many quantum phenomena , often radically different from our intuitive predictions , are attributed to the fundamental principle of quantum superposition that a physical system can be in a linear superposition of two distinct states . when the principle of quantum superposition is applied to multipartite physical systems
, it manifests another interesting feature of quantum mechanics , namely quantum entanglement .
quantum entanglement is nonclassical correlation between local systems and is now widely referred to as a key resource for quantum information processing .
quantum phenomena are observed typically on microscopic scales .
however , as illustrated in schrdinger s famous cat paradox @xcite , quantum mechanics does not preclude , in principle , the possibility of a macroscopic object being in a quantum superposition or being a part of quantum entanglement .
natural questions then follow .
if `` macroscopic _ and _ quantum '' is somehow a possible combination , how can we define , characterize and quantify `` macroscopic quantumness '' or `` quantum macroscopicity '' ?
further , how and to what extent can we implement such macroscopic quantumness ?    of course , scientists have tried to answer these questions . in the early days of quantum mechanics ,
such attempts were primarily in the area of interpretations or philosophical discussions , as they are not within the reach of experimental tests or implementations .
since then , however , a remarkable development of quantum and atom optics has been brought about , which has paved a way to control and detect individual quantum systems at the level of single photons and atoms .
based on this progress , further efforts are being made to collectively control larger quantum systems , that is also closely related to the ability to perform quantum information processing @xcite .
now , we may say that a significant amount of efforts made in physics and optics research in the last few decades are more or less related to explorations of macroscopic quantumness . in this paper
, we review two major research topics on macroscopic quantumness  its quantifications and physical implementations using optical fields  and attempt to make remarks on them .
we want to know whether and/or how much a physical system is _ both _ macroscopic _ and _ quantum .
needless to say , it is not sufficient for a state to be either macroscopic or quantum
. it should be _ quantum - mechanically macroscopic _ or _ macroscopically quantum_. this point may sound too obvious to make , but it is nontrivial to technically define and quantify macroscopic quantumness .
leggett posed a question along this line as `` what is the correct measure of ` schrdingers - cattiness ' ? '' and commented , `` ideally , one would like a quantitative measure which corresponds to our intuitive sense '' @xcite .
a number of proposals have been made for quantification of macroscopic quantum superpositions @xcite based on the effective number of particles that involve the superposition @xcite , distinguishability between the constituent states @xcite and operational interpretations @xcite . in the context of this paper
, we would like to pose three requirements for a desirable measure of macroscopic quantumness .
first , it should be applicable to a wide range of states , not limited to a specific type of states .
second , we prefer to have a measure that quantifies the degree of a genuine superposition against a classical mixture , together with its effective size factor . in other words , it should be applicable not only to pure states but also to mixed states .
third , if a state is given , the degree should be unambiguously determined .
these points are important because our motivation is to compare different types of states being considered as candidates for macroscopic quantum superpositions using a conclusive measure . in view of these points
, we shall review in chronological order such measures proposed to quantify macroscopic quantumness .      in 1980 ,
leggett in his pioneering work defined a measure called  disconnectivity " @xmath0 @xcite that quantifies genuine multipartite quantum correlations .
suppose that we are interested in characterizing an @xmath1-mode bosonic system @xmath2 .
we first obtain a reduced density operator @xmath3 ( @xmath4 ) from @xmath5 by tracing out every mode except for @xmath6 arbitrarily chosen modes .
quantity @xmath7 is introduced as @xmath8 where @xmath9 $ ] is von - neumann entropy of @xmath3 . by definition
, @xmath7 is set to be @xmath10 when both the numerator and the denominator are zero , and @xmath11 .
the disconnectivity @xmath0 is defined as the largest integer @xmath6 that makes @xmath7 the smallest .
for an ideal greenberger - horne - zeilinger ( ghz ) state @xmath12 with an orthogonal basis @xmath13 , it is clear that @xmath14 and @xmath15 for @xmath16 . its disconnectivity is then @xmath17 that is the largest @xmath6 minimizing @xmath7 to be @xmath18 .
however , @xmath0 is always @xmath10 for mixed states @xmath19 regardless of the values of @xmath1 and @xmath20 as far as @xmath21 .
this means that macroscopic quantumness for partially mixed states can not be identified by @xmath0 .
leggett pointed out that so called  macroscopic quantum phenomena " such as superconductivity or superfluidity do not require the existence of a high-@xmath0 state .
superfluidity can be explained by a product of identical bosonic states of which disconnectivity is obviously @xmath10 .
a superconducting system described by @xmath1 cooper pairs , @xmath22 , also shows a small value of disconnectivity @xmath23 regardless of @xmath1 . on the other hand , multi - mode quantum correlations , in the form of pure states ,
always give large values of @xmath0 .    even though disconnectivity sensibly quantifies multipartite correlations for pure states
, it is not always sensitive to distinguishability between the constituent states
. this point shall be clearer in the following example discussed by dr _
et al . _
@xcite .
dr _ et al . _
@xcite considered the effective size of a generalized form of the greenberger - horne - zeilinger ( ghz ) state : @xmath24 where @xmath25 .
the disconnectivity of this state is found to be @xmath17 regardless of @xmath26 even though @xmath26 obviously contributes to the distinguishability between @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
it would be of particular interest to know whether @xmath29 can still be a macroscopic superposition in comparison to an ideal ghz state when @xmath26 takes a small value . to put it concretely
, they attempt to find out what size of the ideal ghz state ( i.e. @xmath30 ) state @xmath29 is equivalent to .
two different methods lead to the same result that the effective size of state @xmath29 as a macroscopic superposition approaches @xmath31 when @xmath32 .
the first method is based on the rate of decoherence and the second is related to the ghz entanglement distillation by local operations and classical communication ( locc ) .
consider a dephasing process that is described by a completely positive map @xmath33 where @xmath34 , @xmath35 is time , @xmath36 is the dephasing rate , and @xmath37 is the pauli-@xmath38 operator . they show that the trace - norm of the off - diagonal elements for state @xmath29 is @xmath39 when @xmath32 and that it is @xmath40 for state @xmath30 . based on this comparison
, they conclude that the effective size of the generalized ghz state @xmath29 is equivalent to that of an ideal ghz state @xmath30 of size @xmath31 for small values of @xmath26 .
this conclusion is also derived from depolarizing decoherence where it gives exactly the same decay rate .
of course , this analysis is limited only to a very specific type of states in the form of eq .
