accretion provides the energy that powers radiation from the galactic center black hole , sagittarius a * @xcite .
the vlt nir discovery of an infalling object onto sgr  a * , named g2 , offers an especially exciting possibility for probing the nature of that accretion flow via potential interactions as the object goes through periastron @xcite .
if it is a pressure - confined gas cloud , the g2 object is estimated to have a gas mass of @xmath2 , which is comparable to the total accretion flow mass within its closest approach .
best estimates indicate a highly eccentric orbit with a periastron to sgr  a*of @xmath3 schwarzschild radii ( @xmath4 ) , a mere @xmath5 of the bondi accretion radius , in early 2014 @xcite .
the origin , structure , and fate of the object remain uncertain . while the vlt observations of the br-@xmath6 transition indicate that g2 is being disrupted , through tidal processes and possibly through gas dynamical processes , keck nir observations have shown a persistently compact @xmath7 continuum source @xcite .
these observational results have led to a range of models , from diffuse clouds to dense , dusty stellar winds surrounding stars @xcite . both the nature of the accretion process and the timescale on which it takes place depend sensitively on the density profile of the accretion region and the initial density structure of the object , among other factors @xcite .
proposed models anticipate a steep increase in the accretion rate , potentially by several orders of magnitude , and heightened variability on timescales of months to decades @xcite .
the g2 encounter could shed light on the historic and episodic galactic center flares seen through x - ray fluorescence .
the processing of g2 s material through the accretion flow around sgr  a *  presents a unique opportunity to study the radial density and temperature structure of the flow , filling in crucial gaps in our understanding of ultra - low - eddington - luminosity accretion .    the long - term monitoring at radio and millimeter wavelengths for sgr  a *  demonstrates short - term variability and long - term stability , consistent with damped random walk evolution @xcite . since the detection of sgr a * at shorter wavelengths , x - ray and nir light curves
have also not shown any secular evolution @xcite .
intensive campaigns to monitor sgr  a *  over a wide range of wavelengths have been launched since the discovery of g2 was announced , none of which have detected significant changes in the flux density or activity of sgr  a*@xcite , although those searches did lead to the discovery of the galactic center pulsar psr j1745 - 2900  @xcite .    among the predictions for g2
are strong increases in radio through millimeter spectrum driven by two processes .
increasing the mass accretion rate at separations of a few schwarzschild radii would be expected to lead to enhanced emission from the accretion flow and/or jet .
the timescale for this accretion event may be as short as the free - fall time ( @xmath8 yr ) or as long as the viscous time ( 0.1  100 yr ) .
additionally , a strong precursor effect has been predicted for low radio frequencies due to the potential shock forming between the incoming object and the accretion flow @xcite . in this paper , we present karl g. jansky very large array ( vla ) , atacama large millimeter array ( alma ) , and submillimeter array ( sma ) observations that span the time since the discovery of g2 through periastron . in section  [ sec : obs ] , we present the observations and analysis techniques . in section  [ sec : results ] , we give the results , which show a marked lack of any change in level of activity relative to historical variability . in section  [ sec : discussion ] , we discuss and summarize our conclusions .
vla observations were carried out as part of a service observing program on the advice of an ad hoc committee ( project code tobs0006 ; * ? ? ? * ) between late 2012 and mid-2014 ( table  [ tab : vlaobs ] ) at frequencies between 1 and 41 ghz ( table  [ tab : frequencytable ] ) .
observations were obtained in 8 separate observing bands , each with a total bandwidth of 2 ghz with the exception of l band observations , which had a total bandwidth of 1 ghz . for each band ,
the correlator was configured with 16 spectral windows , each with 64 channels , for a total of 1024 channels spanning the bandwidth of 2 ghz ( 1 ghz in the case of l band ) .
observations were snapshots of a few minutes duration in each of the eight frequency bands .
observations of 3c 286 were obtained for absolute gain calibration .
standard pipeline calibration techniques in casa were carried out by nrao staff @xcite .
the pipeline produced calibrated visibility files that we then analyzed with our own software .
table  [ tab : vlaobs ] summarizes beam sizes for sgr a * for l and q band ( 1.5 and 40 ghz , respectively ) from images obtained from all of the data in each epoch . unlike the reduction described below ,
the images included short baselines as a means of demonstrating the large beams that occurred .
the ratio of q to l band beam sizes does not exactly follow the expected frequency scaling ratio , which is indicative of the poorly shaped beams from these snapshot observations and frequency - dependent weighting in the imaging stage .
we averaged the data in time into 30s intervals and in frequency for each spectral window .
we then exported the data for further analysis with our code .
we performed two kinds of analyses .
for the first , we extracted flux densities for sgr  a *  by averaging visibility amplitudes on baselines longer than 50 @xmath9 .
past experience has shown that these long baselines are sufficient to exclude the effects of extended structure on the flux density of sgr  a *  ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) . at high frequencies and in extended configurations ,
we determine flux densities for sgr  a *  that are consistent with those provided by @xcite .
for the second analysis , we used a visibility subtraction method to determine deviations from the average flux density .
this method is important for low frequency observations in compact configurations , where the extended flux dominates that of sgr  a*. these epochs were reported to have upper limits as high as 15 jy ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) . for each epoch , we gridded the visibilities for each spectral window and then found individual grid cells for which there was an overlap between the individual epoch and the remaining ensemble .
we differenced each epoch s visibility grid against the grid derived from the ensemble of visibilities ( minus the particular epoch ) .
the differential flux density was determined as a weighted sum of the residual visibilities .
we applied a weighting scheme that scales as the inverse of the @xmath10 distance .
that is , longer baselines have greater weight than shorter baselines in order to bias against contamination from extended structure .
different weighting schemes do not qualitatively alter our conclusions .
the scatter in the differences determines the error .
we then averaged over each observing band and , again , calculated the error based on the scatter in the measurements .
this visibility subtraction scheme works well given the large number of data sets and the fine frequency resolution of the observations .
the frequency resolution permits us to make comparisons that are not limited by the steep spectral indices of some of the extended structures present in the galactic center .
the large number of data sets gives good overlap between extended and compact structures .
the method is sensitive to the effect of pairs of observations with significant overlap in @xmath10 coverage , i.e. , those conducted at the same sidereal time and in the same configuration . in this case
, the method effectively differences those two epochs and does not provide a difference with respect to the average .
this effect can be seen in the epochs 20131129 and 20131229 , in which the flux difference for one mirrors the other .
the apparent minimum in rms variability of the flux density excess at 5 ghz is the result of increasing variability toward high frequencies and decreasing accuracy of the method toward low frequencies because of the smaller number of long baselines .
we summarize the mean flux densities and differential flux densities in table  [ tab : vlaresults ] .
we show total intensity and differential spectra for sgr  a *  in figures  [ fig : specvla ] and  [ fig : diffspecvla ] .
we plot the total intensity spectrum alongside historical average spectra @xcite .     ]     ]      we carried out alma observations between mid-2013 and mid-2014 ( table  [ tab : almaobs ] ) , over eight epochs , each with band 6 ( 230 ghz ) and band 7 ( 345 ghz ) receivers .
details of the frequency setup are presented in table  [ tab : frequencytable ] .
one spectral window in each band was configured with higher spectral resolution in order to permit detection of hydrogen recombination lines .
we will discuss those results in a separate paper .
observations were snapshots with durations of a few minutes .
the total flux density , corresponding to stokes i , was produced by summing the response of parallel handed cross - correlations of the orthogonal linearly polarized feeds .
we set absolute amplitude calibration with observations of titan and neptune and set bandpass gains with observations of the compact source j1427 - 421 .
all calibrator sources and sgr  a *  were phase - self - calibrated on timescales of a single integration ( 10 sec ) .
for sgr  a * , phase self - calibration solutions were obtained only for baselines longer than @xmath11 .
flux densities for calibrators were determined by bootstrapping amplitude self - calibration solutions to the absolute flux density calibrator .
time - dependent amplitude gain solutions were applied to sgr  a*. unfortunately , alma observations did not include system temperature measurements on sgr  a*itself .
