clusters of galaxies are usually located at the knots of the filamentary structures in the universe .
they are the most massive bound systems to trace the large - scale structure @xcite .
statistical studies of clusters provide very powerful constraint on the cosmological parameters ( see a review in * ? ? ?
* ) by using , e.g. , cluster mass function @xcite and gas fraction in massive clusters @xcite .
clusters are also important laboratories to investigate the evolution of galaxies in dense environment @xcite and act as natural telescope to study lensed high - redshift faint background galaxies @xcite . as a large number of clusters
have been detected @xcite , the distributions of galaxy clusters are used to detect the baryon acoustic oscillation of the universe @xcite .
correlation of background objects with a large sample of clusters shows the effects of weak lensing and spectra line absorption @xcite .
galaxy clusters have been found from single - band optical imaging data ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) , multicolor photometric data ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) and spectroscopic redshift surveys ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
in addition , clusters have also been found from x - ray surveys ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . at millimeter wavelength , the sunyaev
zeldovich ( sz ) effect has recently used to find clusters , which is insensitive to cluster redshift @xcite .
hundreds of sz clusters have been identified @xcite .
the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ; * ? ? ? * ) offers an opportunity to produce the largest and most complete cluster sample .
it provides photometry in five broad bands ( @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 , and @xmath10 ) covering 14,000 deg@xmath11 and the follow - up spectroscopic observations .
the photometric data reach a limit of @xmath12 @xcite with the star  galaxy separation reliable to a limit of @xmath13 @xcite .
the spectroscopic survey observes galaxies with an extinction - corrected petrosian magnitude of @xmath14 for the main galaxy sample @xcite and @xmath15 for the luminous red galaxy ( lrg ) sample @xcite .
galaxy clusters or groups have been found by using the sdss spectroscopic data ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) and the photometric data ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) .    for large samples of galaxy clusters ,
the determination of optical richness still has a large uncertainty because of difficulties in the discrimination of cluster member galaxies from background galaxies using photometric data .
this causes a large scatter when the optical richness is used to represent the cluster mass for the constraint of cosmological parameters @xcite .    in this paper , we improve the method of @xcite using photometric redshifts to identify a large sample of galaxy clusters up to @xmath16 . in section 2 , we identify clusters using a new cluster detection algorithm and determine a cluster richness that is closely related to cluster mass . in section 3 , we compare our sample with the previous cluster samples from the sdss , and correlate the cluster richness with x - ray and sz measurements . in section 4 , we study the brightest cluster galaxies ( bcgs ) and cross - identify them with the sdss lrgs .
a summary is presented in section 5 .    throughout this paper , we assume a @xmath17cdm cosmology , taking @xmath18100 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 , with @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
@xcite identified 39,668 galaxy clusters from the sdss dr6 by the discrimination of member galaxies of clusters using photometric redshifts ( hereafter photo-@xmath10s ) of galaxies .
@xcite improved the method and successfully identified the high - redshift clusters from the deep fields of the canada  france
hawaii telescope wide ( cfht ) survey , the chft deep survey , the cosmic evolution survey , and the _ spitzer _ wide - area infrared extragalactic survey . here ,
we follow and improve the algorithm to identify clusters from sdss - iii .
we first use the sdss data to determine scaling relations for cluster mass and radius which will be used in the cluster detection .
the galaxy data of 14,000 deg@xmath11 are downloaded from the sdss - iii database .
the photo-@xmath10s , the @xmath25-corrections , and the absolute magnitudes are obtained from the table _ photoz _ in which photo-@xmath10s are estimated based on the method of @xcite .
we remove objects with deblending problems and saturated objects using the flags20 ) = 0 and ( flags & 0@xmath2680000 ) = 0 and ( ( flags & 0@xmath26400000000000 ) = 0 or psfmagerr@xmath27 ) and ( ( flags & 0@xmath2640000 ) = 0 ) . ] .
as shown in figure  [ photozg ] , the uncertainties of photo-@xmath10s are @xmath280.0250.030 in the redshift range @xmath29 .
they become larger at higher redshifts . in the following analysis , we assume that the uncertainty of photo-@xmath10 , @xmath30 , increases with redshift in the form of @xmath31 for all galaxies . here , we discard those galaxies with a large photo-@xmath10 error @xmath32 , i.e. , about @xmath33 , which suffer bad photometry or contamination of stars . this procedure removes 20% of objects , most of which are faint objects ( @xmath34 ) with large photometric errors .
bcgs are the most luminous members of clusters . generally , the bcgs are elliptical galaxies and have smaller photo-@xmath10 error than other member galaxies
. proper selection of bcgs can be helpful to identify clusters and estimate the cluster parameters . to get right bcgs , we select those galaxies as bcg candidates which have a photo-@xmath10 error @xmath35 and a galaxy ellipticity in the @xmath8 band less than 0.7 .       +    the cluster mass and radius are two fundamental parameters for clusters .