( [ eq : gen - ghz ] ) .
bjrk and mana s suggestion @xcite is based on their observation that a quantum superposition is more sensitive than its constituent states for interferometric applications .
let us consider a pure state @xmath41 with a measurement outcome distribution of observable @xmath42 as @xmath43 where @xmath44 is a function of a reasonably smooth form centered at @xmath45 with width @xmath46 .
the operator @xmath47 is applied to state @xmath48 where @xmath49 corresponds to the degree of the interaction time and strength . generally , the overlap between the original and evolved states is @xmath50 which becomes zero when @xmath51 . in other words ,
the original state @xmath41 evolves to a state that is orthogonal to the original one at a certain interaction time @xmath52 .
meanwhile , if there was only a single peak @xmath44 ( @xmath53 or @xmath54 ) for the distribution of @xmath48 , the overlap simply would be @xmath55 regardless of @xmath56 and its first local minimum ( or a half of the initial value ) would be found at @xmath57 .
the measure of a macroscopic superposition in terms of interferometric sensitivity is defined as the ratio of the two interaction times : @xmath58 bjrk and mana s approach has a distinguishing feature as an operational measure based on a physical application even though it is devised only for pure states .
there is an ambiguity applying this measure to mixed states about how close the evolved state should be to the orthogonal state in determining @xmath59 .
this may lead to ambiguity in comparing different types of states .
shimizu and miyadera proposed index @xmath60 @xcite that determines whether a given form of @xmath1-mode state @xmath62 becomes macroscopically quantum as @xmath1 increases .
the index @xmath60 is obtained as @xmath63 where @xmath64 is the variance for observable @xmath65 with state @xmath48 , @xmath1 is the number of modes , and @xmath66 if @xmath67 is a nonzero constant .
the maximum in eq .
( [ eq : pindex ] ) is taken over all possible additive observables represented by @xmath68 where @xmath69 is a local observable for mode @xmath6 .
the value of index @xmath60 is found to be @xmath70 for ghz - type entanglement while @xmath71 for a simple product form of state .
a state is considered to be macroscopically quantum if its index is @xmath70 .
the index @xmath60 , however , can not be applied to mixed states .
for example , a mixed state @xmath72 have the same value of index @xmath70 as an ideal ghz state .
shimizu and morimae generalized the measure for arbitrary mixed states @xcite .
the index @xmath61 for state @xmath73 is @xmath74 where @xmath75 is an arbitrary projection operator satisfying @xmath76 and @xmath77 $ ] .
the correlation can be represented as @xmath78 where @xmath79 is an eigenstate of @xmath65 with eigenvalue @xmath80 .
it becomes @xmath81 so that @xmath82 when there is non - negligible @xmath83 coherence @xmath84 between the macroscopically distinct states of @xmath85 .
the indices @xmath60 and @xmath61 are equivalent for pure state , i.e. , index @xmath60 is a special case of index @xmath61
.    the index @xmath61 , as well as index @xmath60 , does not give a value for a given _ state _ ; rather it identifies what _ kinds _ ( or forms ) of states can scale to be macroscopically quantum when they become large multipartite states of @xmath86 .
therefore , it can not be directly applied to a single - mode state such as @xmath87 where its macroscopicity depends on @xmath88 , nor is it a quantifier of macroscopic quantumness for a given state .
cavalcanti and reid proposed an inequality of which violations verify macroscopic superpositions of continuous - variable states @xcite .
suppose a generalized macroscopic superposition @xmath89 and a pointer - measurement @xmath90 giving macroscopically ranged outcomes @xmath91 .
the domain for @xmath91 can be partitioned into three regions for @xmath92 , @xmath18 , and @xmath93 which correspond to @xmath94 , @xmath95 and @xmath96 , respectively . if the reference value @xmath97 is sufficiently large , two region @xmath92 and @xmath93 are called macroscopically distinct .
in contrast to eq .
( [ eq : gs ] ) , a mixed state @xmath98 is not a macroscopic superposition in the sense that the outcomes of @xmath99 only spread for @xmath100 @xmath101 and those of @xmath102 for @xmath103 @xmath104 . in other words , state ( [ eq : rholr ] )
does not incorporate a macroscopic superposition since the coherence element is @xmath105 .
the authors derived an inequality that should be satisfied by state  ( [ eq : rholr ] ) : @xmath106 with @xmath107 where @xmath108 are the normalized probability distributions for regions @xmath109 , and @xmath110 and @xmath111 are their means and variances , respectively .
cavalcanti and reid s inequality can be applied to a wide range of states compared to previous measures , i.e. , applicable to arbitrary single - mode continuous - variable states and may be extended to multi - mode continuous - variable states if appropriate measurements are defined .
however , it does not provide a degree of macroscopic quantumness , but it works as a criterion of macroscopic quantumness for a given state with respect to an arbitrarily chosen scale @xmath97 .
its calculations involve nontrivial numerical integrations and optimization processes .
et al . _ experimentally demonstrated violations of this inequality using gaussian states and showed that it critically depends on purity of the states @xcite .
korsbakken _ et al_. @xcite suggested an effective size of an @xmath1-particle superposition state in the form of @xmath112 based on how many measurements are required to distinguish @xmath113 and @xmath114 .
the size measure for state @xmath62 is defined by @xmath115 for given probability @xmath116 @xmath117 of distinguishing the two constituent states by measuring @xmath118 number of particles .
the discrimination probability is calculated as @xmath119+\tr[\rho_b^{(n)}e_b^{(n)}]\right)\ ] ] where @xmath120 are reduced density matrices for @xmath6 particles ( @xmath121 ) and @xmath122 are positive - operator valued measurements ( povms ) acting nontrivially only on @xmath6 particles .
the maximum value of the discrimination probability is obtained when the povm is a projective measurement in the eigenbasis of @xmath123 @xmath124 obviously , the two constituent states of an ideal ghz state @xmath125 can be distinguished by a single particle @xmath37 measurement so that @xmath126 regardless of @xmath127 .
korsbakken _ et al .
