there are two meanings ordinarily associated with the noun _ paradox_.
either it is an apparently absurd or counter - intuitive statement that further explanation nevertheless proves to be well - founded , or it is a statement that is taken to be self - contradictory or intrinsically unreasonable ( adapted from @xcite ) . often , in the former meaning , a paradox is also said to be _
apparent_. in brief , the intent of this paper is is to show that a number of paradoxes in chain dynamics are indeed apparent paradoxes , as they can be explained within a unified theory .    to this end , in sections  [ sec : dissipation ] and [ sec : shocks ] , building on earlier work of oreilly and varadi  @xcite and others before them , we propose a theory for dissipative singularities in a one - dimensional inextensible continuum , which we conventionally call a _
string_. the chain problems to which this theory is to be applied are presented in section  [ sec : chain_problems ] along with a brief history of the ( supposedly ) paradoxical solutions that have been proposed so far . in due order ,
these very problems are then solved within the present theory in sections  [ sec : falling ] , [ sec : folded ] , and [ sec : sliding ] .
although attained in a different perspective , the conclusions reached here are in tune with those of grewal , johnson , and ruina  @xcite , and of hamm and gminard  @xcite before them .
there is a common ground between these approaches which perhaps deserves further study and experimental validation .
here we derive the balance equations that govern the dynamic evolution of inextensible strings with singularities in the velocity field from an appropriate extension of rayleigh s dissipation principle .
the development illustrated below largely rests on sect .
2.2 of @xcite , whose major essential features will be briefly recalled whenever the need for self - consistency is more urgently felt .
rayleigh s dissipation principle finds its complete formulation within thermodynamics , where it is also known as the principle of _ minimum entropy production _ , see ( * ? ? ?
2.2.2 ) . here
we shall only need its purely mechanical variant , which can be easily obtained by specializing ( and partly extending ) the treatment in sect .
2.2.3 of @xcite to the purely isothermal case . a similar
development suited for classical mechanical systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom has recently been proposed in @xcite in response to a different attitude towards non - conservative systems @xcite . here
we shall extend the approach suggested in @xcite to one - dimensional continua with singularities , showing that rayleigh s formalism is indeed more far - reaching than commonly believed .    for a material body ,
we denote by @xmath0 the power expended by all active agencies directly applied to it from the exterior ( and which are given explicitly in terms of the body s motion ) . letting @xmath1 denote the kinetic energy ( in a given inertial frame ) , we call @xmath2 the _ net working _ , as it represents the amount of external power still available to the body once that going into the motion has been accounted for . in general , @xmath3 can be expressed as a _ linear _ functional in the _ generalized _ velocities of the body ( including the classical velocity field @xmath4 and any extra field describing the evolution of additional degrees of freedom ) . by duality
, the specific form of @xmath3 also identifies the _ generalized forces _ corresponding to the generalized velocities . in the presence of internal constraints ,
the _ total working _
@xmath5 is defined as @xmath6 where @xmath7 is the power expended by the ( generalized ) reactions enforced by the constraints .
the version of rayleigh s principle that we posit here states that the true evolution of a body is identified by requiring that a functional @xmath8 , representing a _ dissipation potential _ , be such that @xmath9 is stationary with respect to all virtual motions for which the generalized forces are held fixed .
formally , this amounts to requiring that @xmath10 provided that @xmath11 is linear in the ( generalized ) velocity variations .
classically , @xmath8 is a _
, positive semi - definite functional , related to the _ dissipation _ @xmath12 in the body through @xmath13 were this always the case , rayleigh s principle would be a genuine _ minimum _ principle , and @xmath12 is actually minimized by the true motion compared to all virtual ones subject to the same generalized forces . here ,
for the class of problems at hand , we shall afford a generalization of .
consider an inextensible string moving in the three - dimensional space @xmath14 .
we denote by @xmath15 the _ motion _ of the string relative to a reference configuration , described by the convected co - ordinate @xmath16 , which by the constraint of inextensibility can be taken to represent the arc - length in both the reference configuration and the present one , the latter being the image @xmath17,t)$ ] at time @xmath18 of the former .
the velocity field @xmath4 is defined as @xmath19 likewise , @xmath20 is the acceleration field . by requiring that the length of any arc @xmath21 be preserved in time , we easily obtain that @xmath4 must obey the constraint @xmath22 where @xmath23 denotes the unit tangent field in the present configuration .
we further assume that a _ shock _ traverses the reference configuration , represented by a propagating front @xmath24 upon which the velocity field @xmath4 is discontinuous , while @xmath25 itself is continuous .
the point @xmath26 designates the position in space of the shock .
we call it a _ singular point _ , for brevity ; the arcs of the string that do not contain singular points will be called _
regular_. letting for any function @xmath27 denote by @xmath28 and @xmath29 the right and left limits of @xmath27 , that is , the limits for @xmath30 and @xmath31 , respectively , we set , as usual , @xmath32 we denote by @xmath33 the velocity of the singular point @xmath34 .
it is not a material velocity and it must be continuous across the shock : @xmath35 hence @xmath36 figure [ fig : shock ] illustrates the general situation envisaged here .
