this conclusion is not altered by adopting the energy - dependent effective volume @xmath140  @xcite . on the other hand ,
if dm decays predominantly to @xmath211 , the expected deepcore sensitivity is much poorer than the constraint from fermi - lat data .
in this paper , we have evaluated sensitivities of icecube deepcore detector to neutrino cascade events induced by dm annihilations and decays in galactic halo .
we focus on the scenario of small dm mass and the threshold energy for the cascade events is taken to be @xmath168 gev .
the event rate of background atmospheric neutrinos is calculated with @xmath212 oscillations taken into account for neutrino energies less than @xmath213 gev .
the signal event rate is calculated by taking nfw profile for dm density distribution in the galactic halo . among all dm annihilation and decay channels ,
the annihilation mode @xmath7 and the decay mode @xmath192 provide the best search sensitivity , while the search sensitivity provided by the annihilation mode @xmath155 and the decay mode @xmath214 is the poorest .
it is important to compare the expected sensitivities of deepcore detector to dm annihilation cross section and decay time with the existing constraints on the same quantities obtained by cosmology and fermi - lat gamma - ray observations .
it is seen that the fermi - lat constraints on @xmath155 and @xmath214 are much stronger than the expected deepcore sensitivities to the same channels .
hence , if dm predominantly annihilates or decays into @xmath211 , the deepcore detector is not expected to observe neutrino signature induced by dm in the galactic halo . for leptonic final states , one can see from fig . 6
that the expected deepcore sensitivity to @xmath10 annihilation cross section is stronger than the fermi - lat constraint on the same channel based upon gamma - ray data from the galactic halo .
however , the former sensitivity with the current angular resolution of cascade events is slightly weaker than both the dsphs constraint and the constraint obtained from wmap and act results on cmb anisotropy . on the other hand ,
the deepcore sensitivity can be improved with an improved angular resolution for cascade events . in fig .
11 , we also see that the expected deepcore sensitivity to @xmath191 decay time is comparable to the fermi - lat constraint based upon gamma - ray data from the galactic halo . from the above comparisons ,
there remain slight possibilities to observe dm induced neutrino signature from the galactic halo provided dm annihilates or decays predominantly into leptons .
it should be noted that fermi - lat and cmb data does not directly set limits on @xmath7 or @xmath192 modes with monochromatic neutrinos . there
exist models @xcite in which @xmath7 and @xmath192 are dominant annihilation and decay modes , respectively . in the annihilation case
@xcite for example , the dm candidate can be the lightest right - handed ( rh ) sneutrino in a @xmath215 extension of the minimal supersymmetric standard model .
rh sneutrinos annihilate into a pair of rh neutrinos .
each of these rh neutrinos then decays into ordinary left - handed ( lh ) neutrino and a neutral higgs boson while the decay of rh neutrino into charged final states @xmath216 is typically forbidden in such a model . in the case
that the mass difference between rh sneutrinos and rh neutrinos is small , rh neutrinos are produced non - relativistically by dm annihilations .
hence lh neutrinos produced by the decays of rh neutrinos are approximately monochromatic with an energy around half of the dm mass . therefore the sensitivity of icecube deepcore to this type of models
can be read off from the @xmath7 curve in fig .
2 with the shift @xmath217 .    before closing ,
we comment on the detection of neutrino signature induced by dm in the galactic halo with neutrino telescopes in the northern hemisphere .
generally a neutrino telescope in such a location has advantages in detecting track - like neutrino events .
first , the telescope s effective volume for upward going track events is enhanced by the muon range .
this effect is particularly significant for energetic track events originated from high - energy muon neutrinos .
second , a neutrino telescope in the northern hemisphere naturally suppresses atmospheric muon background while icecube needs to use optical modules located at the outer region for vetoing the same background  @xcite .
following these arguments , it is interesting to see if a detector array in the northern hemisphere with the size of deepcore detector has a significantly better sensitivity than the current deepcore detector surrounded by icecube strings .
since the latter also has a good veto capability , the former can gain only in the effective volume expected to be enhanced by the muon range .
