the microscopic nature of high-@xmath0 superconductivity in the cuprates is still under heavy debate after more than two decades of intensive studies .
it has been widely accepted that the cuprates may be properly considered as doped mott insulators and the superconductivity arises after the antiferromagnetic ( afm ) long range order is destroyed by doping .
the challenge is that a typical doped mott insulator is a strongly correlated electron system in which two electrons staying at the same lattice site will cost a huge energy as compared to other energy scales like the hopping energy . with the failure of conventional perturbative many - body methods , to tackle a doped mott insulator one usually resorts to either the so - called gutzwiller projected trial wavefunction or constructing an effective low - energy theory @xcite . in the latter approach , the electron fractionalization @xcite
is often utilized in order to implement some key features of a doped mott insulator .
indeed , the fractionalization due to the mottness is most transparent at half - filling where only the spin degrees of freedom of the electrons are left , with the charge part being totally frozen out . only by doping
can charge carriers emerge which account for a small portion of the total number of the electrons at low doping .
the real challenge is that there exist many different ways of introducing fractionalized elementary objects to implement the same local mottness , i.e. , the no double occupancy constraint .
these elementary particles are generally further coupled to some emergent gauge field(s ) due to the uncertainty in the fractionalization @xcite . in the lack of precise energetic comparison ,
a full self - consistent development of a potential fractionalization / gauge theory becomes essential in order for it to be convincingly verified or falsified by experiment as well as by general theoretical considerations . in principle
, an inappropriate fractionalization would always lead to strong gauge fluctuations rendering the effective theory intractable .
therefore , a stable , well - controlled gauge theory description will be a highly desired candidate for the correct low - energy theory of cuprate superconductors .
we will consider a particular electron fractionalization description with a mutual chern - simons gauge structure @xcite .
specifically , an electron in this theory is fractionalized  into an @xmath1 bosonic spinon and a charge @xmath2 bosonic holon , which are minimally coupled to u(1 ) gauge fields @xmath3 and @xmath4 , which do not have their own dynamics , but are entangled  by a mutual chern - simons topological term @xmath5which is ( 2 + 1)d realization of the topological bf theory.@xcite physically it simply means that the spinons and holons will perceive each other as quantized @xmath6 fluxoids @xcite . in the limit of zero hole concentration
, the spinon condensation can naturally lead to an afm long - range ordered state . at finite doping , the mutual chern - simons term in eq .
( [ lmcs ] ) captures @xcite a precise statistical sign structure  identified @xcite in the @xmath7-@xmath8 model . by the @xmath6 fluxoids carried by the mobile holons
, the afm state will be destroyed and eventually a superconducting will set in with the holon condensation , and a zero - temperature phase diagram as a function of doping concentration has been recently discussed in refs .
ye1,ye2 . finally , there are other quantum systems dst96,galitski05,cho11,xu09 which have the mutual chern - simons gauge structures in different contexts .    in this paper , we focus on the superconducting state to develop an effective description based on the mutual chern - simons gauge theory in sec .
ii . instead of
a conventional ginzburg - landau theory in description of the fluctuations of the pairing order parameter , we obtain a gauge description of the low - lying collective fluctuations of charge and spin currents , which are essentially the phase fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter .
we show that the meissner effect in such a superconductor is basically controlled by a spin gap . in sec .
iii , we further  identify a non - bcs - type order parameter @xmath9 that characterizes the sc phase coherence . here
@xmath9 is related to the correlation function of two wilson loops ( of @xmath4 and @xmath10 ) and is topological as it merely depends on the gaussian linking number under a continuous deformation of the loops .
such a relation is similar to the connection between the chern - simons theory and knot theory first studied in ref . .
but by coupling to the matter fields , we show that the spin correlations strongly renormalize @xmath9 such that the phase coherence terminates at a critical point where the spin gap vanishes . in sec .
iii c , we shall propose a direct experimental probe of such a topological nature of the gauge interaction between the spin and charge degrees of freedom . finally , in sec .
iii d , we show that a fermionic excitation can emerge in the superconducting phase , which is gauge neutral and thus coherent , resembling a bogoliubov quasiparticle .
the lattice field theory formulation of the phase string theory@xcite for a doped mott insulator has been recently constructed in refs . in terms of partition function : @xmath11d[h^{\dagger } , h , b^{\dagger } , b]e^{-s }   \label{partition}\]]in which the action @xmath12 ( @xmath13 denotes spacetime coordinates ) with @xmath14    here the first two terms , @xmath15 and @xmath16 , are the lagrangian densities for the matter fields , holon @xmath17 and spinon @xmath18 , which carry charge and spin degrees of freedom , respectively .
they are given by @xmath19equations ( [ lh ] ) and ( [ ls ] ) show that the bosonic holon and spinon fields minimally couple to two lattice u(1 ) gauge fields , @xmath20 and @xmath21 , respectively , in 2 + 1 dimensions ( @xmath22 @xmath23 , with @xmath24 , @xmath25 ) .