_ applied this measure to superconducting flux qubits @xcite where a superposition of macroscopically distinct values of currents and magnetic moments is observed .
they found the effective size of the flux qubits is surprisingly ( but not trivially ) small despite the apparent large difference in macroscopic observables .
the reason is that only a small fraction of all electrons contribute to the superposition , while their speeds are high enough to yield large currents or magnetic moments .
there is an ambiguity in using this measure due to the arbitrariness of the choice of @xmath127 .
for example , the size of the superposition in the form of @xmath128 is found to be @xmath129 @xcite .
therefore , for example , which of the two states , @xmath130 and @xmath131 , is more `` macroscopically quantum '' depends on the choice of @xmath127 .
marquardt _ et al .
_ define the size of quantum superposition by a number of particles that effectively involve the superposition @xcite .
more precisely , for given constituent states @xmath113 and @xmath114 they count how many single - particle operations are required to convert @xmath113 into @xmath114 or vice versa . as a simple example , an @xmath1-product horizontal - polarization state @xmath132 can be converted into and a vertical - polarization state @xmath133 by acting @xmath134 , where @xmath135 and @xmath136 are creation and annihilation operators for corresponding modes of the subscripts .
this operation is an @xmath1 number of single - particle operations , and the size of superposition @xmath137 is @xmath1 .    in general ,
@xmath114 is obtained by superposing different states as @xmath138 , where @xmath139 is a state converted from @xmath113 by at least @xmath140 single particle operations .
the average effective particle number is then @xmath141 . in ref .
@xcite , the authors considered @xmath142 and @xmath143 for modes @xmath144 and @xmath145 . the constituent state @xmath114 is expanded as @xmath146 with coefficients @xmath147 @xcite .
the state @xmath148 can be obtained by applying @xmath140 times of the single particle operation @xmath149 to @xmath150 implying that its effective number is @xmath140 .
the average effective number is then @xmath151 and it becomes @xmath1 for an ideal ghz state of @xmath152 .
it is obvious that this measure can not be applied to mixed states .      in the phase space of mutually conjugate variables ,
the wigner function of a macroscopic quantum superposition typically shows an interference pattern with a high frequency . taking note of this point , lee and
jeong @xcite defined a measure of macroscopic quantumness for an arbitrary harmonic - oscillator state .
it simultaneously quantifies two different kinds of essential information : the degree of quantum coherence and the effective size of the physical system that involves the superposition .
the basic idea is to take an integral @xmath154 , where @xmath155 $ ] is the characteristic function for state @xmath73 , in order to measure `` frequency '' and `` magnitude '' of the interference fringes at the same time in the wigner representation . in a continuous - variable phase space
, it effectively quantifies _ both _
`` how widespread '' the constituent states of a given state are _ and _ `` how quantum mechanically pure '' coherences between those constituent states are , at the same time .
the formal definition of the measure @xmath156 for an @xmath157-mode harmonic oscillator system @xcite is only slightly different : @xmath158 \left|    \chi \left ( \xi_1,\ , \xi_2,\ , \cdots,\ , \xi_m \right ) \right|^2\ ] ] where @xmath159 is the @xmath157-mode characteristic function , @xmath160 .
the value @xmath161 has been inserted to make any coherent states or their product states ( regardless of their amplitudes ) a reference with @xmath162 , but it may be removed to guarantee positivity of the measure @xcite .
the maximum possible value of @xmath153 for an optical state is shown to be its average photon number @xcite .    assuming the photon loss condition , @xmath163 with @xmath164=(decay rate @xmath165 time )
, it turns out that the measure is equivalent to the purity decay rate of the state @xmath166 where @xmath167 $ ] is the purity of state @xmath73 .
this is consistent with the rapid decay of macroscopic superpositions , and the purity decay rate itself and eq .
( [ eq : ad ] ) may be an alternative definition of @xmath153 .
it is possible to detect @xmath153 for optical states using overlap measurements without full tomography of quantum states @xcite .
the measure @xmath153 is applicable to arbitrary harmonic oscillator systems including mixed and multi - mode states .
it is decomposition - independent and straightforward to calculate for any states represented in the phase space , giving definite values for direct comparison between different types of states .
frwis and dr suggested using the fisher information as a measure of macroscopic quantumness for spin systems @xcite . when estimating an unknown parameter , @xmath168 , caused by an unitary evolution @xmath169 with hamiltonian @xmath42 , the classical limit of the estimation uncertainty is determined by @xmath170 where @xmath1 is the system size .
it is well known that this limit can be lowered down to @xmath171 using a quantum mechanically correlated probe state .
more generally , the limit of the estimation uncertainty using probe state @xmath73 is given by the cramr - rao bound @xcite , @xmath172 , where @xmath173 is the quantum fisher information where @xmath174 and @xmath175 are eigenvalues and eigenvectors of @xmath73 .
] for a given additive hamiltonian @xmath42
. therefore , @xmath176 implies that state @xmath73 is capable of the parameter estimation over the classical limit . noting that this improvement is attributed to long - range quantum correlations in the state @xmath73 , fr@xmath177wis and d@xmath178r call it a genuine macroscopic quantum effect , not an accumulation of microscopic effects @xcite .
they call a quantum state @xmath73 macroscopic if @xmath179 , where the maximization is taken over the entire set @xmath180 of additive operators .    however , there are some cases where individual particles do not show long - range quantum correlation while local groups of them do @xcite .
therefore , the aforementioned measure needs to be generalized to @xmath181 where @xmath182 is a set of extended additive operator @xmath183 with each @xmath184 locally acts on @xmath185 distinct groups of particles sized @xmath83 . as indices @xmath60 and @xmath61 , frwis and dr s approach in the forms of eq .
( [ eq : d2 ] ) can not be directly applied to a single - mode state .
such a measure is defined as @xmath186 giving a definite number for a given state .
this proposal is applicable to arbitrary spin systems .
it was applied to cloned quantum states to find that they are macroscopically quantum @xcite .
frwis and dr also compared @xcite several measures for spin systems @xcite and concluded that index @xmath60 and their fisher - information - base approach detect the most broad set of macroscopic quantum states among those .
nimmrichter and hornberger @xcite call a quantum superposition of a mechanical system to be macroscopic , if its experimental demonstration allows one to rule out even a minimal modification of quantum mechanics . in order to specify such minimal modification , they consider an additional generator @xmath187 to the von neumann equation for @xmath1 particle density matrix @xmath5 as @xmath188 + \mathcal{l}_n ( \rho_n ) , \label{eq : vonneumann}\ ] ] where @xmath189\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath190 is the weighted sum of the single particle operators @xmath191 $ ] giving position translation @xmath192 and momentum boost @xmath193 of the @xmath6-th particle of mass @xmath194 . here ,
@xmath195 , @xmath196 , and @xmath197 are the mass , the coherence time parameter , and the normalized distribution function for the reference particle , respectively .
the reference particle is chosen to be an electron , and the distribution @xmath198 is taken to be a gaussian distribution with standard deviations @xmath199 and @xmath200 for position and momentum respectively .
the role of the generator @xmath201 in eq .
