on the whole , measurements of observables in the @xmath3 system agree with the standard model ( sm ) .
however , some cracks have started to appear .
there are now several quantities whose measured values differ from the predictions of the sm .
although these disagreements are not statistically significant  they are typically at the level of @xmath4  they are intriguing since there are a number of different @xmath3 decays and effects involved , and they all appear in @xmath5 transitions .
because of this , there have been numerous papers examining new - physics ( np ) flavour - changing neutral - current ( fcnc ) contributions to the various @xmath5 processes .
these analyses have been performed in the context of specific np models , or model - independently .    in general
, such np can also contribute to fcnc processes involving the top quark .
this has been looked at , though much less so than in @xmath3 decays .
however , given that the lhc will produce a large number of top quarks and will be able to measure flavour - changing @xmath6 decays , it is important to explore the possibility of np contributions to fcncs in the top sector . in the past , analyses have focused on rare top decays such as @xmath7 ( @xmath8 ) and @xmath9  @xcite .
other top decays where np effects have been examined include @xmath10  @xcite and @xmath11  @xcite .    in this paper
we examine the decay @xmath12 . in the sm
, this decay occurs at tree level , via @xmath13 . on the other hand , because it involves the small element @xmath14 ( @xmath15 ) of the cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa ( ckm ) quark mixing matrix , the amplitude for this process is also rather small , and is therefore quite sensitive to np .
for example , there could be np contributions to this decay in models with a charged higgs boson  @xcite , or via @xmath16 , where @xmath17 corresponds to some neutral particle ( such as a @xmath18 or a non - sm higgs boson ) .
such processes could interfere with the sm process , leading to observable consequences , even if the intermediate np particle were heavier than the top quark . rather than restricting our attention to any one particular model , we examine np contributions to @xmath19 model - independently ( i.e. ,  using an effective lagrangian ) .
our model - independent treatment of @xmath12 takes into account the effects of the 10 possible four - fermi operators .
these operators contribute to both cp - conserving and cp - violating observables . for the cp - even observables
, we consider the cp - averaged partial width , a forward - backward - like asymmetry , and an asymmetry that depends on the spin of the top quark .
for the cp - odd observables , we note that the decay @xmath19 is dominated by one amplitude in the sm ; i.e. , there is only one weak phase involved . as such
, all cp - violating asymmetries are very suppressed in the sm , so the observation of a non - zero asymmetry would be a smoking - gun signal of np . in this paper , we discuss two types of cp - odd asymmetries : the partial - rate asymmetry ( pra ) and a triple - product asymmetry ( tpa ) .
pras require a strong phase in order to be non - zero .
strong phases can arise due to gluon exchange , but it is expected that such phases will be small since the energies involved are so large .
another source of a strong phase is the width of the @xmath20 . in our calculation
, we ignore qcd - based strong phases and assume that the required strong phase is due entirely to the width of the @xmath20 .
this means that only sm - np interference can lead to a pra . on the other hand ,
in contrast with pras , tpas do not require a strong phase in order to be non - zero .
thus , np - np interference terms can give rise to tpas .
as we will see , tpas generated by sm - np interference tend to be small , but np - np tpas can be large . these are particularly interesting .    we show that the measurement of the partial width by itself can reveal the presence of np .
however , if the np exists , we will want to know its identity , i.e. ,  which of the 10 operators is responsible , and the partial width measurement does not give us this information . in order to do this , it is necessary to measure the other quantities mentioned above .
since the various observables depend differently on the operators , the knowledge of their sizes will give us an idea of which np operators are present .
this will allow us in turn to deduce which model(s ) might be responsible for the observed effects .
although we confine our attention to @xmath12 in this work , we note that most of our results are easily transferable to @xmath21 by the replacement @xmath22 in feynman diagrams and expressions .
since @xmath1 , the branching ratio for @xmath21 is similar to that for @xmath12 , and the two processes would apriori have similar sensitivities to np effects .
one difference between @xmath0 and @xmath21 is that the `` cpt '' correction to the pra would be significant for @xmath21 , whereas it is miniscule for @xmath12 ( see the discussion in sec .
[ sec : pra ] and appendix  [ sec : cpt ] ) .
the remainder of this paper is organized as follows . in sec .
[ sec : smnp ] we write down the sm contribution to @xmath0 , and also parameterize np contributions to this decay in terms of an effective lagrangian containing ten terms . in sec .
