from the atmospheric and solar neutrino data , there is increasing evidence for neutrino oscillations@xcite .
if this is a correct interpretation , the standard model ( sm ) has to be extended to incorporate the small masses of the neutrinos suggested by data .
there have been several ideas proposed in literature to generate small neutrino masses .
the zee - model is one of such attempts@xcite . in this model ,
all flavor neutrinos are massless at the tree level , and their small masses are induced radiatively through one - loop diagrams .
for such a mass - generation mechanism to work , it is necessary to extend the higgs sector of the sm to contain at least two weak - doublet fields and one weak - singlet charged scalar field .
although some studies have been done to examine the interaction of the leptons and the higgs bosons in the zee - model@xcite , the scalar ( higgs ) sector of the model remains unexplored in detail . in this paper
we study the higgs sector of the zee - model to clarify its impact on the higgs search experiments , either at the cern lep - ii , the run - ii of the fermilab tevatron , the cern large hadron collider ( lhc ) , or future linear colliders ( lc s ) .
experimental search for the higgs boson has been continued at the cern lep and the fermilab tevatron experiments . in the lep - ii experiments ,
the higgs boson with the mass less than about 110 gev has been excluded if its production cross section and decay modes are similar to those of the sm higgs boson@xcite .
run - ii of the tevatron can be sensitive to a sm - like higgs boson with the mass up to about 180 gev , provided that the integrated luminosity of the collider is large enough ( about @xmath2)@xcite .
furthermore , the primary goal of the cern lhc experiments is to guarantee the discovery of a sm - like higgs boson for its mass as large as about 1 tev@xcite , which is the upper bound of the sm higgs boson mass .
( for a higgs boson mass beyond this value , the sm is no longer a consistent low energy theory . )
when the higgs boson is discovered , its mass and various decay properties will be measured to test the sm and to distinguish models of new physics at high energy scales .
for example , the allowed mass range of the lightest cp - even higgs boson ( @xmath0 ) can be determined by demanding the considered theory to be a valid effective theory all the way up to some cut - off energy scale ( @xmath3 ) . for @xmath4 gev ( i.e. , the planck scale ) ,
the lower and upper bounds of the sm higgs boson masses are 137 gev and 175 gev , respectively @xcite .
the higgs mass bounds for the two - higgs - doublet - model ( thdm ) were also investigated@xcite with and without including the soft - breaking term with respect to the discrete symmetry that protects the natural flavor conservation .
it was found in ref .
@xcite that the lower bound of the lightest cp - even higgs boson is about 100 gev in the decoupling regime where only one neutral higgs boson is light as compared to the other physical states of higgs bosons .
the higgs sector of the zee - model is similar to that of the thdm except for the existence of an additional weak - singlet charged higgs field , so that the physical scalar bosons include two cp - even , one cp - odd and two pairs of charged higgs bosons . in this paper , we shall first determine the upper and lower bounds for the lightest cp - even higgs boson mass ( @xmath5 ) as a function of the cut - off scale @xmath6 of the zee - model , using renormalization group equations ( rge s ) .
we show that the upper and lower mass bounds for @xmath0 are almost the same as those in the thdm .
we also study the possible range of the higgs - boson self - coupling constants at the electroweak scale as a function of @xmath6 . by using these results ,
we examine effects of the additional loop contribution of the singlet charged higgs boson to the partial decay width of @xmath7 .
we show that , by taking @xmath8 gev , the deviation of the decay width from the sm prediction can be about @xmath920% or nearly @xmath1010% for @xmath11 between 125 gev and 140 gev when the mass of the isospin singlet charged higgs boson is taken to be around 100 gev .
the magnitude of the deviation becomes larger for lower cutoff scales and smaller masses of the singlet charged higgs boson .
if we choose @xmath12 gev and the singlet charged higgs boson mass to be 100 gev , the positive deviation can be greater than @xmath1030% ( @xmath1040% ) for @xmath13 gev ( @xmath14 gev ) .
such a deviation from the sm prediction could be tested at the lhc , the @xmath15 lc and the @xmath16 option of lc@xcite .
we also discuss phenomenology of the singlet charged higgs boson at present and future collider experiments , which is found to be completely different from that of the ordinary thdm - like charged higgs bosons .
to detect such a charged higgs boson at lep - ii experiments , experimentalists have to search for their data sample with @xmath17 or @xmath18 plus missing energy , in contrast to the usual detection channels : either @xmath19 or @xmath20 decay modes .
this paper is organized as follows . in sec .
[ sec : zeemodel ] , we introduce the higgs sector of the zee - model and review the neutrino masses and mixings in this model which are consistent with the atmospheric and solar neutrino observations . numerical results on the possible range of the mass and coupling constants of the higgs bosons are given in sec .
[ sec : rge_analysis ] . in sec
[ sec : h-2gamma ] , we discuss the one - loop effect of the extra - higgs bosons in the zee - model to the partial decay width of @xmath7 and its impacts on the neutral higgs - boson search at high - energy colliders .
the phenomenology of the charged higgs boson that comes from the additional singlet field is discussed in sec .
[ sec : charged ] . in sec .
[ sec : conclusion ] , we present additional discussions and conclusion .
relevant rge s for the zee - model are given in the appendix .
to generate small neutrino mass radiatively , the zee - model contains a @xmath21 singlet charged scalar field @xmath22 , in addition to two @xmath21 doublet fields @xmath23 , and @xmath24 .
the zee - model lagrangian is written as : @xmath25 where @xmath26 @xmath27 where @xmath28 ( @xmath29 are the generation indices , and @xmath30 \nonumber \\   &   & + \sigma _ { 1}\left| \omega^{-}\right| ^{2}\left| \phi _ { 1}\right| ^{2}+   \sigma _ { 2}\left| \omega^{-}\right| ^{2}\left| \phi _ { 2}\right| ^{2}+   \frac{1}{4}\sigma _ { 3}\left| \omega^{-}\right| ^{4 } \ , .
