starting from the 2007 crisis , one of the most striking features of today s financial environment is represented by the segmentation of interest rate markets . more specifically , while the pre - crisis interest rate market was well described by a _ single _
yield curve and interbank xibor rates associated to different tenors were simply determined by no - arbitrage relations , nowadays the market is segmented in the sense that distinct yield curves are constructed from market instruments that depend on a specific tenor , thus giving rise to _ multiple _ yield curves .
the credit and liquidity risks existing in the interbank market , which were perceived as negligible before the crisis , are at the origin of this phenomenon .
this is also reflected by the emergence of spreads between ois rates and xibor rates as well as between xibor rates associated to different tenors .    in this paper
, we propose the most general tractable approach based on affine processes to model multiple yield curves . in our view
, it should be understood as _ the affine framework _ for this modeling purpose and not as a specific model class , such as the affine libor models considered in @xcite .
we provide a unifying affine methodology within which all interest rate modeling approaches , i.e. , ( i ) short rate , ( ii ) libor market , and ( iii ) heath - jarrow - morton modeling , can be consolidated . on the one hand
, this allows us to embed in our framework all affine multiple curve models proposed so far in the literature . on the other hand , the approach allows for novel developments , for instance multiple curve short rate models based on wishart processes as well as interest rate models under alternative numraires .
moreover , the generality of the setting does not preclude tractability and appealing practical features , as will be made precise below .
we model a general numraire process and , inspired by our previous work @xcite , _ multiplicative spreads _ between ( normalized ) spot xibor rates and ( normalized ) simply compounded ois rates . besides being directly observable from market quotes ,
multiplicative spreads represent the most convenient modeling quantity in an affine setting and admit a natural interpretation in terms of forward exchange premia .
we consider a general interest rate market where ois zero - coupon bonds and fra contracts are traded , for a finite set of tenors and for all maturities , and assume the existence of a numraire - martingale measure couple , thus ensuring absence of arbitrage in a sense precisely specified below .
we then model the logarithm of the multiplicative spreads and of the numraire process as affine functions of an underlying affine process . in the special case where the numraire is chosen as the ois bank account
, our framework can be regarded as the natural extension of classical affine short rate models to the multi - curve setting . in the special case where the numraire is chosen to be the ois bond with terminal maturity
, we can recover an extension of the affine libor market model of @xcite .
the proposed framework fully exploits the analytical tractability of affine processes and exhibits several desirable modeling features .
indeed , besides its generality , it allows for    * an automatic fit to the initially observed term structures of ois bond prices and spreads ; * a transparent characterization of order relations between spreads associated to different tenors ; * efficient valuation formulae for caplets and swaptions in a multi - curve setting .
the driving affine process is allowed to take values in a general convex state space .
in particular , we analyze a specification based on wishart processes and we derive a novel closed - form formula for the price of a caplet , expressed in terms of the distribution function of weighted sums of independent non - central chi - square - distributed random variables . beyond that
, we test the empirical performance of two simple specifications of our setup and show that they achieve a satisfactory fit to market data .    referring to the introductory section of @xcite and to the monographies @xcite for a more detailed overview of the relevant literature ,
we mention here that affine processes have been used to model multiple yield curves in @xcite by adopting a short rate approach and , more recently , in @xcite by extending the affine libor model originally introduced in @xcite .
as already mentioned , the flexibility of our approach is highlighted by the fact that , to the best of our knowledge , all existing affine multi - curve models can be recovered as special cases of our framework .
for this reason , the present work structurally differs from papers on specific affine modeling approaches , as previously considered in the literature . beyond that
, it also provides a broad class of tractable specifications of the abstract hjm approach based on general it semimartingales proposed in @xcite for arbitrage - free modeling of the term structures of ois bonds and multiplicative spreads .
the paper is organized as follows .
section  [ sec : intro2 ] starts by introducing the main market rates and multiplicative spreads and then presents an abstract approach to the arbitrage - free modeling of a general multi - curve interest rate market . in section  [ affinespecification ] , we develop a general framework driven by affine processes as well as possible specifications based on a short rate approach .
moreover , we relate our setup to several affine multi - curve models recently proposed in the literature . in section  [ sec : aff_pricing ] , we derive general semi - closed valuation formulae for caplets and an approximate formula for the price of a swaption .
section  [ sec : wishart ] contains a detailed analysis of a tractable specification based on wishart processes , deriving an analytical pricing formula for caplets .
section  [ sec : aff_examples ] presents the calibration results for two specifications of the framework .
finally , appendix  [ sec : gen_pricing ] presents general pricing formulae in terms of the quantities used in our framework and appendix  [ app : proof_prop ] contains the proof of proposition  [ prop : bonds_spreads ] .
the underlying quantities of most interest rate products are represented by xibor rates .
we denote by @xmath0 the xibor rate prevailing at date @xmath1 for the time interval @xmath2 $ ] , where the tenor @xmath3 is typically one day ( 1d ) , one week ( 1w ) , or several months ( 1 m , 2 m , 3 m , 6 m or 12 m ) . referring to (
* chapter 1 ) for a more detailed presentation of post - crisis interest rate markets , we just mention that xibor rates are reference rates determined by a panel of primary financial institutions for unsecured lending and are not based on actual transactions . in the post - crisis fixed income market , xibor rates associated to different tenors started to exhibit distinct behaviors , leading for instance to non - negligible basis spreads ( see appendix a.1 ) . in this paper
, we shall consider xibor rates for a generic set of tenors @xmath4 , with @xmath5 , for some @xmath6 .
the reference rates for overnight borrowing ( i.e. , for the shortest tenor of 1d ) correspond to the eonia ( euro overnight index average ) rate in the eurozone and to the federal funds rate in the us market . unlike xibor rates , the eonia and the federal funds rates are determined on the basis of actual overnight transactions in the interbank market by a panel of banks ( in the case of the eonia rate , this is the same panel determining the euribor rate ) .
overnight rates represent the underlying of overnight indexed swaps ( ois ) , whose market swap rates are referred to as ois rates ( see appendix  [ sec : noopt ] ) , typically considered as the best proxy for risk - free rates in market practice . by bootstrapping techniques ( see  @xcite ) , ois rates allow to recover the ois term structure @xmath7 , where @xmath8 denotes the price at date @xmath1 of an ois zero - coupon bond with maturity @xmath9 .
we define the simply compounded ( risk - free ) ois spot rate by @xmath10 for @xmath3 .
in particular , note that the right - hand side of the above formula corresponds to the pre - crisis textbook definition of xibor rate .
our main modeling quantities are the following _ spot multiplicative spreads _ : @xmath11 corresponding to multiplicative spreads between ( normalized ) xibor rates and ( normalized ) simply compounded ois spot rates .
the multiplicative spreads @xmath12 can be directly inferred from the quoted xibor and ois rates .
indeed , the numerator of is determined by the xibor rate quoted on the market , while the quantity appearing in the denominator can be bootstrapped from quoted ois rates , as mentioned above . in the post - crisis environment , the quantities @xmath12
are usually greater than one and increasing with respect to the tenor s length @xmath13 . neglecting liquidity issues ,
this is related to the fact that xibor rates embed the risk that the average credit quality of the banks included in the xibor panel deteriorates over the term of the loan , while ois rates reflect the average credit quality of a newly refreshed xibor panel ( see , e.g. ,  @xcite ) .
as will be shown below , a key feature of our modeling framework is the facility of generating multiplicative spreads satisfying such requirements .    in comparison to additive spreads ( as considered for instance in @xcite ) , multiplicative spreads admit a natural economic interpretation in a multiple curve setting and , as shown in the following sections , represent a convenient modeling quantity in relation with affine processes . referring to ( * ? ? ?
* appendix b ) for full details , xibor rates can be associated with artificial risky bond prices @xmath14 , so that @xmath15 , for @xmath16
. if risky bonds are interpreted as bonds of a foreign economy , with @xmath14 representing the price ( in units of the foreign currency ) of a foreign zero - coupon bond , and ois bonds are interpreted as domestic bonds , then the quantity @xmath12 corresponds to the _ forward exchange premium _ between the domestic and the foreign economy over the period @xmath17 $ ] . in this sense
, the multiplicative spread @xmath12 can be regarded as a market expectation ( at date @xmath1 ) of the riskiness of the xibor panel over the period @xmath17 $ ] .
related foreign exchange analogies have been proposed in @xcite and @xcite .
let us now make precise the financial market considered in this paper . among all financial contracts written on xibor rates , forward rate agreements ( fra )
can be rightfully considered as the basic building blocks , due to the simplicity of their payoff and to the fact that all linear interest rate derivatives ( such as interest rate swaps and basis swaps ) can be represented as portfolios of fras . as usually done in the literature ,
we consider standard `` textbook '' fras , in contrast to the cash - settled fras traded in the market ( compare with  ( * ? ? ?
* remark 1.3 ) ) . while the payoff of market fras is non - linear , the discrepancy between the two versions of fras is typically negligible for practical purposes , as documented in  @xcite .    motivated by the above observation
, we shall consider a general financial market consisting of the following families of _ basic traded assets _ , with @xmath18 denoting a fixed time horizon :    * ois zero - coupon bonds for all maturities @xmath19 $ ] ; * fra contracts for all maturities @xmath19 $ ] and for all tenors @xmath4 .
note that , differently from the pre - crisis single - curve setting , fra contracts have to be considered on top of ois bonds since they can not be perfectly replicated by the latter any longer , due to the discrepancy between xibor rates @xmath20 and simply compounded ois rates @xmath21 .
moreover , ois bonds play a particularly important role in collateralized transactions . indeed , the collateral rate adopted in collateralized transactions in interest rate markets is typically specified as the ois short rate and , hence , ois bonds represent the natural discount factors for the valuation of interest rate products ( see , e.g. ,  @xcite and ( * ? ? ?
