the observed properties of galaxies can be attributed to a wide variety of complex factors . in order to understand the environmental causes that might trigger intense star - formation in the local universe , such as that observed at high redshifts for lyman break galaxies , we explore two regimes : large - scale , to study the connection between halo mass and high star formation rates ( sfrs ) ; and small scale , calculating merger rates . at large scales
, a galaxy s sfr may be connected to how the galaxy accretes gas from its large - scale environment , which depends on the halo mass .
smaller scale environmental effects , from nearby galaxies , may induce star formation from interactions and eventual mergers .
the study of galaxy evolution has been connected to that of larger structure formation their growth related to overdensities arising from primordial density fluctuations .
studies of galaxy bias , the distribution of galaxies relative to underlying dark matter distribution , attempt to describe the fate and origin of present - day galaxies .
the link between halo mass and star formation has been discussed and explored in several papers @xcite .
a simple description involves gas flowing to centers of dark matter potentials , reaching sufficient density to radiate and cool , losing pressure support and settling into a disk , and then forming stars .
the system is eventually accreted onto a larger structure
. such accretion by clusters can shock - heat the gas into high temperatures , preventing new stars from forming .
therefore , we expect that active star formation can occur for halo masses whose virial temperatures are less than 10@xmath8k , where shock - heating inhibits new star formation .
redshift evolution of the link between halo mass and star formation , determined by large scale environmental effects , might explain observations such as the butcher - oemler @xcite effect .
in this effect , clusters at high redshifts host more blue , star - forming galaxies than local clusters , which are predominantly inhabited by `` red and dead '' galaxies .
similarly , using the two - point angular correlation function to measure clustering strength , @xcite find that uv - selected , star - forming galaxies have migrated from cluster regions , with high correlation lengths ( r@xmath9 ) , at high redshift to more isolated regions at low redshifts . from the view of hierarchical structure formation ,
higher redshift clusters have lower halo masses compared to low - z clusters , thus high - z clusters have virial temperatures low enough to allow star formation . adding to this framework , @xcite discuss the importance of hot vs. cold accretion  in the simplified picture above , gas does not get heated to the virial temperature necessarily .
massive galaxies draw gas via quasi - spherical , `` hot mode '' accretion , in which the gas does shock - heat to the virial temperature .
however , less massive galaxies acquire gas from flow along filaments in `` cold mode '' accretion where the gas radiates away its gravitational energy and never reaches the virial temperature ( see @xcite and references therein ) .
these simulations show that the large - scale galaxy environment influences gas accretion processes . therefore
, a galaxy s halo mass contributes significantly to how it acquires gas , the fuel that affects its star formation efficiency .
similar shock physics may affect the relation between small scale merger effects and star formation .
@xcite predict that the merger of a halo with a larger structure , such as a cluster , suppresses star formation as gas is shock - heated to the virial temperature of the more massive halo and then cools onto the central object of the most massive halo .
thus , these results suggest that the mass of the larger companion is a consideration for whether mergers might enhance star formation . according to the work of @xcite , mergers with clusters should not result in enhanced star formation .
nevertheless , other studies show that at these small scales galaxy - galaxy interactions and close neighbors can stimulate star formation activity . in hierarchical structure formation
, the merger process is an important ingredient for galaxy evolution . over thirty years ago
, @xcite suggested that tidal forces during the merger process can funnel gas into the central regions of galaxies , triggering strong star formation activity .
further theoretical studies have investigated the connection between mergers and high star formation rates ( see @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) .
@xcite have shown that nearly half of the highest star - forming galaxies have close companions ( galaxies within a projected radius of 100 kpc ) , by correlating 10@xmath10 galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) . according to this research ,
tidal interactions are the primary cause for enhanced star formation for these most active star - forming galaxies .
several studies using various star formation indicators from h@xmath11 , co , far - infrared luminosities for interacting galaxies have shown that enhanced star formation results from galaxy interactions ( e.g. , @xcite , @xcite , and references therein ) .    using the galaxy evolution explorer ( _ galex _  ) , @xcite have uncovered a population of local , intensely star - forming galaxies .
these galaxies are selected based on their fuv luminosities ( l@xmath12 @xmath13 2@xmath1410@xmath15 ) .
the most compact of these uv - luminous galaxies ( uvlgs ) , with i@xmath16 l@xmath2 kpc@xmath17 , share many similar properties with z@xmath73 lbgs : specific sfrs , metallicities , morphologies , kinematics , and attenuations @xcite .
we refer to these systems as lyman break analogs ( lbas ) , to discriminate this special subset of uvlgs from lower surface brightness uvlgs .
given that lbgs are found at higher redshifts ( z@xmath182 - 3 ) where major and minor mergers are generally more prevalent than for z@xmath180.1 lbas , lbas and lbgs may be expected to differ in their recent merger histories , environments , and location within large scale structure .    in this paper
, we study the environments , as quantified by correlation functions , of low to intermediate redshift ( 0.4@xmath0z@xmath01.2 ) uvlgs in the cosmos field .
we extend our analysis to lbas to compare with z@xmath73 lbgs , although this analysis is limited because of the rarity of z@xmath01 lbas .
we measure two - point auto - correlation functions ( acfs ) and cross - correlation functions ( ccfs ) of uvlgs with other galaxy samples to probe the mass of the dark halos within which uvlgs reside .
we connect these observations with those of lbgs at high redshift ( z@xmath73 ) , which are known to strongly cluster @xcite .
recent hubble space telescope ( _ hst _  ) images of z@xmath70.2 lbas show disturbed morphologies , signs of mergers and interactions @xcite .
we relate small - scale correlations to pair fractions in order to estimate merger rates . studying the locations of current uvlgs , as examples of extreme star - forming galaxies , we explore the relationship between high rates of star - formation , host halo mass , and merger rate as a function of redshift .    in the following section ,
we discuss our sample selection . in the three subsequent sections
, we outline the theory (  [ sec : theory ] ) and techniques for measuring the angular correlation functions([sec : meas ] ) , and derivations of physical quantities (  [ sec : quant ] ) used to analyze our data .
we discuss our results for the large and small scale environments of uvlgs and lbas in
[ sec : results ] , and discuss these in the context of other environmental studies in  [ sec : disc ] .
a summary of our analysis can be found in the final section :  [ sec : conc ] . throughout this paper
we adopt the cosmology given by ( h@xmath9 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 ) = ( 70 km s@xmath3 mpc@xmath3 , 0.3 , 0.7 ) . unless explicitly stated , our number densities are in physical , proper units .
correlation lengths are quoted in comoving units of h@xmath3mpc .
with its large contiguous field and deep observations , the cosmos survey provides excellent data for environmental studies .
the cosmos field covers 2 deg@xmath21 , centered on @xmath22 , @xmath23 .