the widely used are @xmath36 , the radius within which the mean density of a cluster is 200 times of the critical density of the universe , and @xmath37 , the cluster mass within @xmath36 .
we use the sdss data of known clusters to get the scaling relations for @xmath36 and @xmath37 . here
, we take the clusters whose masses or radii have been estimated by x - ray or weak - lensing methods as compiled by @xcite . for each cluster , we calculate the total luminosities of cluster member candidates in the sdss @xmath8-band within a radius of 1 mpc from its bcg by summing luminosities of member galaxy candidates brighter than @xmath38 but fainter than the bcg within a photo-@xmath10 gap of @xmath39 , with a local background subtraction . here , @xmath40 is the evolution - corrected absolute magnitude in the @xmath8 band , @xmath41 , where we adopt a passive evolution of @xmath42 @xcite . to estimate local background ,
we follow the method analogous to @xcite . for each cluster , we divide the annuals between 2 and 4 mpc from its bcg into 48 sections with equal area . within the same magnitude and photo-@xmath10 range ,
we calculate the total luminosity in each sector and estimate the mean value and its root mean square .
the regions with luminosities larger than 3@xmath43 are discarded and the mean is recalculated to be the local background .
we measure the total luminosity of cluster member candidates in units of @xmath44 , here @xmath44 is the evolved characteristic luminosity of galaxies in the @xmath8 band , defined as @xmath45 @xcite .    in figure  [ r200m200 ] , we show the correlation between cluster radius @xmath36 and total luminosity within a radius of 1 mpc , @xmath46 .
the best fit gives @xmath47 where @xmath36 is in units of mpc and @xmath46 is in units of @xmath44 .
similarly , we also get the total @xmath8-band luminosity within the radius of @xmath36 , @xmath48 , in units of @xmath44 , with a background subtraction . in this paper
, we define the cluster richness as @xmath49 .
we find that cluster mass @xmath37 and cluster richness are closely correlated as ( lower panel of figure  [ r200m200 ] ) @xmath50 where @xmath37 is in units of @xmath51 . using these scaling relations
, we can estimate the cluster radius and mass from observables of @xmath46 and @xmath48 or @xmath52 .
we have shown in our previous work that the measurements of the total luminosity or richness are robust for adopting different widths of the photo-@xmath10 gap @xcite .
in the following , we extrapolate these relations to lower richness for cluster identification .
based on the estimated richness , we identify clusters with a richness threshold of @xmath53 .
rrrrrccrrl[t ] whl j000000.6@xmath54321233 & 0.00236 & 32.20925 & 0.1274 & @xmath55 & 14.92 & 1.72 & 70.63 & 24 & abell
+ whl j000002.3@xmath54051718 & 0.00957 & 5.28827 & 0.1696 & @xmath55 & 16.20 & 0.94 & 17.48 & 9 & + whl j000003.3@xmath54311354 & 0.01377 & 31.23175 & 0.5428 & @xmath55 & 20.17 & 0.87 & 14.27 & 8 & + whl j000003.5@xmath54314708 & 0.01475 & 31.78564 & 0.0932 & @xmath55 & 15.18 & 0.94 & 16.97 & 9 & + whl j000004.7@xmath54022826 & 0.01945 & 2.47386 & 0.4179 & @xmath55 & 19.32 & 0.95 & 13.71 & 10 & + whl j000004.9@xmath56033248 & 0.02024&@xmath57 & 0.5968 & @xmath55 & 20.67 & 1.00 & 19.19 & 11 & + whl j000005.5@xmath54354610 & 0.02303 & 35.76957 & 0.4762 & @xmath55 & 19.59 & 0.91 & 15.58 & 9 & + whl j000006.0@xmath54152548 & 0.02482 & 15.42990 & 0.1656 & @xmath55 & 16.60 & 1.13 & 23.53 & 19 & maxbcg , whl09,gmbcg + whl j000006.3@xmath54221220 & 0.02643 & 22.20558 & 0.3985 & @xmath55 & 19.36 & 0.84 & 12.73 & 11 & + whl j000006.6@xmath54100648 & 0.02755 & 10.11333 & 0.3676 & @xmath55 & 19.07 & 0.93 & 16.73 & 13 & + whl j000006.6@xmath54315235 & 0.02762 & 31.87626 & 0.2134 & @xmath55 & 17.11 & 1.18 & 28.58 & 15 & + whl j000006.6@xmath54292129 & 0.02765 & 29.35813 & 0.2489 & @xmath55 & 18.13 & 0.92 & 15.11 & 16 & + whl j000007.1@xmath56092910 & 0.02957&@xmath58 & 0.3332 & @xmath55 & 19.11 & 0.80 & 12.81 & 13 & amf + whl j000007.6@xmath54155003 & 0.03177 & 15.83424 & 0.1436 & 0.1528 & 15.99 & 1.17 & 34.11 & 27 & abell , maxbcg , whl09,gmbcg , amf + whl j000007.7@xmath54185245 & 0.03208 & 18.87909 & 0.4347 & @xmath55 & 18.95 & 1.03 & 20.47 & 12 & +    in @xcite , we identified a cluster if more than eight member galaxies of @xmath59 ( without evolution correction and different from @xmath60 in this paper ) are found within a radius of 0.5 mpc and a photo-@xmath10 gap of @xmath61 .
