in the standard scenario of planet formation , planetesimals are the precursors of planets .
their formation process is one of the unsolved problems of the planet formation theory . beginning with micron - sized dust grains
, they grow to centimeter size in a protoplanetary disk via collisional agglomeration @xcite .
the least understood growth phase is that of growth from centimeter size to kilometer size .
since the gas drag of meter - sized aggregates is weak , they are slightly decoupled from gas with the sub - keplerian velocity . the resulting head - wind decreases their angular momentum and causes inward drift
, whose timescale is about a few hundred years @xcite .
the growth process in this stage must be faster than this drift timescale .
another problem is the sticking probability of the aggregates . in this stage , since the threshold velocity for the destruction is low , their collisions may lead to destruction ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
a very thin and dense layer of settled dust aggregates in the mid - plane of the protoplanetary disk is gravitationally unstable .
then the gravitational collapse of the dust layer occurs , and kilometer - sized planetesimals are formed directly @xcite .
this scenario has the advantage of a very rapid formation timescale , which is on the order of the keplerian time , thus avoiding the migration of meter - sized aggregates .
however , turbulence in the protoplanetary disk may prevent dust from settling to the mid - plane .
as dust settles in the protoplanetary disk , a vertical shear velocity develops because the dust - rich gas in the mid - plane rotates with the velocity closer to the keplerian velocity than that of the dust - depleted gas , which may cause turbulence .
the turbulence can mix dust with gas and prevent the dust layer from settling into a dense enough sheet for gravitational instability @xcite .
problems concerning the gravitational instability of the dust layer still remain unsolved .
there are two methods for calculating the dynamics of dust particles in gas : fluid simulation and @xmath0-body simulation .
one can consider the particles as virtually fluid and treat them with the euler equation or navier - stokes equation .
for example , @xcite performed the two - dimensional numerical simulation to investigate the density evolution of the dust layer due to gravitational instability .
they assumed that the dust layer is axisymmetric with respect to the rotational axis .
they treated the dust component as a pressure - free fluid because the velocity dispersion of dust is negligible if the stopping time @xmath2 is sufficiently short , where the stopping time @xmath2 is the characteristic timescale for a particle to stop in gas .
they found that the dust layer becomes extremely thin if the stopping time is long .
@xcite performed the numerical simulation of the gravitational instability of a two - dimensional thin disk and investigated the non - axisymmetric modes .    on the other hand , we can investigate the dynamics of particles in gas by using @xmath0-body simulations @xcite .
this is straightforward and precise , but the calculation is very time - consuming and the practical number of particles is limited .
@xcite performed @xmath0-body simulations of a gravitationally unstable disk with a local - shearing box .
they investigated the formation of clumps of planetesimals at t30 au by the gravitational instability .
they considered the drag force from the background gas .
they showed that the planetesimal clumps form owing to the gravitational instability , which correspond to planetesimals in our calculation . in their simulation ,
the optical depth is smaller than that in our calculation and the particle disk is unstable even initially .
we consider the formation of planetesimals at 1 au , thus we use the large optical depth , and assume the dust layer is initially stable .
@xcite performed a set of local simulations of the self - gravitating collisional particle disks without gas using @xmath0-body simulation ( hereafter paper i ) .
dust particle dynamics is calculated with the hill equations in a local - shearing box @xcite .
they adopted the rubble pile model ( hard and soft sphere models ) as collision models .
they found that the formation process is divided into three stages : the formation of non - axisymmetric wake - like structures @xcite , the creation of aggregates , and the rapid collisional growth of the aggregates .
the mass of the largest aggregates is larger than the mass predicted by the linear perturbation theory .
@xcite adopted the alternative model of collisions , ` accretion model ' ( paper ii ) . in the accretion model ,
the number of particles decreases as the calculation proceeds ; thereby this model enables us to perform large - scale and long - term simulations .
they obtained the final mass of planetesimals as a function of the size of the computational box .
@xcite performed the numerical simulations to investigate the validity of the super - particle approximation .
they considered the various physics , such as the gas drag , the self - gravity , the physical collision and the turbulence .
they treated the collisions as the hard sphere model .
they investigated the numerical requirements to study the gravitational instability .
to understand the basic dynamics of gravitational instability , we neglected the effect of gas in papers i and ii .
however , it is obvious that the gas plays an important role in planetesimal formation when dust particles are small .
the interaction with gas through drag is dominant in the dynamical evolution of particles .
many authors investigated the effect of gas .
the particles drift radially due to gas drag @xcite . as the sedimentation of dust aggregates towards the midplane proceeds , the vertical velocity shear increases .
thus , the kelvin - helmholtz instability occurs @xcite .
the kelvin - helmholtz instability makes the dust layer turbulent .
the turbulent gas prevents the concentration of dust @xcite , and helps the concentration @xcite .
the interaction between gas and dust causes the streaming instability @xcite . by the streaming instability , the dust grains concentrate strongly and the large ceres - sized planetesimals form @xcite .
the loss of angular momentum due to the gas drag helps gravitational instability @xcite .
the time - scale for the dissipative instability is relatively slow , but the dust layer may be unstable even when the toomre s q value is larger than unity . as a first step toward understanding the effect of gas on gravitational instability , we introduce gas as a background laminar flow in the present paper .
the aim of the present paper is to investigate the effect of the laminar gas on the planetesimal formation through gravitational instability .
the laminar flow causes the dissipation of the kinetic energy and thus radial migration of dust .    in
 2 , we summarize the results of the linear analysis of the gravitational instability under gas drag . in  3 , we describe the simulation method and the initial condition . in  4 , we present our numerical results .  5
is devoted to discussions .
we summarize the results in  6 .
the linear stability analyses of the dust layer with a finite thickness were performed by @xcite and @xcite .
they assumed that the size of dust aggregates is sufficiently small , in other words , dust is fully coupled with gas , thus they treated gas and dust as one fluid . that introduces no dissipation due to gas drag .
they considered the vertical structure of the dust layer , and studied the roche criterion .
the linear stability analyses of dissipative gravitational instability were performed by @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite . in this section ,
we summarize the essence of their results . @xcite and @xcite used one component model , i.e. , they neglected the dynamics of gas flow , but they consider the gas drag from the stationary background gas flow . using their results
, we discuss conditions for the gravitational instability under the influence of gas drag .
we adopt the isothermal equation of state for the dust layer : @xmath3 where @xmath4 is the pressure , @xmath5 is the isothermal sound speed , and @xmath6 is the density of the dust layer . in this equation of state ,
the velocity dispersion of dust is always constant .
clearly , the velocity dispersion must not be constant .
it changes owing to several processes such as gas drag , inelastic collisions , and gravitational scattering .
this assumption gives us the simple analytical expression of the dispersion relation , with which we can grasp the nature of dissipative gravitational instability .
we assume that the gas velocity is equal to the kepler velocity .
we consider the reference point that is at the semi - major axis @xmath7
. the kepler angular velocity of the reference point is @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the mass of the central star and @xmath10 is the gravitational constant .
we introduce the local cartesian coordinates in which the @xmath11-axis is directed radially , the @xmath12-axis follows the direction of rotation , and the @xmath13-axis follows the direction perpendicular to mid - plane .
we define @xmath14 as the deviation velocity field from the local kepler velocity .
the basic equations for the dust layer in this frame are given by @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the gravitational potential due to the self - gravity .
the simulation results in  4 show that the density fluctuation is not axisymmetric .
however , for the sake of simplicity , restricting ourselves to the axisymmetric mode ( @xmath19 ) , we carry out a normal mode analysis in the form of @xmath20 where @xmath21 is the wave number in the @xmath11-direction and @xmath22 is the growth rate .    integrating toward @xmath13 , we obtain the equation of perturbed quantities @xmath23 : @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the surface density of the dust layer . @xcite
considered the finite thickness model using the softening term @xcite .
poisson equation with the softening parameter is @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the scale height of the dust layer and @xmath31 is the softening parameter : @xmath32    for nontrivial solutions , the determinant of the coefficient matrix must vanish .
thus the following dispersion relation is obtained @xcite : @xmath33 where @xmath34 .
the mode for @xmath35 is unstable , where @xmath36 is the real part of a complex number @xmath37 . in the gas - free limit ( @xmath38 ) and the thin disk limit ( @xmath39 )
, the dispersion relation converges to the conventional dispersion relation of a thin disk @xcite .
equation ( [ eq : disp1 ] ) can be written in a non - dimensional form scaled by the length @xmath40 and the time @xmath41 : @xmath42 where we used toomre s @xmath1 given by @xmath43 .
a tilde denotes non - dimensional quantity hereafter .
a dissipative dust layer is secularly unstable for long - wavelength modes although @xmath44 .
the physical mechanism of the instability is explained as follows @xcite .
we consider a thin axisymmetric overdense ring and the thick back - ground gas . from the force balance of the self - gravity , we find that the dust rotates faster at the outer edge of the ring .
thus , the drag force at the outer edge is strong .
this causes the inward drift .
conversely , the dust at the inner edge drifts outward .
these effects shrink ring radially .
figure [ fig : disper.eps ] shows the dispersion relation of the dust layer under gas drag for @xmath45 .
we used the thin disk model ( @xmath46 ) .
the stopping time is @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 , and @xmath50 ( gas - free ) .
all models have the maximum growth rate at @xmath51 .
we will see that the growth rate has the maximum value at @xmath52 in  [ sec : mugr ] . as the stopping time lengthens ,
the growth rate shrinks . in the gas - free model ,
long - wavelength modes are stable , while in the gas model , they are unstable .      as discussed in  [ sec : dispersion ] , the dust layer is always unstable for long - wavelength modes . however , the timescale of the instability can be longer than the dynamical timescale , because this is the secular instability .
therefore , in order to understand what happens , we have to compare the timescale of the instability with those of other processes such as the sedimentation , the radial migration , and the growth of dust aggregates .    here , we assume the thin disk approximation ( @xmath46 ) in order to obtain the simple analytical formula . for @xmath53
, @xmath54 is a real positive value .
the growth rate for the most unstable mode @xmath54 is a function of @xmath55 , @xmath56 , and @xmath1 . from equation ( [ eq : disp2 ] ) ,
the partial derivative of @xmath54 with respect to @xmath55 is given as @xmath57 using equation ( [ eq : disp2 ] ) , we can show that the denominator on the right hand side of equation ( [ eq : disp3 ] ) is positive when @xmath58 .