the pipeline software applied system temperatures obtained for j1733 - 130 ( nrao 530 ) to sgr  a * , which introduces an error because of the different atmospheric optical depth toward these two sources . to correct for this effect , we fitted system temperatures for all sources in each epoch to determine the atmospheric optical depth and then applied the correct system temperature to sgr  a*. typical changes to the amplitude gain were a few percent , with a maximum value of 7% .
flux densities for sgr  a *  were obtained through fitting a point - source of unknown flux to visibilities on baselines longer than @xmath11 .
we report the results in table  [ tab : almaresults ] .
we do not report statistical errors on the flux densities because these are typically @xmath12 mjy , much less than the likely uncertainty from gain calibration errors for these bright sources .
we show alma spectra for sgr  a *  and all sources in figure  [ fig : specalma ] .     ]
alma flux densities for the calibrators are consistent with recent sma measurements of flux densities .
we plot alma and sma light curves for sgr  a *  and j1733 - 130 in figures  [ fig : almasma ] and [ fig : almasmaj1733 ] .
sma data are described in the following section . where the data are contemporaneous , we see very good agreement in both alma bands .
the variability of the calibrators sets an upper bound on the calibration accuracy for sgr  a*. j1733 - 130 , j1700 - 261 , and j1427 - 421 show 5% , 9% , and 14% variability , respectively , in the fitted intensity at 230 ghz assuming a power - law spectrum for these sources .
thus , we take 5% as the systematic calibration error in the sgr  a*flux density .
alma and sma light curves at 230 ghz ( top ) and 345 ghz ( bottom ) for sgr  a*. each alma spectral window is plotted , covering 218 to 235 ghz ( top ) and 341 to 355 ghz ( bottom ) .
the two lower frequency spectral windows for each alma band are plotted with filled symbols .
these match most closely the plotted sma flux densities , which are in the range 212 to 241 ghz and 331 to 356 ghz , respectively , and have mean frequencies of 221 and 338 ghz . ]    .
[ fig : almasmaj1733 ] ]      observations of the flux density of sgr  a *  were obtained using the sma , an interferometric array of eight 6-m diameter radio dishes located near the summit of mauna kea , hawaii @xcite . in most cases
the sma was operating in a single receiver mode , providing 4 ghz continuum bandwidth in a single polarization , in two sidebands , with the array tuned to one of the three main sma bands ( 1.3 mm , 1.1 mm and 870 micron ) .
data were obtained during short ( @xmath1320 min ) , self - contained observation sets , in which observations of sgr  a *  alternated with those of the relatively nearby blazar j1733 - 130 , and were bookended with observations of a flux standard ( typically neptune ) .
these observations were `` piggy backed '' on full - track scheduled observations - of - the - day for the sma .
this explains the apparent randomness in sky frequencies .
in addition , the flux densities were estimated from a measurements with a single linear polarization .
the fractional linear polarization in sgr a * is typically in the range of 5 - 10 percent and changes rapidly .
the single polarization estimate of the flux density for a polarization of 10 percent has an rms error of 7 percent .
this error is comparable to the level of the statistical errors . to this data set
were added more extensive observations over several hours in dual polarization mode on 5 july and 15 aug 2013 , which allowed short - term monitoring .
data from each observing period were calibrated with the millimeter interferometer reduction ( mir ) suite of reduction routines developed by the sma , involving removal of visibility phase scatter due to atmospheric instability and scaling visibility amplitude via comparison with the flux standard .
neptune was the primary flux standard used ( 85% of observations ) , with uranus ( 13% ) and titan ( 2% ) as the other standards . for uranus and neptune
, we used the broadband spectral model from @xcite .
however , due to the presence of broad co absorption in the spectrum of neptune which is not included in the griffin and orton spectral fit , we opted to use data that were at least 8 ghz separated from either the co(1 - 2 ) or co(3 - 2 ) rotational transitions . for titan
, we used the spectral model developed by author gurwell , which is now included in the casa data reduction package as well ( see * ? ? ?
in all cases the expected error on the flux density scale based upon using these models is  5% . on the other hand , since we are most interested in tracking changes in flux with time , the intrinsic bias in the flux density model is less important .
the presence of gas along the line of sight toward sgr  a *  leads to deep absorption of the sgr  a *  continuum at the co transitions , as well as their isotopologues .
for this reason , we masked spectral regions around these transitions in the sgr  a *  data .
likewise , the structure of the visibility data from sgr  a *  indicated we were sensitive to broad scale continuum emission from dust in the vicinity of sgr  a*. in order to limit our data to emission from sgr  a *  itself , we used only visibility data from baselines that exceeded 35 k@xmath14 , or roughly scales of 6or finer , which was sufficient to isolate sgr  a *  from the broader diffuse emission .
flux densities from the sma for sgr  a *  and j1733 - 130 are tabulated in table  [ tab : smaresults ] .
the mean spectrum of sgr  a *  from vla , alma , and sma observations is presented in table  [ tab : meanspec ] and figure  [ fig : meanspec ] , along with variability , minimum flux , and maximum flux .
variability is substantially stronger at millimeter wavelengths than at radio wavelengths .
the ratio of the rms variability to the total flux density , known as the modulation index , is 8% at 40 ghz and below , while it is @xmath15 at millimeter wavelengths .
this variability can not be attributed to differences in calibration accuracy .
mean spectrum of sgr  a *  from vla and alma observations .
the solid black line shows the mean and the shaded regions show the @xmath16 boundaries for the flux density based on the rms of the variations .
we also plot a curve showing the 230 to 690 ghz spectrum as measured by @xcite .
we plot several model curves representing synchrotron emission from relativistic thermal maxwell - juttner distributions .
we also plot nir mean flux densities and spectral indices from @xcite , along with a curve showing the extension of the nir spectral index to shorter wavelengths ( thin solid line ) .
see text for details . ]    at vla frequencies between 1 and 40 ghz , the mean spectral index @xmath17 is @xmath18 ( @xmath19 ) and shows evidence for steepening at short wavelengths .
a mean spectral index of 0.5 between 40 and 218 ghz is required to connect the vla and alma spectra , comparable to what has been seen previously @xcite .
we also fit the alma data with a power - law spectrum ( figure  [ fig : alphaalma ] ) .
the mean spectral index for frequencies between 217 and 355 ghz is @xmath20 , which is flatter and more variable than those of the calibrators .
the calibrators have mean spectral indices between 217 and 355 ghz of @xmath21 , @xmath22 , and @xmath23 for j1733 - 130 , j1700 - 261 , and j1427 - 421 , respectively .
@xcite found that the 230 to 690 ghz spectral index ranged in four epochs from -0.4 to + 0.2 , with a mean of -0.13 .
our results span the same range of @xmath17 and are statistically indistinguishably from those of @xcite ; that is , the spectrum is consistent with a flat or slightly declining power - law spectrum above 230 ghz .
assuming stationary statistics for sgr  a *  between the early observations and these new observations , we conclude that there is no evidence for spectral curvature or greater steepening in the spectrum between 230 and 690 ghz .     ]
the millimeter and submillimeter spectrum of sgr  a *  indicates that the optical depth is @xmath12 at frequencies as high as 690 ghz .
the result suggests that the source must be composed of stratified regions near the optically thick - to - thin transition in order to produce a near - flat synchrotron spectrum over this broad frequency range .
a single optically thin synchrotron component can not reproduce the spectrum .
this spectrum can be explained in the context of the classical @xcite jet model , but also by inflowing accretion flow models with radially evolving density and magnetic fields together with some non - thermal particles @xcite .    despite this degeneracy in the emission geometry ,
it is clear that above 350 ghz , sgr a * has to become optically thin .
this conclusion is supported by the transition to higher linear polarization at higher frequencies @xcite , and the increased variability and power - law spectrum seen in the infrared band .
our simultaneous radio through submillimeter data can provide some interesting constraints on the underlying particle distribution , when put into context with the infrared measurements . in fig .
