the need for a relativistic methodology that is broadly applicable to nuclear physics has never been more apparent .
one of our most important sets of problems involves understanding the transition between the ( baryon , meson ) and the ( quark , gluon ) degrees of freedom .
using a relativistic formulation of the hadronic degrees of freedom is necessary to avoid a misinterpretation of a kinematic effect as a signal for the transition .
the goal of understanding future high momentum studies of nuclear targets using exclusive , nearly exclusive or inclusive processes can only be met through using relativistic techniques .
the light front approach of dirac@xcite in which the time variable is taken as @xmath0 and the spatial variables are @xmath1 @xcite is one of the promising approaches because the momentum canonically conjugate to @xmath2 , @xmath3 , is directly related to the observables .
it is worthwhile to begin with a qualitative explanation of the utility of these light cone variables and this light front approach in a qualitative fashion .
consider lepton - nucleus deep inelastic scattering as a first example .
the observed structure function depends on the bjorken variable @xmath4 which in the parton model is the ratio of the quark plus momentum to that of the target . if one regards the nucleus as a collection of nucleons , @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the plus momentum of a nucleon bound in the nucleus .
thus , a more direct relationship between the necessary nuclear theory and experiment occurs by using a theory in which @xmath6 is one of the canonical variables . since @xmath6 is conjugate to a spatial variable @xmath7 , it is natural to quantize the dynamical variables at the equal light cone time variable of @xmath8 . to use such
a formalism is to use light front quantization , since the other three spatial coordinates ( @xmath9 ) are on a plane perpendicular to a light like vector@xcite .
this use of light front quantization requires a new derivation of the nuclear wave function , because previous work used the equal time formalism .
are these light cone variables useful only in nuclear deep inelastic scattering ?
let s answer this by examining the origin of such coordinates .
the four momentum of the incident virtual photon , q , can be said to have the components @xmath10 , with @xmath11 , and @xmath12 very large but @xmath13 finite ( the bjorken limit ) .
then @xmath14 the condition that the reaction be elastic scattering from the quarks is that @xmath15 or @xmath16 .
thus @xmath5 results from having only one large momentum in the problem , which can be taken in the negative z - direction , so that minus component is enhanced .
more generally , one expects to be able to use light cone coordinates @xmath17 whenever there is such a large momentum in the problem as in any high energy scattering process .
diverse applications are shown in the text by cheng and wu@xcite .
examples of most relevance include high energy projectile nuclear scattering and high momentum transfer quasi - elastic reactions involving nuclear targets .
light front techniques have previously been applied to systems of two hadrons .
the two main approaches have been the relativistic quantum mechanics of directly interacting particles @xcite and relativistic field theory @xcite .
we choose here to employ specific lagrangians which embody chiral and other symmetries , and thus use field theory .    the light front quantization procedure necessary to treat nucleon interactions with scalar and vector mesons was derived by soper@xcite , and by yan and collaborators@xcite .
here we combine the previous formalisms to obtain a light front treatment of a lagrangian which contains pions , vector and scalar mesons , and which respects the constraints of chiral symmetry .
here is an outline .
the bulk of the formalism is presented in sect .
, a chiral lagrangian which includes pions , scalar mesons and neutral vector mesons is presented .
the field equations are derived , and the quantization procedure for the free and interacting fields are quantized at the zero of light cone time @xmath18 .
the energy momentum tensor , the light front hamiltonian @xmath19 and plus momentum operator @xmath20 are derived .
the necessary contact interactions involving the exchange of instantaneous fermions and vector bosons are obtained .
the principal purpose of the present work is to develop a technique that could have wide application in nuclear physics .
thus we study and check the present formalism by applying it to three different examples- @xmath21 and @xmath22 scattering , and a mean field treatment of infinite nuclear matter- of relevance to nuclear physics . dealing successfully with each of these subjects
is a prerequisite for making progress .
3 shows how light front field theory leads to a chiral treatment of low energy pion - nucleon scattering , which is consistent with the results of soft pion theorems .
then nucleon - nucleon scattering is handled in a manifestly covariant manner , within the one - boson approximation , in sect .
4 . a discussion of the impact of chiral symmetry on the two - nucleon intermediate state contribution to the two pion exchange potential
is also included .
the mean field approximation is applied to infinite nuclear matter in sect 5 .
glazek and shakin@xcite used a lagrangian containing nucleons and scalar mesons to study infinite nuclear matter . here
vector mesons are included and the rotational - invariance arguments used in sect . 4 are used to derive the glazek - shakin @xmath6 variable . the energy of nuclear matter is computed and shown to be the same as found in the equal time formalism . the unique feature of the present formalism is the ability to obtain the nuclear and mesonic plus - momentum distributions from the energy momentum tensor .
we find that that mesons can carry a significant fraction of the nuclear plus momentum , but have support only at 0 plus - momentum .
some the results for nuclear matter have been presented in an earlier publication@xcite ; here the calculation is performed in two different ways and explained in more detail .
sect . 6 summarizes the new results , presents a critique and discusses possible future applications .
appendix a contains a summary of notation and some useful equations .
we use a non - linear chiral model in which the nuclear constituents are nucleons @xmath23 ( or @xmath24 , pions @xmath25 scalar mesons @xmath26@xcite and vector mesons @xmath27 .
the lagrangian @xmath28 is given by @xmath29 where the bare masses of the nucleon , scalar and vector mesons are given by @xmath30 @xmath31 , and @xmath32 .
the unitary matrix @xmath33 can be chosen from amongst three forms @xmath34 : @xmath35 which correspond to different definitions of the fields .
the pion - nucleon coupling here is chosen as that of linear representations of chiral symmetry used by gursey @xcite , with the the lagrangian approximately @xmath36 ) invariant under the chiral transformation @xmath37 one may transform the fermion fields , by taking @xmath38 as the nucleon field .
one then gets lagrangians of the non - linear representation , as explained by weinberg @xcite . in this case
the early soft pion theorems are manifest in the lagrangian , and the linear pion - fermion coupling is of the pseudovector type .
however , the use of light front theory , requires that one find an easy way to solve the constraint equation that governs the fermion field .
we shall show that the constraint can be handled in a simple fashion by using the linear representation .
moreover , we shall see that the early soft pion theorems are indeed manifest from the form of the light front hamiltonian .
the constant @xmath39 plays the role of the bare pion - nucleon coupling constant . if @xmath40 is chosen to be the pion decay constant , the goldberger - trieman relation yields the result that the axial vector coupling constant @xmath41 , which would be a problem for the lagrangian , unless loop effects can make up the needed 25% effect .
corrections of that size are typical of order @xmath42 effects found in the cloudy bag model@xcite for many observables , including @xmath43 .
there are no explicit @xmath44 in the above lagrangian .
those will be handled in a future publication . for the moment
we note that treating the higher order effects of the pion - nucleon inherent in this lagrangian is likely to lead to a resonance in the ( 3,3 ) channel of pion nucleon scattering .
such effects can be included in the two - pion exchange contribution to nucleon - nucleon scattering .
however , such an approach seems cumbersome .
the choice of using an explicit @xmath45 instead of the iterated @xmath46 interaction is analogous to our use of a scalar meson even though the effects of @xmath47 interactions , which could lead to similar effects , are included in the lagrangian .
we follow many authors ( see the review @xcite ) and include a scalar meson to simplify calculations . in this treatment , which follows that of refs.@xcite , the scalar meson @xmath26 is not a chiral partner of the pion-
the chiral transformation is that of eq .
