in particle physics , the neutrino plays a remarkable role of a `` tiny '' particle .
the scale of neutrino mass @xmath0 is much lower than that of the charged fermions ( @xmath1 , @xmath2 ) .
interaction of neutrinos with matter is extremely weak as compared to that in the case of other known elementary fermions .
according to the standard model ( sm ) , it can be mediated only via exchange of the @xmath3 and @xmath4 bosons .
however , the recent development of our knowledge of neutrino mixing and oscillations , supported by the discovery of flavor conversions of neutrinos from different sources ( see  @xcite ) , substantiates the assumption that neutrinos can possess electromagnetic properties and , hence , take part in electromagentic interactions ( see , for instance , the review articles  @xcite ) .
these properties include , in particular , the electric charge , the charge radius , the anapole moment , and the dipole electric and magnetic moments .
such nontypical neutrino features are of particular interest , because they open a door to `` new physics '' beyond the sm ( bsm ) . in spite of appreciable efforts in searches for neutrino electromagnetic characteristics , up to now
there is no experimental evidence favoring their nonvanishing values .    among the electromagnetic properties of neutrinos ,
the most studied and well understood theoretically are neutrino magnetic moments ( nmm ) , along with electric dipole moments .
for the most recent and complete review on theoretical and experimental aspects of nmm , as well as for the corresponding references , see  @xcite .
the effective lagrangian , which describes the coupling of nmm to the electromagnetic field @xmath5 , can be written in the form @xmath6 where the magnetic moments @xmath7 , in the presence of mixing between different neutrino states , are associated with the neutrino mass eigenstates @xmath8 .
an interplay between the magnetic moment and neutrino mixing effects is important .
note that the electric ( transition ) moments @xmath9 do also contribute to the coupling .
a dirac neutrino may have non - zero diagonal electric moments in models where cp invariance is violated . for a majorana neutrino
the diagonal magnetic and electric moments are zero .
therefore , nmm can be used to distinguish dirac and majorana neutrinos @xcite .    in the standard model
the magnetic moment of a massless neutrino is zero . in the minimal extension of the sm , the explicit evaluation of the one - loop contributions to the dirac nmm in the leading approximation over small parameters @xmath10 ( @xmath11 are the neutrino masses , @xmath12 ) , that however exactly accounts for the parameters @xmath13 ( @xmath14 ) ,
yields the following result  @xcite : @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the neutrino mixing matrix , and @xmath17.\ ] ] a majorana neutrino can also have nondiagonal ( transition ) magnetic moment @xmath18 ( @xmath19 ) .
the obtained value for nmm is proportional to the neutrino mass and is , in general , of the order @xmath20 .
much larger values for nmm can be obtained in different other sm extensions ( see @xcite for the detailed discussion ) . however , there is a problem @xcite for any bsm theory how to get a large nmm value and simultaneously to avoid an unacceptable large contribution to the neutrino mass .
recently this problem has been reconsidered for a class of bsm theories and it has been shown in a model - independent way that in principle it is possible to avoid the above mentioned contradiction in the case of dirac @xcite and majorana @xcite neutrinos . it has been shown that in this kind of theoretical models the nmm can naturally reach values of @xmath21 .
these values are at least two orders of magnitude smaller than the present laboratory experimental limits ( see bellow ) .
there is also a huge gap of many orders of magnitude between these values and the prediction of the minimal extension of the sm .
therefore , if any direct experimental confirmation of non - zero nmm is obtained in the laboratory experiments , it will open a window to `` new physics '' .
the neutrino magnetic moments are being searched in reactor  @xcite , accelerator  @xcite and solar  @xcite experiments on low - energy elastic neutrino - electron scattering ( for more details see the review articles  @xcite and references therein ) .
the current best upper limit on the nmm value obtained in such direct laboratory measurements is @xmath22 where @xmath23 is a bohr magneton .
this bound , which is due to the gemma experiment  @xcite with a hpge detector at kalinin nuclear power station , is by an order of magnitude larger than the tightest constraint obtained in astrophysics  @xcite : @xmath24 and it by many orders of magnitude exceeds the value derived in the minimally extended sm that includes right - handed neutrinos  @xcite : @xmath25 where @xmath0 is a neutrino mass . at the same time
, there are different theoretical bsm scenarios that predict much higher @xmath26 values .
for example , the effective nmm value in a class of extra - dimension models can be as large as about @xmath27  @xcite .
future higher precision reactor experiments can therefore be used to provide new constraints on large extra - dimensions .
the paper is organized as follows .
[ nmm_searches ] outlines the current status of searches for nmm and the problem of atomic - ionization effects in reactor experiments .
[ gen_theory ] is devoted to the theoretical background for neutrino scattering on atomic electrons . in sec .
[ 1e ] , we discuss the case of neutrino scattering on one bound electron .
hydrogen - like states and a semiclassical limit are considered .
[ mea ] focuses on ionization of manyelectron atoms by neutrino impact .
the case of a helium atomic target and the thomas - fermi and _ ab initio _ approaches are discussed .
finally , sec .
[ summary ] summarizes this review .
the strategy of experiments searching for nmm is as follows .
one studies an inclusive cross section for elastic ( anti)neutrino - electron scattering which is differential in the energy transfer @xmath28 . in the ultrarelativistic limit @xmath29
, it is given by an incoherent sum of the sm contribution @xmath30 , which is due to weak interaction that conserves the neutrino helicity , and the helicity - flipping contribution @xmath31 , which is due to @xmath26 , @xmath32 the sm term is well - documented and is given by  @xcite @xmath33,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath34 is the incident antineutrino energy , @xmath35 and @xmath36 for @xmath37 and @xmath38 and @xmath39 for @xmath40 and @xmath41 , with @xmath42 being the weinberg angle .
for antineutrinos one must substitute @xmath43 .
the possibility for neutrino - electron elastic scattering due to nmm was first considered in ref .
@xcite , and the cross section of this process was calculated in ref .
@xcite ( the related brief historical notes can be found in ref .
@xcite ) . here
we would like to recall the paper by domogatsky and nadezhin  @xcite , where the cross section of ref .
@xcite was corrected and the antineutrino - electron cross section was considered in the context of the earlier experiments with reactor antineutrinos of cowan and reines  @xcite and cowan et al .
@xcite , which were aimed to reveal the nmm effects .
discussions on the derivation of the cross section and on the optimal conditions for bounding the nmm value , as well as a collection of the cross section formulas for elastic scattering of neutrinos ( antineutrinos ) on electrons , nucleons , and nuclei , can be found in refs .
@xcite and  @xcite .
the result relevant to the @xmath26 component in eq .
( [ cr_sec ] ) reads  @xcite @xmath44 where @xmath45 is the fine - structure constant .
thus , the two components of the cross section  ( [ cr_sec ] ) exhibit qualitatively different dependencies on the recoil - electron kinetic energy @xmath28 .
namely , at low @xmath28 values the sm cross section is practically constant in @xmath28 , while that due to @xmath26 behaves as @xmath46 .
this means that the experimental sensitivity to nmm value critically depends on lowering the energy threshold of the detector employed for measurement of the recoil - electron spectrum .
the current reactor experiments with germanium detectors  @xcite have reached threshold values of @xmath28 as low as few kev and are to further improve the sensitivity to low energy deposition in the detector  @xcite . at low energies , however
, one can expect a modification of the free - electron formulas due to the binding of electrons in the germanium atoms , where e.g. the energy of the @xmath47 line , 9.89kev , indicates that at least some of the atomic binding energies are comparable to the already relevant to the experiment values of @xmath28 .
thus a proper treatment of the atomic effects in neutrino scattering is necessary and important for the analysis of the current and , even more , of the future data with a still lower threshold .
furthermore , there is no known means of independently calibrating experimentally the response of atomic systems , such as the germanium , to the scattering due to the interactions relevant for the neutrino experiments .
therefore one has to rely on a pure theoretical analysis in interpreting the neutrino data .
for the first time this problem was addressed in ref .
@xcite , where a 2 - 3 times enhancement of the electroweak cross section in the case of ionization from a 1@xmath48 state of a hydrogen - like atom with nuclear charge @xmath49 had been numerically determined at neutrino energies @xmath50 .
subsequent numerical calculations within the relativistic hartree - fock method for ionization from inner shells of various atoms showed much lower enhancement ( @xmath51 ) of the electroweak contribution  @xcite .
it was found that in the scattering on realistic atoms , such as germanium , the so - called stepping approximation works with a very good accuracy .
the stepping approach , introduced in ref .
