extremely low mass ( elm ) wds , degenerate objects with @xmath5 ( cm s@xmath6 ) surface gravity or @xmath70.3 @xmath4  mass , are the product of common envelope binary evolution ( e.g. * ? ? ?
elm wds are thus the signposts of the type of binaries that are strong gravitational wave sources and possible supernovae progenitors .
the goal of the elm survey is to discover and characterize the population of elm wds in the milky way .
previous elm survey papers have reported the discovery of 40 wds spanning 0.16 @xmath4  to 0.49 @xmath4  found in the hypervelocity star ( hvs ) survey , the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) , and in our own targeted survey @xcite .
we refer to this full sample of wds as the elm survey sample , but reserve the term `` elm wd '' for those objects with @xmath5 .
all of our wds are found in short - period , detached binaries , 60% of which have merger times @xmath210 gyr .
three notable systems are detached binaries with @xmath240 min orbital periods @xcite . the eclipsing system j0651
+ 2844 is the second - strongest gravitational wave source in the mhz range @xcite .
we measured its period change in one year with optical eclipse timing @xcite .
other results from the elm survey include the first tidally distorted wds @xcite and the first pulsating helium - core wds @xcite .    here
we present the discovery of 17 new wd binaries identified from spectra previously obtained for the hvs survey of @xcite .
@xcite analyzed the visually - identified wds in the original dataset and discovered one elm wd binary @xcite .
this approach failed to identify the lowest surface gravity wds .
we now fit stellar atmosphere models to the entire collection of spectra not previously identified as wds , and acquire follow - up spectroscopy of new elm wd candidates .
the result of this effort is that we find low surface gravity objects that might not be considered wds if not for their observed orbital motion .
we chose to call objects with @xmath8 `` elm wds '' because these objects occupy a unique region of surface gravity / effective temperature space that overlaps the terminal wd cooling branch for elm wds ( see figure [ fig : teff ] ) .
this region is well separated from both hydrogen - burning main sequence tracks and helium - burning horizontal branch tracks .
our objects are systematically @xmath910,000 k too cool , given their surface gravities , to be helium burning sdb stars .
@xcite refer to a similar type of object as a `` proto - wd . ''
the lowest gravity objects in our sample may indeed have hydrogen shell burning and thus are , properly speaking , proto - wds , but here we address our sample of low gravity objects as elm wds .
a variety of observations demonstrate that degenerate helium - core wds exist at our observed temperatures and surface gravities .
elm wd companions to milli - second pulsars are directly observed ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) at the temperatures and gravities targeted by the elm survey .
the measured radius of the @xmath10 object in j0651 + 2844 , a @xmath11 @xmath12  star , demonstrates it is a degenerate wd @xcite .
@xcite account for the unusually long pulsation periods of the elm wd pulsators with low mass wd models .
hence , calling our low surface gravity objects elm wds is appropriate .
interestingly , we find elm wds in binaries with @xmath130.9 @xmath4  companions and rapid merger times .
when these detached binaries begin mass transfer , @xcite show that the extreme mass ratios will lead to stable mass transfer . for the case of massive wd accretors ,
theorists predict large helium flashes that may ignite thermonuclear transients dubbed `` .ia '' supernovae @xcite or may detonate the surface helium - layer and the massive wd @xcite and produce an underluminous supernova .
however , the final outcome of such mergers is uncertain and they may not trigger supernovae explosions @xcite . if the companions are instead neutron stars , this would be the first time a milli - second pulsar is identified through its low - mass wd companion .
such systems allow measurement of the binary mass ratio and the neutron star mass through a combination of the pulsar orbit obtained from radio timing and the wd orbit obtained from optical radial velocity observations .
the importance of identifying the elm wds in the hvs survey is that the hvs survey is a well - defined and a nearly 100% complete spectroscopic survey .
with a complete sample of elm wds we can measure the space density , period distribution , and merger rate of elm wds , and link elm wd merger products to populations of am cvn stars , r crb stars , and possibly underluminous supernovae . in a stellar evolution context , our elm wd survey complements studies of wd binaries with main sequence companions ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) and with sdb star companions ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
sdb stars are @xmath14@xmath15 k helium - burning precursors to wds @xcite .
our elm wds , on the other hand , have @xmath14@xmath16 k.    we organize this paper as follows . in section 2
we discuss our observations and data analysis . in section 3
we present the orbital solutions for 17 new elm wd binaries . in section 4
we discuss the properties of the elm wd sample .
we conclude in section 5 .
the hvs survey is a targeted spectroscopic survey of @xmath17 stars with the colors of @xmath183 @xmath4  main sequence stars , stars which should not exist at faint magnitudes in the halo unless they were ejected there .
the target selection is detailed in @xcite and spans @xmath19 , @xmath20 .
this color selection fortuitously targets wds in the approximate range @xmath21 @xmath14  @xmath16 k and @xmath22 .
we separate elm wds from the other stars in the hvs survey using stellar atmosphere model fits to the single - epoch spectra .
our initial set of fits uses an upgraded version of the ferre code described by @xcite and synthetic da wd pure hydrogen spectra kindly provided by d.  koester .
the grid of wd model atmospheres covers effective temperatures from 6000 k to 30,000 k in steps of 500 k to 2000 k , and surface gravities from @xmath23=5.0 to 9.0 in steps of 0.25 dex .
the model atmospheres are calculated assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium and include both convective and radiative transport @xcite .
we fit 2,000 spectra , mostly from the original hvs survey @xcite but also some newly acquired data @xcite .
these 2,000 spectra were not previously analyzed for the elm survey because the spectra were not previously identified as wds .
we fit both flux - calibrated spectra ( for improved @xmath14  constraints ) as well as continuum - corrected balmer line profiles ( insensitive to reddening and flux calibration errors ) . for the continuum - corrected balmer line profiles ,
we normalize the spectra by fitting a low - order polynomial to the regions between the balmer lines .
we adopt the parameters from the flux - calibrated spectra , except in cases where the spectra were obtained in non - photometric conditions .
the uncertainties in our single - epoch measurements are typically @xmath24500 k in @xmath14  and @xmath25 dex in @xmath23 . from these fits
we identify 57 low mass wd candidates .
we obtain follow - up spectra for each of the candidate low mass wds to improve stellar atmosphere parameters and to search for velocity variability .
observations were obtained over the course of seven observing runs at the 6.5 m mmt telescope between march 2011 and february 2013 .
