the experimental success in the coherent coupling of quantum dots @xcite has enabled measuring the transport properties of systems with a molecule - like level structure . recently
, further progress in this direction has been attained by the reproducible measurement of currents through molecules which are coupled to metallic leads @xcite . together with these experimental achievements ,
new theoretical interest in the transport properties of such nanoscale systems emerged @xcite .
one particular field of interest is the interplay of the electron transport and excitations by an oscillating gate voltage , a microwave field , or an infrared laser , respectively .
such excitations bear intriguing phenomena like photon - assisted tunneling @xcite and the adiabatic @xcite and non - adiabatic @xcite pumping of electrons .
a prominent example for the control of quantum dynamics is the so - called coherent destruction of tunneling , i.e. , the suppression of the tunneling dynamics of a particle in a double - well potential @xcite , in a two - level system @xcite , or in a superlattice @xcite . recently ,
coherent destruction of tunneling has also been found for the dynamics of two interacting electrons in a double quantum dot @xcite .
moreover , it has been demonstrated that a corresponding transport effect exists : if two leads are attached to the ends of a tunneling system , then a proper driving field can be used to suppress the current even in the presence of a large transport voltage @xcite .
moreover , in such a system the corresponding shot noise level _ a priori _ can be controlled by proper ac fields @xcite . within this work
, we provide more details on this noise control scheme and also explore its limitations .
an intuitive description of the electron transport through time - independent mesoscopic systems is provided by the landauer scattering formula @xcite and its various generalizations .
both the average current @xcite and the transport noise characteristics @xcite can be expressed in terms of the quantum transmission coefficients for the respective scattering channels . by contrast , the theory for driven quantum transport is less developed .
scattering of a single particle by an arbitrary time - dependent potentials has been considered @xcite without relating the resulting transmissions to a current between electron reservoirs .
such a relation is indeed non - trivial since the driving opens inelastic transport channels and , therefore , in contrast to the static case , an _ ad hoc _ inclusion of the pauli principle is no longer unique .
this gave rise to a discussion about `` pauli blocking factors '' @xcite . in order to avoid such conflicts
, one should start out from a many - particle description . in this spirit , within a green function approach , a _
solution for the current through a time - dependent conductor has been presented , e.g. , in refs .   and   without taking advantage of the full floquet theory for the wire . nevertheless in some special cases like , e.g. , for conductors consisting of a single level @xcite or for the scattering by a piecewise constant potential @xcite
, an explicit solution becomes feasible .
moreover , for large driving frequencies , the driving can be treated within a self - consistent perturbation theory @xcite .
the spectral density of the current fluctuations has been derived for the low - frequency ac conductance @xcite and the scattering by a slowly time - dependent potential @xcite . for arbitrary driving frequencies ,
the noise has been characterized by its zero - frequency component @xcite .
a remarkable feature of the current noise in the presence of time - dependent fields is its dependence on the phase of the transmission
_ amplitudes _ @xcite . by clear contrast , both the noise in the static case @xcite and the current in the driven case @xcite depend solely on transmission _
probabilities_.    within this work , we _ derive _ within a floquet approach explicit expressions for both the current and the noise properties of the electron transport through a driven nanoscale conductor under the influence of time - dependent forces .
this generalizes recent approaches since the presented floquet formalism is applicable to arbitrary periodically driven tight - binding systems and , in particular , is valid for arbitrary driving strength and , as well , extends beyond the adiabatic regime .
the dynamics of the electrons is solved by integrating the heisenberg equations of motion for the electron creation / annihilation operators in terms of the single - particle propagator . for this propagator , in turn , we provide a solution within a generalized floquet approach .
such a treatment is valid for effectively non - interacting electrons , i.e. , when no strong correlations occur . disregarding these interactions
also implies that the displacement currents are not taken into account entirely . as a consequence , the ac component of the electrical current _ inside
_ the nanoconductor may deviate from the particle current @xcite .
this paper is organized as follows . after introducing in sec .
[ sec : model ] a model for the leads and the conductor under the influence of external fields , we derive in sec .
[ sec : scattering ] for a situation with time - periodic but otherwise arbitrary driving general expressions for the current and its noise and establish a connection to a floquet eigenvalue equation . in sec .
[ sec : approximations ] , we consider some special cases and approximations .
section [ sec : application ] is devoted to the influence of an electromagnetic dipole field on a conductor consisting of a few tight - binding levels .
situations with an ac transport voltage are addressed in appendix  [ app : ac.voltage ] , while in appendix  [ appendix : xi ] , we detail an alternative derivation which has been introduced in ref .  .
we start out by introducing a model for the central conductor ( `` wire '' ) under the influence of an external driving field like , e.g. , a molecular wire subject to laser radiation or coupled quantum dots @xcite driven by microwaves or an oscillating gate voltage .
the conductor is attached by tunneling couplings to external leads .
the entire setup of our nanoscale system is described by the time - dependent hamiltonian @xmath0 where the different terms correspond to the wire , the leads , and the wire - lead couplings , respectively .
we focus on the regime of coherent quantum transport where the main physics at work occurs on the wire itself . in doing so ,
we neglect other possible influences originating from driving induced hot electrons in the leads , dissipation on the wire and , as well , electron - electron interaction effects .
then , the wire hamiltonian reads in a tight - binding approximation with @xmath1 orbitals @xmath2 @xmath3 for a molecular wire , this constitutes the so - called hckel description where each site corresponds to one atom .
the fermion operators @xmath4 , @xmath5 annihilate and create , respectively , an electron in the orbital @xmath2 . the influence of an applied ac field with frequency @xmath6 results in a periodic time - dependence of the wire hamiltonian : @xmath7 .
the leads are modeled by ideal electron gases , @xmath8 where @xmath9 ( @xmath10 ) creates an electron in the state @xmath11 ( @xmath12 ) in the left ( right ) lead .
the tunneling hamiltonian @xmath13 establishes the contact between the sites @xmath14 , @xmath15 and the respective lead , as sketched in fig .
