investigation of an uncontrollable or inaccessible quantum system or quantum systems with a large number of degrees of freedom via some controllable quantum system is known as quantum simulation @xcite . to this end , a wide variety of systems such as atoms in optical lattices , trapped ions , nuclear spins , superconducting circuits and photonic systems have been proposed as quantum simulators in different branches of physics such as condensed matter physics , high - energy physics , and cosmology @xcite .
the general theory of relativity ( gtr ) is , without doubt , one of the fascinating theories of the history of science describing the most important gravitational phenomena .
the light deflection in gravitational field , gravitational waves , and also appearance of black holes , are some famous and spectacular predictions of gtr .
one of the most important goals of recent investigations in theoretical physics is the presentation of a unified theory for gravitation and other quantum fields by their quantization on a curved background , i.e. , a quantum field theory ( qft ) in curved spacetime .
this theory has some experimental consequences , such as particle creation , hawking radiation , etc .
( see e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) . even in the case of small curvature
, various aspects of qft in curved spacetime can not be examined directly with current technologies .
nevertheless , they can be investigated via quantum simulation .
the geometric formulation of quantum mechanics is a very important step toward the presentation of the analog models of gtr in quantum realm .
hence , the investigation of novel models and a better understanding of previous analog models is still open - ended @xcite .
various analog models of gtr have been proposed , such as the acoustic fluid @xcite , liquid helium @xcite , fermi gases @xcite , slow light @xcite , nonlinear electromagnetic waveguides @xcite , graphene @xcite , ion rings @xcite and bose - einstein condensate ( bec)@xcite .
many of the notions of atomic and molecular physics can be realized on an entirely different scale , namely , in optomechanical systems .
the field of optomechanics is currently undergoing rapid experimental and theoretical progress .
typically , electromagnetic radiation and macroscopic mechanical oscillators can interact via radiation pressure in a fabry - perot cavity with a movable end mirror .
this interaction is the basis of various optomechanical phenomena which can occur in a wide range of system sizes and parameters ( for review , see @xcite ) .
many of the rudiments of quantum optomechanics date back to the early attempts of the investigation of one of the most prominent predictions of gtr , i.e. , the gravitational waves .
however , during the past decade , significant efforts have been devoted to developing and implementing optomechanical interaction for position or force sensing @xcite , backaction cooling @xcite , quantum state transfer @xcite , optomechanical entanglement generation @xcite , optomechanically induced transparency realization @xcite , and generating self - sustained mechanical oscillations @xcite .
another interesting aspect of the optomechanical systems , which has not been investigated much yet , is that they can be considered as promising candidate systems for quantum simulation applications .
for instance , it has very recently been shown @xcite how to realize the so - called sphere - coherent motional states of a mechanical oscillator in an optomechanical cavity in the presence of a two - level atom and how to use the optomechanical parameters to control the curvature of the sphere .    in the present paper ,
we investigate the possibility of simulating the curved spacetimes by photonic fields interacting with a mechanical oscillator operating in the reversed dissipation regime ( rdr ) of optomechanics @xcite . due to the radiation pressure force ,
an effective kerr - type photon - photon interaction arises which is mediated by the mirror motion .
the emergence of fluid - like behavior for photons is the consequence of this photon - photon interaction so that we can use the hydrodynamic equations for the photonic fluid to study the corresponding effective metric for the propagation of fluctuations in the photon fluid . in this manner
, the optomechanical system can be regarded as a quantum simulator for the propagation of the collective excitations of photon fluid in a curved spacetime .
we also show that the photonic fluid as well as the corresponding curved spacetime can be controlled by manipulating the system parameters .
the rest of the paper is structured as follows . in section [ sec : sec2 ] , we introduce the quantum field description of our first proposed system , i.e. , a planar optomchanical microcavity .
we discuss the equations of motions in the rdr of optomechanics . in section
[ sec : sec3 ] , we present our second proposed setup which is a two - dimensional optomechanical array . in section [ sec : sec4 ] , we discuss the so - called hydrodynamic version of the nonlinear schrdinger equation ( nlse ) , which can be linearized to describe an effective metric for the two - dimensional photon fluid .
finally , in section [ sec : sec5 ] , we present our concluding remarks as well as some possible outlooks of our work ..
) is used to reach the rdr of cavity optomechanics .
( c ) rdr regime of optomechanics where @xmath0 ( see appendix [ app1 ] for details of calculations).,title="fig:",width=302 ] ) is used to reach the rdr of cavity optomechanics .
( c ) rdr regime of optomechanics where @xmath0 ( see appendix [ app1 ] for details of calculations).,title="fig:",width=302 ]    as the first theoretical proposal , we consider a planar optomechanical microcavity . as depicted in fig ( [ fig : fig1]-a ) , we consider a typical optomechanical system i.e. , a fabry - prot cavity with a movable end mirror , where the displacement of the mirror shifts the cavity resonances and results in the dependence of cavity resonance frequency to the position of the mechanical oscillator .
we separate the total wave vector @xmath1 , into the transversal in - plane , @xmath2 , and the longitudinal , @xmath3 , components .
the photon energy dispersion in the limit of paraxial approximation as a function of in - plane and longitudinal wave vectors reads , @xmath4 where @xmath5 denotes the speed of light . imposing the boundary conditions on the electromagnetic field inside the optomechanical cavity with curved mirrors of radius @xmath6 leads to a discrete wave vector in the @xmath7 direction , namely , @xmath8 $ ] , where the mirrors separation at the distance @xmath9 from the cavity axis is given by @xmath10 and the displacement of the mirror from its equilibrium position is indicated by @xmath7 . in the limit of paraxial approximation @xmath11
the photon dispersion relation becomes @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the trapping potential and @xmath14 is the single - photon optomechanical coupling rate .
therefore , in a fabry - prot cavity with a movable end mirror , spatial confinement of the photons in the @xmath7 direction breaks the symmetry and eventually it provides a finite effective mass ( @xmath15 ) for the photons in the plane perpendicular to the cavity axis @xcite . this makes the photon gas in the @xmath16-plane to be effectively two - dimensional .
moreover , the mirror curvature provides a trapping potential with frequency @xmath17 .
it should be noted that in the case @xmath18 ( cavity with fixed mirrors ) we recover the results of ref .
we now consider the case in which the moving mirror is interacting with a continuum of optical modes , schematically shown in fig .
( [ fig : fig1]-a ) .
the moving mirror is treated as a single - mode quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator with effective mass @xmath19 , frequency @xmath20 , and the position operator @xmath21 where @xmath22 and @xmath23 satisfy the commutation relation @xmath24=1 $ ] and @xmath25 is the zero - point fluctuation of the mirror s position .
the single - mode consideration is valid if the detection bandwidth is chosen such that it includes only a single , isolated , mechanical resonance and mode - mode coupling is negligible @xcite .
the continuum of optical modes , characterized by transverse wave vector @xmath26 and the annihilation ( creation ) operator @xmath27 ( @xmath28 ) , is coupled to the movable mirror via the radiation pressure coupling .
the optical field operators satisfy the commutation relations @xmath29 = { ( 2\pi ) ^2}\delta ( { \bf{k } } - { \bf{k'}})$ ] and @xmath30 = 0 = [ { \hat a_{\bf{k}}^\dag , \hat a_{{\bf{k'}}}^\dag } ] $ ] . in other words ,
the cavity free spectral range is much larger than the mechanical frequency ( the single - longitudinal - mode assumption ) .
we restrict our considerations for the primary mode to the case of a single - longitudinal - cavity mode . using the dispersion relation of eq .
( [ eq : dispersion_relation ] ) , the total hamiltonian of the system is expressed as @xmath31\hat a_{\bf{k}}^\dag { { \hat a}_{\bf{k } } } + { \omega _ m}{{\hat b}^\dag } \hat b , \label{eq : hamiltonian1}\ ] ] where we have defined @xmath32 .
this hamiltonian consists of the free energy of the single mechanical mode and the optical modes , the trapping potential due to the mirror curvature , and the optomechanical interaction energy .
we have also defined @xmath33 , with @xmath34 being the single - photon optomechanical strength , as the effective optomechanical coupling strength .
we investigate the dynamics of the system by the heisenberg - langevin equations associated with the hamiltonian of eq .
( [ eq : hamiltonian1 ] ) @xmath35{{\hat a}_{\bf{k } } } , \label{eq : heisenberglangevin1}\ ] ] @xmath36 where the zero - mean operator @xmath37 denotes the mechanical noise operator . here
, we assume that the fluctuation - dissipation process affects only the mechanical mode .
this assumption is justified by using a cavity with a high - quality factor ( small damping rate @xmath38 ) and a mechanical mode with a large damping rate .
of course , it is not the normal dissipation regime of optomechanics where the mechanical dissipation rate @xmath39 is much smaller than the cavity linewidth @xmath40 . therefore , one has to engineer a mechanical mode with an effective large damping rate .
the mechanism of realizing rdr of optomechanics is depicted in figs .
( [ fig : fig1]-b ) and ( [ fig : fig1]-c ) .
the detailed considerations for the realization of the rdr in the system under study are descibed in appendix [ app1 ] .
briefly , rdr with respect to the optical mode @xmath41 can be achieved by optomechanical sideband cooling of a high - q mechanical mode with an ancillary optical mode possessing a large damping rate @xmath42 . in principle , for time scales longer than @xmath43 and much shorter than @xmath44 we conclude that the photonic subsystem becomes isolated from the environment .
based on the calculations in appendix [ app1 ] , for a typical optomchanical system with a mirror with intrinsic frequency @xmath45 interacting with an ancillary optical mode with damping rate @xmath46 , it is possible to increase the mechanical damping rate to @xmath47 .
since the mechanical damping rate is much greater than the cavity decay rate ( @xmath48 ) , the mechanical mode can be adiabatically eliminated on time scales greater than @xmath43 .
for this purpose , one can formally integrate eq .
( [ eq : heisenberglangevin2 ] ) to obtain @xmath49 for time scales long compared to @xmath43 , the first term becomes zero . substituting this equation into eq .
( [ eq : heisenberglangevin1 ] ) the following equation is obtained for the optical mode @xmath50{{\hat a}_{\bf{k } } } +   \hat f_{\bf{k}}^{in}\left ( t \right ) \nonumber\\      & & \qquad\quad-\ !