, where the unit tangent @xmath37 jumps from @xmath38 to @xmath39 as the arc - length parameter @xmath40 traverses @xmath41 , is acted upon by the force @xmath42 .
the arc under consideration is described by the interval @xmath21 . ]    equations and represent constraints that must be enforced at all times along the string and at the singular point @xmath34 , respectively .    to free the velocity field @xmath4 from its constraint
we account for the power @xmath7 expended by the associated reactive force .
we write @xmath7 in the form @xmath43 where @xmath44 and @xmath45 delimit an interval which comprises the propagating front , @xmath46 , and @xmath47 represents an unknown _ tension _ along the string , which may suffer a jump at the singular point @xmath34 and will eventually be determined by requiring to be satisfied . in a different fashion , we shall enforce by requiring @xmath33 as defined by to be continuous across @xmath34 .
an integration by parts performed in both integrals obtained by splitting the integral in over the intervals @xmath48 $ ] and @xmath49 $ ] leads us to the following equivalent expression for @xmath7 , @xmath50    letting @xmath51 denote the force acting per unit length of the string and @xmath52 its ( uniform ) linear mass density , if an external concentrated force @xmath53 is applied to @xmath34 ( as for the interaction with an obstacle ) , the net working @xmath3 can be written as @xmath54 which is easily derived by splitting as above the integral of the kinetic energy over the intervals @xmath48 $ ] and @xmath49 $ ] .    for simplicity , we shall only consider a portion of string with a single singular point @xmath34 , which is also identified with the only source of dissipation .
the rayleigh potential @xmath8 , which is to be related to the dissipation @xmath12 in the body not necessarily through , reduces to a function of objective dissipation measures .
we take these latter to be the shock s speed @xmath55 in the reference configuration and the jump @xmath56 of the the velocity across the singular point @xmath34 , @xmath57
.    two identities , which follow from , are instrumental to expressing the jump terms in both and in a way that makes only @xmath33 appear there as the natural velocity against which power is expended at the singular point @xmath34 .
these are as follows    [ eq : v_0_identities ] @xmath58 @xmath59 and are supposed to provide linear forms in @xmath33 and @xmath55 , so as to identify by duality the appropriate generalized forces expending power against these kinematic measures in and .
we heed for later use that also allows one to rewrite as @xmath60    by using both and in and , and performing arbitrary variations @xmath61 and @xmath62 of both @xmath55 and @xmath4 , respectively , while leaving all generalized forces frozen , we arrive at @xmath63\cdot{\delta{\bm{v}}}ds , \ ] ] where use has also been made of the conditions @xmath64 which limit the variation of the motion to the portion of string under consideration .
correspondingly , @xmath65 which follows from remarking that @xmath66 and by is further changed into @xmath67 requiring the variational principle in to be identically valid for arbitrary variations @xmath62 and @xmath61 , we arrive at the equations    [ eq : evolution_equations ] @xmath68,\ ] ] @xmath69 @xmath70    where has also been used .
these are the evolution equations of the theory ; they are valid along any regular arc and at any singular point of an inextensible string .
while is clearly the expected balance equation for linear momentum on regular arcs of the string , with @xmath47 the internal tension , and are still to be related to the classical balances of linear momentum and energy at a singular point .
we shall see shortly below how this can be achieved .
i wish first employ equations to relate the rayleigh potential @xmath8 to the dissipation @xmath12 in the system .    by use of and
in and , with the aid of the identities and , we can rewrite @xmath5 as @xmath71 which by and becomes @xmath72 where @xmath73 clearly acquires the meaning of the energy dissipated per unit time in the string , since the singular point @xmath34 is admittedly the only point where energy may get lost .    by its very physical interpretation
, we shall consider @xmath12 as the primary constitutive function of the theory ; the dissipation potential @xmath8 , which enters the evolution equation is to be derived from @xmath12 through . solving this equation by the method of characteristics , we arrive at the following explicit expression for @xmath8 , to within an arbitrary additive constant , @xmath74 by comparing and
, we easily see that whenever @xmath75 equation can equivalently be written as @xmath76 which has the advantage of linking directly the jump in tension to the dissipated energy .
it follows from that whenever @xmath12 is homogeneous of degree @xmath77 in all its variables , @xmath78 of which is just a special case . in the present context
, there is no guarantee that holds .
more generally , we shall assume that @xmath12 is positive semi - definite and vanishing when _ either _ @xmath55 _ or _
@xmath79 vanish .
for such a @xmath12 , @xmath8 as delivered by identifies through the evolution equation for @xmath41 required by the theory .
this equation together with and will determine the motion of a singular string .
equation is not expected to be valid in general . nonetheless , the proposal for @xmath12 made in @xcite ,
whereas does not comply with , still makes satisfied .
it was assumed in @xcite that @xmath80 with @xmath81 a phenomenological , dimensionless coefficient .
it readily follows from that the rayleigh function @xmath8 associated with this @xmath12 is given by with @xmath82 .
the expression for @xmath12 in will also be adopted in the rest of the paper , for it is amenable to a physical interpretation based on the classical laws of impact dynamics ( see section  4[sec : dissipation_chains ] below ) .
we close this section by showing how equation and are related to the classical balances of linear momentum and energy at the singular point @xmath34 . that expresses precisely the former follows from writing as in @xcite the balance of linear momentum for the whole arc @xmath83 $ ] in the form @xmath84 splitting the integral on the left side of this equation over the intervals @xmath48
$ ] and @xmath49 $ ] , both of which depend on time , and taking the limits as both @xmath85 and @xmath86 , which isolates the singular point @xmath34 from the regular arcs adjacent to it , we reobtain .    in a similar way
, granted that the dissipation @xmath12 is concentrated at @xmath34 , the balance of energy over the whole arc @xmath83 $ ] reads as @xmath87 whence by the same reasoning as above we arrive at the following localized energy balance , @xmath88 for @xmath89 , this balance equation coincides with ( 5 ) of @xcite , provided that we identify the power supply @xmath90 introduced there at @xmath34 with @xmath91 .