( [ chiral ] ) .
the present lagrangian may be thought of as a low energy effective theory for nuclei under normal conditions .
a more sophisticated lagrangian is reviewed in @xcite and used in @xcite ; the present one is used to show that light front techniques can be applied to hadronic theories relevant for nuclear physics .
this hadronic model , when evaluated in mean field approximation , gives@xcite at least a qualitatively good description of many ( but not all ) nuclear properties and reactions .
there are a variety of problems occuring when higher order terms are included@xcite .
the aim here is to use a reasonably sophisticated lagrangian to study the effects that one might obtain by using a light front formulation .
we could also have used the linear sigma model .
the light front quantization for that model can be accomplished using a simple generalization of the work of refs .
@xcite and @xcite , and is not shown here . according to the review @xcite the use of such a lagrangean precludes a successful description of nuclei at the mean - field level .    the next step is to examine the field equations .
the relevant dirac equation for the nucleons is @xmath48 the field equations for the mesons are @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 = -m\bar\psi ' { \partial u\over \partial \pi_i}\psi ' , \label{pimeson}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath52 .
the next step is obtain the light front hamiltonian ( @xmath19 ) as a sum of a free , non - interacting and a set of terms containing all of the interactions .
this is accomplished by using the energy momentum tensor as @xmath53 the usual relations determine @xmath54 , with @xmath55 in which the degrees of freedom are labelled by @xmath56 .
it is worthwhile to consider the limit in which the interactions between the fields are removed .
this will allow us to define the free hamiltonian @xmath57 and to display the necessary commutation relations .
the energy momentum tensors of the non - interacting fields are defined as as @xmath58 and @xmath59 the fermion fields are quantized in the next sub - section .
then the use of eq.([tmunu ] ) leads to the result @xmath60,\ ] ] with @xmath61 the scalar field can be expressed in terms of creation and destruction operators : @xmath62,%\bbox{k}\cdot\bbox{x}}\right],\ ] ] where @xmath63 with @xmath64 , and @xmath65 .
the @xmath66 function restricts @xmath6 to positive values .
the commutation relations are @xmath67= \delta(\bbox{k}_\perp-\bbox{k}'_\perp ) \delta(k^+-k'^+)\label{comm}\ ] ] with @xmath68=0 $ ] .
it is useful to define @xmath69 which will be used throughout this paper .
the derivatives appearing in the quantity @xmath70 are evaluated and then one sets @xmath18 to 0 to obtain the result @xmath71 which has the interpretation of an operator the counts the light front energy @xmath64 of all of the particles .
the pion field is treated in a similar manner , with the result @xmath72,\ ] ] and @xmath73 with commutation relations analogous to that of eq.([comm ] ) .
the energy momentum tensor for the free vector meson field is obtained directly from the defining relation ( [ tmunu ] ) as @xmath74.\ ] ] it is desirable to obtain the symmetric energy momentum tensor .
this is done by using @xmath75 , subtracting a total divergence and using the free field equations .
the result is @xmath76.\ ] ] the component relevant for the light front hamiltonian can be shown to be @xmath77 the expression for the vector meson field operator is @xmath78,\label{vfield}\ ] ] where the polarization vectors are the usual ones : @xmath79 once again the four momenta are on - shell with @xmath80 the light front commutation relations : @xmath81=\delta_{\omega\omega ' } \delta^{(2,+)}(\bbox{k}-\bbox{k}'),\ ] ] with the others vanishing , lead to commutation relations amongst the field operators that are the same as in ref .
the expression for @xmath82 can now be obtained from eqs.([t+- ] ) and ( [ vfield ] ) as @xmath83      this subject is complicated by the presence of massive vector meson fields .
various difficulties were handled by soper@xcite and yan@xcite .
the key features that we use are summarized here . in particular , the fields @xmath84 are chosen as the three independent fields , with the others expressible in terms of these .
we shall need only one of these relationships in which the plus component of eq.([vmeson ] ) can be used to obtain @xmath85.\label{vpm}\ ] ] with @xmath86 and the inverse of @xmath87 is defined in refs .
@xcite-@xcite . a more recent discussion is given by harindrinath and zhang@xcite , and the essentials are presented here in appendix a , we turn to the case of spin 1/2 fermions .
although described by four - component spinors , these fields have only two independent degrees of freedom .
the light front formalism allows a convenient separation of dependent and independent variables via the projection operators @xmath88@xcite , with @xmath89 . the independent fermion degree of freedom is chosen to be @xmath90 .
the properties of the projection operators are discussed in appendix a. one gets two coupled equations for @xmath91 by multiplying eq.([dirac ] ) by @xmath92 and @xmath93 : @xmath94 the relation between @xmath95 and @xmath90 is very complicated unless one may set the plus component of the vector field to zero@xcite .
this is a matter of a choice of gauge for qed and qcd , but the non - zero mass of the vector meson prevents such a choice here .
instead , one simplifies the equation for @xmath95 by@xcite transforming the fermion field according to @xmath96 with @xmath97 this transformation leads to the result @xmath98 where @xmath99    note that all of the previously obtained fermionic sources of meson fields are unchanged by the transformation ( [ trans ] ) : @xmath100    the eigenmode expansion for @xmath101 is needed to compute the interaction between nucleons .
( [ vfield ] ) and ( [ vbar ] ) can be used to obtain @xmath102,\label{nvfield}\ ] ] where the polarization vectors @xmath103 are given by@xcite : @xmath104 with the properties @xmath105    the path towards the light front hamiltonian proceeds via the energy momentum tensor , which is given by @xmath106\psi'\nonumber\\ + \partial^\mu\phi\partial^\nu\phi + \partial^\mu\bbox{\pi}\cdot \partial^\nu \bbox{\pi } + \bbox{\pi}\cdot\partial^\nu\bbox{\pi } { \bbox{\pi}\cdot\partial^\mu\bbox{\pi}\over\pi^2}(1-{f^2\over \pi^2 } \mbox{sin}^2{\pi\over f}).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the use of the fermion field equation allows one to obtain the light front hamiltonian density @xmath107 it is now worthwhile to discuss a subtle feature regarding chiral symmetry in light front formalisms .
chiral invariance is defined as invariance under the transformation defined by eq.([chiral ] ) if the equal time formalism is used .
now the independent fermion variable is @xmath108 and @xmath109 is a functional of this .
thus chiral invariance is the invariance under the transformation @xmath110 which is not the same as eq.([chiral ] ) because eq.([newchiral ] ) produces a change in @xmath109 that is different than using @xmath111 @xcite .
the @xmath70 ( or equivalently the light front hamiltonian ) of eq.([tpm1 ] ) is invariant under the transformation ( [ newchiral ] ) if the pion mass is neglected so the usual chiral properties are obtained in these light front dynamics .
the expression ( [ tpm1 ] ) is useful for situations , such as in the mean field approximation case for infinite nuclear matter examined below , for which a simple expression for @xmath108 is known .
this is not always the case , so it is worthwhile to use the dirac equation to express @xmath70 in an alternate form : @xmath112    it is convenient to consider @xmath109 as a sum of terms , one @xmath113 whose relation with @xmath108 is free of interactions@xcite , the other @xmath114 containing the interactions .
that is , rewrite the second of eq .
( [ yan ] ) as @xcite @xmath115 furthermore , define @xmath116 , so that @xmath117 where @xmath118 .
the purpose of the above decomposition is to separate the dependent and independent parts of @xmath23 and to allow one to expand @xmath119 in terms of eigenstates of momentum .
one may make a similar treatment for the vector meson fields .
the operator @xmath120 , determined by eq  ( [ vpm ] ) , is relevant for the hamiltonian .
part of this operator is determined by a constraint equation . to see this examine eq  ( [ vpm ] ) , and make a definition : @xmath121 where @xmath122 next use equations ( [ fcon ] ) and ( [ vcon ] ) to rewrite the hamiltonian as a sum of a free and interacting terms .
the sum of the last term of eq .
