charge transfer is ubiquitous in physical processes affecting biological , chemical , and materials systems .
the representation of charge transfer is of intense current interest throughout the physical sciences .
a powerful concept in both modeling and understanding how charges redistribute themselves during a physical process is chemical potential equalization.@xcite to apply chemical potential equalization successfully , it is essential to use a charge - dependent energy model which behaves correctly for all configurations encountered in the process of interest .    consider a diatomic molecule ab .
atom a is assumed to be more electropositive than atom b. we are interested in charge disproportionation reactions typified by @xmath0 and @xmath1 where the charge @xmath2 is not necessarily an integer .
charge disproportionation and transfer reactions are important in electron transfer in biophysical systems,@xcite enzyme catalysis reactions,@xcite and such processes as electron - hole production and recombination in organic semiconductors.@xcite for dimers ( b = a ) , eq .
( [ i.0a ] ) corresponds to broken charge - symmetry states .
furthermore , eqs .
( [ i.0a ] ) and ( [ i.0b ] ) have been the prototype reactions for a wide variety of theoretical studies of chemical bonding.@xcite    the most prevalent model potential for charged species is the quadratic expansion of the classical electrostatic potential,@xcite @xmath3 the @xmath4 are expansion coefficients which are atom - type dependent and @xmath5 is an interionic potential representing the classical electrostatic contribution . in general all of these functions
depend on the separation @xmath6 .
the charge @xmath2 is usually , but not always , independent of @xmath6 .
@xmath5 approaches a @xmath7 dependence at sufficiently large @xmath6 .
@xmath8 contains the charge - independent short - range and dispersion interactions between the atoms .
the other expansion coefficients are frequently interpreted in terms of physical quantities such as chemical potential and hardness.@xcite the quadratic form has the virtue of simplicity and works adequately when the range of @xmath6 is small enough to prevent @xmath2 from changing appreciably .    if eq .
( [ i.1 ] ) is used at all separations , the atoms in the ab molecule will remain ionic even at separations where they are supposed to return to neutral states . for those situations where charge transfer does occur , alternative functional forms of charge dependence need to be invoked . for instance , alavi et al.@xcite and grochowski and coworkers@xcite use phenomenological switching functions to effect charge transfer . at very large separations ,
though , it is known that the charge dependence becomes piecewise linear ( fig .
[ fig : v2u]).@xcite     comparison of piecewise linear and quadratic models of the charge dependence of the energy for a diatomic .
the solid line corresponds to the energy of the _ isolated _ atoms as a function of acquired charge @xmath2 ( measured with respect to charge transfer from the cation ) .
the dashed curve corresponds to a quadratic representation of the charge dependence .
the energy minimizes at @xmath9 for the piecewise linear model , but not for the quadratic model . at large separations
, the piecewise linear model is correct .
traditionally the quadratic model is considered to be more correct at finite separations . ]
morales and martinez@xcite ( hereafter referred to as mm ) conclude that the `` grand canonical '' ( gc ) approach@xcite can not describe a realistic charge transfer process . in the gc approach each atom
is considered to be an open system with respect to exchange of energy and numbers of electrons .
they use a 3-state model with integer charge resonances representing the states of the ensemble for each atom . for atom
a for instance , the gc energy is expressed in the form of an ensemble average @xmath10 where @xmath11 are the occupation numbers and @xmath12 are the energies for the integer charge species @xmath13 + , 0 , and @xmath14 .
the @xmath15 depend on @xmath2 and are equal to or greater than zero .
( see refs .
, , and for the detailed expressions . )
mm show that the gc energy as expressed by eq .
( [ i.1a ] ) minimizes to integer charges , and never to fractional charges .
when the two atoms are well separated and only weakly interacting , the covalent and ionic resonance states can be regarded as being close to eigenfunctions and the mixing terms between the states can be ignored .
the nonlinearities in the occupation numbers as functions of charge introduced through temperature at physically reasonable temperatures are not sufficient to produce states with fractional charges .
thus charge transfer as represented by an ensemble of weakly interacting integer - charge states is too simplistic to describe fractionally charged states .
mm also examine a 3-state valence bond ( vb ) approach usqing the same resonance states as in the gc approach .
this is equivalent to a 0 k ensemble where the states are allowed to interact .
the vb approach is able to represent charge transfer processes with fractional charges .
however , the representation of the energy depends on resonance matrix elements .
the issue becomes one of defining sets of coefficients for the state wavefunctions that allow one to recover quadratic and gc - like energy expressions . using coulson charges@xcite as an approximation and a maximum entropy valence bond approach ( mevb ) , mm derive energy expressions as functions of @xmath2 with the forms of eqs .
( [ i.1 ] ) and ( [ i.1a ] ) . in the mevb approach , decomposition into atomic contributions
is accomplished through an examination of the various matrix elements appearing in the total energy expression .
however , mm were unable to find a general expression linking the gc and classical electrostatic forms .
the three main difficulties in deriving a charge dependent potential are the same ones facing mm and others .
first is to define the charge , second is to evaluate or eliminate the resonance energy matrix elements , and third is to define the energy for a particular value of @xmath2 .
first , to define @xmath2 , we invoke a density - functional - theory@xcite ( dft ) motivated atom - in - molecule@xcite pseudo - atom concept within the context of the evb approach .
we assume the availability of a practical density decomposition strategy@xcite to define the pseudo - atom densities .
the charge is defined as an average over the difference between two pseudo - atom densities .
no restriction to coulson@xcite or other definitions of charge@xcite is necessary .
the dependence of the evb wavefunction on @xmath2 is then deduced , which in turn yields an energy for arbitrary @xmath2 , not just the optimum @xmath2 .
second , to evaluate resonance energy matrix elements , we retain the vb approach of mm , but use an empirical valence bond ( evb)@xcite strategy , rather than explicitly evaluating a model hamiltonian or using the mevb averaging procedure of mm .