( [ eq : vonneumann ] ) is to wipe out the coherence from the original distribution of @xmath5 in the position - momentum phase space .    for an experimental demonstration of a quantum superposition in a mechanical system , it rules out a certain region of the modification parameter so that there is a lower bound of the time parameter @xmath196 .
if such a lower bound is larger , the superposition becomes more macroscopically quantum .
the lower bounds of @xmath196 for interference experiments with neutrons , electrons , bose - einstein condensates , and molecules are obtained @xcite , and then the measure of macroscopicity is defined as @xmath202 where @xmath203 is the greatest lower bound of the time parameter @xmath196 .
state - of - the - art interferometers achieve macroscopicities of up to @xmath204 @xcite .
it can be applied to any mechanical phenomena and successfully addressed various experiments @xcite .
however , it may require more investigations to find out whether macroscopicity witnessed by this measure is in line with the idea of genuine macroscopic superpositions , for example , in the context of refs .
@xcite .
sekatski _ et al .
_ s measure for optical states is determined by how fuzzy ( or how classical ) a single - shot photon number measurement can be to distinguish two constituent states of a superposition @xcite .
a pointer system is initially assumed to be in a gaussian position distribution @xmath205 with variance @xmath206 .
when a quantum state @xmath207 interacts with the pointer , the final distribution of the pointer becomes @xcite @xmath208.\ ] ] for instance , if @xmath207 is an @xmath6 photon number state @xmath209 , the resultant distribution is exactly shifted by @xmath210 from the original one .
when @xmath211 become larger , the resolution of the detector degrades and the detector is considered to be more `` classical . ''
the probability of a correct discrimination between two constituent states , @xmath113 and @xmath114 , is @xmath212=\frac{1}{2}\left(1+d\left[p_a^\sigma(x),p_b^\sigma(x)\right]\right),\ ] ] where @xmath213=2^{-1}\int dx \vert p_a^\sigma(x)-p_b^\sigma(x)\vert$ ] is the trace distance between the outcome distributions @xmath214 and @xmath215 .
the size of a superposition @xmath216 is then defined by the maximum tolerable @xmath211 for @xmath217 $ ] to reach a certain reference value @xmath218 .    a straightforward example discussed in ref .
@xcite is a superposition of the vacuum and a coherent state @xmath219 ( unnormalized ) .
the measure is obtained as @xmath220 for large @xmath221 , which is proportional to the average photon number @xmath222 for a fixed @xmath218 .
a more controversial example is an entangled state generated by applying the displacement operation @xmath223 on single - photon entanglement @xcite @xmath224 this state can be rewritten as @xmath225 with @xmath226 and @xmath227 can be considered as the constituent states of entanglement .
the measure is then found to be @xmath228 which is proportional to @xmath221 indicating that such a state is macroscopically quantum .    there arises a nontrivial question .
the coherent states are considered to be the most classical states among all pure states @xcite .
a coherent state @xmath229 can be rewritten as @xmath230 , and @xmath231 and @xmath232 are macroscopically distinguishable according to this approach .
we then have to conclude that a coherent state , as far as its amplitude is large enough , is a macroscopic superposition , which would probably be unacceptable to many researchers in the community .
it could also be controversial whether merely a local displacement operation can generate genuine macroscopic quantumness .
various attempts have been made for generating and detecting macroscopic / mesoscopic quantum superpositions using atomic and molecular systems @xcite , optical setups @xcite , superconducting circuits @xcite , and other mechanical systems @xcite .
quantum optics has provided a testbed for such experimental implementations in free - traveling light fields .
for example , there has been remarkable progress in generating superpositions of coherent states ( scss ) and entangled coherent states ( ecss ) .
another example is entanglement between macroscopic and microscopic systems in several different forms @xcite in line with schrdinger s original paradox @xcite .
there are yet other examples for generating macroscopic quantum states such as squeezed macro - macro entanglement @xcite , ghz - type entanglement @xcite and noon states @xcite that are beyond the scope of this paper . in this section ,
we review several of such states and their generation schemes that have been suggested and experimentally performed .
we also discuss their degrees as macroscopic quantum superpositions or entanglement based on some of the measures discussed in the previous section .
let us first consider an scs in the form of @xmath233 where @xmath234 are coherent states of amplitudes @xmath235 , @xmath236 is a real relative phase factor , and @xmath237 is the normalization factor .
the scss are often referred to as `` schrdinger cat states , '' provided that @xmath221 is reasonably large , probably due to the following two reasons .
first , the coherent states are known as classical states due to several reasons @xcite .
a classic criterion of nonclassicality for a quantum state is whether its @xmath238-function @xcite is well defined @xcite .
the coherent states are the only kind of pure states that have well - defined @xmath238-functions @xcite .
they are also robust against decoherence as `` pointer states '' @xcite and the closest analogy of classical point particles in the quantum phase space @xcite .
second , the two coherent states , @xmath234 , are macroscopically distinguishable when @xmath221 is sufficiently large ; they can be efficiently discriminated using homodyne detection with a limited efficiency .
therefore , an scs generates quantum interferences between these two `` classical '' but `` macroscopically distinct '' states as an analogy of schrdinger s paradox .