hence , the @xmath54 has the maximum value at @xmath59 for a fixed @xmath56 and @xmath1 .
the substitution of @xmath59 into equation ( [ eq : disp2 ] ) provides the equation of the maximum growth rate @xmath60 : @xmath61    to obtain the condition that the gravitational instability dominates over the other process ( symbolically denoted by `` x '' ) , we equate @xmath62 with @xmath63 where @xmath64 is the characteristic timescale of a process x , ans solve the resultant equation with respect to q to obtain @xmath1 value : @xmath65 when @xmath66 , gravitational instability is a dominant process compared to the process x. on the other hand , when @xmath67 , the timescale for the process x is shorter than the timescale of gravitational instability .
although the dust layer is unstable , the process x is dominant .
we can derive the leading term of the power series expansion with respect to @xmath2 for equation ( 13 ) and find the asymptotic solution @xcite . when the gas drag is strong @xmath68 ,
the growth rate for the most unstable mode is @xmath69 conversely , when the gas drag force is weak @xmath70 and @xmath44 , the growth rate for the most unstable mode is @xmath71 when @xmath72 , the growth rate for the most unstable mode converges to the finite value @xmath73 as @xmath74 , which is the maximum growth rate for the gas - free gravitational instability .
the method of calculation is the same as those used in papers i and ii except for including gas , which is based on the method of the local simulation of planetary rings ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
we describe quantities in the non - dimensional form independent of the semi - major axis @xmath7 , and the mass of the central star @xmath9 by scaling the time by @xmath75 , the length by the hill radius @xmath76 , and the mass by @xmath77 , where @xmath78 and @xmath79 is the initial mass of particles @xcite .
the initial mass of particles @xmath79 is assumed to be identical .
the non - dimensional hill equations for the particle @xmath80 are given by ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) : @xmath81 where @xmath82 , @xmath83 , and @xmath84 are the position , mass , and the stopping time of the particle @xmath80 , @xmath85 is the distance between particles @xmath80 and @xmath86 , and @xmath87 is the velocity field of gas .
we neglect the dust back - reaction on gas for the sake of simplicity .
we assume that the laminar gas flow , which has the sub - keplerian velocity field : @xmath88 where @xmath89 is the keplerian shear velocity , @xmath90 is the difference from the keplerian velocity . the stopping time @xmath84 depends on the size of particle : @xmath91 where @xmath92 is the power - law index , and @xmath93 is the stopping time of the particle with @xmath94 . in this paper
, we adopt @xmath95 and 2/3 .
the index @xmath96 corresponds to stokes law ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
the calculation box has the periodic boundary condition ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
the size of the box is taken as a square @xmath97 where @xmath98 is the most unstable wavelength of gravitational instability and @xmath99 is the non - dimensional parameter .
the system is characterized by two non - dimensional parameters , the optical depth and the ratio of the hill radius to the diameter of a particle @xcite : @xmath100 @xmath101 where @xmath102 and @xmath103 are the internal density and initial radius of the particle , respectively .
the realistic value for `` solid '' dust particles is @xmath104 for @xmath105 and @xmath106 .
however , we adopt @xmath107 in this paper owing to the computational limit ( see papers i and ii ) .
we set the optical depth @xmath108 , which is approximately equal to the realistic value @xmath109 for @xmath110 , @xmath111 , and @xmath105 .
since our choice of @xmath112 is smaller than the realistic value , a particle used in the simulation is not a realistic dust particle but a ` super - particle ' that represents a group of many small particles that have the same position and velocity .
thus the restitution coefficient @xmath113 corresponds to the rate of the dissipation due to collisions between super - particles .
the low value of @xmath112 means that the physical size of a particle in our simulation is very large .
this implies that the effect of the gravitational scattering is relatively weaker than that of collisions .
we investigated the @xmath112 value dependence in paper i and ii in the narrow range ( @xmath114 ) and we confirmed that the formation process does not change in this range qualitatively .
however , we show that the collisional growth is important in the final stage where @xmath115 controls the growth rate .
thus , we should perform the large @xmath112 value . in the future work
, we will concentrate on the collisional growth and perform the @xmath0-body simulations with a realistic @xmath112 value .    in the hill
coordinates , the keplerian orbit is determined by six parameters : the position of the guiding center , eccentricity @xmath116 , inclination @xmath80 , and two phases for epicyclic and vertical oscillations @xcite . the initial eccentricity and inclination of particles
are assumed to follow the rayleigh distribution .
we fix @xmath117 according to @xcite .
the other parameters are uniformly distributed , avoiding overlapping .
we adopt the hard - sphere and accretion models as a collision model ( papers i and ii ) . in the hard - sphere model ,
the penetration of particles is not possible ( e.g. , paper i , * ? ? ?
when a collision occurs , the particle velocity changes instantly .
the relative tangential velocity is conserved and the magnitude of the relative normal velocity is reduced by a factor of @xmath113 .
we use the constant @xmath113 .
we also use the accretion model ( e.g. , paper ii , * ? ? ?
* ) . in this model , when two particles collide ,
if the binding condition is satisfied , the two particles merge into one particle .
the binding condition is described by the jacobi integral @xmath118 ( e.g. , paper ii , * ? ? ?
* ) .    in the hard - sphere model ,
since a planetesimal consists of many small particles , it can be distorted in shape and break up . on the other hand , in the accretion model , a planetesimal can not be distorted or break up . in this respect ,
the hard - sphere model is more realistic than the accretion model .
however the accretion model has an advantage .
first , since the number of particles decreases as the calculation proceeds , this model enables us to reduce the calculation cost .
second , we can easily handle size - dependent drag coefficient .
in general , the drag coefficient depends on the size of a particle . in the hard sphere model
, it is complicated to handle the size - dependent drag coefficient . in the accretion model , we can adopt the size - dependent drag without any difficulty .
we have shown that results in the accretion model are the same as those in the hard sphere model in the gas - free model ( paper ii ) .
we compare the accretion model with the hard sphere model in the laminar gas flow .
we performed simulations with the same model parameters except for collision models ( models 100h0 , 100ac0 , and 100as0 ) in order to check the validity of the accretion model .
the initial stopping time of particles is @xmath119 . in the accretion models ,
we calculate the drag coefficient using the constant model ( @xmath120 ) and the stokes law model ( @xmath96 ) .
the left panel of figure [ fig : q_value_accretion.eps ] shows the time evolution of @xmath1 . in the phase where @xmath1 decreases ,
there are no clear differences among all models . on the other hand , in the phase where @xmath1 increases , the discrepancies appear among them .
@xmath1 value in the accretion model with @xmath96 is larger than those in the hard sphere model and the accretion model with @xmath120 . in the stokes law model , as particles grow ,
the drag coefficient becomes small and thus the dissipation becomes inefficient , which leads to the relatively large velocity dispersion .
the right panel of figure [ fig : q_value_accretion.eps ] shows the maximum mass of planetesimals for all models . in the early stage , particles or aggregates
do not grow . there
the difference in collision models is not important .
the difference can be seen in the late stage . in the stokes law model @xmath96 , the drag coefficient changes as particles grow , which affects the evolution of the maximum mass . in the hard - sphere model ,
the drag coefficient is constant although aggregates grow , therefore the evolution in the hard - sphere model must be similar to that in the accretion model with @xmath120 .
however , the difference appears at @xmath121 .
the maximum mass of the accretion model with @xmath120 increases , but that of the hard - sphere model does not change . at @xmath121 , there are only a few particles or aggregates .
the maximum mass of planetesimals is sensitive to the initial condition and noise .
but , at @xmath122 , the maximum mass converges to the same value .
the final mass of the planetesimal depends on the size of the computational domain @xcite .
the dispersion of the mass of the final state is relatively small .    in the early stage
where no planetesimals form , the time evolution is quite similar in all models . in the late stage , once planetesimals form , there are no remarkable differences among all models .
if we focus on the the evolution of statistical value , such as the velocity dispersion , the number of planetesimals , we can investigate the gravitational instability and planetesimal formation using the accretion model .
although the time evolution of the maximum mass of the planetesimal in the late stage depends on the initial noise , the maximum mass finally converge to the same value .
therefore , we adopt the accretion model to investigate the gravitational instability from now on .
we performed 14 simulations with different disk models .
the model parameters are summarized in table @xmath123 .
we fixed the following parameters : the optical depth , @xmath124 , the restitution coefficient @xmath125 , the ratio of the hill radius to the diameter @xmath126 , the initial toomre s @xmath1 value @xmath127 , and the size of the computational domain @xmath128 .
the basic dependence of planetesimal formation of these parameters was investigated in papers i and ii .
ccccc 010as0 & 0.10 & accretion & 2/3 & 0 + 025as0 & 0.25 & accretion & 2/3 & 0 + 050as0 & 0.50 & accretion & 2/3 & 0 + 100as0 & 1.00 & accretion & 2/3 & 0 + 200as0 & 2.00 & accretion & 2/3 & 0 + 400as0 & 4.00 & accretion & 2/3 & 0 + 1000as0 & 10.00 & accretion & 2/3 & 0 + infa & @xmath129 & accretion & - & 0 + 100ac0 & 1.00 & accretion & 0 & 0 + 100h0 & 1.00 & hard & 0 & 0 + 100ac1 & 1.00 & accretion & 0 & 10 + 100as1 & 1.00 & accretion & 2/3 & 10 + 100ac2 & 1.00 & accretion & 0 & 20 + 100as2 & 1.00 & accretion & 2/3 & 20 + [ table : model2 ]      figure [ fig : snap_shot ] shows the typical evolution of the simulation ( model 100as0 ) . at @xmath130 , and @xmath47 ,
particles are distributed randomly and uniformly in the computational box .
no gravitational instability occurs , thus we can see no remarkable structures . at @xmath131 , the large non - axisymmetric density structures appear .
then , the gravitational instability seems to start . in the model where ( @xmath132 ) , the structure is not clear . for the short stopping time models ,
the velocity dispersion is small and the critical wave length is short .
thus , we can not observe the large density structure clearly . at @xmath133 ,
particles begin to grow in the dense region . at @xmath134 and @xmath48
, particles continue to grow , and the number of small particles decreases rapidly .
the small particles are absorbed by large particles .
