optical spectra of active galactic nuclei ( agn ) exhibit an extremely wide variety of properties .
the emission - line regions of agn have proven to be among the most complex of all astrophysical environments @xcite .
agn have also been known to emit a substantial fraction of their luminosity as x - rays .
multi - wavelength observations of well - defined source samples are effective in understanding the physical processes in agn . in the last decade ,
several correlations between optical emission line properties and x - ray properties were noted @xcite : for instance , the strong correlations between optical fe  ii , [ o  iii]@xmath1 line strengths , velocity width of h@xmath0 and the slope of soft x - ray continuum ( @xmath2 ) .
these correlations received great interest previously and were expected to give important insight into the agn phenomenon .
still , however , their interpretation remained unclear .
it is therefore of great importance to test whether these correlations are fundamental properties or subtle selection effects , and search for new ones .
clearly , a large and homogeneous x - ray selected sample would be advantageous in addressing these issues .
we present such a sample here .
x - ray agn samples are also of great interest for a number of other issues .
agn of different types are the major contributors to the extragalactic soft and hard x - ray background ( xrb ) .
the definitions of statistically significant agn samples using x - ray data are key to test agn number - flux relations , luminosity functions and cosmological evolution . in the course of the rosat all sky survey ( rass ) @xcite , many new agn have been identified by different teams , confirming that x - ray surveys are very efficient in finding new agn .
@xcite performed an unbiased survey of all bright , @xmath3 , high galactic latitude sources in the rass without applying other selection criteria .
* paper i ) identified a sample with high x - ray to optical flux ratio .
@xcite and @xcite presented a catalog of sources in selected areas down to the rass limit .
@xcite drew a high galactic latitude sample from the rass with soft pspc spectra ( @xmath4 ) , the corresponding sample of point - like x - ray sources with relatively hard x - ray spectra ( @xmath5 ) was presented by @xcite . @xcite published a catalog of northern agn in the rass based on their schmidt plate survey .
these authors presented new agn , but they did not use their samples to address correlations issues .
this will be done with the present sample .    in paper
i we described and presented the optical identification of a sample of 165 x - ray sources with high x - ray to optical flux ratio ( @xmath6 ) discovered in the rass .
about 73% of the sources were identified as agn , including 115 emission line agn ( qsos and seyferts ) as well as 2 bl lac objects and 4 bl lac candidates . in this paper
we investigate the optical emission line properties of the emission line agn that were identified as main optical counterparts of the sample and discuss their connection with x - ray properties .
not included in the following discussion are the bl lac objects .    the initial identification program excluded known x - ray sources that have counterparts in the simbad , ned and agn catalogs . motivated by the need of larger and better samples ,
we have cross - referenced the rass bright source catalog with the ned and agn catalogs .
we find that 40 known emission line agn meet our selection criteria . , where cr and r represent x - ray count rate and r magnitude respectively ; declination @xmath7 ; galactic latitude @xmath8 ; optical counterparts within a circle with radius @xmath9 , where @xmath10 is the rass position error given by voges   et   al.(1996 ) ; optical counterparts with r magnitudes between 13.5 and 16.5 .
] in order to keep consistent emission line properties measurements , new optical spectra have been acquired for the 40 additional sources .
these data , combined with the previous optical identifications , provide a large , bright and ( @xmath6 ) limited sample of emission line agn in the rosat x - ray band .
the relatively complete sample is the largest x - ray selected agn sample with intense optical investigation so far .
as described in paper  i , our classifications and identifications were based on low resolution spectra obtained with a 2.16  m telescope at xinglong station , national astronomical observatories of china ( naoc ) .
these spectra were exposed to reach a s / n suitable for a reliable classification .
the quality of the majority spectra is sufficient to measure the properties of the emission lines , such as the line widths and line strengths .
for spectra with inadequate s / n , new low resolution ( @xmath1110  fwhm ) optical spectroscopy was performed using the 2.16  m telescope at naoc .
all objects in our emission line agn subsample are found to be seyfert 1 type agn . throughout this paper seyfert 1
galaxies and qsos will be discussed jointly , since these two classes are distinguished only by a certain luminosity level according to our classification criterion .
we do not divide the seyfert 1 class into subclasses such as seyfert 1.5 - 1.9 or nls1 galaxies ( as defined by @xcite , @xcite ) , since the definitions of seyfert classifications depend on the resolution of the spectra used and the noise in the spectra @xcite .
the paper is organized as follows .
detailed optical measurements are given in sect .
the statistical properties are investigated in sect .
3 . several diagnostically important correlations that exist between emission line and continuum properties are studied .
4 discusses the implications of the results , followed by a brief summary of the main conclusions of the paper .    throughout this paper , a hubble constant of @xmath12 and a deceleration parameter of @xmath13
are assumed and all measured parameters are quoted for the rest frame of the source .
the known sources as well as sources without high quality observations in the identification campaign were investigated during several observing runs performed from november 1998 through december 2000 .
the low resolution spectra were taken with the naoc 2.16  m telescope and the omr spectrograph , using a tektronix @xmath14 ccd as detector .
the grating of 300  g  mm@xmath15 was employed in order to get large wavelength coverage .
all observations were made through a 2.3@xmath16 slit that produced a resolution of 10 to 11  as measured from the comparison spectra .
this set - up provided similar wavelength coverage ( 3800
8200 ) and resolution to the identification data .
exposure time was generally between 1200s and 3600s depending on the brightness of the object .
for a few objects , multiple exposures were performed in order to get a higher s / n spectrum .
the exposures were combined prior to extraction where possible in order to help remove cosmic ray contamination . in cases when the target source moved across the ccd chip between exposures ,
the data were extracted separately from each frame and then combined .
the raw data were reduced following standard procedures using iraf .
the ccd reductions included bias subtraction , flatfield correction and cosmic - ray removal .
wavelength calibration was carried out using helium - neon - argon lamps taken at the beginning and end of each exposure . the resulting wavelength accuracy is better than 1   .
the flux calibration was derived with 2 to 3 observations of kpno standard stars @xcite per night .      in many of the spectra
there is a clear contribution from blends of fe  ii line emission on both the blue and red sides of the h@xmath0-[o  iii ] complex .
these blends contaminate strong lines such as [ o  iii]@xmath174959,5007 , and may alter the flux and width of h@xmath0+[o  iii]@xmath174959,5007 . in order to reliably measure line parameters and to determine the strength of the fe ii emission , we have carefully removed the fe  ii multiplets following the method described by @xcite , which relies on an fe  ii template .
the template used in the present work is the same as that of @xcite , namely the fe  ii lines of i  zw  1 , a bright nls1 widely known for the strong and narrow permitted fe  ii emission @xcite .
the observed spectra were wavelength - shifted to the rest frame according to the redshift.@xmath185007 to be the systemic redshift as most commonly used .
the redshift was derived from fitting a gaussian to the upper half of the observed [ o  iii]@xmath185007 line in each spectrum .
] the whole template was broadened to the fwhm of the broad h@xmath0 line by convolving with a gaussian and scaled to match the line intensities .
the best match was then searched for in the two - dimensional parameter space of line width and line strength . from each object the best - fit fe  ii spectrum
was then subtracted .
a successful fe  ii subtraction showed a flat continuum between the h@xmath19 and h@xmath0 and between 51005400  ( which covers the fe  ii multiplets 48 , 49 ) .
the fe  ii flux was measured between the rest wavelength 4434  and 4684   as in @xcite .
the characteristic property of seyfert  1 type agn is the presence of broad emission lines .
the line widths and their distributions provide important information on masses of the central black holes and mass distributions .
the broad balmer lines in agn exhibit a wide variety of profile shapes and a large range in width @xcite and they are often strongly asymmetric @xcite . in many cases
h@xmath0 is a mixture of broad and narrow components .
differences in the relative strengths of these components account for much of the diversity of broad line profiles @xcite .
the fe  ii subtracted spectra were used to measure the non - fe  ii line properties . in order to isolate the broad h@xmath0 component in all spectra ,
we have assumed that the emission line profiles can be represented by a single or a combination of gaussian profiles .
@xcite claimed that the broad emission lines in nls1 galaxies were better fitted with lorentzian profiles than with gaussian profiles .
however , as noted in @xcite , the choice of gaussian or lorentzian profiles as representatives of the observed emission lines may bear no physical meaning .
we performed a multiple gaussian fit in the present work for its simplicity and a direct comparison with the measurements of previous studies ( e.g. @xcite ) .
we adopted the method described by @xcite and used the iraf package specfit to measure blended lines .
as a first step we tried to fit the emission lines with a single gaussian component .
it worked well for most forbidden lines , e.g. , [ o  iii]@xmath185007 .
however , this simplest representation could not fit adequately the wings of h@xmath0 , although its core was nicely fitted in most of targets . in such cases , we then included one narrow component and one broad component to describe adequately the observed profile .