( @xmath26 is the external electromagnetic field which solely couples to the holons@xcite . )
the parameters @xmath27 and @xmath28 are effective hopping integral and superexchange coupling , respectively , and @xmath29 is the difference operator defined along the imaginary time axis .
the lagrangian multipliers , @xmath30 , control the total numbers of holons and spinons , and the last terms in @xmath31 describe the on - site repulsions , which soften the hard - core boson condition .
it is noted that this effective theory is underpinned by a so - called bosonic rvb order parameter : @xmath32 , which describes a short - ranged spin liquid state in the spinion background in the underdoped regime of a doped mott insulator@xcite .
the gauge fields , @xmath21 and @xmath20 , capture the essential physics of the phase string effect@xcite in a doped mott insulator via the following lattice mutual chern - simons term in eq .
( [ s ] ) @xmath33with @xmath34 the integer fields due to the compactness of the lattice field theory@xcite , which are important in restoring the spin symmetry . without @xmath34 , eq . ( [ lmcs ] ) is recovered the present theory reduces to the original mutual chern - simons gauge theory formulation of the phase string theory in ref . .
superconductivity can naturally arise in a saddle - point state of the above mutual chern - simons gauge theory , in which holons become bose - condensed and spinons are gapped@xcite . in the folllowing
, we shall derive a general effective theory governing the low - energy fluctuations of the gauge fields @xmath35 around this saddle - point .
this new effective theory will replace the conventional ginzburg - landau theory to describe the generalized rigidity of a non - bcs superconducting state .    by minimizing the action @xmath36 in eq .
( [ partition ] ) with regard to @xmath37 and @xmath38 , one can find the saddle - point solution of @xmath39 , i.e. , @xmath40 defined by @xmath41 in the presence of a uniform distribution of the holon condensate with @xmath42 as the holon concentration .
one can always choose the temporal components @xmath43 by shifting @xmath30 in eqs .
( [ lh ] ) and ( [ ls ] ) . at the saddle point , one has @xmath44 .
equation ( [ sp ] ) can be understood as that a fictitious uniform flux @xmath45 is generated by the average distribution of the holon condensate via @xmath46 , while the vanishing net flux in @xmath47 is due to the fact that the spinons are short - range paired with @xmath48 ( where @xmath49 denotes the expectation value at the saddle - point ) .    around the saddle - point ,
the gauge field @xmath21 may be rewritten as @xmath50then an effective low - energy lagrangian of the weak  fluctuations of @xmath20 and @xmath21 around the saddle - point can be derived as follows    @xmath51=\frac{g_{\mu } ^{h}}{2\pi ^{2}}% ( a_{\mu } ^{s}+a_{\mu } ^{e})^{2}+\frac{g_{\mu } ^{s}}{2\pi ^{2}}\left ( \epsilon ^{\mu \nu \lambda } \partial _ { \nu } a_{\lambda } ^{h}\right ) ^{2}+% \frac{i}{\pi } \epsilon ^{\mu \nu \lambda } a_{\mu } ^{s}\partial _ { \nu } a_{\lambda } ^{h}\text { \ . }
\label{effectivel}\ ] ]    here the first term on the right - hand - side ( rhs ) of eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) arises from @xmath15 in eq .
( [ lh ] ) after considering the holon condensation@xcite , with @xmath52 and @xmath53 .
note that the gauge field @xmath4 is fixed in the unitary gauge by absorbing goldstone boson field @xmath54 in the holon superfluid @xmath55 , and the superfluid density fluctuation @xmath56 has been integrated out around @xmath57 .    the second term on the rhs of eqs . ( [ effectivel ]
) originates from the spinon term @xmath16 in eq .
( [ ls ] ) after integrating out the spinon field @xmath58 , with @xmath59 , @xmath60 ( the details are outlined in appendix [ appendix_s ] ) . here
, @xmath61 denotes the spin mass gap which is an important parameter as discussed in appendix a below eq .
( [ ls-1 ] ) .
the parameters @xmath62 and @xmath63 as given in eq .
( [ g ] ) . note that in refs .