this region of sky has rich multiwavelength data , including : optical observations with the superb subaru ground - based telescope , atop mauna kea , hawaii , ultraviolet coverage from _ galex _  , radio observations from vla , and xray data from xmm .
the inner 1.7 deg@xmath21 has been imaged by _
hst _  , using the advanced camera survey ( acs ) in the f814w filter ( see @xcite for details ) .
deep photometric data from subaru provides photometric redshifts with @xmath24 , depending on i - band magnitude and redshift @xcite .    from the i - band selected ( i@xmath025.5 ) cosmos photometric redshift catalog ( for details about this catalog
see @xcite ) , we compare uvlg and lba samples , which draws from the combined cosmos+_galex _  data ( i@xmath025.5 , and nuv@xmath023 , see @xcite for more details ) , with three separate galaxy samples ( selected from the cosmos sample , with i@xmath025.5 ) for 0.4@xmath0z@xmath01.2 : ( 1 ) a volume limited sample in m@xmath25-``all '' , ( 2 ) blue luminous galaxies- `` blg '' , and ( 3 ) luminous red galaxies- `` lrg '' .
we briefly note here  while the `` all '' sample is volume - limited in m@xmath25 , it is not volume - limited for all colors .
this is discussed in more detail further below .
figure 1 shows the various cuts applied to the data to create these separate samples : all is comprised of galaxies with -24@xmath26 - 18 ; blg galaxies have @xmath27 - 20.0 and @xmath28 1.8 color ; and lrg set is selected by a luminosity cut , @xmath29 - 20.5 and color cut , @xmath30 @xmath13 2.0 .
both colors and luminosities are given in rest - frame , k - corrected ab magnitudes .
k - corrections were done using the _ kcorrect_4.1.4 _ idl routine @xcite . the spectral energy distribution ( sed ) fitting was done using the cosmos optical bands as well as the _ galex _  fuv and nuv bands , where available since the comparison samples are not required to be uv - detected .
we modified this routine to use the closest band to the rest - frame filters for determining kcorrections for example , at z@xmath180.5 , the observed nuv magnitude at 2300  best approximates the rest - frame fuv magnitude at 1500(i.e , @xmath31 ) .
the uvlgs are selected using their k - corrected , rest - frame fuv properties from the cosmos+_galex _  catalog : fuv @xmath32 - 19.54 , corresponding to the luminosity criterion of l@xmath33 @xcite . to estimate the fuv surface brightness
, we use the value of r@xmath34 output from sextractor @xcite for the acs i - band data ( see @xcite for further detail ) , which corresponds to the half - light radius .
we use this acs i - band half - light radius as a proxy for the uv size , acknowledging that the i - band at these redshifts corresponds to optical wavelengths .
our sample of lbas were determined by the criteria : i@xmath35 l@xmath36 kpc@xmath17 . while the i - band size may overestimate the uv size by a factor of 2 ( @xcite , thereby , underestimating the fuv surface brightness by a factor of 4 ) , we find that @xmath37% of uvlgs are lbas , consistent with what is found at z@xmath7 0.2 @xcite .
we summarize the sample sizes for each redshift bin in table 1 , and show the redshift and spatial distributions of these samples in figures 2 and 3 , respectively .
the `` l '' shape of the color - magnitude diagrams in figure 1 indicates that the red and blue galaxies do not populate the magnitude space in the same way .
the majority of red galaxies tend to be more luminous than blue galaxies ; the faint end for the red galaxies starts decreasing around m@xmath38 - 19 .
while the volume - limited cut shown on the upper left panel of figure 1 selects a complete sample in m@xmath39 , the color - magnitude diagram at m@xmath40 - 19 shows a diminishing sample of red galaxies .
the luminosity function ( lf ) for red galaxies shows that the faint end does have a decreasing slope ( @xcite , but our lf comparison of the red galaxies in the all sample with the theoretical lf does indicate sample incompleteness at higher redshifts .
this incompleteness does not affect either the blg or lrg samples which are selected to be sufficiently bright to avoid magnitude limits .
however , the all magnitude cut of m@xmath38 - 18 suffers from some incompleteness in the red population .
this observation is worth noting for interpreting and comparing the all sample to other samples and studies , but does not affect the overall conclusions of this paper .
the predicted n(z ) , shown as a black dotted line in figure [ fig : zdist ] , is derived using the luminosity functions observed by @xcite for the all , blg and lrg samples and by @xcite for the uvlg sample ( this is discussed further in  [ sec : quant ] ) .
the redshift distributions in figure 2 roughly follow the smooth predicted distribution marked by the black dotted line .
the uvlg , as well as the lba , redshift distributions may be too noisy , because of poor number statistics , to interpret their shape .
the overdensities apparent in the spatial maps ( figure [ fig : skydist ] ) correspond to known physical structures observed in the cosmos field ( see @xcite , @xcite , @xcite for more discussion of these structures ) .      in the standard framework for defining the two - point correlation function ,
galaxies are distributed in space such that the probability , @xmath41 , of finding a galaxy in some volume , @xmath42 is , @xmath43 , where _
n _ is the mean number density of galaxies .
extrapolating to the situation of finding two galaxies at some comoving separation , r@xmath44 , one within volume , @xmath45 and another within volume , @xmath46 , is then @xmath47 \label{eqn : xi}\ ] ] where @xmath48 is defined as the two - point correlation function .
an approximation for the correlation function , @xmath49 , is a power - law with a single slope at all scales : @xmath50 where z refers to redshifft , @xmath51 and @xmath52 specify the slope and comoving clustering strength , respectively .
given a uniform , poissonian distribution , @xmath53 , while correlated data ( @xmath54 ) means that there is an increased probability of finding a second galaxy within distance r of the first .
various studies ( i.e. , @xcite for sdss galaxies and @xcite for high - z lbgs ) have found departures from a power - law with a single slope . rather , they find that the correlation function is better approximated by the sum of two contributions : the `` one - halo term '' , dominating at small scales for galaxy pairs residing within the same halo , and the `` two - halo term '' , dominating at large scales for galaxy pairs within separate haloes .
this so - called hod modeling is beyond the scope of this paper .
however , to account for the fact that the galaxy correlation function might not follow a power law with a single slope , we assume that @xmath55 can be fit by two power laws with different slope for small scales and for large scales .    for data based on photometric redshifts ,
the three dimensional correlation function can not be measured directly , but it can be inferred from the projected two - dimensional angular correlation function . by analogy of the steps outlined above ,
the three - dimensional , real space @xmath56 is collapsed into a two - dimensional function : w(@xmath57 ) , which measures the excess probability that two galaxies are found within some angular separation , @xmath57 .
@xmath58\delta\omega_1\delta\omega_2 \label{eqn : wtheta}\ ] ] where _ n _ is the surface density and @xmath59 and @xmath60 are the solid angle elements describing our field . like @xmath61 in eqn .