we note that the deepcore array aims at detecting neutrinos in the energy range @xmath218 .
muons induced by muon neutrinos in this energy range only travel around @xmath167 m for @xmath219 gev and @xmath220 m for @xmath221 gev .
this does not significantly enhance the detector s effective volume in most cases since the height of the deepcore detector is already around @xmath222 m. therefore , given the existence of icecube detector augmented by deepcore in the south pole , it is clear that neutrino telescopes in the northern hemisphere only have advantages in detecting neutrino signature from heavier dm . in this regard , the acceptance for track events in km3net as a function of neutrino
energy has been estimated @xcite . with this acceptance
, we also calculate the sensitivity of km3net to dm annihilation cross section @xmath149 in the galactic halo . for @xmath223 and @xmath224 gev ,
the km3net @xmath132 sensitivity to @xmath149 in 5 years is comparable to the cmb constraint on this channel  @xcite .
however , for @xmath8 tev , cmb constraint gives @xmath149 no greater than @xmath9 @xmath5s@xmath6 whereas the km3net @xmath132 sensitivity on the same annihilation channel can reach to @xmath225@xmath5s@xmath6 in 5 years .    in conclusion
, we have made detailed comparisons between icecube deepcore sensitivities and other existing constraints on various dm annihilation and decay channels .
the prospect for deepcore detector to observe neutrino signature induced by dm in the galactic halo has been discussed .
we have also mentioned the expected performance of km3net on this observation .
we thank y .- h .
lin for useful discussions and c. rott for bringing ref .
@xcite to our attention . f.f.l . is supported by the grant from research and development office , national chiao - tung university , g.l.l .
is supported by national science council of taiwan under grant no .
99 - 2112-m-009 - 005-my3 , y.s.t . is funded in part by the welcome program of the foundation for polish science .
99 g.  jungman , m.  kamionkowski , and k.  griest , phys .
rep . * 267 * , 195 ( 1996 ) ; l.  bergstrom , rep .
. phys . * 63 * , 793 ( 2000 ) .
g.  bertone , d.  hooper , and j.  silk , phys . rep . *
405 * , 279 ( 2005 ) .
a.  achterberg , _ et al .
_ [ icecube collaboration ] , astropart . phys . * 26 * , 155 ( 2006 ) .
r.  abbasi _ et al . _
[ icecube collaboration ] , phys .
d * 84 * , 022004 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1101.3349 [ astro-ph.he ] ] .
r.  abbasi _ et al . _
[ icecube collaboration ] , arxiv:1111.2738 [ astro-ph.he ] .
r.  abbasi _ et al . _
[ icecube collaboration ] , phys .
d * 84 * , 082001 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1104.5187 [ astro-ph.he ] ] .
i.  f.  m.  albuquerque , l.  j.  beraldo e silva and c.  perez de los heros , phys .  rev .
d * 85 * , 123539 ( 2012 ) .
o.  adriani _ et al . _
[ pamela collaboration ] , phys .
lett .   * 106 * , 201101 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1103.2880 [ astro-ph.he ] ] .
m.  ackermann _ et al .
_ [ fermi lat collaboration ] , phys .  rev .
d * 82 * , 092004 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1008.3999 [ astro-ph.he ] ] .
e.  resconi ( icecube collaboration ) , nucl .
methods phys .
res . , sect .
a * 602 * , 7 ( 2009 ) . c.  wiebusch , for the icecube collaboration , [ arxiv:0907.2263 [ astro-ph.im ] ] . t.  deyoung [ icecube collaboration ] , arxiv:1112.1053 [ astro-ph.he ] .
d.  spolyar , m.  r.  buckley , k.  freese , d.  hooper and h.  murayama , arxiv:0905.4764 [ astro-ph.co ] . m.  r.  buckley , d.  spolyar , k.  freese , d.  hooper and h.  murayama , phys .  rev .
d * 81 * , 016006 ( 2010 ) .
s.  k.  mandal , m.  r.  buckley , k.  freese , d.  spolyar and h.  murayama , phys .
d * 81 * , 043508 ( 2010 ) .
l.  covi , m.  grefe , a.  ibarra and d.  tran , jcap * 1004 * , 017 ( 2010 ) .
a.  e.  erkoca , m.  h.  reno , and i.  sarcevic , phys . rev .
d * 82 * , 113006 ( 2010 ) .
f.  f.  lee and g.  l.  lin , phys .
d * 85 * , 023529 ( 2012 ) .
m.  ackermann _ et al . _
( fermi - lat collaboration ) , arxiv:1205.2739 [ astro - ph ] .
m.  ackermann _ et al . _
( fermi - lat collaboration ) , phys .