2i{g^2}\left [ { \!\int\limits_0^t { \!dt'{e^{\gamma ( { t ' \!-\ ! t})/2}}\sin { \omega _ m } ( { t ' \!-\ !
t})\!\int \!{\frac{{{d^2}{\bf{k}}}}{{{{(2\pi ) } ^2}}}{{\hat n}_{\bf{k } } } ( { t ' } ) } } } \right]{{\hat a}_{\bf{k}}}\ , , \qquad      \label{eq : heisenberglangevin3 }      \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have introduced the generalized noise operator @xmath51 } \,.\ ] ] for time scales much longer than the mechanical characteristic time
@xmath43 this generalized noise operator can be approximated by @xmath52 .
the net effect of the mirror is a redistribution of the photons between the various transversal modes .
now , in the rdr the mirror motion can be adiabatically eliminated , resulting in a mechanical field that is affected too much by the optical field operators . using this approximation and defining @xmath53 which for time scales much longer than @xmath54 can be approximated as @xmath55 eq . ( [ eq : heisenberglangevin3 ] ) becomes @xmath56{{\hat a}_{\bf{k } } } \label{eq : heisenberglangevin4}\ ] ] altogether , the adiabatic elimination of the mirror motion has two consequences on the dynamics of the system .
first , it provides a reservoir for the photons inside the cavity that can exchange excitations .
second , it gives rise to a nonlinear kerr - type photon - photon interaction with a modified interaction rate , @xmath57 .
the fourier transform of @xmath58 ( @xmath59 ) is defined to be the two - dimensional cavity photon field operator @xmath60 ( @xmath61 ) @xmath62 where the field operators satisfy the following equal - time commutation relations @xmath63 = \delta ( { \bf{r } } - { \bf{r'}}),\\      & & [ { \hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r}}),\hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r ' } } ) } ] = 0 = [ { { { \hat \psi } ^\dag } ( t,{\bf{r}}),{{\hat \psi } ^\dag } ( t,{\bf{r ' } } ) } ] .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] using the fourier transform the equation of motion ( [ eq : heisenberglangevin4 ] ) becomes @xmath64\hat \psi \left ( { t,{\bf{r } } } \right ) \nonumber\\      & & \qquad\quad\quad\quad-2\hbar { g^2 } \mathcal{t } \left [ { \int { { d^2}{\bf{r}}{{\hat \psi } ^\dag } \left ( { t,{\bf{r } } } \right)\hat \psi ( { t,{\bf{r } } } ) } } \right]\hat \psi ( { t,{\bf{r } } } ) .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] we now assume that the volume of integration is small and the integrand is slowly varying and smooth in the region of integration so that we can write approximately @xmath65 where @xmath66 is the volume of the integration . in this manner , we arrive at a nlse describing the two - dimensional photon field in the optomechanical microcavity @xmath67{\mkern 1mu } \hat \psi \left ( { t,{\bf{r } } } \right ) , \ ] ] where we have defined @xmath68 , and the photon - photon coupling strength @xmath69 @xmath70 is determined by the optomechanical parameters .
as the second theoretical proposal , we consider a two - dimensional array of coupled optomechanical systems schematically depicted in fig  ( [ fig : fig5 ] ) .
this system could be realized experimentally in optomechanical crystals .
one- and two - dimensional optomechanical crystals have been recently realized experimentally @xcite . in this case ,
optical ( mechanical ) modes on each site interact locally via radiation pressure while photons can tunnel between adjacent site with hopping rate @xmath71.since in such experiments phonon tunneling rate is much smaller ( four orders of magnitude ) than the photon tunneling rate , we can neglect phonon hopping in our considerations .
the optomechanical array hamiltonian is given by @xcite @xmath72 } \nonumber \\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \qquad\quad   + \sum\limits_{\left\langle { i , j , k } \right\rangle } { j\left ( { \hat a_{ij}^\dag { { \hat a}_{kj } } + \hat a_{ij}^\dag { { \hat a}_{ik } } } \right ) } \ , , \label{eq : optomechanical_array_hamiltonian}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath73 and @xmath74 , respectively , stands for the bosonic annihilation operators for phonon and photons on the lattice site denoted by @xmath75 . in the last term @xmath76 denotes the summation over all adjacent lattice sites .
similar to the case of planar optomechanical microcavity , we consider the system in the rdr and write down the heisenberg - langevin equations for the quantum fields @xmath77 @xmath78 for a slowly varying optical field which is justified when the optical wave vector @xmath79 , we can take the field operators to be continuous functions of @xmath80 and @xmath81 where @xmath82 is the cells spacing , i.e. , @xmath83 and @xmath84 .
this assumption allows us to rewrite the equations of motion as follows    @xmath85\hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r}})\nonumber\\ & & \quad\ - ij\left[{\hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r } } \!-\ !
h\hat x ) \!+\ !
\hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r } } \!+\ !
h\hat x ) \!+\ ! \hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r } } \!-\ ! h\hat
y ) \!+\ ! \hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r } } \!+\ ! h\hat y ) } \right ]   \label{eq : array_equation_of_motion1}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    @xmath86    we now expand the field operators @xmath87 and @xmath88 as taylor series up to second order in @xmath89 @xmath90 under this approximation , eq .
( [ eq : array_equation_of_motion1 ] ) takes the form @xmath91\hat \psi ( t,{\bf{r } } )       \label{eq : array_equation_of_motion3 }      \end{aligned}\ ] ] again , applying the adiabatic approximation for the mechanical modes , we arrive at an equation analogous to eq .
( [ eq : gpe ] ) with @xmath92 , @xmath93 and @xmath94 .
we should notice that in contrast to the former case , here photons gain mass due to the hopping between lattice sites .
moreover , the potential @xmath95 could be generally space dependent by introducing a space dependent optical frequency @xmath96 or hopping rate @xmath97 .
using the mean - field approximation , the field operator can be written as the sum of its mean value and a fluctuation operator with zero mean value , that is , @xmath98 . the classical mean field and the fluctuation operator satisfy , respectively    @xmath99{\mkern 1mu } { \psi _ 0 } ,          \label{eq : gpe0 }          \\          & & i\hbar { \partial _ t}\hat \phi   =   - \left [ { \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{{2m}}{\nabla ^2 } + \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{m}\frac{{\nabla { \psi _ 0}}}{{{\psi _ 0}}}\nabla } \right]\hat \phi   + n\mathcal{g}(\hat \phi   + { { \hat \phi } ^\dag } ) , \qquad          \label{eq : bdg }          \end{aligned}\ ] ]    where @xmath100 is defined to be the two - dimensional photon density .    in order to interpret clearly eqs .
( [ eq : gpe0 ] ) and ( [ eq : bdg ] ) , we write the quantum field operator , @xmath101 , in the so - called madulang representation , namely @xmath102 where @xmath103 and @xmath104 denote , respectively , the amplitude of the photon number density fluctuation and the phase fluctuation .
the equations of motion for the density fluctuation and the phase fluctuation read    @xmath105 ,
\label{eq : hydrodynamics1 }          \end{aligned}\ ] ]    where @xmath106 and @xmath107 are the local velocity of fluid and the local speed of excitations , respectively .
the so - called healing length is defined to be @xmath108 . within the hydrodynamic approximation , i.e. , over the length scales much larger than @xmath109 the last term in eq.([eq : hydrodynamics1 ] )
can be safely ignored and thus @xmath110 .
\label{eq : hydrodynamics3}\ ] ] combining eq .
( [ eq : hydrodynamics3 ] ) and eq .
( [ eq : hydrodynamics2 ] ) results in @xmath111 these fluctuations , within the hydrodynamic approximation , are analogous to the collective equantum field on a curved metric .
in fact , the photon phase fluctuation obeys the covariant klein - gordon equation for a massless scalar field propagating in a curved spacetime @xmath112 where the dalembertian operator depends on an effective metric , @xmath113 , and is given by @xmath114 with @xmath115 .
\label{eq : metric}\ ] ] here , the greek indices range from @xmath116 to @xmath117 , @xmath118 range from @xmath119 to @xmath117 , and @xmath120 is the determinant of @xmath121 .
the line element of this spacetime is given by @xmath122.\ ] ] this derivation is similar to the derivation of analog spacetime given in @xcite .
a singularity may occur if the flow velocity and the local excitation velocity have equal values . as depicted in fig .
( [ fig : fig4 ] ) , this configuration corresponds to a black hole since excitation waves traveling with @xmath123 are trapped inside the _ superexcitonic _ region and they are not able to propagate backward .
although analog models of gtr have a limited ability to simulate all aspects of gr , they provide accessible experimental models for quantum field theory in curved spacetime .
some properties ( mainly kinematic ) of gtr can be investigated by the analogies with accessible physical systems .    according to eq .
( [ eq : frequencyshift ] ) if @xmath124 then @xmath69 will be a positive parameter but it is physically unacceptable solution because the system enters an unstable region . therefore , the parameter @xmath69 can only have a negative value for a bare optomechanical system .
this is equivalent to the imaginary velocity for excitation waves and hence they feel a euclidean metric .
positive nonlinearities can also be introduced into the system by placing an extra kerr medium inside the optomechanical microcavity @xcite .
this is equivalent to the real excitonic speed and , consequently , correponds to a lorentzian metric for the analog spacetime which is suitable for the investigation of analog black holes . in both cases ,
the velocity of cavity excitations can be controlled by the ancillary optical mode .
in summary , we have introduced a theoretical scheme for the quantum simulation of the curved spacetimes in two types of optomechanical systems operating in the rdr , that is a planar optomechanical microcavity and a two - dimensional array of coupled optomechanical systems .
such optomechanical systems are realizable with the state - of - the - art technologies . key features of our proposal can be categorized as follows .
first , the optical mode with higher damping rate renormalizes both the damping rate and the frequency of the mechanical element ( see appendix [ app1 ] ) .
second , the mechanical oscillator which operates in the rdr of optomechanics can be adiabatically eliminated to achieve a kerr - like photon - photon interaction .
the description of the system with the nlse allows us to connect the photonic fluid with the notion of the analog spacetime .
we have shown that the phase fluctuation in the photonic fluid obeys the klein - gordon equation for a massless scalar field propagating in a curved spacetime with a metric given by eq .