we used the blue channel spectrograph @xcite with the 832 line mm@xmath26 grating , which provides a wavelength coverage 3650   to 4500   and a spectral resolution of 1.0  .
all observations were paired with a comparison lamp exposure , and were flux - calibrated using blue spectrophotometric standards @xcite .
the extracted spectra typically have a signal - to - noise ( s / n ) of 7 per pixel in the continuum and a 14 km s@xmath26  radial velocity error .
we obtained additional spectroscopy for @xmath27 mag elm wd candidates in queue scheduled time at the 1.5 m flwo telescope .
we used the fast spectrograph @xcite with the 600 line mm@xmath26 grating and a 1.5  slit , providing wavelength coverage 3500   to 5500   and a spectral resolution of 1.7  .
all observations were paired with a comparison lamp exposure , and were flux - calibrated using blue spectrophotometric standards .
the extracted spectra typically have a s / n of 10 per pixel in the continuum and a 18 km s@xmath26  radial velocity error .
our follow - up observations provide improved stellar atmosphere constraints , from which we determine that 24 ( 42% ) of the candidates are probable elm wds with @xmath8 ( see figure [ fig : teff ] ) .
the remaining candidates have either @xmath28 and are normal da wds , or @xmath29 and are presumably halo blue horizontal branch or blue straggler stars .
figure [ fig : teff ] plots the distribution of @xmath14  vs.  @xmath23  for all of the wds with @xmath30 .
previously published elm survey stars are marked with red circles .
the observed wds overlap tracks based on @xcite models for he - core wds with hydrogen shell burning ( ( green lines ) * ? ? ?
* ) , but do not overlap main sequence nor horizontal branch evolutionary tracks . for reference , we also plot @xcite solar metallicity main sequence tracks for 2 , 3 , and 6 @xmath4  stars ( cyan lines ) .
a helium - burning horizontal branch star can have a surface gravity similar to a degenerate he wd ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) , but only at a systematically higher effective temperature than that targeted by the elm survey . this is illustrated by @xcite [ fe / h]=-1.48 horizontal branch tracks for 0.488 , 0.495 , and 0.500 @xmath4  stars ( magenta lines ) , as well as the homogenous helium - burning main sequence from @xcite .
the zero - age main sequence and helium - burning horizontal branch isochrones ( thick lines ) mark the limits .
seventeen of the wds show significant velocity variability , including twelve of the newly identified elm wds .
the other elm wds have insufficient coverage for detecting ( or ruling out ) velocity variability .
we focus the remainder of this paper on the 17 well - constrained systems .
our sample of 17 well - constrained systems contains four @xmath23  @xmath31 objects , objects at the edge of our stellar atmosphere grid that might not be considered degenerate wds if not for their observed orbital motion .
we also fit these stars to grids of @xcite models spanning @xmath32 } \le 0.5 $ ] , @xmath33 ( see * ? ? ?
* ) but found very poor solutions .
this motivated us to perform a new set of stellar atmosphere fits using @xcite hydrogen model atmospheres .
the gianninas models employ improved stark broadening profiles @xcite , and the ml2/@xmath34 = 0.8 prescription of the mixing - length theory for models where convective energy transport is important @xcite .
we calculate atmosphere models for low surface gravities , and use a grid that covers @xmath14  from 4000 k to 30,000 k in steps ranging from 250 to 5000 k and @xmath23  from 5.0 to 8.0 in steps of 0.25 dex .
ccccccccc j0056@xmath350611 & 0:56:48.232 & -6:11:41.62 & @xmath36 & @xmath37 & 0.17 & @xmath38 & 8.0 & 0.69 + j0751@xmath350141 & 7:51:41.179 & -1:41:20.90 & @xmath39 & @xmath40 & 0.17 & @xmath41 & 8.0 & 0.75 + j0755@xmath424800 & 7:55:19.483 & 48:00:34.07 & @xmath43 & @xmath44 & 0.42 & @xmath45 & 9.7 & 0.18 + j0802@xmath350955 & 8:02:50.134 & -9:55:49.84 & @xmath46 & @xmath47 & 0.20 & @xmath48 & 8.2 & 1.19 + j0811@xmath420225 & 8:11:33.560 & 2:25:56.76 & @xmath49 & @xmath50 & 0.17 & @xmath51 & 8.0 & 1.30 + j0815@xmath422309 & 8:15:44.242 & 23:09:04.92 & @xmath52 & @xmath53 & 0.17 & @xmath54 & 6.7 & 1.53 + j0840@xmath421527 & 8:40:37.574 & 15:27:04.53 & @xmath55 & @xmath56 & 0.17 & @xmath57 & 8.0 & 1.69 + j1046@xmath350153 & 10:46:07.875 & -1:53:58.48 & @xmath58 & @xmath59 & 0.37 & @xmath60 & 10.2 & 0.36 + j1104@xmath420918 & 11:04:36.739 & 9:18:22.74 & @xmath61 & @xmath62 & 0.46 & @xmath63 & 10.3 & 0.18 + j1141@xmath423850 & 11:41:55.560 & 38:50:03.02 & @xmath64 & @xmath65 & 0.17 & @xmath66 & 8.0 & 1.56 + j1151@xmath425858 & 11:51:38.381 & 58:58:53.22 & @xmath67 & @xmath68 & 0.17 & @xmath69 & 8.0 & 2.57 + j1157@xmath420546 & 11:57:34.455 & 5:46:45.58 & @xmath70 & @xmath71 & 0.17 & @xmath72 & 8.0 & 2.29 + j1238@xmath421946 & 12:38:00.096 & 19:46:31.45 & @xmath73 & @xmath74 & 0.17 & @xmath75 & 8.0 & 0.68 + j1538@xmath420252 & 15:38:44.220 & 2:52:09.49 & @xmath76 & @xmath77 & 0.17 & @xmath78 & 8.0 & 1.28 + j1557@xmath422823 & 15:57:08.483 & 28:23:36.02 & @xmath79 & @xmath80 & 0.49 & @xmath81 & 11.2 & 0.18 + j2132@xmath420754 & 21:32:28.360 & 7:54:28.24 & @xmath82 & @xmath83 & 0.17 & @xmath84 & 8.0 & 0.96 + j2338@xmath352052 & 23:38:21.505 & -20:52:22.76 & @xmath85 & @xmath86 & 0.27 & @xmath87 & 9.0 & 1.29 +    lccrrcccc j0056@xmath350611 & 33 & @xmath88 & @xmath89 & @xmath90 & @xmath91 & @xmath920.45 & @xmath930.374 & @xmath930.12 + j0751@xmath350141 & 31 & @xmath94 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & @xmath97 & @xmath920.94 & @xmath930.182 & @xmath930.37 + j0755@xmath424800 & 26 & @xmath98 & @xmath99 & @xmath100 & @xmath101 & @xmath920.90 & @xmath930.468 & @xmath9328 + j0802@xmath350955 & 20 & @xmath102 & @xmath103 & @xmath104 & @xmath105 & @xmath920.57 & @xmath930.348 & @xmath9379 + j0811@xmath420225 & 24 & @xmath106 & @xmath107 & @xmath108 & @xmath109 & @xmath921.20 & @xmath930.142 & @xmath93160 + j0815@xmath422309 & 21 & @xmath110 & @xmath111 & @xmath112 & @xmath113 & @xmath920.47 & @xmath930.361 & @xmath93620 + j0840@xmath421527 & 19 & @xmath114 & @xmath115 & @xmath116 & @xmath117 & @xmath920.15 & @xmath930.879 & @xmath93230 + j1046@xmath350153 & 16 & @xmath118 & @xmath119 & @xmath120 & @xmath121 & @xmath920.19 & @xmath930.509 & @xmath9348 + j1104@xmath420918 & 25 & @xmath122 & @xmath123 & @xmath124 & @xmath125 & @xmath920.55 & @xmath930.831 & @xmath9339 + j1141@xmath423850 & 17 & @xmath126 & @xmath127 & @xmath128 & @xmath129 & @xmath920.76 & @xmath930.225 & @xmath9310 + j1151@xmath425858 & 17 & @xmath130 & @xmath131 & @xmath132 & @xmath133 & @xmath920.61 & @xmath930.277 & @xmath93150 + j1157@xmath420546 & 9 & @xmath134 & @xmath135 & @xmath136 & @xmath137 & @xmath920.44 & @xmath930.382 & @xmath93120 + j1238@xmath421946 & 21 & @xmath138 & @xmath139 & @xmath140 & @xmath141 & @xmath920.64 & @xmath930.266 & @xmath937.5 + j1538@xmath420252 & 16 & @xmath142 & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & @xmath145 & @xmath920.76 & @xmath930.222 & @xmath9335 + j1557@xmath422823 & 24 & @xmath146 & @xmath147 & @xmath148 & @xmath149 & @xmath920.43 & @xmath930.886 & @xmath9320 + j2132@xmath420754 & 35 & @xmath150 & @xmath151 & @xmath152 & @xmath153 & @xmath920.95 & @xmath930.179 & @xmath937.7 + j2338@xmath352052 & 25 & @xmath154 & @xmath155 & @xmath156 & @xmath157 & @xmath920.15 & @xmath930.554 & @xmath930.95 +    our stellar atmosphere fits use the so - called spectroscopic technique described in @xcite .
one difference between our work and @xcite is that we fit higher - order balmer lines , up to and including h12 , observed in the low surface gravity elm wds .
the higher - order balmer lines are sensitive to @xmath23  and improve our surface gravity measurement . for the handful of wds in our sample with @xmath28 , we only fit balmer lines up to and including h10 since the higher order balmer lines are not observed at higher surface gravity .
the lowest gravity wds in our sample show ca and mg lines in their spectra . for reference ,
the diffusion timescale for ca in a @xmath158 10,000 k , 0.2 @xmath4  h - rich wd is @xmath9@xmath159 yr @xcite .
extreme horizontal branch stars , which can have surface gravities comparable to the lowest gravity wds , have longer @xmath9@xmath160 yr diffusion timescales @xcite .
these diffusion timescales are shorter than the wd evolutionary timescale , suggesting there may be on - going accretion in these ultra - compact binary systems .
near- and mid - infrared observations are needed constrain the possibility of accretion .
we defer a detailed analysis of the metal abundances in elm wds to a future paper . for our present analysis
we exclude the wavelength ranges where the metal lines are present in our fits .
our error estimates combine the internal error of the model fits , obtained from the covariance matrix of the fitting algorithm , and the external error , obtained from multiple observations of the same object .
uncertainties are typically 1.2% in @xmath14  and 0.038 dex in @xmath23  ( see * ? ? ?
* for details ) .
a measure of the systematic uncertainty inherent in the stellar atmosphere models and fitting routines comes from @xcite , who find a systematic uncertainty of @xmath161 dex in @xmath23 .
this is corroborated by the difference we observe between the different fitting methods discussed in section 2.1 and here : the mean difference and the dispersion in @xmath14is @xmath162 and in @xmath23is @xmath163 dex .
figure [ fig : teff ] plots the properties of the 17 wds with their internal errorbars .
we use @xcite evolutionary tracks to estimate wd mass and luminosity . for purpose of discussion , we assume @xmath164 wds have mass 0.17 @xmath4  and absolute magnitude @xmath165 ( see * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
we summarize the observed and derived stellar parameters of the 17 new binaries in table [ tab : param ] .
position and de - reddened @xmath166-band magnitude come from sdss @xcite and @xmath167 is our heliocentric distance estimate .
we calculate orbital elements and merger times in the same way as previous elm survey papers , and so we refer the reader to those papers for the details of our analysis . in brief
, we measure absolute radial velocities using the cross - correlation package rvsao @xcite and a high - s / n template .
we use the entire spectrum in the cross - correlation .
we then use the summed spectra ( figure [ fig : spec ] ) as cross - correlation templates to maximize our velocity precision for each individual object .
we calculate orbital elements by minimizing @xmath168 for a circular orbit using the code of @xcite .
figure [ fig : pdm ] shows the periodograms for the 17 binaries , and figure [ fig : vel ] plots the radial velocities phased to the best - fit orbital periods .
we use the binary mass function to estimate the unseen companion mass ; an edge - on orbit with inclination @xmath169 yields the minimum companion mass @xmath170 and the maximum gravitational wave merger time .
table [ tab : orbit ] summarizes the binary orbital parameters .
columns include orbital period ( @xmath171 ) , radial velocity semi - amplitude ( @xmath172 ) , systemic velocity ( @xmath173 ) , time of spectroscopic conjunction ( the time when the object is closest to us ) , minimum secondary mass ( @xmath170 ) assuming @xmath169 , the maximum mass ratio ( @xmath174 ) , and the maximum gravitational wave merger time @xmath175 .