likewise , it reduces to the analogous equation ( 2.7)@xmath92 of @xcite , provided that there @xmath93 incorporates both the energy dissipated at the singular point and the power expended by the external force .
equation also agrees with ( 13 ) of @xcite , provided that the power supply @xmath94 introduced there is written as @xmath95 .
now , is nothing but , as shown by using both and and combining the result with .
this also shows that and together imply .
thus , our interpretation of the evolution equations and as balance laws is completely justified . often in the following
we shall turn to as an equivalent formulation for in the presence of a propagating shock , and so our theory will be based on , , and .
the shocks considered in the preceding section , which manifest themselves at singular points in the middle of a moving string , will be called _ internal _ to distinguish them from the _ external _ shocks considered here .
an external shock manifests itself whenever a moving string gets in contact with a still , shapeless reservoir from where it is ejected and set in motion or where it comes to an abrupt halt
. this will be our way of treating continuous systems with a variable mass .
essentially , this idea goes back to cayley  @xcite , who introduced the notion of _ continuously _ imparted impacts , equally able of setting resting matter in motion and of putting moving matter at rest . though our derivation of the balance equations governing an external shock will be similar to the one presented in section  2[sec : classical ] for internal shocks , the reader should not be deceived into thinking that an external shock is nothing but an internal shock with zero velocity on one side . in an external shock
the string is supposed to be quiescent on one side of the shock , but its shape is completely undetermined and it only plays the role of providing sources for both linear momentum and energy .
we distinguish two types of external shocks , as to whether the quiescent string follows or precedes the moving string .
both situations are depicted in fig .
[ fig : external_shocks ] .
we denote by @xmath96 and @xmath97 the sources of linear momentum and energy , respectively , for the former case , and by @xmath98 and @xmath99 the corresponding sources for the latter case .
we note in passing that @xmath100 and @xmath101 are the forces transferred to the quiescent string in the two case , while @xmath102 and @xmath103 are the corresponding energy sources for the quiescent string in the two cases . , these may equally well represent energy gains or energy losses . ]
the external shock represented in fig .
[ fig : external_shocks](a ) is characterized by a front @xmath104 evolving in time in both the reference and present configurations , so that the string s velocity @xmath4 jumps from @xmath105 to nought at the singular point @xmath106 . by requiring the velocity @xmath107 of the geometric point that instantaneously coincides with @xmath108 to vanish identically in time , as commanded by the kinematic compatibility with the quiescent string , we readily obtain that @xmath109 which here replaces
. must be tangent to the moving string , and so this must move along its length at least just before coming to an abrupt stop . ]
the balance of linear momentum for the arc of string in fig .
[ fig : external_shocks](a ) , comprised between @xmath110 and @xmath111 , can be written in the form @xmath112 where as in section  [ sec : dissipation ] @xmath51 denotes the force acting per unit length of the string .
accounting in for the dependence of @xmath113 on time and taking the limit as @xmath44 tends to @xmath113 , we arrive at @xmath114 where @xmath115 is the tension in the moving string at the singular point @xmath108 . by we
give the following form @xmath116{\bm{t}^\ast_+}.\ ] ] if the balance of linear momentum in echoes , the balance of energy in here becomes @xmath117 where account has also be taken of the fact that the force @xmath96 expends no power since @xmath118 . by performing the time differentiation in and then taking the limit as @xmath119 ,
also with the aid of , we obtain the following balance law for the energy at the singular point @xmath108 , @xmath120{\dot{s}^\ast_+}.\ ] ]    reasoning in exactly the same way , we derive the analogs of the kinematic condition and balance equations and at the singular point @xmath121 depicted in fig .
[ fig : external_shocks](b ) where a quiescent string is abruptly set in motion .
letting @xmath122 denote the velocity of the moving sting at @xmath121 and @xmath123 the inward unit tangent , we arrive at the following equations    @xmath124    @xmath125{\bm{t}^\ast_-},\ ] ]    @xmath126{\dot{s}^\ast_-},\ ] ]    where @xmath127 is the tension in the moving string at @xmath121 .
in particular , kinematic compatibility requires the string to be injected at @xmath121 along its tangent and the balance of linear momentum requires the force @xmath98 to be directed along the string s tangent as well .    although equations and are valid in general , precisely as are and , they all are compatible with a special class of motions for a string which will be our object in the following sections , the one in which a string slides everywhere along its length .
such motions are characterized by the kinematic requirement @xmath128 enforced along the entire moving string .
it is compatible with the inextensibility constraint only is @xmath129 is assumed to be a function of time only , @xmath130 . under this assumption , both and reduce to    [ eq : external_shock_plus_minus ] @xmath131 and , , , and collectively simplify into @xmath132 @xmath133    these equations will often be called upon in the following .