\label{higgs_potential } \end{aligned}\ ] ] in the above equations , @xmath31 is the left - handed quark doublet with an implicit generation index while @xmath32 and @xmath33 denote the right - handed singlet quarks .
similarly , @xmath34 and @xmath35 denote the left - handed and right - handed leptons in three generations .
the charge conjugation of a fermion field is defined as @xmath36 , where @xmath37 is the charge conjugation matrix ( @xmath38 ) with the super index @xmath39 indicating the transpose of a matrix .
also , @xmath40 and @xmath41 with @xmath42 . without loss of generality
, we have taken the anti - symmetric matrix @xmath43 and the coupling @xmath44 to be real in the equations ( [ fij_int ] ) and ( [ higgs_potential ] ) . in order to suppress flavor changing neutral current ( fcnc ) at the tree level , a discrete symmetry , with @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 ,
is imposed to the higgs sector of the lagrangian , which is only broken softly by the @xmath48 term and the @xmath49 term . under the discrete symmetry
there are two possible yukawa - interactions ; that is , for type - i @xmath50 and for type - ii , @xmath51 where @xmath52,@xmath53,@xmath54 are diagonal yukawa matrices and @xmath55 is the cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa ( ckm ) matrix .
later , we shall only keep the top yukawa coupling constants @xmath56 in our numerical evaluation of the rge s . ] . in that case
, there is no difference between the yukawa couplings of the type - i and the type - ii models . finally , for simplicity , we assume that all @xmath57 and @xmath58 are real parameters .
let us now discuss the higgs sector .
the @xmath59 symmetry is broken to @xmath60 by @xmath61 and @xmath62 , the vacuum expectation values of @xmath63 and @xmath64 .
( they are assumed to be real so that there is no spontaneous cp violation . )
the number of physical higgs bosons are two cp - even higgs bosons ( @xmath65,@xmath66 ) , one cp - odd higgs boson ( @xmath67 ) and two pairs of charged higgs boson ( @xmath68 , @xmath69 ) .
we take a convention of @xmath70 and @xmath71 . in the basis where two higgs doublets are rotated by the angle @xmath72 , with @xmath73 ,
the mass matrices for the physical states of higgs bosons are given by @xmath74 \,,\ ] ] for cp - even higgs bosons , @xmath75 for cp - odd higgs boson , and @xmath76 \,,\ ] ] for charged higgs bosons .
here , @xmath77 and @xmath78 .
the vacuum expectation value @xmath79 ( @xmath80 gev ) is equal to @xmath81 .
mass eigenstates for the cp - even and the charged higgs bosons are obtained by diagonalizing the mass matrices ( [ neutralmassmatrix ] ) and ( [ chargedmassmatrix ] ) , respectively . the original higgs boson fields , @xmath63 , @xmath64 , @xmath22 , can be expressed in terms of the physical states and the nambu - goldstone modes ( @xmath82 and @xmath83 ) as @xmath84 where the angle @xmath85 and @xmath86 are defined from the matrices which diagonalize the @xmath87 matrices @xmath88 and @xmath89 , respectively .
namely , we have @xmath90 where @xmath91 and @xmath92 . the mixing angles @xmath93 and @xmath94 then satisfy @xmath95 which show that @xmath93 and @xmath94 approaches to @xmath96 and zero , respectively . ] , when @xmath97 is much greater than @xmath98 , @xmath99 and @xmath100 ; i.e. , in the decoupling regime . in this limit
, the massive higgs bosons from the extra weak - doublet are very heavy due to the large @xmath101 so that they are decoupled from the low energy observable .
although neutrinos in this model are massless at the tree level , the loop diagrams involving charged higgs bosons , as shown in fig .
[ fig : neutrino_mass ] , can generate the majorana mass terms for all three - flavors of neutrinos .
it was shown @xcite that at the one - loop order , the neutrino mass matrix , defined in the basis where the charged lepton yukawa - coupling constants are diagonal in the lepton flavor space , is real and symmetric with vanishing diagonal elements .
more explicitly , we have @xmath102 with @xmath103 where @xmath104 @xmath105 is the charged lepton mass for type - i . for type - ii
, @xmath106 should be replaced by @xmath107 .
note that eq .
( [ nmass2fij ] ) is valid for @xmath108 .
the phenomenological analysis of the above mass matrix was given in ref .
it was concluded that , in the zee - model , the bi - maximal mixing solution is the only possibility to reconcile the atmospheric and the solar neutrino data .
here we give a brief summary of their results , for completeness .
let us denote the three eigenvalues for the neutrino mass matrix , cf .
( [ neutrino3x3 ] ) , as @xmath109 , @xmath110 and @xmath111 , which satisfy @xmath112 .
the possible pattern of the neutrino mass spectrum which is allowed in the zee - model is @xmath113 , with @xmath114 , and @xmath115 , where @xmath116 ev@xmath117 from the atmospheric neutrino data , and @xmath118 ev@xmath117 ( msw large angle solution ) or @xmath119 ev@xmath117 ( vacuum oscillation solution ) from the solar neutrino data ) , only the hierarchy pattern @xmath120 , rather than @xmath121 , is realized in the zee - model@xcite ] .
thus , we have @xmath122 ( @xmath123 ) and @xmath124 .
the approximate form of the neutrino mass matrix is given by @xmath125 where the upper ( lower ) sign corresponds to @xmath126 ( @xmath127 ) case , and the corresponding maki - nakagawa - sakata ( mns ) matrix@xcite which diagonalizes the neutrino mass matrix is @xmath128 in the above equations , we took the limiting case where @xmath129 and @xmath130   and @xmath131 in the notation of ref .  @xcite . ] . from eqs
( [ nmass2fij ] ) and ( [ bimaximal_neutrino_mass ] ) , we obtain @xmath132 therefore , the magnitudes of the three coupling constants should satisfy the relation @xmath133 .
this hierarchy among the couplings @xmath134 is crucial for our later discussion on the phenomenology of the singlet charged higgs bosons .    for a given value of the parameters @xmath135 , @xmath136 , @xmath107 and @xmath49 ,
the coupling constants @xmath134 can be calculated from eq .
( [ nmass2fij ] ) .
for example , for @xmath137gev , @xmath138gev , @xmath139 , @xmath140gev and @xmath141ev , we obtain @xmath142 . as in this example
, when @xmath143 is rather heavy and the lighter charged higgs boson @xmath144 is almost a weak singlet , i.e. the mixing angle @xmath94 approaches to zero , it is unlikely that there are observable effects to the low energy data@xcite ; e.g. , the muon life - time , the universality of tau decay into electron or muon , the rare decay of @xmath145 , the universality of @xmath146-boson decay into electron , muon or tau , and the decay width of @xmath147 boson . when @xmath148 are small , we do not expect a large rate in the lepton flavor violation decay of a light neutral higgs boson , such as @xmath149 ( the largest one ) , @xmath150 , or @xmath151 ( the smallest one ) .
on the contrary , as to be discussed in section iv , the decay width of @xmath1 can significantly deviate from the sm value .
finally , the phenomenological constraints on @xmath152 were derived in ref .