( [ eq : metric ] ) which can be regarded as an analog of the curved spacetime .
the corresponding metric can be controlled by the system parameters .
the system introduced here is rather a simple system . as an outlook for future works
, it can be extended to more complex situations which open up several possibilities .
for example , by introducing two primary modes with different polarizations , it should be possible to produce a two - component photonic fluid inside an optical cavity . in principle , it could be possible to introduce an effective mass for the photons in two dimensions by adding an optical parametric amplifier in the cavity .
studying the quantum nature of the photon fluid through various quantum optical measurements on the leakage photon field is another outlook for future works .
for two different couplings of the ancillary mode : @xmath125 ( solid line ) , @xmath126 ( dashed line ) .
parameter values are @xmath45 , @xmath127 , @xmath128 , @xmath129 . ,
title="fig:",width=158 ]   for two different couplings of the ancillary mode : @xmath125 ( solid line ) , @xmath126 ( dashed line ) .
parameter values are @xmath45 , @xmath127 , @xmath128 , @xmath129 . , title="fig:",width=158 ]    in this appendix , we discuss how to prepare the mechanical mode in the rdr of optomechanics .
assume that the mechanical mode with intrinsic frequency @xmath130 is coupled to another ancillary optical mode denoted by @xmath131 via the radiation pressure .
the hamiltonian of the system in the frame rotating with the laser frequency @xmath132 is given by @xmath133 where @xmath134 , @xmath135 and @xmath136 are the single - photon optomechanical coupling , laser pumping rate and the detuning , respectively . considering a strongly driven field and weak optomechanical coupling
allows us to linearize the quantum dynamics of fluctuations around the semiclassical amplitudes , @xmath137 and @xmath138 .
the steady - state solutions for the classical mean fields are given by @xmath139 $ ] and @xmath140 . here , the cavity damping rate for the ancillary mode is denoted by @xmath141 and the intrinsic damping rate of the mechanical mode is denoted by @xmath142 .
the linearized quantum langevin equations for the fluctuations are obtained as @xmath143 where we have defined @xmath144 and @xmath145 .
the zero - mean operators @xmath146 and @xmath147 that denote , respectively , the vacuum optical input noise and the mechanical noise operator satisfy commutation relations @xmath148 = [ { { { \hat d}^{in } } ( t),{{\hat d}^{in,\dag } } ( t ' ) } ] = \delta ( t - t')$ ] and the second order correlations @xmath149 and @xmath150 in which we have assumed that the cavity is at zero temperature and @xmath151 is the mean number of thermal phonons of the mechanical oscillator at heat bath temperature @xmath152 with @xmath153 being the boltzmann constant . equations ( [ eq : linearizedheisenberglangevin1 ] ) and ( [ eq : linearizedheisenberglangevin2 ] ) together with noise correlations fully describe the dynamics of the system under consideration . it is convenient to rewrite the equations of motion in the fourier space @xmath154 \!=\ ! ( i\bar \delta   \!-\ ! \kappa ' /2)\hat c[\omega ] \!-\!i g ( { \hat d[\omega ] \!+\ ! { { \hat d}^\dag } [ \omega ] } ) \!-\ !
\sqrt \kappa '   { { \hat a}^{in}}[\omega ] , \\ & & - i\omega \hat d[\omega ] \!=\ !   - \left ( i{{\omega _ i } \!+\ ! { \gamma _ i}/2 } \right)\hat d[\omega ] \!-\
! i ( { g{{\hat c}^\dag } [ \omega ] \!+\ ! g^*\hat c[\omega ] } ) \!-\ ! \sqrt
\gamma_i   { { \hat b}^{in}}[\omega ] .\end{aligned}\ ] ] combining these two equations results in @xmath155 = \frac { { - i\sqrt \kappa '   \left\ { { { g^*}\chi [ \omega ] { { \hat a}_{{\rm{in}}}}[\omega ] + g{\chi ^ * } [ - \omega ] \hat a_{{\rm{in}}}^\dag [ \omega ] } \right\ } + \sqrt \gamma_i   { { \hat b}_{{\rm{in}}}}[\omega ] } } { { i\left ( { \omega   - { \omega _ i } + \sigma [ \omega ] } \right ) - { \gamma _ i}/2}}\,,\ ] ] where @xmath156 =   [ - i(\omega   + \bar \delta ) + \kappa ' /2]^{-1 } $ ] and @xmath157 =   - i|g|^2\left ( { \chi [ \omega ] - { \chi ^ * } [ - \omega ] } \right ) $ ] are the optical susceptibility and the self - energy , respectively . therefore , the effect of the ancillary mode will be a renormalization in the mechanical damping rate ( @xmath158 ) and the mechanical frequency ( @xmath159 ) .
the finite cavity lifetime leads to the retarded essence of the radiation - pressure force and , consequently , it introduces the frequency - dependent mechanical frequency shift @xmath160 and optomechanical damping rate @xmath161 given by @xcite @xmath162,\ ] ] @xmath163.\ ] ] the intrinsic mechanical resonator damping rate and frequency modify due to the radiation pressure as follows @xmath164 one can thus increase or decrease the damping rate and frequency of the moving mirror , depending on the sign of the detuning . in particular , for a red - detuned ancillary pump , @xmath165 , there is an increase in the mechanical damping rate of the mechanical oscillator and consequently the cooling of the mechanical oscillator is provided .
moreover , the mechanical oscillator will be spring softened . in fig .
( [ fig : fig3]-a ) and fig .
( [ fig : fig3]-b ) we have plotted , respectively , the modified mechanical frequency and the modified optomechanical damping rate versus the normalized frequency @xmath166 for two different values of the optomechanical coupling of the ancillary optical mode for experimentally feasible parameters of a typical optomechanical system @xcite . with @xmath167 , and in the resolved side - band limit ( @xmath168 )
the induced damping rate and the frequency shift of the oscillator are , respectively , given by @xmath169 it is evident that @xmath20 is negative for @xmath170 .
under such a circumstance , the system can enter unstable region and the routh - hurwitz stability conditions are violated @xcite .    driving the system with an ancillary optical mode with a large damping rate ( @xmath171 and @xmath172 ) tuned to the red side of the optical cavity @xcite , as the consequence of the optomechanical interaction ,
the ancillary mode induces an optical damping to the mechanical oscillator . working in the resolved - sideband regime and using a red detuned driving laser together with a weak optomechanical coupling the net effect of the ancillary optical mode
is to renormalize the mechanical damping rate according to eq .
( [ eq : dampingrate ] ) . in this manner
, @xmath173 can be adjusted by the strength of the driving ancillary field so that the total damping rate of the mechanical oscillator , @xmath174 becomes very large .
therefore , coupling a high - q mechanical oscillator to an auxiliary cavity mode allows us to realize the rdr of the cavity optomechanics , @xmath48 @xcite ( see figs .
( [ fig : fig1]-b ) and ( [ fig : fig1]-c ) ) . the wide separation between the time scales of dissipation mechanisms allows us to use the mechanical oscillator as an extra dissipative reservoir for the optical mode .
m. novello , matt visser , and g. e. volovik , `` _ _ artificial black holes , _ _ '' ( world scientific , 2002 ) .
c. barcel , s. liberati and m. visser , `` _ _ analogue gravity , _ _ ''   http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2005-12[living rev .
relativity * 8 * , 12 ( 2005 ) . ] w. g. unruh , `` _ _ quantum analogues : from phase transitions to black holes and cosmology _ _ '' ( springer , 2007 ) .
d. faccio , f. belgiorno , s. cacciatori , v. gorini , s. liberati , and u. moschella , `` _ _ analogue gravity phenomenology : analogue spacetimes and horizons , from theory to experiment _ _ '' ( springer , 2012 ) . l. sindoni , `` _ emergent models for gravity : an overview of microscopic models , _ '' http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/sigma.2012.027[sigma * 8 * , 027 ( 2012 ) ] . w. g. unruh , `` _ _ experimental black - hole evaporation ? , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.46.1351[phys .
lett . * 46 * , 1351 ( 1981 ) ] .
g. e. volovik , `` _ _ superfluid analogies of cosmological phenomena , _ _ '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00139-3[phys .
rep . * 351 * , 195 ( 2001 ) ] .
t. a. jacobson and g. e. volovik , `` _ _ event horizons and ergoregions in @xmath175 , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.58.064021[phys .
d * 58 * , 064021 ( 1998 ) ] .
s. giovanazzi , `` _ _ hawking radiation in sonic black holes , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.061302[phys .
. lett . * 94 * , 061302 ( 2005 ) ] .
s. giovanazzi , `` _ _ entanglement entropy and mutual information production rates in acoustic black holes , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.011302[phys .
106 * , 011302 ( 2011 ) ] .
u. leonhardt and p. piwnicki , `` _ _ relativistic effects of light in moving media with extremely low group velocity , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.84.822[phys . rev
. lett . * 84 * , 822 ( 2000 ) ] .
u. leonhardt , `` _ _ space - time geometry of quantum dielectrics , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physreva.62.012111[phys .
a * 62 * , 012111 , ( 2000 ) ] .
b. reznik , `` _ _ origin of the thermal radiation in a solid - state analogue of a black hole , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.62.044044[phys .
d * 62 * , 044044 ( 2000 ) ] .
w. g. unruh and r. schtzhold , `` _ _ on slow light as a black hole analogue , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.68.024008[phys .
d * 68 * 024008 , ( 2003 ) ] .
r. schtzhold and w. g. unruh , `` _ _ hawking radiation in an electromagnetic waveguide ? , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.95.031301[phys .
* 95 * , 031301 ( 2005 ) ] .
a. cortijo and m. a. h. vozmediano , `` _ _ effects of topological defects and local curvature on the electronic properties of planar graphene , _ _ ''
b * 763 * , 293 ( 2007 ) ] .
m. a. h. vozmediano , m. i. katsnelson , and f. guinea , `` _ _ gauge fields in graphene , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.003[phys
. rep . * 496 * , 109 ( 2010 ) ] .
b. horstmann , b. reznik , s. fagnocchi , and j. i. cirac , `` _ _ hawking radiation from an acoustic black hole on an ion ring , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.250403[phys .