@xcite from an interpretation of numerical data , treats the process as scattering on individual independent electrons occupying atomic orbitals and suggests that the cross section follows the free - electron behavior in eqs .
( [ cr_sec_sm ] ) and ( [ cr_sec_mu ] ) down to @xmath28 equal to the ionization threshold for the orbital , and that below that energy the electron on the corresponding orbital is ` deactivated ' thus producing a sharp ` step ' in the dependence of the cross section on @xmath28 .
the interest to the role of atomic effects was renewed in several more recent papers .
the early claim  @xcite of a significant enhancement of the nmm contribution in the case of germanium due to the atomic effects has been later disproved  @xcite and it was argued  @xcite that the modification of the free - electron formulas ( [ cr_sec_sm ] ) and ( [ cr_sec_mu ] ) by the atomic - binding effects is insignificant down to very low values of @xmath28 .
this conclusion appeared to be also in contradiction with the results of ref .
@xcite , where it was deduced by means of numerical calculations that the @xmath26 contribution to ionization of the helium atomic target by impact of electron antineutrinos strongly enhances relative to the free - electron approximation .
however , from calculations performed in ref .
@xcite it follows that the stepping approximation is well applicable practically down to the ionization threshold for helium .
as indicated in the introduction , the most sensitive and widely used method for the experimental investigation of the neutrino electromagnetic properties is provided by direct laboratory measurements of low - energy elastic scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos with electrons in reactor , accelerator and solar experiments . in this section
we deliver a theoretical background for such studies .
let us consider the elastic - scattering process @xmath52 where an incident neutrino with energy @xmath34 transfers to a free electron , which is initially at rest in the laboratory frame , the energy - momentum @xmath53 .
there are two recoil - electron observables : the kinetic energy @xmath28 , which amounts to the energy transfer , and the outgoing angle @xmath54 measured with respect to the incident neutrino direction . in the ultrarelativistic limit @xmath55 ,
these kinematical variables are related by @xmath56 the maximal value of the kinetic electron energy is thus realized when @xmath57 and is given by @xmath58 within the sm , the scattering process  ( [ nu - e_process ] ) takes place due to exchange of the weak bosons , as shown in fig .
[ fig : e - nu_sm ] .     elastic neutrino - electron scattering due to the weak interaction .
exchange by the @xmath59 ( left ) and @xmath4 ( right ) bosons is shown.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ]   elastic neutrino - electron scattering due to the weak interaction .
exchange by the @xmath59 ( left ) and @xmath4 ( right ) bosons is shown.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ]    the @xmath59-boson channel corresponds to the charged current interaction and is absent in the cases of the muon and tau neutrinos . if @xmath60 , where @xmath61 is the @xmath59-boson mass , the scattering amplitude is given by  @xcite @xmath62 where @xmath63 ( @xmath64 ) and @xmath65 ( @xmath66 ) are initial and final neutrino ( electron ) spinors .
the @xmath4 boson mediates the neutral current interaction .
the corresponding scattering amplitude in the case @xmath67 , where @xmath68 is the @xmath4-boson mass , reads  @xcite @xmath69 using the matrix elements ( [ m_w ] ) and ( [ m_z ] ) , one arrives , after averaging over the initial and summing over the final electron spins , at the sm single - differential cross section  ( [ cr_sec_sm ] ) .    fig .  [ fig : e - nu_em ] shows the electromagnetic channel of the scattering process  ( [ nu - e_process ] ) .
contribution of the neutrino electromagnetic vertex function to neutrino elastic scattering on a charged lepton  @xcite.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]    in general the matrix element of the neutrino electromagnetic current @xmath70 can be considered between different neutrino initial @xmath71 and final @xmath72 states of different masses , @xmath73 and @xmath74 : @xmath75 in the most general case consistent with lorentz and electromagnetic gauge invariance , the vertex function is defined as ( see refs .
@xcite and references therein ) @xmath76(q^2\gamma_\mu-\gamma_\mu\!\not{\!q})+f_m(q^2)_{ij}i\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu+f_e(q^2)_{ij}i\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu\gamma_5,\ ] ] where @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 , and @xmath80 are respectively the charge , anapole , dipole magnetic , and dipole electric neutrino form factors , which are matrices in the space of neutrino mass eigenstates  @xcite .
consider the diagonal case @xmath81 .
the hermiticity of the electromagnetic current and the assumption of its invariance under discrete symmetries transformations put certain constraints on the form factors , which are in general different for the dirac and majorana neutrinos . in the case of dirac neutrinos
, the assumption of cp invariance combined with the hermiticity of the electromagnetic current @xmath70 implies that the electric dipole form factor vanishes , @xmath82 . at zero momentum transfer only @xmath83 and @xmath84 , which are called the electric charge and the magnetic moment , respectively ,
contribute to the hamiltonian @xmath85 that describes the neutrino interaction with the external electromagnetic field @xmath86 .
the hermiticity also implies that @xmath87 , @xmath88 , and @xmath89 are real .
in contrast , in the case of majorana neutrinos , regardless of whether cp invariance is violated or not , the charge , dipole magnetic and electric moments vanish , @xmath90 , so that only the anapole moment can be non - vanishing among the electromagnetic moments .
note that it is possible to prove  @xcite that the existence of a non - vanishing magnetic moment for a majorana neutrino would bring about a clear evidence for cpt violation .    in the off - diagonal case @xmath19 ,
the hermiticity by itself does not imply restrictions on the form factors of dirac neutrinos .
it is possible to show  @xcite that , if the assumption of the cp invariance is added , the form factors @xmath87 , @xmath89 , @xmath91 , and @xmath88 should have the same complex phase .
for the majorana neutrino , if cp invariance holds , there could be either a transition magnetic or a transition electric moment . finally , as in the diagonal case , the anapole form factor of a majorana neutrino can be nonzero .
the neutrino dipole magnetic and electric form factors ( and the corresponding magnetic and electric dipole moments ) are theoretically the most well understood among the form factors .
the value of the magnetic form factor @xmath79 at @xmath92 defines the nmm , @xmath93 . in the low - energy limit
, the nmm contribution to the effective electromagnetic vertex can be expressed in the following form : @xmath94 thus , the corresponding scattering amplitude is @xmath95 this leads to the nmm single - differential cross section given by  ( [ cr_sec_mu ] ) .
consider the process where a neutrino with energy - momentum @xmath96 scatters on an atom at energy - momentum transfer @xmath97 . in
what follows the recoil of the atomic nucleus is neglected because of the typical for current experiments situation @xmath98 , where @xmath99 is the nuclear mass .
the atomic target is supposed to be unpolarized and in its ground state @xmath100 with the corresponding energy @xmath101 .
it is also supposed that @xmath102 and @xmath103 , where @xmath49 is the nuclear charge and @xmath45 is the fine - structure constant , so that the initial and final electronic systems can be treated nonrelativistically .
the neutrino states are described by the dirac spinors assuming @xmath104 .
thus , the magnetic moment interaction of the neutrino field @xmath105 with the atomic electrons is described by the lagrangian @xmath106 where @xmath107 is the final neutrino four - momentum .
the electromagnetic field @xmath108 of the atomic electrons is . ]
@xmath109 , @xmath110 , where @xmath111 and @xmath112 are the fourier transforms of the electron number density and current density operators , respectively , @xmath113 @xmath114 , \label{ce}\ ] ] and the sums run over the positions @xmath115 of all the @xmath49 electrons in the atom .
the double - differential cross section can be presented as @xmath116 where @xmath117 and @xmath118 where @xmath119 , also known as the dynamical structure factor  @xcite , and @xmath120 are @xmath121 @xmath122 with @xmath123 being the @xmath124 component perpendicular to @xmath125 and parallel to the scattering plane , which is formed by the incident and final neutrino momenta .
the sums in eqs .