[ eqn : xiform ] , w(@xmath57 ) is also expected to have a similar power law form : @xmath62 we convert the three - dimensional correlation function into the angular one , using the formalism introduced by @xcite and @xcite .
therefore , we relate the comoving correlation length , @xmath63 , to @xmath64 and @xmath51 to @xmath65 by the following : @xmath66 where @xmath67 , @xmath68 is the comoving distance , @xmath69 and @xmath70 are the number densities , and f(r ) is the curvature term from the robertson - walker metric , @xmath71 }    \ ] ] using the @xcite form for the evolution of @xmath52 : @xmath72 where r@xmath73 is the comoving correlation length at z@xmath180 , and @xmath74 gives the evolution of clustering ( i.e. , @xmath75 specifies a stable state , @xmath76 describes no evolution , and @xmath77 corresponds to the linear growth of fluctuations ) . throughout our analysis , we assume no evolution , or @xmath76 , which allows us to simplify eqn .
[ eqn : r0 ] . over the relatively narrow redshift ranges for which we are integrating over
, we can justify this assumption @xcite find that r@xmath9 evolves by @xmath78 20% between z@xmath180.2 and z@xmath181.2 for late type galaxies and
@xmath78 50% for early type galaxies .
auto - correlations compare distributions of a sample with itself , while cross - correlations compare distributions of one set of objects with a separate sample . naturally , in the auto - correlation cases , @xmath79 in eqn .
[ eqn : r0 ] .
we infer the real - space correlation length , r@xmath9 and power - law slope , @xmath51 , by fitting the angular correlation function .    along with slope and amplitude parameters ,
we additionally calculate the integral constraint ( ic ) correction . in principle , our observed field may be superimposed on a void or overdensity , such that the observed number density in our field will not match the average number density in the universe . in theory , the integral in eqn .
[ eqn : wtheta ] should average to 0 over all scales , i.e. ,
since there are n galaxies in the universe , excess at small scales must be balanced by deficits at larger scales .
we correct the observed angular correlation function by the ic factor defined in @xcite .
the angular correlation function , w(@xmath57 ) , measures the excess of clustering compared to a uniform , random distribution . to simulate the random distribution
appropriately , we first create masks from the cosmos+_galex _  fields .
these masks mark the locations where bright , saturated stars and field edges prevent galaxies in those locations from appearing in the catalog .
the black regions in fig .
[ fig : skydist ] display masked locations .
populating the allowed , un - masked regions with random galaxies , we create the random set .
the histogram of separations in the random set and data sets are referred to as rr(@xmath57 ) and d@xmath80d@xmath81(@xmath57 ) , respectively , where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote two separate data samples ; d@xmath80d@xmath82dd in the auto - correlation case .
similarly , the separations between galaxies in the random and data sets are represented by d@xmath80r and d@xmath81r , or simply dr for autocorrelations .
it has been shown that the landy - szalay @xcite estimator is one of the most robust ways of measuring w(@xmath57 ) , reducing the edge effects of finite fields . here
we give the expression for the angular correlation function that we use to measure auto - correlations ( eqn .
[ eqn : auto ] ) and cross - correlations ( eqn .
[ eqn : cross ] ) : @xmath83    where r and n refer to the number of galaxies in the random and data samples ( the subscripts 1 and 2 for n@xmath80 and n@xmath81 distinguish the separate samples , in the cross - correlation case ) .
our angular correlation function errors have been derived from boot - strapping , as described in @xcite .
cosmic variance adds another important source for error .
however , unlike the bootstrap errors which are scale dependent , the errors from cosmic variance shift the entire correlation function . using @xcite to calculate cosmic variance errors for our samples
, we show these errors in our correlation function figures as shaded regions ( for example , see figs .
[ fig : fit]-[fig : acor_comp ] ) .    as described in @xmath84[sec : data ] , our samples span the redshift range 0.4@xmath0z@xmath01.2 .
while we may reduce statistical noise by choosing the largest sample possible  selecting galaxies in this entire redshift span , correlating data across such a wide redshift range has disadvantages . by correlating data in two - dimensions , which are nt physically correlated in three - dimensional , de -
projected space , we risk weakening the actual correlations .
therefore , we select two bin sizes : dz@xmath180.2 ( resulting in 4 overlapping bins : 0.4@xmath10.6 , 0.6@xmath10.8 ,  ,
1.0@xmath11.2 ) and dz@xmath180.4 ( 2 bins : 0.4@xmath10.8 , and 0.8@xmath11.2 ) . comparing the angular correlation functions for different redshift bins
requires converting the angular correlation function into physical de - projected units , by the following reasoning : @xmath85^{1/2 } ) d}\pi \\ & = & { \rm   \frac{\frac{dn(r_p)}{da}-\left < \frac{dn}{da}\right > _ 0}{\left < \frac{dn}{dv}\right > _ 0}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where r@xmath86 is the transverse distance and @xmath87 is the line - of - sight separation ; @xmath88 , @xmath89 , and @xmath90 are , respectively , dn / da , dn / d@xmath91 and comoving number density for a uniform , non - clustered distribution . finally , multiplying the w(@xmath57 ) equation ( eqn .
[ eqn : wthetadef ] ) by d@xmath91/da and averaging these expressions over the redshift bins , we derive @xmath92 where d@xmath93 is the angular diameter distance . as such
, we can compare how the correlation function of the narrower bin sizes compare to the wider redshift ranges .
[ fig : acor_all ] shows how the wide bins differ from the narrow ones for samples with 0.8@xmath0z@xmath01.2 ; we plot the ratio of the correlation functions for the wide to narrow bins , displaying both w(@xmath57 ) , top , and w@xmath86(r@xmath86 ) , bottom .
since the discrepancy was not severe , we decided that the wider redshift bins would provide better statistics .
given the low abundance of uvlgs , their auto - correlation only proved possible for the full 0.4@xmath0z@xmath01.2 sample ; and for the lbas , their auto - correlation proved too noisy to be useful , and we were only able to attain reasonable results by cross - correlating with the largest sample : the all sample with dz@xmath180.4 bins .
for each sample , we calculate separate fits to the angular correlation function in two regimes : large scales ( @xmath94kpc ) and small scales ( @xmath95kpc ) .
we create a grid of a@xmath96 , spaced logarithmically , and delta , linearly spaced , values , with the best fit values corresponding to the minimum @xmath97 .
the errors on this fit are derived as the values corresponding to min@xmath98 , and we make certain that the grid values extend significantly past these error values to avoid restricting the errors within the minimum or maximum value . the large scale is fit , additionally to the slope and amplitude , with the ic correction , discussed in the previous section .
we show examples of our fitting to the separate samples in fig .