in the following sections we shall apply the general theory presented so far to three specific problems in the dynamics of chains . below in this section the reader will be introduced to these problems collectively , also indulging in some historical notes on the supposedly paradoxical aspects that they have shown since the work of buquoy nearly two centuries ago .. if attention is restricted to an appropriate subsystem , all the problems treated here could also be seen as problems for systems with a variable mass . ] before doing so , however , we need supplement the theory by showing that the choice for the shock dissipation @xmath12 in is the most appropriate for chains .      resuming the notation introduced in @xcite , for a shock in a chain
we shall denote by @xmath90 the energy supply at a singular point , and so hereafter we shall set @xmath134    the kink formed in a chain where a shock is propagating through it is likely to involve an impact between the chain s links that come there in contact .
when two smooth rigid bodies collide in a single point of their boundaries , the variation @xmath135 in the total kinetic energy during the impact can be expressed as @xmath136 where @xmath137 is newton s restitution coefficient and @xmath138 is the kinetic energy of the velocity differences , that is , the kinetic of the imaginary motion that would result from attributing to all the particles in the colliding bodies the velocities @xmath139 they lose in the impact . in other words , letting @xmath140 be the velocity of the @xmath141th particle before impact and @xmath142 that after impact , @xmath143 and @xmath144 where @xmath145 is the mass of the @xmath141th particle and the sum is extended to any discretization of of both colliding bodies .
when a chain is described as a one - dimensional , inextensible string , as we did above , and a shock propagating though it is envisaged as a localized mass transfer with rate @xmath146 associated with the energy supply @xmath90 , directly suggests taking the rate of change of @xmath138 as @xmath147 so that the justifies , after setting @xmath148 in the following we shall not insist in representing the coefficient @xmath149 through in terms of the restitution coefficient for the impact of two chain s links . rather , we shall consider @xmath149 as a phenomenological coefficient pertaining only to the shape of the links in a chain and the material that constitutes them .
of we shall only retain the bounds it imposes on @xmath149 , @xmath81 , . ] and we shall say that @xmath150 is the completely elastic limit , as there would be no dissipation at the shock , while @xmath151 is the completely inelastic limit , for which the dissipation at the shock would be maximum , for a given velocity jump @xmath79 .
as we shall see , @xmath149 is a measurable parameter , and indeed it has been measured already , though perhaps inadvertently .      how chains have come to be associated with paradoxes is quite an interesting story , which here i only recount briefly .
these _ paradoxes _ are indeed counter - intuitive predictions which some theories made and others did not support , which were sometimes sustained by experimental observations and sometimes were not .
often it was considered paradoxical in this context relaxing an assumption mostly taken for granted and regarded as natural , but indeed unnecessary .
the examples treated in the following are concerned with chains falling in one fashion or another in the terrestrial gravitational field . for them , for example
, it might have been regarded as paradoxical a theory that predicted falling with an acceleration greater than the gravitational acceleration @xmath152 , not to mention the possibility that in the continuum limit either the velocity or the acceleration became unbounded during the motion .
specifically , these are the problems we shall treat here ( and certainly , not for the first time ) . problem ( a ) , or the problem of a _ falling chain _ : a chain initially kept at equilibrium over a smooth , rigid plane , is let go under the action of its own weight ; describe the motion of the chain while the links coming in contact with the supporting plane accumulate over it , and compute the total force impressed on it , that is , the _ dynamical weight _ of the chain , see fig .
[ fig : chain_sketches](a ) .    problem ( b ) , or the problem of a _ folded chain _ : a chain is initially held in a u - shaped configuration , with one arm ending in a fixed point and the other free to fall under its own weight ; describe the motion until when the chain is fully stretched vertically and compute the dynamical weight of the chain , see fig .  [
fig : chain_sketches](b ) .
problem ( c ) , or the problem of a _ sliding chain _ : a chain is supported by a smooth , rigid plane and leaves it though a hole under the action of gravity ; describe the motion of the chain hanging vertically below the plane and compute the dynamical weight of the chain , see fig .
[ fig : chain_sketches](c ) .
it is hard to say which of these problems is the oldest .
for example , a variant of problem ( a ) is treated in tait and steele s treatise  @xcite .
here one end of a uniformly heavy chain hangs over a small , smooth pulley and the other end is coiled up on a table ; if the free arm of the chain preponderates the antagonistic arm is pulled upward and keeps removing links from the table ; if , on the contrary , the free arm is outweighed by the other arm , this problem becomes very similar to problem ( a ) .
problem ( b ) is treated in love s book  @xcite ; here the free chain s arm is supposed to fall with acceleration @xmath152 and the jump in tension at the tight chain s bight is derived from the localized balance of linear momentum .
problem ( c ) featured in both jean s @xcite and love s @xcite treatises , which arrive at the same equation of motion obtained by cayley  @xcite from his general variational principle for the motion of systems whose mass grows by continuously taking into `` connextion '' ( in cayley s own language ) the contents of a quiescent reservoir .
the solution method suggested by those textbooks was based on the balance of linear momentum , and no mention was made there of cayley s principle , though both methods produced one and the same equation of motion when applied to problem ( c ) .    in solving both problems ( b ) and ( c ) , love s approach , unlike others ,
requires computing the tension within the chain .
moreover , also in view of our further development , i found very illuminating the following sentence from love s book @xcite : `` it is important to observe that discontinuous motions such as are considered here in general involve dissipation of energy . ''      before discussing the details of the solutions to problems ( a)-(c ) afforded by the theory proposed in this paper , also to place them in a clearer perspective , i summarize below some other , newer approaches to these problems , some perhaps more convincing than others .