[ fig : meanspec ] we include the average ir flux based on vlt and keck measurements @xcite .
these results are consistent with a mean flux density of @xmath24 mjy in the @xmath25 band and a stable spectral index @xmath26 between @xmath25 and @xmath27 band .
previous estimates of the nir spectral index appear to show steeper spectral indices but may have suffered from non - simultaneous observations of the variable flux density . to illustrate the new limits on the radiating particle distributions , we plot for reference a series of synchrotron spectra from mildly relativistic thermal electrons in equipartition with the magnetic field , ranging from @xmath28 k , assuming an emission region of size @xmath29 .
the observed brightness temperature of sgr a * at 230 ghz is @xmath30 k @xcite .
these are fiducial values spanning the range from the literature ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ?
* and references therein ) , to illustrate how stratified , self - absorbed regions can add to a near - flat spectrum , but also to place some limits on the fraction and distribution of non - thermal particles present .
the peak of a given temperature component can shift by a factor of a few in frequency for different emission size regions or energy partition between radiating particles and the magnetic energy density .
however , it is clear that a peak temperature ( in the plasma closest to the black hole ) below a few @xmath31 k can not account for the extension of the self - absorbed spectrum through the alma range shown , and that a peak temperature much higher than a few @xmath32 k would violate the ir limits .
it is also clear from these spectra that a purely thermal distribution can not account for the ir flux .
the intersection of the ir power - law with the intermediate ranges indicates that a non - thermal `` tail '' of particles is present , with normalization on the order of @xmath33% of the thermal peak .
this fraction is consistent with the results of fits to sgr a * in quiescence , using a self - consistent calculation of the particle distribution given a mechanism for injecting a power - law of nonthermal particles @xcite .
recent work exploring second - order acceleration processes in turbulent , magnetized plasmas by @xcite shows the self - consistent production of a such a nonthermal tail ; however , its slope and relation to the thermal peak may be difficult to match to these newest constraints .
therefore the combination of simultaneous alma ( eventually using even higher frequency bands ) and ir data offers the best constraints yet on the shape of the radiating particle distributions and nonthermal fraction .
the results presented here can already be used to guide implementation of the inclusion of particle acceleration in semi - analytical models and in the so - called `` painting '' of grmhd simulations to produce images ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
simultaneous observations between alma , ir , and x - ray , particularly during flaring , would provide strong constraints on the upper extreme of the nonthermal population and accelerating mechanisms .      bow shock emission from the interaction of g2 with the accretion flow was anticipated to appear and peak months before the center of mass reached periastron @xcite .
the bow shock would excite nonthermal electrons that then produce synchrotron radiation in the magnetic field of the accretion flow .
the synchrotron radiation is expected to peak at frequencies near 1 ghz and decline with an optically thin power - law index @xmath34 .
the predicted peak flux density of the radio light curve scales with a number of factors , including the relative velocity of the cloud , the accretion flow density profile , the efficiency of nonthermal electron energy production , and the timescale for electrons to cool .
perhaps the most important term is the cross - sectional area of the shock as it impacts the accretion flow .
@xcite use the geometrical size of g2 as observed at large radii , @xmath35 .
@xcite , on the other hand , constructs a magnetically arrested , tidally distorted cloud , which has an area @xmath36 .
@xcite model g2 as a wind driven from a hidden star with a radius that shrinks as the external pressure in the accretion flow increases , leading to a minimum area at periastron of @xmath37 .
the flux density in all models scales linearly with the area .
thus , predictions of the 1 ghz excess flux density excess range from @xmath38 jy for some models to @xmath39 jy for others .
synchrotron lifetimes for the radiating electrons in the accretion inflow are long , so the timescale for the radio emission is determined by the dynamics of the bow shock .
@xcite predicts a characteristic timescale of four months , which is comparable to predictions in other models .    the l band data alone in the first and last epochs of our experiment show that no significant secular change has occurred over the course of this experiment . between october 2012 and may 2014 , the 1.5 ghz flux density changed by at most 12 mjy ( 2% )
we can examine in more detail whether there is evidence for shorter time scale variations through an analysis of all the measurements in the three lowest vla frequency bands .
we compute estimates of the flux density excess above the average at 1.0 ghz using low frequency measurements ( figure  [ fig : bowshock ] ) .
we extrapolate the flux density excess at 1.5 , 3.1 , and 5.4 ghz to 1 ghz , assuming a power - law spectrum with index @xmath40 , appropriate for optically thin synchrotron emission . at frequencies above 5 ghz ,
intrinsic variability rises rapidly and is likely to exceed estimates of any bow shock - related variability .
1.5 ghz results alone are sometimes only weakly sensitive to variations because of limited overlap in @xmath10 coverage for the most compact configurations .     ]
the average 1 ghz flux density excess computed in this way is only significantly non - zero for a single epoch , 2013 august 08 , with a value of @xmath41 jy .
the excess is positive and comparable for all three bands and very high significance at 5 ghz .
the subsequent epoch , 2013 september 18 , has a comparable value , @xmath42 jy , but much lower significance .
the total flux density spectrum for 2013 august 08 is one of the most elevated across the band , with a peak flux density of 1.8 jy at 40 ghz .
these observations were obtained in a compact configuration and no total flux density measurements were obtained at 1.4 and 3.1 ghz .    for 11 of 15 epochs ,
the 95% confidence upper limit on 1 ghz flux density excess is 0.4 jy .
for the remaining four epochs , the upper limit is 0.8 jy .
a four - month moving average of the average 1 ghz flux has a peak at 0.3 jy , centered on the 2013 august 08 epoch , and typical values of 0.1 jy .
these results clearly exclude an object with size @xmath43 . at 95% confidence
, we can set an upper limit to the size of g2 of @xmath44 .
this can be attributed to the magnetically arrested cloud derived by @xcite or due to a pressure - confined stellar wind @xcite .
alternatively , the detailed model of the accretion flow structure could be in error .
the new data appear to show higher radio flux densities at frequencies @xmath45 ghz over historical averages ( figure  [ fig : specvla ] and table  [ tab : meanspec ] ) .
the 40.9 ghz flux density , for instance , has a mean of 1.5 jy and a range of 1.3 to 1.9 jy , whereas @xcite found a 43 ghz flux density mean of 1.0 jy and a range of 0.6 to 1.9 jy .
similar results with smaller amplitudes differences are apparent at lower frequencies .
the flux densities from @xcite and @xcite are higher than those of @xcite but still show a lower average flux density at most frequencies relative to the new vla data .
@xcite presented many epochs of archival data obtained between 1979 and 1999 .
@xcite reported over 100 epochs with regular monitoring from 2000 to 2003 , while @xcite is from a single - epoch simultaneous spectrum .    over the whole radio spectrum
, we infer an increase of @xmath46 relative to @xcite and @xmath47 relative to @xcite in the total flux density .
these differences are comparable to the variability between @xcite and @xcite and consistent with variability seen in low - luminosity agn ( llagn ) in general .
thus , these differences can not be attributed to any effects associated with the g2 periastron .
the mean flux density that we measure at 21 ghz , @xmath48 jy , is comparable to the 22 ghz flux density measured over a similar time period with the japanese vlbi network , @xmath49 jy @xcite .
the lower variability in our result may reflect some of the difficulties of providing accurate amplitude calibration for vlbi arrays .
a comparison against historical millimeter and submillimeter flux densities also does not reveal any significant change .