[ fig : fit ] .
the number density is required for calculating both limber s equation and the pair fraction . for our analysis
, we use the observed number density . however , as a check we calculate the predicted physical number densities for the all , blg , and lrg samples .
we use @xmath11 , m@xmath99 ( given in vega magnitudes , and converted to ab magnitudes using @xcite ) , and @xmath100 given for the combo-17 data in @xcite to determine the luminosity function , interpolating the lf between the specified redshift - dependent values to derive a smooth n(z ) across our entire redshift range .
we use a gaussian kernel with @xmath101 , simulating the photo - z errors , to convolve the derived n(z) the results are shown as black dash - dotted lines in fig . [
fig : zdist ] , compared to the observed numbers . with the exception of some peaks and valleys , the observed blg and lrg samples follow the predicted values well .
the agreement between the predicted and observed all distribution is poorer at higher redshifts the observed number density appears to be underestimated .
it is possible that the peaks in the observed n(z ) in the lrg sample correspond to real structure . for the uvlg and lba samples ,
we predict the number density using the calibrated luminosity function from @xcite . in table [
tab : lffit ] , we list the values used to fit the luminosity function to derive n(z ) for all of our samples . for use in limber s equation , we smooth the observed redshift distribution , performing a boxcar average with a kernel size : @xmath102z@xmath180.08 .
the discrepancy between results derived using the observed versus predicted number densities is negligible .    quantifying the smaller scales , we relate the fits from the inner regions ( shown in red in fig .
[ fig : fit ] ) to pair fractions and merger rate , similar to analysis done by @xcite for massive , luminous galaxies .
the pair fraction is derived from integrating eqn .
[ eqn : xi ] from 0 to some maximum radius , within which galaxies are assumed to eventually merge the pair fraction quantifies the number of galaxies that are found within some critical , merging radius of another galaxy .
however , since we are interested in the physical separation between the galaxies rather than the comoving distance , we replace the comoving correlation length , @xmath103 , with the physical correlation length , @xmath104 .
therefore , we calculate pair fractions by simplying the integral of eqn .
[ eqn : xi ] with the following assumption : @xmath105 , into this expression @xmath106 here , @xmath107 is the number density of the second sample in the cross - correlation .
following @xcite , we also use r@xmath108=30 kpc to define close , physical pairs .
our errors for the pair fraction include cosmic variance uncertainty , estimated using the relations from @xcite .
while referred to as a probability , the pair fraction is the mean number of galaxies found within r@xmath108 ( see @xcite ) and may exceed unity .
the pair fraction has quantitative power in comparing small scale clustering between different samples .
the merger rate is derived by dividing the pair fraction by the timescale for this merging event to occur ( assuming that the close pair merge into one merger remnant , such that the pair fraction is equal to twice the merger fraction ) . though the calculation is uncomplicated , the steps for deriving the merger timescale are quite complex and fraught with uncertainties .
@xcite have compared pair fractions derived from their mock catalogs with merger rates from the millenium simulations to determine merger timescales . from these results
, we infer that the merger timescale is @xmath109 myr h@xmath3 , using the most general cross - correlation case of uvlgs with all and estimating @xmath0 m@xmath110 m@xmath36 @xcite in the range z@xmath180.4@xmath11.2 . using this value ,
we determine merger rates for our data , shown in table [ tab : pf ] . according to @xcite ,
merger timescales have been underestimated by @xmath111 in previous studies for example , @xcite estimate the merger timescale to be 400 myr . to avoid the large uncertainties in the merger timescale , we compare our pair fraction results to other studies , rather than comparing merger rates .
given the fits shown in fig .
[ fig : fituvlg ] , we derive the correlation strength ( r@xmath9 ) for uvlgs .
we determine that uvlgs have r@xmath4 h@xmath3mpc ( see table [ tab : lsauto ] ) , corresponding to m@xmath112 ( see @xcite ) .
figure [ fig : r0_uvlg ] shows how our results compare with other published data , at various redshifts .
the shaded region in this figure corresponds to the shaded arrow in figure 11 of @xcite this marks how r@xmath9 evolves with redshift for a halo of mass 10@xmath113m@xmath2 ( bottom of shaded region ) to 10@xmath114m@xmath2 ( top of shaded region ) .
we discuss the evolution of uv - selected galaxies , in relation to other samples , in the following section .    studying the autocorrelations of the separate samples with each other , we find that typically ( at all z ) lrgs cluster most strongly with themselves at small scales , compared to auto - correlations of blgs or all samples ( top panel of fig . [
fig : acor_comp ] ) . comparing auto - correlations of the samples with cross - correlations with uvlgs in the bottom panels of fig .
[ fig : acor_comp ] , we find that at small scales ( r@xmath115kpc ) , uvlgs cluster less strongly with lrgs compared to lrgs with themselves ( _ i.e. _  @xcite ) ; however , it is difficult to differentiate the uvlg cross correlations with the all and blg samples compared to their auto - correlations .
we compare the pair fractions of the autocorrelation of the other three samples with their cross - correlation with uvlgs in fig .
[ fig : comp]100% of the galaxies are found in pairs .
rather the pair fraction represents the mean number of secondary galaxies likely found near the primary all galaxy .
see discussion in  [ sec : quant ] . ] . at the smallest scales
the all sample pairs more with uvlgs than with themselves , and given the large errors , the blg sample galaxies appear to pair with uvlgs with equal likelihood to pairing with themselves .
yet , uvlgs are not likely companions of lrgs . finally , the lba - all ( purple ) pair fraction in table [ tab : pf ] has excessively large errors , preventing a meaningful comparison of the lba - all sample with these other cases .
as we have discussed , small scale clustering translates to merger rates suggesting that uvlgs appear to merge often with all sample galaxies ( and possibly , with other blue , star - forming galaxies ) , and do not merge often with lrgs .
however , as there are some small scale pairs of uvlg - lrgs , these systems do interact on some occasions .
given that blue , star - forming galaxies typically do not reside in clusters , and uvlgs merge with these galaxies as often as they do with themselves , we expect that uvlgs will inhabit lower mass halos rather than massive clusters further constraining our results .
comparing with other results , we show our pair fraction results for the all , blg , and lrg samples with other studies in fig .
[ fig : pfpub ] .
@xcite observe a sample of m@xmath116 galaxies ( orange squares ) to measure merger fractions , assumed to be half of the pair fractions since two pair galaxies interact in a single merger ; @xcite study pair fractions for galaxies with @xmath117m@xmath118 ( green triangles ) , and the magenta star marks the result for m@xmath119 , found by @xcite . since all of these samples are magnitude limited and color - selection independent , the all sample is most comparable ( m@xmath120 ) .
it should be noted that many studies ( e.g. @xcite , @xcite , @xcite ) find that pair fractions are extremely sensitive to the limiting magnitude . in order to compare our pair fraction results with other work
, we adopt the observation from @xcite that the correlation parameters are less sensitive to limiting depth than the number density .
therefore , we modify the derived pair fraction for our all sample , using eqn . [ eqn : pf ] with the small - scale correlation function parameters in table [ tab : acor ] , but changing the number density to represent m@xmath121 selection .
the modified pair fraction is shown as open circles in fig .