* appendix a ) ) .
we denote by @xmath22 the price at date @xmath1 of a fra contract starting at date @xmath9 with maturity @xmath23 , rate @xmath24 and unitary notional , for @xmath25 and @xmath16 .
we denote by @xmath26 the corresponding _ fair fra rate _ , i.e. , the rate @xmath27 fixed at date @xmath1 satisfying @xmath28 .
we say that a fra contract written at @xmath1 is _ fair _ if its rate @xmath27 is set equal to @xmath26 , i.e. , if the price of the fra contract at the inception date @xmath1 is zero . extending definition of the spot multiplicative spread , we define ( forward ) _ multiplicative spreads _
@xmath29 , for @xmath25 and @xmath16 , by @xmath30 multiplicative spreads of the form have been first introduced in @xcite and further considered as main modeling quantities in @xcite ( see also @xcite ) .
we refer to ( * ? ? ?
* appendix b ) for the interpretation of the forward multiplicative spread @xmath29 in terms of the foreign exchange analogy introduced at the end of section [ sec : rates ] .
a first and fundamental issue is the absence of arbitrage in the financial market composed by the basic traded assets introduced above . to this end
, we let @xmath31 be a measurable space endowed with a right - continuous filtration @xmath32 and formulate the following definition .
[ def : couple ] let @xmath33 be a probability measure on @xmath31 and @xmath34 a strictly positive adapted process with @xmath35 .
we say that @xmath36 is a _ numraire - martingale measure couple _ if the @xmath37-discounted price of every basic traded asset is a martingale on @xmath38 .    in other words ,
if @xmath36 is a numraire - martingale measure couple , the price of every ois zero - coupon bond and fra contract is a @xmath33-martingale when discounted with respect to the numraire process @xmath37 .
definition  [ def : couple ] is in the spirit of  @xcite , where the authors consider term structure models generated by a numraire - martingale measure couple in the above sense .
note that we do not assume that @xmath37 is a traded asset and it can therefore be interpreted as a state - price density process when @xmath39 corresponds to the physical probability measure ( compare with  @xcite ) .    in the present paper , we shall work under the following standing assumption .
[ ass : couple ] there exists a numraire - martingale measure couple @xmath36 .
in particular , assumption [ ass : couple ] suffices to exclude the existence of arbitrage profits , in the sense of _ no asymptotic free lunch with vanishing risk _
( naflvr , see @xcite ) , in the large financial market composed by all basic traded assets , i.e. , by all ois zero - coupon bonds and fra contracts .
[ rem : ois_num ] in the literature on multiple curves , the numraire is typically chosen to be the ois bank account and @xmath33 is the corresponding ( spot ) martingale measure .
while this choice of @xmath36 will be considered in detail in section [ sec : short_rate ] , we want to point out that our framework is not limited to this specification and allows to consider several alternative settings , depending on the choice of the numraire - martingale measure couple ( see section [ sec : aff_model ] below ) . for the moment
, we just think of the couple @xmath36 in abstract and general terms .
assumption [ ass : couple ] implies that the arbitrage - free price of every basic traded asset can be computed by taking the conditional @xmath33-expectation of its @xmath37-discounted payoff , similarly as in the classical risk - neutral valuation paradigm is the ois bank account and @xmath33 the corresponding martingale measure , as considered in remark [ rem : ois_num ] , computing the price of a derivative by taking the conditional @xmath33-expectation of its @xmath37-discounted payoff corresponds to computing its _ clean price _ ,
i.e. , neglecting counterparty risk and assuming a funding rate equal to the ois rate ( compare also with the discussion in  ( * ? ? ?
* appendix a ) ) . ] . throughout the paper ,
unless explicitly indicated , expectations are taken under the measure @xmath33 , while the measure @xmath40 denotes the @xmath9-forward measure with density @xmath41 , for @xmath19 $ ] .
we can now state the following proposition , which is a simple consequence of definition  [ def : couple ] ( for completeness , the proof is given in appendix  [ app : proof_prop ] ) .
[ prop : bonds_spreads ] suppose that assumption [ ass : couple ] holds .
then the following hold :    1 .
ois zero - coupon bond prices satisfy @xmath42 , \qquad \text { for all } 0\leq t\leq t\leq { \mathbb{t}};\ ] ] 2 .   for every @xmath16 ,
the fair fra rate satisfies @xmath43 , \qquad \text { for all } 0\leq t\leq t\leq { \mathbb{t}};\ ] ] 3 .   for every @xmath16 ,
the multiplicative spread satisfies @xmath44
, \qquad \text { for all } 0\leq t\leq t\leq { \mathbb{t}}.\ ] ]    from the modeling perspective , proposition [ prop : bonds_spreads ] together with representation implies that , in order to give an arbitrage - free description of the financial market composed by all ois zero - coupon bonds and fra contracts , it suffices to model the numraire process @xmath37 together with the spot multiplicative spreads @xmath45 , under some reference measure @xmath33 . in the next section , this will be achieved in a flexible and tractable way by letting the numraire process and the spot multiplicative spreads be driven by a common underlying affine process .
in this section we develop a general framework based on affine processes for modeling multiple curves .
we first recall in section  [ sec : aff_gen ] some general results on affine processes , mainly relying on @xcite . in section  [ sec : aff_model ] , we provide the general definition of an affine multi - curve model with respect to an abstract numraire - martingale measure couple and derive its fundamental properties .
this general setup is then specialized in section  [ sec : short_rate ] to the typical setting where the numraire is given by the ois bank account modeled via a short rate .
section  [ sec : relations ] shows how our setup relates to the existing multi - curve models driven by affine processes .
let @xmath46 be a finite - dimensional real vector space with associated scalar product @xmath47 .
we denote by @xmath48 a non - empty closed convex subset of @xmath46 , which will serve as state space for the stochastic process to be introduced below , endowed with the borel @xmath49-algebra @xmath50 .
typical choices for the state space are represented by @xmath51 or combinations thereof , for some @xmath52 , where @xmath53 denotes the cone of symmetric @xmath54 positive semidefinite matrices . and @xmath55 , the scalar product is given by @xmath56 $ ] , with @xmath57 $ ] being the trace operator . ]    on a filtered probability space @xmath58 satisfying the usual conditions , we introduce a stochastic process @xmath59 , starting from an initial value @xmath60 belonging to the interior of @xmath48 .
the process @xmath61 is assumed to be an adapted , time - homogeneous and conservative markov process taking values in @xmath48 and we denote by @xmath62;t\in[0,{\mathbb{t}}]\}$ ] the family of its transition kernels . to the process @xmath61 we associate the sets @xmath63<+\infty ,   \text { for all } t\in[0,t]\bigr\ } \qquad\text { and } \qquad { \mathfrak{u}}:={\mathfrak{u}}_{\mathbb{t}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] letting @xmath64\times(v+{\ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}v ) : \zeta\in{\mathfrak{u}}_t\}$ ] , we define as follows the class of affine processes .
[ def : affine ] the markov process @xmath65 is said to be _ affine _ if    1 .
it is stochastically continuous , i.e. , the transition kernels satisfy @xmath66 weakly on @xmath48 , for every @xmath67\times d$ ] ; 2 .
its fourier - laplace transform has exponential affine dependence on the initial state , i.e. , there exist functions @xmath68 and @xmath69 such that , for every initial value @xmath70 and for every @xmath71 , it holds that @xmath72 = \int_de^{\langle u,\xi\rangle}p_t(x , d\xi)=e^{\phi(t , u)+\langle\psi(t , u),x\rangle}.\label{affineproperty}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    [ rem : convex_expmom ]    1 .   definition [ def : affine ] slightly differs from the usual definition of affine process where the exponential affine form is only assumed to hold on the set of bounded exponentials .
indeed , in most theoretical works the definition of affine process only refers to the characteristic function or laplace transform ( for processes with values in a cone ) .
then a natural question arises , namely if the exponential affine form can be extended beyond the characteristic function or laplace transform , in our notation to @xmath73 .
this important question has been answered positively in @xcite under general assumptions and , therefore , we modified the classical definition .
in particular , in view of  ( * ? ? ? * lemma 4.2 ) , it holds that @xmath74<+\infty\bigr\ } , \qquad\text { for all } t\in[0,{\mathbb{t}}].\ ] ] 2 .   at the expense of greater technicalities
, our setup can be extended to affine processes taking values in general ( possibly non - convex ) state spaces . however , the class of affine processes considered in definition [ def : affine ] is sufficiently rich to cover any affine multi - curve model of practical interest .
the affine property together with the chapman - kolmogorov equation implies that the functions @xmath75 and @xmath76 have the _
semiflow property _ , i.e. , for every @xmath77 and @xmath78 $ ] with @xmath79 , it holds that @xmath80 the stochastic continuity of the affine process @xmath61 also implies its _ regularity _ , according to ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 7 ) ( see also ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 4.3 ) in the case @xmath81 , for some @xmath82 , and ( * ? ? ?
* proposition 3.4 ) in the case @xmath83 ) , in the sense that the derivatives @xmath84 exist and are continuous at @xmath85 .
regularity implies that it is possible to differentiate the semiflow relations with respect to @xmath1 and evaluate them at @xmath86 , thus obtaining the following system of generalized riccati odes @xmath87
we state the following result ( see  ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 4.10 ) ) , which will be useful for some specifications of our setup .
we refer to  @xcite for the notion of differential characteristics of an affine process and we denote by @xmath88 and @xmath89 two real vector spaces .
[ mixedstate ] let @xmath90 be an affine process taking values in a state space of the form @xmath91 , with initial value @xmath92 and such that the differential characteristics of @xmath93 only depend on @xmath94 .
then there exist functions @xmath95 and @xmath96 such that , for every @xmath97 , it holds that @xmath98=e^{\tilde{\phi}(t , u_1,u_2)+\langle \tilde{\psi}(t , u_1,u_2),x^1\rangle+\langle u_2,x^2\rangle}.\ ] ]    typical examples where affine processes satisfying the assumptions of lemma [ mixedstate ] are employed are short rate models ( see section [ sec : short_rate ] ) and affine stochastic volatility models ( see , e.g. ,  ( * ? ? ?