the rapid collisional growth of particles continues until the one large planetesimal finally forms .
the formation process of planetesimals in the laminar gas model is similar to those in the gas - free model ( papers i and ii ) .
the gas drag from the laminar gas does not qualitatively change formation process .
this process is divided into three stages : the formation of density structures , the creation of planetesimal seeds , and their collisional growth .
the linear stability analysis of gas - free gravitational instability shows that the disk is stable when @xmath44 @xcite .
as discussed in  3 , the dust layer in the laminar gas disk is secularly unstable although @xmath44 .
however , the growth time of the dissipative gravitational instability is longer than the sedimentation in the initial stage .
thus , the disk shrinks vertically . as the velocity dispersion and the scale height decrease , the growth rate of the dissipative gravitational instability increases .
then , the gravitational instability becomes a dominant process , and the wake - like structures appear .
these structures fragment into the seeds of planetesimals .
the seeds grow rapidly owing to mutual collisions .
finally , almost all mass in the computational domain is absorbed by only one planetesimal in this calculation .
the size of the final planetesimal depends on the size of the computational domain ( paper ii ) .    [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ]      we assume that the difference in the rotational velocity from the kepler velocity is equal to zero ( @xmath135 ) ( models infa , 010as0 - 1000as0 ) . in the model infa , @xmath136 , i.e. , the drag term is neglected . in other models ,
the stopping times are @xmath137 and @xmath138 .
we adopt the stokes law model , @xmath139 .
the top panel of figure [ fig : q_value_hard.eps ] shows the time evolution of toomre s @xmath1 values . in all models ,
toomre s @xmath1 value initially decreases . in the gas - free model ( model infa ) ,
the kinetic energy is dissipated only by inelastic collisions .
the dissipation timescale due to inelastic collisions is approximately estimated by @xmath140 @xcite . in the laminar gas models ,
the decrease of toomre s @xmath1 value is caused by the dissipation due to both the gas drag and inelastic collisions .
the top panel of figure [ fig : min_q_value.eps ] shows the dependence of the decay time @xmath141 on @xmath142 , where the decay time of toomre s @xmath1 value @xmath141 is defined by @xmath143 where @xmath144 is the minimum @xmath1 value at @xmath145 .
the decay time @xmath141 is proportional to @xmath142 for @xmath146 .
@xmath1 value is proportional to the velocity dispersion @xmath147
. the inelastic collisions and the gas drag decrease the velocity dispersion .
if the drag is sufficiently strong , the decay time scale of the velocity dispersion is on the order of the stopping time .
the timescale of the decay of the velocity dispersion due to inelastic collisions is about @xmath148 .
thus , when @xmath149 as @xmath150 increases , we can not neglect collisions .
therefore the decay timescale of the velocity dispersion is smaller than the stopping time for @xmath149 .    in all models ,
toomre s @xmath1 value has the minimum value @xmath144 at @xmath151 . in the gas - free model ,
the minimum @xmath1 value is about @xmath152 ( papers i , and ii ) , and according to the linear theory , the critical value of a thin disk is @xmath153 .
this is because the decrease in the velocity dispersion due to inelastic collisions is sufficiently slow .
however , as shown in figure [ fig : q_value_hard.eps ] , if the gas drag is strong , @xmath1 value becomes smaller than unity . as the stopping time shortens , the minimum @xmath1 value decreases .
for example , the minimum @xmath1 value is 0.15 for @xmath154 .
the axisymmetric structure starts forming when @xmath1 value is minimum .
for example , in the model where @xmath155 , @xmath1 value is minimum at @xmath156 , and we can see the non - axisymmetric structure at @xmath157 .
particles are scattered by the non - axisymmetric structures , and the velocity dispersion of particles increases .
if the decrease of the @xmath1 value is more rapid than the gravitational instability , the dust layer can not collapse although the dust layer is gravitationally unstable .
as @xmath1 value decreases , the timescale of the gravitational instability becomes short , therefore , the critical @xmath1 value is determined by @xmath158 , where @xmath159 is the timescale of the gravitational instability .
here , we assume @xmath160 because particles do not grow much before gravitational instability . from equation ( [ eq : crit_q ] )
, we obtain the following condition : @xmath161 the minimum toomre s @xmath1 value as a function of @xmath142 is shown in the bottom panel of figure [ fig : min_q_value.eps ] . strictly speaking ,
equation ( [ eq : qmin ] ) is valid only when the disk is thin .
nevertheless , the analytical expression agrees with the numerical result .
we define the scale height of a dust layer as the mean square root of @xmath13 , @xmath162 .
we can calculate the mean density of the dust layer from the scale height , @xmath163 .
the density at which the self - gravity is equal to the tidal force is called the roche density , which is defined by the following equation ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) : @xmath164 the dust layer may collapse if the dust layer density exceeds the roche density .
the linear analysis gives the more precise criterion @xcite .
however , the criterion does not change very much .
thus , we introduce @xmath165 given by @xmath166 which corresponds to the non - dimensional scale height .
the bottom panel of figure [ fig : q_value_hard.eps ] shows the time evolution of @xmath167 .
the time evolution of @xmath167 is similar to toomre s @xmath1 .
the value @xmath167 has the minimum value @xmath168 at @xmath169 in all models .
but , the time evolution of @xmath167 is slower than that of @xmath1 value .
this result indicates that the standard hydrostatic relation @xmath170 is not satisfied .
figure [ fig : v_over_h ] shows the time evolution of the ratio @xmath171 , which is on the order of the sound crossing time across a scale height . in the gas - free model , the ratio @xmath172 is nearly constant in @xmath173 .
the hydrostatic relation is satisfied . in a laminar gas model ,
the ratio @xmath171 is not constant . as the stopping time decreases , the variation of the ratio becomes steep .
especially , those for @xmath174 is prominent . in the model @xmath132 , the ratio @xmath171 increases for @xmath175 .
the maximum value is about @xmath176 .
the sound crossing time is @xmath177 in the gas - free model . when @xmath146 , the dissipation is faster than the sound crossing
. therefore , the velocity dispersion decays before the scale height decays , and the ratio becomes larger than unity . in figure
[ fig : v_over_h ] , we can see the oscillation .
the period is about @xmath178 , and the amplitude decreases gradually .
the reason for the oscillation is not clear .
this may be due to some kind of the relaxation process .
we can not use the roche density as the collapse criterion for @xmath179 . for @xmath180
, @xmath167 is always larger than unity .
but the large particles form . for @xmath181 ,
@xmath167 becomes unity at @xmath182 , but the large particles start forming at @xmath133 . for @xmath183 , the time when @xmath184 corresponds to the time when the large particles start forming .
when we derive the roche criterion , we simply compare the self - gravity with the tidal force .
however , we showed that the non - axisymmetric structure develops
. the azimuthal motion may be important to discuss the formation of the wake - like structure .
therefore , the roche criterion is not applicable .
the decay time of @xmath167 value @xmath185 is defined by @xmath186 where @xmath187 is the initial scale height of a dust layer .
figure [ fig : min_height_time.eps ] shows @xmath185 as a function of @xmath142 .
the decay time of @xmath167 has a minimum value at @xmath188 . for @xmath189 ,
the decay time shortens with the stopping time . for @xmath189 , the strong coupled particles with gas fall to the midplane at the terminal velocity .
the settling time is proportional to @xmath190 . on the other hand , for @xmath191
, the decay time lengthens with longer stopping time . in this regime ,
the particles oscillate around the equatorial plane @xcite .
the decay time scale of the amplitude is proportional to the stopping time .
figure [ fig : cluster_number.eps ] shows the time evolution of the number of planetesimal seeds per the area @xmath192 , @xmath193 .
we define a particle whose mass is larger than @xmath194 as a seed of planetesimals , where @xmath194 is the planetesimal mass predicted by the linear theory @xmath195 . in all models , @xmath193 has a maximum value at @xmath196 .
the number @xmath193 increases rapidly in the early stage , and decreases in the late stage . in the early stage ,
gravitational instability occurs and the small density fluctuation grows and many planetesimal seeds form . in this stage , the number of seeds increases .
they form through the gravitational instability .
once many planetesimal seeds form , the mutual collisions among them start .
the number of planetesimals decreases rapidly in the late stage .
in the final state , almost all particles are absorbed by a few particles .
the number of planetesimals in the final state depends on the size of the computational domain ( paper ii ) .
the peak of @xmath193 depends on the stopping time @xmath150 .
figure [ fig : max_number.eps ] shows the maximum number of the planetesimal @xmath197 as a function of the stopping time @xmath150 .
the maximum number of planetesimals @xmath197 has a peak at @xmath198 .
as discussed in  [ sec : scaleheight ] , the scale height has the minimum value at @xmath198 .
the characteristic length scale of gravitational instability corresponds to the scale height . as the characteristic length of gravitational instability shortens , the number of the planetesimals formed increases .
figure [ fig : largest_planetesimal.eps ] shows the time evolution of the mass of the largest planetesimal . in all models
, the largest planetesimal grows rapidly in @xmath199 , and the growth is stalled at @xmath200 .
the growth in the gas - free model is slower than those in the gas models . as discussed in  [ sec : qvalue ] , the gas drag enhances the dissipation of the kinetic energy of dust .
as the drag becomes stronger , the gravitational instability occurs earlier and the growth becomes more rapid .
the final mass of the largest planetesimal is @xmath201 .
the clear dependence of the largest mass on the initial stopping time can not be seen .
as seeds grow , the stopping time lengthens . in the final state
, we can neglect the effect of the drag .
therefore , the final mass and the number do not depend on the initial stopping time .
large planetesimals sweep small particles in the rotational direction .
therefore the final mass depends on the size of the computational domain ( paper ii ) .
the difference in rotational velocity between dust and gas causes the radial migration of dust . by neglecting the self - gravity and the time derivatives of equation ( [ eq : hilleqx ] ) and ( [ eq : hilleqy ] )
, we obtain the steady solution : @xcite @xmath202    figure [ fig : maxmass_vx.eps ] shows the time evolution of the radial velocity @xmath203 of the largest particle . in these models , the initial stopping time is @xmath155 .
the power - law index and the velocity difference are @xmath204 , @xmath205 , @xmath206 , and @xmath207 ( models 100ac1 , 100as1 , 100ac2 , and 100as2 ) . in all models ,
the radial velocity @xmath203 is negative at @xmath208 .
this corresponds to the radially inward drift .
the rotational velocity of gas is slower than the kepler velocity ; dust experiences a headwind , which causes its inward migration .
therefore their radial velocities become negative .
although @xmath92 is different , if @xmath209 is same , the time evolutions of @xmath210 are similar in the early phase .
this is because the planetesimals do not grow sufficiently in @xmath211 .
if we estimate the terminal velocity from equation ( [ eq : driftvelo ] ) by the initial stopping time , they are the radial velocity @xmath212 for @xmath213 and @xmath214 for @xmath215 . in models for @xmath120 ,
the drag coefficient of a particle is independent of its size , thus the radial velocity converges to @xmath216 for @xmath213 and @xmath217 for @xmath215 ; the radial migration does not stop . on the other hand , in models for @xmath96 , as planetesimals grow , the drag coefficient becomes small ; the radial migration stops finally .
the radial velocity oscillates with the period of about @xmath218 .
this oscillation is caused by the epicycle motion .
the gas drag is so weak that the oscillation is not damped .