[ fig : pfpub ] and agree well with published results .
the picture that has emerged from this analysis depicts uvlgs as galaxies that inhabit halos with m@xmath122 .
uvlgs are more likely to interact and eventually merge with other galaxies ( all ) than the all sample does with itself , and they are as likely to interact and have companions as other blue , star - forming galaxies
. these results are consistent with other studies showing that high sfrs may be closely related to increased merger rates .
uvlgs are unlikely to interact with lrgs , which are expected to reside at the centers of massive clusters , providing another constraint regarding uvlg halo masses . in this section ,
we first place uvlgs amongst other categories of star - forming galaxies ; then , we discuss our findings in light of other work related to uv - selected galaxies , star - formation and environments .      in figure
[ fig : r0_uvlg ] , we display the large scale environmental measure for several other classes of star - forming galaxies .
the bm , bx , lbgs @xcite are selected by color and limiting magnitude to be both luminous and blue , exhibiting the lyman break in their spectra . as discussed in the introduction , the lbas have been found to have similar colors and specific star formation rates ( sfr / m@xmath123 ) , suggesting similar star formation histories and stellar populations . in @xcite , we found evidence for recent and continuous star formation activity , similar to the results found for z@xmath124 lbgs by @xcite and @xcite .
we argue that lbas are most comparable to lbgs .    the fuv@xmath125 sample by @xcite is a less extreme sample ( extending to fainter magnitudes ) of uv - selected galaxies compared to uvlgs .
the other star - forming samples ( blgs , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite ) are selected based on color and magnitude , and span a larger range of sfrs and stellar masses . as demonstrated in @xcite for the local universe , the correlation strength appears to decrease with increasing uv luminosity . yet
, blue galaxies appear to have similar or lower r@xmath9 than the _ galex _  sample , including , the uvlg sample .
@xcite finds that around a critical stellar mass of @xmath126 m@xmath36 , galaxies separate into two classes : massive , red , with low sfrs versus less massive , blue , with high sfrs .
the typical uvlg stellar mass is @xmath127m@xmath36 ( lbas have @xmath128m@xmath129)@xcite .
while extremely star - forming and blue , these galaxies have masses placing them on the boundary between these two classes suggesting , that they may be in the process of transitioning .
this in - between stage is not well - understood as yet , but mergers and environmental processes may drive the transition in this regime .
the more massive , infrared counterpart to uvlgs are luminous infrared galaxies ( lirgs ) and the more extreme ultra - luminous infrared galaxies ( ulirgs )  dusty star - forming galaxies with significant emission coming from central 1kpc .
they experience significant merger events in the local universe @xcite .
as yet , little research has been completed on studying the environments of local ulirgs . according to @xcite , mostly z@xmath130 ulirgs
occupy the field environment , with few cases having cluster densities of abell richness class 0 or 1 .
studying lirg pair fractions at z@xmath131 , @xcite find that @xmath132 of the ir luminosity density arises from close pairs , while morphologically classified mergers contribute to @xmath133 thereby , @xmath134 of the ir luminosity density can be attributed to early interactions ( as evidenced by close pairs ) and mergers ( morphologically determined ) .
while uvlgs are not dusty , it seems that uvlgs and lirgs / ulirgs share environmental conditions , possibly contributing to their high sfrs .
@xcite investigate the relationship between star formation , stellar mass and halo mass .
assuming that a tight relationship between stellar mass and halo mass exists , based on observational `` abundance matching '' , they theoretically derive how mass assembly and star formation history evolve with time . based on averaged results ( they caution that exceptions to their results are completely plausible ) , @xcite determine that the relationship between star formation rate ( sfr ) and halo mass is gaussian - shaped , whose mean and normalization parameters evolve slightly with redshift . however
the broadness of the sfr peak , spanning 11.9@xmath13513.1 for z@xmath70 , suggests that a distinct characteristic halo mass leading to higher sfrs does not exist .
rather galaxy properties likely shift gradually across the halo mass scale .
as discussed earlier , @xcite suggest two regimes of gas fueling and star formation efficiency , depending on halo mass : hot - mode accretion for massive galaxies and halos masses @xmath136 m@xmath36 which relate to lower sfrs , and cold - mode accretion in less massive galaxies , where gas is drawn along filamentary structure and able to feed star formation more efficiently . both of the results from @xcite and @xcite imply that the range of allowed halo masses for high sfrs could be broad with the possibility that there is some mixing of both hot- and cold- accretion modes for halos with masses , m@xmath137 .
while the study by @xcite has been very thorough for z@xmath02 , they do allow that the situation might differ at higher redshifts . as illustrated by @xcite ,
at high redshifts observations show a strong correlation between rest - frame uv - luminosity and correlation length , or halo mass @xcite . yet
, their results show that the nearly linear relation between uv - luminosity , or sfr , and halo mass seems to level off , or possibly even reverse at low redshifts @xcite .
although we have studied a rare sample of galaxies , their close relation to well - studied high redshift lbgs allows us to make a direct comparison about the halo mass condition for lbg - like properties .
@xcite find that lbg halo masses are @xmath138 .
the uvlgs have halo masses that are consistent with these values . while the errors are admittedly too large to be conclusive , our result hints that the halo masses in extreme star - forming galaxies , such as lbgs and uvlgs , are consistent with masses @xmath139 .      at large scales , we measured halos masses of uvlgs , in an attempt to connect star formation properties with large scale processes ; at small scales another important environmental quantity is measured the likelihood for mergers .
it has been shown by @xcite that halos do not necessarily merge in the same way that galaxies merge .
at small scales , the more relevant quantity is the halo occupation distribution ( hod ) , or the way in which galaxies occupy their halos .
this information constrains galaxy formation models at the @xmath32 100 kpc scales .    studying their small scale clustering
, we find that uvlgs and lbas tend to have high pair fractions and merger rates with the all sample .
images of the lbas offer similar clues , displaying companions or ongoing interactions ( such as tidal features and plumes ) in the high resolution images @xcite .
consistent with the results found by @xcite , the most extreme star - forming galaxies are preferentially found in close pairs .
studying lbgs at high redshifts ( z@xmath140 ) , @xcite also find evidence for small - scale clustering .
they interpret that lbgs likely have fainter companions occupying the same halos , and find that the hod model fits their data well .
using merger histories to connect z@xmath124 lbgs to present - day massive galaxies , @xcite argue that m@xmath141 galaxies undergo @xmath7 4 major mergers , with most of the interactions having occured before z@xmath181.5 .
furthermore , they show that z@xmath180.5 galaxy with stellar mass @xmath142 likely originated as a 10@xmath143 galaxy , whose stellar mass has grown both by mergers and increased star formation activity . while the number of mergers plateaus for @xmath144 galaxies by z@xmath72 , less massive galaxies seem to continue merging until z@xmath180.5 .