( note that when h@xmath0 measurements were taken from the literature , many of them refer to the whole line . ) for each assumed component , a first guess of the central wavelength , the total flux , and width of that component were specified .
there were two parameters for each continuum component , i.e. , the flux and the slope .
initially , we constructed a narrow component with a width determined from fitting the [ o  iii ] lines . in some spectra
such a guess failed to give a good fit and needed an additional component .
we then left the width of the narrow component as a free parameter .
it led to a nice fitting result by checking the residual , i.e. , the narrow component could be well isolated from the broad component . for h@xmath0 lines with asymmetric profile , the two gaussian components are not stationary in wavelength .
the velocity shift between the broad and narrow components is defined as the shift of the broad component relative to the narrow component in units of km  s@xmath15 ( see also zheng et al 2002 ) . as an illustration , we show the decomposition in figure  1 .
the observed profile is represented by a solid line , the total fit by a dashed line , the individual gaussian components by a dot - dashed line and the differences between the data and the fit ( the residual ) by the lower dotted line .
the broad component is referred as h@xmath20 , and the narrow component as h@xmath21 .
the fwhm h@xmath20 is what we consider as representative of the broad line region ( blr ) .
the instrumental resolution was determined from the fwhms of night sky spectra taken with each of the exposures and tested by comparison - lamp spectra .
all quoted line widths were corrected for the instrumental resolution .
the uncertainty of h@xmath0 velocity shift measurement is within 150  km  s@xmath15 . to measure line fluxes and equivalent widths ( ew ) ,
power - law continua were fitted and subtracted from underneath the lines and the remaining line flux was integrated . for most objects ,
the uncertainty of flux measurement of emission lines is about 10% to 15% .
the continuum level at the position of h@xmath0 @xmath184861 was measured from the fe  ii subtracted spectra .
all equivalent widths measurements in this paper refer to the continuum at that point to allow direct comparison with the measurements for other samples @xcite .
the optical index @xmath22 was calculated using the continuum flux density at 4000   and 7000   in the rest frame .    for the x - ray analysis ,
a single power law description was employed .
this application has proven to be a fairly good approximation for agn in previous studies ( e.g. fiore et al .
1994 , brinkmann & siebert 1994 , schartel et al .
1996 , grupe et al .
1998 ) . because of the limited signal - to - noise ratio of the rass spectra we assumed that the absorption comes from our galaxy only .
the assumption usually improves the reliability of the estimation of spectral index because of the reduced number of free parameters .
the x - ray spectral slope @xmath23 was estimated using the rosat hardness ratios hr1 and hr2 , which are defined as @xcite : @xmath24 @xmath25 here , a , b , c and d denote the count rate in the energy range 0.10.4 kev , 0.52.0 kev , 0.50.9 kev and 0.92.0 kev , respectively .
the full optical dataset was used to define the statistical properties of the sample and explore the correlations between various observed parameters . according to paper  i , 115 sources ( about 73% of the total )
were identified as new seyfert  1s and qsos , together with 40 known emission line agn that meet our sample selection criteria , the agn subsample comprises 49 `` ultrasoft '' ( @xmath26 ) sources and 106 `` normal '' objects with mean @xmath27 . in the catalog in paper  i we listed the absolute magnitude m@xmath28 and redshift @xmath29 .
the distributions of the m@xmath28 values and redshift are plotted in figure  2 .
as shown by these figures , the sample is dominated by moderate luminosity objects ( @xmath30 ) with an average redshift @xmath31 .
table  1 lists the derived parameters .
the columns list the following information : ( 2 ) redshift ; ( 3 ) fwhm of broad h@xmath0 ; ( 4 ) fwhm of narrow h@xmath0 ; ( 5 ) fwhm of [ o  iii]@xmath185007 ; ( 6 ) , ( 7 ) and ( 8) the local equivalent widths of h@xmath0 broad component , fe  ii and [ o  iii]@xmath185007 ; ( 9 ) and ( 10 ) ratio of fluxes of [ o  iii]@xmath185007 to broad and narrow h@xmath0 ; ( 11 ) ratio of fluxes of fe  ii to broad h@xmath0 ; ( 12 ) velocity shift between h@xmath0 broad and narrow components , where a positive velocity corresponds to a redshifted broad component relative to narrow component ; ( 13 ) and ( 14 ) h@xmath0 broad and narrow components velocity shift with respect to the systemic frame , where a positive velocity indicates a redward shift with respect to systemic ; ( 15 ) and ( 16 ) spectral indices defined above ; ( 17 ) the monochromatic 250ev luminosity .    the distribution of the broad h@xmath0 line width of the objects in our emission line agn subsample shows a significantly smaller fraction ( 3% ) of objects with fwhm @xmath32 2000  km  s@xmath15 compared to another x - ray selected sample ( 18% ) @xcite . however , the fwhm measurements in @xcite refer to the full line profile and the widths of the broad components may have been underestimated . therefore , the real difference should be smaller .
five out of 155 objects in our sample are nls1 galaxies without detectable broad balmer line components of fwhm @xmath33 2000  km  s@xmath15 but with strong fe  ii emission , which agrees within the error limits with that of @xcite ( about 2% ) .
the distribution of the fwhm of the broad component of h@xmath0 in the sample is displayed in figure  3 .
the mean value of 4350 km  s@xmath15 is similar to the hard sample of @xcite .
the velocity shift distribution of h@xmath34 with respect to [ o  iii]@xmath1 is shown in figure  4a .
positive velocity corresponds to a redward h@xmath0 with respect to systemic , while a negative velocity represents a blueshift .
the peak of this distribution is near zero , but has a mean redshift of 78  km  s@xmath15 with standard deviation of 305  km  s@xmath15 .
this shift is in good agreement with the previous studies @xcite , i.e. , balmer emission lines gives the same redshift to within 100  km  s@xmath15 of narrow forbidden emission ( _ e.g. _ [ o  iii]@xmath185007 ) in low redshift ( @xmath35 ) qsos and seyfert galaxies .
in contrast , a systematic mean redward shift of 520  km  s@xmath15 was found for a high redshift ( @xmath36 ) qsos sample @xcite .
@xcite proposed this observed trend of increased balmer redshift with increased systemic redshift represents a luminosity dependency .    for comparison
, we also present the h@xmath21  [ o  iii]@xmath1 shift in figure  4b .
the mean of the distribution is 8  km  s@xmath15 with a standard deviation of 176  km  s@xmath15 .
we can see from the figures that the dispersion of the h@xmath21  [ o  iii]@xmath1 shift is significantly narrower than the h@xmath34  [ o  iii]@xmath1 shift , which is expected by the different emitting regions between h@xmath0 broad component and narrow component , as well as [ o  iii]@xmath1 .    in a similar manner to the h@xmath34
[ o  iii]@xmath1 shift , figure  4c illustrates the velocity differences between the broad and narrow components of h@xmath0 .
the redshift ( or blueshift ) is defined as the shift of the broad component relative to the narrow component in units of km  s@xmath15 .
positive velocities refer to redshifts with respect to the narrow component velocities , whereas negative velocities indicate blueshifts .
we emphasis that both the h@xmath0 redshift ( or blueshift ) in the present work and the asymmetry parameter in @xcite are measures for line profile , but characterized differently .
the latter is a measure of the shift between the centroids at @xmath37 and @xmath38 maximum .
the mean redshift of the distribution is found to be 70  km  s@xmath15 with a standard deviation of 357  km  s@xmath15 .
correlation analyses involving the line profiles of h@xmath0 are investigated in section 3.3 .      in this subsection
, we explore whether the various emission - line and continuum properties correlate with one another . for this purpose , we calculated the spearman rank - order correlation matrix @xcite , along with its significance matrix for measured properties .
the complete correlation coefficient matrix is shown in table  2 .
the number of parameter pairs included in the trials ranges from 86 to 149 .
spectra with s /
n @xmath39 were excluded from the analyses including optical properties .
the probability of the null correlation , ps , for a sample with corresponding correlation coefficient rs is also given in table  2 for entries with @xmath40 .
a set of 12 different properties results in @xmath41 correlation coefficients ; therefore , at this level of significance , we would expect @xmath42 spurious events .    among 66 trials ,
31 correlations ( both positive and negative ) are found with two - sided probabilities @xmath40 .
four are due to the dependent parameters , e.g. , relative strength of fe  ii to h@xmath0 and fe  ii  ew ; 12 are degenerate correlations , i.e. , different measures of the same property ( e.g. , [ o  iii ]  ew , [ o  iii]/h@xmath34 and [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 ) all correlate with another property ( e.g. , fe  ii  ew ) ; and therefore 15 are independent correlations at the @xmath43 confidence level .    the well - known anti - correlation between the x - ray spectral slope @xmath44 and the fwhm of h@xmath0 @xcite is not prominent in our sample ( @xmath45 , @xmath46 ) as is the case in the @xcite sample ( @xmath47 , @xmath48 ) .