, by assuming that the state is deep inside the superconducting phase , the limit of @xmath64 has been taken such that @xmath65 there . equation ( [ effectivel ] )
corresponds to the general case for a finite spin mass gap @xmath61 .
the last term on the rhs of eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) is the mutual chern - simons term with the high - energy fluctuations of @xmath66 omitted .
note that the role played by @xmath67 in constructing a topological object like the magnetic flux quantization has been discussed in ref . and the references therein .      to see that the effective lagrangian @xmath68 in eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) indeed describes a superconducting state , one may further integrate out @xmath4 and @xmath69 to arrive at a low - energy action @xmath70=\int d^{3}x\frac{m_{p}{}^{2}}{2}({\mathbf{a}}% ^{e\perp } ) ^{2 } ,   \label{seff}\]]where the summation @xmath71 is replaced by integration in the continuum limit , with the external magnetic field @xmath72 fixed in the coulomb gauge ( @xmath73 ) . here
the transverse photon mass @xmath74 is given by @xmath75with the london penetration depth @xmath76 in which @xmath77 .
therefore , so long as @xmath78 , the system does exhibit the meissner effect with a finite @xmath79 in response to an external magnetic field .
the physical electric current @xmath80 satisfies the london equation : @xmath81}{\delta \mathbf{a}% ^{e\perp } } = \frac{1}{\lambda _ { p}^{2}}\mathbf{a}^{e\perp } \text{. } \label{london}\]]equations ( [ mp ] ) and ( [ lambda - p ] ) will recover the previous result@xcite obtained in the ideal superconductor  limit of @xmath64 , where the london penetration depth @xmath79 approaches the shortest  @xmath82 .
namely , in the large spin - gap limit , the superfluidity of a holon condensate is well protected .
however , in the opposite limit of @xmath83 , i.e. , with the spin gap closing up , one finds @xmath84 in eq .
( lambda - p ) such that the meissner effect disappears .
it implies that the superconducting phase coherence can be destroyed by the gapless spin excitations at zero temperature , even in the presence of a bare holon condensate with a finite @xmath82 .
this is a peculiar manifestation that the neutral spin degrees of freedom can strongly influence the superconducting condensate .
the quantum phase transition of superconductivity occurring here is quit different from the conventional transition of bcs - type as in the latter a charge ( superconducting ) gap must be closed up at the fermi surface .
physically , with @xmath83 , the proliferation of neutral spinons will disorder the superconducting phase coherence via the @xmath6-vortices bound to them in the mutual chern - simons gauge theory
. such a superconducting phase transition can also occur at a finite temperature at @xmath85 @xmath86 which is of non - bcs - type ( see ref . ) .
finally it is noted that @xmath87 with a spinon condensation is a necessary , but not a sufficient condition for the emergence of a true afm ordering in the mutual chern - simons gauge theory .
a so - called _ bose insulating phase _ ( bi ) with @xmath87 but @xmath88 has been proposed@xcite to appear as an intermediate phase between the superconducting and afm phases . in other words ,
the present superconducting phase can be terminated at a critical point defined by @xmath83 before a true afm order can set in with further reducing doping concentration near the half - filling .
the effective low - energy lagrangian @xmath68 in eq .
( effectivel ) has replaced the conventional ginzburg - landau equation to describe superconductivity in the mutual chern - simons theory .
now we examine the following question : what is the essential physical quantity that captures the nature of superconductivity , since the bcs order parameter ( as governed by the conventional ginzburg - landau equation ) no longer explicitly appears in the low - energy effective theory ?    to be sure , the off diagonal long order ( odlro ) of superconductivity is still described by the cooper pairing order parameter in the phase string theory of doped mott insulators@xcite . nevertheless ,
since the cooper pairing amplitude can persist well beyond the superconducting phase , as determined@xcite by the bosonic rvb parameter @xmath89 and the holon condensation @xmath90 , the low - lying excitations and the phase transition of superconducting phase are essentially characterized by the topological phase fluctuations via the mutual chern - simons gauge fields , @xmath4 and @xmath69 , in the low - energy effective lagrangian ( [ effectivel ] ) .    physically , @xmath4 and @xmath10 are related to the spin and hole currents in the mutual chern - simon gauge theory by the following equations of motionkou05,ye2 @xmath91where the internal electric  fields in the imaginary time representation @xmath92 and the spin and charge currents are defined as @xmath93 .
hence the low - lying fluctuations of @xmath4 and @xmath69 in eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) actually describe the current fluctuations of the spin and charge degrees of freedom , while the amplitude fluctuations of the matter fields remain gapped in the superconducting phase .      in order to characterize the gauge fluctuations of @xmath94 , a pair of wilson loops have been introduced@xcite : @xmath95\equiv \left \langle \hat{w}^{s , h}[\mathcal{c}]\right \rangle ,   \label{wilson}\]]where@xmath96e^{-\sum_{x}\mathcal{l}_{eff}} ...