@xcite presents historical data for sgr  a *  at 230 , 345 , and 690 ghz with dates from 2001 through 2012 .
the flux densities from this paper span timescales from minutes to years and were obtained with multiple telescopes with varying calibration accuracy . the mean alma band 6 ( 230 ghz ) flux density is @xmath50 jy while the mean historical flux density at 230 ghz is @xmath51 jy .
similarly , for band 7 ( 345 ghz ) and historical 345 ghz data , we find @xmath52 jy and @xmath53 jy , respectively . results from the sma data are comparable .
thus , increases in the millimeter and submillimeter mean flux density are no more than 20% relative to historical averages , again consistent with typical llagn variability levels .
a kolmogorov - smirnov test shows that the alma and sma measurements are consistent ( @xmath54 ) with originating from the same distribution .
the alma and sma measurements differ from the @xcite measurements with varying significance .
sma 230 and 345 ghz data differ from the @xcite distributions with @xmath55 , while the band 6 ( 230 ghz ) and dexter 230 ghz and band 7 and 345 ghz distributions differ with significances of @xmath56 and @xmath57 .
these variations may be partly the result of different calibration accuracies and as the result of evolution of the light curves over @xmath58 yr .
similar to the case with the radio spectrum , there is no clear evidence that the millimeter and submillimeter changes are the result of the g2 periastron .
we have analyzed the light curve data for our measurements near 220 ghz from both alma and the sma .
there are 104 data points spanning an interval of 524 days with the shortest interval being 0.02 days .
the data were binned in a sparsely filled array of 32,768 elements and fourier transformed .
the resulting spectrum was averaged into logarithmically spaced frequency intervals .
the spectrum has a simple power law form characterized as @xmath59 over a frequency interval of 0.04 to 2 cycle / day .
@xmath17 was found to be @xmath60 .
the error bar was determined by bootstrap resampling .
this result is intuitively obvious from the light curve , i.e. the variations over a period of a few day are uncorrelated and have the same range as the variations over the entire data span .
the spectral variations from historical data at millimeter / submillimeter wavelengths are known to approximate white noise at frequencies less than 3 cycles / day , with a steepening power law above that frequency @xcite .
it is plausible that an enhancement of emission caused by g2 might have produced long term variations indicative of red noise .
however , there is no evidence for this effect .
the spectrum of sgr  a *  from radio to submillimeter wavelengths has remained remarkably stable over the past 30 years .
our new vla , alma , and sma results demonstrate that this stability has continued throughout the apparent periastron passage of g2 . in the case of low - frequency emission ,
the absence of significant change permits us to constrain the size of the ensuing bow shock to be a factor of 30 smaller than the apparent g2 size observed with nir wavelengths at larger distances from the black hole .
these observations do not resolve the nature of g2 .
the smaller bow shock size is consistent with both cloud and stellar - wind models .
@xcite propose a model that may reconcile the apparently discrepant nir continuum and spectroscopic observations and may also be consistent with our results .
@xmath7 continuum observations reveal a compact source while br-@xmath6 observations reveal an extended source that appears to be tidally disrupted .
@xcite argue that the continuum emission is the photosphere of a binary stellar merger , while the ionized emission represents a smaller tidally disrupted tail .
the @xmath7 source has a cross - sectional area of @xmath61 @xmath62 , much less than our upper limit of @xmath0 @xmath62 .
however , the size of the extended br-@xmath6 emission , which is consistent between vlt and keck observations , primarily determines the creation of a bow shock .
some form of confinement for the diffuse gas appears to be important for attenuating the shock amplitude .
the lack of any enhanced short wavelength radio and millimeter emission from the black hole is also consistent with a compact size for g2 .
simulations have shown that more extended objects are more readily disrupted and would therefore be more likely to have some gas initiate enhanced accretion onto the black hole .    at shorter wavelengths ,
the mean flux density has not increased by more than @xmath15 relative to historical averages .
this is within the range of variations seen in the past and in other llagn .
thus , we can not attribute any increase in the flux density to a g2-induced enhancement of the accretion rate .
the amplitude and timescale for a change in the accretion rate , should g2 be fully disrupted , are uncertain . in order for the disrupted material to enhance the flux density , the gas must reach a radius of a few schwarzschild radii to contribute to the accretion flow and/or enhance jet power . the free - fall time from @xmath63 is @xmath64 yr . if a fraction @xmath65 of the material were on a plunging orbit due to tidal disruption or a spread in orbital characteristics , we would have expected an enhancement of the overall flux density during these observations .
the flux density should scale as @xmath66 where @xmath67 is a model - dependent constant for jet and accretion disk models . for a g2 mass of @xmath68 appropriate for the gas - cloud model and a steady - state accretion rate onto sgr  a *  of @xmath69 , and @xmath70 , we find @xmath71 for @xmath72 .
that is , very little of g2 s mass has yet accreted directly onto the black hole .
longer term monitoring ( 10 yr ) will be sensitive to @xmath73 reaching the black hole through an increase of the average flux density .
the bulk of the material is more likely to accrete on the viscous time scale , @xmath74 .
@xmath75 , where @xmath76  1 is the viscous parameter and @xmath27 is the height at radius @xmath77 . for reasonable parameters , @xmath78  100 yr
. continued monitoring of the radio through millimeter flux densities can constrain further the properties and origin of g2 as well as the properties of the accretion flow at large radii .    the long - term stability of the radio / millimeter spectrum
indicates that episodic events such as a fully disrupted cloud falling onto the black hole are rare .
such cloud disruptions may take place but they must have timescales that are long compared to the free - fall time .    we confirm a flat spectrum for sgr  a *  emission in the millimeter / submillimeter regime . the emission is likely to originate from a stratified region with optical depth in transition between optically thick and thin .
optically thick emission at frequencies of @xmath79 ghz may influence images obtained with the event horizon telescope @xcite .
accretion disk models with tilted disks and/or high ratios of ion to electron temperature produce larger regions with optical depth greater than 1 @xcite .
higher optical depths may obscure or complicate the interpretation of gravitational lensing effects such as the black hole shadow .
on the other hand , higher optical depth in regions that are offset from the black hole as expected from doppler boosting may enhance the contrast associated with geometric features .
new alma measurements of the spectrum at frequencies from 100 to 950 ghz can resolve the uncertainty in the spectrum between the submillimeter and the nir regime and assist in optimization of eht observations .
the national radio astronomy observatory is a facility of the national science foundation operated under cooperative agreement by associated universities , inc .
this paper makes use of the following alma data : ads / jao.alma # 2012.1.00635.s .
alma is a partnership of eso ( representing its member states ) , nsf ( usa ) and nins ( japan ) , together with nrc ( canada ) and nsc and asiaa ( taiwan ) , in cooperation with the republic of chile .
the joint alma observatory is operated by eso , aui / nrao and naoj . the submillimeter array is a joint project between the smithsonian astrophysical observatory and the academia sinica institute of astronomy and astrophysics and is funded by the smithsonian institution and the academia sinica .