@xcite suggested that the relation between h@xmath0 width and @xmath44 is not a linear correlation , but probably resulted from a `` zone of avoidance '' @xcite , i.e. , broad line objects always tend to show flat x - ray spectra , whereas there is a very large scatter in the x - ray spectral steepness of nls1 galaxies , with several as flat as normal seyfert 1s ( xu et al .
the correlation is more pronounced among the agn with higher luminosity as in the samples of @xcite and @xcite . for objects with @xmath49
the significance becomes @xmath50 .
the correlation between @xmath44 and h@xmath34 is illustrated in figure  5 .
the anti - correlation between the width of h@xmath0 and fe  ii / h@xmath0 @xcite is strong ( @xmath51 , @xmath52 ) in the present data whereas it is only weak ( @xmath47 , @xmath53 ) if fwhm h@xmath0 is compared directly with ew fe  ii . instead
, there is a strong correlation ( @xmath54 , @xmath52 ) between fwhm h@xmath0 and ew h@xmath0 .
the lack of correlation between the line width and fe  ii strength ( when measured independently with h@xmath0 ) in @xcite , @xcite and the present work has confirmed that the anti - correlation arises because h@xmath0 gets weaker as the lines get narrower @xcite .
in addition to our confirmation of well documented correlations between different agn properties , we report on three newly discovered correlations involving the h@xmath0 redshift ( or blueshift ) , flux ratios of fe  ii to h@xmath0 broad component ( fe  ii / h@xmath34 ) and [ o  iii ] to h@xmath0 narrow component ( [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 ) .
the correlations covering [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 have never been investigated by other authors so far .
we find the relative strength of fe  ii to h@xmath34 ( fe  ii / h@xmath34 ) significantly correlated to both the h@xmath0 redshift blueshift and flux ratio of fe  ii to h@xmath0 whole line was detected in @xcite .
we emphasize that our ratio refers to the broad component in h@xmath0 only .
note the sign difference between this paper and @xcite .
the positive correlation quoted by @xcite becomes negative in the notation used herein . ]
( @xmath55 , @xmath52 ) and the relative strength of [ o  iii ] to h@xmath21 ( [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 , @xmath56 , @xmath52 ) .
a correlation test was also applied between h@xmath0 redshift and [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 .
the correlation is prominent in our sample ( @xmath57 , @xmath58 ) .
figure  6 shows the correlations .
there is a trend that strong fe  ii / h@xmath34weak [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 objects tend to have blueshifts in h@xmath0 while strong [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 weak fe  ii / h@xmath34 objects tend to have redshifts in h@xmath0 . these strong correlations between fe  ii / h@xmath34 , h@xmath0 redshift and [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 must reflect some physical connection between broad and narrow line emitting regions .
one key to understand the central engines of agn lies in examining their local environment .
the standard paradigm proposes that the surrounding gas is photoionized in physically distinct regions by radiation emerging from the central power source@xcite .
however , the segregation of the ionized gas into broad - line region ( blr ) and narrow - line region ( nlr ) , as well as the details of the gas kinematics are still far from clear .
optical spectroscopy of the ionized gas around galactic nuclei provides strong constraints on the excitation mechanisms .
the following discussion addresses three key points : ( 1 ) how do the present results compare to previous work ; ( 2 ) which new correlations do we find and how can we understand them ; and ( 3 ) which future observations can we perform to distinguish between different suggested scenarios .    a number of consistent correlations among observational parameters have been searched in order to understand the basic properties underlying the observed spectra . in particular , @xcite made a landmark study of the optical emission - line properties and continuum properties ( radio through x - ray ) of 87 low redshift pg quasars .
a principal component analysis revealed `` eigenvector  1 '' ( ev1 ) links stronger fe  ii emission , weaker [ o  iii ] emission from the nlr , and narrower h@xmath0 ( blr ) with stronger line blue asymmetry .
more recently , @xcite found these optical properties also go along with steeper soft x - ray spectra and claimed the soft x - ray slope as a related part of ev1 .
we confirm these trends and present in addition three newly discovered correlations involving the h@xmath0 redshift , fe  ii / h@xmath34 and [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 .
potentially , ev1 represents a fundamental physical driver that control the energy producing and radiation emitting processes .
the two leading interpretations by far are that ev1 is driven by ( 1 ) the eddington ratio @xmath59 @xcite and ( 2 ) orientation effect .
@xcite argued strongly that viewing angle is unlikely to drive ev1 , by assuming [ o  iii ] emission is isotropic , originating from radii large enough to be free from orientation dependent obscuration .
the isotropy of [ o  iii ] emission has been questioned by the studies of radio - loud agn @xcite .
however , a recent study of radio - quiet quasars @xcite showed a significant correlation between ev1 and orientation independent [ o  ii ] emission , which implied that ev1 is not driven by orientation .
moreover , the correlation between [ o  ii ] and [ o  iii ] emission indicated [ o  iii ] emission is not dependent on orientation .
the most promising interpretation at present is that ev1 is mostly governed by @xmath59 @xcite .
this suggestion was based on the notion that the vertical thickness of the accretion disk , driven by the eddington ratio , controls the line strengths and continuum parameters .
the striking correlations between the h@xmath0 redshift , fe  ii / h@xmath34 and [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 found in the present work give us linkages of the gas kinematics and ionization between blr and nlr .
the question raised is what is the physical process behind the correlations ? can both the new and previous correlations be explained within one single scenario ?
indeed , the @xmath59 interpretation provides plausible explanations for the observed trends .
one of the two general scenarios in agn to explain asymmetric profile is in terms of an outflowing component in the blr with a change in obscuration by a central disk of clouds on the receding side .
accreting systems in high @xmath59 agn will drive relatively thick outflows due to their larger photon luminosities per unit gravitational mass .
as the velocity of the outflow increases , the h@xmath0 develops an increasing excess on the blue wing . the corresponding blue h@xmath34 velocity shift in comparison with [ o  iii ]
can be also well predicted because both the line asymmetry and the shift of the line centroids are effects of the same process .
the link between blr and nlr in terms of density is less straight forward to predict .
e.g. , due to the strong outflow , the nlr might be replaced by denser clouds . given a typical radial distribution of nlr clouds , [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 peaks around densities of @xmath60 = 24 ( e.g. , komossa & schulz 1997 ) .
high - density nlr clouds would therefore lead to a suppression of [ o  iii ] strength .
the same is true for the other limit , a low - density nlr .
some authors favored a low - density blr of nls1 galaxies ( see , e.g. , the discussion in rodriguez - pascual et al .
1997 and komossa & mathur 2001 ) , which may indicate a low - density nlr as well , if both regions are coupled . the best way to measure directly the density of the nlr of nls1s in the future is to employ the density - sensitive line ratios [ o  ii]@xmath183729/[o  ii]@xmath183726 or [ s  ii]@xmath186716/[s  ii]@xmath186731 . these ratios are presently generally not reported in the literature .
their measurements requires high s / n spectroscopy and/or resolution to detect and resolve these lines .-
ratio measured by @xcite .
this yields @xmath61 2.8 and does not deviate significantly from the values found for , e.g. , seyfert 1 and 2 galaxies .
however , ngc 4051 is not an extreme nls1 in terms of x - ray steepness and fe  ii emission . ] more indirectly , other line - ratios will also change in dependence of density and thus allow a density determination .
for instance , a higher - density nlr would strongly boost the [ o  i]@xmath186300 line @xcite .    although it is more difficult to illustrate the direct connection between strong fe  ii emission and large @xmath59 , some suggestions have been proposed .
@xcite suggested the x - ray spectrum becomes steeper in high @xmath59 agn .
if the euv  x - ray spectrum plays an important role in the formation and confinement of the blr clouds ( e.g. , krolik , mckee & tarter 1981 ) , a steep x - ray spectrum coupled to a flatter euv spectrum will lead to a thicker blr ( e.g. , komossa & meerschweinchen 2000 ) , and thus stronger fe  ii emission if the the low - excitation part of the blr is mechanically heated @xcite .
increased metal abundances in more extreme nls1 galaxies @xcite would enhance these trends , i.e. lead to thicker blrs @xcite .
supersolar iron abundance may additionally boost the strength of fe  ii . in another model by @xcite ,
fe  ii line emission is produced in an accretion disk .
the agn with higher @xmath59 might simply have more mass in the accretion disk to produce stronger fe  ii emission by postulating collisional excitation @xcite as the origin of the fe  ii emission in general .
the strong correlations of properties linking dynamics ( line widths ) , kinematics ( line shifts ) , ionization in blr and nlr ( fe  ii and [ o  iii ] strengths ) , and radiation process ( x - ray spectral shape ) are likely driven by an intrinsic properties , i.e. , the @xmath59 . in order to further test the favored scenario ( and get more constraints on , e.g. ,
the density of the nlr ) , larger and even more complete agn sample with higher resolution optical data is needed .
this paper presents the statistical study of optical emission line properties of a bright agn sample selected from rass .
the sample comprises 155 seyfert  1 type agn .
our conclusions based on the correlation analysis can be succinctly summarized as follows :    * the previously reported correlations between the strengths of fe  ii , [ o  iii ] emission and the x - ray slope are confirmed .
strong optical fe  ii blends go along with weak forbidden emission lines ( e.g. , [ o  iii ] ) and steep x - ray slopes . *
the anti - correlation between the x - ray spectral slope @xmath62 and the fwhm of h@xmath0 becomes prominent as far as the high luminosity agn are concerned .