\]]and @xmath97\equiv \exp \big [ i\sum_{x}a_{\mu } ^{s , h}(x)j_{% \mathcal{c}}^{\mu } ( x)\big],\ , \ ,   \label{w - operator}\]]in which the ( 2 + 1)-dimensional unit current , for a test holon or a test spinon , @xmath98 @xmath99 for the link @xmath100 @xmath101 , and is zero otherwise on a close loop @xmath102 .    physically , the wilson loop @xmath103 $ ] or @xmath104 $ ] probes the interaction of a pair of test holons or spinons at a distance @xmath105 , defined by @xmath106 or @xmath107 , via@xcite @xmath108 ,   \label{confinev}\]]if @xmath102 is taken as a spacetime rectangle with length @xmath109 ( @xmath105 ) in the imaginary time ( spatial ) direction . in refs .
, in the limit of large spin gap ( @xmath64 ) , one finds @xmath110 and @xmath111 @xmath112 .
namely the holons are deconfined while the spinons are logarithmically confined .
it is consistent with the present saddle - point state of holon condensation discussed in sec .
ii .    in the presence of a finite spin gap @xmath61
, we find that the above conclusion remains true , with the the confining potential , between a test spinon and test anti - spinon , modified to @xmath113where @xmath82 is replaced by @xmath79 defined in eq .
( lambda - p ) ( @xmath114 is an ultraviolet cutoff of the distance ) .
the result indicates that the spinons will experience a confinement - deconfinement transition at @xmath84 or @xmath83 , coinciding with the superconducting phase transition critical point at @xmath115 . on the other hand , @xmath106 for holons
remains deconfined .
the wilson loops , @xmath116 $ ] , can provide important information on the confinement / deconfinement of spinons and holons in the superconducting phase as discussed above .
however , to understand why @xmath117 $ ] behave as such , the topological nature of the mutual chern - simons effective theory in eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) has to be further revealed .    for this purpose
we define @xmath118\ , \hat{w}^{h}[\mathcal{c}_{2}]\right \rangle \ , ,   \label{topo}\]]with the normalization factor @xmath119\,w^{s}[\mathcal{c}_{2 } ] .
\label{k}\ ] ]    let us first consider the case of a _ pure _ mutual chern - simons term ( [ mcs ] ) without coupling to the matter fields [ i.e. , omitting the first two terms in eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) ] , a straightforward calculation shows @xmath120where @xmath121 , denotes the gaussian linking number , which is the winding number of the close loops , @xmath122 and @xmath123 as shown in fig .
[ figure_geometry ] ( a ) and ( b ) . to obtain eq .
( [ link number ] ) , we write down the explicit expression of @xmath124 in a pure mutual chern - simons gauge theory , @xmath125e^{-\int d^{3}x\left ( \frac{i}{\pi } \epsilon ^{\mu \nu \lambda } a_{\mu } ^{s}\partial _ { \nu } a_{\lambda } ^{h}-a_{\mu } ^{s}j_{\mu } ^{\mathcal{c}_{1}}-a_{\mu } ^{h}j_{\mu } ^{\mathcal{c}_{2}}\right ) } \]]where , the unit spacetime currents @xmath126 and @xmath127 keep track of spacetime loops , @xmath122 and @xmath128 , respectively . integrating over
@xmath4 leads to a flux constraint on @xmath129 configuration , namely , @xmath130 .
it means that the gauge field @xmath69 forms a spacetime closed @xmath131-fluxtube along @xmath122 .
@xmath132 denotes the spacetime flux piercing @xmath128 . noting that there are @xmath133 times for the fluxtube @xmath122 piercing @xmath128 , one arrives at @xmath134 , with @xmath135 .
ignoring the @xmath136-periodicity , we thus obtain eq .
( [ link number ] ) . in witten s seminal paper@xcite ,
a similar gaussian linking number structure was found in the chern - simons gauge theory , which is related to the jones polynomial in the knot theory .     and
@xmath128 in ( 2 + 1)-dimensional euclidean spacetime .
@xmath137 is an arbitrary loop but restricted inside spatial plane ( i.e. , the xy plane ) at some imaginary time .
@xmath128 is an arbitrary loop with a definite gaussian linking number @xmath138 ( @xmath139 in ( a ) ; @xmath140 in ( b ) ) that characterizes the number of times that @xmath141 winds around @xmath122 .
the ball ( in blue ) and the arrow ( in red ) stand for the test holon and test spinon , respectively .
the arrows on the two loops indicate the direction of test spinon current and test holon current.,width=377 ]    in fig .