( [ dsf ] ) and  ( [ dsfc ] ) run over all the atomic states @xmath126 with energies @xmath127 of the electron system , with @xmath128 being the initial state .
the longitudinal term  ( [ dcs_par ] ) is associated with atomic excitations induced by the force that the neutrino magnetic moment exerts on electrons in the direction parallel to @xmath125 .
the transverse term  ( [ dcs_perp ] ) corresponds to the exchange of a virtual photon which is polarized as a real one , that is , perpendicular to @xmath125 .
it resembles a photoabsorption process when @xmath129 and the virtual - photon four - momentum thus approaches a real - photon value . due to selections rules
, the longitudinal and transverse excitations do not interfere ( see @xcite for detail ) .    the factors @xmath119 and @xmath120 are related to respectively the density - density ( or polarization ) and current - current green s functions @xmath130 @xmath131 where @xmath132 @xmath133@xmath134 being the hamiltonian for the system of electrons .
from these relations it follows that , due to the parity selection rule , the functions @xmath119 and @xmath120 are even with respect to @xmath53 .    for small @xmath135 values , in particular ,
such that @xmath136 , only the lowest - order non - zero terms of the expansion of eqs .
( [ sfrel ] ) and  ( [ sfrelc ] ) in powers of @xmath137 are of relevance ( the so - called dipole approximation ) . in this case , one has  @xcite @xmath138 taking into account eq .
( [ dipole_approx ] ) , the experimentally measured singe - differential inclusive cross section is , to a good approximation , given by ( see e.g. in @xcite ) @xmath139 the standard electroweak contribution to the cross section can be similarly expressed in terms of the same factor @xmath119  @xcite as @xmath140 where the factor @xmath119 is integrated over @xmath137 with a unit weight , rather than @xmath141 as in eq .
( [ d1s ] ) .    the kinematical limits for @xmath137 in an actual neutrino scattering are explicitly indicated in eqs .
( [ d1s ] ) and ( [ d1sw ] ) . at large @xmath142 ,
typical for the reactor neutrinos , the upper limit can in fact be extended to infinity , since in the discussed here nonrelativistic limit the range of momenta @xmath143 is indistinguishable from infinity on an atomic scale .
the lower limit can be shifted to @xmath144 , since the contribution of the region of @xmath145 can be expressed in terms of the photoelectric cross section  @xcite and is negligibly small ( at the level of below one percent in the considered range of @xmath28 ) .
for this reason one can discuss the momentum - transfer integrals in eqs .
( [ d1s ] ) and  ( [ d1sw ] ) running from @xmath144 to @xmath146 : @xmath147   and @xmath148 for a free electron , which is initially at rest , the density - density correlator is the free particle green s function @xmath149 so that the dynamical structure factor is given by @xmath150 and the discussed here integrals are in the free - electron limit as follows : @xmath151 @xmath152 clearly , these expressions , when used in the formulas ( [ d1s ] ) and ( [ d1sw ] ) , result in the free - electron cross sections for the case @xmath153 , @xmath154 and @xmath155 , \label{sew}\end{aligned}\ ] ] correspondingly .
in this section we consider neutrino scattering on an electron bound in an atom following consideration of @xcite .
the binding effects generally deform the density - density green s function , so that both the integrals ( [ defi_1 ] ) and ( [ defi_2 ] ) are somewhat modified .
namely , the binding effects spread the free - electron @xmath156-peak in the dynamical structure function  ( [ struc_factor_fe ] ) at @xmath157 and also shift it by the scale of characteristic electron momenta in the bound state .
consider the situation when the initial electron occupies the discrete @xmath158 orbital in a coulomb potential @xmath159 .
the dynamical structure factor for this hydrogen - like system is given by @xmath160 where @xmath161 is the bound - state wave function , @xmath162 is the outgoing coulomb wave for the ejected electron with momentum @xmath163 , and @xmath164 , with @xmath165 being the electron momentum in the @xmath166th bohr orbit .
the closed - form expressions for the bound - free transition matrix elements in eq .
( [ sfnl ] ) can be found , for instance , in ref .
@xcite . in principle , they allow for performing angular integrations in eq .
( [ sfnl ] ) analytically .
this task , however , turns out to be formidable for large values of @xmath166 .
therefore , below we restrict our consideration to the @xmath167 states only , which nevertheless is enough for demonstrating the validity of the semiclassical approach developed in sec .
[ 1e ] .    using results of ref .
@xcite , we can present the function  ( [ sfnl ] ) when @xmath167 as @xmath168}\frac{q^2f_{nl}(q^2)}{[(q^2-k^2+p_n^2)^2 + 4p_n^2k^2]^{2n+1}}\nonumber\\ & { } & \times \exp\left[-2\eta\arctan\left(\frac{2p_nk}{q^2-k^2+p_n^2}\right)\right ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the branch of the arctangent function should be used that lies between 0 and @xmath169 , @xmath170 is the sommerfeld parameter , and @xmath171 @xmath172,\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath173.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] fig .
[ fig1 ] shows the magnetic single - differential cross section  ( [ d1s ] ) for ionization from the @xmath174 orbital , which is normalized to the free - electron value  ( [ cr_sec_mu ] ) , as a function of @xmath175 , with the electron binding energy given by @xmath176 .
as can be seen , the numerical results for @xmath177 are close to the free - electron ones in magnitude .
this can be qualitatively explained by noticing the following facts .
first , in an attractive coulomb potential there is an infinite set of bound states , with the discrete spectrum smoothly transforming into the continuum at the ionization threshold .
second , the average value of the @xmath174-electron momentum is @xmath178 and the average change in the electron momentum after ejection , @xmath179 , is such that @xmath180 , which is analogous to the free - electron case .     the ratio of single - differential cross sections for magnetic neutrino scattering from the @xmath174 hydrogen - like and free - electron states , respectively , versus @xmath175 at different values of @xmath34 .
the @xmath181 and @xmath182 curves are practically indistinguishable.,scaledwidth=90.0% ]    thus , taking into account the results in fig .
[ fig1 ] , one might expect the atomic - binding effects to play a subsidiary role when @xmath177 .
the authors of @xcite , however , came to the contrary conclusion that the single - differential cross section dramatically enhances due to atomic ionization when @xmath183 .
the enhancement mechanism proposed in  @xcite is based on an analogy with the photoionization process . as mentioned above , when @xmath184 the virtual - photon momentum approaches the physical regime @xmath185 . in this limit , we have for the transverse component of the double - differential cross section  ( [ dcs_perp ] ) @xmath186 where @xmath187 is the photoionization cross section at the photon energy @xmath28  @xcite .
the limiting form  ( [ photoeffect ] ) was used in @xcite in the whole integration interval , when deriving the single - differential cross section .
such a procedure is obviously incorrect , for the integrand rapidly falls down as @xmath137 ranges from @xmath188 up to @xmath189 , especially when @xmath190 , where @xmath191 is a characteristic atomic size ( within the thomas - fermi model @xmath192  @xcite ) .
this fact reflects a strong departure from the real - photon regime .
for this reason we can classify the enhancement of the differential cross section determined in @xcite as spurious .
insertion of eq .
( [ sfnl1 ] ) into the integrals  ( [ defi_1 ] ) and  ( [ defi_2 ] ) and integration over @xmath193 , using the change of variable @xmath194 and the standard integrals involving the products of the exponential function and the powers of sine and cosine functions , yields  @xcite @xmath195\nonumber\\&{}&\times\left . \left(1-\frac{4}{y_1}+\frac{16}{3y_1 ^ 2}\right)\right \},%\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath196\nonumber\\&{}&\left.\times \left(1-\frac{8}{y_2}+\frac{80}{3y_2 ^ 2}-\frac{448}{15y_2 ^ 3}+\frac{1792}{15y_2 ^ 4}\right)\right \},%\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath197\nonumber\\&{}&\left.\times \left(1-\frac{8}{y_2}+\frac{80}{3y_2 ^ 2}-\frac{448}{15y_2 ^ 3}+\frac{1024}{15y_2 ^ 4}\right)\right \},%\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath198\nonumber\\&{}&\left.\times \left(1-\frac{8}{y_2}+\frac{80}{3y_2 ^ 2}-\frac{704}{15y_2 ^ 3}+\frac{3328}{45y_2 ^ 4}\right)\right \},%\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath199\nonumber\\&{}&\left.\times \left(1-\frac{8}{y_2}+\frac{80}{3y_2 ^ 2}-\frac{704}{15y_2 ^ 3}+\frac{512}{15y_2
^ 4}\right)\right \ } , % \nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath200
. the largest deviations of these integrals from the free - electron analogs  ( [ intf_1 ] ) and  ( [ intf_2 ] ) occur at the ionization threshold @xmath201 .