( [ tpm2 ] ) and the terms involving @xmath123 is the density of the interaction hamiltonian , @xmath124 , plus the free fermion term , @xmath125 .
use equations ( [ fcon ] ) and ( [ vcon ] ) in the expression ( [ tpm2 ] ) for @xmath70 along with the field equations and integration by parts to find : @xmath126 and @xmath127 with @xmath128 @xmath129 and @xmath130    the term @xmath131 accounts the emission or absorption of a single vector or scalar meson , as well as the emission or absorption of any number of pions through the operator @xmath132 .
the term @xmath133 includes contact terms in which there is propagation of an instantaneous fermion .
the term @xmath134 accounts for the propagation of an instantaneous vector meson .
we may now quantize the fermion fields using @xmath135 , \label{dq}\ ] ] where again the momenta are on shell : @xmath136 , and the anti - commutation relations are given by @xmath137 the properties of the dirac spinors are described in appendix a. the term @xmath125 of eq .
( [ freef ] ) can now be expressed as @xmath138    the component that is related to the plus momentum is @xmath139 .
the necessary expression is given by @xmath140
we begin by showing that , if one starts with a non - linear representation of chiral symmetry , the requirement of solving the constraint equation for the @xmath141 component of the fermion field leads one to a lagrangian of the gursey - type linear representation .
the focus is on chiral properties and pion - nucleon scattering , so we dispense with the vector and non - chiral @xmath26 meson fields for this section , and it is sufficient to examine only the following fermion - pion term of a non - linear representation@xcite : @xmath142n.\ ] ] next obtain the fermion field equation and make the usual decomposition : @xmath143 with @xmath144n_-\label{nn } \nonumber\\ \left(i\partial^+-o^+\right)n_-= [ \bbox{\alpha}_\perp\cdot\bbox{(p}_\perp-\bbox{o}_\perp)+\beta m]n_+,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the operator @xmath145 has been defined as @xmath146 we wish to remove the @xmath147 term from the left hand side of the equation for @xmath148 .
this can be done by defining a unitary operator @xmath149 and fermion field @xmath150 such that @xmath151 with @xmath152 the identity@xcite @xmath153 where @xmath154 is given in eq .
( [ us ] ) , helps a good deal .
its use in eq .
( [ feq ] ) , combined with the condition @xmath155 , leads to the result @xmath156 so that using eqs .
( [ ff ] ) and ( [ defchi ] ) in ( [ nn ] ) yields @xmath157\chi_- \nonumber\\ i\partial^+\chi_-=\left [ \bbox{\alpha}_\perp\cdot\bbox { p}_\perp+\beta mu_2\right]\chi_+.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is of the desired form in which no interactions appear on the left - hand - side of the equation for @xmath158 .
thus the use of light front quantization mandates that the pion - nucleon interactions be of the form of eq .
( [ lag ] ) .
the first test for any chiral formalism is to reproduce the early soft pion theorems@xcite .
here we concentrate on low energy pion nucleon scattering because of its relation to the nucleon - nucleon force .
we work to second order in @xmath159 in this first application . in this case , each of the @xmath34 takes the same form : @xmath160    this expression is to be used in the potentials @xmath131 and @xmath133 of eqs .
( [ v1 ] ) and ( [ v2 ] ) .
the second order scattering graphs are of three types and are shown as time @xmath18 ordered perturbation theory diagrams in fig .  1
. the kinematics are such that @xmath161 , with @xmath162 and @xmath163 .
the iteration of @xmath131 to second order yields the direct and crossed graphs of fig .
1a . in this formalism
@xmath131 is proportional to the matrix element of @xmath164 between @xmath165 spinors , so it is proportional to the momentum of the absorbed or emitted pion .
thus the terms of fig .
1a vanish near threshold .
the terms of fig .
1b are generated by the @xmath166 terms of @xmath131 .
using the various field expansions in the expression ( [ v1 ] ) for @xmath131 leads to the result that plus - momentum is conserved and the plus momentum of every particle is greater than zero .
this means that the first of fig.1b vanishes identically and the second vanishes for values of the initial pion plus momentum that are less than twice the nucleon mass .
the net result is that only the instantaneous term of @xmath133 and the @xmath167 term of @xmath131 ( shown in fig .
1c ) remain to be evaluated .
proceeding more formally , we evaluate the s - matrix given by @xmath168 where @xmath169 is the @xmath18 ( light - front time ) ordering operator and @xmath170 is the interaction representation light front hamiltonian .
then @xmath171 with @xmath172 the evaluation proceeds by using the field expansions in the expressions for @xmath131 and @xmath133 . integrating over @xmath173 and evaluating the result between the relevant initial and final pion - nucleon states leads to the result that each contribution to the s - matrix is proportional to a common factor , @xmath174 which combines with the result of the required integration over the light cone time ( @xmath18 ) to provide the necessary momentum conservation and flux factors . the remaining factor of each term is its contribution to the invariant amplitude @xmath175 .
the result is @xmath176 where the three terms here correspond to the three terms of fig .
the role of cancellations in the reduction of the term proportional to @xmath177 is already apparent . to understand the threshold physics take @xmath178 and @xmath179
. then one finds @xmath180 to leading order in @xmath181 .
the weak nature of the @xmath177 term and the presence of the second weinberg - tomazowa term is the hallmark of chiral symmetry@xcite .
the same results could be obtained using the linear sigma model , with @xmath182 exchange playing the role of the @xmath167 term of eq.([um1 ] ) .
the ultimate aim is to derive the nuclear wave function including correlation effects .
the first step is to understand nucleon - nucleon scattering using our light front formalism .
we start with the one boson exchange approximation , discuss the light front wave equation and show that this procedure gives the same scattering amplitude as the usual procedure of computing the one - boson exchange contributions to the invariant amplitudes and using the blankenbeckler - sugar reduction of the bethe - salpeter equation@xcite .
this usual procedure is covariant , so that our construction shows that the light front wave procedure respects rotational invariance .
this invariance is the result of strikman and frankfurt@xcite and others .
the present treatment explicitly includes the effects of nucleon spin and the nucleon - nucleon interaction can derived from an underlying chiral lagrangian .
the starting point is the s matrix of eqs .
( [ smat1 ] ) and ( [ smat2 ] ) . here
the initial state @xmath183 consists of nucleons with quantum numbers labeled by 1 and 2 , and the state @xmath40 consists of nucleons 3 and 4 . to be definite , we take the plus momentum of nucleon 1 to be greater than that of nucleon 3 , and the momentum transfer @xmath184 to be @xmath185 so that @xmath186 .
the lowest order contributions to the invariant amplitude are represented by the light - front - time ordered graphs shown in fig .
the graphs of fig .
2a represent terms of the form @xmath187 , and that of fig .
2b accounts for the instantaneous massive vector boson exchange term of @xmath134 .
these terms may be evaluated by using the field expansions and doing the relevant integrals over the @xmath188 coordinate space .
each term has a common factor of @xmath189 where the factor @xmath190 in the numerator is compensated by dividing the invariant amplitude by @xmath190 .
it is simplest to consider the effects of scalar @xmath26 and pseudoscalar @xmath191 exchanges at the same time .
the scattering amplitudes @xmath192 take the form @xmath193 where the notation is that @xmath194 is the spinor for a nucleon of quantum numbers @xmath183 , and @xmath195 is either of the form @xmath196 or @xmath197 .
the momentum of the exchanged meson is @xmath198 , and it is necessary to realize that @xmath199 but @xmath200 where @xmath201 is the mass of the exchanged scalar meson or pion .
the factor @xmath202 arises from the denominators of the field expansions and @xmath203 is the result of evaluating the light front energy denominator @xmath204 . define the energy denominator of eq.([gen ] ) to be @xmath205 so that @xmath206 using eqs .