the systemic velocities in table [ tab : orbit ] are not corrected for the wds gravitational redshifts , which should be subtracted from the observed velocities to find the true systemic velocities .
this correction is a few km s@xmath26 for a 0.17 @xmath4  helium wd , comparable to the systemic velocity uncertainty .
the orbital solutions constrain the nature of the elm wd binaries . here
we discuss the systems with short merger times , massive companions , or that may be underluminous supernovae progenitors .
the elm wd j0056@xmath350611 has a well - constrained orbital period of @xmath176 hr and a semi - amplitude of @xmath177 km s@xmath26 .
we can calculate its likely companion mass if we assume a distribution for the unknown orbital inclination .
although radial velocity detections are biased towards edge - on systems ( see section 4 ) , we will assume that we are observing a random inclination for purpose of discussion .
the mean inclination angle for a random sample , @xmath178 , is then an estimate of the most likely companion mass . for j0056@xmath350611 ,
the most likely companion is a 0.61 @xmath4  wd at an orbital separation of 0.5 @xmath12 .
this orbital separation rules out the possibility of a main sequence companion .
there is no evidence for a 0.61 @xmath4  wd in the spectrum of j0056@xmath350611 , but we would not expect there to be . if the two wds in this binary formed at the same time , we would expect the 0.61 @xmath4  wd to be 15 - 100 times less luminous than the 0.17 @xmath4  wd for cooling ages of 100 myr - 1 gyr @xcite . a more plausible evolutionary scenario for an elm wd binary like j0056@xmath350611 is two consecutive phases of common - envelope evolution in which the elm wd is created last , giving the more massive wd a longer time to cool and fade ( e.g. * ?
* ) .    for the most probable companion mass of 0.61 @xmath4
, j0056@xmath350611 will begin mass transfer in 100 myr . @xcite
discuss the many possible stellar evolution paths for such a system .
this system s mass ratio @xmath1790.37 suggests that mass transfer will likely be stable @xcite and that j0056@xmath350611 will evolve into an am cvn system .
the elm wd j0751@xmath350141 has a @xmath180 hr orbital period with aliases ranging between 1.85 and 2.05 hr ( see figure [ fig : pdm ] ) .
the large @xmath181 km s@xmath26  semi - amplitude indicates that the companion is massive , regardless of the exact period .
the minimum companion mass is 0.94 @xmath4 . assuming a random inclination distribution , there is a 47% probability that the companion is @xmath131.4 @xmath4 .    given that the elm wd went through a common envelope phase of evolution with its companion , j0751@xmath350141 possibly contains a milli - second pulsar binary companion .
helium - core wds are the most common type of companion in known milli - second pulsar binaries @xcite .
we have been allocated cycle 14 _ chandra x - ray observatory _ time to search for x - ray emission from a possible neutron star .    for @xmath178 ,
the companion is a 1.32 @xmath4  wd , and the system will begin mass transfer in 290 myr .
the extreme mass ratio @xmath1790.18 means that this system will undergo stable mass transfer and evolve into an am cvn system .
as the binary orbit widens in the am cvn phase , the mass accretion rate will drop and the mass required for the unstable burning of the accreted he - layer increases up to several percent of a solar mass .
the final flash should ignite a thermonuclear transient visible as an underluminous supernova @xcite .
it is also possible that the helium flash will detonate the massive wd in a double - detonation scenario ( * ? ? ?
* though see dan et al .
if j0751@xmath350141 has a massive wd companion , it is a probable supernova progenitor .
the elm wd j0811 + 0225 has an orbital period of @xmath182 hr and a semi - amplitude of 221 km s@xmath26 .
these orbital parameters yield a minimum companion mass of 1.20 @xmath4 .
that means the companion probably exceeds a chandrasekhar mass . for @xmath178 ,
the most likely companion is a 1.70 @xmath4  neutron star at an orbital separation of 4.6 @xmath12 .
there is no fermi gamma - ray detection at this location , but additional observations are needed to determine the nature of this system .
the elm wd j0840 + 1527 has a best - fit @xmath23@xmath183 near the limit of our model grid .
its best - fit orbital period is @xmath184 hr with a significant alias at 8.3 hr .
assuming this object is 0.17 @xmath4 , its most likely companion is a wd with a comparable mass , 0.19 @xmath4 , at an orbital separation of 1.9 @xmath12 . if , on the other hand , j0840 + 1527 were a 3 @xmath4  main sequence star , its companion would have an orbital separation of 4.3 @xmath12   a separation comparable to the radius of a 3 @xmath4  star , and thus physically implausible .
there is no evidence for mass transfer in this system .
we conclude that j0840 + 1527 is a pair of elm wds .
j1141 + 3850 , j1157 + 0546 , and j1238 + 1946 are the other systems containing wds near the low - gravity limit of our stellar atmosphere model grid , but their @xmath185 - 266 km s@xmath26  semi - amplitudes are significantly larger than that of j0840 + 1527 .
if we assume that the objects are 0.17 @xmath4  elm wds , then the binary companions have minimum masses of 0.45 - 0.75 @xmath4 .
if we instead assume that the objects are main sequence stars , then the required orbital separations are comparable to the radius of the main sequence star and physically impossible . there is no evidence for mass transfer in these systems .
we conclude that j1141 + 3850 , j1157 + 0546 , and j1238 + 1946 are elm wds with likely wd companions . for j1141 + 3850 , there is a 36% probability that the companion is @xmath131.4 @xmath4 , possibly a milli - second pulsar . for j1141 + 3850 and j1238 + 1946
, mass transfer will begin in 7 - 10 gyr , making them am cvn progenitors and possible underluminous supernovae progenitors .
the elm wd j2132 + 0754 has a well - constrained orbital period of @xmath186 hr and semi - amplitude of @xmath187 km s@xmath26 .
the minimum companion mass is 0.95 @xmath4 , and there is a 48% probability that the companion is @xmath131.4 @xmath4 , possibly a milli - second pulsar .
for @xmath178 , the most likely companion is a 1.33 @xmath4  wd that will begin mass transfer in 6 gyr .
that makes j2132 + 0754 a likely am cvn progenitor and another possible underluminous supernovae progenitor .
the elm wd j2338@xmath352052 has an orbital period of @xmath188 hr and a semi - amplitude of @xmath189 km s@xmath26 . in this case
the companion is another elm wd ; for @xmath178 , the most likely companion is a 0.17 @xmath4  wd at an orbital separation of 0.56 @xmath12 . given the unity mass ratio , this system will undergo unstable mass transfer and will merge to form a single @xmath90.4 @xmath4  wd .