_ studied nonclassical properties of scss such as sub - poissonian and oscillatory photon statistics @xcite .
one may also consider entangled coherent states ( ecss ) and one of the simplest forms of such states is @xmath239 with normalization factor @xmath240 .
several measures of macroscopic quantum superpositions confirm that scss and ecss are clearly macroscopically quantum .
the values of measure @xmath153 for an scs and an ecs are found to be @xmath241 and @xmath242 for @xmath243 . in the case of @xmath244
, they are @xmath245 and @xmath246 . as another evidence ,
we numerically obtain the maximum value of @xmath97 for an scs to violate cavalcanti and reid s inequality  ( [ eq : cavalcanti ] ) @xcite using homodyne detection is @xmath247 which corresponds to the distance between the two peaks of the superposition in the phase space .
yurke and stoler found that a coherent state in a kerr nonlinear medium evolves to an scs in the form of @xmath248 after a certain interaction time @xcite , based on the calculations for an anharmonic oscillator coupled to a zero - temperature heat bath by milburn and holmes @xcite .
they explicitly referred it to as a `` quantum mechanical superposition of macroscopically distinguishable states '' @xcite , quoting einstein and schdinger @xcite .
mecozzi and tombesi showed that a type of two - mode ecss can be generated using a two - mode nonlinear interaction @xcite .
sanders proposed a scheme to generate ecss using a mach - zehnder interferometer with a single - mode kerr nonlinearity @xcite and later provided a comprehensive review on this kind of states @xcite .
gerry suggested using a cross - kerr nonlinearity in a mach - zehnder inteferometer setup with two photodetectors to generate scss and ecss @xcite .
similar schemes using cross - kerr effects and beam - splitter interferences were independently developed by dariano _
_ @xcite and howell and yeazell @xcite .
paris devised a two - step scheme that generates a small scs using a kerr nonlinear effect and then amplifies it using @xmath249 nonlinearity @xcite .
studied a method to generate scss and ecss via cross phase modulation in a double electromagnetically induced transparency ( eit ) regime @xcite .
however , all these approaches have remained as theoretical proposals yet .
the required levels of nonlinearities are extremely demanding even though there are developing techniques such as eit to obtain giant kerr effects @xcite .
there have been trials to reduce the required levels of nonlinearities .
_ found that it is possible to use a relatively weak single - mode kerr nonlinearity together with a conditioning homodyne measurement to generate scss @xcite .
the idea of using a weak cross - kerr interaction has been discussed in the context of the development of the bell - state detection @xcite and quantum computation @xcite .
it was explicitly shown @xcite that a cross - kerr nonlinearity can be used to generate scss and ecss and this approach can overcome decoherence due to photon losses . there
exist nontrivial problems to overcome even at a theoretical level in order to utilize the approach based on a weak cross - kerr nonlinearity @xcite .
recently , he _
_ showed that approximately ideal cross - kerr effects can be obtained using relatively weak interactions between photon pulses in atomic ensembles @xcite .
non - deterministic methods based on linear optics and conditioning measurements have been investigated @xcite since initial attempts by several authors @xcite .
_ showed that an scs with a small amplitude as @xmath250 can be well approximated ( @xmath251 ) by applying the squeezing operation on a single photon @xcite .
it can be achieved by subtracting a single photon from a squeezed state and a number of experiments have been performed along this line @xcite . however , this type of experiment can not generate two separate peaks in the phase space with interferences between them because the resulting state is simply a squeezed form of the single photon .
et al . _ attempted a different method : a number state is divided by a 50:50 beam splitter and conditioned by a homodyne detection to generate an scs @xcite .
the experiment with a number state of @xmath252 has resulted in an approximate scs with @xmath253 with interferences between two clearly separate peaks in the phase space @xcite .
it can be used to generate arbitrarily large scss if large number states are available @xcite .
glancy and de vasconcelos provided a comprehensive review on various methods for producing scss in optical systems in 2008 @xcite .
_ showed that multiple photon subtractions result in large squeezed scss with extremely high fidelities @xcite . in this way
, demonstrations of subtracting two or more photons on a squeezed vacuum state have been performed to generate scss @xcite .
-photon subtraction on a squeezed vacuum @xmath254 using a beam splitter ( bs ) with low reflectivity ( @xmath255 ) and a photodetector .
( b ) scs generation scheme using homodyne detection @xcite .
homodyne conditioning for measurements outcomes @xmath256 using a 50:50 beam splitter ( bs ) and homodyne detection @xmath257 on a photon number state @xmath258 .
the additional ( optional ) squeezed vacuum @xmath259 may be used to control the degree of squeezing @xmath260 of the the output scs .
( c ) the scs amplification scheme @xcite .
two small scss with amplitudes @xmath221 may be used to conditionally generate an scs of a larger amplitude @xmath261 using two 50:50 beam splitters ( bs1 and bs2 ) , an auxiliary coherent state @xmath262 and two _ imperfect _ on / off photodetectors . ]
many of the non - deterministic yet feasible schemes are categorized into two major approaches .
one is based on the squeezing operation and photon subtractions @xcite and the other is based on the number state generation and homodyne detection @xcite .
figures  [ fig - scs](a ) and 1(b ) present schematics of the two approaches .
in fact , either the multiple photon subtraction from a squeezed vacuum @xcite or homodyning on the one part of the number state divided by a beam splitter @xcite yields a _ squeezed _ scs , i.e. @xmath263 where @xmath264 is the squeezing operator with the squeezing parameter @xmath260 as depicted in fig .
[ fig - scs ] . in principle ,
as far as one could perform the photon number subtraction of many photons @xcite or generate a large number state @xcite , a squeezed scs of a large amplitude and high fidelity can be obtained . in order to generate a normal scs ( without squeezing ) with high fidelity @xmath265 , in addition to the scheme in ref .
@xcite , one may use an additional squeezed vacuum as shown in fig .
[ fig - scs](b ) @xcite .
a generation scheme for arbitrary scss with unbalanced ratios was suggested @xcite and experimentally demonstrated @xcite .
it is worth noting that large scss may be obtained in a non - deterministic way out of small scss using realistic on / off detectors and an auxiliary coherent state as shown in fig .