* chapter 5 ) ) .      as explained in section  [ sec : abstract_setting ] , our general setup assumes the existence of a numraire - martingale measure couple @xmath36 , meaning that the @xmath37-discounted price of every traded asset is a @xmath33-martingale .
recall also that we consider as basic traded assets the ois zero - coupon bonds and the fra contracts , for all maturities @xmath19 $ ] and for a finite set of tenors @xmath4 , with @xmath5 , for some @xmath6 .
letting @xmath65 be an affine process taking values in a state space @xmath99 under a measure @xmath33 , we are now in a position to give the general definition of an _ affine multi - curve model_.    [ def : aff_model ] let @xmath100 be a family of functions @xmath101\rightarrow v$ ] , @xmath102 , such that @xmath103 and @xmath104 , for every @xmath16 and @xmath105 $ ] , and @xmath106 a family of functions @xmath107\rightarrow{\mathbb{r}}$ ] , @xmath102 .
we say that the triplet @xmath108 is an _ affine multi - curve model _ if    1 .
the logarithm of the numraire process @xmath109 satisfies @xmath110;\ ] ] 2 .
the logarithm of the spot multiplicative spreads @xmath111 satisfies @xmath112 \text { and } i=1,\ldots , m.\ ] ]    depending on the choice of the numraire - martingale measure couple @xmath36 and of the triplet @xmath108 , different modeling approaches can be obtained from the present general setup .
for instance :    * if the numraire asset @xmath37 is chosen to be the ois bank account , @xmath33 is the corresponding ( spot ) martingale measure and @xmath37 is modeled via an ois short rate @xmath113 , then definition [ def : aff_model ] embeds an affine framework for modeling the ois short rate and the multiplicative spreads .
this specification will be analyzed in detail in section [ sec : short_rate ] ( compare also with section [ sec : rel_short_rate ] ) ; * if the ois zero - coupon bond with maturity @xmath114 is chosen as numraire and @xmath33 is the @xmath114-forward measure , then definition [ def : aff_model ] yields an extension of the affine libor model with multiple curves recently introduced in @xcite ( see section [ sec : rel_affinelibor ] ) ; * if @xmath33 is the physical probability measure and @xmath37 is chosen as the _ growth - optimal portfolio _ ( in the spirit of the _ benchmark approach _ to interest rate modeling , see , e.g. ,  @xcite and , for a general account of the benchmark approach , @xcite ) or , more generally , as a _ state - price density _ ( as recently considered in the rational multi - curve models @xcite ) , then definition [ def : aff_model ] leads to a _ real - world _ approach to the modeling of multiple curves .
affine multi - curve models lead to a tractable structure for ois bond prices and multiplicative spreads .
more precisely , affine multi - curve models can be characterized via the exponentially affine form of ois bond prices and spreads . to this end , let us give the following definition .
[ def : qaffinemodel ] the affine process @xmath61 is said to _ generate exponentially affine ois bond prices and spreads _ if    1 .
the @xmath37-discounted prices of ois zero - coupon bonds satisfy @xmath115 for some functions @xmath116\times[0,{\mathbb{t}}]\rightarrow{\mathbb{r}}$ ] and @xmath117\times[0,{\mathbb{t}}]\rightarrow v$ ] , and 2 .
the multiplicative spreads satisfy @xmath118 for some functions @xmath119\times[0,{\mathbb{t}}]\rightarrow{\mathbb{r}}$ ] and @xmath120\times[0,{\mathbb{t}}]\rightarrow v$ ] , for all @xmath16 .
the following proposition provides the announced characterization of affine multi - curve models , thereby showing that definition [ def : aff_model ] is equivalent to definition [ def : qaffinemodel ] .
[ prop : qaffinecharacterization ] let @xmath61 be an affine process . then the following hold :    1 .
if @xmath108 is an affine multi - curve model , then @xmath61 generates exponentially affine ois bond prices and spreads and the functions @xmath121 , @xmath122 , @xmath102 , appearing in - are given by @xmath123 for all @xmath25 and @xmath16 , where @xmath75 and @xmath76 denote the characteristic exponents of @xmath61 as in definition [ def : affine ] ; 2 .
conversely , if @xmath61 generates exponentially affine ois bond prices and spreads , then @xmath108 is an affine multi - curve model , where the functions @xmath124 , @xmath102 , are given by @xmath125 for all @xmath105 $ ] and @xmath16 .
suppose first that @xmath108 is an affine multi - curve model .
then , in view of proposition [ prop : bonds_spreads ] , ois bond prices are given by @xmath126 = { \mathbb{e}}\left[e^{v_0(t)+\langle u_0(t),x_t\rangle}\bigr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right ] = e^{v_0(t)+\phi(t - t , u_0(t))+\langle\psi(t - t , u_0(t)),x_t\rangle},\ ] ] where the last equality follows from together with the assumption that @xmath127 ( see also remark [ rem : convex_expmom ] ) .
this proves that representation holds with the functions @xmath128 and @xmath129 being given as in .
similarly , proposition [ prop : bonds_spreads ] together with the assumption that @xmath130 , for every @xmath19 $ ] and @xmath16 , implies that the multiplicative spreads satisfy @xmath131 = { \mathbb{e}}^{{\mathbb{q}}^t}\left[e^{v_i(t)+\langle u_i(t),x_t\rangle}\bigr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right ]    \\ & = \frac{b_t}{b(t , t)}{\mathbb{e}}\left[e^{v_i(t)+v_0(t)+\langle u_i(t)+u_0(t),x_t\rangle}\bigr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right ]   \\ & = e^{v_i(t)+\phi(t - t , u_i(t)+u_0(t))-\phi(t - t , u_0(t))+\langle\psi(t - t , u_i(t)+u_0(t))-\psi(t - t , u_0(t)),x_t\rangle},\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus showing that representation holds with the functions @xmath121 and @xmath122 being given as in .
conversely , suppose that @xmath61 generates exponentially affine ois bond prices and spreads .
then , for every @xmath105 $ ] , letting @xmath132 in - and recalling that @xmath133 , it follows that @xmath134 defining the functions @xmath135 and @xmath136 as in , this proves that representations - hold true .
it remains to prove that @xmath137 and @xmath138 , for every @xmath19 $ ] and @xmath16 .
this follows from proposition [ prop : bonds_spreads ] , since @xmath139 & = e^{-v_0(t)}{\mathbb{e}}\left[\frac{1}{b_t}\right ] = e^{-v_0(t)}b(0,t ) < + \infty ,     \\ { \mathbb{e}}\left[e^{\langle u_i(t)+u_0(t),x_t\rangle}\right ] & = e^{-v_i(t)-v_0(t)}{\mathbb{e}}\left[\frac{s^{\delta_i}(t , t)}{b_t}\right ] = e^{-v_i(t)-v_0(t)}b(0,t){\mathbb{e}}^{{\mathbb{q}}^t}[s^{\delta_i}(t , t ) ]     \\ & = e^{-v_i(t)-v_0(t)}b(0,t)s^{\delta_i}(0,t )
< + \infty.\end{aligned}\ ] ] together with remark [ rem : convex_expmom ] , this implies that @xmath127 and @xmath130 , for all @xmath19 $ ] and @xmath16 , thus proving that @xmath108 is an affine multi - curve model .    in particular
, proposition [ prop : qaffinecharacterization ] implies that affine multi - curve models admit explicit valuation formulas for all linear interest rate derivatives ( i.e. , fra contracts , interest rate swaps , overnight swaps and basis swaps ) , since their prices can always be expressed in terms of ois bond prices and multiplicative spreads , as detailed in appendix  [ sec : noopt ] .    a major issue when modeling multiple curves consists in characterizing when the multiplicative spreads are greater than one and ordered with respect to the tenor s length , as it is the case in typical market scenarios .
to this effect , we can establish the following result ( compare also with  ( * ? ? ? * corollary  3.17 ) ) .
[ prop : x0y ] let @xmath108 be an affine multi - curve model .
suppose that the process @xmath61 is of the form @xmath140 and takes values in a state space @xmath141 , with @xmath142 a cone .
suppose that @xmath143 , for all @xmath105 $ ] and that the functions @xmath135 are of the form @xmath144 with @xmath145\rightarrow c_z^*$ ] , where @xmath146 denotes the dual cone of @xmath142 , for all @xmath16
. then @xmath147 for all @xmath148 and @xmath149 . moreover , if in addition @xmath150,\ ] ] with @xmath151 denoting the partial order on @xmath146 , then it holds that @xmath152    the assertion is a direct consequence of proposition [ prop : bonds_spreads ] , stating that the process @xmath153 is a @xmath40-martingale , for every @xmath16 and @xmath19 $ ] . it thus satisfies @xmath154={\mathbb{e}}^{{\mathbb{q}}^t}[e^{v_i(t ) + \langle w_i(t ) , z_t \rangle}|{\mathcal{f}}_t ] , \qquad \text { for all } t\in[0,{\mathbb{t}}].\ ] ]    besides the modeling flexibility and tractability ensured by affine processes , this facility of generating spreads which are greater than one and ordered with respect to the tenor s length represents one of the main advantages of specifying multiplicative spreads via  .
the family of functions @xmath106 appearing in definition [ def : aff_model ] can always be chosen in such a way to automatically achieve an exact fit to the initially observed term structures of ois bond prices and multiplicative spreads .
we denote by @xmath155 the price of an ois zero - coupon bond with maturity @xmath9 observed on the market at the initial date @xmath86 and , similarly , by @xmath156 the multiplicative spread of tenor @xmath13 observed on the market at @xmath86 , for @xmath16 and @xmath19 $ ] .
we say that _ an exact fit to the initially observed term structures is achieved _
if @xmath157 \text { and } i=1,\ldots , m.\ ] ] the following proposition provides a necessary and sufficient condition for an exact fit to hold .
if @xmath108 is an affine multi - curve model , we denote by @xmath158 and @xmath159 , for @xmath25 and @xmath16 , the theoretical bond prices and spreads computed according to the model @xmath160 via - , i.e. , with all the functions @xmath136 , @xmath102 , set equal to zero .