uvlgs have stellar masses @xmath145m@xmath36 , and lbas have lower masses ( @xmath146 m@xmath36 ) . if uvlgs follow the same merger histories and evolution as more general galaxies studied by @xcite , the present uvlg and lba masses suggest that their z@xmath124 predecessors had stellar masses between @xmath147 m@xmath36 and are probably still actively merging at z@xmath148
.    could mergers be the main triggers for the increased star formation in these low dust , high star - forming galaxies ?
our results , and more generally , the conclusion reached by @xcite find that interactions and mergers do lead to enhanced star formation . as discussed in the introduction , this concept is not new  having theoretical roots from @xcite , mergers efficiently funnel gas into central regions of galaxies , providing fodder for star formation .
this theory is supported by several observational studies ( see reviews by @xcite and @xcite ) .
we can also reverse the query : do all mergers and interactions create uvlgs or lbgs ? mergers and interactions do enhance star formation , but these processes are also seen in lirgs and ulirgs  which are dustier systems , apparently different from uvlgs and lbas .
the overlap between these ir star - forming populations and uv - star - forming galaxies has not been studied in detail .
we speculate that both of these systems may be related , as different phases of the merger process with various unknown factors such as orientation , timescales , and kinematics adding complexity to the evolution and final merger state ; or , while some fraction of mergers result in uvlgs , some other fraction result in dustier lirgs or a separate class of galaxies , altogether .
@xcite has found that a larger fraction of lirgs appear in the merger phase than in the pre - merger , close pair phase .
so it is plausible that uvlgs relate to the earliest interaction phase , exhibiting high sfrs , low dust and distorted features .
the highest restframe - uv surface brightnesses , observed in lbas , corresponds to galaxies found to have a higher incidence of pairs .
unfortunately , further investigation about their environment is beyond the scope of this statistical study because of their rarity .
extrapolating from our data on local lbg analogs , it seems that close pairs are one relevant ingredient to their condition .
however , it is unlikely that every merger will result in a low dust , high surface brightness , high sfr galaxy  other ( unknown as yet ) constraints must also be placed in order to produce this particular breed of galaxy .
using the cosmos data to compare angular cross - correlation functions of uvlgs with three other samples : all , blgs , and lrgs , we determine both large and small scale environments of uvlgs . in our analysis , we assume the following : 1 . )
the correlation function does not evolve with redshift .
the full correlation function includes a term from evolution ( see eqns .
[ eqn : xiform ] and [ eqn : r0z ] ) .
we assume that @xmath76 , which describes non - evolution in the correlation function .
this assumption is justified by the study by @xcite  finding that r@xmath9 evolves by @xmath78 20% over z@xmath180.2@xmath11.2 range .
the correlation function can be characterized by a power law at large scales , and a separate power law at small scales ( see @xcite ) .
3.)the size of the redshift bins do not affect correlation results .
bins that are too wide might make real - space correlations appear weaker by projecting across an excessively wide redshift range .
however , we assume that dz@xmath180.4 is not too wide , and check this assumption by comparing to more narrow dz@xmath180.2 bins finding that there is good agreement between the wide and narrow cases .
we find that uvlgs inhabit halos with masses exceeding @xmath149m@xmath36 .
this result is further constrained by the additional observation that uvlgs and lrgs ( which typically trace the most massive halos ) do not often form pairs .
rather , uvlgs form close pairs with higher probability compared to the all sample forming pairs with themselves ; and uvlgs pair with blgs with the same probability as blg - blg pairs . therefore we conclude that mergers are relevant environmental effects responsible for triggering high levels of sfr , observed in uvlgs and the high redshift lbgs .
we are not able to definitively measure the halo mass of this sample given our large errors .
however , we explore the possibility that halo mass may play some role in the uvlg or lbg condition since both examples of uv - selected , high sfr galaxies have halo masses consistent with @xmath150m@xmath36 .
( galaxy evolution explorer ) is a nasa small explorer , launched in april 2003 .
we gratefully acknowledge nasa s support for construction , operation , and science analysis for the galex mission , developed in cooperation with the centre national detudes spatiales of france and the korean ministry of science and technology .
the hst cosmos program was supported through nasa grant hst - go-09822 .
more information on the cosmos survey is available at http://www.astro.caltech.edu/cosmos .
we thank michael blanton for access to the idl kcorrect ( version 4.1.4 ) analysis package .
this work has greatly benefitted from the careful comments and suggestions made by the anonymous referee .
a.r.b . gratefully recognizes ian mcgreer and andrei mesinger for their contributions to this analysis , and david hogg for insightful discussions .
ccc all & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 60872 + all & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 107473 + all & 0.4 @xmath1 1.2 & 168345 + blg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 7678 + blg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 25100 + blg & 0.4 @xmath1 1.2 & 32778 + lrg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 11175 + lrg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 15861 + lrg & 0.4 @xmath1 1.2 & 27036 + uvlg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 752 + uvlg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 2737 + uvlg & 0.4 @xmath1 1.2 & 3489 + lba & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 50 + lba & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 232 + lba & 0.4 @xmath1 1.2 & 282 +    cccccc all & 0.3 & -1.3 & -21.10 & 32.26 & @xcite + all & 0.5 & -1.3 & -21.30 & 33.32 & @xcite + all & 0.7 & -1.3 & -21.62 & 32.16 & @xcite + all & 0.9 & -1.3 & -21.35 & 41.26 & @xcite + all & 1.1 & -1.3 & -21.48 & 34.72 & @xcite + blg & 0.3 & -1.3 & -20.84 & 24.26 & @xcite + blg & 0.5 & -1.3 & -21.20 & 23.20 & @xcite + blg & 0.7 & -1.3 & -21.40 & 27.27 & @xcite + blg & 0.9 & -1.3 & -21.20 & 37.32 & @xcite + blg & 1.1 & -1.3 & -21.35 & 29.19 & @xcite + lrg & 0.3 & -0.5 & -20.73 & 21.91 & @xcite + lrg & 0.5 & -0.5 & -20.87 & 19.97 & @xcite + lrg & 0.7 & -0.5 & -21.20 & 17.75 & @xcite + lrg & 0.9 & -0.5 & -21.28 & 11.89 & @xcite + lrg & 1.1 & -0.5 & -21.68 & 5.32 & @xcite + uvlg & 0.3 & -1.5 & -19.53 & 6.00 & @xcite + uvlg & 0.6 & -1.5 & -19.63 & 10.30 & @xcite + uvlg & 1.0 & -1.5 & -19.89 & 8.00 & @xcite + [ tab : lffit ]    ccccc all & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 5.0 @xmath151 & 0.64 @xmath152 & 3.3 @xmath153 + all & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 22.0 @xmath154 & 0.32 @xmath155 & 3.8 @xmath153 + blg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 16.6 @xmath156 & 0.44 @xmath157 & 3.9 @xmath158 + blg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 50.0 @xmath159 & 0.22 @xmath160 & 4.4 @xmath161 + lrg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 2.7 @xmath162 & 0.83 @xmath163 & 2.9 @xmath164 + lrg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 22.3 @xmath165 & 0.43 @xmath166 & 4.8 @xmath167 + uvlg & 0.4 @xmath1 1.2 & 32.8 @xmath168 & 0.32 @xmath169 & 4.8 @xmath170 + [ tab : lsauto ]    cccccccc uvlg x all & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 0.06 @xmath171 & 1.5 @xmath172 & 1.3 @xmath173 & 0.084 @xmath174 & 0.47 @xmath175 & 0.109 @xmath176 + uvlg x all & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 0.03 @xmath177 & 1.5 @xmath178 & 1.3 @xmath179 & 0.159 @xmath180 & 1.18 @xmath181 & 0.276 @xmath182 + uvlg x blg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 0.07 @xmath183 & 1.5 @xmath184 & 1.4 @xmath185 & 0.011 @xmath186 & 0.07 @xmath187 & 0.015 @xmath188 + uvlg x blg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 0.24 @xmath189 & 1.2 @xmath172 & 1.9 @xmath190 & 0.039 @xmath191 & 0.14 @xmath192 & 0.032 @xmath193 +
uvlg x lrg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 0.21 @xmath194 & 1.2 @xmath195 & 1.6 @xmath196 & 0.015 @xmath186 & 0.03 @xmath197 & 0.007 @xmath198 + uvlg x lrg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 0.16 @xmath199 & 1.2 @xmath200 & 1.8 @xmath201 & 0.023 @xmath202 & 0.11 @xmath203 & 0.025 @xmath204 + lba x all & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 0.22 @xmath205 & 1.3 @xmath206 & 1.9 @xmath207 & 0.084 @xmath208 & 0.65 @xmath209 & 0.153 @xmath210 + lba x all & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 0.01 @xmath211 & 1.6 @xmath179 & 1.2 @xmath212 & 0.159 @xmath213 & 2.61 @xmath214 & 0.608 @xmath215 + [ tab : pf ]    cccccccc all & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 0.56 @xmath216 & 1.05 @xmath217 & 2.0 @xmath200 & 0.084 @xmath218 & 0.14 @xmath219 & 0.033 @xmath220 + all & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 0.30 @xmath221 & 1.12 @xmath222 & 1.9 @xmath172 & 0.159 @xmath180 & 0.26 @xmath221 & 0.060 @xmath223 + blg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 0.44 @xmath224 & 1.14 @xmath225 & 1.9 @xmath226 & 0.011 @xmath227 & 0.03 @xmath228 & 0.007 @xmath229 + blg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 0.34 @xmath230 & 1.11 @xmath231 & 1.9 @xmath232 & 0.039 @xmath202 & 0.07 @xmath219 & 0.017 @xmath233 + lrg & 0.4 @xmath1 0.8 & 0.38 @xmath234 & 1.23 @xmath235 & 2.0 @xmath236 & 0.015 @xmath227 & 0.06 @xmath237 & 0.015 @xmath238 + lrg & 0.8 @xmath1 1.2 & 0.18 @xmath239 & 1.41 @xmath240 & 2.1 @xmath241 & 0.023 @xmath242 & 0.24 @xmath243 & 0.056 @xmath244 + [ tab : acor ]    25.5 ) cosmos catalog : all ( upper panels ) , blg ( middle left ) , and lrg ( middle right ) and the color - magnitude distributions of uvlgs ( lower left ) and lbas ( lower right ) , selected from the cosmos+_galex _
( i@xmath025.5 and nuv@xmath023 ) combined catalog .
the upper left panel illustrates the luminosity - redshift distribution for the full data , with the black box defining a volume - limited sample ( all ) .
the plot on the upper right shows how this sample of galaxies , all , occupies the color - magnitude diagram .
the lower plots show color magnitude diagrams for the other samples .
we define blgs to have @xmath2451.8 and @xmath246 - 20.0 ( shown on middle left ) and lrgs to have @xmath2472.0 and @xmath248 - 20.5 ( middle right ) .
the lowest left panel shows the uvlg distribution in purple with contour levels representing the number of galaxies in color - magnitide bins corresponding to ( 3 , 6 , 12 , 24 ) galaxies ; similarly , the lowest right panel shows the same for lbas with contour levels corresponding to ( 1.5 , 3 , 6 ) galaxies . , title="fig:",width=249 ] 25.5 ) cosmos catalog : all ( upper panels ) , blg ( middle left ) , and lrg ( middle right ) and the color - magnitude distributions of uvlgs ( lower left ) and lbas ( lower right ) , selected from the cosmos+_galex _  ( i@xmath025.5 and nuv@xmath023 ) combined catalog .
the upper left panel illustrates the luminosity - redshift distribution for the full data , with the black box defining a volume - limited sample ( all ) .
the plot on the upper right shows how this sample of galaxies , all , occupies the color - magnitude diagram .
the lower plots show color magnitude diagrams for the other samples .
we define blgs to have @xmath2451.8 and @xmath246 - 20.0 ( shown on middle left ) and lrgs to have @xmath2472.0 and @xmath248 - 20.5 ( middle right ) .
the lowest left panel shows the uvlg distribution in purple with contour levels representing the number of galaxies in color - magnitide bins corresponding to ( 3 , 6 , 12 , 24 ) galaxies ; similarly , the lowest right panel shows the same for lbas with contour levels corresponding to ( 1.5 , 3 , 6 ) galaxies .
, title="fig:",width=249 ] 25.5 ) cosmos catalog : all ( upper panels ) , blg ( middle left ) , and lrg ( middle right ) and the color - magnitude distributions of uvlgs ( lower left ) and lbas ( lower right ) , selected from the cosmos+_galex _  ( i@xmath025.5 and nuv@xmath023 ) combined catalog .
the upper left panel illustrates the luminosity - redshift distribution for the full data , with the black box defining a volume - limited sample ( all ) .
the plot on the upper right shows how this sample of galaxies , all , occupies the color - magnitude diagram .
the lower plots show color magnitude diagrams for the other samples .
we define blgs to have @xmath2451.8 and @xmath246 - 20.0 ( shown on middle left ) and lrgs to have @xmath2472.0 and @xmath248 - 20.5 ( middle right ) .
the lowest left panel shows the uvlg distribution in purple with contour levels representing the number of galaxies in color - magnitide bins corresponding to ( 3 , 6 , 12 , 24 ) galaxies ; similarly , the lowest right panel shows the same for lbas with contour levels corresponding to ( 1.5 , 3 , 6 ) galaxies . , title="fig:",width=249 ] 25.5 ) cosmos catalog : all ( upper panels ) , blg ( middle left ) , and lrg ( middle right ) and the color - magnitude distributions of uvlgs ( lower left ) and lbas ( lower right ) , selected from the cosmos+_galex _
( i@xmath025.5 and nuv@xmath023 ) combined catalog .