@xcite . from the consistency of the muon decay rate and electroweak precision test
it was found that @xmath153 where @xmath154 is the fermi constant , and @xmath155 this means that the @xmath134 can not be @xmath156 unless the charged higgs boson masses are at the order of 10 tev .
in this section , we determine the bounds on the mass of the lightest cp - even higgs boson as a function of the cut - off scale of the zee - model by analyzing the set of renormalization group equations ( rge s ) .
we also study the allowed ranges of the coupling constants , especially @xmath157 and @xmath158 in eq .
( [ higgs_potential ] ) . in sec .
iv , they will be used to evaluate how much the partial decay width of @xmath159 can deviate from its sm value due to the one - loop contribution from the singlet charged higgs boson .
the mass bounds are determined in the following manner .
for each set of parameters defined at the electroweak scale , the running coupling constants are calculated numerically through rge s at the one - loop level .
we require that all the dimensionless coupling constants do not blow up below a given cut - off scale @xmath3 , and the coupling constants satisfy the vacuum stability condition .
we vary the input parameters at the electroweak scale and determine the possible range of the lightest cp - even higgs boson mass as a function of @xmath3 . in a similar manner , we also study the allowed ranges of various higgs boson self - coupling constants at the electroweak scale as well as a function of the lightest cp - even higgs boson mass .
we derived the one - loop rge s for the zee - model , and listed them in the appendix for reference . for simplicity , in the rge s ,
we have neglected all the yukawa coupling constants ( @xmath160 , @xmath161 , @xmath162 ) but the top yukawa coupling @xmath163 .. ] although we kept the new coupling constants @xmath43 in the rge s listed in the appendix , we have neglected @xmath43 in the numerical calculation .
this is because the magnitudes of these coupling constants are numerically too small to affect the final results unless the singlet - charged scalar - boson mass is larger than a few tev [ cf .
( [ f12value ] ) ] .
the dimensionless coupling constants relevant to our numerical analysis are the three gauge - coupling constants @xmath164 , @xmath165 , @xmath166 , the top yukawa - coupling constant @xmath163 , and eight scalar self - coupling constants , @xmath57 ( @xmath167 ) and @xmath168 ( @xmath169 ) .
there are five dimensionful parameters in the higgs potential , namely @xmath170 , @xmath171 , @xmath48 , @xmath172 and @xmath44 . instead of @xmath170 , @xmath171 , @xmath48 , we take @xmath173 , @xmath174 , and @xmath78 , as independent parameters , where @xmath79 ( @xmath80 gev ) characterizes the weak scale and @xmath101 the soft - breaking scale of the discrete symmetry .    in the actual numerical calculation
we first fix @xmath174 and @xmath175 . for a given mass ( @xmath176 ) of the lightest cp - even higgs boson , we solve one of the @xmath57 , which is chosen to be @xmath177 here , in terms of other @xmath57 .
we then numerically evaluate all dimensionless coupling constants according to the rge s . from @xmath176 to @xmath175
we use the sm rge s , which are matched to the zee - model rge s at the soft - breaking scale @xmath175 .
and @xmath49 are only relevant to the charged scalar mass matrix . in principle
, our numerical results also depend on these parameters through the renormalization of various coupling constants from the scale of @xmath5 to the charged scalar mass .
since these effects are expected to be small , we calculate the rge s as if all the scalar - bosons except @xmath0 decouple at the scale @xmath101 . ]
we requires the following two conditions to be satisfied for each scale @xmath178 up to a given cut - off scale @xmath3 .
1 .   applicability of the perturbation theory implies + @xmath179 2 .
the vacuum stability conditions must be satisfied .
the requirement that quartic coupling terms of the scalar potential do not have a negative coefficient in any direction leads to the following conditions at each renormalization scale @xmath178 : 1 .
@xmath180 2 .
@xmath181 + @xmath182 + @xmath183 + where @xmath184 .
3 .   if @xmath185 and @xmath186 , then @xmath187 if @xmath185 and @xmath188 , then @xmath189 if @xmath186 and @xmath188 , then @xmath190 [ when @xmath191 , @xmath192 and @xmath193 are all negative , the above three conditions are equivalent . ]
in addition to the above conditions , we also demand local stability of the potential at the electroweak scale , namely , we calculate the mass spectrum of all scalar fields at the extremum of the potential and demand that all eigenvalues of the squared scalar mass are positive .
we scan the remaining seven - dimensional space of @xmath57 and @xmath168 and examine whether a given mass of the lightest cp - even higgs boson is allowed under the above conditions . in this way
we obtain the allowed range of @xmath5 as a function of @xmath174 and @xmath175 , for each value of the cut - off scale @xmath3 .     the allowed mass range of the lightest cp - even higgs boson for @xmath194 gev .
@xmath6 is the cut - off scale . ]
first , we discuss our result in the decoupling case , in which the soft - breaking scale @xmath101 is much larger than the electroweak scale @xmath195 , and the masses of all the higgs bosons but @xmath0 ( and @xmath196 ) are at the order of @xmath197 , which leads to @xmath198 and @xmath199 ) , the masses of @xmath0 and @xmath196 are dominated by the @xmath200 component of the mass matrix in eq .
( [ neutralmassmatrix ] ) and the @xmath201 component of that in eq .
( [ chargedmassmatrix ] ) , respectively .
the mass of @xmath0 is determined by the self - coupling constants @xmath202 , while that of @xmath196 depends not only on the self - couplings constants @xmath203 but also on the free mass parameter @xmath204 . as noticed in the footnote 7 , from @xmath5 to @xmath101 , the sm rge
are used in our analysis , even if the mass of @xmath196 is smaller than @xmath101 .
the effect of @xmath196 on the mass bound of @xmath0 is expected to be small , because at the one - loop level the primary effect is through the running of @xmath205 , whose contribution to the right - handed side of the rge for the higgs - self coupling constant is small . ] . in fig .
[ fig : z1000 ] , the allowed range of @xmath176 is shown as a function of @xmath174 for @xmath206 gev .