* 104 * , 250403 ( 2010 ) ] .
l. j. garay , j. r. anglin , j. i. cirac , and p. zoller , `` _ _ sonic analog of gravitational black holes in bose - einstein condensates , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.4643[phys .
lett . * 85 * , 4643 ( 2000 ) ] .
l. j. garay , j. r. anglin , j. i. cirac , and p. zoller , `` _ _ sonic black holes in dilute bose - einstein condensates , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.63.023611[phys .
a * 63 * , 023611 ( 2001 ) ] .    c. barcel , s. liberati , and m. visser ,
`` _ _ analogue gravity from bose - einstein condensates , _ _ '' http://stacks.iop.org/0264-9381/18/i=6/a=312[class .
quantum grav . * 18 * , 1137 ( 2001 ) ] . c. mayoral , a. fabbri , and m. rinaldi , `` _ _ steplike discontinuities in bose - einstein condensates and hawking radiation : dispersion effects , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.83.124047[phys .
d * 83 * , 124047 ( 2011 ) ] .
f. girelli , s. liberati , and l. sindoni , `` _ _ gravitational dynamics in bose - einstein condensates , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.78.084013[phys .
d * 78 * , 084013 ( 2008 ) ] .
s. finazzi , s. liberati , and l. sindoni , `` _ _ cosmological constant : a lesson from bose - einstein condensates , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.108.071101[phys .
lett . * 108 * , 071101 ( 2012 ) ] .
p. r. anderson , r. balbinot , a. fabbri , and r. parentani , `` _ _ hawking radiation correlations in bose - einstein condensates using quantum field theory in curved space , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.87.124018[phys .
d * 87 * , 124018 ( 2013 ) ] .
t. j. kippenberg and k. j. vahala , `` _ _ cavity opto - mechanics , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1364/oe.15.017172[optics express * 15 * , 17172 ( 2007 ) ] .
p. meystre , `` _ _ a short walk through quantum optomechanics , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1002/andp.201200226[ann .
( berlin ) * 525 * , 215 ( 2013 ) ] .
m. aspelmeyer , t. j. kippenberg , and f. marquardt , `` _ _ cavity optomechanics , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391[rev .
86 * , 1391 ( 2014 ) ] .
w. p. bowen and g. j. milburn , `` _ _ quantum optomechanics , _ _ '' ( crc press , 2015 ) .
k. w. murch , k. l. moore , s. gupta , and d. m. stamper - kurn , `` _ _ observation of quantum - measurement backaction with an ultracold atomic gas , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1038/nphys965[nature physics * 4 * , 561 ( 2008 ) ] .
j. d. thompson , b. m. zwickl , a. m. jayich , f. marquardt , s. m. girvin , and j. g. e. harris , `` _ _ strong dispersive coupling of a high - finesse cavity to a micromechanical membrane , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1038/nature06715[nature ( london ) * 452 * , 72 ( 2008 ) ] .
t. p. purdy , r. w. peterson , and c. a. regal , `` _ _ observation of radiation pressure shot noise on a macroscopic object , _ _ ''
https:/doi.org/10.1126/science.1231282[science * 339 * , 801 ( 2013 ) ] .
a. motazedifard , f. bemani , m. h. naderi , r. roknizadeh , and d. vitali , `` _ _ force sensing based on coherent quantum noise cancellation in a hybrid optomechanical cavity with squeezed - vacuum injection , _ _ ''
https:/doi.org/10.1088/1367 - 2630/18/7/073040[new j. phys .
* 18 * , 073040 ( 2016 ) ] .
j. d. teufel , t. donner , d. li , j.w .
harlow , m. s. allman , k. cicak , a. j. sirois , j. d. whittaker , k.w .
lehnert , and r.w .
simmonds , `` _ _ sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state , _ _ ''
https:/doi.org/10.1038/nature10261[nature ( london ) * 475 * , 359 ( 2011 ) ] .
j. chan , t. p. m. alegre , a. h. safavi - naeini , j. t. hill , a. krause , s. grblacher , m. aspelmeyer , and o. painter , `` _ _ laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1038/nature10461[nature ( london ) * 478 * , 89 ( 2011 ) ] .
t. a. palomaki , j.w .
harlow , j. d. teufel , r.w .
simmonds , and k.w .
lehnert , `` _ _ coherent state transfer between itinerant microwave fields and a mechanical oscillator , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1038/nature11915[nature ( london ) * 495 * , 210 ( 2013 ) ] .
t. a. palomaki , j. d. teufel , r.w .
simmonds , and k.w .
lehnert , `` _ _ entangling mechanical motion with microwave fields , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1126/science.1244563[science * 342 * , 710 ( 2013 ) ] .
m. paternostro , d. vitali , s. gigan , m. s. kim , c. brukner , j. eisert , and m. aspelmeyer , `` _ _ creating and probing multipartite macroscopic entanglement with light , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.250401[phys .
* 99 * , 250401 ( 2007 ) ] .
d. vitali , s. gigan , a. ferreira , h. r. bhm , p. tombesi , a. guerreiro , v. verdal , a. zeilinger , and m. aspelmeyer , `` _ _ optomechanical entanglement between a movable mirror and a cavity field , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.030405[phys .
* 98 * , 030405 ( 2007 ) ] .    j. zhang , k. peng , and s. l. braunstein , `` _ _ quantum - state transfer from light to macroscopic oscillators , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physreva.68.013808[phys .
a * 68 * , 013808 ( 2003 ) ] .
s. weis , r. rivire , s. delglise , e. gavartin , o. arcizet , a. schliesser , and t. j. kippenberg , `` _ _ optomechanically induced transparency , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1126/science.1195596[science * 330 * , 1520 ( 2010 ) ] .
t. hong , h. yang , h. miao , and y. chen , `` _ _ open quantum dynamics of single - photon optomechanical devices , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.023812[phys .
a * 88 * , 023812 ( 2013 ) ] .
f. marquardt , j. g.e .
harris , and s. m. girvin , `` _ _ dynamical multistability induced by radiation pressure in high - finesse micromechanical optical cavities , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.103901[phys .
lett . * 96 * , 103901 ( 2006 ) ] .
f. bemani , r. roknizadeh , and m. h. naderi , `` _ _ theoretical scheme for the realization of the sphere - coherent motional states in an atom - assisted optomechanical cavity , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1364/josab.32.001360[j .
b * 32 * , 1361 ( 2015 ) ] .
a. nunnenkamp , v. sudhir , a. feofanov , a. roulet , and t. j. kippenberg , `` _ _ quantum - limited amplification and parametric instability in the reversed dissipation regime of cavity optomechanics , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.023604[phys .
lett . * 113 * , 023604 ( 2014 ) ] .
l. d. toth , n. r. bernier , a. nunnenkamp , e. glushkov , a. k. feofanov , and t. j. kippenberg , `` _ _ a dissipative quantum reservoir for microwave light using a mechanical oscillator , _ _ '' https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05180[arxiv:1602.05180 ( 2016 ) ] .
j. klaers , f. vewinger , and m. weitz , `` _ _ thermalization of a two - dimensional photonic gas in a ` white wall ' photon box , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1038/nphys1680[nat .
phys . 6 , 512 ( 2010 ) ] . c. genes , d. vitali , and p. tombesi , `` _ _ simultaneous cooling and entanglement of mechanical modes of a micromirror in an optical cavity , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/9/095009[new j. phys .
* 10 * , 095009 ( 2008 ) ]
. a. h. safavi - naeini , j. t. hill , s. meenehan , j. chan , s. grblacher , and o. painter , `` _ _ two - dimensional phononic - photonic band gap optomechanical crystal cavity , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.153603[phys .
lett . * 112 * , 153603 ( 2014 ) ] .
j. chan , a. h. safavi - naeini , j. t. hill , s. meenehan , and o. painter , `` _ _ optimized optomechanical crystal cavity with acoustic radiation shield , _ _ '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4747726[appl .
* 101 * , 081115 ( 2016 ) ] .
m. ludwig and f. marquardt , `` _ _ quantum many - body dynamics in optomechanical arrays _ _ , '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.073603[phys .
lett . * 111 * , 073603 ( 2013 ) ] . w. chen and a. a. clerk , `` _ _ photon propagation in a one- dimensional optomechanical lattice _ _ , '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.89.033854[phys .
rev . a * 89 * , 033854 ( 2014 ) ] . v. peano , c. brendel , m. schmidt , and f. marquardt , `` _ _ topological phases of sound and light , _ _ '' https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.5.031011[phys .
x * 5 * , 031011 ( 2015 ) ] .
s. shahidani , m. h. naderi , and m. soltanolkotabi , and s. barzanjeh , `` _ _ steady - state entanglement , cooling , and tristability in a nonlinear optomechanical cavity , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1364/josab.31.001087[j .
b * 31 * , 1087 ( 2014 ) ] .
s. shahidani , m. h. naderi , and m. soltanolkotabi , `` _ _ normal - mode splitting and output - field squeezing in a kerr - down conversion optomechanical system , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2014.958111[j .
mod . opt . * 62*,116 ( 2015 ) ] .    c. genes , d. vitali , p. tombesi , s. gigan , and m. aspelmeyer , `` _ _ ground - state cooling of a micromechanical oscillator : comparing cold damping and cavity - assisted cooling schemes , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physreva.77.033804[phys .
a * 77 * , 033804 ( 2008 ) ] .
a. hurwitz , `` _ _ selected papers on mathematical trends in control theory _ _ , '' edited by r. bellman and r. kabala ( dover , new york , 1964 ) .
f. marquardt , j. p. chen , a. a. clerk , and s. m. girvin , `` _ _ quantum theory of cavity - assisted sideband cooling of mechanical motion , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.093902[phys .
lett . * 99 * , 093902 ( 2007 ) ] . i. wilson - rae , n. nooshi , w. zwerger , and t. j. kippenberg , `` _ _ theory of ground state cooling of a mechanical oscillator using dynamical backaction , _ _ '' https:/doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.093901[phys . rev
. lett . * 99 * , 093901 ( 2007 ) ] .