[ fig - scs](c ) @xcite , and there exists an alternative amplification scheme using homodyne detection @xcite .
in general , the scss and ecss are sensitive to a lossy environment and detection inefficiency as their amplitudes become large @xcite .
theoretical attempts were made using the squeezing operation to make the scss more robust against losses @xcite or to amplify them @xcite .
schemes for entanglement purification for mixed ecss @xcite and concentration for pure ecss @xcite were investigated using bell - state measurements @xcite .
et al_. devised and experimentally demonstrated a method to generate an ecs in a remote way using two scss and two photodetectors @xcite .
et al_. suggested another scheme for the same purpose that is made to be more robust against detection inefficiency using an auxiliary coherent state @xcite . proposals to distribute ecss using the quantum repeater protocol
were also suggested @xcite .
superpositions and entanglement of multiple numbers of coherent states have been theoretically studied @xcite .
experimentally demonstrated quantum teleportation of a single - photon - subtracted squeezed vacuum ( i.e. , an approximate scs ) using the continuous variable teleportation protocol @xcite
. generalization of scss and ecss to highly mixed forms has been studied for testing quantum theory in an even more `` classical '' limit @xcite .
the wide scope of applications using scss and ecss includes quantum teleportation @xcite , quantum computation @xcite , precision measurements @xcite , bell - type inequality tests @xcite , leggett - type inequality tests @xcite , quantum contextuality tests @xcite and quantum steering @xcite . in particular , quantum teleportation and computation schemes using scss and ecss are considered as a strong candidate for the optical implementation of quantum computation in terms of the resource requirement and loss tolerance @xcite .
a proof - of - principle experiment of this type of teleportation scheme was performed by neergaard - nielsen _ et al_. @xcite .
there have been attempts to generate entanglement between microscopic and macroscopic ( or quantum and classical ) states of light by using several different methods @xcite .
implementations of such micro - macro entanglement are of special interest in relation to schrdinger s cat paradox where a cat as a macroscopic classical object and an atom as a microscopic quantum system are entangled @xcite .
we limit our discussions to several examples using free - traveling optical systems mainly from a theoretical point of view , while there are other examples such as atom - field entanglement @xcite .
de martini _ et al_. suggested @xcite and experimentally demonstrated @xcite a scheme depicted in fig .
[ fig - micro - macro]a to amplify a local part of microscopic entanglement using quantum injected optical parametric amplification ( qiopa ) @xcite @xcite .
the microscopic entanglement is supposed to be a polarization entangled state , @xmath266 , where @xmath267 ( @xmath268 ) is the left ( right ) circularly polarization state for mode @xmath269 ( @xmath270 ) .
one of the modes , say @xmath270 , is amplified to be `` macroscopic '' using qiopa @xcite .
the states @xmath271 and @xmath272 then evolve to two orthogonal states with different photon number distributions as @xmath273 where @xmath274 ( @xmath275 ) is the photon number state with @xmath276 photons and the right ( left ) circularly polarization , and @xmath277 are real coefficients ] with the amplification constant @xmath278 .
the amplification results in entanglement between microscopic and macroscopic states : @xmath279    it is straightforward to verify that state @xmath280 has the maximum value of measure @xmath153 @xcite as @xmath281 that corresponds to its average photon number .
this result is implied in the fact that the qiopa causes @xmath282 and @xmath283 to be macroscopically quantum as seen in eq .
( [ eq : process ] ) .
in fact , @xmath284 and @xmath285 themselves have the maximum values of @xmath153 .
however , it is a separate question whether @xmath284 and @xmath285 are truly macroscopically distinct in this type of entanglement . in ref .
@xcite , the two states @xmath284 and @xmath285 are considered to be macroscopically distinct in the sense that their average photon numbers for the @xmath286-polarization are @xmath287 and @xmath288 , respectively . however , as we discussed in sec .
[ dcn ] , this type of approach leads to a problem that becomes more noticeable when it is applied to a single - mode superposition . once again
, the example of a strong coherent state , @xmath289 with @xmath244 , may be considered for a comparison .
it can be simply shown that the difference between the average photon numbers of constituent states @xmath231 and @xmath232 is @xmath290 , i.e. , it monotonically increases with @xmath221 although a coherent state would not be regarded as a macroscopic superposition . in spite of this ambiguity
, a strong nonclassical feature of state @xmath280 seems evident based on the high value of @xmath153 .
a perfect discrimination of @xmath284 and @xmath285 by a single - shot measurement requires a photon - number resolving detector for a parity measurement . in the real experiment @xcite ,
an alternative procedure called the `` orthogonality filter '' was used where @xmath284 and @xmath285 are discriminated by field intensity measures for each polarization in a non - deterministic and approximate way .
there have been considerable debates and discussions @xcite over whether the state generated in ref .
@xcite possesses genuine entanglement and how to verify this type of entanglement more clearly .
sekatski _ et al .
_ proposed a scheme that uses the displacement operation for an amplification process to generate macroscopic entanglement @xcite .
the state is generated by locally displacing each mode of single - photon entanglement as @xmath291 .
they claim @xmath292 and @xmath293 are macroscopically distinguishable since they exhibit 3 times different photon number variances @xcite .
_ @xcite and lvovsky _
et  al . _
@xcite experimentally realized a simpler variant @xmath294 in eq .
( [ eq : gisinstate ] ) , where only one of the modes is displaced for generating micro - macro entanglement ( see fig .
[ fig - micro - macro]b ) .    in refs .
@xcite , it was shown that a single shot photon number measurement can distinguish between @xmath292 and @xmath293 in the macroscopic part ( @xmath270 ) of state ( [ eq : gisinstate ] ) with 74% probability for @xmath244 .
it can be improved up to 90% by changing the basis of the initial microscopic state into @xmath295 .
however , we already discussed in secs .
[ dcn ] and [ sec : amp - mm ] that this type of approach does not seem very convincing .
the value of measure @xmath153 for @xmath296 , as well as @xmath297 , is exactly the same to that of microscopic single - photon entanglement @xmath298 .
in fact , measure @xmath153 is invariant under the displacement operation that does not change the structure of phase space distributions of any states @xcite .
the same principle is applied to cavalcanti and reid s inequality @xcite so that neither @xmath296 nor @xmath297 is found macroscopically quantum .    in the experiments @xcite ,
entanglement was detected after applying the `` reverse '' displacement operation , @xmath299 , to state ( [ eq : gisinstate ] ) .
_ observed entanglement with more than 500 photons using photodetectors @xcite .