( we take the pole mass of top quark @xmath207 gev , @xmath208 for numerical calculation . )
the allowed ranges are shown as contours for six different values of @xmath3 , i.e. @xmath4 , @xmath209,@xmath210,@xmath211,@xmath212 and @xmath213 gev . for most values of @xmath174 , except for small @xmath174 region , the upper bound of @xmath176 is about @xmath214 gev and the lower bound is between @xmath215 gev and @xmath216 gev for the cut - off scale @xmath6 to be near the planck scale .
the numerical values in this figure are very close to those in the corresponding figure for the thdm discussed in ref .
@xcite . compared to the corresponding lower mass bound in the sm , which is @xmath217 gev when using the one - loop rge s , the lower mass bound in this model
is reduced by about @xmath218 gev to @xmath219 gev .
the reason is similar to the thdm case : the lightest cp - even higgs boson mass is essentially determined by the value of @xmath220 for @xmath221 to be larger than about 2@xmath222 , where @xmath220 plays the role of the self - coupling constant of the higgs potential in the sm can not be too large to ignore the contribution of the bottom quark in the case with the type - ii yukawa interaction . ] . on the right - hand side of the rge for @xmath220 , cf
( [ rge_lambda2 ] ) , there are additional positive - definite terms @xmath223 as compared to the rge for the higgs self - coupling constant in the sm
. these additional terms can improve vacuum stability , and allow lower values of @xmath176 .
therefore , one of the features of the model is to have a different mass range for the lightest cp - even higgs boson as compared to the sm higgs boson , for a given cut - off scale .    the allowed mass range of the lightest cp - even higgs boson for @xmath224 gev . ]    next , we show our result for @xmath101 to be around @xmath79 . in fig .
[ fig : z100 ] , we present the @xmath5 bound for @xmath225 gev . in this case , the allowed range of @xmath5 is reduced as compared to that in the decoupling case , and lies around @xmath226 for large @xmath107 . notice that we have not included phenomenological constraints from the @xmath227 , @xmath228 parameter and the direct higgs boson search experiment at lep . as mentioned before , the mass bounds obtained from the rge analysis are the same for the type - i and type - ii models without these phenomenological constraints . however , it was shown in ref .
@xcite that the @xmath227 data can put a strong constraint on the allowed range of the higgs boson mass for @xmath229@xmath230 gev in the type - ii thdm , whereas there is no appreciable effect in the type - i model .
this is because a small @xmath101 implies a light charged higgs boson in the thdm which can induce a large decay branching ratio for @xmath227 in the type - ii model@xcite data also give strong constraints on the charged higgs bosons in the type - ii thdm@xcite . ] .
we expect a similar constraint from the @xmath227 data on the type - ii zee - model , when @xmath101 is small .    in fig .
[ fig : zeem ] , we show the upper and lower bounds of @xmath5 as a function of @xmath101 for various values of @xmath6 . for given @xmath101 , we scan the range of @xmath107 for @xmath231 .
we find that the obtained @xmath5 bounds are almost the same as those for the thdm .
the primary reason for this is that the new coupling constants @xmath157 , @xmath158 and @xmath232 do not appear directly in the mass formula for @xmath176 , and therefore , do not induce large effects on the bounds of @xmath5 .     the allowed range of @xmath233 and @xmath5 for various @xmath6 values .
]     the allowed range of @xmath234 and @xmath5 for various @xmath6 values . ]    the allowed range of @xmath233 and @xmath234 for @xmath235 gev . ]    the allowed range of @xmath233 and @xmath234 for @xmath236 gev . ]    the allowed range of @xmath237 and @xmath5 for various @xmath6 values . ]
we also investigate the allowed range of coupling constants @xmath157 , @xmath158 and @xmath232 . for this purpose , we fix @xmath157 ( or @xmath158 , @xmath232 ) as well as @xmath174 and @xmath175 to evaluate the upper and the lower bounds of @xmath176 for each @xmath3 value . in this way , we determine the possible range of @xmath157 ( or @xmath158 , @xmath232 ) under the condition that the theory does not break down below the cut - off scale @xmath3 . in fig .
[ fig : s1range ] , we present the allowed range of @xmath157 and @xmath176 for different choice of @xmath3 in the case of @xmath206 gev and @xmath238 or @xmath239 .
a similar figure is shown for the possible range of @xmath158 in fig .
[ fig : s2range ] .
we see that the maximal value of @xmath157 and @xmath158 is around @xmath240 for @xmath241 gev if we take the cut - off scale to be @xmath242 gev . for smaller value of @xmath3
the allowed ranges of @xmath168 becomes larger .
for example , @xmath157 can exceed @xmath243 for @xmath244 gev .
we have calculated for other value of @xmath174 and checked that these figures does not change greatly between @xmath245 and @xmath239 .
we also present the allowed range in the @xmath157 and @xmath158 plane for a fixed value of @xmath176 in figs .
[ fig : s12range_m1000_mh125 ] and [ fig : s12range_m1000_mh140 ] for @xmath246 gev and @xmath247 gev , respectively . for either value of @xmath176 with @xmath248
, both @xmath157 and @xmath158 can be as large as 0.5 ( 2 ) for @xmath4 ( @xmath212 ) gev .
the allowed range of @xmath249 and @xmath5 for various values of @xmath6 is given in fig .
[ fig : s3range ] .
it is shown that , @xmath249 has to be larger than zero , due to the vacuum stability condition .
the maximal value of @xmath232 is about @xmath243 ( 3 ) for @xmath4 ( @xmath212 ) gev and @xmath206 gev .
the impact of these new coupling constants on the collider phenomenology is discussed in the next section .
in this section , we study the phenomenological consequences of the higgs boson mass and the higgs - boson - coupling constants derived in the previous section .
the important feature of the higgs sector of the zee - model is that there are an additional weak doublet and a singlet charged higgs boson .
the physical states of the higgs particles are two cp - even higgs bosons , one cp - odd higgs boson and two pairs of charged higgs bosons .
therefore , the higgs phenomenology is quite close to the ordinary two - higgs - doublet model .
one unique difference is the existence of the additional weak - singlet charged higgs boson .
the effect of this extra charged higgs boson is especially important when @xmath175 is much larger than the @xmath250 boson mass , i.e. in the decoupling regime .
in such a case , the heavier cp - even higgs boson , the cp - odd higgs boson as well as one of the charged higgs bosons have masses approximately equal to @xmath175 , and these heavy states are decoupled from low energy observables .