[ fig : levels ] .
this tunneling coupling is described by the spectral density @xmath16 of lead @xmath17 , @xmath18 .
if the lead modes are dense , @xmath19 becomes a smooth function .
level structure of a nano - conductor with @xmath20 orbitals .
the end sites are coupled to two leads with chemical potentials @xmath21 and @xmath22.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]    to fully specify the dynamics , we choose as an initial condition for the left / right lead a grand - canonical electron ensemble at temperature @xmath23 and electro - chemical potential @xmath24 , respectively .
thus , the initial density matrix reads @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the number of electrons in lead @xmath17 and @xmath27 denotes the boltzmann constant times temperature .
an applied voltage @xmath28 maps to a chemical potential difference @xmath29 with @xmath30 being the electron charge .
then , at initial time @xmath31 , the only nontrivial expectation values of the wire operators read @xmath32 where @xmath33)^{-1}$ ] denotes the fermi function .    in our model hamiltonian ,
the leads are time - independent .
thus , it seemingly can not describe ac transport voltages .
such a situation , however , can be mapped by a gauge transformation to one with time - independent chemical potentials as demonstrated in appendix  [ app : ac.voltage ] .
due to their experimental accessibility , the central quantities in a quantum transport problem are the stationary current and the low - frequency part of its noise spectrum . within a scattering picture of _ non - driven _
mesoscopic transport , both quantities can be expressed in terms of a transmission function @xmath34 which reflects the probability that an electron is transmitted from one lead to the other @xcite . due to energy conservation , the reversed process ,
occurs with equal probability .
this is no longer true for driven systems and , consequently , the scattering approach needs to be generalized .
thus , in this section , we _ derive _ expressions for the currents and its noise properties for the transport through the time - dependent system modeled above .
in the so - called wide - band limit , the more compact derivation presented in ref .   becomes possible , cf .
appendix  [ appendix : xi ] . we will show that the average electrical current contains only transition probabilities and , thus , resembles a scattering formula . in clear contrast to the static two - terminal case
, however , we will find that the noise depends in addition also on the phases of the scattering matrix .      to avoid the explicit appearance of commutators in the definition of correlation functions
, we perform the derivation of the central transport quantities in the heisenberg picture . as a starting point
we choose the operator @xmath35 that describes the charge accumulated in lead @xmath17 with respect to the initial state . due to total charge conservation ,
@xmath36 equals the net charge transmitted across the contact @xmath17 ; its time derivative defines the corresponding current @xmath37 the current noise is described by the symmetrized correlation function @xmath38_+ \big\rangle \label{eq : s}\ ] ] of the current fluctuation operator @xmath39 , where the anticommutator @xmath40_+=ab+ba$ ] ensures hermiticity .
it can be shown that at long times , @xmath41 shares the time - periodicity of the driving @xcite .
therefore , it is possible to characterize the noise level by the zero - frequency component of @xmath42 averaged over the driving period , @xmath43 we find below that for two - terminal devices @xmath44 is independent of the contact @xmath17 , i.e. , @xmath45 .
the evaluation of the zero - frequency noise @xmath46 directly from its definition can be tedious due to the explicit appearance of both times , @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
this inconvenience can be circumvented by employing the relation @xmath49 which follows from the integral representation of eqs .   and , @xmath50 , in the limit @xmath51 .
by averaging eq .   over the driving period and using @xmath52 , we obtain @xmath53 where @xmath54 denotes the charge fluctuation operator and @xmath55 the time average .
the fact that the time average can be evaluated from the limit @xmath56 allows to interpret the zero - frequency noise as the `` charge diffusion coefficient '' . as a dimensionless measure for
the _ relative _ noise strength , we employ the so - called fano factor @xcite @xmath57 where @xmath58 denotes the time - average of the current expectation value @xmath59 .
note that in a two - terminal device , the absolute value of the average current is independent of the contact @xmath17 .      in order to take the exclusion principle properly into account , we have formulated the transport problem under consideration in terms of second quantization .
nevertheless , in the absence of interactions , both the current and its noise can be traced back to the solution of the corresponding single - particle problem .
thus , our next step is to relate the expectation value and the variance of the charge operator to the transmission of electrons from one lead to the other . for that purpose ,
we start from the heisenberg equations of motion @xmath60 for these coupled linear equations , the formal solution @xmath61 involves the propagator @xmath62 of the corresponding single - particle problem . we insert into and use the initial condition to obtain for the transfered charge at long times [ i.e. , in the limit @xmath63 , where all transients die out and , in particular , the second line in eq
.   becomes irrelevant ] the expectation value @xmath64 to symmetrize this expression , we eliminate the backscattering terms , i.e. , the contributions with @xmath65 , by employing the completeness relation @xmath66 where @xmath67 , @xmath68 , and @xmath69 denote the projectors onto the states of the left lead , the right lead , and the wire , respectively .
then , from the time derivative of eq .
, we find for the current through the left contact the result @xmath70 and _ mutatis mutandis _ for the current through the right contact .
this expression already obeys the `` scattering form '' with the _ time - dependent _ transmission @xmath71 of electrons with energy @xmath72 from lead @xmath17 to lead @xmath73 . at asymptotic times
, the transitions from the lead state @xmath74 to the lead state @xmath75 and the wire state @xmath2 happen with the rates @xmath76 the last term in the current describes a periodic charging of the wire stemming from the external driving . with an average over one driving period
, this contribution vanishes and , thus , the dc current reads @xmath77 with @xmath78 denoting the time average of the rate .
interchanging in eq .
@xmath79 and @xmath80 yields the negative current @xmath81 .
thus , as expected from total charge conservation , the average current is , besides its sign , independent of the contact at which it is evaluated .
we emphasize that obeys the form of the current formula obtained for a _ static _
conductor within a scattering formalism .
in particular , consistent with refs .   and  ,
no `` pauli blocking factors '' @xmath82 appear in our derivation .
in contrast to a static situation , this is in the present context relevant since for a driven system generally @xmath83 , such that a contribution proportional to @xmath84 would not cancel @xcite .
the zero - frequency noise @xmath46 is conveniently derived from the charge fluctuation with the help of relation . expressing the charge fluctuation by the heisenberg operators yields for the initial condition after some algebra @xmath85 by using the completeness relation , we have achieved a form which is , besides the appearance of @xmath69 , symmetric under exchanging @xmath86 .
here , @xmath87 is a shorthand notation for @xmath62 and @xmath88 . taking the time derivative and averaging over the driving period yields @xmath89 where we have defined @xmath90 the contributions in eq .   which contain the projector @xmath69 on the wire states
do not contribute to the zero - frequency noise .
this can be demonstrated by inserting for the propagator the explicit expressions and which we derive in the next subsection .
interestingly enough , the noise @xmath46 depends on both the diagonal and the off - diagonal elements of the projector @xmath91 .
by contrast , the current depends only on the diagonal elements of this operator . as a consequence , in the presence of driving it is not possible to express the noise solely by transmission _
probabilities _ ; cf .
eq .  , below .
the evaluation of the rates @xmath92 and @xmath93 involves the matrix elements of the time - evolution operator @xmath62 with the wire and the lead states . in the following , we eliminate the lead states and will find expressions for the rates that depend explicitly only on the propagator for the wire electrons and the spectral density of the couplings to the leads .
we start from the schrdinger equation for the propagator , @xmath94 , where @xmath95 is the single - particle hamiltonian underlying .