[ sec : cpeven ] ( cp - even observables ) we compute the cp - averaged partial width for the decay under consideration , as well as a forward - backward - like asymmetry and an asymmetry based on the spin of the top quark .
the latter two asymmetries are both constructed in such a way that they are zero within the context of the sm .
we close this section with a brief numerical study , noting that the cp - even asymmetries could reasonably be of order 10 s of percent .
section  [ sec : cpodd ] contains our analysis of two cp - odd observables  the partial rate asymmetry and the triple - product asymmetry .
section  [ sec : discussion ] concludes with a discussion of our results .
appendices  [ sec : appa ] , [ sec : cpt ] and [ sec : appb ] contain some technical details .
in particular , appendix  [ sec : cpt ] contains a discussion of results related to the cpt theorem , namely which vertex - type corrections must be considered in the calculation of pras in order not to violate cpt .
in this section we parameterize the np contributions to @xmath23 in terms of an effective lagrangian .
we then write down expressions for the sm and np amplitudes .
these expressions are used in following sections to determine various cp - even and cp - odd observables .
figure  [ fig : feynman_diagram1](a ) shows the feynman diagram for the sm contribution to @xmath19 .
the resulting amplitude is given by , @xmath24 , ~     \label{eq : wamp}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath25 is the ckm matrix .
we work in the standard representation of the ckm matrix , in which @xmath14 and @xmath26 are both real .
note that colour indices have been suppressed .
the expression in square parentheses is proportional to the @xmath20 propagator , with @xmath27 , @xmath28^{-1}$ ] and @xmath29 , where @xmath30 .
( note : throughout this paper we neglect the leptons and light quarks masses .
however , if this not done , the @xmath20 propagator is modified to i  , where @xmath31^{-1}$ ] .
@xmath32 and @xmath33 are related to the transverse and longitudinal widths of the @xmath20  @xcite , and they both depend on the quark masses .
there has been considerable discussion in the literature regarding the correct form of the @xmath20 propagator .
( see , for example , refs .
the above expression has been derived by performing a dyson summation of the absorptive parts of the @xmath20 self - energy diagrams in unitary gauge , with quarks and leptons in the loops .
some of the disagreement in the literature has focused on the form of @xmath34 ( see the brief discussion in ref .
@xcite , for example ) .
still , when all light masses are neglected , none of the observables in the present work depend on @xmath34 .
there seems to be broader agreement on the form for @xmath35 in the literature , although many authors drop the @xmath36 dependence in @xmath37 .
finally , we should note that the pinch technique may be used to reorganize perturbative calculations  even those involving resonances  in such a way that results are explicitly gauge - invariant ( see , for example , ref .
rigorous application of the pinch technique to the problem at hand is beyond the scope of this work . )
we parameterize new - physics effects via an effective lagrangian @xmath38 , where , @xmath39 in the above expressions , @xmath40 is assumed to be of order @xmath41 , @xmath42 is the np mass scale and the @xmath43 and @xmath44 couplings may include weak ( cp - violating ) phases . for the levi - civita tensor , we adopt the convention @xmath45 .
the np contributions to @xmath46 are illustrated in fig .
[ fig : feynman_diagram1](b ) .
colour indices are not shown in the above expressions , but are assumed to contract in the same manner as those of the sm ( i.e. , @xmath47 with @xmath6 and @xmath48 with @xmath49 ) . in fcnc models
 those with a flavour - changing neutral particle such as a @xmath50 or a scalar  the colour indices would contract in the opposite manner ( i.e. , @xmath48 with @xmath6 and @xmath47 with @xmath49 ) .
it is straightforward to incorporate colour - mismatched terms into the effective lagrangian .
this topic is discussed further in appendix  [ sec : appb ] .
it is useful to define @xmath51 and similarly for the other @xmath43 and @xmath44 couplings . in terms of the `` @xmath52 '' parameters
, we have the following expression for the np contribution to @xmath12 , @xmath53 to get a sense of the possible order of magnitude of the @xmath52 couplings , note that , if @xmath54 and @xmath55  gev , then @xmath56 .
thus , @xmath57 could reasonably be assumed to be of order unity . in other words ,
the sm and np contributions to @xmath12 can very well be about the same size . when computing the effect of np on a particular observable , it is therefore important to include both the sm - np interference and np@xmath58 pieces .    at present , there are no direct constraints on the @xmath52 couplings . the precision measurements of @xmath14 place an indirect constraint via the loop diagram shown in fig .
[ fig : vcb ] .
it is known that some care must be taken when attempting to incorporate terms from an effective lagrangian into loop calculations @xcite . incorporating the diagram shown in fig .
[ fig : vcb ] , we find the following expression for the effective lagrangian for @xmath59 , @xmath60\overline{\ell}_l\gamma^\mu \nu_l + \mbox{h.c .
, } \label{eq : bcellnu}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in which we have dropped corrections of order @xmath61 . using the feynman rules for the various vertices , and employing dimensional arguments , we estimate @xmath62 since semileptonic @xmath63 transitions are used to determine @xmath14 , the experimental value of @xmath14 can be used to bound @xmath57 and @xmath64 .
let us first consider the @xmath57 term in eq .