specifically , a reference energy is separated out for a fixed value of @xmath2 . to define the energy for an atom in the molecule , we require consistency between the evb wavefunction energy and dft energy for each atom . in so doing we are able to cast the energy of each atom into a form suitable for constructing empirical potential energy surfaces that could be used in simulations of larger systems .
third , the typical situation is that there are many wavefuctions and many electron densities that are consistent with a particular @xmath2 . to define a unique energy from among the possible choices , we adhere to constrained search density functional theory ( cs - dft)@xcite rather than appealing to a maximum entropy principle .
to the best of our knowledge , the evb method has not previously been combined with an atom - in - molecule approach.@xcite von szentply and coworkers define atomic charges , but their definition is implicitly limited to a quadratic dependence.@xcite grochowski and coworkers@xcite use evb parameterized by _ ab initio _
calculations for key molecular fragments and for defining the charges .
the charges are defined with a phenomenological spatial dependence that does maintain correct dissociation to neutrals .
furthermore , the charge dependence of the final potential is purely electrostatic .
the inconsistency between the gc and classical electrostatic forms is explained in ciosowski and stefanov@xcite using a different definition of @xmath2 , which is based on the total system wavefunction .
the charge is expressed as a perturbation on the molecular hamiltonian @xmath16 . computed atom - in - molecule equilibrium charges are used in subsequent `` charge - constrained '' calculations to study the energy and electronegativity dependences about the ground - state atom - in - molecule charges .
nalewajski@xcite provides a simplified rendition of ciosowski and stefanov , but only for orthogonal resonance states . while physically correct , these efforts have not been cast in the form of general purpose potential energy surfaces . in particular , neither attempts to resolve the resonance energy issue in a way that is tractable for large - scale simulations .
here we derive a charge - dependent empirical potential which faithfully represents charge transfer as a function of separation between atom a and an entity b. in the simplest case , entity b is another atom . more generally , b represents a collective embedding environment or reservior.@xcite the charge may be fractional .
our primary interest is in deriving a general functional form with correct physical and chemical behavior at all interaction strengths rather than providing an exact treatment of particular terms or systems .
the three difficulties just outlined are addressed .
we then analyze these potentials in special limiting cases and in the light of the results of ciosowski and stefanov@xcite and nalewajski.@xcite finally , we derive general models for both pair potentials and atom - in - molecule energies .
the evb method is a much more general technique than described here .
reviews of evb are available from warshel _ et .
al_.@xcite here we confine our discussion to a 2-state model of the ab molecule .
there are fixed covalent and ionic resonance states represented by wavefunctions @xmath17 and @xmath18 , respectively.@xcite no assumption is made about the quality of these wavefunctions .
however , @xmath17 retains @xmath19 electrons on atom a and @xmath20 electrons on atom b. atoms a and b are neutral in the covalent resonance state .
consequently @xmath19 and @xmath20 are equal to their respective nuclear charges , @xmath21 and @xmath22 .
similarly , @xmath18 retains @xmath23 electrons on atom a and @xmath24 electrons on atom b. in each resonance state , the total number of electrons is @xmath25 .
@xmath17 and @xmath18 are assumed to be normalized to unity .
the wavefunction of the system @xmath26 is the combination@xcite @xmath27 where @xmath28 determines the relative ionic character . by normalization , @xmath29 where @xmath30 for the ab molecule with hamiltonian @xmath16 , the mixed - state energy takes the form @xmath31 where @xmath32 , @xmath33 and @xmath34 are the associated energy matrix elements
, @xmath35 and @xmath36    minimizing @xmath37 with respect to @xmath28 gives the optimized values , @xmath38 where @xmath39 and @xmath40 .
the @xmath41 signs in eq .
( [ ii.7 ] ) correspond to ground ( gs ) and excited ( xs ) states , whose energies are designated as @xmath42 and @xmath43 , respectively . from eq .
( [ ii.7 ] ) , one can see that the off - diagonal matrix elements , @xmath34 and @xmath44 , control charge transfer in evb . when @xmath45 , @xmath46 .
depending on the root , @xmath47 ( @xmath14 root ) or @xmath48 ( + root ) varies from @xmath141 to + 1 .
note that as @xmath49 goes to zero , that is , as the covalent and ionic curves cross , charge transfer or the coulson - fischer transition@xcite becomes more abrupt . if @xmath50 and @xmath51 are nondegenerate eigenfunctions of @xmath16 , then @xmath52 .
there is either no charge transfer or there is complete charge transfer . in either case
, the states do not mix .
the coefficient @xmath28 governs the ionic contribution to @xmath26 . as @xmath28 increases
, @xmath26 migrates toward more complete charge transfer . even neglecting overlap,@xcite the ionic strength @xmath28 interpolates between covalent and ionic states in a physically reasonable way.@xcite the state - to - state interpolating behavior of @xmath28 in eq .
( [ ii.7 ] ) is the essential behavior that we wish to emulate in developing a more broadly applicable charge dependent potential .    later in the paper
, two other relationships will become useful , which we provide here .
first , in the spirit of evb,@xcite one always wants to know the resonance energy in the terms of the ground - state @xmath42 , @xmath44 , @xmath32 , and @xmath33 .
that is , @xmath53 where @xmath54 is either `` gs '' or `` xs '' . the second relationship expresses @xmath47 as a function of these same parameters .
this is done by substituting eq .
( [ ii.8 ] ) into the expressions for @xmath55 and @xmath56 .
the general expression is @xmath57 \ ,       \nonumber \\
\label{ii.9}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath58 is either `` @xmath59 '' or `` @xmath60 '' and either the ground or excited state is selected .
we begin with the question of how to define charge in our model .
there is no unique definition of the charge on an atom in a molecule . to assign charges to individual atoms
, we assume that it is possible to decompose the total electron density into pseudo - atom densities .
however , we do not need to specify a particular decomposition procedure at this time .
we only need to know that some procedure is available.@xcite      to define the charge , it is convenient to use @xmath25-electron density matrices and 1-electron densities . in terms of density matrix language ,
the state of ab is represented as @xmath61 where @xmath62 are the 3@xmath25 dimensional spatial electronic coordinates for the full ab system and @xmath26 is given in eq .