the richness was estimated to be the number of galaxies within a radius of 1 mpc which may be systematically smaller than the true radius for rich clusters but larger than that for poor clusters .
note also that the radius of 0.5 mpc for cluster identification is not the same as the radius of 1 mpc for richness estimate .    with the tight scaling relations shown in section  [ scaling ] ,
we can improve the method of @xcite and @xcite to identify clusters from the sdss - iii .
our new algorithm includes following steps .
\1 . for each galaxy at a given photometric redshift , @xmath10 , we count the number of luminous member galaxies of @xmath38 within a radius of 0.5 mpc and a photo-@xmath10 gap of @xmath61 , @xmath62 .
to get cluster candidates , we apply the friend - of - friend algorithm @xcite to the luminous galaxies using a linking length of 0.5 mpc in the transverse direction and a photo-@xmath10 difference of @xmath63 . the linked galaxy with the maximum @xmath62 is taken as the temporary center of a cluster candidate .
if two or more galaxies have the same maximum number , the brightest one is taken as the temporary central cluster galaxy . then , we obtain a temporary list of cluster candidates .    \3 . for each cluster candidate at @xmath10 , we assume that the galaxies of @xmath38 within a radius of 1 mpc from the temporary central galaxy and the photo-@xmath10 gap of @xmath61 are member galaxies . the cluster redshift @xmath64 is then defined to be the median value of the photometric redshifts of the recognized `` members '' .
we recognize the bcg of a cluster candidate as the brightest galaxy from the bcg candidate sample within a radius of 0.5 mpc from the temporary center and the photo-@xmath10 gap of @xmath61 . as a new development in this paper
, we use the bcg as the center of a cluster and calculate @xmath46 from the estimated redshift .
subsequently , we get @xmath36 using equation  ( [ r200 ] ) and measure @xmath52 from @xmath48 within the estimated @xmath36 for each cluster candidate .
note that the local background has been subtracted already here .
we define a galaxy cluster if @xmath65 , which corresponds to @xmath66 using equation  ( [ m200 ] ) .
note that a cluster candidate at low richness may be contaminated by a small number of bright field galaxies with their photo-@xmath10s seriously overestimated .
to avoid such contamination , we require the number of galaxies within a radius of @xmath36 and a photo-@xmath10 gap of @xmath61 , @xmath67 .
this assures that the cluster sample above the detection criteria has a high completeness and a low false detection rate ( see sections  [ complete ] and [ false ] ) .
after we get the cluster candidate list , we merge possible repeatedly identified clusters which may survive in the previous procedure by using the friend - of - friend algorithm .
if two cluster candidates have photo-@xmath10 difference less than @xmath63 and a projection separation less than @xmath36 , we merge the cluster candidates as one cluster , and the poorer one is then removed from the list .
finally , we visually inspect the color images on the sdss web site for all cluster candidates .
about 5000 ( 3.6% ) cluster candidates are obvious contaminations from bad photometries and are removed . by this procedure , we discovered 68 lensing systems from the color images @xcite .
after above procedures , we find 132,684 clusters in the redshift of @xmath68 from the sdss - iii data .
all clusters are listed in table  [ cat ] .
figure  [ histcz ] show the redshift distribution of the identified clusters in the sdss - iii which is compared with those of the maxbcg @xcite , whl09 @xcite , gaussian mixture brightest cluster galaxy ( gmbcg ; * ? ? ? * ) and adaptive matched - filter ( amf ; * ? ? ?