( note that the condition on the applicability of the perturbation theory forbids too large self - couplings among the higgs bosons .
hence , in the limit of large @xmath101 , the heavy higgs bosons decouple from the low energy effective theory . )
the remaining light states are the lighter cp - even higgs boson @xmath0 and the lighter charged higgs boson @xmath196 which mainly comes from the weak - singlet . in the previous section ,
we show that , even in the decoupling case , there can be large difference in the allowed range of @xmath5 between the zee - model and the sm .
similarly , we expect that , even in the decoupling case , the presence of the additional weak - singlet charged higgs boson can give rise to interesting higgs phenomenology .
since the lighter charged higgs boson @xmath196 can couple to higgs bosons and leptons , it can affect the decay and the production of the neutral higgs bosons at colliders through radiative corrections . in the following , we consider the decay width of @xmath251 as an example . for a sm higgs boson ,
the partial decay width ( or branching ratio ) of @xmath7 is small : @xmath252 kev ( or @xmath253 ) for @xmath246 gev , and @xmath254 kev ( or @xmath255 ) for @xmath247 gev , with a 175 gev top quark .
nevertheless , it is an important discovery mode of the higgs boson at the lhc experiments for @xmath5 less than twice of the @xmath146-boson mass .
needless to say that a change in the branching ratio of @xmath256 would lead to a different production rate of @xmath257 . at future @xmath15
lc s , the branching ratio of @xmath159 can be determined via the reaction @xmath258 and @xmath259 with a 16 - 22% accuracy@xcite . at the photon - photon collision option of the future
lc s , the partial decay width of @xmath7 can be precisely tested within a 2 % accuracy@xcite by measuring the inclusive production rate of the higgs boson @xmath0 .
clearly , a change in the partial decay width of @xmath7 will lead to a different production rate for @xmath0 . in the zee - model
, such a change is expected after taking into account the loop contribution of the extra charged higgs boson .
we find that the deviation from the sm prediction can be sizable , and therefore testable at the lhc and future lc s .
the partial decay width of @xmath7 is calculated at the one - loop order .
similar to our previous discussion , we limit ourselves to the parameter space in which @xmath260 , and keep only the top quark contribution from the fermionic loop diagrams .
including the loop contributions from the @xmath146 boson and the charged higgs bosons @xmath261 and @xmath196 together with the top quark loop contribution , we obtain@xcite @xmath262 with @xmath263 where @xmath264 and @xmath265 is the mass of the internal lines in the loop diagram . @xmath266 and @xmath267 are given by @xmath268 \
, , \end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath269 \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath270 with @xmath271 ^{2 } &   \mbox { if}\ ; r\geq 1\\ -\frac{1}{4}\left [ \ln \frac{1+\sqrt{1-r}}{1-\sqrt{1-r}}-i\pi \right ] ^{2 } &   \mbox { if}\ ; r<1 \end{array}\right . .\ ] ]    in the decoupling case of the model , namely @xmath272 , the above formulae are greatly simplified .
this limit corresponds to @xmath273 and @xmath274 , so that the light charged higgs boson @xmath69 is identical to the weak - singlet higgs boson @xmath275 .
thus , we have @xmath276 and both the top - quark and the @xmath146 boson loop contributions reduce to their sm values .
we like to stress that the weak - singlet higgs boson does not directly couple to the quark fields in the limit of @xmath277 .
therefore , it does not affect the decay rate of @xmath278 at the one - loop order .
similarly , being a weak singlet , it also gives no contribution to the @xmath279 parameter .
hence the low - energy constraint from either the @xmath278 decay or the @xmath279 parameter on the zee - model in the limit of @xmath280 is similar to effects of that on the thdm .
let us examine at the one - loop effect of the weak - singlet charged higgs boson on the decay width of @xmath159 in the decoupling limit .
let us recall that in fig .
[ fig : s12range_m1000_mh140 ] , the size of the new couplings @xmath281 and @xmath282 can be as large as 2 simultaneously , if the cut - off scale is at the order of @xmath283 gev . for the zee - model to be a valid low energy effective theory up to @xmath284 gev , @xmath281 and @xmath282 can not be much larger than @xmath285 . to illustrate the implications of this result , we show in figs .
[ fig : ratio125_140 ] ( a ) and [ fig : ratio125_140 ] ( b ) the ratio ( @xmath286 ) of the @xmath287 width predicted in the zee - model to that in the sm , @xmath288 , as a function of the coupling constant @xmath282 and the charged higgs boson mass @xmath136 . here , for simplicity , we have set @xmath289 so that the @xmath107 dependence drops in the decoupling case , cf .
( [ eq : decoup ] ) . for illustrations ,
we consider two cases for the mass of the lighter cp - even higgs boson : @xmath246 gev and @xmath247 gev .
as shown in the figures , the ratio @xmath290 can be around 0.8 for @xmath291 and @xmath292 gev .
this reduction is due to the cancellation between the contribution from the @xmath196-boson loop and the @xmath146-boson loop contributions . to have a similar reduction rate in @xmath293 for a heavier @xmath196 , the coupling constant @xmath282 ( and @xmath281 ) has to be larger
next , as shown in figs .  7 and 8 , @xmath281 and @xmath282
do not have to take the same values in general , and they can be less than zero . in the case where both @xmath281 and @xmath282 are negative , the contribution of the @xmath196-loop diagram and that of the @xmath146-loop diagram have the same sign , so that @xmath286 can be larger than 1 .
such an example is shown in fig .  [ fig : ratio125_140_negatives2 ] ( a ) , where the ratio @xmath286 for @xmath246 gev is shown as a function of @xmath294 at various negative @xmath282 values with @xmath295 and @xmath296 .
we consider the case with @xmath297 , @xmath298 or @xmath299 , which is consistent with the cut - off scale @xmath8 , @xmath300 or @xmath301 gev , respectively . in the case of @xmath8 gev
( @xmath301 gev ) , the deviation from the sm prediction can be about + 6% ( + 30% ) for @xmath302 gev . in fig .