@xcite performed linear analyses of the dissipative gravitational instability of a dust layer .
they studied the effect of the stopping time , the thickness of the dust layer , and the velocity dispersion .
we summarized the essence of their results in  [ sec : disprel ] .
the dust layer is always unstable for long wavelength modes .
thus , we should compare the timescale of the gravitational instability with those of other processes . under the thin disk approximation ( @xmath46 )
, we derived that simple condition that the gravitational instability dominates the other processes .
though the disk thickness can not be neglected and the gravitational wakes is not axisymmetric , this condition corresponds to the occurrence of the gravitational wakes , as shown in
[ sec : result ] . to discuss the formation of the self - gravity wakes ,
toomre s @xmath1 value is more important than the roche criterion @xmath219 .
they applied the growth rate of the gravitational instability to the gravitational collapse in the turbulent disks .
they assumed the simple turbulence model and studied the particle response to the turbulence flow .
the protoplanetary disk can be turbulent due to magnetorotational instability or kelvin - helmholtz instability .
they suggested that the standard hydrostatic relation @xmath170 is not satisfied in the turbulent disk and the dust disk can be very thick .
the thin disk approximation is clearly not valid .
the criterion of the formation of the self - gravitational wakes may change .
we plan to study the effect of the turbulence in the next paper .
@xcite performed the two - dimensional numerical simulation of the gravitational instability of a dust layer .
they found that the dust layer becomes extremely thin if the stopping time is long , such as @xmath220 .
this is because the dust settling is faster than the growth of the gravitational instability .
however , our results show that the gravitational instability occurs although the stopping time is long .    there are some differences between our simulations and theirs .
we treated the dust component as particles .
but , @xcite treated it as a pressure - free fluid .
if the stopping time is short and the velocity dispersion is small , we can treat dust as a pressure - free fluid .
the pressure - free fluid model becomes irrelevant for longer stopping times . for @xmath221
, we can use the pressure - free fluid , thus this should not cause the difference . in addition , the velocity dispersion stabilizes the gravitational instability generally .
we neglected the dust back - reaction on the gas , but @xcite adopted two - component model and solved the interaction between them . if the dust density is high and the stopping time is short , the dust back - reaction on the gas should be important .
the resulting gas flow may change the criterion .
we performed three - dimensional local calculation . on the other hand
, @xcite assumed that the the dust layer to be axisymmetric with respect to the rotational axis .
the gravitational instability forms the non - axisymmetric structures such as the gravitational wakes ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
the motion in the azimuthal direction is important to study the structure of the gravitationally unstable disk .
to understand the dynamics of planetesimal formation in gas , we need to perform three - dimensional two - component simulations .
we should consider the dust back - reaction on the gas and solve the hydrodynamic equations consistently .
we will treat the dust component as particles because this method is applicable although the dust is loosely coupled to gas .
we plan to study this point in the following papers of this series .
we performed local @xmath0-body simulations of the planetesimal formation through gravitational instability . in papers
i and ii , we adopted the gas - free model . however the gas is not negligible and is important to the formation of planetesimals . as a first step to understand the effect of gas , we considered gas as the background laminar flow .
we neglected the dust back - reaction on the gas for the sake of simplicity .
laminar flow causes the dissipation of the kinetic energy and thus radial migration of dust .    in
 2 , we summarized the results of the linear analysis of the dissipative gravitational instability . to handle the dispersion relation
analytically , we imposed the assumptions : the isothermal equation of state , the infinitely thin disk , and the axisymmetric perturbation .
simulations show that these assumptions are not valid , but they help us to understand the physical nature of the dissipative gravitational instability .
we can use the growth rate to understand the simulation results .
the long wavelength modes are always secularly unstable although @xmath44 .
therefore , we must compare with the timescale of the gravitational instability with other processes .
we provided the equation ( [ eq : crit_q ] ) for the critical @xmath1 value .
if @xmath1 is smaller than the critical value , the gravitational instability is a dominant process .
the numerical simulations show that the formation process of planetesimals is the same as that in the gas - free model .
the formation process is divided into three stages qualitatively : the formation of wake - like structures , the creation of planetesimal seeds , and their collisional growth . by the linear stability analysis ,
the dust layer in the laminar gas disk is secularly unstable although @xmath44 .
the growth time of the dissipative gravitational instability is slower than the dust sedimentation and the decrease of the velocity dispersion when the initial @xmath1 value is sufficiently large .
thus , the disk shrinks vertically and @xmath1 decreases . as the velocity dispersion and the scale height decrease , the growth rate of the gravitational instability increases .
finally , the gravitational instability becomes dominant .
then wake - like structures are formed by the gravitational instability .
these structures fragment into planetesimal seeds .
seeds grow rapidly owing to the mutual collisions .
finally , almost all mass in the computational domain is absorbed by only one planetesimal in the calculation .
we investigated the dependence of results on the initial stopping time .
the @xmath1 value decreases in the initial stage , and it reaches the minimum .
the decay time scale of @xmath1 is proportional to the stopping time for @xmath222 , which is the decay timescale of the velocity dispersion .
the minimum @xmath1 is determined by the balance between the dissipation and gravitational instability . at the minimum q , the wake - like structures are formed .
the time evolution of the ratio of the dust layer density to the roche density @xmath167 is similar to that of @xmath1 .
however the decay time scale of @xmath167 is longer than that of @xmath1 .
the time when @xmath184 or @xmath223 does not correspond to the onset of the gravitational instability , such as the formation of the wake - like structures .
this indicates that the roche criterion is not applicable in this system .
we investigated the time evolution of the number of planetesimal seeds .
we define a particle whose mass is larger than @xmath194 as a planetesimal seed , where @xmath194 is the planetesimal mass predicted by the linear theory @xmath195 .
the number of planetesimals has a maximum value .
after the gravitational instability becomes a dominant process , planetesimal seeds form . in this stage , the number of planetesimal seeds increases .
however , in the late stage , the number of seeds decreases by the mutual collisions among them .
the maximum of the number of the planetesimal seeds depends on the initial stopping time .
the maximum number of planetesimal seeds has a peak at @xmath198 .
we are unable to identify a clear difference in the mass of the largest particle in the final state .
the final mass of the planetesimal depends on the size of the computational domain @xcite .
we also investigated the models where the gas rotational velocity is slower than the kepler velocity .
we confirmed that the planetesimal is able to form in the sub - keplerian gas disk . in the initial stage ,
particles experience a headwind , which causes its inward migration .
if we adopt stokes gas drag law , as planetesimals grow , the drag coefficient becomes small ; the radial migration finally slows .
almost all mass is absorbed by the largest planetesimal .
in the gas - free models , we showed that the final mass of planetesimals depends on the size of computational domain . to investigate the final mass of planetesimals in detail
, we should perform larger scale simulations .
this remains to be discussed further .
in addition , in this paper , we assumed gas to be laminar flow .
however , the gas may be turbulent .
if the turbulence is strong , the particles are stirred up and the gravitational instability may be prevented .
the timescale for the dissipative gravitational instability is long @xcite .
however , though the velocity dispersion of dust particles is large and the timescale for the instability is long , the dust layer may disrupt owing to the dissipative gravitational instability over time in the turbulent disk . in the next paper
, we will investigate the particle response to the turbulence and the gravitational instability in the turbulent disk .


energetic electromagnetic radiation is emitted by a wide range of astrophysical objects , such as supernova remnants ( snrs ) @xcite , microquasars @xcite and gamma ray bursts ( grbs ) @xcite .
this radiation is at least partially attributed to the synchrotron- or synchrotron jitter emissions @xcite of ultra - relativistic electrons , which gyrate in strong magnetic fields .
such extreme conditions do not exist in the interstellar medium and probably not in astrophysical jets or in snr blast shells , if their plasma would be in a steady state .
efficient electron acceleration and magnetic field amplification mechanisms must be at work and they are driven primarily by collisionless plasma shocks @xcite .    through their interaction with the electromagnetic fields in the shock transition layer
, the electrons may gain enough energy to be injected into the diffusive shock acceleration process @xcite .
the latter is probably capable of accelerating charged particles to the highest observed cosmic ray energies and it should supply a population of highly relativistic electrons .
the apparent magnetization of snr shocks @xcite is attributed to cosmic ray - driven instabilities , which can operate on large scales @xcite .
filamentation instabilities of counterstreaming beams of charged particles are thought to be the origin of the micro - scale magnetic fields , in particular of those in grb jets @xcite , although the lifetimes of these fields might be too short @xcite .
filamentation or beam - weibel instabilities develop in an initially spatially uniform system of two counter - streaming particle beams .
typically one examines this instability in the reference frame , in which the net charge and current vanish .
the beams consist of electrons and ions and they may contain a sizeable fraction of positrons in grb jets .
the filamentation instability transforms the spatially uniform beams into a system of spatially separated current flux tubes , which are enwrapped and separated by electromagnetic fields [ 13 - 17 ] .
observations of the filamentation instability in laboratory settings and the therefrom resulting electromagnetic radiation exist @xcite and they are likely to occur close to shocks @xcite in astrophysical settings .    the weibel instability @xcite is another magnetic instability .
it is driven by a thermal anisotropy of a single electron species .
weibel considered in his original work a spatially uniform bi - maxwellian electron velocity distribution .
the electrons were cooler along one direction than along the other two .