* ) samples .
our new sample has a peak at @xmath69 and the number of our clusters is nearly two times as the previously largest amf sample by @xcite .
the clusters of @xmath70 seem to be a complete sample .
because of the magnitude limit of the sdss photometric data , the member galaxies of @xmath3 are incomplete for the threshold of @xmath71 , so that clusters of @xmath3 have a biased smaller richness than the real one because of missing members . in the following ,
we only consider clusters of @xmath70 when we compare our richness with other richness estimates and x - ray measurements .      using the sdss spectroscopic data
, we can get the spectroscopic redshift of identified clusters and verify the accuracy of their photometric redshifts .
the spectroscopic redshift of a cluster is taken to be that of its bcg .
we find that the bcgs of 38,116 clusters have spectroscopic redshifts .
figure  [ phzc ] shows the distribution of the difference between photometric and spectroscopic redshifts , @xmath72 .
the standard deviations roughly indicate the accuracy of redshift estimate for clusters . in each panel
, we fit the distribution of @xmath73 with a gaussian function .
the systematic offset @xmath74 of the fitting is less than @xmath75 , and the standard deviation @xmath76 is less than 0.018 .
+    we use monte carlo simulation to test the completeness of our sample .
mock clusters are simulated with assumptions for their distributions and then added to the real data of the sdss .
the cluster detection algorithm is applied to the combined data to find the input mock clusters .
the detection rate of mock clusters is considered as the indication of completeness of our detection procedure .
first , we generate a population of halos with masses @xmath77 following a mass function of @xcite in a cosmology with @xmath23 and @xmath78 in the redshift range of @xmath79 .
then , we relate the cluster mass to cluster richness ( i.e. , total luminosity in units of @xmath44 ) by @xmath80 where @xmath81 is a scaling factor between input richness @xmath82 and output richness @xmath83 of our detection procedure .
the discrepancy between @xmath84 and @xmath83 is caused by the uncertainty of galaxy photo-@xmath10 . because the equation  ( [ m200 ] ) is obtained for the estimated richness based on the sdss data , we adjust this factor @xmath81 to make output richness consistent with equation  ( [ m200 ] ) .
we first set @xmath85 for equation  ( [ m200s ] ) to get input richness .
member galaxies are simulated for each halo within a radius of @xmath36 .
the luminosity function and density profile of member galaxies are taken as described in @xcite . here ,
the luminosities of member galaxies are evolution - corrected , as mentioned in section  [ scaling ] .
we assume that the uncertainty of photometric redshift of member galaxies follows a gaussian probability function with a standard deviation of @xmath30 , but varies with redshift in the form of @xmath86 .
we add the mock clusters into the real sdss data and apply our cluster detection algorithm to measure the output richness .
figure  [ outrich ] shows the correlation between the input richness and the output richness .
the best fit gives @xmath87 therefore , we get the factor @xmath88 for equation  ( [ m200s ] ) so that the output richness @xmath83 can be related to cluster mass by equation  ( [ m200 ] ) .
subsequently , we use equation  ( [ m200s ] ) to get a new population of input richness .
again , we apply our method to detect the mock clusters .
a cluster is detected if the output richness @xmath89 and @xmath67 .
the detection rate is given to be the number of detected mock clusters divided by the total number of added mock clusters .
figure  [ detrate ] shows the detection rate as a function of redshift .
the detection rate is nearly 100% for clusters with masses @xmath90 ( richness @xmath91 ) up to redshift of @xmath92 , and @xmath2875% for clusters of @xmath93 ( richness @xmath94 ) up to redshift of @xmath95 .
the detection rate drops at higher redshifts , because the member galaxy selection of our algorithm is consistent up to @xmath95 , as mentioned in section  [ algorithm ] . in figure
[ detrate ] , we also show the detection rate as a function of cluster mass for clusters of @xmath70 .
more than 95% of clusters of @xmath96 are detected .
the presence of the large - scale structures makes it possible to detect false clusters because of projection effect .
we perform a monte carlo simulation with the real sdss data to estimate the false detection rate .
first , we discard the member candidates of identified clusters within a radius of @xmath36 and a photo-@xmath10 gap of @xmath97 .
second , we shuffle the data following @xcite . our new cluster detection algorithm is applied to the shuffled data .
after above procedures , we get the `` false clusters '' which satisfy the criteria of @xmath65 and @xmath67 . the false detection rate is calculated to be the total number of `` false clusters '' identified from the shuffled data divided by the number of clusters identified from the original sdss data .
we show that the false detection rate is 6.0% for a cluster richness of 12 , but decreases to less than 1% for a richness of 23 ( see figure  [ falrich ] ) .
note that we have removed some obvious contaminations from cluster list in the cluster identification ( section  [ algorithm ] ) . here ,
most of the contaminations can not be found when shuffling the cataloged galaxy data .
hence , removing the contaminations slightly decreases the false detection rate .
we compare our cluster sample in this paper ( hereafter whl12 ) with previous ones , including the classical abell sample from the palomar sky survey @xcite , the maxbcg @xcite , whl09 @xcite , gmbcg @xcite and amf @xcite cluster samples from the sdss .
we also compare our clusters with x - ray and sz cluster samples .
we get the abell cluster sample @xcite from the nasa / ipac extragalactic database . for the abell clusters without redshift measurements ,
we take their redshifts from the sdss photo-@xmath10 data .
there are 1844 abell clusters with redshifts @xmath98 in the sky coverage of sdss - iii , of which 1688 ( 92% ) clusters are within a projected separation of @xmath36 and redshift difference of @xmath99 ( about 2@xmath76 of the uncertainty of the redshift difference ) from the whl12 clusters .
the non - matched abell clusters are relatively poor clusters or projected to neighbors of the large scale structure @xcite .
we mark the abell clusters in column 10 of table  [ cat ] .