[ fig : ratio125_140_negatives2 ] ( b ) , the similar plot of the ratio @xmath286 is shown for @xmath247 gev with @xmath295 and @xmath296 . each case with @xmath303 , @xmath304 or @xmath305 is consistent with @xmath8 , @xmath300 or @xmath301 gev , respectively .
the correction is larger in the case with @xmath247 gev than in the case with @xmath246 gev for a given @xmath6 .
the deviation from the sm prediction can amount to about + 8% ( + 40% ) for @xmath8 gev ( @xmath301 gev ) when @xmath306 gev .
larger positive corrections are obtained for smaller @xmath294 values .
such a deviation from the sm prediction can be tested at the lhc , the @xmath15 lc and the @xmath16 option of lc .    before concluding this section
, we remark that if @xmath5 is larger than @xmath307 such that the decay mode @xmath308 is open , the total decay width of @xmath0 can be largely modified from the sm prediction for large @xmath309 . in terms of @xmath310 , the partial decay width of @xmath311
is given by @xmath312 where @xmath313 . in fig .
[ fig : hsswidth ] ( a ) , we show the partial decay width @xmath314 for @xmath315 gev with @xmath316 , cf .
( [ eq : decoup ] ) , for the allowed range of @xmath5 from 100 gev to 500 gev . in fig .
[ fig : hsswidth ] ( b ) , the ratio of @xmath314 to the total width of the sm higgs boson ( @xmath317 ) is shown as a function of @xmath5 for each value of @xmath318 .
this is to illustrate the possible size of the difference between the total width of the lightest cp - even higgs boson @xmath0 in the zee - model and that of the sm higgs boson gev , which allows a wide range of values for @xmath319 s , @xmath136 and @xmath5 . ] . clearly , the impact of the @xmath320 decay channel is especially large in the small @xmath5 region .
we note that @xmath317 can be determined to the accuracy of 10 - 20% at the lhc and the lc if @xmath321 , and to that of a couple of per cents if @xmath322@xcite .
( @xmath323 is the mass of the @xmath147-boson . ) hence , measuring the total width of the lightest neutral higgs boson can provide a further test of the zee - model for @xmath324 .
the change in the total width also modifies the decay branching ratio of @xmath325 , hence yields a different rate of @xmath326 for a given @xmath5 .
( in the sm , the branching ratio of @xmath325 is about 1/3 for @xmath327 gev . )
needless to say that for @xmath328 , the production mode of @xmath329 is also useful to test the zee - model .
further discussion on this possibility will be given in sec .
in the zee - model , two kinds of charged higgs bosons appear . if there is no mixing between them ( @xmath330 ) , the mass eigenstates @xmath331 and @xmath332 correspond to the thdm - like charged higgs field and the singlet higgs field @xmath275 , respectively .
the case with @xmath330 occurs in the limit of @xmath333 and @xmath100 ; i.e. in the decoupling limit . the detection of @xmath332 can be a clear indication of the zee - model .
as to be shown later , its phenomenology is found to be drastically different from that of the thdm - like charged higgs bosons @xmath331@xcite . here
, we discuss how the effects of this extra charged boson can be explored experimentally .
we first consider the case with @xmath330 , and then extend the discussion to the case with a non - zero @xmath94 .
the @xmath334 boson decays into a lepton pair @xmath335 with the coupling constant @xmath134 .
the partial decay rate , @xmath336 , is calculated as @xmath337 and the total decay width of @xmath334 is given by @xmath338 by taking into account the hierarchy pattern of @xmath134 , cf .
( [ eq21 ] ) and ( [ eq22 ] ) , and by assuming @xmath302 gev and @xmath339 , the total decay width and the life time ( @xmath340 ) is estimated to be .
if we take @xmath341 gev or @xmath342 gev , @xmath343 can become one order of magnitude larger than @xmath344 , while still being consistent with the phenomenological bounds discussed in sec .
@xmath345 this implies that @xmath196 decays after traveling a distance of @xmath346 m , which is significantly shorter than the typical detector scale .
therefore , @xmath332 decays promptly after its production , and can be detected at collider experiments
.    the main production channel at the lep - ii experiment may be the pair production process @xmath347 , similar to the production of the thdm - like charged higgs boson @xmath348 .
the matrix - element squares for the @xmath349 production ( @xmath350 ) are given by @xmath351 where @xmath352 and @xmath353 ( @xmath354 ) for the incoming electron @xmath355 ( @xmath356 ) ; @xmath357 and @xmath358 ( @xmath354 ) for @xmath359 ( @xmath360 ) ; @xmath361 , @xmath362 , @xmath363 , and @xmath364 is the scattering angle of @xmath365 in the @xmath15 center - of - mass ( cm ) frame whose energy is @xmath366 . for the other electron - positron helicity configuration ( @xmath367 and @xmath368 ) , the cross sections are zero .
thus the total cross section for the @xmath320 pair production is given by @xmath369 .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence , the production rates of @xmath143 and @xmath334 are different .
we note that the ratio of cross sections for @xmath370 and @xmath371 production , @xmath372 , is @xmath373 at @xmath374 gev assuming that the masses of @xmath331 and @xmath332 are the same .
this ratio is independent of the masses of @xmath375 and @xmath376 for a fixed cm energy .
( only the difference between @xmath377 and @xmath378 coupling constants determines this ratio . )    the lower mass bound of the thdm - like charged boson @xmath379 can be obtained by studying its @xmath19 and @xmath380 decay modes , completely in the same way as the charged higgs boson search in the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm)@xcite . similar experimental constraints may be obtained for the extra charged bosons @xmath332 .
the situation , however , turns out to be fairly different from the @xmath331 case .
first of all , decays of @xmath332 are all leptonic .
secondly , the branching ratios of various @xmath332 decay modes are estimated as @xmath381 where we have used the relations given in eqs .
( [ eq21 ] ) and ( [ eq22 ] ) .
clearly , the branching ratio into the @xmath382 mode is very small , so that it is not useful for detecting @xmath332 at all .
this is different from the case of detecting the ordinary thdm - like charged higgs boson , which preferentially decays into heavy fermion pairs ( e.g. @xmath19 and @xmath20 ) . instead of studying the @xmath383 mode
, the @xmath384 and @xmath385 modes can provide a strong constraint on the mass of @xmath332 .
in fact , the branching ratio of @xmath386 or @xmath387 is almost 100 % , so that we have @xmath388 , where @xmath389 and @xmath390 represent @xmath391 or @xmath392 ( not @xmath393 ) .
let us compare this with the cross section @xmath394 , where @xmath395 . as seen in fig .