the weibel instability gives rise to the aperiodic growth of magnetowaves with a wavevector that is parallel to the cool direction @xcite and with wavelengths that are comparable to an electron skin depth .
the weibel instability has been widely examined in the past both analytically and numerically [ 21 - 30 ] .
its importance for the generation of magnetic fields in jet outflows and on a cosmological scale has been pointed out @xcite .
it has , however , previously been unclear how a strong thermal anisotropy could form and survive over spatial scales that exceed the wavelength of the modes , which are destabilized by the weibel instability in its original form @xcite .
such a process has been identified recently @xcite .
a plasma density gradient together with the high electron mobility gives rise to an ambipolar electrostatic field , which confines the electrons and accelerates the ions .
the electric field vector is antiparallel to the density gradient .
the ion acceleration launches a rarefaction wave [ 33 - 38 ] .
the electrons , which move from the dense plasma to the front of the rarefaction wave , are slowed down and reflected inelastically by the electric field of the expanding wave , through which they provide the energy for the ion acceleration .
the modulus of the electron momentum along the density gradient is reduced by these processes , while both orthogonal momentum components are unchanged .
the thermal anisotropy can give rise to the weibel instability . in what follows
we refer to it as the thermal anisotropy - driven weibel instability ( tawi ) .
particle - in - cell ( pic ) simulations @xcite have shown that the tawi can magnetize a planar plasma cloud that expands into a vacuum .
a shock develops , if the rarefaction wave expands into a dilute ambient medium .
the tawi is suppressed if a shock is limiting the extent of the rarefaction wave to a length that is shorter than the wavelength of its modes @xcite .
this process , which requires ion density gradients and hot electrons , can be important for energetic astrophysical plasma .
the internal shock model for the prompt grb emissions assumes that the jet consists of plasma clouds with varying densities and mildly relativistic relative speeds @xcite .
we can also assume that the ion density close to snr shocks will not be spatially uniform .
the bulk electrons in the grb jets are thought to be relativistically hot and the bulk electrons close to snr shocks have kev temperatures . the magnetic energy generated by the tawi can reach a sizeable fraction of the electron thermal energy , which could result in strong magnetic fields .
the tawi has previously been examined numerically in a two - dimensional planar geometry .
a plasma slab is centred in these studies in the simulation box and confined by two parallel boundaries , across which the density jumps from the constant high density within the slab to a low density or a vacuum outside of it .
the plasma density is constant along the second simulation direction and the boundary conditions are periodic .
the rarefaction waves launched at both boundaries move into opposite directions , causing an expansion of the slab plasma .
the density gradients of both rarefaction waves are antiparallel .
an electron can cross the slab many times and its momentum component along the density gradients remains decoupled from both orthogonal ones .
multiple electron reflections , which reduce only the electron momentum component along the plasma density gradient , result in an increasingly strong thermal anisotropy , which may exaggerate the strength of the tawi .
we examine here with a pic simulation the expansion of an initially unmagnetized circular plasma cloud .
the electron momentum can in this case not be subdivided into a component that is always parallel to the density gradient and into two components orthogonal to it , unless the electron moves exactly in the radial direction .
this case is unlikely .
consecutive electron reflections by the electric field of the rarefaction wave will diminish different momentum components and the anisotropy between the temperature in the radial and azimuthal directions is not boosted by multiple reflections .
the purpose of our simulation study is to assess if the slowdown of the electrons in the sheath potential alone is still strong enough to trigger the tawi .
our results are as follows .
the ambipolar electric field accelerates the protons in the simulations to a few percent of @xmath0 .
a tawi develops within the density gradient of the rarefaction wave .
this instability is similar to that observed in ref .
it drives radial current channels , which yield the growth of a transverse magnetic ( tm ) field component .
the growth of the tm wave is followed by that of a secondary te magnetowave .
the rotational polarization of this te wave is concluded from the simultaneous presence of in - plane magnetic vortices and out - of - plane magnetic fields that interfere with those driven by the tawi .
the combined magnetic field of both waves breaks the circular symmetry of the rarefaction wave and scatters rapidly the electrons within , thereby reducing their thermal anisotropy .
the instability saturates in our simulation , when the total magnetic energy density is about 1% of the electron thermal energy .
the te and tm magnetowaves develop in the same radial interval , which suggests their connection .
we propose that the superposition of the electric field , which is induced by the magnetic field of the tawi , with the radial electric field of the rarefaction wave triggers the growth of the te wave by the misalignment of the plasma density gradient and the electric field vector .
such a system is unstable @xcite and it results in an instability similar to a thermoelectric instability .
the structure of this paper is as follows .
section 2 describes the pic simulation code and the initial conditions .
our results are presented in section 3 .
section 4 summarizes our findings and it discusses how these could be verified experimentally .
the 2d3v ( resolves two spatial and three momentum dimensions ) particle - in - cell simulation code we employ here is based on the virtual particle - mesh numerical scheme @xcite .
faraday s and ampre s laws @xmath1 are solved on a grid and evolve the electromagnetic fields in time , while @xmath2 and @xmath3 are fulfilled as constraints .
the code solves all three field components as a function of @xmath4 . the relativistic force equation @xmath5 + \mathbf{v}_i \times \mathbf{b } [ \mathbf{x}_i ]
\right ) \label{eq3}\ ] ] is used to update the momentum of the @xmath6 computational particle ( cp ) of species @xmath7 , with charge @xmath8 and mass @xmath9 , that is located at the position @xmath10 .
the electric @xmath11 and magnetic @xmath12 fields are connected with the cps as follows .
the micro - current of each cp is interpolated to the grid .
the sum of the interpolated micro - currents of all cps gives the macroscopic current @xmath13 , which is used to update the electromagnetic fields through eq .
the new fields are interpolated back to the positions of the individual cps to update their momentum in time through eq .
the position of each cp is updated with @xmath14 .
a detailed review of the pic method is given elsewhere @xcite .
the plasma cloud with radius @xmath15 is surrounded by vacuum and it consists of electrons with the number density @xmath16 and protons with the same density , which are initially distributed uniformly across the cloud .
figure [ fig1 ] illustrates the setup .    .
a circular plasma cloud has its center at @xmath17 and the radius @xmath18 .
it is filled with electrons and protons with the density @xmath16 .
the boundary conditions are periodic for the fields and for the particles .
we will in some cases exploit the circular symmetry and use the circular coordinates @xmath19 instead of @xmath20.,width=302 ]    the electron s relativistic maxwellian velocity distribution has a temperature of 32 kev or a thermal speed @xmath21 . the proton thermal speed in both simulations is @xmath22 m@xmath23 and corresponds to a thermal energy of 10 ev .
the mean speeds of the electrons and of the protons vanish initially .
the electrons and protons are approximated each by @xmath24 2500 cps per cell .
the electron mass is @xmath25 and the proton mass @xmath26 .
the @xmath27 is the initial electron skin depth and @xmath28 is the electron plasma frequency .
the time is expressed in units of @xmath29 .
the time step is @xmath30 .
the simulation time is @xmath31 .
the cloud radius @xmath32 .
an electron with the thermal speed @xmath33 will cross the cloud diameter @xmath34 about 8 times during @xmath35 , resulting in multiple bounces at the electrostatic sheath field .
the simulation box with periodic boundary conditions in all directions uses @xmath36 cells for a square domain with the side length @xmath37 .
we examine the plasma phase space distributions and the electromagnetic field distributions , the loss of electron thermal energy to the protons and the thermal anisotropy . we consider in more detail the simulation times @xmath38 , @xmath39 and @xmath40 .
this section concludes with a discussion of the time - evolution of the plasma quantities and effects due to the periodic boundary conditions .
we transform the distributions from a representation in @xmath20-space into one in @xmath19-space , where @xmath41 is the center of the cloud and of the simulation box .
we exploit the approximate circular symmetry and average these quantities over the azimuth angle @xmath42 .
this average will become less accurate at late times , when @xmath12 breaks this symmetry .
the electron number density @xmath43 .
the phase space densities @xmath44 are integrated as @xmath45 , where @xmath46 and @xmath47 stand for electrons and protons .
the phase space densities at all times are normalized to the maximum of the respective distribution at @xmath48 .
the azimuthally averaged radial thermal energy @xmath49 and azimuthal thermal energy @xmath50 define the thermal anisotropy @xmath51 .
the initial electron thermal energy per degree of freedom is @xmath52 . the in - plane electric field @xmath53 and
the orthogonal @xmath54 field are expressed in units of @xmath55 , while the magnetic field components @xmath56 and @xmath57 are expressed in units of @xmath58 .
the fields are azimuthally averaged as @xmath59 , where @xmath60 serves as a place holder for @xmath61 and @xmath57 .
their mobility implies that some electrons can escape from the cloud and build up a negatively charged sheath outside of the now positively charged cloud .
an ambipolar electrostatic field develops that points along the surface normal .
its modulus is displayed in fig .
[ fig2 ] for the time @xmath62 .    : ( a ) shows the modulus of the in - plane electric field @xmath63 .
( b ) displays the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 and ( c ) the orthogonal field @xmath65 .
a strong electric field points radially outwards and outlines the cloud s perimeter .
the magnetic fields are at noise levels .
overplotted is a black circle with @xmath66.,title="fig:",width=302 ] : ( a ) shows the modulus of the in - plane electric field @xmath63 .
( b ) displays the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 and ( c ) the orthogonal field @xmath65 .
a strong electric field points radially outwards and outlines the cloud s perimeter .
the magnetic fields are at noise levels .
overplotted is a black circle with @xmath66.,title="fig:",width=302 ]    the electric field outlines the cloud radius and has a thickness comparable to @xmath67 .
the magnetic @xmath64 and @xmath57 components show noise that is strongest for @xmath68 and weaker in the rarefaction wave .
the noise originates from statistical fluctuations of the current density .
the initial plasma evolution is dominated by the electrostatic fields because their amplitude is much larger than the amplitude of the magnetic fields and because the latter are incoherent .
the protons are accelerated radially outwards by the electric field , which confines at the same time the electrons .
this is confirmed by fig .
the electrons lose speed in the radial direction and their density decreases drastically as they cross the strong in - plane electric field @xmath63 at @xmath66 .
this field is not strong enough to hold back all electrons and some escape into the vacuum .
the fastest electrons have expanded to a radius @xmath69 , while the proton expansion is still negligible .
the protons with @xmath70 are accelerated by @xmath63 and some reach already at the time @xmath62 a peak speed that exceeds their initial thermal speed @xmath71 by an order of magnitude .
normalized to its initial value : panels ( a ) and ( b ) show @xmath72 and @xmath73 , respectively . the color scale is 10-logarithmic and @xmath15 is the initial cloud radius .