formal integration with the initial condition @xmath96 results in the dyson equation @xmath97 where @xmath98 denotes the propagator in the absence of the wire - lead coupling .
we emphasize that due to the explicit time - dependence of the wire hamiltonian , the integral in is not a mere convolution .
using @xmath99 $ ] , we find for the transition matrix elements the relations @xmath100 and @xmath101 where @xmath102 denotes the wire site attached to lead @xmath17 , i.e. , @xmath103 and @xmath104 .    at this stage
, it is convenient to make use of the time - periodicity of the hamiltonian , @xmath105 .
this has the consequence @xcite that @xmath106 and , thus , the retarded green function @xmath107 can be decomposed into a fourier series , @xmath108 , with the coefficients @xmath109 physically , @xmath110 describes the propagation of an electron with initial energy @xmath72 under the absorption ( emission ) of @xmath111 photons for @xmath112 ( @xmath113 ) .
we emphasize that generally all sidebands @xmath114 contribute to the green function and that , consequently , the @xmath115-summations are unrestricted .    after making use of eqs .   and , the transition amplitudes and become @xmath116 and @xmath117 respectively . since below we
restrict ourselves to asymptotic times , @xmath63 , we have shifted the lower limit of the integrals accordingly . moreover , in order to perform the @xmath118-integration in eq .
, we have introduced a converging factor @xmath119 and will finally consider the limit @xmath120 .
for the further evaluation of the average current , we insert the transition amplitude into . after taking the time derivative , averaging over time @xmath47 , and considering the limit @xmath120 , we find @xmath121 and the corresponding expression for @xmath122 . we have introduced the notation @xmath123 . by use of the spectral density ,
we replace the remaining sums over the lead states by energy integrals and obtain as our first main result the dc current @xmath124 where @xmath125 denote the transmission probabilities for electrons from the right lead , respectively from the left lead , with initial energy @xmath72 and final energy @xmath126 , i.e. , the probability for an scattering event under the absorption ( emission ) of @xmath111 photons if @xmath112 ( @xmath113 ) .    for a static situation ,
the transmissions @xmath127 and @xmath128 are identical and contributions with @xmath129 vanish .
thus , it is possible to write the current as a product of a _ single _ transmission @xmath130 and the difference of the fermi functions , @xmath131 .
we emphasize that in the driven case this is no longer true .
although below we focus on the computation of dc currents , we here continue the derivation of the transport quantities by presenting explicit expressions for the ac currents . we restrict ourselves to @xmath132 since @xmath133 simply follows by proper index replacements . evaluating @xmath132 ,
we consider also the last term in eq .   which describes a periodic charging / discharging of the wire .
apart from the time average we perform the same steps as in the derivation of the dc current and obtain @xmath134 where @xmath135 denotes the charge oscillating between the left lead and the wire .
obviously , since @xmath136 is time - periodic and bounded , its time derivative can not contribute to the average current .
the corresponding charge arising from the right lead , @xmath137 , is _ a priori _ unrelated to @xmath136 ; the actual charge on the wire reads @xmath138 .
the time - dependent current is determined by the time - dependent transmission @xmath139^ *      \big [ \gamma_l ( \epsilon+k'\hbar \omega )          + \frac{i}{\pi } \mathcal{p } \!\!\ ! \int d\epsilon '           \frac{\gamma_l ( \epsilon')}{\epsilon'-\epsilon - k'\hbar\omega }     \big ] .\end{aligned}\ ] ]
the corresponding expression for @xmath140 follows from the replacement @xmath141 .
note that in the wide - band limit @xmath142 , @xmath18 , the contribution from the principal value integral vanishes .      in order to obtain the zero - frequency noise @xmath46
, we evaluate the rates @xmath93 .
this step is performed along the lines of reasoning for the evaluation of @xmath143 ( although the actual calculation is far more tedious ) : we insert the transition amplitude into , take the derivative with respect to @xmath47 , and average over one driving period .
finally , we employ the relation @xmath144^{-1 } = ( 2\pi)^3 \delta(\epsilon - a)\ , \delta(\epsilon'-b)\ , \delta(a - b)$ ] to perform the limit @xmath120 and find @xmath145^ *          g^{(k')}_{1n}({\epsilon}_{q } )    \big|^2    \delta(\epsilon_{q ' } - \epsilon_q - k\hbar\omega ) , \\ \label{eq : w : llr } w_{lq',rq}^{l } & = \frac{2 \pi}{\hbar } |v_{lq'}|^2 |v_{rq}|^2     \sum_k    \big|      \sum_{k ' } \gamma_l \big ( \epsilon_{q}+k'\hbar\omega \big )       \big [ g^{(k'-k)}_{11}({\epsilon}_{q ' } ) \big]^ *            g^{(k')}_{1n } ( { \epsilon}_{q } )       -i g^{(k)}_{1n } ( { \epsilon}_{q } )    \big|^2 \delta(\epsilon_{q'}-{\epsilon}_{q}-k\hbar\omega ) .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the corresponding expressions for @xmath146 and @xmath147 follow from the replacement @xmath141 .
inserting these into the noise expression we arrive at our central result @xmath148^ * \big|^2      f_r ( \epsilon ) \bar f_r ( \epsilon_k ) \\ + & \gamma_r ( \epsilon_k ) \gamma_l ( \epsilon )       \big| \sum_{k ' }      \gamma_l(\epsilon_{k ' } ) g^{(k'-k)}_{1n}(\epsilon_k )      \big [ g_{11}^{(k')}(\epsilon ) \big]^ * -i g^{(-k)}_{1n}(\epsilon_k )      \big|^2 f_l(\epsilon ) \bar f_r(\epsilon_k )      \big\ } \\
+ & \text{same terms with the replacement $ ( l,1 ) \leftrightarrow ( r , n)$ } .
\end{split}\ ] ] we have defined @xmath149 and replaced the sums over the lead states by energy integrations using the spectral density .      in order to evaluate the expressions for @xmath58 and @xmath46 further , we derive an eigenfunction representation for the green function .
it is well - known that beyond the adiabatic limit , the eigenfunctions of the hamiltonian are not of particular use  rather a proper basis is provided by a floquet ansatz @xcite .
let us start from the schrdinger equation for the propagator , @xmath150 for @xmath151 , and @xmath152 where @xmath102 is defined by @xmath103 and @xmath104 . to eliminate the lead states in the second line of eq .