[ fig : zee_pair ] , the cross section @xmath396 is comparable with @xmath397 .
therefore , by examining the lep - ii data for @xmath398 ( where @xmath399 , @xmath400 or @xmath401 , in contrast to @xmath402 for the @xmath331 case ) , the experimental lower bound on the mass of @xmath332 can be determined .
such a bound can be induced from the smuon search results at the lep experiments@xcite in the case that neutralinos are assumed to be massless . from the @xmath403 data accumulated up to @xmath404 gev@xcite , we find that the lower mass bound of @xmath332 is likely to be 80 - 85 gev for the @xmath330 cases .
[ we note that the right - handed smuon ( @xmath405 ) in the mssm carries the same @xmath406 quantum number as the weak - singlet charged higgs boson ( @xmath332 for @xmath407 ) . ]
we next comment on @xmath332-production processes at hadron colliders and future lc s . at hadron colliders ,
the dominant production mode is the pair production through the drell - yan - type process .
the cross sections for @xmath408 at the tevatron run - ii energy ( @xmath409 tev ) and @xmath410 at the lhc energy ( @xmath411 tev ) are shown as a function of @xmath136 in fig .
[ fig : zee_hadron ] for @xmath412 . at future lc s
, the @xmath332 boson may be discovered through the above - discussed pair - production process from the electron - positron annihilation if @xmath413 . in fig .
[ fig : zee_lc ] , we show the total cross section of @xmath414 for @xmath330 as a function of @xmath136 for @xmath415 , @xmath416 , and @xmath417 gev .
finally , we like to discuss the case with a non - zero @xmath94 , in which @xmath334 is a mixture of the singlet charged higgs boson state ( @xmath418 ) and the doublet charged higgs boson state ( @xmath419 ) .
let us see how the above discussion is changed in this case .
the doublet charged higgs bosons with the mass of @xmath420 gev mainly decay into the @xmath421 and @xmath422 channels .
thus , the branching ratio of the decay process @xmath423 , where @xmath389 represents @xmath391 and @xmath392 , is expressed in a non - zero @xmath94 case as @xmath424 where @xmath425 ( @xmath426 ) is the total width of @xmath365 at @xmath330 with the same mass as the decaying @xmath334 on the left - hand side of the above equation .
the formula of @xmath427 is given in eq .
( [ s2width_0 ] ) , while @xmath428 , which is the same as the total decay width of the charged higgs boson in the thdm is given by @xmath429 where @xmath430 are fermion pairs which are kinematically allowed . in the type - ii yukawa couplings
, we have @xmath431 in the thdm , the total decay width of the charged higgs boson ( @xmath419 ) for @xmath432 gev is about 470 kev . hence ,
if the mixing angle @xmath94 is not so small , the decay pattern of @xmath334 is dominated by that of the thdm charged higgs boson @xmath419 . in fig .
[ fig : nonmix ] , we plot the branching ratio @xmath433 as a function of @xmath434 at @xmath302 gev for several values of @xmath343 .
we only show the case with @xmath435 , where the result is independent of the type of the yukawa interaction .
the coupling constant @xmath343 is taken to be @xmath436 and @xmath437 ( @xmath438 ) , which satisfy the phenomenological constraints given in sec .
as expected , the branching ratio decreases as @xmath94 increases . when @xmath439 , @xmath433 is smaller than 10% for @xmath440 .
for the smaller @xmath343 values , the branching ratio reduces more quickly .
the branching ratio is not sensitive to @xmath294 unless the mass exceeds the threshold of the decay into a @xmath441 or @xmath442 pair . above the threshold of the @xmath441 pair production ,
the decay rate of @xmath443 is large due to the large mass of the top quarks , so that @xmath433 is substantial only for very small values of @xmath94 . finally ,
while the decay branching ratio can change drastically depending on the mixing angle @xmath94 , the production cross section for @xmath414 remains unchanged .
in conclusion , the process @xmath444 can also be useful for testing the zee - model in the non - zero @xmath94 case , provided @xmath434 is not too large .
in this paper , the higgs sector of the zee - model has been investigated , in which neutrino masses are generated radiatively .
this model contains extra weak - doublet higgs field and singlet charged higgs field .
we have studied indirect effects of these extra higgs bosons on the theoretical mass bounds of the lightest cp - even higgs boson , which are obtained from the requirement that the running coupling constants neither blow up to a very large value nor fall down to a negative value , up to a high - energy cut - off scale @xmath3 . for @xmath4 gev , the upper bound of @xmath176 is found to be about @xmath214 gev , which is almost the same value as the sm prediction . in the decoupling regime ( @xmath445 ) , the lower bound is found to be about @xmath446 gev for @xmath4 gev , which is much smaller than the lower bound in the sm , and is almost the same as that in the thdm . for smaller @xmath447 values ,
the bounds are more relaxed , similar to that of the sm .
we have also investigated the allowed range of the coupling constants relevant to the weak - singlet higgs field .
the most striking feature of the zee - model higgs sector is the existence of the weak - singlet charged higgs boson .
we have examined the possible impact of the singlet charged - higgs boson on the neutral higgs boson search through radiative corrections .
we found that its one - loop contributions to the @xmath7 width can be sizable . in the allowed range of the coupling constants the deviation from the sm prediction for this decay width can be about @xmath448% or near @xmath449% for @xmath302 gev and @xmath8 gev , depending on the sign of the coupling constants @xmath203 .
the magnitude of the deviation is larger for lower @xmath6 values or for smaller @xmath136 values . for example , a positive deviation over @xmath450-@xmath451% is possible for @xmath452-@xmath14 gev , @xmath453 gev , and @xmath454 gev .    in the decoupling limit
( i.e. when @xmath455 , where @xmath456 and @xmath199 ) , we expect that the production cross sections for @xmath457 , @xmath458 and @xmath459 in the zee - model are the same as those in the sm .
however , a sizable change in the decay branching ratio of @xmath159 can alter the production rate of @xmath257 at the lhc , where this production rate can be determined with a relative error of 10 - 15%@xcite .
also , such a deviation in the branching ratio of @xmath159 directly affects the cross section of @xmath460 , which can be measured with an accuracy of 16 - 22% at the future @xmath15 lc ( with @xmath461 gev and the integrated luminosity of 1 ab@xmath462)@xcite .
therefore , the zee - model with low cut - off scales can be tested through the @xmath463 process at the lhc and the @xmath15 lc s . at the future photon colliders , the enhancement ( or reduction ) of the @xmath463 partial decay rate
will manifest itself in the different production rate of @xmath0 from the sm prediction .