[ fig3],width=302 ]    the protons with @xmath74 still show their initial velocity distribution .
their low thermal speed implies , that they could not yet interact with the surface electric field .
figure [ fig4 ] shows the particle distributions at the time @xmath75 .
the protons have been accelerated by the ambipolar electric field to about @xmath76 or to 2% of the speed of light @xmath0 .
the protons form a narrow beam with a speed , which grows approximately linearly with @xmath77 for @xmath78 , and a density that decreases with an increasing radius .
this high speed has been reached by the protons , because there is no shock that limits their acceleration .
a shock would form , if the rarefaction wave would expand into an ambient plasma .
normalized to its initial value : panels ( a ) and ( b ) show @xmath72 and @xmath73 , respectively .
the color scale is 10-logarithmic and @xmath15 is the initial cloud radius.[fig4],width=302 ]    the electron distribution has been altered significantly at this time .
the peak speed of the electron s bulk population in the cloud s core , which has shrunk to @xmath79 at this time , has been decreased compared to that in fig .
[ fig3](a ) , which is indicative of an energy loss .
this energy loss can be attributed to the electron s inelastic reflection by the ambipolar electric field of the expanding rarefaction wave .
the electrons fill up the entire simulation box , although their phase space density close to the boundary is 4 orders of magnitude less than the peak density within @xmath79 .
the erosion of the cloud implies , that the initial distribution of @xmath63 in fig .
[ fig2](a ) could not have been upheld .
this is confirmed by fig .
[ fig5 ] , which shows the @xmath63 , @xmath64 and the modulus of @xmath57 at the time @xmath75 .
: panel ( a ) shows the modulus of the in - plane electric field @xmath63 and ( b ) shows that of the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 .
panel ( c ) shows the modulus @xmath65 . the black circles with radius @xmath15 outline the initial cloud perimeter.[fig5],title="fig:",width=302 ] : panel ( a ) shows the modulus of the in - plane electric field @xmath63 and ( b ) shows that of the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 .
panel ( c ) shows the modulus @xmath65 .
the black circles with radius @xmath15 outline the initial cloud perimeter.[fig5],title="fig:",width=302 ]    the electric field maximum is located at @xmath80 , which is at the tip of the expanding protons in fig . [ fig4](b ) .
the electric field distribution expands to lower @xmath77 .
it thus continues to accelerate the protons and sustains the increase of the proton mean speed with the radius .
the electric fields at @xmath70 are a consequence of the plasma density gradient in this interval and of the higher electron mobility , which implies a space charge .
figure [ fig5](a ) reveals , that the electric field in the interval @xmath70 does not show an exact circular symmetry .
the amplitude is a function of @xmath42 .
this break of the circular symmetry and its origin become evident in fig .
[ fig6 ] , which shows the amplitude modulus of @xmath63 and the electron density distribution in the relevant spatial interval and compares both quantities to @xmath57 .
the amplitude of the azimuthal oscillation of @xmath63 at @xmath70 is about 10% of the mean value .    .
the contour lines correspond to the values -0.01
, -0.005 , 0.005 and 0.01 of the @xmath57 field .
the @xmath57 field has maxima in the upper right and lower left quadrant and minima in the other two quadrants .
panel ( b ) compares the same contour lines of @xmath57 with the contour lines 2.7 , 2.9 , 3.1 and 3.3 of the 10-logarithmic electron number density . the density increases with decreasing radius .
the number density is expressed in computational particles per cell and @xmath81.,title="fig:",width=291 ] .
the contour lines correspond to the values -0.01 , -0.005 , 0.005 and 0.01 of the @xmath57 field .
the @xmath57 field has maxima in the upper right and lower left quadrant and minima in the other two quadrants .
panel ( b ) compares the same contour lines of @xmath57 with the contour lines 2.7 , 2.9 , 3.1 and 3.3 of the 10-logarithmic electron number density . the density increases with decreasing radius .
the number density is expressed in computational particles per cell and @xmath81.,title="fig:",width=291 ]    figure [ fig6](a ) suggests a correlation of @xmath63 with @xmath57 for two reasons .
firstly the azimuthal oscillation of @xmath63 and the strong @xmath57 are observed at approximately the same radius .
secondly the @xmath63 field shows two amplitude minima and two maxima , which are shifted by 45@xmath82 relative to those of @xmath57 .
we find one maximum of @xmath63 at @xmath83 and @xmath84 ( @xmath85 ) , while one maximum of @xmath57 is located at @xmath86 ( @xmath87 ) .
the circular symmetry of @xmath63 can , in principle , be broken by an electrostatic drift wave along the azimuthal direction .
they could be generated by the lower - hybrid drift instability @xcite , which is caused by gradients in the plasma density and in the magnetic field amplitude .
a second possibility is the simon - hoh instability that develops , if a radial electrostatic field and a spatially uniform orthogonal magnetic field are present @xcite .
the electron @xmath88 drift destabilizes the plasma . the electric field driving
the simon - hoh instability would be the @xmath63 and the orthogonal magnetic field would be @xmath57 .
however , the characteristic wave lengths of the waves driven by both instabilities would be much less than that of the modulation of @xmath63 observed in fig .
the lower hybrid instability destabilizes wavelengths , which are shorter than the characteristic length scale of the magnetic field gradient and the simon - hoh instability requires that @xmath57 be uniform over a scale much larger than the wave length of the unstable wave .
figure [ fig6](b ) furthermore demonstrates that the electron density distribution is still circularly symmetric .
the azimuthal oscillation of @xmath63 is thus not correlated with a charge density modulation and it is probably not an electrostatic wave .
we can understand the modulation of @xmath63 , if we take into account the in - plane current @xmath89 and electric field @xmath90 that sustain the localized @xmath57 .
we neglect the weak @xmath64 in fig . [
fig5](b ) .
ampre s law ( eq .
[ eq2 ] ) connects @xmath57 with the in - plane electric field and the in - plane current .
consider the right part of the simulation box @xmath91 in fig .
[ fig6](a ) .
the contour lines with @xmath92 denote a maximum of @xmath57 and those with @xmath93 a minimum . at @xmath94 and @xmath84
we find with the right hand rule that the electric field induced by @xmath95 gives @xmath96 and @xmath97 .
the electric field amplitude should grow to a sizeable amplitude before a balance between the in - plane current and @xmath57 cancels any further growth of @xmath63 .
the superposition of the ambipolar electric field from the rarefaction wave and the practically parallel induced @xmath98 at @xmath94 and @xmath99 imply that @xmath63 is strong .
the induced electric field will also amplify the ambipolar electric field at @xmath100 and @xmath99 , because both fields reverse their sign .
the induced electric field weakens the ambipolar electric field at @xmath101 and @xmath102 .
a magnetically induced electric field is not tied to charge density modulations , which would explain why the circular symmetry is maintained for the electron density in fig . [ fig6](b ) .
we turn now to the identification of the source mechanism of the magnetic @xmath57 component in fig . [ fig5](c ) .
figure [ fig7 ] compares the azimuthally averaged energy density @xmath103 of the magnetic field , the thermal anisotropy @xmath104 and the azimuthally averaged electron number density @xmath105 .
the division of @xmath106 by @xmath77 ensures that a uniform density within the cloud results in a constant value of @xmath105 and the multiplication of the azimuthally averaged energy density by @xmath77 gives us a curve that is proportional to the magnetic energy .
these quantities are computed at the time @xmath75 .
: the ( dashed ) curve @xmath107 corresponds to the radially averaged electron number density @xmath105 , which is normalized to @xmath16 .
the curve @xmath108 equals @xmath109 and denotes the local plasma frequency .
the curve @xmath110 is the total magnetic energy density @xmath111 .
the thermal anisotropy @xmath112 is the second dashed curve.,width=302 ]    the onset of the rarefaction wave is found at @xmath113 in fig .
[ fig7 ] , where the electron density and plasma frequency start to decrease .
a sidelobe of the magnetic energy @xmath110 is found within this radius , but most energy is concentrated within @xmath114 .
the thermal anisotropy curve is a steadily decreasing function up to @xmath115 and it is below 1 everywhere .
the mean kinetic energy of the electrons in the radial direction is thus lower than their azimuthal one , which we attribute to the radial proton acceleration .
the tawi destabilizes waves with wave vectors along the cool direction .
figure [ fig5](c ) shows that @xmath57 oscillates fastest in the radial direction .
one oscillation is visible with the wavelength @xmath116 .
the magnetic @xmath57 component performs two oscillations in the azimuthal direction , each with a wavelength @xmath117 .
a long oscillation orthogonal to the density gradient has also been observed in simulations of a planar rarefaction wave @xcite , which is probably a consequence of the density gradient that has not been taken into account by the existing analytic studies .
the simulation data suggests that the large anisotropy observed in fig .
[ fig7 ] triggers the tawi .
the @xmath110 peaks at @xmath118 , where @xmath119 .
one may think that @xmath110 should peak in the interval , where @xmath120 is lowest .
however , both the growth rate of the tawi in units of @xmath121 and the magnetic field amplitude the plasma can support increase with @xmath108 .
the latter can be concluded from the fact , that we can normalize the vlasov - maxwell set of equations with the help of @xmath108 . a higher @xmath108 results in a higher @xmath12 for the same plasma configuration .
the magnetic amplitude decreases to noise levels at about @xmath122 .
it is thus confined to within the rarefaction wave and it does not extend into the surrounding electron plasma at this time .
the electrons have spread out in significant numbers up to @xmath123 at the time @xmath124 .
normalized to its initial value : panels ( a ) and ( b ) show @xmath72 and @xmath73 , respectively .
the color scale is 10-logarithmic and @xmath15 is the initial cloud radius.,width=302 ]    the radial electric field has accelerated the protons to about 260@xmath71 or 2.6% of c at the time @xmath124 , as we can see from fig . [
fig8](b ) .
the protons form a cool beam with one well defined mean speed for any @xmath125 .
this compact distribution justifies its approximation by a single cold fluid @xcite .
the mean speed of the protons increases linearly within @xmath126 .
figure [ fig9 ] shows @xmath63 , @xmath64 and @xmath65 at the time @xmath124 .    :
panel ( a ) shows the in - plane electric field @xmath63 and ( b ) shows the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 .
panel ( c ) shows the modulus @xmath65 . the black circles with radius @xmath15 outline the initial cloud perimeter .