this system will merge in less than 1 gyr .
with these 17 new discoveries , plus the pulsating elm wd discovery published by @xcite , the elm survey has found 54 detached , double degenerate binaries ; 31 of the binaries will merge within a hubble time .
table [ tab : summary ] summarizes the properties of the systems .
eighty percent of the elm survey binaries are formally elm wd systems .
we find low mass wds in compact binaries , binaries that must have gone through common envelope evolution .
this makes sense because extremely low mass wds require significant mass loss to form ; the universe is not old enough to produce an extremely low mass wd through single star evolution . yet
four objects published in the elm survey have no significant velocity variability , two of which are elm wds ( see table [ tab : summary ] ) . to understand
whether or not these stars are single requires that we understand the significance of our binary detections .
each elm survey binary is typically constrained by 10 - 30 irregularly spaced velocities with modest errors .
given that we determine orbital parameters by minimizing @xmath168 , the @xmath190-test is a natural choice .
we use the @xmath190-test to check whether the variance of the data around the orbital fit is consistent with the variance of the data around a constant velocity ( we use the weighted mean of the observations ) .
@xmath190-test probabilities for the published elm survey binaries are @xmath191 . in other words ,
our binaries have significant velocity variability at the @xmath192% confidence level .    in the null cases we need to calculate the likelihood of not detecting a binary .
this is a trickier problem , and one that we approach with a monte carlo calculation .
we start by selecting a set of observations ( times , velocity errors ) and an orbital period and semi - amplitude .
we convert observation times to orbital phases using a randomly drawn zero time , and calculate velocities at those phases summed with a randomly drawn velocity error .
we perform the @xmath190-test , using 0.01 as a detection threshold .
we repeat this calculation 10,000 times for a given orbital period and semi - amplitude , and then select a new orbital period and semi - amplitude to iterate on .
this analysis is done for each object .
we find that the datasets for our 17 new binaries have a median 99.9% likelihood of detecting @xmath193 km s@xmath26  binaries , a 97% likelihood of detecting @xmath194 km s@xmath26  binaries , and a 44% likelihood of detecting @xmath195 km s@xmath26  binaries .
it is no surprise that we are less likely to detect a low semi - amplitude binary , but this analysis suggests that we can be quite confident of detecting @xmath196 km s@xmath26systems .
we find very similar likelihoods for detecting binaries containing elm wds in the full elm survey sample .
the datasets for the null cases typically contain fewer observations and so are not as well - constrained .
for j0900 + 0234 , a 0.16 @xmath4  elm wd with no observed velocity variation @xcite , the likelihoods of detecting a @xmath193 , 100 , and 50 km s@xmath26  binary are 87% , 57% , and 10% , respectively .
additional observations are required to claim this elm wd as non - variable .
there is , of course , an orbital period dependence to the detections , and periods near 24 hr are the most problematic . taken together ,
our datasets have a median 39% likelihood of detecting a @xmath194 km s@xmath26  binary at @xmath197 hr . yet we remain sensitive to longer periods : our datasets have median 99% and 98% likelihoods of detecting a @xmath194 km s@xmath26  binary at @xmath198 hr and @xmath199 hr , respectively .
figure [ fig : kp ] plots the observed distribution of @xmath171 and @xmath172 for the elm survey binaries .
the dashed lines indicate the approximate companion mass assuming @xmath200 is 0.2 @xmath4  and @xmath201 is 60@xmath202 . at @xmath194 km s@xmath26
, we can detect companion masses down to 0.1 @xmath4  at 2 hr orbital periods and 0.55 @xmath4companions at 2 day orbital periods .
systems with @xmath203 km s@xmath26  are the realm of @xmath70.2 @xmath4  companions , and we observe a half - dozen systems with these parameters .
our incompleteness at @xmath203
km s@xmath26  implies there are quite likely more elm wds with @xmath180.2 @xmath4  companions ; the remaining elm wd candidates that do not show obvious velocity change in a couple observations are possible examples of such low amplitude systems .
finally , orbital inclination acts to increase the difficulty of identifying lone elm wds .
consider the set of 46 elm wds in table [ tab : summary ] with @xmath5 , two of which are non - variable .
their median @xmath172 is 240 km s@xmath26 , a semi - amplitude that would appear @xmath204 km s@xmath26  at @xmath205
. if the 46 objects have randomly distributed orbital inclinations , one object should have @xmath205 and a second @xmath206 .
we conclude there is no good evidence for a lone elm wd in our present sample .
this is in stark contrast to the population of 0.4 @xmath4 wds in the solar neighborhood , of which 20%-30% are single @xcite .
one of the most exciting aspects of our elm wd binaries is that many have gravitational wave merger times less than a hubble time , and in one case as short as 1 myr @xcite .
a natural question , then , is what will happen when the wds merge .
notably , 5 of our 17 new binaries have probable system masses ( for @xmath178 ) in excess of a chandrasekhar mass .    figure [ fig : merge ] plots the distribution of merger time and system mass for the elm survey binaries assuming @xmath178 , except when inclination is known .
the majority of our binaries have probable masses below the chandrasekhar mass and are not potential supernova type ia progenitors , but six systems appear to have either neutron star or massive wd companions .
the evolution of these six systems depends on the stability of mass transfer during the roche lobe overflow phase , and thus on the mass ratio of the binary .
figure [ fig : tau ] plots the distribution of merger time and mass ratio @xmath174 for the elm survey binaries , again assuming @xmath178 except when inclination is known .
the chandrasekhar mass systems generally have extreme @xmath207 and so will evolve into stable mass transfer am cvn systems . if the accretors are massive wds , these systems should experience a large helium flash that may appear as an underluminous .ia supernova ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
it is also possible that the helium flash will detonate the massive wd in a double - detonation scenario @xcite .
the chandrasekhar mass systems are thus potential supernovae progenitors .
however , the outcome of a merger of an elm wd with a massive wd is uncertain ( see * ? ? ?
systems with @xmath208 , such as j2338@xmath352052 , will experience unstable mass transfer .
these systems may merge @xcite to form a single low - mass wd , r crb star , or helium - burning sdb star .
systems with intermediate @xmath209 , such as j0651 + 2844 , will experience either stable or unstable mass transfer depending on their spin - orbit coupling . after we constrain the remaining elm wd candidates plotted in fig.[fig : teff ] we look forward to calculating their space density and merger rate .