( [ eq : bcellnu ] ) , ignoring the @xmath64 term .
the @xmath57 term has exactly the same structure as the sm term .
its effect is thus simply to multiply any inclusive or exclusive @xmath65 width by a factor of @xmath66 $ ] .
the current experimental value of @xmath14 is @xmath67  @xcite , implying a @xmath68 uncertainty on @xmath69 .
if we assume that the @xmath57 contribution to @xmath59 is hiding in the experimental uncertainty of @xmath69 , we find the bound , @xmath70 in which we have neglected the quadratic contribution of @xmath71 , since it is small . since @xmath64 is associated with the right - handed quark current in eq .
( [ eq : bcellnu ] ) , its effect is process - dependent . for example , for @xmath72 ,
the hadronic matrix element is only sensitive to the vector part of the hadronic current , so left - handed and right - handed couplings both have the same effect , and they can be absorbed in with the sm current  @xcite . for other modes , such as @xmath73 , the right - handed and left - handed currents must be treated differently  @xcite . since our expression in eq .
( [ eq : zetavllr ] ) is somewhat of an approximation in any case , we assume the same upper bound for @xmath64 as for @xmath57 , i.e. , @xmath74    the np operators considered in this work could contribute , via loops , to other observables as well .
as an example , consider the decay @xmath75 , which proceeds at tree - level in the sm . in the present context ,
the np operators contribute to this decay via a diagram similar to fig .
[ fig : vcb ] , but with @xmath76 replaced by @xmath77 in the final state
. the resulting effective lagrangian would be very similar to eq .
( [ eq : bcellnu ] ) , which could lead to effects in the measurement of @xmath78  @xcite .
we do not consider such effects further here .
although we do not perform any model calculations in this work , it is worthwhile to consider which types of models could give rise to the various np operators .
the terms in eqs .
( [ eq : eff1 ] ) and ( [ eq : eff2 ] ) arise in models that contain new charged vector or scalar bosons .
for example , extensions of the sm containing gauge bosons with left- and right - handed charged - current couplings ( such as the left - right model ) would contribute terms such as those appearing in @xmath79  including the @xmath80 and @xmath81 terms if there were some amount of mixing between the left- and right - handed gauge bosons .
models containing charged scalars ( such as the charged higgs bosons that appear in many extensions of the sm ) could give rise to the terms in the expression for @xmath82 . alternatively , there are many fcnc models containing a heavy neutral np particle ( such as a @xmath18 or a neutral higgs boson ) with flavour - changing @xmath6-@xmath83 couplings . here
fierz rearrangements of the eight operator combinations @xmath84 $ ] and @xmath85 $ ] ( in the notation employed in ref .
@xcite ) lead to all ten of the operator combinations in eqs .
( [ eq : eff1])-([eq : eff3 ] ) . in this case
there would be mismatched colour indices between the np and sm diagrams .
appendix  [ sec : appb ] explains how to deal with this situation .    in the following sections we compute various observables associated with the decays @xmath86 and @xmath87 .
we take as our starting point the expressions for the sm and np amplitudes in eqs .
( [ eq : wamp ] ) and ( [ eq : npamplitude2 ] ) , respectively .
we begin by considering three cp - even observables associated with the decays in question .
the first is the cp - averaged partial width , normalized to the sm result ; the second is a forward - backward - like asymmetry ; and the third is a cp - even asymmetry that employs the spin of the top quark . in secs .
[ sec : cpaveragedwidth]-[sec : singlespin ] we work out expressions for the various observables .
section  [ sec : discussioncpeven ] contains a numerical analysis and discussion of the results .
we first consider the partial width for @xmath12 .
the expression for the differential partial width , including the various np terms from the effective lagrangian , may be found in eq .
( [ eq : appdgam ] ) in appendix  [ sec : appa ] . performing the integrations over @xmath88 and @xmath36 , we find , @xmath89 \nonumber\\     & & + ~\frac{3g_f m_t^2}{\sqrt{2}\pi^2       \left(1-\zeta_w^2\right)^2\left(1 + 2\zeta_w^2\right ) }     \bigg [       \left|x_{ll}^v\right|^2 + \left|x_{lr}^v\right|^2 +       \left|x_{rl}^v\right|^2 + \left|x_{rr}^v\right|^2        \nonumber\\     & & + ~       \frac{1}{4}\left(\left|x_{ll}^s\right|^2 + \left|x_{lr}^s\right|^2 +       \left|x_{rl}^s\right|^2 + \left|x_{rr}^s\right|^2\right ) +       24\left|x_t\right|^2 + 96\left|x_{te}\right|^2       \bigg ]     \bigg\}\ , ,     \label{eq : gam_tbbbarc}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath90 and @xmath91 in calculating the expressions in eqs .