( [ ii.2 ] ) .
spin is ignored at this point and , for simplicity , the matrix elements are assumed to be real .
( [ iv.1 ] ) corresponds to the pure - state representation of the density matrix for the 2-state model .
we can expand eq .
( [ iv.1 ] ) in terms of the covalent and ionic states , resulting in the relationship @xmath63 where @xmath64 and @xmath65 the total electronic energy expression analogous to eq .
( [ iv.2 ] ) is @xmath66 eq .  ( [ iv.3 ] ) corresponds to a non - diagonal representation of the energy .
its advantage is that the component contributions of the essential states that are thought to represent the physical system are delineated .
a diagonal representation of @xmath67 when state mixing is important can be devised by diagonalizing @xmath16 .
for the purposes of extending the present treatment to finite temperature ensembles,@xcite this particular diagonalization of @xmath67 would be useful .
the @xmath25-electron densities of interest are @xmath68 , @xmath69 , @xmath70 , and @xmath71 .
they bear the usual relationships to the respective @xmath25-electron density matrices , @xmath72 : @xmath73 where @xmath74 are the 3(@xmath25 - 1 ) dimensional spatial electronic coordinates and @xmath75 is either `` @xmath59 '' , `` @xmath76 '' , `` @xmath60 '' , or no subscript .
@xmath68 , @xmath69 , and @xmath71 are normalized to @xmath25 .
the relationship of central interest is @xmath77 recall the assumption that the covalent and ionic state wavefunctions are given and fixed .
thus the total density @xmath68 is determined solely by the value of @xmath28 .
the energies of @xmath69 and @xmath71 are well - defined in a conventional dft sense.@xcite however , the `` interference density''@xcite @xmath70 does not have a well - defined energy in dft .
nevertheless , its energy may be inferred from the energies of @xmath68 , @xmath69 , and @xmath71 , as we will show below .
next we assume that all of the @xmath78 can be decomposed into corresponding pseudo - atom densities , @xmath79 and @xmath80.@xcite the pseudo - atom densities @xmath81 and @xmath82 integrate to non - integer values , @xmath83 and @xmath84 , whereas @xmath85 , @xmath86 , @xmath87 , and @xmath88 are constrained to integrate to integer numbers of electrons .
we use asterisks throughout to indicate atom - in - molecule quantities .    with these definitions in place , we define @xmath2 from either pair of total and covalent pseudo - atom densities , which others have sometimes referred to as pseudo - atom distortion densities.@xcite we choose atom a : @xmath89 the density decompositions must be constrained to yield the correct number of electrons prescribed by eq .
( [ i.14]).@xcite finally , we note that the present definition of @xmath2 falls into truhlar s class ii category.@xcite now we want to eliminate @xmath28 in favor of @xmath2 . assuming that a component definition of @xmath90 based on eq .
( [ iii.1 ] ) is possible , @xmath91 where @xmath92 @xmath93 is the number of electrons on atom a when it is in a neutral state , and the relationship @xmath94 has been used .
the quantity @xmath95 is determined by the difference between @xmath96 and the atom a component of the decomposition of @xmath70 with locally unbiased , electron - number decomposition.@xcite clearly , different density decomposition strategies will yield somewhat different values of @xmath97 .
one possibility for determining @xmath97 is to require consistency with the ground - state value of @xmath28 .
for instance , if @xmath9 is optimum as for a dimer , @xmath28 equals either 0 or @xmath98 . for eq .
( [ iii.3 ] ) to be applied successfully , @xmath99 would have to correspond to a lower energy state than @xmath100 and the value of @xmath28 would have to be determined from a separate calculation , such as represented by eq .
( [ ii.7 ] ) .
in such an approach , one would be effectively modeling @xmath95 via a correspondence with the coulson - fischer transition.@xcite alternatively , by analogy with @xmath68 , we assume that single - particle determinants ( e.g.  kohn - sham determinants@xcite ) can be calculated for the @xmath101.@xcite in a kohn - sham based approach , one would be effectively estimating @xmath96 from the overlaps of these determinants .
additional ambiguity in @xmath102 arises from the choices for @xmath50 and @xmath51 .
these ambiguities lie behind the designation of the present approach as an empirical one .
however , these ambiguities can be mitigated by using a reference state as discussed in the next subsection .
to that end , it is useful to invert eq .
( [ iii.3 ] ) so that @xmath97 becomes a function of @xmath2 and @xmath28 .
that relationship is @xmath103 it should be understood that , in the limit that @xmath104 , @xmath105 also .      to construct a potential energy surface for ab ,
one option is to use eq .
( [ iii.3 ] ) to model the dependence of the charge on separation for some reference state . some empirical potentials such as evb and the modified embedded atom method
( meam)@xcite utilize reference states as a model calibration method .
the methods of mcdonald and coworkers,@xcite mccammon , grochowski , and coworkers,@xcite and broughton and mehl@xcite effectively make @xmath2 bond - length dependent .
( [ iii.3 ] ) provides a basis in evb theory for their phenomenological charge transfer switching functions .
a more attractive option is to solve for @xmath106 , @xmath107 the coefficient @xmath28 determines the strength of the contribution of @xmath51 to @xmath26 .
( [ iii.5 ] ) states how the charge governs that strength .
this expression is consistent with the results of ciosowski and stefanov,@xcite which are derived from a perturbative technique . as noted previously , even if @xmath9 , @xmath28 equals either 0 or @xmath108 .
this is because the evb model describes state mixing even when there is no charge transfer .
for example , in the @xmath109 molecule , the covalent and ionic wavefunctions mix at all finite separations , but the ground state never involves charge transfer .
significantly , this formula also describes deviations from the ground - state charge .
( [ iii.5 ] ) can be substituted into eq .