elm wds binaries are clearly an important channel for am cvn star formation , and thus an important source of strong gravitational waves in the mhz regime .
we perform stellar atmosphere fits to the entire collection of single - epoch spectra in the hvs survey and identify 57 new low mass wd candidates .
follow - up spectroscopy reveals 17 wds with significant velocity variability , 12 of which are elm wds .
presently , the elm survey sample is consistent with all of the elm wds being part of close binaries .
elm wds are thus signposts for binaries that are strong gravitational wave sources and possible supernovae progenitors .
four binaries in our sample contain @xmath1 objects , objects that might not be considered wds or proto - wds if not for their observed orbital motion .
the existence of @xmath1 wds motivates us to develop a new set of stellar atmosphere models following @xcite .
interestingly , all of the lowest surface gravity ( @xmath164 ) wds in our sample have metal lines in their spectra .
this issue will be studied in detail in a future paper ; infrared observations are needed to constrain the possibility of debris disks as the source of ca and mg accretion in these compact binary systems .
recent discoveries of pulsations in several of our elm wd targets @xcite enable us to probe the interiors of low - mass , presumably he - core wds using the tools of asteroseismology .
due to the hvs color selection , all of the newly identified systems are hotter than 10,000 k and therefore too hot to show the g - mode pulsations detected in cooler elm wds @xcite .
four binaries in our sample have massive @xmath30.9 @xmath4  companions and @xmath210 gyr merger times
. if the unseen companions are massive wds , these extreme mass ratio binaries will undergo stable mass transfer and will evolve into am cvn systems and potentially future .ia or underluminous supernovae .
thus the systems j0751@xmath350141 , j1141 + 3850 , j1238 + 1946 , and j2132 + 0754 are possible supernova progenitors .
the other possibility is that the massive companions in these four binaries are neutron stars . given their past common envelope evolution , the systems quite possibly contain milli - second pulsars . a fifth system , j0811 + 0225 , appears to have a minimum companion mass close to a chandrasekhar mass .
we are conducting follow - up optical , radio , and x - ray observations to establish the nature of these extreme mass ratio elm wd binaries .
optically visible wd companions of neutron stars are useful for constraining the binary mass ratio and also to calibrate the spin - down ages of milli - second pulsars .    given our present observations , we expect that the elm survey will grow to 100 binaries in a few years .
a large sample is important for finding more systems like j0651 + 2844 , a 12.75 min period system that provides us with a laboratory for measuring the spin - orbit coupling and tidal heating of a rapidly merging pair of wds .
we expect that photometric observations will discover more pulsating elm wds
. finally , a larger sample of elm wds will be an important source of gravitational wave verification sources for @xmath210 and other future gravitational wave detection experiments .
we thank m.  alegria , p.  canton , s.  gotilla , j.  mcafee , e.  martin , a.milone , and r.  ortiz for their assistance with observations obtained at the mmt observatory , and p.  berlind and m.  calkins for their assistance with observations obtained at the fred lawrence whipple observatory .
we also thank p.  bergeron and d.  koester for their invaluable assistance in the computation of our stellar atmosphere model grids .
this research makes use of the sao / nasa astrophysics data system bibliographic service .
this project makes use of data products from the sloan digital sky survey , which has been funded by the alfred p.  sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , and the u.s.department of energy office of science .
this work was supported in part by the smithsonian institution .
_ facilities : _