* striking correlations between the h@xmath0 redshift , fe  ii / h@xmath34 and [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 are found .
there is a general trend that strong fe  ii / h@xmath34weak [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 objects tend to have blueshifts in h@xmath0 while strong [ o  iii]/h@xmath21 weak fe  ii / h@xmath34 objects tend to have redshifts in h@xmath0 . *
we add new arguments that the observed trends are likely driven by @xmath59 and describe some future observations that could further test this suggestion .
we thank drs .
todd a. boroson and richard f. green for providing the fe  ii template , drs .
dirk grupe , simon vaughan , mira vron , philippe vron , tinggui wang , dieter engels for helpful discussions on the optical measurements , and the anonymous referee for many useful comments and suggestions .
special thanks go also to the staff at xinglong station for their instrumental and observing help . d.x . acknowledges a mpg - cas exchange program . this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) , which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , caltech , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration .
the rosat project is supported by the bundesministerium fr bildung und forschung ( bmbf ) and the max - planck - gesellschaft .
this work was supported by nsfc under grant 19973014 .
appenzeller , i. , zickgraf , f.j . ,
krautter , j. , & voges , w. 2000 , , 364 , 443 appenzeller , i. , thiering , i. , zickgraf , f .- j . , et al .
1998 , , 117 , 319 bade , n. , engels , d. , & voges , w. 1998 , , 127 , 145 bade , n. , fink , h. , engels , d. , et al .
1995 , , 110 , 469 baker , j.c .
1997 , , 286 , 23 boller , th . ,
brandt , w.n .
, & fink , h. 1996 , , 305 , 53 boroson , t.a . , & green , r.f .
1992 , , 80 , 109 brinkmann , w. , & siebert , j. 1994 , , 285 , 812 brotherton , m.s . ,
wills , b.j . , francis , p.j . , & steidel , c.c .
1994 , , 430 , 495 corbin , m.r .
1995 , , 447 , 496 corbin , m. r. , & boroson , t. a. 1996 , , 107 , 69 corbin , m.r .
1997 , , 113 , 245 creshaw , d.m .
1986 , , 62 , 821 de robertis , m.m . 1985 , , 289 , 67 evans , i.n . 1988 , , 67 , 373 fiore , f. , elvis , m. , mcdowell j. c. , et al .
1994 , , 431 , 515 fischer , j .- u . ,
hasinger , g. , schwope , a.d .
, et al . 1998 , astron .
nachr . , 319 , 347 francis , p.j . , hewett , p.c . , foltz , c.b . ,
& chaffee , f.h .
1992 , , 398 , 476 gaskell , c. m. 1982 , , 263 , 79 gaskell , c.m . 1985 , , 291 , 112 gaskell , c.m .
2000 , new astronomy review , 44 , 563 goodrich , r.w .
1989a , , 340 , 190 goodrich , r.w .
1989b , , 342 , 224 grupe , d. , beuermann , k. , thomas , h .- c . ,
mannheim , k. , & fink h.h .
1998 , , 330 , 25 grupe , d. , beuermann , k. , mannheim , k. , & thomas , h .- c .
1999 , , 350 , 31 he s , r. , barthel , p.d . , & fosbury , r.a.e .
1993 , , 362 , 326 joly , m. 1987 , , 184 , 33 komossa , s. , grupe , d. , & janek , m. 2001 , in aip conf .
599 , x - ray astronomy 999 : stellar endpoints , agn and the diffuse background , ed . n. white , g. malaguti , & g. palumboi , 686 komossa , s. , & schulz , h. 1997 , , 323 , 31 komossa , s. , & mathur , s. 2001 , , 374 , 914 komossa , s. , & meerschweinchen , j. 2000 , , 354 , 411 krolik , j.h . , mckee , c.f .
, tarter , c.b .
1981 , , 249 , 422 kuraszkiewicz , j. , wilkes , b.j . ,
brandt , w.n .
, et al . 2000 , , 542 , 631 kwan , j. , cheng , f. , fang , l. , et al .
1995 , , 440 , 628 laor , a. , bahcall , j. n. , jannuzi , b.t . ,
schneider , d.p . , & green , r.f .
1995 , , 99 , 1 laor , a. , fiore , f. , martin , e. , et al .
1997 , , 477 , 93 lawrence , a. , elvis , m. , wilkes , b.j . , mchardy , i. & brandt , n. 1997 , , 285 , 879 massey , p. , & strobel , k. 1988 , , 328 , 315 mathur , s. 2000 , , 314 , l17 mcintosh , d.h . ,
rix , h .- w .
, rieke , m.j . , & foltz , c.b .
1999 , , 517 , l73 miller , p. , rawlings , s. , saunders , r. , & eales , s. 1992 , , 254 , 93 netzer , h. , & wills , b.j . 1983 , , 275 , 445 oke , j.b .
, & lauer , t.r .
1979 , , 230 , 360 osterbrock , d.e . 1977 , , 215 , 733 osterbrock , d.e .
, & shuder , j.m .
1982 , , 49 , 149 osterbrock , d.e . , & pogge , r.w . 1985 , , 297 , 166 osterbrock , d.e .
1989 , astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei ( university science books : mill valley , ca ) pounds , k.a .
, done , c. , osborne , j.p . , 1995 , , 277 , l5 press , w.h . , teukolsky , s.a .
, vetterling , w.t . , & flannery , b.p .
1992 , numerical recipes in fortran : the art of scientific computing ( 2nd ed . ;
cambridge : university press ) phillips , m.m .
1978 , , 226 , 736 rodriguez - ardila , a. , pastoriza , m.g . , & donzelli , c.j .
2000a , , 126 , 63 rodriguez - ardila , a. , binette , l. , pastoriza , m.g . , &
donzelli , c.j .
2000b , , 538 , 581 rodriguez - pascual p.m. , mas - hesse j.m . , santos - lleo m. , 1997 , , 327 , 72 schartel , n. , walter , r. , fink , h.h . , et al .
1996 , , 307 , 33 schwope , a.d .
, hasinger , g. , lehmann , i. , et al .
2000 , astron .
nachr . , 321 , 1 stripe , g.m .
1991 , , 247 , 3 thomas , h .- c . , beuermann , k. , reisch , k. , et al .
1998 , , 335 , 467 tytler , d. , & fan , x .- m . 1992 , , 79 , 1 vaughan , s. , edelson , r. , warwick , r.s . , et al .
2001 , , 327 , 673 veilleux , s. 1991 , , 369 , 331 vron - cetty , m.p . , vron , p. , & gonalves , a.c .
2001 , , 372 , 730 vron - cetty , m.p . , & vron , p. 2000 , , 10 , 81 voges , w. , boller , th . ,
dennerl , k. , et al .
1996 , in mpe report 263 , rontgenstrahlung from the universe , ed .
zimmermann , j. trmper , & h. yorke , 637 voges , w. , et al . 1999 , , 349 , 389 wang , t. , brinkmann , w. , & bergeron , j. 1996 , , 309 , 81 wei , j.y .
, xu , d.w . ,
dong , x.y .
, & hu , j.y . 1999 , , 139 , 575 ( paper i ) wills , b.j .
, brotherton , m.s .
, fang , d. , steidel , c.c .
, & sargent , w.l.w .
1993 , , 415 , 563 wills , b.j . ,
netzer , h. , & wills , d. 1985 , , 288 , 94 wills , b. 1982 , in iau symp .
97 , extragalactic radio sources , ed .
heeschen & c.m .
wade ( dordrecht : kluwer ) , 373 xu , d.w .
, wei , j.y . , &
hu , j.y . 1999 , , 517 , 622 zheng , x.z . , xia , x.y . ,
mao , s. , et al .
2002 , , 124 , 18 zickgraf , f .- j .
, thiering , i. , krautter , j. , et al .