we thank michael johnson for helpful discussions .                                        , s.  s. , weintroub , j. , rogers , a.  e.  e. , plambeck , r. , freund , r. , tilanus , r.  p.  j. , friberg , p. , ziurys , l.  m. , moran , j.  m. , corey , b. , young , k.  h. , smythe , d.  l. , titus , m. , marrone , d.  p. , cappallo , r.  j. , bock , d. , bower , g.  c. , chamberlin , r. , davis , g.  r. , krichbaum , t.  p. , lamb , j. , maness , h. , niell , a.  e. , roy , a. , strittmatter , p. , werthimer , d. , whitney , a.  r. , & woody , d. 2008 , , 455 , 78    , r.  p. , falcke , h. , karuppusamy , r. , lee , k.  j. , champion , d.  j. , keane , e.  f. , desvignes , g. , schnitzeler , d.  h.  f.  m. , spitler , l.  g. , kramer , m. , klein , b. , bassa , c. , bower , g.  c. , brunthaler , a. , cognard , i. , deller , a.  t. , demorest , p.  b. , freire , p.  c.  c. , kraus , a. , lyne , a.  g. , noutsos , a. , stappers , b. , & wex , n. 2013 , , 501 , 391    , a. , baganoff , f.  k. , schdel , r. , morris , m. , genzel , r. , bower , g.  c. , marrone , d. , moran , j.  m. , viehmann , t. , bautz , m.  w. , brandt , w.  n. , garmire , g.  p. , ott , t. , trippe , s. , ricker , g.  r. , straubmeier , c. , roberts , d.  a. , yusef - zadeh , f. , zhao , j.  h. , & rao , r. 2006 , , 450 , 535          , v. , alef , w. , anderson , j. , asada , k. , baudry , a. , broderick , a. , carilli , c. , colomer , f. , conway , j. , dexter , j. , doeleman , s. , eatough , r. , falcke , h. , frey , s. , gabnyi , k. , glvan - madrid , r. , gammie , c. , giroletti , m. , goddi , c. , gmez , j.  l. , hada , k. , hecht , m. , honma , m. , humphreys , e. , impellizzeri , v. , johannsen , t. , jorstad , s. , kino , m. , krding , e. , kramer , m. , krichbaum , t. , kudryavtseva , n. , laing , r. , lazio , j. , loeb , a. , lu , r .- s . , maccarone , t. , marscher , a. , marti - vidal , i. , martins , c. , matthews , l. , menten , k. , miller , j. , miller - jones , j. , mirabel , f. , muller , s. , nagai , h. , nagar , n. , nakamura , m. , paragi , z. , pradel , n. , psaltis , d. , ransom , s. , rodr@xmath80iguez , l. , rottmann , h. , rushton , a. , shen , z .- q . , smith , d. , stappers , b. , takahashi , r. , tarchi , a. , tilanus , r. , verbiest , j. , vlemmings , w. , walker , r.  c. , wardle , j. , wiik , k. , zackrisson , e. , & zensus , j.  a. 2013 , arxiv e - prints                                        , k. , gotthelf , e.  v. , zhang , s. , an , h. , baganoff , f.  k. , barrire , n.  m. , beloborodov , a.  m. , boggs , s.  e. , christensen , f.  e. , craig , w.  w. , dufour , f. , grefenstette , b.  w. , hailey , c.  j. , harrison , f.  a. , hong , j. , kaspi , v.  m. , kennea , j.  a. , madsen , k.  k. , markwardt , c.  b. , nynka , m. , stern , d. , tomsick , j.  a. , & zhang , w.  w. 2013 , , 770 , l23                  , j. , nowak , m.  a. , gammie , c. , dexter , j. , markoff , s. , haggard , d. , nayakshin , s. , wang , q.  d. , grosso , n. , porquet , d. , tomsick , j.  a. , degenaar , n. , fragile , p.  c. , houck , j.  c. , wijnands , r. , miller , j.  m. , & baganoff , f.  k. 2013 , , 774 , 42        , n. , esposito , p. , pons , j.  a. , turolla , r. , torres , d.  f. , israel , g.  l. , possenti , a. , burgay , m. , vigan , d. , papitto , a. , perna , r. , stella , l. , ponti , g. , baganoff , f.  k. , haggard , d. , camero - arranz , a. , zane , s. , minter , a. , mereghetti , s. , tiengo , a. , schdel , r. , feroci , m. , mignani , r. , & gtz , d. 2013 , , 775 , l34                    , g. , eckart , a. , bremer , m. , zamaninasab , m. , shahzamanian , b. , valencia - s . , m. , schdel , r. , karas , v. , lenzen , r. , marchili , n. , sabha , n. , garcia - marin , m. , buchholz , r.  m. , kunneriath , d. , & straubmeier , c. 2012 , , 203 , 18    , g. , ghez , a.  m. , morris , m.  r. , sitarski , b.  n. , boehle , a. , naoz , s. , campbell , r. , becklin , e.  e. , canalizo , g. , chappell , s. , do , t. , lu , j.  r. , matthews , k. , meyer , l. , stockton , a. , wizinowich , p. , & yelda , s. 2014 , , 796 , l8            lrrrr 20121014 & 23:16 - 00:25 & @xmath81 , 11.7 & @xmath82 , 45.1 & a + 20121222 & 17:30 - 18:39 & @xmath83 , -15.8 & @xmath84 , -12.5 & a + 20130218 & 13:42 - 14:51 & @xmath85 , -13.6 & @xmath86 , -72.9 & d + 20130323 & 12:02 - 13:11 & @xmath87 , 29.3 & @xmath88 , 36.9 & d + 20130426 & 10:56 - 12:05 & @xmath89 , 28.0 & @xmath90 , 50.2 & d + 20130609 & 06:25 - 07:34 & @xmath91 , 42.9 & @xmath92 , -26.2 & c + 20130808 & 03:30 - 04:39 & @xmath93 , 24.2 & @xmath94 , 29.1 & c + 20130918 & 01:33 - 02:42 & @xmath95 , 63.1 & @xmath96 , 32.4 & cnb + 20131026 & 23:14 - 00:24 & @xmath97 , 28.9 & @xmath98 , 23.4 & b + 20131129 & 19:46 - 20:55 & @xmath99 , 23.4 & @xmath100 , 26.8 & b + 20131229 & 17:48 - 18:57 & @xmath101 , 33.7 & @xmath102 , -1.3 & b + 20140215 & 14:11 - 15:21 & @xmath103 , 37.3 & @xmath104 , -101.8 & bna + 20140322 & 13:26 - 14:35 & @xmath105 , 22.0 & @xmath106 , 24.0 & a + 20140426 & 10:19 - 11:28 & @xmath107 , 27.0 & @xmath108 , -27.4 & a + 20140531 & 08:11 - 09:20 & @xmath109 , 43.6 & @xmath110 , -28.1 & a +    llrrr vla & l & 994.0 & 2006.0 & 1024 + vla & s & 1988.0 & 3948.0 & 1024 + vla & c & 4488.0 & 6448.0 & 1024 + vla & x & 7988.0 & 9948.0 & 1024 + vla & u & 12988.0 & 14948.0 & 1024 + vla & k & 20188.0 & 22148.0 & 1024 + vla & a & 32008.0 & 31968.0 & 1024 + vla & q & 39988.0 & 41948.0 & 1024 + alma & b6 - 1 & 217.0 & 219.0 & 128 + alma & b6 - 2 & 219.0 & 221.0 & 128 + alma & b6 - 3 & 231.0 & 