( [ eq : gam_tbbbarc ] ) and ( [ eq : gamsm ] ) , we have used the narrow width approximation , in which @xmath92 is replaced by a @xmath93-function in @xmath36 , appropriately normalized .
[ one exception is the term proportional to re(@xmath94 ) in eq .
( [ eq : gam_tbbbarc ] ) , which was computed numerically . ]
( note that the term proportional to im(@xmath94 ) in eq .
( [ eq : gam_tbbbarc ] ) , which is involved in the partial rate asymmetry discussed below , is not quite complete . in its present form
, it would lead to a violation of cpt . to avoid running into problems with the cpt theorem ,
certain vertex - type corrections need to be included in the calculation when computing partial rate asymmetries .
we discuss these extra terms in appendix [ sec : cpt ] . )    the partial width for the cp - conjugate decay may be obtained from eq .
( [ eq : gam_tbbbarc ] ) by complex conjugating all weak phases . ''
multiplying @xmath95 in the np amplitude does _ not _ get complex conjugated when computing the amplitude for the cp - conjugate process .
] this has the effect of changing the sign of the im(@xmath94 ) term , while leaving the other terms unchanged . adding the widths for @xmath12 and @xmath96 , and dividing by twice the sm result yields @xmath97 ,     \label{eq : rcal}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in which we have inserted the known values for the various physical constants , and used the expression for @xmath98 noted below eq .
( [ eq : wamp ] ) .
note that , in practice , the term proportional to re(@xmath94 ) is always small compared to the other terms .
above , we noted that the @xmath52 s could well be @xmath99 .
thus , from eq .
( [ eq : rcal ] ) , we see that the cp - averaged partial width could be used as a tool to search for np .
in particular , an experimental value for @xmath43 that is different from unity would give clear evidence for np .
( depending on the size of the np signal , it may be important to include corrections to eq .
( [ eq : gamsm ] ) @xcite . )    on the other hand , all 10 np operators contribute to @xmath43 in similar ways .
thus , even if the measurement of @xmath43 reveals the presence of np , it does not give us any clue as to the type of np .
for this reason , it is important to look for signs of np in other quantities .
this is most easily done using observables that are strictly zero within the context of the sm .
such observables would typically depend upon differing combinations of np parameters , so that the observation of np effects using several different observables would yield insight into the precise nature of the np . in the following ,
we construct several asymmetries that are zero within the context of the sm and discuss their potential usefulness as tools for searching for np .
note that the ratio @xmath43 , defined above , will also appear in the denominators of all asymmetries considered below . since @xmath43 is primarily a sum of positive quantities , and since it will always appear in the denominators of the asymmetries , it will always tend to decrease the values of the asymmetries compared to the analogous expressions employing the approximation @xmath100 .
a tool that has historically been useful to experimentalists is the forward - backward ( fb ) asymmetry .
the differential width for @xmath23 may be written in terms of @xmath101 and @xmath102 , where @xmath103 is the angle between the momentum of the top quark and that of the charm quark in the @xmath47-@xmath83 rest frame .
the fb asymmetry makes use of the following asymmetric integration over @xmath102 , @xmath104    dq^2 \ , .
\label{eq : fb1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we choose instead to work with the kinematical variables @xmath36 and @xmath105 , noting that @xmath106 using eq .
( [ eq : costheta ] ) , we may rewrite eq .
( [ eq : fb1 ] ) as follows , @xmath107    dq^2 \ , .
\label{eq : fbdef}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    let us first consider the sm contribution to the fb asymmetry .
the sm - only contribution to the width is such that @xmath108 ( see eq .
( [ eq : appdgam ] ) in appendix  [ sec : appa ] ) . using the integration prescription in eq .
( [ eq : fbdef ] ) , and assuming the narrow - width approximation , we find , @xmath109 thus , we see that the sm contribution to the fb asymmetry is non - zero .
as noted above , in order to use a particular asymmetry as a discriminator of np , it is useful if the asymmetry is zero when no np contribution is present .
the regular fb asymmetry does not satisfy this requirement , as is evidenced by eq .
( [ eq : afbsm ] ) .
it turns out , however , that if we modify the @xmath105 integration prescription somewhat , the sm contribution can be made to disappear .
that is , instead of breaking up the integral over @xmath105 at the point @xmath110 , as is done in eq .
( [ eq : fbdef ] ) , we move the boundary to the value @xmath111 , @xmath112    dq^2 \ , ,    \label{eq : fb - likedgam}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in which @xmath111 is chosen such that [ see eq .
( [ eq : smdqsqdrhosq ] ) ] , @xmath113 then , by construction , @xmath114 dq^2 = 0 .