[ prop : fitting ] an affine multi - curve model @xmath108 achieves an exact fit to the initially observed term structures if and only if the family of functions @xmath106 satisfies @xmath161,\\ v_i(t ) & =   \log s^{m,\delta_i}(0,t ) - \log s^{0,\delta_i}(0,t ) , & \qquad & \text { for all } t\in[0,{\mathbb{t } } ] \text { and } i=1,\ldots , m,\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath162 and @xmath163 denoting the theoretical bond prices and spreads computed according to the affine multi - curve model @xmath160 via - , for @xmath105 $ ] and @xmath16 .
the claim follows by noting that , for all @xmath105 $ ] and @xmath16 , @xmath164 = e^{v_0(t)}{\mathbb{e}}[e^{\langle u_0(t),x_t\rangle } ] = e^{v_0(t)}b^0(0,t ) ,     \\
s^{\delta_i}(0,t ) & = { \mathbb{e}}^{{\mathbb{q}}^t}[s^{\delta_i}(t , t ) ] = e^{v_i(t)}{\mathbb{e}}^{{\mathbb{q}}^t}[e^{\langle u_i(t),x_t\rangle } ] = e^{v_i(t)}s^{0,\delta_i}(0,t),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last equality we used the fact that the density of the @xmath1-forward measure @xmath165 is the same for both models @xmath108 and @xmath160 . indeed , for every @xmath105 $ ] , it holds that @xmath166 } = \frac{e^{\langle u_0(t),x_t\rangle}}{{\mathbb{e}}[e^{\langle u_0(t),x_t\rangle } ] } = \frac{1}{b^0_tb^0(0,t)},\ ] ] with @xmath167 denoting the numraire process corresponding to the model @xmath160 .
we have so far introduced a general setup based on affine processes for modeling multiple curves .
as outlined in the previous subsection , depending on the choice of the numraire - martingale measure couple @xmath36 , different modeling approaches can be obtained from definition [ def : aff_model ] .
we now specialize the above general framework to a classical setting where the numraire is given by the ois bank account , defined with respect to the ( risk - free ) ois short rate process @xmath113 , and @xmath33 is the associated ( spot ) martingale measure .
more specifically , in this subsection we shall work under the following assumption .
[ ass : short_rate ] the numraire @xmath34 satisfies @xmath168 , for all @xmath105 $ ] , where @xmath113 is a real - valued adapted process denoting the ois short rate .
the probability measure @xmath33 is such that the @xmath37-discounted price of every basic traded asset is a @xmath33-martingale .    throughout this subsection ,
let @xmath65 be an affine process taking values in @xmath169 .
we also introduce the auxiliary affine process @xmath170 defined by @xmath171 , for @xmath105 $ ] , and taking values in @xmath172 .
the set @xmath173 is defined as in with respect to @xmath174 .
we specialize definition [ def : aff_model ] as follows .
[ def : short_rate_model ] let @xmath175 , @xmath176 \to \mathbb{r}$ ] such that @xmath177 , @xmath178 and @xmath179 a family of functions
@xmath180 \to \mathbb{r}$ ] , @xmath181 .
the tuple @xmath182 is said to be an _ affine short rate multi - curve model _ if @xmath183 is an affine multi - curve model in the sense of definition [ def : aff_model ] , where @xmath184 , \\
v_i(t ) & : = c_i(t ) & \text{and } \quad & u_i(t ) : = ( \gamma_i,0 ) , & \qquad&\text { for all } t\in[0,{\mathbb{t } } ] \text { and } i=1,\ldots , m.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    if assumption [ ass : short_rate ] holds , so that @xmath185 , assuming that a tuple @xmath182 is an affine short rate multi - curve model in the sense of definition [ def : short_rate_model ] is equivalent to letting the ois short rate @xmath186 and the spot multiplicative spreads @xmath12 be specified as follows : @xmath187 ,    \label{eq : short_rate_1}\\ \log s^{\delta_i}(t , t ) & = c_i(t ) + \langle\gamma_i , x_t\rangle ,   & \text { for all } & t\in[0,{\mathbb{t } } ] \text { and } i=1,\ldots , m .
\label{eq : short_rate_2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that definition [ def : short_rate_model ] implicitly requires ( via definition [ def : aff_model ] ) that the parameters @xmath188 and @xmath189 satisfy @xmath190 , for all @xmath102 , with @xmath191 .
if the function @xmath192 is chosen to be constant and @xmath193 and @xmath194 set to @xmath195 , definition [ def : short_rate_model ] reduces to a classical ( i.e. , single - curve ) time - homogeneous affine short rate model . by additionally allowing @xmath192 and
also @xmath193 to be deterministic functions we introduce a time - inhomogeneity which in turn enables a perfect fit to the initial term structures ( see proposition  [ prop : deterministicshiftcharacterization ] below ) . definition [ def : short_rate_model ] thus already incorporates _
deterministic shift extended models _
first introduced in  @xcite in the single - curve setting and recently taken up in  @xcite in the multi - curve setting ( cf . section  [ sec : rel_short_rate ] for the relation between  @xcite and the present setting ) .    in definition
[ def : short_rate_model ] , the ois bank account is specified via a short rate modeled as in . by analogy
, multiplicative spreads can also be specified via an instantaneous _ short spread rate _
, similarly as in ( * ? ? ?
* remark  3.19 ) . this can be achieved by letting the affine process @xmath61 be of the form @xmath196 , where @xmath197 is an affine process on some state space @xmath198 and @xmath199 , with @xmath200 being an affine function , for all @xmath16 .
the coefficients @xmath179 and @xmath189 are chosen as @xmath201 and @xmath202 , for all @xmath16 , with @xmath203 being the canonical basis of @xmath204 .
the spot multiplicative spreads admit then the representation @xmath205 \text { and } i=1,\ldots , m,\ ] ] where the process @xmath206 can be interpreted as a short spread rate , for @xmath16 .    similarly as in the case of general affine multi - curve models , affine
short rate multi - curve models admit an equivalent characterization in terms of the structure of ois bond prices and spreads .
more specifically , we can establish the following result , which specializes proposition [ prop : qaffinecharacterization ] .
let @xmath61 be an affine process and suppose that assumption [ ass : short_rate ] holds . then the following hold :    1 .
if @xmath182 is an affine short rate multi - curve model , then @xmath61 generates exponentially affine ois bond prices and spreads , in the sense that @xmath207 where the functions @xmath208 , @xmath209 , @xmath102 , are given by @xmath210 for all @xmath211 and @xmath16 , with @xmath212 and @xmath213 denoting the characteristic exponents of the affine process @xmath214 as in lemma [ mixedstate ] ; 2 .
conversely , if ois bond prices and spreads admit the representation for some functions @xmath208 , @xmath209 , @xmath102 , with @xmath215 and @xmath216 differentiable , for all @xmath105 $ ] , then @xmath182 is an affine short rate model , where , for all @xmath16 , @xmath217    noting that the affine process @xmath214 satisfies the assumptions of lemma [ mixedstate ] , part ( i ) easily follows from definition [ def : short_rate_model ] together with proposition [ prop : qaffinecharacterization ] .
conversely , if ois bond prices and spreads admit the representation with respect to some differentiable functions @xmath208 and @xmath209 , @xmath102 , then the instantaneous ois forward rate is given by @xmath218 so that the ois short rate @xmath186 satisfies @xmath219.\ ] ] representations - then follow by letting @xmath220 and @xmath221 , for all @xmath16 .
finally , the condition @xmath190 , for all @xmath102 , with @xmath191 , follows by the same arguments used in the last part of the proof of proposition [ prop : qaffinecharacterization ] .    in view of proposition
[ prop : x0y ] , multiplicative spreads greater than one and ordered with respect to the tenor s length can be easily generated by affine short rate multi - curve models .    in the current market environment , negative rates have been observed to coexist with spreads which are strictly greater than one and ordered with respect to the tenor s length .
this market scenario can be easily captured by letting the affine process @xmath61 be of the form @xmath140 and take value in a state space of the form @xmath222 , for some @xmath223 and where @xmath142 is a cone .
if @xmath192 takes values in @xmath224 , @xmath225 and the assumptions of proposition [ prop : x0y ] are satisfied , then spreads will be greater than one and ordered , while the ois short rate will not be restricted to positive values only .
similarly to proposition [ prop : fitting ] , we can obtain a necessary and sufficient condition to achieve an exact fit to the initially observed term structures .
let us denote by @xmath158 and @xmath159 the bond prices and spreads computed according to the model @xmath226 .
moreover , we denote by @xmath227 and @xmath228 the initially observed term structures of ois bond prices and spreads .
we also define the corresponding ois forward rates by @xmath229 the following result is a direct consequence of the above definitions together with proposition [ prop : fitting ] .    [
prop : deterministicshiftcharacterization ] suppose that assumption [ ass : short_rate ] holds .
then an affine short rate multi - curve model @xmath182 achieves an exact fit to the initially observed term structures if and only if @xmath230,\\ c_i(t ) & = \log s^{m,\delta_i}(0,t ) - \log s^{0,\delta_i}(0,t ) , & \qquad & \text { for all } t\in[0,{\mathbb{t } } ] \text { and } i=1,\ldots , m.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    in view of proposition  [ prop : deterministicshiftcharacterization ] , assuming that the spreads @xmath159 generated by the model @xmath226 are greater than one and ordered , it then easily follows that    1 .
for any @xmath231 , if @xmath232 , for all @xmath233 $ ] , then @xmath234 , for all @xmath25 ; 2 .   for any @xmath235 with @xmath236 ,
if @xmath237,\ ] ] then @xmath238 , for all @xmath25 .      in this section ,
we discuss how our setup relates to several multiple curve models based on affine processes that have been recently proposed in the literature .
we show that all the existing approaches we are aware of can be recovered as special cases of our framework .      as mentioned in the introduction , short rate models based on affine processes
have been proposed for modeling multiple curves , see @xcite .
a general framework encompassing all the models introduced in these papers has been recently provided in ( * ? ? ?