one popular solution to problem ( a ) assumes that the chain s links fall with acceleration @xmath152 and computes the force that they exert on the supporting plane by balancing the linear momentum when they come abruptly at rest @xcite .
the conclusion is that at each instant in time the dynamical weight of the chain is three times the static weight of the chain collected on the plane up to then .
this solution was already common knowledge by the early 1950s @xcite and also received some experimental confirmation , mixed with the voicing of some concerns as to the validity of the assumption that the chain falls with acceleration @xmath152 , or _
freely _ , as one might also say @xcite .
it was indeed shown experimentally by hamm and gminard  @xcite that a chain does _ not _ fall freely on a supporting plane , but with an acceleration _ greater _ than @xmath152 .
this naturally led then to envision the existence of a dynamical force pulling the chain down , which can only be exerted by the solid surface on which the chain is accumulating , and for which an explicit representation was also proposed , based on a model for the growth of the accumulating coil @xcite . as remarked in @xcite ,
this force is for all intents and purposes a _ tension _ exerted by the supporting surface , pulling downward the falling chain . as a result ,
the dynamical weight of the chain now exceeds three times the static weight of the accumulated chain ( even dramatically so , as the experimental figures on @xcite suggest that it is nearly 6 times the total static weight of the chain at the time immediately preceding its complete deposition ) . in section  [ sec : falling ] below , we shall make a more definite contact with both this study and that of grewal , johnson and ruina  @xcite , which are equally central to our development .    problem ( b ) is perhaps the most controversial of the three considered here .
if , as we learned above , love  @xcite assumed that the chain s arm with a free end falls freely , hamel  @xcite , as before him had done kucharski  @xcite , rejected this assumption and based instead the solution of the problem of the folded chain on the conservation of the total mechanical energy .
this latter implies that the velocity of the falling arm increases indefinitely as the chain approaches the fully stretched configuration . this can be easily understood by realizing that conservation of energy requires a finite amount of potential energy to be transferred to a moving chain fragment whose mass decreases to nought as the chain straightens to its full length .
direct inspection of the equation of motion derived from the energy conservation shows that also the acceleration diverges in the same limit , and so the chain is bound to fall faster than in a free fall .
again a positive tension , @xmath153 , applied to the falling arm at the chain s bight must be responsible for such a faster fall .
it was realized in @xcite that conservation of energy actually requires that @xmath153 equals the tension , @xmath154 , acting at the bight on the resting arm .
as also pointed out in @xcite , different _ constitutive _ choices for these tensions would grant a full host of evolutions for the folded chain , including the one where the free arm falls freely @xcite . the problem , however , is that we are not at liberty of choosing constitutive laws for @xmath153 and @xmath154 , at least as long as we model chains as _ inextensible _ strings , for which the tension in an internal _ reactive _ force to be determined .
we shall show in section  [ sec : folded ] how this task can be accomplished within our theory .
the chain problems treated here have been selected with the purpose of proving that , treated in the appropriate continuum theory , they are free from any paradox .
studies that treat the problem of a folded chain with the methods and language appropriate to a discrete systems have also been pursued ; among these , two in particular deserve notice @xcite .    in the classical solution of problem ( c ) ,
when the chain starts sliding downward from rest and zero dangling length , the motion is predicted to take place with uniform acceleration @xmath155 . although nothing would of course be paradoxical with such a prediction , echoing love  @xcite , sommerfeld  @xcite remarked that in the corresponding motion the total mechanical energy is not conserved and made carnot s energy loss mechanism responsible for this @xcite .
such a conclusion was rejected in @xcite and @xcite in favour of a lagrangean theory that enforces energy conservation .
thus , if not paradoxical , problem ( c ) has become at least controversial , even more so on account of the fact that a convincing explanation for the energy loss can be given in terms of the ( inelastic ) impacts suffered by the links continuously set in motion by the sliding chain .    in the following three sections we shall study the chain problems described in this section within the general theory proposed here
. the only constitutive parameter will be @xmath149 in . whenever @xmath156 , the singular point which will be appropriately identified for the three problems , is the site of a dissipative internal shock .
further sources of dissipation may arise from external shocks , if present ; for them expresses in this theory the analogue of what in sommerfeld s language @xcite is carnot s energy loss .
in this section and in the following two we solve problems ( a ) , ( b ) , and ( c ) , respectively , by applying the theory put forward in sects .
[ sec : dissipation ] and [ sec : shocks ] .
in particular , we shall make use of equation to describe the motion of a regular arc in a chain , of to balance the linear momentum at a singular point , and of , which combined with embodies the balance of energy at a singular point . by , here acquires the form @xmath157 all the above equations , which are dynamical in nature , must be combined with the condition for kinematic compatibility in .     and
@xmath108 , the former being an internal shock and the latter an external one .
the height of the falling chain at time @xmath18 is @xmath158 ; the length being deposited on the supporting plane at the same time is @xmath159 , where @xmath160 is the total length of the chain .
@xmath161 is the reactive , impulsive force continuously imparted by the plane to the chain at @xmath34 .
( b ) the time of fall @xmath162 scaled to @xmath163 in as a function of the parameter @xmath149 .
, title="fig : " ]   and @xmath108 , the former being an internal shock and the latter an external one .
the height of the falling chain at time @xmath18 is @xmath158 ; the length being deposited on the supporting plane at the same time is @xmath159 , where @xmath160 is the total length of the chain .
@xmath161 is the reactive , impulsive force continuously imparted by the plane to the chain at @xmath34 .