_ achieved the displacement operations with @xmath300 and entanglement was observed using homodyne tomography @xcite .
ghobadi _ et al . _
@xcite investigated an alternative proposal to create micro - macro entanglement by applying the squeezing operation @xmath264 to one mode of single - photon entanglement as @xmath301 .
it was shown that two states @xmath302 and @xmath303 can be discriminated by the mean photon number contained in each state which are 3 times different for large enough squeezing .
the squeezing operation changes the structure of the phase space distribution and the degree of macroscopic quantumness @xmath304 increases as @xmath260 becomes larger while the tricky issue explained above on macroscopic distinctness between @xmath302 and @xmath303 remains .
this state can be categorized into the same type of state with the one in eq .
( [ martinistate ] ) .
recently , hybrid entanglement between particle - like ( or quantum ) and wave - like ( or classical ) states was experimentally demonstrated by jeong _
_ @xcite and morin _
a form of such state is @xmath305 it takes the maximum value of @xmath153 for @xmath244 as @xmath306 .
s scheme uses an idea of superposing two distinct quantum operations .
initially , a coherent state @xmath307 and the vacuum are prepared with two photon addition devices @xcite and a beam splitter with appropriate ratio as shown in fig .
[ fig - micro - macro](c ) .
when only of the two detectors d1 and d2 clicks , one does not know which mode the single photon was added to .
the resulting state is then superposition as @xmath308 ( unnormalized ) that can be made to be an approximate state of @xmath309 by applying an appropriate displacement operation . however , hybrid entanglement with only small values of @xmath221 can be obtained in this way .
experimentally , a fidelity of @xmath310 and entanglement of negativity @xmath311 were shown with @xmath312 @xcite .
more sophisticated methods such as the tele - amplification method @xcite need be used to obtain large values of @xmath221 for such hybrid states @xcite .
et  al . _
s experiment @xcite is based on a similar type of idea but using the photon subtraction with a beam splitter and a photodetector , a two - mode squeezed state with a very low gain , and a single - mode squeezed state in order to generate a slightly different type of target state such as @xmath313 .
entanglement of negativity @xmath314 and fidelity @xmath315 were observed with amplitude @xmath316 @xcite .
this type of idea is also found in andersen and neergaard - nielsen s previous proposal where a single photon , a single - mode squeezed state and a detector with a beam splitter for the photon subtraction are required @xcite .
the target states of all these schemes @xcite show strong properties as macroscopic quantum states , i.e. , the maximum values of @xmath153 for @xmath244 .
kreis and van loock investigated how to classify and quantify various types of hybrid entanglement between discrete and continuous variable states @xcite .
entanglement between microscopic and macroscopic states is closely related to schrdinger s
gedankenexperiment @xcite . micro - macro ( or hybrid - type ) entangled states are useful for loophole - free bell - type inequality tests @xcite , quantum information processing @xcite , and exploring quantum gravity @xcite .
in particular , optical hybrid states benefit from both their discrete- and continuous - variable features in such a way that they are useful resources for quantum teleportation @xcite , quantum computation @xcite , and quantum key distribution @xcite . sheng _ et al . _
proposed an entanglement purification scheme for hybrid entanglement using linear optics elements and photon number measurements @xcite .
we have reviewed and discussed proposed measures of macroscopic quantumness together with several attempts for implementing macroscopic quantum states using optical fields . in line with our discussions , three @xcite among the discussed measures seem to be a little more general than the others in the sense that they are applicable to various kinds of quantum states and serve as unambiguous quantifiers .
those measures are particularly suitable for light fields @xcite , spin systems @xcite , and mechanical systems @xcite , respectively .
it seems that the former two @xcite stick to the idea of genuine macroscopic quantum superpositions @xcite , i.e. , superpositions of macroscopically distinct states or genuine macroscopic quantum effects over mere accumulation of microscopic quantum effects . on the other hand , the latter @xcite seems to approach macroscopic quantumness in a broader way .
it would be interesting to find out relations between measures for different physical systems from an inclusive point of view .
very recently , frwis _ et al .
_ investigated macroscopic quantumness of several optical states using measures for spin systems @xcite .
they mapped a photonic state into a spin state using an ideal interaction model and found that some different measures show strong mathematical connections and give a similar classification of macroscopic quantum states .
there have been various attempts to generate macroscopic quantum states using light fields .
the arbitrariness of the decomposition for a quantum state leads to a question of whether certain quantum states @xcite are truly macroscopically quantum , at a theoretical level , even though they seem so with certain criteria @xcite .
we exemplified the case where even a coherent state , @xmath229 , is categorized into a macroscopic superposition under a certain decomposition using this type of approach @xcite .
perhaps , this suggests that more stringent considerations are necessary for classifications of macroscopic quantum states .
this work was supported by the national research foundation of korea ( nrf ) grant funded by the korea government ( msip ) ( no .
2010 - 0018295 ) and the center for theoretical physics at seoul national university .
iskhakov , i. n. agafonov , m. v. chekhova , g. o. rytikov , g. leuchs , phys .
rev . a 84 ( 2011 ) 045804 .
iskhakov , m. v. chekhova , g. o. rytikov , g. leuchs , phys .
106 ( 2011 ) 113602 .
iskhakov , i. n. agafonov , m. v. chekhova , g. leuchs , phys .
( 2012 ) 150502 .
b. kanseri , t. sh .
iskhakov , g. rytikov , m. v. chekhova , g. leuchs , phys .
a 87 ( 2013 ) 032110 .
b. sanders , phys .
a 40 ( 1989 ) 2417 .
a. n. boto , p. kok , d. s. abrams , s. l. braunstein , c. p. williams , j. p. dowling , phys . rev . lett . 85 ( 2000 ) 2733 .
p. kok , h. lee , j. p. dowling , phys .
a 65 ( 2002 ) 052104 .
i. afek , o. ambar , y. silberberg , science 328 ( 2010 ) 879 - 881 .
s. olivares , m. g. a. paris , j. opt .
b : quantum semiclass . opt . 7
( 2005 ) s616 .
m. s. kim , e. park , p. l. knight , h. jeong , phys .
a 71 ( 2005 ) 043805 .
s. olivares , m. g. a. paris , laser physics 16 ( 2006 ) 1533 .
k. s. lee , m. s. kim , s .- d .
lee , v. buzk , j. kor .
( 1993 ) 197 .
x. wang , phys .
a 64 ( 2001 ) 022303 .
s. j. van enk , phys .