. lett . * 107 * , 241302 ( 2011 ) .
m.  cirelli , p.  panci and p.  d.  serpico , nucl .
b * 840 * , 284 ( 2010 ) .
g.  hutsi , j.  chluba , a.  hektor and m.  raidal , astron .
astrophys .   *
535 * , a26 ( 2011 ) .
s.  galli , f.  iocco , g.  bertone and a.  melchiorri , phys .
d * 84 * , 027302 ( 2011 ) .
e.  komatsu _ et al .
_ , astrophys
. ser . * 192 * , 18 ( 2011 ) .
j.  w.  fowler _ et al .
_ , astrophys .
j. * 722 * , 1148 ( 2010 ) .
j.  hisano , m.  kawasaki , k.  kohri , and k.  nakayama , phys .
d * 79 * , 043516 ( 2009 ) .
a.  e.  erkoca , g.  gelmini , m.  h.  reno , and i.  sarcevic , phys .
d * 81 * , 096007 ( 2010 ) .
a.  sommerfeld , ann .
( leipzig ) * 403 * , 257 ( 1931 ) ; j.  hisano , s.  matsumoto and m.m .
nojiri , phys .
lett . * 92 * , 031303 ( 2004 ) ; j.m .
russell , s.m .
west , d.  cumberbatch and d.  hooper , jhep * 0807 * , 058 ( 2008 ) ; n.  arkani - hamed , d.p .
finkbeiner , t.r .
slatyer and n.  weiner , phys .
d * 79 * , 015014 ( 2009 ) ; i.  cholis , g.  dobler , d.p .
finkbeiner , l.  goodenough and n.  weiner , phys .  rev .
d * 80 * , 123518 ( 2009 ) ; j.m .
russell and s.m .
west , phys .
b * 676 * , 133 ( 2009 ) ; s.m .
koushiappas and m.  kamionkowski , phys .
lett . * 103 * , 121301 ( 2009 ) ; m.  kamionkowski , s.m .
koushiappas and m.  kuhlen , phys .
d * 81 * , 043532 ( 2010 ) ; m.  lindner , a.  merle and v.  niro , arxiv:1005.3116 ; d.  suematsu , t.  toma and t.  yoshida , phys .
d * 82 * , 013012 ( 2010 ) ; s.  hannestad and t.  tram , arxiv:1008.1511 , j.l .
feng , m.  kaplinghat and h .- b .
yu , arxiv:1005.4678 ; c.  arina , f .- x .  josse - michaux and n.  sahu , phys .
b * 691 * , 219 ( 2010 ) .
gondolo , j.  edsjo , p.  ullio , l.  bergstrom , m.  schelke and e.  a.  baltz , jcap * 0407 * , 008 ( 2004 ) . j.  f.  navarro , c.  s.  frenk and s.  d.  m.  white , astrophys .
j. * 462 * , 563 ( 1996 ) .
a.  w.  graham , d.  merritt , b.  moore , j.  diemand and b.  terzic , astrophys .
j. * 132 * , 2685 ( 2006 ) .
j.  f.  navarro _ et al .
_ , arxiv : astro - ph/0810.1522 . j. diemand , m. kuhlen , p. madau , m. zemp , b. moore , d. potter and j. stadel , nature ( london ) 454 , 735 ( 2008 ) j.  n.  bahcall and r.  m.  soneira , astrophys . j. suppl .
* 44 * , 73 ( 1980 ) .
j.  g.  learned and s.  pakvasa , astropart .