the corresponding relative values in this specific case are  @xcite @xmath202 @xmath203 @xmath204 the above results indicate a clear tendency : the larger @xmath166 and @xmath205 , the closer @xmath206 and @xmath207 are to the free - electron values . the departure from the free - electron behavior does not exceed several percent at most .
these observations provide a solid base for the semiclassical approach described below .      in the one - electron approximation
, the hamiltonian has the form @xmath208 , and the density - density green s function from eq.([fdef ] ) can be written as @xmath209^{-1 } \ , e^{i { \bf q } \cdot { \bf r}}\ , \right | 0 \right \rangle \nonumber \\ & = & \left \langle 0 \left | \ , \left [ t -h({\bf p } + { \bf q } , { \bf r } ) + e_0   \right ] ^{-1 } \ ,   \right | 0
\right \rangle \nonumber\\ & = &   \left \langle 0 \left | \ ,
\left [ t -{{q}^{2 } \over 2 m_e}- { { \bf p }   \cdot { \bf q } \over m_e }   - h({\bf p } , { \bf r } ) + e_0   \right ] ^{-1 } \ ,   \right | 0
\right \rangle \nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the infinitesimal shift @xmath210 is implied .
clearly , a nontrivial behavior of the latter expression in eq.([f1 ] ) is generated by the presence of the operator @xmath211 in the denominator , and the fact that it does not commute with the hamiltonian @xmath134 .
thus an analytical calculation of the green s function as well as the dynamical structure factor is feasible in only few specific problems . in sec .
[ h ] such a calculation has been presented for ionization from the @xmath174 , @xmath212 , and @xmath213 hydrogen - like states . in particular
, we have seen that the deviation of the discussed integrals ( [ defi_1 ] ) and ( [ defi_2 ] ) from their free values are very small : the largest deviation is exactly at the ionization threshold , where , for instance , each of the @xmath174 integrals is equal to the free - electron value multiplied by the factor @xmath214 ( see eq .
( [ mw1s_num ] ) ) .
it can be also noted from  ( [ mw1s ] ) that both integrals are modified in exactly the same proportion , so that their ratio is not affected at any @xmath28 : @xmath215 .
we find however , that this exact proportionality is specific for the ionization from the ground state in the coulomb potential .
the problem of calculating the integrals ( [ defi_1 ] ) and ( [ defi_2 ] ) , however , can be solved in the semiclassical limit , where one can neglect the noncommutativity of the momentum @xmath216 with the hamiltonian , and rather treat this operator as a number vector .
taking also into account that @xmath217 , one can then readily average the latter expression in eq.([f1 ] ) over the directions of @xmath125 and find the formula for the dynamical structure factor : @xmath218 , \label{scls}\ ] ] where @xmath219 is the standard heaviside step function .
the expression in eq .
( [ scls ] ) is nonzero only in the range of @xmath220 satisfying the condition @xmath221 , i.e. between the ( positive ) roots of the binomials in the arguments of the step functions : @xmath222 and @xmath223 .
one can notice that the previously mentioned ` spread and shift ' of the peak in the dynamical structure function in this limit corresponds to a flat pedestal between @xmath224 and @xmath225 .
the calculation of the integrals ( [ defi_1 ] ) and ( [ defi_2 ] ) with the expression ( [ scls ] ) is straightforward , and yields the free - electron expressions ( [ intf_1 ] ) and ( [ intf_2 ] ) for the discussed here integrals in the semiclassical ( wkb ) limit : @xmath226 the appearance of the free - electron expressions here is not surprising , since the equation ( [ scls ] ) can be also viewed as the one for scattering on an electron boosted to the momentum @xmath227 .
the difference from the pure free - electron case however is in the range of the energy transfer @xmath28 .
namely , the expressions ( [ wkbi ] ) are applicable in this case only above the ionization threshold , i.e. at @xmath228 . below the threshold
the electron becomes ` inactive ' .
we believe that the latter conclusion explains the so - called stepping behavior observed empirically  @xcite in the results of numerical calculations .
namely the calculated cross section @xmath229 for ionization of an electron from an atomic orbital follows the free - electron dependence on @xmath28 all the way down to the threshold for the corresponding orbital with a very small , at most a few percent , deviation .
this observation led the authors of ref .
@xcite to suggest the stepping approximation for the ratio of the atomic cross section ( per target electron ) to the free - electron one : @xmath230 where the sum runs over the atomic orbitals with the binding energies @xmath231 and the filling numbers @xmath232 .
clearly , the factor @xmath233 simply counts the fraction of ` active ' atomic electrons at the energy @xmath28 , i.e. those for which the ionization is kinematically possible .
for this reason we refer to @xmath233 as an _ atomic factor_. we conclude here that the stepping approximation is indeed justified with a high accuracy in the approximation of the scattering on independent electrons , i.e. if one neglects the two - electron correlations induced by the interference of terms in the operator @xmath111 in eq .
( [ ne ] ) corresponding to different electrons .
the effects of such an interference will be discussed in the next section .
in considering the neutrino scattering on actual manyelectron atoms one needs to evaluate the dependence of the number of active electrons on @xmath28 and generally also evaluate the effect of the two - electron correlations .
the latter can be studied , for example , in the case of a helium atom , where the electron - electron correlations are known to play a very significant role .
recently , the authors of  @xcite deduced by means of numerical calculations that the @xmath26 contribution to ionization of the he atomic target by impact of electron antineutrinos from reactor and tritium sources strongly departures from the stepping approximation , exhibiting large enhancement relative to the free - electron case . according to  @xcite , the effect is maximal when the @xmath28 value approaches the ionization threshold in helium , @xmath234ev , where the relative enhancement is as large as almost eight orders of magnitude .
it was thus suggested that this finding might have an impact on searches for @xmath26 , provided that its value falls within the range @xmath235 . in this section
we show that ( i ) the result of  @xcite is erroneous and ( ii ) the stepping approximation for helium is well applicable , except the energy region @xmath236 where the differential cross section substantially decreases relative to the free - electron case .
we consider the process where an electron antineutrino with energy @xmath34 scatters on a he atom at energy and spatial - momentum transfers @xmath28 and @xmath125 , respectively . in
what follows we focus on the ionization channel of this process in the kinematical regime @xmath153 , which mimics a typical situation with reactor ( @xmath237mev ) and tritium ( @xmath238kev ) antineutrinos when the case @xmath239 is concerned .
the he target is assumed to be in its ground state @xmath240 with the corresponding energy @xmath231 . since for helium
one has @xmath241 , where @xmath242 is the nuclear charge , the state @xmath240 can be treated nonrelativistically .
as we are interested in the energy region @xmath236 , the final he state @xmath243 ( with one electron in continuum ) can also be treated in the nonrelativistic approximation .    under the above assumptions , the dynamical structure factor  ( [ dsf ] )
is given by @xmath244 here the @xmath245 sum runs over all final he states having one electron ejected in continuum , with @xmath246 being their energies .    for evaluation of the dynamical structure factor  ( [ dyn_str_fact ] )
we employ the same models of the initial and final he states as in  @xcite .
the initial state is given by a product of two @xmath174 hydrogenlike wave functions with an effective charge @xmath247 , @xmath248 where @xmath249 is the bohr radius .
the final state has the form @xmath250,\ ] ] where @xmath251 is an outgoing coulomb wave for the ejected electron with spatial momentum @xmath163 .