, we insert and replace by use of the spectral density the sum over the lead states by an energy integral .
then the last term in eq .   becomes @xmath153    within the present context , we are mainly interested in the influence of the driving field on the conductor and not in the details of the coupling to the leads .
therefore , we choose for @xmath19 a rather generic form by assuming that in the relevant regime , it is practically energy - independent , @xmath154 this so - called wide - band limit allows further progress since we now can perform in eq .
the remaining energy integration to obtain @xmath155 and , consequently , eq .   becomes @xmath156 equations and , together with the initial conditions @xmath157 fully determine the propagator .
solving this linear set of equations is equivalent to computing a complete set of solutions for the equation @xmath158 where the self - energy @xmath159 results from the coupling to the leads .
equation is linear and possesses time - dependent , @xmath160-periodic coefficients .
thus , it is possible to construct a complete solution with the floquet ansatz @xmath161 |u_\alpha(t)\rangle , \\    = & \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty |u_{\alpha , k}\rangle\exp(-ik\omega t ) .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the so - called floquet states @xmath162 obey the time - periodicity of @xmath163 and have been decomposed into a fourier series . in a hilbert space that is extended by a periodic time
coordinate , the so - called sambe space @xcite , they obey the floquet eigenvalue equation @xcite @xmath164 due to the brillouin zone structure of the floquet spectrum @xcite , it is sufficient to compute all eigenvalues of the first brillouin zone , @xmath165 . since the operator on the l.h.s .  of eq .
is non - hermitian , the eigenvalues @xmath166 are generally complex valued and the ( right ) eigenvectors are not mutually orthogonal .
thus , to determine the propagator , we need to solve also the adjoint floquet equation yielding again the same eigenvalues but providing the adjoint eigenvectors @xmath167 .
it can be shown that the floquet states @xmath168 together with the adjoint states @xmath167 form at equal times a complete bi - orthogonal basis : @xmath169 and @xmath170 .
a proof requires to account for the time - periodicity of the floquet states since the eigenvalue equation holds in a hilbert space extended by a periodic time coordinate @xcite .    using the floquet equation ,
it is straightforward to show that with the help of the floquet states @xmath168 the propagator can be written as @xmath171 where the sum runs over all floquet states within one brillouin zone . consequently , the fourier coefficients of the green function [ cf .
.  ] read @xmath172 inserting them into eqs .   and yields explicit expressions for the current and the noise , respectively .
in the previous section , the dc current and the zero - frequency noise have been derived for a periodic but otherwise arbitrary driving . within the wide - band limit , both quantities can be expressed in terms of the solutions of the floquet equation , i.e. , the solution of a non - hermitian eigenvalue problem in an extended hilbert space .
thus , for large systems , the numerical computation of the floquet states can be rather costly .
moreover , for finite temperatures , the energy integration in the expressions and has to be performed numerically .
therefore , approximation schemes which allow a more efficient computation are of much practical use .    before introducing various approximation schemes for the wire propagator , we discuss two particular cases for which current and noise assume more intuitive expressions . in doing so ,
we define quantities to which we will refer later in this section .      for consistency , the expressions and for the dc current and the zero - frequency noise , respectively , must coincide in the undriven limit with the corresponding expressions of the time - independent scattering theory @xcite .
this is indeed the case since the static situation is characterized by two relations : first , in the absence of spin - dependent interactions , we have time - reversal symmetry , @xmath173 and , second , all sidebands with @xmath129 vanish , i.e. , @xmath174 , where @xmath175 and @xmath176 is the green function in the undriven limit . then the current assumes the known form @xmath177 .\ ] ] moreover in a static situation , the relation @xcite @xmath178   \\    + & t(\epsilon ) \left [ 1-t(\epsilon ) \right ]       \left [ f_r ( \epsilon ) - f_l ( \epsilon ) \right]^2 \big\ } . \end{split}\ ] ] for zero temperature , the terms in the first line vanish and pure shot noise remains .
in contrast , for zero voltage , @xmath179 and the terms in the first line constitute equilibrium quantum noise .
obviously if both voltage and temperature are zero , not only the current but also the noise vanishes . in the presence of driving ,
this is no longer the case .
this becomes particularly evident in the high - frequency limit studied in sec .
[ sec : approx : hf ] .
it is known that in the adiabatic limit , i.e. , for small driving frequencies , the numerical solution of the floquet equation becomes infeasible because a diverging number of sidebands has to be taken into account . in more mathematical terms
, floquet theory has no proper limit as @xmath180 @xcite .
the practical consequence of this is that for low driving frequencies , it is favorable to tackle the transport problem with a different strategy : if @xmath181 is the smallest energy - scale of the hamiltonian , one computes for the `` frozen '' hamiltonian at each instance of time the current and the noise from the static expressions and being followed up by time - averaging .
many phenomena can be discussed in the limit of very large ( practically infinite ; subscript @xmath182 ) voltages such that @xmath183 and @xmath184 in the relevant energy range .
then , the dc current becomes @xmath185 remains , thus , @xmath186 . to derive this expression ,
we again have used the completeness relation and the fact that terms containing the projector on the wire states do not contribute to time averages . expressing @xmath187 and @xmath188 by the green functions yields @xmath189^ * \big|^2 , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath190 .
these expressions make explicit that @xmath191 and @xmath192 .
consequently , for infinite voltage the fano factor can not exceed unity .      in the limit of a weak wire - lead coupling , i.e. , for coupling constants @xmath193 which are far lower than all other energy scales of the wire hamiltonian , it is possible to derive within a master equation approach a closed expression for the dc current @xcite .
the corresponding approximation within the present floquet approach is based on treating the self - energy contribution @xmath194 in the non - hermitian floquet equation as a perturbation .
then , the zeroth order of the floquet equation @xmath195 describes the driven wire in the absence of the leads , where @xmath196 are the `` usual '' floquet states with quasienergies @xmath197 . in the absence of degeneracies the first order correction to the quasienergies is @xmath198 where @xmath199 since the first - order correction to the floquet states will contribute to neither the current nor the noise , the zeroth - order contribution @xmath200 and @xmath128 accordingly .
the transmission exhibits for small values of @xmath193 sharp peaks at energies @xmath201 and @xmath202 with widths @xmath203 and @xmath204 .
therefore , the relevant contributions to the sum come from terms for which the peaks of both factors coincide and , in the absence of degeneracies in the quasienergy spectrum , we keep only terms with @xmath205 then , the fraction in is a lorentzian and can be approximated by @xmath206 provided that @xmath207 is small .
consequently , the energy integration in can be performed even for finite temperature and we obtain for the dc current the expression @xmath208 .\ ] ] the coefficients @xmath209 denote the overlap of the @xmath115th sideband @xmath210 of the floquet state @xmath211 with the first site and the last site of the wire , respectively .
we have used @xmath212 which follows from .