a large number of the ly@xmath0 emitters at high redshift have been detected in sensitive search using the narrow - band filters ( e.g. , hu & mcmahon 1996 ; steidel et al . 2000 ; rhoads et al . 2001 ; 2003 ; kodaira et al .
2003 ; palunas et al . 2004 ; hayashino et al . 2004 ; matsuda et al . 2004 ; taniguchi et al . 2005 ; gronwall et al . 2006 ; iye et al . 2006 , ouchi et al .
2008 ) . from the photometric study ,
they are generally considered to be young star - forming objects and found to be widely distributed in their luminosity , size , and equivalent width ( e.g. , gawiser et al .
2007 ; finkelstein et al .
2007 ) .
while the ly@xmath0 emission is one of the fundamental tools to study the galaxy formation at high redshift , it is , however , still difficult to understand what the dominant origins of the ly@xmath0 emission are , and how the ly@xmath0 photons escape from the galaxy . resonance scattering and extinction by the neutral hydrogen or dust in galaxies may easily modify the observed flux and line profile .
there are at least three different physical origins of the ly@xmath0 lines from high - redshift star - forming galaxies ; photo - ionization by hot massive stars , cooling radiation from the gas heated either by the shock during to the gravitational collapse or by the shock due to the gas outflow driven by the thermal energy of frequent supernovae or active galactic nuclei .
the ly@xmath0 photons produced by any of these process are affected by the neutral hydrogen gas mixed with or surrounding the emission - line regions .
recent results suggest that statistical average of the ly@xmath0 escape fraction of a sample of the star - forming galaxies at redshift @xmath8 is only @xmath9@xmath7 ( hayes et al .
2009 ) .
it is important to study their spectroscopic properties , especially their line profiles to study how the lines are produced and modified .
if the ly@xmath0 emission is largely reprocessed by the neutral gas with large bulk motion , we may observe the signatures in their line profiles .
for example , dijikstra et al .
( 2006 ) studied the expected ly@xmath0 profile of optically thick , spherically symmetric collapsing gas clouds .
the expected profiles are generally blueshifted and show double peaked profile possibly dominated by the blue peak due to the combination of the infalling gas motion and line radiation transfer effects . on the other hand , verhamme et al .
( 2006 , 2008 ) modeled the line profiles expected for the expanding neutral hydrogen shell .
although the expected profiles are also double - peaked , in many cases they are redshifted and the red peak appears stronger due to the scattered components behind the original ly@xmath0 emission - line region in our line of sight .
it is , however , not easy to discriminate these two cases from the observation of the individual ly@xmath0 line itself if we do not know the systemic velocity .
it is known that high - redshift star - forming galaxies typically show gas outflow from the sources .
pettini et al .
( 2001 ) and shapley et al .
( 2003 ) compared the redshifts of the interstellar absorption line with the rest - frame optical emission lines which are nearly at the systemic velocity of the photo - ionized region and found that the inter - stellar absorption gas is generally blueshifted for typically 200 km s@xmath5 indicating that the outflow gas motion is common among the lyman break galaxies .
ly@xmath0 lines in these objects also show p cyg - type profiles , namely , a narrow emission line with a blueshifted absorption line .
verhamme et al .
( 2008 ) applied their models to the ly@xmath0 line profile of the lyman break galaxies and found that they can be explained by the scattering in the simple expanding shell models .
steidel et al .
( 2010 ) also showed that the cool gas around @xmath10 - 3 lyman break galaxies typically exhibit outward motion .    on the other hand , the models of cold accretion ( dekel et al .
2009 ; goerdt et al .
2009 ) also suggest that the observed luminosity , surface brightness , and size distributions of the ly@xmath0 emitters , especially for the extended ly@xmath0 blobs ( steidel et al .
2000 ; matsuda et al .
2004 ) can be explained by the gas heated by the collisional excitation in the cold gas stream .
spectroscopic observations to study the line profiles of the ly@xmath0 emitters are essential to discriminate these cases although only a small sample of spectroscopy with enough high spectral resolution is available so far .
matsuda et al . ( 2006 ) studied the line profiles of the extended ly@xmath0 emitters , or ly@xmath0 blobs as well as more ordinary ly@xmath0 emitters , and found that the ly@xmath0 lines of the blobs have more structure and the whole velocity width is positively correlated with their size .    in this paper , we present the results of our new spectroscopic observations for the 91 ly@xmath0 emitters to show their ly@xmath0 line profiles .
the photometric data for the sample selection is similar as in matsuda et al .
( 2006 ) but the number of the spectra for normal ly@xmath0 emitters are significantly increased .
we describe our observations and data reduction in section 2 , the observed line profiles in section 3 , and the discussion in section 4 .
the sample of the ly@xmath0 emitters are selected based on the same data presented in hayashino et al .
( 2004 ) at the field of ssa22-sb1 where one of the largest overdensity of lyman break galaxies as well as ly@xmath0 emitters at @xmath11=3.1 is known to exist ( steidel et al . 1998 ; 2000 ) .
the selection criteria for the emitters are , however , slightly modified to include the objects with relatively low equivalent width .
we also did not use the @xmath12 color criteria , which was needed to make the very robust imaging sample of ly@xmath0 emitters to exclude the contamination by the foreground objects .
we here applied only the following criteria .
@xmath13 or    @xmath14    where @xmath15 is the effectively averaged @xmath16 magnitude of the @xmath17 and the @xmath18-band and @xmath19 represents the @xmath16 magnitude in the nb497 narrow - band filter ( hayashino et al .
2004 ) .
the observations of the ly@xmath0 profiles of the emitters are done by the faint object camera and spectrograph ( focas ) equipped with the subaru 8.2 m telescope in jul 2004- aug 2005 .
the vph grating 600_450 was used to obtain the spectral dispersion of 0.37   per pixel . using slits with a width of 1 arcsec and spectral resolution , @xmath2/@xmath3 @xmath4
was achieved as measured from the widths of the arc lines . in order to observe as many targets as we can in one exposure
, we used the custom - made intermediate band filter with @xmath3 @xmath20  to limit the spectral length on the detectors . by this method
, we obtain the range of the spectra only around the emission lines , but the spectral resolution is high enough to clearly discriminate the [ oii ] 3727   doublet , which is the only significant contaminants , from the @xmath1 ly@xmath0 lines .
the data was reduced in the standard manner using iraf .
the accuracy of the wavelength calibration is higher than 0.2   .
the one - dimensional spectra are then extracted by averaging the three spatial pixels , each 0.@xmath212 .
we also smoothed the spectra by three pixels in the dispersion direction .    as a result
, we obtained the ly@xmath0 emission - line spectra for the 91 objects .
the sample contains the 12 objects classified as ly@xmath0 blobs by matsuda et al .
( 2004 ) whose isophotal area above the surface brightness of @xmath22 erg s@xmath5 @xmath23 arcsec@xmath24 is larger than 16 arcsec@xmath25 or 900 kpc@xmath25 at @xmath1 .
matsuda et al . ( 2004 ; 2006 ) showed that the photometric or the spectroscopic properties of the ly@xmath0 blobs are not quite discriminated from other objects but rather continuously distributed in the whole sample of the emitters .
as described in matsuda et al .
( 2005 ) and matsuda et al .
( 2006 ) , the sample selected by the criteria in hayashino et al .
( 2004 ) is almost free for contamination ( @xmath26 ) . for the objects with lower equivalent width ( i.e. , @xmath27 ) , the fraction of the [ oii ] emitter at @xmath28 increases , as expected , but still less than @xmath9% .
we identified in total of 91 spectroscopic ly@xmath0 emitters in the 11 masks located in the ssa22-sb1 field .
fig.1a-1f show the observed ly@xmath0 spectrum for all the 91 objects .
two of them ( lae j221709.6 + 001801 and lae j221720.2 + 002019 ) clearly show a very large line width ( @xmath29 1000 km s@xmath5 ) and possibly host active galactic nuclei ( agn ) . table 1 summarizes their observed properties .    in fig.1
, we first notice that many of the objects show the characteristic profiles , namely the double - peaked spectra with a strong , asymmetrical red peak and a much weaker blue peak .
while the most conspicuous cases are the objects lae j221720.3 + 002438 , lae j221745.3 + 002006 , and lae j221759.2 + 002254 ( lab28 in matsuda et al .
2004 ) , many other cases can be recognized in fig.1 . as a large fraction of the observed ly@xmath0 spectra shows the similar profiles
, it may represent the common physical properties of the emitters .
we therefore tried to characterize the profile and to evaluate the fraction of the objects with the similar profile among those observed in more objective way .
we first fitted the visually isolated peaks in each spectrum with the gaussian profiles .
these procedures are rather formal ones but useful in the following discussions . fig.2 and
fig.3 show the example of the fitting for the two objects with high and moderate signal - to - noise ratio , respectively . fig.2a and 3a are for the multiple gaussian fitting .
the green lines show the each component and the blue ones the total .
the red dashed lines in the figures show the noise level measured at the same wavelength by using the blank part of the slits .
bottom panels show the residual . on the other hand , fig.2b and
3b show the examples of the single gaussian fitting similar with those tried in matsuda et al .
for the objects with multiple peaks , the data points between the peaks are not used for the fitting ( thin crosses in fig.2b and 3b ) .
the center of the wavelength in each panel in fig.1 is the central wavelength of the single - component gaussian fitting .
the central wavelengths of the primary red and secondary blue peaks ( for the objects with the feature ) as well as that of the single - component fitting ( for all the objects ) are also presented in table 1 .
of the 89 objects except for the two broad - line agn , 50 objects have the visually identified strong blue and weak red peaks .
4 other objects ( 221728.3 + 001212 , 221740.3 + 001129 , 221740.9 + 001125 , and 221812.5 + 001433 ) do not show the weak blue peaks but have notable components to the red of the strongest peak .
three of these four objects , 221728.3 + 001212 , and closely located objects 221740.3 + 001129 and 221740.9 + 001125 are associated with the ly@xmath0 blobs lab33 and lab7 in matsuda et al .