( [ off ] ) and ( [ off1 ] ) immediately yields @xmath207 so the amplitude @xmath208 takes the form @xmath209 this is the usual @xcite expression for a one - boson exchange potential , if no form factor effects are included .
note that the klein - gordon propagator is obtained using only a single time - ordered graph .
the calculation with the equal - time formulation requires the summation of two time - ordered graphs .    the derivation of the contribution of vector meson exchange proceeds by adding the terms of fig 2a and 2b . the term of fig .
2a can immediately seen to be @xmath210.\ ] ] the factor in brackets arises from the polarization sum , recall eq .
( [ ebar ] ) .
it is worthwhile to define the contribution of the second two terms in the bracket , which result from the difference between @xmath101 and @xmath27 fields , as @xmath211 , with @xmath212 next use the relations @xmath213 and the equality of the @xmath214 and @xmath215 components of @xmath198 with those of @xmath184 to obtain the results @xmath216 but @xmath217 , which leads to a compact rewriting of eq .
( [ bar ] ) as @xmath218 the term of fig .
2b is obtained by using the field expansion in the equation for @xmath134 , ( [ v3 ] ) , integrating over coordinate space and removing the common factor .
the result is @xmath219 which exactly cancels the term @xmath211 .
the net result is that the amplitude for vector meson exchange , @xmath220 , takes the familiar form : @xmath221    the sum of the amplitudes arising from each of the individual one boson exchange terms : @xmath222 gives the invariant amplitude to second order in each of the coupling constants .
these amplitudes are strong , so computing the nucleon - nucleon scattering amplitude and phase shifts requires including higher order terms .
one may include a sum which gives unitarity by including all iterations of the scattering operator @xmath223 through intermediate two - nucleon states : @xmath224 where @xmath225 is the negative - momentum in the initial state and @xmath226 projects on to two - nucleon intermediate states .
more explicitly , eq .  ( [ iter ] ) is given by @xmath227 after removing the common factor and accounting for the momentum conserving delta functions .
one realizes that this is of the form of the weinberg equation@xcite by expressing the plus - momentum variable in terms of a light - front momentum fraction @xmath228 such that @xmath229 and using the relative and total momentum variables : @xmath230 then @xmath231 where @xmath232 is square of the total initial four - momentum , otherwise known as the invariant energy @xmath233 and @xmath234 is the corresponding quantity for the intermediate state . because the kernal @xmath223 is itself an invariant amplitude the procedure of solving this equation to determine observables is manifestly covariant .
equation  ( [ 419 ] ) can in turn can be re - expressed as the blankenbecler - sugar ( bbs ) equation @xcite by using the variable transformation@xcite : @xmath235 with @xmath236 .
the result is : @xmath237 which is the desired equation .
the three - dimensional propagator is exactly that of the bbs equation ; there is one difference .
our one boson exchange potentials depend on the square of the four momentum @xmath238 transferred when a meson is absorbed or emitted by a nucleon .
thus the energy difference between the initial and final on - shell nucleons is included and @xmath239 .
the derivation of the bbs equation from the bethe - salpeter equation specifies that @xmath240 is used in the meson propagator .
including @xmath241 instead of @xmath240 increases the range of the potential .
such an effect can be hidden in phenomenological potentials by changing the pion - nucleon coupling constant or form factor .
one can easily convert eq .
( [ bsbs ] ) into the lippman - schwinger equation of non - relativistic scattering theory by removing the factor @xmath242 with a simple transformation@xcite .
the present results are that one can use the light front technique to derive nucleon - nucleon potentials in the one - boson exchange obe approximation and use these in an appropriate wave equation .
therefore our procedure is directly comparable to the one used in constructing the realistic bonn one - boson exchange potentials used in momentum space .
those potentials also have a close connection with an underlying lagrangian .
our purpose here is to argue that the present procedure can yield potentials essentially identical to the bonn obep potentials and therefore would lead to a good description of the nn data .
the bonn one - boson exchange potentials employ six different mesons @xmath243 and the ( isovector scalar ) @xmath244 meson .
the present techniques can be used to handle all of these mesons and their couplings , with the possible exception of the tensor @xmath245 part of the @xmath246-nucleon interaction .
the presence of such a tensor interaction makes it difficult ( or impossible ) to write the equation for @xmath109 as @xmath247 this is relevant because the standard value of the ratio of the tensor to vector @xmath246-nucleon coupling @xmath248 is 6.1 , based upon ref .
@xcite and subsequent papers .
reproducing the observed values of @xmath249 and p - wave wave phase shifts requires a large value @xmath248 ; see ref .
however the lagrangian compensates for its lack of a @xmath246-n interaction with tensor coupling by generating such a term via vertex correction diagrams ( which are the origin of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron in qed ) .
such diagrams probably do not generate the phenomenologically required values of the coupling constants , but all that is needed here is that terms of the correct form be produced .
this is because the standard procedure is to choose the values of the coupling constants so as to yield a good description of the nn scattering data . indeed
the potentials a , b , and c are defined by the parameters which account for the mesonic masses , coupling constants and form factors .
thus we end up with the same procedure that is used in the bonn one boson exchange potentials .
this brings us to the treatment of divergent terms in our procedure . the definition of any effective lagrangian requires the specification of such a procedure . for the present , it is sufficient to say that we introduce form factors , @xmath250 which reduce the strength of the @xmath228 meson - nucleon coupling for large values of @xmath251 .
this is also the procedure of ref  @xcite .
the net result is that the one - boson exchange treatment of the nucleon - nucleon potential and the t - matrix resulting from its use in the bbs equation is essentially the same as the one - boson exchange procedure of ref .
thus our light front treatment is guaranteed to be consistent with nucleon - nucleon nucleon scattering data measured in the standard energy range .
such a similarity has also been obtained using relativistic hamiltonian dynamics@xcite .      the dominant contribution to
the two pion exchange potential arises from contributions to intermediate states that include one or two @xmath45s@xcite , and a treatment of such effects based on chiral symmetry has been provided by van kolck and collaborators@xcite .
including the effects of @xmath45 s is beyond the scope of the present work , but we are able to discuss the two pion exchange contribution ( of order @xmath252 ) to the nucleon nucleon potential . the property that a sum of light cone time - ordered diagrams is equal a single feynman graph can be used to simplify the calculation .
the relevant feynman graphs are displayed in fig .  3 ; the terms originating from the linear @xmath253 coupling ( a ,
b ) , from the quadratic @xmath254 coupling ( c ) and from a combination of the linear and quadratic interactions ( d ) are indicated .
the line through the two - nucleon intermediate state of fig .
3a is meant to indicate that the contribution arising from iterating the one pion exchange interaction is removed .
this has been a standard procedure since the work of ref .
@xcite , and will not be discussed further .
the sum of the terms of fig .
3a and 3b is equal to the partovi - lomon two pion exchange potential , as they used the pseudoscalar pion - nucleon interaction .
this interaction certainly simplifies the calculation ; in particular the diagrams of fig .  3a , b and d are convergent ( whereas they would be strongly divergent if pseudovector coupling were to be used .
one can use such a pseudoscalar coupling , and include the effects of chiral symmetry , provided one also includes the effects of the @xmath254 coupling shown in fig .  3c , and the combined effects of the linear and quadratic interactions , fig .
the quadratic interaction term cancels the large pair terms in pion - nucleon scattering and should also play a significant role here in reducing the size of the computed potential .
thus we expect that the partovi - lomon potential contains too large an attraction .
next turn to the procedure used in constructing the full bonn potential .
this potential is constructed by ignoring all of the z - graphs and including the the effects of the two - nucleon intermediate states which arise from the crossed graph , fig .