* chapter 2 ) . in that work ,
the authors assume that the numraire is given as usual by the ois bank account , modeled via a short rate @xmath113 , with a corresponding martingale measure @xmath33 .
considering for simplicity of presentation a single tenor @xmath3 , spot libor rates @xmath0 are then specified by @xmath239 where @xmath240 denotes the price at date @xmath1 of an artificial risky bond with maturity @xmath241 .
note that risky bonds are only introduced as a modeling tool , their riskiness being referred to the interbank market , and do not represent real traded assets .
by analogy to the short rate approach in a classical single - curve setting , ois bond prices and risky bond prices are assumed to be given by @xmath242 \quad\text { and } \quad b^{\delta}(t , t ) = \mathbb{e}\left[e^{-\int_t^t(r_u+s_u)du}\bigr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right],\ ] ] for all @xmath25 , where @xmath243 denotes an instantaneous spread . the ois short rate @xmath186 and the spread @xmath244 are modeled as affine functions of a common affine process @xmath65 taking values on some state space @xmath245 ( @xcite also consider the case of a wishart process @xmath61 and deterministic shift extensions , meaning that the constant part of the affine function is actually a deterministic function in time ) .
this framework can be regarded as a special case of our affine short rate setup introduced in section [ sec : short_rate ] .
indeed , it suffices to observe that in the present setting the spot multiplicative spreads can be represented as @xmath246}{\mathbb{e}\left[e^{-\int_t^{t+\delta}(r_u+s_u)du}\bigr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right ] } = c_{\delta}(t ) + \langle \gamma_{\delta},x_t\rangle,\ ] ] where @xmath247\rightarrow{\mathbb{r}}$ ] and @xmath248 are determined in terms of the characteristic exponents of @xmath61 and the specification of the affine functions for @xmath186 and @xmath244 .
this shows that representations - hold with respect to the underlying affine process @xmath61 .
similar considerations allow to recover the gaussian exponentially quadratic model recently proposed in  @xcite .
since our spot multiplicative spread is an observable quantity , unlike the instantaneous spread @xmath244 , it seems to us more natural to define affine short rate multi - curve models directly with respect to spot multiplicative spreads as in definition [ def : short_rate_model ] .
the general affine multi - curve setup of section [ sec : aff_model ] allows to recover a generalization of the model recently introduced in @xcite , which extends to a multi - curve setting the affine libor model originally proposed in @xcite . in this setting ,
the numraire - martingale measure couple @xmath249 is given by the ois zero - coupon bond with maturity @xmath114 and the corresponding @xmath114-forward measure , i.e. , @xmath250 .
we explicitly indicate this measure in the expectations below . as in section
[ sec : aff_model ] , consider an affine process @xmath251 ( under @xmath252 ) taking values in @xmath253 and denote by @xmath254 the @xmath252-martingale defined by @xmath255 $ ] , for @xmath105 $ ]
.    for each tenor @xmath3 traded in the market , @xcite consider a finite collection of ordered maturities @xmath256 . for any tenor @xmath3 and @xmath257 , the multiplicative spread @xmath258 is given by @xmath259,\ ] ] where @xmath260 is a sequence in @xmath261 such that @xmath262 , for all @xmath263 , in order to ensure non - negative ois forward rates , and @xmath264 is a sequence in @xmath261 such that @xmath265 , for all @xmath263 , in order to ensure that spreads are greater than one .    by its own nature , the model of @xcite is formulated with respect to a finite collection of maturities .
however , a continuous extension can be obtained by considering a function @xmath266\rightarrow{\mathfrak{u}}$ ] such that @xmath267 and a function @xmath268\times \mathbb{r}_+ \rightarrow{\mathfrak{u}}$ ] such that @xmath269 , for all @xmath263 and @xmath3 .
the idea of a continuous extension first appeared ( in a single - curve setting ) in the unpublished note  @xcite and , after the appearance of the present paper , has been further developed in the multi - curve setting in  @xcite . in analogy to (
* section 6 ) , let ois bond prices be given as follows : @xmath270 with @xmath271 $ ] . in line with equation , we then model @xmath272 by @xmath273 with @xmath274 $ ] . observe that , in order to ensure that @xmath275 , for all @xmath25 and @xmath3 , it suffices to require that @xmath276 for all @xmath19 $ ] and @xmath3 .
similarly , order relations among multiplicative spreads @xmath272 associated to different tenors can be obtained by imposing suitable requirements on the function @xmath277 .
recalling that @xmath133 , for all @xmath105 $ ] , representation together with the affine property of @xmath61 implies that the numraire process satisfies @xmath278,\ ] ] where @xmath75 and @xmath76 denote the characteristic exponents of @xmath61 .
similarly , representation implies that the spot multiplicative spreads satisfy , for all @xmath105 $ ] and @xmath3 , @xmath279 the model - thus represents a special case of our general affine multi - curve framework .
indeed , representations - follow by letting , for all @xmath105 $ ] and @xmath16 , @xmath280 moreover , in view of ( * ? ? ?
* lemma 4.3 ) , it holds that @xmath127 and @xmath130 , for all @xmath19 $ ] and @xmath16 , thus showing that this version of the affine libor model with multiple curves can be recovered as a special case of definition [ def : aff_model ] .    in our view , our general framework presents significant advantages with respect to the model of @xcite , not only due to the flexibility in the choice of the numraire - martingale measure couple and of affine processes on general convex state spaces .
indeed , even under the assumption that the couple @xmath36 is specified in terms of the ois bond with maturity @xmath114 together with the corresponding @xmath114-forward measure as above , our definition [ def : aff_model ] allows for greater generality .
this can be seen by noting that , given a family of functions @xmath281 as in definition [ def : aff_model ] , it is not always possible to find a couple of functions @xmath282\times[0,{\mathbb{t}}]\times{\mathbb{r}}_+\rightarrow{\mathfrak{u}}\times{\mathfrak{u}}$ ] such that holds . moreover , as shown in proposition [ prop : fitting ] , our specification - always allows for an automatic fit to the initially observed term structures .
in contrast , in @xcite this is only possible under some conditions , notably that the initial ois term structure is decreasing with respect to maturity together with the finiteness of suitable exponential moments of the driving process .
furthermore , while in our specification the initial term structures univocally determine the family of functions @xmath283 , in  @xcite this is not the case , so that all model parameters have to be jointly determined by fitting the initial term structures and by calibration to market data .
multi - curve models based on affine processes have been briefly mentioned in ( * ? ? ?
* section 5.3 ) as a simple example of _ hjm - type multiple yield curve models_. the affine specification proposed in @xcite represents a special case of the general setup developed in the present paper .
indeed , an affine multi - curve model in the sense of definition  [ def : aff_model ] belongs to the family of risk neutral hjm - type multiple yield curve models considered in @xcite only if @xmath284 is absolutely continuous .
more specifically , the affine specification considered in @xcite ( see ( * ? ? ?
* definition 5.3 ) ) represents a special case of our  definition [ def : short_rate_model ] when @xmath192 and @xmath193 are chosen to be constant .
for clarity of notation , let us denote all the ingredients appearing in  ( * ? ? ?
* definition 5.3 ) with fractur letters .
then  ( * ? ? ?
* definition 5.3 ) can be embedded into definition  [ def : short_rate_model ] by setting @xmath285 , @xmath286 and @xmath287 , for all @xmath181 .
conversely , in the special case where @xmath192 and @xmath193 are constant , definition  [ def : short_rate_model ] can be embedded into  ( * ? ? ?
* definition 5.3 ) by letting @xmath288 , @xmath289 , @xmath290 and @xmath291 , for all @xmath292 and @xmath16 .
we now show that affine multi - curve models , in the sense of definition  [ def : aff_model ] , lead to tractable general valuation formulae for caplets and swaptions .
we compute _ clean prices _ and follow the pricing approach outlined in  ( * ? ? ?
* appendix a ) , in particular assuming that the collateral account is given by the numraire asset . for simplicity of presentation
, we shall consider a fixed maturity @xmath293 and assume that @xmath108 is an affine multi - curve model in the sense of definition  [ def : aff_model ] .
in the present affine setting , caplets can be easily priced by means of fourier techniques . as a preliminary ,
let @xmath294 and define the stochastic process @xmath295}$ ] by @xmath296 where the second equality follows from proposition  [ prop : qaffinecharacterization ] .
we denote by @xmath297 the set @xmath298<+\infty\right\}^{\circ},\ ] ] and introduce the strip of complex numbers @xmath299 . for @xmath300 , we can compute the following expectation , which we call _ modified moment generating function _ of @xmath301 : @xmath302}\\ & = \exp((1- { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta)(v_0(t+\delta_i)+\phi(\delta_i , u_0(t+\delta_i)))+ { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta(v_i(t)+v_0(t)))\\ & \quad \times{\mathbb{e}^{}\left[\left.e^{\langle ( 1- { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta ) \psi(\delta_i , u_0(t+\delta_i))+   { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta ( u_i(t)+ u_0(t ) ) , x_t\rangle}\right|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right]}\\ & = \exp((1- { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta)(v_0(t+\delta_i)+\phi(\delta_i , u_0(t+\delta_i)))+ { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta(v_i(t)+v_0(t)))\\ & \quad \times \exp(\phi(t - t , ( 1- { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta ) \psi(\delta_i , u_0(t+\delta_i))+   { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta ( u_i(t)+ u_0(t))))\\ & \quad \times \exp(\langle\psi(t - t , ( 1- { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta ) \psi(\delta_i , u_0(t+\delta_i))+   { \ensuremath{\mathsf{i}}}\zeta ( u_i(t)+ u_0(t))),x_t\rangle ) .