crcccccccc j0022@xmath351014 & 18980 & 7.15 & 0.07989 & 145.6 & 0.33 & @xmath211 & 0.23 & @xmath212 & 6 + j0056@xmath350611 & 12210 & 6.17 & 0.04338 & 376.9 & 0.17 & @xmath213 & 0.61 & @xmath214 & + j0106@xmath351000 & 16490 & 6.01 & 0.02715 & 395.2 & 0.17 & 0.43 & & 0.037 & 7 + j0112 + 1835 & 9690 & 5.63 & 0.14698 & 295.3 & 0.16 & @xmath215 & 0.85 & @xmath216 & 1 + j0651 + 2844 & 16530 & 6.76 & 0.00886 & 616.9 & 0.26 & 0.50 & & 0.0011 & 3,15 + j0751@xmath350141 & 15660 & 5.43 & 0.08001 & 432.6 & 0.17 & @xmath217 & 1.32 & @xmath218 & + j0755 + 4906 & 13160 & 5.84 & 0.06302 & 438.0 & 0.17 & @xmath219 & 1.12 & @xmath220 & 2 + j0818 + 3536 & 10620 & 5.69 & 0.18315 & 170.0 & 0.17 & @xmath221 & 0.33 & @xmath222 & 2 + j0822 + 2753 & 8880 & 6.44 & 0.24400 & 271.1 & 0.17 & @xmath223 & 1.05 & @xmath224 & 4 + j0825 + 1152 & 24830 & 6.61 & 0.05819 & 319.4 & 0.26 & @xmath225 & 0.61 & @xmath226 & 0 + j0849 + 0445 & 10290 & 6.23 & 0.07870 & 366.9 & 0.17 & @xmath227 & 0.88 & @xmath228 & 4 + j0923 + 3028 & 18350 & 6.63 & 0.04495 & 296.0 & 0.23 & @xmath229 & 0.44 & @xmath230 & 2 + j1005 + 0542 & 15740 & 7.25 & 0.30560 & 208.9 & 0.34 & @xmath231 & 0.86 & @xmath232 & 0 + j1005 + 3550 & 10010 & 5.82 & 0.17652 & 143.0 & 0.17 & @xmath211 & 0.24 & @xmath233 & 0 + j1053 + 5200 & 15180 & 6.55 & 0.04256 & 264.0 & 0.20 & @xmath221 & 0.33 & @xmath234 & 4,9 + j1056 + 6536 & 20470 & 7.13 & 0.04351 & 267.5 & 0.34 & @xmath229 & 0.43 & @xmath235 & 0 + j1112 + 1117 & 9590 & 6.36 & 0.17248 & 116.2 & 0.17 & @xmath236 & 0.17 & @xmath237 & 16 + j1141@xmath423850 & 11620 & 5.31 & 0.25958 & 265.8 & 0.17 & @xmath223 & 1.05 & @xmath238 & + j1233 + 1602 & 10920 & 5.12 & 0.15090 & 336.0 & 0.17 & @xmath239 & 1.20 & @xmath240 & 2 + j1234@xmath350228 & 18000 & 6.64 & 0.09143 & 94.0 & 0.23 & @xmath241 & 0.11 & @xmath216 & 6 + j1238@xmath421946 & 16170 & 5.28 & 0.22275 & 258.6 & 0.17 & @xmath227 & 0.88 & @xmath242 & + j1436 + 5010 & 16550 & 6.69 & 0.04580 & 347.4 & 0.24 & @xmath213 & 0.60 & @xmath243 & 4,9 + j1443 + 1509 & 8810 & 6.32 & 0.19053 & 306.7 & 0.17 & @xmath244 & 1.15 & @xmath245 & 1 + j1630 + 4233 & 14670 & 7.05 & 0.02766 & 295.9 & 0.30 & @xmath246 & 0.37 & @xmath247 & 8 + j1741 + 6526 & 9790 & 5.19 & 0.06111 & 508.0 & 0.16 & @xmath248 & 1.55 & @xmath249 & 1 + j1840 + 6423 & 9140 & 6.16 & 0.19130 & 272.0 & 0.17 & @xmath227 & 0.88 & @xmath250 & 1 + j2103@xmath350027 & 10000 & 5.49 & 0.20308 & 281.0 & 0.17 & @xmath251 & 0.99 & @xmath252 & 0 + j2119@xmath350018 & 10360 & 5.36 & 0.08677 & 383.0 & 0.17 & @xmath253 & 1.04 & @xmath254 & 2 + j2132@xmath420754 & 13700 & 6.00 & 0.25056 & 297.3 & 0.17 & @xmath255 & 1.33 & @xmath256 & + j2338@xmath352052 & 16630 & 6.87 & 0.07644 & 133.4 & 0.27 & @xmath257 & 0.18 & @xmath258 & + nltt11748 & 8690 & 6.54 & 0.23503 & 273.4 & 0.18 & 0.76 & & 7.2 & 5,10,11 + j0022 + 0031 & 17890 & 7.38 & 0.49135 & 80.8 & 0.38 & @xmath259 & 0.26 & & 6 + j0152 + 0749 & 10840 & 5.80 & 0.32288 & 217.0 & 0.17 & @xmath260 & 0.78 & & 1 + j0730 + 1703 & 11080 & 6.36 & 0.69770 & 122.8 & 0.17 & @xmath261 & 0.41 & & 0 + j0755@xmath424800 & 19890 & 7.46 & 0.54627 & 194.5 & 0.42 & @xmath262 & 1.18 & & + j0802@xmath350955 & 16910 & 6.42 & 0.54687 & 176.5 & 0.20 & @xmath260 & 0.76 & & + j0811@xmath420225 & 13990 & 5.79 & 0.82194 & 220.7 & 0.17 & @xmath263 & 1.71 & & + j0815@xmath422309 & 21470 & 5.78 & 1.07357 & 131.7 & 0.17 & @xmath225 & 0.63 & & + j0840@xmath421527 & 13810 & 5.04 & 0.52155 & 84.8 & 0.17 & @xmath257 & 0.19 & & + j0845 + 1624 & 17750 & 7.42 & 0.75599 & 62.2 & 0.40 & @xmath211 & 0.22 & & 0 + j0900 + 0234 & 8220 & 5.78 & & @xmath264 & 0.16 & & & & 1 + j0917 + 4638 & 11850 & 5.55 & 0.31642 & 148.8 & 0.17 & @xmath265 & 0.36 & & 12 + j1046@xmath350153 & 14880 & 7.37 & 0.39539 & 80.8 & 0.37 & @xmath211 & 0.23 & & + j1104@xmath420918 & 16710 & 7.61 & 0.55319 & 142.1 & 0.46 & @xmath266 & 0.70 & & + j1151@xmath425858 & 15400 & 6.09 & 0.66902 & 175.7 & 0.17 & @xmath267 & 0.84 & & + j1157@xmath420546 & 12100 & 5.05 & 0.56500 & 158.3 & 0.17 & @xmath268 & 0.59 & & + j1422 + 4352 & 12690 & 5.91 & 0.37930 & 176.0 & 0.17 & @xmath269 & 0.55 & & 2 + j1439 + 1002 & 14340 & 6.20 & 0.43741 & 174.0 & 0.18 & @xmath213 & 0.62 & & 2 + j1448 + 1342 & 12580 & 6.91 & & @xmath270 & 0.25 & & & & 2 + j1512 + 2615 & 12130 & 6.62 & 0.59999 & 115.0 & 0.20 & @xmath265 & 0.36 & & 2 + j1518 + 0658 & 9810 & 6.66 & 0.60935 & 172.0 & 0.20 & @xmath271 & 0.78 & & 1 + j1538@xmath420252 & 11560 & 5.97 & 0.41915 & 227.6 & 0.17 & @xmath272 & 1.06 & & + j1557@xmath422823 & 12550 & 7.76 & 0.40741 & 131.2 & 0.49 & @xmath273 & 0.54 & & + j1625 + 3632 & 23570 & 6.12 & 0.23238 & 58.4 & 0.20 & @xmath274 & 0.08 & & 6 + j1630 + 2712 & 11200 & 5.95 & 0.27646 & 218.0 & 0.17 & @xmath275 & 0.70 & & 2 + j2252@xmath350056 & 19450 & 7.00 & & @xmath276 & 0.31 & & & & 2 + j2345@xmath350102 & 33130 & 7.20 & & @xmath277 & 0.42 & & & & 2 + lp400@xmath3522 & 11170 & 6.35 & 1.01016 & 119.9 & 0.19 & @xmath269 & 0.52 & & 13,14    73 natexlab#1#1    , h. , allende prieto , c. , an , d. , et  al .
2011 , , 193 , 29    , c. , beers , t.  c. , wilhelm , r. , et  al .
2006 , , 636 , 804    , c. , sivarani , t. , beers , t.  c. , et  al .