3b , as well as the parts of fig .
3a arising from time ordered terms in which two pions exist at the same time .
( for such contributions to the tpep the linear pseudoscalar and pseudovector interactions are are evaluated between on shell positive energy nucleon spinors , and are therefore equivalent .
the resulting contribution to the tpep is small , but is comparable to that of the iterated opep .
the neglect of the z graphs goes a long way towards including the effects of chiral symmetry .
however , terms involving the weinberg - tomazowa interaction at one or two vertices are ignored . the computation of the graphs of fig .
3 would include such effects implicitly as well as that of pair suppression .
thus a detailed comparison would be useful .
however , the small nature of the effects that we discuss now indicate that the dominance of the tpep by effects of intermediate @xmath45 s will remain unchallenged .
the nucleon - nucleon interaction of the previous section can be used as the basis for a light front brueckner theory of nuclei .
we study the mean field approximation for infinite nuclear matter as a first step .
the nuclear mean field model- the shell model- occupies pre - eminence in understanding nuclear structure .
we need to see if our formalism can describe this physics .    in the mean field approximation@xcite ,
the coupling constants are considered strong and the fermion density large .
then the meson fields can be approximated as classical- the sources of the meson fields are replaced by their expectation values . in this case
, the nucleon mode functions will be plane waves and the nuclear matter ground state can be assumed to be a normal fermi gas , of fermi momentum @xmath255 , and of large volume @xmath256 in its rest frame .
we consider the case that there is an equal number of protons and neutrons .
first we examine the mesonic field equations ( [ vmeson])-([pimeson ] ) .
the baryon source of the pion field is a pseudoscalar operator , so its expectation value vanishes in the ground state .
thus this mean field approximation leads to the result that @xmath257 .
the other meson fields are constants , independent of space and time , given by @xmath258 where the brackets denote expectation values of the nuclear ground state in its rest frame and the baryon density is @xmath259 this result that @xmath27 is a constant , along with eqs .
( [ vbar ] ) and ( [ mfa ] ) , can be used to determine @xmath101 .
in particular , @xmath260 by construction . furthermore
, the conditions that @xmath261 and @xmath262 tell us that @xmath263 .
finally @xmath264 , so that @xmath265 , so the net result is that the only non - vanishing component of @xmath101 is @xmath266 .    with this mean field approximation , the fermionic field equations ( [ yan ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath267 now @xmath26 and @xmath268 are constants so we expect the mode functions for the field expansion of @xmath23 to be of the plane wave form @xmath269 and can be obtained from eq .
( [ nyan ] ) as@xcite @xmath270 the light front eigenenergy @xmath271 is the sum of a kinetic energy term in which the mass is shifted by the presence of the scalar field , and an energy arising from the vector field . comparing this equation with the one for free nucleons , @xmath272 , shows that the nucleons have a mass @xmath273 and move in plane wave states .
the nucleon field operator is constructed using the solutions of eq .
( [ sol ] ) as the plane wave basis states .
this means that the nuclear matter ground state , defined by operators that create and destroy baryons in eigenstates of eq .
( [ sol ] ) , is the correct wave function and that equations   ( [ mfa ] ) and ( [ sol ] ) represent the solution of the approximate field equations , and the diagonalization of the hamiltonian .
one question remains .
we are going to fill up a fermi sea , but @xmath255 is the magnitude of a three vector .
how is this three vector defined ?
this was answered in the paper of glazek and shakin @xcite who showed that rotational invariance is manifest if one uses the definition : @xmath274 which implicitly defines @xmath275 .
using eq .
( [ kplus ] ) allows one to maintain the equivalence between energies computed in the light front and equal time formulations of scalar field theories@xcite .
a similar equation has been used to restore manifest rotational invariance in light - front qed@xcite .
we shall show that this same expression also restores rotational invariance in this mean field problem when vector mesons are included .
equation  ( [ kplus ] ) has the correct form in the limit of non - interacting nucleons and therefore seems natural@xcite .
we attempt a heuristic derivation of this equation using the requirement that manifest rotational invariance be restored .
the starting point is the observation that eq .
( [ alpha ] ) , with its definition of @xmath228 as the plus momentum fraction carried by a nucleon , restores manifest rotational invariance in the two - nucleon system .
let s consider the mean field approximation as involving an interaction between a nucleon and a very heavy particle containing a-1 nucleons ( with @xmath276 ) .
then the variable @xmath277 , which is the fraction of the nuclear plus - momentum carried by a nucleon , is given by @xmath278 and is a suitable generalization of the variable @xmath228 .
the nucleon mass is taken to be @xmath273 , because it is this mass that appears in the nucleon field equations .
the mass of the @xmath279 body system is dominated by the mass of the ( a-1 ) nucleons mass ( the binding energy per particle is 16 mev @xmath280 compared with 940 mev ) , so that we may write @xmath281 in which the last line results from the limit @xmath282 .
the key feature is that the variable @xmath277 is defined as a momentum fraction , so that @xmath283 comparing eq .
( [ approx ] ) and eq .
( [ begin ] ) leads to eq .
( [ kplus ] ) .
the computation of the energy and plus momentum distribution proceeds from taking the appropriate expectation values of the energy momentum tensor @xmath284 discussed in sect .  2 and @xmath285 we are concerned with the light front energy @xmath19 and momentum @xmath20 .
the relevant components of @xmath284 are presented in eqs .
( [ tpm1 ] ) and ( [ tpp ] ) . within the mean field approximation(mfa ) , the derivatives of the meson fields are zero so that one finds @xmath286 taking the nuclear matter expectation value of @xmath70 and @xmath139 and performing the spatial integral of eq .
( [ pmu ] ) leads to the result @xmath287 the subscript f denotes that @xmath288 with @xmath275 defined by the relation ( [ kplus ] ) . equations ( [ pminus ] ) and ( [ pplus ] ) along with the expression for @xmath6 , ( [ kplus ] ) allow an evaluation of @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
this shall be done in two different ways .
in the first method we evaluate the energy of the a - nucleon system @xmath289@xcite , which turns out to be the same as in the usual equal - time treatment@xcite . this can be seen by summing equations ( [ pminus ] ) and ( [ pplus ] ) to obtain @xmath290 then replace the integration over @xmath6 by one over @xmath275 , using eq .
( [ kplus ] ) so that @xmath291 where @xmath292 then eq .
( [ ei ] ) takes the form : @xmath293 which is the expression familiar from the walecka model , this confluence of energies is a nice check on the present result because a manifestly covariant solution of the present problem , with the usual energy , has been obtained@xcite .
we consider the system to be at a fixed large volume , @xmath256 , so that @xmath294 depends on @xmath26 and @xmath255 .
the ground state energy is determined by minimizing @xmath294 with respect to those two parameters .
setting @xmath295@xcite to zero reproduces the field equation for @xmath26 ( [ smf ] ) as is also the case in the equal - time formalism .
the next step is to minimize the energy per particle @xmath296 at fixed volume with respect to @xmath255 .
( one may also minimize the energy with respect to the volume@xcite . )
start this calculation by using @xmath297 to obtain : @xmath298 using eq .
( [ e ] ) followed by eqs .
( [ smf ] ) and ( [ mfa ] ) leads to the result @xmath299 where @xmath300 .
this is a transcendental equation which determines @xmath255 , so that the calculation of @xmath301 is complete
. it is useful to note that the relation @xmath302 ( which must hold for a system in its rest frame ) also emerges as a result of this minimization . to see this rewrite the left hand side of eq .
( [ mid ] ) as @xmath303 using this in eq .