expression has been derived in a prior work @xcite within a rotating - wave approximation of a floquet master equation approach .    within the same approximation
, we expand the zero - frequency noise to lowest order in @xmath213 : after inserting the spectral representation of the green function , we again keep only terms with identical floquet index @xmath214 and identical sideband index @xmath115 to obtain @xmath215    of particular interest for the comparison to the static situation is the limit of a large applied voltage such that practically @xmath216 and @xmath217 . then , in eqs .   and , the sums over the sideband indices @xmath115 can be carried out such that @xmath218 these expressions resemble the corresponding expressions for the transport across a _ static _ double barrier @xcite . if now @xmath219 for all floquet states @xmath211 , we find @xmath220 .
this is in particular the case for systems obeying reflection symmetry @xcite . in the presence of such symmetries
, however , the existence of exact crossings , i.e.  degeneracies , limits the applicability of the weak - coupling approximation .      in many experimental situations ,
the driving field acts as a time - dependent gate voltage , i.e. , it merely shifts all on - site energies of the wire uniformly .
thus , the wire hamiltonian is of the form @xmath221 where , without loss of generality , we restrict @xmath222 to possess zero time - average .
a particular case of such a homogeneous driving is realized with a system that consists of only one level @xcite .
then trivially , the time and the position dependence of the floquet states factorize and , therefore , the dc current can be obtained within the formalism introduced by tien and gordon @xcite . here
, we establish the relation between such a treatment and the present floquet approach .    since the time - dependent part of the hamiltonian is proportional to the unity operator , the solution of the floquet equation is , besides a phase factor , given by the eigenfunctions @xmath223 of the static operator @xmath224 , @xmath225 and @xmath226 . the quasienergies @xmath227 coincide with the eigenvalues of the static eigenvalue problem .
note that @xmath228 obeys the @xmath229-periodicity of the driving field since the time - average of @xmath222 vanishes by definition .
thus , the phase factor in the floquet states can be written as a fourier series , @xmath230 and , consequently we find @xmath231 and the adjoint states accordingly .
then , the green function becomes @xmath232 where @xmath176 denotes the green function in the absence of the driving field .
inserting into and employing the sum rule @xmath233 , yields @xmath234 , \label{eq : itucker}\ ] ] where @xmath130 is the transmission in the absence of the driving .
this expression allows the interpretation , that for homogeneous driving , the floquet channels contribute _ independently _ to the current @xmath235 . for the special case of a one - site conductor and a sinusoidal
driving , this relation to the static situation has been discussed in refs .   and  .
addressing the noise properties , we obtain by inserting the green function into the expression    @xmath236 \big|^2 f_l(\epsilon ) \bar f_r(\epsilon+k\hbar\omega ) \\ + & \,\text{same terms with the replacement $ ( l,1 ) \leftrightarrow ( r , n)$ } \big\ } .
\end{split}\ ] ]    while the term in the first line contains only the static transmission at energies shifted by multiples of the photon energies , the contribution in the second line can not be brought into such a convenient form .
the reason for this is that the sum over @xmath237 inhibits the application of the relation . as a consequence , in clear contrast to the dc current
, the zero - frequency noise can not be interpreted in terms of independent floquet channels . only in the limit of large driving frequencies
, we find below that the channels become effectively independent and reduces to an expression that depends only on the transmission in the absence of the driving and the fourier coefficients @xmath238 , cf .
next subsection .
expressions for the dc current and the noise that depend only on the static transmission have been derived by tucker and feldman @xcite within a tien - gordon approach @xcite .
the central approximation of this approach is the description of a time - dependent chemical potential by an effective electron distribution .
while this yields the correct expression for the dc current , it does not capture the interference terms in the noise formula .
this reveals that a tien - gordon - like approach yields the correct dc current while for the noise ( and other higher - order correlation functions ) it is only valid in a high - frequency limit .    for large voltages where @xmath217 and @xmath216 , the sums over the fourier coefficients in eqs .   and
can be evaluated with the help of the sum rule @xmath239 .
then both the dc current and the zero - frequency noise become identical to their value in the absence of the driving .
this means that for a sufficiently large transport voltage , a time - dependent gate voltage has no influence on the average current and the zero - frequency noise .
many effects occurring in driven quantum systems , such as coherent destruction of tunneling @xcite or current and noise control @xcite , are most pronounced for large excitation frequencies .
thus , it is particularly interesting to derive for the present floquet approach an expansion in terms of @xmath240 .
thereby , the driven system will be approximated by a static system with renormalized parameters .
such a perturbation scheme has been developed for two - level systems in ref .   and applied to driven tunneling in bistable systems @xcite and superlattices @xcite .
for open quantum system , the coupling to the external degrees of freedom ( e.g. , the leads or a heat bath ) bears additional complications that have been solved heuristically in ref .   by replacing the fermi functions by effective electron distributions . in the following , we present a rigorous derivation of this approach based on a perturbation theory for the floquet equation  .
we assume a driving that leaves all off - diagonal matrix elements of the wire hamiltonian time - independent while the tight - binding levels undergo a position - dependent , time - periodic driving @xmath241 with zero time - average .
then , the wire hamiltonian is of the form @xmath242 if @xmath181 represents the largest energy scale of the problem , we can in the floquet equation treat the _ static _ part of the hamiltonian as a perturbation .
correspondingly , the eigenfunctions of the operator @xmath243 determine the zeroth order floquet states @xmath244 we have defined the function @xmath245 which is @xmath229-periodic due to the zero time - average of @xmath246 . as a consequence of this periodicity , to zeroth order the quasienergies are zero ( @xmath247 ) and the floquet spectrum is given by multiples of the photon energy , @xmath248 .
each @xmath249 defines a degenerate subspace of the extended hilbert space .
if now @xmath181 is larger than all other energy scales , the first - order correction to the floquet states and the quasienergies can be calculated by diagonalizing the perturbation in the subspace defined by @xmath250 .
thus , we have to solve the time - independent eigenvalue equation @xmath251 the time - independent effective hamiltonian @xmath252 is defined by the matrix elements of the original static hamiltonian @xmath253 with the zeroth order floquet states , @xmath254 the @xmath47-integration constitutes the inner product in the hilbert space extended by a periodic time coordinate @xcite .
to first order in @xmath240 , the quasienergies @xmath255 are given by the eigenvalues of the static equation and , consequently , the corresponding floquet states read @xmath256 are @xmath229-periodic , allows to write in the time - dependent phase factor as a fourier series , @xmath257 thus , @xmath258 and the green function for the high - frequency driving reads @xmath259 where @xmath260 denotes the green function corresponding to the static hamiltonian @xmath252 with the self - energy @xmath261 . finally ,
substituting @xmath262 and using the sum rule @xmath263 , we obtain @xmath264 the effective transmission @xmath265 and @xmath266 follows from the replacement @xmath267 .    in order to derive a high - frequency approximation for the zero - frequency noise @xmath46
, we insert the green function into and neglect products of the type @xmath268 for @xmath269 . employing the above sum rule for the fourier coefficients @xmath270
, we obtain for the noise the static expression but with the transmission @xmath130 and the fermi functions @xmath271 replaced by the effective transmission @xmath272 and the effective distribution function , respectively . the fact that @xmath273 is generally not a mere heaviside step function has an intriguing consequence : in the presence of driving ,
the noise remains finite even if both voltage and temperature are zero .
two differences between the high - frequency approximation and the homogeneous driving , cf .  sec .