\label{eq : fb - likedgamsmzero2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the new boundary , @xmath111 , is @xmath36-dependent and can be solved for numerically . is cubic and can also be solved analytically , although the resulting expressions for the roots of the equation are not particularly enlightening . ]
figure  [ fig : phasespace ] shows the phase space available for @xmath12 and also indicates the two boundary choices described above .
the vertical band indicates the location of the @xmath20 resonance for the sm contribution .
equation  ( [ eq : appdgam ] ) in appendix  [ sec : appa ] gives the expression for @xmath115 .
the @xmath105 dependence of the sm piece is given by @xmath116 ; the sm - np cross terms and the @xmath117 and @xmath118 terms have this same @xmath105 dependence .
since the integration prescription described above is engineered to eliminate the sm term when integrating over @xmath105 , these latter terms also disappear upon integration over @xmath105 in this manner . performing the integration numerically for the other terms yields the following , @xmath119 \nonumber\\   & & + 1.81     \left(\left|x_t\right|^2 + 4\left|x_{te}\right|^2\right )     \bigg ] .
\label{eq : gammarhobarsq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the above expression is cp - even ; i.e. , the analogous expression for @xmath96 is the same .
finally , we form an fb - like asymmetry as follows , @xmath120 \nonumber\\   & & + 0.460     \left(\left|x_t\right|^2 + 4\left|x_{te}\right|^2\right )     \bigg ] .
\label{eq : arhobarsq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] by construction , this asymmetry is only non - zero if np contributions are present .
section  [ sec : discussioncpeven ] contains a discussion of the range of sizes that are possible for the fb - like asymmetry . at this point
we note only that asymmetries of order tens of percent are possible .          in this section
we have described three observables that are even under cp and that could be used to detect the presence of np in the decays @xmath19 and @xmath137 . should np be discovered , detailed analysis of such observables could allow experimentalists to map out the nature of the np .
the first observable considered in this section was a ratio , @xmath138 , which was defined to be proportional to the cp - averaged partial width .
of the observables considered in this work , @xmath43 would probably be the simplest to measure experimentally .
decisive experimental deviation from the sm value @xmath139 would be evidence for np .    on the other hand , @xmath43 can not be used to distinguish the different np operators . to do this
requires the use of other quantities .
it is useful to employ observables that give a null signal within the context of the sm . for such observables ,
a significant departure from zero would be a `` smoking - gun '' signal for new physics .
in addition , since they depend differently on the various np operators , the observation of non - zero values for these observables would help in identifying the type of np .    the usual forward - backward asymmetry for @xmath12 is expected to be non - zero within the context of the sm .
it is possible , however , to alter the kinematical weighting that is used in defining the fb asymmetry in such a way that the resulting `` fb - like '' asymmetry is zero within the context of the sm . equation  ( [ eq : arhobarsq ] ) defines the fb - like asymmetry @xmath140 in terms of an asymmetric integration over the kinematical variable @xmath105 .
the integration is engineered in such a way that the sm contribution disappears kinematically . in eq .
( [ eq : aparallel ] ) we formed a cp - even asymmetry using the spin of the top quark .
this asymmetry was also defined in such a way that it was zero within the context of the sm . a non - zero experimental signal for either of these asymmetries would indicate the presence of np .
.some representative values for the fb - like asymmetry @xmath140 and the cp - even spin asymmetry @xmath141 . the value for @xmath43 is also included for each case .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     [ tab : acptpnpnp ]    finally , we define the tpa as @xmath142 so that @xmath143 }          { \left(1-\zeta_w^2\right)^2\left(1 + 2\zeta_w^2\right ) } \nonumber \\     & \simeq & \frac{0.243}{\cal r}\ ,      \mbox{im}\!\left[x_t\left(x^{s*}_{ll}+x^{s*}_{rr}\right )         -2x_{te}\left(x^{s*}_{ll}-x^{s*}_{rr}\right)\right ] .
\label{eq : atpcpnon - suppressed}\end{aligned}\ ] ] table  [ tab : acptpnpnp ] contains some numerical results following from the above expression , showing that the tpas can indeed be large  of order 10 s of percent  if the np coefficients are assumed not to be suppressed .
figure  [ fig : acpodd ] shows a scatter plot of @xmath144 versus @xmath43 .
the points in this plot were obtained by generating combinations of purely real and purely imaginary random numbers for @xmath145 , @xmath146 , @xmath147 and @xmath95 over various ranges .
once again , asymmetries were only plotted if @xmath148 .
it is evident from the plot that relatively large tpas are possible .
in this paper we consider new - physics ( np ) contributions to the decay @xmath12 . in the standard model ( sm ) , this is a tree - level process : @xmath13 .
however , the sm amplitude involves the small cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa element @xmath14 ( @xmath15 ) , and is therefore suppressed . as a result , the decay is quite sensitive to np . rather than working within the context of any one particular extension of the sm , we parameterize the np couplings by an effective lagrangian that includes the 10 possible four - fermi operators .
we show that the sm and np contributions to @xmath12 can indeed be about the same size .
we first compute the @xmath149 partial width in the presence of np . the ratio @xmath43 , defined in eq .