@xmath252 is the effective charge experienced by the ejected electron in the field of the final he@xmath253 ion .
contributions to the dynamical structure factor from excited he@xmath253 states are neglected due to their very small overlap with the @xmath254-electron state in the he atom .    to avoid nonphysical effects connected with nonorthogonality of states  ( [ init_state ] ) and  ( [ fin_state ] )
, we use the gram - schmidt orthogonalization @xmath255 substitution of  ( [ init_state ] ) and  ( [ fin_state ] ) into  ( [ dyn_str_fact ] ) thus yields @xmath256 where @xmath257 , and @xmath258 is the inelastic form factor , with @xmath259 it is straightforward to perform the further calculation of the dynamical structure factor analytically ( see , for instance , the textbook  @xcite ) .
the resulting expression is @xmath260,\ ] ] where @xmath261 and ( introducing @xmath262 ) @xmath263 ^ 3 } \bigg\{(p_{i}+\eta k)^2(p_{i}^2+q^2+k^2)^2\nonumber \\&{}&+4kq^2\left[\frac{1}{3}kp_{i}^2-\frac{2}{3}\eta^2kp_{i}^2-\eta^2k^3-\eta p_{i}(p_{i}^2+q^2+k^2)\right ] \bigg\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath264^{i\eta}}{[(p_{eff}-ik)^2+q^2 ] } % \left\{\frac{(k - q+ip_{eff})^2}{[(k - q)^2+p_{eff}^2]^{1+i\eta}}-\frac{(k+q+ip_{eff})^2}{[(k+q)^2+p_{eff}^2]^{1+i\eta}}\right\}. a_2(k , q)&=&\frac{2\exp\left(\eta\,{\rm arccos}\frac{p_{i}^2+q^2-k^2}{\sqrt{(p_{i}^2+q^2+k^2)^2 - 4k^2q^2}}\right)}{(p_{i}^2+q^2+k^2)^2 - 4k^2q^2 } \left[p_{i}\cos\left(\frac{\eta}{2}\ln\frac{(k+q)^2+p_{i}^2}{(k - q)^2+p_{i}^2}\right)\right.\nonumber\\ & { } & \left.+\frac{p_{i}^2-q^2+k^2}{2q } \sin\left(\frac{\eta}{2}\ln\frac{(k+q)^2+p_{eff}^2}{(k - q)^2+p_{i}^2}\right)\right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath265 ^ 2}-\frac{32p_{i}^4}{(4p_{i}^2+q^2)^2}\right\}.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally , the usual choice of the effective charges is @xmath266 and @xmath267 ( see , for instance ,  @xcite and references therein ) .
the value @xmath268 follows from the variational procedure that minimizes the ground - state energy @xmath231 , while the value @xmath267 ensures the correct asymptotic behavior of the final state .
however , the authors of  @xcite utilized in their calculations the values @xmath269 and @xmath270 derived from fitting the photoionization cross - section data on helium with the present model of the he states .    the departures of the differential cross sections  ( [ d1s ] ) and  ( [ d1sw ] ) from the free - electron approximation are characterized by the respective atomic factors @xmath271 where @xmath272 and @xmath273 are the sm and @xmath26 contributions to the differential cross section for scattering of an electron antineutrino on two free electrons .
let us recall that following  @xcite one should expect the @xmath274 value to be of about @xmath275 at @xmath239 .
atomic factors  ( [ at_factor ] ) as functions of the energy transfer  @xcite.,scaledwidth=90.0% ]    numerical results for atomic factors  ( [ at_factor ] ) are shown in fig .
they correspond to the kinematical regime @xmath276 , which is typically realized both for reactor and for tritium antineutrinos when @xmath277ev .
note that in such a case one can safely set the upper limit of integrals in  ( [ d1s ] ) and  ( [ d1sw ] ) to infinity , as the dynamical structure factor @xmath278 rapidly falls down when @xmath279 and practically vanishes in the region @xmath280 .
it can be seen from fig .
[ fig ] that atomic factors exhibit similar behaviors for both sets of the @xmath281 and @xmath252 parameters discussed in the previous section .
namely , their values are minimal ( @xmath282 ) at the ionization threshold , @xmath283 , and tend to unity with increasing @xmath28 . the latter tendency is readily explained by approaching the free - electron limit . it can be also seen that a more or less serious deviation ( @xmath284 ) of the present results from the stepping approximation is observed only in the low - energy region @xmath285ev .
this deviation can be attributed to the effect of the electron - electron correlation in a helium atom .
indeed , if the electrons do not interact with each other , then they occupy two @xmath174 hydrogen - like states ( with opposite spins ) , in which case the departure of the atomic - factor values from unity is , according to the results of sec .
[ h ] , less than 5% .
thus , the calculations presented in fig .
[ fig ] do not confirm the huge enhancement of the @xmath26 contribution with respect to the free - electron approximation .
moreover , in accord with various calculations for other atomic targets  @xcite , we find that at small energy - transfer values the electron binding in helium leads to the appreciable reduction of the differential cross section relative to the free - electron case .
we attribute the erroneous prediction of  @xcite to the incorrect dynamical model that draws an analogy between the nmm - induced ionization and photoionization . indeed , as discussed in sec .
[ nu - at_el ] , the virtual photon in the nmm - induced ionization process can be treated as real only when @xmath184 .
however , the integration in  ( [ d1s ] ) involves the @xmath53 values ranging from @xmath28 up to @xmath286 .
since @xmath287 , the real - photon picture appears to be applicable only in the vicinity of the lower integration limit .
when moving away from that momentum region , one encounters a strong departure from the real - photon approximation which treats the integrand as a constant in the whole integration range , assuming it to be equal to its value at @xmath288 , that is , @xmath289 such an approach is manifestly unjustified , and it gives rise to the spurious enhancement of the @xmath26 contribution to the differential cross section .      in the thomas - fermi model
( see e.g. ref .
@xcite ) the atomic electrons are described as a degenerate free electron gas in a master potential @xmath290 filling the momentum space up to the zero fermi energy , i.e. up to the momentum @xmath291 such that @xmath292 . the electron density @xmath293 then determines the potential @xmath290 from the usual poisson s equation . in the discussed picture at an energy transfer @xmath28
the ionization is possible only for the electrons whose energies in the potential are above @xmath294 , i.e. with momenta above @xmath295 with @xmath296 .
the electrons with lower energy are inactive . calculating the density of the inactive electrons as @xmath297 and subtracting their total number from z ,
one readily arrives at the formula for the atomic factor , i.e. the effective fraction of the active electrons @xmath298 as a function of @xmath28 : @xmath299^{3/2 } \
, x^2 \ , dx~ , \label{zeff}\ ] ] where @xmath300 is the thomas - fermi function , well known and tabulated , of the scaling variable @xmath301 , the energy scale @xmath302 is given by @xmath303 and , finally , @xmath304 is the point where the integrand becomes zero , i.e. corresponding to the radius beyond which all the electrons are active at the given energy @xmath28 .
the energy scale @xmath302 in germanium ( z=32 ) evaluates to @xmath305kev . the thomas - fermi atomic factor for germanium calculated from the formula ( [ zeff ] )
is shown by the dashed line in the plot of fig .
the discussed statistical model is known to approximate the average bulk properties of the atomic electrons with a relative accuracy @xmath306 and as long as the essential distances @xmath307 satisfy the condition @xmath308 , which condition in terms of the scaling variable @xmath309 reads as @xmath310 . in terms of the formula ( [ zeff ] ) for the number of active electrons , the lower bound on the applicability of the model is formally broken at @xmath311 , i.e. at the energy scale of the inner atomic shells .
however the effect of the deactivation of the inner electrons is small , of order @xmath312 in comparison with the total number @xmath49 of the electrons . on the other hand , at low @xmath28 ,
including the most interesting region of @xmath313 , the integral in eq .
( [ zeff ] ) is determined by the range of @xmath309 of order one , where the model treatment is reasonably justified .     the atomic factor @xmath245 for germanium in the stepping approximation with the actual energies of the orbitals ( solid line ) and its interpolation in the thomas - fermi model ( dashed )  @xcite.,scaledwidth=90.0% ]    the energies of the inner @xmath314 and @xmath315 orbitals in the germanium atom are well known ( see e.g. ref .
@xcite ) and provide the necessary data for a description of the neutrino scattering by the stepping formula ( [ step ] ) down to the values of the energy transfer @xmath28 in the range of the binding of the @xmath315 electrons , i.e. at @xmath316kev .
the corresponding steps in the atomic factor are shown in fig .
one can see that the stepping atomic factor  ( [ step ] ) mimics upon average over the energy intervals between the electron shells in germanium the thomas - fermi result .
thus , it can be considered as refinement of the latter due to account for the quantization of the electron binding energies .
it can be mentioned that if one applies formulas of sec .
[ h ] to the onset of the @xmath254 shell step , i.e. just above 10.9kev , the difference from the shown in the plot step function would be practically invisible in the scale of fig .