[ sec : approx : homo ] , are worth mentioning : first , the static transmission is now replaced by an effective transmission which can be considerably influenced by the driving , see below .
second , in general @xmath274 such that @xmath275 .
this means that the driving can create an effective bias and thereby create a non - adiabatic pump current .
by contrast eq .
reveals that a homogeneous driving can not create such a pump current .
moreover , if all @xmath276 are identical as in the case of a homogeneous driving , the effective hamiltonian @xmath252 equals the original static hamiltonian .
then , also the second line of eq .   can be written in terms of the static transmission @xmath130 .
in this section , we apply the formalism derived in secs .  [
sec : scattering ] and [ sec : approximations ] to study the conduction and noise properties of a nanoscale conductor under the influence of an electromagnetic field . as an elementary model that captures the essential features of a molecular wire @xcite
, we employ a tight - binding model composed of @xmath1 sites as sketched in fig .
[ fig : levels ] .
each orbital is coupled to its nearest neighbor by a hopping matrix element @xmath277 , thus , the single - particle wire hamiltonian reads @xmath278\,|n\rangle\langle n| , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath279 denote the on - site energies of the tight - binding levels . within a dipole approximation ,
the oscillating electromagnetic field causes the time - dependent level shifts @xmath280 with @xmath281 the scaled position of site @xmath2 . since typical laser frequencies are below the work function of a usual metal , we assume that the radiation does not penetrate the leads and that , consequently , the leads stay in thermal equilibrium .
the energy @xmath282 denotes the electrical field amplitude multiplied by the electron charge and the distance between two neighboring sites and , thus , depends implicitly on the length of the sample .
this model describes , as well , an array of coherently coupled quantum dots @xcite under the influence of microwave radiation .
the dipole approximation inherent to the driving   neglects the propagation of the electromagnetic field and , thus , is valid only for wavelengths that are much larger than the size of the sample @xcite .
this condition is indeed fulfilled for both applications we have in mind : for molecular wires , we consider frequencies up the optical spectral range , i.e. , wavelengths of the order @xmath283 and samples that extend over a few nanometers . coupled quantum dots typically @xcite have a distance of less than @xmath283 while the coupling matrix element @xmath277 is of the order of @xmath284 which corresponds to a wavelength of roughly @xmath285 .
we assume that the wire couples equally strong to both leads , thus , @xmath286 .
an applied transport voltage @xmath28 is mapped to a symmetric shift of the leads chemical potentials , @xmath287 . moreover , for the evaluation of the dc current and the zero - frequency noise , we restrict ourselves to zero temperature .
the zero - temperature limit is physically well justified for molecular wires at room temperature and for quantum dots at helium temperature since in both cases thermal electron excitations do not play a significant role .      for a wire described by the hamiltonian , it has been found @xcite that a dipole force of the form suppresses the transport if the ratio @xmath288 is close to a zero of the bessel function @xmath289 ( i.e. , values 2.405 .. , 5.520 .. , 8.654 .. ,  ) .
moreover , in the vicinity of such suppressions , the shot noise characterized by the fano factor assumes two characteristic minima .
these suppression effects are most pronounced in the high - frequency regime , i.e. , if the energy quanta @xmath181 of the driving exceed the energy scales of the wire .
thus , before going into a detailed discussion , we start with a qualitative description of the effect based on the static approximation for a high - frequency driving that has been derived in sec .  [
sec : approx : hf ] .
let us consider first the limit of a voltage which is so large that in eq .
, @xmath290 can be replaced by unity .
then , the average current is determined by the effective hamiltonian @xmath291 which has been derived by inserting the driving into eqs . and .
then , obviously @xmath252 is identical to the hamiltonian in the absence of the driving field but with the tunnel matrix element renormalized according to @xmath292 since the bessel function @xmath289 assumes values between zero and one , the amplitude of the driving field allows to switch the absolute value of the effective hopping on the wire , @xmath293 , between 0 and @xmath277 .
since the transmission of an undriven wire is proportional to @xmath294 , the effective transmission @xmath272 acquires a factor @xmath295 .
this renormalization of the hopping results finally in a current suppression@xcite .    for the discussion of the shot noise
, we employ the fano factor as a measure . in the limit of large applied voltages , we have to distinguish two limits : ( i ) weak wire - lead coupling @xmath296 ( i.e. , weak with respect to the effective hopping ) and ( ii ) strong wire - lead coupling @xmath297 . in the first case , the tunnel contacts between the lead and the wire act as `` bottlenecks '' for the transport .
in that sense they form barriers . thus qualitatively
, we face a double barrier situation and , consequently , expect the shot noise to exhibit a fano factor @xmath298 @xcite . in the second case ,
the links between the wire sites act as @xmath299 barriers .
correspondingly , the fano factor assumes values @xmath300 for @xmath301 ( single barrier ) and @xmath302 for @xmath20 ( double barrier ) @xcite . at the crossover between the two limits ,
the conductor is optimally `` barrier free '' such that the fano factor assumes its minimum .    in order to be more quantitative ,
we evaluate the current and the zero - frequency noise in more detail thereby considering a finite voltage .
this requires a closer look at the effective electron distribution ; in particular , we have to quantify the concept of a `` practically infinite '' voltage . in a static situation ,
the voltage can be replaced by infinity , @xmath303 , if all eigenenergies of the wire lie well inside the range @xmath304 $ ] .
in contrast to the fermi functions , the effective electron distribution which is decisive here , decays over a broad range in multiple steps of size @xmath181 . since for our model , @xmath272
is peaked around @xmath305 , we replace here the effective electron distributions by their values for @xmath305 , @xmath306 for zero temperature . we have inserted the coefficients @xmath307 and @xmath308 which have been computed directly from their definition ; @xmath309 denotes the @xmath115th order bessel functions of the first kind .
the current , the noise , and the fano factor are given by the static expressions and with the transmission and the electron distribution replaced by the corresponding effective quantities , @xmath310 and @xmath311 , respectively .
thus , we obtain @xmath312 respectively , where the subscript @xmath182 denotes the corresponding quantities in the infinite voltage limit , @xmath313 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath314 . the factor
@xmath315 reflects the influence of a finite voltage ; @xmath316 denotes the largest integer not exceeding @xmath317 . since @xmath318 for @xmath319 and @xmath320
, we find @xmath321 if @xmath322 .
this means that for small driving amplitudes @xmath323 , we can consider the voltage as practically infinite . with an increasing driving strength
, @xmath324 decreases and , thus , the current becomes smaller by a factor @xmath324 but still exhibits suppressions .
by contrast , since @xmath325 for all situations considered here [ cf .  the remark after eq .  ]
, we find from eq .   that the fano factor will increase with smaller @xmath324 .
the qualitative discussion of the current and noise suppressions can be corroborated by exact numerical results .
for this purpose , we have solved numerically the floquet equation . with the resulting floquet states and quasienergies , we obtained the green function .
in the zero temperature limit considered here , the fermi functions in the expressions for the average current and the zero - frequency noise become step functions .
the remaining energy integrals can be performed analytically since the integrands are rational functions .
figure  [ fig : hfr ] depicts the average current , the zero - frequency noise , and the corresponding fano factor for a wire that consists of @xmath20 sites with on - site energies @xmath326 as sketched in fig .