( b ) the time of fall @xmath162 scaled to @xmath163 in as a function of the parameter @xmath149 .
, title="fig : " ]    figure  [ fig : falling_chain](a ) , which is a decorated version of the sketch in fig .
[ fig : chain_sketches](a ) , describes our idealized model for a falling chain . here
@xmath34 denotes the point where the chain comes in contact with a smooth , rigid plane ; we think of it as a singular point for the chain dynamics , where the unit tangent @xmath37 jumps from @xmath164 to @xmath165 in the cartesian frame @xmath166 at the value @xmath167 of the arc - length parameter that describes the material points in the chain with origin in its free end .
an internal shock in propagating at @xmath34 with speed @xmath55 . at the point @xmath108 , which we shall imagine to be arbitrarily close to @xmath34 , the chain comes in contact with the coil of links already deposited on the supporting plane .
this is the site of an external shock , governed by ( the plus side of ) equations .
here we study the dynamics of this chain in the special class of motions that preserve its shape , characterized by . by the inextensibility constraint , at instant @xmath18 in time
@xmath168 is the velocity of all links in the moving chain .
the compatibility condition indeed readily gives that @xmath169 and so the internal shock is standing in space , as also is the external shock at @xmath108 , by .
the theory we adopt does not require any specific assumption on the shape of the quiescent coil deposited on the plane .
we only need to know the force @xmath100 it suffers from the chain .
since we assume @xmath108 to be arbitrarily close to @xmath34 , we identify the tension @xmath115 featuring in with the right limit @xmath153 of the tension in the chain at @xmath34 and we write as @xmath170    at @xmath34 the chain is also subject to the linear momentum supply @xmath161 , which here plays the role of @xmath53 in and is taken to be orthogonal to the supporting plane ( since the latter is smooth ) , @xmath171 , with @xmath172 . having a reactive nature , @xmath173 is to be determined along with the motion . writing in the frame @xmath166 ,
we readily conclude that    [ eq : falling_chain_singular_momentum_balance ] @xmath174    where @xmath154 is the left limit of the tension at @xmath34 , responsible when positive for a faster fall of the chain . making use of in
, we see that @xmath175 , and so the coil of accumulating links is free from any horizontal forces . to determine @xmath173
, we need to know @xmath154 , which since @xmath172 is subject to the bound @xmath176    if , as in fig .
[ fig : falling_chain](a ) , @xmath158 denotes the hight of the falling chain at time @xmath18 and @xmath160 is the total length of the chain , then @xmath159 is the length of the chain accumulated on the plane .
correspondingly , @xmath177 , where a superimposed dot denotes differentiation with respect to time , and becomes @xmath178 since along the falling chain @xmath179 and @xmath180 , equation yields @xmath181 being the left side of equation independent of @xmath40 and @xmath182 at the free end @xmath183 , it readily follows that @xmath184 since @xmath185 at @xmath34 , combining , , , and , we obtain the equation @xmath186 which actually describes the motion of the chain only in terms of the constitutive parameter @xmath149 .    shortly below we shall give an analytic representation of certain solutions of . some of their qualitative features can be easily obtained directly from .
first , if @xmath187 , then @xmath188 , and so the chain falls with an acceleration greater than @xmath152 .
second , if @xmath81 and @xmath189 , which is when the chain is released with initial zero velocity , then @xmath190 all along the motion , and so becomes @xmath191 which coincides with ( 5 ) of @xcite , provided that @xmath149 is set equal to the parameter @xmath192 introduced there .
accordingly , by , , and , we can write the tension @xmath154 exerted on the falling chain at @xmath34 as @xmath193 which obeys and vanishes for @xmath151 , that is , when the chain is in free fall . by inserting into
, we arrive at @xmath194 which agrees with ( 6 ) of @xcite .
moreover , the tension @xmath154 was denoted @xmath195 in @xcite and we may identify with @xmath173 the force denoted @xmath196 there . by comparing and
we can easily express our @xmath149 in terms of @xmath195 and @xmath196 , in terms of @xmath195 and @xmath196 in @xcite .
that formula would be reconciled with by exchanging @xmath195 and @xmath196 . ]
@xmath197 an identification which is further confirmed by comparing with ( 10 ) of @xcite .
the advantage of and over is that it expresses both @xmath195 and @xmath196 in terms of a single constitutive parameter , @xmath149 .
thus , for the record , the special chains ingeniously constructed in @xcite would correspond to @xmath198 and @xmath199 , see equations ( 18 ) and ( 19 ) of @xcite , respectively .
@xmath173 is also the dynamic weight of the chain that is yet to fall ; to obtain the total dynamic weight @xmath200 of the falling chain we need to add to @xmath173 the static weight of the chain that has already fallen : @xmath201 once is solved for @xmath158 , shall deliver @xmath200 as a function of time .    hamm and gminard  @xcite used @xmath149 ( which they called @xmath192 ) , as a fitting parameter to explain their measurements indicating that a chain was indeed falling with acceleration greater than @xmath152 .
they determined @xmath202 and , more importantly , they found that this value was independent of the material properties of the floor on which the chain was falling , supporting our view that @xmath149 is indeed a constitutive parameter of the chain only .
the ( implicit ) solution of can be found by quadratures .
to free the solution from inessential physical constants , we rescale both lengths and time .
lengths will be rescaled to the total length @xmath160 of the chain .