[ fig2 ] .
while the treatments based on a generic model of manyelectron atomic targets allow to determine characteristic features and behaviors of the differential cross sections  ( [ d1s ] ) and  ( [ d1sw ] ) , to obtain accurate numerical results one needs to resort to _ ab initio _ calculations .
such calculations can be realized using the hartree - fock ( hf ) method ( see , for instance ,  @xcite ) and its modifications . in the hf approximation ,
atomic electrons occupy one - electron states in a spherically - symmetric mean - field potential which is derived self - consistently from the solution of the hf equations . accordingly
, each one - electron state independently contributes to the atomic ionization process .
for the first time this approach was formulated in refs .
@xcite , where it was illustrated with numerical calculations of neutrino - impact ionization of the f and mo atomic targets .
the wave functions and energies of atomic bound states were calculated within the relativistic hf method  @xcite with local exchange - correlation potential  @xcite .
the wave functions of outgoing electrons were obtained by a numerical solution of the dirac equation in the same mean - field potential as for the wave functions of discrete states . performed in ref .
@xcite numerical calculations for ionization of the iodine atoms by impact of reactor antineutrinos led the authors to suggest the stepping approximation  ( [ step ] ) .    in a very recent theoretical study  @xcite
, the authors adopted the multiconfiguration relativistic random - phase approximation ( mcrrpa )  @xcite to evaluate the germanium atomic factors .
this particular method is based on the time - dependent hf approximation  @xcite , however , several important features make it a better tool beyond the usual hf approximation to describe transitions of open - shell atoms of high atomic number @xmath49 .
first , for open - shell atoms , typically there are more than one configuration which have the desired ground - state properties .
therefore , a proper hf reference state should be formed by a linear combination of these allowed configurations , i.e. , a multiconfiguration reference state .
second , for atoms of high @xmath49 , the relativistic corrections can no longer be ignored . by using a dirac equation , instead of a schrdinger one , the leading relativistic terms in the atomic hamiltonian
are treated nonperturbatively from the onset .
third , two - body correlations in addition to the hf approximation are generally important for excited states and transition matrix elements .
the random - phase approximation ( rpa ) is devised to account for part of the additional two - body correlations ( particles can be in the valence or core states ) not only for the excited but also for the reference state , and in a lot of cases , it gives good agreement with experiment  @xcite .
furthermore , it has been shown that rpa equations preserve gauge invariance  @xcite ; this provides a measure of stability of their solutions .
the mcrrpa has been applied successfully to photoexcitation and photoionization of divalent atoms such as be , mg , zn , and etc .
( some of the results are summarized in  @xcite ) . following similar treatments , the authors of  @xcite treated the electronic configuration of germanium as a core filled up to the 4@xmath48 orbits , with two valence electrons in the @xmath317 orbits .
as the ge ground state is a @xmath318 state , it is a linear combination of two configurations , namely [ zn]@xmath319 and [ zn]@xmath320 .
the wave function was calculated using the multiconfiguration dirac - fock package  @xcite .
the atomic excitations due to weak and magnetic scattering were solved by the mcrrpa equation , and consequently transition matrix elements were yielded . in that calculation ,
all the current operators were expanded by spherical multipoles , and the resulting final scattering states were represented in the spherical wave basis and subject to the incoming - wave boundary condition .    compared with the previous works on the same subject  @xcite which are also in the similar spirit of the relativistic hf method , the mcrrpa approach differs in several respects .
first , due to the near degeneracy of the @xmath321 and @xmath322 levels , using a multiconfiguration reference state is necessary .
second , the nonlocal fock term is treated exactly , without resorting to the local exchange potentials .
third , the excited states are calculated with two - body correlation built in by mcrrpa , not simply by solving a coulomb wave function with a static one - hole mean field .
the sm ( weak ) and nmm contributions to the differential cross section of @xmath323-ge ionization at @xmath324mev  @xcite in comparison with the corresponding stepping - approximation results ( fea ) .
the nmm value is set to be the current upper limit @xmath325
@xcite.,scaledwidth=90.0% ]    fig .
[ fig : ge_ab_initio ] shows numerical results from ref .
@xcite for ionization of germanium by impact of an electron antineutrino . as can be seen , in the energy region @xmath326kev the results
are very well explained by the stepping - approximation formula  ( [ step ] ) . at the same time , in the sub - kev region , i.e. , where the electrons from the @xmath254 and @xmath327 shells in germanium stay ` inactive ' , both the sm and nmm contributions appear to be significantly suppressed as compared to the stepping approximation .
the latter finding seems to disagree with the semiclassical approach discussed in sec .
[ wkb ] , according to which the ionization involving more loosely - bound electron states , such as those belonging to the @xmath315 and @xmath328 shells , is expected to follow more closely the free - electron scenario .
notice that a similar suppression of the atomic - factor values close to the ionization threshold was observed in the case of helium ( see fig .
[ fig ] ) , and it was attributed to the two - electron correlation effect .
thus , we can suggest that the correlation effects beyond the approximation of independent electrons lead to the suppression of atomic factors in the low - energy region
. this feature will be important for the next - generation experiments with ge detectors having energy thresholds in the sub - kev region  @xcite .
in this review , we have considered the neutrino - atom ionizing collisions with focus on the most important theoretical issues related to the problem .
the main results discussed in the paper can be summed up as follows .
the differential over the energy transfer cross section given by the free - electron formulas ( [ cr_sec_sm ] ) and ( [ cr_sec_mu ] ) and the stepping behavior of the atomic factor given by eq .
( [ step ] ) provides a reasonable description of the neutrino - impact ionization of a complex atom , such as germanium , down to quite low energy transfer . the deviation from this approximation due to the onset of the ionization near
the threshold is less than 5% ( of the height of the step ) for the @xmath254 electrons , if one applies the analytical behavior of this onset that one finds for the ground state of a hydrogen - like ion .
it is also found that the free - electron expressions for the differential cross section are not affected by the atomic binding effects in the semiclassical limit and for independent electrons .
these analytical results can support the numerically determined behaviors of the electroweak and magnetic contributions to the neutrino - impact ionization of various atomic targets within the mean - field model  @xcite . at the same time , very recent numerical calculations of the @xmath323-impact ionization processes of helium  @xcite and germanium  @xcite exhibit suppression of the sm and nmm differential cross sections relative to the stepping approximation with lowering the energy - transfer value .
this suppression can be assigned to the electron - electron correlation effects .
a theoretical analysis  @xcite of ionization of helium by electron - antineutrino impact shows no evidence of the recently predicted enhancement  @xcite of the electromagnetic contribution as compared with the free - electron case .
in contrast , in line with previous studies on other atomic targets , it is found that the magnitudes of the differential cross sections decrease relative to the free - electron approximation when the energy transfer is close to the ionization threshold .
thus , no sensitivity enhancement can be expected when using the he atomic target in searches for nmm .
and the stepping approximation appears to be valid , within a few - percent accuracy , down to the energy - transfer values as low as almost 100ev .
we thus conclude that for practical applications , i.e. for the analysis of data of the searches for nmm , one can safely apply the free - electron formulas and the stepping approximation at the energy transfer down to this range .
when analyzing the low-@xmath28 data of the current high - sensitivity experiments searching for neutrino electromagnetic properties , one must go beyond the free - electron approximation for the elastic neutrino - electron scattering and take into account the atomic - ionization effects , at least , in the case of @xmath254 electrons . at the present time , the experiment gemma - ii with reactor antineutrinos is in preparation  @xcite .
its sensitivity to the nmm value is expected to be at the level of @xmath329 .
to achieve such a sensitivity level , which is the region of astrophysical interest  @xcite , it is planed to reduce the effective energy threshold of a ge detector from 2.8 to 1.5kev .
this threshold value will be very close to the binding energies of the @xmath327 electrons in germanium ( 1.2 - 1.4kev  @xcite ) .
recently , a @xmath227-type point - contact ge detector  @xcite has been implemented in the texono experiment with reactor antineutrinos .
the energy threshold of this detector is about 0.3kev , which value is comparable to the binding energies of the @xmath330 electrons in germanium ( 0.12 - 0.18kev  @xcite ) .
this means that an accurate analysis of the corresponding data will require numerical calculations based on the _ ab initio _ methods .    with lowering the @xmath28 value down to @xmath331 ,
an additional collision channel apart from ionization opens up , namely the coherent elastic neutrino - nucleus scattering  @xcite , which has not been observed experimentally so far .
the early treatments of the atomic effects in the coherent elastic neutrino - nucleus scattering within sm can be found in  @xcite .
it should be noted that any deviation of the measured cross section of the coherent elastic neutrino - nucleus scattering from the very precisely known sm value  @xcite will provide a signature of the bsm physics ( see  @xcite ) . in this context , the accurate calculations of the nmm - induced contribution to the cross section of the coherent elastic neutrino - nucleus scattering appear to be of particular importance .
the nmm - induced coherent neutrino scattering by single atoms as well as by crystals was discussed theoretically only in  @xcite
. however , further studies are necessary for the correct interpretation of future measurements at low @xmath28 values  @xcite .
this work was partially supported by the russian foundation for basic research ( grants no .