[ fig : levels ] .
the driving frequency @xmath327 lies above all transition energies of the wire states and the applied voltage @xmath328 is relatively large .
this particular value of the voltage has been selected to avoid chemical potentials to lie close to multiples of @xmath181 , i.e. , close to the steps of the effective electron distribution .
the wire - lead coupling @xmath329 is sufficiently weak , such that in the absence of the driving , the transport is dominated by resonant tunneling .
correspondingly , the current is essentially determined by the hopping rate @xmath330 of the electrons from the lead to the wire .
the noise exhibits a fano factor @xmath302 which is the characteristic value for the transport across a double barrier @xcite . with an increasing driving amplitude ,
the current becomes smaller until it reaches its minimum when the ratio @xmath288 assumes a zero of the bessel function @xmath289 .
note that while the analytical treatment within a high - frequency approximation predicts a vanishing current , the exact result is still roughly 1% of the value in the absence of the driving .
close to the current suppression , the effective tunnel matrix element is much smaller than the wire - lead coupling @xmath331 and the connections to the central site of the wire form a double barrier .
consequently , we again find a fano factor @xmath302 . at the crossover @xmath332 ,
the effective barriers vanish and , therefore , the fano factor assumes its minimum .
these exact numerical results are well reproduced by the expressions
obtained within a high - frequency approximations for finite voltage .
figure [ fig : hfr ] also reveals that for small driving amplitudes , @xmath323 , the assumption of a practically infinite voltage yields the correct results . by contrast ,
for larger driving amplitudes , @xmath333 , the fano factor can assume values @xmath334
, i.e. , the shot noise becomes even larger than in the static situation .
time - averaged current ( a ) , zero - frequency noise ( b ) , and fano factor ( c ) for a conductor consisting of @xmath20 sites with equal on - site energies , @xmath326 , as a functions of the driving amplitude @xmath282 .
the driving frequency is @xmath327 , the wire - lead coupling is @xmath329 , and the chemical potentials are @xmath335 . the exact numerical results ( solid lines ) are compared to the high - frequency approximation for finite ( dashed ) and infinite voltage ( dash - dotted ) . ]
as the coupling strength @xmath331 is lowered , the distance between a pair of minima of the fano factor becomes smaller until the minima finally vanish @xcite ( not shown ) . in this limit , the current and the noise are given by the weak coupling results and , respectively .
the corresponding fano factor @xmath220 [ cf .
the discussion after eq .  ] is independent of the driving amplitude .    figure  [ fig : lf]a depicts the behavior for a driving frequency which is of the order of the wire excitations , @xmath336 .
then , the high - frequency approximation is no longer applicable . nevertheless , the average current exhibits clear minima with a reduction of the order 50% . compared to the high - frequency case
, these minima are shifted towards smaller driving amplitudes , i.e. , they occur for ratios @xmath288 slightly below the zeros of the bessel function @xmath289 . at the minima of the current , the fano factor ( solid line in fig .
[ fig : lf]b ) still assumes a maximum with a value close to @xmath302 .
although , the sharp minima close to the current suppressions have vanished , in - between the maxima the fano factor assumes remarkably low values ( @xmath337 ) .
figure  [ fig : lf]b also reveals that already for @xmath338 , the high - frequency regime is reached .
( a ) time - averaged current ( solid line ) and zero - frequency noise ( dashed line ) as a function of the driving amplitude for the driving frequency @xmath336 .
( b ) corresponding fano factor for the same data ( solid line ) and for the driving frequencies @xmath339 ( broken ) and @xmath340 ( dash - dotted ) .
all other parameters are as in fig .
[ fig : hfr ] . ]      for strong wire - lead coupling , it is possible to choose a driving frequency that is large with respect to the wire excitations , but small as compared to the coupling @xmath331 , thus @xmath341 .
figure  [ fig : lg ] depicts the current and the fano factor in this limit for wires with a different number of sites .
the qualitative difference between these cases can be explained by the fact that due to the strong coupling , the first and the last wire site hybridize with the leads
. then the setup behaves similar to a wire with @xmath342 sites and a weak wire - lead coupling @xmath343 .
this means that for @xmath301 the wire acts as point contact while for @xmath20 , we qualitatively have resonant transport through a single level . in both cases
remains no tunneling matrix element of the wire that could be renormalized and , consequently , for @xmath344 the current suppressions vanish in the strong - coupling limit ( cf .
[ fig : lg]a ) .
this scenario is also reflected in the behavior of the fano factor ( fig .
[ fig : lg]b ) which exhibits the characteristic values @xmath300 ( point contact ) for @xmath301 and @xmath302 ( single resonant level ) for @xmath20 .
finally , for @xmath345 we observe the behavior of a driven wire with two sites and weak coupling @xcite .
then , a vanishing effective hopping @xmath346 corresponds to a point contact , thus , @xmath300 .
although the behavior of the fano factor can be explained by drawing analogies to a weakly coupled wire with @xmath342 sites , the global decay of the current with the driving amplitude , cf .