91 ( 2003 ) 017902 .
s. j. van enk , phys .
a 72 ( 2005 ) 022308 .
n. lee , h. benichi , y. takeno , s. takeda , j. webb , e. huntington , a. furusawa , science 332 ( 2011 ) 330 .
h. jeong , t. c. ralph , phys .
97 ( 2006 ) 100401 .
h. jeong , t. c. ralph , phys .
a 76 ( 2007 ) 042103 .
s. j. van enk , o. hirota , phys .
a 64 ( 2001 ) 022313 .
h. jeong , m. s. kim , j. lee , phys .
a 64 ( 2001 ) 052308 .
h. jeong , m. s. kim , phys .
a 65 ( 2002 ) 042305 .
t. c. ralph , a. gilchrist , g. j. milburn , w. j. munro , s. glancy , phys .
a 68 ( 2003 ) 042319 .
a. p. lund , t. c. ralph , h. l. haselgrove , phys .
( 2008 ) 030503 .
p. marek , j. fiurek , phys .
a. 82 ( 2010 ) 014304 .
a. p. lund , t. c. ralph , h. l. haselgrove , new j. phys .
13 ( 2011 ) 115015 .
j. kim , j. lee , s .- w .
ji , h. nha , p. m. anisimov , j. p. dowling , arxiv:1012.5872 ( 2010 ) .
c. c. gerry , r. a. campos , phys .
a 64 ( 2001 ) 063814 .
c. c. gerry , a. benmoussa , r. a. campos , phys .
a 66 ( 2002 ) 013804 .
r. a. campos , c. c. gerry , a. benmoussa , phys .
a 68 ( 2003 ) 023810 . c. r. myers , t. c. ralph , phys .
a 66 ( 2002 ) 023819 .
j. joo , w. j. munro , t. p. spiller , phys .
( 2011 ) 083601 .
o. hirota , k. kato , d. murakami , arxiv:1108.1517 ( 2011 ) .
j. joo , k. park , h. jeong , w. j. munro , k. nemoto , t. p. spiller , phys .
rev . a 86 ( 2012 ) 043828 .
a. mann , b. c. sanders , w. j. munro , phys . rev .
a 51 ( 1995 ) 989 .
r. filip , j. ehck , m. duek , j. opt .
b : quantum semiclass .
opt . 3 ( 2001 ) 341 .
d. wilson , h. jeong , m. s. kim , j. mod .
49 ( 2002 ) 851 .
h. jeong , w. son , m. s. kim , d. ahn , c. brukner , phys . rev .
a 67 ( 2003 ) 012106 .
j. wenger , m. hafezi , f. grosshans , r. tualle - brouri , p. grangier , phys .
a 67 ( 2003 ) 012105 .
m. stobiska , h. jeong , t. c. ralph , phys . rev . a 75 ( 2007 ) 052105 .
h. jeong , phys .
a 78 ( 2008 ) 042101 .
lee , h. jeong phys .
a * 80 * , 052105 ( 2009 ) . c. c. gerry , j. mimih , a. benmoussa , phys .
rev . a 80 ( 2009 ) 022111 .
h. jeong , m. paternostro , t. c. ralph , phys .
102 ( 2009 ) 060403 .
y. lim , m. paternostro , j. lee , m. kang , h. jeong , phys .
rev . a 85 ( 2012 ) 062112 .
b. t. kirby , j. d. franson , phys .
rev . a 87 ( 2013 ) 053822 .
b. t. kirby , j. d. franson , phys . rev . a 89 ( 2014 ) 033861 .
m. paternostro , h. jeong , phys .
a 81 ( 2010 ) 032115 .
lee , m. paternostro , h. jeong , phys .
a 83 ( 2011 ) 022102 .
g. mckeown , m. g. a. paris , m. paternostro , phys .
a 83 ( 2011 ) 062105 .
lee , s .- w .
ji , h. nha , j. opt .
b 30 ( 2013 ) 2483 . t. c. ralph , g. j. pryde , prog . opt .
54 ( 2009 ) 209 .
j. s. neergaard - nielsen , y. eto , c .- w .
lee , h. jeong , m. sasaki , nat . photon . 7
( 2013 ) 439 . f. de martini , phys .
81 ( 1998 ) 2842 .
f. de martini , phys .
lett . a 250 ( 1998 ) 15 .
p. sekatski , b. sanguinetti , e. pomarico , n. gisin , c. simon , phys .
a 82 ( 2010 ) 053814 .
r. ghobadi , a. lvovsky , c. simon , phys .
( 2013 ) 170406 .
n. bruno , a. martin , p. sekatski , n. sangouard , r. t. thew , n. gisin , nat .
( 2013 ) 545 .
a. i. lvovsky , r. ghobadi , a. chandra , a. s. prasad , c. simon , nat .
( 2013 ) 541 .
s. raeisi , p. sekatski , c. simon , phys .
( 2011 ) 250401 .
s. raeisi , w. tittel , c. simon , phys .
( 2012 ) 120404 .
p. sekatski , n. brunner , c. branciard , n. gisin , c. simon , phys .
103 ( 2009 ) 113601 .
n. spagnolo , c. vitelli , m. paternostro , f. de martini , f. sciarrino , phys . rev .
a 84 ( 2011 ) 032102 .
m. stobi ' nska , p. sekatski , a. buraczewski , n. gisin , g. leuchs , phys .
a 84 ( 2011 ) 034104 .
h. kwon , h. jeong , phys .
a 88 ( 2013 ) 052127 .
m. stobi ' nska , f. tppel , p. sekatski , a. buraczewski , phys .
rev . a 89 ( 2014 ) 022119 .
f. de martini , f. sciarrino , c. vitelli , arxiv:0804.0341 ( 2008 ) .
a. furusawa , p. van loock , quantum teleportation and entanglement : a hybrid approach to optical quantum information processing , john wiley and sons , new york , 2011 .
p. van loock , laser & photon .
rev . 5 ( 2011 ) 167 .
k. park , s .- w .
lee , h. jeong , phys .
a 86 ( 2012 ) 062301 .
lee , h. jeong , phys .
a 87 ( 2013 ) 022326 .
j. rigas , o. ghne , n. ltkenhaus , phys .
a 73 ( 2006 ) 012341 . c. wittmann , j. frst , c. wiechers , d. elser , h. hseler , n. ltkenhaus , g. leuchs , opt .
express 18 ( 2010 ) 4499 .