the upper left panel illustrates the luminosity - redshift distribution for the full data , with the black box defining a volume - limited sample ( all ) .
the plot on the upper right shows how this sample of galaxies , all , occupies the color - magnitude diagram .
the lower plots show color magnitude diagrams for the other samples .
we define blgs to have @xmath2451.8 and @xmath246 - 20.0 ( shown on middle left ) and lrgs to have @xmath2472.0 and @xmath248 - 20.5 ( middle right ) .
the lowest left panel shows the uvlg distribution in purple with contour levels representing the number of galaxies in color - magnitide bins corresponding to ( 3 , 6 , 12 , 24 ) galaxies ; similarly , the lowest right panel shows the same for lbas with contour levels corresponding to ( 1.5 , 3 , 6 ) galaxies . , title="fig:",width=249 ] 25.5 ) cosmos catalog : all ( upper panels ) , blg ( middle left ) , and lrg ( middle right ) and the color - magnitude distributions of uvlgs ( lower left ) and lbas ( lower right ) , selected from the cosmos+_galex _
( i@xmath025.5 and nuv@xmath023 ) combined catalog .
the upper left panel illustrates the luminosity - redshift distribution for the full data , with the black box defining a volume - limited sample ( all ) .
the plot on the upper right shows how this sample of galaxies , all , occupies the color - magnitude diagram .
the lower plots show color magnitude diagrams for the other samples . we define blgs to have @xmath2451.8 and @xmath246 - 20.0 ( shown on middle left ) and lrgs to have @xmath2472.0 and @xmath248 - 20.5 ( middle right ) .
the lowest left panel shows the uvlg distribution in purple with contour levels representing the number of galaxies in color - magnitide bins corresponding to ( 3 , 6 , 12 , 24 ) galaxies ; similarly , the lowest right panel shows the same for lbas with contour levels corresponding to ( 1.5 , 3 , 6 ) galaxies . , title="fig:",width=249 ] 25.5 ) cosmos catalog : all ( upper panels ) , blg ( middle left ) , and lrg ( middle right ) and the color - magnitude distributions of uvlgs ( lower left ) and lbas ( lower right ) , selected from the cosmos+_galex _  ( i@xmath025.5 and nuv@xmath023 ) combined catalog .
the upper left panel illustrates the luminosity - redshift distribution for the full data , with the black box defining a volume - limited sample ( all ) .
the plot on the upper right shows how this sample of galaxies , all , occupies the color - magnitude diagram .
the lower plots show color magnitude diagrams for the other samples .
we define blgs to have @xmath2451.8 and @xmath246 - 20.0 ( shown on middle left ) and lrgs to have @xmath2472.0 and @xmath248 - 20.5 ( middle right ) .
the lowest left panel shows the uvlg distribution in purple with contour levels representing the number of galaxies in color - magnitide bins corresponding to ( 3 , 6 , 12 , 24 ) galaxies ; similarly , the lowest right panel shows the same for lbas with contour levels corresponding to ( 1.5 , 3 , 6 ) galaxies .
, title="fig:",width=249 ]      z@xmath00.8 ( left ) , and 0.8@xmath0z@xmath01.2(right ) for samples from top to bottom : all ( top ) , blg , lrg , uvlg , and lba ( bottom ) .
the distribution is smoothed to a scale of 4.8 .
the spatial distributions are displayed over the mask ( black denotes regions where no reliable observations exist) the allowed regions of the masks , appearing in these plots as dark violet regions underlying the colored points , are used for populating the random catalogs .
colors in this figure progress from deep violet to red with increasing density .
, title="fig:",height=624 ] +    0.2 ) to wide ( dz@xmath180.4 ) redshift bins , by displaying the ratios of w(@xmath57 ) , at top , and w@xmath249(r@xmath249 ) , at bottom . for simplicity ,
we have chosen to display only one representative redshift range ( 0.4@xmath10.8 ) for the autocorrelation of the all ( left ) , blg ( middle ) and lrg ( right ) samples .
the ratios of the 0.4@xmath0z@xmath00.6 data to the wider 0.5@xmath0z@xmath00.9 are shown as black points , and the ratios of 0.6@xmath10.8 to 0.5@xmath10.9 appear as orange points .
while the narrow bin data appears a factor of 1.5@xmath12 higher than that of the wide bins in the w(@xmath57 ) plots ( top ) , we show that converting this into w@xmath249(r@xmath249 ) units shows little discrepancy between the separate narrow redshift ranges and the wider redshift ( the dashed red line marks where the narrow and wide bins give equivalent results . in most cases ,
the correlation function derived using wide z bins corresponds to the average correlation function of the narrower bins .
therefore , selecting a dz@xmath180.4 redshift bin will not systematically affect the correlation strength.,width=624 ]          1.2 redshift data .
the shaded regions within the dashed lines provide errors caused by cosmic variance .
the topmost panel compares auto - correlation of the all sample ( black ) with blg sample ( open navy circle ) and lrg sample ( open red circle ) .
the second panel displays the all auto - correlation ( black ) with the ` all x uvlgs ' cross - correlation ( purple ) .
the third panel , similarly , shows the blg auto - correlation ( blue ) in comparison with the ` blg x uvlgs ' cross - correlation ( purple ) . finally , in the bottom panel
the auto - correlation of ` lrgs ' is shown in red , with the cross - correlation of ` lrgs ' with uvlgs shown in purple .
while on small scales , the auto - correlations of the all and blg samples are indistinguishable from their cross correlations with the uvlgs , the lrgs appear to cluster with themselves more strongly than with uvlgs .
, height=624 ]    z@xmath01.2 uvlgs .
we compare with correlation length data for star - forming galaxies from other studies .
we also include high redshift results for lbgs , bx , and bm ( see @xcite for their description ) with low - redshift _ galex _  results to compare uvlgs with other uv - selected samples ( all shown in magenta ) .
the dark green shaded region shows the evolution of a 10@xmath25010@xmath114 m@xmath36 halo with redshift ( identical to @xcite).,height=384 ]        m@xmath118 ; @xcite ( magenta star ) studies a sample with m@xmath119 ; @xcite ( orange square ) finds merger fraction , assumed to be half the pair fraction , for m@xmath116 .
these magnitude limited samples , with no color selection , are most comparable to our all sample . from eqn .
[ eqn : pf ] we see that the pair fraction depends on number density , which depends strongly on limiting magnitude . in order to compare our pair fraction with other studies ,
we extrapolate the pair fraction of the all sample for m@xmath251 , changing only the number density , and assuming that the correlation lengths is the same as our all sample ( see discussion in @xcite ) .
these points are shown as open circles , and appear to agree well with the other studies.,height=432 ]