1997 , , 123 , 103    llrrrrrrrrrrrrrcc 1.0 mm 1rxs j000011.9 + 052318&0.040 & 3050 & 1050 & 600 & 37.3 & 26.7 & 22.5 & 0.6 & 1.8 & 0.7 & 40 & -50 & -90 & 1.2&2.08@xmath630.18 & 43.6 + 1rxs j000055.5 + 172346&0.215 & 6420 & 2290 & 830 & 75.5 & 64.9 & 8.5 & 0.1 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 640 & 150 & -490 & 0.6&1.73@xmath630.35 & 44.3 + 1rxs j000550.0 + 102249&0.095 & 4240 & - & 660 & 58.6 & 0.0 & 45.8 & 0.8 & - & 0.0 & 380 & 340 & -40 & 2.0&1.06@xmath630.47 & 43.4 + 1rxs j000915.0 + 243758&0.118 & 3880 & 1540 & 640 & 34.0 & 13.5 & 12.9 & 0.4 & 2.3 & 0.4 & -70 & -150 & -80 & 1.4&1.60@xmath630.43 & 44.0 + 1rxs j000953.0 + 371906&0.154 & 4240 & - & 1380 & 27.6 & 34.6 & 22.8 & 0.8 & - & 1.3 & - & 70 & - & - & 1.84@xmath630.46 & 44.3 + 1rxs j001121.2 + 373919&0.104 & 3770 & 1010 & 860 & 52.7 & 38.2 & 12.4 & 0.2 & 1.7 & 0.7 & 480 & 290 & -190 & - & 0.60@xmath630.49 & 43.5 + 1rxs j001452.7 + 270549&0.086 & 3350 & 870 & 760 & 28.7 & 25.5 & 24.4 & 0.8 & 2.3 & 0.9 & 230 & 200 & -30 & 1.1&1.69@xmath630.23 & 43.9 + 1rxs j002007.2 + 324423&0.082 & 3820 & 1380 & 950 & 38.1 & 78.7 & 3.6 & 0.1 & 0.3 & 2.1 & -230 & -260 & -30 & - & 1.62@xmath630.45 & 43.6 + 1rxs j002445.3 + 082047&0.067 & 1660 & 690 & 690 & 31.0 & 72.2 & 6.2 & 0.2 & 4.0 & 2.3 & -170 & -220 & -50 & - & 2.11@xmath630.50 & 43.3 + 1rxs j002811.6 + 310342&0.500 & - & - & 762 & - & - & 8.8 & - & - & - & - & - & - & 2.1&1.32@xmath630.25 & 45.5 + 1rxs j002902.7 + 195717&0.264 & 5720 & 740 & 720 & 71.0 & 24.7 & 14.4 & 0.2 & 6.2 & 0.3 & 720 & 260 & -460 & - & 0.66@xmath630.63 & 44.2 + 1rxs j003121.2 + 301558&0.200 & 3940 & 715 & 630 & 23.8 & 27.2 & 33.1 & 1.4 & 9.9 & 1.1 & -370 & -310 & 60 & - & 1.99@xmath630.52 & 44.4 + 1rxs j003221.1 + 242359&0.066 & 3460 & 1180 & 620 & 13.2 & 38.2 & 14.1 & 1.1 & 0.9 & 2.9 & -260 & -230 & 30 & - & 1.21@xmath630.33 & 43.1 + 1rxs j004459.4 + 192143&0.179 & 3900 & 1380 & 750 & 20.3 & 64.6 & 9.5 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 3.2 & -520 & -470 & 50 & 0.8&2.20@xmath630.24 & 44.6 + 1rxs j005034.2 + 044152&0.097 & 1780 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.88@xmath630.40 & 43.5 + 1rxs j005050.6 + 353645&0.058 & 5470 & 2300 & 1230 & 48.1 & 27.3 & 10.8 & 0.2 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 160 & 0 & -160 & 0.7&2.21@xmath630.15 & 44.0 + 1rxs j005607.6 + 254802&0.153 & 6600 & 1960 & 1230 & 73.3 & 61.9 & 13.8 & 0.2 & 0.9 & 0.8 & -760 & 90 & 850 & 1.1&1.71@xmath630.39 & 44.4 + 1rxs j011655.1 + 254937&0.099 & 4000 & 910 & 1070 & 56.4 & 40.1 & 43.1 & 0.8 & 3.0 & 0.7 & -50 & -110 & -60 & 0.0&- & - + 1rxs j011745.5 + 363718&0.107 & 3770 & 1720 & 700 & 68.3 & 51.8 & 17.2 & 0.3 & 0.6 & 0.8 & 40 & 230 & 190 & 0.7&1.03@xmath630.28 & 44.0 + 1rxs j011848.2 + 383626&0.216 & 5040 & 1590 & 1070 & 68.0 & 50.0 & 13.5 & 0.2 & 0.8 & 0.7 & -150 & 40 & 190 & - & 2.85@xmath630.43 & 44.8 + 1rxs j012556.6 + 351039&0.312 & 6790 & - & 570 & 78.3 & 21.0 & 12.6 & 0.2 & - & 0.3 & - & 0 & - & - & 0.86@xmath630.89 & 44.3 + 1rxs j012923.0 + 223100&0.231 & 4730 & 980 & 800 & 65.7 & 39.4 & 17.3 & 0.3 & 2.2 & 0.6 & 170 & 0 & -170 & - & 1.55@xmath630.71 & 44.4 + 1rxs j013738.5 + 852414&0.499 & 4270 & - & 710 & - & - & 8.0 & 0.2 & - & - & - & 180 & - & - & 0.80@xmath630.92 & 44.8 + 1rxs j014023.0 + 240255&0.072 & 4620 & 1300 & 1260 & 48.3 & 44.0 & 13.7 & 0.3 & 0.9 & 0.9 & -200 & -70 & 130 & 1.6&1.89@xmath630.37 & 44.0 + 1rxs j014025.2 + 382400&0.067 & 3110 & 800 & 620 & 72.2 & 38.2 & 22.6 & 0.3 & 4.0 & 0.5 & 380 & 290 & -90 & 1.7&2.02@xmath630.24 & 44.0 + 1rxs j015536.7 + 311525&0.135 & 3830 & 1750 & 910 & 24.8 & 42.6 & 9.3 & 0.4 & 0.6 & 1.7 & 60 & 270 & 200 & 0.5&2.34@xmath630.50 & 44.1 + 1rxs j015546.4 + 071902&0.069 & 3750 & 1090 & 800 & - & - & 26.7 & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.0&1.22@xmath630.54 & 43.2 + 1rxs j015555.6 + 040620&0.136 & 6980 & 2030 & 750 & 51.9 & 63.1 & 9.9 & 0.2 & 1.1 & 1.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & 1.15@xmath630.36 & 43.8 + 1rxs j015621.6 + 241838&0.155 & 3770 & 940 & 660 & 51.5 & 70.7 & 18.9 & 0.4 & 2.7 & 1.4 & -60 & -20 & 40 & - & 1.73@xmath630.85 & 44.3 + 1rxs j023601.9 + 082124&0.228 & 4390 & 1250 & 1230 & 82.1 & 74.2 & 21.2 & 0.3 & 1.7 & 0.9 & 250 & 80&-170 & - & 2.86@xmath630.62 & 45.5 + 1rxs j023739.9 + 181945&0.168 & 4560 & 950 & 850 & 87.4 & 58.1 & 15.8 & 0.2 & 5.1 & 0.7 & 160 & 30 & -130 & 0.8&- & - + 1rxs j024214.5 + 074442&0.451 & 4950 & 1410 & 700 & 59.2 & 0.0 & 17.2 & 0.3 & 0.9 & 0.0 & 60 & 0 & -60 & - & 1.71@xmath630.78 & 45.5 + 1rxs j033522.6 + 190739&0.189 & 6180 & - & 800 & 30.8 & 5.8 & 19.3 & 0.6 & - & 0.2 & - & 200 & - & 0.9&0.20@xmath630.45 & 44.2 + 1rxs j034308.0 + 185836&0.110 & 3420 & 1300 & 830 & 75.0 & 56.5 & 44.4 & 0.6 & 1.5 & 0.8 & 280 & 410 & 130 & 1.6&0.63@xmath630.62 & 43.8 + 1rxs j035147.6 + 103618&0.185 & 5100 & 1040 & 910 & 70.1 & 0.0 & 28.9 & 0.4 & 7.3 & 0.0 & 580 & 460 & -120 & 1.9&2.54@xmath630.66 & 45.2 + 1rxs j035345.9 + 195825&0.029 & 3800 & 1150 & 710 & 23.0 & 14.0 & 6.4 & 0.3 & 1.2 & 0.6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & 1.73@xmath630.72 & 43.2 + 1rxs j040513.2 + 173647&0.098 & 3850 & - & 920 & 67.9 & - & 9.0 & 0.1 & - & - & - & -310 & - & - & - & - + 1rxs j041147.1 + 132417&0.277 & 2960 & 1010 & 790 & 49.1 & 49.5 & 8.8 & 0.2 & 0.4 & 1.0 & -30 & 170 & 200 & - & 3.10@xmath631.07 & 45.8 + 1rxs j044428.6 + 122113&0.089 & 3140 & 1320 & 1280 & 33.8&106.3 & 30.5 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 3.1 & -490 & -250 & 240 & 1.2&1.33@xmath630.54 & 44.0 + 1rxs j062334.6 + 644542&0.086 & 4400 & 1550 & 990 & 53.0 & 0.0&117.3 & 2.2 & 3.6 & 0.0 & 680 & 490 & -190 & 2.0&0.87@xmath630.38 & 43.8 + 1rxs j065136.5 + 563732&0.286 & 4810 & 1320 & 670 & 52.0 & 55.5 & 13.8 & 0.3 & 2.0 & 1.1 & -630 & -680 & -50 & - & 1.53@xmath630.59 & 44.6 + 1rxs j065211.3 + 553436&0.064 & 2750 & 1010 & 620 & 25.8 & 40.3 & 39.4 & 1.5 & 3.1 & 1.6 & -510 & -400 & 110 & - & 0.47@xmath630.46 & 43.1 + 1rxs j071006.0 + 500243&0.154 & 4030 & 1600 & 620 & 43.7 & 60.4 & 7.3 & 0.2 & 0.2 & 1.4 & 40 & 250 & 210 & 0.0&0.91@xmath630.58 & 44.1 + 1rxs j071339.7 + 382043&0.123 & 4140 & 1200 & 700 & 58.0&102.5 & 17.0 & 0.3 & 0.7 & 1.8 & -490 & -340 & 150 & 0.5&1.33@xmath630.46 & 44.0 + 1rxs j071858.2 + 705920&0.066 & 4810 & 1310 & 850 & 20.3 & 57.7 & 38.2 & 1.9 & 1.6 & 2.8 & -280 & -250 & 30 & - & 1.48@xmath630.32 & 43.2 + 1rxs j071923.7 + 570840&0.175 & 6540 & 1150 & 960 & 102.7 & 0.0 & 81.4 & 0.8 & 3.2 & 0.0 & 670 & 560 & -110 & 0.2&1.01@xmath630.33 & 44.3 + 1rxs j072220.6 + 732041&0.350 & 3570 & 1320 & 820 & 59.7 & 76.4 & 10.6 & 0.2 & 0.7 & 1.3 & -150 & 300 & 450 & - & 2.71@xmath630.35 & 45.1 + 1rxs j072408.4 + 355309&0.138 & 7260 & 820 & 680 & 94.4 & 0.0 & 74.0 & 0.8&11.1 & 0.0 & -450 & -510 & -60 & 0.6&1.89@xmath630.18 & 44.7 + 1rxs j072826.6 + 303407&0.100 & 3980 & 1010 & 600 & 59.7 & 48.1 & 15.3 & 0.3 & 2.2 & 0.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1.4&1.46@xmath630.53 & 43.7 + 1rxs j072912.9 + 410552&0.103 & 4460 & 1580 & 1040 & 47.6 & 41.6 & 29.4 & 0.6 & 3.7 & 0.9 & -230 & 190 & 420 & - & 1.28@xmath630.39 & 43.8 + 1rxs j073308.7 + 455511&0.142 & 8070 & 3240 & 930 & 58.1 & 48.9 & 16.7 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 0.8 & -440 & -190 & 250 & 0.1&1.28@xmath630.29 & 44.5 + 1rxs j073735.8 + 430856&0.119 & 4500 & 670 & 660 & 33.8 & - & 51.7 & 1.5&14.9 & - & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - & - + 1rxs j074228.1 + 465648&0.170 & 4050 & - & 620 & 99.3 & 69.3 & 25.4 & 0.3 & - & 0.7 & - & 330 & - & 1.4&- & - + 1rxs j074311.3 + 742926&0.332 & 7380 & 1060 & 840 & 94.0 & 32.1 & 31.4 & 0.3 & 4.4 & 0.3 & -50 & -140 & -90 & - & 1.29@xmath630.26 & 44.9 + 1rxs j074759.2 + 205229&0.156 & 5540 & 820 & 690 & 71.7 & 48.7 & 12.4 & 0.2 & 3.5 & 0.7 & 130 & 70 & -60 & 1.2&0.97@xmath630.45 & 44.0 + 1rxs j074906.2 + 451039&0.192 & 4500 & 800 & 800 & 100.4 & 55.1 & 80.4 & 0.8 & 8.4 & 0.6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.4&0.04@xmath630.84 & 43.6 + 1rxs j075026.6 + 270726&0.154 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.01@xmath630.38 & 43.7 + 1rxs j075039.5 + 624205&0.194 & 6300 & 1330 & 1500 & 58.5 & 18.0 & 22.3 & 0.4&11.0 & 0.3 & 20 & -90 & -110 & 0.9 & 1.69@xmath630.36 & 44.4 + 1rxs j075408.7 + 431611&0.350 & - & - & 570 & - & - & 31.5 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.38@xmath630.30 & 45.0 + 1rxs j075409.5 + 512436&0.331 & 3680 & - & 730 & 99.0&108.2 & 11.0 & 0.1 & - & 1.1 & - & 0 & - & - & -&- + 1rxs j075634.7 + 362232&0.884&-&- & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.60@xmath630.42 & 45.8 + 1rxs j075910.0 + 115152&0.050 & 4470 & 1180 & 700 & 25.9 & 52.8 & 12.7 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 2.0 & -190 & -190 & 0 & 1.4 & 1.99@xmath630.32 & 43.3 + 1rxs j080132.3 + 473618&0.157 & 7840 & - & 900 & 119.0 & 69.7 & 13.1 & 0.1 & - & 0.6 & -530 & -190 & 340 & 0.4 & 1.29@xmath630.17 & 44.6 + 1rxs j080358.9 + 433248&0.451 & 5580 & 1340 & 670 & 75.6 & 0.0 & 38.4 & 0.5 & 1.3 & 0.0 & 390 & 570 & 180 & - & 2.31@xmath630.32 & 45.3 + 1rxs j080534.6 + 543132&0.406 & 5780 & 1530 & 730 & 51.5 & - & 30.1 & 0.6 & 1.5 & - & -370 & -250 & 120 & - & 2.01@xmath630.22 & 45.5 + 1rxs j080548.5 + 112617&0.144 & 4480 & 880 & 770 & 89.6 & 0.0 & 50.0 & 0.6 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 260 & 0 & -260 & 0.7 & 1.90@xmath630.22 & 44.2 + 1rxs j080639.9 + 724831&0.099 & 1760 & 740 & 820 & 13.7 & 34.4 & 61.9 & 4.5 & 6.2 & 2.5 & -190 & -220 & -30 & 0.7 & 1.25@xmath630.34 & 43.7 + 1rxs j080727.2 + 140534&0.074 & 2450 & - & - & 51.7 & 70.2&@xmath3220&@xmath320.4 & -&1.4 & - & 0 & - & - & 0.98@xmath630.45 & 43.3 + 1rxs j081237.9 + 435636&0.183 & 4110 & - & 700 & 51.5 & 21.6 & 11.8 & 0.2 & - & 0.4 & - & -90 & - & 0.4 & 1.14@xmath630.44 & 44.2 + 1rxs j081502.4 + 525304&0.126 & 4110 & 1080 & 770 & 75.8 & 41.2 & 14.7 & 0.2 & 1.7 & 0.5 & 360 & 230 & -130 & 0.2 & 1.62@xmath630.24 & 44.2 + 1rxs j081651.4 + 180252&0.158 & 3890 & 810 & 700 & 68.4 & 0.0 & 84.6 & 1.2 & 9.0 & 0.0 & 620 & 680 & 60 & 0.9 & 1.37@xmath630.20 & 44.5 + 1rxs j081718.6 + 520200&0.040&2170 & 470 & - & - & 25.2 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.09@xmath630.42 & 42.6 + 1rxs j081738.0 + 242333&0.283 & 5560 & 960 & 740 & 73.0 & 14.9&125.4 & 1.7 & 8.6 & 0.2 & 390 & 350 & -40 & - & 0.90@xmath630.74 & 44.3 + 1rxs j082633.1 + 074259&0.312 & 3460 & 1010 & 880 & 50.0 & 65.6 & 6.0 & 0.1 & 1.3 & 1.3 & -130 & 310 & 440 & - & - & - + 1rxs j082942.2 + 415442&0.126 & 7960 & 800 & 910 & 70.1 & 0.0 & 98.6 & 1.4&12.1 & 0.0 & 750 & 700 & -50 & 1.8 & 0.55@xmath630.39 & 43.5 + 1rxs j083737.3 + 254746&0.080 & - & - & 960 & 0.0 & - & 13.3 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - + 1rxs j083820.6 + 241025&0.043 & 4980 & 780 & 750 & 26.0 & 18.0 & 11.0 & 0.