[ figure_experiment ] , a gedankenexperiment is shown to illustrate the case of winding number @xmath139 in the ( 2 + 1)-dimensional euclidean spacetime , with a pair of test spinon and antispinon creating and annihilating on a close loop @xmath128 .
if the background spin degrees of freedom are gapped with @xmath142 , the test spinons can not induce spin excitations from the ground state and thus the net contribution to @xmath143 comes from the @xmath6 flux phase shift ( with @xmath144 mentioned above due to the pure mutual chern - simons action .    on the other hand ,
if the spin gap @xmath61 becomes finite , then the spin excitations can be induced from the spinon background to renomalize @xmath124 .
now we consider the full @xmath68 given in eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) . by choosing the close loop @xmath122 of the test holon within the spatial @xmath145-plane , one finally arrives at the following compact result ( for the details , see appendix b )
: @xmath146we see that @xmath9 remains to be real and positive as a topological quantity , which is invariant under a continuous deformation of loops @xmath147 and @xmath128 for a given gaussian linking number @xmath148 , as illustrated in fig .
[ figure_geometry ] .
but @xmath9 is renormalized by a factor @xmath149 which is solely determined by the spin gap @xmath61 .
in particular , in the limit of @xmath83 , one finds @xmath150 .     for simplicity ) .
( a - d ) are four snapshots of spatial plane subsequently at imaginary time @xmath151 .
( a ) a pair of test spinons with opposite spin indices are created at a spatial site @xmath152  at @xmath153 .
( b ) two spinons arrive at new spatial positions at @xmath154 via the dashed trajectories .
( c ) at @xmath155 , a holon current circuit @xmath122 is located in plane , indicating that an aharonov - bohm phase around @xmath122 is picked up by the test holon .
( d ) at @xmath156 , the pair of test spinons meet each other again at some position and then are annihilated into vacuum simultaneously .
, width=377 ]    if one rewrites eq .
( [ i ] ) by @xmath157where @xmath79 becomes a function of topological order parameter @xmath124 for a given gaussian linking number @xmath139 , then the limit @xmath84 , i.e. , the disappearance of superconductivity , will correspond to @xmath158 . in other words ,
the topological quantity @xmath9 can be regarded as the superconducting order parameter in the effective theory of eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) , and the quantum phase transition at @xmath115 occurs when @xmath9 gets fully screened by the gapless spin excitations at @xmath87 .    as illustrated in fig .
[ figure_geometry ] , @xmath159 indicates that a test spinon can be always feltby a vortex - like current loop of a test holon if their mutual winding number @xmath160 . physically , since the holons are in the bose condensed state , a spinon excitation will then induce a supercurrent vortex response from the condensed holons throughout the sample to form a so - called spinon - vortex@xcite .
this is the origin of spinon confinement discussed above , since each spinon - vortex composite is logarithmically divergent in energy which will result in vortex - antivortex confinement . in a non - superconducting phase where the spinons become deconfined due to the vortex - antivortex disassociation and proliferation
, one finds  @xmath161 in the gedankenexperiment shown in fig .
[ figure_experiment ] .
namely , @xmath158 describes a phase disordered superconductor .
we propose an experimental setup to probe the topological characterization @xmath124 of the superconducting phase in fig .
[ figure_prediction ] . note that @xmath159 reflects the mutual statistical interaction between spin and charge degrees of freedom ( cf .
[ figure_geometry ] ) . by using the idea illustrated in the gedankenexperiment of fig .
figure_experiment , one may inject free test  spinons by heating up the middle semi - island part of the sample in fig .
[ figure_prediction ] to a temperature slightly higher than @xmath0 , such that free spinons can be excited and flow towards the lower @xmath109 end connecting to the outside superconducting ring . with @xmath162 inside the ring
, one expects that such an injection of free spinons can generate supercurrents in the superconducting ring in a form of significant noise spikes due to the unpolarized spinon - vortex effect .    ,
while the outside part remains below @xmath0 and spinons are confined into vortex - antivortex pairs .
the confinement is indicated by the black wavy line between two spinons .
the small directional discs ( red arrows ) represent vortices ( spinons ) .
in such a mutual chern - simons superconductor at @xmath163 @xmath164 , spinons become deconfined to form free spinon - vortices qi07 .
then , the flow of such free spinons from the semi - island towards the cooler end connecting to the outside superconducting ring is expected to generate random supercurrents in the latter as indicated by @xmath80 ( blue dashed line ) .
, width=302 ]    instead of raising the temperature , one may also apply an in - plance magnetic field @xmath165 to reduce the spinon mass gap @xmath61 inside the semi - island part by @xmath166 , where @xmath167 is the land factor and @xmath168 is the bohr magneton .
then a sufficiently strong @xmath165 may drive the  semi - island part into a spinon - vortex liquid state with @xmath158 via the zeeman effectqi07 . at the same time , the gradient of @xmath165 can also naturally cause the free spinons flow into the superconducting ring to induce the similar supercurrent response shown in fig .
[ figure_prediction ] .      the mutual chern - simons theory given in eq .