time will be rescaled to @xmath203 which is the time of _ free fall _ from the height @xmath160 .
thus , letting @xmath204 equation is transformed into @xmath205 where a prime @xmath206 denotes differentiation with respect to @xmath207 .
correspondingly , letting @xmath208 be the total static weight of the chain , we obtain from that @xmath209    the solution of under the initial conditions @xmath210 and @xmath211 reads as @xmath212 whence it follows that the _ time of fall _
@xmath162 is given by @xmath213 which is function of @xmath149 only .
figure  [ fig : falling_chain](b ) shows the graph of this function ; it is apparent that @xmath214 , with equality holding only for @xmath151 .
it also makes us appreciate quantitatively how faster than freely a chain may actually fall .
figure  [ fig : falling_chain_y_p_plots](a ) illustrates the graphs of @xmath215 against @xmath207 according to for three values of @xmath149 .
they indicate that , apart from the case where @xmath151 , @xmath216 diverges to @xmath217 as @xmath218 , which indeed follows directly from , as also does the similar divergence of @xmath219 in the same limit . as a consequence , by , @xmath200 is predicted to diverge to @xmath220 as @xmath218 .
by , equation can be given an easier expression , @xmath221 which shows how @xmath200 diverges as @xmath222 , unless @xmath151 or @xmath150 .
the former is the case of free fall , when reduces to @xmath223 .
the latter is the case of no dissipation at the internal shock , when reduces to @xmath224
. for @xmath150 appears a bit peculiar , we shall offer below an independent argument that would suggest that @xmath149 should indeed be greater than or equal to @xmath199 . ]    the unboundedness of @xmath216 , @xmath219 , and @xmath200 could be regarded as paradoxical .
it is indeed a consequence of the continuum model being used here , which can hardly be considered valid up to when @xmath225 vanishes .. ] following @xcite and @xcite , we introduce a cutoff length , @xmath226 , which could be estimated as consisting of up to 3 chain s links @xcite , so that @xmath215 would be subject to the bound @xmath227 .
such a bound alters only marginally the time of fall @xmath162 , especially if @xmath228 is sufficiently small , but it makes the limiting value of @xmath200 finite .
figure  [ fig : falling_chain_y_p_plots](b ) illustrates the graphs of @xmath200 against time for several values of @xmath149 ; they are drawn up to the time when @xmath229 .
we close this section by computing the total dissipation associated with our solution of the falling chain problem .
there are two independent sources of dissipation in this system , one for each shock . at the internal shock , by and , the dissipative power @xmath90 is given by    @xmath230    at the external shock , by and
, the dissipative power @xmath97 is given by @xmath231    that both these expressions are compatible with the total balance of energy is seen by computing the time rates of the total kinetic energy @xmath232 and the total potential energy @xmath233 making use of it is a simple matter to show that @xmath234 which coincides with ( 13 ) of @xcite . since @xmath235
, requires that for the total dissipation to be non - negative ( which is the same as requiring that @xmath236 ) , @xmath149 must obey the inequality @xmath237 .
precisely the same strategy adopted in section  [ sec : falling ] to solve the problem of a falling chain is followed here to solve the problem of a folded chain . to avoid unnecessary repetitions
, i shall only outline the major steps of the solution and comment the results .
figure  [ fig : folded_chain](a ) illustrates the problem in the notation introduced in our theory .
the length of the fallen chain is denoted by @xmath225 ; @xmath160 is the total length of the chain , so that the distance between fixed and free ends is @xmath238 , and @xmath34 is the singular point where the chain is tightly folded . as in @xcite and @xcite
, we further assume that a vertical force @xmath239 , with @xmath240 , is applied to the free end of the chain .
the motion is assumed to take place under gravity and along the vertical line , so that only @xmath158 suffices to describe it .
taking the origin of the arc - length parameter @xmath40 in the fixed point of the chain , we denote by @xmath241 the value of @xmath40 designating the front of the shock . there , as @xmath40 increases , @xmath37 jumps from @xmath164 to @xmath242 in the cartesian frame @xmath166 shown in fig .
[ fig : folded_chain](a ) .
the kinematic compatibility condition here gives @xmath243 which replaces .
since the free end moves with speed @xmath244 , inexensibility and require that holds also here , and implies that @xmath245 setting @xmath246 equal to the tension at the free end and integrating , we arrive at @xmath247 by , the balance of linear momentum at @xmath34 reduces to the equation @xmath248 which combined with and delivers @xmath249 and @xmath250 which is the equation of motion for @xmath158 .
for @xmath151 , equation reduces to equations ( 15 ) and ( 16 ) of @xcite .
moreover , setting @xmath251 in equation ( 7.8 ) of @xcite , we recover our equation , provided that @xmath149 is identified with the parameter @xmath137 of @xcite .    since the arm of the chain ending in the fixed point is at rest , the dynamical weight of the whole chain is simply @xmath252 , which by becomes @xmath253    for the folded chain the only source of dissipation is at the internal shock .
it is an immediate consequence of and that @xmath254 which coincides with ( 7.7 ) of @xcite and agrees with ( 15 ) of @xcite for @xmath151 .
moreover , the power @xmath255 expended by the force @xmath256 is easily computed to be @xmath257 the balance of total energy requires that @xmath258 starting from the following expressions for @xmath259 and @xmath260 , @xmath261 @xmath262 it is an easy exercise to show that is indeed valid along all solutions of .