a few per cent of the deviation in @xmath464 can be detected at a photon collider@xcite , so that the effects of the singlet charged higgs boson can be tested even if the cutoff scale @xmath6 is at the planck scale .
the collider phenomenology of the singlet charged higgs boson has turned out to be completely different from that of the thdm - like charged higgs boson .
the singlet charged higgs boson mainly decays into @xmath465 ( with @xmath466 or @xmath18 ) , while the decay mode @xmath467 is almost negligible due to the relation @xmath468 .
this hierarchy among the coupling constants @xmath134 results from demanding bi - maximal mixings in the neutrino mass matrix generated in the zee - model to be consistent with the neutrino oscillation data . on the other hand
, the thdm - like charged higgs boson decays mainly into either the @xmath19 mode or the @xmath380 mode , through the usual yukawa - interactions .
hence , to probe this singlet charged higgs boson using the lep - ii data , experimentalists should examine their data sample with @xmath469 , @xmath470 , @xmath471 or @xmath403 , while the experimental lower mass bound of the thdm - like charged higgs boson is obtained from examining the @xmath472 , @xmath473 and @xmath474 events . using
the published lep - ii constraints on the mssm smuon production ( assuming the lightest neutralinos to be massless ) , we estimate the current lower mass bound of this singlet charged higgs boson to be about 80 - 85 gev . the tevatron run - ii , lhc and future lc s can further test this model .
finally , we comment on a case in which the singlet charged higgs boson ( @xmath332 for @xmath330 ) is the lightest of all the higgs bosons . for @xmath475 ,
the higgs sector of the zee - model can be further tested by measuring the production rate of @xmath476 .
the branching ratio for @xmath329 can be large .
for instance , for @xmath477 gev and @xmath306 gev , this branching ratio is about 12% for each @xmath478 , @xmath479 , @xmath480 or @xmath401 .
the branching ratio decreases for larger masses of @xmath0 .
moreover , the total decay width of @xmath0 can be largely modified when the decay channel @xmath481 is open . in this case , the decay branching ratios of @xmath482 , @xmath483 are also different from the sm predictions .    in conclusion ,
the distinguishable features of the zee - model from the sm and the thdm can be tested by the data from lep - ii , the tevatron run - ii and future experiments at lhc and lc s .
we are grateful to the warm hospitality of the center for theoretical sciences in taiwan where part of this work was completed .
cpy would like to thank h .- j .
he , j. ng and w. repko for stimulating discussions .
sk was supported , in part , by the alexander von humboldt foundation .
gll and jjt were supported , in part , by the national science council of r.o.c . under the grant
no nsc-89 - 2112-m-009 - 035 ; yo was supported by the grant - in - aid of the ministry of education , science , sports and culture , government of japan ( no .
09640381 ) , priority area `` supersymmetry and unified theory of elementary particles '' ( no .  707 ) , and `` physics of cp violation '' ( no .  09246105 ) ; cpy is supported by the national science foundation in the usa under the grant phy-9802564 .
here , we summarize the relevant rge s to our study . for the gauge
coupling constants , we have [ sec : rgelist ] @xmath484 the rge s for the higgs - self - coupling constants of the doublets are calculated at the one - loop level as @xmath485 and those with respect to the additional singlet charged higgs are given by @xmath486 finally , the rge s for the yukawa - type coupling constants are obtained at one - loop level as @xmath487 where @xmath488        s.t .
petcov , ; j.  liu , ; b.k .
pal , ; w.  grimus , and g.  nardulli , ; a.y .
smirnov and z .- j .
tao , ; p.h .
frampton and s.l .
glashow , ; g.c .
mclaughlin and j.n .
ng , ; a.s .
jaurabh and s.d .
rindani , ; k.  cheung , o.c.w .
kong , ; k.  cheung , o.c.w .
kong , hep - ph/0003276 ; y.  koide and a.  ghosal , .
n.  cabibbo , l.  maiani , g.  parisi and r.  petronzio , _ nucl .
_ b * 158 * ( 1976 ) 295 ; m. lindner , _ z. phys .
_ c * 31 * ( 1986 ) 295 ; g.  altarelli and i.  ishidori , _ phys .
_ b * 337 * ( 1994 ) 141 ; j.a .
casas , j.r .
espinosa , and m.  quirs , _ phys .
_ b * 342 * ( 1995 ) 171 ; _ ibid .
_ b * 382 * ( 1996 ) 374 ; j.r .
espinosa and m.  quirs , _ phys .
_ b * 353 * ( 1995 ) 257 ; m.  quirs , iem - ft-153/97 , in _
perspectives on higgs physics ii , ed .
g.l . kane _
, world scientific , singapore ; t. hambye and k. riesselmann , .
h.  komatsu , ; r.a .
flores and m.  sher , _ ann .
( ny ) _ * 148 * ( 1983 ) 295 ; m.  sher , _ phys .
_ * 179 * ( 1989 ) 273 ; d.  kominis and r.s .
chivukula , ; s.  kanemura , t.  kubota and e.  takasugi , ; s.  nie and m.  sher , ; a.  akeroyd , a.  arhrib , e.  naimi , .
e. boos , j .- c .
brient , d.w .
reid , h.j .
schreiber , and r. schanidze , hep - ph/0011366 ; rick van kooten , talk at the berkeley linear collider meeting in march 2000 ( http://needmore.physics.indiana.edu/~rickv/nlc/talks/berkeley_2000/berkeley_2000.html ) .
m.  ciuchini , g.  degrassi , p.  gambini and g.f .
giudice , _ nucl .
_ b * 527 * ( 1998 ) 21 ; p.  ciafaloni , a.  romanino and a.  strumia , _ nucl .
_ b * 524 * ( 1998 ) 361 ; f.  borzumati and g.  greub , _ phys .
_ d * 58 * ( 1998 ) 074004 ; t.m .
aliev and e.o .
iltan , _ phys .
_ d * 58 * ( 1998 ) 095014 .          v.  drollinger and a.  sopczak , hep - ph/0102342 .
s.  kanemura , t.  kasai , g .-
lin , y.  okada , j.j .
tseng , and c .- p .
yuan , hep - ph/0010233 .
m.  dima , talk given at lcws 2000 ( fermilab , october 2000 ) + http://www-lc.fnal.gov/lcws2000/ ; + aleph collaboration , .
aleph collaboration , .