\label{cfchi } \end{split}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    in the case of an affine short rate multi - curve model as of definition  [ def : short_rate_model ] , expression becomes @xmath303 similarly , expression becomes @xmath304    the sets @xmath297 and @xmath305 depend on the specific choice of the driving process @xmath61 . by relying on  (
* theorem 5.1 ) , we now provide a general caplet pricing formula , which is valid for any choice of the underlying affine process @xmath61 and for different choices of the contour of integration .
in particular , the next result highlights the tractability of our framework : caplets can be priced by means of univariate fourier integrals . in turn
, this implies that a calibration may be obtained with a reasonable amount of computational effort ( which may be further reduced by means of an application of an fft algorithm ) .
[ prop : capletbasicaffine ] let @xmath306 , @xmath307 , @xmath308 and assume that @xmath309 .
then the price at date @xmath1 of a caplet with notional @xmath310 , reset date @xmath9 and payoff @xmath311 at the settlement date @xmath23 is given by @xmath312 where @xmath313 is given in and @xmath314 is given by @xmath315    as shown in appendix  [ sec : option ] , the price of a caplet can be expressed as @xmath316}\\ & = n\,{\mathbb{e}^{}\left[\left.\frac{b_t}{b_t}b(t , t+\delta_i)\left(s^{\delta_i}(t , t)b(t , t+\delta_i)^{-1}-(1+\delta_i k)\right)^+\right|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right]}\\ & = n\,{\mathbb{e}^{}\left[\left.\frac{b_t}{b_t}b(t , t+\delta_i)\left(e^{\mathcal{y}_t}-(1+\delta_i k)\right)^+\right|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right]}\end{aligned}\ ] ] since the modified moment generating function of @xmath301 can be explicitly computed as in , the pricing of a caplet is thus reduced to the pricing of a call option written on an asset whose characteristic function is explicitly known . at this point , a direct application of ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 5.1 ) yields the result .
note that , in the terminology of ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 5.1 ) , the present case corresponds to @xmath317 and @xmath318 , which is an element of @xmath297 by definition  [ def : aff_model ] .      in the present general setting , swaptions do not admit a closed - form pricing formula .
indeed , on the one side , we consider general multi - factor models , so that the  jamshidian trick " ( see @xcite ) is not applicable ; on the other side , in a multiple curve setting , a payer ( resp .
receiver ) swaption can not be represented as a put ( resp .
call ) option on a coupon bond . in this subsection , by relying on fourier methods and along the lines of @xcite , we provide a general analytical approximation which exploits the affine property of our framework .
we work in the general setting of section  [ sec : aff_model ] , noting that all formulas admit suitable simplifications in the case of affine short - rate multi - curve models .
we consider a european payer swaption with maturity @xmath9 , written on a ( payer ) interest rate swap starting at @xmath319 , with payment dates @xmath320 , with @xmath321 for @xmath322 and @xmath294 , with notional @xmath310 .
as shown in appendix  [ sec : option ] , the value of such a claim at date @xmath1 is given by @xmath323.\ ] ] the general idea underlying our approximation consists in approximating the exercise region by an event defined in terms of an affine function of @xmath324 .
more specifically , we have that @xmath325\\ & \geq n\mathbb{e}^{}\left[\frac{b_t}{b_t}\left(\sum_{j=1}^{{\mathcal{n}}}b(t , t_{j-1})s^{\delta_i}(t , t_{j-1})-(1+\delta_i k)b(t , t_j)\right){\mathbf{1}}_{\mathcal{g}}\biggr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right]\\ & = : \widetilde{\pi}^{swptn}(\alpha , \beta),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath326 and @xmath327 .
let us simplify the notation by introducing @xmath328 so that , in view of proposition [ prop : qaffinecharacterization ] , @xmath329 admits the representation @xmath330.\end{aligned}\ ] ] recall from definition  [ def : aff_model ] that @xmath130 , so that @xmath331 and @xmath332 are well - defined . as shown in the following proposition ,
the quantity @xmath333 can be explicitly computed , analogously to proposition [ prop : capletbasicaffine ] .
[ prop : swaptionbasicaffine ] assume @xmath334 @xmath335 .
let @xmath307 such that @xmath336 , @xmath335 .
then the lower bound in terms of @xmath337 for a payer swaption with notional @xmath310 , maturity @xmath9 , payment dates @xmath338 , with @xmath321 for all @xmath322 is given by @xmath339\right)d\zeta\big ) ,    \end{aligned } \label{eq : swaptionapproxgeneral}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath340 is given by @xmath341 , & \mbox{if } \epsilon<0 , \\
\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{e}\left[e^{v_0(t_l)+v_{i , j}(t_l)+\phi(t_l - t , u_{i , j}(t_l)+u_0(t_l))+\langle \psi(t_l - t , u_{i , j}(t_l)+u_0(t_l ) ) , x_t\rangle}\biggr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right],&\mbox{if } \epsilon = 0,\\      0,&\mbox{if } \epsilon > 0 .
\end{cases}\ ] ]    the claim is a direct consequence of ( * ? ? ?
* theorem  5.1 ) , noting that each summand appearing in corresponds in the notation of @xcite to the case @xmath342 , @xmath343 , @xmath344 and @xmath345 .
proposition [ prop : swaptionbasicaffine ] gives a general lower bound for the price of a swaption , parameterized in terms of @xmath346 .
these parameters should be determined in such a way that the lower bound becomes as tight as possible , while at the same time ensuring the finiteness of suitable exponential moments of @xmath324 .
as pointed out in @xcite , to which we refer for more details on the numerical implementation , the values of @xmath346 can be chosen in two ways :    1 .   by maximizing with respect to @xmath347 , thus providing the lower bound @xmath348 note that this solution can be computationally demanding , especially for highly dimensional models . moreover , for a given choice of @xmath349 , the optimization procedure should be constrained in order to ensure the finiteness of joint exponential moments of @xmath324 .
2 .   by considering hyperplane - like
approximations and predetermining the best possible values of @xmath347 ( the well - known singleton - umantsev approximation constitutes an example in this sense , see @xcite and compare also with @xcite ) .
for notational simplicity we consider here the case of one single tenor @xmath350 and suppose that the driving process @xmath61 is a wishart process on @xmath351 with state space @xmath352 of the form @xmath353 where @xmath354 is @xmath355 matrix of brownian motions , @xmath356 and @xmath357 are @xmath358 matrices .
the particular appealing feature of wishart processes is stochastic correlation between the nonnegative diagonal elements of the matrix . on the classical canonical state space @xmath359
this property can not be achieved for positive factors .
this possibility is however a crucial ingredient when it comes to modeling spreads which are highly correlated .
we consider an affine short rate multi - curve model as of section  [ sec : short_rate ] with short rate @xmath360 and spread @xmath361 , where @xmath362 and @xmath363 to guarantee positivity of the spreads .
recall that the scalar product @xmath364 is here the trace .    by choosing @xmath188 and @xmath365 to be diagonal matrices ,
the above model represents a natural extension of the classical cir model to the multi - curve setting since the diagonal elements of a wishart process are stochastically correlated cir processes .
the goal of this section is to study the pricing of caps for this particular model . as shown in section  [ sec : option ] , the price of a caplet with unitary notional can be computed via @xmath366\\ & \quad -(1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\mathbb{q}^{t+\delta}\left[s^{\delta}(t , t)\geq ( 1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\ , |\ ,   \mathcal{f}_t\right ] , \end{split}\ ] ] where the probability measure @xmath367 is defined via @xmath368 in the case of the above introduced model , it can be easily shown that the process @xmath61 follows under both measures @xmath369 and @xmath370 a non - central wishart distribution with time dependent parameters , which is stated in lemma  [ lem : newwish ] below . as the density is ( up to the solution of odes )
explicitly known , this allows obtaining ( semi-)analytical pricing formulas for caplets , similarly as in the cir model . as a preliminary ,
let us introduce the following definition , in line with  ( * ? ? ?
* definition a.4 ) .
suppose that @xmath356 , @xmath371 and @xmath372 is a @xmath355 matrix such that @xmath373 is symmetric positive semidefinite .
a symmetric positive definite random matrix @xmath374 is said to be _ non - centrally wishart distributed _ with @xmath375 degrees of freedom , covariance matrix @xmath376 , and matrix of non - centrality parameter @xmath372 , if its laplace transform satisfies @xmath377=\det(i_d-2
u\sigma)^{-\frac{\delta}{2}}e^{- \langle u(i_d+2u\sigma)^{-1},\sigma\theta\rangle}.\ ] ] in this case , we write @xmath378 .
[ lem : newwish ] let @xmath61 be a wishart process of the form   under @xmath39 .    1 .   under @xmath369 , @xmath324 has a non - central wishart distribution @xmath379 where @xmath380 and @xmath381 are solutions of the following system of ordinary differential equations @xmath382 where @xmath212 and @xmath213 denote the characteristic exponents of the process @xmath383 .
the solution of   is explicitly given by @xmath384 with @xmath385 .