14 - 01 - 00420-a and no .
14 - 22 - 03043-ofi - m ) .
99 c. giunti and c.w .
kim , _ fundamentals of neutrino physics and astrophysics _ , oxford university press , oxford , uk , 2007 .
m. c. gonzalez - garcia and m. maltoni , `` phenomenology with massive neutrinos , '' _ physics reports _ , vol .
460 , no . 1 - 3 , pp . 1 - 129 , 2008 .
s. bilenky , _ introduction to the physics of massive and mixed neutrinos _ ,
817 of lecture notes in physics , springer , new york , ny , usa , 2010 .
z. z. xing and s. zhou , _ neutrinos in particle physics , astronomy and cosmology _ , zhejiang university press , 2011 .
c. giunti and a. studenikin , `` neutrino electromagnetic properties , '' _ physics of atomic nuclei _ , vol .
12 , pp . 2089 - 2125 , 2009 .
c. broggini , c. giunti , and a. studenikin , `` electromagnetic properties of neutrinos , '' _ advances in high energy physics _ , vol .
2012 , article i d 459526 , 47 pages , 2012 . c.  giunti and a.  studenikin , `` neutrino electromagnetic interactions : a window to new physics , '' arxiv:1403.6344 [ hep - ph ] , 72 pages . s.  t.  petcov , `` the processes @xmath332 , @xmath333 , @xmath334 in the weinberg - salam model with neutrino mixing , '' _ soviet journal of nuclear physics _ , vol .
25 , p. 340
k. fujikawa and r. shrock , `` magnetic moment of a massive neutrino and neutrino - spin rotation , '' _ physical review letters _
963 - 966 , 1980 .
b.  pal and l.  wolfenstein , `` radiative decays of massive neutrinos , '' _ physical review d _ , vol .
3 , pp . 766 - 773 , 1982 .
r. e. shrock , `` electromagnetic properties and decays of dirac and majorana neutrinos in a general class of gauge theories , '' _ nuclear physics b _ , vol .
359 - 379 , 1982 .
j. f. nieves , `` electromagnetic properties of majorana neutrinos , '' _ physical review d _ , vol .
3152 - 3158 , 1982
. b. kayser , `` majorana neutrinos and their electromagnetic properties , '' _ physical review d _ ,
26 , no . 7 , pp . 1662 - 1670 , 1982 .
b. kayser , `` cpt , cp , and c phases , and their effects , in majorana - particle processes , '' _ physical review d _ , vol .
1023 - 1033 , 1984 . j.  f.  beacom and p.  vogel , `` neutrino magnetic moments , flavor mixing , and the super - kamiokande solar data , '' _ physical review letters _ , vol .
25 , pp . 5222 - 5225 , 1999 .
n.  f.  bell , v.  cirigliano , m.  j.  ramsey - musolf , p.  vogel , and m.  b.  wise , `` how magnetic is the dirac neutrino ? , '' _ physical review letters _ ,
15 , article i d 151802 , 4 pages , 2005 .
n.  f.  bell , m.  gorchtein , m.  j.  ramsey - musolf , p.  vogel , and p.  wang , `` model independent bounds on magnetic moments of majorana neutrinos , '' _ physics letters b _ , vol .
642 , no.4 , pp .
377 - 383 , 2006 .
h. t. wong , h. b. li , s. t. lin et al .
, `` search of neutrino magnetic moments with a high - purity germanium detector at the kuo - sheng nuclear power station , '' _ physical review d _ , vol .
1 , article i d 012001 , 16 pages , 2007 .
a. g. beda , v. b. brudanin , v. g. egorov et al . , `` the results of search for the neutrino magnetic moment in gemma experiment , '' _ advances in high energy physics _ , vol .
2012 , article i d 350150 , 12 pages , 2012 .
l. b. auerbach , r. l. burman , d. o. caldwell et al .
, `` measurement of electron - neutrino electron elastic scattering , '' _ physcial review d _ , vol .
11 , 11 pages , 2001 .
r. schwienhorst , d. ciampa , c. erickson et al .
, `` a new upper limit for the tau - neutrino magnetic moment , '' _ physics letters b _ , vol . 513 , no . 1 - 2 , pp .
23 - 29 , 2001 .
d. w. liu , y. ashie , s. fukuda et al .
, `` limits on the neutrino magnetic moment using 1496 days of super - kamiokande - i solar neutrino data , '' _ physical review letters _ , vol .
2 , article i d 021802 , 5 pages , 2004 . c. arpesella ,
h. o. back , m. balata et al . , `` direct measurement of the @xmath335be solar neutrino flux with 192 days of borexino data , '' _ physical review letters _ , vol
. 101 , no .
9 , article i d 091302 , 6 pages , 2008
. g. raffelt , `` new bound on neutrino dipole moments from globular - cluster stars , '' _ physical review letters _ ,
2856 - 2858 , 1990 .
r. n. mohapatra and p. b. pal , _ massive neutrinos in physics and astrophysics _
72 of _ lecture notes in physics _ , world scientific , river edge , nj , usa , 3rd edition , 2004 .
e. d. commins and p. h. bucksbaum , _ weak interactions of leptons and quarks _ , thid edition , cambridge university press , cambridge , 1983 .
j. f. carlson and j. r. oppenheimer , `` the impacts of fast electrons and magnetic neutrons , '' _ physical review _ , vol .
41 , no . 6 , pp .
763 - 792 , 1932 .
h. bethe , `` ionization power of a neutrino with magnetic moment , '' _ mathematical proceedings of the cambridge philosophical society _ , vol .
108 - 115 , 1935 .
a. v. kyuldjiev , `` searching for effects of neutrino magnetic moments at reactors and accelerators , '' _ nuclear physics b _ , vol .
387 - 397 , 1984 .
g. domogatsky and d. nadezhin , `` modern theory of star evolution and experiments of f. reines on anti @xmath37-scattering detection , '' _ soviet journal of nuclear physics _ , vol .
12 , p. 678
, 1971 . c. l. cowan and f. reines , `` neutrino magnetic moment upper limit , '' _ physical review _
528 - 530 , 1957 . c. l. cowan , jr . ,
f. reines , and f. b. harrison , `` upper limit on the neutrino magnetic moment , '' _ physcial review _ , vol .
5 , pp . 1294 - 1294 , 1954 .
p. vogel and j. engel , `` neutrino electromagnetic form factors , '' _ physical review d _
3378 - 3383 , 1989
. h. t. wong , `` low energy neutrino and dark matter physics with sub - kev germanium detectors , '' international journal of modern physics , vol .
20 , no . 8 , pp . 1463 - 1470 , 2011
. h. b. li , h. y. liao , s. t. lin et al .
, `` limits on spin - independent couplings of wimp dark matter with a @xmath227-type point - contact germanium detector , '' physical review letters , vol . 110 , no . 26 , article
i d 261301 , 5 pages , 2013 .
h. b. li , l. singh , m. k. singh et al .
, `` differentiation of bulk and surface events in @xmath227-type point - contact germanium detectors for light wimp searches , '' vol .
56 , pp . 1 - 8 , 2014 .
v. gaponov , yu . l. dobrynin , and v. n. tikhonov , `` neutrino and antineutrino scattering on a hydrogen - like atom , '' _ soviet journal of nuclear physics _ , vol .
22 , p. 170
v.  yu .  dobretsov , a.  b.  dobrotsvetov , and s.  a.  fayans , `` inelastic neutrino scattering by atomic electrons , '' _ soviet journal of nuclear physics _ , vol .
55 , p. 1180 , 1992 .
s.  a.  fayans , v.  yu .  dobretsov , and a.  b.  dobrotsvetov , `` effect of atomic binding on inelastic @xmath336e scattering '' _ physics letters b _ , vol .