[ fig : lg]a , is not within the scope of this intuitive picture .
time - averaged current ( a ) and fano factor ( b ) as a function of the driving amplitude @xmath282 for a wire with @xmath347 sites and the wire - lead coupling strength @xmath348 .
the other parameters are @xmath326 , @xmath327 and @xmath349 . ]
so far , we have assumed that all on - site energies of the wire are identical . in an experimental setup , however , the applied transport voltage acts also a static dipole force which rearranges the charge distribution in the conductor and thereby causes an internal potential profile @xcite .
the self - consistent treatment of such effects is , in particular in the time - dependent case , rather ambitious and beyond the scope of this work .
thus , here we only derive the consequences of a static bias without determining its shape from microscopic considerations .
we assume a position - dependent static shift of the on - site energies by an energy @xmath350 , i.e. , for a wire with @xmath20 sites , @xmath351 figure [ fig : bias]a demonstrates that the behavior of the average current is fairly stable against the bias . in particular , we still find pronounced current suppressions . note that since @xmath352 a high - frequency approximation is still possible . as a main effect of the bias , we find reduced current maxima while the minima remain . by contrast , the minima of the fano factor ( fig .  [
fig : bias]b ) become washed out : once the bias becomes of the order of the wire - lead coupling , @xmath353 , the structure in the fano factor vanishes and we find @xmath302 for all driving amplitudes @xmath323 [ cf .
the discussion discussion after eq .  ] .
interestingly , the value of the fano factor at current suppressions is bias independent .
time - averaged current ( a ) and fano factor ( b ) as a function of the driving amplitude @xmath282 for a wire with @xmath20 sites in the presence of an internal bias .
the on - site energies are @xmath354 , @xmath355 , @xmath356 .
all other parameters are as in fig .
[ fig : hfr ] . ]
we have derived with eqs .   , , and expressions for the dc current , the zero - frequency noise , and the time - dependent current for the electron transport through ac - driven nanoscale systems .
a cornerstone of our approach is the relation of the propagator to a non - hermitian floquet equation .
this yields explicit formulae for the current and the noise .
moreover , the connection to floquet theory allows to elucidate various approximation schemes that enable an efficient computation and , in addition , provide physical insight .
above all , a high - frequency approximation has emerged to be very useful : within an expansion in @xmath240 , the driven transport problem can be approximated by a time - independent transport problem with a renormalized tunneling and effective distribution functions for the lead electrons .
the conductance properties of the latter can be derived with standard methods .
moreover , for the case of a time - dependent gating voltage , we have revealed the limitations of the tien - gordon approach : while such a treatment provides the correct expression for the current , it neglects interferences of different floquet channels .    a detailed investigation of the recently found shot noise suppression provided a deeper understanding of this effect . in particular
, the analytical treatment within a high - frequency approximation can explain the characteristic emergence of the current suppressions which are accompanied by a noise maximum and two remarkably low minima .
a numerical study fully confirmed the analytical results . for lower driving frequencies ,
i.e. , beyond the high - frequency limit , the current suppressions become considerably less pronounced . by contrast , the shot noise suppression turned out to be more stable .
thus , since the current stays remarkably large while the noise is controllable , this regime is particularly promising for applications . at first sight , in the limit of strong wire - lead coupling
these phenomena appear quite different . a closer look , however , revealed that the strong coupling entails a hybridization of the first and the last site with the respective lead .
therefore , the wire behaves qualitatively like a weakly coupled wire with two sites less .
moreover , we have found that the noise suppressions are quite sensitive to an internal bias .
once the on - site energies of neighboring sites have differences of the order of the wire - lead coupling energy , the minima of the fano factor vanish .
a most interesting application of these results is the development of current sources with a controllable noise level .
we thank gert - ludwig ingold , jrg lehmann , and michael strass for helpful discussions .
this work has been supported by the volkswagen - stiftung under grant no .
i/77 217 , a marie curie fellowship of the european community program ihp under contract no .  hpmf - ct-2001 - 01416 ( s.c . ) , and the dfg sonderforschungsbereich 486 .
within this work , we focus on models where the driving enters solely by means of time - dependent matrix elements of the wire hamiltonian while the leads and the wire - lead couplings remain time - independent .
an _ a priori _ different type of driving is the application of a time - dependent transport voltage . in this appendix
, we demonstrate that a setup with an oscillating transport voltage can be mapped by a gauge transformation to a hamiltonian of the form .
consequently , it is possible to apply the formalism derived derived in sec .  [
sec : scattering ] also to situations with an oscillating transport voltage .
we restrict the discussion to the case where the electron energies of only the left lead are modified by an external @xmath160-periodic voltage @xmath357 with zero time - average , thus in the left lead @xmath358 the generalization to a situation where also the levels in the right lead are @xmath160-periodically time - dependent , is straightforward .
since an externally applied voltage causes a potential drop along the wire @xcite , we have to assume for consistency that for an ac voltage , the wire hamiltonian also obeys a time - dependence .
ignoring such a time - dependent potential profile enables a treatment of the transport problem within the approach of refs .   and  .
in the general case , however , we have to resort to the approach put forward with this work .
we start out by a gauge transformation of the hamiltonian with the unitary operator @xmath359 where @xmath360 describes the phase accumulated from the oscillating voltage .
the transformation has been constructed such that the new hamiltonian @xmath361 possesses a time - independent tunnel coupling .
since , the operator @xmath362 transforms as @xmath363 , the matrix elements @xmath364 of the wire hamiltonian acquire an additional time - dependence , @xmath365 the second term in the hamiltonian stems from @xmath366 . owing to the zero time - average of the voltage @xmath357 , the phase @xmath367 is @xmath160-periodic .
therefore , the transformed wire hamiltonian is also @xmath160-periodic while the contact and the lead contributions are time - independent , thus , @xmath368 is of form  .
in ref .  , the expressions and for the current and the noise in the wide - band limit have been derived by eliminating the leads in favor of a stochastic operator . in this appendix
, we detail this approach .
like in section [ sec : scattering ] , we start here also from the heisenberg equations  for the annihilation operators . the ones for the lead operators , eq .  , are easily integrated to read @xmath369 and @xmath370 accordingly . inserting into the heisenberg equations for the wire operators
yields @xmath371 owing to the wide - band limit , the dissipative terms are memory free . within the chosen grand canonical ensembles
the operator - valued gaussian noise @xmath372 obeys @xmath373 the current operator then assumes the form @xmath374    the homogeneous set of equations that corresponds to coincides with the equations of motion and which are solved by the floquet states @xmath168 .
thus , the floquet states @xmath168 together with the adjoint states @xmath167 , allow to write the solution of in closed form .
in the asymptotic limit @xmath63 , it reads @xmath375 where @xmath376 is the propagator for the wire electrons .    to obtain the current @xmath132 , we insert the operator into the expression and use the expectation values . with the green function ,
we find the still unsymmetric expression @xmath377 f_l(\epsilon ) \big\ } .
\end{split}\ ] ] for a symmetrization , we eliminate the backscattering terms , i.e. , terms containing @xmath378 , by use of the relation @xcite @xmath379 which follows readily from the floquet representation of the propagator and the floquet eigenvalue equation together with its adjoint . a subsequent fourier transformation with respect to @xmath380 yields
by inserting the matrix element @xmath381 , we obtain from for the time - dependent current the symmetric expression .
to derive an expression for the zero frequency noise , we insert the operator into the definition of the current - current correlation function and integrate over the times @xmath382 and @xmath47 .
again , we employ the relation to bring @xmath383 into the symmetric form .