( 2004 ) , respectively .    for these 50 candidates of the  strong red and weak blue " profiles ,
we then evaluated the significance of the weak peaks relative to the noise level .
we evaluated the r.m.s .
noise in the blank - sky spectra ( the red dashed lines in fig.2 and fig.3 for the example ) at the line core ( @xmath30@xmath31 of the gaussian ) and then selected only the objects with the weak peaks which are more significant than the 3@xmath32 level as the final sample of the  strong red and weak blue " profiles . for the cases between 3@xmath32 and 4@xmath32 , we further visually checked the spectra and rejected a few cases .
after all , 39 objects among the 89 ( 44@xmath7 ) show the significant characteristic profile . the wavelength of the primary and the secondary peaks are shown by the vertical dotted lines in fig.1 .
this is a large fraction , which implies that the  strong red and weak blue " profile is a common characteristic property of the observed ly@xmath0 emitters .
the fraction should be considered even as the lower limit because it is more difficult to detect the secondary weaker peaks significantly if the objects are faint or their emission - lines are weak .
indeed , if we limit the objects with @xmath33 and further with @xmath34 , the fraction is even larger , 53 and 55@xmath7 , respectively .
table 2 summarizes the number of the objects with the characteristic profile .
we also listed the wavelength of the secondary component for five marginal objects whose blue peaks were visually identified but not found to be significant in table 1 with :.    while it is difficult , only from such formal fitting procedure as shown in fig.2 and fig.3 , to tell whether the peaks are the multiple emission lines with different central velocities or the single line modified by the absorption and/or scattering by neutral gas in vicinity , the latter interpretation is plausible as such large fraction of the sample always show much stronger peak at the long wavelength .
we confirm this further by the following two different methods .
first , we investigated the asymmetry of the strongest peaks of the sample .
we identify the pixel with the largest flux and obtained the ratio of the flux integrated over the 4.5  ( about 1.5 times the spectral resolution ) toward longer wavelength to those toward shorter wavelength .
fig.4 shows the result for the objects with @xmath35 and @xmath36 , avoiding the objects with relatively low signal to noise ratio .
the symmetry index ( the ratio ) of those with the characteristic  strong red and weak blue " profile is strongly concentrated around 0.5 while those of other objects are distributed around the unity ( the median is 0.83 ) with the r.m.s .
scatter of @xmath37 .
12 objects with characteristic profile has the value below 0.6 and they indeed show the conspicuous
strong red and weak blue " profiles .
we applied the kolmogorov - smirnov test to the symmetry distribution of the objects with and without the characteristic profile and the probability that they are drawn from the same population is 7% .
we also changed the magnitude or color range as well as the wavelength region for the index and found that the trend is always seen .
the objects with the characteristic profile with strong red and weak blue components are shown by the blue histogram which strongly peaked at 0.5 .
the objects with strong blue and weak red peaks are shown by the green line .
other objects are shown by the red line . , width=302 ]     and @xmath38 are marked by the large open circles .
the dotted line is the best fit regression line.,width=302 ]    next , for those objects with the characteristic profile , we compared the observed width of the stronger red peak and the separation of the peaks obtained in the formal gaussian fitting
. fig.5 shows the result ; the clear correlation between these two quantities is seen .
this strongly support that the two peaks are indeed the parts of a single feature .
if they are multiple different components , such trend as seen in fig.5 is not necessary to be observed .
fig.6 shows the distribution of the observed fwhm of the most prominent peak of the each object .
those with the characteristic profile tend to show the smaller values .     and
@xmath38 are used .
same as in fig.4 , the blue and red line show the objects with multiple characteristic peaks and those with a single peak , respectively .
, width=302 ]
we found that a large fraction , @xmath3940@xmath7 of the observed ly@xmath0 emitters in ssa22-sb1 field have a characteristic double - peaked line profile with a strong red peak and a much weaker blue peak .
what does this characteristic ly@xmath0 profile means ? the double peaked profiles can be a single source absorbed or scattered by the neutral hydrogen gas or multiple components of the ionized gas with different velocities .
the multiple component cases are not favored , however , as the observed lines show asymmetry and there is a correlation between the peak separation and the line width as described in the previous section .
ly@xmath0 line profile emission is affected by intergalactic medium ( igm ) in the line of sight toward the object ( dijikstra et al .
2007 ; laursen et al . 2011 ) . at @xmath40 ,
the mean transmission of the photon at the wavelength just shorter than ly@xmath0 due to the absorption by the foreground intergalactic ly@xmath0 clouds is @xmath41 ( madau et al .
1996 ) . due to the fluctuation by the large - scale structure ,
the absorption varies by the line of sight toward the sources .
laursen et al .
( 2011 ) recently examined how the line profile of ly@xmath0 emitter at z=2.5 - 6.5 is affected by igm absorption . the case for @xmath42 ( their figure 7 ) indeed predicts the double peaked ly@xmath0 line profile with the stronger red component .
the red and blue peak - strength difference is more conspicuous for the smaller objects .
as the size of the emitter becomes larger , the two peaks show comparable strength on average although the distribution of the igm optical depth can produce the variation of the profiles .
the prediction may be compared with our observed results . for those objects identified to have the characteristic profile ,
most of them show the large flux difference between the red and blue peaks and there are few objects with comparable strength ( fig.1 ) .
the formal single - component gaussian fitting shows that more than 50% of the line flux is absorbed for the typical cases ( e.g. , fig.2b , fig.3b ) .
it seems difficult to explain the current results only by igm absorption in this sense .
note that , however , the emitters observed here are located in the dense environment and the igm absorption is much larger than average .
we revisit this possibility in sec.4.4 .
we then consider the cases that the profiles show the intrinsic properties of the ly@xmath0 emitters , namely the effects by the gas associated with them .
scattering in the infalling partially ionized emission - line gas ( dijikstra et al .
2006 ) as well as scattering in the expanding shell - like out - flowing gas ( verhamme et al . 2006 ; 2008 ) can modify the line profile .
for the case of spherically symmetric infalling gas model , dijikstra et al .
( 2006 ) argued that the entire line profile shows strong blue symmetry and the blue peaks are observed stronger than the red peaks .
as the red peaks are much stronger than the blue peak for the most of the cases studied here , the other interpretation , namely the expanding shell model is more favored . for the spherically symmetrical expanding shell model ( verhamme et al .
2006 ) surrounding the ly@xmath0 source , the ly@xmath0 line is shifted red ward from the systemic velocity and also show strong red asymmetry . indeed , some model profiles shown in verhamme et al .
( 2006 ) ( their fig.15 ) as well as in verhamme et al .
( 2008 ) seems quite similar with the characteristic
strong red and weak blue " profiles discussed here .
recently , mclinden et al .
( 2011 ) reported that a strong [ oiii ] 5007  emission line is detected for a ly@xmath0 emitter at @xmath1 which show the similar double peaked ly@xmath0 profile .
interestingly , the [ oiii ] line locates at the middle of the two ly@xmath0 peaks , which implies that the systemic velocity of the galaxy is indeed at the middle of the two ly@xmath0 peaks .
thus the expanding shell by verhamme et al .
( 2008 ) is favored to understand the observed line profiles . in this case , the star - formation in these ly@xmath0 emitters must be dominated by the burst - like events since the continuous gas infall is needed to maintain continuous star - formation activities .
the population of the ly@xmath0 emitters are generally considered to be less massive objects in stellar mass as the many of them are not detected even in the deepest ground - based near - infrared images .
the early active starburst events may result in the galactic wind activity producing the expanding shells .
it is important to note that the ly@xmath0 emission from @xmath43@xmath7 , and possibly a larger fraction of the observed sample , show such evidence .    to prove the expanding shell or gas outflow models ,
another important observational constraint is the surface - brightness distribution of the ly@xmath0 emission .
rauch et al ( 2008 ) , having obtained 2-dimensional spectra of lyman alpha emitters and found the surface - brightness to be mostly strongly peaked in the spatial direction , even though the emission could be traced out to several arcseconds .
barnes & haehnelt ( 2010 ) argued that this rapid drop of surface brightness with radius is inconsistent with the much flatter radial profile predicted by a simple expanding shell model .
in fact , there is a weak trend , though not very significant , that the objects with the characteristic profile are rather small ( see sec.4.3 and fig.8 and fig.9 below ) .
this is against the interpretation by the simple expanding - shell models .
for much extended objects such as ly@xmath0 blobs , on the other hand , mori and umemura ( 2006 ) successfully reproduce the observed ly@xmath0 morphology by the models of expanding gas heated by supernovae .
future improvements both in observations and models ( e.g. , barnes et al .
2011 ) will allow more detailed study on the surface - brightness distributions .
it is also interesting to discuss the relation between characteristic line profile and the ly@xmath0 blobs .
matsuda et al .
( 2006 ) found that the galaxies with larger size tend to have more structures in the line profiles and total line width larger than fwhm @xmath44 km s@xmath5 if fitted by a single gaussian profile ( as in fig.2b or 3b in this paper ) .    for the velocity width
, a similar trend is confirmed with the current sample . in table 3 , we listed the velocity fwhm obtained by the single gaussian fitting , namely the same procedure as in matsuda et al .
( 2006 ) , for the 12 objects associated with the ly@xmath0 blobs in matsuda et al .
( 2004 ) . of the 12 objects ,
9 have fwhm @xmath45 km s@xmath5 . while the rest three objects have the smaller velocity width , lab32 and lab33 are among the smallest in the sample of the 35 ly@xmath0 blobs in matsuda et al .
lab7 has three , or possibly four distinguished ly@xmath0 peaks ( matsuda et al .
2004 ) and the slit position in this study just covers a single south - most peak and the value measured in this observation may not represent the whole nature of the system .
of the 12 objects associated with the ly@xmath0 blobs , on the other hand , only 5 are classified as the  strong red and weak blue " profile objects . at a glance ,
this appears somewhat strange , since the line profiles of the ly@xmath0 blobs shown in matsuda et al .
( 2006 ) have more structures with possible absorption than the other smaller emitters . if we closely see fig.1 , however , there are hints of the multiple components which are not significantly detected in the current data .
although it is difficult to conclude , as the exposure time ( 7 hours in matsuda et al .