+    @xcite developed a `` red - sequence cluster finder '' , maxbcg , to detect clusters dominated by red galaxies .
they identify clusters with a richness of @xmath100 , where @xmath101 is the number of galaxies brighter than @xmath102 in the @xmath9 band within @xmath36 and @xmath103 of the ridgeline colors . from the sky coverage of the sdss dr4
, they obtained a complete volume - limited sample containing 13,823 clusters in the redshift range of @xmath104 .
the maxbcg sample is approximately 85% complete for the clusters with masses @xmath105 .
we cross - match the whl12 clusters with the maxbcg clusters in the sky coverage of the sdss dr4 .
figure  [ hist_dz ] shows the redshift difference ( @xmath106 ) between the whl12 clusters and the maxbcg clusters ( also the whl09 , gmbcg , and amf clusters for discussion below ) within a projected separation of @xmath36 .
it shows that a value of @xmath107 is an appropriate selection threshold for cluster matching in redshift difference ( top left panel of figure  [ hist_dz ] ) .
we find that 10,301 ( 75% ) of 13,823 maxbcg clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters within a separation of @xmath36 and a redshift difference of @xmath107 .
figure  [ rate_max ] shows the matching rates between the whl12 clusters and the maxbcg clusters as a function of redshift .
we find that 70%80% maxbcg clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters in the redshift range of @xmath104 , while only 30%40% of the whl12 clusters are matched with the maxbcg clusters because our sample is more complete for poor clusters .
the matching rates increase with cluster richness for both samples .
as shown in figure  [ rate_max ] , 95% of the maxbcg clusters of @xmath108 are matched with the whl12 clusters , and 85% of the whl12 clusters of @xmath109 are matched with the maxbcg clusters .
those non - matched maxbcg clusters mostly have a richness smaller than the criteria of our cluster finding algorithm
. a small number of the maxbcg clusters of @xmath108 are missing in our sample .
as we have checked , some of them are merged in the friend - of - friend algorithm of our procedure ( steps 2 and 5 ) , and some of them can be found with a larger separation . if we match
the clusters within a separation of @xmath110 , @xmath111 of the maxbcg clusters of @xmath108 can be found in our sample .
figure  [ rich_max ] shows the correlation between the maxbcg richness , @xmath101 , and the richness of this paper , @xmath52 , for the matched clusters .      from the sdss dr6
, @xcite identified 39,668 clusters of galaxies in the redshift range @xmath112 .
monte carlo simulations show that the sample is complete up to redshift @xmath113 for clusters with a richness @xmath114 .
the cluster richness is the number of member candidates of @xmath115 within a radius of 1 mpc and a photo-@xmath10 of @xmath116 after background subtraction .    comparing to @xcite ,
we modify the richness estimate and cluster identification criteria .
a cluster is identified in this paper when the richness @xmath53 and the number of member candidates @xmath117 within @xmath36 , which is looser than the criteria of @xmath118 within a radius of 0.5 mpc in @xcite .
the cluster sample in this paper is more complete for clusters of low richness .
the completeness is 40% for clusters with a mass of @xmath51 ( richness of @xmath2812 ) in @xcite , while it is @xmath2890% in this paper .
+    matching is applied between two cluster samples in sky coverage of the sdss dr6 .
we find that 25,929 ( 65% ) of 39,668 whl09 clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters within a separation of @xmath36 and a redshift difference of @xmath107 .
figure  [ rate_whl ] shows the matching rate as a function of redshift between the whl12 clusters and whl09 clusters .
the matching rates of the whl12 clusters to whl09 clusters decrease from 85% at @xmath119 to 55% at @xmath120 .
the matching rates of the whl09 clusters to the whl12 clusters increase from 20% at @xmath119 to 40% at @xmath120 .
the matching rates vary as a function of cluster richness within @xmath121 , 90% of the whl09 clusters of @xmath122 are matched with the whl12 clusters , 86% of the whl12 clusters of @xmath109 are matched with the whl09 clusters . if we match the clusters within a separation of @xmath110 , @xmath123 of the whl09 clusters of @xmath122 are matched .
the non - matched whl09 clusters are probably merged in the friend - of - friend algorithm of our procedure , or are poorer than the criteria of cluster finding in this work .
figure  [ rich_whl ] shows a tight correlation between the whl09 richness , @xmath124 , and the richness of this paper , @xmath52 , for the matched clusters .