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & -680 & -770 & -90 & - & 1.70@xmath630.29 & 43.2 + 1rxs j084026.2 + 033316&0.060 & 4940 & 1510 & 990 & 55.6 & 0.0 & 28.5 & 0.5 & 1.6 & 0.0 & 430 & 390 & -40 & 0.3 & 1.73@xmath630.21 & 43.6 + 1rxs j084302.0 + 030226&0.512 & 1920 & - & - & 53.1 & 43.3 & - & - & - & 0.8 & - & - & - & - & 2.25@xmath630.38 & 45.4 + 1rxs j084622.3 + 031318&0.107 & 4380 & 1000 & 960 & 71.6 & 49.7 & 24.2 & 0.3 & 4.1 & 0.7 & 0 & -150 & -150 & 0.9 & 1.81@xmath630.26 & 44.1 + 1rxs j084856.8 + 584150&0.134 & - & - & 890 & - & 0.0 & 23.3 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.29@xmath630.47 & 43.7 + 1rxs j084918.7 + 531806&0.112 & 2750 & 810 & 990 & 23.3 & 20.6 & 29.7 & 1.3 & 7.6 & 0.9 & -150 & -20 & 130 & 1.5 & 0.77@xmath630.48 & 43.2 + 1rxs j085233.3 + 422539&0.137 & 2670 & 750 & 700 & 14.8 & 43.3 & 22.8 & 1.5 & 2.7 & 2.9 & -250 & -220 & 30 & 1.1 & 1.83@xmath630.38 & 43.9 + 1rxs j085358.8 + 770054&0.106 & 5480 & 2300 & 620 & 23.1 & 40.8 & 11.7 & 0.5 & 0.8 & 1.8 & -640 & -540 & 100 & 1.6 & 1.34@xmath630.16 & 43.8 + 1rxs j085443.8 + 401912&0.152 & 5520 & 1100 & 810 & 60.6 & 37.1 & 19.7 & 0.3 & 1.9 & 0.6 & 460 & 440 & -20 & 1.8 & 0.80@xmath630.30 & 43.7 + 1rxs j085706.2 + 621050&0.160 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.08@xmath630.97 & 43.4 + 1rxs j085820.6 + 642100&0.115&3060 & 1260 & 970 & -&-&63.7 & -&- & - & - & -&- & - & 1.18@xmath630.40 & 43.6 + 1rxs j085902.0 + 484611&0.083 & 4420 & 1300 & 910 & 80.0 & 72.2 & 36.1 & 0.5 & 2.3 & 0.9 & -150 & -130 & 20 & 0.6 & 1.44@xmath630.11 & 44.1 + 1rxs j190910.3 + 665222&0.191 & 3830 & 600 & 670 & 97.0&111.7 & 7.0 & 0.1 & 1.1 & 1.2 & -290 & -40 & 250 & 0.9 & 2.55@xmath630.12 & 44.8 + 1rxs j193929.8 + 700752&0.116 & 4850 & 1690 & 1160 & 60.9 & 54.1 & 14.1 & 0.2 & 0.4 & 0.9 & -20 & 80 & 100 & 0.2 & 1.36@xmath630.15 & 44.4 + 1rxs j210550.5 + 041435&0.139 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.54@xmath630.54 & 43.9 + 1rxs j212654.3 + 112403&0.096 & 2730 & 1600 & 1120 & 66.7 & 33.3 & 14.1 & 0.2 & 0.8 & 0.5 & 780 & 350 & -430 & 0.7 & 1.60@xmath630.28 & 44.1 + 1rxs j214309.6 + 153658&0.385 & 7610 & - & 1230 & 72.7 & 0 & 10.9 & 0.1 & - & 0 & - & 120 & - & - & 1.00@xmath630.94 & 44.9 + 1rxs j214655.2 + 092102&0.984&- & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.83@xmath630.61 & 45.6 + 1rxs j215912.7 + 095247&0.102 & 5380 & - & 1110 & 71.4 & 26.0 & 50.0 & 0.7 & - & 0.4 & - & 0 & - & 1.3 & 1.51@xmath630.25 & 44.2 + 1rxs j221537.8 + 290239&0.229 & 5980 & 600 & 640 & 70.0 & 0.0 & 54.5 & 0.8&11.8 & 0.0 & 150 & 220 & 70 & - & 1.02@xmath630.36 & 44.4 + 1rxs j221918.8 + 120757&0.082&2080 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & -&- & - & 2.58@xmath630.22 & 44.4 + 1rxs j222537.5 + 225917&0.173 & 2150 & 1100 & 1100 & 52.5 & 39.4 & 17.8 & 0.3 & 4.7 & 0.7 & -40 & 0 & 40 & 0.6 & 1.50@xmath630.47 & 44.0 + 1rxs j222846.3 + 333500&0.090 & 3270 & 900 & 1260 & 44.4 & 24.1 & 46.1 & 1.0&11.0 & 0.5 & -70 & 0 & 70 & - & 1.65@xmath630.73 & 44.0 + 1rxs j222934.3 + 305720&0.319 & 7930 & 1390 & 1110 & 88.0 & 0.0 & 30.0 & 0.3 & 6.3 & 0.0 & 800 & 900 & 100 & - & 1.40@xmath630.43 & 44.8 + 1rxs j223019.5 + 163114&0.084 & 4270 & 1740 & 1310 & 55.8 & 34.9 & 17.2 & 0.3 & 1.2 & 0.6 & -20 & 80 & 100 & 0.8 & 1.39@xmath630.31 & 43.8 + 1rxs j224621.7 + 314206&0.145 & - & - & 660 & 0 & - & 25.3 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 1.48@xmath630.30 & 44.4 + 1rxs j224939.6 + 110016&0.084 & 4390 & 1440 & 1220 & 24.7 & 47.2 & 3.5 & 0.1 & 0.3 & 1.9 & -430 & -180 & 250 & 0.9 & 1.74@xmath630.25 & 44.0 + 1rxs j225148.5 + 341937&0.132 & 3050 & 1120 & 590 & 51.4 & 55.5 & 10.5 & 0.2 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 40 & 220 & 180 & 0.6 & 1.43@xmath630.22 & 44.5 + 1rxs j225209.6 + 264236&0.069 & 2160 & 700 & 700 & 16.7 & 39.4 & 15.5 & 0.9 & 1.3 & 2.4 & -200 & -200 & 0 & 1.3 & 1.75@xmath630.26 & 43.7 + 1rxs j225639.4 + 261846&0.176 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.87@xmath630.79 & 43.8 + 1rxs j230328.0 + 144341&0.080 & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 0.20@xmath630.46 & 42.9 + 1rxs j231456.0 + 224325&0.171 & 3750 & 1230 & 1170 & 62.8&127.8 & 22.4 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 2.0 & -360 & -360 & 0 & 0.9 & 0.98@xmath630.35 & 44.1 + 1rxs j231517.5 + 182825&0.104 & 3310 & 1190 & 1200 & 25.0 & 18.3 & 10.7 & 0.4 & 6.4 & 0.7 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & -&-
+ 1rxs j232554.6 + 215310&0.120 & 5260 & 950 & 770 & 125.2 & 0.0 & 62.5 & 0.5 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 390 & 330 & -60 & 1.1 & 1.14@xmath630.13 & 44.5 + 1rxs j232841.4 + 224853&0.129 & 5400 & - & 810 & 121.7 & 0.0 & 34.6 & 0.3 & - & 0.0 & - & 0 & - & 1.5 & 1.10@xmath630.54 & 43.7 + 1rxs j234728.8 + 242743&0.159 & 4270 & 2550 & 1350 & 105.1 & 0.0 & 75.2 & 0.7 & 2.2 & 0.0 & 980 & 770 & -210 & 1.7 & 0.64@xmath630.17 & 44.2 + 1rxs j234734.6 + 271910&0.646&- & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & -&- + 1rxs j235152.7 + 261938&0.040 & 3750 & 1850 & 1460 & 47.7 & 19.0 & 36.7 & 0.8 & 1.8 & 0.4 & -300 & -250 & 50 & 0.9 & 1.09@xmath630.21 & 43.3 + 1rxs j235754.3 + 132418&0.115 & 4290 & 2000 & 1480 & 102.3&101.9 & 35.5 & 0.3 & 0.9 & 1.0 & 40 & 380 & 340 & 1.5 & 1.67@xmath630.18 & 44.2 + iii zw 2 & 0.090 & 4990 & 700 & 630 & 72.1 & 33.3 & 47.1 & 0.7&10.0 & 0.5 & 140 & 0 & -140 & 0.5 & 0.68@xmath630.24 & 44.0 + 4c 25.01 & 0.284 & 4310 & 1050 & 840 & 74.6 & 79.1 & 38.8 & 0.5 & 8.2 & 1.1 & 140 & 140 & 0 & - & 1.51@xmath630.43 & 44.9 + pg 0026 + 12 & 0.142 & 4890 & 1120 & 690 & 36.1 & 19.2 & 14.8 & 0.4 & 1.5 & 0.5 & 0 & 360 & 360 & 0.9 & 0.98@xmath630.13 & 44.5 + s 10785 & 0.134 & 5970 & 1290 & 850 & 89.1 & 65.4 & 26.2 & 0.3 & 5.6 & 0.7 & 60 & 260 & 200 & 1.5 & 1.88@xmath630.21 & 44.6 + mark 1148 & 0.064 & 5560 & 840 & 800 & 135.3 & 22.8 & 55.0 & 0.4 & 8.4 & 0.2 & 190 & 290 & 100 & 1.2 & 0.52@xmath630.16 & 43.5 + pg 0052 + 251 & 0.155 & 5110 & 780 & 780 & 68.8 & 19.2 & 30.0 & 0.4 & 8.6 & 0.3 & 60 & 20 & -40 & 0.6 & 1.38@xmath630.18 & 44.9 + b2 0110 + 29 & 0.363 & 7360 & 680 & 750 & 77.6 & 0.0 & 63.1 & 0.8&15.0 & 0.0 & 490 & 520 & 30 & - & 1.51@xmath630.63 & 44.8 + 3c 48.0 & 0.367 & 4080 & 1840 & 1200 & 31.0 & 46.2 & 37.2 & 1.2 & 2.8 & 1.5 & -220 & 270 & 490 & 0.3 & 1.78@xmath630.11 & 45.9 + ms 02448 + 1928 & 0.176 & 4510 & 2000 & 780 & 70.0 & 59.5 & 23.9 & 0.3 & 1.1 & 0.9 & 780 & 720 & -60 & - & 1.93@xmath630.77 & 44.7 + ms 03574 + 1046 & 0.182 & 4160 & 1660 & 890 & 42.2 & 72.2 & 13.0 & 0.3 & 0.5 & 1.7 & -380 & -90 & 290 & 1.1 & 2.73@xmath631.10 & 45.3 + rx j04506 + 0642 & 0.118 & 3460 & 1150 & 940 & 22.5 & 45.2 & 11.0 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 2.0 & -460 & -360 & 100 & 0.7 & 1.36@xmath631.11 & 44.0 + ms 07007 + 6338 & 0.152 & 5070 & 2070 & 840 & 49.8 & 63.6 & 8.4 & 0.2 & 0.4 & 1.3 & 710 & 450 & -260 & 0.2 & 2.18@xmath630.33 & 44.4 + vii zw 118 & 0.079 & 4910 & 2300 & 860 & 58.1 & 71.4 & 14.3 & 0.2 & 0.5 & 1.2 & 490 & 680 & 190 & 0.5 & 1.95@xmath630.09 & 44.7 + f07144 + 4410 & 0.061 & 3820 & 1380 & 830 & 95.8 & 65.3&105.1 & 0.8 & 2.4 & 0.7 & -120 & -70 & 50 & 0.7 & 1.16@xmath630.21 & 44.1 + ms 07199 + 7100 & 0.125 & 4020 & 1330 & 680 & 54.8 & 50.9 & 26.3 & 0.5 & 7.2 & 0.9 & 800 & 230 & -570 & - & 1.72@xmath630.23 & 44.1 + rx j07491 + 2842 & 0.345 & 4710 & 820 & 620 & 84.3 & 57.7 & 12.3 & 0.1 & 4.8 & 0.7 & 250 & 140 & -100 & - & 2.10@xmath630.39 & 44.7 + rx j07527 + 2617 & 0.082 & 2940 & 1060 & 780 & 38.3 & 55.0 & 7.9 & 0.2 & 0.4 & 1.4 & -40 & -40 & 0 & - & 2.12@xmath630.23 & 44.0 + b3 0754 + 394 & 0.096 & 3840 & 1430 & 870 & 57.3 & 46.8 & 38.1 & 0.7 & 1.7 & 0.8 & -170 & -130 & 40 & 0.6 & 2.16@xmath630.33 & 43.9 + kuv 07549 + 4228&0.210 & 4620 & 1520 & 780 & 57.5 & 74.2 & 48.5 & 0.8 & 2.4 & 1.3 & 170 & 70 & -100 & 0.3 & 2.14@xmath630.22 & 44.9 + pg 0804 + 761 & 0.100 & 5490 & 2380 & 950 & 65.4 & 85.1 & 11.3 & 0.2 & 0.3 & 1.3 & -300 & -60 & 240&-0.2 & 1.30@xmath630.07 & 44.7 + rx j08297 + 3252 & 0.127 & 3420 & 820 & 710 & 33.7 & 30.9 & 44.2 & 1.3 & 3.2 & 0.9 & 150 & 150 & 0 & 1.3 & 2.13@xmath630.42 & 43.9 + rx j08307 + 3405 & 0.063 & 4500 & 1090 & 680 & 37.7 & 21.6 & 36.9 & 1.0 & 4.1 & 0.6 & 110 & 140 & 30 & 1.6 & 1.79@xmath630.26 & 43.6 + us 1329 & 0.249 & 5180 & 1280 & 760 & 112.4 & 48.2 & 55.8 & 0.5 & 2.7 & 0.4 & 170 & 120 & -50 & - & 1.69@xmath630.15 & 45.2 + vii zw 244 & 0.131 & 4510 & 2000 & 770 & 60.1 & 88.0 & 15.2 & 0.3 & 0.7 & 1.5 & -440 & -190 & 250 & 0.8 & 1.61@xmath630.17 & 44.2 + kuv 08482 + 4146 & 0.134 & 4130 & - & 740 & 62.2 & 39.4 & 11.4 & 0.2 & - & 0.7 & - & -520 & - & 1.2 & 1.47@xmath630.26 & 44.0 + mark 1220 & 0.064 & 4050 & 770 & 930 & 30.7 & 23.9 & 25.8 & 0.8 & 6.1 & 0.8 & -90 & 140 & 220 & - & 1.53@xmath630.31 & 43.5 + 4c 73.18 & 0.303 & 5670 & 1770 & 870 & 53.6 & 0.0 & 10.3 & 0.2 & 0.6 & 0.0 & -60 & 50 & 110 & - & 1.02@xmath630.16 & 45.1 + rx j20389 + 0303&0.137 & 4410 & 1410 & 750 & 65.5 & 67.7 & 31.3 & 0.3 & 0.7 & 1.0 & 40 & -100 & -140 & 1.3 & 1.81@xmath630.74 & 44.1 + s5 2116 + 81 & 0.086 & 4130 & - & 740 & 122.7 & 22.5 & 92.6 & 0.8 & - & 0.2 & - & 0 & - & 1.8 & 0.71@xmath630.14 & 44.0 + ms
21283 + 0349 & 0.094 & 4900 & 1330 & 660 & 105.4 & 50.9 & 54.8 & 0.5 & 2.5 & 0.5 & -370 & -310 & 60 & 0.4 & 2.14@xmath630.22 & 44.6 + ii zw 136 & 0.063 & 3770 & 980 & 760 & 81.4 & 72.5 & 17.4 & 0.2 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 250 & 120 & -130 & 0.9 & 2.46@xmath630.13 & 44.7 + ms 22102 + 1827 & 0.079 & 2950 & 870 & 900 & 27.3 & 68.9 & 6.2 & 0.1 & 0.3 & 2.5 & -120 & -120 & 0 & 1.3 & 2.49@xmath630.27 & 44.0 + rx j22186 + 0802 & 0.120 & 2530 & 780 & 810 & 22.5 & 36.1 & 23.7 & 1.1 & 3.5 & 1.6 & -140 & 90 & 220 & 1.6 & -&-
+ rx j22198 + 0935 & 0.060 & 2520 & 910 & 740 & 15.1 & 7.9 & 11.4 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 0.5 & -160 & -100 & 60 & - & 1.63@xmath630.45 & 43.1 + pg 2233 + 134 & 0.325 & 4750 & 1340 & 740 & 41.1 & 67.8 & 10.4 & 0.3 & 0.4 & 1.7 & -570 & -410 & 160 & - & 0.90@xmath630.62 & 44.3 + akn 564 & 0.025 & 3860 & 970 & 720 & 31.6 & 23.1 & 50.6 & 1.6 & 2.2 & 0.7 & -100 & -150 & -50 & 1.4 & 2.12@xmath630.04 & 44.5 + kuv 22497 + 1439 & 0.135 & 4140 & 1560 & 1040 & 47.5&110.1 & 4.2 & 0.1 & 0.2 & 2.3 & -470 & 0 & 470 & 0.6 & 2.04@xmath630.20 & 44.5 + rx j2256.6 + 0525 & 0.065 & 4240 & 1230 & 730 & 82.9 & 37.0 & 53.5 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 0.4 & -160 & -50 & 110 & 1.1 & 1.09@xmath630.20 & 43.8 + kaz 320 & 0.034 & 4430 & 1230 & 830 & 48.3 & 17.8 & 53.8 & 1.1 & 1.2 & 0.4 & 90 & 220 & 130 & 1.3 & 0.62@xmath630.12 & 43.1 + rx j23171 + 0838 & 0.165 & 5440 & 910 & 690 & 85.7 & 21.1 & 31.1 & 0.4&10.1 & 0.2 & 250 & 60 & -190 & 0.7 & 1.47@xmath630.37 & 44.2 +    lllllllllllll ( 1)fwhm(h@xmath34)& & 0.002 & 0.032 & -0.32 & 0.35 & -0.59 & -0.05 & 0.34 & -0.20 & -0.04 & 0.38 & 0.48 + & & & & ( 0.0020)&(0.0009 ) & ( 0.0000 ) & & ( 0.001 ) & & & ( 0.0003)&(0.0000 ) + ( 2)fwhm(h@xmath21 ) & &  & 0.46 & 0.30 & -0.263 & 0.23 & -0.294 & -0.15 & 0.23 & -0.104 & -0.66 & 0.11 + & & & ( 0.0000 ) & ( 0.004 ) & & & ( 0.005 ) & & & & ( 0.0000 ) & + ( 3)fwhm([oiii ] ) & & &  & -0.03 & 0.004 & -0.02 & -0.08 & 0.02 & -0.06 & -0.166 & -0.15 & -0.01 + & & & & & & & & & & & & + ( 4)ew feii & & & &  & -0.59 & 0.81 & -0.546 & -0.471 & 0.41 & -0.129 & -0.544 & 0.06 + & & & & & ( 0.0000 ) & ( 0.0000 ) & ( 0.0000 ) & ( 0.0000)&(0.0001 ) & & ( 0.0000 ) & + ( 5)ew [ oiii ] & & & & &  & -0.64 & 0.73 & 0.33 & -0.39 & 0.195 & 0.67 & 0.05 + & & & & & & ( 0.0000 ) & ( 0.0000 ) & ( 0.0019)&(0.0002 ) & & ( 0.0000 ) & + ( 6)feii / h@xmath34 & & & & & &  & -0.23 & -0.64 & 0.34 & -0.055 & -0.60 & 0.24 + & & & & & & & & ( 0.0000)&(0.0011 ) & & ( 0.0000 ) & + ( 7)[oiii]/h@xmath34 & & & & & & &  & 0.009 & -0.33 & 0.27 & 0.45 & -0.314 + & & & & & & & & & ( 0.0017 ) & & ( 0.0000)&(0.0038 ) + ( 8)@xmath64 & & & & & & & &  & -0.24 & 0.147 & 0.375 & 0.14 + & & & & & & & & & & & ( 0.0003 ) & + ( 9)@xmath65 & & & & & & & & &  & -0.236 & -0.37 & 0.36 + & & & & & & & & & & & ( 0.0004)&(0.001 ) + ( 10)@xmath66 & & & & & & & & & &  & 0.109 & -0.29 + & & & & & & & & & & & & ( 0.0069 ) + ( 11)[oiii]/h@xmath21 & & & & & & & & & & &  & 0.1 + & & & & & & & & & & & & + ( 12)log  @xmath67l@xmath68 & & & & & & & & & & & &  +