( [ ii.6 ] ) , and the variational procedure repeated .
the result is the same as solving for @xmath2 in terms of the resonance and overlap matrix elements obtained by equating eq .
( [ iii.5 ] ) and ( [ ii.7 ] ) .
the evb strategy is to use experimental information to eliminate the resonance energy.@xcite here the analogous procedure is to choose a particular value of @xmath110 and solve for @xmath34 in terms of @xmath111 and the diagonal matrix elements for each @xmath6 .
( the @xmath6 dependence is suppressed . )
the result is @xmath112 substituting eq .
( [ iii.5a ] ) into eq .
( [ iv.3 ] ) , the total energy for arbitrary @xmath113 has the form    @xmath114    this form might be used in lieu of classical electrostatic potentials like eq .
( [ i.1 ] ) that have been in common use .
it has the structure of an ensemble average,@xcite but the coefficients of @xmath32 and @xmath33 are not necessarily positive semidefinite .
( [ iii.5b ] ) is constructed to possess the proper changes in atomic charges in the limit of molecular dissociation .
the construction of a proper ensemble representation is discussed in section 5.a .    the foundations for the quadratic dependence of the energy on charge , such as eq .
( [ i.1 ] ) , must stem from eqs .
( [ iii.5 ] ) and ( [ ii.6 ] ) .
however , even this simplest example of charge transfer has a considerably more complex dependence than quadratic . that dependence is clearly carried through the overlap contributions .
once @xmath115 has been chosen , the procedure for determining a point on the potential energy surface for arbitrary values of @xmath6 and @xmath2 is as follows . from some other source(s ) of information
, one must have available five reference values : @xmath111 , its associated ionicity @xmath116 , @xmath32 , @xmath33 , and @xmath44 . for a chosen @xmath6 ,
one first evaluates    * @xmath117 , etc . from eq .
( [ iv.2 ] ) ; * @xmath34 from eq .
( [ iii.5a ] ) ; and * @xmath97 from eq .
( [ iii.10 ] ) .
+ then , for each @xmath2 of interest , one evaluates *
@xmath118 from eq .
( [ iii.5 ] ) using values from steps ( a ) ,
( b ) , and ( c ) ; and * @xmath119 from eq .
( [ ii.5 ] ) .
the procedure is repeated for each value of @xmath6 of interest .
an important question is what to choose for @xmath115 .
one possible choice for @xmath115 is the optimum value @xmath120 .
however , @xmath120 depends on @xmath34 through eqs .
( [ ii.7 ] ) and ( [ iii.3 ] ) .
this variant is equivalent to using the ground - state wavefunction as one of the basis functions in the original formulation of the problem .
( [ iii.5b ] ) then characterizes deviations of the energy from the ground - state energy , @xmath121 , as a function of @xmath2 .
note that by choosing @xmath111 to be consistent with @xmath121 , this variant and eq .
( [ iii.5b ] ) will be identical .    when @xmath122 , the procedure for determining a point on the potential energy surface is substantially the same as the first . again
five reference values are needed , except that knowledge of @xmath123 replaces knowledge of @xmath116 .
relative to the first procedure , steps ( a ) and ( b ) become to evaluate    * @xmath34 from eq .  ( [ ii.8 ] ) ; and * @xmath124 from eq .
( [ ii.7 ] ) .
all of the other steps remain the same .
one can extend this model to @xmath2 between @xmath125 and 0 . the entire procedure with atom a assumed to be anionic in @xmath51 is repeated . in eq .
( [ i.14 ] ) , for @xmath126 , one simply replaces @xmath2 with @xmath127 and adjusts the partitioning of @xmath70 so that atom a is anionic . requiring continuity in the energy at @xmath9
dictates that @xmath128 as @xmath129 .
( [ iii.5b ] ) remains the same structurally .
equivalently , one could replace the subscript `` a '' with the subscript `` b '' everywhere in the procedure .
the potential over the entire range of @xmath2 is then represented in a piecewise fashion . while not as rigorous as a 3-state model , the present treatment does retain substantially greater simplicity .
another possible extension is to apply the above procedure when the two resonance states both correspond to charged species . for cao , for example ,
the effective @xmath2 on ca near equilibrium would be almost + 2 .
as the cao bond is stretched , @xmath2 would decrease until it passed through a region of undetermined length where it would range between + 1 and 0
. then there would be one form of eq .
( [ iii.5b ] ) covering the range in @xmath2 between 0 and + 1 and a second form covering the range between + 1 and + 2 range .
a final extension of this model would allow the entity b correspond to a more general environment than just one other atom .
most of the model presented here does not explicitly invoke the specific properties of a diatomic model .
however , this extension requires separate considerations not pursued here .
we now show how to define pseudo - atom energies for the 2-state model of the previous section .
we do this by requiring consistency between the energies based on the density decompositions that were assumed in the previous section and the energies that would result from the corresponding wavefunction expressions . as with @xmath68
, we assume that there is a decomposition @xmath67 into pseudo - atom density matrices . in conformance with rychlewski and
parr,@xcite the decomposition applies to @xmath67 rather than to @xmath16 .
thus , for @xmath130 the total energy decomposes into @xmath131 analogous expressions are assumed to exist for each of the covalent and ionic contributions to the pseudo - atom energies .
the pseudo - atom densities @xmath81 and @xmath82 correspond to the pseudo - atom density matrices @xmath132 and @xmath133 . in the following relations ,
the expressions for atoms a and b are analogous . only the expressions for atom a will be given .
we want the energies of each pseudo - atom defined via density matrices to be equal to the energies defined via densities .
consequently , we require that @xmath134 \ .
\label{iv.5a}\ ] ] this identification places a new constraint on @xmath132 . rigorously speaking , it should be optimal in the sense of levy cs - dft.@xcite the constraint is that @xmath132 should yield the lowest energy for all other ensemble density matrices which integrate to @xmath81 : @xmath135 \equiv \langle h,\gamma_{\rm       a}^*\rangle = \min_{\gamma_{\rm a } \rightarrow \rho_{\rm a}^ * }       \langle h,\gamma_{\rm a}\rangle \ .