( [ s ] ) is an all - boson description of doped mott insulators . in the above subsections
we have studied the low - lying collective fluctuations of this theory based on the effective lagrangian ( [ effectivel ] ) .
an important question that arises naturally is if and how a low - energy fermionic excitation can _ emerge _ in such an all - boson theory , which is independent of the above collective excitations .    to give a proof of principle
, we first note that the mutual chern - simons term in eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) can be replaced by an auxiliary lagrangian in real - time representation : @xmath169where @xmath170 is an auxiliary 4-component dirac spinor in ( 2 + 1)-dimensional spacetime with flavor  indices @xmath171 .
@xmath172 . here
@xmath173-matrices are defined in 4-dimensional reducible representation of 2-dimensional clifford algebra , i.e. , @xmath174 , where @xmath175 and @xmath176 are pauli matrices .
the covariant derivative @xmath177 is defined as @xmath178 the @xmath179 matrix @xmath180 , where @xmath181 is the @xmath182 unit matrix .
the second term in eq . ( [ aux ] ) is mass term with @xmath183 .
@xmath184 preserves a @xmath185 gauge symmetry where subscripts @xmath186 and @xmath187 denote axial vector type and ordinary vector type @xmath188 gauge invariance , respectively .
it originates from the fact that @xmath20 is an ordinary vector field with gauge group generator 1  while @xmath69 is an axial vector field with gauge group generator @xmath189 @xcite .
the parity and time - reversal symmetries are conserved even in the presence of finite mass gap which may be expressed as : @xmath190 , where , @xmath191 ( @xmath192 ) is upper ( lower ) 2-component spinor of @xmath170 . here , @xmath193 denotes the chiralityvafa84 . in the case of parity ( @xmath194 is parity operator )
, @xmath195it is easy to check that the mass term is invariant under such parity transformation in ( 2 + 1)-dimensional spacetime . integrating over @xmath170 leads to a pure mutual chern - simons term by ignoring maxwell terms ( @xmath196 momentum squared ) in the one - loop quantum correction ( fig .
[ vertex ] ) in the long wavelength limit @xmath197 .
the key steps of derivation are given as follows .
, @xmath69 , and @xmath198 , correspondingly .
the first two diagrams correspond to maxwell terms , while the last one gives the non - vanishing mutual chern - simons vertex.,width=302 ]    as shown in fig .
[ vertex ] , the vacuum polarization for @xmath4 and @xmath129 at one - loop level@xcite ( @xmath199 is a 3-dimensional euclidean momentum ) : @xmath200.\]]where the total flavor number @xmath201 .
the expansion around small @xmath199 is given by @xmath202the propagators of gauge fields can be constructed in the landau gauge and the maxwell terms read out : @xmath203 with @xmath204 and @xmath205 . meanwhile
, the nonvanishing mutual chern - simons term for @xmath4 and @xmath69 in fig . [ vertex ] is also radiatively generated without breaking parity and time - reversal symmetries .
note that , upper(lower)-component spinor has mass @xmath206 ( @xmath207 ) : @xmath208where , the superscript @xmath209 denoting upper and lower 2-component spinor contributions respectively , and @xmath210 with identity : @xmath211 . in the sufficiently low momentum transfer limit ( @xmath212 ) , it is expanded as power series of @xmath199 : @xmath213 in eq .
( [ eq_sigma ] ) , the sign factor @xmath214  renders vanishing of abelian chern - simons terms ( @xmath215 and @xmath216 ) .
but due to the structure of matrix @xmath189 , the crossing term , i.e the mutual chern - simons term survives as expected .
mathematically , the above quantum corrections are organized as below : @xmath217where the maxwell terms are ignored in the long wavelength limit .
it is important to note that the fermionic auxiliary field @xmath170 is not gauge - neutral as it still couples to @xmath20 and @xmath218 in eq .
( [ aux ] ) .
a true fermion excitation of quasiparticle should be gauge - neutral without knowing @xmath4 and @xmath69 .
it is only possible if there exists a residual attractive potential such that a holon and a spinon excited from the condensates can form a bound state properly with the auxiliary field @xmath170 .
the resulting object @xmath198 will be both _
fermionic _ and _ coherent _ because all statistical gauge charges carried by @xmath170 can be exactly canceled by that of the spinon and holon partners . in fig .