( [ eq : rcal ] ) , provides a quantitative measure of the deviation of the partial width from its sm expectation ( @xmath150 in the sm ) .
this shows clearly that this observable is excellent for showing that np is present  significant deviations of @xmath43 from 1 are possible .    on the other hand ,
the partial width is not a good observable to _ identify _ the new physics
all 10 np operators contribute to @xmath43 in a similar way . in order to get an idea of the type of np present ,
it is necessary to consider other quantities . to this end , we construct two cp - conserving and two cp - violating observables : ( i ) cp - even : a forward - backward - like asymmetry [ @xmath140  eq .
( [ eq : arhobarsq ] ) ] and a top - quark - spin - dependent asymmetry [ @xmath141  eq .
( [ eq : aparallel ] ) ] , ( ii ) cp - odd : the partial rate asymmetry [ @xmath151  eq .  ( [ eq : pra1 ] ) ] and a triple - product asymmetry [ @xmath152  eq .  ( [ eq : atpcpnon - suppressed ] ) ] . in each case , the observable is formulated in such a way that it is zero within the context of the sm .
the key point is that these observables depend on differing combinations of the np parameters .
this gives them different sensitivities to the various lorentz structures present in the np effective lagrangian .
the allowed values of these four observables vary greatly depending on the values of the np parameters , but results in the 10 - 20% range are possible ( see tables [ tab : acpeven ] and [ tab : acptpnpnp ] )
. if np is present , it may well produce measurable values of these observables .
taken together , the measurements of these quantities will give a good indication of the type of np present .
* acknowledgments * : we would like to thank a. soni for helpful discussions . this work was financially supported by nserc of canada ( d.l . ) the work of k.k .
, t.k . and k.w .
was supported by the u.s .
national science foundation under grant phy0900914 .
this work was also partially supported by anpcyt ( argentina ) under grant # pict - prh 2009 - 0054 .
the cpt theorem requires the total decay width for the top to be equal to that for the anti - top .
an apparent violation of the cpt theorem arises , however , if the np contributions in fig .  [ fig : feynman_diagram1 ] ( b ) are the only ones that are kept . that this is the case is straightforward to see , since the diagram in fig .
[ fig : feynman_diagram1 ] ( b ) affects the partial widths for @xmath153 and @xmath162 differently [ leading to the pra in eq .
( [ eq : pra1 ] ) ] , but has no effect on the other top or anti - top decay modes . thus , the top and anti - top total widths are not equal if only such contributions are kept , resulting in an apparent violation of the cpt theorem .
this phenomenon is well - known ( see , for example , refs .
@xcite ) . in this appendix
we show that the inclusion of certain vertex - type corrections gives rise to compensating differences in the top and anti - top widths .
the sum of the differences is zero , so that the top and anti - top widths no longer differ , in agreement with the cpt theorem .      equation  ( [ eq : delgamma ] ) gives a correction to the pra for @xmath23 , leading to the following modification of eq .
( [ eq : pra1 ] ) , @xmath172 .
\label{eq : pra2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the correction to the original expression is miniscule , since @xmath173 .
an interesting consequence of the cpt theorem is that , if np operators give a pra in a particular decay mode ( such as @xmath174 , as in our case ) , then those same np operators must also contribute to one or more other decay modes in such a way that the total width of the top is the same as that of the anti - top .
this means that those other decay modes must also have pras ( barring other accidental cancellations ) .
we can use eq .
( [ eq : delgamma ] ) to estimate the pras in other decay modes due to the np operators in eqs .
( [ eq : eff1])-([eq : eff3 ] ) .
the resulting expression is given by , @xmath175 thus the contributions of these np operators to pras in other top decay modes are expected to be very small .
one could also consider the complementary question : are there np operators , other than those given in eqs .
( [ eq : eff1])-([eq : eff3 ] ) , that could contribute to the pra in @xmath12 ?
the answer to this question appears to be yes .
for example , the effective operators @xmath176 or @xmath177 could appear in a diagram similar to that in fig .
[ fig : cpt_vertex_correction ] , but with the usual sm @xmath178 vertex at the top , and the np - induced one - loop correction to the @xmath179 vertex at the bottom .
such operators are constrained by @xmath3 decays .
we should note that the np effective operators in eqs .