\label{iv.5c}\ ] ]    in terms of valence bond resonance states @xmath136 similar to @xmath137 , the pure - state terms in eqs .
( [ iv.6 ] ) , @xmath138 and @xmath139 , can be represented in conventional dft language .
the resonance energy can not .
( [ iv.6 ] ) represents pseudo - atom energies for any @xmath2 . to evaluate the resonance energy
, we again follow the evb strategy of determining them from some particular value of @xmath110 .
the result is @xmath140 if @xmath115 is set equal to the optimum @xmath2 for each value of atomic separation , then @xmath141 will correspond to the experimental potential energy for ab .
note that all of the energies in traditional evb are 0 k values .
some variations of evb incorporate temperature - dependent solvent effects.@xcite we do not include these variations here .
finite temperatures are not required to establish the model . on the other hand , there is nothing here that precludes extending the analysis to a finite temperature ensemble.@xcite    substituting eq .
( [ iv.7a ] ) into eq .
( [ iv.6 ] ) , an expression for the pseudo - atom energy is achieved . for any @xmath2
, @xmath142 eq .  ( [ iv.8a ] ) has the same structure as eqs .
( [ iii.5b ] ) , but refers to an individual atom .
all of the quantities on the right - hand sides of these two equations can be deduced from experiment and/or decomposition calculations on resonance states and overlaps .    using the present formulations in simulations of larger systems naturally invokes consideration of chemical potential equalization .
one can obtain a statement of chemical potential equalization from eq .
( [ iv.8a ] ) .
the total energy is given in eq .
( [ iv.4a ] ) .
if @xmath37 is minimized with respect to @xmath2 , then small deviations from @xmath120 will not change the total energy to first order : @xmath143 or @xmath144 where @xmath145 is the chemical potential .
charge balance requires that the charges on a and b be exactly opposite .
the minus sign in front of @xmath145 comes from the fact that @xmath2 is related to the negative of the change in the number of electrons on a.
here we introduce approximations consistent with the dissociation limits of ab , present a general definition of the energy for a given charge , and discuss @xmath146 , hf , and lih as examples .
it is insightful to introduce a concept of neglect of differential overlap between resonance states , @xmath147 , which we will refer to as ndol .
this leads to simple analytical expressions whose behavior can be examined in detail .
ndol is to be distinguished from zero differential overlap ( zdo),@xcite which refers to overlap between orbitals on different atomic centers . in the ndol approximation , @xmath147.@xcite under special conditions
, zdo implies ndol .    in the ndol approximation ,
@xmath148 and @xmath44 are zero . from eq .
( [ iii.5 ] ) , the dependence of @xmath28 on @xmath2 becomes @xmath149 from eq .
( [ ii.6 ] ) , the energy dependence on @xmath2 becomes @xmath150 the @xmath151 construct ensures that @xmath152 corresponds to the ground state .
here we have used the fact that , by definition of the ionization potential ip and electron affinity ea , @xmath153 .
these atom - in - molecule quantities include some electrostatic contributions .
this quantity is also called a `` bond hardness''.@xcite    thus , eq .  ( [ iii.6.1 ] ) is consistent with previous energy expressions obtained with coulson charges@xcite and with the 2-state model of nalewajski@xcite . in coulson,@xcite murrell
al_,@xcite and mcweeny@xcite a fraction of ionic character is defined instead of a charge .
that fraction is identical to @xmath154 which is @xmath2 in the ndol approximation . clearly , at large @xmath6 , eq .  ( [ ii.5 ] ) in combination with eq .
( [ iii.5 ] ) approaches eq .
( [ iii.6 ] ) , eq .
( [ iii.6 ] ) becomes linear in @xmath2 , and @xmath33 , @xmath32 , and @xmath34 approach asymptotic values ( in @xmath6 ) analogous to mm s eq .
( 2.40).@xcite the linear behavior in the asymptotic regime is consistent with the conclusions of pplb .
even more importantly , eq .  ( [ iii.6 ] ) is expressly non - analytical ( _ i.e. _ , it can not be expanded in a taylor series ) about @xmath9 and @xmath155 , whereas eq .
( [ ii.5 ] ) in combination with eq .
( [ iii.5 ] ) is analytical at both points away from the ndol limit ( @xmath156 ) .
coulson s fig .
5.7 is a graph of @xmath157 , which clearly shows the non - analytical behavior , although he did not comment on it.@xcite the non - analytical behavior of the energy as a function of @xmath2 is also seen in gc - dft.@xcite eq .
( [ iii.6 ] ) embodies the evb representation of that behavior .
the non - analytical behavior results in a derivative discontinuity in the energy as a function of charge at integer values of the charge .
perhaps because orthogonality between resonance states is assumed , nalewajski does not comment on the behavior of the derivative at integer charges.@xcite ciosowski and stefanov do see their version of the ndol limit as connected with pplb.@xcite likewise , pplb,@xcite perdew,@xcite and ciosowski and stefanov@xcite note that the derivative discontinuity disappears once the systems in the gc representation begin to interact significantly .
( [ iii.5 ] ) embodies that behavior as well .
examples of these charge dependences are illustrated below .
starting from eq .
( [ iii.6 ] ) , we evaluate @xmath34 at the optimum ndol @xmath2 , @xmath158 where @xmath159 .
the ground state corresponds to the negative root of @xmath118 in eq .
( [ iii.6.1 ] ) , since as @xmath160 , @xmath2 must also go to zero , assuming that @xmath161 . for convenience ,
we call the ground state value of eq .
( [ iii.6 ] ) @xmath162 .
the solution for the resonance energy is equivalent to the well - known evb expression@xcite @xmath163 substituting eq .
( [ iv.13 ] ) into eq .
( [ iii.6 ] ) , we find    @xmath164    the dependence of @xmath165 on @xmath32 and @xmath33 appears to be different from that implied by eq .