2006 ) , spectral resolution ( @xmath46 ) , instrument ( @xmath47 deimos ) are different from those in this paper , the deeper data may probe significant structures of these lines .
other possible interpretation is as follows . if ly@xmath0 blobs are more massive objects , they may have more thick absorbing material and the weak blue line is too much absorbed to be detected .
this is likely to be the case for those with the single but asymmetrical component , such as lae j221808.3 + 001022 ( lab15 ) , lae j221812.5 + 001433 ( lab33 ) , and lae j221817.3 + 001209 ( lab21 ) .
matsuda et al . ( 2006 ) argued that the large velocity width implies that ly@xmath0 blobs are more massive objects than other normal ly@xmath48 emitters . while the large size of the ly@xmath0 emission of the blobs can be explained by either the expanding gas ionized and excited by the supernova feedback ( mori and umemura 2006 ) or by the infalling cooling gas ( haiman et al .
2000 ; fardal et al .
on the other hand , recent models of the cold flows can reproduce the size and luminosity distribution of the ly@xmath0 blobs ( dekel et al .
2009 ; goerdt et al .
if the ly@xmath0 blobs are the scaled - up version of the normal emitters whose line profiles are dominated by the outflowing gas , the gas - outflow interpretation may be favored .
we also investigated whether the presence of the characteristic profile is related with any other properties of the ly@xmath0 emitters .
first , we see the distribution of the observed excess in @xmath49 color , or equivalent width , in fig.7a and 7b .
fig.7a shows the result for the color measured in the fixed 2@xmath50-diameter aperture and the fig.7b shows those for the semi - total flux measured in the kron aperture ( i.e. , sextracter mag_auto ) for those laes with @xmath51 mag .
the emitters with the characteristic profile seem to dominate at @xmath52 , where 13/16 objects show  strong red and weak blue " peaks , although the @xmath49 colors excess of the objects with the characteristic profile is not always large .
the trend is also notable in fig.7b .
the probabilities for kolmogorov - smirnov test that they follow the same distribution are 17@xmath7 and @xmath53 , respectively .
the large excess in the narrow band , or ly@xmath0 equivalent width can be related to the gas outflow such as additional ly@xmath0 emission due to the collisional excitation or ionization by the shock .
if the source of the ly@xmath0 emission is the photoionization by massive stars , the large equivalent width suggests the presence of a very young or metal - poor stellar population , which is also consistent with the gas outflow by the supernovae or strong stellar wind .
we also studied the distributions of the size , observed fwhm and the isophotal area above the detection threshold and the results are shown in fig.8 and fig.9 . to omit the objects with low s / n ratio
, we again limited the sample to those with @xmath35 and @xmath34 .
while the distributions for the objects with and without the characteristic profile are not quite distinguishable , there is some concentration of the  strong red and blue weak " object for smaller sizes ( kolmogorov - smirnov test probability is @xmath54 ) .
this is disadvantageous for the simple expanding shell model which predicts a rather flat surface brightness distribution .
if the starburst is so young , however , the area of the outflowing gas can be still very limited within small radius from the galactic center to show nearly unresolved morphology .
finally , we revisit the possibility that the characteristic profile is caused by the intergalactic absorption systems . as the field is known to have a high density of star - forming galaxies ( steidel et al .
1998 ; 2000 , hayashino et al . 2004 ) , the neutral gas density may also be enhanced along the filamentary large - scale structure .
the characteristic profile can be caused by the absorption by the common gas in such structure in front of the observed emitters .
in such a case , absorption redshift is expected to be spatially correlated .
fig.10 shows the sky distribution of the ly@xmath0 emitters with the characteristic profile .
the redshift of the  absorption " that was formally obtained by the multiple component gaussian fitting allowing the absorption features are color coded , from the redshift 3.047 to 3.129 with the interval of 0.008 ( 600 km s@xmath5 ) .
no large - scale correlation of the absorption redshift is seen .
we thank the staff of the subaru telescope for their assistance .
this research is supported in part by the grant - in - aid 20450224 for scientific research of the ministry of education , science , culture , and sports in japan .
data analysis was in part carried out on common use data analysis computer system at the astronomy data center , adc , of the national astronomical observatory of japan .
ccccccccc name & z@xmath55 & @xmath56 & @xmath57 & @xmath58 & @xmath59 & nb@xmath60 & nb@xmath61 & bv@xmath61 + & & km s@xmath5 &    &    &    & & & + lae j221650.2 + 002750 & 3.099 & 171.1 & 4984.9 & 0.0 & 4984.9 & 25.24 & 25.68 & 26.88 + lae j221650.9 + 002327 & 3.087 & 191.1 & 4970.8 & 0.0 & 4970.8 & 25.00 & 25.14 & 26.31 + lae j221652.7 + 002423 & 3.067 & 217.3 & 4944.7 & 0.0 & 4944.7 & 24.73 & 24.89 & 25.89 + lae j221653.9 + 002137 & 3.081 & 402.5 & 4964.6 & 4950.9 & 4966.6 & 24.57 & 24.67 &
26.27 + lae j221658.4 + 002430 & 3.102 & 392.0 & 4987.1 & 0.0 & 4987.1 & 24.07 & 24.61 & 25.90 + lae j221659.3 + 002304 & 3.069 & 306.0 & 4947.2 & 0.0 & 4947.2 & 23.95 & 24.92 & 25.69 + lae j221659.3 + 002501 & 3.088 & 141.5 & 4970.7 & 4960.9 : & 4969.3 & 24.30 & 24.97 & 26.08 + lae j221700.3 + 002404 & 3.098 & 96.7 & 4981.8 & 0.0 & 4981.8 & 24.61 & 24.78 & 26.35 + lae j221700.7 + 002006 & 3.075 & 42.5 & 4955.3 & 0.0 & 4956.4 & 25.17 & 25.22 & 26.66 + lae j221701.6 + 002135 & 3.070 & 265.8 & 4947.6 & 4932.9 & 4942.2 & 24.59 & 24.96 & 25.63 + lae j221701.8 + 002003 & 3.077 & 161.9 & 4956.1 & 4947.0 & 4953.1 & 25.21 & 25.25 & 28.03 + lae j221702.7 + 002433 & 3.067 & 385.4 & 4944.7 & 0.0 & 4944.7 & 23.58 & 23.88 & 24.91 + lae j221702.8 + 002121 & 3.091 & 0.0 & 4973.5 & 4968.7 & 4971.7 & 25.27 & 25.34 & 27.70 + lae j221704.9 + 002226 & 3.108 & 279.8 & 4995.5 & 0.0 & 4995.5 & 24.80 & 25.26 & 26.63 + lae j221706.7 + 002134 & 3.067 & 330.4 & 4944.2 & 4935.8 & 4941.9 & 23.60 & 24.11 &
24.97 + lae j221709.6 + 001801 & 3.105 & 924.1 & 4994.2 & 0.0 & 4987.8 &
23.07 & 23.08 & 24.75 + lae j221713.3 + 002034 & 3.101 & 278.0 & 4987.2 & 0.0 & 4987.2 & 24.73 & 25.06 & 27.55 + lae j221713.6 + 000640 & 3.113 & 302.7 & 5002.0 & 4991.5 & 5000.9 & 23.23 & 23.31 & 24.82 + lae j221713.7 + 001656 & 3.057 & 249.4 & 4934.2 & 0.0 & 4934.2 & 24.75 & 25.13 & 26.45 + lae j221715.7 + 001906 & 3.101 & 233.2 & 4986.7 & 4972.3 & 4986.0 & 24.55 & 24.60 & 27.03 + lae j221715.8 + 002431 & 3.106 & 276.5 & 4992.4 & 0.0 & 4992.4 & 24.47 & 24.68 & 26.40 + lae j221716.7 + 002309 & 3.066 & 388.7 & 4945.7 & 0.0 & 4945.7 & 24.53 & 25.36 & 26.61 + lae j221717.3 + 000728 & 3.090 & 149.3 & 4972.9 & 0.0 & 4972.9 & 24.47 & 25.18 & 26.53 + lae j221717.5 + 002010 & 3.075 & 563.1 & 4954.4 & 0.0 & 4954.7 & 24.65 & 25.36 & 28.47 + lae j221718.8 + 001518 & 3.067 & 91.1 & 4944.8 & 0.0 & 4943.4 & 24.44 & 24.90 & 26.98 + lae j221719.0 + 001200 & 3.090 & 265.7 & 4972.1 & 4965.6 : & 4970.3 & 25.03 & 25.13 & 26.64 + lae j221719.3 + 001450 & 3.065 & 288.8 & 4942.8 & 4935.2 : & 4943.8 & 24.40 & 0.00 &