[ qploop ] , the spacetime loop of a composite - particle @xmath219 is illustrated as a gauge neutral and thus physically observable elementary excitation at low energies .
in particular , it carries the right quantum number as a bogoliubov quasiparticle . as noted before , to produce the right prefactor @xmath220 of the pure mutual chern - simons term
, @xmath170 has totally @xmath221 branches of positive energy solutions , which are consistent with the existence of totally four quasiparticle nodal regions in the brillouin zone , although the detailed energy spectrum depends on the residual attractive potential which goes beyond the present long - wavelength effective description .
on the other hand , the existence of a _ nodal _ fermionic bogoliubov quasiparticle has been recently demonstrated based on a ground state wavefunction approach to the @xmath7-@xmath8 model in the phase string formulation , in which the quasiparticle as a similar bound state has been explicitly shown@xcite .
therefore , the present field - theory formulation provides a _ proof - of - principle _ for a fermionic quasiparticle mode emerging in the mutual chern - simons theory .
is composed by a spinon ( red arrow ) , a holon ( blue ball ) and a dirac fermion ( small grey ball @xmath170 ) .
its spacetime loop is composed by three loops rendering gauge charge neutrality.,width=302 ]
in this work , we have obtained an effective theory of the low - lying fluctuations in the superconducting state of the mutual chern - simons theory .
in contrast with a conventional ginzburg - landau action for a bcs superconductor , the present effective description in eq .
( [ effectivel ] ) deals with peculiar phase fluctuations in the doped mott insulator via a pair of mutual chern - simons gauge fields , which are related to the fluctuations of charge and spin currents of the condensate .
the superconducting phase coherence is found to be properly characterized by a topological order parameter which measures the mutual entanglement of the charge and spin currents in the low - energy effective theory . in particular , a zero - temperature quantum phase transition is shown to occur , due to the vanishing of this topological order parameter , when the spin gap is reduced to zero at low doping .    we have discussed a possible experimental probe into the long - range entanglement between the supercurrents and the neutral spin excitations as a unique signature of this non - bcs superconducting state .
we have also given a proof - of - principle how a fermionic quasiparticle can emerge in the mutual chern - simons theory .
together with the previously identified flux quantization@xcite at @xmath222 , the non - bcs superconductivity in the mutual chern - simons theory is well established .
we acknowledge stimulating discussions with z. c. gu , s .-
kou , z .- x .
liu , c .- s .
tian , y. wang , z. wang , n. xu , and y .- z .
you . this work is supported by nsfc grant no .
10834003 , by most national program for basic research grant no .
2009cb929402 , no . 2010cb923003 .
99    for a review , see , p. a. lee , n. nagaosa , and x. g. wen , rev .
phys . * 78 * , 17 ( 2006 ) .
s. a. kivelson , d. s. rokhsar and j. p. sethna .
b * 35 * , 8865 ( 1987 ) .
z. zou and p.w .
anderson , phys .
b * 37 * , 627 ( 1988 ) .
t. senthil and matthew p. a. fisher , phys .
b * 62 * , 7850 ( 2000 ) .    z.
y. weng , int . j. mod
b * 21 * , 773 ( 2007 ) .
p. ye , c. s. tian , x. l. qi , and z. y. weng , phys .
lett . * 106 * , 147002 ( 2011 ) ;    p.
ye , c. s. tian , x. l. qi , and z. y. weng , nucl .
b * 854 * , 815 ( 2012 ) .
s. p. kou , x. l. qi , and z. y. weng , phys .
b * 71 * , 235102 ( 2005 ) .
d. birmingham , m. blau , m. rakowski , and g. thompson , phys .
rep . * 209 * , 129 ( 1991 ) .
z. y. weng , d. n. sheng , y .- c .
chen , and c. s. ting , phys .
b 55 , 3894 ( 1997 ) .
k. wu , z. y. weng , and j. zaanen , phys .
b * 77 * , 155102 ( 2008 ) .    v. m. galitski , g. refael , m. p. a. fisher , and t. senthil , phys
lett . * 95 * , 077002 ( 2005 ) .
m. c. diamantini , p. sodano , and c. a. trugenberger , nucl .
b * 448 * , 505 ( 1991 ) ; nucl .
b * 474 * , 641 ( 1996 ) .
g. y. cho and j. e. moore , ann . of phys . * 326 * , 1515 ( 2011 ) .    c. xu and s. sachdev , phys .
b * 79 * , 064405 ( 2009 ) .
e. witten , commun . math
. phys . * 121 * , 351 ( 1989 ) .
j. w. mei and z. y. weng , phys .
b * 81 * , 014507 ( 2010 ) .
j. smit , _ introduction to quantum fields on a lattice_. ( cambridge , 2003 ) x. l. qi and z. y. weng , phys .
b * 76 * , 104502 ( 2007 ) . c. vafa and e. witten , commun . math .
phys . * 95 * , 257 ( 1984 ) .
robert d. pisarski , phys .
d , * 29 * , 2423 ( 1984 ) .
s. deser , r. jackiw , and s. templeton , ann .
phys . , * 140 * , 372 ( 1982 ) .
z. y. weng , new j. phys .