2008 , , 136 , 2070    , c.  g. , van kerkwijk , m.  h. , koester , d. , & verbunt , f. 2006 , , 456 , 295    , p. , wesemael , f. , & beauchamp , a. 1995 , , 107 , 1047    , l. , shen , k.  j. , weinberg , n.  n. , & nelemans , g. 2007 , , 662 , l95    , j.  m. , kilic , m. , brown , w.  r. , & kenyon , s.  j. 2011 , , 729 , 2    , w.  r. , geller , m.  j. , & kenyon , s.  j. 2009 , , 690 , 1639    . 2012 , , 751 , 55    , w.  r. , geller , m.  j. , kenyon , s.  j. , & kurtz , m.  j. 2005 , , 622 , l33    . 2006 , , 640 , l35    . 2006 , , 647 , 303    , w.  r. , geller , m.  j. , kenyon , s.  j. , kurtz , m.  j. , & bromley , b.  c. 2007 , , 660 , 311    . 2007 , , 671 , 1708    , w.  r. , kilic , m. , allende prieto , c. , & kenyon , s.  j. 2010 , , 723 , 1072    . 2011 , , 411 , l31    . 2012 , , 744 , 142    , w.  r. , kilic , m. , hermes , j.  j. , et  al .
2011 , , 737 , l23    , g. , ferraro , f.  r. , possenti , a. , & damico , n. 2006 , , 641 , l129    , a.  h. , romero , a.  d. , althaus , l.  g. , & hermes , j.  j. 2012 , , 547 , a96    , m. , rosswog , s. , guillochon , j. , & ramirez - ruiz , e. 2011 , , 737 , 89    . 2012 , , 422 , 2417    , b. , rood , r.  t. , & oconnell , r.  w. 1993 , , 419 , 596    , d. , cheimets , p. , caldwell , n. , & geary , j. 1998 , , 110 , 79    , s. , schaffenroth , v. , hirsch , h. , et  al .
2012 , in asp conf .
ser , , vol . 452 , fifth meeting on hot subdwarf stars and related objects , ed .
d.  kilkenny , c.  s. jeffery , & c.  koen , 129    , a. , bergeron , p. , & ruiz , m.  t. 2011 , , 743 , 138    , l. , bertelli , g. , bressan , a. , et  al .
2002 , , 391 , 195    , l. , grebel , e.  k. , odenkirchen , m. , & chiosi , c. 2004 , , 422 , 205    , u. 2009 , , 47 , 211    , u. , edelmann , h. , lisker , t. , & napiwotzki , r. 2003 , , 411 , l477    , j.  j. , kilic , m. , brown , w.  r. , montgomery , m.  h. , & winget , d.  e. 2012 , , 749 , 42    , j.  j. , kilic , m. , brown , w.  r. , et  al .
2012 , , 757 , l21    , j.  j. , montgomery , m.  h. , winget , d.  e. , brown , w.  r. , kilic , m. , & kenyon , s.  j. 2012 , , 750 , l28    , j.  j. , montgomery , m.  h. , winget , d.  e. , et  al .
2013 , , accepted    , d.  l. , bhalerao , v.  b. , van kerkwijk , m.  h. , et  al .
2013 , , accepted    , a. , vennes , s. , & vaccaro , t.  r. 2010 , , 516 , l7    , s.  j. & garcia , m.  r. 1986 , , 91 , 125    , m. , allende prieto , c. , brown , w.  r. , & koester , d. 2007 , , 660 , 1451    , m. , allende prieto , c. , brown , w.  r. , et  al .
2010 , , 721 , l158    , m. , brown , w.  r. , allende prieto , c. , kenyon , s.  j. , & panei , j.  a. 2010 , , 716 , 122    , m. , brown , w.  r. , allende prieto , c. , pinsonneault , m. , & kenyon , s. 2007 , , 664 , 1088    , m. , brown , w.  r. , allende prieto , c. , swift , b. , kenyon , s.  j. , liebert , j. , & ageros , m.  a. 2009 , , 695 , l92    , m. , brown , w.  r. , allende prieto , c. , et  al .
2011 , , 727 , 3    . 2012 , , 751 , 141    , m. , brown , w.  r. , hermes , j.  j. , et  al .
2011 , , 418 , l157    , m. , brown , w.  r. , kenyon , s.  j. , et  al .
2011 , , 413 , l101    , d. 2008 , arxiv:0812.0482    , m.  j. & mink , d.  j. 1998 , , 110 , 934    , r.  l. 1993 , synthe spectrum synthesis programs and line data ( kurucz cd - rom ; cambridge , ma : smithsonian astrophysical observatory )    , j. , bergeron , p. , & holberg , j.  b. 2005 , , 156 , 47    , t.  r. , dhillon , v.  s. , & duck , s.  r. 1995 , , 275 , 828    , t.  r. , nelemans , g. , & steeghs , d. 2004 , , 350 , 113    , p. , strobel , k. , barnes , j.  v. , & anderson , e. 1988 , , 328 , 315    , g. , richer , j. , & richard , o. 2008 , , 675 , 1223    , f. , badenes , c. , thompson , s.  e. , & lupton , r. 2009 , , 707 , l51    , k. 1982 , , 253 , 798    , b. 1971 , acta astron . , 21 , 1    , j.  a. , althaus , l.  g. , chen , x. , & han , z. 2007 , , 382 , 779    , c. , pelletier , c. , fontaine , g. , & michaud , g. 1986 , , 61 , 197    , s. , gnsicke , b.  t. , brady , s. , et  al .
2012 , , 419 , 817    , a. , nebot gmez - morn , a. , schreiber , m.  r. , et  al .
2012 , , 419 , 806    , g.  d. , weymann , r.  j. , & foltz , c.  b. 1989 , , 101 , 713    , k.  j. & bildsten , l. 2009 , , 699 , 1365    , r. , stensen , r.  h. , bloemen , s. , et  al .
2012 , , 424 , 1752    , s.  a. , fink , m. ,
kromer , m. , et  al .
2012 , , 420 , 3003    , j.  d.  r. , kaplan , d.  l. , shporer , a. , bildsten , l. , & howell , s.  b. 2010 , , 716 , l146    , t.  m. , langer , n. , & kramer , m. 2012 , , 425 , 1601    , p .- e . & bergeron , p. 2009
, , 696 , 1755    , p .- e . ,
bergeron , p. , kalirai , j.  s. , & gianninas , a. 2010 , , 712 , 1345    , v. , fontaine , g. , brassard , p. , & dupret , m .- a .
2013 , , 762 , 57    , s. , kawka , a. , vaccaro , t.  r. , & silvestri , n.  m. 2009 , , 507 , 1613    , s. , thorstensen , j.  r. , kawka , a. , et  al .
2011 , , 737 , l16    , s.  e. & weaver , t.  a. 1994 , , 423 , 371
table [ tab : dat ] presents our radial velocity measurements .
the table columns include object name , heliocentric julian date ( based on utc ) , heliocentric radial velocity ( uncorrected for the wd gravitational redshift ) , and velocity error .