* 3 * , 267 ( 1995 ) .
h.  athar , m.  jezabek and o.  yasuda , phys .
d * 62 * , 103007 ( 2000 ) ; l.  bento , p.  keranen and j.  maalampi , phys .
b * 476 * , 205 ( 2000 ) .
see also k.  c.  lai , g.  l.  lin and t.  c.  liu , phys .
d * 80 * , 103005 ( 2009 ) .
k.  abe _ et al . _
[ t2k collaboration ] , phys .
lett .   * 107 * , 041801 ( 2011 ) .
y.  abe _ et al . _
[ double - chooz collaboration ] , phys .
* 108 * , 131801 ( 2012 ) [ arxiv:1112.6353 [ hep - ex ] ] .
f.  p.  an _ et al .
_ [ daya - bay collaboration ] , arxiv:1203.1669 [ hep - ex ] .
j.  k.  ahn _
[ reno collaboration ] , arxiv:1204.0626 [ hep - ex ] .
g.  l.  fogli , e.  lisi , a.  marrone , d.  montanino , a.  palazzo and a.  m.  rotunno , phys .
d * 86 * , 013012 ( 2012 ) .
t.  k.  gaisser , astropart .
* 16 * , 285 ( 2002 ) .
f.  f.  lee and g.  l.  lin , astropart .
phys .   * 25 * , 64 ( 2006 ) .
t.  k.  gaisser and m.  honda , ann .
nucl .  part .
* 52 * , 153 ( 2002 ) .
m.  honda , t.  kajita , k.  kasahara , and s.  midorikawa , phys .
d * 70 * , 043008 ( 2004 ) .
p.  lipari , astropart .
* 1 * , 195 ( 1993 ) . m.  honda , t.  kajita , k.  kasahara , s.  midorikawa , and t.  sanuki , phys
d * 75 * , 043006 ( 2007 ) .
r.  abbasi _ et al .
_ , astropart . phys .
* 34 * , 48 ( 2010 ) .
t.  k.  gaisser , _ cosmic rays and particle physics _
( cambridge university press , cambridge , uk , 1992 ) .
a.  b.  mcdonald , c.  spiering , s.  .schonert , e.  t.  kearns and t.  kajita , rev .
instrum .   * 75 * , 293 ( 2004 ) .
r.  gandhi , c.  quigg , m.  h.  reno , and i.  sarcevic , astropart .
phys . * 5 * , 81 ( 1996 ) ; phys .
d * 58 * , 093009 ( 1998 ) .
r.  abbasi _ et al . _
[ icecube collaboration ] , astropart .
phys .   * 35 * , 615 ( 2012 ) .
e. middell , j. mccartin and m. dagostino , _ proceedings of the 31st icrc , lodz 2009_. r. auer , nucl .
instrum .
methods  phys .
res . , sect .
a * 602 * , 84 ( 2009 ) .
w.  b.  atwood _ et al .
_ ( fermi - lat collaboration ) , astrophys .
j. * 697 * 1071 ( 2009 ) . for discussions on this issue ,
see , for example , j.  hisano _ et al .
d * 83 * , 123511 ( 2011 ) .
m.  mateo , ann .
astron . astrophys . *
36 * , 435 ( 1998 ) .
j.  grcevich and m.  e.  putman , astrophys . j. * 696 * , 385 ( 2009 ) .
the spectral shapes of gamma ray and neutrinos from dm annihilations are summarized in m.  cirelli , g.  corcella , a.  hektor , g.  hutsi , m.  kadastik , p.  panci , m.  raidal and f.  sala _ et al .
_ , jcap * 1103 * , 051 ( 2011 ) , where original references are listed .
r.  allahverdi , s.  bornhauser , b.  dutta and k.  richardson - mcdaniel , phys .
d * 80 * , 055026 ( 2009 ) .
a.  falkowski , j.  juknevich and j.  shelton , arxiv:0908.1790 [ hep - ph ] .
r.  abbasi _ et al . _
[ icecube collaboration ] , arxiv:1210.3557 [ hep - ex ] . technical design report , km3net collaboration , http://www.km3net.org/tdr/tdrkm3net.pdf .