* 13 * , 103039 ( 2011 ) .    for a review ,
see , c. schubert , phys .
rep . * 355 * , 73 ( 2001 ) .
greiner and reinhardt , _ field quantization _ , ( spinger - verlag , 1996 ) .
first of all , we note that the spinon lagrangian @xmath16 in eq .
( [ ls ] ) may be further simplified to a cp@xmath223 form in the long - wavelength , low - energy regime as follows@xcite @xmath224\ , ,   \label{ls-1}\]]here the temporal component is rescaled by the spin wave velocity @xmath225 with the coupling constant @xmath226 , and @xmath61 is treated as a dynamically generated spinon mass enforcing @xmath227 .    the problem of studying the fluctuation of @xmath228 , or @xmath229 , in eq .
( [ ls-1 ] ) is then transformed into calculating the vacuum polarization tensor in ( 2 + 1)-dimensional scalar quantum electrodynamics in the presence of a uniform background magnetic field of @xmath46 defined in eq .
( [ sp ] ) .
the technical challenge arises from the fact that because of @xmath46 , the momentum is no longer a good quantum number .
nevertheless the issue is resolved by using the so - called string - inspired  formalism@xcite . following the procedures and conventions in ref .
, we obtain the polarization tensor : @xmath230 \int_{0}^{1}d\ell i^{\mu \nu } \label{bubble}\]]where the prefactor @xmath231 comes from the summation over the spin index , @xmath109 denotes the schwinger proper time , and spacetime dimension @xmath232 . here
@xmath233 is a @xmath234 matrix , defined by @xmath235 with @xmath236the determinant in eq .
( [ bubble ] ) can be simply factorized into : @xmath237 = \frac{\pi \ , \delta \,t}{\sinh ( \pi \ , \delta \,t)}\text{,}\]]and the transversality of lorentz tensor @xmath238 is given by @xmath239by further restoring the spin wave velocity @xmath240 , we arrive at the maxwell  term on the rhs of eq .
( effectivel ) which describes the fluctuation @xmath241 , with the coefficients given by @xmath242 in which the dimensionless coefficient @xmath243 depends on the dimensionless quantity @xmath244 as follows @xmath245note that @xmath246 in the limit of the absence of magnetic flux@xmath247 in @xmath46 .
to obtain @xmath9 , we first note that the lagrangian with holon and spinon currents circulating on loops @xmath248 ( @xmath249 ) @xmath250=\frac{\delta } { 2{m^*}}% \left(a_{\alpha } ^s\right)^2+\frac{1}{2u_1}\left(a_0^s\right)^2 + \frac{i}{% \pi } \epsilon _ { \mu \nu \lambda } a_{\mu } ^h\partial _ { \nu } a_{\lambda } ^s+% \frac{1}{2}\frac{g_{\mu } } { \pi ^2}\left(\epsilon _
{ \mu \nu \lambda } \partial _ { \nu } a_{\lambda } ^h\right)^2-i a_{\mu } ^sj_{\mu } ^{\mathcal{c}_1}-i a_{\mu } ^hj_{\mu } ^{\mathcal{c}_2}\ ] ] is quadratic in the gauge fields thus allows rigorously integrating out @xmath251 and @xmath252 in the generating functional @xmath253\hat{w}^h\left[\mathcal{c}_2% \right]\right \rangle = \int d [ a^s a^h]e^{-\int d^3x l_{\text{sc}}\left[% \mathcal{c}_1 , \mathcal{c}_2\right ] } \\
= \text{const}.\times \int d [ a^h]\exp \left \{-\int d^3x\left(\frac{g_{\mu } % } { 2\pi ^2}\left(\epsilon _ { \mu \nu \lambda }
\partial _ { \nu } a_{\lambda } ^h\right)^2-i a_{\mu } ^hj_{\mu } \right)\right \}\ ] ] in which we have defined @xmath254 and absorbed terms unrelated to mutual correlation between @xmath255 and @xmath256 into const . which will be canceled by the denominator in the definition of @xmath9 .
adopting the `` deformed '' lorentz gauge condition , @xmath257 and integrating out @xmath252 in the feynman gauge@xcite , we get @xmath253\hat{w}^h\left[\mathcal{c}_2% \right]\right \rangle = \\ \text{const}.\times \exp \left \{-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\pi ^2}{g_0g_1g_2}\int d^3x\int d^3y\sum
_ { \mu } g_{\mu } j_{\mu } ( x)j_{\mu } ( y)f(x , y)\right \ } \label{eq:6}\ ] ] in which @xmath258        given that @xmath266 , eq .
[ eq:10 ] is greatly reduced if @xmath255 lies within a spatial plane , @xmath267 in which @xmath268 is the gaussian linking number of @xmath255 and @xmath269 loops . to obtain the last line of above identity , the definition of @xmath270 and @xmath271 in eq .
( [ lambda - p ] ) is applied .