2 .   under @xmath370 , @xmath324 has a non - central wishart distribution @xmath386 , where @xmath387 and @xmath388 are solutions of the following system of ordinary differential equations @xmath389 where @xmath212 and @xmath213 denote the characteristic exponents of the process @xmath383 . the solution of   is explicitly given as above .
concerning ( i ) , note that the density process @xmath390 of @xmath391 is given by @xmath392=   \frac{1}{s^{\delta}(0,t ) b(0,t)}\mathbb{e}\left[\frac{s^{\delta}(t , t ) b(t , t)}{b_t } \big| \mathcal{f}_t\right]\\   & = \frac{1}{s^{\delta}(0,t ) b(0,t)}\mathbb{e}\left[e^{c(t)+\langle \gamma , x_{t}\rangle-\int_0^t \ell(s)ds-\langle\lambda , \int_0^t x_{s}ds\rangle } \big| \mathcal{f}_t\right]\\   & = \frac{1}{s^{\delta}(0,t ) b(0,t)}\exp\left(c(t)-\int_0^t \ell(s)ds+\tilde{\phi}\left(t - t , \gamma,-\lambda \right)+\left\langle\tilde{\psi}\left(t - t , \gamma , -\lambda\right ) , x_t\right\rangle-\langle \lambda , \int_0^t x_{s}ds\rangle\right),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath212 and @xmath393 denote the characteristic exponents of @xmath383 .
note that the diffusion part of @xmath394 is given by @xmath395 so that we can write @xmath396 by girsanov s theorem , under the measure @xmath397 , the linear drift of @xmath61 changes to @xmath398 so that @xmath61 becomes a wishart process with time - varying linear drift under @xmath369 . according to  (
* proposition a.6 ) , @xmath324 has a noncentral wishart distribution @xmath399 , where @xmath380 and @xmath381 are solutions of  . concerning ( ii ) , we have for the density process of @xmath400 @xmath401&=\frac{b(t , t)}{b_t b(0,t)}\\   & = \frac{1}{b(0,t)}\exp\left(-\int_0^t \ell(u)du+\tilde{\phi}\left(t - t , 0 , -\lambda \right)+\left\langle\tilde{\psi}\left(t - t , 0,-\lambda\right ) , x_t\right\rangle-\langle \lambda , \int_0^t x_{s}ds\rangle \right).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the assertion then follows similarly as for @xmath369 .      in view of
, we focus here on the computation of @xmath402 \qquad\text{and}\qquad \mathbb{q}^{t+\delta}\left[s^{\delta}(t , t)\geq ( 1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\right].\ ] ] by the specification of our model , the first of the two quantities above becomes @xmath403\ ] ] and similarly for the @xmath370-probability .
it thus amounts to compute expressions of the type @xmath404,\ ] ] for some matrix @xmath405 ( note that @xmath406 can be symmetrized to lie in @xmath407 ) and some constant @xmath408 .
the following proposition relates linear combination of elements of non - centrally wishart distributed matrices with @xmath409-distributed random variables .
[ prop : chisquare ] let @xmath410 with @xmath411 .
then @xmath412 where @xmath413 are the eigenvalues of @xmath414 and @xmath415 are independent random variables with @xmath416 ,
where @xmath417    by  ( * ? ?
* proposition 6 ) , @xmath61 has the same distribution as @xmath418 where @xmath419 . therefore @xmath420 where @xmath421 .
let us now compute the moment generating function of @xmath422 , which is given by ( see , e.g. ,  ( * ? ? ? * proposition a.5 ) ) @xmath423=\prod_{i=1}^d(1 - 2u\lambda_i)^{-\frac{\kappa}{2}}e^{\frac{u\lambda_iy_{ii}}{1 - 2u\lambda_i}}.\ ] ] however , this corresponds to the moment generating function of @xmath424 , where @xmath425 are independent random variables .
indeed , it holds that @xmath426=\prod_{i=1}^d\mathbb{e}\left[e^{u \lambda_i v_{i}}\right ] = \prod_{i=1}^d(1 - 2u\lambda_i)^{-\frac{\kappa}{2}}e^{\frac{u\lambda_iy_{ii}}{1 - 2\lambda_iu}}.\ ] ] this proves that @xmath427 . since @xmath428 ,
the assertion is proved .
[ cor : wish ] let @xmath405 and @xmath61 a wishart process of form  .
then under @xmath370 it holds that @xmath429 where @xmath430 are the eigenvalues of @xmath431 and @xmath432 are independent random variables with @xmath433 , where @xmath434 and @xmath435 and @xmath436 are given in lemma  [ lem : newwish ] .
the same assertion holds for @xmath437 with @xmath435 and @xmath436 replaced by @xmath438 and @xmath439 .
the assertion is a direct consequence of lemma  [ lem : newwish ] and proposition  [ prop : chisquare ] .      finally , by relying on the above results , we are ready to give a ( semi-)analytical formula for the price of a caplet in the above wishart model .
let @xmath61 be a wishart process of the form  .
consider an affine short rate multi - curve model with    * ois short rate @xmath440 , for all @xmath441 $ ] and * logarithmic multiplicative spreads @xmath442 , for all @xmath441 $ ] .
then the price of a caplet at date @xmath195 with unitary notional , reset date @xmath9 and payoff @xmath443 at the settlement date @xmath444 , is given by @xmath445 where    * the constant @xmath446 is given by @xmath447 with @xmath448 being the constant part in the characteristic exponent of @xmath449 , and * @xmath450 and @xmath451 denote the cumulative distribution functions of a weighted sum of non - centrally @xmath409-distributed random variables corresponding to @xmath452 and @xmath453 as of corollary  [ cor : wish ] for @xmath369 and @xmath370 with @xmath454 and @xmath455 the constant part in the characteristic exponent of @xmath449 .
the assertion is a consequence of equation   together with corollary  [ cor : wish ] .    in order to practically implement the pricing formula  ,
the following steps are necessary :    * compute @xmath455 and integrate it over the interval @xmath456 $ ] to obtain @xmath457 ; * compute the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of @xmath458 and @xmath459 with @xmath454 to get the weights @xmath460 and the non - centrality parameters @xmath461 ; * compute @xmath446 as given in   and the distribution function of a positive weighted sum of two independent non - centrally @xmath409-distributed random variables , e.g. , via a laguerre series expansions ( see  @xcite ) of the form @xmath462 where @xmath463 is a function depending on @xmath464 and @xmath465 are the coefficients ( depending on @xmath466 ) of the laguerre polynomials @xmath467 ( evaluated at @xmath468 where @xmath469 denotes a constant ) . for an alternative computation based on fourier inversion
we refer to @xcite .
note that the weights @xmath460 and the non - centrality parameters @xmath470 depend on the maturity ( the degrees of freedom @xmath375 are constant ) while the arguments @xmath446 in the distribution function depend additionally on the strike . in the case where @xmath192 and @xmath471 are constants
, @xmath408 only depends on @xmath27 and we write only @xmath472 . in this case
the matrix @xmath473 for different maturities and strikes needed for calibration purposes can be obtained by a matrix product @xmath474 where @xmath475 and @xmath476 are defined by @xmath477 provided the initial term structure of spreads and bonds is known , this procedure then gives the prices for all maturities and strike rates .
in this section , we discuss the calibration of two simple specifications of our general framework to cap / floor market data .
this section aims at illustrating the practical feasibility of the proposed approach and it is not meant to suggest a particular specification of the framework .
the first specification is based on a cir - gamma model , while the second specification is driven by a wishart process , as presented in section  [ sec : wishart ] . in particular , this represents the first instance of calibration of a wishart short rate model in the multi - curve framework . moreover , we complement our results with a parameter stability analysis in the case of the cir - gamma model , showing a satisfactory degree of stability .
we refer to @xcite for calibration results based on swaption data and to @xcite for a calibration approach which relies on atm european swaption and cap quotes .
let us start by briefly describing our market data sample .
we initially consider a fixed trading date , namely august @xmath478 , 2011 .
the data sample consists of a cross section of market quotes ( corresponding to perfectly collateralized transactions ) of linear and non - linear interest rate derivatives .
as far as linear products are concerned , we consider market data for overnight indexed swaps and interest rate swaps . on the basis of these market quotes ,
we construct the ois discount curve @xmath479 and the forward curves @xmath480 , for @xmath481 and @xmath482 .
this has been performed by relying on the finmath java library ( see @xcite ) .
concerning non - linear interest rate products , the market practice consists in posting a cap / floor composite surface : when the strike price is below the at - the - money ( atm ) level , quotes refer to out - of - the - money ( otm ) floors , whereas if the strike is above atm , quotes refer to otm caps . in this way
, the whole surface is constructed from liquidly traded otm options . by relying on the put - call parity between caps and floors
, we can however treat all implied volatilities as cap volatilities . to reduce the complexity of the calibration
, it is convenient to construct a caplet implied volatility surface , suitably bootstrapped from cap implied volatility data .
the surface refers to strike prices ranging between @xmath483 and @xmath484 and maturities between @xmath485 months and @xmath486 years . in the market , caps with maturity larger than two years are indexed to the @xmath485-month forward rate while those with lower expiry are linked to the @xmath487-month curve .
a normal implied volatility is obtained by numerically searching for the value of @xmath488 ( where @xmath310 stands for normal ) such that the bachelier pricing formula for a caplet @xmath489}\\ & = b(t , t_i)\delta\sigma_n\sqrt{t_{i-1}-t}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{z^2}{2}}+zn(z)\right),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath490 best fits the market price of a given caplet .
we now provide a detailed description of the implementation of proposition  [ prop : capletbasicaffine ] , by means of the fft algorithm ( see @xcite ) . in the present discussion , we express the integration variable as @xmath491 .
let also @xmath492 and @xmath493 the integral term appearing in can then be written as @xmath494 we perform a first approximation by introducing a trapezoidal rule of the form @xmath495 , so that the effective upper limit of integration is given by @xmath496 . as we want to perform a simultaneous evaluation of the integral term for a grid of strike prices
, we also introduce a grid for @xmath263 of the form @xmath497 , which gives a mesh covering the interval @xmath498 , with @xmath499 .
since we want to apply the fft algorithm , we need to impose the nyquist condition , meaning that we set @xmath500 , thus introducing a tradeoff between the accuracy of the log - strike and integration grids .
as suggested by @xcite , we introduce the weights of the simpson rule , in order to obtain a satisfactory accuracy even for large values of @xmath501 . in summary , the integral term ( along a grid of log - strikes )
is approximated via @xmath502,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath503 denotes a kronecker delta function which is @xmath504 for @xmath505 and zero otherwise .
formula can be computed by a direct application of the fft algorithm . in our analysis
, we set @xmath506 and @xmath507 .    for a given vector of model parameters @xmath508 , belonging to the set of admissible parameters @xmath509 , we compute caplet prices using the above methodology and convert them into model implied normal volatilities , that we denote by @xmath510 .
the aim of the calibration procedure is to solve @xmath511 where @xmath512 denotes the market - observed implied volatilities and @xmath513 the euclidean norm .      in the following , we illustrate two candidate specifications along with their calibration results .
note that both models allow for a perfect fit to the observed term structures via a suitable choice of the functions @xmath192 and @xmath471 in line with proposition  [ prop : deterministicshiftcharacterization ] .