a special case of is worth considering in more details .
if @xmath263 , becomes @xmath264 it follows from that @xmath265 whenever @xmath266 . if , in addition , @xmath151 then @xmath267 , which means that the free end of the chain falls freely . however , if @xmath268 then @xmath269 and the chain falls faster . introducing the scaled variables defined in , we write as @xmath270 valid whenever @xmath271 .
equation can be solved by quadratures . setting @xmath272 and letting @xmath211
, we arrive at the following ( implicit ) representation for the solution , @xmath273 and correspondingly @xmath200 in becomes @xmath274+\eta.\ ] ]    to illustrate this solution we consider the case when @xmath275 , so that the chain is fully extended upward before being set free .
the time of fall @xmath162 , which is delivered by the formula @xmath276 is plotted in fig .  [
fig : folded_chain](b ) as a function of @xmath149 .
again @xmath162 is equal to the time of free fall @xmath163 only for @xmath151 ; otherwise , @xmath277 .
figure  [ fig : folded_chain](c ) shows how @xmath225 grows in time for three values of @xmath149 . here ,
unless @xmath151 , @xmath216 diverges to @xmath220 as @xmath218 . in fig .
[ fig : folded_chain](d ) are plotted in a logarithm scale the graphs of @xmath200 as delivered by . for @xmath151 , @xmath278 , so that the dynamic weight of the completely fallen chain is @xmath279 . for @xmath268
, @xmath200 diverges to @xmath220 as @xmath280 and each graph in fig .
[ fig : folded_chain](d ) is plotted up to the time when @xmath281 , where @xmath228 is the same cutoff parameter introduced in section  [ sec : falling ] .
an idealized sliding chain is represented in in fig .  [
fig : sliding_chain](a ) .
here a heap of links , whose specific shape and structure is ignored , is sitting on a smooth , rigid plane and act as a reservoir for the chain sliding away under gravity through a hole in the plane .
an internal shock travels through the singular point @xmath34 as does an external shock through @xmath121 , which we take to be extremely close to @xmath34 .
the origin of the arch - length co - ordinate @xmath40 is such that the falling free end of the chain has @xmath282 , where @xmath160 is the total length of the chain .
as above , we denote by @xmath283 and @xmath241 the propagating shocks fronts . with this choice for the orientation of @xmath40 , at @xmath34 the unit tangent @xmath37 jumps from @xmath284 to @xmath285 .
kinematic compatibility acquires again the form , both shocks are standing in space , and is replaced by @xmath286 where @xmath158 denotes the length of the chain fallen at time @xmath18 .
accordingly , becomes @xmath287 since the tension vanishes at the free end of the chain , integrating we readily arrive at @xmath288 as shown in fig .
[ fig : sliding_chain](a ) , the plane exerts an impulsive reaction , @xmath171 , with @xmath172 . at @xmath34 the balance equation for linear momentum
then requires that    [ eq : sliding_chain_tau_m_and_phi_0 ] @xmath289    combining together , , and , we obtain the equation of motion for @xmath225 , @xmath290 and @xmath291 which delivers an admissible reaction only is @xmath292 , which is indeed a consequence of , if @xmath266 and @xmath293 , both taken as valid here . for @xmath150 equation
coincides with both cayley s equation @xcite and the equation proposed in @xcite . from
, we also derive the dynamical weight @xmath200 of the chain , @xmath294 identifying @xmath154 with the tension @xmath127 at @xmath121 , by and , we also conclude that @xmath295 , and so the heap of links suffers no horizontal force as a consequence of the chain s motion .    by and , we easily see that the power @xmath99 expended at the external shock is @xmath296 while by the power expended at the internal shock is @xmath297 since the total kinetic and potential energies are here expressed as @xmath298 respectively , a simple computation shows that @xmath299 along every solution of , as expected .    a special solution of deserves notice by its simplicity .
if @xmath300 and @xmath189 , then either @xmath301 or @xmath302 with @xmath303 which corresponds to a uniformly accelerated fall with acceleration @xmath304 . correspondingly , the time @xmath162 for the complete fall of the chain is @xmath305 , where @xmath163 is the same as in , and @xmath306 where @xmath307 is again the total static weight of the chain .    more generally , introducing the same scaled variables as in , we give and the following forms @xmath308 @xmath309 both valid for @xmath310 . letting @xmath311 and @xmath211 , the implicit solution of reads as @xmath312 valid for @xmath313 .
the corresponding time of fall @xmath162 is plotted in fig .  [ fig : sliding_chain](b ) for different values of @xmath314 .
i am indebted to peter palffy - muhoray for having sparkled my recent interest in chain dynamics and to james a. hanna for having encouraged me to pursue further the method of _ external shocks _ presented in this paper ( of course , all possible mistakes remain my own . )                            whittaker et .
1937 _ a treatise on the analytical dynamics of particles and rigid bodies_. cambridge : cambridge university press , 4th edition .
reissued with forward in the cambridge mathematical library series 1988 .
1921 _ theoretical mechanics : an introductory treatise on principles of dynamics_. london : cambridge university press , 3rd edition .
available at https://archive.org/details/theoreticalmecha00loveiala .
feynman rp , leighton rb , sands m. 2011 _ the feynman lectures on physics _
, volume  1 .
new york : basic books .
available at http://www.feynmanlectures.info/. see , in particular , http://www.feynmanlectures.info/exercises/falling_chain.html .