( [ iii.5b ] ) .
in fact , by setting @xmath166 in eq .
( [ iii.5b ] ) , the two expressions become identical .
we can gain further insight from eq .
( [ iv.14 ] ) by solving for @xmath32 and @xmath33 in terms of @xmath167 , @xmath43 , and @xmath168 . in a typical diatomic
, @xmath43 corresponds to the first electronic state which dissociates to the ions @xmath169 and @xmath170 . because of the ndol approximation , these three pieces of information are sufficient to specify the energy . to achieve the desired result , we first use the fact that @xmath171 can be derived from either eigenvalue to find that @xmath172 .
next we solve for @xmath32 from eq .
( [ iv.12 ] ) assuming that we know @xmath173 .
the result is that @xmath174 and @xmath175 in the ndol approximation , the pure state energies are simple linear combinations of the eigenenergies . making all of the necessary substitutions and rearrangements in eq .
( [ iv.14 ] ) , we achieve the ensemble representation : @xmath176 where the occupation number is @xmath177 to see that eq .
( [ iv.15c ] ) has the desired properties , note that @xmath178 lies between 0 and 1 over the interval [ 0,1 ] in @xmath2 , it is 0 at @xmath179 , and @xmath180 at @xmath179 is also 0 .
these properties are illustrated in fig .
[ fig : omega - ndol ] . taking into account our restriction to a 2-state model ,
if we apply atom decomposition to the eigenenergies , we would obtain the same form as eq .
( [ i.1a ] ) , with @xmath181 , @xmath182 , and @xmath183 .
importantly , the representation is in terms of eigenenergies instead of energy matrix elements .
furthermore , as @xmath173 approaches 0 , as in the assumed dissociation limit for ab , @xmath165 becomes linear in @xmath2 .
2-state evb - ndol occupation number , eq .
( [ iv.15e ] ) , in the ensemble representation of @xmath184 , eq .  ( [ iv.15c ] ) .
charges are dimensionless . ]
another representation of the occupation number , eq .
( [ iv.15e ] ) , is significant . by using the relationship @xmath185 from eqs .
( [ iii.6.1 ] ) , we obtain @xmath186 as is necessary physically , the occupation number is 0 when @xmath187 , where @xmath188 corresponds to @xmath189 .
the complete generalization of eq .
( [ iv.15f ] ) is equivalent to following the process steps outlined above .
( [ iv.15a ] ) and ( [ iv.15b ] ) can be inverted .
inversion gives @xmath165 in terms of @xmath32 and @xmath33 : @xmath190 where @xmath191 and @xmath192 consistent with the conclusions of mm and physical necessity , the coefficients are not positive - semidefinite .
[ fig : omega - h ] illustrates eq .
( [ iv.15h ] ) , the coefficient for the covalent state . in order to cover the range of energies between @xmath42 and @xmath43 , the coefficients of @xmath32 and @xmath33 can not possibly be positive - semidefinite .
the coefficients are not defined for @xmath193 . at that value of the ground - state charge , @xmath32 must equal @xmath33 .
2-state evb - ndol coefficient for the covalent state given by eq .
( [ iv.15h ] ) .
the ionic state coefficient is obtained by reflecting this figure through @xmath194 .
charges are dimensionless . ]
it is interesting to see how the present results connect with classical electrostatic potentials ( eq .  ( [ i.1 ] ) ) .
we can expand eq .
( [ iv.15e ] ) locally as a function of @xmath2 as long as the expansion point is not zero or one .
first , @xmath195 the obvious value about which to expand is @xmath173 . by construction , @xmath196 if we evaluate eq .
( [ iv.17 ] ) at @xmath179 , as @xmath197 0 or 1 , the expansion behaves badly .
alternatively , we might try expanding about @xmath198 , for the physically appealing reason that @xmath199 .
then @xmath200 to second order , @xmath201 this quadratic expansion has the form of eq .
( [ i.1 ] ) and behaves well physically under dissociation , even to the extent of preserving the dissociation limit .
the electronegativity , hardness , and electrostatic contributions are embedded in the eigenenergies .
the equivalent expansion of eq .
( [ iv.15 g ] ) might be more revealing in displaying these contributions .
a key observation is that the quadratic term vanishes completely at infinite separation ( @xmath197 0 ) and only the linear dependence survives .
again , the survival of the linear charge dependence is consistent with pplb .
there is no residual atomic hardness contribution as has appeared in many implementations of eq .
( [ i.1]).@xcite we speculate that a hardness contribution might be missing because we have considered only a 2-state model instead of a 3-state model .
our reasoning behind this speculation is discussed below .
we have ruled out the possibility that introducing the ndol approximation prior to making the expansion is a factor .
nevertheless , adding a third state must not change the fact that the coefficient of the quadratic term must go zero in order for the results to be consistent with pplb.@xcite likewise , any hardness contributions to the linear term must be scaled by a coefficient that goes to zero at large @xmath6 .
clearly , one can not approximate either eq .
( [ iii.5 ] ) or ( [ iii.6 ] ) quadratically to arbritrary accuracy in a global sense .
next we consider the densities and their energies in the ndol approximation . from eq .
( [ iii.1 ] ) we have @xmath202 thus , from eq .
( [ iii.6.1 ] ) , @xmath203 by symmetry in eq .
( [ iv.20 ] ) , @xmath204 , but , from eq .
( [ ii.5 ] ) , @xmath205 . to address this difficulty ,
mm appeal to a maximum entropy principle .
we prefer instead to appeal to cs - dft.@xcite accordingly , cs - dft instructs us to place the @xmath206 into groups defined by the density that they produce .
since @xmath207 and @xmath208 both yield the same density , @xmath209 , they are grouped together .
the energy assigned to @xmath210 $ ] is the minimum of the energies for these two @xmath67 s : @xmath211 = \min \ { \langle h,\gamma^{\rm        ndol}(\gamma(q))\rangle , \nonumber \\
\langle h,\gamma^{\rm ndol}(-\gamma(q))\rangle\ } \ .