, title="fig:",width=302 ] : panel ( a ) shows the in - plane electric field @xmath63 and ( b ) shows the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 .
panel ( c ) shows the modulus @xmath65 . the black circles with radius @xmath15 outline the initial cloud perimeter .
, title="fig:",width=302 ]    the in - plane electric field has weakened while the magnetic fields have grown further .
the plasma density gradient and the ambipolar electric field in a rarefaction wave decrease with time .
the influence on the particle dynamics of the magnetic field and its induced electric field thus become more important .
the circular symmetry of @xmath63 imposed by the rarefaction wave is no longer dominant in fig . [
fig9](a ) . the amplitude of the in - plane @xmath64 in fig .
[ fig9](b ) has increased by an order of magnitude compared to that in fig . [
fig5](b ) and it is now comparable to the amplitude of @xmath57 .
the distribution of @xmath65 in fig .
[ fig9](c ) does no longer show four almost equally important peaks as it did in fig . [
fig5](c ) .
we would expect such a pattern , if the wave responsible for the @xmath64 is driven by a separate secondary instability and if it results in a circularly or elliptically polarized magnetowave .
an instability is discussed in the next subsection that can generate such a wave .
the @xmath64 field oscillates much faster in the radial than in the azimuthal direction in fig . [ fig9](b ) and its wave vector is thus practically aligned with the radius vector .
we call this magnetowave _ wave 2_. an elliptically polarized wave will have a @xmath57 component that is phase shifted along @xmath77 with respect to its @xmath64 component .
the @xmath57 component of wave 2 would interfere with the @xmath57 component of the wave that is driven by the tawi ( wave 1 ) .
wave 2 performs one oscillation in the azimuthal direction according to fig .
[ fig9 ] and we may assume that the same is true for its @xmath57 component .
the @xmath57 field of wave 1 oscillates twice along @xmath42 .
so we expect that wave 2 interferes constructively with two half - oscillations of wave 1 and that it interferes destructively with the other two .
interference between both waves could thus explain the pattern observed in fig .
[ fig9](b ) .
figure [ fig7 ] has demonstrated that the magnetic field energy density is increased in the radial interval , in which we find a strong thermal anisotropy in the electron distribution .
the anisotropy is caused by the loss of electron thermal energy to the radially accelerating protons .
the supplementary movie 1 animates in time this energy exchange .
it shows the electron phase space distribution in ( a ) and the proton phase space distribution in ( b ) , which are displayed in the form of snapshots and discussed in figs .
[ fig3 ] , [ fig4 ] and [ fig8 ] .
movie 1 confirms that electrons , which cross the boundaries on one side , re - enter on the opposite side , as we expect from the periodic boundary conditions of the simulation .
the fastest electrons that escaped from the plasma cloud reach the boundaries at @xmath127 and they encounter the electrons that crossed the boundary from the other direction . note that movie 1 ( a ) shows the velocity modulus and does thus not reveal that both electron populations move into opposite directions .
the electron two - stream configuration can result in instabilities .
however , the two - stream configuration is rapidly destroyed by the arrival of the slower electrons at the boundaries .
the supplementary movie 2 demonstrates that the life - time of the two - stream configuration is too short and the electron density too low to drive detectable instabilities at @xmath127 .
it animates in time the 10-logarithmic electron density in the simulation box , which is averaged over blocks of @xmath128 cells and given in particles per cell .
an average density of less than one computational particle per cell is found close to the boundaries .
the local plasma frequency is @xmath129 , which implies a low growth rate for any beam instability @xcite .
movie 2 reveals faint electron structures at a time @xmath130 that flow parallel to the x - axis and y - axis .
they are probably caused by an instability between the electrons of the plasma cloud and the electrons , which return from the boundary and are accelerated by the ambipolar electric field when they re - enter the cloud @xcite .
figure [ fig10 ] quantifies both the energy loss of the electrons to the accelerating protons and it follows the thermal anisotropy in time .
figure [ fig10](a ) is a measure for the average kinetic energy per electron , which corresponds to their velocity in the simulation plane .
this energy is obtained by summing @xmath131 and @xmath132 and by dividing the result by @xmath133 .
@xmath52 is the initial thermal energy contributed by each velocity component and the division by @xmath134 gives us a measure of the kinetic energy per electron .
the thermal anisotropy @xmath135 is displayed in fig . [ fig10](b ) .     and
panel ( b ) the thermal anisotropy @xmath136 .
the colour scale is linear .
the horizontal black line corresponds to the time @xmath75,title="fig:",width=291 ]   and panel ( b ) the thermal anisotropy @xmath136 .
the colour scale is linear .
the horizontal black line corresponds to the time @xmath75,title="fig:",width=291 ]    the electrons within the cloud lose about 30% of their kinetic energy to the accelerating protons .
the electron kinetic energy is apparently increased outside of the rarefaction wave .
this is a selection process , which can be seen in the movie 1 .
the bulk of the slow electrons is contained by the rarefaction wave , while the most energetic electrons , which have a kinetic energy that far exceeds the potential energy of the rarefaction wave , can escape .
the thermal anisotropy is negligible for the radial interval without a plasma density gradient , e.g. for @xmath137 and @xmath138 .
@xmath139 reveals that the electrons in the interval with the proton density gradient lose more energy in the radial than in the azimuthal direction .
the radial electron energy is less than half of the azimuthal energy over an extended radial interval .
the interval with a value of @xmath140 is largest at the time @xmath75 in fig .
[ fig10](b ) , when it covers @xmath141 .
the @xmath57 saturates at around this time .
the tawi starts to grow at @xmath142 , when the anisotropy is sufficiently strong .
the saturation is demonstrated by fig .
[ fig11 ] , which compares the time - evolution of the mean amplitude of the azimuthally averaged fields @xmath143 , @xmath144 , @xmath145 and @xmath146 .
the supplementary movie 3 animates in time the spatial distributions of the in - plane electric field @xmath63 ( a ) , the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 ( b ) and the @xmath57 .
( a ) , @xmath144 ( b ) , @xmath145 ( c ) and @xmath147 ( d ) .
the color scale is 10-logarithmic .
the black horizontal line corresponds to the time @xmath75.,title="fig:",width=302 ]   ( a ) , @xmath144 ( b ) , @xmath145 ( c ) and @xmath147 ( d ) .
the color scale is 10-logarithmic .
the black horizontal line corresponds to the time @xmath75.,title="fig:",width=302 ]    the in - plane electric field @xmath63 in fig .
[ fig11](a ) peaks initially at @xmath66 .
the build - up of this electrostatic field launches electrostatic waves into the cloud , which yields the amplitude peaks for @xmath68 . the electric field that expands to larger @xmath148 and reaches @xmath149 at @xmath150 is induced by the electrons that escape from the cloud , e.g. those with @xmath151 in fig . [ fig3](a ) .
the electron current is not balanced by an ionic current and a radial electric field grows .
the density of the escaped electrons decreases as they spread over the simulation box and the electric amplitude eventually drops below the threshold of fig . [
fig11](a ) .
the position associated with the maximum of @xmath63 accelerates in time .
this maximum coincides with the tip of the rarefaction wave .
the electric field with the uniform amplitude of @xmath152 behind the tip of the ion front roughly outlines the extent of the rarefaction wave .
it expands to lower @xmath68 as the cloud is progressively eroded .
the electric field component @xmath54 in fig .
[ fig11](b ) remains at noise levels , except for a peak at @xmath153 .
this peak coincides spatially and temporally with the growth of the rotational magnetowave , which is responsible for the @xmath154 in fig .
[ fig11](c ) .
it is related to the displacement current @xmath155 connected to @xmath64 .    a comparison of the figs .
[ fig11 ] ( c ) and ( d ) confirms the observation from the supplementary movie 3 that @xmath57 starts to grow to a large amplitude well before @xmath64 .
the latter grows fastest at around the time @xmath153 , when @xmath57 saturates .
the presence of a strong @xmath57 is apparently necessary for the growth of @xmath64 , which supports our previous claim that @xmath64 is driven by a secondary instability .
figure [ fig11 ] reveals that @xmath57 is confined to within the rarefaction wave , while the magnetic field distribution @xmath64 reaches out into the dilute electron plasma outside of the rarefaction wave .
it eventually reaches the boundaries and effects due to the periodic boundary conditions can no longer be neglected at the final time @xmath156 .
the development of the strong magnetic fields at @xmath70 coincide with a balancing of @xmath157 and @xmath158 in fig .
[ fig10](b ) .
this change in @xmath120 is partially due to the electron deflection by @xmath12 , which will contribute to an equilibration of @xmath157 and @xmath158 .
we want to determine the source mechanism of the in - plane magnetic field @xmath64 . the ambipolar electric field due to the rarefaction wave and the electric field induced by @xmath57 are both confined to the simulation plane .
the electric fields and @xmath57 can excert a force on the electrons only in this plane and no current orthogonal to the simulation plane can be generated . since we have no initial beams moving along the z - axis , we can rule out magnetic beam instabilities @xcite .
one possibility to generate an electron flow along z is a coupling of the electron velocity components through the lorentz factor .
an electron acceleration in the simulation plane would change @xmath159 .
the fastest electrons in fig .
[ fig4](a ) have the mildly relativistic speed @xmath160 that gives a lorentz factor @xmath161 . however , their number density is low and we could not expect them to drive strong in - plane magnetic fields .
a possible mechanism for the growth of @xmath64 is the electric field induced by @xmath57 .
the induced field is strong when @xmath57 saturates and it changes the direction of the in - plane electric field vector by up to 5% relative to the radius vector .
the plasma density is according to fig .