( [ mid ] ) leads to @xmath304 which is just the relation that one obtains by setting @xmath302 with the versions of eqs .
( [ pminus ] ) and ( [ pplus ] ) obtained by replacing the variable @xmath6 by @xmath275 .
another way to obtain the energy of the ground state is to minimize the value of @xmath305 subject to the constraint that @xmath306 , or to minimize the quantity @xmath307 with @xmath308 where @xmath309 is a lagrange multiplier .
setting @xmath310 leads to @xcite @xmath311 but the field equation ( [ smf ] ) for @xmath26 can be restated as @xmath312 combining eqs.([mini ] ) and ( [ rew ] ) leads to the result that @xmath313 so that the minimization of @xmath314 with respect to @xmath255 is the same as minimizing @xmath294 with respect to @xmath255 .
this ends the discussion of how the expressions for @xmath315 are used to determine the energy of the system .
solving the field equations and minimizing the energy density determines the properties of nuclear matter , once the meson - nucleon coupling constants and masses are chosen .
one can now discuss the properties of the resulting system .
of course the necessary calculations have been done long ago . in particular ,
the parameters @xmath316 and @xmath317 have been chosen @xcite so as to give the binding energy per particle of nuclear matter as 15.75 mev with @xmath255=1.42 fm@xmath318 . in this case , solving the equation for @xmath26 gives @xmath319 .
the light front formalism embodies the use of @xmath6 as a canonical variable which allows us to study the nucleonic and mesonic contributions to the nuclear plus momentum .
the study of the plus momentum content is motivated by the desire to obtain a better understanding of lepton - nucleus deep inelastic scattering .
the emc effect@xcite that the structure function of a bound nucleon differs from that of a free one , showed a principal effect that the plus momentum carried by the valence quarks is less for a bound nucleon than for a free one .
many different interesting interpretations and related experiments@xcite were stimulated by these experiments .
but a correct interpretation requires that the role of conventional effects , such as nuclear binding , be assessed and understood .
our formalism employs plus component of the momentum so that it s use in assessing the nucleon s ( and therefore the valence quark s ) plus - momentum is necessary .
we therefore examine the @xmath320 component of the energy momentum tensor eq .
( [ pplus ] ) to determine how much momentum is carried by nucleons and how much by mesons .
rewrite eq .
( [ pplus ] ) as a sum of mesonic @xmath321 and nucleonic @xmath322 terms @xmath323 with @xmath324 and @xmath325 the parameters of eqs .
( [ cv ] ) and ( [ cc ] ) leads to @xmath326 and the use of eq .
( [ cv ] ) in eq .
( [ pm ] ) gives : @xmath327 while performing the integral involved in eq .
( [ nuc ] ) leads to @xmath328 the result is that 65% of the nuclear plus momentum must be carried by the nucleons and the remainder of 35% is carried by the mesons .
how do these numbers relate to experiments ?
to answer we need to recall that the nuclear structure function @xmath329 can be obtained from the light front distribution function @xmath330 ( which gives the probability for a nucleon to have a plus momentum fraction @xmath331 ) and the nucleon structure function @xmath332 using the relation@xcite : @xmath333 where @xmath331 is the @xmath334 times the fraction of the nuclear plus - momentum carried by the nucleon , and @xmath335 is the bjorken variable computed using the nuclear mass divided by @xmath334 ( @xmath336 ) : @xmath337 .
this formula is the expression of the convolution model in which one means to assess , via @xmath330 , only the influence of nuclear binding .
other effects such as the nuclear modification of the nucleon structure function ( if @xmath332 is obtained from deep inelastic scattering on the free nucleon ) and any influence of the final state interaction between the debris of the struck nucleon and the residual nucleus@xcite are neglected .
our formalism enables us to calculate the function @xmath330 from the integrand of eq.([pplus ] ) . since the integral gives the total plus - momentum carried by nucleons , the integrand which multiplies the factor @xmath6 can be interpreted as the necessary probability distribution .
thus : @xmath338 @xmath339 the function @xmath330 can be obtained by replacing @xmath6 by the dimensionless variable @xmath331 using @xmath340 with @xmath341 mev .
then using eq.([fdef ] ) leads to the result @xmath342 , \label{fy}\ ] ] where @xmath343 and @xmath344 . knowing the following integrals is useful : @xmath345 with the 0.65 representing the earlier 65% result .
we may now assess the implications of the statement that nucleons carry only 65% of the nuclear plus - momentum .
this number is to be compared with the value obtained by frankfurt and strikman@xcite .
they used data for @xmath329 and @xmath332 along with eq .
( [ deep ] ) to determine the average value of @xmath331 required by experiments with the result that @xmath346 this means that nucleons carrying 95% of the nuclear plus momentum ( a 5% depletion effect ) is sufficient to explain the 10 - 15% depletion effect observed for the fe nucleus .
our 35% depletion seems to be rather large , but one must remember that it results from nuclear matter . a result that compares more closely with experiment could be obtained in a version of the present model for which the value of @xmath273 is closer to @xmath347 . however , determining specific features of the present model is not the goal of the present work .
instead we wish to demonstrate that the light front formalism can be used to obtain a nuclear wave function expressed in terms of the plus - momentum variable which is closely related to experiment .
indeed we can verify that the ability to obtain the nucleonic plus momentum , feature that requires the use of a light front front formalism , instead of an equal time formalism . to do this compare the 0.65 fraction with the result of a relativistic calculation using the equal time ( et ) formalism@xcite . in this calculation , which uses eq .
( [ lag ] ) ) and for which the scalar and vector fields are the same as here , the plus momentum of a nucleon was chosen as the sum of the dirac eigenenergy and @xmath275 : @xmath348 using this leads to an average nucleon plus momentum fraction @xmath349 , which when evaluated with our parameters for @xmath350 and @xmath268 , leads to @xmath351 ! the big difference between our result and the earlier equal time result -compare eqs .
( [ kplus ] ) and ( [ ident])- arises from our use of the plus momentum as a canonical momentum variable and the consequent use of @xmath54 to construct the light front momentum and energy density . in particular , the first line of eq.([ident ] ) is only a reasonable guess .
we note also that the baryon number distribution @xmath352 ( number of baryons per @xmath331 , normalized to unity ) can be determined from the expectation value of @xmath353 .
the result is @xmath354   -{1\over 2y^2}({k_f^4\over \bar { m}^4}-({e_f\over \bar{m}}-y)^4 )     \right].\label{fby}\ ] ] some phenomenological models treat the two distributions @xmath330 and @xmath352 as identical .
the distributions have the same normalization , but they are different as shown by eqs .