\label{iv.23}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the ground state energy is then the minimum over all @xmath2 of @xmath212 $ ] .
when differential overlap ( @xmath213 ) is included , the densities appear to become unique for @xmath28 s of different signs.@xcite    note that a similar procedure could be followed for mm s 3-state case at the zdo level that they assume .
see also ref .  .
even with this comparatively simple extension , the situation is less clear than in the 2-state case .
many densities may have the same charge on the atoms .
by again appealing to cs - dft , one can assign @xmath119 for a given @xmath2 by minimizing over the energies of all densities with the same @xmath2 .
that is , as a straightforward extension of cs - dft , we very generally define @xmath214 \ ,        \label{iv.24}\ ] ] where @xmath215 represents all of the other undetermined parameters of the density @xmath216 . by minimizing over @xmath215 , one may introduce dependencies on the energy matrix elements that are absent from the present 2-state model.@xcite this is the reason behind our speculation that the isolated - atom hardnesses do not appear in eq .
( [ iv.19 ] ) because of the limitations of the 2-state model .
one advantage of the charge - generalized cs - dft approach over a maximum entropy principle is that the true ground state properties can be preserved in the same way that the ground state energy can be recovered by minimizing over all allowed densities in conventional cs - dft.@xcite      first we discuss modeling the polar molecules hf and lih in the ndol approximation .
then , for the nonpolar molecule @xmath146 , we compare the ndol and general cases .
there we utilize the weinbaum wavefunction.@xcite it provides an excellent illustration of the ambiguities encoountered in defining the resonance state wavefunctions .
we also examine various approximations for @xmath148 and examine the change in the charge dependence as a function of @xmath6 .    for hf and lih
, we use rkr curves@xcite to define @xmath42 and @xmath43 . for the x@xmath218 and b@xmath218 states of hf , the rkr data are from di lonardo and douglas,@xcite ; for the x@xmath218 and a@xmath218 states of lih , the rkr data are from chan _ et al._@xcite and pardo _ et al._@xcite we use the calculations of ref .   to define @xmath173 .
these data are shown in figs .
[ fig : hf - fit ] and [ fig : lih - fit ] .
the b@xmath218 and a@xmath218 states dissociate to ions , h@xmath219 and f@xmath220 and li@xmath219 and h@xmath220 , respectively . to allow matching of the different spatial ranges of the data , analytical fits for the energy curves
were made with the rose and rose+ionic functional forms.@xcite the charge data were fit with the functional form , @xmath221 , where the @xmath222 s are fitting parameters . @xmath32 and
@xmath33 were computed from eqs .
( [ iv.15a ] ) and ( [ iv.15b ] ) , respectively . in both cases ,
@xmath32 and @xmath33 cross at @xmath223 and meet their respective states at the dissociation limits .
representative shapes of the charge dependence for given values of @xmath6 are shown in figs .
[ fig : hf - cuts ] and [ fig : lih - cuts ] .
the correct dissociation - limit behavior is observed in both cases . in simulations where each atom remains within a unit charge interval ,
the ndol model might therefore prove to be useful , although it is unlikely to be quantitative .
the difference in charge transfer characteristics between the present results and pplb can be seen by contrasting the @xmath224  curve of fig .
[ fig : lih - cuts ] with the @xmath225  curve of their fig .
1.@xcite the transfer is more gradual here and passes through fractional charge states , compared to pplb which is very sharp and passes directly from a completely covalent state to a completely ionic one .
next we consider @xmath146 .
the simplest valence bond form for the covalent state @xmath226 , where @xmath227 is the atomic orbital overlap.@xcite our nave inclination for the ionic state is to use the familiar @xmath228 .
the total wavefunction is @xmath229 .
it turns out that the total densities for both states are identical : @xmath230 .
( designation of the electronic coordinate is suppressed in the densities for readability . )
the interference density is @xmath231 .
evb model of hf .
all energies are in ev , distances in  , and charges dimensionless .
rkr data from ref .  .
charges from ref .  .
]     evb model of hf .
all energies are in ev , distances in  , and charges dimensionless .
rkr data from ref .   and .
charges from ref .  .
]     eq .
( [ iv.15c ] ) at discrete values of @xmath6 for hf .
all energies are in ev , distances in  , and charges dimensionless . ]
( [ iv.15c ] ) at discrete values of @xmath6 for lih .
all energies are in ev , distances in  , and charges dimensionless . ]
if we assume a simple hirshfeld partitioning as our total density decomposition strategy,@xcite then it is natural to assume that each component of the density is likewise scaled by @xmath232 in order to obtain the atom a contribution .
however , we find that because of symmetry , @xmath233 , which can not be correct . of course , the problem is that the assumption about the hirshfeld partitioning form is incorrect .
this partitioning can not lead to a value of @xmath234 that integrates to @xmath235 . a different partitioning
must be chosen to force all of the density in @xmath71 to belong to atom b. in addition , we know the optimum values of @xmath28 for these two resonance states@xcite and that these values correspond to @xmath9 .
for instance , at the equilibrium @xmath146 separation , @xmath236 , with the resonance energy defined as positive.@xcite from eq .
( [ iii.3 ] ) , we also can deduce that @xmath237 .
this analysis hints at the subtle properties that the density decomposition must possess if one implements explicit decomposition of @xmath70 .
another immediate insight is that any fixed value of @xmath28 applied within @xmath26 leads to an acceptable covalent state .
clearly , the energy change caused by a polarization of the @xmath146 charge density will differ depending on one s choice for the resonance state .
similarly , the density decomposition will show some sensitivity to this choice .
of course , a more sensible choice for the ionic state is @xmath238 because , for a homonuclear diatomic , the charged states correspond to broken charge - symmetry states . even in this simple case
, the partitioning of @xmath70 may be nontrivial . as a final consideration ,
we illustrate the influence of overlap on ionicity . for this purpose
, we utilize our original choices for covalent and ionic wavefunctions , @xmath239 and @xmath240 .
the overlap integral is estimated in terms of @xmath227 as given above .
taking @xmath241 , the atomic overlap is @xmath242 , where @xmath243 .
the effect of overlap is shown in fig .