[ fig6](b ) circularly symmetric at @xmath138 .
a misalignment of the in - plane electric field vector and the density gradient can give rise to elliptically polarized magnetowaves @xcite .
we have examined here the expansion of an initially unmagnetized circular plasma cloud into a vacuum by means of a 2d3v pic simulation .
the purpose of our study has been to test , if a thermal anisotropy - driven weibel instability ( tawi ) can also develop in curved rarefaction waves .
previous studies considered planar plasma slabs that expanded under their own thermal pressure @xcite and observed the growth of strong magnetic fields in the rarefaction wave , unless a shock suppressed the tawi @xcite .
a thermally anisotropic electron distribution develops due to two reasons .
firstly the slow - down of the electrons in the ambipolar electric field implies that their thermal pressure is decreased along the density gradient .
this mechanism occurs in planar and curved rarefaction waves .
secondly , the inelastic reflection of an electron by the expanding rarefaction wave implies that it looses momentum along the electric field direction .
this momentum is transferred to the accelerating ions . the initial plasma distribution used in the refs .
@xcite is a plasma slab of infinite extent in one direction , which has a finite width in the second direction .
this plasma slab is immersed in a vacuum or in a low - density plasma .
both plasma boundaries are parallel .
this implies that every reflection of the electron will decrease the same momentum component , namely the component that is aligned with the antiparallel density gradients of both rarefaction waves . the anisotropy increases with every electron reflection .
this mechanism can not occur in a circular rarefaction wave , since here consecutive electron reflections tend to decrease different momentum components .
our study can thus test if consecutive electron reflections are necessary to achieve a tawi .
if the slowdown of the electrons in the ambipolar electric field of a plasma with a spatially non - uniform density is enough to trigger the tawi , then this instability may play a role in the magnetization of astrophysical plasma @xcite besides the filamentation instability @xcite and cosmic ray - driven instabilities @xcite .
the magnetic energy that can be generated by the tawi is a fraction of the electron thermal energy , here about 1% .
this energy density is well below that of the filamentation instability , which can reach about 10 - 20% of the kinetic energy density of leptonic beams if they are cold .
however , the tawi requires only hot electrons and a density gradient to grow , while the filamentation instability is triggered by relativistic particle beams that we may find only close to plasma shocks .
the tawi could thus magnetize much larger intervals in energetic astrophysical jets , such as grb jets , which are thought to have a nonuniform plasma density and relativistically hot electrons .
the tawi may also generate a seed magnetic field in the turbulent plasma close to snr shocks and speed up the development of the much more powerful cosmic ray - driven instabilities .
our findings are as follows .
the electron expansion results in a strong radial electrostatic field .
it counteracts a further electron expansion and accelerates the protons into the radial direction .
a rarefaction wave emerges , which is characterised by an increase of the proton mean speed and by a decrease of the proton density with an increasing radius .
the expansion of a rarefaction wave is self - similar @xcite .
the absence of an ambient medium has prevented the formation of a shock and the protons could reach a speed exceeding 250 times their thermal speed .
the fields within the rarefaction wave have initially been electrostatic .
electrons lose momentum to the accelerating protons only in the radial direction , which implies that their radial thermal pressure decreases more quickly than the azimuthal one .
a thermal anisotropy - driven weibel instability ( tawi ) @xcite grows once the radial extent of the rarefaction wave is sufficient to accommodate a wavelength of the unstable modes @xcite and once the thermal anisotropy between the radial and the azimuthal direction became sufficiently large .
the tawi results in the aperiodic growth of a transverse magnetic ( tm ) wave .
this tm wave induces an electric field that is added to that of the electrostatic ambipolar electric field of the rarefaction wave .
the total electric field is thus no longer parallel to the plasma density gradient .
a misalignment between the electric field and the plasma density gradient can drive circularly or elliptically polarized magnetowaves @xcite .
we propose that these waves are responsible for the in - plane magnetic field we observe in our simulation , which can not be explained in terms of the tawi .
the magnetic fields of this wave reach an amplitude that is comparable to the waves due to the tawi .
our findings can be verified in an experiment , where the absorption of a laser pulse heats up the electrons in a thin wire @xcite .
some electrons will leave the now positively charged wire and build up an ambipolar electric field .
this ambipolar field accelerates the ions through the transverse normal sheath acceleration ( tnsa ) mechanism @xcite and it results in the formation of a rarefaction wave .
the ablation of a wire generates a cylindrical rarefaction wave .
our circular plasma cloud corresponds to an idealized cross section of the wire , as long as it is sufficiently far away from the laser impact point @xcite .
the cross section is idealized , because we do not consider ionization processes that require more elaborate numerical codes @xcite .
the plasma dynamics outside of the wire should be comparable in the simulation and experiment .
the strong magnetic fields that develop in the rarefaction wave should be detectable .
it is thus possible to investigate systematically the tawi in a controlled laboratory experiment and to determine the strength and life - time of the magnetic field .
the interplay of the tawi with the secondary magnetowave we have observed here and other instabilities , such as the rayleigh - taylor instability @xcite , can also be examined .
the experiment can reveal the topology of the magnetic fields in a three - dimensional setting , which is currently computationally too expensive .
acknowledgments : this work was supported by vetenskapsrdet ( dnr 2010 - 4063 ) , epsrc ( ep / e035728/1 , ep / c003586/1 , ep / d043808/1 ) , consejeria de educacion y ciencia ( ene2009 - 09276 ) , the junta de comunidades de castilla - la mancha ( pai08 - 0182 - 3162 ) , sfi ( 08/rfp / phy1694 ) . computer time and support was provided by the hpc2n in ume and by the ichec in dublin .    99 aharonian fa _
et al _ 2004 _ nature _ * 432 * 75 fender r and belloni t 2004 _ ann .
astrophys . _
* 42 * 317 piran t 2004 _ rev
phys . _ * 76 * 1143 medvedev mv 2000 _ astrophys .
j. _ * 540 * 704 bykov am and treumann ra 2011 _ astron .
_ * 19 * 42 blandford rd and eichler d 1987 _ phys . rep . _ * 154 * 1 berezhko eg , ksenofontov lt and volk hj 2003 _ astron .
astrophys . _ * 412 * l11 bell ar 2004 _ mon . not .
royal astron .
_ * 353 * 550 medvedev mv and a. loeb 1999 _ astrophys . j. _ * 526 * 697 brainerd jj 2000 _ astrophys . j. _ * 538 * 628 gruzinov a 2001 _ astrophys . j. _ * 563 * l15 waxman e 2006 _ plasma phys .
controll . fusion _ * 48 * b137 kazimura y , sakai ji , neubert t and bulanov sv 1998 _ astrophys . j. _ * 498 * l183 silva lo , fonseca ra , tonge jw , dawson jm , mori wb and medvedev mv 2003 _ astrophys .
j. _ * 596 * l121 schlickeiser r and shukla pk 2003 _ ppastrophys . j. _ * 599 * l57 bret a , gremillet l and dieckmann me 2010 _ phys .
plasmas _ * 17 * 120501 bret a , firpo mc and deutsch c 2005 _ phys .
lett . _ * 94 * 115002 kapetanakos ca 1974 _ appl .
_ * 25 * 484 weibel es 1959 _ phys .
* 2 * 83 kalman bg , montes c and quemada d 1968 _ phys
. fluids _ * 11 * 1797 morse rl and nielson cw 1971 _ phys .
fluids _ * 14 * 830 davidson rc , hammer da , haber i and wagner ce 1972 _ phys . fluids .
_ * 15 * 317 kaang hh , ryu cm and yoon ph 2009 _ phys .
plasmas _ * 16 * 082103 bret a 2007 _ contrib .
plasma phys .
_ * 47 * 133 stockem a , dieckmann me and schlickeiser r 2009 _ plasma phys .
controll . fusion _ * 51 * 075014 stockem a , dieckmann me and schlickeiser r 2010 _ plasma phys .
fusion _ * 52 * 085009 palodhi l , califano f and pegoraro f 2009 _ plasma phys .
controll . fusion _ * 51 * 125006 lazar m , schlickeiser r and poedts s 2010 _ phys
. plasmas _ * 17 * 062112 tautz rc 2011 _ phys .
plasmas _ * 18
* 012101 shaisultanov r and eichler d 2011 _ phys . plasmas _ * 18 * 034501 schlickeiser r 2005 _ plasma phys .
controll . fusion _
* 47 * a205 thaury c , mora p , heron a and adam jc _ phys .
e _ * 82 * 016408 sack c and schamel h 1987 _ phys .
rep . _ * 156 * 311 grismayer t , mora p , adam jc and heron a 2008 _ phys .
e _ * 77 * 066407 lyutikov m 2010 _ phys .
e _ * 82 * 056305 gargate l , fonseca ra , bingham r and silva lo 2008 _ ieee trans .
plasma sci . _
* 36 * 1168 sarri g , dieckmann me , kourakis i and borghesi m 2011 _ phys .
_ , * 107 * 025003 sarri g , murphy gc , dieckmann me , bret a , quinn k , kourakis i , borghesi m , drury loc and ynnerman a 2011 _ new j. phys . _
* 13 * 073023 saleem h 1996 _ phys .
e _ * 54 * 4469 saleem h 2009 _ phys .
plasmas _ * 16 * 082102 eastwood jw 1991 _ comput
* 64 * 252 dawson jm 1983 _ rev . mod .
* 55 * 403 daughton w , lapenta g and ricci p 2004 _ phys . rev . lett .
_ * 93 * 105004 lapenta g and brackbill ju 2002 _ phys
. plasmas _ * 9 * 1544 simon a 1963 _ phys .
fluids _ * 6 * 382 sakawa y , joshi c , kaw pk , jain vk , johnston tw , chen ff and dawson jm 1992 _ phys .
lett . _ * 69 * 85 dieckmann me , sarri g , romagnani
l , kourakis i and borghesi m 2010 _ plasma phys .
controll . fusion _ * 52 * 025001 quinn k _ et al _ 2009 _ phys .
* 102 * 194801 snavely ra _ et al _ 2000 _ phys .
lett _ * 85 * 2945 dhumieres e , lefebvre e , gremillet l and malkav 2005 _ phys .
plasmas _ * 12 * 062704 gibbon p , beg fn , clark el , evans rg and zepf m 2004 _ phys
. plasmas _ * 11 * 4032 nuter r , gremillet l , lefebvre e , levy a , ceccotti t and martin p 2011 _ phys . plasmas _ * 18 * 033107 piriz ar , di lucchio l and prieto gr 2011 _ phys . plasmas _ * 18 * 012702 piriz ar , sanz j and ibanez lf 1997 _ phys
. plasmas _ * 4 * 1117