232.9 & 3840 + alma & b6 - 4 & 232.8 & 234.8 & 128 + alma & b7 - 1 & 340.6 & 342.6 & 128 + alma & b7 - 2 & 342.6 & 344.6 & 128 + alma & b7 - 3 & 350.7 & 352.7 & 128 + alma & b7 - 4 & 352.7 & 354.6 & 3840 +    lrrr 20121014 & 1.5 & @xmath111 & @xmath112 + 20121014 & 3.0 & @xmath113 & @xmath114 + 20121014 & 5.4 & @xmath115 & @xmath116 + 20121014 & 8.9 & @xmath117 & @xmath118 + 20121014 & 13.9 & @xmath119 & @xmath120 + 20121014 & 21.1 & @xmath121 & @xmath122 + 20121014 & 32.0 & @xmath123 & @xmath124 + 20121014 & 40.9 & @xmath125 & @xmath126 + 20121222 & 1.5 & @xmath127 & @xmath128 + 20121222 & 3.0 & @xmath129 & @xmath130 + 20121222 & 5.4 & @xmath131 & @xmath132 + 20121222 & 8.9 & @xmath133 & @xmath134 + 20121222 & 13.9 & @xmath135 & @xmath136 + 20121222 & 21.1 & @xmath137 & @xmath138 + 20121222 & 32.0 & @xmath139 & @xmath140 + 20121222 & 40.9 & @xmath141 & @xmath142 + 20130218 & 1.5 &  & @xmath143 + 20130218 & 3.0 &  & @xmath144 + 20130218 & 5.4 &  & @xmath145 + 20130218 & 8.9 &  & @xmath146 + 20130218 & 13.9 & @xmath147 & @xmath148 + 20130218 & 21.1 & @xmath149 & @xmath150 + 20130218 & 32.0 & @xmath151 & @xmath152 + 20130218 & 40.9 & @xmath153 & @xmath154 + 20130323 & 1.5 &  & @xmath155 + 20130323 & 3.0 &  & @xmath156 + 20130323 & 5.4 &  & @xmath157 + 20130323 & 8.9 &  & @xmath158 + 20130323 & 13.9 & @xmath159 & @xmath160 + 20130323 & 21.1 & @xmath161 & @xmath162 + 20130323 & 32.0 & @xmath163 & @xmath164 + 20130323 & 40.9 & @xmath165 & @xmath166 + 20130426 & 1.5 &  & @xmath167 + 20130426 & 3.0 &
& @xmath168 + 20130426 & 5.4 &  & @xmath169 + 20130426 & 8.9 &  & @xmath170 + 20130426 & 13.9 &  & @xmath171 + 20130426 & 21.1 & @xmath172 & @xmath173 + 20130426 & 32.0 & @xmath174 & @xmath175 + 20130426 & 40.9 & @xmath176 & @xmath177 + 20130609 & 1.5 &  & @xmath178 + 20130609 & 3.1 &  & @xmath179 + 20130609 & 5.4 & @xmath180 & @xmath181 + 20130609 & 8.9 & @xmath182 & @xmath183 + 20130609 & 13.9 & @xmath184 & @xmath185 + 20130609 & 21.1 & @xmath186 & @xmath187 + 20130609 & 32.0 & @xmath188 & @xmath189 + 20130609 & 40.9 & @xmath190 & @xmath191 + 20130808 & 1.5 &  & @xmath192 + 20130808 & 3.0 &  & @xmath193 + 20130808 & 5.4 & @xmath194 & @xmath195 + 20130808 & 9.4 & @xmath196 & @xmath197 + 20130808 & 13.9 & @xmath198 & @xmath199 + 20130808 & 21.1 & @xmath200 & @xmath201 + 20130808 & 32.0 & @xmath202 & @xmath203 + 20130808 & 40.9 & @xmath204 & @xmath205 + 20130918 & 1.5 &  & @xmath206 + 20130918 & 3.0 & @xmath207 & @xmath208 + 20130918 & 5.4 & @xmath209 & @xmath210 + 20130918 & 8.9 & @xmath211 & @xmath212 + 20130918 & 13.9 & @xmath213 & @xmath214 + 20130918 & 21.1 & @xmath215 & @xmath216 + 20130918 & 32.0 & @xmath217 & @xmath218 + 20130918 & 40.9 & @xmath219 & @xmath220 + 20131026 & 1.5 & @xmath221 & @xmath222 + 20131026 & 3.0 & @xmath223 & @xmath224 + 20131026 & 5.4 & @xmath225 & @xmath226 + 20131026 & 8.9 & @xmath227 & @xmath228 + 20131026 & 13.9 & @xmath229 & @xmath230 + 20131026 & 21.1 & @xmath231 & @xmath232 + 20131026 & 32.0 & @xmath233 & @xmath234 + 20131026 & 40.9 & @xmath235 & @xmath236 + 20131129 & 1.5 & @xmath237 & @xmath238 + 20131129 & 3.0 & @xmath239 & @xmath240 + 20131129 & 5.4 & @xmath241 & @xmath242 + 20131129 & 8.9 & @xmath243 & @xmath244 + 20131129 & 13.9 & @xmath245 & @xmath246 + 20131129 & 21.1 & @xmath247 & @xmath248 + 20131129 & 32.0 & @xmath249 & @xmath250 + 20131129 & 40.9 & @xmath251 & @xmath252 + 20131229 & 1.5 &  & @xmath253 + 20131229 & 3.0 & @xmath254 & @xmath255 + 20131229 & 5.4 & @xmath256 & @xmath257 + 20131229 & 8.9 & @xmath258 & @xmath259 + 20131229 & 13.9 & @xmath260 & @xmath261 + 20131229 & 21.1 & @xmath262 & @xmath263 + 20131229 & 32.0 & @xmath264 & @xmath265 + 20131229 & 40.9 & @xmath266 & @xmath267 + 20140215 & 1.5 & @xmath268 & @xmath269 + 20140215 & 3.0 & @xmath270 & @xmath271 + 20140215 & 5.4 & @xmath272 & @xmath273 + 20140215 & 8.9 & @xmath274 & @xmath275 + 20140215 & 13.9 & @xmath276 & @xmath277 + 20140215 & 21.1 & @xmath278 & @xmath279 + 20140215 & 32.0 & @xmath280 & @xmath281 + 20140215 & 40.9 & @xmath282 & @xmath283 + 20140322 & 1.5 & @xmath284 & @xmath285 + 20140322 & 3.0 & @xmath286 & @xmath287 + 20140322 & 5.4 & @xmath288 & @xmath289 + 20140322 & 8.9 & @xmath290 & @xmath291 + 20140322 & 13.9 & @xmath292 & @xmath293 + 20140322 & 21.1 & @xmath294 & @xmath295 + 20140322 & 32.0 & @xmath296 & @xmath297 + 20140322 & 40.9 & @xmath298 & @xmath299 + 20140426 & 1.5 & @xmath300 & @xmath301 + 20140426 & 3.0 & @xmath302 & @xmath303 + 20140426 & 5.4 & @xmath304 & @xmath305 + 20140426 & 8.9 & @xmath306 & @xmath307 + 20140426 & 13.9 & @xmath308 & @xmath309 + 20140426 & 21.1 & @xmath310 & @xmath311 + 20140426 & 32.0 & @xmath312 & @xmath313 + 20140426 & 40.9 & @xmath314 & @xmath315 + 20140531 & 1.5 & @xmath316 & @xmath317 + 20140531 & 3.0 & @xmath318 & @xmath319 + 20140531 & 5.4 & @xmath320 & @xmath321 + 20140531 & 8.9 & @xmath322 & @xmath323 + 20140531 & 13.9 & @xmath324 & @xmath325 + 20140531 & 21.1 & @xmath326 & @xmath327 + 20140531 & 32.0 & @xmath328 & @xmath329 + 20140531 & 40.9 & @xmath330 & @xmath331 +    llrrl 20130708 & 02:14 - 02:44 & @xmath332 , 65.1 & @xmath333 , 73.8 & titan + 20131102 & 22:39 - 22:57 & @xmath334 , -84.2 & @xmath335 , -87.2 & neptune + 20131218 & 14:07 - 14:27 & @xmath336 , 88.3 & @xmath337 , 86.0 & titan + 20140128 & 10:26 - 10:44 & @xmath338 , 78.8 & @xmath339 , 77.6 & titan + 20140222 & 09:20 - 09:45 & @xmath340 , 69.3 & @xmath341 , 68.2 & titan + 20140321 & 09:17 - 09:35 & @xmath342 , 79.3 & @xmath343 , 77.1 & titan + 20140425 & 06:59 - 07:29 & @xmath344 , 78.7 & @xmath345 , 88.8 & titan + 20140527 & 05:47 - 06:06 & @xmath346 , -75.2 & @xmath347 , -75.8 & titan +    lrrrrrrrrr 20130708 & sgrastar & 3.792 & 3.795 & 3.872 & 3.892 & 4.259 & 4.278 & 4.270 & 4.265 + 20131102 & sgrastar & 4.635 & 4.649 & 4.752 & 4.758 & 4.537 & 4.564 & 4.569 & 4.537 + 20131218 & sgrastar & 2.976 & 2.970 & 2.997 & 3.010 & 3.032 & 3.046 & 3.012 & 3.003 + 20140128 & sgrastar & 3.868 & 3.868 & 3.944 & 3.957 & 4.293 & 4.313 & 4.309 & 4.294 + 20140222 & sgrastar & 2.811 & 2.803 & 2.800 & 2.801 & 2.332 & 2.341 & 2.311 & 2.301 + 20140321 & sgrastar & 4.078 & 4.047 & 3.983 & 4.002 & 3.476 & 3.447 & 3.428 & 3.406 + 20140425 & sgrastar & 4.121 & 4.111 & 4.004 & 4.163 & 4.296 & 4.287 & 4.295 & 4.064 + 20140527 & sgrastar & 3.054 & 3.048 & 3.054 & 3.051 & 2.587 & 2.596 & 2.568 & 2.556 + 20130708 & j1733 - 130 & 1.359 & 1.337 & 1.256 & 1.264 & 0.952 & 0.951 & 0.917 & 0.857 + 20131102 & j1733 - 130 & 1.586 & 1.570 & 1.429 & 1.413 & 0.998 & 0.994 & 0.995 & 0.998 + 20131218 & j1733 - 130 & 1.771 & 1.754 & 1.668 & 1.657 & 1.311 & 1.273 & 1.261 & 1.263 + 20140128 & j1733 - 130 & 1.576 & 1.561 & 1.477 & 1.482 & 1.203 & 1.190 & 1.181 & 1.173 + 20140222 & j1733 - 130 & 1.649 & 1.638 & 1.557 & 1.560 & 1.214 & 1.201 & 1.192 & 1.187 + 20140321 & j1733 - 130 & 1.517 & 1.502 & 1.426 & 1.426 & 1.125 & 1.109 & 1.097 & 1.092 + 20140425 & j1733 - 130 & 1.545 & 1.532 & 1.406 & 1.449 & 1.140 & 1.126 & 1.114 & 1.053 + 20140527 & j1733 - 130 & 1.619 & 1.600 & 1.517 & 1.514 & 1.179 & 1.169 & 1.142 & 1.150 + 20131218 & j1427 - 421 & 2.899 & 2.876 & 2.739 & 2.750 & 2.131 & 2.079 & 2.065 & 2.058 + 20140128 & j1427 - 421 & 3.073 & 3.041 & 2.908 & 2.907 & 2.422 & 2.387 & 2.375 & 2.379 + 20140222 & j1427 - 421 & 3.370 & 3.353 & 3.201 & 3.206 & 2.665 & 2.658 & 2.639 & 2.645 + 20140321 & j1427 - 421 & 3.773 & 3.735 & 3.570 & 3.582 & 2.931 & 2.900 & 2.859 & 2.856 + 20140425 & j1427 - 421 & 4.015 & 3.984 & 3.669 & 3.799 & -0.019 & -0.019 & -0.016 & -0.015 + 20140527 & j1427 - 421 & 4.227 & 4.187 & 4.002 & 4.002 & 3.253 & 3.217 & 3.191 & 3.176 + 20130708 & j1700 - 261 & 0.967 & 0.962 & 0.914 & 0.916 & 0.701 & 0.685 & 0.666 & 0.651 + 20131102 & j1700 - 261 & 0.791 & 0.784 & 0.721 & 0.720 & 0.517 & 0.518 & 0.525 & 0.522 + 20131218 & j1700 - 261 & 0.774 & 0.775 & 0.732 & 0.734 & 0.592 & 0.583 & 0.574 & 0.585 + 20140128 & j1700 - 261 & 0.887 & 0.882 & 0.842 & 0.846 & 0.716 & 0.707 & 0.706 & 0.700 + 20140222 & j1700 - 261 & 0.969 & 0.961 & 0.921 & 0.924 & 0.749 & 0.744 & 0.738 & 0.738 + 20140321 & j1700
- 261 & 0.846 & 0.838 & 0.800 & 0.804 & 0.664 & 0.657 & 0.650 & 0.646 + 20140425 & j1700 - 261 &  &  &  &  & 0.773 & 0.763 & 0.757 & 0.723 + 20140527 & j1700 - 261 & 1.072 & 1.062 & 1.004 & 1.005 & 0.824 & 0.799 & 0.803 & 0.799 +    lrrrr 20130601 & 13:18 & 218.60 & @xmath348 & @xmath349 + 20130605 & 13:23 & 336.40 & @xmath350 & @xmath351 + 20130609 & 13:21 & 271.80 & @xmath352 & @xmath353 + 20130610 & 13:32 & 265.99 & @xmath354 & @xmath355 + 20130612 & 12:15 & 271.79 & @xmath356 & @xmath357 + 20130615 & 12:08 & 218.48 & @xmath358 & @xmath359 + 20130616 & 12:53 & 218.95 & @xmath360 & @xmath361 + 20130617 & 12:15 & 219.71 & @xmath362 & @xmath363 + 20130618 & 12:03 & 218.47 & @xmath364 & @xmath365 + 20130619 & 12:41 & 218.95 & @xmath366 & @xmath367 + 20130620 & 12:13 & 214.60 & @xmath368 & @xmath369 + 20130621 & 12:37 & 218.77 & @xmath370 & @xmath371 + 20130622 & 12:41 & 218.93 & @xmath372 & @xmath373 + 20130623 & 11:39 & 218.68 & @xmath374 & @xmath375 + 20130624 & 12:10 & 218.75 & @xmath376 & @xmath377 + 20130626 & 11:43 & 218.68 & @xmath378 & @xmath379 + 20130630 & 12:13 & 333.40 & @xmath380 & @xmath381 + 20130701 & 10:35 & 342.96 & @xmath382 & @xmath383 + 20130705 & 07:18 & 226.86 & @xmath384 & @xmath385 + 20130705 & 08:55 & 226.86 & @xmath386 & @xmath387 + 20130705 & 11:41 & 226.86 & @xmath388 & @xmath389 + 20130708 & 11:07 & 218.87 & @xmath390 & @xmath391 + 20130713 & 10:55 & 336.38 & @xmath392 & @xmath393 + 20130714 & 10:44 & 333.40 & @xmath394 & @xmath395 + 20130716 & 10:36 & 218.84 & @xmath396 & @xmath397 + 20130717 & 11:05 & 265.99 & @xmath398 & @xmath399 + 20130719 & 10:32 & 265.97 & @xmath400 & @xmath401 + 20130720 & 10:42 & 271.78 & @xmath402 & @xmath403 + 20130721 & 10:30 & 218.69 & @xmath404 & @xmath405 + 20130723 & 10:43 & 218.84 & @xmath406 & @xmath407 + 20130724 & 10:45 & 218.90 &
@xmath408 & @xmath409 + 20130728 & 10:12 & 336.07 & @xmath410 & @xmath411 + 20130731 & 10:07 & 218.79 & @xmath412 & @xmath413 + 20130801 & 09:58 & 218.79 & @xmath414 & @xmath415 + 20130802 & 09:38 & 218.79 & @xmath416 & @xmath417 + 20130803 & 09:01 & 218.82 & @xmath418 & @xmath419 + 20130804 & 08:46 & 334.73 & @xmath420 & @xmath421 + 20130804 & 09:39 & 215.44 & @xmath422 & @xmath423 + 20130805 & 08:51 & 336.98 & @xmath424 & @xmath425 + 20130806 & 09:49 & 218.96 & @xmath426 & @xmath427 + 20130808 & 09:09 & 333.98 & @xmath428 & @xmath429 + 20130809 & 08:34 & 218.85 & @xmath430 & @xmath431 + 20130810 & 09:13 & 218.77 & @xmath432 & @xmath433 + 20130811 & 08:55 & 218.77 & @xmath434 & @xmath435 + 20130812 & 09:10 & 218.99 & @xmath436 & @xmath437 + 20130813 & 09:10 & 218.66 & @xmath438 & @xmath439 + 20130814 & 08:19 & 334.00 & @xmath440 & @xmath441 + 20130815 & 03:27 & 226.85 & @xmath442 & @xmath443 + 20130815 & 03:56 & 226.85 & @xmath444 & @xmath445 + 20130815 & 04:27 & 226.85 & @xmath446 & @xmath447 + 20130815 & 04:56 & 226.85 & @xmath448 & @xmath449 + 20130815 & 05:27 & 226.85 & @xmath450 & @xmath451 + 20130815 & 05:56 & 226.85 & @xmath452 & @xmath453 + 20130815 & 06:25 & 226.85 & @xmath454 & @xmath455 + 20130815 & 06:57 & 226.85 & @xmath456 & @xmath457 + 20130815 & 07:25 & 226.85 & @xmath458 & @xmath459 + 20130815 & 08:01 & 226.85 & @xmath460 & @xmath461 + 20130815 & 08:26 & 226.85 & @xmath462 & @xmath463 + 20130815 & 08:53 & 226.85 & @xmath464 & @xmath465 + 20130815 & 09:24 & 226.85 & @xmath466 & @xmath467 + 20130816 & 08:12 & 220.59 & @xmath468 & @xmath469 + 20130914 & 06:24 & 218.93 & @xmath470 & @xmath471 + 20130916 & 06:28 & 331.32 & @xmath472 & @xmath473 + 20130917 & 06:43 & 219.19 & @xmath474 & @xmath475 + 20130918 & 06:15 & 331.31 & @xmath476 & @xmath477 + 20130920 & 06:12 & 331.31 & @xmath478 & @xmath479 + 20130921 & 05:01 & 219.87 & @xmath480 & @xmath481 + 20130921 & 05:01 & 334.79 & @xmath482 & @xmath483 + 20130922 & 05:49 & 220.64 & @xmath484 & @xmath485 + 20130922 & 05:49 & 355.92 & @xmath486 & @xmath487 + 20130924 & 05:38 & 331.37 & @xmath488 & @xmath489 + 20130925 & 06:30 & 219.21 & @xmath490 & @xmath491 + 20130926 & 06:28 & 218.93 & @xmath492 & @xmath493 + 20130928 & 05:24 & 220.71 & @xmath494 & @xmath495 + 20130928 & 05:24 & 355.92 & @xmath496 & @xmath497 + 20130930 & 05:54 & 220.28 & @xmath498 & @xmath499 + 20131002 & 05:32 & 220.27 & @xmath500 & @xmath501 + 20131003 & 05:30 & 220.27 & @xmath502 & @xmath503 + 20131004 & 04:22 & 219.85 & @xmath504 & @xmath505 + 20131006 & 05:06 & 334.92 & @xmath506 & @xmath507 + 20131007 & 05:00 & 220.27 & @xmath508 & @xmath509 + 20131008 & 04:37 & 239.61 & @xmath510 & @xmath511 + 20131012 & 04:26 & 218.83 & @xmath512 & @xmath513 + 20131013 & 04:27 & 218.83 & @xmath514 & @xmath515 + 20131022 & 04:08 & 239.61 & @xmath516 & @xmath517 + 20131101 & 03:25 & 218.90 & @xmath518 & @xmath519 + 20131102 & 03:16 & 219.37 & @xmath520 & @xmath521 + 20140116 & 19:58 & 225.02 & @xmath522 & @xmath523 + 20140408 & 13:59 & 266.10 & @xmath524 & @xmath525 + 20140409 & 16:42 & 334.01 & @xmath526 & @xmath527 + 20140410 & 17:01 & 219.74 & @xmath528 & @xmath529 + 20140412 & 16:41 & 218.92 & @xmath530 & @xmath531 + 20140415 & 16:22 & 356.05 & @xmath532 & @xmath533 + 20140416 & 16:40 & 218.78 & @xmath534 & @xmath535 + 20140417 & 16:37 & 218.43 & @xmath536 & @xmath537 + 20140422 & 16:10 & 220.56 & @xmath538 & @xmath539 + 20140423 & 16:47 & 218.97 & @xmath540 & @xmath541 + 20140425 & 15:19 & 215.27 & @xmath542 & @xmath543 + 20140505 & 15:01 & 219.02 & @xmath544 & @xmath545 + 20140506 & 14:49 & 218.74 & @xmath546 & @xmath547 + 20140510 & 13:43 & 336.95 & @xmath548 & @xmath549 + 20140511 & 14:15 & 336.95 & @xmath550 & @xmath551 + 20140512 & 15:43 & 218.93 & @xmath552 & @xmath553 + 20140521 & 14:31 & 219.00 & @xmath554 & @xmath555 + 20140522 & 14:12 & 219.00 & @xmath556 & @xmath557 + 20140523 & 14:15 & 332.14 & @xmath558 & @xmath559 + 20140826 & 08:13 & 335.55 & @xmath560 & @xmath561 + 20140829 & 07:09 & 353.75 & @xmath562 & @xmath563 + 20140902 & 07:39 & 241.36 & @xmath564 & @xmath565 + 20140903 & 07:45 & 271.52 & @xmath566 & @xmath567 + 20140904 & 07:07 & 220.77 & @xmath568 & @xmath569 + 20140905 & 07:20 & 220.77 & @xmath570 & @xmath571 + 20140909 & 07:18 & 241.36 & @xmath572 & @xmath573 + 20140912 & 06:06 & 335.59 &
@xmath574 & @xmath575 + 20140915 & 05:45 & 220.20 & @xmath576 & @xmath577 + 20140917 & 06:19 & 333.39 & @xmath578 & @xmath579 + 20140925 & 05:40 & 214.17 & @xmath580 & @xmath581 + 20140930 & 05:15 & 219.42 & @xmath582 & @xmath583 + 20141001 & 05:50 & 213.23 & @xmath584 & @xmath585 + 20141002 & 05:05 & 213.44 & @xmath586 & @xmath587 + 20141003 & 05:39 & 219.52 & @xmath588 & @xmath589 + 20141005 & 05:25 & 218.68 & @xmath590 & @xmath591 + 20141006 & 05:36 & 218.67 & @xmath592 & @xmath593 + 20141009 & 05:18 & 218.62 & @xmath594 & @xmath595 + 20141015 & 05:24 & 219.71 & @xmath596 & @xmath597 + 20141016 & 05:16 & 218.90 & @xmath598 & @xmath599 + 20141021 & 05:03 & 220.26 & @xmath600 & @xmath601 + 20141025 & 04:09 & 219.42 & @xmath602 & @xmath603 + 20141029 & 04:10 & 335.58 & @xmath604 & @xmath605 + 20141030 & 04:03 & 335.58 & @xmath606 & @xmath607 + 20141031 & 04:18 & 356.16 & @xmath608 & @xmath609 + 20141103 & 04:10 & 220.27 & @xmath610 & @xmath611 + 20141104 & 04:09 & 218.63 & @xmath612 & @xmath613 + 20141107 & 03:49 & 220.26 & @xmath614 & @xmath615 + 20141109 & 03:55 & 333.33 & @xmath616 & @xmath617 + 20141110 & 03:46 & 333.36 & @xmath618 & @xmath619 + 20141112 & 03:51 & 333.36 & @xmath620 & @xmath621 +    rrrrrrrr 1.6 & 0.592 & 0.028 & 0.512 & 0.683 & 8 & vla + 3.1 & 0.702 & 0.032 & 0.659 & 0.896 & 10 & vla + 5.4 & 0.870 & 0.118 & 0.647 & 1.134 & 12 & vla + 9.0 & 0.932 & 0.129 & 0.791 & 1.276 & 12 & vla + 14.0 & 1.075 & 0.135 & 0.887 & 1.749 & 14 & vla + 21.1 & 1.164 & 0.052 & 0.999 & 1.562 & 15 & vla + 32.0 & 1.382 & 0.087 & 1.146 & 1.648 & 15 & vla + 40.9 & 1.485 & 0.073 & 1.275 & 1.882 & 15 & vla + 218.0 & 3.667 & 0.650 & 2.811 & 4.635 & 8 & alma + 220.0 & 3.661 & 0.652 & 2.803 & 4.649 & 8 & alma + 231.9 & 3.676 & 0.664 & 2.800 & 4.752 & 8 & alma + 233.8 & 3.704 & 0.680 & 2.801 & 4.758 & 8 & alma + 341.6 & 3.602 & 0.866 & 2.332 & 4.537 & 8 & alma + 343.6 & 3.609 & 0.870 & 2.341 & 4.564 & 8 & alma + 351.7 & 3.595 & 0.884 & 2.311 & 4.569 & 8 & alma + 353.6 & 3.553 & 0.860 & 2.301 & 4.537 & 8 & alma + 216.8 & 3.677 & 0.762 & 2.154 & 5.420 & 68 & sma + 223.9 & 3.391 & 0.489 & 2.586 & 4.796 & 23 & sma + 238.2 & 3.310 & 0.424 & 2.955 & 4.035 & 4 & sma + 266.8 & 3.369 & 0.096 & 3.237 & 3.482 & 4 & sma + 274.0 & 3.526 & 0.697 & 2.799 & 4.743 & 4 & sma + 331.1 & 3.205 & 1.074 & 1.999 & 5.492 & 14 & sma + 338.3 & 3.436 & 0.863 & 2.421 & 5.751 & 13 & sma + 352.6 & 4.890 & 0.721 & 4.146 & 6.090 & 4 & sma +