+    @xcite presented a gmbcg algorithm , which detects clusters by identifying the red sequence and the bcg feature . from the sdss dr7
, they found 55,424 clusters in the redshift range of @xmath125 .
they provide two richnesses , the weighted richness which is the total number of galaxies brighter than @xmath102 within @xmath36 weighted by a factor from the fitting of color distribution , and the scaled richness which is the number of galaxies within @xmath36 and @xmath103 of the ridgeline colors .
we adopt the weighted richness as gmbcg richness @xmath126 if available , otherwise the scaled richness .
we cross - match the whl12 clusters with the gmbcg clusters in the sky coverage of the sdss dr7 .
we find that 25,370 ( 46% ) of 55,424 gmbcg clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters within a separation of @xmath36 and a redshift difference of @xmath107 ( see figure  [ rate_gmbcg ] ) .
the matching rates of the whl12 clusters to the gmbcg clusters decrease from 80% at @xmath119 to 40% at @xmath120 .
the matching rates of the gmbcg clusters to the whl12 clusters are 30%40% within @xmath127 . within the redshift range of @xmath121
, the matching rates increase with cluster richness for both samples .
we find that 72% of the gmbcg clusters of @xmath128 are matched with the whl12 clusters , 83% of the whl12 clusters of @xmath109 are matched with the gmbcg clusters .
the fraction of missing rich gmbcg clusters is larger than those of the maxbcg and whl09 clusters .
this may be due to a broader distribution of redshift difference ( see figure  [ hist_dz ] ) .
if we match clusters within a separation of @xmath110 and a redshift difference of @xmath129 , 55% of the gmbcg clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters , 85% of the gmbcg rich clusters of @xmath130 are matched ( see dashed lines in figure  [ rate_gmbcg ] ) .
we note that a few rich gmbcg clusters are still missing .
some of them are merged in the friend - of - friend algorithm of our procedure , or have a redshift difference of @xmath131 from the whl12 clusters .
most of other missing gmbcg clusters are poorer than the criteria of cluster finding in this work .
we note a large scatter between the gmbcg richness @xmath126 and @xmath52 ( see figure  [ rich_gmbcg ] ) .
+    @xcite used a modified amf algorithm to identify clusters using photometric redshifts of galaxies . from the sdss dr6 ,
69,173 clusters are identified in the redshift range @xmath132 with a richness of @xmath133 .
the richness of the amf clusters is defined as the total luminosity within @xmath36 in units of @xmath44 , the same as that in this work .
we cross - match the whl12 clusters with the amf clusters in the sky coverage of the sdss dr6 . within a separation of @xmath36 and a redshift difference of @xmath107 , 27,966 ( 40% ) of 69,173
amf clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters .
figure  [ rate_amf ] shows the matching rate as a function of redshift .
the matching rates of the whl12 clusters to the amf clusters decrease from 80% at @xmath119 to 30% at @xmath92 .
the matching rates of the amf clusters to the whl12 clusters are constantly @xmath2830% .
the matching rates vary with cluster richness within @xmath121 , 72% of the amf clusters of @xmath134 are matched with the whl12 clusters , 74% of the whl12 clusters of @xmath109 are matched with the amf clusters .
we note that many amf clusters have a large redshift difference of @xmath135 ( see figure  [ hist_dz ] ) .
if we match clusters within a separation of @xmath110 and a redshift difference of @xmath129 , 91% of the amf rich clusters of @xmath134 are matched with the whl12 clusters ( see dashed lines in figure  [ rate_amf ] ) .
those non - matched amf clusters are missing due to friend - of - friend merging of our algorithm , large redshift difference from the whl12 clusters and large scatter between two richness estimates .
figure  [ rich_amf ] shows the correlation between the amf richness @xmath136 and the @xmath52 for the matched clusters .