( [ fy ] ) and ( [ fby ] ) .
consider that the average value of @xmath331 equal to 0.65 represents a very strong binding effect on lepton - nucleus deep inelastic scattering .
one might think that the mesons , which cause this binding , would also have huge effects on deep inelastic scattering .
it is therefore certainly necessary to determine the momentum distributions of the mesons .
the mesons contribute 0.35 of the total nuclear plus momentum , but we need to know how this is distributed over different individual values .
the paramount feature is that @xmath26 and @xmath27 are the same constants for any and all values of the spatial coordinates @xmath355 ( and also @xmath18 ) .
this means that the related momentum distribution can only be proportional to a delta function setting both the plus and @xmath215 components of the momentum to zero .
this result is attributed to the mean field approximation for infinite nuclear matter , in which the meson fields are treated as classical quantitates .
thus the finite plus momentum can be thought of as coming from an infinite number of quanta , each carrying an infinitesimal amount of plus momentum
. a plus momentum of 0 can only be accessed experimentally at @xmath356 , which requires an infinite amount of energy .
thus , in the mean field approximation , the scalar and vector mesons can not contribute to deep inelastic scattering .
the usual term for a field that is constant over space is a zero mode , and the present lagrangian provides a simple example . for finite nuclei , in the mean field approximation
, the mesons would carry a very small momentum of scale given by the inverse of the nuclear radius , under the mean field approximation .
if fluctuations were to be included , the relevant momentum scale would be of the order of the inverse of the average distance between nucleons ( about 2 fm ) .
we can understand the significance of the presence of components of a wave function that carry plus momentum but do not participate deep inelastic processes by reviewing a bit of history .
the nuclear binding effect is that the plus momentum of a bound nucleon is reduced by the binding energy , and so is that of its confined quarks .
conservation of momentum implies that if nucleons lose momentum , other constituents such as nuclear pions@xcite , must gain momentum .
this partitioning of the total plus momentum amongst the various constituents is called the momentum sum rule .
pions are quark anti - quark pairs so that a specific enhancement of the nuclear antiquark momentum distribution , mandated by momentum conservation , is a testable @xcite consequence of this idea . a nuclear drell yan experiment @xcite , in which a quark from a beam proton annihilates with a nuclear antiquark to form a @xmath357 pair , was performed .
no influence of nuclear pion enhancement was seen , leading bertsch et al.@xcite to question the idea that the pion is a dominant carrier of the nuclear force . in the present situation , we have a huge depletion effect of 35% , but with no consequence for either the nuclear deep inelastic scattering or drell - yan experiments .
we hasten to add that the lagrangian of eq .
( [ lag ] ) and its evaluation in mean field approximation for nuclear matter have been used to provide a simple but semi - realistic example .
it would be premature to compare the present results with data before obtaining light front dynamics for a model in which the correlational corrections to the mean field approximation are included , and which treats finite nuclei .
thus the specific numerical results of the present work are far less relevant than the central feature that the mesons responsible for nuclear binding need not be accessible in deep inelastic scattering .
however , the present model may be regarded as being one of a class of models in which the mean field plays an important role@xcite . for
such models nuclei would have constituents that contribute to the momentum sum rule but do not contribute to deep inelastic scattering .
in particular , a model can have a large binding effect , nucleons can carry a significantly less fraction of @xmath20 than unity , and it is not necessary to include the influence of mesons that could be ruled out in a drell - yan experiment .
the present paper shows how the light front quantization of a chiral lagrangian can be accomplished .
the resulting formalism can be applied to many problems of interest to nuclear physics . in particular , pion - nucleon , nucleon - nucleon scattering , and infinite nuclear matter ( in the mean field approximation ) are presented here .
soft pion theorems for pion - nucleon scattering are reproduced .
the treatment of nucleon - nucleon scattering is shown to be manifestly covariant in the one boson exchange approximation .
the implications of chiral symmetry for the two - nucleon intermediate state contribution to the two pion exchange potential are discussed .
the present results mainly constitute a feasibility study , in that the emphasis here is on checking the formalism by reproducing known results .
but this light front treatment does allow the effects of chiral symmetry to be incorporated within a relativistic formalism , and therefore should have a broad applicability in the future .
one remaining technical problem is to provide a light front quantization of a lagrangian for spin 3/2 particles .
the special feature of the light front formalism is its use of the plus momentum as one of the canonical variables .
this enables a close contact with the experimental variables used to analyse deep inelastic scattering and any experiment in which there is one large momentum .
this feature is exploited here in the derivation ( within the mean field approximation ) of the nucleonic and mesonic distribution functions for infinite nuclear matter .
the mesons are shown to carry a significant fraction of the nuclear plus momentum , but only a zero plus - momentum ( a zero mode ) , and therefore do not participate in nuclear deep inelastic scattering or drell - yan experiments .    the ultimate validity of the above ( perhaps startling ) statement depends on whether or not the dominance of mesonic zero modes survives calculations performed for finite nuclei and calculations which include the effects of nucleon - nucleon correlations .
there seems to be no technical barrier precluding such calculations .
this work is partially supported by the usdoe .
i thank the slac theory group and the national int for their hospitality .
i thank p. blunden , s.j .
brodsky , l. frankfurt , s. glazek , r. machleidt , r.j .
perry , c.m .
shakin , m. strikman and u. van kolck for useful discussions .
this is patterned after the review of harindrinath@xcite the light - front variables are defined by @xmath358 so the four - vector @xmath359 is denoted @xmath360 with this notation the scalar product is denoted by @xmath361 the metric tensor @xmath362 with @xmath363 is obtained from the usual one by using ( [ def ] ) ( i.e. @xmath364 )
. then @xmath365 , with the other elements vanishing .
the term @xmath366 is obtained from the condition that @xmath367 .
its elements are the same as those of @xmath368 except for @xmath369 .
thus @xmath370 and the partial derivatives are similarly given by @xmath371    the step function is defined as @xmath372 for @xmath373 , and @xmath374 for @xmath375 .
the antisymmetric step function is given by @xmath376 with @xmath377 in this notation , @xmath378 .
the above few definitions allow us to express the inverse operators appearing in the text in terms of integrals : @xmath379 @xmath380      the hermitian projection operators @xmath383 are given by @xmath384 and obey the following relations @xmath385 @xmath386 @xmath387 @xmath388 and @xmath389 the dirac spinors are given by @xmath390 \ ; \chi_{\lambda }   , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath391 the anti - particle spinors are given by @xmath392 where @xmath393 is the charge conjugation operator , so that @xmath394 \ ; \eta_{\lambda }   \end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath395 other useful relations are @xmath396 @xmath397 and @xmath398 note that in the above three equations @xmath399 is an on - shell four vector with @xmath400 and @xmath401 .    99 p. a. m. dirac , rev .
* 21 * , 392 ( 1949 ) .
s. j. brodsky , g. mccartor , h. c. pauli , s. s. pinsky part .
world * 3 * , 109 ( 1993 ) ; s. j. brodsky , h - c pauli , s.s .
pinsky , slac - pub-7474 , hep - ph/9705477 m. burkardt adv .
* 23 * , 1 ( 1993 ) .
j. m. namyslowski(1985 ) : progress in particle and nuclear physics , vol .
* 14 * , faessler a. ( ed . ) ( pergamon press ) ; s. j. brodsky and g. p. lepage in _ perturbative quantum chromodynamics _ , a. mueller ( ed . ) .
( world scientific , singapore 1989 ) ; x. d. ji comments nucl .
* 21 * , 123 ( 1992 ) w .- m .
zhang , chinese j. phys . * 32 * , 717 ( 1994 ) .
 theory of hadrons and light - front qcd " edited by s.d .
glazek , world scientific , ( singapore ) 1994 .
a. harindranath , an introduction to light front dynamics for pedestrians , hep - ph/9612244 our notation is that a four vector @xmath402 is defined by the plus , minus and perpendicular components as @xmath403 and @xmath404 .
see the appendix for more on this .
h. cheng and t. wu  expanding protons : scattering at high energies " , mit press cambridge ( 1987 ) f. coester , helv .
phys . acta . *
38 * , 7 ( 1965 ) ; and in  constraint s theory and relativistic dynamics , edited by g. longhi and l.lusanna ( world scientific singapore , 1987 ) , p. 159 and
in  the three body force in the three - nucleon system " edited by b.l.berman and bf gibson ( springer new york , 1986 ) b.d .
keister and w. n.polyzou relativistic hamiltonian dynamics in nuclear and particle physics in _ advances in nuclear physics_. j.w .
negele and e. vogt ( ed . ) . * 20*,1 ( 1991 ) ( plenum press , new york )      m. g. fuda and y.zhang , phys.rev . *
c51 * , 23 ( 1995 ) ; phys .