( [ eq : eff1])-([eq : eff3 ] ) give rise to other loop - level diagrams that could contribute to pras in top decays .
the contributions in different decay modes would still complement each other in the sense that the total top and anti - top widths would remain equal .
figure  [ fig : tczvertex ] shows an example of loop - level corrections to @xmath180 ( @xmath181 ) mediated by the np operators considered in this work .
these diagrams could interfere with their corresponding sm diagrams to induce pras .
we do not compute such contributions here .
the effective lagrangian incorporating np effects given in eqs .
( [ eq : eff1])-([eq : eff3 ] ) assumed that the colour indices contracted in the same manner as those of the sm diagram .
this need not be the case , so it is useful to consider the effects of including colour - mismatched terms in the effective lagrangian . to this end , let us generalize the np effective lagrangian in eq .
( [ eq : eff1 ] ) as follows , @xmath182 and similarly for eqs .
( [ eq : eff2 ] ) and ( [ eq : eff3 ] ) . in this expression ,
the subscripts @xmath183 and @xmath49 are colour indices and the primed coefficients correspond to the new , colour - mismatched terms . the total amplitude for @xmath184 ( with the subscripts @xmath183 , @xmath49 , @xmath83 and @xmath185 representing the colours )
could then be parameterized as @xmath186 in which the sum runs over the sm diagram , plus all np contributions .
the factors @xmath187 and @xmath188 are the coefficients for the colour - matched and colour - mismatched terms , respectively , and are assumed to contain all of the weak phases .
( the @xmath189 coefficient for the sm term is assumed to be zero . ) for a given value of @xmath190 , the phases of @xmath187 and @xmath188 could be different . the factors @xmath191 contain all the spinors and @xmath192 matrices and , in the case of the sm diagram , the @xmath20 propagator .
summing over the quarks colours and dividing by 3 for the average over the top quark s colours , we find , @xmath193\left|{\cal m}_i\right|^2 \nonumber\\    & + & 6 \sum_{j > i }      \left\{\mbox{re}\!\left[\mathbb{r}_i\mathbb{r}_j^ * +     \mathbb{r}_i^\prime \mathbb{r}_j^{\prime * } +     \frac{1}{3}\left (     \mathbb{r}_i\mathbb{r}_j^{\prime * } +     \mathbb{r}_i^\prime\mathbb{r}_j^*\right)\right ]     \!\mbox{re}\!\left({\cal m}_i { \cal m}_j^*\right ) \right . \nonumber\\    & - & \left . \mbox{im}\!\left[\mathbb{r}_i\mathbb{r}_j^ * +     \mathbb{r}_i^\prime \mathbb{r}_j^{\prime * } +     \frac{1}{3}\left (     \mathbb{r}_i\mathbb{r}_j^{\prime * } +     \mathbb{r}_i^\prime\mathbb{r}_j^*\right)\right ]     \!\mbox{im}\!\left({\cal m}_i { \cal m}_j^*\right ) \right\ } .
\label{eq : colourmismatchcorrection}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the @xmath194 terms in the above expression correspond to the `` colour - matched '' terms that we have taken into account in this work .
the other terms are new .
equation  ( [ eq : colourmismatchcorrection ] ) can be used to generalize the expressions in this paper , provided the expressions have already been split cleanly into pieces containing the weak phases ( @xmath187 , etc . ) and those containing the spinors and any strong phases ( @xmath191 ) .
expressions containing sm - np cross - terms may safely set @xmath195 and incorporate the entire amplitude into the `` @xmath196 '' part [ in eq .
( [ eq : mabcd ] ) ] , since @xmath26 and @xmath14 have been taken to be real .
as an example , the generalized form for eq .
( [ eq : rcal ] ) would be @xmath197\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] in which we have used the fact that @xmath198 . similarly , eq .  ( [ eq : atpcpnon - suppressed ] ) would become , @xmath199\right\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] and eq .  ( [ eq : pra1 ] )
would become , @xmath200 finally , an expression such as `` re@xmath201 '' in eq .
( [ eq : appdgam ] ) , which contains both a strong phase ( in @xmath35 ) and a weak phase ( in @xmath157 ) , first needs to be separated into two pieces using @xmath202 .
g.  eilam , j.  l.  hewett and a.  soni , phys .
d * 44 * , 1473 ( 1991 ) [ erratum - ibid .
d * 59 * , 039901 ( 1998 ) ] ; m.  e.  luke and m.  j.  savage , phys .
b * 307 * , 387 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9303249 ] ; t.  han , r.  d.  peccei and x.  zhang , nucl .
b * 454 * , 527 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9506461 ] ; t.  han , k.  whisnant , b.  l.  young and x.  zhang , phys .  rev .
d * 55 * , 7241 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9603247 ] ; t.  han , k.  whisnant , b.  l.  young and x.  zhang , phys .  lett .