we first calibrate the following model consisting of a two - dimensional process @xmath90 of the form @xmath514 where @xmath515 , @xmath354 is a brownian motion and @xmath93 is a gamma process with compensating jump measure @xmath516 , with @xmath517 .
the short rate is specified as @xmath518 and the spreads are of the form @xmath519 , @xmath520 , with @xmath521 and @xmath522\rightarrow{\mathbb{r}}$ ] .
table  [ table : cir - vgparams ] reports the calibrated model parameters while figure  [ fig : calibrationerrorsdataset08022011 ] illustrates the quality of the fit in terms of prices and implied volatilities .
more precisely , the left panel shows the squared error in price while the right panel illustrates the squared error in implied volatilities . despite its simplicity , the model achieves a reasonably good fit to the observed market quotes .
looking at squared error in implied volatilities , we observe that the quality of the fit is lower for higher strikes and for the first maturity we considered ( 6 months ) .
however , the quality of the fit is acceptable as can be seen by looking at the left panel of figure  [ fig : calibrationerrorsdataset08022011 ] , which highlights that the squared error in price in the @xmath485-month maturity and deep otm region is low . observe that the calibrated parameters satisfy @xmath523 , reflecting the fact that @xmath485-month rates embed a higher degree of interbank risk with respect to @xmath487-month rates .
this was achieved without imposing a priori constraints in the optimization algorithm .
note also that the computational complexity of the procedure is at the same level of a calibration of a standard affine stochastic volatility model for equities .
.calibration result for the cir - gamma model .
resnorm represents the sum of squared distances between market and model implied volatilites.[table : cir - vgparams ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ]
this appendix presents general pricing formulas for typical interest rate derivatives . as we are going to show
, the quantity @xmath272 plays a pivotal role in the valuation of interest rate products .
we here derive clean prices in the spirit of  ( * ? ? ? * appendix a ) , assuming perfect collateralization with the collateral asset being equal to the numraire .
the prices of linear interest rate products ( i.e. , without optionality features ) can be directly expressed in terms of the basic quantities @xmath8 and @xmath272
. + _ forward rate agreement . _ + a forward rate agreement ( fra ) starting at @xmath9 , with maturity @xmath444 , fixed rate @xmath27 and notional @xmath310 is a contract which pays at time @xmath444 the amount @xmath524 the value of such a claim at time @xmath525 is @xmath526}\\ & = n\bigl(b(t , t)s^{\delta}(t , t)-b(t , t+\delta)(1+\delta k)\bigr ) .
\end{split}\ ] ]    _ overnight indexed swap . _ + an overnight indexed swap ( ois ) is a contract where two counterparties exchange two streams of payments : the first one is computed with respect to a fixed rate @xmath27 , whereas the second one is indexed by an overnight rate ( eonia ) .
let us denote by @xmath527 the payment dates , with @xmath528 for all @xmath529 .
the swap is initiated at @xmath530 .
the value of an ois at @xmath531 with notional @xmath310 can be expressed as ( see e.g.  ( * ? ? ?
* section 2.5 ) ) @xmath532 therefore , the ois rate @xmath533 , which is by definition the value for @xmath27 such that the ois contract has zero value at inception , is given by @xmath534    _ interest rate swap .
_ + in an interest rate swap ( irs ) , two streams of payments are exchanged between two counterparties : the first cash flow is computed with respect to a fixed rate @xmath27 , whereas the second one is indexed by the libor rate . the value of the irs at time @xmath531 , where @xmath535 denotes the inception time , is given by @xmath536 the swap rate @xmath537 , which is by definition the value for @xmath27 such that the contract has zero value at inception , is given by @xmath538    _ basis swap . _ + a basis swap is a special type of interest rate swap where two cash flows related to libor rates associated to different tenors are exchanged between two counterparties . for instance , a typical basis swap may involve the exchange of the 3-month against the 6-month libor rate .
following the standard convention for the definition of a basis swap in the euro market ( see  @xcite ) , the basis swap is equivalent to a long / short position on two different interest rate swaps which share the same fixed leg .
let @xmath539 , @xmath540 and @xmath541 , with @xmath542 , @xmath543 , @xmath544 and corresponding tenor lengths @xmath545 , with no constraints on @xmath546 . the first two tenor structures on the one side and the third on the other are associated to the two floating and to the single fixed leg , respectively .
we denote by @xmath310 the notional of the swap , which is initiated at time @xmath547 . the value at time @xmath548 is given by @xmath549 the value @xmath550 ( called _ basis swap spread _ ) such that the value of the contract at initiation is zero is then given by @xmath551 note that , prior to the financial crisis , the value of @xmath550 used to be ( approximately ) zero .
in this section , we report general valuation formulas for plain vanilla interest rate products such as ( european ) caplets and swaptions . _ caplet . _ + the price at time @xmath1 of a caplet with strike price @xmath27 , maturity @xmath9 , settled in arrears at @xmath444 , is given by @xmath552}\notag\\ & = n{\mathbb{e}^{}\left[\left.\frac{b_t}{b_t}\bigl(s^{\delta}(t , t)-(1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\bigr)^+\right|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right ] } \label{eq : caplet_gen}.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    note that , in the classical single - curve setting ( i.e. , under the assumption that @xmath553 is identically equal to one ) , the valuation formula reduces to the classical relationship between a caplet and a put option on a zero - coupon bond with strike @xmath554 .    from  , we see that the payoff of a caplet at time @xmath9 and notional @xmath555 corresponds to @xmath556 let us now introduce the following probability measure on @xmath557 : @xmath368 note that @xmath558 and @xmath559=1 $ ] , since @xmath560 is a @xmath39-martingale by proposition  [ prop : bonds_spreads ] . by bayes formula , we therefore have @xmath561=s^{\delta}(t , t)b(t , t)\mathbb{e}^{\widetilde{\mathbb{q}}}\left[1_{\{s^{\delta}(t , t)\geq
( 1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\}}\ , \bigr| \ , \mathcal{f}_t\right].\ ] ] similarly , we obtain @xmath562\\=(1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\mathbb{e}^{\mathbb{q}^{t+\delta}}\left[1_{\{s^{\delta}(t , t)\geq ( 1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\}}\ , \bigr|\ ,   \mathcal{f}_t\right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence , the price of a caplet can be computed via @xmath563\\ & \quad -(1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\mathbb{q}^{t+\delta}\left[s^{\delta}(t , t)\geq ( 1+\delta k)b(t , t+\delta)\ , \bigr|\ ,   \mathcal{f}_t\right ] .
\end{split}\ ] ]    _ swaption . _ + we consider a standard european payer swaption with maturity @xmath9 , written on a ( payer ) interest rate swap starting at @xmath319 and payment dates @xmath564 , with @xmath528 for all @xmath529 , with notional @xmath310 .
the value of such a claim at time @xmath1 is given by    @xmath565.\ ] ]
under assumption [ ass : couple ] , the process @xmath566 is a martingale , for all @xmath19 $ ] . since @xmath567
, this implies that @xmath568 = { \mathbb{e}}\left[\frac{1}{b_t}\bigr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right ] , \qquad\text { for all } 0\leq t\leq t\leq { \mathbb{t}},\ ] ] thus proving part ( i ) . in particular , note that this implies that @xmath569 $ ] , thus ensuring that @xmath570 defines a probability measure @xmath571 , for every @xmath19 $ ] . recalling that @xmath572 , for all @xmath25 and @xmath16 , it holds that @xmath573   \\ & = { \mathbb{e}}\left[\frac{l_t(t , t+\delta_i)-l_t(t , t+\delta_i)}{b_{t+\delta_i}}\bigr|{\mathcal{f}}_t\right ] = \frac{b(t , t+\delta_i)}{b_t}\bigl({\mathbb{e}}^{{\mathbb{q}}^{t+\delta_i}}[l_t(t , t+\delta_i)|{\mathcal{f}}_t]-l_t(t , t+\delta_i)\bigr).\end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath574 by part ( i ) , the last equality proves part ( ii ) .
finally , by bayes formula , the process @xmath153 is a @xmath40-martingale if and only if the process @xmath575 defined by @xmath576 is a @xmath577-martingale , for every @xmath16 . by definition of @xmath29
, it holds that @xmath578 and the desired martingale property then follows from part ( ii ) .
f.  m. ametrano and m.  bianchetti .
everything you always wanted to know about multiple interest rate curve bootstrapping but were afraid to ask .
preprint ( available at ` http://ssrn.com/abstract=2219548 ` ) , 2013 .
g.  bormetti , d.  brigo , m.  francischello , and a.  pallavicini .
impact of multiple - curve dynamics in credit valuation adjustments . in k.
glau , z.  grbac , m.  scherer , and r.  zagst , editors , _ innovations in derivatives markets _ , pages 251266 .
springer , 2016 .                                c.  cuchiero and j.  teichmann .
path properties and regularity of affine processes on general state spaces . in c.  donati - martin , a.  lejay , and a.  rouault , editors ,
_ sminaire de probabilits xlv _ , volume 2078 of _ lecture notes in mathematics _ , pages 201244 .
springer , 2013 .
z.  grbac , l.  meneghello , and w.  j. runggaldier .
derivative pricing for a multi - curve extension of the gaussian , exponentially quadratic short rate model . in k.
glau , z.  grbac , m.  scherer , and r.  zagst , editors , _ innovations in derivatives markets _ , pages 191226 .
springer , 2016 .
j.  kallsen . a didactic note on affine stochastic volatility models . in y.
kabanov , r.  lipster , and j.  stoyanov , editors , _ from stochastic calculus to mathematical finance - the shiryaev festschrift _ , pages 343368 .
springer , berlin , 2006 .
l.  morino and w.  j. runggaldier .
on multicurve models for the term structure . in r.
dieci , x .- z .
he , and c.  hommes , editors , _ nonlinear economic dynamics and financial modelling : essays in honour of carl chiarella_. springer , 2014 .