0.00 + lae j221719.7 + 001149 & 3.067 & 150.1 & 4945.4 & 4938.1 & 4943.4 & 24.83 & 0.00 &
0.00 + lae j221720.1 + 002226 & 3.104 & 226.7 & 4991.1 & 0.0 & 4991.1 & 24.87 & 25.40 & 26.73 + lae j221720.2 + 002019 & 3.108 & 1997.2 & 5005.8 & 0.0 & 4995.0 &
22.44 & 22.40 & 23.43 + lae j221720.3 + 002438 & 3.070 & 201.4 & 4948.0 & 4935.9 & 4943.9 & 23.59 & 23.87 & 25.18 +    ccccccccc name & z@xmath55 & @xmath56 & @xmath57 & @xmath58 & @xmath59 & nb@xmath60 & nb@xmath61 & bv@xmath61 + & & km s@xmath5 &    &    &    & & & + lae j221721.7 + 001223 & 3.068 & 355.1 & 4947.0 & 0.0 & 4947.0 & 25.06 & 25.32 & 26.90 + lae j221722.3 + 000804 & 3.085 & 88.4 & 4967.3 & 4957.4 & 4962.0 & 23.81 & 24.07 & 25.55 + lae j221722.6 + 002145 & 3.104 & 88.1 & 4988.4 & 4978.1 & 4989.0 & 25.00 & 25.05 &
27.06 + lae j221722.9 + 001441 & 3.054 & 0.0 & 4929.2 & 4924.1 & 4928.7 & 24.99 & 25.08 & 26.90 + lae j221723.5 + 002040 & 3.071 & 368.3 & 4950.8 & 4935.7 & 4950.9 & 24.76 & 24.88 & 26.51 + lae j221723.8 + 002155 & 3.102 & 0.0 & 4987.2 & 0.0 & 4987.2 & 24.71 & 25.49 & 27.09 + lae j221724.6 + 001557 & 3.079 & 172.0 & 4960.1 & 4953.5 : & 4958.8 & 25.34 & 25.42 & 28.47 + lae j221724.7 + 002227 & 3.091 & 349.8 & 4974.4 & 0.0 & 4975.2 & 25.12 & 25.37 & 26.75 + lae j221724.8 + 001717 & 3.096 & 358.3 & 4981.2 & 0.0 & 4980.8 & 23.62 & 0.00 & 0.00 + lae j221727.2 + 001622 & 3.096 & 339.5 & 4978.1 & 0.0 & 4978.1 & 24.67 & 24.81 & 26.33 + lae j221727.3 + 001046 & 3.069 & 307.2 & 4946.9 & 4938.1 & 4945.3 & 24.64 & 24.77 &
27.02 + lae j221727.8 + 001737 & 3.092 & 172.9 & 4975.6 & 4967.6 & 4973.2 & 24.31 & 24.40 & 26.97 + lae j221728.3 + 001212 & 3.067 & 162.3 & 4945.3 & 0.0 & 4947.5 & 24.31 & 24.51 & 26.27 + lae j221733.9 + 001215 & 3.106 & 0.0 & 4991.5 & 4982.5 & 4990.7 & 24.67 & 25.04 & 26.93 + lae j221735.9 + 001559 & 3.094 & 673.8 & 4978.0 & 0.0 & 4978.0 & 24.08 & 24.68 & 26.92 + lae j221736.4 + 001251 & 3.058 & 150.5 & 4934.1 & 0.0 & 4934.1 & 25.20 & 25.17 & 27.31 + lae j221736.8 + 002614 & 3.069 & 179.5 & 4948.0 & 4942.2 & 4947.3 & 24.98 & 25.06 & 27.40 + lae j221738.5 + 002215 & 3.096 & 144.4 & 4980.3 & 0.0 & 4980.3 & 24.85 & 24.96 & 26.74 + lae j221738.9 + 001102 & 3.064 & 116.9 & 4940.9 & 4929.9 & 4937.3 & 23.56 & 24.06 &
25.36 + lae j221739.0 + 001726 & 3.072 & 165.0 & 4951.5 & 4943.3 & 4949.0 & 24.66 & 0.00 &
0.00 + lae j221739.2 + 002242 & 3.098 & 189.3 & 4981.4 & 0.0 & 4983.8 & 25.25 & 25.52 & 27.64 + lae j221739.3 + 001610 & 3.093 & 66.0 & 4976.5 & 0.0 & 4976.4 & 24.84 & 25.40 & 27.51 + lae j221739.9 + 002142 & 3.089 & 361.1 & 4972.8 & 0.0 & 4972.8 & 25.24 & 25.21 & 27.66 + lae j221740.3 + 001129 & 3.065 & 71.9 & 4941.4 & 0.0 & 4943.2 & 25.01 & 24.58 & 25.43 + lae j221740.9 + 001125 & 3.089 & 288.4 & 4968.8 & 0.0 & 4968.8 & 23.49 & 24.53 & 25.31 + lae j221741.4 + 002227 & 3.096 & 208.0 & 4980.9 & 0.0 & 4980.9 & 24.31 & 24.55 & 25.35 + lae j221743.3 + 002149 & 3.097 & 88.2 & 4981.9 & 4967.8 & 4975.4 & 24.68 & 0.00 & 0.00 + lae j221743.4 + 001348 & 3.098 & 142.8 & 4982.1 & 4975.9 & 4980.9 & 23.95 & 24.01 & 25.97 + lae j221743.7 + 002451 & 3.101 & 350.0 & 4987.4 & 4977.5 & 4984.3 & 25.04 & 25.18 &
26.91 + lae j221745.3 + 002006 & 3.074 & 195.8 & 4953.0 & 4943.9 & 4950.3 & 24.00 & 24.13 & 26.53 +    ccccccccc name & z@xmath55 & @xmath56 & @xmath57 & @xmath58 & @xmath59 & nb@xmath60 & nb@xmath61 & bv@xmath61 + & & km s@xmath5 &    &    &    & & & + lae j221745.6 + 001544 & 3.065 & 241.6 & 4942.3 & 4933.6 & 4939.4 & 24.58 & 24.59 & 26.25 + lae j221745.9 + 002319 & 3.098 & 142.8 & 4981.9 & 4976.0 & 4979.9 & 24.81 & 0.00 & 0.00 + lae j221748.6 + 001334 & 3.056 & 93.5 & 4932.7 & 4924.5 & 4930.5 & 23.90 & 0.00 &
0.00 + lae j221750.5 + 001310 & 3.089 & 57.0 & 4970.6 & 4965.9 & 4967.5 & 25.52 & 25.35 & 27.81 + lae j221751.0 + 001858 & 3.081 & 346.1 & 4963.7 & 4954.0 & 4961.6 & 24.17 & 24.42 & 27.00 + lae j221753.2 + 001238 & 3.095 & 112.4 & 4977.9 & 4969.3 : & 4975.1 & 24.60 & 0.00 & 0.00 + lae j221754.3 + 001224 & 3.093 & 184.0 & 4976.4 & 0.0 & 4973.9 &
24.49 & 24.50 & 26.00 + lae j221755.1 + 002460 & 3.058 & 402.7 & 4935.7 & 4923.4 & 4932.3 & 23.73 & 24.03 & 25.33 + lae j221757.6 + 001204 & 3.093 & 282.1 & 4976.6 & 4966.1 : & 4973.9 & 24.38 & 24.80 & 26.15 + lae j221759.2 + 002254 & 3.087 & 333.3 & 4968.2 & 4958.8 & 4965.1 & 23.00 & 23.34 & 25.43 + lae j221759.3 + 001148 & 3.055 & 19.4 & 4928.9 & 0.0 & 4929.0 & 25.41 & 25.01 & 25.86 + lae j221802.2 + 002556 & 3.081 & 0.0 & 4961.5 & 0.0 & 4960.3 & 23.03 & 23.88 & 25.97 + lae j221803.6 + 002247 & 3.079 & 133.8 & 4958.9 & 0.0 & 4958.9 & 25.44 & 25.42 & 27.50 + lae j221805.9 + 002407 & 3.095 & 0.0 & 4979.0 & 4973.7 & 4977.0 & 25.24 & 25.38 & 27.25 + lae j221807.9 + 002317 & 3.088 & 131.8 & 4970.1 & 4955.8 & 4964.9 & 23.97 & 24.58 &
26.12 + lae j221808.0 + 001151 & 3.096 & 159.7 & 4980.1 & 0.0 & 4980.1 & 24.82 & 25.19 & 26.33 + lae j221808.3 + 001022 & 3.097 & 421.7 & 4982.6 & 4969.6 & 4980.0 & 23.02 & 23.47 & 24.72 + lae j221809.2 + 001242 & 3.096 & 60.0 & 4980.1 & 4972.2 & 4976.9 & 24.82 & 25.05 & 27.06 + lae j221809.4 + 001358 & 3.105 & 124.5 & 4989.9 & 0.0 & 4989.9 & 24.96 & 25.49 & 26.77 + lae j221811.0 + 002508 & 3.095 & 294.8 & 4978.9 & 0.0 & 4978.9 & 25.04 & 25.07 & 26.59 + lae j221812.5 + 001433 & 3.095 & 164.1 & 4978.8 & 0.0 & 4983.9 & 23.57 & 24.15 & 25.25 + lae j221813.2 + 002157 & 3.115 & 176.1 & 5003.6 & 4990.3 & 4999.2 & 25.22 & 25.32 &
26.37 + lae j221813.8 + 000925 & 3.104 & 110.3 & 4989.8 & 4983.0 & 4987.9 & 24.83 & 24.83 & 27.93 + lae j221813.9 + 002222 & 3.089 & 0.0 & 4971.3 & 0.0 & 4971.3 & 24.69 & 0.00 & 0.00 + lae j221816.0 + 001412 & 3.086 & 74.2 & 4968.0 &
4957.4 & 4964.7 & 24.24 & 24.66 & 26.64 + lae j221817.3 + 001209 & 3.087 & 330.9 & 4970.8 & 0.0 & 4966.6 & 24.45 & 24.78 & 25.77 + lae j221818.2 + 001143 & 3.091 & 315.8 & 4975.6 & 0.0 & 4975.6 & 25.00 & 25.17 & 26.11 + lae j221820.8 + 001257 & 3.109 & 119.2 & 4996.0 & 4986.8 & 4991.7 & 25.40 & 25.28 & 27.52 + lae j221820.8 + 001241 & 3.103 & 342.0 & 4989.6 & 4978.0 & 4986.0 & 23.78 & 24.60 & 26.46 + lae j221820.9 + 001031 & 3.097 & 178.3 & 4981.3 & 0.0 & 4981.3 & 24.99 & 25.50 &
28.16 +    \(a ) redshift measured by the peak of the strongest emission - line component .
( b ) fwhm of the strongest component after corrected for the instrumental profile .
the zero value means that the line is not resolved .
( c ) the central wavelength of the red peak in the multiple - component gaussian fitting .
( d ) the central wavelength of the blue peak in the multiple - component gaussian fitting .
( e ) the central wavelength of peak in the single - component gaussian fitting .
( f ) the aperture magnitude values are measured in the 2-arcsec diameter apertures .
lae j221658.4 + 002430 & 428.8 & lab34 & no + lae j221706.7 + 002134 & 562.9 & lab27 & yes + lae j221723.8 + 002155 & 474.3 & lab32 & no + lae j221724.8 + 001717 & 474.4 & lab35 & no + lae j221735.9 + 001559 & 696.0 & lab14 & no + lae j221738.9 + 001102 & 641.2 & lab31 & yes + lae j221740.9 + 001125 & 338.1 & lab7 & no + lae j221759.2 + 002254 & 625.5 & lab28 & yes + lae j221807.9 + 002317 & 582.4 &
lab23 & yes + lae j221808.3 + 001022 & 738.8 & lab15 & yes + lae j221812.5 + 001433 & 222.1 & lab33 & no + lae j221817.3 + 001209 & 661.5 & lab21 & no +    \(a ) name of the associated ly@xmath0 blobs listed in matsuda et al . (
2004 ) ( b ) the column indicates whether the ly@xmath0 line profile shows the characteristic ` strong red and weak blue ' one (  yes " ) or not (  no " ) .