* c54 * , 495 ( 1996 ) . l.  l. frankfurt and m.  i.strikman phys .
76 * , 215 ( 1981 ) .
frankfurt and m.i .
strikman , phys . rep . * 160 * , 235 ( 1988 ) .
soper , `` field theories in the infinite momentum frame '' , slac pub-137 ( 1971 ) ; d.e .
soper , phys .
rev d4 , 1620 ( 1971 ) ; j.b .
kogut and d.e .
soper , phys .
rev . * d1 * , 2901 ( 1971 ) .
s - j chang , r.g . root , and t - m yan ,
phys . rev . * d7 * , 1133 , 1147 ( 1973 ) .
t - m yan phys . rev . * d7 * , 1760 , 1780 ( 1974 ) .
miller ,  a light front treatment of the nucleus- implications for deep inelastic scattering " , to be published phys .
rev . c. rapid communications , nucl - th/9702036
the use of scalar mesons is meant as a simple representation of part of the two pion exchange potential which causes much of the the medium range attraction between nucleons , as well as the effects of a possible fundamental scalar meson .
f. gursey , nuovo cimento * 16 * 230 ( 196 ) ; ann . phys .
( n.y.)*12 * 91 ( 1961 ) ; p. chang and f. gursey , phys . rev . *
164 * , 1752 ( 1967 ) . s. weinberg , phys .
rev . * 166 * , 1568 ( 1968 ) . s.  thberge , a.  w.  thomas and g.  a.  miller , phys .
d22 * ( 1980 ) 2838 ; * d23 * ( 1981 ) 2106(e ) .
a.  w.  thomas , s.  thberge , and g.  a.  miller , phys . rev .
* d24 * , 216 ( 1981 ) ; a.  w.  thomas , adv .
* 13 * ( 1984 ) 1 ; g.  a.  miller , p 190 in int .
* 2 * ( 1984 ) .
b.d . serot and j.d .
walecka , adv .
. phys . * 16*,1 ( 1986 ) .
furnstahl , b.d .
serot , h - b tang , nucl - th/9608035 . nucl.phys . *
a615 * , 441 ( 1997 ) .
serot and j.d .
walecka , iu - ntc-96 - 17 , jan .
1997 nucl - th/9701058 the determination of the inverse of the operator @xmath405 is discussed in the original literature @xcite and in other places .
the equations in appendix a are sufficient for our calculations . for a more recent discussion
see a. harindrinath and w - m zhang , phys . rev . * d48 * ,
4861 , 4881 , 4903 ( 1993 ) .
the most general non - linear realization does not specify the ratio of the two pion - nucleon couplings .
b.h . brandsden and r.g .
moorhouse , `` the pion - nucleon system '' ( princeton university press , princeton , 1973 ) ; s.l .
adler and r.f .
dashen , `` current algebras '' , ( w.a .
benjamin , new york , 1968 ) .
r. machleidt , k. holinde , ch .
elster , phys .
rep . * 149 * , 1 ( 1987 ) ; r. machleidt , adv .
* 19 * , 189 ( 1989 ) .
r. brockmann and r. machleidt , `` the dirac - brueckner approach '' , prepared for `` open problems in nuclear matter '' , m. baldo , ed ( world scientific , singapore , to be published ) , chapt .
nucl - th/9612004 .    nucleon - nucleon interaction  , g.e .
brown and a.d .
jackson north - holland ( amsterdam ) 1976 ; `` pions and nuclei '' , t. ericson and w. weise oxford science publications , ( new york ) 1987 .
s. weinberg phys . rev . *
150 * , 1313 ( 1966 )    r. blankenbecler and r. sugar , phys.rev . *
142 * , 1051 ( 1966 ) .
terentev , sov .
* 24 * , 106 ( 1976 ) .
m - h partovi , and e.l .
lomon , phys . rev . *
d2 * , 1999 ( 1970 ) .
g. hoehler and h. pietarinen , nucl . phys . *
b95 * , 210 ( 1975 ) ; g.e .
brown and r. machleidt , phys .
rev . * c50 * , 1731 ( 1994 ) .    c. ordonez , l. ray , and u. van kolck , phys
. rev . * c53 * , 2086 ( 1996 ) ; phys . rev
. lett . * 72 * , 1982 ( 1994 ) ; c. ordonez , and u. van kolck phys.lett .
* b291*,459 ( 1992 ) .
the symbol for the nucleon field operator and the mode functions of that field is taken to be the same -@xmath23 to reduce the amount of notation .
bartnik and st .
glazek , phys .
* d39 * , 1249 ( 1989 ) .
m. brisudov and r. perry , phys . rev .
* d54 * , 6453 ( 1996 ) . minimal substitution would require that the plus component of the vector field would enter into the equation ( [ kplus ] ) for @xmath6 , but we are using a formalism for which that component vanishes .
serot , and r.j .
furnstahl , phys . rev . *
c43 * , 105 ( 1991 ) . minimizing @xmath301 with respect to @xmath26 ( for fixed @xmath255 )
is the same as minimizing @xmath294 with respect to @xmath26 ( for fixed @xmath255 ) because the volume @xmath256 is held fixed .
s. a. chin , and j.d .
walecka , phys . lett . *
b52 * , 24 ( 1974 ) j. aubert _ et al . ,
b123 * , 275 ( 1982 ) .
et al.,_phys .
* 52 * 727 ( 1984 ) .
a. bodek , _ et al.,_phys .
* 51 , * 534 ( 1983 ) .
see e.g. the reviews : r.l .
jaffe , in relativistic dynamics and quark - nuclear physics . ed . by m. b. johnson and a. picklesimer ; m. arneodo , phys .
240 , 301 ( 1994 ) .
geesaman , k. saito , a.w .
thomas , ann .
nucl . part .
sci . * 45 * , 337 ( 1995 ) .
( [ deep ] ) is essentially eq .
( 5.2 ) of frankfurt and strikman , @xcite , with a correspondence between our @xmath406 and their @xmath407 .
k. saito , and a.w .
thomas , nucl . phys . *
a574 * , 659 ( 1994 ) .
birse , phys . lett . *
b299 * , 186 ( 1930 ) .
the standard nuclear shell model is one model of finite nuclei in which the mean field is dominant .
the quark meson coupling model , see e.g. p.a.m .
guichon , k. saito , e. rodionov , and a.w .
thomas , nucl .
* a601 * , 349 ( 1996 ) ; and p.g . blunden and g.a .
miller , phys.rev .
* c54 * , 359 ( 1996 ) is another .
bjorkenand s.d .
relativistic quantum fields _ ( mcgraw - hill , new york ) ( 1965 ) .      fig .
1 @xmath18-ordered graphs for low energy pion - nucleon scattering .
( a ) second - order effects of the @xmath408 term @xmath131 .
( b ) second - order effects of the @xmath166 and @xmath409 terms of @xmath131 .
( c ) effects of the instantaneous fermion propagation terms of @xmath133 , and of the @xmath167 term of @xmath131 .
the terms @xmath410 are defined in eqs ,  ( 2.46)-(2.48 ) .
@xmath18-ordered graphs for one boson exchange contributions to nucleon - nucleon scattering .
the numbers 1 - 4 represent the momentum , spin and charge states of the nucleons . here
( a ) meson propagation terms ( b ) instantaneous vector meson exchange of @xmath134 , eq .
( 2.48 )      fig .
3 feynman graphs for the two - pion exchange potential ( a ) uncrossed box diagram- the horizontal line represents the subtraction of the contribution arising from the iterated one pion exchange potential .
( b ) crossed box diagram ( c ) second order effect of the @xmath167 term of @xmath131 , eq .
( 2.46 ) ( d ) terms with one @xmath167 term .