+    with luminous member galaxies well discriminated in the identification procedure , good correlations between the cluster richness with x - ray measurements are expected @xcite .
we get x - ray clusters from the northern rosat all - sky ( noras ) galaxy cluster survey @xcite and the rosat - eso flux limited x - ray ( reflex ) galaxy cluster survey @xcite .
the noras sample contains 378 clusters and the reflex contains 447 clusters .
survey provides x - ray luminosity for detected clusters .
we also get x - ray clusters from the query of the x - ray cluster database ( bax ) , where luminosities for 1028 clusters and temperatures for 210 clusters are available compiled from reference .
the _ rosat _
clusters mostly are massive with a luminosity greater than @xmath137 in the 0.12.4 kev band , while the bax sample contains many less massive clusters with a low luminosity less than @xmath137 .
previous work shows that the luminosity in both samples is statistically consistent @xcite . here ,
we combine two sample for the correlation with our cluster richness . for the clusters in both _
rosat _ and bax samples , we adopt the x - ray luminosity from _ rosat _ data .
x - ray clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters within a separation of @xmath36 and a redshift difference of @xmath107 .
we find 611 matched x - ray clusters with luminosities measured , 84 matched x - ray clusters with temperatures measured .
figure  [ rich_xray ] shows the correlations between cluster richness with x - ray luminosity and temperature for the matched clusters . the best fits give @xmath138 and @xmath139 where @xmath140 refers to x - ray luminosity in the 0.12.4 kev band in units of @xmath137 , @xmath141 refers to x - ray temperature in units of kev .
the tight correlations suggest that the richness we estimate is reasonable and statistically reliable .
the slopes of the @xmath142@xmath52 and the @xmath141@xmath52 relations are in agreement with those of @xcite .
we measure the scatter in x - ray luminosity to the best - fit relation and get a value of @xmath143 , i.e. , @xmath144 .
the scatter is in agreement with that for the correlation of @xmath142 with the maxbcg richness @xcite , but larger than those for the correlations with the improved maxbcg richness @xcite . for a similar comparison ,
we measure the scatter in cluster mass to the best - fit @xmath37@xmath52 relation given in section  [ scaling ] and get @xmath145 , i.e. , @xmath146 .
the scatter in mass based on our richness is also in agreement with that based on the maxbcg richness @xcite .
the sz effect is the result of high energy electrons interacting with the cosmic microwave background radiation through inverse compton scattering .
it has been detected around rich galaxy clusters due to a high temperature of host ionized gas @xcite .
the sz signal is characterized by the quantity @xmath147 , where @xmath148 is the angular distance to a cluster at redshift @xmath10 , @xmath149 is the thomson cross - section , @xmath150 is the speed of light , @xmath151 is the electron rest mass , @xmath152 is the integration of the pressure of hot ionized gas over the cluster volume .
as the pressure is related to gravitational potential , @xmath153 is expected to be a proxy of cluster mass @xcite .    recently , the planck releases an sz cluster sample including 189 clusters @xcite .
we find that 71 sz clusters are located at the sky coverage of the sdss - iii .
six of them have redshifts less than 0.05 .
other 65 clusters are matched with the whl12 clusters , of which 61 have x - ray measurements .
figure  [ rich_sz ] shows the correlations between the richness and the sz measurements by the planck for the 61 clusters , where @xmath154 is the sz signal measured within a radius of @xmath155 and @xmath156 .
the matched clusters mostly have a richness of @xmath157 .
clearly , there is a positive correlation between cluster richness and sz measurement .
bcgs are luminous and usually located at the centers of clusters .
their properties provide the information of galaxy formation in the extreme dense environment . using our sample
, we can study the evolution of the bcgs .
moreover , we cross - identity the bcgs with the sdss lrg sample .
+   +    the bcgs in rich clusters are formed at redshift @xmath158 and evolved passively ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
the properties of bcgs are related to their host clusters @xcite .
richer clusters tend to have brighter bcgs . here
, we use our sample to address the magnitude evolution of the bcgs with redshift and richness .
figure  [ bcg1 ] shows the evolution of absolute magnitudes of the bcgs with cluster redshift in the range of @xmath121 for six richness bins and with cluster richness for six redshift bins .
we get the mean values and fit the correlation ( solid lines ) for each bin . here , the variations of completeness and false detection rate are considered by a weighting factor in the fitting . the weight is calculated as the percentage of true cluster ( i.e. , @xmath159false detection rate ) divided by completeness for each richness and redshift bin .
there are very small changes of the average richnesses within the redshift ranges ( upper panels ) or the average redshifts within the richness ranges ( lower panels ) , indicating that the changes of bcg magnitudes have been well decoupled for redshift and richness .
the best fits between absolute magnitude and redshift give @xmath160 clearly , the bcg are brighter in clusters of higher redshifts .
as the stellar population in the bcgs was formed at redshift @xmath158 and becomes old with comic time , the bcgs become fainter at lower redshifts . to verify the evolution of bcg magnitude with redshift , using the amf clusters @xcite and the brightest one of three bcg candidates for each cluster
, we get @xmath161 which is roughly consistent with the results derived from our cluster sample .
the bcg magnitude evolution is in agreement with that of @xmath44 found by @xcite .