[ fig : h2-ion ] as @xmath244 .
there it can been seen that the ndol approximation becomes accurate beyond approximately 2  .
the relatively large range of @xmath6 for which the ndol approximation is accurate in this case is due in no small part to the fact that @xmath44 depends on the square of @xmath227 .
this broad range of accuracy and the fact that eqs .
( [ iv.15c ] ) and ( [ iv.15e ] ) are well - behaved for any @xmath6 makes it tempting to use ndol in general .
however , near equilibrium bond lengths , fig .
[ fig : h2-ion ] indicates that overlap effects should not be ignored .
ionicity scaled by @xmath245 at discrete values of @xmath6 for @xmath146 .
distances are in  and charges are dimensionless . ]
in order to apply chemical potential equalization in a simulation that involves conditions far from reference states , the potential energy must be defined for arbitrary values of the charges . to address this challenge ,
we have derived a new charge - dependent pair potential from a 2-state empirical valence bond model .
the charge is defined from a decomposition of the density into constituent contributions .
the explicit charge dependence is deduced by requiring consistency between the density decomposition and the wavefunction descriptions of the ground state .
the energy expression can be made valid for any range of charge of interest .
the decomposition theme is further extended to define the energy of individual constituents , again by requiring consistency between the density decomposition and the wavefunction descriptions .
the energy of the system for a given value of charge is made unique by appealing to constrained search density functional theory .
an examination of the model shows linear dependence on charge at the dissociation limit , as well as discontinuous behavior in the derivative of the energy as a function of charge at integer values of the charge .
this behavior is consistent with the analysis of perdew _
et al._@xcite and others.@xcite the potential energy for arbitrary charge and separation of the constituents can be represented as an ensemble average of the eigenenergies with a nonlinear , analytical dependence of the occupation number on charge .
the representation of the potential energy in terms of the pure - state energy matrix elements is possible , but , by physical necessity , can not be expressed as an ensemble average with positive semidefinite coefficients .    to determine a pair potential for all values of @xmath2 and @xmath6 with this method
, one needs five reference or calibration curves .
these most often will be computed values of the ground - state energy , the charges along the ground - state energy curve , the resonance state overlap integral , the covalent energy and ionic energy .
measurements of ground and ionic - excited state energies and charges can also be used . the covalent energy and ionic energy
are determined for integer charges only . to determine a point on the potential energy curve
, a well - defined five step procedure is followed using the five input curves .
an immediate application of the method could be to construct the reference potential curves for the @xmath246 , @xmath247 , and ab systems .
simulations on arbitrary mixtures of these three types of systems under nonequilibrium initial conditions would then be possible .
chemical potential equalization would be used to dynamically adjust the charges of the constituents .
more generally , we envision the present approach as forming the basis for a new class of charge - dependent empirical potentials for use in large - scale simulations of reactive systems .
the work of s.m.v .  was performed in part at los alamos national laboratory under the auspices of the u.  s.  department of energy , under contract no .
w-7405-eng-36 , and funded through its center for semiconductor modeling and simulation , a crada program performed jointly with the semiconductor research corporation , and through the advanced fuel cycle initiative . s.m.v .
thanks the university of new mexico , department of physics and astronomy for its hospitality during the 2003 - 2004 academic year .
s.r.a .  would like to thank the national science foundation for support during the initial stages of this work ( dmr-9520371 ) .
this work was supported by national science foundation grant no .
che-0304710 .
m.  i.  page , `` the mechanism of chemical catalysis used by enzymes , '' in _ new comprehensive biochemistry , vol .  6
the chemistry of enzyme action _ edited by m.  i.  page , ( elsevier , amsterdam , 1984 ) , pp .
229 - 270 .
van der horst , p.  a.  bobbert , p.  h.  l.  de jong , m.  a.  j.  michels , g.  brock , and p.  j.  kelly , phys .
b * 61 * , 15817 ( 2000 ) ; m.  rohlfing and s.  g.  louie , phys .  rev .
b * 62 * , 4927 ( 2000 ) ; m.  rohlfing , m.  l.  tiago , and s.  g.  louie , synth .
metals * 116 * , 101 ( 2001 ) .
u.  w.  schmitt , and g.  a.  voth , j.  phys .
b * 102 * , 5547 ( 1998 ) ; u.  w.  schmitt , and g.  a.  voth , j.  chem .
phys .  * 111 * , 9361 ( 1999 ) ; m.  cuma , u.  w.  schmitt , and g.  a.  voth , j.  phys .  chem .
a * 105 * , 2814 ( 2001 ) .
l.  jaroszewski , b.  lesyng , and j.  a.  mccammon , j.  mol .
( theochem ) * 283 * , 57 ( 1993 ) ; p.  grochowski , b.  lesyng , p.  baa , and j.  a.  mccammon , int .
j.  quant .
chem .  * 60 * , 1143 ( 1996 ) ; j.  trylska , p.  grochowski , and m.  geller , int .
j.  quant .
* 82 * , 86 ( 2001 ) .
j.  h.  rose , j.  ferrante , and j.  r.  smith , phys .
47 * , 675 ( 1981 ) ; j.  h.  rose , j.  ferrante , and j.  r.  smith , phys .
b * 28 * , 1835 ( 1983 ) ; j.  h.  rose , j.  r.  smith , f.  guinea , and j.  ferrante , phys .
b * 29 * , 2963 ( 1984 ) ; j.  ferrante , and j.  r.  smith , phys .
b * 31 * , 3427 ( 1985 ) ; j.  r.  smith , h.  schlosser , w.  leaf , j.  ferrante , and j.  h.  rose , phys .
a * 39 * , 514 ( 1989 ) .