b * 385 * , 311 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9606231 ] ; g.  eilam , a.  gemintern , t.  han , j.  m.  yang and x.  zhang , phys .
b * 510 * , 227 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0102037 ] ; j.  a.  aguilar - saavedra , acta phys .
b * 35 * , 2695 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0409342 ] ; a.  datta and m.  duraisamy , phys .
d * 81 * , 074008 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0912.4785 [ hep - ph ] ] .
j.  l.  diaz - cruz and g.  lopez castro , phys .
b * 301 * , 405 ( 1993 ) .
d.  atwood , g.  eilam , a.  soni , r.  r.  mendel and r.  migneron , phys .
lett .   * 70 * , 1364 ( 1993 ) ; d.  atwood , g.  eilam and a.  soni , phys .  rev .  lett .   * 71 * , 492 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9303268 ] .
r.  cruz , b.  grzadkowski and j.  f.  gunion , phys .
b * 289 * , 440 ( 1992 ) .
j.  liu , phys .
d * 47 * , r1741 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9209294 ] .
d.  atwood , g.  eilam , a.  soni , r.  r.  mendel and r.  migneron , phys .
d * 49 * , 289 ( 1994 ) .
t.  arens and l.  m.  sehgal , phys .
d * 51 * , 3525 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9404259 ] .
x.  j.  bi and y.  b.  dai , eur .  phys .
j.   c * 12 * , 125 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9904228 ] .
d.  atwood , s.  bar - shalom , g.  eilam and a.  soni , phys .
rept .   * 347 * , 1 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0006032 ] . b.  grzadkowski and w.  y.  keung , phys .
b * 319 * , 526 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9310286 ] ; e.  christova and m.  fabbrichesi , phys .
b * 320 * , 299 ( 1994 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9307298 ] ; s.  bar - shalom , d.  atwood and a.  soni , phys .
d * 57 * , 1495 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9708357 ] . m.  nowakowski and a.  pilaftsis , z.  phys .
c * 60 * , 121 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9305321 ] .
g.  lpez castro , j.  l.  lucio and j.  pestieau , int .
j.  mod .
a * 11 * , 563 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9504351 ] .
j.  papavassiliou and a.  pilaftsis , phys .
lett .   * 75 * , 3060 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9506417 ] .
j.  papavassiliou , in _
`` beyond the standard model iv , '' _ pp .
509 - 513 , eds .
j. gunion , t. han and j. ohnemus ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9504386 ] .
d.  binosi and j.  papavassiliou , phys .
rept .   * 479 * , 1 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0909.2536 [ hep - ph ] ] .
c.  p.  burgess and d.  london , phys .
d * 48 * , 4337 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9203216 ] .
k.  nakamura _ et al .
_ [ particle data group ] , j.  phys .
g * 37 * , 075021 ( 2010 ) .
g.  h.  wu , k.  kiers and j.  n.  ng , phys .
d * 56 * , 5413 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9705293 ] .
k.  kiers , a.  soni and g.  h.  wu , phys .  rev .
d * 59 * , 096001 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9810552 ] . c.  c.  nishi , am .
j.  phys .
* 73 * , 1160 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0412245 ] . for a discussion of some corrections to the tree - level result , see w.  bernreuther , j.  phys .
g * 35 * , 083001 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0805.1333 [ hep - ph ] ] , and references therein .
the effect of the higher - order corrections is to reduce the value of the top width somewhat
.    for a discussion of top quark polarization , see m.  beneke , i.  efthymiopoulos , m.  l.  mangano , j.  womersley , a.  ahmadov , g.  azuelos , u.  baur , a.  belyaev _ et al .
_ , [ hep - ph/0003033 ] , and references therein .
g.  eilam , j.  l.  hewett and a.  soni , phys .
lett .   * 67 * , 1979 ( 1991 ) .
k.  kiers , a.  szynkman and d.  london , phys .
d * 74 * , 035004 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605123 ] .
a.  szynkman , k.  kiers and d.  london , phys .
d * 75 * , 075009 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0701165 ] . m.  nagashima , k.  kiers , a.  szynkman , d.  london , j.  hanchey and k.  little , phys .
d * 80 * , 095012 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0907.1063 [ hep - ph ] ] .
j.  m.  gerard and w.  s.  hou , phys .
lett .   * 62 * , 855 ( 1989 ) .
l.  wolfenstein , phys .
d * 43 * , 151 ( 1991 ) .
j.  m.  soares , phys .
lett .   * 68 * , 2102 ( 1992 ) .
g.  eilam , j.  l.  hewett and a.  soni , phys .
lett .   * 68 * , 2103 ( 1992 ) . for a similar discussion in the context of @xmath203 , see g.  l.  kane , g.  a.  ladinsky and c.  p.  yuan , phys .  rev .
d * 45 * , 124 ( 1992 ) .