in addition , we find that bcgs are brighter in richer clusters , consistent with conclusions in previous works @xcite . from the fitting ,
the bcgs have an average absolute magnitude of @xmath162 for cluster richness of @xmath16315 at redshift @xmath164 , but a brighter magnitude of @xmath165 for cluster richness of @xmath166 .
this tendency can be clearly shown from the correlation between bcg absolute magnitude with cluster richness for six redshift bins ( the lower panel of figure  [ bcg1 ] ) .
the evolution of the bcgs magnitudes with redshift and the dependence of richness can be formulated together as , @xmath167      the sdss lrgs are selected to produce a volume - limited sample of massive galaxies to redshift of 0.5 .
they are efficiently selected by color cuts based on passive evolution model at redshifts @xmath168 @xcite .
generally , lrgs are more massive and located at denser environment than general galaxies .
they are most likely bcgs or brightest group galaxies .
bcgs are luminous and mostly have red colors .
they are likely to be lrgs
. however , this may not always be true .
@xcite showed that about 27% bcgs in x - ray bright clusters have optical emission lines .
they may have blue colors due to recent star formation @xcite .
therefore , many bcgs are not lrgs .
first , we cross - identify the clusters in our sample with the sdss lrgs to address how many lrgs are member galaxies .
we get 112,191 lrgs of @xmath168 from the sdss spectroscopic data .
cross - matching between lrgs with bcgs in our sample , we find that 28,336 ( 25% ) lrgs are bcgs and 40,039 ( 36% ) lrgs are located within a projected separation of @xmath36 and a redshift difference of 0.05 .
this suggests that most lrgs are located not in our clusters but in an environment poorer than our clusters .    on the other hand
, we estimate the fraction of the bcgs as the sdss lrgs .
follow @xcite , we match the colors of the bcgs with the lrg selection criteria .
figure  [ sdsslrg ] shows the color  magnitude and color  color diagrams for the bcgs in our clusters .
the color @xmath169 is defined as @xmath170.\ ] ] if we only consider the color cuts and do not limit the petrosian magnitude @xmath171 , the bcgs can be classified as lrgs for those with the color @xmath169 above the line in the left panel of figure  [ sdsslrg ] and the colors , @xmath172 and @xmath173 , between the lines in the right panel
. there are 83,740 ( 66% ) of 126,041 bcgs in the redshift range @xmath168 satisfying the color cuts of the sdss lrg selection criteria .
when the petrosian magnitude limits of @xmath174 for cut i and @xmath5 for cut ii are considered , we find that 63% of bcgs of @xmath5 are lrgs .
we identify 132,684 clusters of galaxies in the redshift range @xmath68 using photometric redshifts of galaxies from the sdss - iii .
the clusters are recognized for those with a richness @xmath53 and a number of member galaxies candidates @xmath117 within @xmath36 .
monte carlo simulations show that the false detection rate is less than 6% for the whole sample .
the cluster detection rate is more than 95% for clusters of @xmath96 in the redshift range of @xmath2
. we cross - match our cluster sample with previous cluster samples .
the matching rates are 5070% for previously known clusters but depend on cluster richness .
clusters in our sample match more than 90% of previously known rich clusters . comparing with x - ray and the planck data , we find that the determined cluster richness is related to the x - ray luminosity , temperature and sz measurements .
the richer clusters have brighter bcgs .
the bcgs are brighter in higher redshift clusters .
cross - matching the bcgs with the sdss lrgs , we find that 25% lrgs are bcgs of our clusters , 36% lrgs are member galaxies , and 63% of the bcgs of @xmath5 in our clusters satisfy the sdss lrg selection criteria .
we thank the referee for valuable comments that helped to improve the paper .
the authors are supported by the national natural science foundation ( nnsf ) of china ( 10833003 and 11103032 ) .
funding for sdss - iii has been provided by thealfred p. sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , and theusdepartment of energy .
the sdss - iii web site is http://www.sdss3.org/. sdss - iii is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions of the sdss - iii collaboration including the university of arizona , the brazilian participation group , brookhaven national laboratory , university of cambridge , university of florida , the french participation group , the german participation group , the instituto de astrofisica de canarias , the michigan state / notre dame / jina participation group , johns hopkins university , lawrence berkeley national laboratory , max planck institute for astrophysics , newmexico state university , new york university , ohio stateuniversity , pennsylvania state university , university of portsmouth , princeton university , the spanish participation group , university of tokyo , university of utah , vanderbilt university , university of virginia , university of washington , and yale university .                                                                              , r. , gunn , j.  e. , ivezi , z. , knapp , g.  r. , & kent , s. 2001 , in asp conf .
238 , astronomical data analysis software and systems x , ed
. f.  r. harnden , jr .
, f.  a. primini , & h.  e. payne(san francisco , ca : asp ) , 269