291 , nos . 1 - 2 , pp . 1 - 6 , 1992 .
v.  i.  kopeikin , l.  a.  mikaelyan , v.  v.  sinev and s.  a.  fayans , `` scattering of reactor antineutrinos by electrons '' , _ physics of atomic nuclei _ , vol .
1859 - 1864 , 1997 .
s.  a.  fayans , l.  a.  mikaelyan , and v.  v.  sinev , `` weak and magnetic inelastic scattering of antineutrinos on atomic electrons , '' _ physics of atomic nuclei _ , vol .
64 , no . 8 , pp . 1475 - 1480 , 2001 . g. j. gounaris , e.a .
paschos , p. i. porfyriadis , `` the ionization of h ,
he or ne atoms using neutrinos or antineutrinos at kev energies , '' _ physics letters b _ , vol .
525 , nos . 1 - 2 , pp .
63 - 70 , 2002 .
v. i. kopeikin , l. a. mikaelyan , and v. v. sinev , `` inelastic scattering of tritium - source antineutrinos on electrons of germanium atoms , '' _ physics of atomic nuclei _ , vol .
707 - 711 , 2003 .
h. t. wong , h. b. li , and s. t. lin , `` enhanced sensitivities for the searches of neutrino magnetic moments through atomic ionization , '' _ physical review letters _ , vol .
105 , no . 6 , article i d 061801 , 4 pages , 2010 .
m. voloshin , `` neutrino scattering on atomic electrons in searches for the neutrino magnetic moment , '' _ physical review letters _ , vol .
20 , article i d 201801 , 4 pages , 2010 .
h.  t.  wong , h.  b.  li , and s.  t.  lin,``enhanced sensitivities for the searches of neutrino magnetic moments through atomic ionization , '' http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/1001.2074v3 .
k.  a.  kouzakov and a.  i.  studenikin,``magnetic neutrino scattering on atomic electrons revisited , '' _ physics letters b _ , vol .
252 - 256 , 2011 .
k. a. kouzakov and a. i. studenikin , `` electromagnetic neutrino - atom collisions : the role of electron binding , '' _ nuclear physics b ( proc . suppl . )
353 - 356 , 2011 .
k. a. kouzakov , a. i. studenikin , and m. b. voloshin , `` testing neutrino magnetic moment in ionization of atoms by neutrino impact , '' _ jetp letters _ , vol .
699 - 703 , 2011 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.5543 .
k. a. kouzakov , a. i. studenikin , and m. b. voloshin , `` neutrino - impact ionization of atoms in searches for neutrino magnetic moment , '' _ physical review d _
11 , article i d 113001 , 11 pages , 2011 . v. p. martemyanov and v. g. tsinoev , `` ionization of helium atoms under the effect of the antineutrino magnetic moment , '' _ physics of atomic nuclei _ ,
12 , pp . 1671 - 1675 , 2011 .
k. a. kouzakov and a. i. studenikin , `` on sensitivity of neutrino - helium ionizing collisions to neutrino magnetic moments , '' _ physics of particles and nuclei letters _ , vol .
4 , pp . 458 - 461 , 2014 .
l.  van hove , `` correlations in space and time and born approximation scattering in systems of interacting particles , '' _ physical review _ , vol . 95 , no . 1 , pp . 249 - 262 , 1954 .
u. fano , `` penetration of protons , alpha particles , and mesons , '' _ annual review of nucler science _
13 , pp . 1 - 66 , 1963 .
belki , `` bound - free non - relativistic transition form factors in atomic hydrogen , '' _ journal of physics b : atomic and molecular physics _ , vol .
12 , pp . 1907 - 1914 , 1981 .
a.  r.  holt , `` matrix elements for bound - free transitions in atomic hydrogen , '' _ journal of physics b : atomic and molecular physics _
2 , no . 11 , pp .
1209 - 1213 , 1969 .
a. i. akhiezer and v. b. berestetskii , _ quantum electrodynamics _ , wiley , new york , 2nd edition , 1965 .
l.  d.  landau and e.  m.  lifshits , _ quantum mechanics ( non - relativistic theory ) _ , pergamon , oxford , 3rd edition , 1977 .
k. a. kouzakov , s. a. zaytsev , yu . v. popov , and m. takahashi , `` singly ionizing 100-mev / amu c@xmath337he collisions with small momentum transfer , '' _ physical review a _ , vol .
86 , article i d 032710 , 8 pages , 2012 .
b. l. henke , e. m. gullikson , and j. c. davis , `` x - ray interactions : photoabsorption , scattering , transmission , and reflection at @xmath338ev , @xmath339 , '' atomic data and nuclear data tables , vol .
181 - 342 , 1993 .
i. p. grant , `` relativistic self - consistent fields , '' _ proceedings of the royal society a _ , vol .
555 - 576 , 1961 .
i. p. grant , `` relativistic self - consistent fields , '' _ proceedings of the physical society _ , vol .
523 - 527 , 1965 . v. l. moruzzi , j. f. janak , and a. r. williams ,
_ calculated electronic properties of metals _ , pergamon , oxford , 1978 .
chen , h .- c .
n . huang et al . , `` atomic ionization of germanium by neutrinos from an ab initio approach , '' _ physics letters b _ , vol .
159 - 162 , 2014 .
huang and w. r. johnson , `` multiconfiguration relativistic random - phase approximation .
theory , '' _ physical review a _ , vol .
634 - 649 , 1982 .
n . huang , `` relativistic many - body theory of atomic transitions .
the relativistic equation - of - motion approach , '' _ physical review a _ , vol .
734 - 739 , 1982 .
p. jrgensen , `` molecular and atomic applications of time - dependent hartree - fock theory , '' _ annual review of physical chemistry _ ,
359 - 380 , 1975 .
amusia and n. a. cherepkov , `` many - body electron correlations in scattering processes , '' _ case studies in atomic physics _ , vol . 5 , pp .
47 - 179 , 1975 .
d. l. lin , `` gauge properties of the hartree - fock and random - phase approximations , '' _ physical review a _ , vol . 16 , no .
600 - 605 , 1977 .
n . huang , h .- c .
chi , and h .- s .
chou , `` the mcrrpa theory and its applications to photoexcitation and photoionization , '' _ chinese journal of physics _ ,
33 , no . 6 , pp .
565 - 644 , 1995 .
j. p. desclaux , `` a multiconfiguration relativistic dirac - fock program , '' _ computer physics communications _ , vol . 9 , no . 1 , pp .
31 - 45 , 1975 .
d. z. freedman , `` coherent effects of a weak neutral current , '' _ physical review d _ , vol .
5 , pp . 1389 - 1392 , 1974 .
v. gaponov and v. n. tikhonov , `` elastic scattering of low - energy neutrinos by atomic systems , '' _ soviet journal of nuclear physics _ , vol .
26 , p. 314
, 1977 . l. m. sehgal and m. wanninger , `` atomic effects in coherent neutrino scattering , '' _ physics letters b _ , vol .
107 - 112 , 1986 .
a. drukier and l. stodolsky , `` principles and applications of a neutral - current detector for neutrino physics and astronomy , '' _ physical review d _ , vol .
2295 - 2309 , 1984
. k. scholberg , `` prospects for measuring coherent neutrino - nucleus elastic scattering at a stopped - pion neutrino source , '' _ physical review d _ , vol .
73 , article i d 033005 , 9 pages , 2006 .
j. barranco , o. g. miranda , and t. i. rashba , `` probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei , '' _ journal of high energy physics _ , vol .
02 , article i d 021 , 14 pages , 2005 .
j. barranco , o. g. miranda , and t. i. rashba , `` sensitivity of low energy neutrino experiments to physics beyond the standard model , '' _ physical review d _ ,
vol .76 , article i d 073008 , 9 pages , 2007 .
s. davidson , c. pea - garay , n. rius , and a. santamaria , `` present and future b ounds on non - standa rd neutrino interactions , '' _ journal of high energy physics _ ,
03 , article i d 011 , 34 pages , 2003 .
j. augustin , b. mller , and w. greiner , `` magnetic neutrino scattering by crystals , '' _ physical review d _ ,
5 , pp . 1683 - 1686 , 1990 . j. a. formaggio , e. figueroa - feliciano , and a. j. anderson , `` sterile neutrinos , coherent scattering , and oscillometry measurements with low - temperature bolometers , '' _ physical review d _
85 , article i d 013009 , 14 pages , 2012 .